e10vqza
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q/A
(Amendment No. 1)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-6402-1
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
|
|
|
Texas
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
74-1488375
(I. R. S. employer identification
number) |
|
|
|
1929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
77019
(Zip code) |
713-522-5141
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of May 4, 2006 was 295,753,231
(net of treasury shares).
Explanatory Note:
The
Company is amending its March 31, 2006 Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2006 to restate its condensed consolidated statement of operations and consolidated statement of cash flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, and its
condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Included in this amended Form 10-Q are certain adjustments to correct errors related to 1) the
miscalculation of the Companys actuarially determined pension benefit obligation, 2) the
accounting for certain leases related to funeral home properties which were previously accounted for
as operating leases,
but should have been accounted for as capital leases, and 3) other out-of-period adjustments previously
identified by the Company but deemed to be not material either individually or in the aggregate. All
applicable amounts relating to this restatement have been reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosed in the notes
to the condensed consolidated financial statements in this amended
Form 10-Q. For a discussion of the individual restatement
adjustments, see Item 1. Financial Statements-note two.
Restatement of Financial Statements. Additionally, see Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
INDEX
2
GLOSSARY
The following terms are common to the deathcare industry, are used throughout this report and have
the following meanings:
Atneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements after the death has occurred.
Burial
Vaults A reinforced outer burial container intended to protect the casket against the
weight of the earth.
Cash Overrides Funds received based on achieving certain dollar volume targets of life
insurance policies.
Cremation The reduction of human remains to bone fragments by intense heat.
General Agency (GA) Revenues Commissions earned as the general agent for an insurance
company on preneed funeral life insurance or annuity policies. These commissions are based on a
percentage per contract sold, are dependent on the type of product sold and are recognized as
funeral revenues when the insurance purchase transaction between the customer and third party
insurance provider is completed.
Interment The burial or final placement of human remains in the ground.
Lawn Crypt An underground outer burial receptacle constructed of concrete and reinforced
steel which is usually pre-installed in predetermined designated areas.
Marker A method of identifying the occupant of a particular grave or crypt. Permanent
grave markers are usually of bronze or stone.
Maturity
At the time of death. This is the point at which preneed contracts are
converted to atneed contracts.
Mausoleum An above ground structure that is designed to house one to several hundred
caskets and cremation urns.
Perpetual Care or Endowment Care Fund A trust fund used for the maintenance and upkeep
of burial spaces within a cemetery.
Preneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements made prior to the time of death.
Preneed Backlog Future revenues from unfulfilled preneed funeral and cemetery sales.
Production Sales of preneed and/or atneed contracts.
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
441,798 |
|
|
$ |
447,442 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(354,191 |
) |
|
|
(349,642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
87,607 |
|
|
|
97,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(22,007 |
) |
|
|
(19,707 |
) |
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net |
|
|
(4,510 |
) |
|
|
(5,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
61,090 |
|
|
|
72,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(26,728 |
) |
|
|
(25,005 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
5,981 |
|
|
|
4,056 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,333 |
) |
|
|
(23,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income
taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
|
42,757 |
|
|
|
48,988 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(15,776 |
) |
|
|
(17,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
|
|
26,981 |
|
|
|
31,468 |
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (net of income
tax benefit (provision) of $35 and $(1,155), respectively) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
1,175 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of
income tax benefit of $117,428) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
26,926 |
|
|
$ |
(154,895 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.10 |
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares |
|
|
294,308 |
|
|
|
313,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
|
298,678 |
|
|
|
317,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
.025 |
|
|
$ |
.025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
4
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
490,408 |
|
|
$ |
446,782 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
76,400 |
|
|
|
97,747 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
67,256 |
|
|
|
68,327 |
|
Other |
|
|
31,017 |
|
|
|
37,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
665,081 |
|
|
|
650,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
|
|
1,227,556 |
|
|
|
1,226,192 |
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
|
|
1,307,832 |
|
|
|
1,288,515 |
|
Cemetery property, at cost |
|
|
1,366,323 |
|
|
|
1,355,654 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net |
|
|
1,043,073 |
|
|
|
950,174 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
264,366 |
|
|
|
249,581 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,122,205 |
|
|
|
1,123,888 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
697,871 |
|
|
|
700,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,694,307 |
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
213,961 |
|
|
$ |
231,693 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
35,996 |
|
|
|
20,716 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
18,203 |
|
|
|
20,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
268,160 |
|
|
|
272,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,271,857 |
|
|
|
1,186,485 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues |
|
|
535,489 |
|
|
|
535,384 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues |
|
|
783,520 |
|
|
|
792,485 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
157,481 |
|
|
|
138,677 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
317,778 |
|
|
|
326,985 |
|
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts |
|
|
2,060,380 |
|
|
|
2,015,811 |
|
Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
695,456 |
|
|
|
694,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 per share par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized,
295,454,597 and 294,808,872, issued and outstanding
(net of 48,606,563 and 48,962,063 treasury shares, at par) |
|
|
295,455 |
|
|
|
294,809 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
2,174,541 |
|
|
|
2,182,745 |
|
Unearned compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,593 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(935,979 |
) |
|
|
(962,905 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
70,169 |
|
|
|
70,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,604,186 |
|
|
|
1,581,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,694,307 |
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
5
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
26,926 |
|
|
$ |
(154,895 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
Premiums paid on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,538 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
25,091 |
|
|
|
20,645 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
2,356 |
|
|
|
2,347 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
13,555 |
|
|
|
16,064 |
|
(Gains) losses on dispositions and impairment charges, net |
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
5,741 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
Other non-cash adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,950 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in receivables |
|
|
7,407 |
|
|
|
(8,835 |
) |
Decrease in other assets |
|
|
3,591 |
|
|
|
28,740 |
|
Decrease in payables and other liabilities |
|
|
(27,566 |
) |
|
|
(5,532 |
) |
Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities |
|
|
3,833 |
|
|
|
12,470 |
|
Net effect of cemetery production and deliveries |
|
|
18,365 |
|
|
|
23,289 |
|
Other |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations |
|
|
80,214 |
|
|
|
125,661 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
80,214 |
|
|
|
127,114 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(19,049 |
) |
|
|
(20,559 |
) |
Proceeds from divestitures and sales of property and equipment |
|
|
7,463 |
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
Proceeds from dispositions of foreign operations, net of cash retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,597 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(14,662 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net (deposits) withdrawals of restricted funds and other |
|
|
(3,353 |
) |
|
|
6,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(23,701 |
) |
|
|
15,463 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(23,701 |
) |
|
|
15,409 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of debt |
|
|
(1,182 |
) |
|
|
(1,951 |
) |
Principal payments on capital leases |
|
|
(5,437 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
Early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,131 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
3,904 |
|
Purchase of Company common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,570 |
) |
Payments of dividends |
|
|
(7,371 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of subsidiary stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(12,771 |
) |
|
|
(109,663 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
43,626 |
|
|
|
32,708 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
446,782 |
|
|
|
287,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
490,408 |
|
|
$ |
320,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
6
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
stock, par |
|
|
excess of |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
stock |
|
|
value |
|
|
par value |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
deficit |
|
|
income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
|
|
|
Balance at
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
294,809 |
|
|
|
$ |
343,771 |
|
|
$ |
(48,962 |
) |
|
$ |
2,182,745 |
|
|
$ |
(3,593 |
) |
|
$ |
(962,905 |
) |
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared on common stock
($.025 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
Share based compensation earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of unearned
compensation for restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,593 |
) |
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option exercises and other |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock award |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
295,455 |
|
|
|
$ |
344,061 |
|
|
$ |
(48,606 |
) |
|
$ |
2,174,541 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(935,979 |
) |
|
$ |
70,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
7
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Operations
Service Corporation International (SCI or the Company) is a provider of deathcare products and
services, with a network of funeral service locations and cemeteries primarily operating in the
United States and Canada. The Company also owns a 25 percent equity interest in funeral operations
of an entity in France. Additionally, the Company owns Kenyon International Emergency Services
(Kenyon), a wholly owned subsidiary that specializes in providing disaster management services in
mass fatality incidents. Kenyons results are included in the Companys funeral operations
segment.
Funeral service locations provide all professional services relating to atneed funerals,
including the use of funeral facilities and motor vehicles, and preparation and embalming services.
Funeral related merchandise (including caskets, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers, and
other ancillary products and services) is sold at funeral service locations. Certain funeral
service locations contain crematoria. The Company also sells preneed funeral services whereby a
customer contractually agrees to the terms of a funeral to be performed in the future. The
Companys cemeteries provide cemetery property interment rights (including mausoleum spaces, lots,
and lawn crypts) and sell cemetery related merchandise (including stone and bronze memorials,
markers, and cremation memorialization products) and services (primarily merchandise installations
and burial openings and closings). Cemetery items are sold on an atneed or preneed basis.
Personnel at cemeteries perform interment services and provide management and maintenance of
cemetery grounds. Certain cemeteries operate crematoria, and certain cemeteries contain gardens
specifically for the purpose of cremation memorialization.
2.
Restatement of Financial Statements
The Company has restated herein its previously issued condensed
consolidated statement of operations and condensed consolidated
statement of cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, and its
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2006 and December 31,
2005. This restatement corrects errors related to 1) the
miscalculation of the Companys actuarially determined pension benefit obligation,
2) the accounting for certain leases related to funeral
home properties which were previously accounted
for as operating leases, but should have been accounted for as
capital leases, and 3) other out-of-period adjustments
previously identified by the Company but deemed to be not
material either individually or in the aggregate. All applicable
amounts related to this restatement have been reflected in the
Companys condensed consolidated financial statements and
disclosed in the notes to the condensed consolidated statements
in this amended Form 10-Q.
Pension
Benefit Obligation
As previously disclosed in the Companys 2004
Form 10-K, effective January 1, 2004, the Company
adopted a new accounting policy related to the accounting for
actuarial gains and losses in its pension plan. Under the new
accounting policy, the Company began to recognize such gains and
losses in its consolidated statement of operations as they
occurred. Previously, the Company amortized the difference
between actual and expected investment returns and other
actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the
extent that settlements with employees required earlier
recognition). As a result of this accounting change, the Company
initially recognized an after tax charge in its 2004 financial statements,
representing the cumulative effect of this accounting change, of
$33,599 ($54,873 before tax). This amount represented the
accumulated unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan
assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2004.
During the second
quarter of 2006, the Company discovered that
its actuarially determined pension benefit obligation
(PBO) had been incorrectly calculated for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002 as the impact
of pending lump sum cash settlements in the PBO calculation at
the end of each respective year had been inadvertently omitted.
The net aggregate pre-tax impact of this error over the four-year
period ended December 31, 2005 was $4,233. Had this PBO
calculation been correct at the time the Company adopted its new
accounting policy effective January 1, 2004, the Company
would have recognized an additional cumulative effect of
accounting change of $4,961 ($3,037 after tax) in its
December 31, 2004 consolidated statement of operations, as
the vast majority of the impact of previously unrecognized
pending lump sum settlements for 2002 and 2003 would have been
recognized in connection with the accounting policy change.
In
addition, in connection with the preparation of its second quarter
2006 condensed consolidated financial statements; the Company also identified an actuarial calculation error that
resulted in an understatement of pension expense of $1,940 in
the fourth quarter of 2005.
Lease Accounting
As
previously disclosed in the Companys initial first
quarter 2006
Form 10-Q filing, the Company determined, in the first quarter of 2006, that
certain of its leases related to funeral home properties that
were previously accounted for as operating leases should have
been accounted for as capital leases. The aggregate pre-tax
adjustment to the Companys previously issued consolidated financial
statements is $2,677, of which $657 relates to the three-year
period ended December 31, 2005. The remaining $2,020
relates to periods prior to January 1, 2003.
Other Out-of-Period Adjustments
The Company has also included other adjustments that were
previously identified but deemed to be not material either
individually or in the aggregate and therefore corrected in a
subsequent period. Such adjustments impacted the timing of
expense items, including income tax expenses previously
recognized in the first quarter of 2006. The cumulative amount
of such out-of-period adjustments was a net aggregate decrease
to pre-tax income of $1,079 and an additional $496 of income tax
expense for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Materiality Assessment
The Company evaluated the materiality of these
adjustments to
its previously issued interim and annual financial statements
including its interim financial statements as of and for the three months
ended March 31, 2006. The Company determined that the
impact of these errors was not material to its previously issued
consolidated financial statements; however, the Company has
determined that the cumulative correction of the errors in the
second quarter of 2006 would have been material to the current
period. Therefore, in accordance with paragraph 29 of
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28 and the
SECs Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) Topic 5-F, the
Company is restating its previously issued financial statements
to reflect the corrections of the errors in each of the periods
affected. As a result, the Company has restated its condensed consolidated
statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 and its condensed consolidated balance
sheet at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The effect of the adjustments
to the Companys condensed consolidated statement of operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously |
|
|
As |
|
|
previously |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
reported |
|
|
restated |
|
|
reported |
|
|
restated |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(355,995 |
) |
|
|
(354,191 |
) |
|
|
(350,215 |
) |
|
|
(349,642 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
85,803 |
|
|
|
87,607 |
|
|
|
97,227 |
|
|
|
97,800 |
|
General and
administrative expenses |
|
|
(22,007 |
) |
|
|
(22,007 |
) |
|
|
(19,716 |
) |
|
|
(19,707 |
) |
Other
operating expense |
|
|
(2,884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
56,402 |
|
|
|
61,090 |
|
|
|
71,770 |
|
|
|
72,352 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(26,724 |
) |
|
|
(26,728 |
) |
|
|
(24,656 |
) |
|
|
(25,005 |
) |
Income from continuing
operations before income
taxes and cumulative
effects of accounting
changes |
|
|
38,073 |
|
|
|
42,757 |
|
|
|
48,755 |
|
|
|
48,988 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(13,824 |
) |
|
|
(15,776 |
) |
|
|
(17,338 |
) |
|
|
(17,520 |
) |
Income from continuing
operations before
cumulative effects of
accounting changes |
|
|
24,249 |
|
|
|
26,981 |
|
|
|
31,417 |
|
|
|
31,468 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
24,194 |
|
|
|
26,926 |
|
|
$ |
(154,946 |
) |
|
$ |
(154,895 |
) |
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
Diluted |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
The effect of the above restatement on the Companys
previously reported condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
|
|
previously |
|
|
As |
|
|
previously |
|
|
As |
|
|
|
reported |
|
|
restated |
|
|
reported |
|
|
restated |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected condensed consolidated balance sheet data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost, net |
|
$ |
1,043,544 |
|
|
$ |
1,043,073 |
|
|
$ |
942,229 |
|
|
$ |
950,174 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
264,234 |
|
|
|
264,366 |
|
|
|
249,449 |
|
|
|
249,581 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
7,694,646 |
|
|
|
7,694,307 |
|
|
|
7,536,692 |
|
|
|
7,544,769 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
215,196 |
|
|
|
213,961 |
|
|
|
231,129 |
|
|
|
231,693 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
36,055 |
|
|
|
35,996 |
|
|
|
20,468 |
|
|
|
20,716 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,271,828 |
|
|
|
1,271,857 |
|
|
|
1,175,463 |
|
|
|
1,186,485 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
158,527 |
|
|
|
157,481 |
|
|
|
141,676 |
|
|
|
138,677 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
311,607 |
|
|
|
317,778 |
|
|
|
320,812 |
|
|
|
326,985 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
1,608,385 |
|
|
|
1,604,186 |
|
|
|
1,588,486 |
|
|
|
1,581,555 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
7,694,646 |
|
|
|
7,694,307 |
|
|
$ |
7,536,692 |
|
|
$ |
7,544,769 |
|
The effect of the above restatement on the Companys
previously reported condensed consolidated statement of cash
flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
As |
|
|
|
|
previously |
|
As |
|
|
reported |
|
restated |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
127,066 |
|
|
|
127,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(109,615 |
) |
|
|
(109,663 |
) |
The
restatement had no impact to the Companys net cash
provided by operating activities or net cash used in financing activities for
the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The Company has also reflected the effects of this restatement
in notes four, five, six, seven, eight and ten to these
condensed financial statements.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The
condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 include
the accounts of SCI and all majority-owned subsidiaries. These statements also include the
accounts of the funeral trusts, cemetery merchandise and services trusts and perpetual care trusts
in which the Company has a variable interest and is the primary
beneficiary. The interim condensed
consolidated financial statements are unaudited but include all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring accruals and any other adjustments, which management considers necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for these periods. These condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in a manner consistent with the accounting
policies described in the Companys amended Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005, unless otherwise disclosed
herein, and should be read in conjunction therewith. The accompanying year-end condensed balance
sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Operating
results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the full year period.
The Company has reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current period financial presentation with no effect on previously reported results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions as described in the Companys Form 10-K, as amended that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. As a result, actual results could differ
from these estimates.
4. Share-Based Compensation and Stockholders Equity
(All shares reported in whole numbers)
Share-Based Payment
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R
is a revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
8
Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25), Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. Among other items, SFAS 123R eliminates the use of the intrinsic value
method of accounting, and requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations the cost
of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date
fair value of those awards. The Company adopted SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006 and utilizes the
modified-prospective transition method.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for share-based payments using the intrinsic
value recognition method prescribed by APB 25. Because all of the Companys stock options were
granted at market value on the date of each grant, no stock-based compensation expense related to
stock options was reflected in net income prior to adopting SFAS 123R.
Under the modified-prospective transition method, the Company recognizes compensation expense
on a straight-line basis in its condensed consolidated financial statements issued subsequent to the date of
adoption for all share-based payments granted, modified or settled after December 31, 2005, as well
as for any awards that were granted prior to December 31, 2005 for which requisite service will be
provided after December 31, 2005. The compensation expense on awards granted prior to December
31, 2005 is recognized using the fair values determined for the pro forma disclosures on
stock-based compensation included in prior filings. The amount of compensation expense recognized
on awards that were not fully vested at the date of SFAS 123R adoption excludes the compensation
expense cumulatively recognized in the pro forma disclosures on stock-based compensation. Further,
the Company assumed no forfeitures on restricted shares granted prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R
due to the nature of the employees to whom the shares were granted, thus the Company recorded no
cumulative effect of accounting change upon the adoption of SFAS 123R.
Stock Benefit Plans
The Company maintains benefit plans whereby shares of its common stock may be issued pursuant
to the exercise of stock options or restricted stock granted to officers and key employees. The
Companys Amended 1996 Incentive Plan reserves 24,000,000 shares of common stock for outstanding
and future awards of stock options, restricted stock and other stock based awards to officers and
key employees of the Company. The Companys 1996 Non-qualified Incentive Plan reserves 8,700,000
shares of common stock for outstanding and future awards of nonqualified stock options to employees
who are not officers of the Company.
The benefit plans allow for options to be granted as either non-qualified or incentive stock
options. The options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys
common stock at the date of grant. The options are generally exercisable at a rate of 33 1/3% each
year unless alternative vesting methods are approved by the Companys Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors. Restricted stock awards generally vest at a rate of 33 1/3% each year. The
Company issues new shares for option exercises and treasury shares for restricted stock awards. At
March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, 2,800,550 and 4,856,459 shares, respectively, were reserved
for future option and restricted stock grants under these stock benefit plans.
Options of 1,868,163 and 1,959,283, respectively, were outstanding with alternative vesting
methods at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. These
shares were fully vested prior to the implementation of FAS 123R and as such compensation
expense for these options is not included in the Statement of
Operations for the period ended March 31, 2006.
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes option valuation model for estimating the fair value of
its stock options. This model allows the use of a range of assumptions related to volatility, the
risk-free interest rate, the expected life, and the dividend yield. The expected volatility
utilized in the valuation model is based on implied volatilities from traded options on the
Companys stock and the historical volatility of the Companys stock price. The decrease in
expected volatility from the three months ended March 31, 2005 to the three months ended March 31,
2006 is primarily the result of a lower implied volatility. Similarly, the dividend yield and the
expected holding period are both based on historical experience and managements estimate of future
events. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve based on the
expected life of the grant in effect at the time of grant. The fair values of the Companys stock
options are calculated using the following weighted average assumptions based on the methods
described above for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005:
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
March 31, |
Assumptions |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
43.3 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Expected holding period |
|
5.6 years |
|
5.5 years |
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R, income from continuing operations before income
taxes was reduced by $1,433, income from continuing operations and net income were both reduced by
$931 and basic and diluted earnings per share were both reduced by less than $.01 for the three
months ended March 31, 2006.
