e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-12815
CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
The Netherlands
|
|
IRS Identification Number: Not Applicable |
(State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Polarisavenue 31
2132 JH Hoofddorp
The Netherlands
31-23-5685660
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The number of shares outstanding of
the registrants common stock as of October 15, 2007 96,578,625.
CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
Table of Contents
2
CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,171,752 |
|
|
$ |
860,983 |
|
|
$ |
3,040,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,251,766 |
|
Cost of revenue |
|
|
1,064,376 |
|
|
|
784,639 |
|
|
|
2,787,550 |
|
|
|
2,042,504 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
107,376 |
|
|
|
76,344 |
|
|
|
252,874 |
|
|
|
209,262 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
35,313 |
|
|
|
34,136 |
|
|
|
103,822 |
|
|
|
102,618 |
|
Intangibles amortization |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
Other operating loss (income), net |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
71,772 |
|
|
|
41,900 |
|
|
|
148,688 |
|
|
|
105,459 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
(1,269 |
) |
|
|
(2,980 |
) |
|
|
(5,982 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
8,298 |
|
|
|
5,717 |
|
|
|
24,420 |
|
|
|
12,705 |
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
|
79,085 |
|
|
|
46,348 |
|
|
|
170,128 |
|
|
|
112,182 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(18,742 |
) |
|
|
(11,953 |
) |
|
|
(44,233 |
) |
|
|
(29,728 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
60,343 |
|
|
|
34,395 |
|
|
|
125,895 |
|
|
|
82,454 |
|
Minority interest in income |
|
|
(1,605 |
) |
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
|
|
(4,446 |
) |
|
|
(4,068 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
58,738 |
|
|
$ |
32,432 |
|
|
$ |
121,449 |
|
|
$ |
78,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
95,665 |
|
|
|
96,581 |
|
|
|
95,613 |
|
|
|
97,059 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
96,744 |
|
|
|
98,325 |
|
|
|
96,709 |
|
|
|
98,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
$ |
3,859 |
|
|
$ |
2,909 |
|
|
$ |
11,576 |
|
|
$ |
8,762 |
|
Per share |
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
financial statements.
3
CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
580,789 |
|
|
$ |
619,449 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
160,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,745 in 2007
and $2,008 in 2006 |
|
|
537,442 |
|
|
|
489,008 |
|
Contracts in progress with costs and estimated earnings exceeding related
progress billings |
|
|
215,122 |
|
|
|
101,134 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
28,433 |
|
|
|
42,158 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
86,929 |
|
|
|
44,041 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,609,252 |
|
|
|
1,295,790 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
231,232 |
|
|
|
194,644 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current contract retentions |
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
17,305 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
228,296 |
|
|
|
229,460 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
25,694 |
|
|
|
26,090 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
26,328 |
|
|
|
21,123 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,126,522 |
|
|
$ |
1,784,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
Current maturity of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
456,139 |
|
|
|
373,668 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
175,478 |
|
|
|
130,443 |
|
Contracts in progress with progress billings exceeding related costs and
estimated earnings |
|
|
699,578 |
|
|
|
604,238 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
15,941 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,347,136 |
|
|
|
1,137,160 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
97,030 |
|
|
|
93,536 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,691 |
|
Minority interest in subsidiaries |
|
|
10,057 |
|
|
|
5,590 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,454,223 |
|
|
|
1,241,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, Euro .01 par value; shares authorized: 250,000,000 in 2007 and 2006;
shares issued: 99,073,635 in 2007 and 99,019,462 in 2006;
shares outstanding: 96,490,781 in 2007 and 95,967,024 in 2006 |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
353,136 |
|
|
|
355,939 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
400,504 |
|
|
|
292,431 |
|
Stock held in trust |
|
|
(21,633 |
) |
|
|
(15,231 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost; 2,582,854 shares in 2007 and 3,052,438 shares in 2006 |
|
|
(74,371 |
) |
|
|
(80,040 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
13,509 |
|
|
|
(11,817 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
672,299 |
|
|
|
542,435 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,126,522 |
|
|
$ |
1,784,412 |
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
financial statements.
4
CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
121,449 |
|
|
$ |
78,386 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,716 |
|
|
|
20,245 |
|
Long-term incentive plan amortization |
|
|
13,478 |
|
|
|
13,028 |
|
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(259 |
) |
Unrealized gain on foreign currency hedge ineffectiveness |
|
|
(1,222 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
(5,704 |
) |
|
|
(17,382 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities (see below) |
|
|
88,213 |
|
|
|
320,852 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
240,898 |
|
|
|
414,554 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(197,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
37,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(65,976 |
) |
|
|
(60,690 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1,674 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(224,839 |
) |
|
|
(58,424 |
) |
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in notes payable |
|
|
(781 |
) |
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
Repayment of private placement debt |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
5,704 |
|
|
|
17,382 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(30,961 |
) |
|
|
(50,514 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
4,945 |
|
Issuance of treasury stock |
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(11,576 |
) |
|
|
(5,853 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(54,719 |
) |
|
|
(59,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(38,660 |
) |
|
|
296,396 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year |
|
|
619,449 |
|
|
|
333,990 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
$ |
580,789 |
|
|
$ |
630,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in receivables, net |
|
$ |
(48,434 |
) |
|
$ |
(130,339 |
) |
Change in contracts in progress, net |
|
|
(18,648 |
) |
|
|
304,365 |
|
Decrease (increase) in non-current contract retentions |
|
|
12,707 |
|
|
|
(7,466 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable |
|
|
82,471 |
|
|
|
130,224 |
|
Increase in other current and non-current assets |
|
|
(30,777 |
) |
|
|
(23,277 |
) |
Change in income taxes payable and deferred income taxes |
|
|
21,968 |
|
|
|
6,779 |
|
Increase in accrued and other non-current liabilities |
|
|
52,885 |
|
|
|
36,657 |
|
Decrease in other |
|
|
16,041 |
|
|
|
3,909 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
88,213 |
|
|
$ |
320,852 |
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these
financial statements.
5
CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2007
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
1. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of PresentationThe accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (CB&I or the Company) have been prepared pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). In the opinion of
management, our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments,
which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position
as of September 30, 2007, our results of operations for each of the three-month and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, and our cash flows for each of the nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 is
derived from the December 31, 2006 audited consolidated financial statements. Certain prior year
balances have been reclassified to conform to our current year presentation. Specifically,
prepayment balances associated with our contracts have been reclassified from other current assets
to contracts in progress balances on our December 31, 2006 condensed consolidated balance sheet.
Although management believes the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally
included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the SEC. The results of operations and cash flows for the interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The
accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Revenue RecognitionRevenue is primarily recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. A
significant portion of our work is performed on a fixed-price or lump-sum basis. The balance of our
work is performed on variations of cost reimbursable and target price approaches. Contract revenue
is accrued based on the percentage that actual costs-to-date bear to total estimated costs. We
utilize this cost-to-cost approach as we believe this method is less subjective than relying on
assessments of physical progress. We follow the guidance of the Statement of Position 81-1,
Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts (SOP
81-1), for accounting policies relating to our use of the percentage-of-completion method,
estimating costs, revenue recognition, including the recognition of profit incentives, combining
and segmenting contracts and unapproved change order/claim recognition. Under the cost-to-cost
approach, while the most widely recognized method used for percentage-of-completion accounting, the
use of estimated cost to complete each contract is a significant variable in the process of
determining income earned and is a significant factor in the accounting for contracts. The
cumulative impact of revisions in total cost estimates during the progress of work is reflected in
the period in which these changes become known. Due to the various estimates inherent in our
contract accounting, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Contract revenue reflects the original contract price adjusted for approved change orders and
estimated minimum recoveries of unapproved change orders and claims. We recognize revenue
associated with unapproved change orders and claims to the extent that related costs have been
incurred when recovery is probable and the value can be reliably estimated. At September 30, 2007,
we had a project with outstanding unapproved change orders/claims of approximately $78,500 factored
into the determination of its revenue and estimated costs. We anticipate reaching agreement with
our customer to resolve the change orders/claims and other commercial issues on this project within
the next several months. At December 31, 2006, we had no material outstanding unapproved change
orders/claims.
6
Losses expected to be incurred on contracts in progress are charged to earnings in the period such
losses are known. Charges to earnings include the reversal of any profit recognized on the
project in prior periods. During the three month period ended September 30, 2007, we recognized provisions
for additional costs associated with a project in a loss position in our Europe, Africa, and Middle East
(EAME) segment that resulted
in a $25,832 charge to earnings for the period. Charges to earnings for this project during the
nine month period ended September 30, 2007 were $44,837. We have also recognized $22,775 of
provisions to date for a project in our North America segment that is substantially complete. There
were no additional charges to earnings for this project during the three month period ended
September 30, 2007. There were no significant provisions for additional costs associated with
contracts projected to be in a material loss position in the comparable periods of 2006.
Costs and estimated earnings to date in excess of progress billings on contracts in progress
represent the cumulative revenue recognized less the cumulative billings to the customer. Any
billed revenue that has not been collected is reported as accounts receivable. Unbilled revenue is
reported as contracts in progress with costs and estimated earnings exceeding related progress
billings on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The timing of when we bill our customers is
generally based on advance billing terms or contingent upon completion of certain phases of the
work as stipulated in the contract. Progress billings in accounts receivable at September 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006 include retentions totaling $72,481 and $62,723, respectively, to be
collected within one year. Contract retentions collectible beyond one year are included in
non-current contract retentions on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Cost of revenue
includes direct contract costs such as material and construction labor, and indirect costs which
are attributable to contract activity.
Foreign CurrencyThe nature of our business activities involves the management of various financial
and market risks, including those related to changes in currency exchange rates. The effects of
translating financial statements of foreign operations into our reporting currency are recognized
in shareholders equity within accumulated other comprehensive income/loss as cumulative
translation adjustment, net of tax, which includes tax credits associated with the translation
adjustment. Foreign currency exchange gains/losses are included in the condensed consolidated
statements of income within cost of revenue.
New Accounting StandardsOn January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position is
required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance
on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. As a result of our adoption of FIN 48, we recognized an
approximate $1,800 increase in our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for
as a cumulative-effect adjustment to our beginning retained earnings balance. Including the impact
of adoption of FIN 48, our unrecognized tax benefits totaled approximately $17,100.
We are subject to taxation in the United States and various states and foreign jurisdictions. We
have significant operations in the United States, The Netherlands, Canada and the United Kingdom.
Tax years remaining subject to examination by worldwide tax jurisdictions vary by country and legal
entity, but are generally open for tax years ending after 2001, and in certain cases back to 1997.
To the extent penalties, if any, would be assessed on any underpayment of income tax, such amounts
are accrued and classified as a component of income tax expense in our financial statements.
Interest is included in interest expense on our consolidated statement of income.
We do not anticipate significant changes in the balance of our unrecognized tax benefits in the
next twelve months.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, and
accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
7
November 15, 2007. We do not anticipate that
our adoption of this standard would have a material
effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 provides companies with an option to report
selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The objective of SFAS No. 159 is to reduce
both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently. U.S. GAAP has required different measurement
attributes for different assets and liabilities that can create artificial volatility in earnings.
The FASB has indicated it believes that SFAS No. 159 helps to mitigate this type of
accounting-induced volatility by enabling companies to report related assets and liabilities at
fair value, which would likely reduce the need for companies to comply with detailed rules for
hedge accounting. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed
to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for
similar types of assets and liabilities.
SFAS No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards,
including requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements included in SFAS No. 157 and
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. SFAS No. 159 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not anticipate that our adoption of this
standard would have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
Per Share ComputationsBasic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
assumed conversion of dilutive securities, consisting of employee stock options, restricted shares,
performance shares (where performance criteria have been met) and directors deferred fee shares.
The following schedule reconciles the income and shares utilized in the basic and diluted EPS
computations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
58,738 |
|
|
$ |
32,432 |
|
|
$ |
121,449 |
|
|
$ |
78,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
|
|
95,665 |
|
|
|
96,581 |
|
|
|
95,613 |
|
|
|
97,059 |
|
Effect of stock options/restricted shares/performance shares |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
1,701 |
|
Effect of directors deferred fee shares |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
96,744 |
|
|
|
98,325 |
|
|
|
96,709 |
|
|
|
98,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
Short-Term InvestmentsOur
short-term investments on our condensed consolidated balance sheet, which consist entirely of market auction rate
debt securities, are classified as available-for-sale securities under the provisions of SFAS No.
115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Accordingly, these
investments are recorded at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Due to the
inherent short-term nature of these securities, fair value approximates cost. Realized gains and
losses and interest are included in interest income in the condensed consolidated statements of
income. As we have the intent and ability to divest these investments at pre-scheduled auctions
ranging from seven to thirty-five days, including those investments with original contractual
maturities beyond one year from the date of purchase, they are classified as current assets on the
condensed consolidated balance sheet.
8
2. Stock Plans
During the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, we recognized $3,577 and $2,462,
respectively, of compensation expense reported as selling and administrative expense in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. During the nine months ended September
30, 2007 and 2006, we recognized $13,478 and $13,028, respectively, of compensation expense
reported as selling and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of income.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we granted 154,529 stock options with a
weighted-average per share fair value of $13.65 and a weighted-average exercise price per share of
$30.30. Using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on
the date of grant based on the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rate of
4.59%, expected dividend yield of 0.53%, expected volatility of 41.68% and an expected life of 6
years.
Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of our stock. We use historical data to
estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model. The expected term of
options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.
The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, 415,438 restricted shares and 192,655 performance
shares were granted with a weighted-average per share grant-date fair value of $31.13 and $30.48,
respectively.
The changes in common stock, additional paid-in capital, stock held in trust and treasury stock
since December 31, 2006 primarily relate to activity associated with our stock plans. Our treasury
stock also reflects the impact of our share repurchase program.
3. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
58,738 |
|
|
$ |
32,432 |
|
|
$ |
121,449 |
|
|
$ |
78,386 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
4,973 |
|
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
10,827 |
|
|
|
5,147 |
|
Change in unrealized loss on debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Change in unrealized fair value of cash flow hedges (1) |
|
|
14,388 |
|
|
|
(1,356 |
) |
|
|
14,562 |
|
|
|
1,778 |
|
Change in unrecognized net prior service pension credits |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in unrecognized net actuarial pension losses |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
78,073 |
|
|
$ |
32,867 |
|
|
$ |
146,775 |
|
|
$ |
85,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Recorded under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133). Offsetting the unrealized gain/loss on cash
flow hedges is an unrealized loss/gain on the underlying transactions, to be recognized when
settled. |
Accumulated other comprehensive income reported on our balance sheet at September 30, 2007 includes
the following, net of tax: $2,430 of currency translation adjustment gain, $14,861 of unrealized
fair value gain on cash flow hedges, $1,060 of unrecognized net prior service pension credits and
$4,842 of unrecognized net actuarial pension losses. The total unrealized fair value gain on cash
flow hedges recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income as of September 30, 2007 totaled $14,861, net of tax of $1,408. Of this
amount, $13,448 of
9
unrealized
fair value gain, net of tax of $1,274, is expected to be reclassified
into earnings during the next twelve months due to settlement of the related contracts.
4. ShortTerm Investments
The amortized cost and estimated fair
value by contractual maturities of the available-for-sale
auction rate securities classified as short-term investments on our condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of September 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Short-Term Investments (with underlying maturities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in less than one year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
14,321 |
|
|
|
14,321 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
146,216 |
|
|
|
146,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
160,537 |
|
|
$ |
160,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These auction rate securities are tax-advantaged investments in long-term bonds with short-term
holding periods. At the end of each holding period, the short-term interest rates are reset, and we
have the option of selling or continuing to hold the investment. As of September 30, 2007, we held
investments in auction rate securities that ranged from seven to thirty-five days.
5. Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Goodwill
At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our goodwill balances were $228,296 and $229,460,
respectively, attributable to the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets
acquired relative to acquisitions within our North America and EAME segments.
The decrease in goodwill primarily relates to a reduction in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, where tax goodwill exceeded book goodwill in our North America
segment, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation within our EAME segment.
The change in goodwill by segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
EAME |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
201,150 |
|
|
$ |
28,310 |
|
|
$ |
229,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments associated with tax goodwill in excess of
book goodwill and foreign currency translation |
|
|
(1,444 |
) |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
199,706 |
|
|
$ |
28,590 |
|
|
$ |
228,296 |
|
|
|
|
Impairment TestingSFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), states
that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are no longer amortized to earnings, but
instead are reviewed for impairment at least annually via a two-phase process, absent any
indicators of impairment. The first phase screens for impairment, while the second phase (if
necessary) measures impairment. We have elected to perform our annual analysis during the fourth
quarter of each year based upon goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible balances as of the
beginning of the fourth quarter. Impairment testing of goodwill is accomplished by comparing an
estimate of
10
discounted future cash flows to the net book value of each reporting unit. Impairment
testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consist of tradenames, is accomplished by
demonstrating recovery of the underlying
intangible assets, utilizing an estimate of discounted future cash flows. No indicators of goodwill
or other intangible asset impairment have been identified during 2007. There can be no assurance
that future goodwill or other intangible asset impairment tests will not result in charges to
earnings.
Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the following table provides information concerning our other
intangible assets for the periods ended September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Amortized intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology (10 years) |
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
$ |
(699 |
) |
|
$ |
1,276 |
|
|
$ |
(603 |
) |
Non-compete agreements (8 years) |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
(2,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,376 |
|
|
$ |
(3,399 |
) |
|
$ |
4,376 |
|
|
$ |
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames |
|
$ |
24,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in other intangibles relates to additional amortization.
6. Financial Instruments
Although we do not engage in currency speculation, we periodically use hedges, primarily forward
contracts, to mitigate certain operating exposures, as well as hedge intercompany loans utilized to
finance non-U.S. subsidiaries. At September 30, 2007, our outstanding contracts to hedge
intercompany loans and certain operating exposures are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract |
|
Weighted Average |
Currency Sold |
|
Currency Purchased |
|
Amount(1) |
|
Contract Rate |
|
Forward contracts to hedge intercompany loans: (2) |
British Pound |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
$ |
42,166 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Canadian Dollar |
|
$ |
41,829 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
South African Rand |
|
$ |
2,686 |
|
|
|
7.22 |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Australian Dollar |
|
$ |
65,949 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts to hedge certain operating exposures: (3) |
U.S. Dollar |
|
Euro |
|
$ |
259,396 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Chilean Unidad de Fomento (4) |
|
$ |
136,444 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
British Pound |
|
$ |
18,095 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Norwegian Krone |
|
$ |
1,498 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
U.S. Dollar |
|
Swiss Francs |
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
British Pound |
|
Euro |
|
£ |
28,437 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
British Pound |
|
Swiss Francs |
|
£ |
3,120 |
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
British Pound |
|
Japanese Yen |
|
£ |
2,156 |
|
|
|
216.72 |
|
11
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the notional U.S. dollar equivalent at inception of the contract, with the
exception of forward contracts to sell 28,437 British Pounds for 41,458 Euros, 3,120
British Pounds for 7,327 Swiss Francs, and 2,156 British Pounds for 467,321 Japanese Yen.
These contracts are denominated in British Pounds and equate to approximately $69,019 at
September 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
These contracts, for which we do not seek hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No.
133, generally mature within seven days of quarter-end and are marked-to-market within cost
of revenue in the condensed consolidated income statement, generally offsetting any
translation gains/losses on the underlying transactions. |
|
(3) |
|
Represent primarily forward contracts that hedge forecasted transactions and firm
commitments and generally mature within two years of quarter-end. The increase in the total
notional value of cash flow hedge contracts is due primarily to new awards within our Central and
South America (CSA)
segment. Certain of our hedges were designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133. We
exclude forward points, which represent the time value component of the fair value of our
derivative positions, from our hedge assessment analysis. This time value component is
recognized as ineffectiveness within cost of revenue in the condensed consolidated
statement of income and was an unrealized loss totaling approximately $4,029 during the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. Additionally, certain of these hedges have become
ineffective as it has become probable that their underlying forecasted transactions will
not occur within their originally specified periods of time, or at all. The unrealized
hedge fair value gain associated with these ineffective instruments, as well as instruments
for which we do not seek hedge accounting treatment, totaled $5,251 and was recognized
within cost of revenue in the 2007 condensed consolidated statement of income. Included in
this unrealized hedge fair value gain was an approximate $4,800 unrealized gain resulting from a hedge
of the Euro portion of the purchase price of the pending Lummus Global acquisition. We recognized an
approximate net $3,800 gain within cost of revenue for this hedge as a premium of $1,000 was paid
in the third quarter 2007. Our
total unrealized hedge fair value gains recognized within cost of revenue for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 was $1,222. At September 30, 2007, the total fair value of
our outstanding contracts was $18,211, including the total foreign currency exchange loss
related to ineffectiveness. Of the total mark-to-market, $17,537 was recorded in other
current assets, $1,525 was recorded in other non-current assets, $762 was recorded in
accrued liabilities and $89 was recorded in other non-current liabilities on the condensed
consolidated balance sheet. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents an inflationary-adjusted currency that is indexed to the Chilean Peso. |
12
7. Retirement Benefits
We previously disclosed in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 that, in
2007, we expected to contribute $6,339 and $1,502 to our defined benefit and other postretirement
plans, respectively. The following table provides updated contribution information for our defined
benefit and postretirement plans as of September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions made through September 30,
2007 |
|
$ |
3,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
Remaining contributions expected for 2007 |
|
|
2,708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contributions expected for 2007 |
|
$ |
6,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined |
|
|
Other Postretirement |
|
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
Benefits |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,496 |
) |
|
|
(2,022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
757 |
|
|
$ |
995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
3,669 |
|
|
$ |
3,611 |
|
|
$ |
963 |
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
4,415 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(7,342 |
) |
|
|
(5,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service costs |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
1,944 |
|
|
$ |
2,237 |
|
|
$ |
2,266 |
|
|
$ |
2,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
8. Segment Information
We manage our operations by four geographic segments: North America; Europe, Africa and Middle
East; Asia Pacific; and Central and South America. Each geographic segment offers similar services.
Our Chief Executive Officer evaluates the performance of these four segments based on revenue and
income from operations. Each segments performance reflects the allocation of corporate costs,
which were based primarily on revenue. Intersegment revenue is eliminated in consolidation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
520,679 |
|
|
$ |
436,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,407,209 |
|
|
$ |
1,201,932 |
|
Europe, Africa and Middle East |
|
|
329,871 |
|
|
|
341,568 |
|
|
|
952,354 |
|
|
|
801,257 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
122,581 |
|
|
|
53,021 |
|
|
|
305,951 |
|
|
|
162,353 |
|
Central and South America |
|
|
198,621 |
|
|
|
30,169 |
|
|
|
374,910 |
|
|
|
86,224 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,171,752 |
|
|
$ |
860,983 |
|
|
$ |
3,040,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,251,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
$ |
43,374 |
|
|
$ |
22,980 |
|
|
$ |
91,632 |
|
|
$ |
47,343 |
|
Europe, Africa and Middle East |
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
|
|
14,689 |
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
43,795 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
12,647 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
27,072 |
|
|
|
10,518 |
|
Central and South America |
|
|
17,091 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
30,710 |
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
Total income from operations |
|
$ |
71,772 |
|
|
$ |
41,900 |
|
|
$ |
148,688 |
|
|
$ |
105,459 |
|
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
We have been and may from time to time be named as a defendant in legal actions claiming damages in
connection with engineering and construction projects and other matters. These are typically claims
that arise in the normal course of business, including employment-related claims and contractual
disputes or claims for personal injury or property damage which occur in connection with services
performed relating to project or construction sites. Contractual disputes normally involve claims
relating to the timely completion of projects, performance of equipment, design or other
engineering services or project construction services provided by our subsidiaries. Management does
not currently believe that pending contractual, employment-related personal injury or property
damage claims will have a material adverse effect on our earnings or liquidity.
Antitrust ProceedingsIn October 2001, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (the FTC or the
Commission) filed an administrative complaint (the Complaint) challenging our February 2001
acquisition of certain assets of the Engineered Construction Division of Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.
(PDM) that we acquired together with certain assets of the Water Division of PDM (the Engineered
Construction and Water Divisions of PDM are hereafter sometimes referred to as the PDM
Divisions). The Complaint alleged that the acquisition violated Federal antitrust laws by
threatening to substantially lessen competition in four specific business lines in the United
States: liquefied nitrogen, liquefied oxygen and liquefied argon (LIN/LOX/LAR) storage tanks;
liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) storage tanks; liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage tanks and
associated facilities; and field erected thermal vacuum chambers (used for the testing of
satellites) (the Relevant Products).
In June 2003, an FTC Administrative Law Judge ruled that our acquisition of PDM assets threatened
to substantially lessen competition in the four business lines identified above and ordered us to
divest within 180 days
of a final order all physical assets, intellectual property and any uncompleted construction
contracts of the PDM
14
Divisions that we acquired from PDM to a purchaser approved by the FTC that is
able to utilize those assets as a viable competitor.
We appealed the ruling to the full FTC. In addition, the FTC Staff appealed the sufficiency of the
remedies contained in the ruling to the full FTC. On January 6, 2005, the Commission issued its
Opinion and Final Order. According to the FTCs Opinion, we would be required to divide our
industrial division, including employees, into two separate operating divisions, CB&I and New PDM,
and to divest New PDM to a purchaser approved by the FTC within 180 days of the Order becoming
final. By order dated August 30, 2005, the FTC issued its final ruling substantially denying our
petition to reconsider and upholding the Final Order as modified.
We believe that the FTCs Order and Opinion are inconsistent with the law and the facts presented
at trial, in the appeal to the Commission, as well as new evidence following the close of the
record. We have filed a petition for review of the FTC Order and Opinion with the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Oral arguments occurred on May 2, 2007. In addition to the
legal proceedings, we also continue to explore a negotiated resolution of this matter with the FTC.
We are not required to divest any assets until we have exhausted all appeal processes available to
us, including appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Because (i) the remedies described in the
Order and Opinion are neither consistent nor clear, (ii) the needs and requirements of any
purchaser of divested assets could impact the amount and type of possible additional assets, if
any, to be conveyed to the purchaser to constitute it as a viable competitor in the Relevant
Products beyond those contained in the PDM Divisions, and (iii) the demand for the Relevant
Products is constantly changing, we have not been able to definitively quantify the potential
effect on our financial statements. The divested entity could include, among other things, certain
fabrication facilities, equipment, contracts and employees of CB&I. The remedies contained in the
Order, depending on how and to the extent they are ultimately implemented to establish a viable
competitor in the Relevant Products, could have an adverse effect on us, including the possibility
of a potential write-down of the net book value of divested assets, a loss of revenue relating to
divested contracts and costs associated with a divestiture.
Securities Class ActionA class action shareholder lawsuit was filed on February 17, 2006 against
us, Gerald M. Glenn, Robert B. Jordan, and Richard E. Goodrich in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York entitled Welmon v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV, et al. (No.
06 CV 1283). The complaint was filed on behalf of a purported class consisting of all those who
purchased or otherwise acquired our securities from March 9, 2005 through February 3, 2006 and were
damaged thereby.
The action asserts claims under the U.S. securities laws in connection with various public
statements made by the defendants during the class period and alleges, among other things, that we
misapplied percentage-of-completion accounting and did not follow our publicly stated revenue
recognition policies.
Since the initial lawsuit, other suits containing substantially similar allegations and with
similar, but not exactly the same, class periods were filed.
On July 5, 2006, a single Consolidated Amended Complaint was filed in the Welmon action in the
Southern District of New York consolidating all previously filed actions. We and the individual
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint, which was denied by the Court. On March 2,
2007, the lead plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, and we and the individual
defendants filed an opposition to class certification on April 2, 2007. After an initial hearing on
the motion for class certification held on May 29, 2007, the Court scheduled another hearing to be
held on November 13-14, 2007, to resolve factual issues regarding the typicality and adequacy of
the proposed class representatives. The parties have agreed to a rescheduling of the hearing to a
later date. Although we believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims made in the above
action and intend to contest it vigorously, an adverse resolution of the action could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations in the period in which
the lawsuit is resolved.
Asbestos LitigationWe are a defendant in lawsuits wherein plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos
due to work we may have performed at various locations. We have never been a manufacturer,
distributor or supplier of asbestos products. As of September 30, 2007, we have been named a
defendant in lawsuits alleging exposure to asbestos
involving approximately 4,645 plaintiffs, and of those claims, approximately 1,993 claims were
pending and 2,652
15
have been closed through dismissals or settlements. As of September 30, 2007, the
claims alleging exposure to asbestos that have been resolved have been dismissed or settled for an
average settlement amount per claim of approximately one thousand dollars. With respect to
unasserted asbestos claims, we cannot identify a population of potential claimants with sufficient
certainty to determine the probability of a loss and to make a reasonable estimate of liability, if
any. We review each case on its own merits and make accruals based on the probability of loss and
our ability to estimate the amount of liability and related expenses, if any. We do not currently
believe that any unresolved asserted claims will have a material adverse effect on our future
results of operations or financial position and at September 30, 2007 we had accrued $873 for
liability and related expenses. While we continue to pursue recovery for recognized and
unrecognized contingent losses through insurance, indemnification arrangements or other sources, we
are unable to quantify the amount, if any, that may be expected to be recoverable because of the
variability in the coverage amounts, deductibles, limitations and viability of carriers with
respect to our insurance policies for the years in question.
OtherWe were served with subpoenas for documents on August 15, 2005 and January 24, 2006 by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its investigation titled In the Matter of
Halliburton Company, File No. HO-9968, relating to an LNG construction project on Bonny Island,
Nigeria, where we served as one of several subcontractors to a Halliburton affiliate. We are
cooperating fully with such investigation.
Environmental MattersOur operations are subject to extensive and changing U.S. federal, state and
local laws and regulations, as well as laws of other nations, that establish health and
environmental quality standards. These standards, among others, relate to air and water pollutants
and the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. We are exposed to potential
liability for personal injury or property damage caused by any release, spill, exposure or other
accident involving such pollutants, substances or wastes.
In connection with the historical operation of our facilities, substances which currently are or
might be considered hazardous were used or disposed of at some sites that will or may require us to
make expenditures for remediation. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify parties to whom we have
sold facilities for certain environmental liabilities arising from acts occurring before the dates
those facilities were transferred. We are not aware of any manifestation by a potential claimant of
its awareness of a possible claim or assessment with respect to any such facility.
We believe that we are currently in compliance, in all material respects, with all environmental
laws and regulations. We do not anticipate that we will incur material capital expenditures for
environmental controls or for investigation or remediation of environmental conditions during the
remainder of 2007 or 2008.
10. Pending Acquisition
Pursuant to the terms of a Share Sale and Purchase Agreement dated August 24, 2007, we and certain
of our affiliates have agreed to purchase all of the outstanding shares of ABB Lummus Global Inc.
and ABB Oil & Gas Europe B.V. (Lummus Global) from ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. and certain of its
affiliates for a net cash purchase price, including estimated transaction costs, of approximately
$850 million, subject to adjustments at closing. We expect to fund the acquisition with cash on
hand and a combination of new term debt and our credit facility.
Lummus Globals operations include on/near shore engineering, procurement, construction and
technology operations. Lummus Global supplies a comprehensive range of products and services to the
global oil, gas and petrochemical industries, including the design and supply of production
facilities, refineries and petrochemical plants.
Lummus Global is focused mainly in the downstream business of the oil, gas and petrochemical
industry and generates its revenue through its segments of engineering, procurement and
construction services and project management services, as well as engineering services and the
licensing of technology to the refining and
petrochemical industries. Lummus Global transacts business and operates internationally in the
United States of America, The Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Germany, Russia, Singapore, India
and Egypt.
16
The record date, shareholder approval date, material terms of the sale and purchase agreement, pro
forma and historical financial information for us and Lummus Global and other information with
respect to Lummus Global are included in a definitive proxy statement filed by us with the SEC on
October 18, 2007. Subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to completion, including
shareholder approval, the acquisition is expected to be completed in November 2007.
In relation to the acquisition, we are in the process of increasing the capacity of our existing
revolving credit facility and have arranged for an underwritten $200 million, five-year, unsecured
term loan facility (the Term Loan) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as
administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent. The Term Loan is intended to
be fully utilized upon closing the acquisition of Lummus Global. Interest under the Term Loan will
be based upon LIBOR plus an applicable floating spread, and paid quarterly in arrears. The Term
Loan will amortize in equal principal installments of $40 million per year, with the last principal
payment due in December 2012.
The Term Loan contains certain restrictive covenants, such as a minimum net worth level, a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The Term Loan also includes restrictions
with regard to subsidiary indebtedness, sales of assets, liens, investments, type of business
conducted, affiliate transactions, sales and leasebacks, and mergers and acquisitions, among other
restrictions.
17
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
The following Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations is provided to assist readers in understanding our financial performance during the
periods presented and significant trends which may impact our future performance. This discussion
should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related
notes thereto included elsewhere in this quarterly report.
We are a global engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) company serving customers in a
number of key industries including oil and gas; petrochemical and chemical; power; water and
wastewater; and metals and mining. We have been helping our customers produce, process, store and
distribute the worlds natural resources for more than 100 years by supplying a comprehensive range
of engineered steel structures and systems. We offer a complete package of design, engineering,
fabrication, procurement, construction and maintenance services. Our projects include hydrocarbon
processing plants, LNG terminals and peak shaving plants, offshore structures, pipelines, bulk
liquid terminals, water storage and treatment facilities, and other steel structures and their
associated systems. We have been continuously engaged in the engineering and construction industry
since our founding in 1889.
Recent Developments
Pursuant to the terms of a Share Sale and Purchase Agreement dated August 24, 2007, we have agreed
to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Lummus Global from ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. and
certain of its affiliates for a net cash purchase price, including estimated transaction costs, of
approximately $850 million, subject to adjustments at closing. The record date, shareholder
approval date, material terms of the sale and purchase agreement, pro forma and historical
financial information for us and Lummus Global and other information with respect to Lummus Global
are included in a definitive proxy statement filed by us with the SEC on October 18, 2007. Subject
to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to completion, including shareholder approval, the
acquisition is expected to be completed in November 2007.
Results of Operations
New Awards/BacklogDuring the three months ended September 30, 2007, new awards, representing the
value of new project commitments received during a given period, were $715.3 million, compared with
$1.9 billion in the same 2006 period. These commitments are included in backlog until work is
performed and revenue is recognized or until cancellation. Approximately 72% of the new awards
during the third quarter of 2007 were for contracts awarded in the North America segment.
Significant awards during the quarter included the engineering, procurement and construction of an
LNG terminal expansion project, and the engineering, procurement and fabrication for a major
refinery expansion project, both awarded in the United States. New awards during the comparable
prior year period included an LNG import terminal in the United States, valued at $1.1 billion. New
awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were $4.9 billion compared with $3.5 billion in
the same period last year. The increase over the comparable prior year period was primarily due to
awards within our CSA segment during the first half of 2007.
Backlog increased $2.0 billion or 45% to $6.4 billion at September 30, 2007 compared with the
year-earlier period, primarily due to new awards in our CSA segment.
RevenueRevenue during the three months ended September 30, 2007 of $1.2 billion increased $310.8
million, or 36%, compared with the corresponding period in 2006. Revenue grew $84.5 million, or
19%, in the North America segment, primarily as a result of progress on a U.S. LNG import terminal
awarded at the end of the third quarter of 2006. Revenue in our EAME segment was impacted by two
projects that accounted for approximately $169.1 million, or 14% of the Companys total revenue
during the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared with $239.0 million or 28% for these two
projects in the comparable prior year period, partly offset by stronger steel plate structure and
refining and related processes activity in the Middle East during the current year period.
18
Revenue increased 131% in the Asia Pacific (AP) segment as a result of progress on a
significant project in Australia, and revenue was 558% higher in the CSA segment, mainly due to the
higher level of new awards during the year. Revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
of $3.0 billion increased $788.7 million or 35% compared with the corresponding period in 2006. We
anticipate that a larger portion of our revenue will be generated in the CSA segment as a result of
the significant increase in new awards.
Gross ProfitGross profit in the third quarter of 2007 was $107.4 million, or 9.2% of revenue,
compared with $76.3 million, or 8.9% of revenue, for the same period in 2006. While the overall
gross profit level as a percentage of revenue in the third quarter of 2007 was consistent with the
comparable period of 2006, our results were influenced by the factors described below. Gross profit
in the first nine months of 2007 was $252.9 million, or 8.3% of revenue, versus $209.3 million, or
9.3% of revenue, for the same period in 2006.
|
|
Our North America segment was favorably impacted by the strength of the steel plate
structure markets in the United States and Canada. |
|
|
|
Our EAME segment was unfavorably impacted by increased forecasted construction costs on a
project in the United Kingdom. We increased our forecasted costs to complete the project
primarily as a result of lower than expected labor productivity and schedule impacts, which
further increased our project management and field labor estimates and associated subcontract
costs. As a result of the cumulative revisions to its estimated costs to complete, the project
is now forecasted to result in an approximate $26.0 million third quarter and cumulative loss,
which will prospectively result in the recognition of revenue on the project with no associated
gross margin. If subcontractor issues are not resolved for amounts currently included in our
estimates or labor productivity declines further than currently estimated, our future results of
operations would be negatively impacted. |
|
|
|
Our AP segment was favorably impacted by the higher level of revenue volume in the region. |
|
|
|
Our CSA segment benefited from the significant new awards in the first half of 2007. During
the comparable period in 2006, negative project cost adjustments were recognized in the
segment. |
Selling and Administrative ExpensesSelling and administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 were $35.3 million, or 3.0% of revenue, compared with $34.1 million, or 4.0% of
revenue, for the comparable period in 2006. Selling and administrative expenses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 were $103.8 million, or 3.4% of revenue, versus $102.6 million, or 4.6% of
revenue, for the comparable period in 2006.
Income from OperationsIncome from operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007 was $71.8 million and $148.7 million, respectively, compared with $41.9 million and $105.5
million for the corresponding 2006 periods. As described above, our third quarter 2007 results were
favorably impacted by higher revenue volume.
Interest Expense and Interest IncomeInterest expense for the third quarter 2007 was $1.0 million,
compared with $1.3 million for the corresponding 2006 period. The $0.3 million decrease was
primarily due to lower interest expense on our senior notes, resulting from a final scheduled
principal installment payment of $25.0 million in the beginning of the third quarter of 2007.
Interest income for the third quarter 2007 of $8.3 million increased $2.6 million compared to the
prior year period due to higher short-term investment levels and higher associated yields.
Income Tax ExpenseIncome tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $18.7
million, or 23.7% of pre-tax income, compared with an income tax expense of $12.0 million, or
25.8%, in the prior year period. Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
was $44.2 million, or 26.0% of pre-tax income, compared with income tax expense of $29.7 million,
or 26.5% in the prior year period. The rate decrease compared with the corresponding prior year
period is primarily due to the U.S. / non-U.S. income mix.
19
Minority Interest in IncomeMinority interest in income for the three months ended September 30,
2007 was $1.6 million compared with $2.0 million for the comparable period in 2006. Minority
interest in income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $4.4 million versus $4.1
million for the comparable period in 2006. The changes compared with the prior year periods are
commensurate with the levels of operating income for the contracting entities.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2007, cash and cash equivalents totaled $580.8 million.
OperatingDuring the first nine months of 2007, our operations generated $240.9 million of cash
flows as a result of profitability and increased accounts payable levels. The increase in accounts
payable primarily resulted from project growth within our CSA and EAME segments.
InvestingIn the first nine months of 2007, net cash flows utilized in investing activities totaled
$224.8 million. Net cash utilized for short-term investments totaled $160.5 million, including
purchases of $197.8 million and sales of $37.3 million, respectively. Additionally, we incurred
$66.0 million for capital expenditures, primarily in support of projects in our North America and
EAME segments.
We expect
to fund the acquisition of the Lummus Global business from ABB Asea
Brown Boveri Ltd. with cash on hand and a
combination of new term debt and our credit facility. The acquisition is conditional upon approval
of our shareholders. We continue to evaluate and selectively pursue opportunities for expansion of
our business through acquisition of complementary businesses. Future acquisitions, if they arise,
may involve the use of cash or may require debt or equity financing.
FinancingDuring the first nine months of 2007, net cash flows utilized in financing activities
were $54.7 million. Purchases of treasury stock totaled $31.0 million (approximately 1.0 million
shares at an average price of $31.63 per share) which included cash payments of $3.3 million for
withholding taxes on taxable share distributions, for which we withheld approximately 0.1 million
shares, and approximately $27.7 million for the repurchase of 0.9 million shares of our stock. On
July 13, 2007, we also paid the final of three annual installments of $25.0 million on our senior
notes. Uses of cash also included $11.6 million for the payment of dividends. Our annual 2007
dividend is expected to be in the $15.0 to $16.0 million range. These decreases were partly offset
by a $5.7 million reclassification of benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized
compensation cost from an operating to a financing cash flow as required by SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment. Cash provided by financing activities included $6.7 and $1.2 million from
the issuance of treasury and common shares, respectively, primarily as a result of the exercise of
stock options.
Our investment portfolio of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments consists primarily
of money market investments and highly-rated auction rate debt securities which are monitored
regularly to maximize our after-tax yields. Our portfolio is subject to inherent interest rate risk
as investments mature and are reinvested at current market or auction rates.
Our primary internal source of liquidity is cash flow generated from operations. Capacity under our
revolving credit facility is also available, if necessary, to fund our operating and investing
activities. We have a five-year $850.0 million, committed and unsecured revolving credit facility,
which terminates in October 2011. As of September 30, 2007, no direct borrowings were outstanding
under the revolving credit facility, but we had issued $333.5 million of letters of credit and
$516.5 million of available capacity remained under this five-year facility. Such letters of credit
are generally issued to customers in the ordinary course of business to support advance payments,
as performance guarantees, or in lieu of retention on our contracts. The facility contains certain
restrictive covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio
and a minimum net worth level, among other restrictions. The facility also places restrictions on
us with regard to subsidiary indebtedness, sales of assets, liens, investments, type of business
conducted, and mergers and acquisitions, among other restrictions.
20
In addition to the revolving credit facility, we have three committed and unsecured letter of
credit and term loan agreements (the LC Agreements) with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, and various private placement note investors.
Under the terms of the LC Agreements, either banking institution can issue letters of credit (the
LC Issuers). In the aggregate, the LC Agreements provide up to $275.0 million of capacity. As of
September 30, 2007, no direct borrowings were outstanding under the LC Agreements, but we had
issued $275.0 million of letters of credit among all three tranches of LC Agreements. Tranche A, a
$50.0 million facility, Tranche B, a $100.0 million facility, and Tranche C, a $125.0 million
facility, were all fully utilized at September 30, 2007. Both Tranche A and Tranche B are five-year
committed facilities which terminate in November 2011. Tranche C is an eight-year facility
expiring in November 2014. The LC Agreements contain certain restrictive covenants, such as a
minimum net worth level, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The LC
Agreements also include restrictions with regard to subsidiary indebtedness, sales of assets,
liens, investments, type of business conducted, affiliate transactions, sales and leasebacks, and
mergers and acquisitions, among other restrictions. In the event of default under the LC
Agreements, including our failure to reimburse a draw against an issued letter of credit, the LC
Issuer could transfer its claim against us, to the extent such amount is due and payable by us
under the LC Agreements, to the private placement note investors, creating a term loan that is due
and payable no later than the stated maturity of the respective LC Agreement. In addition to
quarterly letter of credit fees, and to the extent that a term loan is in effect, we would be
assessed a floating rate of interest over LIBOR.
We also have various short-term, uncommitted revolving credit facilities across several geographic
regions of approximately $818.1 million. These facilities are generally used to provide letters of
credit or bank guarantees to customers in the ordinary course of business to support advance
payments, as performance guarantees or in lieu of retention on our contracts. At September 30,
2007, we had available capacity of $294.4 million under these uncommitted facilities. In addition
to providing letters of credit or bank guarantees, we also issue surety bonds in the ordinary
course of business to support our contract performance.
In relation to the Lummus Global acquisition, we are in the process of increasing the capacity of
our existing revolving credit facility and have arranged for an underwritten $200 million,
five-year, unsecured term loan facility (the Term Loan) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as administrative agent and Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent. The Term Loan
is intended to be fully utilized upon closing the acquisition of Lummus Global. Interest under the
Term Loan will be based upon LIBOR plus an applicable floating spread, and paid quarterly in
arrears. The Term Loan will amortize in equal principal installments of $40 million per year, with
the last principal payment due in December 2012.
The Term Loan contains certain restrictive covenants, such as a minimum net worth level, a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. The Term Loan also includes restrictions
with regard to subsidiary indebtedness, sales of assets, liens, investments, type of business
conducted, affiliate transactions, sales and leasebacks, and mergers and acquisitions, among other
restrictions.
As of September 30, 2007, the following commitments were in place to support our ordinary course
obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts of Commitments by Expiration Period |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Less than 1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
After 5 Years |
|
|
Letters of Credit/Bank Guarantees (1) |
|
$ |
1,132,170 |
|
|
$ |
298,965 |
|
|
$ |
610,798 |
|
|
$ |
192,773 |
|
|
$ |
29,634 |
|
Surety Bonds |
|
|
222,794 |
|
|
|
179,554 |
|
|
|
43,205 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commitments |
|
$ |
1,354,964 |
|
|
$ |
478,519 |
|
|
$ |
654,003 |
|
|
$ |
192,808 |
|
|
$ |
29,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Letters of credit include $37,893 of letters of credit issued in
support of our insurance program. |
We believe cash on hand, funds generated by operations, amounts available under existing credit
facilities and external sources of liquidity, such as the issuance of debt and equity instruments,
will be sufficient to finance capital expenditures, the settlement of commitments and contingencies
(as fully described in Note 9 to our condensed
21
consolidated financial statements) and working
capital needs for the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance that such funding will
be available, as our ability to generate cash flows from operations and our ability to access
funding under the revolving credit facility may be impacted by a variety of business, economic,
legislative, financial and other factors which may be outside of our control. Additionally, while
we currently have significant, uncommitted bonding facilities, primarily to support various
commercial provisions in our engineering and construction contracts, a termination or reduction of
these bonding facilities could result in the utilization of letters of credit in lieu of
performance bonds, thereby reducing our available capacity under the revolving credit facility.
Although we do not anticipate a reduction or termination of the bonding facilities, there can be no
assurance that such facilities will be available at reasonable terms to service our ordinary course
obligations.
We are a defendant in a number of lawsuits arising in the normal course of business and we have in
place appropriate insurance coverage for the type of work that we have performed. As a matter of
standard policy, we review our litigation accrual quarterly and as further information is known on
pending cases, increases or decreases, as appropriate, may be recorded in accordance with SFAS
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
For a discussion of pending litigation, including lawsuits wherein plaintiffs allege exposure to
asbestos due to work we may have performed, matters involving the FTC and securities class action
lawsuits against us, see Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We use operating leases for facilities and equipment when they make economic sense. In 2001, we
entered into a sale (for approximately $14.0 million) and leaseback transaction of our Plainfield,
Illinois administrative office with a lease term of 20 years, which is accounted for as an
operating lease. Minimum lease payments over the next five years of the lease, from 2007 through
2011, for this facility are expected to be approximately $1.6 million per year.
Other than the commitments to support our ordinary course obligations, as described above, we have
no other significant off-balance sheet arrangements.
New Accounting Standards
For a discussion of new accounting standards, see the applicable section included within Note 1 to
our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis, based on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Our management has discussed the development and selection of our critical
accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of our Supervisory Board of Directors. Actual results
may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements:
Revenue RecognitionRevenue is primarily recognized using the percentage-of-completion method. A
significant portion of our work is performed on a fixed-price or lump sum basis. The balance of our
work is performed on variations of cost reimbursable and target price approaches. Contract revenue
is accrued based on the percentage
that actual costs-to-date bear to total estimated costs. We utilize this cost-to-cost approach as
we believe this method is less subjective than relying on assessments of physical progress. We
follow the guidance of SOP 81-1 for accounting policies relating to our use of the
percentage-of-completion method, estimating costs, revenue
22
recognition, including the recognition
of profit incentives, combining and segmenting contracts and unapproved change order/claim
recognition. Under the cost-to-cost approach, while the most widely recognized method used for
percentage-of-completion accounting, the use of estimated cost to complete each contract is a
significant variable in the process of determining income earned and is a significant factor in the
accounting for contracts. The cumulative impact of revisions in total cost estimates during the
progress of work is reflected in the period in which these changes become known. Due to the various
estimates inherent in our contract accounting, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Contract revenue reflects the original contract price adjusted for approved change orders and
estimated minimum recoveries of unapproved change orders and claims. We recognize revenue
associated with unapproved change orders and claims to the extent that related costs have been
incurred when recovery is probable and the value can be reliably estimated. At September 30, 2007,
we had a project with outstanding unapproved change orders/claims of $78.5 million factored into
the determination of its revenue and estimated costs. We anticipate reaching agreement with our
customer to resolve the change orders/claims and other commercial issues on this project within the
next several months. At December 31, 2006, we had no material outstanding unapproved change
orders/claims. If the final settlement is less than the unapproved change order, our results of
operations could be negatively impacted.
Losses expected to be incurred on contracts in progress are charged to earnings in the period such
losses are known. Charges to earnings include the reversal of any profit
recognized on the project in prior periods. During the three month period ended September 30, 2007, we recognized provisions
for additional costs associated with a project in a loss position in our EAME segment that resulted
in a $25.8 million charge to earnings for the period. Charges to earnings for this project during
the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 were $44.8 million. We have also recognized $22.8
million of provisions to date for a project in our North America segment that is substantially
complete. There were no additional charges to earnings for this project during the three month
period ended September 30, 2007. There were no significant provisions for additional
costs associated with contracts projected to be in a material loss position in the comparable periods
of 2006.
Credit ExtensionWe extend credit to customers and other parties in the normal course of business
only after a review of the potential customers creditworthiness. Additionally, management reviews
the commercial terms of all significant contracts before entering into a contractual arrangement.
We regularly review outstanding receivables and provide for estimated losses through an allowance
for doubtful accounts. In evaluating the level of established reserves, management makes judgments
regarding the parties ability to make required payments, economic events and other factors. As the
financial condition of these parties changes, circumstances develop or additional information
becomes available, adjustments to the allowance for doubtful accounts may be required.
Financial InstrumentsAlthough we do not engage in currency speculation, we periodically use
hedges, primarily forward contracts, to mitigate certain operating exposures, as well as hedge
intercompany loans utilized to finance non-U.S. subsidiaries. Hedge contracts utilized to mitigate
operating exposures are generally designated as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133. Therefore,
gains and losses, exclusive of forward points, associated with marking highly effective instruments
to market are included in accumulated other comprehensive income/loss on the condensed consolidated
balance sheets, while the gains and losses associated with instruments deemed ineffective during
the period and instruments for which we do not seek hedge accounting treatment are recognized
within cost of revenue in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Changes in the fair
value of forward points are recognized within cost of revenue in the condensed consolidated
statements of income. Additionally, gains or losses on forward contracts to hedge intercompany
loans are included within cost of revenue in the condensed consolidated statements of income. Our
other financial instruments are not significant.
Income TaxesDeferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases using tax rates in effect for the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred
tax assets if, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely
than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The final realization of
the deferred tax asset depends on our ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the
appropriate character in the future and in appropriate jurisdictions.
23
Under the guidance of FIN 48, we provide for income taxes in situations where we have and have not
received tax assessments. Taxes are provided in those instances where we consider it probable that
additional taxes will be due in excess of amounts reflected in income tax returns filed worldwide.
As a matter of standard policy, we continually review our exposure to additional income taxes due
and as further information is known, increases or decreases, as appropriate, may be recorded in
accordance with FIN 48.
Estimated Reserves for Insurance MattersWe maintain insurance coverage for various aspects of our
business and operations. However, we retain a portion of anticipated losses through the use of
deductibles and self-insured retentions for our exposures related to third-party liability and
workers compensation. Management regularly reviews estimates of reported and unreported claims
through analysis of historical and projected trends, in conjunction with actuaries and other
consultants, and provides for losses through insurance reserves. As claims develop and additional
information becomes available, adjustments to loss reserves may be required. If actual results are
not consistent with our assumptions, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material.
Recoverability of Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible AssetsEffective January 1, 2002, we
adopted SFAS No. 142 which states that goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are no
longer to be amortized but are to be reviewed annually for impairment.
The goodwill impairment analysis required under SFAS No. 142 requires us to allocate goodwill to
our reporting units, compare the fair value of each reporting unit with our carrying amount,
including goodwill, and then, if necessary, record a goodwill impairment charge in an amount equal
to the excess, if any, of the carrying amount of a reporting units goodwill over the implied fair
value of that goodwill. The primary method we employ to estimate these fair values is the
discounted cash flow method. This methodology is based, to a large extent, on assumptions about
future events which may or may not occur as anticipated, and such deviations could have a
significant impact on the estimated fair values calculated. These assumptions include, but are not
limited to, estimates of future growth rates, discount rates and terminal values of reporting
units. Our goodwill balance at September 30, 2007 was $228.3 million.
SFAS No. 142 also requires us to compare the fair value of our indefinite-lived intangible assets
to the carrying amount. Impairment testing of our indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consist
of tradenames, is accomplished by demonstrating recovery of the underlying intangible assets, also
utilizing an estimate of discounted future cash flows. Our indefinite-lived intangible asset
balance at September 30, 2007 was $24.7 million.
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. You should read carefully
any statements containing the words expect, believe, anticipate, project, estimate,
predict, intend, should, could, may, might, or similar expressions or the negative of
any of these terms.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. In addition to the
material risks listed under Item 1A. Risk Factors, as set forth in our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 filed with the SEC, that may cause our actual results, performance or
achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking
statements, the following factors could also cause our results to differ from such statements:
|
|
|
our ability to realize cost savings from our expected execution performance of
contracts; |
|
|
|
|
the uncertain timing and the funding of new contract awards, and project cancellations
and operating risks; |
|
|
|
|
cost overruns on fixed price, target price or similar contracts whether as the result of
improper estimates or otherwise; |
|
|
|
|
risks associated with percentage-of-completion accounting; |
24
|
|
|
our ability to settle or negotiate unapproved change orders and claims; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the costs or availability of, or delivery schedule for, equipment,
components, materials, labor or subcontractors; |
|
|
|
|
adverse impacts from weather affecting our performance and timeliness of completion,
which could lead to increased costs and affect the costs or availability of, or delivery
schedule for, equipment, components, materials, labor or subcontractors; |
|
|
|
|
increased competition; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuating revenue resulting from a number of factors, including the cyclical nature of
the individual markets in which our customers operate; |
|
|
|
|
lower than expected activity in the hydrocarbon industry, demand from which is the
largest component of our revenue; |
|
|
|
|
lower than expected growth in our primary end markets, including but not limited to LNG
and refining and related processes; |
|
|
|
|
risks inherent in proposed acquisitions and our ability to obtain financing for these
acquisitions; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate and successfully operate acquired businesses and the risks
associated with those businesses; |
|
|
|
|
adverse outcomes of pending claims or litigation or the possibility of new claims or
litigation, including, but not limited to, pending securities class action litigation, and
the potential effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
the ultimate outcome or effect of the pending FTC order on our business, financial
condition and results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
lack of necessary liquidity to finance expenditures prior to the receipt of payment for
the performance of contracts and to provide bid and performance bonds and letters of credit
securing our obligations under our bids and contracts; |
|
|
|
|
proposed and actual revisions to U.S. and non-U.S. tax laws, and interpretation of said
laws, and U.S. tax treaties with non-U.S. countries (including The Netherlands), that seek
to increase income taxes payable; |
|
|
|
|
political and economic conditions including, but not limited to, war, conflict or civil
or economic unrest in countries in which we operate; and |
|
|
|
|
a downturn or disruption in the economy in general. |
Although we believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we
cannot guarantee future performance or results. We are not obligated to update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You
should consider these risks when reading any forward-looking statements.
25
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, which may adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition. One exposure to fluctuating exchange
rates relates to the effects of translating the financial statements of our non-U.S. subsidiaries,
which are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, into the U.S. dollar. The foreign
currency translation adjustments are recognized in shareholders equity within accumulated other
comprehensive income/loss as cumulative translation adjustment, net of any applicable tax. We generally do
not hedge our exposure to potential foreign currency translation adjustments.
Another form of foreign currency exposure relates to our non-U.S. subsidiaries normal contracting
activities. We generally try to limit our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations in most of our
engineering, procurement and construction contracts through provisions that require customer
payments in U.S. dollars or other currencies corresponding to the currency in which costs are
incurred. As a result, we generally do not need to hedge foreign currency cash flows for contract
work performed. However, where construction contracts do not contain foreign currency provisions,
we primarily use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure of forecasted
transactions and firm commitments. Our primary foreign currency exchange rate exposure hedged
includes the Euro, Chilean Unidad de Fomento, British Pound, Norwegian Krone, Swiss Franc and
Japanese Yen. The gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset changes in the value
of the related exposures. However, certain of these hedges have become ineffective as it has become
probable that their underlying forecasted transaction will not occur within their originally
specified periods of time, or at all. The unrealized hedge fair value gain associated with these
ineffective instruments as well as instruments for which we do not seek hedge accounting treatment
totaled $5.3 million and was recognized within cost of revenue in the condensed consolidated
statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Included in this unrealized hedge
fair value gain was an approximate $4.8 million unrealized gain resulting from a hedge of the Euro portion of
the purchase price of the pending Lummus Global acquisition. We
recognized an approximate net $3.8 million gain within cost of
revenue for this hedge as a premium of $1.0 million was paid in
the third quarter 2007. As of September 30, 2007, the notional
amount of cash flow hedge contracts outstanding was
$484.6 million. Our total unrealized hedge fair
value gains recognized within cost of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $1.2
million. The terms of our contracts extend up to two years. The potential change in fair value for
our outstanding contracts from a hypothetical ten percent change in quoted foreign currency
exchange rates would be approximately $1.8 million at September 30, 2007.
In circumstances where intercompany loans and/or borrowings are in place with non-U.S.
subsidiaries, we will also use forward contracts to generally offset any translation gains/losses
of the underlying transactions. If the timing or amount of foreign-denominated cash flows vary, we
incur foreign exchange gains or losses, which are included within cost of revenue in the condensed
consolidated statements of income. We do not use financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes.
The carrying value of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
notes payable approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.
See Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for quantification of our financial
instruments.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such
term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act)). Based upon such evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that, as
of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure
information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period
specified in the SECs rules and forms.
26
Changes in Internal Controls There were no changes in our internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We have been and may from time to time be named as a defendant in legal actions claiming damages in
connection with engineering and construction projects and other matters. These are typically claims
that arise in the normal course of business, including employment-related claims and contractual
disputes or claims for personal injury or property damage which occur in connection with services
performed relating to project or construction sites. Contractual disputes normally involve claims
relating to the timely completion of projects, performance of equipment, design or other
engineering services or project construction services provided by our subsidiaries. Management does
not currently believe that pending contractual, employment-related personal injury or property
damage claims will have a material adverse effect on our earnings or liquidity.
Antitrust ProceedingsIn October 2001, the FTC filed an administrative complaint (the Complaint)
challenging our February 2001 acquisition of certain assets of the Engineered Construction Division
of Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. (PDM) that we acquired together with certain assets of the Water
Division of PDM (the Engineered Construction and Water Divisions of PDM are hereafter sometimes
referred to as the PDM Divisions). The Complaint alleged that the acquisition violated Federal
antitrust laws by threatening to substantially lessen competition in four specific business lines
in the United States: liquefied nitrogen, liquefied oxygen and liquefied argon (LIN/LOX/LAR)
storage tanks; liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) storage tanks; liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage
tanks and associated facilities; and field erected thermal vacuum chambers (used for the testing of
satellites) (the Relevant Products).
In June 2003, an FTC Administrative Law Judge ruled that our acquisition of PDM assets threatened
to substantially lessen competition in the four business lines identified above and ordered us to
divest within 180 days of a final order all physical assets, intellectual property and any
uncompleted construction contracts of the PDM Divisions that we acquired from PDM to a purchaser
approved by the FTC that is able to utilize those assets as a viable competitor.
We appealed the ruling to the full FTC. In addition, the FTC Staff appealed the sufficiency of the
remedies contained in the ruling to the full FTC. On January 6, 2005, the Commission issued its
Opinion and Final Order. According to the FTCs Opinion, we would be required to divide our
industrial division, including employees, into two separate operating divisions, CB&I and New PDM,
and to divest New PDM to a purchaser approved by the FTC within 180 days of the Order becoming
final. By order dated August 30, 2005, the FTC issued its final ruling substantially denying our
petition to reconsider and upholding the Final Order as modified.
We believe that the FTCs Order and Opinion are inconsistent with the law and the facts presented
at trial, in the appeal to the Commission, as well as new evidence following the close of the
record. We have filed a petition for review of the FTC Order and Opinion with the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Oral arguments occurred on May 2, 2007. In addition to the
legal proceedings, we also continue to explore a negotiated resolution of this matter with the FTC.
We are not required to divest any assets until we have exhausted all appeal processes available to
us, including appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Because (i) the remedies described in the
Order and Opinion are neither consistent nor clear, (ii) the needs and requirements of any
purchaser of divested assets could impact the amount and type of possible additional assets, if
any, to be conveyed to the purchaser to constitute it as a viable competitor in the Relevant
Products beyond those contained in the PDM Divisions, and (iii) the demand for the Relevant
Products is constantly changing, we have not been able to definitively quantify the potential
effect on our financial statements. The divested entity could include, among other things, certain
fabrication facilities, equipment, contracts and employees of CB&I. The remedies contained in the
Order, depending on how and to the extent they are ultimately implemented to establish a viable
competitor in the Relevant
27
Products, could have an adverse effect on us, including the possibility of a potential write-down
of the net book value of divested assets, a loss of revenue relating to divested contracts and
costs associated with a divestiture.
Securities Class ActionA class action shareholder lawsuit was filed on February 17, 2006 against
us, Gerald M. Glenn, Robert B. Jordan, and Richard E. Goodrich in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York entitled Welmon v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV, et al. (No.
06 CV 1283). The complaint was filed on behalf of a purported class consisting of all those who
purchased or otherwise acquired our securities from March 9, 2005 through February 3, 2006 and were
damaged thereby.
The action asserts claims under the U.S. securities laws in connection with various public
statements made by the defendants during the class period and alleges, among other things, that we
misapplied percentage-of-completion accounting and did not follow our publicly stated revenue
recognition policies.
Since the initial lawsuit, other suits containing substantially similar allegations and with
similar, but not exactly the same, class periods were filed.
On July 5, 2006, a single Consolidated Amended Complaint was filed in the Welmon action in the
Southern District of New York consolidating all previously filed actions. We and the individual
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint, which was denied by the Court. On March 2,
2007, the lead plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, and we and the individual
defendants filed an opposition to class certification on April 2, 2007. After an initial hearing on
the motion for class certification held on May 29, 2007, the Court scheduled another hearing to be
held on November 13-14, 2007, to resolve factual issues regarding the typicality and adequacy of
the proposed class representatives. The parties have agreed to a rescheduling of the hearing to a
later date. Although we believe that we have meritorious defenses to the claims made in the above
action and intend to contest it vigorously, an adverse resolution of the action could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations in the period in which
the lawsuit is resolved.
Asbestos LitigationWe are a defendant in lawsuits wherein plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos
due to work we may have performed at various locations. We have never been a manufacturer,
distributor or supplier of asbestos products. As of September 30, 2007, we have been named a
defendant in lawsuits alleging exposure to asbestos involving approximately 4,645 plaintiffs, and
of those claims, approximately 1,993 claims were pending and 2,652 have been closed through
dismissals or settlements. As of September 30, 2007, the claims alleging exposure to asbestos that
have been resolved have been dismissed or settled for an average settlement amount per claim of
approximately one thousand dollars. With respect to unasserted asbestos claims, we cannot identify
a population of potential claimants with sufficient certainty to determine the probability of a
loss and to make a reasonable estimate of liability, if any. We review each case on its own merits
and make accruals based on the probability of loss and our ability to estimate the amount of
liability and related expenses, if any. We do not currently believe that any unresolved asserted
claims will have a material adverse effect on our future results of operations or financial
position and at September 30, 2007 we had accrued $0.9 million for liability and related expenses.
While we continue to pursue recovery for recognized and unrecognized contingent losses through
insurance, indemnification arrangements or other sources, we are unable to quantify the amount, if
any, that may be expected to be recoverable because of the variability in the coverage amounts,
deductibles, limitations and viability of carriers with respect to our insurance policies for the
years in question.
OtherWe were served with subpoenas for documents on August 15, 2005 and January 24, 2006 by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its investigation titled In the Matter of
Halliburton Company, File No. HO-9968, relating to an LNG construction project on Bonny Island,
Nigeria, where we served as one of several subcontractors to a Halliburton affiliate. We are
cooperating fully with such investigation.
Environmental MattersOur operations are subject to extensive and changing U.S. federal, state and
local laws and regulations, as well as laws of other nations, that establish health and
environmental quality standards. These standards, among others, relate to air and water pollutants
and the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. We are exposed to potential
liability for personal injury or property damage caused by any release, spill, exposure or other
accident involving such pollutants, substances or wastes.
28
In connection with the historical operation of our facilities, substances which currently are or
might be considered hazardous were used or disposed of at some sites that will or may require us to
make expenditures for remediation. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify parties to whom we have
sold facilities for certain environmental liabilities arising from acts occurring before the dates
those facilities were transferred. We are not aware of any manifestation by a potential claimant of
its awareness of a possible claim or assessment with respect to any such facility.
We believe that we are currently in compliance, in all material respects, with all environmental
laws and regulations. We do not anticipate that we will incur material capital expenditures for
environmental controls or for investigation or remediation of environmental conditions during the
remainder of 2007 or 2008.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosure included in our 2006 Form
10-K filed on March 1, 2007.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
31.1 (1)
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 (1)
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 (1)
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 (1)
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. |
|
|
|
|
By: Chicago Bridge & Iron Company B.V. |
|
|
|
|
Its: Managing Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ RONALD A. BALLSCHMIEDE |
|
|
|
|
Ronald A. Ballschmiede |
|
|
|
|
Managing Director |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
Date: October 31, 2007
30
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
|
31.1 (1)
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 (1)
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 (1)
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 (1)
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |