def14a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMB APPROVAL |
|
|
|
|
|
OMB Number:
|
|
3235-0059 |
|
|
Expires:
|
|
February 28, 2006 |
|
|
Estimated average burden hours per
response |
12.75 |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant o |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
x Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
o No fee required. |
|
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
SEC 1913 (11-01) |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid
OMB control number. |
MGIC
Investment
Corporation
Notice
of 2005
Annual
Meeting
and
Proxy
Statement
2004
Annual
Report
to
Shareholders
MGIC Investment Corporation
March 31, 2005
Dear Shareholder:
On behalf of the Board of Directors of MGIC Investment
Corporation, it is my pleasure to invite you to attend the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday,
May 12, 2005, at the Marcus Center for the Performing Arts
in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
At the meeting, shareholders will be asked to elect four
directors, approve a proposal to amend to the companys
Stock Incentive Plan, approve a performance formula for annual
bonus awards to the companys executive officers, and
ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
companys independent accountants for 2005. We will also
report on our business.
Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend, to be sure
that your shares are represented at the meeting, we encourage
you to sign the enclosed card designating the proxies to vote
your shares. Please read the Proxy Statement for more
information about the matters to be considered at the meeting
and the voting process.
Our Annual Report to Shareholders follows the Proxy Statement in
this booklet.
Sincerely,
Curt S. Culver
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
MGIC Investment Corporation
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To Be Held On
May 12, 2005
To the Shareholders of
MGIC Investment Corporation:
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MGIC Investment
Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation, will be held at the Marcus
Center for the Performing Arts, 929 North Water Street,
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on May 12, 2005, at 9:00 a.m.,
to vote on the following matters:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Election of a class of four directors to serve a three-year term
expiring at the 2008 Annual Meeting; |
|
|
(2) |
Approval of a proposal to amend the MGIC Investment Corporation
2002 Stock Incentive Plan; |
|
|
(3) |
Approval of a performance formula for annual bonus awards to the
companys CEO and other executive officers; |
|
|
(4) |
Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
independent accountants for 2005; and |
|
|
(5) |
Any other matters that may be properly brought before the
meeting. |
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on
March 11, 2005, as the record date to determine the
shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Jeffrey H. Lane, Secretary
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 31, 2005
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
PLEASE PROMPTLY COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD
MGIC Investment
Corporation P.O. Box 488, MGIC Plaza, Milwaukee, WI 53201
Proxy Statement
This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy are first being
mailed to shareholders on or about March 31, 2005, in
connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the
Board of Directors of MGIC Investment Corporation (the
Company), a Wisconsin corporation, for use at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 9:00 a.m.,
Thursday, May 12, 2005. The Annual Meeting will be held at
the Marcus Center for the Performing Arts, 929 North Water
Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Voting Matters
Record Date Information
You are entitled to one vote for each share of Common Stock
registered in your name in the Companys records on
March 11, 2005. On that date, 95,463,858 shares of the
Companys Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to
vote.
Voting by Proxies
The enclosed proxy card is solicited by the Board of Directors
of the Company. Your shares will be voted at the meeting by the
named proxies in accordance with the choices you specify on the
proxy card. If you sign and return a proxy card without giving
specific choices, your shares will be voted as follows:
FOR Election to the Board of the four individuals
nominated by the Board of Directors;
FOR Approval of a proposal to amend the MGIC
Investment Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan;
FOR Approval of a performance formula for annual
bonus awards to the Companys CEO and other executive
officers;
FOR Ratification of the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent accountants for the
year ending December 31, 2005; and
On such other matters as properly come before the meeting, in
the best judgment of the named proxies.
If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other
nominee, or in the Companys Profit Sharing and Savings
Plan and Trust, you should be receiving with this Proxy
Statement instructions from them on how you can vote your shares.
How to Revoke a Proxy
You may revoke your proxy instructions at any time before your
shares have been voted by advising the Secretary of the Company
in writing or by signing and delivering a proxy card with a
later date. If you attend the meeting, you may withdraw your
proxy and vote shares registered in your name in person. If your
shares are held in the name of a broker or other nominee, or in
the Companys Profit Sharing and Savings Plan and Trust,
you must follow their instructions on how to revoke your vote.
How Votes are Counted
A quorum is necessary to hold the meeting and will exist if a
majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to
vote are represented at the meeting. Votes cast by proxy or in
person at the meeting will be counted at the meeting by
representatives of Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A., the
transfer agent and registrar of the Companys Common Stock,
which has been appointed by the Company to act as inspector of
election for the meeting. Abstentions will be counted for
purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but do not
constitute a vote for or against any
matter and will be disregarded in the calculation of votes
cast.
A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or other
nominee does not have authority to vote on a particular matter
without instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and
has not received such instructions. Broker non-vote shares will
be counted for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum,
but will be disregarded in the calculation of votes
cast.
Annual Report to Shareholders
The Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, follows this Proxy Statement.
The Annual Report to Shareholders is a separate report and
should not be considered a part of this Proxy Statement.
Stock Ownership
The following table gives information about shareholders who
were beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Common Stock as of
December 31, 2004, based on information filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The table also shows the
Common Stock beneficially owned by each executive officer named
in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement and by
all directors and executive officers as a group (the
Group). Unless otherwise noted, the persons listed
in the table have sole voting and investment power over their
shares, and information regarding persons in the Group is given
as of February 15, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
Percent | |
Name |
|
Owned | |
|
of Class | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Legg Mason Funds Management, Inc.
|
|
|
15,874,380 |
|
|
|
16.49 |
% |
Legg Mason Capital Management, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Light Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citigroup Inc.
|
|
|
5,569,568 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
% |
|
399 Park Avenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York, NY 10043 (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Janus Capital Management LLC
|
|
|
4,885,359 |
|
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
100 Fillmore Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denver, Colorado 80206 (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FMR Corp.
|
|
|
4,871,915 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
82 Devonshire Street |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boston, Massachusetts 02109 (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curt S. Culver (5)
|
|
|
714,176 |
|
|
|
* |
|
J. Michael Lauer (5)
|
|
|
300,234 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Lawrence J. Pierzchalski (5)
|
|
|
192,092 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Patrick Sinks (5)
|
|
|
108,545 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey H. Lane (5)
|
|
|
166,715 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(17 persons) (5)(6)
|
|
|
1,780,525 |
|
|
|
1.85 |
% |
* Less than 1%
(1) For all shares listed voting and investment power are
shared. Includes 11,301,255 shares as to which accounts are
managed by Legg Mason Funds Management, Inc., a registered
investment adviser. Legg Mason Value Trust, Inc., a registered
investment company managed by Legg Mason Funds Management, Inc.,
manages 7,600,000 of such shares. Also includes
4,573,000 shares as to which accounts are managed by Legg
Mason Capital Management, Inc., a registered investment adviser.
(2) For all shares listed voting and investment power are
shared. Includes 5,494,586 shares held by subsidiaries of
Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc.
(3) Includes 4,287,859 shares beneficially owned by
accounts as to which Janus Capital Management LLC, and its
direct and indirect subsidiaries, each a registered investment
adviser, provide investment advice, and 597,500 shares as
to which voting and investment power are shared.
(4) Includes 4,681,430 shares beneficially owned by
Fidelity Management & Research Company
(Fidelity), a registered investment adviser and
wholly-owned subsidiary of FMR Corp., and 181,870 shares
beneficially owned by Fidelity Management Trust Company
(Fidelity Trust), a bank and wholly-owned subsidiary
of FMR Corp. Edward C. Johnson 3d, Chairman of FMR Corp.,
FMR Corp., through its control of Fidelity, and the investment
companies for which Fidelity acts as investment adviser
(Funds) each has sole investment power as to the
4,681,430 shares owned by the Funds; the Funds Boards
of Trustees have sole voting power as to such shares.
Mr. Johnson and FMR Corp., through its control of Fidelity
Trust, each has
2
sole investment power as to 181,870 shares owned by the
institutional accounts managed by Fidelity Trust, sole voting
power as to 170,070 of such shares and no voting power as to
11,800 of such shares. Also includes 8,500 shares
beneficially owned by Fidelity International Limited
(FIL). Mr. Johnson is Chairman of FIL and FMR
Corp., and with members of his family owns 39.89% of the FIL
voting stock. Mr. Johnson and members of his family own
approximately 49% of the voting stock of FMR Corp. and through
such ownership and a shareholders voting agreement may be
deemed to form a controlling group with respect to FMR Corp.
(5) Includes shares which the named executive officers had
the right to acquire on, or within 60 days after,
February 15, 2004, under stock options granted to executive
officers as follows: Mr. Culver 524,509;
Mr. Lauer 191,800;
Mr. Pierzchalski 141,800;
Mr. Sinks 39,500; Mr. Lane
84,485; and the Group 1,066,194. Also includes
shares held in the Companys Profit Sharing and Savings
Plan and Trust as follows: Mr. Culver 12,369;
Mr. Lauer 10,335; Mr. Sinks
1,601; and the Group 33,677. Also includes
restricted shares over which the named executive officer has
sole voting power but no investment power as follows:
Mr. Culver 131,093; Mr. Lauer
45,695; Mr. Pierzchalski 45,366;
Mr. Sinks 55,559; and Mr. Lane
43,608. Also includes shares for which voting and investment
power are shared as follows: Mr. Lauer 50,884;
and the Group 58,042. Excludes shares, beneficial
ownership of which is disclaimed, which are held as custodian
for children or owned by spouses or trusts as follows:
Mr. Lauer 1,600; and the Group
1,735.
(6) Includes an aggregate of 31,755 share units held
under the Deferred Compensation Plan over which there is neither
investment nor voting power. See The Board of Directors
and Its Committees Compensation of
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Also
includes an aggregate of 383,722 restricted shares held by the
Group. The beneficial owners have sole voting power but no
investment power over these shares.
3
Item 1 Election of Directors
The Board of Directors
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with the
directors of each class serving for a term of three years. The
term of office of one class of directors expires each year in
rotation so that one class is elected at each Annual Meeting for
a three-year term. If a nominee for director is not available
for election, the proxies will vote for another person proposed
by the Board of Directors, or as an alternative, the Board of
Directors may reduce the number of directors to be elected at
the Annual Meeting.
Under the Companys Bylaws, written notice of nominations
by shareholders for election to the Board must have been
received by the Secretary no later than February 16, 2005.
No notice of any such nominations was received. As a result, no
other nominations for election to the Board of Directors may be
made by shareholders at the Annual Meeting.
Mr. Culver, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, is
also Chairman of the Board. The Corporate Governance Guidelines
of the Board of Directors (see The Board of Directors and
Its Committees) provide that a director who is an officer
of the Company and leaves the Company must resign from the Board.
Nominees for Director
The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the
Boards Management Development, Nominating and Governance
Committee, has nominated four incumbent directors for
re-election to serve a three-year term of office ending at the
time of the 2008 Annual Meeting:
Mary K. Bush
David S. Engelman
Kenneth M. Jastrow, II
Daniel P. Kearney
The principal occupation, business experience for at least the
past five years and committee assignments of the nominees and
the directors continuing in office are described below. Also
listed are other publicly traded companies of which a director
is a director and certain other board memberships.
Shareholder Vote Required
Each nominee who receives a plurality of the votes cast at the
meeting will be elected a director. Only votes cast for a
nominee will be counted. Votes cast include votes under proxies
which are signed and do not have contrary voting instructions.
Broker non-votes, abstentions and instructions on the proxy card
to withhold authority to vote for one or more of the nominees
will be disregarded in the calculation of a plurality of the
votes cast.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES
NAMED ABOVE. PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES UNLESS A
SHAREHOLDER GIVES OTHER INSTRUCTIONS.
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
| |
NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR
Term Ending 2008 |
|
|
Mary K. Bush, 56, a Director since 1991, has been
President of Bush International, a financial advisory firm,
since 1991. Ms. Bush was Managing Director and Chief
Operating Officer of the Federal Housing Finance Board, a
U.S. government agency, from 1989 to 1991, Vice
President-International Finance of the Federal National Mortgage
Association, a secondary mortgage institution, from 1988 to
1989, and served the President of the United States as a member
of the Board of the International Monetary Fund from 1984 to
1988. She is a Director of Brady Corporation, Briggs &
Stratton Corp. and the Pioneer Family of Mutual Funds, and a
member of the Advisory Board of Washington Mutual Investors
Fund. Ms. Bush is Chairperson of the Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors. |
|
|
9,581 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
David S. Engelman, 67, a Director since 1993, has been a
private investor for more than five years, having served as
President and Chief Executive Officer, on an interim basis, of
Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc., a manufacturer of recreational
vehicles and manufactured housing, from February to August 2002.
He is a Director of Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. and Fieldstone
Investment Corporation. Mr. Engelman is a member of the
Risk Management Committee and the Securities Investment
Committee of the Board of Directors. |
|
|
11,057 |
(2)(3)(4) |
|
|
Kenneth M. Jastrow, II, 57, a Director since 1994,
has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Temple-Inland
Inc., a holding company with interests in paper, forest products
and financial services, since January 2000. He served as
President and Chief Operating Officer of Temple-Inland Inc. from
1998 to 2000 and held senior executive positions with that
company and its subsidiaries for more than five years before
then. He is a Director of Temple-Inland Inc. and KB Home.
Mr. Jastrow is a member of the Executive Committee and
Chairman of the Management Development, Nominating and
Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. |
|
|
19,195 |
(2)(3) |
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
|
|
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Daniel P. Kearney, 65, a Director since 1999, is a
business consultant and private investor. Mr. Kearney
served as Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
of Aetna, Inc., a provider of health and retirement benefit
plans and financial services, from 1991 to 1998. He was
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Resolution Trust
Corporation Oversight Board from 1990 to 1991, a principal of
Aldrich, Eastman & Waltch, Inc., a pension fund
advisor, from 1988 to 1989, and a managing director at Salomon
Brothers Inc, an investment banking firm, from 1977 to 1988. He
is a Director of Fiserv, Inc. and MBIA, Inc. Mr. Kearney is
a member of the Audit Committee and Chairman of the Securities
Investment Committee of the Board of Directors. |
|
|
13,924 |
(3) |
DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE
Term Ending 2007 |
|
|
James A. Abbott, 65, a Director since 1989, has been
Chairman and a principal of American Security Mortgage Corp., a
mortgage banking firm, since June 1999. He served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of First Union Mortgage Corporation,
a mortgage banking company, from January 1980 to December 1994.
Mr. Abbott is a member of the Risk Management Committee of
the Board of Directors. |
|
|
15,339 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
Thomas M. Hagerty, 42, a Director since 2001, has been a
managing director with Thomas H. Lee Company, a private
investment firm, since 1992 and has been with the firm since
1988. Mr. Hagerty previously was in the Mergers and
Acquisitions Department of Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated. He is a Director of Fidelity National Financial,
Inc. and Metris Companies Inc. In an attempt to preserve the
value of an investment in Conseco, Inc. by an affiliate of THL,
Mr. Hagerty served as the interim chief financial officer
of Conseco, Inc. from July 2000 until April 2001. In December
2002, Conseco filed a petition under the federal bankruptcy
code. Mr. Hagerty is a member of the Management
Development, Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of
Directors. |
|
|
11,393 |
(3) |
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
|
|
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Michael E. Lehman, 54, a Director since 2001, served as
Executive Vice President of Sun Microsystems, Inc., a provider
of computer systems and professional support services, from July
2000 to September 2002, as Chief Financial Officer from February
1994 to July 2002, and held senior executive positions with Sun
Microsystems, Inc. for more than five years before then. He is a
Director of Echelon Corporation, NetIQ Corporation and Sun
Microsystems, Inc. Mr. Lehman is a member of the Audit
Committee of the Board of the Directors. |
|
|
6,564 |
(3) |
DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICE
Term Ending 2006 |
|
|
Karl E. Case, 58, a Director since 1991, is the Katharine
Coman and A. Barton Hepburn Professor of Economics at Wellesley
College where he has taught since 1976. Dr. Case has been
Visiting Scholar at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston since
1985. He is a Director of Century Bancorp, Inc. Dr. Case is
Chairman of the Risk Management Committee of the Board of
Directors. |
|
|
10,417 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
Curt S. Culver, 52, a Director since 1999, has been
Chairman of the Board since January 2005 and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company since January 2000. Mr. Culver has
been President of the Company and Chief Executive Officer of
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC) since
January 1999, President of MGIC since May 1996, and held senior
executive positions with MGIC for more than five years before
then. He is a Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company and
Wisconsin Energy Corporation. Mr. Culver is a member of the
Executive Committee of the Board of Directors. |
|
|
714,176 |
(5) |
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
|
|
|
Owned(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
William A. McIntosh, 65, a Director since 1996, was an
executive committee member and a managing director at Salomon
Brothers Inc, an investment banking firm, when he retired in
1995 after 35 years of service. Mr. McIntosh is a
member of the Securities Investment Committee of the Board of
Directors. |
|
|
16,369 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
Leslie M. Muma, 60, a Director since 1995, has been Chief
Executive Officer of Fiserv, Inc., a financial industry
automation products and services firm, since March 1999.
Mr. Muma is a Director of Fiserv, Inc. and has been its
President since 1984. Mr. Muma is a member of the Executive
Committee and the Management Development, Nominating and
Governance Committee of the Board of Directors. |
|
|
25,814 |
(2)(3)(6) |
(1) Ownership information is for shares of Common Stock as
of February 15, 2005 and for non-employee directors
includes share units held under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
See The Board of Directors and Its Committees
Compensation of Directors Deferred Compensation
Plan. Unless otherwise noted, all directors have sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares. Common
Stock beneficially owned by each director represents less than
1% of the total number of shares outstanding.
(2) Includes 2,000 shares held under the
Companys 1993 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors. The directors have sole voting power and no
investment power over these shares.
(3) Includes restricted stock units representing
500 shares awarded under the Companys 2002 Stock
Incentive Plan which are restricted until January 27, 2006.
Directors have sole voting power and no investment power over
these shares during the restricted period. Also includes shares
held under the Deposit Share Program for Non-Employee Directors
under the Companys 1991 Stock Incentive Plan as follows:
Mr. Abbott 4,889; Ms. Bush
3,178; Dr. Case 3,498;
Mr. Engelman 5,551;
Mr. Hagerty 3,181; Mr. Jastrow
6,733; Mr. Kearney 3,657;
Mr. Lehman 2,249; Mr. McIntosh
5,684; and Mr. Muma 3,232. Directors have sole
voting power and no investment power over these shares. Also
includes share units (referred to in note (1) above), over
which the directors have neither voting nor investment power, as
follows: Ms. Bush 2,429;
Dr. Case 4,379; Mr. Hagerty
2,712; Mr. Jastrow 8,816;
Mr. Kearney 4,680; Mr. Lehman
1,315; and Mr. Muma 7,424.
(4) Includes 7,158 shares owned by a trust of which
Mr. Engelman is a trustee and a beneficiary and as to which
Mr. Engelman disclaims beneficial ownership except to the
extent of his interest in the trust. Voting and investment power
are shared for all shares owned by the trust.
8
(5) Includes 524,509 shares which Mr. Culver had
the vested right to acquire as of February 15, 2005, or
which become vested within sixty days thereafter pursuant to
options granted to Mr. Culver; 12,369 shares held in
the Companys Profit Sharing and Savings Plan and Trust;
and 131,093 restricted shares awarded under the Companys
1991 and 2002 Stock Incentive Plans, over which Mr. Culver
has sole voting power but no investment power.
(6) Includes 9,132 shares owned by a trust of which
Mr. Muma is a trustee and a beneficiary and as to which
Mr. Muma disclaims beneficial ownership except to the
extent of his interest in the trust.
The Board of Directors and Its Committees
Corporate Governance
The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance
Guidelines which are available on the Companys website
(www.mgic.com) under the Investor link. Among other
provisions, under the Guidelines:
|
|
|
|
|
A substantial majority of the Board members will be independent
directors. |
|
|
|
A director who retires from his principal employment or joins a
new employer shall offer to resign from the Board. |
|
|
|
A director who is an officer of the Company and leaves the
Company must resign from the Board. |
|
|
|
A director should not be nominated by the Board for re-election
if the director would be 70 or more at the date of the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders. |
|
|
|
At the January and October Board meetings and at any additional
times determined by the Board, the Board will meet in executive
session without the presence of any member of the Companys
management; the Chairman of the Management Development,
Nominating and Governance Committee will preside at these
sessions. |
|
|
|
Members of the Companys senior management should generally
be present at Board meetings (other than executive sessions) and
Board committee meetings; directors may communicate directly
with members of senior management. |
|
|
|
All members of the Audit Committee and the Management
Development, Nominating and Governance Committee must be
independent directors, with no member of the Audit Committee
directly or indirectly receiving compensation from the Company
other than as a director. |
|
|
|
A meaningful portion of the compensation of directors should
consist of longer-term common equity in the Company. |
|
|
|
The Board may retain outside advisors in its discretion. |
|
|
|
The Board will conduct a self-assessment annually. |
|
|
|
Directors who are independent directors will not solicit the
Company to make substantial charitable contributions to
organizations with which the director has a material
relationship. |
Independence: The Guidelines provide that a director
is not independent if the director has any of the specific
disqualifying relationships with the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries set forth in the Guidelines. These
relationships are equivalent to the disqualifying relationships
in the independence rules of the New York Stock Exchange, except
that the disqualification for board interlocks is more stringent
than under such rules. In addition, for a director to be
independent under the Guidelines the director may not have a
material relationship with the Company in the sense that such
relationship could reasonably call into question whether the
director is independent from the management of the Company.
The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Bush and
Messrs. Abbott, Case, Engelman, Hagerty, Jastrow, Kearney,
Lehman, McIntosh and Muma are independent directors under the
Guidelines and the rules of the New York Stock Exchange. These
independent directors are all of the members of the Board other
than Mr. Culver, the Companys Chief Executive Officer.
The Board made its determination by considering that no
disqualifying relationships existed during the periods specified
under the Guidelines and the rules of the Exchange. To determine
that there were no material relationships, the Board applied
categorical standards that it had adopted. Under these
standards, a director is not independent if payments under
transactions between the Company and a company of which a
director is an executive officer or 10% or
9
greater owner exceeded the greater of $1 million or 1% of
the other companys gross revenues. Payments made to and
payments made by the Company are considered separately and the
threshold is applied to transactions occurring in the last three
fiscal years of the other company prior to the date of the
determination. The Boards categorical standards also
provide that no director is independent if during the last three
fiscal years of the Company the director
|
|
|
|
|
was an executive officer of a charity to which the Company made
contributions, |
|
|
|
was an executive officer or member of a law firm or investment
banking firm providing services to the Company, or |
|
|
|
had received any direct compensation from the Company other than
as a director, or if during such fiscal year a member of the
directors immediate family had received such compensation. |
For purposes of applying the Boards categorical standards
(as well as applying the Guidelines and the rules of the
Exchange), the Company consists of MGIC Investment Corporation
and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The committees of the Board of Directors include the Audit
Committee. The Board determined that the members of the Audit
Committee satisfied the independence requirements of
Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the related rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Board Attendance
The Board of Directors met five times during 2004. Each
incumbent director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the
Board and committees of the Board on which he or she served that
were held while he or she was a director, except for
Mr. Hagerty who due to an extended illness attended five of
eight meetings. The Annual Meeting of Shareholders is scheduled
in conjunction with a meeting of the Board of Directors and as a
result directors are expected to attend the Annual Meeting. Ten
of the Companys directors attended the 2004
Annual Meeting.
Code of Business Conduct
The Company has a Code of Business Conduct that applies to all
employees, including its executive officers. Specified portions
of the Code also apply to directors. The Code is available on
the Companys website (www.mgic.com) under the
Investor link.
Communicating with the Board
As provided in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, security
holders and other interested persons desiring to communicate
with the members of the Board, the non-management members of the
Board as a group or the Chair of the Management Development,
Nominating and Governance Committee, may do so by sending a
written communication to the Companys Secretary. The
Secretary shall pass on any such communication, other than a
solicitation for a product or service, to the Chair of the
Management Development, Nominating and Governance Committee.
Audit Committee
The members of the Audit Committee are Ms. Bush
(Chairperson), Mr. Kearney and Mr. Lehman. The Board
has determined that Mr. Lehman is an audit committee
financial expert as that term is defined in
Regulation S-K of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Audit Committee held twelve meetings during 2004. The Audit
Committee Charter is included as Exhibit A to this Proxy
Statement. The Charter is also available on the Companys
website (www.mgic.com) under the Investor link.
Report of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee assists the oversight by the Board of
Directors of the integrity of the Companys financial
statements, the qualifications, independence and performance of
the independent accountants, the performance of the
Companys internal audit function, and the Companys
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. As provided
in the Audit Committee Charter, the ultimate responsibility for
the integrity, completeness and fairness of the Companys
financial statements rests with the Companys management.
The Charter provides that the independent accountants are
intended to be the primary check on managements
performance in this regard. The ultimate responsibility for the
Companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
also rests with the Companys management.
The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), the Companys
independent accountants, the Companys audited financial
statements for the
10
year ended December 31, 2004. The Audit Committee discussed
with PwC the matters required to be discussed by Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communication with Audit
Committees). The Audit Committee also received from PwC the
written disclosures required by the Independence Standards
Boards Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with
Audit Committees) and discussed with PwC their independence from
the Company and its management. None of the officers of the
Company having responsibility for finance or accounting matters
is a former partner or employee of PwC.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above,
the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that
the Companys audited financial statements be included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004, which has been filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. These are the same financial
statements that appear in the Companys Annual Report to
Shareholders.
Members of the Audit Committee:
Mary K. Bush, Chairperson
Daniel P. Kearney
Michael E. Lehman
Management Development, Nominating and Governance
Committee
The members of the Management Development, Nominating and
Governance Committee are Messrs. Jastrow (Chairman),
Hagerty and Muma, each of whom is an independent director as
discussed under Corporate Governance
Independence above. The Committee held three meetings
during 2004. The Committee oversees the compensation program for
the CEO and other members of the Companys senior
management, oversees the CEO succession planning process,
identifies new director candidates, recommends to the Board its
nominees for directors and committee members and reviews the
Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Management
Development, Nominating and Governance Committee Charter is
available on the Companys website (www.mgic.com) under the
Investor link.
Director Candidates: The Committee identifies new
director candidates through recommendations from members of the
Committee, other Board members and executive officers of the
Company, and will consider candidates who are recommended by
security holders, as described below. The Committee and the
Board believe that director nominees recommended by the
Committee should have an inquiring and independent mind, sound
and considered judgment, high standards of ethical conduct and
integrity and well-respected experience at senior levels of
business, academia, government or other fields that will enable
the Board to have access to a diverse body of talent and
expertise relevant to the Companys activities. The
Committee and the Board also believe that a candidates
other time commitments, anticipated tenure on the Board given
the retirement policy for directors in the Companys
Corporate Governance Guidelines, and whether the candidate will
enable the Board to continue to have a substantial majority of
independent directors under those Guidelines must be considered
for each candidate.
Security holders who want to recommend to the Committee a
candidate for director may do so by submitting to the
Companys Secretary in writing biographical information
about the candidate, a description of the candidates
qualifications and the candidates consent to the
recommendation. If the candidate is to be considered for
nomination at the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the
submission must be received by December 1 of the year
preceding that meeting. Requirements that govern the procedure
for shareholders to nominate directors at an Annual Meeting are
described under Other Matters Shareholder
Proposals.
The Committee evaluates new director candidates in view of the
criteria described above, as well as other factors the Committee
deems to be relevant, through reviews of biographical and other
information, input from others, including members of the Board
and executive officers of the Company, and personal discussions
with the candidate when warranted by the results of these other
assessments. The Committee will evaluate any director candidates
recommended by security holders under the same process. In
determining whether to recommend to the Board the nomination of
a director who is a member of the Board, the Committee will
review the Board performance of such director and solicit
feedback about the director from other Board members.
Other Board Committees
The other Committees of the Companys Board are the Risk
Management Committee, the Securities Investment Committee and
the Executive Committee.
11
The purpose of the Risk Management Committee is to have
oversight responsibility for managements operation of the
Companys mortgage insurance business. The members of the
Risk Management Committee are Dr. Case (Chairman) and
Messrs. Abbott and Engelman. The Risk Management Committee
met four times in 2004.
The purpose of the Securities Investment Committee is to have
oversight responsibility for the management of the
Companys investment portfolio and the investment
portfolios of the Companys employee benefit plans by those
persons (employees of the Company or external asset managers)
who are managing such assets on a day-to-day basis. In addition,
the Securities Investment Committee makes recommendations to the
Board with respect to the Companys capital management,
including dividend policy, repurchase of shares and external
funding. The members of the Securities Investment Committee are
Messrs. Kearney (Chairman), Engelman and McIntosh. The
Securities Investment Committee met four times in 2004.
The Charters of the Risk Management Committee and the Securities
Investment Committee are available on the Companys website
(www.mgic.com) under the Investor link.
The Executive Committee is established under the Companys
Bylaws and has all authority that the Board may exercise with
the exception of certain matters that under the Wisconsin
Business Corporations Law are reserved to the Board itself. The
primary purpose of the Executive Committee is to provide an
alternative to convening a meeting of the entire Board for
transactions that require Board authorization between meetings
of the Board. The members of the Executive Committee are
Messrs. Culver (Chairman), Jastrow and Muma. The Executive
Committee did not meet in 2004 or 2003.
Compensation of Directors
Annual and Meeting Fees: Directors receive an annual fee
for their services of $32,000, plus $3,000 for each Board of
Directors meeting attended, and $2,000 for all committee
meetings attended on any one day. A director who serves as
chairperson of a Board committee other than the Audit Committee
receives an additional $5,000 annual fee and the chairperson of
the Audit Committee receives an additional $10,000 annual fee.
However, directors who are employees of the Company are not
compensated for their service as directors. The Company
reimburses directors, and for meetings not held on Company
premises, their spouses, for travel, lodging and related
expenses incurred in connection with attending Board of
Directors and committee meetings.
Deferred Compensation Plan: Under the Companys
Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, an
eligible director may elect to defer payment of all or part of
the annual and meeting fees until the directors death,
disability, termination of service as a director or to another
date specified by the director. A director who participates in
this plan may elect to have his or her deferred compensation
account either credited quarterly with interest accrued at an
annual rate equal to the six-month U.S. Treasury Bill rate
determined at the closest preceding January 1 and
July 1 of each year or to have the fees deferred during a
quarter translated into share units. Each share unit is equal in
value to a share of the Companys Common Stock and is
ultimately distributed only in cash. If a director defers fees
into share units, dividend equivalents in the form of additional
share units are credited to the directors account as of
the date of payment of cash dividends on the Companys
Common Stock. Mr. Culver, because of his employment by the
Company, is not eligible to participate.
Deposit Share Program: Under the Deposit Share Program,
which is offered to directors under the 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan, an eligible director may purchase shares of Common Stock
from the Company at fair market value which are then held by the
Company. The amount that may be used to purchase shares cannot
exceed the annual and meeting fees for the preceding year. The
Company matches each of these shares with one and one-half
shares of restricted Common Stock (Restricted Stock)
or, beginning with the 2005 Program, and at the election of the
director, Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). A director
who had deferred annual and meeting fees during the preceding
year into share units (see Deferred Compensation
Plan above) may reduce the amount that would otherwise be
required to be used to purchase Common Stock by the amount so
deferred. For matching purposes, the amount so deferred is
treated as if shares had been purchased and one and one-half
shares of Restricted Stock (or RSUs) are awarded for each such
share.
Beginning with the 2005 Program, the Restricted Stock and RSUs
vest on the first anniversary of the award. Under the prior
Program vesting occurred on
12
the third anniversary of the award unless a director chose an
extended vesting date. Except for gifts to family members, the
Restricted Stock may not be transferred prior to vesting; RSUs
are not transferable. If the shares have not vested when a
directors service on the Board of Directors ends, they
will be forfeited unless service as a director ends on account
of the directors death or certain events specified in the
agreement relating to the Restricted Stock and RSUs or the
Management Development, Nominating and Governance Committee
waives the forfeiture. All of the directors shares of
Restricted Stock and RSUs vest on death. The shares of
Restricted Stock and RSUs will immediately become vested upon a
change in control of the Company, as defined by the agreement
relating to the Restricted Stock and RSUs. Once vested, RSUs are
settled in Common Stock as promptly as practicable after the
director ceases to be a member of the Board. If RSUs are
outstanding on the record date for a cash dividend on the Common
Stock, a cash payment will be made to the director equal to the
dividend that would have been paid had the shares of Common
Stock underlying the RSUs been outstanding on the record date.
Only directors who are not employees of the Company are eligible
to participate in the Program. Mr. Culver, because of his
employment by the Company, is not eligible.
RSU Award Program: Under a program approved in January
2005, each director of the Company who is not an employee of the
Company will be awarded annually under the 2002 Stock Incentive
Plan RSUs representing 500 shares of Common Stock. The RSUs
vest on the first anniversary of the award date, or upon the
earlier death of the director. Once vested, the RSUs are settled
in Common Stock as promptly as practicable after the director
ceases to be a member of the Board. If RSUs are outstanding on
the record date for a cash dividend on the Common Stock, a cash
payment will be made to the director equal to the dividend that
would have been paid had the shares of Common Stock underlying
the RSUs been outstanding on the record date.
Former Restricted Stock Plan: Non-employee directors
elected to the Board of Directors before 1997 were each awarded,
on a one-time basis, 2,000 shares of Common Stock under the
Companys 1993 Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors. The shares are restricted from transfer until the
director ceases to be a director of the Company by reason of
death, disability or retirement, as defined by the agreement
relating to the shares, and are forfeited if the director leaves
the Board for another reason unless the forfeiture is waived by
the plan administrator. In 1997, the Board decided that no new
awards of Common Stock would be made under the plan.
Other: The Company also pays premiums for directors and
officers liability insurance under which the directors are
insureds.
Stock Ownership Guideline
The Board has adopted a stock ownership guideline for directors
under which each member of the Board is expected to own stock in
the Company having a value equal to five times the annual fee
for serving on the Board. See Compensation of
Directors Annual and Meeting Fees. Stock owned
consists of shares owned outright by the director (including
under RSUs that have vested but which have not been settled) and
55% of the market value of Restricted Stock and shares
underlying RSUs that are scheduled to vest within the next year.
Directors are expected to achieve the ownership guideline within
four years after joining the Board. As of February 15,
2005, all directors meet the ownership guideline.
13
Report of the Management Development, Nominating and
Governance Committee on Executive Compensation
The Management Development, Nominating and Governance Committee
(Committee) of the Board of Directors submits this
report on the compensation of the Companys executive
officers for 2004.
Executive Compensation Program
The Companys executive compensation program is designed to
attract, retain, motivate and reward high-quality professionals.
The principal objectives of the program are to:
|
|
|
|
|
link compensation to Company performance by making an
executives annual bonus opportunity a substantially more
significant portion of annual compensation than base salary, |
|
|
|
align the interests of management and shareholders by providing
a substantial portion of an executives compensation
opportunity in the form of equity in the Company; and |
|
|
|
maintain competitive levels of total compensation. |
The key components of the Companys executive compensation
program for 2004 were base salary, annual performance bonus,
restricted stock and stock options. Consistent with the
Committees past practice, the base salary, restricted
stock and stock option components of the program were determined
at the Committees January 2004 meeting, while the annual
bonus award was determined at the Committees January 2005
meeting.
The materials provided to the Committee in advance of its
January 2005 meeting included a schedule that set forth for the
CEO and each of the other executive officers named in the
Summary Compensation Table projected amounts for base salary for
2005, annual bonus for 2005 performance, restricted stock awards
and payments to the CEO and two other executive officers on
account of the elimination of a Company-provided split dollar
life insurance benefit as described in Other
Matters Split Dollar Life Termination below in
this report. The schedule set forth actual retirement benefits
earned as of January 1, 2005 and payable at age 62
under the Companys pension and supplemental retirement
plans described under Executive Compensation
Pension Plan. This schedule also described payments that
could be made under the change of control agreements described
under Executive Compensation Change of Control
Agreements.
The Committee periodically receives competitive pay reports from
an independent compensation consultant comparing the salary,
bonus and long-term incentives of the Companys executive
officers to the amounts paid by a comparison group of companies.
These reports generally cover the CEO individually and the other
four highest paid executive officers as a group. The individual
companies in the comparison group have changed over time but the
group has generally consisted of financial services companies,
including mortgage insurance companies.
Base Salary
The Committees philosophy is to target base salary range
midpoints for executive officers at the median compensation
levels for comparable positions in a comparison group of
companies. The Committees compensation consultant provided
a competitive pay report to the Committee at the
Committees October 2004 meeting in connection with the
Committees review of base salaries for 2005 that would be
approved by the Committee at its January 2005 meeting. For
meetings of the Committee, at which base salary for the ensuing
year is determined, but at which a competitive pay report was
not provided to the Committee, such as the meeting of the
Committee that occurred in January 2004, the Committee has
adjusted salary ranges and base salaries based upon compensation
survey data that covers the projected average base salary
midpoint increase for officer and executive positions in
financial services companies.
Mr. Culvers base salary is addressed under
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer below.
For 2004, excluding Patrick Sinks, whose base salary adjustment
is discussed below, the Committee increased the salary range
midpoints of the other executive officers by an average of 2.7%,
representing the approximate average salary midpoint movement
reflected in the compensation survey data, and increased the
salaries of those executives who were below their adjusted
salary midpoints to approximate the new midpoint of their
respective positions. Mr. Sinkss base salary was
increased by 24% to reflect his promotion in January 2004 to
Executive Vice President-Field Operations. Following this
increase, Mr. Sinkss base salary was below the
midpoint for his new position. The salaries shown for
14
the named officers in the Summary Compensation Table which
follows this report reflect payment for the first three months
of the year at the salary rates in effect prior to the
adjustments, which became effective in April 2004.
Annual Performance Bonus
Annual bonuses are awarded to executive officers in January of
each year based upon Company and individual performance. The
Committee determines the bonus awards for executive officers
based upon the goals in the Companys financial plan for
the prior year (including the Companys earnings), which
the Committee may review in light of the business environment in
which the Company operated during the prior year. For 2004, for
executive officers to have been eligible for maximum bonus
awards, the Companys earnings must have exceeded a target
amount established by the Committee in January 2004. For 2004,
the Committee set the target at an amount equal to the earnings
projected in the Companys 2004 financial plan.
In January 2004, the Committee established three tiers of bonus
opportunities for executive officers covering 2004 performance,
with maximums ranging from 120% to 200% of base salary in effect
at the time of the bonus award. The maximum bonus level for each
executive officer was determined by the Committee based upon
Mr. Culvers recommendations. Mr. Culvers
recommendations generally reflected his subjective judgment
regarding the ability of each executive officer to influence the
Companys competitiveness and profitability and to
contribute to the improvement of the Companys operations.
Actual bonus amounts paid to the executive officers were
determined in January 2005, based upon, among other factors, the
Companys earnings compared to the earnings target
established a year earlier, the Committees assessment of
the Companys business environment and for bonus awards for
executive officers other than Mr. Culver, giving
consideration to Mr. Culvers recommendations.
Mr. Culvers recommendations were based, in general,
on his subjective evaluation of each executives
performance during 2004 and on the Companys earnings for
the year.
For 2004, as in past years, an executive officer could elect to
receive up to one-third of his bonus in the form of shares of
restricted stock with an equivalent market value at the time of
the award. When restricted stock was elected, the Company
awarded one and one-half matching shares for each restricted
shared elected. The balance of the annual bonus was paid in
cash. Full ownership of the restricted shares for up to
one-third of the bonus vests one year from the date of award.
Full ownership of the matching restricted shares vests three
years from the date of award.
Stock Options and Performance Restricted Stock
Under the Companys stock incentive plan, stock options are
granted at the market value on the date of grant. As a result,
executive officers will realize a gain from the options only if
the price of the Companys Common Stock increases in the
future.
Beginning in 1999, stock options were awarded to executive
officers by the Committee on an annual basis and beginning in
2000, awards were made at the Committees January meeting.
The number of options granted is within the discretion of the
Committee, although the Committee has generally awarded options
based on the executives salary grade level. Information on
the stock option grants during 2004 to Mr. Culver and the
other named executive officers is set forth in the table under
Executive Compensation Option Grants in
2004. The options granted in 2004 (as well as in the prior
three years) vest ratably over a five-year period on the basis
of continuing employment.
The options awarded in January 2000 (which have an exercise
price of $45.375 per share) provided for vesting on the
first five anniversaries of the grant based on achievement of
corporate performance goals established by the Committee. Any
portion of these options that had not vested by the fifth
anniversary in January 2005, vest in January 2009 if the
executive is still employed at that time. The performance goal
for these options was based on a five-year aggregate earnings
per share target and an annual threshold increase in earnings
per share of at least 10%. The earnings per share threshold was
achieved for 2004 and 18% of the options vested in January 2005.
Because the earnings per share threshold was not achieved for
either of the preceding two years no portion of these options
vested in January 2003 or 2004, and 47% of these options will
not vest until January 2009.
To place additional emphasis on restricted stock with a
performance feature as a method of compensating executive
officers, the Committee reduced the number of stock options that
were awarded to these executives in 2003 and 2004,
15
compared to the awards made in 2002, and awarded restricted
stock that is eligible to vest during the first five years after
the award based on the achievement of a performance goal
approved by the Committee. Any restricted stock that has not
vested by the fifth anniversary is forfeited. Additional
information on such restricted stock granted during 2004 to
Mr. Culver and the other named executive officers appears
under Executive Compensation Long-Term
Incentive Plans Awards in Last Fiscal Year.
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Culvers base salary was increased by the
Committee in January 2004 by 4.0% to $650,000, an amount equal
to the Companys salary range midpoint for the Chief
Executive Officer position. For 2004, the Committee assigned
Mr. Culver to the bonus tier with the highest bonus
opportunity, 200% of his base salary. The Committees
decision to assign Mr. Culver to this bonus category was
based on a subjective evaluation of his ability to influence the
Companys profitability.
In January 2005, the Committee awarded Mr. Culver a bonus
for 2004 of $1,170,000, an amount equal to 180% of his base
salary and 90% of his maximum bonus opportunity. The factors
considered by the Committee in determining the amount of
Mr. Culvers bonus were the Companys performance
in 2004 with respect to the goals in the financial plan for the
year, including the Companys 2004 earnings, which
significantly exceeded the earnings goal for the year, and the
Committees favorable evaluation of Mr. Culvers
general job performance. (In January 2004, the Committee had
awarded Mr. Culver a bonus for 2003 of $625,000, which was
100% of his base salary and 50% of his maximum bonus
opportunity; and in January 2003, the Committee awarded
Mr. Culver a bonus for 2002 of $630,000, which was 105% of
his base salary and 52.5% of his maximum bonus opportunity.)
Two-thirds of the bonus for 2004, or $780,392, was paid in cash,
and pursuant to Mr. Culvers election to receive
one-third of his bonus in restricted stock (as described under
Annual Performance Bonus above), Mr. Culver was
awarded 6,063 shares of restricted Company stock,
representing one-third of his bonus, and 9,094 additional shares
representing the matching shares awarded on account of
Mr. Culvers election. All of the restricted stock was
valued at the then current market price ($64.26) per share. The
shares representing one-third of Mr. Culvers bonus
will vest in January 2006 and the remaining shares will vest in
January 2008, in each case if Mr. Culver continues to be
employed by the Company through the vesting dates.
Mr. Culver was granted stock options on 80,000 shares
in January 2004. The options have a term of ten years and vest
at a rate of 20% each year over the next five years (subject to
acceleration under certain circumstances) based on continued
employment. The options are exercisable at $68.20 per
share, the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York
Stock Exchange on the date of the grant. Mr. Culver was
also granted 32,000 shares of restricted stock in January
2004 that is eligible to vest based on the achievement of a
performance goal as described under Executive
Compensation Long-Term Incentive Plans
Awards in Last Fiscal Year.
Tax Deductibility Limit
Under the Internal Revenue Code, certain compensation in excess
of $1 million paid during a year to any of the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table for that year
is not deductible. The deduction for compensation arising from
the exercise of stock options should not be subject to such
limit. As a result of approval by shareholders at the 2003
Annual Meeting of performance goals for restricted stock awards,
the deduction for restricted stock granted with performance
features should also not be subject to such limit. At the Annual
Meeting this year, shareholders are being asked to approve a
performance formula for annual bonus awards to executive
officers. See Item 3 Approval of a
Performance Formula for Annual Bonus Awards to the
Companys CEO and Other Executive Officers. If the
performance formula is approved by shareholders, bonus amounts
awarded to executive officers under the formula after such
approval should be deductible by the Company and should not be
subject to such limit. The Committee believes that the effect on
income tax expense for 2004 of compensation that is subject to
the limit on deductibility was not material to the Company and
that the effect of such compensation awarded for 2004 on future
income tax expense will not be material.
Other Matters
Split Dollar Life Termination: For many years the Company
had in effect a split dollar life insurance program under which
the Company paid premiums for
16
life insurance policies covering the CEO and Executive Vice
Presidents. The policies were owned by these officers and the
premiums paid were required to be repaid to the Company from the
policies when the employment of the officer ended. The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been viewed as prohibiting a
public company from paying such premiums when the insured is an
executive officer. As a result, the Company did not pay any
premiums for the policies after the effective date of that Act.
To compensate Messrs. Culver, Lauer and Pierzchaksi for the loss
of this benefit, the Company made cash payments to them in 2004
of $46,666, $10,515 and $14,200, respectively. The present value
of this cash payment and other payments to be made in the future
with the approval of the Committee during the period that
premiums were required to keep the policies in force represented
the approximate present value cost to the Company had the
program continued until an assumed employment termination date.
Employment Agreements: No executive officer has an
employment or severance agreement, other than an agreement that
provides employment and severance benefits following a change of
control of the Company and the termination (or constructive
termination) of the executives employment, as described
under Executive Compensation Change of Control
Agreements.
Perks: Perquisites (also known as perks)
provided by the Company to executive officers are generally
reimbursement of: club dues and expenses; tax counsel and tax
preparation services for the CEO and CFO; depending on the
executives age, the cost of an annual or bi-annual medical
examination; and commercial aircraft travel, accommodation and
related expenses of spouses who accompany executives to
business-related events in which spouses of customers are
present. During 2004, as in past years, there was no personal
use of general aviation aircraft in which the Company has an
interest. The Company also provides executive officers with a
covered parking space at the Companys headquarters.
Stock Ownership Guidelines: The Committee has adopted
stock ownership guidelines for executive officers. Stock
ownership under these guidelines is a multiple of the
executives base salary, with the multiple determined by
the executives bonus tier. For the CEO, the value of stock
owned is five times base salary; for the executive officers
named in the Summary Compensation Table, the multiple is four
times base salary; and for other executive officers, the
multiple is three times base salary. Stock owned consists of
shares owned outright by the executive (including shares in the
executives account in the Companys 401(k) plan), 55%
of the difference between the market value of stock underlying
vested stock options and the exercise price of those options,
and the market value of restricted stock and shares underlying
restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within the
next year. As of December 31, 2004, Mr. Culver and
each of the other executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table met these stock ownership guidelines.
|
|
|
Members of the Management Development, Nominating and
Governance Committee: |
Kenneth M. Jastrow, II, Chairman
Thomas M. Hagerty (a member of the Committee
since May 2004)
Leslie M. Muma
17
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder
return on the Companys Common Stock for the last five
fiscal years with the cumulative total return on the
Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index and the
Standard & Poors 500 Financials Index (the
industry index which includes the Company). The graph assumes
$100 was invested on December 31, 1999, in each of the
Companys Common Stock, the Standard & Poors
500 Stock Index and the Standard & Poors 500
Financials Index, and that all dividends were reinvested. The
subsequent year-end values are shown in the table below the
graph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
($) | |
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
S&P 500 Financials
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
MGIC Investment Corporation
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
18
Executive Compensation
The following tables provide information concerning
compensation, stock option and restricted stock awards and
aggregated stock option exercises as they relate to the Chief
Executive Officer and the four other most highly compensated
executive officers of the Company or MGIC in 2004, as determined
under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Companys retirement benefits are also described below.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation(1) | |
|
Awards | |
|
Payouts | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Underlying | |
|
LTIP | |
|
Compensa- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards | |
|
Stock | |
|
Payouts | |
|
tion | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary($) | |
|
Bonus($) | |
|
($)(2) | |
|
Options(#) | |
|
($)(3) | |
|
($)(4) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Curt S. Culver
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
644,231 |
|
|
|
780,392 |
|
|
|
973,989 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
299,244 |
|
|
|
60,733 |
|
|
Chairman, President and
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
619,231 |
|
|
|
416,922 |
|
|
|
520,161 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
14,067 |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
588,462 |
|
|
|
420,240 |
|
|
|
524,400 |
|
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
60,463 |
|
|
J. Michael Lauer
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
330,462 |
|
|
|
299,888 |
|
|
|
374,122 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
100,940 |
|
|
|
22,115 |
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
319,231 |
|
|
|
171,872 |
|
|
|
214,284 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
305,385 |
|
|
|
165,451 |
|
|
|
206,351 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
30,072 |
|
|
Lawrence J. Pierzchalski
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
319,692 |
|
|
|
292,687 |
|
|
|
365,125 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
100,940 |
|
|
|
25,800 |
|
|
Executive Vice President-
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
299,231 |
|
|
|
171,245 |
|
|
|
213,602 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
Risk Management
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
283,077 |
|
|
|
154,782 |
|
|
|
193,023 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
34,231 |
|
|
Patrick Sinks
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
303,077 |
|
|
|
279,184 |
|
|
|
348,289 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
74,811 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
Executive Vice President-
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
247,692 |
|
|
|
150,116 |
|
|
|
187,209 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
Field Operations
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
216,346 |
|
|
|
104,084 |
|
|
|
129,789 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
Jeffrey H. Lane
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
266,539 |
|
|
|
243,177 |
|
|
|
303,307 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
100,940 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
252,692 |
|
|
|
136,073 |
|
|
|
169,818 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
General Counsel
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
239,231 |
|
|
|
130,756 |
|
|
|
163,088 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Annual Compensation for the years shown in the table does not
include perquisites and other personal benefits because the
aggregate amount of such compensation for each of the named
individuals in each year did not exceed the disclosure threshold
of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. See
Report of Management Development, Nominating and
Governance Committee on Executive Compensation Other
Maters Perks for a description of perks
provided by the Company. |
|
(2) |
The amounts shown in this column are the value of restricted
shares awarded under the Companys annual bonus program
described under Report of the Management Development,
Nominating and Governance Committee on Executive
Compensation Annual Performance Bonus. The
value is the New York Stock Exchange closing price on the date
of the award multiplied by the number of shares. For 2004, 2003
and 2002, restricted shares were awarded as part of the annual
bonus as follows: Mr. Culver 15,157, 7,627 and
12,000, respectively; Mr. Lauer 5,822, 3,142
and 4,722, respectively; Mr. Pierzchalski
5,682, 3,132 and 4,417, respectively; Mr. Sinks
5,420, 2,745 and 2,970, respectively; and
Mr. Lane 4,720, 2,490 and 3,732, respectively.
Forty percent of the shares vest on the first anniversary of the
award and the remainder on the third anniversary through
continued employment. At December 31, 2004, the number of
restricted shares held, which also includes the shares described
under Long-Term Incentive Plans Awards in Last
Fiscal Year, and their value based on the New York
Stock Exchange closing price at that date, were as follows:
Mr. Culver 81,129, $5,590,599; |
19
|
|
|
Mr. Lauer 28,717, $1,978,888;
Mr. Pierzchalski 28,254, $1,946,983;
Mr. Sinks 29,352, $2,022,646; and
Mr. Lane 26,926, $1,855,471. Dividends are paid
on all restricted shares. |
|
(3) |
The amount shown in this column is the closing price on the
New York Stock Exchange of the shares of Common Stock
awarded in January 2003 that vested in January 2004. Vesting was
determined by the Companys 2004 diluted earnings per share
compared to an earnings target established at the date of the
award. |
|
(4) |
The amounts shown in All Other Compensation for 2004 for each
named executive officer consist of profit sharing contributions
of $10,000 and matching 401(k) contributions of $1,600. Also
included for Mr. Culver are supplemental long-term
disability insurance premiums of $2,467 paid on his behalf, and
for Messrs. Culver, Lauer and Pierzchalski payments of
$46,666, $10,515 and $14,200, respectively, based on the value
of split dollar life insurance premiums formerly paid by the
Company on behalf of the executives. The amounts in this column
for 2003 and 2002 were primarily profit sharing and matching
401(k) contributions and in addition for 2002, in the case of
Messrs. Culver, Lauer and Pierzchalski, premiums for split
dollar life insurance. |
Option Grants in 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Expiration | |
|
Present | |
Name |
|
Granted(#) | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
($/Share) | |
|
Date | |
|
Value($) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Curt S. Culver
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
13.07 |
|
|
|
68.20 |
|
|
|
01/28/2014 |
|
|
|
1,734,400 |
|
J. Michael Lauer
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
68.20 |
|
|
|
01/28/2014 |
|
|
|
585,360 |
|
Lawrence J. Pierzchalski
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
68.20 |
|
|
|
01/28/2014 |
|
|
|
585,360 |
|
Patrick Sinks
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
6.54 |
|
|
|
68.20 |
|
|
|
01/28/2014 |
|
|
|
867,200 |
|
Jeffrey H. Lane
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
|
|
68.20 |
|
|
|
01/28/2014 |
|
|
|
585,360 |
|
The options have a term of ten years and vest 20% on each of the
next five anniversaries of the January 28, 2004 grant date
(subject to acceleration under certain circumstances) based on
continued employment. Grant date present values were determined
using a binomial model incorporating the following assumptions:
expected stock price volatility of 30.20%; expected life of the
options is 5.5 years; an expected dividend yield of 0.25%;
and a risk-free rate of return of 3.27%, which was the yield at
the grant date on a U.S. Government Zero Coupon Bond with a
maturity equal to the expected term of the grant; and an
expected forfeiture rate of 9%. Determining the grant date
present value by use of this model is permitted by rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The inclusion of the
models determination in the table is not an endorsement or
acknowledgement that the model can accurately determine the
value of these options. The actual value realized from an option
will be measured by the difference between the stock price and
the exercise price on the date the option is exercised.
20
Aggregated Option Exercises in 2004 and Year-End Option
Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options at | |
|
In-the-Money Options | |
|
|
Shares Acquired | |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
at December 31, 2004(2) | |
|
|
on Exercise | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
During 2004 | |
|
Realized(1) | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
Name |
|
(#) | |
|
($) | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Curt S. Culver
|
|
|
35,291 |
|
|
|
1,251,331 |
|
|
|
426,509 |
|
|
|
343,200 |
|
|
|
10,431,387 |
|
|
|
4,656,662 |
|
J. Michael Lauer
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
3,966,547 |
|
|
|
1,559,180 |
|
Lawrence J. Pierzchalski
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
1,040,775 |
|
|
|
109,000 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
2,342,922 |
|
|
|
1,559,180 |
|
Patrick Sinks
|
|
|
31,800 |
|
|
|
781,211 |
|
|
|
16,500 |
|
|
|
89,200 |
|
|
|
214,990 |
|
|
|
929,497 |
|
Jeffrey H. Lane
|
|
|
44,899 |
|
|
|
1,603,047 |
|
|
|
93,712 |
|
|
|
106,900 |
|
|
|
1,933,933 |
|
|
|
1,368,546 |
|
(1) Value realized is the market value at the close of
business on the date immediately preceding the date of exercise
less the exercise price. For Messrs. Culver and Lane, other
than shares acquired on exercise that were used to satisfy
income tax withholding requirements, none of the shares acquired
were disposed of in connection with the exercise of the option.
(2) Value is based on the closing price of $68.91 for the
Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange at year-end
2004, less the exercise price.
Long-Term Incentive Plans Awards in Last Fiscal
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts under | |
|
|
Number of Shares, | |
|
Performance or | |
|
Non-Stock Price-Based Plans | |
|
|
Units or Other | |
|
Other Period Until | |
|
| |
|
|
Rights | |
|
Maturation or | |
|
Threshold | |
|
Target | |
|
Maximum | |
Name |
|
(#) | |
|
Payout | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#) | |
|
(#) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Curt S. Culver
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
1/28/04 1/28/09 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
J. Michael Lauer
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
1/28/04 1/28/09 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
Lawrence J. Pierzchalski
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
1/28/04 1/28/09 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
Patrick Sinks
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
1/28/04 1/28/09 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
Jeffrey H. Lane
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
1/28/04 1/28/09 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
The awards listed in the table are restricted shares that are
eligible to vest on the each of the next five anniversaries of
the January 28, 2004 grant date in an amount equal to the
percentage that the Companys diluted earnings per share,
excluding the after-tax effect of realized gains and losses and
extraordinary items, for the year ended prior to the relevant
anniversary bears to a specified target. The
Threshold column assumes that there were no such
earnings in any such year other than earnings of $0.01 in one
year. Any shares that have not vested by the fifth anniversary
are forfeited. Shares are also forfeited upon a termination of
employment with the Company, other than as a result of the
officers death (in which case all of the shares vest). In
addition, if employment termination occurs after age 62 and
the officer has been employed by the Company for at least seven
years, the shares are eligible to continue to vest if the
officer enters into a non-competition agreement. Prior to
forfeiture, the shares are entitled to vote and to receive
dividends but are nontransferable. All shares vest upon a change
of control of the Company.
Pension Plan
The Company maintains a Pension Plan for the benefit of
substantially all employees of the Company and maintains a
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the Supplemental
Plan) for designated employees, including executive
officers. The Supplemental Plan provides benefits that cannot be
provided by the Pension Plan because of limitations in the
Internal Revenue Code on benefits that can be provided by a
qualified pension plan, such as the Companys Pension Plan.
Under the Pension Plan and the Supplemental Plan taken together,
each executive officer named above earns an annual pension
credit for each year of employment equal to 2% of the
officers eligible compensation for that year. At
retirement, in general, the annual pension credits are added
together to determine the employees accrued pension
benefit.
21
However, the annual pension credits for service prior to 1998
for each employee with at least five years of vested service on
January 1, 1998 will generally be equal to 2% of the
employees average eligible compensation for the five years
ended December 31, 1997. Eligible employees with credited
service for employment prior to October 31, 1985 also
receive a past service benefit, which is generally equal to the
difference between the amount of pension the employee would have
been entitled to receive for service prior to October 31,
1985 under the terms of a prior plan had such plan continued,
and the amount the employee is actually entitled to receive
under an annuity contract purchased when the prior plan was
terminated.
Retirement benefits vest on the basis of a graduated schedule
over a seven-year period of service. Full pension benefits are
payable upon retirement at or after age 65 (age 62 if
the employee has completed at least seven years of service), and
reduced benefits are payable beginning at age 55. The
estimated annual benefits payable upon retirement at age 62
to Messrs. Culver, Lauer, Pierzchalski, Sinks and Lane
under the Pension Plan and the Supplemental Plan taken together,
based on pension benefits earned through December 31, 2004,
and an annual compensation increase of 3%, are $535,106,
$156,849, $276,019, $280,673 and $168,968, respectively. If
these executive officers had retired effective January 1,
2005, the annual amounts payable to them at age 62 under
the Pension Plan and the Supplemental Plan together would have
been: Mr. Culver $255,270;
Mr. Lauer $141,616;
Mr. Pierzchalski $142,483;
Mr. Sinks $95,729; and
Mr. Lane $102,411.
Change of Control Agreements
Each of Messrs. Culver, Lauer, Pierzchalski, Sinks and Lane
is a party to a Key Executive Employment and Severance Agreement
with the Company (a KEESA). If a change in control
of the Company occurs and the executives employment is
terminated within three years after the change in control (this
three-year period is referred to as the employment
period), other than for cause or disability, or if the
executive terminates his employment for good reason, the
executive is entitled to a lump sum termination payment equal to
twice the sum of his annual base salary, his maximum bonus award
and an amount for pension accruals and profit sharing and
matching contributions. If the employment termination occurs
during the employment period but more than three months after
the change in control, the termination payment is reduced. The
executive is also entitled to certain other benefits and the
continuation of medical and other specified employee benefits
during the remainder of the employment period. The KEESA
provides that all unvested stock options and restricted stock
become fully vested at the date of the change in control. If the
excise tax under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code
would apply to the benefits provided under the KEESA, the
executive is entitled to receive a payment so that he is placed
in the same position as if the excise tax did not apply.
While the executive is employed during the employment period,
the executive is entitled to a base salary no less than the base
salary in effect prior to the change in control and to a bonus
opportunity of no less than 75% of the maximum bonus opportunity
in effect prior to the change in control. The executive is also
entitled to participate in medical and other specified benefits.
The terms change in control of the Company,
cause, disability and good
reason are defined in the KEESA. The Company has entered
into the same or similar agreements with 43 other officers.
Other Information
During 2004, MGIC and other subsidiaries of the Company provided
mortgage insurance and other services to, or received services
from, unaffiliated companies of which certain non-employee
directors were executive officers, directors or 10% or greater
equity owners. These transactions were made in the ordinary
course of business, represented less than 2% of the consolidated
revenues of the Company and these other companies and are not
considered material to the Company. Similar transactions are
expected in 2005.
The Companys long standing principal outside legal counsel
is Foley & Lardner. The spouse of the Companys General
Counsel is a partner of Foley & Lardner, which was paid
$468,767 by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries for
legal services in 2004.
Citigroup Inc. has publicly reported that it was the beneficial
owner of 5.7% of the Common Stock at December 31, 2004.
During 2004, the Company wrote mortgage insurance on loans
purchased by an affiliate of Citigroup and purchased from and
sold to an affiliate of Citigroup fixed income securities. These
transactions occurred in the ordinary course of business. The
premiums involved in the mortgage
22
insurance were $2.4 million and the aggregate of the
purchase and sale prices of the fixed income securities was
$105.3 million.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires the Companys executive officers and directors,
and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of the
Companys Common Stock (other than certain investment
advisers with respect to shares held for third parties), to file
reports of their beneficial ownership of Company stock and
changes in stock ownership with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the New York Stock Exchange. Based in part on
statements by the persons subject to Section 16(a), the
Company believes that all Section 16(a) forms were timely
filed in 2004, except as described below. One report was filed
late by the Company on behalf of Patrick Sinks, Executive Vice
President Field Operations, covering a transaction
in which 46 shares were used to satisfy tax withholding
requirements in connection with the release of restricted shares
to Mr. Sinks. One report was filed late by the Company on
behalf of Joseph Komanecki, Senior Vice President, Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer, covering two transactions in which
a total of 69 shares was used to satisfy tax withholding
requirements in connection with the release of restricted shares
to Mr. Komanecki. Seven reports were filed late covering
eleven transactions effected on behalf of Karl E. Case, a
director of the Company, by an unrelated investment adviser to
whom Dr. Case had given investment discretion. The
transactions by the adviser in the Companys stock were
effected without the prior approval of Dr. Case as part of
a program of investing the assets managed by the adviser. They
involved a relatively small number of the total transactions
effected by the adviser for Dr. Cases account. The
short swing profit resulting from these transactions was
computed by the Company to be $422.05, and such amount was paid
by Dr. Case to the Company pursuant to a written agreement
between Dr. Case and the Company.
Item 2 Approval of Amendments to the MGIC
Investment Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan
Shareholders are being asked to approve amendments to the MGIC
Investment Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the
Plan). Set forth below are the material features of
the Plan and a summary of the proposed amendments to the Plan
(collectively, the Amendment). Under the Amendment,
the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan
would be reduced and the maximum number of shares that may be
issued as restricted stock and restricted stock units would be
increased. In addition, the Amendment prohibits the repricing of
options, either by amending existing options to lower the
exercise price or by granting new options in exchange for
outstanding options, and eliminates the increase in shares
available under the Plan that results from the forfeiture of
certain shares awarded under the Companys 1991 Stock
Incentive Plan. See Summary of the Amendment.
The Plan is included as Exhibit B to this Proxy Statement.
Exhibit B is marked to show the changes to the Plan made by
the Amendment; language deleted is struck through and language
added is underlined. The descriptions of the Plan and the
Amendment are summaries only and are subject to the actual
provisions of Exhibit B.
Summary of Current Plan
Except to the extent changed by the Amendment, the provisions
described in the following summary of the Plan will continue in
effect and, if shareholders do not approve the Amendment, will
continue unchanged.
General: The purpose of the Plan is to provide the
benefits of additional incentive inherent in ownership of the
Companys Common Stock by executive officers, other key
employees of the Company and non-employee directors, who are
viewed by the Company as important to the Companys
success. The Plan helps the Company to compete with other
organizations in obtaining and retaining the services of these
persons. The persons who are eligible to receive awards under
the Plan as described above are referred to as eligible
individuals and the persons to whom awards are made under
the Plan are referred to as participants. A
non-employee director is a director of the company
who is not an employee of the Company or any affiliate and is
not a representative of a particular holder of the
Companys securities.
The maximum number of shares of Common Stock which may be issued
under the Plan is 10,000,000, plus an additional amount of
shares that is the total of two components. The first component
(the Forfeited 1991 Plan Share Component) is the
number of shares covered by awards under the Companys 1991
Stock Incentive Plan that were
23
outstanding on March 1, 2002 but are subsequently
forfeited. The 1991 Stock Incentive Plan was terminated when the
2002 Stock Incentive Plan was approved by shareholders at the
2002 Annual Meeting. As of March 1, 2005,
283,820 shares covered by awards under the 1991 Stock
Incentive Plan had been added to the shares available under the
Plan as a result of the Forfeited 1991 Plan Share Component. The
second component (the Purchased Share Component) is
the number of shares that must be purchased at a purchase price
of not less than the fair market value of the shares as a
condition to the award of restricted stock under the Plan. While
the Common Stock is listed on an exchange, fair market value is
the last reported sale price on the exchange.
Shares awarded under the Plan that are subsequently forfeited or
are used to satisfy income tax withholding requirements will not
count against the limit on the maximum number of shares that may
be issued under the Plan. During the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, 51,821, 124,283 and
227,272 shares, respectively, that had been awarded as
restricted stock or stock options under the Plan and the
1991 Stock Incentive Plan were forfeited. During these
years, 60,261, 13,194 and 56,295 additional shares,
respectively, were used to satisfy income tax withholding
requirements.
The Plan provides for the award of stock options
(options), stock appreciation rights
(SARs), restricted stock and restricted stock units.
Each type of award is described briefly below and they are
referred to together as awards. No award may be
granted after May 2, 2012.
On March 1, 2005, the last reported sale price of the
Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $63.23. There
are currently about 150 eligible individuals, of whom
10 are non-employee directors.
Administration: The Plan is administered by a Committee
of the Board, which currently is the Boards Management
Development, Nominating and Governance Committee. The Plan
provides that each member of the Committee must be an
outside director for purposes of Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code). Among other functions, the Committee has
power (a) to select the participants from among the
eligible individuals, (b) to determine the number of shares
covered by awards, and (c) within the limits of the Plan,
to set the terms of awards. The Plan authorizes the Committee to
delegate its functions to any one or more of its members.
Options and SARs: An option is the right to purchase a
specified number of shares of Common Stock at a specified
exercise price. An SAR is the right to receive, in cash or
shares with equivalent value, the difference between the fair
market value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock and
a specified exercise price. The exercise price per share of
Common Stock subject to an option or an SAR will be determined
by the Committee, but may not be less than the fair market value
of a share of Common Stock on the date the award is made.
The term of an option or SAR will be determined by the
Committee, but may not be more than ten years. Options and SARs
will vest on such conditions as are determined by the Committee.
Vesting means that an option or SAR may be exercised by the
participant. Conditions to vesting can include remaining as an
employee or non-employee director for a specified period or
achievement of performance goals set by the Committee. The
vesting of options that would vest at a later date if the
participant remained with the Company may be accelerated to an
earlier date if performance goals are satisfied.
Options are exercised by payment in full of the exercise price,
which may be paid in cash or by delivery of shares of Common
Stock owned by the participant having a fair market value equal
to the exercise price or by a combination of cash and shares.
Options may also be exercised through sale of the shares
received on exercise with sufficient proceeds from the sale
remitted to the Company to pay the exercise price. While not
required by the terms of the Plan, it is anticipated awards will
generally provide that options and SARs that have not vested
terminate upon termination of the participants employment,
other than by reason of death. In the case of death, it is
anticipated that awards will provide options and SARs will
become fully vested.
Options may be incentive stock options under the
Code (ISOs) or options that are not ISOs. No more
than 10,000,000 shares may be issued under options that are
ISOs. This maximum would be reduced under the Amendment to
7,100,000 shares, of which 1,950,816 would represent awards
outstanding at March 1, 2005 and the remainder (5,149,184)
would be authority for new awards.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units: Restricted
stock is Common Stock that is not freely transferable to the
participant until specified restrictions lapse or specified
conditions are met. In this description, these restrictions and
conditions are referred to together as
24
restrictions. A restricted stock unit is the right to receive
stock in the future, which right is subject to restrictions. The
Plan authorizes the issuance of up to a total of
1,000,000 shares of restricted stock and stock issued under
restricted stock units. This maximum would be increased under
the Amendment to 5,900,000 shares, of which 883,916 would
represent awards outstanding on March 1, 2005 and the
remainder (5,016,084) would be authority for new awards.
Restricted stock that is forfeited or upon vesting is used to
satisfy income tax withholding requirements will not count
against the limit on the maximum number of restricted shares.
Restricted stock and restricted stock units will be subject to
such restrictions as the Committee may impose. In addition to
restrictions, the Committee may condition an award of restricted
stock on the participants purchasing shares of Common
Stock and retaining the shares for a period specified by the
Committee. While not required by the terms of the Plan, it is
anticipated awards will generally provide that, upon termination
of a participants employment during the applicable
restriction period for any reason other than death, all shares
of restricted stock and all restricted stock units still subject
to restriction will be forfeited. Upon death of a participant,
it is anticipated that the award will provide that the
restrictions still in effect will immediately lapse and the
person entitled to receive such shares under law will take them
free and clear of any restriction. The Committee has authority,
in its discretion, to waive in whole or in part, any
restrictions with respect to shares of restricted stock or
restricted stock units.
Adjustments and Change of Control: In the event of any
corporate transaction involving the Company, including any stock
dividend, stock split, extraordinary cash dividend,
recapitalization or merger, the Committee will have the
authority to adjust the number and type of shares that may be
issued under the Plan, including the limit on the number of
shares of restricted stock and stock issued under restricted
stock units, and any awards that are outstanding.
Upon a change of control of the Company, as defined by the
Committee and included in the agreement that will evidence the
award, all awards become vested immediately and all restrictions
will lapse.
Maximum Awards and Transferability: The maximum number of
shares covered by all awards made to any one employee
is 2,000,000 shares. Unless otherwise provided by the
Committee, no award may be transferred by any participant other
than by will, by designation of a beneficiary or by the laws of
descent and distribution.
Amendment and Termination: The Board or the Committee may
amend the Plan at any time. However, the approval of
shareholders is required for amendments that increase the
maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan;
increase the maximum aggregate number of shares of restricted
stock and stock issued under restricted stock units that may be
issued under the Plan; increase the maximum number of shares
covered by awards to any one employee; decrease the minimum
option or SAR exercise price; or increase the maximum term of an
option or SAR to more than ten years. Under the Amendment, the
approval of shareholders is required for any change to the
provisions of the Plan that prohibit option repricing without
shareholder approval. The Board or the Committee may also
terminate the Plan at any time. No amendment or termination of
the Plan will adversely affect any award outstanding without the
approval of the affected participant.
Withholding: Not later than the date on which an amount
with respect to an award first becomes includable in the income
of a participant who is an eligible employee, the participant is
required to pay to the Company or make arrangements satisfactory
to the Company regarding the payment of any taxes required by
law to be withheld with respect to such amount. The Committee
may permit withholding obligations to be settled with shares of
Common Stock, including shares of Common Stock that are part of
an award that gives rise to the withholding requirement.
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences of Options and
SARs
The grant of an option or SAR under the Plan will create no
income tax consequences to the participant or the Company. A
participant who is granted an option that is not an ISO will
generally recognize ordinary income at the time of exercise in
an amount by which the fair market value of the Common Stock at
such time exceeds the exercise price. The value of the Common
Stock or the amount of cash delivered on exercise of an SAR will
also generally be ordinary income to the participant. The
Company will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount and
at the same time as ordinary income is recognized by the
participant. A subsequent disposition of the Common Stock will
give rise to capital gain or loss to the extent the amount
realized from the sale differs from the fair
25
market value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise.
In general, if an ISO is awarded to an employee, the participant
holds the shares of Common Stock acquired on the exercise of the
ISO for at least two years from the date of grant and one year
from the date of exercise, and the participant remained an
employee until at least three months before exercise, the
participant will recognize no income or gain as a result of the
exercise, except the alternative minimum tax may apply. Any gain
or loss realized by the participant on the disposition of the
Common Stock will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss.
No deduction will be allowed to the Company. If the holding
period requirements described above are not satisfied, the
participant will recognize ordinary income at the time of the
disposition equal to the lesser of (a) the gain realized on
the disposition, or (b) the difference between the exercise
price and the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on
the date of exercise. The Company will be entitled to a
deduction in the same amount and at the same time as ordinary
income is recognized by the participant. Any additional gain
realized by the participant over the fair market value at the
time of exercise will be treated as capital gain.
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences of Restricted
Stock
A participant will not recognize income upon the award of
restricted stock that is subject to a substantial risk of
forfeiture unless the election described below is made. A
participant who has not made such an election will recognize
ordinary income at the end of the applicable restriction period
in an amount equal to the fair market value of the restricted
stock at such time. Subject to any limitation on such deduction
under Section 162(m) of the Code, the Company will be
entitled to a corresponding deduction in the same amount and at
the same time as the participant recognizes income. An otherwise
taxable disposition of the restricted stock after the end of the
applicable restriction period will result in capital gain or
loss. Dividends paid in cash and received by a participant prior
to the end of the applicable restriction period will constitute
ordinary income to the participant in the year paid. The Company
will be entitled to a corresponding deduction for such
dividends. Any dividends paid in stock will be treated as an
award of additional restricted stock subject to the tax
treatment described herein.
A participant may, within thirty days after the date of the
award of restricted stock, elect to recognize ordinary income as
of the date of the award in an amount equal to the fair market
value of such restricted stock on the date of the award,
determined without regard to any of the restrictions. Subject to
any limitation on such deduction under Section 162(m) of
the Code, the Company will be entitled to a corresponding
deduction in the same amount and at the same time as the
participant recognizes income. If the election is made, any cash
dividends received with respect to the restricted stock will be
treated as dividend income to the participant in the year of
payment and will not be deductible by the Company. An otherwise
taxable disposition of the restricted stock (other than by
forfeiture) will result in capital gain or loss. If a
participant who has made an election subsequently forfeits the
restricted stock, the participant will not be entitled to deduct
any loss. In addition, the Company would then be required to
include as ordinary income the amount of the deduction it
originally claimed with respect to such shares.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
The table below sets forth certain information, as of
March 1, 2005, about options outstanding under the
Companys 1991 Stock Incentive Plan and the Plan. Upon
approval of the Plan at the 2002 Annual Meeting, no further
awards could be made under the 1991 Stock Incentive Plan. Other
than under these plans, no options, warrants or rights were
outstanding at that date under any compensation plan or
individual compensation arrangement of the Company. The Company
has no compensation plan under which its equity securities may
be issued that has not been approved by shareholders. Share
units issued under the Deferred Compensation Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (see The Board of Directors and Its
Committees Compensation of Directors
Deferred Compensation Plan), which have no voting power
and can be settled only in cash, are not considered to be equity
securities for this purpose.
26
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
Remaining Available | |
|
|
to be Issued | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
Upon Exercise of | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Compensation Plans | |
|
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
(Excluding Securities | |
|
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Reflected in Column (a)) | |
Plan Category |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
3,480,224 |
|
|
$ |
53.56 |
|
|
|
8,171,541 |
* |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total
|
|
|
3,480,224 |
|
|
$ |
53.56 |
|
|
|
8,171,541 |
* |
|
|
* |
In addition, the Plan provides that the number of shares
available is increased by the Purchased Share Component and the
Forfeited 1991 Plan Share Component, as described under
Summary of Current Plan above. The Amendment
eliminates the Forfeited 1991 Plan Share Component,
effective March 1, 2005. |
Comparable information as of December 31, 2004 may be found
in note 11, Shareholders equity and dividend
restrictions of the notes to the Companys financial
statements for the three years ended December 31, 2004 in
the accompanying 2004 Annual Report to Shareholders.
New Plan Benefits
The awards to be made in the future under the Plan giving effect
to the Amendment are not determinable. The following table shows
the awards made under the Plan for 2004 to the persons listed in
the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value | |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
|
|
Restricted | |
Name |
|
Options (1) | |
|
Stock (2) | |
|
Options | |
|
Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Curt S. Culver
|
|
|
1,734,400 |
|
|
|
3,156,389 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
47,157 |
|
J. Michael Lauer
|
|
|
585,360 |
|
|
|
1,110,682 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
16,622 |
|
Lawrence J. Pierzchalski
|
|
|
585,360 |
|
|
|
1,101,685 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
16,482 |
|
Patrick Sinks
|
|
|
867,200 |
|
|
|
1,439,489 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
21,420 |
|
Jeffrey H. Lane
|
|
|
585,360 |
|
|
|
1,039,867 |
|
|
|
27,000 |
|
|
|
15,520 |
|
Executive officers as a group
|
|
|
4,796,700 |
|
|
|
8,801,578 |
|
|
|
221,250 |
|
|
|
131,532 |
|
Non-executive officer directors as a group
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
883,040 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
13,343 |
|
Non-executive officer employees as a group
|
|
|
8,471,460 |
|
|
|
11,362,268 |
|
|
|
390,750 |
|
|
|
169,643 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Options are valued as described under Executive
Compensation Option Grants in 2004. |
|
(2) |
Restricted stock is valued at the New York Stock Exchange
closing prices on the dates of the awards. |
Summary of the Amendment
The Amendment would reduce the maximum number of shares of
Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan and would
increase the maximum number of shares which may be issued as
restricted stock or in settlement of restricted stock units. The
Company believes the increase is necessary to enable the Company
to provide compensation under the Plan using substantially
greater amounts of restricted stock and restricted stock units.
The decrease in the maximum number of shares that may be issued
under the Plan has been proposed to contain the aggregate cost
of the Plan after the Amendment. The Amendment increases the
number of shares of restricted stock and stock issued in
settlement of restricted stock units from 1,000,000 to
5,900,000 shares. As of March 1, 2005,
16,660 shares remained available under the Plan for awards
of restricted stock and restricted stock units, and
883,916 shares awarded as restricted stock or restricted
stock units were outstanding.
The Amendment also reduces the total number of shares of Common
Stock which may be issued under the Plan, including restricted
stock and restricted stock units awarded, from 10,000,000 to
7,100,000 shares, plus the additional amount of shares
under the Purchased Share Component. Effective March 1,
2005, the Amendment eliminates the
27
Forfeited 1991 Plan Share Component under which the number
of shares which may be issued under the Plan may increase. The
Purchased Share Component and the Forfeited 1991 Plan Share
Component are described under Summary of Current
Plan above. As of March 1, 2005,
8,171,541 shares remained available for future awards of
options and SARs under the Plan. If the Amendment is approved,
the number of shares that would be available for future awards
would be 5,149,184 shares. The number of shares subject to
the Plan may be increased for changes in the outstanding shares
of Common Stock as described under Summary of Current
Plan Adjustments and Change of Control above.
The Amendment also prohibits the repricing of options, either by
amending existing options to lower the exercise price or by
granting new options having a lower exercise price in exchange
for outstanding options having a higher exercise price, unless
such repricing is approved by shareholders. The Company has not
repriced options in the past.
Approximately 140 employees are eligible for awards of options,
SARs, restricted stock and restricted stock units under the Plan
and there are currently 10 non-employee directors eligible for
awards of restricted stock under the Plan.
Shareholder Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the
Amendment is required for adoption of the Amendment, provided
that the total votes cast on the Amendment equal at least 50% of
the number of shares entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions and
shares referred to as broker non-votes will not be
treated as votes cast.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE
AMENDMENT. PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR APPROVAL, UNLESS INDICATED
OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY.
Item 3 Approval of a Performance Formula
for Annual Bonus Awards to the Companys CEO and Other
Executive Officers
Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), the Company may not deduct
compensation in excess of $1 million paid in a year to a
person who on the last day of that year is the CEO or is among
the four highest paid executive officers other than the CEO for
that year unless such compensation meets certain requirements.
Among these requirements are that such compensation must be
payable solely on account of the attainment of a preestablished,
objective performance goal. As a result, the Company is asking
shareholders to approve a performance formula for annual bonus
awards for 2005 and subsequent years under the Companys
bonus program covering the Chief Executive Officer and other
persons who are executive officers of the Company under the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
With the exception of the proposed formula, which has been
approved by the Management Development, Nominating and
Governance Committee of the Companys Board (the
Committee), the annual bonus program for 2005 has
not yet been finally determined by the Committee. The Committee
expects that the 2005 program for the CEO and the Companys
other executive officers will provide a cash bonus opportunity
for the CEO of up to 300% of his year-end 2005 base salary (at
the date of this Proxy Statement, Mr. Culvers base
salary was $750,000), up to 225% of year-end base salary for
other executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table
(at the date of this Proxy Statement, the base salaries of
Messrs. Lauer, Pierzchalski, Sinks and Lane were $378,000,
$371,000, $365,000 and $303,000, respectively), and up to 180%
of year-end base salary for other executive officers. The
Committee also expects that, as in past years, the CEO and the
other executive officers will be able to make an election to
receive up to one-third of the bonus that would otherwise be
paid in cash in the form of restricted stock having an
equivalent market value at the time of the award. If restricted
stock is elected, the Company will award one and one-half
matching shares for each restricted share elected. See
Report of the Management Development, Nominating and
Governance Committee on Executive Compensation
Annual Performance Bonus elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.
Performance Formula
The proposed performance formula would limit bonuses to the CEO
and to each executive officer (including the value of restricted
stock awarded to the officer, as described above) to 0.75% of
the sum of (a) the Companys pre-tax income, excluding
extraordinary items and realized gains, and (b) the pre-tax
contribution to the Company from joint ventures. The
Companys pre-tax income and the pre-
28
tax joint venture contribution will be determined by the
Committee from the Companys consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal year for which the bonus is being
paid. The formula will limit the maximum bonus that may be paid
to the CEO and to each executive officer for such year. The
Committee has discretion to pay bonuses in a lower amount.
Historically, the annual bonus awards to the CEO and the other
executive officers of the Company have been determined by the
Committee in January of each year. The Committee has approved
actual bonus amounts paid based upon, among other factors, the
achievement of goals in the Companys financial plan for
the year and the performance of the individual officer.
Accordingly, the bonus compensation for 2005 and subsequent
years to be paid to the CEO and other executive officers cannot
be determined at this time. Had the proposed formula been in
effect with respect to the bonuses paid for 2004 performance to
the CEO and the other executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table, the Committee believes the bonuses paid
would have been the same as those shown for these persons in the
Table for 2004 (including the portion shown in the
Restricted Stock Awards column) and would have been
$4,946,846 for all current executive officers as a group.
Shareholder Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the
performance formula item is required for approval. Shares
represented by proxies that reflect abstentions and shares
referred to as broker non-votes will not be treated
as votes cast.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE
PERFORMANCE FORMULA. PROXIES WILL BE VOTED FOR APPROVAL, UNLESS
INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY.
Item 4 Ratification of Appointment of
Independent Accountants
The Audit Committee has reappointed the accounting firm of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as independent
accountants of the Company for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2005. Shareholders are being asked to ratify
this appointment at the Annual Meeting. A representative of PwC
is expected to attend the meeting and will be given an
opportunity to make a statement and respond to appropriate
questions.
Audit and Other Fees
For the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31,
2004, PwC billed the Company fees for services of the following
types:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees
|
|
$ |
503,000 |
|
|
$ |
939,788 |
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
|
|
64,440 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
33,250 |
|
|
|
96,826 |
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
97,250 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
697,940 |
|
|
$ |
1,074,914 |
|
Audit Fees includes PwCs review of the
Companys quarterly financial statements.
Audit-Related Fees is comprised of work relating to
securities offerings in which the Companys or MGICs
financial statements were included and advice regarding GAAP
accounting. Tax Fees is comprised of tax compliance
services provided to certain employees of the Company, and for
2004 also includes tax analysis services related to a potential
Company transaction. All Other Fees is comprised of
actuarial services relating to employee benefits and other
actuarial services.
The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding
auditor independence provide that independence may be impaired
if the auditor performs services without the approval (or
pre-approval) of the Audit Committee in advance. The Audit
Committees policy regarding approval and pre-approval of
services by the independent auditor includes a list of services
that are pre-approved as they become necessary and the
Committees approving at its February meeting a schedule of
other services expected to be performed during the ensuing year.
If the Company desires the auditor to provide a service that is
not in either category, the service may be presented for
approval by the Committee at its next meeting or may be approved
by the Chairperson (or another Committee member designated by the
29
Chairperson). The Committee is periodically provided with
information about fees paid for services that have been approved
and pre-approved.
The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding
auditor independence provide an exception to the approval and
pre-approval requirement if services are subsequently approved
by an audit committee under a de minimis exception. The
de minimis exception was not used in 2004.
Shareholder Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on this
matter is required for the ratification of the appointment of
PwC as independent accountants. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will not be counted as votes cast.
YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR RATIFICATION OF
THE APPOINTMENT OF PwC AS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS. PROXIES WILL
BE VOTED FOR RATIFICATION, UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE
PROXY.
Other Matters
Shareholder Proposals
Any shareholder who wants to include a proposal in the proxy
material for the Companys 2006 Annual Meeting must submit
the proposal to the Company on or before December 1, 2005.
The rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission also
establish other requirements for shareholder proposals of this
type.
Under the Companys Bylaws, a shareholder who wants to
bring business before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, other
than a proposal included in the Companys proxy material,
or who wants to nominate directors at the Annual Meeting must
satisfy the following requirements: (1) be a shareholder of
record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and also be a
shareholder of record at the time the following notice is given;
and (2) give notice to the Companys Secretary in
writing that is received at the Companys principal offices
not less than 45 days nor more than 70 days before the
first anniversary of the date set forth in the Companys
proxy statement for the prior Annual Meeting as the date on
which the Company first mailed such proxy materials to
shareholders. For the 2006 Annual Meeting, the relevant dates
are no later than February 14, 2006 and no earlier than
January 20, 2006.
In the case of business other than nominations for directors,
the notice must, among other requirements, briefly describe such
business, the reasons for conducting the business and any
material interest of the shareholder in such business. In the
case of director nominations, the notice must, among other
requirements, give various information about the nominees,
including information that would be required to be included in a
proxy statement of the Company had each such nominee been
proposed for election by the Board of Directors of the Company.
Manner And Cost Of Proxy Solicitation
The cost of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. In
addition to soliciting proxies by mail, employees of the Company
may solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile or personal
interview. The Company also has engaged D.F. King &
Co., Inc. to provide proxy solicitation services for a fee of
$8,000, plus expenses, including charges by brokers and other
custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting
material to the beneficial owners of the Companys Common
Stock.
Other Business
At the date of mailing of this Proxy Statement, the Board of
Directors knew of no other business to be presented at the
Annual Meeting. Under the Companys Bylaws as described
under Other Matters Shareholder
Proposals, because no notice of any other business was
given to the Company, no business may be brought before the
Annual Meeting by a shareholder.
30
EXHIBIT A
MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION
Audit Committee Charter
Purpose and Authority
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the oversight by
the Companys Board of Directors of:
|
|
|
|
|
the integrity of the Companys financial statements, |
|
|
|
the qualifications, independence and performance of the
independent accountants, |
|
|
|
the performance of the Companys internal audit
function, and |
|
|
|
the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements. |
The Committee shall also provide the report of the Committee to
be included in the Companys proxy statement under the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC).
Within the scope of its purpose, the Committee shall have
unrestricted access to any of the Companys activities and
personnel. Within the scope of its purpose, the Committee has
authority to retain persons from within or outside the Company
as necessary in its judgment to assist or advise the Committee,
and the Company shall provide funds to pay the costs and
expenses of persons so retained. In addition, the Company shall
provide funds to pay the compensation of the independent
accountants appointed by the Committee and the ordinary
administrative expenses of the Committee.
Notwithstanding the Committees purpose as set forth above,
the ultimate responsibility for the integrity, completeness and
fairness of the Companys financial statements rests with
the Companys management. The independent accountants are
intended to be the primary check on managements
performance in this regard. Furthermore, the ultimate
responsibility for the Companys compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements also rests with the Companys
management.
Structure
The Committee shall be comprised of three or more directors,
each of whom shall be independent under Sections I. B.
(Composition of the Board Independence) and III. A.
(Committees of the Board Standing Committees) of the
Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines (the
Guidelines). All members of the Committee shall have
the ability to read and understand fundamental financial
statements, and shall meet the requirements for audit committee
membership of the New York Stock Exchange.
As contemplated by the Guidelines, the members of the Committee
shall be appointed annually by the Board, and the Board shall
appoint one of the members as Chairperson for the Committee.
Duties And Responsibilities
Subject to the considerations referred to in the final paragraph
under Purpose and Authority above, the Audit
Committee shall perform the duties listed below. The degree of
effort the Committee devotes to the performance of any
particular duty shall be determined in the judgment of the
Committee. It is expressly recognized that, unless the Committee
decides otherwise or except as provided below, some duties need
not be performed each year.
1. Appoint and compensate the independent accountants
(subject to ratification by the shareholders, if the Committee
deems such ratification appropriate in the circumstances),
oversee the work of the independent accountants, and, if
appropriate, discharge such firm. The independent accountants
shall report directly to the Committee.
2. Pre-approve the audit and non-audit services to be
performed by the independent accountants pursuant to the
Committees Audit and Non-Audit Services Approval and
Pre-Approval Policy, in each case, giving consideration to
the effect on the accountants independence of performing
the service. Prior to the annual audit, discuss with the
independent accountants the planning and staffing of the audit.
Review fees associated with audit and non-audit services
performed by the independent accountants quarterly.
3. Annually obtain and review a written statement
from the independent accountants
A-1
describing the firms internal quality-control procedures;
any material issues raised by the most recent internal
quality-control review or peer review of the firm, or by any
inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional
authorities within the preceding five years, and any steps taken
to deal with any such issues; and all relationships between the
independent accountants and the Company. Discuss with the
independent accountants any disclosed relationships or services
that may impact the independence of the independent accountants,
and take appropriate action to satisfy the Committee of the
independence of the independent accountants. Review any other
matters of which the Committee becomes aware which would impair
the independence of the independent accountants.
4. After completion of the annual audit and prior to
the filing of the audited financial statements with the SEC,
review with the independent accountants the results of the audit
of the financial statements and discuss matters required to be
communicated to audit committees in accordance with SAS 61,
including any difficulties or disputes with management
encountered during the audit and managements response.
Consider the independent accountants judgments regarding
the quality and appropriateness of the Companys accounting
principles as applied in the financial statements, including
reviewing the accountants report of critical accounting
policies used in the audited financial statements and
alternative treatments within GAAP for material items that were
discussed by the accountants and management.
5. Appoint the actuary who will render the Statement
of Actuarial Opinion on the Companys loss and loss
adjusting expense reserves. Obtain and review the actuarys
report and Statement of Actuarial Opinion.
6. Review the financial information included in the
annual earnings release with management and the independent
accountants prior to release to the public. Review the annual
financial statements and a draft of the annual Managements
Discussion and Analysis with management and the independent
accountants. Recommend to the Board of Directors that the
audited financial statements be included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
7. Review the financial information included in the
quarterly earnings release with management prior to release to
the public. Discuss with management the types of information to
be included in the Companys earnings releases and in any
earnings guidance. Discuss with the independent accountants and
management the Companys quarterly financial statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis covering the quarterly
financial statements, and discuss with the independent
accountants certain matters required to be communicated to audit
committees in accordance with SAS 61, in each case prior to the
Companys filing of Form 10-Q.
8. Review the material activities of the internal
audit function, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the appointment, performance and, if appropriate, dismissal of
the Internal Audit Director. |
|
|
|
Internal Audits charter. |
|
|
|
Internal Audits annual audit plan and changes thereto, and
coordination with the independent accountants. |
|
|
|
any difficulties encountered in the course of their audits,
including any restrictions on the scope of work performed or
access to required information. |
|
|
|
Internal Audits independence and effectiveness. |
|
|
|
Internal Audits resources and expertise. |
|
|
|
corrective actions taken by management to address the findings
and recommendations of the internal auditors. |
9. Review with management and the independent
accountants:
|
|
|
|
|
significant accounting and financial reporting developments
(including significant changes in the selection or application
of accounting principles) and their impact on the Companys
financial statements. |
|
|
|
significant matters relating to the Companys income tax
filings. |
10. Review the Companys processes for assessing risks
(other than those reviewed by the Risk Management and Securities
Investment Committees of the Board) and the effectiveness of the
Companys system of internal controls in place to manage
the risks through a review of the reports of the independent
accountants and the internal auditors, and discussions with
management, the Internal Audit Director, and the independent
accountants.
A-2
11. Review with management, the Internal Audit Director,
and the independent accountants the Companys annual
assessment of internal control over financial reporting and the
independent accountants attestation and report regarding
the Companys assessment prior to filing of Form 10-K.
12. Review significant reports of examinations made by
regulatory agencies and managements responses thereto.
13. Review with management the adequacy of statements of
policy regarding conflicts of interest and business conduct, the
means used to monitor compliance and address exceptions, and the
results of monitoring programs.
14. Review with the Companys counsel and compliance
officer the processes for monitoring compliance with laws and
regulations, and review any legal, regulatory and compliance
matters that could have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements.
15. Review the policies, procedures and audit results
associated with officers expenses.
16. Provide the report of the Committee to be included in
the Companys proxy statement under the rules of the SEC.
17. Report after each Committee meeting a summary of the
Committees activities to the Board of Directors.
18. Annually evaluate the performance of the Committee by
completing a self-assessment.
19. Establish procedures for the receipt, retention and
treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal
accounting controls or auditing matters, including procedures
for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of
concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
and review any such complaints received by the Company.
20. Meet separately, periodically, with management, the
Internal Audit Director, and the independent accountants and at
least annually with the General Counsel.
21. Set hiring policies for employees or former employees
of the independent accountants.
22. Review the Form 11-K filing associated with the
Companys Profit Sharing and Savings Plan.
23. Review this charter annually. Submit any proposed
changes to the charter resulting from the review to the Board of
Directors for approval.
Meetings
The Committee shall meet as often as it determines, but not less
frequently than quarterly. The Committee shall also meet
telephonically to review the financial information contained in
the Companys quarterly and annual earnings releases, and
the financial statements and Managements Discussion and
Analysis contained in the Companys Form 10-Q and
Form 10-K. The Internal Audit Director will act as
Committee Secretary and prepare minutes of the meetings. After
the minutes are approved by the Committee, a copy will be sent
to the Secretary of the Company for filing in the Companys
minute books. The approved minutes of the Committee, as is the
case with the minutes of all of the Committees of the Board, are
available for review by any interested Director.
The internal auditors, independent accountants and
representatives of management shall meet alone with the
Committee periodically and have the authority and are expected
to contact the Committee on any matters requiring its attention.
As necessary or desirable, the Chairperson may request that
members of management, the Internal Audit Director and
representatives of the independent accountants be present at
Committee meetings.
A-3
EXHIBIT B
MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION
2002 Stock Incentive Plan
Section 1
General
1.1. Purpose. The MGIC
Investment Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the
Plan) has been established by MGIC Investment
Corporation (the Company) to secure for the Company
and its Subsidiaries the benefits of the additional incentive
inherent in the ownership of the Companys Common Stock,
$1.00 par value (the Stock), by certain
executive officers and other key employees of the Company and
its Subsidiaries and by Non-Employee Directors of the Company,
all of whom are important to the success and the growth of the
business of the Company, and to help the Company secure and
retain the services of such persons.
1.2. Participation. Subject
to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee shall
determine and designate, from time to time, from among the
Eligible Individuals, those persons who will be granted one or
more Awards under the Plan, and thereby become
Participants in the Plan.
1.3. Definitions.
Capitalized terms in the Plan are defined as set forth in the
Plan (including the definition provisions of subsection 8.1
of the Plan).
Section 2
Options and SARs
2.1. Definitions.
(a) The grant of an Option entitles the
Participant to purchase shares of Stock at an Exercise Price
established by the Committee. Any Option granted under the Plan
may be either an incentive stock option (an ISO) or
a non-qualified option (an NQO), as determined in
the discretion of the Committee. An ISO is an Option
that is intended to satisfy the requirements applicable to an
incentive stock option described in
Section 422(b) of the Code. An NQO is an Option
that is not intended to be such an incentive stock
option.
(b) A stock appreciation right (an SAR)
entitles the Participant to receive, in cash or Stock (as
determined in accordance with subsection 4.7), value equal
to (or otherwise based on) the excess of: (a) the Fair
Market Value of a specified number of shares of Stock at the
time of exercise; over (b) an Exercise Price established by
the Committee.
2.2. Exercise Price. The
Exercise Price of each Option and SAR granted under
the Plan shall be established by the Committee or shall be
determined by a method established by the Committee at the time
the Option or SAR is granted, except that the Exercise Price
shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share
of Stock on the date of grant.
2.3. Exercise. An Option and
an SAR shall be exercisable in accordance with such terms,
conditions, restrictions and contingencies, including those
governing the period(s) during which such Awards may be
exercised, as the Committee shall determine, except that the
term of an Option and an SAR may not exceed ten years.
2.4. Payment of Exercise
Price. The payment of the Exercise Price of an Option shall
be subject to the following:
(a) Except as provided in the remainder of this
subsection 2.4, the entire Exercise Price for shares of
Stock purchased upon the exercise of an Option shall be paid at
the time of such exercise.
(b) The Exercise Price shall be payable in cash or by
tendering, through either actual delivery of shares or through
attestation, shares of Stock acceptable to the Committee, and
valued at Fair Market Value as of the day prior to the day of
exercise (or if the Committee determines, as of the day of
exercise), or in any combination of such shares and cash, as
determined by the Committee.
(c) The Committee may permit a Participant to elect to pay
the Exercise Price upon the exercise of an Option by irrevocably
authorizing a third party to sell shares of Stock (or a
sufficient portion of the shares) acquired upon exercise of the
Option and remit to the Company a sufficient portion of the sale
proceeds to pay the entire Exercise Price and any tax
withholding resulting from such exercise. In the case of an
exercise arrangement described in the preceding
B-1
sentence, payment of the Exercise Price may be made as soon as
practicable after the exercise.
2.4. Repricing Prohibited
Without Shareholder Approval. Without the approval of the
Companys shareholders, the Exercise Price of an Option
that has been granted shall not be reduced nor shall a new
Option be granted with an Exercise Price that is lower than an
outstanding Option for which such new Option is exchanged.
Section 3
Restricted Stock And Restricted Stock Unit Awards
3.1. Definitions. A
Restricted Stock Award is a grant of shares of
Stock, and a Restricted Stock Unit Award is the
grant of a right to receive shares of Stock in the future, with
such shares of Stock or right to future delivery of such shares
of Stock subject to a risk of forfeiture or other restrictions
that will lapse upon the achievement of one or more goals
relating to completion of service by the Participant, or
achievement of performance or other objectives, as determined by
the Committee.
3.2. Restrictions on Awards.
Each Restricted Stock Award and Restricted Stock Unit Award
shall be subject to such conditions, restrictions and
contingencies as the Committee shall determine, including the
satisfaction of conditions that must be satisfied prior to the
grant of the Award, such as a condition that to receive the
Award, the Participant must purchase, and retain for a specified
period, shares of Stock. Stock that must be purchased as a
condition to the receipt of a Restricted Stock Award or a
Restricted Stock Unit Award is referred to as Purchased
Stock. Purchased Stock shall be deemed to be issued or
sold by the Company under the Plan.
Section 4
Operation And Administration
4.1. Effective Date. Subject
to the approval of the shareholders of the Company at the
Companys 2002 annual meeting of shareholders, the Plan
shall be effective as of the date of such meeting (the
Effective Date). The Plan shall be unlimited in
duration and, in the event of Plan termination, shall remain in
effect as long as any Awards are outstanding. However, except
for Awards granted pursuant to commitments entered into prior to
such ten-year anniversary, no Awards may be granted after the
ten-year anniversary of the Effective Date.
4.2. Shares Subject to Plan.
The shares of Stock for which Awards may be granted under the
Plan shall be subject to the following:
(a) The shares of Stock may be authorized but unissued
shares or treasury shares. As used herein, the term
issued and similar terms include treasury shares
delivered under an Award.
(b) Subject to the following provisions of this
subsection 4.2, the maximum number of shares of Stock that
may be delivered to Participants and their beneficiaries under
the Plan shall be equal to the sum of:
(i) 10,000,000
7,100,000 shares of Stock; (ii) all
shares of stock subject to awards granted under the
Companys 1991 Stock Incentive Plan to the extent that,
after March 1, 2002, such shares are forfeited, or the
Award terminates, expires or is cancelled and the shares covered
by the terminated, cancelled or expired Award cannot be
delivered; and (iii) all
Purchased Stock which is purchased for cash, or in exchange for
shares of Stock if, in either case, the purchase price per share
of such Purchased Stock is at least equal to 100% of the Fair
Market Value of the Stock on the date of the Award related to
such Purchased Stock.
(c) Subject to subsections 4.2(d) and (e), the following
additional limits are imposed under the Plan.
(i) The
maximum number of shares that may be covered by Awards granted
to any one employee shall be 2,000,000 shares. If an Option
is in tandem with an SAR, such that the exercise of the Option
or SAR with respect to a share of Stock cancels the tandem SAR
or Option right, respectively, with respect to such share, the
tandem Option and SAR rights with respect to each share of Stock
shall be counted as covering but one share of Stock for purposes
of applying the limit of this clause (i). If an Award is
terminated, cancelled or expires, or the shares under an Award
are forfeited, the number of shares subject to the Award shall
be counted for purposes of applying such limit.
(ii) The
maximum number of shares that may be issued under Options
intended to be ISOs shall be 10,000,000
7,100,000 shares. The maximum number of shares that
may be issued in conjunction with Awards granted pursuant to
Section 3 (relating to Restricted Stock and Restricted
Stock Unit Awards) shall be 1,000,000
5,900,000 shares.
(d) To the extent any shares of Stock covered by an Award
are not delivered to a Participant or beneficiary because the
Award is forfeited, canceled, or expires, or if the shares are
delivered but
B-2
subsequently forfeited, or the shares of Stock are not delivered
because the Award is settled in cash or used to satisfy the
applicable tax withholding obligation, such shares shall not be
deemed to have been delivered for purposes of determining the
maximum number of shares of Stock available for delivery under
subsections 4.2(b) and 4.2(c)(ii). If the Exercise Price of any
Option is satisfied by tendering shares of Stock to the Company
(by either actual tender or by attestation), only the number of
shares of Stock issued net of the shares of Stock tendered shall
be deemed delivered for purposes of determining the maximum
number of shares of Stock available for delivery under
subsections 4.2(b) and 4.2(c)(ii).
(e) In the event of a corporate transaction involving the
Company (including, without limitation, any stock dividend,
stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization,
reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off,
combination or exchange of shares), the Committee may adjust the
shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan and may also
adjust Awards to preserve the benefits or potential benefits of
the Awards. Action by the Committee may include:
(i) adjustment of the number and kind of shares which may
be delivered under the Plan; (ii) adjustment of the number
and kind of shares subject to outstanding Awards;
(iii) adjustment of the Exercise Price of outstanding
Options and SARs; and (iv) any other adjustments that the
Committee determines to be equitable.
4.3. General Restrictions.
Delivery of shares of Stock or other amounts under the Plan
shall be subject to the following:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the
Company shall have no liability to deliver any shares of Stock
or make any other distribution of benefits unless such delivery
or distribution would comply with all applicable laws
(including, without limitation, the requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933), and the applicable requirements of any
stock exchange or similar entity.
(b) To the extent that the Plan provides for issuance of
stock certificates to reflect the issuance of shares of Stock,
the issuance may be effected on a non-certificated basis, to the
extent not prohibited by applicable law or the applicable rules
of any stock exchange.
4.4. Tax Withholding.
Delivery of shares of Stock or other amounts under the Plan is
subject to withholding of all applicable taxes, and the
Committee may condition the delivery of any shares of Stock or
other amounts under the Plan on satisfaction of the applicable
withholding obligations. The Committee, in its discretion, and
subject to such requirements as the Committee may impose prior
to the occurrence of such withholding, may permit such
withholding obligations to be satisfied through cash payment by
the Participant, through the surrender of shares of Stock which
the Participant already owns, or through the surrender of shares
of Stock to which the Participant is otherwise entitled under
the Plan.
4.5. Grant and Use of
Awards. In the discretion of the Committee, a Participant
may be granted any Award permitted under the provisions of the
Plan, and more than one Award may be granted to a Participant.
Awards may be granted as alternatives to or replacement of
Awards granted or outstanding under the Plan, or any other plan
or arrangement of the Company or a Subsidiary (including a plan
or arrangement of a business or entity, all or a portion of
which is acquired by the Company or a Subsidiary). Subject to
the overall limitation on the number of shares of Stock that may
be delivered under the Plan, the Committee may use available
shares of Stock as the form of payment for compensation, grants
or rights earned or due under any other compensation plans or
arrangements of the Company or a Subsidiary, including the plans
and arrangements of the Company or a Subsidiary assumed in
business combinations.
4.6. Dividends and Dividend
Equivalents. An Award (including without limitation an
Option or SAR Award) may provide the Participant with the right
to receive dividend payments or dividend equivalent payments
with respect to Stock subject to the Award (both before and
after the Stock subject to the Award is earned, vested, or
acquired), which payments may be either made currently or
credited to an account for the Participant, and may be settled
in cash or Stock, as determined by the Committee. Any such
settlements, and any such crediting of dividends or dividend
equivalents or reinvestment in shares of Stock, may be subject
to such conditions, restrictions and contingencies as the
Committee shall establish, including the reinvestment of such
credited amounts in Stock equivalents.
4.7. Settlement of Awards.
The obligation to make payments and distributions with respect
to Awards may be satisfied through cash payments, the delivery
of shares of Stock, the granting of replacement Awards, or
combination thereof as the
B-3
Committee shall determine. Satisfaction of any such obligations
under an Award, which is sometimes referred to as
settlement of the Award, may be subject to such
conditions, restrictions and contingencies as the Committee
shall determine. The Committee may permit or require the
deferral of any Award settlement, subject to such rules and
procedures as it may establish, which may include provisions for
the payment or crediting of interest or dividend equivalents,
and may include converting such credits into deferred Stock
equivalents. Each Subsidiary shall be liable for payment of cash
due under the Plan with respect to any Participant to the extent
that such benefits are attributable to the services rendered for
that Subsidiary by the Participant. Any disputes relating to
liability of a Subsidiary for cash payments shall be resolved by
the Committee.
4.8. Transferability. Except
as otherwise provided by the Committee, Awards under the Plan
are not transferable except as designated by the Participant by
will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
4.9. Form and Time of
Elections. Unless otherwise specified herein, each election
required or permitted to be made by any Participant or other
person entitled to benefits under the Plan, and any permitted
modification, or revocation thereof, shall be in writing filed
with the Committee at such times, in such form, and subject to
such restrictions and limitations, not inconsistent with the
terms of the Plan, as the Committee shall require.
4.10. Agreement With
Company. An Award under the Plan shall be subject to such
terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the Plan, as the
Committee shall, in its sole discretion, prescribe. The terms
and conditions of any Award to any Participant shall be
reflected in such form of written document as is determined by
the Committee. A copy of such document shall be provided, or
otherwise made available, to the Participant, and the Committee
may, but need not, require that the Participant sign a copy of
such document. Such document is referred to in the Plan as an
Award Agreement regardless of whether any
Participant signature is required.
4.11. Action by Company or
Subsidiary. Any action required or permitted to be taken by
the Company or any Subsidiary shall be by resolution of its
board of directors, or by action of one or more members of the
board (including a committee of the board) who are duly
authorized to act for the board, or (except to the extent
prohibited by applicable law or applicable rules of any stock
exchange) by a duly authorized officer of such company.
4.12. Gender and Number.
Where the context permits, words in any gender shall include any
other gender, words in the singular shall include the plural and
the plural shall include the singular.
4.13. Limitation of Implied
Rights.
(a) Neither a Participant nor any other person shall, by
reason of participation in the Plan, acquire any right in or
title to any assets, funds or property of the Company or any
Subsidiary whatsoever, including, without limitation, any
specific funds, assets, or other property which the Company or
any Subsidiary, in its sole discretion, may set aside in
anticipation of a liability under the Plan. A Participant shall
have only a contractual right to the Stock or amounts, if any,
payable under the Plan, unsecured by any assets of the Company
or any Subsidiary, and nothing contained in the Plan shall
constitute a guarantee that the assets of the Company or any
Subsidiary shall be sufficient to pay any benefits to any person.
(b) The Plan does not constitute a contract of employment,
in the case of a Participant who is an employee, or an agreement
to renominate a director as a director, in the case of a
Participant who is a Non-Employee Director, and selection as a
Participant will not give any participating employee or
Non-Employee Director the right to be retained in the employ, or
remain a director, of the Company or any Subsidiary, nor any
right or claim to any benefit under the Plan, unless such right
or claim has specifically accrued under the terms of the Plan.
Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, no Award under the
Plan shall confer upon the holder thereof any rights as a
shareholder of the Company prior to the date on which the
Participant fulfills all conditions for receipt of such rights.
4.14. Evidence. Evidence
required of anyone under the Plan may be by certificate,
affidavit, document or other information which the person acting
on it considers pertinent and reliable, and signed, made or
presented by the proper party or parties.
B-4
Section 5
Change In Control
Subject to the provisions of subsection 4.2(e) (relating to
the adjustment of shares), and except as otherwise provided in
the Plan or the Award Agreement reflecting the applicable Award,
upon the occurrence of a Change in Control:
(a) All outstanding Options (regardless of whether in
tandem with SARs) shall become fully exercisable.
(b) All outstanding SARs (regardless of whether in tandem
with Options) shall become fully exercisable.
(c) All Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall
become fully vested.
Section 6
Committee
6.1. Administration. The
authority to control and manage the operation and administration
of the Plan shall be vested in a committee (the
Committee) in accordance with this Section 6.
The Committee shall be selected by the Board, and shall consist
of at least two members and shall be appointed from among the
members of the Board. Any member of the Committee may resign or
be removed by the Board and new members may be appointed by the
Board. Additionally, the Committee shall be constituted so as to
satisfy at all times the outside director requirement of Code
Section 162(m) and the regulations thereunder. Unless
otherwise determined by the Board, the Committee shall be the
Management Development, Nominating and Governance
Committee. If the Committee does not exist, or for any other
reason determined by the Board, the Board may take any action
under the Plan that would otherwise be the responsibility of the
Committee.
6.2. Powers of Committee.
The Committees administration of the Plan shall be subject
to the following:
(a) Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee
will have the authority and discretion to select from among the
Eligible Individuals those persons who shall receive Awards, to
determine the time or times of receipt, to determine the types
of Awards and the number of shares covered by the Awards, to
establish the terms, conditions, performance criteria,
restrictions, and other provisions of such Awards, and (subject
to the restrictions imposed by Section 7) to cancel or
suspend Awards.
(b) To the extent that the Committee determines that the
restrictions imposed by the Plan preclude the achievement of the
material purposes of the Awards in jurisdictions outside the
United States, the Committee will have the authority and
discretion to modify those restrictions as the Committee
determines to be necessary or appropriate to conform to
applicable requirements or practices of jurisdictions outside of
the United States.
(c) The Committee will have the authority and discretion to
interpret the Plan, to establish, amend, and rescind any rules
and regulations relating to the Plan, to determine the terms and
provisions of any Award Agreement made pursuant to the Plan, and
to make all other determinations that may be necessary or
advisable for the administration of the Plan.
(d) Any interpretation of the Plan by the Committee and any
decision made by it under the Plan, including an adjustment
under subsection 4.2(e), is final and binding on all
persons. Except to the extent precluded by applicable law
governing discrimination in employment, decisions made by the
Committee under the Plan need not be uniform with respect to
Participants notwithstanding that Participants are similarly
situated.
6.3. Delegation by
Committee. Except to the extent prohibited by applicable law
or the applicable rules of a stock exchange, the Committee may
allocate all or any portion of its responsibilities and powers
to any one or more of its members and may delegate all or any
part of its responsibilities and powers to any person or persons
selected by it. Any such allocation or delegation may be revoked
by the Committee at any time.
6.4. Information to be Furnished
to Committee. The Company and Subsidiaries shall furnish the
Committee with such data and information as it determines may be
required for it to discharge its duties. The records of the
Company and Subsidiaries as to an employees or
Participants employment, termination of employment, leave
of absence, reemployment and compensation shall be conclusive on
all persons unless determined to be incorrect. Participants and
other persons entitled to benefits under the Plan must furnish
the Committee such
B-5
evidence, data or information as the Committee considers
desirable to carry out the terms of the Plan.
Section 7
Amendment And Termination
The Board or the Committee may, at any time, amend or terminate
the Plan, except that the Board may amend the Plan to prohibit
or restrict the Committees power to amend or terminate the
Plan after the time at which such amendment is adopted by the
Board, and any such amendment by the Board shall not be subject
to change by the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing
sentence, (i) no amendment or termination may, in the
absence of written consent to the change by the affected
Participant (or, if the Participant is not then living, the
affected beneficiary of the former Participant), adversely
affect the rights of any Participant or beneficiary under any
Award prior to the date such amendment is adopted; (ii) no
amendment may increase the limitations on the number of shares
set forth in subsections 4.2(b) and 4.2(c),
or decrease the minimum Option or SAR Exercise Price
set forth in subsection 2.2, or increase
the maximum term of an Option or SAR from the maximum term set
forth in subsection 2.3 or amend section 2.4
unless any such amendment is approved by the Companys
shareholders. Adjustments pursuant to subsection 4.2(e)
shall not be subject to the foregoing limitations of this
Section 7.
Section 8
Defined Terms And Governing Law
8.1. Defined Terms. In
addition to the other definitions contained herein, the
following definitions shall apply:
(a) Award. The term Award shall mean any
award or benefit granted under the Plan, including, without
limitation, the grant of Options, SARs, Restricted Stock Awards
and Restricted Stock Unit Awards.
(b) Board. The term Board shall mean the
Board of Directors of the Company.
(c) Change in Control. The term Change in
Control shall mean a change in control of the Company, as
defined in the Award Agreement.
(d) Code. The term Code shall mean the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. A reference to any
provision of the Code shall include reference to any successor
provision of the Code.
(e) Eligible Individual. The term Eligible
Individual shall mean any executive officer or other key
employee of the Company or a Subsidiary and any Non-Employee
Director. An Award may be granted to an employee, in connection
with hiring, retention or otherwise, prior to the date the
employee first performs services for the Company or a
Subsidiary, provided that such Award shall not become vested
prior to the date the employee first performs such services.
(f) Fair Market Value. For purposes of determining
the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock as of any
date, the following rules shall apply:
(i) If
the principal market for the Stock is a national securities
exchange or the Nasdaq stock market, then the Fair Market
Value as of that date shall be the last reported sale
price of the Stock on that date on the principal exchange or
market on which the Stock is then listed or admitted to trading.
(ii) If
the last sale price is not available or if the principal market
for the Stock is not a national securities exchange and the
Stock is not quoted on the Nasdaq stock market, then the
Fair Market Value as of that date shall be the
average between the highest bid and lowest asked prices for the
Stock on such day as reported on the Nasdaq OTC
Bulletin Board Service or by the National Quotation Bureau,
Incorporated or a comparable service.
(iii) If
the day is not a business day, and as a result,
paragraphs (i) and (ii) next above are
inapplicable, the Fair Market Value of the Stock
shall be determined as of the next earlier business day. If
paragraphs (i) and (ii) next above are otherwise
inapplicable, then the Fair Market Value of the
Stock shall be determined in good faith by the Committee.
(g) Non-Employee Directors. The term
Non-Employee Director means a member of the Board
who is not an employee of the Company, any Subsidiary or of any
person, directly or indirectly, controlling, controlled by or
under common control with the Company and is not a member of the
Board representing a particular holder of any class of
securities of the Company.
(h) Subsidiary. The term Subsidiary and
its plural means any company during any period in which it is a
subsidiary corporation (as that term is
B-6
defined in Code Section 424(f)) with respect to the Company.
The following terms are defined where indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
Award Agreement
|
|
|
Subsection 4.10 |
|
Committee
|
|
|
Subsection 6.1 |
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Subsection 2.2 |
|
ISO
|
|
|
Subsection 2.1 |
(a) |
NQO
|
|
|
Subsection 2.1 |
(a) |
Option
|
|
|
Subsection 2.1 |
(a) |
Participant
|
|
|
Subsection 1.2 |
|
Purchased Stock
|
|
|
Subsection 3.2 |
|
Stock
|
|
|
Subsection 1.1 |
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Subsection 3.1 |
|
Restricted Stock Unit
|
|
|
Subsection 3.1 |
|
SAR
|
|
|
Subsection 2.1 |
(b) |
8.2. Governing Law. This
Plan, and all Award Agreements, shall be construed in accordance
with and governed by the laws of the State of Wisconsin, without
reference to any conflict of law principles. Any legal action or
proceeding with respect to this Plan, any Award or any Award
Agreement, or for recognition and enforcement of any judgment in
respect of this Plan, any Award or any Award Agreement, may be
brought and determined only in a state court sitting in the
County of Milwaukee, or the Federal District Court for the
Eastern District of Wisconsin sitting in the County of
Milwaukee, in the State of Wisconsin.
B-7
MGIC INVESTMENT CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Thursday, May 12, 2005
9:00 a.m. Central Time
MARCUS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
929 North Water Street
Milwaukee, WI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MGIC Investment Corporation
P.O. Box 488
Milwaukee, WI 53201
|
|
proxy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors for use at the Annual Meeting on May 12, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
The undersigned hereby appoints CURT S. CULVER and J. MICHAEL LAUER, and either one of them, as
proxy and attorney-in-fact of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to represent and
vote, as designated on the reverse side, all shares of Common Stock of MGIC Investment Corporation
which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of such Corporation
to be held at the Marcus Center for the Performing Arts, 929 North Water Street, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin, on Thursday, May 12, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, and at any adjournment. |
|
|
|
|
|
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Corporations Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement
and 2004 Annual Report. |
|
|
|
|
|
Notice to Participants in the Corporations Profit Sharing and Savings Plan and Trust: As a
participant in the MGIC Investment Corporation Profit Sharing and Savings Plan and Trust (the
Plan), you have the right to instruct the Plan Trustee how to vote the shares of the
Corporations Common Stock allocated to your account. If you sign, date and return this card in the
enclosed reply envelope and it is received by the Plan Trustee at least five days before the Annual
Meeting, shares held in your account will be voted by the Plan Trustee in accordance with the
voting choices you specify on the reverse side. You may revoke your instructions by delivering a
signed proxy card with a later date to the Plan Trustee at least five days before the Annual
Meeting. If your instructions are not timely received or if you do not respond, shares held in your
account will be voted by the Plan Trustee in accordance with the Plan and applicable law. |
See reverse for voting
instructions.
DETACH BELOW AND RETURN USING THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED
òPlease detach hereò
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors Recommends a Vote FOR All Nominees Listed in Item 1 and FOR Items 2, 3 and 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Election of directors: |
|
01 Mary K. Bush |
|
03 Kenneth M. Jastrow, II |
|
o |
|
Vote FOR all nominees |
|
o |
|
Vote WITHHELD |
|
|
|
|
|
02 David S. Engelman |
|
04 Daniel P. Kearney |
|
|
|
(except as marked) |
|
|
|
from all nominees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Instructions: To withhold authority to vote for any indicated nominee,
write the number(s) of the nominee(s) in the box provided to the right.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
Approve amendments to the MGIC Investment Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
o |
|
For |
|
o |
|
Against |
|
o |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
Approve a performance formula for maximum annual bonus awards. |
|
o |
|
For |
|
o |
|
Against |
|
o |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
Ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent accountants
of the Corporation. |
|
o |
|
For |
|
o |
|
Against |
|
o |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
In his discretion, each Proxy is authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY SIGNED, WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHOICES SPECIFIED ABOVE BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO CHOICES ARE SPECIFIED,
THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL NOMINEES LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND FOR ITEMS 2, 3 AND 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Address Change? Mark Box o Indicate changes below: |
|
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature(s) in Box |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name appears to the left.
Joint owners should each sign personally. A corporation
should sign full corporate name by duly authorized
officers and affix corporate seal. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian,
give full title. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|