Results
for the first quarter of 2005 have not been restated for
SFAS 123R. If, prior to January 1, 2006,
the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense for its stock option plans, based on the
fair value of awards at the grant dates, net loss and loss per share would have changed for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 to the following pro forma amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
note 2 |
|
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(154,895 |
) |
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value
based method, net of related tax expense |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(155,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value
based method, net of related tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma basic loss per share |
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported |
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
Deduct: Total pro forma stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value
based method, net of related tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma diluted loss per share |
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The tax benefit associated with
this additional compensation expense would have been $211 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Prior to the implementation of SFAS 123R, the Company computed stock-based compensation cost
for employees eligible to retire over the three-year standard vesting period of the grants. Upon
adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company amortizes new option grants to such retirement-eligible
employees immediately upon grant, consistent with the retirement vesting acceleration provisions of
these grants. If the Company had historically computed stock-based compensation cost for these
employees under this accelerated method, $559 or less than $.01 per diluted share of after-tax
compensation cost would have been accelerated and cumulatively included in the pro forma expense
above through March 31, 2005.
10
The following table shows a summary of information with respect to stock option and restricted
share compensation for 2006 and restricted share compensation for 2005, which are included in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations for those respective periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Total pretax share-based compensation expense
included in net income (loss) |
|
$ |
2,145 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
Income tax benefit related to share-based
compensation included in net income (loss) |
|
$ |
778 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
Stock Options
The following tables set forth certain stock option information:
(Shares reported in whole numbers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
24,250,429 |
|
|
$ |
9.21 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,602,800 |
|
|
|
8.24 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(298,653 |
) |
|
|
4.31 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(11,150 |
) |
|
|
6.88 |
|
Expired |
|
|
(557,253 |
) |
|
|
21.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
24,986,173 |
|
|
$ |
8.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
22,436,321 |
|
|
$ |
9.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value for stock options outstanding and
exercisable was $51,198 and $50,328, respectively.
(Shares reported in whole numbers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
|
Options exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Range of |
|
Outstanding at |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Exercisable at |
|
|
Average |
|
Exercise Price |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
$0.00 3.00 |
|
|
2,068,212 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
|
2,068,212 |
|
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
3.01 4.00 |
|
|
5,641,334 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
|
5,641,334 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
4.01 6.00 |
|
|
4,374,512 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
|
|
4,374,512 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
6.01 9.00 |
|
|
6,414,017 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
7.11 |
|
|
|
3,864,165 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
9.01 15.00 |
|
|
2,898,003 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
13.73 |
|
|
|
2,898,003 |
|
|
|
13.73 |
|
15.01 21.00 |
|
|
2,285,160 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
19.18 |
|
|
|
2,285,160 |
|
|
|
19.18 |
|
21.01 38.00 |
|
|
1,304,935 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
35.05 |
|
|
|
1,304,935 |
|
|
|
35.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.00 38.00 |
|
|
24,986,173 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.93 |
|
|
|
22,436,321 |
|
|
$ |
9.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other information pertaining to option activity during the three months ended March
31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted |
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
Total fair value of stock options vested |
|
$ |
1,987 |
|
|
$ |
6,003 |
|
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised |
|
$ |
1,112 |
|
|
$ |
3,098 |
|
11
The Company calculated its historical pool of windfall tax benefits by comparing the book
expense for individual stock grants and the related tax deduction for options granted after January
1, 1995. Adjustments were made to exclude windfall tax benefits which were not realized due to the
Companys net operating loss position. The Company has completed this calculation and has
determined an additional paid in capital pool of $2,140.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006, cash received from the exercise of stock options
was $1,219. As of March 31, 2006, the unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options
of $6,415 is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.1 years.
Restricted Shares
Restricted shares awarded under the Amended 1996 Incentive Plan were 355,500 in the first quarter
of 2006 and 498,800 in the first quarter of 2005. The weighted average fair market value per share
at the date of grant for shares granted during the first quarter of 2006 and 2005 was $8.24 and
$6.90, respectively. The fair market value of the stock, as
determined on the grant date, is being amortized
and charged to income (with similar credits to capital in excess of par value) generally over the
average period during which the restrictions lapse. At March 31, 2006, unrecognized compensation
expense related to restricted shares totaling $5,811 is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.8 years. The Company recognized compensation cost of $712 in the first quarter
of 2006 and $447 in the first quarter of 2005 related to the restricted shares of this Plan.
Restricted share activity for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
(Shares reported in whole numbers) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested restricted shares at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
779,850 |
|
|
$ |
6.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
355,500 |
|
|
|
8.24 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(308,867 |
) |
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
826,483 |
|
|
$ |
7.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Authorization
The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $1 per share par
value. No preferred shares were issued as of March 31, 2006. At March 31, 2006 and December 31,
2005, 500,000,000 common shares of $1 par value were authorized. The Company had 295,454,597 and
294,808,872 common shares issued and outstanding, net of 48,606,563 and 48,962,063 common shares
held in treasury at par at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Share Purchase Rights Plan
The Companys preferred share purchase rights plan declares a dividend of one preferred share
purchase right for each share of common stock outstanding. The rights are exercisable in the event
certain investors attempt to acquire 20% or more of the common stock of the Company and entitle the
rights holders to purchase certain securities of the Company or the acquiring company. The rights,
which are redeemable by the Company for $.01 per right, expire in July 2008 unless otherwise
extended.
12
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other |
|
|
|
translation |
|
|
Unrealized gains |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
|
adjustment |
|
|
and losses |
|
|
income |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,499 |
|
Activity in 2006 |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
Increase in net unrealized gains associated with
available-for-sale securities of the trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,210 |
|
|
|
16,210 |
|
Reclassification of net unrealized gains activity
attributable to the non-controlling interest holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,210 |
) |
|
|
(16,210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
70,169 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
70,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars using the
current exchange rate. The U.S. dollar amount that arises from such translation, as well as
exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a long-term investment nature, are included
in the cumulative currency translation adjustments in Accumulated other comprehensive income.
Income taxes are generally not provided for foreign currency translation.
The components of Comprehensive income (loss) are as follows for the three months ended March
31, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
note 2 |
|
|
|
(Restated)
note 2 |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
26,926 |
|
|
$ |
(154,895 |
) |
Total other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
65,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
26,596 |
|
|
$ |
(89,594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends
On January 31, 2006, the Company paid a cash dividend of $7,371 to shareholders of record at the
close of business on January 16, 2006. In the first quarter of 2006, the Companys Board of
Directors approved a cash dividend of $.025 per common share that was
paid on April 28, 2006 based on the Companys fourth
quarter 2005 financial results. At March
31, 2006, this dividend totaling $7,329 was recorded in Accrued Liabilities and Capital in Excess
of Par Value in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Subsequent to March 31, 2006, the companys
Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $.025 per common share
based on the companys first quarter 2006 financial results.
13
5. Debt
Debt as of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
(Restated) |
|
|
|
note 2 |
|
|
note 2 |
|
7.2% notes due June 2006 |
|
$ |
10,698 |
|
|
$ |
10,698 |
|
6.875% notes due October 2007 |
|
|
13,497 |
|
|
|
13,497 |
|
6.5% notes due March 2008 |
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
7.7% notes due April 2009 |
|
|
341,635 |
|
|
|
341,635 |
|
7.875% debentures due February 2013 |
|
|
55,627 |
|
|
|
55,627 |
|
6.75% notes due April 2016 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.0% notes due June 2017 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest rates
from 4.75% to 5.25%, conversion prices from $13.02 to $50.00 per share |
|
|
22,213 |
|
|
|
22,213 |
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
|
110,998 |
|
|
|
11,425 |
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050 |
|
|
28,406 |
|
|
|
29,588 |
|
Unamortized pricing discounts and other |
|
|
(20,221 |
) |
|
|
(22,482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
1,307,853 |
|
|
|
1,207,201 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(35,996 |
) |
|
|
(20,716 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,271,857 |
|
|
$ |
1,186,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of debt at March 31, 2006 were comprised primarily of the 7.2% notes due
June 2006, convertible debentures and capital leases. The Companys consolidated debt had a
weighted average interest rate of 7.21% at March 31, 2006 and
7.11% at December 31, 2005.
Approximately 95% and 99% of the total debt had a fixed interest rate at March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively.
Capital Leases
In the
first quarter of 2006, the Company acquired $105,085 of
transportation equipment utilizing capital leases, of which $102,322 were classified as operating
leases in prior periods. See additional information regarding these
leases in note nine to these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Bank Credit Agreements
The Companys bank credit facility matures in August of 2007 and provides a total lending
commitment of $200,000, including a sublimit of $175,000 for letters of credit. The Company will
commence negotiations on an amendment or a new credit facility during 2006. As of March 31, 2006,
the Company has no cash borrowings under this credit facility, but has used it to support $51,193
of letters of credit. The credit facility provides the Company with flexibility for acquisitions,
dividends, and share repurchases. It is secured by the stock of the Companys domestic
subsidiaries and these domestic subsidiaries have guaranteed the Companys indebtedness associated
with this credit facility. The subsidiary guarantee is a guarantee of payment of the outstanding
amount of the total lending commitment. It covers the term of the credit facility, including
extensions of our letters of credit, and totaled a maximum potential amount of $51,193 and $54,727
at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. The credit facility contains certain
financial covenants, including a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, maximum
capital expenditure limitations, minimum net worth requirements and certain cash distribution
restrictions. As of March 31, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants.
Interest rates for the outstanding borrowings are based on various indices as determined by the
Company. The Company also pays a quarterly fee on the unused commitment that ranges from 0.25% to
0.50%.
14
Early Extinguishment
In the first quarter of 2005, the Company purchased $7,131 aggregate principal amount of its 7.70%
notes due in the open market. As a result of this transaction, the Company recognized a loss of
$1,207 recorded in loss on early extinguishment of debt in its condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
6. Retirement Plans
The components of net periodic pension plan benefit cost for the three months ended March 31 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Restated (note 2) |
|
|
Restated (note 2) |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
|
$ |
2,027 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(1,806 |
) |
Actuarial
loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
981 |
|
|
$ |
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Segment Reporting
The Companys operations are both product based and geographically based. The Companys reportable
segments include its funeral operations and its cemetery operations and collectively represent 100%
of the Companys revenues.
The Companys reportable segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
Funeral |
|
Cemetery |
|
segments |
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
302,984 |
|
|
$ |
138,814 |
|
|
$ |
441,798 |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
319,451 |
|
|
$ |
127,991 |
|
|
$ |
447,442 |
|
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
(Restated note 2) |
|
$ |
65,396 |
|
|
$ |
22,211 |
|
|
$ |
87,607 |
|
2005
(Restated note 2) |
|
$ |
80,126 |
|
|
$ |
17,674 |
|
|
$ |
97,800 |
|
The following table reconciles gross profit from reportable segments to the Companys
consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
(Restated)
note 2 |
|
|
|
(Restated)
note 2 |
|
Gross profit from reportable segments |
|
$ |
87,607 |
|
|
$ |
97,800 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(22,007 |
) |
|
|
(19,707 |
) |
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net |
|
|
(4,510 |
) |
|
|
(5,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
61,090 |
|
|
|
72,352 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(26,728 |
) |
|
|
(25,005 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
5,981 |
|
|
|
4,056 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
|
(1,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income
taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change |
|
$ |
42,757 |
|
|
$ |
48,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys geographic areas include North America and Other Foreign. North America
includes funeral and cemetery operations in the United States and Canada. Other Foreign consists
of the Companys operations in Singapore and Germany. Results from the Companys funeral and
cemetery businesses in Argentina, Uruguay, and Chile, which were sold in 2005, are classified as
15
discontinued operations for all periods presented. The Company conducts both funeral and cemetery
operations in North America and funeral operations in Other Foreign geographic areas.
The Companys geographic area information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North |
|
|
|
|
|
|
America |
|
Other Foreign |
|
Total |
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
438,890 |
|
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
|
$ |
441,798 |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
444,177 |
|
|
$ |
3,265 |
|
|
$ |
447,442 |
|
|
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
(4,510 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,510 |
) |
2005 |
|
$ |
(5,741 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,741 |
) |
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
(Restated note 2) |
|
$ |
60,485 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
61,090 |
|
2005
(Restated note 2) |
|
$ |
71,835 |
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
72,352 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
(Restated note 2) |
|
$ |
25,077 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
25,091 |
|
2005
(Restated note 2) |
|
$ |
20,577 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
20,645 |
|
Included in the North America figures above are the following United States amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
410,482 |
|
|
$ |
416,699 |
|
Operating
income (Restated note 2) |
|
$ |
55,995 |
|
|
$ |
65,176 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization (Restated note 2) |
|
$ |
23,474 |
|
|
$ |
19,391 |
|
8. Supplementary Information
Prior to the fourth quarter of 2005, certain costs, specifically salaries and facility costs, were
allocated based upon each of the respective segments revenue components within goods and services.
Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company refined its allocation of the costs
described above to more accurately reflect the cost of goods and services for its funeral and
cemetery segments. Such costs are now allocated based on an hourly factor, which represents the
average amount of time spent by employees when selling or providing goods and services to a
consumer. The Company has made certain disclosure reclassifications to comparative prior periods
to conform to the current period presentation. The disclosure reclassifications made to these
prior periods to conform to the current period presentation have no
effect on the Companys condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations or statement of cash flows.
16
The detail of certain income statement accounts is as follows for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Restated)
note 2 |
|
|
(Restated)
note 2 |
|
North America goods and services revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
120,173 |
|
|
$ |
140,334 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
89,452 |
|
|
|
82,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goods |
|
|
209,625 |
|
|
|
223,102 |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
171,920 |
|
|
|
169,198 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
41,215 |
|
|
|
36,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services |
|
|
213,135 |
|
|
|
205,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America goods and services revenues |
|
|
422,760 |
|
|
|
428,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International revenues |
|
|
2,908 |
|
|
|
3,265 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
16,130 |
|
|
|
15,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
441,798 |
|
|
$ |
447,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America goods and services costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goods |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
56,100 |
|
|
$ |
53,502 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
37,343 |
|
|
|
34,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of goods |
|
|
93,443 |
|
|
|
88,107 |
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
88,856 |
|
|
|
92,491 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
23,477 |
|
|
|
23,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services |
|
|
112,333 |
|
|
|
116,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America goods and services costs |
|
|
205,776 |
|
|
|
204,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International costs and expenses |
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
2,748 |
|
Overhead and other expenses |
|
|
146,112 |
|
|
|
142,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
$ |
354,191 |
|
|
$ |
349,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The Companys leases principally relate to funeral home facilities and transportation equipment.
Rental expense for operating leases was
$7,375 and $14,043 for the
quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of March 31, 2006, future minimum lease
payments for non-cancelable operating and capital leases exceeding one year are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
Remainder of 2006 |
|
$ |
6,456 |
|
|
$ |
19,695 |
|
2007 |
|
|
7,581 |
|
|
|
23,004 |
|
2008 |
|
|
7,116 |
|
|
|
18,878 |
|
2009 |
|
|
6,791 |
|
|
|
15,179 |
|
2010 |
|
|
5,617 |
|
|
|
37,745 |
|
2011 and thereafter |
|
|
54,995 |
|
|
|
30,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
88,556 |
|
|
|
145,026 |
|
Less: Subleases |
|
|
(1,644) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
86,912 |
|
|
$ |
145,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Interest on capital leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payable on capital leases |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
110,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To eliminate the variable interest rate risk in the Companys operating margins and improve
the transparency of our financial statements, we amended certain of our transportation lease
agreements in the first quarter of 2006. Based on the amended terms, these leases have been
classified as capital leases as of March 31, 2006 and are presented as such in the table above.
For additional information, see note five to these condensed consolidated financial statements.
17
Representations and Warranties
As of March 31, 2006, the Company has contingent obligations of $33,177 resulting from the
Companys international asset sales and joint venture transactions. In some cases, the Company has
agreed to guarantee certain representations and warranties made in such disposition transactions
with letters of credit or interest-bearing cash investments. The Company has interest-bearing cash
investments of $5,908 included in Deferred charges and other assets collateralizing certain of
these contingent obligations. The Company believes it is remote that it will ultimately be required
to fund to third parties claims against these representations and warranties above the carrying
value of the liability.
In March 2004, the Company disposed of its funeral operations in France to a newly formed,
third party company. As a result of this sale, the Company recognized $35,768 of contractual
obligations related to representations, warranties, and other indemnifications in accordance with
the provisions of FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. During the first quarter of 2006, the
Company paid $481 to settle certain tax and litigation matters. The remaining obligation of
$23,657 at March 31, 2006 represents the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original |
|
|
|
|
Maximum potential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
|
amount of future |
|
|
Carrying value as |
|
|
|
obligation |
|
|
Time limit |
|
payments |
|
|
of March 31, 2006 |
|
Tax reserve liability |
|
$ |
18,610 |
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
2006 30 million
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation provision |
|
|
7,765 |
|
|
Until entire
resolution of (i)
the relevant claims
or (ii) settlement
of the claim by the
purchaser at the
request of the
vendor
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee litigation provision |
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
December 31, 2006
(for all claims
other than those
relating to tax and
social security
matters) one month
after expiration of
the statutory
period of
limitations for tax
and social
security
matters.
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
6,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VAT taxes |
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
One month after the
expiration of
statutory period of
limitations
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
Until entire
resolution of (i)
the relevant claims
or (ii) settlement
of the claim by the
purchaser at the
request of the
vendor
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
40,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Deductible of majority equity owner
|
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is 20 million or $24,152
at March 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
The potential maximum exposure for these two items combined is 40 million or $48,304
at March 31, 2006. |
Litigation
The Company is a party to various litigation matters, investigations and proceedings. For each of
its outstanding legal matters, the Company evaluates the merits of the case, its exposure to the
matter, possible legal or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. The
Company intends to defend itself in the lawsuits described herein, however, if the Company
determines that an unfavorable outcome is probable and can be reasonably estimated, it establishes
the necessary accruals. Certain insurance policies held by the Company may reduce cash outflows
with respect to an adverse outcome of certain of these litigation matters. The Company accrues such
insurance recoveries when they become probable of being paid and can be reasonably estimated.
18
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation International, et al; Civil Action
04-MD-1609; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The 2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and
consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation of three lawsuitsEdgar Neufeld v.
Service Corporation International, et al; Cause No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL; In the United States
District Court for the District of Nevada; and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation
International, et. al.; Cause No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL; In the United States District Court for the
District of Nevada; and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation International, et. al.; Cause No.
04-CV-20114; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The 2003
Securities Lawsuit names as defendants the Company and several of the Companys current and former
executive officers or directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class action alleging
that the defendants failed to disclose the unlawful treatment of human remains and gravesites at
two cemeteries in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida. Since the action is in its
preliminary stages, no discovery has occurred, and the Company cannot quantify its ultimate
liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
David Hijar v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., SCI Funeral Services, Inc., and Service
Corporation International; In the County Court of El Paso, County, Texas, County Court at Law
Number Three; Cause Number 2002-740, with an interlocutory appeal pending in the El Paso Court of
Appeals, No. 08-05-00182-CV, and a mandamus proceeding which has been denied by the El Paso Court
of Appeals, No. 08-05-00335-CV (collectively, the Hijar Lawsuit). The Hijar Lawsuit involves a
state-wide class action brought on behalf of all persons, entities and organizations who purchased
funeral services from the Company or its subsidiaries in Texas at any time since March 18, 1998.
Plaintiffs allege that federal and Texas funeral related regulations and/or statutes (Rules)
required the Company to disclose its markups on all items obtained from third parties in connection
with funeral service contracts and that the failure to make certain disclosures of markups resulted
in breach of contract and other legal claims. The Plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount
of monetary damages. The plaintiffs also seek attorneys fees, costs of court, pre- and
post-judgment interest, and unspecified injunctive and declaratory relief. The Company denies
that the plaintiffs have standing to sue for violations of the Texas Occupations Code or the Rules;
denies that plaintiffs have standing to sue for violations under the relevant regulations and
statutes; denies that any breaches of contractual terms occurred; and on other grounds denies
liability on all of the plaintiffs claims. Finally, the Company denies that the Hijar Lawsuit
satisfies the requirements for class certification.
In May 2004, the trial court heard summary judgment cross-motions filed by the Company and
Plaintiff Hijar (at that time, the only plaintiff). The trial court granted Hijars Motion for
partial summary judgment and denied the Companys motion. In its partial summary judgment order,
the trial court made certain findings to govern the case, consistent with its summary judgement
ruling. The Companys request for rehearing was denied.
During the course of the Hijar Lawsuit, the parties have disputed the proper scope and
substance of discovery. Following briefing by both parties and evidentiary hearings, the trial
court entered three orders against the Company that are the subject of appellate review: (a) a
January 2005 discovery sanctions order; (b) an April 2005 discovery sanctions order; and (c) an
April 2005 certification order, certifying a class and two subclasses. On April 29, 2005, the
Company filed an appeal regarding the certification order and, concurrently with its initial brief
in that appeal, filed a separate mandamus proceeding regarding the sanctions orders. In the
certification appeal, briefing has concluded, and the court of appeals heard oral arguments on
April 4, 2006. In the mandamus proceeding, the court of appeals denied the mandamus petition in
January 2006, and denied rehearing on March 15, 2006. The Company is considering further steps,
including the option of pursuing mandamus relief from the Supreme Court of Texas.
19
Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation International, et al; the plaintiffs
counsel in the Hijar Lawsuit initiated an arbitration claim raising similar issues in California
and filed in November 2004 a case styled Mary Louise Baudino, et al v. Service Corporation
International, et al; in Los Angeles County Superior Court; Case No. BC324007 (Baudino Lawsuit).
The Baudino Lawsuit makes claims similar to those made in the Hijar lawsuit. However, the Baudino
Lawsuit seeks a nation-wide class of plaintiffs. The Baudino Lawsuit is in its early stages and
discovery is in its infancy.
The Company is a defendant in three related class action antitrust cases filed in 2005. The
first case is Cause No 4:05-CV-03394; Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. v. Service Corporation
International, et al; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Houston (Funeral Consumers Case). This is a purported class action on behalf of casket consumers
throughout the United States alleging that the Company and several other companies involved in the
funeral industry violated federal antitrust laws and state consumer laws by engaging in various
anti-competitive conduct associated with the sale of caskets. A related class action lawsuit
(Leoncio Solis v. Service Corporation International; In the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas Houston Division) was consolidated into the Funeral Consumers Case in
the fourth quarter of 2005.
The Company is also currently a defendant in Ralph Lee Fancher v. Service Corporation
International, et al; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Houston Division, and Cause No. 4:05-CV-00246. This lawsuit, which was previously consolidated
with the Funeral Consumers Case, makes the same allegations as the Funeral Consumers Case and is
also brought against several other companies involved in the funeral industry. The case is a
purported class action on behalf of casket consumers throughout the United States and alleges that
the Company violated the Tennessee Trade Practices Act. On May 4, 2006, plaintiffs in the Fancher
case filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal requesting that the case be dismissed without prejudice.
The Company is also a defendant in Cause No. 4:05-CV-03399; Pioneer Valley Casket, et al v.
Service Corporation International, et al. In the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Texas Houston Division. This lawsuit makes the same allegations as the Funeral
Consumers Case and is also brought against several other companies involved in the funeral
industry. Unlike the Funeral Consumers Case, this case is a purported class action on behalf of all
independent casket distributors that are in the business or were in the business any time between
July 18, 2001 to the present.
The funeral and casket antitrust lawsuits seek injunctions, unspecified amounts of monetary
damages, and treble damages. In the Funeral Consumers Case, plaintiffs are seeking the Courts
permission to add a claim to enjoin the Company and the Alderwoods Group, Inc. from closing the
proposed merger discussed on pages 22 and 23 herein. Since the litigation is in its preliminary
stages, the Company cannot quantify its ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
In addition to the funeral and casket antitrust lawsuits, the Company has received Civil
Investigative Demands, dated in August 2005 and February 2006, from the Attorney General of
Maryland on behalf of itself and other state attorneys general, who have commenced an investigation
of alleged anti-competitive practices in the funeral industry. The Company has also received
similar Civil Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General of Florida and Connecticut.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above under the caption Litigation cannot be
determined at this time. The Company intends to aggressively defend all of the above lawsuits;
however, an adverse decision in one or more of such matters could have a material adverse effect on
the Company, its financial condition, results of operation and cash flows.
10. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per common share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net
income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other obligations to issue
common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common
shares that then shared in the Companys earnings (losses).
20
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations
is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
|
(Restated) note 2 |
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change (numerator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting change basic |
|
$ |
26,981 |
|
|
$ |
31,468 |
|
After tax interest on convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting change diluted |
|
$ |
26,981 |
|
|
$ |
31,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) (numerator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) basic |
|
$ |
26,926 |
|
|
$ |
(154,895 |
) |
After tax interest on convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) diluted |
|
$ |
26,926 |
|
|
$ |
(154,883 |
) |
|
Weighted average shares (denominator): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
294,308 |
|
|
|
313,490 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
4,251 |
|
|
|
4,086 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
298,678 |
|
|
|
317,751 |
|
|
Income from continuing operations before cumulative
effect of accounting change per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.10 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.10 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change per share, net
of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(.59 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(.59 |
) |
|
Net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
Diluted |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
(.49 |
) |
|
The computation of diluted EPS excludes outstanding stock options and convertible debt in
certain periods in which the inclusion of such options and debt would be antidilutive in the
periods presented. Total options and convertible debentures not currently included in the
computation of dilutive EPS are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Antidilutive options |
|
|
7,479 |
|
|
|
8,912 |
|
Antidilutive convertible debentures |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock equivalents excluded from
computation |
|
|
8,138 |
|
|
|
9,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
11. Gains (Losses) on Dispositions and Impairment Charges, Net
As dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or losses on the sale of such
businesses are recognized in the income statement line item Gains (losses) on dispositions and
impairment charges, net. Additionally, as dispositions occur pursuant to the Companys ongoing
asset sale programs, adjustments are made through this income statement line item to reflect the
difference between actual proceeds received from the sale compared to the original impairment
estimates.
Gains (losses) on dispositions and impairment charges, net for the three months ended March
31, consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Gains on dispositions |
|
$ |
1,432 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
Impairment losses for assets held for sale |
|
|
(5,942 |
) |
|
|
(7,118 |
) |
Changes to previously estimated impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4,510 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Discontinued Operations
During 2005, the Company disposed of its funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and Uruguay
and its cemetery operations in Chile. Accordingly, the operations in these countries are
classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The Companys current year discontinued operations are attributable to a remaining income tax
receivable of approximately $15,859 denominated in Chilean pesos. This receivable is fully hedged;
therefore, the Company has no foreign exchange rate risk associated with it. The fair market value
hedge, which is effective, is recorded at market value at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Currency fluctuations associated with this hedge resulted in a loss of $55, net of a tax benefit of
$35, which is included in Income from discontinued operations in the Companys condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006. This hedge will
expire June 30, 2006.
The results of the Companys discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,177 |
|
Costs and other expenses |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(6,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
2,330 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(1,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
$ |
1,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes during 2005 was negatively impacted by certain net operating
loss valuations and a tax accrual release related to the sale of the Companys operations in
Argentina and Uruguay.
13. Subsequent Event
On April 3, 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding
shares of Alderwoods Group, Inc. (Alderwoods) for $20.00 per share in cash. Alderwoods operated
584 funeral homes, 73 cemeteries and 60 combination funeral home and cemetery locations in North
America at March 25, 2006.
This transaction is valued at approximately $1,230,000, which includes approximately $374,000
of Alderwoods debt. The Company has received a commitment letter from JPMorgan for an $850,000
bridge facility and believes it also has access to debt markets. The Company expects to fund this
transaction with at least $400 million of cash on hand as well as through the utilization of term
loans and bonds.
This acquisition is subject to, among other conditions, antitrust clearance and approval of
the Alderwoods stockholders. It is anticipated that the acquisition will be completed by the end
of 2006, however there can be no assurance that the acquisition will be completed by this time or
at all.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
Service Corporation International (SCI or the Company) is North Americas leading provider of
deathcare products and services, with a network of 1,053 funeral homes and 354 cemeteries within 42
states and seven Canadian provinces at March 31, 2006. We also own a 25 percent equity interest in
AKH Luxco S.C.A., more commonly referred to as Pompes Funebres Générales (PFG), Frances leading
provider of funeral services. Additionally, Kenyon International Emergency Services (Kenyon), a
wholly-owned subsidiary specializes in providing disaster management services in mass fatality
incidents. We also have funeral homes in Germany and Singapore that we intend to exit when
economic values and conditions are conducive to a sale.
22
Competitive Strengths
In recent years, we have improved both our operating margins and operating cash flows by
introducing more efficient systems and processes, effectively streamlining our infrastructure, and
strengthening our balance sheet. While continuing to pursue additional efficiencies, we now intend
to improve shareholder value by (1) seeking enhancement opportunities through disciplined
acquisition activities and construction of new properties and (2) increasing volume and
profitability at existing businesses.
In 2006, our acquisition strategy has focused on transactions that would most effectively
enhance our position as North Americas premier funeral and cemetery services provider. Consistent
with this objective to expand scale and scope, on April 3, 2006, we announced our execution of a
definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding shares of the Alderwoods Group, Inc.
(Alderwoods), the second largest operator of funeral homes and cemeteries in North America. This
transaction will allow us the ability to serve a number of new, complementary areas, while enabling
us to capitalize on significant synergies and operating efficiencies. Based upon businesses owned
at December 31, 2005, the combined companies will have an expanded geographic footprint that would
include a network of 1,712 funeral homes and 490 cemeteries (of which 243 are combination funeral
homes and cemeteries) in 48 states, eight Canadian provinces and Puerto Rico. This transaction is
expected to close by the end of 2006; however, it is subject to antitrust clearance and approval by
the shareholders of Alderwoods.
We believe that the success of this combination can be achieved by optimizing our competitive
strengths, which will be enhanced by capitalizing on the best practices and processes of both
companies. These competitive strengths include:
|
|
|
Industry leadership, which allows us to establish standardization and industry best
practices; |
|
|
|
|
A network of funeral homes and cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach,
which has provided efficiencies of scale and enabled us to pursue strategic affinity
partnerships with national groups that can influence their members choice of deathcare
provider; |
|
|
|
|
A North America brand, Dignity Memorial®, that stands for integrity, respect
and service excellence wherever we do business and supports the creation of enduring family
and community relationships with SCI. We are currently developing our most recent brand,
Funeraria del AngelTM, that has been established to serve North Americas
growing Hispanic population; |
|
|
|
|
More comprehensive product and service offerings than traditional industry practice such
as bereavement travel discounts, grief counseling for survivors and assistance with legal
and other family business details and packaged plans for funerals, cemeteries and
cremations that are designed to simplify customer decision-making; |
|
|
|
|
A reputation of service excellence achieved through a culture of disciplined consistency
across our network of businesses and a commitment to attract, develop and retain a superior
team of people; |
|
|
|
Holding a level of financial strength and flexibility that allows us to reward
shareholders through quarterly dividends and share repurchases while maintaining a prudent
capital structure and allowing us to reinvest in our business; and |
|
|
|
|
Retaining a strong preneed backlog that not only contributes to profitability and volume
but increases the predictability and stability of our revenues and cash flow. |
We also completed two business acquisitions, which included five funeral homes and one
cemetery, during the three months ended March 31, 2006. These acquisitions were selected because
of their strategic fit with our initiatives to target customers who yield high returns and to
combine existing stand-alone funeral homes with cemeteries.
23
Opportunity for Growth
Over the long-term, we believe that our industry leadership, along with superior brand, reputation,
financial strength and geographic reach, will result in expanded growth opportunities with the
aging of the Baby Boom generation. During the short-term, we believe we can grow our existing
businesses by centralization and standardization of our processes. This includes aligning preneed
and pricing strategies with customer segments and expanding customer segments in which we excel.
We believe we can expand operating and financial growth by replacing the industrys
traditional one-size-fits-all approach with an operating strategy that considers customers personal
needs and preferences. Using this approach, we will tailor our product and service offerings based
on four variables: convenience and location, religious and ethnic customs, quality and prestige,
and price. By identifying these customer bases, we can re-deploy resources to the most attractive
customer segments. In 2006, we are continuing to refine our pricing, product, and marketing
strategies to support this approach.
Understanding customer attitude and preferences is essential to our business. We believe
customers are less focused on products and more concerned about creating a meaningful funeral
service. Accordingly, we have realigned our pricing strategy from products to service offerings
and as such have focused on services that are most valued by our customers. Our initial results
have been favorable as evidenced by the increase in the North America comparable average per
funeral service in the first quarter of 2006. See a more detailed discussion regarding average
revenue in Results of Operations within this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
With our industry leadership, geographic reach, and financial strength, we are well-positioned
to deliver superior service to an expanding customer base while achieving profitable growth for our
shareholders.
Key Performance Indicators
Overview
We utilize various key operating and financial measures to monitor the performance of our business
and to respond quickly to performance changes as necessary. Key performance indicators in our
cemetery segment include preneed and atneed sales production and cemetery operating profit. Key
performance indicators in our funeral segment include preneed sales production (both insurance and
trust), case volume, average revenue per funeral service, and funeral operating profit. See a more
detailed discussion regarding funeral and cemetery operating profit, funeral case volume and
average revenue per funeral in Results of Operations within this Managements Discussion and
Analysis.
Our key financial performance indicator is cash flow from operating activities
(CFOA). CFOA is discussed in more detail in the Financial Condition and Liquidity discussion
within this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Preneed Production and Maturities
In addition to selling our products and services to client families at the time of need, we sell
price guaranteed preneed funeral and cemetery trust contracts which provide for future funeral or
cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and cemetery services or merchandise will
not be provided until some time in the future, most states and provinces require that all or a
portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid
into trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service is performed. In certain situations,
where permitted by state or provincial laws, we post a surety bond as financial assurance for a
certain amount of the preneed funeral or cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust
accounts.
24
The tables below detail the North America results of trust funded preneed funeral and cemetery
production and maturities for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 and the associated number
of preneed funeral contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Funeral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed Trust Funded (including bonded): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Production |
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Production (number of contracts) |
|
|
7,902 |
|
|
|
9,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Maturities |
|
$ |
46.4 |
|
|
$ |
45.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Maturities (number of contracts) |
|
|
10,676 |
|
|
|
11,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
77.4 |
|
|
$ |
74.4 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sales Production |
|
$ |
133.4 |
|
|
$ |
129.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Production Deferred to Backlog: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
36.4 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Sales Production Deferred to Backlog |
|
$ |
79.1 |
|
|
$ |
77.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognized from Backlog: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
29.9 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue Recognized from Backlog |
|
$ |
68.4 |
|
|
$ |
68.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where permitted, customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by purchasing a life
insurance or annuity policy from third party insurance companies, for which we earn a commission as
general agent for the insurance company. We do not offer funding for preneed cemetery contracts
with insurance policies. The policy amount of the insurance contract between the customer and the
third party insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed funeral contract.
However, we do not reflect the unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our
consolidated balance sheet.
The table below details the North America results of insurance funded preneed funeral
production and maturities for the quarters ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the number of
contracts associated with those transactions. The decrease in preneed funeral insurance production
in 2006 is related to a shift of sales from the sale of insurance contracts to trust contracts in
California.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Preneed Funeral Insurance Funded (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Production |
|
$ |
47.6 |
|
|
$ |
54.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Production (number of contracts) |
|
|
9,635 |
|
|
|
11,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Agency Revenue |
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Maturities |
|
$ |
50.0 |
|
|
$ |
54.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales Maturities (number of contracts) |
|
|
10,640 |
|
|
|
12,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet. |
Approximately 59% of our North America preneed funeral production in the first quarter of 2006
is insurance funded preneed funeral contracts.
Backlog
The following table reflects the North America backlog of trust funded deferred preneed
funeral and cemetery contract revenues (market and cost bases) including amounts related to
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
Additionally, we have reflected the North America backlog of unfulfilled insurance funded contracts
(not included in our consolidated balance sheet) and total North America backlog of preneed funeral
contract revenues at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The backlog amounts presented are
reduced by an amount that we believe will cancel before maturity based on our historical
experience.
25
The table also reflects the North America trust funded preneed funeral and cemetery
receivables and trust investments (investments at market and cost bases) associated with the
backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral and cemetery contract revenues, net of an
estimated cancellation allowance.
The market value of funeral and cemetery trust investments was based primarily on quoted
market prices at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005. The difference between the backlog and
asset amounts represents the contracts for which we have posted surety bonds as financial assurance
in lieu of trusting, the amounts collected from customers that were not required to be deposited to
trust and allowable cash distributions from trust assets. The table also reflects the amounts
expected to be received from insurance companies from the assignment of policy proceeds related to
insurance funded funeral contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral revenues
(1) |
|
$ |
1,503.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,483.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,495.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,482.6 |
|
Backlog of insurance funded preneed funeral revenues (2) |
|
$ |
2,188.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,188.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,162.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,162.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
3,691.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,671.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,658.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,645.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of trust funded deferred
preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation |
|
$ |
1,164.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,144.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,158.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,145.9 |
|
Insurance policies associated with insurance funded
deferred
preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation (2) |
|
$ |
2,188.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,188.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,162.7 |
|
|
$ |
2,162.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets associated with backlog of preneed funeral
revenues |
|
$ |
3,352.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,332.0 |
|
|
$ |
3,321.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,308.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues (1) |
|
$ |
1,673.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,612.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,644.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,600.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of deferred
cemetery revenues,
net of estimated allowance for cancellation |
|
$ |
1,171.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,119.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,157.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,119.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes amounts reflected as Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts
in the consolidated balance sheet, net of estimated allowance for cancellation. |
|
(2) |
|
Insurance funded preneed funeral contracts, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation, are not included in the consolidated balance sheet. |
Other Matters
The Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (Staff) recently issued a letter (Comment
Letter) to us dated April 19, 2006, commenting on certain
aspects of our initial Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed on March 6,
2006. We believe that most of the issues raised in the Comment
Letter have been appropriately addressed, and we have included required disclosures in this report
or will include in future filings to the extent necessary as a result of the SECs comments. While
there may be others, we believe that three items from the Comment Letter remain under consideration
with the Staff at this time.
First, the Staff requested information regarding the treatment of preneed funeral and cemetery
merchandise and services trust and cemetery perpetual care trust activity in the consolidated
statement of cash flows. We have responded to the Staffs request for additional information. To
the best of our knowledge, this issue remains unresolved with the Staff. Although we believe that
our consolidated statement of cash flows is properly presented, there can be no certainty that the Staff will
agree to our position.
Second, the Staff requested information regarding our operating and reporting segments and
whether these segments have been appropriately identified and disclosed. We have responded to the
Staffs request for additional information. We believe that our treatment of operating and
reporting segments and reporting units is appropriate under the provisions of SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information and SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Although we believe that we have addressed this matter appropriately, there can be no certainty
that the Staff will agree with our position.
Third, the Staff requested information regarding the classification of our operating
leases related primarily to funeral home properties. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company
determined that certain of its leases related to funeral home properties should have been
accounted for as capital leases. For additional information, see
note two for discussion.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Our critical accounting policies are
disclosed in our amended Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. No
significant changes to our
accounting policies have occurred subsequent to December 31, 2005, except as described below within Accounting Changes.
Accounting Changes
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R is a revision of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Among other items, SFAS 123R
eliminates the use of the intrinsic value method of accounting, and requires companies to recognize
in the statement of operations the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of
equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of those awards. We adopted SFAS 123R on
January 1, 2006 and are utilizing the modified-prospective transition method. For further
information regarding this accounting change, see note four to the condensed consolidated
financial statements in Item 1 of this amended Form 10-Q.
Restatement
of Financial Statements
We have
restated herein our condensed consolidated statements of operations
and cash flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005. We have also restated herein our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005. For details related to this restatement, please see note two
to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of
this amended Form 10-Q. This restatement has been reported in an
amendment to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006. In
addition, this restatement will be reported in an amendment to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2005.
27
Results of Operations Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
Management Summary
We began 2006 with renewed financial strength, allowing us to focus on profitability and growth.
Led by a strong performance from our cemetery segment, our total revenue from comparable operations
continued to improve in the first quarter. Other key highlights to date include:
|
|
|
On April 3, 2006, announced the execution of a definitive agreement to acquire the
outstanding shares of Alderwoods Group, Inc. combining two of the leading providers of
funeral and cemetery services in North America. |
|
|
|
|
An improvement in first quarter 2006 cemetery margins of 220 basis points over the same
period in 2005. |
|
|
|
|
A 6.6% increase in comparable average revenue per funeral service compared to the first
quarter of 2005, which helped to offset a 5.1% decline in comparable funeral services
performed, and |
|
|
|
|
The declaration of a dividend payable in May 2006 based on our first quarter 2006
financial results. |
Results of Operations
In the
first quarter of 2006, we reported net income of $26.9 million
or $.09 per diluted
share. These results were impacted by net losses on dispositions and impairment charges of $3.5
million after tax or $.01 per diluted share.
In
the first quarter of 2005, we reported a net loss of $154.9 million or $.49 per
diluted share. These results were also impacted by non-recurring items that decreased earnings
including accounting changes of $187.5 million, losses on the early extinguishment of debt of $0.8
million after tax, and net losses on dispositions and impairment charges of $3.7 million after tax.
During the first quarter of 2005, discontinued operations produced $1.2 million of earnings.
Actual Versus Comparable Results Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 and 2005
The table below reconciles our GAAP results to our comparable, or same store, results for the
three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. We define comparable operations (or same store
operations) as those that were owned for the entire period beginning January 1, 2005 and ending
March 31, 2006. The following tables present operating results for SCI funeral and cemetery
locations that were owned by SCI for this period.
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity |
|
|
Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated with |
|
|
Associated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition / |
|
|
with |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
Actual |
|
|
New Construction |
|
|
Dispositions |
|
|
Comparable |
|
|
|
(Restated) |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
(Restated) |
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
$ |
300.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
299.1 |
|
Cemetery revenue |
|
|
138.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
137.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
436.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
441.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
439.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
gross profits |
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
65.4 |
|
Cemetery
gross profits |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
87.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
88.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 |
|
Actual |
|
|
Dispositions |
|
|
Comparable |
|
|
|
(Restated) |
(Dollars in millions) |
(Restated) |
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
$ |
316.3 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
301.3 |
|
Cemetery revenue |
|
|
127.9 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
123.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444.2 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
424.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
447.4 |
|
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
$ |
427.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral
gross profits |
|
$ |
79.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
$ |
77.9 |
|
Cemetery
gross profits |
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
97.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
96.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate SCIs comparable average revenue
per funeral service in North America for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005. We
calculate average revenue per funeral service by dividing adjusted comparable North America funeral
revenue by the comparable number of funeral services performed in North America during the period.
In calculating average revenue per funeral service, we exclude GA revenues and revenues from our
Kenyon subsidiary in order to avoid distorting our funeral case volume averages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, |
|
|
|
except average revenue |
|
|
|
per funeral service) |
|
Comparable North America funeral revenue |
|
$ |
299.1 |
|
|
$ |
301.3 |
|
Less: GA revenues |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Kenyon revenues |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Comparable North America funeral revenue |
|
$ |
289.9 |
|
|
$ |
286.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable North America funeral services performed |
|
|
63,036 |
|
|
|
66,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable North America average revenue per funeral service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
4,515 |
|
|
$ |
4,264 |
|
Atneed |
|
$ |
4,641 |
|
|
$ |
4,342 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,599 |
|
|
$ |
4,316 |
|
Funeral Results
Consolidated Funeral Revenue
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations were $303.0 million in the first quarter of 2006
compared to $319.5 million in the first quarter of 2005. Higher
average revenue per funeral service and the increase of floral
revenues of approximately $4.0 million were more than offset by a decline
in volume. This decline was primarily attributable
to a decrease in funeral properties as a result of our effort to dispose of non-strategic
locations as well as a decrease in the mortality rate. Additionally, Kenyons revenue fell $6.9 million
compared to the prior year as we were not involved in any catastrophic
events in the first quarter of 2006.
Comparable Funeral Revenue
North America comparable funeral revenue decreased less than 1% in the first quarter of 2006
compared to the first quarter of 2005 reflecting higher average
revenue per funeral service and the increase of floral revenue
described above, essentially offset by a decline in comparable
funeral volume. Therefore, the decrease in revenue in the
first quarter of 2006 was attributable primarily to the decrease in
Kenyons revenue. GA revenue increased $1.5 million, or over 20%, in the first quarter of 2006 as
a result of a mix shift in the types of insurance contracts sold.
Average Revenue per Funeral
Despite a 130 basis point increase in cremation rates, our focus on strategic pricing in the second
half of 2005 and early in 2006 resulted in an increase in average revenue per funeral service of
6.6%, or $283 per funeral service (5.1% or $222 per service excluding the
floral revenue increase) over the prior year. We have realigned prices in approximately
half of our regions and expect these benefits to continue in the future as the remaining half of
our regions implement these changes. We anticipate that the realignment will be substantially
complete by the end of the second quarter of 2006. See a more detailed discussion regarding our
strategic pricing initiative in Opportunity for Growth in this Managements Discussion and
Analysis.
Funeral Case Volume
The overall success of our strategic pricing initiative was offset by a 5.1% decrease in comparable
funeral volume in the first quarter of 2006 compared to the first quarter of 2005. The decrease of
3,384 is largely attributable to a decline in atneed funeral services performed during the first
quarter of 2006 compared to the first quarter of 2005. This decline appears consistent with
decreases reported by other funeral service companies and with our review of preliminary mortality
data which indicates a decline in the number of deaths in early 2006. Over time, we believe the
decline in the number of deaths will stabilize because of the aging population. In the short term,
we believe that our reputation of providing excellent service, increasing our brand recognition,
and expanding scale and reach through our pending acquisition will result in increased volume as we
continue to stay firm to our pricing strategy and customer focus.
30
Consolidated Funeral Gross Profit
Consolidated
funeral gross profits decreased $14.7 million in the first quarter of 2006 compared to
the same period of 2005. The decline in revenues against an
inflationary high fixed-cost structure negatively impacted gross
profit. Increases in salaries, healthcare, floral and energy costs
contributed to the decrease in gross profit. Additionally, gross profit was reduced by
$3.0 million from Kenyons operations.
Comparable Funeral Gross Profit
Comparable
North America funeral gross profit decreased $12.5 million or
16.0% in the first quarter
of 2006 versus the same period of 2005. The comparable funeral gross margin percentage decreased
to 21.9% compared to 25.9% in 2005. Comparable gross profit was negatively impacted by the
decrease in revenues described above against an inflationary high fixed-cost structure. The remainder of the decrease in gross profit was due to increases in salary, healthcare and energy costs.
Cemetery Results
Consolidated Cemetery Revenue
Despite a decrease in the number of operating locations, consolidated revenues from our cemetery
operations increased $10.9 million, or 8.5%, in the first quarter of 2006 compared to the same
period of 2005. Sales production increased $4.2 million due to our tiered-product strategy, which
focuses on the development of high-end cemetery property and our related pricing realignment.
Recognized production rates increased in the first quarter of 2006 compared to the prior year
period due to an increase in the recognition of merchandise and the success of our strategy to shorten the time between when property is sold
and when it is constructed.
Comparable Cemetery Revenue
North America comparable cemetery revenue increased $14.0 million or 11.3% compared to the first
quarter of 2005. This increase primarily resulted from the revenue increases described above.
Consolidated Cemetery Gross Profits
Consolidated
cemetery gross profits increased $4.5 million, or 25.7%, in the first quarter of 2006
compared to the first quarter of 2005 and margins increased over 220
basis points to 16.0%. The
increase in revenue described above was partially offset by a related increase in
variable costs and higher healthcare and energy costs.
Comparable Cemetery Gross Profits
North
America comparable cemetery gross profits increased $4.8 million in the first quarter of 2006
compared to the same period of 2005. The comparable cemetery
percentage increased to 16.5% in the
first quarter of 2006 from 14.4% in the first quarter of 2005. These improvements were also a
result of the strong revenue increases offset by cost increases as described above.
Other Financial Statement Items
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $22.0 million in the first quarter of 2006 compared to
$19.7 million in the first quarter of 2005. Increased costs associated with the expensing of stock
options, which totaled $1.4 million (pretax), and higher audit
fees contributed to the increase. We expect stock option expense in
the remaining quarters of 2006 to be approximately $2.5 million in
aggregate.
31
Interest Expense
Interest
expense increased 6.8% to $26.7 million in the first quarter of
2006, compared to $25.0
million in the first quarter of 2005. The increase of $1.7 million reflects the modification of the
contractual terms of certain transportation leases in January 2006, which resulted in additional
interest expense related to these newly reclassified capital leases. For additional information,
see notes four and eight to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
Interest Income
Interest income of $6.0 million in the first quarter of 2006 increased $1.9 million compared to the
same period of 2005, reflecting the increase in our cash balances invested in commercial paper
and higher interest returns.
Other Income (Expense), Net
Other income (expense), net was a $2.4 million gain in the first quarter of 2006, compared to
an expense of $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2005. The components of other income for the
periods presented are as follows:
|
|
|
Cash overrides received from a third party insurance provider related to the sale of
insurance funded preneed funeral contracts were $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2006
compared to $1.6 million in the same period of 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Surety bond premium costs were $1.0 million in the first quarters of 2006 and 2005. |
|
|
|
|
The remaining income of $1.9 million in the first
quarter of 2006 is primarily due to favorable adjustments to our allowance on notes receivable. The expense of $1.8 million in the same
period of 2005 is primarily attributable to net gains and losses related to foreign currency
transactions. |
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes
The
consolidated effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2006 resulted in a provision of 36.9%,
compared to 35.8% in the same period of 2005. The 2006 and 2005 tax rates were negatively impacted
by permanent differences between the book and tax bases of North American asset dispositions.
Weighted Average Shares
The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding was 298.7 million in the first quarter of
2006, compared to 317.8 million in the same period of 2005. The decrease in 2006 versus 2005 was
mainly due to the full quarter impact of our share repurchase program initiated during 2005.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We believe that we have sufficient resources to meet our near and intermediate term debt
obligations, our planned capital expenditures, and other cash requirements. Our primary sources of
liquidity are currently cash flows from operations, available cash reserves, and debt capacity
available under our credit facility. We are focusing our capital resources on funding disciplined
growth initiatives, including the planned acquisition of Alderwoods.
Cash Flow
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is one of our fundamental financial
strengths and provides us with substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing needs.
Highlights of cash flow for the first three months of 2006 compared to the same period of 2005 are
as follows:
Operating Activities Cash flows from operating activities in the first quarter of 2006 were
$80.2 million, a decrease of $46.9 million compared to the first quarter of 2005. The first
quarter of 2005 included a federal income tax refund of $29.0 million.
32
Additionally, in the first quarter of 2006, bonus payments increased $21.7 million as compared to the same period of 2005.
This increase reflects $16.5 million of long-term incentive compensation payments related to a 2003
award program as previously disclosed in our 2006 annual guidance.
Investing Activities Cash flows from investing activities decreased by $39.1 million in the
first three months of 2006 compared to the same period of 2005 due to a decline in proceeds from
sales of international businesses and an increase in acquisition activities. In the first quarter
of 2006, we paid $14.7 million in cash for acquisitions as we begin to focus on growth. We also
sold the 280,952 StoneMor Limited Partner units received in the fourth quarter of 2005 related to
the disposition of assets. The proceeds from the sale of these shares totaled $5.9 million. In
the first quarter of 2005, we received $21.6 million from the disposition of our businesses in
Argentina and Uruguay.
Financing
Activities Cash used in financing activities decreased $96.9 million in the first
three months of 2006 compared to the first three months of 2005 primarily due to share repurchases
and a debt extinguishment in 2005, partially offset by dividend payments and an increase in capital
lease payments in 2006. During the first quarter of 2005, we repurchased 14.7 million shares of
common stock for an aggregate of $103.6 million and paid $7.7 million to extinguish debt (of which
$7.1 million is reported as a financing activity). Dividends, which were not paid in the first
quarter of 2005, totaled $7.4 million in 2006. Capital lease payments increased $5.4 million
compared to the prior year reflecting new capital leases for certain transportation assets.
Liquidity
As of March 31, 2006, our cash balance was $490.4 million. We also have a $200.0 million credit
facility that was executed in August 2004. We have no cash borrowings under this credit facility,
but we have used it to support $51.2 million of letters of credit as of March 31, 2006. As a
result of the terms of the bridge facility discussed below, we plan to commence negotiations on an
amendment or a new credit facility prior to the closing of the Alderwoods acquisition.
We expect to generate cash flows in the next several years above our operating and financing
needs. We believe that this financial flexibility allows us to consider investments or capital
structure related transactions that will enhance shareholder value. On April 3, 2006, we entered
into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Alderwoods for $20.00 per
share. This transaction is valued at $1.2 billion, which includes approximately $374.0 million of
Alderwoods debt. We have received a commitment letter from JPMorgan for an $850.0 million bridge
facility and believe we also have access to debt markets. We intend to fund this transaction with
at least $400 million of cash on hand as well as through the utilization of term loans and bonds.
We will continue to evaluate external opportunities and expect to make acquisitions, if such
acquisitions are available at reasonable market prices and align with our strategic plan. We will
also evaluate internal opportunities such as construction of new funeral homes and development of
high-end cemetery inventory.
We currently have $64.6 million authorized by the Board of Directors to repurchase common
stock. We have made and intend to make purchases from time to time in the open market or through
privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions and normal trading restrictions.
There can be no assurance that we will buy our common stock under our share repurchase program in
the future.
Since April 2005, we have paid a quarterly cash dividend of $.025 per share. While we intend
to pay regular quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, all subsequent dividends are
subject to final determination by our Board of Directors each quarter after its review of our
financial performance.
We are continuing our program to divest of our operations outside of North America. In the
first quarter of 2005, we sold our operations in Argentina and Uruguay for net cash proceeds of
$21.6 million. In the third quarter of 2005, we sold our
cemetery operations in Chile. We expect to receive the remaining
proceeds from this disposition, as income tax receivable totaling
approximately $15,859, in the second quarter of 2006. We currently own funeral businesses in Germany and Singapore that we will look to
exit when market values and economic conditions are conducive to a sale; however, these businesses
are not currently being held for sale.
Financial Assurances
In support of operations, we have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies whereby
such companies agree to issue
33
surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance and/or as required
by existing state and local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various business purposes;
however, the majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been used to support our
preneed funeral and cemetery sales activities. The obligations underlying these surety bonds are
recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as Deferred preneed funeral revenues and
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues. The breakdown of surety bonds between funeral and cemetery
preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other activities, are described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Preneed funeral |
|
$ |
132.0 |
|
|
$ |
139.3 |
|
Preneed cemetery: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise and services |
|
|
159.7 |
|
|
|
161.8 |
|
Pre-construction |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations |
|
|
304.2 |
|
|
|
313.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed business permits |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Other bonds |
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total surety bonds outstanding |
|
$ |
319.7 |
|
|
$ |
329.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we may post surety bonds where allowed by
applicable law. We post the surety bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received
from the customer. The amount of the bond posted is generally determined by the total amount of
the preneed contract that would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with applicable
state or provincial law. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, we had $14.3 million
and $18.2 million, respectively, of cash receipts attributable to bonded sales. These amounts do
not consider disbursements associated with taxes, obtaining costs, or other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically renewable until maturity of the
underlying preneed contracts, unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for
cemetery preconstruction bonds (which are irrevocable), the surety companies generally have the
right to cancel the surety bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety
company were to cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain replacement surety assurance from
another surety company or fund a trust for an amount generally less than the posted bond amount.
Management does not expect it will be required to fund material future amounts related to these
surety bonds because of lack of surety capacity.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
The
statements in this Form 10-Q as amended that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made
in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be accompanied by words such as believe, estimate,
project, expect, anticipate or predict, that convey the uncertainty of future events or
outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, many
important factors could cause our actual results in the future to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements made herein and in any other documents or oral presentations made by us,
or on our behalf. Important factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from
those in forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
|
|
Changes in general economic conditions, both domestically and internationally, impacting financial markets (e.g., marketable
security values, as well as currency and interest rate fluctuations) that could negatively affect us, particularly, but not
limited to, levels of trust fund income, interest expense, pension expense and negative currency translation effects. |
|
|
|
The outcome of the acquisition of Alderwoods and the possibility that certain closing conditions will not be satisfied that
will result in the acquisition not being completed. |
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully integrate Alderwoods or that the anticipated benefits of the acquisition are not fully realized. |
34
|
|
The outcomes of pending lawsuits and proceedings against us and the possibility that insurance coverage is deemed not to apply
to these matters or that an insurance carrier is unable to pay any covered amounts to us. |
|
|
|
The amounts payable by us with respect to our outstanding legal matters exceed our established reserves. |
|
|
|
The outcome of a pending Internal Revenue Service audit. We maintain accruals for tax liabilities that relate to uncertain
tax matters. If these tax matters are unfavorably resolved, we will make any required payments to tax authorities. If these
tax matters are favorably resolved, the accruals maintained by us will no longer be required and these amounts will be
reversed through the tax provision at the time of resolution. |
|
|
|
Our ability to continue to successfully implement our plan to realign pricing according to our strategy and to increase
standardization of our processes. |
|
|
|
Our ability to manage changes in consumer demand and/or pricing for our products and services due to several factors, such as
changes in numbers of deaths, cremation rates, competitive pressures and local economic conditions. |
|
|
|
Changes in domestic and international political and/or regulatory environments in which we operate, including potential
changes in tax, accounting and trusting policies. |
|
|
|
Changes in credit relationships impacting the availability of credit and the general availability of credit in the marketplace. |
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully access surety and insurance markets at a reasonable cost. |
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully exploit our substantial purchasing power with certain of our vendors. |
|
|
|
The effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, and our ability to certify the effectiveness of the
internal controls and to obtain a favorable attestation report of our auditors regarding our assessment of our internal
controls. |
For further information on these and other risks and uncertainties, see our Securities and
Exchange Commission filings, including our 2005 Annual Report on Form
10-K, as amended. Copies of this
document as well as other SEC filings can be obtained from our website at www.sci-corp.com. We
assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein or any
other forward-looking statements made by us, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in the Companys exposure to market risk during the most
recently completed fiscal quarter.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Companys periodic Securities Exchange Act of 1934
reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys
management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Disclosure Committee and
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation, such officers
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the
most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
35
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in note eight to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of
this Amended Form 10-Q which information is hereby
incorporated by reference herein.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our Risk Factors as set forth in Item 1A of the Companys
Form 10-K, as amended for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 except as detailed below.
The acquisition of Alderwoods is subject to certain closing conditions that, if not satisfied or
waived, will result in the acquisition not being completed, which may cause the market price of SCI
common stock to decline.
The acquisition is subject to customary conditions to closing, including the receipt of the
required approval of the shareholders of Alderwoods. If any condition to the acquisition agreement
is not satisfied or, if permissible, waived, the acquisition will not be completed. In addition,
SCI and Alderwoods may terminate the acquisition agreement in certain circumstances. If the
acquisition is not completed, the market price of SCI common stock may decline if the current
market price reflects a market assumption that the acquisition will be completed. SCI will also
still be obligated to pay certain investment banking, financing, legal and accounting fees and
related expenses.
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition of Alderwoods.
The success of the acquisition will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated cost
savings from shared corporate and administrative areas and the rationalization of duplicative
expenses. However, to realize the anticipated benefits from the acquisition, we must successfully
combine the businesses of SCI and Alderwoods in a manner that permits those costs savings to be
realized. If we are not able to successfully achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits of
the acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer or cost more to realize than
expected. SCI and Alderwoods have operated and, until the completion of the acquisition, will
continue to operate, independently. It is possible that the integration process could result in
the loss of valuable employees, the disruption of each companys ongoing businesses or
inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures, practices, and policies that could adversely
impact our operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On January 31, 2006, we issued 330 deferred common stock equivalents, or units, pursuant to
provisions regarding dividends under the Director Fee Plan to four non-employee directors. We did
not receive any monetary consideration for the issuances. These issuances were unregistered
because they did not constitute a sale within the meaning of Section 2(3) of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
2.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 2, 2006, by and among Service
Corporation International, Coronado Acquisition Corporation and Alderwoods Group,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K dated April 5, 2006). |
|
|
10.1 |
|
Commitment Letter, dated as of April 2, 2006, by and among Service
Corporation International, Chase Lincoln First Commercial Corporation and J.P.
Morgan Securities Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated
April 5, 2006). |
|
|
10.2 |
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, between
SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Sumner J. Waring, III. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006) |
36
|
10.3 |
|
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 1,
2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Sumner J. Waring, III. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006) |
|
|
10.4 |
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1, 2004 between
SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Stephen M. Mack. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006) |
|
|
10.5 |
|
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 1,
2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Stephen M. Mack. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5 to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2006) |
|
|
12.1 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005. |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in
satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as Chief
Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal
Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Undertaking
We hereby undertake, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b), paragraph (4) (iii),
to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, all constituent
instruments defining the rights of holders of our long-term debt not filed herewith for
the reason that the total amount of securities authorized under any of such instruments
does not exceed 10 percent of our total consolidated assets.
37
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
August 11, 2006 |
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Jeffrey I. Beason
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey I. Beason |
|
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
|
38
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
Exhibits |
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 2, 2006, by and among Service
Corporation International, Coronado Acquisition Corporation and Alderwoods Group,
Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K dated April 5, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Commitment Letter, dated as of April 2, 2006, by and among Service
Corporation International, Chase Lincoln First Commercial Corporation and J.P.
Morgan Securities Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated
April 5, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, between
SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Sumner J. Waring, III. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 1,
2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Sumner J. Waring, III. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated January 1, 2004 between
SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Stephen M. Mack. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Addendum to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement, dated December 1,
2005, between SCI Executive Services, Inc. and Stephen M. Mack. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended March 31,
2006 and 2005. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in
satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Eric D.
Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as Chief
Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Periodic
Financial Reports by Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal
Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |