e424b3
The information
in this preliminary prospectus supplement is not complete and
may be changed. This preliminary prospectus supplement and the
attached prospectus are not an offer to sell these securities,
and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in
any state where the offer or sale is
not permitted.
|
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-123150
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
FEBRUARY 27, 2006
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus Dated March 23, 2005)
15,000,000 Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests
We are offering 15,000,000 common units representing
limited partner interests in Enterprise Products
Partners L.P.
Our common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol EPD. The last reported sales price
of our common units on the New York Stock Exchange on
February 23, 2006 was $25.04 per common unit.
Investing in our common units involves a high degree of
risk. See Risk Factors beginning on
page S-12 of this
prospectus supplement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Unit | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Public offering price
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
We have granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up
to an additional 2,250,000 common units at the public
offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions, if
the underwriters sell more than 15,000,000 common units in
this offering.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the common units to investors
on or
about ,
2006.
|
|
Lehman Brothers |
Morgan Stanley |
Citigroup
A.G.
Edwards
|
|
|
Sanders Morris Harris
Inc. |
|
|
|
Banc of America
Securities LLC |
|
|
|
Natexis Bleichroeder
Inc. |
,
2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Prospectus Supplement |
|
|
|
S-1 |
|
|
|
|
S-12 |
|
|
|
|
S-27 |
|
|
|
|
S-28 |
|
|
|
|
S-29 |
|
|
|
|
S-31 |
|
|
|
|
S-34 |
|
|
|
|
S-48 |
|
|
|
|
S-50 |
|
|
|
|
S-54 |
|
|
|
|
S-54 |
|
|
|
|
S-54 |
|
|
|
|
S-55 |
|
|
Prospectus |
About This Prospectus
|
|
|
iv |
|
Our Company
|
|
|
1 |
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
3 |
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
16 |
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
16 |
|
Description of Debt Securities
|
|
|
16 |
|
Description of Our Common Units
|
|
|
30 |
|
Cash Distribution Policy
|
|
|
32 |
|
Description of Our Partnership Agreement
|
|
|
36 |
|
Material Tax Consequences
|
|
|
41 |
|
Selling Unitholders
|
|
|
54 |
|
Plan of Distribution
|
|
|
55 |
|
Where You Can Find More Information
|
|
|
57 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
|
|
59 |
|
Legal Matters
|
|
|
59 |
|
Experts
|
|
|
60 |
|
About This Prospectus Supplement
This document is in two parts. The first part is this prospectus
supplement, which describes the terms of this offering of our
common units. The second part is the accompanying prospectus,
which gives more general information, some of which may not
apply to this offering of common units. If the information
varies between this prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus, you should rely on the information in this
prospectus supplement.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to
provide you with additional or different information. We are not
making an offer to sell these securities in any state where the
offer is not permitted. You should not assume that the
information contained in this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus is accurate as of any date other than
the date on the front of these documents or that any information
we have incorporated by reference is accurate as of any date
other than the date of the document incorporated by reference.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since these dates.
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information from this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus to help you
understand our business and the common units. It does not
contain all of the information that is important to you. You
should read carefully the entire prospectus supplement, the
accompanying prospectus, the documents incorporated by reference
and the other documents to which we refer for a more complete
understanding of this offering. You should read Risk
Factors beginning on
page S-12 of this
prospectus supplement for more information about important risks
that you should consider before making a decision to purchase
common units in this offering.
The information presented in this prospectus supplement
assumes that the underwriters do not exercise their option to
purchase additional common units, unless otherwise indicated.
Our, we, us and
Enterprise as used in this prospectus supplement and
the accompanying prospectus refer to Enterprise Products
Partners L.P. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
We are a North American midstream energy company that provides a
wide range of services to producers and consumers of natural
gas, natural gas liquids, or NGLs, and crude oil, and are an
industry leader in the development of pipeline and other
midstream infrastructure in the continental United States and
Gulf of Mexico. Our midstream asset network links producers of
natural gas, NGLs and crude oil from some of the largest supply
basins in the United States, Canada and the Gulf of Mexico with
domestic consumers and international markets. We operate an
integrated midstream asset network within the United States that
includes natural gas gathering, processing, transportation and
storage; NGL fractionation (or separation), transportation,
storage and import and export terminaling; crude oil
transportation; and offshore production platform services. NGL
products (ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural
gasoline) are used as raw materials by the petrochemical
industry, as feedstocks by refiners in the production of motor
gasoline and as fuel by industrial and residential users.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, we had revenues of
$12.3 billion, operating income of $663 million and
net income of $420 million.
Our Business Segments
We have four reportable business segments: (i) NGL
Pipelines & Services; (ii) Onshore Natural Gas
Pipelines & Services; (iii) Offshore
Pipelines & Services; and (iv) Petrochemical
Services. Our business segments are generally organized and
managed along our asset base according to the type of services
rendered (or technology employed) and products produced and/or
sold.
NGL Pipelines & Services. Our NGL Pipelines &
Services business segment includes our (i) natural gas
processing business and related NGL marketing activities,
(ii) NGL pipelines aggregating approximately 12,810 miles
and related storage facilities including our Mid-America
Pipeline, Seminole Pipeline and Dixie Pipeline systems and
(iii) NGL fractionation facilities located in Texas and
Louisiana. This segment also includes our import and export
terminal operations.
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services. Our Onshore
Natural Gas Pipelines & Services business segment includes
approximately 17,200 miles of onshore natural gas pipeline
systems that provide for the gathering and transmission of
natural gas in Alabama, Colorado, Louisiana, Mississippi, New
Mexico and Texas. In addition, we own two salt dome natural gas
storage facilities located in Mississippi and lease natural gas
storage facilities located in Texas and Louisiana.
Offshore Pipelines & Services. Our Offshore Pipelines
& Services business segment includes (i) approximately
1,190 miles of offshore natural gas pipelines strategically
located to serve production areas including some of the most
active drilling and development regions in the Gulf of Mexico,
(ii) approximately 870 miles of offshore Gulf of Mexico
crude oil pipeline systems and (iii) seven multi-purpose
offshore hub platforms located in the Gulf of Mexico.
S-1
Petrochemical Services. Our Petrochemical Services
business segment includes four propylene fractionation
facilities, an isomerization complex and an octane additive
production facility. This segment also includes approximately
690 miles of petrochemical pipeline systems.
Our Strategy
Our business strategy is to:
|
|
|
|
|
capitalize on expected increases in natural gas, NGL and crude
oil production resulting from development activities in the
Rocky Mountain region and Gulf of Mexico; |
|
|
|
maintain a balanced and diversified portfolio of midstream
energy assets and expand this asset base through growth capital
projects and accretive acquisitions of complementary midstream
energy assets; |
|
|
|
share capital costs and risks through joint ventures or
alliances with strategic partners that will provide the raw
materials for these projects or purchase the projects end
products; and |
|
|
|
increase fee-based cash flows by investing in pipelines and
other fee-based businesses and de-emphasize commodity-based
activities. |
Competitive Strengths
We believe we have the following competitive strengths:
Large-Scale, Integrated Network of Diversified Assets in
Strategic Locations. We operate an integrated natural gas
and NGL transportation, fractionation, processing, storage and
import/export network within the United States. Our operations
are strategically located to serve the major supply basins for
NGL-rich natural gas, the major NGL storage hubs in North
America and international markets. We believe that our location
in these markets provides better access to natural gas, NGL and
petrochemical supply volumes, anticipated demand growth and
business expansion opportunities.
Cash-Flow Stability Through Fee-Based Businesses and Balanced
Asset Mix. Our cash flow is derived primarily from fee-based
businesses which are not directly affected by volatility in
energy commodity prices. As a result of our merger with
GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., or GulfTerra, we have a more
diversified asset portfolio that provides operating income from
a broad range of sources. Prior to the merger, GulfTerras
historical operations generally benefited from strong or average
hydrocarbon prices, while our historical operations generally
benefited from stable or lower hydrocarbon prices. Following the
merger, this relationship results in a natural hedge to natural
gas prices that has provided greater cash flow stability.
Relationships with Major Oil, Natural Gas and Petrochemical
Companies. We have long-term relationships with many of our
suppliers and customers, and we believe that we will continue to
benefit from these relationships. We jointly own facilities with
many of our customers who either provide raw materials to, or
consume the end products from, our facilities. These joint
venture partners include major oil, natural gas and
petrochemical companies, including BP, Burlington Resources,
ChevronTexaco, Dow Chemical, Duke Energy Field Services, El Paso
Corporation, ExxonMobil, Marathon and Shell.
Strategic Platform for Continued Expansion. We have
strong business positions across our midstream energy asset base
in key producing and consuming regions in North America. In
addition, we have a significant portfolio of organic growth
opportunities to construct new facilities or expand existing
assets. These projects include the recently announced Jonah
Expansion, Piceance Basin Gas Processing and Wyoming Gas
Processing projects in the Rocky Mountain region and the
Independence Hub offshore platform and related Independence
Trail pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico.
Lower Cost of Capital. We believe that our general
partners maximum incentive distribution level of 25% (as
compared to 50% for many publicly traded master limited
partnerships) combined with our
S-2
investment grade credit ratings from Moodys Investors
Service and Fitch Ratings provides us with a lower cost of
capital than many of our competitors, enabling us to compete
more effectively in acquiring assets and expanding our asset
base.
Experienced Operator and Management Team. We have
historically operated our largest natural gas processing and
fractionation facilities and most of our pipelines. As the
leading provider of NGL related services, we have established a
reputation in the industry as a reliable and cost-effective
operator. The officers of our general partner average more than
26 years of industry experience. Following this offering,
Dan L. Duncan, our co-founder and the Chairman of the board
of directors of our general partner, and his affiliates,
including EPCO, Inc., or EPCO, and Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.,
or Enterprise GP Holdings, collectively will own or control an
approximate 34.9% limited partner interest in us.
Recent Developments
Growth Capital Projects
Jonah Expansion. In February 2006, we and TEPPCO
Partners, L.P., or TEPPCO, an affiliate of EPCO, entered into a
letter of intent related to the formation of a joint venture to
expand TEPPCOs Jonah Gas Gathering System, or the Jonah
system, located in the Green River Basin in southwestern
Wyoming. The proposed expansion of the Jonah system would
increase the natural gas gathering and transportation capacity
of the Jonah system from 1.5 Bcf/d to 2.0 Bcf/d.
The letter of intent stipulates that we will be responsible for
all activities related to the construction of the expansion of
the Jonah system, including advancing all expenditures necessary
to plan, engineer and construct the expansion project. We
estimate that total funds needed for this project will be
approximately $200 million and that the expansion assets
will be placed in service in late 2006.
The amounts we advance to complete the expansion of the Jonah
system will constitute a subscription for an equity interest in
the proposed joint venture. TEPPCO has the option to return to
us up to 100% of the amounts we advance (i.e., the subscription
amounts). If TEPPCO returns any portion of the subscription to
us, the relative interests of us and TEPPCO in the new joint
venture would be adjusted accordingly. The proposed joint
venture arrangement will terminate without liability to either
party if TEPPCO returns 100% of the advances we make in
connection with the expansion project, including carrying costs
and expenses.
The general partner of TEPPCO and 2,500,000 common units of
TEPPCO are owned by an affiliate of Mr. Duncan, Chairman of
the board of directors of our general partner.
Piceance Basin Gas Processing Project. In January 2006,
we announced the execution of a minimum
15-year natural gas
processing agreement with an affiliate of the EnCana
Corporation, or EnCana. Under that agreement, we will have the
right to process up to 1.3 Bcf/d of EnCanas natural
gas production from the Piceance Basin area of western Colorado.
To accommodate this production, we have begun construction of
the Meeker natural gas processing facility in Rio Blanco County,
Colorado. In addition, we will construct a
50-mile NGL pipeline
that will connect our Meeker facility with our Mid-America
Pipeline System. Phase I, which includes construction of the
plant and pipeline, will provide us with 750 MMcf/d of
natural gas processing capacity and the ability to recover up to
35 MBPD of NGLs. Phase II, which includes the
expansion of the plant, will expand natural gas processing
capacity at the facility to 1.3 Bcf/d and increase NGL
extraction rates to up to 70 MBPD. We expect Phase I
and Phase II to be operational by mid-2007 and late-2008,
respectively. Phase I is expected to cost $284 million.
Wyoming Gas Processing Projects. In January 2006, we
announced our intent to purchase from TEPPCO the Pioneer natural
gas processing plant located in Opal, Wyoming and the rights to
process natural gas originating from the Jonah and Pinedale
fields in the Greater Green River Basin in Wyoming. Upon
execution of definitive agreements, the receipt of all necessary
regulatory approval and approvals from the boards of directors
of TEPPCO and our general partner, we would purchase the Pioneer
plant for $36 million
S-3
and commence construction to increase its processing capacity
from 275 MMcf/d to 550 MMcf/d at an additional
expected cost of $21 million. We anticipate this expansion
will be completed in mid-2006.
We have also announced our intent to build a new gas processing
plant with a capacity of 650 MMcf/d adjacent to the Pioneer
plant. We expect to place the new facility in service during
2007. The Pioneer expansion and the new natural gas processing
plant will serve growing natural gas production in the Jonah and
Pinedale fields. The cost of this new processing facility is
expected to be $228 million.
Natural Gas Storage Expansion. In December 2005, we
completed the conversion of an existing brine well located at
our Petal, Mississippi storage facility to a 2.4 Bcf natural gas
storage cavern at a cost of $15 million. Due to strong
demand for natural gas storage, we have commenced the
development of an additional storage cavern at the Petal
facility that is expected to add 5 Bcf of storage capacity.
This cavern is expected to cost $75 million and be placed
in service during the first quarter of 2008.
Expansion of Mont Belvieu NGL and Petrochemical Storage
Services. In November 2005, we announced an expansion of our
NGL and petrochemical storage services at our complex in Mont
Belvieu, Texas to improve our ability to receive and deliver
NGLs and petrochemicals. The Mont Belvieu expansion projects
include the drilling of two new brine production wells and the
construction of two above-ground brine storage pits. The
increased brine storage capability will further enable us to
enhance product storage services and movement to transportation
and distribution pipelines that serve the Gulf Coast region, as
well as our import and export facilities on the Houston Ship
Channel. As a result of these projects, we will also more than
double our above-ground brine storage capabilities to
19 MMBbls and will increase our capacity to produce brine.
These projects are expected to be placed in service in 2006 and
2007 and are expected to cost $77 million.
Change in Board of Directors
On February 13, 2006, Dr. Ralph S. Cunningham, Michael
A. Creel, Richard H. Bachmann, W. Randall Fowler and
Stephen L. Baum were elected as directors of our general
partner, Enterprise Products GP, LLC, or Enterprise
Products GP. In addition, on February 13, 2006,
O.S. Andras, W. Matt Ralls and Richard S. Snell
resigned from the board of directors of our general partner.
Following such resignations, Mr. Andras and Mr. Ralls,
together with Mr. Bachmann, Mr. Fowler and
Robert G. Phillips, were elected directors of the general
partner of Enterprise GP Holdings, which owns a 100% membership
interest in our general partner. Mr. Snell was appointed a
director of the general partner of TEPPCO on January 6,
2006. Mr. Bachmann, Mr. Creel and Mr. Fowler were
also elected to the board of directors of the general partner of
TEPPCO on February 13, 2006. Please read
Management for more information about the current
directors and executive officers of our general partner.
As a result of the foregoing, a majority of the directors of
Enterprise Products GP will no longer be independent
directors. The New York Stock Exchange does not require a listed
limited partnership like us to have a majority of independent
directors on the board of directors of our general partner. The
limited liability company agreement of Enterprise
Products GP has been amended to provide that certain
matters, such as a merger, consolidation or combination by us,
any amendment to our partnership agreement related to delegation
of powers, change in purpose and business and separateness and
other credit related matters, must be approved by a majority of
the independent directors.
Increase in Quarterly Cash Distribution Rate
On January 17, 2006, our general partner increased our
quarterly cash distribution to $0.4375 per common unit, or $1.75
per common unit on an annualized basis, with respect to the
fourth quarter of 2005. This distribution was paid on
February 9, 2006 and represented a 9.4% increase over the
$0.40 per unit quarterly distribution paid with respect to the
fourth quarter of 2004.
S-4
The following chart depicts our organizational structure and
ownership after giving effect to this offering.
The table below shows the ownership of our common units as of
February 22, 2006 and after giving effect to this offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership after | |
|
|
Current ownership | |
|
the offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
Units | |
|
interest | |
|
Units | |
|
interest | |
| |
Public common units
|
|
|
216,746,816 |
|
|
|
54.4% |
|
|
|
231,746,816 |
|
|
|
56.0% |
|
EPCO common units(1)
|
|
|
130,699,495 |
|
|
|
32.8% |
|
|
|
130,699,495 |
|
|
|
31.6% |
|
Enterprise GP Holdings common units
|
|
|
13,454,498 |
|
|
|
3.4% |
|
|
|
13,454,498 |
|
|
|
3.3% |
|
Shell common units
|
|
|
29,407,549 |
|
|
|
7.4% |
|
|
|
29,407,549 |
|
|
|
7.1% |
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
390,308,358 |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
405,308,358 |
|
|
|
100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes common units in us beneficially owned by Dan Duncan,
related family trusts and other EPCO affiliates (excluding
Enterprise GP Holdings). |
Information regarding our management is set forth under
Management in this prospectus supplement. Our
partnerships principal offices are located at
2727 North Loop West, Houston, Texas 77008, and our
telephone number is
(713) 880-6500.
S-5
The Offering
|
|
|
Common units offered |
|
15,000,000 common units; or |
|
|
|
17,250,000 common units if the underwriters exercise their
option to purchase up to an additional 2,250,000 common
units in full. |
|
Common units outstanding after this offering |
|
405,308,358 common units or 407,558,358 common units
if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase up to an
additional 2,250,000 common units in full. |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We expect to use the net proceeds from this offering, including
our general partners proportionate capital contribution,
to temporarily reduce borrowings outstanding under our
multi-year revolving
credit facility and for general partnership purposes. Affiliates
of certain of the underwriters are lenders under our multi-year
revolving credit facility and, accordingly, will receive a
portion of the proceeds of this offering. Please read Use
of Proceeds. |
|
Cash distributions |
|
Under our partnership agreement, we must distribute all of our
cash on hand as of the end of each quarter, less reserves
established by our general partner. We refer to this cash as
available cash, and we define its meaning in our
partnership agreement. |
|
|
|
On February 9, 2006, we paid a quarterly cash distribution
with respect to the fourth quarter of 2005 of $0.4375 per
common unit, or $1.75 per unit on an annualized basis,
which represents a 9.4% increase over the same period one
year ago. |
|
|
|
When quarterly cash distributions exceed $0.253 per unit in
any quarter, our general partner receives a higher percentage of
the cash distributed in excess of that amount, in increasing
percentages up to 25% if the quarterly cash distributions exceed
$0.3085 per unit. For a description of our cash
distribution policy, please read Cash Distribution
Policy in the accompanying prospectus. |
|
Estimated ratio of taxable income
to distributions |
|
We estimate that if you own the common units you purchase in
this offering through December 31, 2008, you will be
allocated, on a cumulative basis, an amount of federal taxable
income for the taxable years 2006 through 2008 that will be less
than 10% of the cash distributed with respect to that period.
Please read Material Tax Consequences in this
prospectus supplement for the basis of this estimate. |
|
New York Stock Exchange symbol |
|
EPD |
|
Risk factors |
|
Investing in our common units involves certain risks. You should
carefully consider the risk factors discussed under the heading
Risk Factors beginning on page
S-12 of this prospectus
supplement and other information contained or incorporated by
reference in this prospectus supplement before deciding to
invest in our common units. |
S-6
Summary Historical Financial and Operating Data
The following tables set forth, for the periods and at the dates
indicated, summary historical financial and operating data for
Enterprise. The summary historical income statement and balance
sheet data for the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005 are derived from and should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements of Enterprise
that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus
supplement.
The non-generally accepted accounting principle, or non-GAAP,
financial measures of gross operating margin and earnings before
interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, which we
refer to as EBITDA, are presented in our summary
historical financial data. In supplemental sections titled
Non-GAAP Financial Measures and
Non-GAAP Reconciliations, we have provided the
necessary explanations and reconciliations for the non-GAAP
financial measures presented in this prospectus supplement.
S-7
Summary Historical Financial and Operating Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
For year ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
Income statement data: |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars in millions, | |
|
|
except per unit amounts | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
5,346.4 |
|
|
$ |
8,321.2 |
|
|
$ |
12,257.0 |
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
5,046.8 |
|
|
|
7,904.3 |
|
|
|
11,546.2 |
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
5,084.3 |
|
|
|
7,951.0 |
|
|
|
11,608.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
248.1 |
|
|
|
423.0 |
|
|
|
663.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(140.8 |
) |
|
|
(155.7 |
) |
|
|
(230.6 |
) |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(134.4 |
) |
|
|
(153.6 |
) |
|
|
(225.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes, minority interest and
changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
269.4 |
|
|
|
437.8 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and changes in accounting
principles
|
|
|
108.4 |
|
|
|
265.6 |
|
|
|
429.5 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
257.5 |
|
|
|
423.7 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
104.5 |
|
|
$ |
268.3 |
|
|
$ |
419.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per unit (net of general partner interest):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per unit
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per unit (net of general partner
interest):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per unit
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to limited partners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common unit
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
1.54 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
4,802.8 |
|
|
$ |
11,315.5 |
|
|
$ |
12,591.0 |
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
2,139.5 |
|
|
|
4,281.2 |
|
|
|
4,833.8 |
|
|
Total partners equity
|
|
|
1,705.9 |
|
|
|
5,328.8 |
|
|
|
5,679.3 |
|
|
Other financial data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
424.7 |
|
|
$ |
391.5 |
|
|
$ |
631.7 |
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
662.1 |
|
|
|
941.4 |
|
|
|
1,130.4 |
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
254.0 |
|
|
|
544.0 |
|
|
|
516.2 |
|
|
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
Gross operating margin
|
|
|
410.4 |
|
|
|
655.2 |
|
|
|
1,136.3 |
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
366.4 |
|
|
|
623.2 |
|
|
|
1,079.0 |
|
S-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
For year ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
Selected volumetric operating data by segment: |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
NGL Pipelines & Services, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL transportation volumes in thousand barrels per day (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
NGL fractionation volumes (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
Equity NGL production (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
Fee-based natural gas processing in million cubic feet per day
(MMcf/d)
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
1,767 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas transportation volumes in billion British thermal
units per day (BBtus/d)
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
5,638 |
|
|
|
5,916 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas transportation volumes (BBtus/d)
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
2,081 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
Crude oil transportation volumes (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
Platform gas processing in thousands of decatherms per day
(Mdth/d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
Platform oil processing (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Petrochemical Services, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butane isomerization volumes (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
Propylene fractionation volumes (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Octane additive production volumes (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Petrochemical transportation volumes (MBbls/d)
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
S-9
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We include in this prospectus supplement the non-GAAP financial
measures of gross operating margin and EBITDA and provide
reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to their
most directly comparable financial measure or measures
calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
Gross Operating Margin
We define gross operating margin as operating income before:
(1) depreciation and amortization expense;
(2) operating lease expenses for which we do not have the
cash payment obligation; (3) gains and losses on the sale
of assets; and (4) selling, general and administrative
expenses. We view gross operating margin as an important
performance measure of the core profitability of our operations.
This measure forms the basis of our internal financial reporting
and is used by our senior management in deciding how to allocate
capital resources among business segments. We believe that
investors benefit from having access to the same financial
measures that our management uses. The GAAP measure most
directly comparable to gross operating margin is operating
income.
EBITDA
EBITDA is defined as net income (income from continuing
operations with regards to pro forma information) plus interest
expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense. EBITDA is used as a supplemental financial
measure by our management and by external users of financial
statements such as investors, commercial banks, research
analysts and ratings agencies, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
the financial performance of our assets without regard to
financing methods, capital structures or historical costs basis; |
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay
interest cost and support our indebtedness; |
|
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to
those of other companies in the midstream energy sector, without
regard to financing and capital structure; and |
|
|
|
the viability of projects and the overall rates of return on
alternative investment opportunities. |
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income or
income from continuing operations, operating income, cash flow
from operating activities or any other measure of financial
performance presented in accordance with GAAP. This non-GAAP
financial measure is not intended to represent GAAP-based cash
flows. We have reconciled our historical EBITDA amounts to our
consolidated net income and historical EBITDA amounts further to
operating activities cash flows.
S-10
Non-GAAP Reconciliations
The following table presents a reconciliation of our non-GAAP
financial measure of gross operating margin to the GAAP
financial measure of operating income and a reconciliation of
the non-GAAP financial measure of EBITDA to the GAAP financial
measures of net income and of operating activities cash flows,
on a historical basis for each of the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Historical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
For year ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
| |
|
|
(dollars in millions | |
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Gross operating margin
to GAAP Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$ |
248.1 |
|
|
$ |
423.0 |
|
|
$ |
663.0 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile Operating income to Gross operating
margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization in operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
115.7 |
|
|
|
193.7 |
|
|
|
413.4 |
|
|
|
Operating lease expense paid by EPCO, net in operating costs and
expenses
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets in operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
General and administrative costs
|
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
62.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Operating Margin
|
|
$ |
410.4 |
|
|
$ |
655.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,136.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP EBITDA to GAAP
Net income or Income from continuing
operations and GAAP Cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
104.5 |
|
|
$ |
268.3 |
|
|
$ |
419.5 |
|
|
Adjustments to derive EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
140.8 |
|
|
|
155.7 |
|
|
|
230.6 |
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization component
in interest expenses)
|
|
|
115.8 |
|
|
|
195.4 |
|
|
|
420.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
366.4 |
|
|
|
623.2 |
|
|
|
1,079.0 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(140.8 |
) |
|
|
(155.7 |
) |
|
|
(230.6 |
) |
|
Amortization in interest expense
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
Provision for impairment charge
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss (income) of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
(52.8 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
Operating lease expense paid by EPCO (excluding minority
interest portion)
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Other expenses paid by EPCO
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
Changes in fair market value of financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Net effect of changes in operating accounts
|
|
|
120.9 |
|
|
|
(93.7 |
) |
|
|
(266.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
424.7 |
|
|
$ |
391.5 |
|
|
$ |
631.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-11
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common units involves certain risks. If any
of these risks were to occur, our business, results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected. In that case, the trading price
of our common units could decline, and you could lose part or
all of your investment.
Among the key risk factors that may have a direct impact on our
business, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition are:
Risks Related to Our Business
Changes in the prices of hydrocarbon products may materially
adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition.
We operate predominantly in the midstream energy sector which
includes gathering, transporting, processing, fractionating and
storing natural gas, NGLs and crude oil. As such, our results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition may be materially
adversely affected by changes in the prices of these hydrocarbon
products and by changes in the relative price levels among these
hydrocarbon products. Generally, the prices of natural gas,
NGLs, crude oil and other hydrocarbon products are subject to
fluctuations in response to changes in supply, demand, market
uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are
impossible to control. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of domestic production; |
|
|
|
the availability of imported oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
actions taken by foreign oil and natural gas producing nations; |
|
|
|
the availability of transportation systems with adequate
capacity; |
|
|
|
the availability of competitive fuels; |
|
|
|
fluctuating and seasonal demand for oil, natural gas and NGLs;
and |
|
|
|
conservation and the extent of governmental regulation of
production and the overall economic environment. |
We are exposed to natural gas and NGL commodity price risk under
certain of our natural gas processing and gathering and NGL
fractionation contracts that provide for our fees to be
calculated based on a regional natural gas or NGL price index or
to be paid in-kind by taking title to natural gas or NGLs. A
decrease in natural gas and NGL prices can result in lower
margins from these contracts, which may materially adversely
affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial
position.
A decline in the volume of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil
delivered to our facilities could adversely affect our results
of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Our profitability could be materially impacted by a decline in
the volume of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil transported,
gathered or processed at our facilities. A material decrease in
natural gas or crude oil production or crude oil refining, as a
result of depressed commodity prices, a decrease in exploration
and development activities or otherwise, could result in a
decline in the volume of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil handled
by our facilities.
The crude oil, natural gas and NGLs available to our facilities
will be derived from reserves produced from existing wells,
which reserves naturally decline over time. To offset this
natural decline, our facilities will need access to additional
reserves. Additionally, some of our facilities will be dependent
on reserves that are expected to be produced from newly
discovered properties that are currently being developed.
Exploration and development of new oil and natural gas reserves
is capital intensive, particularly offshore in the Gulf of
Mexico. Many economic and business factors are beyond our
control and can
S-12
adversely affect the decision by producers to explore for and
develop new reserves. These factors could include relatively low
oil and natural gas prices, cost and availability of equipment
and labor, regulatory changes, capital budget limitations, the
lack of available capital or the probability of success in
finding hydrocarbons. For example, a sustained decline in the
price of natural gas and crude oil could result in a decrease in
natural gas and crude oil exploration and development activities
in the regions where our facilities are located. This could
result in a decrease in volumes to our offshore platforms,
natural gas processing plants, natural gas, crude oil and NGL
pipelines, and NGL fractionators, which would have a material
adverse affect on our results of operations, cash flows and
financial position. Additional reserves, if discovered, may not
be developed in the near future or at all.
A decrease in demand for NGL products by the petrochemical,
refining or heating industries could materially adversely affect
our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
A decrease in demand for NGL products by the petrochemical,
refining or heating industries, whether because of general
economic conditions, reduced demand by consumers for the end
products made with NGL products, increased competition from
petroleum-based products due to pricing differences, adverse
weather conditions, government regulations affecting prices and
production levels of natural gas or the content of motor
gasoline or other reasons, could materially adversely affect our
results of operations, cash flows and financial position. For
example:
Ethane. If natural gas prices increase significantly in
relation to ethane prices, it may be more profitable for natural
gas producers to leave the ethane in the natural gas stream to
be burned as fuel than to extract the ethane from the mixed NGL
stream for sale.
Propane. The demand for propane as a heating fuel is
significantly affected by weather conditions. Unusually warm
winters could cause the demand for propane to decline
significantly and could cause a significant decline in the
volumes of propane that we transport.
Isobutane. A reduction in demand for motor gasoline
additives may reduce demand for isobutane. During periods in
which the difference in market prices between isobutane and
normal butane is low or inventory values are high relative to
current prices for normal butane or isobutane, our operating
margin from selling isobutane could be reduced.
Propylene. A downturn in the domestic or international
economy could cause reduced demand for propylene, which could
cause a reduction in the volumes of propylene that we produce
and expose our investment in inventories of propane/propylene
mix to pricing risk due to requirements for short-term price
discounts in the spot or short-term propylene markets.
We face competition from third parties in our midstream
businesses.
Even if reserves exist in the areas accessed by our facilities
and are ultimately produced, we may not be chosen by the
producers in these areas to gather, transport, process,
fractionate, store or otherwise handle the hydrocarbons that are
produced. We compete with others, including producers of oil and
natural gas, for any such production on the basis of many
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
geographic proximity to the production; |
|
|
|
costs of connection; |
|
|
|
available capacity; |
|
|
|
rates; and |
|
|
|
access to markets. |
S-13
Our future debt level may limit our future financial and
operating flexibility.
As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately
$4.8 billion of consolidated debt outstanding. The amount
of our future debt could have significant effects on our
operations, including, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
a significant portion of our cash flow could be dedicated to the
payment of principal and interest on our future debt and may not
be available for other purposes, including the payment of
distributions on our common units and capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
credit rating agencies may view our debt level negatively; |
|
|
|
covenants contained in our existing debt arrangements will
require us to continue to meet financial tests that may
adversely affect our flexibility in planning for and reacting to
changes in our business; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital,
capital expenditures, acquisitions and general partnership
purposes may be limited; |
|
|
|
we may be at a competitive disadvantage relative to similar
companies that have less debt; and |
|
|
|
we may be more vulnerable to adverse economic and industry
conditions as a result of our significant debt level. |
Our public debt indentures currently do not limit the amount of
future indebtedness that we can create, incur, assume or
guarantee. Although our multi-year revolving credit facility
restricts our ability to incur additional debt above certain
levels, any debt we may incur in compliance with these
restrictions may still be substantial. For information regarding
our multi-year revolving credit facility, please read
Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included under Item 8 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Our Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility and each of our
indentures for our public debt contain conventional financial
covenants and other restrictions. For example, we are prohibited
from making distributions to our partners if such distributions
would cause an event of default or otherwise violate a covenant
under our multi-year revolving credit facility. A breach of any
of these restrictions by us could permit our lenders or
noteholders, as applicable, to declare all amounts outstanding
under these debt agreements to be immediately due and payable
and, in the case of our multi-year revolving credit facility, to
terminate all commitments to extend further credit. For
additional information regarding our multi-year revolving credit
facility, please read Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Item 8 of our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Our ability to access capital markets to raise capital on
favorable terms will be affected by our debt level, the amount
of our debt maturing in the next several years and current
maturities, and by prevailing market conditions. Moreover, if
the rating agencies were to downgrade our credit ratings, then
we could experience an increase in our borrowing costs,
difficulty assessing capital markets or a reduction in the
market price of our common units. Such a development could
adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for working
capital, capital expenditures or acquisitions or to refinance
existing indebtedness. If we are unable to access the capital
markets on favorable terms in the future, we might be forced to
seek extensions for some of our short-term securities or to
refinance some of our debt obligations through bank credit, as
opposed to long-term public debt securities or equity
securities. The price and terms upon which we might receive such
extensions or additional bank credit, if at all, could be more
onerous than those contained in existing debt agreements. Any
such arrangements could, in turn, increase the risk that our
leverage may adversely affect our future financial and operating
flexibility and thereby impact our ability to pay cash
distributions at expected rates.
S-14
We may not be able to fully execute our growth strategy if we
encounter illiquid capital markets or increased competition for
investment opportunities.
Our strategy contemplates growth through the development and
acquisition of a wide range of midstream and other energy
infrastructure assets while maintaining a strong balance sheet.
This strategy includes constructing and acquiring additional
assets and businesses to enhance our ability to compete
effectively and diversifying our asset portfolio, thereby
providing more stable cash flow. We regularly consider and enter
into discussions regarding, and are currently contemplating
and/or pursuing, potential joint ventures, stand alone projects
or other transactions that we believe will present opportunities
to realize synergies, expand our role in the energy
infrastructure business and increase our market position.
We will require substantial new capital to finance the future
development and acquisition of assets and businesses. Any
limitations on our access to capital will impair our ability to
execute this strategy. If the cost of such capital becomes too
expensive, our ability to develop or acquire accretive assets
will be limited. We may not be able to raise the necessary funds
on satisfactory terms, if at all. The primary factors that
influence our initial cost of equity include market conditions,
fees we pay to underwriters and other offering costs, which
include amounts we pay for legal and accounting services. The
primary factors influencing our cost of borrowing include
interest rates, credit spreads, covenants, underwriting or loan
origination fees and similar charges we pay to lenders.
In addition, we are experiencing increased competition for the
types of assets and businesses we have historically purchased or
acquired. Increased competition for a limited pool of assets
could result in our losing to other bidders more often or
acquiring assets at less attractive prices. Either occurrence
would limit our ability to fully execute our growth strategy.
Our inability to execute our growth strategy may materially
adversely affect our ability to maintain or pay higher
distributions in the future.
Our growth strategy may adversely affect our results of
operations if we do not successfully integrate the businesses
that we acquire or if we substantially increase our indebtedness
and contingent liabilities to make acquisitions.
Our growth strategy includes making accretive acquisitions. As a
result, from time to time, we will evaluate and acquire assets
and businesses that we believe complement our existing
operations. We may be unable to integrate successfully
businesses we acquire in the future. We may incur substantial
expenses or encounter delays or other problems in connection
with our growth strategy that could negatively impact our
results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Moreover, acquisitions and business expansions involve numerous
risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in the assimilation of the operations,
technologies, services and products of the acquired companies or
business segments; |
|
|
|
establishing the internal controls and procedures that we are
required to maintain under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
|
|
|
managing relationships with new joint venture partners with whom
we have not previously partnered; |
|
|
|
inefficiencies and complexities that can arise because of
unfamiliarity with new assets and the businesses associated with
them, including with their markets; and |
|
|
|
diversion of the attention of management and other personnel
from day-to-day
business to the development or acquisition of new businesses and
other business opportunities. |
If consummated, any acquisition or investment would also likely
result in the incurrence of indebtedness and contingent
liabilities and an increase in interest expense and
depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses. As a result,
our capitalization and results of operations may change
significantly following an acquisition. A substantial increase
in our indebtedness and contingent liabilities could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows
and financial condition. In addition, any
S-15
anticipated benefits of a material acquisition, such as expected
cost savings, may not be fully realized, if at all.
Our growth strategy may adversely affect our results of
operations if we do not successfully integrate the businesses
that we acquire or if we substantially increase our indebtedness
and contingent liabilities to make acquisitions.
Our growth strategy includes making accretive acquisitions. As a
result, from time to time, we will evaluate and acquire assets
and businesses that we believe complement our existing
operations. We may incur substantial expenses or encounter
delays or other problems in connection with our growth strategy
that could negatively impact our results of operations, cash
flows and financial condition.
If consummated, any acquisition or investment would also likely
result in the incurrence of indebtedness and contingent
liabilities and an increase in interest expense and depreciation
and amortization expenses. As a result, our capitalization and
results of operations may change significantly following an
acquisition. A substantial increase in our indebtedness and
contingent liabilities could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Our operating cash flows from our capital projects may not be
immediate.
We are engaged in several construction projects involving
existing and new facilities for which significant capital has
been or will be expended, and our operating cash flow from a
particular project may not increase until a period of time after
its completion. For instance, if we build a new pipeline or
platform or expand an existing facility, the design,
construction, development and installation may occur over an
extended period of time, and we may not receive any material
increase in operating cash flow from that project until a period
of time after it is placed in service. If we experience any
unanticipated or extended delays in generating operating cash
flow from these projects, we may be required to reduce or
reprioritize our capital budget, sell non-core assets, access
the capital markets or decrease or limit distributions to
unitholders in order to meet our capital requirements.
Our actual construction, development and acquisition costs
could exceed forecasted amounts.
We will have significant expenditures for the development and
construction of energy infrastructure assets, including some
construction and development projects with significant
technological challenges. We may not be able to complete our
projects at the costs estimated at the time of each
projects initiation.
Substantially all of the common units in us that are owned by
EPCO and its affiliates are pledged as security under
EPCOs credit facility. Additionally, all of the member
interests in our general partner and all of the common units in
us that are owned by Enterprise GP Holdings are pledged under
its credit facility. Upon an event of default under either of
these credit facilities, a change in ownership or control of us
could ultimately result.
An affiliate of EPCO has pledged substantially all of its common
units in us as security under its credit facility. EPCOs
credit facility contains customary and other events of default
relating to defaults of EPCO and certain of its subsidiaries,
including certain defaults by us and other affiliates of EPCO.
An event of default, followed by a foreclosure on EPCOs
pledged collateral, could ultimately result in a change in
ownership of us. In addition, the 100% membership interest in
our general partner and the 13,454,498 of our common units that
are owned by Enterprise GP Holdings are pledged under Enterprise
GP Holdings credit facility. Enterprise GP Holdings
credit facility contains customary and other events of default.
Upon an event of default, the lenders under Enterprise GP
Holdings credit facility could foreclose on Enterprise GP
Holdings assets, which could ultimately result in a change
in control of our general partner and a change in the ownership
of our units held by Enterprise GP Holdings.
S-16
The credit and risk profile of our general partner and its
owners could adversely affect our credit ratings and profile.
The credit and business risk profiles of the general partner or
owners of a general partner may be factors in credit evaluations
of a master limited partnership. This is because the general
partner can exercise significant influence over the business
activities of the partnership, including its cash distribution
and acquisition strategy and business risk profile. Another
factor that may be considered is the financial condition of the
general partner and its owners, including the degree of their
financial leverage and their dependence on cash flow from the
partnership to service their indebtedness.
Entities controlling the owner of our general partner have
significant indebtedness outstanding and are dependent
principally on the cash distributions from their general partner
and limited partner equity interests in us to service such
indebtedness. Any distributions by us to such entities will be
made only after satisfying our then current obligations to our
creditors. Although we have taken certain steps in our
organizational structure, financial reporting and contractual
relationships to reflect the separateness of us and Enterprise
Products GP from the entities that control Enterprise Products
GP, our credit ratings and business risk profile could be
adversely affected if the ratings and risk profiles of the
entities that control our general partner were viewed as
substantially lower or more risky than ours.
The interruption of distributions to us from our subsidiaries
and joint ventures may affect our ability to satisfy our
obligations and to make distributions to our partners.
We are a holding company with no business operations. Our only
significant assets are the equity interests we own in our
subsidiaries and joint ventures. As a result, we depend upon the
earnings and cash flow of our subsidiaries and joint ventures
and the distribution of that cash to us in order to meet our
obligations and to allow us to make distributions to our
partners.
In addition, the charter documents governing our joint ventures
typically vest in the joint venture management committee sole
discretion regarding the occurrence and amount of distributions.
Some of the joint ventures in which we participate have separate
credit agreements that contain various restrictive covenants.
Among other things, those covenants may limit or restrict the
joint ventures ability to make distributions to us under
certain circumstances. Accordingly, our joint ventures may be
unable to make distributions to us at current levels if at all.
We may be unable to cause our joint ventures to take or not
to take certain actions unless some or all of our joint venture
participants agree.
We participate in several joint ventures. Due to the nature of
some of these arrangements, each participant in these joint
ventures has made substantial investments in the joint venture
and, accordingly, has required that the relevant charter
documents contain certain features designed to provide each
participant with the opportunity to participate in the
management of the joint venture and to protect its investment,
as well as any other assets which may be substantially dependent
on or otherwise affected by the activities of that joint
venture. These participation and protective features customarily
include a corporate governance structure that requires at least
a majority-in-interest
vote to authorize many basic activities and requires a greater
voting interest (up to 100%) to authorize more significant
activities. Examples of these more significant activities are
large expenditures or contractual commitments, the construction
or acquisition of assets, borrowing money or otherwise raising
capital, transactions with affiliates of a joint venture
participant, litigation and transactions not in the ordinary
course of business, among others. Thus, without the concurrence
of joint venture participants with enough voting interests, we
may be unable to cause any of our joint ventures to take or not
to take certain actions, even though those actions may be in the
best interest of us or the particular joint venture.
Moreover, any joint venture owner may sell, transfer or
otherwise modify its ownership interest in a joint venture,
whether in a transaction involving third parties or the other
joint venture owners. Any such transaction could result in us
being required to partner with different or additional parties.
S-17
A natural disaster, catastrophe or other event could result
in severe personal injury, property damage and environmental
damage, which could curtail our operations and otherwise
materially adversely affect our cash flow and, accordingly,
affect the market price of our common units.
Some of our operations involve risks of personal injury,
property damage and environmental damage, which could curtail
our operations and otherwise materially adversely affect our
cash flow. For example, natural gas facilities operate at high
pressures, sometimes in excess of 1,100 pounds per square inch.
We also operate oil and natural gas facilities located
underwater in the Gulf of Mexico, which can involve
complexities, such as extreme water pressure. Virtually all of
our operations are exposed to potential natural disasters,
including hurricanes, tornadoes, storms, floods and/or
earthquakes.
If one or more facilities that are owned by us or that deliver
oil, natural gas or other products to us are damaged by severe
weather or any other disaster, accident, catastrophe or event,
our operations could be significantly interrupted. Similar
interruptions could result from damage to production or other
facilities that supply our facilities or other stoppages arising
from factors beyond our control. These interruptions might
involve significant damage to people, property or the
environment, and repairs might take from a week or less for a
minor incident to six months or more for a major interruption.
Additionally, some of the storage contracts that we are a party
to obligate us to indemnify our customers for any damage or
injury occurring during the period in which the customers
natural gas is in our possession. Any event that interrupts the
revenues generated by our operations, or which causes us to make
significant expenditures not covered by insurance, could reduce
our cash available for paying distributions and, accordingly,
adversely affect the market price of our common units.
We believe that EPCO maintains adequate insurance coverage on
behalf of us, although insurance will not cover many types of
interruptions that might occur. As a result of market
conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance
policies can increase substantially, and in some instances,
certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for
reduced amounts of coverage. As a result, EPCO may not be able
to renew existing insurance policies on behalf of us or procure
other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if
at all. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we
were not fully insured, it could have a material adverse effect
on our financial position and results of operations. In
addition, the proceeds of any such insurance may not be paid in
a timely manner and may be insufficient if such an event were to
occur.
An impairment of goodwill and intangible assets could reduce
our earnings.
At December 31, 2005, our balance sheet reflected
$494 million of goodwill and $913.6 million of
intangible assets. Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price
of a business exceeds the fair market value of the tangible and
separately measurable intangible net assets. Generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (otherwise known as
GAAP) require us to test goodwill for impairment on
an annual basis or when events or circumstances occur indicating
that goodwill might be impaired. Long-lived assets such as
intangible assets with finite useful lives are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If we determine
that any of our goodwill or intangible assets were impaired, we
would be required to take an immediate charge to earnings with a
correlative effect on partners equity and balance sheet
leverage as measured by debt to total capitalization.
Increases in interest rates could materially adversely affect
our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
In addition to our exposure to commodity prices, we have
significant exposure to increases in interest rates. As of
December 31, 2005, we had approximately $4.8 billion
of consolidated debt, of which approximately $3.3 billion
was at fixed interest rates and approximately $1.5 billion
was at variable interest rates, after giving effect to existing
interest swap arrangements. From time to time, we may enter into
additional interest rate swap arrangements, which could increase
our exposure to variable interest rates. As
S-18
a result, our results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition, could be materially adversely affected by significant
increases in interest rates.
An increase in interest rates may also cause a corresponding
decline in demand for equity investments, in general, and in
particular for yield-based equity investments such as our common
units. Any such reduction in demand for our common units
resulting from other more attractive investment opportunities
may cause the trading price of our common units to decline.
The use of derivative financial instruments could result in
material financial losses by us.
We historically have sought to limit a portion of the adverse
effects resulting from changes in oil and natural gas commodity
prices and interest rates by using financial derivative
instruments and other hedging mechanisms from time to time. To
the extent that we hedge our commodity price and interest rate
exposures, we will forego the benefits we would otherwise
experience if commodity prices or interest rates were to change
in our favor. In addition, even though monitored by management,
hedging activities can result in losses. Such losses could occur
under various circumstances, including if a counterparty does
not perform its obligations under the hedge arrangement, the
hedge is imperfect, or hedging policies and procedures are not
followed.
Our pipeline integrity program may impose significant costs
and liabilities on us.
The U.S. Department of Transportation issued final rules
(effective March 2001 with respect to hazardous liquid pipelines
and February 2004 with respect to natural gas pipelines)
requiring pipeline operators to develop integrity management
programs to comprehensively evaluate their pipelines, and take
measures to protect pipeline segments located in what the rules
refer to as high consequence areas. The final rule
resulted from the enactment of the Pipeline Safety Improvement
Act of 2002. At this time, we cannot predict the ultimate costs
of compliance with this rule because those costs will depend on
the number and extent of any repairs found to be necessary as a
result of the pipeline integrity testing that is required by the
rule. We will continue our pipeline integrity testing programs
to assess and maintain the integrity of our pipelines. The
results of these tests could cause us to incur significant and
unanticipated capital and operating expenditures for repairs or
upgrades deemed necessary to ensure the continued safe and
reliable operation of our pipelines.
Environmental costs and liabilities and changing
environmental regulation could materially affect our results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local
regulatory requirements relating to environmental affairs,
health and safety, waste management and chemical and petroleum
products. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce
compliance with applicable regulations and permits and to
subject violators to civil and criminal penalties, including
substantial fines, injunctions or both. Third parties may also
have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce compliance.
We will make expenditures in connection with environmental
matters as part of normal capital expenditure programs. However,
future environmental law developments, such as stricter laws,
regulations, permits or enforcement policies, could
significantly increase some costs of our operations, including
the handling, manufacture, use, emission or disposal of
substances and wastes.
Federal, state or local regulatory measures could materially
adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows
and financial condition.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, regulates our
interstate natural gas pipelines and interstate natural gas
storage facilities under the Natural Gas Act, and interstate NGL
and petrochemical pipelines under the Interstate Commerce Act.
The Surface Transportation Board regulates our interstate
propylene pipelines. State regulatory agencies regulate our
intrastate natural gas and NGL pipelines, intrastate storage
facilities and gathering lines.
S-19
Under the Natural Gas Act, the FERC has authority to regulate
natural gas companies that provide natural gas pipeline
transportation services in interstate commerce. Its authority to
regulate those services is comprehensive and includes the rates
charged for the services, terms and condition of service and
certification and construction of new facilities. The FERC
requires that our services are provided on a non-discriminatory
basis so that all shippers have open access to our pipelines and
storage. Pursuant to the FERCs jurisdiction over
interstate gas pipeline rates, existing pipeline rates may be
challenged by customer complaint or by the FERC Staff and
proposed rate increases may be challenged by protest.
We have interests in natural gas pipeline facilities offshore
from Texas and Louisiana. These facilities are subject to
regulation by the FERC and other federal agencies, including the
Department of Interior, under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands
Act, and by the Department of Transportations Office of
Pipeline Safety under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act.
Our intrastate NGL and natural gas pipelines are subject to
regulation in many states, including Alabama, Colorado,
Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico and Texas, and our intrastate
natural gas pipelines are subject to regulation by the FERC
pursuant to Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act. We
also have natural gas underground storage facilities in
Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. Although state regulation is
typically less onerous than at the FERC, proposed and existing
rates subject to state regulation and the provision of services
on a non-discriminatory basis are also subject to challenge by
protest and complaint, respectively.
For a general overview of federal, state and local regulation
applicable to our assets, please read the regulation and
environmental information included under Item 1 of our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005. This regulatory oversight can
affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our
products and could materially adversely affect our cash flows.
Terrorist attacks aimed at our facilities could adversely
affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition.
Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the
United States, the United States government has issued warnings
that energy assets, including our nations pipeline
infrastructure, may be the future target of terrorist
organizations. Any terrorist attack on our facilities or
pipelines or those of our customers could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
We depend on the leadership and involvement of Dan L. Duncan
for the success of our and our subsidiaries businesses.
We depend on the leadership, involvement and services of Dan L.
Duncan, the founder of EPCO and the Chairman of our general
partner. Mr. Duncan has been integral to our success and
the success of EPCO due in part to his ability to identify and
develop business opportunities, make strategic decisions and
attract and retain key personnel. The loss of his leadership and
involvement or the services of any members of our senior
management team could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows and financial
condition.
Some of our executive officers and directors face potential
conflicts of interest in managing our business.
Certain of our executive officers and directors are also
officers and/or directors of EPCO, the general partner of
Enterprise GP Holdings, the general partner of TEPPCO and other
affiliates of EPCO. These relationships may create conflicts of
interest regarding corporate opportunities and other matters.
The resolution of any such conflicts may not always be in our or
our unitholders best interests. In addition, these
overlapping executive officers and directors allocate their time
among EPCO, Enterprise GP Holdings, TEPPCO and other affiliates
of EPCO. These officers and directors face potential conflicts
regarding the allocation of their time, which may adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial
condition. Please read Management for more detailed
information on which of our officers and directors serve as
officers and/or directors of EPCO, Enterprise GP Holdings,
TEPPCO and other affiliates of EPCO.
S-20
Risks Related to Our Common Units as a Result of Our
Partnership Structure
We may issue additional securities without the approval of
our common unitholders.
Subject to NYSE rules, we may issue an unlimited number of
limited partner interests of any type (to parties other than our
affiliates) without the approval of our unitholders. Our
partnership agreement does not give our common unitholders the
right to approve the issuance of equity securities, including
equity securities ranking senior to our common units. The
issuance of additional common units or other equity securities
of equal or senior rank will have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
the proportionate ownership interest of a common unit will
decrease; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash available for distributions on each unit may
decrease; |
|
|
|
the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase; |
|
|
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit
may be diminished; and |
|
|
|
the market price of our common units may decline. |
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to pay
distributions at the current level following establishment of
cash reserves and payments of fees and expenses, including
payments to Enterprise Products GP.
Because distributions on our common units are dependent on the
amount of cash we generate, distributions may fluctuate based on
our performance. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to
pay distributions at the current level each quarter. The actual
amount of cash that is available to be distributed each quarter
will depend upon numerous factors, some of which are beyond our
control and the control of Enterprise Products GP. These factors
include but are not limited to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our operating costs; |
|
|
|
the level of competition in our business segments; |
|
|
|
prevailing economic conditions; |
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make; |
|
|
|
the restrictions contained in our debt agreements and our debt
service requirements; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
the cost of acquisitions, if any; and |
|
|
|
the amount, if any, of cash reserves established by Enterprise
Products GP in its sole discretion. |
In addition, you should be aware that our ability to pay the
minimum quarterly distribution each quarter depends primarily on
our cash flow, including cash flow from financial reserves and
working capital borrowings, not solely on profitability, which
is affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make cash
distributions during periods when we record losses and we may
not make distributions during periods when we record net income.
We do not have the same flexibility as other types of
organizations to accumulate cash and equity to protect against
illiquidity in the future.
Unlike a corporation, our partnership agreement requires us to
make quarterly distributions to our unitholders of all available
cash reduced by any amounts of reserves for commitments and
contingencies, including capital and operating costs and debt
service requirements. The value of our units and other limited
partner interests may decrease in direct correlation with
decreases in the amount we distribute per unit. Accordingly, if
we experience a liquidity problem in the future, we may not be
able to issue more equity to recapitalize.
S-21
Cost reimbursements and fees due to Enterprise Products GP
may be substantial and will reduce our cash available for
distribution to holders of our units.
Prior to making any distribution on our units, we will reimburse
Enterprise Products GP and its affiliates, including officers
and directors of Enterprise Products GP, for expenses they incur
on our behalf. The reimbursement of expenses could adversely
affect our ability to pay cash distributions to holders of our
units. Enterprise Products GP has sole discretion to determine
the amount of these expenses. In addition, Enterprise Products
GP and its affiliates may provide other services to us for which
we will be charged fees as determined by Enterprise Products GP.
Enterprise Products GP and its affiliates have limited
fiduciary responsibilities to, and conflicts of interest with
respect to, our partnership, which may permit it to favor its
own interests to your detriment.
The directors and officers of Enterprise Products GP and its
affiliates have duties to manage Enterprise Products GP in a
manner that is beneficial to its members. At the same time,
Enterprise Products GP has duties to manage our partnership in a
manner that is beneficial to us. Therefore, Enterprise Products
GPs duties to us may conflict with the duties of its
officers and directors to its members. Such conflicts may
include, among others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement
requires Enterprise Products GP or EPCO to pursue a business
strategy that favors us; |
|
|
|
decisions of Enterprise Products GP regarding the amount and
timing of asset purchases and sales, cash expenditures,
borrowings, issuances of additional units and reserves in any
quarter may affect the level of cash available to pay quarterly
distributions to unitholders and Enterprise Products GP; |
|
|
|
under our partnership agreement, Enterprise Products GP
determines which costs incurred by it and its affiliates are
reimbursable by us; |
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP is allowed to resolve any conflicts of
interest involving us and Enterprise Products GP and its
affiliates; |
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us, such as EPCO, in resolving
conflicts of interest, which has the effect of limiting its
fiduciary duty to unitholders; |
|
|
|
any resolution of a conflict of interest by Enterprise Products
GP not made in bad faith and that is fair and reasonable to us
shall be binding on the partners and shall not be a breach of
our partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
affiliates of Enterprise Products GP, including TEPPCO, may
compete with us in certain circumstances; |
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP has limited its liability and reduced its
fiduciary duties, and has also restricted the remedies available
to our unitholders for actions that might, without the
limitations, constitute breaches of fiduciary duty. As a result
of purchasing our units, you are deemed to consent to some
actions and conflicts of interest that might otherwise
constitute a breach of fiduciary or other duties under
applicable law; |
|
|
|
we do not have any employees and we rely solely on employees of
EPCO and its affiliates; |
|
|
|
in some instances, Enterprise Products GP may cause us to borrow
funds in order to permit the payment of distributions, even if
the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make incentive
distributions; |
|
|
|
our partnership agreement does not restrict Enterprise Products
GP from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services
rendered to us or entering into additional contractual
arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf; |
S-22
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP intends to limit its liability regarding
our contractual and other obligations and, in some
circumstances, may be entitled to be indemnified by us; |
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP controls the enforcement of obligations
owed to us by our general partner and its affiliates; and |
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP decides whether to retain separate
counsel, accountants or others to perform services for us. |
We have significant business relationships with entities
controlled by Dan L. Duncan, including EPCO and TEPPCO. For
detailed information on these relationships and related
transactions with these entities during 2005, please read
Item 13 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot easily
remove Enterprise Products GP.
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
managements decisions regarding our business. Unitholders
did not elect Enterprise Products GP or its directors and will
have no right to elect our general partner or its directors on
an annual or other continuing basis.
Furthermore, if unitholders are dissatisfied with the
performance of our general partner, they currently have no
practical ability to remove Enterprise Products GP or the
officers or directors of Enterprise Products GP. Enterprise
Products GP may not be removed except upon the vote of the
holders of at least 60% of our outstanding units voting together
as a single class. Because affiliates of Enterprise Products GP
will own approximately 35.6% of our outstanding common units
after this offering, the removal of Enterprise Products GP as
our general partner is not practicable without the consent of
Enterprise Products GP and its affiliates.
Unitholders voting rights are further restricted by a
provision in our partnership agreement stating that any units
held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of our units
then outstanding, other than our general partner and its
affiliates, cannot be voted on any matter. In addition, our
partnership agreement contains provisions limiting the ability
of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about
our operations, as well as other provisions limiting our
unitholders ability to influence the manner or direction
of our management.
As a result of these provisions, the trading price of our common
units may be lower than other forms of equity ownership because
of the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading
price.
Enterprise Products GP has a limited call right that may
require common unitholders to sell their units at an undesirable
time or price.
If at any time Enterprise Products GP and its affiliates own 85%
or more of the common units then outstanding, Enterprise
Products GP will have the right, but not the obligation, which
it may assign to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all,
but not less than all, of the remaining common units held by
unaffiliated persons at a price not less than the then current
market price. As a result, common unitholders may be required to
sell their common units at an undesirable time or price and may
therefore not receive any return on their investment. They may
also incur a tax liability upon a sale of their units.
Our common unitholders may not have limited liability if a
court finds that limited partner actions constitute control of
our business.
Under Delaware law, common unitholders could be held liable for
our obligations to the same extent as a general partner if a
court determined that the right of limited partners to remove
our general partner or to take other action under our
partnership agreement constituted participation in the
control of our business.
S-23
Under Delaware law, our general partner generally has unlimited
liability for our obligations, such as our debts and
environmental liabilities, except for those of our contractual
obligations that are expressly made without recourse to our
general partner.
In addition, Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform
Limited Partnership Act provides that, under some circumstances,
a limited partner may be liable to us for the amount of a
distribution for a period of three years from the date of the
distribution.
A large number of our outstanding common units may be sold in
the market, which may depress the market price of our common
units.
Shell owns 29,407,549 of our common units, representing
approximately 7.5% of our outstanding common units at
February 22, 2006, and has publicly announced its intention
to reduce its holdings of our common units on an orderly
schedule over a period of years, taking into account market
conditions. All of the common units held by Shell are registered
for resale under our effective registration statement on
Form S-3.
Sales of a substantial number of our common units in the public
market could cause the market price of our common units to
decline. As of February 22, 2006, we had
390,308,358 common units outstanding. Sales of a
substantial number of these common units in the trading markets,
whether in a single transaction or series of transactions, or
the possibility that these sales may occur, could reduce the
market price of our outstanding common units. In addition, these
sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, could make
it more difficult for us to sell our common units in the future.
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
If we were to become subject to entity level taxation for
federal or state tax purposes, then our cash available for
distribution to our common unitholders would be substantially
reduced.
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in
our common units depends largely on our being treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes. We have not
requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on this matter.
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income
at the corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35%,
and we likely would pay state taxes as well. Distributions to
our unitholders would generally be taxed again as corporate
distributions, and no income, gains, losses or deductions would
flow though to our unitholders. Because a tax would be imposed
upon us as a corporation, the cash available for distributions
to our common unitholders would be substantially reduced.
Therefore, treatment of us as a corporation would result in a
material reduction in the after-tax return to our common
unitholders, likely causing a substantial reduction in the value
of our common units.
Current law may change, causing us to be treated as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise
subjecting us to entity level taxation. For example, because of
widespread state budget deficits, several states are evaluating
ways to subject partnerships to entity level taxation through
the imposition of state income, franchise or other forms of
taxation. If any state were to impose a tax upon us as an
entity, the cash available for distribution to our common
unitholders would be reduced.
A successful IRS contest of the federal income tax positions
we take may adversely impact the market for our common units,
and the costs of any contests will be borne by our unitholders
and our general partner.
The IRS may adopt positions that differ from the positions we
take, even positions taken with advice of counsel. It may be
necessary to resort to administrative or court proceedings to
sustain some or all of the positions we take. A court may not
agree with some or all of the positions we take. Any contest
with the IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for
our common units and the price at which our
S-24
common units trade. In addition, the costs of any contest with
the IRS, principally legal, accounting and related fees, will be
borne indirectly by our unitholders and our general partner.
Even if our common unitholders do not receive any cash
distributions from us, they will be required to pay taxes on
their share of our taxable income.
Common unitholders will be required to pay federal income taxes
and, in some cases, state and local income taxes on their share
of our taxable income even if they do not receive any cash
distributions from us. Our common unitholders may not receive
cash distributions from us equal to their share of our taxable
income or even equal to the actual tax liability which results
from their share of our taxable income.
Tax gain or loss on the disposition of our common units could
be different than expected.
If a common unitholder sells its common units, the unitholder
will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between
the amount realized and the unitholders tax basis in those
common units. Prior distributions to a unitholder in excess of
the total net taxable income a unitholder is allocated for a
common unit, which decreased the unitholders tax basis in
that common unit, will, in effect, become taxable income to the
unitholder if the common unit is sold at a price greater than
the unitholders tax basis in that common unit, even if the
price the unitholder receives is less than the unitholders
original cost. A substantial portion of the amount realized,
whether or not representing gain, may be ordinary income to a
unitholder.
Tax-exempt entities, regulated investment companies and
foreign persons face unique tax issues from owning common units
that may result in adverse tax consequences to them.
Investments in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as
individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs), regulated
investment companies (known as mutual funds), and foreign
persons raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all
of our income allocated to unitholders who are organizations
exempt from federal income tax, including individual retirement
accounts and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business
taxable income and will be taxable to them. Recent legislation
treats net income derived from the ownership of certain publicly
traded partnerships (including us) as qualifying income to a
regulated investment company. Distributions to
non-U.S. persons
will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable
effective tax rate, and
non-U.S. persons
will be required to file United States federal income tax
returns and pay tax on their share of our taxable income.
We will treat each purchaser of our common units as having
the same tax benefits without regard to the units purchased. The
IRS may challenge this treatment, which could adversely affect
the value of our common units.
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common
units, we adopt depreciation and amortization positions that may
not conform with all aspects of applicable Treasury regulations.
A successful IRS challenge to those positions could adversely
affect the amount of tax benefits available to a common
unitholder. It also could affect the timing of these tax
benefits or the amount of gain from a sale of common units and
could have a negative impact on the value of our common units or
result in audit adjustments to the common unitholders tax
returns.
Our common unitholders will likely be subject to state and
local taxes and return filing requirements in states where they
do not live as a result of an investment in our common units.
In addition to federal income taxes, our common unitholders will
likely be subject to other taxes, including state and local
income taxes, unincorporated business taxes and estate,
inheritance or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various
jurisdictions in which we do business or own property. Our
common unitholders will likely be required to file state and
local income tax returns and pay state and local income taxes in
some or all of these various jurisdictions. Further, they may by
subject to penalties for failure to comply with those
requirements. We may own property or conduct business in other
states or foreign
S-25
countries in the future. It is the responsibility of the common
unitholder to file all United States federal, state and local
tax returns.
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and
profits interests during any twelve-month period will result in
the termination of our partnership for federal income tax
purposes.
We will be considered to have terminated for federal income tax
purposes if there is a sale or exchange of 50% or more of the
total interests in our capital and profits within a twelve-month
period. Our termination would, among other things, result in the
closing of our taxable year for all unitholders and could result
in a deferral of depreciation deductions allowable in computing
our taxable income.
S-26
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds, based on an assumed offering
price of $25.04 per common unit, of approximately
$367.5 million from the sale of 15,000,000 common
units in this offering (including the net capital contribution
of $7.3 million from our general partner to maintain its 2%
general partner interest), after deducting underwriting
discounts, commissions and estimated offering expenses payable
by us. If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase
additional common units in full, we will receive net proceeds of
approximately $422.7 million, including a proportionate net
capital contribution of $8.5 million from our general
partner. We will use the net proceeds of this offering,
including any exercise of the underwriters option to
purchase additional common units, to temporarily reduce
borrowings outstanding under our multi-year revolving credit
facility and for general partnership purposes.
In general, our indebtedness under the multi-year revolving
credit facility was incurred for working capital purposes,
capital expenditures and business combinations. Amounts repaid
under our multi-year revolving credit facility may be reborrowed
from time to time for acquisitions, capital expenditures and
other general partnership purposes. As of February 23,
2006, we had $365 million of borrowings outstanding under
our multi-year revolving credit facility that bears interest at
a variable rate, which is currently approximately 5.1% per
annum. Our multi-year
revolving credit facility matures in October 2010.
Affiliates of certain of the underwriters or their affiliates
are lenders under our multi-year revolving credit facility and,
accordingly, will receive a portion of the proceeds of this
offering.
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
per common unit would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us
from this offering by $14.7 million, assuming the number of
common units offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting
underwriting discounts, commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us. The foregoing increase (decrease)
includes the net capital contribution from our general partner
to maintain its 2% general partner interest, which net capital
contribution will increase (decrease) by $0.3 million for
each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering
price per common unit and based on the other assumptions noted
above. For a further description of the effect of the use of
proceeds on our capitalization, please read
Capitalization.
S-27
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON UNITS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
On February 22, 2006, we had 390,308,358 common units
outstanding, beneficially held by approximately
155,000 holders. Our common units are traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol EPD.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low sales price ranges for our common units, as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange Composite
Transaction Tape, and the amount, record date and payment date
of the quarterly cash distributions paid per common unit. The
last reported sales price of our common units on the
New York Stock Exchange on February 23, 2006 was
$25.04 per common unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price ranges | |
|
Cash distribution history | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Per unit | |
|
Record date | |
|
Payment date | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
$ |
24.72 |
|
|
$ |
21.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.3725 |
|
|
|
April 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
May 12, 2004 |
|
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
|
23.84 |
|
|
|
20.00 |
|
|
|
0.3725 |
|
|
|
July 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
August 6, 2004 |
|
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
|
23.70 |
|
|
|
20.19 |
|
|
|
0.3950 |
|
|
|
October 29, 2004 |
|
|
|
November 5, 2004 |
|
|
4th Quarter
|
|
|
25.99 |
|
|
|
22.73 |
|
|
|
0.4000 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
February 14, 2005 |
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
$ |
28.35 |
|
|
$ |
23.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.4100 |
|
|
|
April 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
May 10, 2005 |
|
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
|
27.09 |
|
|
|
24.77 |
|
|
|
0.4200 |
|
|
|
July 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
August 10, 2005 |
|
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
|
27.66 |
|
|
|
23.50 |
|
|
|
0.4300 |
|
|
|
October 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
November 8, 2005 |
|
|
4th Quarter
|
|
|
26.02 |
|
|
|
23.38 |
|
|
|
0.4375 |
|
|
|
January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
February 9, 2006 |
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
Quarter(1)
|
|
$ |
26.00 |
|
|
$ |
24.25 |
|
|
$ |
|
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Through February 23, 2006. |
|
|
(2) |
The distribution with respect to the 1st quarter of 2006
has neither been declared nor paid. |
S-28
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
on a consolidated historical basis; |
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to give effect to (i) the sale of
15,000,000 common units in this offering at an assumed
offering price of $25.04 per common unit, (ii) our
general partners proportionate net capital contribution of
$7.3 million and (iii) the application of all of the
net proceeds of $367.5 million (before exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional common units)
to temporarily reduce debt under our multi-year revolving credit
facility as described under Use of Proceeds. |
The historical data in the table on the following page are
derived from and should be read in conjunction with our
historical financial statements, including the accompanying
notes, incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement.
The historical data on the following page does not reflect
events after December 31, 2005, including the quarterly
cash distribution of an aggregate $193.2 million paid on
February 9, 2006.
S-29
Historical and As Adjusted Capitalization
As of December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
As Adjusted(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(dollars in millions) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
42.1 |
|
|
$ |
42.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings, including current portions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility, variable rate, due
October 2010
|
|
$ |
490.0 |
|
|
$ |
122.5 |
|
|
Pascagoula MBFC Loan, 8.70% fixed-rate, due March 2010
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes B, 7.50% fixed-rate, due February 2011
|
|
|
450.0 |
|
|
|
450.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes C, 6.375% fixed-rate, due February 2013
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes D, 6.875% fixed-rate, due March 2033
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes E, 4.00% fixed-rate, due October 2007
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes F, 4.625% fixed-rate, due October 2009
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes G, 5.60% fixed-rate, due October 2014
|
|
|
650.0 |
|
|
|
650.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes H, 6.65% fixed-rate, due October 2034
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
|
350.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes I, 5.00% fixed-rate, due March 2015
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes J, 5.75% fixed-rate, due March 2035
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
Senior Notes K, 4.95% fixed-rate, due June 2010
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
Dixie revolving credit facility, due June 2007
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
GulfTerra senior notes and senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
Other, including unamortized discounts and premiums
|
|
|
(32.3 |
) |
|
|
(32.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt obligations
|
|
|
4,833.8 |
|
|
|
4,466.3 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
|
103.2 |
|
|
Partners equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners
|
|
|
5,561.3 |
|
|
|
5,921.5 |
|
|
General partner
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
|
|
120.8 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners equity
|
|
|
5,679.3 |
|
|
|
6,046.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
10,616.3 |
|
|
$ |
10,616.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
per common unit (a) would decrease (increase) each of
our as adjusted multi-year revolving credit facility and total
debt obligations by $14.7 million, and (b) would
increase (decrease) our as adjusted limited partners
partners equity by $14.4 million, general
partners partners equity by $0.3 million and
total partners equity by $14.7 million, assuming the
number of common units offered by us, as set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting
underwriting discounts, commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us. The foregoing increases (decreases)
include the net capital contribution from our general partner to
maintain its 2% general partner interest, which net capital
contribution will increase (decrease) by $0.3 million for
each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering
price per common unit and based on the other assumptions noted
above. The as adjusted information discussed above is
illustrative only and following the completion of this offering
will be adjusted based on the actual public offering price and
other terms of this offering determined at pricing. |
S-30
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of
each of the directors and executive officers of our general
partner at February 23, 2006. Each executive officer holds
the same respective office shown below in the general partner of
the Operating Partnership. Each member of the Board of Directors
serves until such members death, resignation or removal.
The executive officers are elected for one-year terms and may be
removed, with or without cause, only by the Board of Directors.
Our unitholders do not elect the officers or directors of
Enterprise Products GP. Dan. L. Duncan, through his indirect
control of Enterprise Products GP, has the ability to elect,
remove and replace at any time, all of the officers and
directors of Enterprise Products GP.
Three of our nine directors are independent under the
independence standards established by the New York Stock
Exchange. The New York Stock Exchange does not require a listed
limited partnership like us to have a majority of independent
directors on the board of directors of our general partner. As
described below, certain of our officers and directors are also
officers and/or directors of (i) EPCO, (ii) EPE
Holdings, LLC, or EPE Holdings, the general partner of
Enterprise GP Holdings, (iii) Texas Eastern Products
Pipeline Company, LLC, or TEPPCO GP, the general partner of
TEPPCO, and (iv) other affiliates of EPCO. These
overlapping executive officers and directors allocate their time
among EPCO, Enterprise GP Holdings, TEPPCO and other affiliates
of EPCO. These officers and directors face potential conflicts
regarding the allocation of their time and business
opportunities, which may adversely affect our business, results
of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position with Enterprise Products GP |
|
Dan L.
Duncan(1)
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Director and Chairman |
Robert G.
Phillips(1)
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Dr. Ralph S.
Cunningham(1)
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director, Group Executive Vice President and Chief Operating
Officer |
Michael A.
Creel(1)
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Richard H.
Bachmann(1)
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Director, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and
Secretary |
W. Randall
Fowler(1)
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Director, Senior Vice President and Treasurer |
E. William
Barnett(2,3,5)
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Director |
Philip C.
Jackson(2,3,4)
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
Director |
Stephen L.
Baum(2,3)
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director |
James H.
Lytal(1)
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
A.J.
Teague(1)
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Executive Vice President |
Michael J.
Knesek(1)
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller and Principal Accounting
Officer |
|
|
(1) |
Executive officer |
|
(2) |
Member of Audit and Conflicts Committee |
|
(3) |
Member of Governance Committee |
|
(4) |
Chairman of Audit and Conflicts Committee |
|
(5) |
Chairman of Governance Committee |
Dan L. Duncan was elected Chairman and a Director of
Enterprise Products GP in April 1998 and Chairman and a Director
of the general partner of our operating partnership in December
2003. Mr. Duncan has served as Chairman and a Director of
EPE Holdings since April 2005 and as Chairman of EPCO since 1979.
Robert G. Phillips was elected President and Chief
Executive Officer of Enterprise Products GP in February 2005.
Mr. Phillips served as President and Chief Operating
Officer of Enterprise Products GP
S-31
from September 2004 to February 2005. Mr. Phillips has
served as a Director of Enterprise Products GP since September
2004; a Director of the general partner of our operating
partnership since September 2004; and a Director of EPE Holdings
since February 2006. Mr. Phillips served as a Director of
GulfTerras general partner from August 1998 until
September 2004. He served as Chief Executive Officer for
GulfTerra and its general partner from November 1999 until
September 2004 and as Chairman from October 2002 until September
2004. He served as Executive Vice President of GulfTerra from
August 1998 to October 1999. Mr. Phillips served as
President of El Paso Field Services Company from June 1997 to
September 2004. He served as President of El Paso Energy
Resources Company from December 1996 to July 1997, President of
El Paso Field Services Company from April 1996 to December 1996
and Senior Vice President of El Paso Corporation from September
1995 to April 1996. For more than five years prior,
Mr. Phillips was Chief Executive Officer of Eastex Energy,
Inc.
Dr. Ralph S. Cunningham was elected Group Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Enterprise
Products GP in December 2005 and a Director in February 2006.
Dr. Cunningham previously served as a Director of
Enterprise Products GP from 1998 until March 2005 and served as
Chairman and a Director of TEPPCO GP from March 2005 until
November 2005. He retired in 1997 from CITGO Petroleum
Corporation, where he had served as President and Chief
Executive Officer since 1995. He serves as a Director of Tetra
Technologies, Inc. (a publicly traded energy services and
chemical company), EnCana Corporation (a Canadian publicly
traded independent oil and natural gas company) and Agrium, Inc.
(a Canadian publicly traded agricultural chemicals company) and
was a Director of EPCO from 1987 to 1997.
Michael A. Creel was elected Executive Vice President of
Enterprise Products GP and EPCO in January 2001, after serving
as a Senior Vice President of Enterprise Products GP and EPCO
from November 1999 to January 2001. Mr. Creel, a certified
public accountant, served as Chief Financial Officer of EPCO
from June 2000 through April 2005 and was named Chief Operating
Officer of EPCO in April 2005. In June 2000, Mr. Creel was
also named Chief Financial Officer of Enterprise Products GP.
Mr. Creel has served as a Director of the general partner
of our Operating Partnership since December 2003, and has served
as President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of EPE
Holdings since August 2005. Mr. Creel was elected a
Director of Edge Petroleum Corporation (a publicly traded oil
and natural gas exploration and production company) in October
2005 and a Director of Enterprise Products GP and TEPPCO GP in
February 2006.
Richard H. Bachmann was elected Executive Vice President,
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of Enterprise Products GP and
EPCO in January 1999 and a Director of Enterprise Products GP in
February 2006. Mr. Bachmann previously served as a Director
of Enterprise Products GP from June 2000 to January 2004.
Mr. Bachmann has served as a Director of the general
partner of our Operating Partnership since December 2003 and has
served as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and
Secretary of EPE Holdings since August 2005. Mr. Bachmann
was elected a Director of EPE Holdings and TEPPCO GP in February
2006 and of EPCO in January 1999.
W. Randall Fowler was elected Senior Vice President
and Treasurer of Enterprise Products GP in February 2005 and a
Director in February 2006. Mr. Fowler, a certified public
accountant (inactive), joined us as Director of Investor
Relations in January 1999 and served as Treasurer and a Vice
President of Enterprise Products GP and EPCO from August 2000 to
February 2005. Mr. Fowler has served as Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of EPE Holdings since
August 2005 and as Chief Financial Officer of EPCO since April
2005. Mr. Fowler was elected a Director of EPE Holdings and
TEPPCO GP in February 2006.
E. William Barnett was elected a Director of
Enterprise Products GP in March 2005. Mr. Barnett practiced
law with Baker Botts L.L.P. from 1958 until his retirement in
2004. In 1984, he became Managing Partner of Baker Botts L.L.P.
and continued in that role for fourteen years until 1998. He was
Senior Counsel to the firm from 1998 until June 2004, when he
retired from the firm. Mr. Barnett served as Chairman of
the Board of Trustees of Rice University from 1996 to July 2005.
He is a Life Trustee of The University of Texas Law School
Foundation; a Director of St. Lukes Episcopal Health
System; a
S-32
Director of the Center for Houstons Future and a current
Director and former Chairman of the Houston Zoo, Inc. (the
operating arm of the Houston Zoo). He is a Director of Reliant
Energy, Inc., a publicly traded electric services company. He is
also Director and former Chairman of the Greater Houston
Partnership and Chairman of the Advisory Board of the Baker
Institute for Public Policy at Rice University. He also served
as a trustee of Baylor College of Medicine from 1993 until 2004.
Mr. Barnett is a member of Enterprise Products GPs
Audit and Conflicts Committee and serves as Chairman of its
Governance Committee.
Philip C. Jackson was elected a Director of Enterprise
Products GP in August 2005. Mr. Jackson was an Adjunct
Professor of Finance at Birmingham-Southern College from 1989
until his retirement in 1999. Mr. Jackson served as Vice
Chairman of Compass Bancshares, Inc. from 1980 until 1989 and as
a consultant and outside Director from 1978 until 1980. He was a
member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
from 1975 until 1978. Mr. Jackson is a member of the
Advisory Board of Compass Bank; a Trustee of Birmingham-Southern
College; a Director of Saul Centers, Inc., a publicly traded
real estate investment trust; and a Governor of the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America. Mr. Jackson is a member of
Enterprise Products GPs Governance Committee and serves as
Chairman of its Audit and Conflicts Committee.
Stephen L. Baum was elected a Director of Enterprise
Products GP in February 2006. Mr. Baum served as Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Sempra Energy from
September 2000 until his retirement in January 2006. He served
as Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer of Sempra Energy
from June 1998 to June 2000. Mr. Baum was President and
Chief Executive Officer of Enova Corp., the parent company of
San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) from 1996
to 1997, and was an Executive Vice President of SDG&E from
1993 to 1996. Prior to joining SDG&E in 1985, he was Senior
Vice President and General Counsel of the New York Power
Authority from 1982 to 1985. Mr. Baum has served as a
Director of Computer Sciences Corp. (a publicly traded
information technology company) since 1999 and serves as
Chairman of its Audit Committee. Mr. Baum serves on the
Audit and Conflicts Committee and the Governance Committee of
Enterprise Products GP.
James H. Lytal was elected Executive Vice President of
Enterprise Products GP in September 2004. Mr. Lytal served
as a Director of GulfTerras general partner from August
1994 until September 2004, and as President of GulfTerra and its
general partner from July 1995 until September 2004. He served
as Senior Vice President of GulfTerra and its general partner
from August 1994 to June 1995. Prior to joining GulfTerra,
Mr. Lytal served in various capacities with the oil and gas
exploration and production and natural gas pipeline businesses
of United Gas Pipeline Company, Texas Oil and Gas, Inc. and
American Pipeline Company
A.J. Teague was elected an Executive Vice President
of Enterprise Products GP in November 1999. From 1998 to 1999,
Mr. Teague served as President of Tejas Natural Gas
Liquids, LLC.
Michael J. Knesek, a certified public accountant, was
elected Senior Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer
of Enterprise Products GP in February 2005. Previously,
Mr. Knesek served as Principal Accounting Officer and a
Vice President of Enterprise Products GP from August 2000 to
February 2005. Mr. Knesek has served as Senior Vice
President and Principal Accounting Officer of EPE Holdings since
August 2005. Mr. Knesek has been the Controller and a Vice
President of EPCO since 1990.
S-33
MATERIAL TAX CONSEQUENCES
This section is a summary of the material tax consequences that
may be relevant to prospective unitholders who are individual
citizens or residents of the United States and, unless otherwise
noted in the following discussion, represents the opinion of
Andrews Kurth LLP, special counsel to our general partner and
us, insofar as it relates to matters of United States federal
income tax law and legal conclusions with respect to those
matters. This section is based upon current provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code, existing and proposed regulations and
current administrative rulings and court decisions, all of which
are subject to change. Later changes in these authorities may
cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the
consequences described below.
The following discussion does not comment on all federal income
tax matters affecting us or our unitholders. Moreover, the
discussion focuses on unitholders who are individual citizens or
residents of the United States and has only limited application
to corporations, estates, trusts, nonresident aliens or other
unitholders subject to specialized tax treatment, such as
tax-exempt institutions, foreign persons, individual retirement
accounts (IRAs), real estate investment trusts (REITs) or mutual
funds. Accordingly, we recommend that each prospective
unitholder consult, and depend on, his own tax advisor in
analyzing the federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences
particular to him of the ownership or disposition of common
units.
All statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions, but
not as to factual matters, contained in this section, unless
otherwise noted, are the opinion of Andrews Kurth LLP and are
based on the accuracy of the representations made by us and our
general partner.
No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS regarding
our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Instead, we will rely on opinions and advice of Andrews Kurth
LLP. Unlike a ruling, an opinion of counsel represents only that
counsels best legal judgment and does not bind the IRS or
the courts. Accordingly, the opinions and statements made here
may not be sustained by a court if contested by the IRS. Any
contest of this sort with the IRS may materially and adversely
impact the market for the common units and the prices at which
common units trade. In addition, the costs of any contest with
the IRS will be borne directly or indirectly by the unitholders
and the general partner. Furthermore, the tax treatment of us,
or of an investment in us, may be significantly modified by
future legislative or administrative changes or court decisions.
Any modifications may or may not be retroactively applied.
For the reasons described below, Andrews Kurth LLP has not
rendered an opinion with respect to the following specific
federal income tax issues: the treatment of a unitholder whose
common units are loaned to a short seller to cover a short sale
of common units (please read Tax Consequences of
Unit Ownership Treatment of Short Sales); whether
our monthly convention for allocating taxable income and losses
is permitted by existing Treasury Regulations (please read
Disposition of Common Units Allocations
Between Transferors and Transferees); and whether our
method for depreciating Section 743 adjustments is
sustainable (please read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election).
Partnership Status
A partnership is not a taxable entity and incurs no federal
income tax liability. Instead, each partner of a partnership is
required to take into account his share of items of income,
gain, loss and deduction of the partnership in computing his
federal income tax liability, regardless of whether cash
distributions are made to him by the partnership. Distributions
by a partnership to a partner are generally not taxable unless
the amount of cash distributed is in excess of the
partners adjusted basis in his partnership interest.
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that
publicly traded partnerships will, as a general rule, be taxed
as corporations. However, an exception, referred to as the
Qualifying Income Exception, exists with respect to
publicly traded partnerships of which 90% or more of the gross
income for every taxable year consists of qualifying
income. Qualifying income includes income and gains
derived from the exploration, development, mining or production,
processing, refining, transportation and marketing of any
mineral or natural resource. Other types of qualifying income
include interest other than
S-34
from a financial business, dividends, gains from the sale of
real property and gains from the sale or other disposition of
assets held for the production of income that otherwise
constitutes qualifying income. We estimate that less than 2% of
our current gross income is not qualifying income; however, this
estimate could change from time to time. Based upon and subject
to this estimate, the factual representations made by us and the
general partner and a review of the applicable legal
authorities, Andrews Kurth LLP is of the opinion that at least
90% of our current gross income constitutes qualifying income.
No ruling has been or will be sought from the IRS and the IRS
has made no determination as to our status or the status of the
Operating Partnership as partnerships for federal income tax
purposes. Instead, we will rely on the opinion of Andrews Kurth
LLP that, based upon the Internal Revenue Code, its regulations,
published revenue rulings and court decisions and the
representations described below, we and the Operating
Partnership will be classified as partnerships for federal
income tax purposes.
In rendering its opinion, Andrews Kurth LLP has relied on
factual representations made by us and our general partner. The
representations made by us and our general partner upon which
Andrews Kurth LLP has relied include:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Neither we nor the Operating Partnership will elect to be
treated as a corporation; and |
|
|
(b) |
For each taxable year, more than 90% of our gross income will be
income that Andrews Kurth LLP has opined or will opine is
qualifying income within the meaning of
Section 7704(d) of the Code. |
If we fail to meet the Qualifying Income Exception, other than a
failure that is determined by the IRS to be inadvertent and that
is cured within a reasonable time after discovery, we will be
treated as if we had transferred all of our assets, subject to
liabilities, to a newly formed corporation, on the first day of
the year in which we fail to meet the Qualifying Income
Exception, in return for stock in that corporation, and then
distributed that stock to the unitholders in liquidation of
their interests in us. This contribution and liquidation should
be tax-free to unitholders and us so long as we, at that time,
do not have liabilities in excess of the tax basis of our
assets. Thereafter, we would be treated as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes.
If we were taxable as a corporation in any taxable year, either
as a result of a failure to meet the Qualifying Income Exception
or otherwise, our items of income, gain, loss and deduction
would be reflected only on our tax return rather than being
passed through to the unitholders, and our net income would be
taxed to us at corporate rates. In addition, any distribution
made to a unitholder would be treated as either taxable dividend
income, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, or, in the absence of earnings and profits, a
nontaxable return of capital, to the extent of the
unitholders tax basis in his common units, or taxable
capital gain, after the unitholders tax basis in his
common units is reduced to zero. Accordingly, taxation as a
corporation would result in a material reduction in a
unitholders cash flow and after-tax return and thus would
likely result in a substantial reduction of the value of the
units.
The discussion below is based on the conclusion that we will be
classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Limited Partner Status
Unitholders who have become limited partners of Enterprise
Products Partners L.P. will be treated as partners of Enterprise
Products Partners L.P. for federal income tax purposes. Also,
assignees who have executed and delivered transfer applications,
and are awaiting admission as limited partners, and unitholders
whose common units are held in street name or by a nominee and
who have the right to direct the nominee in the exercise of all
substantive rights attendant to the ownership of their common
units, will be treated as partners of Enterprise for federal
income tax purposes. As there is no direct authority addressing
assignees of common units who are entitled to execute and
deliver transfer applications and thereby become entitled to
direct the exercise of attendant rights, but who fail to execute
and deliver transfer applications, Andrews Kurth LLPs
opinion does not extend to these persons. Furthermore, a
S-35
purchaser or other transferee of common units who does not
execute and deliver a transfer application may not receive some
federal income tax information or reports furnished to record
holders of common units unless the common units are held in a
nominee or street name account and the nominee or broker has
executed and delivered a transfer application for those common
units.
A beneficial owner of common units whose units have been
transferred to a short seller to complete a short sale would
appear to lose his status as a partner with respect to those
units for federal income tax purposes. Please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership Treatment
of Short Sales.
Income, gains, deductions or losses would not appear to be
reportable by a unitholder who is not a partner for federal
income tax purposes, and any cash distributions received by a
unitholder who is not a partner for federal income tax purposes
would therefore be fully taxable as ordinary income. We strongly
recommend that prospective unitholders consult their own tax
advisors with respect to their status as partners in Enterprise
Products Partners L.P. for federal income tax purposes.
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Flow-through of Taxable Income. We will not pay any
federal income tax. Instead, each unitholder will be required to
report on his income tax return his share of our income, gains,
losses and deductions without regard to whether corresponding
cash distributions are received by him. Consequently, we may
allocate income to a unitholder even if he has not received a
cash distribution. Each unitholder will be required to include
in income his allocable share of our income, gains, losses and
deductions for our taxable year ending with or within his
taxable year. Our taxable year ends on December 31.
Treatment of Distributions. Distributions by us to a
unitholder generally will not be taxable to the unitholder for
federal income tax purposes to the extent of his tax basis in
his common units immediately before the distribution. Our cash
distributions in excess of a unitholders tax basis in his
common units generally will be considered to be gain from the
sale or exchange of the common units, taxable in accordance with
the rules described under Disposition of Common
Units below. Any reduction in a unitholders share of
our liabilities for which no partner, including our general
partner, bears the economic risk of loss, known as
nonrecourse liabilities, will be treated as a
distribution of cash to that unitholder. To the extent our
distributions cause a unitholders at risk
amount to be less than zero at the end of any taxable year, he
must recapture any losses deducted in previous years. Please
read Limitations on Deductibility of Losses.
A decrease in a unitholders percentage interest in us
because of our issuance of additional common units will decrease
his share of our nonrecourse liabilities, and thus will result
in a corresponding deemed distribution of cash. A non-pro rata
distribution of money or property may result in ordinary income
to a unitholder, regardless of his tax basis in his common
units, if the distribution reduces the unitholders share
of our unrealized receivables, including
depreciation recapture, and/or substantially appreciated
inventory items, both as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code, and collectively, Section 751
Assets. To that extent, he will be treated as having been
distributed his proportionate share of the Section 751
Assets and having exchanged those assets with us in return for
the non-pro rata portion of the actual distribution made to him.
This latter deemed exchange will generally result in the
unitholders realization of ordinary income, which will
equal the excess of (1) the non-pro rata portion of that
distribution over (2) the unitholders tax basis for
the share of Section 751 Assets deemed relinquished in the
exchange.
Ratio of Taxable Income to Distributions. We estimate
that if you purchase common units in this offering and own them
through the period ending December 31, 2008, then you will
be allocated, on a cumulative basis, an amount of federal
taxable income for that period that will be less than 10% of the
cash distributed with respect to that period. If you own common
units purchased in this offering for a shorter period, the
percentage of federal taxable income allocated to you may be
higher. These estimates are based upon the assumption that our
available cash for distribution will approximate the amount
required to distribute cash to holders of the common units in an
amount equal to the quarterly distribution of $0.4375 per
unit and other assumptions with respect to capital expenditures,
cash flow and anticipated cash distributions. These estimates
and assumptions are subject to, among other things, numerous
business,
S-36
economic, regulatory, competitive and political uncertainties
beyond our control. Further, our estimates are based on current
tax law and certain tax reporting positions that we have adopted
with which the IRS could disagree. In addition, subsequent
issuances of equity securities by us could also affect the
percentage of distributions that will constitute taxable income.
Accordingly, we cannot assure you that these estimates will be
correct. The actual percentage of distributions that will
constitute taxable income could be higher or lower, and any
differences could be material and could materially affect the
value of the common units.
For example, the ratio of allocable taxable income to cash
distributions to a purchaser of common units in this offering
may be greater, and perhaps substantially greater, than 10% with
respect to the period described above if gross profit exceeds
the amount required to make quarterly distributions of $0.4375
on all common units, yet we only distribute $0.4375 per
common unit each quarter; or we make a future offering of common
units and use the proceeds of the offering in a manner that does
not produce substantial additional deductions during the period
described above, such as to repay indebtedness outstanding at
the time of this offering or to acquire property that is not
eligible for depreciation or amortization for federal income tax
purposes or that is depreciable or amortizable at a rate
significantly slower than the rate applicable to our assets at
the time of this offering.
Basis of Common Units. A unitholders initial tax
basis for his common units will be the amount he paid for the
common units plus his share of our nonrecourse liabilities. That
basis will be increased by his share of our income and by any
increases in his share of our nonrecourse liabilities. That
basis will be decreased, but not below zero, by distributions
from us, by the unitholders share of our losses, by any
decreases in his share of our nonrecourse liabilities and by his
share of our expenditures that are not deductible in computing
taxable income and are not required to be capitalized. A
unitholder will have no share of our debt which is recourse to
the general partner, but will have a share, generally based on
his share of profits, of our nonrecourse liabilities. Please
read Disposition of Common Units Recognition
of Gain or Loss.
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses. The deduction by
a unitholder of his share of our losses will be limited to the
tax basis in his units and, in the case of an individual
unitholder or a corporate unitholder, if more than 50% of the
value of the corporate unitholders stock is owned directly
or indirectly by five or fewer individuals or some tax-exempt
organizations, to the amount for which the unitholder is
considered to be at risk with respect to our
activities, if that is less than his tax basis. A unitholder
must recapture losses deducted in previous years to the extent
that distributions cause his at risk amount to be less than zero
at the end of any taxable year. Losses disallowed to a
unitholder or recaptured as a result of these limitations will
carry forward and will be allowable to the extent that his tax
basis or at risk amount, whichever is the limiting factor, is
subsequently increased. Upon the taxable disposition of a unit,
any gain recognized by a unitholder can be offset by losses that
were previously suspended by the at risk limitation but may not
be offset by losses suspended by the basis limitation. Any
excess loss above that gain previously suspended by the at risk
or basis limitations is no longer utilizable.
In general, a unitholder will be at risk to the extent of the
tax basis of his units, excluding any portion of that basis
attributable to his share of our nonrecourse liabilities,
reduced by any amount of money he borrows to acquire or hold his
units, if the lender of those borrowed funds owns an interest in
us, is related to the unitholder or can look only to the units
for repayment. A unitholders at risk amount will increase
or decrease as the tax basis of the unitholders units
increases or decreases, other than tax basis increases or
decreases attributable to increases or decreases in his share of
our nonrecourse liabilities.
The passive loss limitations generally provide that individuals,
estates, trusts and some closely-held corporations and personal
service corporations can deduct losses from passive activities,
which are generally corporate or partnership activities in which
the taxpayer does not materially participate, only to the extent
of the taxpayers income from those passive activities. The
passive loss limitations are applied separately with respect to
each publicly traded partnership. Consequently, any passive
losses we generate will be available to offset only our passive
income generated in the future and will not be available to
offset income from other passive activities or investments,
including our investments or investments in other publicly
traded partnerships, or salary or active business income.
Passive losses that are not deductible
S-37
because they exceed a unitholders share of income we
generate may be deducted in full when he disposes of his entire
investment in us in a fully taxable transaction with an
unrelated party. The passive activity loss rules are applied
after other applicable limitations on deductions, including the
at risk rules and the basis limitation.
A unitholders share of our net income may be offset by any
suspended passive losses, but it may not be offset by any other
current or carryover losses from other passive activities,
including those attributable to other publicly traded
partnerships.
Limitations on Interest Deductions. The deductibility of
a non-corporate taxpayers investment interest
expense is generally limited to the amount of that
taxpayers net investment income. Investment
interest expense includes:
|
|
|
|
|
interest on indebtedness properly allocable to property held for
investment; |
|
|
|
our interest expense attributed to portfolio income; and |
|
|
|
the portion of interest expense incurred to purchase or carry an
interest in a passive activity to the extent attributable to
portfolio income. |
The computation of a unitholders investment interest
expense will take into account interest on any margin account
borrowing or other loan incurred to purchase or carry a unit.
Net investment income includes gross income from property held
for investment and amounts treated as portfolio income under the
passive loss rules, less deductible expenses, other than
interest, directly connected with the production of investment
income, but generally does not include gains attributable to the
disposition of property held for investment. The IRS has
indicated that net passive income earned by a publicly traded
partnership will be treated as investment income to its
unitholders. In addition, the unitholders share of our
portfolio income will be treated as investment income.
Entity-Level Collections. If we are required or
elect under applicable law to pay any federal, state, local or
foreign income tax on behalf of any unitholder or the general
partner or any former unitholder, we are authorized to pay those
taxes from our funds. That payment, if made, will be treated as
a distribution of cash to the partner on whose behalf the
payment was made. If the payment is made on behalf of a person
whose identity cannot be determined, we are authorized to treat
the payment as a distribution to all current unitholders. We are
authorized to amend the partnership agreement in the manner
necessary to maintain uniformity of intrinsic tax
characteristics of units and to adjust later distributions, so
that after giving effect to these distributions, the priority
and characterization of distributions otherwise applicable under
the partnership agreement is maintained as nearly as is
practicable. Payments by us as described above could give rise
to an overpayment of tax on behalf of an individual partner in
which event the partner would be required to file a claim in
order to obtain a credit or refund.
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction. In
general, if we have a net profit, our items of income, gain,
loss and deduction will be allocated among the general partner
and the unitholders in accordance with their percentage
interests in us. At any time that incentive distributions are
made to the general partner, gross income will be allocated to
the recipients to the extent of these distributions. If we have
a net loss for the entire year, that loss will be allocated
first to the general partner and the unitholders in accordance
with their percentage interests in us to the extent of their
positive capital accounts and, second, to the general partner.
Specified items of our income, gain, loss and deduction will be
allocated to account for the difference between the tax basis
and fair market value of our property at the time of this
offering, referred to in this discussion as Contributed
Property. The effect of these allocations to a unitholder
purchasing common units in this offering will be essentially the
same as if the tax basis of our assets were equal to their fair
market value at the time of the offering. In addition, items of
recapture income will be allocated to the extent possible to the
partner who was allocated the deduction giving rise to the
treatment of that gain as recapture income in order to minimize
the recognition of ordinary income by some unitholders. Finally,
although we do not expect that our operations will result in the
creation of negative capital accounts, if
S-38
negative capital accounts nevertheless result, items of our
income and gain will be allocated in an amount and manner to
eliminate the negative balance as quickly as possible.
An allocation of items of our income, gain, loss or deduction,
other than an allocation required by the Internal Revenue Code
to eliminate the difference between a partners
book capital account, credited with the fair market
value of Contributed Property, and tax capital
account, credited with the tax basis of Contributed Property,
referred to in this discussion as the Book-Tax
Disparity, will generally be given effect for federal
income tax purposes in determining a partners share of an
item of income, gain, loss or deduction only if the allocation
has substantial economic effect. In any other case, a
partners share of an item will be determined on the basis
of his interest in us, which will be determined by taking into
account all the facts and circumstances, including:
|
|
|
|
|
his relative contributions to us; |
|
|
|
the interests of all the partners in profits and losses; |
|
|
|
the interest of all the partners in cash flow and other
nonliquidating distributions; and |
|
|
|
the rights of all the partners to distributions of capital upon
liquidation. |
Andrews Kurth LLP is of the opinion that, with the exception of
the issues described in Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election and
Disposition of Common Units Allocations
Between Transferors and Transferees, allocations under our
partnership agreement will be given effect for federal income
tax purposes in determining a partners share of an item of
income, gain, loss or deduction.
Treatment of Short Sales. A unitholder whose units are
loaned to a short seller to cover a short sale of
units may be considered as having disposed of those units. If
so, he would no longer be a partner for tax purposes with
respect to those units during the period of the loan and may
recognize gain or loss from the disposition. As a result, during
this period:
|
|
|
|
|
any of our income, gain, loss or deduction with respect to those
units would not be reportable by the unitholder; |
|
|
|
any cash distributions received by the unitholder as to those
units would be fully taxable; and |
|
|
|
all of these distributions would appear to be ordinary income. |
Andrews Kurth LLP has not rendered an opinion regarding the
treatment of a unitholder where common units are loaned to a
short seller to cover a short sale of common units; therefore,
unitholders desiring to assure their status as partners and
avoid the risk of gain recognition from a loan to a short seller
are urged to modify any applicable brokerage account agreements
to prohibit their brokers from borrowing their units. The IRS
has announced that it is actively studying issues relating to
the tax treatment of short sales of partnership interests.
Please also read Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Alternative Minimum Tax. Each unitholder will be required
to take into account his distributive share of any items of our
income, gain, loss or deduction for purposes of the alternative
minimum tax. The current minimum tax rate for noncorporate
taxpayers is 26% on the first $175,000 of alternative minimum
taxable income in excess of the exemption amount and 28% on any
additional alternative minimum taxable income. We strongly
recommend that prospective unitholders consult with their tax
advisors as to the impact of an investment in units on their
liability for the alternative minimum tax.
Tax Rates. In general the highest effective United States
federal income tax rate for individuals currently is 35.0% and
the maximum United States federal income tax rate for net
capital gains of an individual is currently 15.0% if the asset
disposed of was held for more than 12 months at the time of
disposition.
Section 754 Election. We have made the election
permitted by Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code. That
election is irrevocable without the consent of the IRS. The
election generally permits us to
S-39
adjust a common unit purchasers tax basis in our assets
(inside basis) under Section 743(b) of the
Internal Revenue Code to reflect his purchase price. This
election does not apply to a person who purchases common units
directly from us. The Section 743(b) adjustment belongs to
the purchaser and not to other unitholders. For purposes of this
discussion, a unitholders inside basis in our assets will
be considered to have two components: (1) his share of our
tax basis in our assets (common basis) and
(2) his Section 743(b) adjustment to that basis.
Treasury Regulations under Section 743 of the Internal
Revenue Code require that, if the remedial allocation method is
adopted (which we have adopted), a portion of the
Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to recovery property
be depreciated over the remaining cost recovery period for the
Section 704(c) built-in gain. Under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-l(a)(6), a
Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to property subject
to depreciation under Section 167 of the Internal Revenue
Code, rather than cost recovery deductions under
Section 168, is generally required to be depreciated using
either the straight-line method or the 150% declining balance
method. Under our partnership agreement, our general partner is
authorized to take a position to preserve the uniformity of
units even if that position is not consistent with these
Treasury Regulations. Please read Tax Treatment of
Operations Uniformity of Units.
Although Andrews Kurth LLP is unable to opine as to the validity
of this approach because there is no clear authority on this
issue, we intend to depreciate the portion of a
Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to unrealized
appreciation in the value of Contributed Property, to the extent
of any unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, using a rate of
depreciation or amortization derived from the depreciation or
amortization method and useful life applied to the common basis
of the property, or treat that portion as non-amortizable to the
extent attributable to property the common basis of which is not
amortizable. This method is consistent with the Treasury
Regulations under Section 743 of the Internal Revenue Code
but is arguably inconsistent with Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6). To the extent
this Section 743(b) adjustment is attributable to
appreciation in value in excess of the unamortized Book-Tax
Disparity, we will apply the rules described in the Treasury
Regulations and legislative history. If we determine that this
position cannot reasonably be taken, we may take a depreciation
or amortization position under which all purchasers acquiring
units in the same month would receive depreciation or
amortization, whether attributable to common basis or a
Section 743(b) adjustment, based upon the same applicable
rate as if they had purchased a direct interest in our assets.
This kind of aggregate approach may result in lower annual
depreciation or amortization deductions than would otherwise be
allowable to some unitholders. Please read Tax
Treatment of Operations Uniformity of Units.
A Section 754 election is advantageous if the
transferees tax basis in his units is higher than the
units share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets
immediately prior to the transfer. In that case, as a result of
the election, the transferee would have, among other items, a
greater amount of depreciation and depletion deductions and his
share of any gain or loss on a sale of our assets would be less.
Conversely, a Section 754 election is disadvantageous if
the transferees tax basis in his units is lower than those
units share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets
immediately prior to the transfer. Thus, the fair market value
of the units may be affected either favorably or unfavorably by
the election.
The calculations involved in the Section 754 election are
complex and will be made on the basis of assumptions as to the
value of our assets and other matters. For example, the
allocation of the Section 743(b) adjustment among our
assets must be made in accordance with the Internal Revenue
Code. The IRS could seek to reallocate some or all of any
Section 743(b) adjustment allocated by us to our tangible
assets to goodwill instead. Goodwill, as an intangible asset, is
generally amortizable over a longer period of time or under a
less accelerated method than our tangible assets. We cannot
assure you that the determinations we make will not be
successfully challenged by the IRS and that the deductions
resulting from them will not be reduced or disallowed
altogether. Should the IRS require a different basis adjustment
to be made, and should, in our opinion, the expense of
compliance exceed the benefit of the election, we may seek
permission from the IRS to revoke our Section 754 election.
If permission is granted, a subsequent purchaser of units may be
allocated more income than he would have been allocated had the
election not been revoked.
S-40
Tax Treatment of Operations
Accounting Method and Taxable Year. We use the year
ending December 31 as our taxable year and the accrual
method of accounting for federal income tax purposes. Each
unitholder will be required to include in income his share of
our income, gain, loss and deduction for our taxable year ending
within or with his taxable year. In addition, a unitholder who
has a taxable year ending on a date other than December 31
and who disposes of all of his units following the close of our
taxable year but before the close of his taxable year must
include his share of our income, gain, loss and deduction in
income for his taxable year, with the result that he will be
required to include in income for his taxable year his share of
more than one year of our income, gain, loss and deduction.
Please read Disposition of Common Units
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees.
Tax Basis, Depreciation and Amortization. The tax basis
of our assets will be used for purposes of computing
depreciation and cost recovery deductions and, ultimately, gain
or loss on the disposition of these assets. The federal income
tax burden associated with the difference between the fair
market value of our assets and their tax basis immediately prior
to this offering will be borne by our general partner, its
affiliates and our unitholders immediately prior to this
offering. Please read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and
Deduction.
To the extent allowable, we may elect to use the depreciation
and cost recovery methods that will result in the largest
deductions being taken in the early years after assets are
placed in service. Property we subsequently acquire or construct
may be depreciated using accelerated methods permitted by the
Internal Revenue Code.
If we dispose of depreciable property by sale, foreclosure, or
otherwise, all or a portion of any gain, determined by reference
to the amount of depreciation previously deducted and the nature
of the property, may be subject to the recapture rules and taxed
as ordinary income rather than capital gain. Similarly, a common
unitholder who has taken cost recovery or depreciation
deductions with respect to property we own will likely be
required to recapture some, or all, of those deductions as
ordinary income upon a sale of his interest in us. Please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership Allocation
of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction and
Disposition of Common Units Recognition of
Gain or Loss.
The costs incurred in selling our units (called
syndication expenses) must be capitalized and cannot
be deducted currently, ratably or upon our termination. There
are uncertainties regarding the classification of costs as
organization expenses, which may be amortized by us, and as
syndication expenses, which may not be amortized by us. The
underwriting discounts and commissions we incur will be treated
as syndication expenses.
Valuation and Tax Basis of Our Properties. The federal
income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of
units will depend in part on our estimates of the relative fair
market values, and the tax bases, of our assets. Although we may
from time to time consult with professional appraisers regarding
valuation matters, we will make many of the relative fair market
value estimates ourselves. These estimates and determinations of
basis are subject to challenge and will not be binding on the
IRS or the courts. If the estimates of fair market value or
basis are later found to be incorrect, the character and amount
of items of income, gain, loss or deductions previously reported
by unitholders might change, and unitholders might be required
to adjust their tax liability for prior years and incur interest
and penalties with respect to those adjustments.
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss. Gain or loss will be
recognized on a sale of units equal to the difference between
the amount realized and the unitholders tax basis for the
units sold. A unitholders amount realized will be measured
by the sum of the cash or the fair market value of other
property received by him plus his share of our nonrecourse
liabilities. Because the amount realized includes a
unitholders share of our nonrecourse liabilities, the gain
recognized on the sale of units could result in a tax liability
in excess of any cash received from the sale.
S-41
Prior distributions from us in excess of cumulative net taxable
income for a common unit that decreased a unitholders tax
basis in that common unit will, in effect, become taxable income
if the common unit is sold at a price greater than the
unitholders tax basis in that common unit, even if the
price received is less than his original cost.
Except as noted below, gain or loss recognized by a unitholder,
other than a dealer in units, on the sale or
exchange of a unit held for more than one year will generally be
taxable as capital gain or loss. Capital gain recognized by an
individual on the sale of units held more than 12 months
will generally be taxed at a maximum rate of 15%. A portion of
this gain or loss, which will likely be substantial, however,
will be separately computed and taxed as ordinary income or loss
under Section 751 of the Internal Revenue Code to the
extent attributable to assets giving rise to depreciation
recapture or other unrealized receivables or to
inventory items we own. The term unrealized
receivables includes potential recapture items, including
depreciation recapture. Ordinary income attributable to
unrealized receivables, inventory items and depreciation
recapture may exceed net taxable gain realized upon the sale of
a unit and may be recognized even if there is a net taxable loss
realized on the sale of a unit. Thus, a unitholder may recognize
both ordinary income and a capital loss upon a sale of units.
Net capital losses may offset capital gains and no more than
$3,000 of ordinary income, in the case of individuals, and may
only be used to offset capital gains in the case of corporations.
The IRS has ruled that a partner who acquires interests in a
partnership in separate transactions must combine those
interests and maintain a single adjusted tax basis for all those
interests. Upon a sale or other disposition of less than all of
those interests, a portion of that tax basis must be allocated
to the interests sold using an equitable
apportionment method. Treasury Regulations under
Section 1223 of the Internal Revenue Code allow a selling
unitholder who can identify common units transferred with an
ascertainable holding period to elect to use the actual holding
period of the common units transferred. Thus, according to the
ruling, a common unitholder will be unable to select high or low
basis common units to sell as would be the case with corporate
stock, but, according to the Treasury Regulations, may designate
specific common units sold for purposes of determining the
holding period of units transferred. A unitholder electing to
use the actual holding period of common units transferred must
consistently use that identification method for all subsequent
sales or exchanges of common units. We strongly recommend that a
unitholder considering the purchase of additional units or a
sale of common units purchased in separate transactions consult
his tax advisor as to the possible consequences of this ruling
and application of the final Treasury Regulations.
Specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code affect the
taxation of some financial products and securities, including
partnership interests, by treating a taxpayer as having sold an
appreciated partnership interest, one in which gain
would be recognized if it were sold, assigned or terminated at
its fair market value, if the taxpayer or related persons
enter(s) into:
|
|
|
|
|
a short sale; |
|
|
|
an offsetting notional principal contract; or |
|
|
|
a futures or forward contract with respect to the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. |
Moreover, if a taxpayer has previously entered into a short
sale, an offsetting notional principal contract or a futures or
forward contract with respect to the partnership interest, the
taxpayer will be treated as having sold that position if the
taxpayer or a related person then acquires the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. The Secretary of
the Treasury is also authorized to issue regulations that treat
a taxpayer that enters into transactions or positions that have
substantially the same effect as the preceding transactions as
having constructively sold the financial position.
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees. In
general, our taxable income and losses will be determined
annually, will be prorated on a monthly basis and will be
subsequently apportioned among the unitholders in proportion to
the number of units owned by each of them as of the opening of
the applicable exchange on the first business day of the month
(the Allocation Date). However, gain or loss
S-42
realized on a sale or other disposition of our assets other than
in the ordinary course of business will be allocated among the
unitholders on the Allocation Date in the month in which that
gain or loss is recognized. As a result, a unitholder
transferring units may be allocated income, gain, loss and
deduction realized after the date of transfer.
The use of this method may not be permitted under existing
Treasury Regulations. Accordingly, Andrews Kurth LLP is unable
to opine on the validity of this method of allocating income and
deductions between unitholders. If this method is not allowed
under the Treasury Regulations, or only applies to transfers of
less than all of the unitholders interest, our taxable
income or losses might be reallocated among the unitholders. We
are authorized to revise our method of allocation between
unitholders, as well as among unitholders whose interests vary
during a taxable year, to conform to a method permitted under
future Treasury Regulations.
A unitholder who owns units at any time during a quarter and who
disposes of them prior to the record date set for a cash
distribution for that quarter will be allocated items of our
income, gain, loss and deductions attributable to that quarter
but will not be entitled to receive that cash distribution.
Notification Requirements. A unitholder who sells or
exchanges units is required to notify us in writing of that sale
or exchange within 30 days after the sale or exchange. We
are required to notify the IRS of that transaction and to
furnish specified information to the transferor and transferee.
However, these reporting requirements do not apply to a sale by
an individual who is a citizen of the United States and who
effects the sale or exchange through a broker. Failure to
satisfy these reporting obligations may lead to the imposition
of substantial penalties.
Constructive Termination. We will be considered to have
been terminated for tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange
of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital and profits
within a 12-month
period. A constructive termination results in the closing of our
taxable year for all unitholders. In the case of a unitholder
reporting on a taxable year other than a fiscal year ending
December 31, the closing of our taxable year may result in
more than 12 months of our taxable income or loss being
includable in his taxable income for the year of termination. We
would be required to make new tax elections after a termination,
including a new election under Section 754 of the Internal
Revenue Code, and a termination would result in a deferral of
our deductions for depreciation. A termination could also result
in penalties if we were unable to determine that the termination
had occurred. Moreover, a termination might either accelerate
the application of, or subject us to, any tax legislation
enacted before the termination.
Uniformity of Units
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of units, we
must maintain uniformity of the economic and tax characteristics
of the units to a purchaser of these units. In the absence of
uniformity, we may be unable to completely comply with a number
of federal income tax requirements, both statutory and
regulatory. A lack of uniformity can result from a literal
application of Treasury Regulation
Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6).
Any non-uniformity could have a negative impact on the value of
the units. Please read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election.
We intend to depreciate the portion of a Section 743(b)
adjustment attributable to unrealized appreciation in the value
of Contributed Property, to the extent of any unamortized
Book-Tax Disparity, using a rate of depreciation or amortization
derived from the depreciation or amortization method and useful
life applied to the common basis of that property, or treat that
portion as nonamortizable, to the extent attributable to
property the common basis of which is not amortizable,
consistent with the Treasury Regulations under Section 743
of the Internal Revenue Code, even though that position may be
inconsistent with Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6). Please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Section 754 Election. To the extent that the
Section 743(b) adjustment is attributable to appreciation
in value in excess of the unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, we
will apply the rules described in the Treasury Regulations and
legislative history. If we determine that this position cannot
reasonably be taken, we may adopt a depreciation and
amortization position under which all purchasers acquiring units
in the same month would receive depreciation and amortization
deductions, whether attributable to a
S-43
common basis or Section 743(b) adjustment, based upon the
same applicable rate as if they had purchased a direct interest
in our property. If this position is adopted, it may result in
lower annual depreciation and amortization deductions than would
otherwise be allowable to some unitholders and risk the loss of
depreciation and amortization deductions not taken in the year
that these deductions are otherwise allowable. This position
will not be adopted if we determine that the loss of
depreciation and amortization deductions will have a material
adverse effect on the unitholders. If we choose not to utilize
this aggregate method, we may use any other reasonable
depreciation and amortization method to preserve the uniformity
of the intrinsic tax characteristics of any units that would not
have a material adverse effect on the unitholders. The IRS may
challenge any method of depreciating the Section 743(b)
adjustment described in this paragraph. If this challenge were
sustained, the uniformity of units might be affected, and the
gain from the sale of units might be increased without the
benefit of additional deductions. Please read
Disposition of Common Units Recognition of
Gain or Loss.
Tax-Exempt Organizations and Other Investors
Ownership of units by employee benefit plans, other tax-exempt
organizations, regulated investment companies, non-resident
aliens, foreign corporations, and other foreign persons raises
issues unique to those investors and, as described below, may
have substantially adverse tax consequences to them.
Employee benefit plans and most other organizations exempt from
federal income tax, including individual retirement accounts and
other retirement plans, are subject to federal income tax on
unrelated business taxable income. Virtually all of our income
allocated to a unitholder that is a tax-exempt organization will
be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them.
A regulated investment company or mutual fund is
required to derive 90% or more of its gross income from certain
permitted sources. Recent legislation generally treats net
income derived from the ownership of certain publicly traded
partnerships (including us) as derived from such a permitted
source.
Non-resident aliens and foreign corporations, trusts or estates
that own units will be considered to be engaged in business in
the United States because of the ownership of units. As a
consequence they will be required to file federal tax returns to
report their share of our income, gain, loss or deduction and
pay federal income tax at regular rates on their share of our
net income or gain. Moreover, under rules applicable to publicly
traded partnerships, we will withhold tax at the highest
applicable effective tax rate on cash distributions made
quarterly to foreign unitholders. Each foreign unitholder must
obtain a taxpayer identification number from the IRS and submit
that number to our transfer agent on a Form W-8 BEN or
applicable substitute form in order to obtain credit for these
withholding taxes. A change in applicable law may require us to
change these procedures.
In addition, because a foreign corporation that owns units will
be treated as engaged in a United States trade or business, that
corporation may be subject to the United States branch profits
tax at a rate of 30%, in addition to regular federal income tax,
on its share of our income and gain, as adjusted for changes in
the foreign corporations U.S. net equity,
which are effectively connected with the conduct of a United
States trade or business. That tax may be reduced or eliminated
by an income tax treaty between the United States and the
country in which the foreign corporate unitholder is a
qualified resident. In addition, this type of
unitholder is subject to special information reporting
requirements under Section 6038C of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Under a ruling of the IRS, a foreign unitholder who sells or
otherwise disposes of a unit will be subject to federal income
tax on gain realized on the sale or disposition of that unit to
the extent that this gain is effectively connected with a United
States trade or business of the foreign unitholder. Apart from
the ruling, a foreign unitholder will not be taxed or subject to
withholding upon the sale or disposition of a unit if he has
owned less than 5% in value of the units during the five-year
period ending on the date of the disposition and if the units
are regularly traded on an established securities market at the
time of the sale or disposition.
S-44
Administrative Matters
Information Returns and Audit Procedures. We intend to
furnish to each unitholder, within 90 days after the close
of each calendar year, specific tax information, including a
Schedule K-1, which describes each unitholders share
of our income, gain, loss and deduction for our preceding
taxable year. In preparing this information, which will not be
reviewed by Andrews Kurth LLP, we will take various accounting
and reporting positions, some of which have been mentioned
earlier, to determine each unitholders share of income,
gain, loss and deduction. We cannot assure you that those
positions will yield a result that conforms to the requirements
of the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations or
administrative interpretations of the IRS. Neither we nor
Andrews Kurth LLP can assure prospective unitholders that the
IRS will not successfully contend in court that those positions
are impermissible. Any challenge by the IRS could negatively
affect the value of the units.
The IRS may audit our federal income tax information returns.
Adjustments resulting from an IRS audit may require each
unitholder to adjust a prior years tax liability, and
possibly may result in an audit of his own return. Any audit of
a unitholders return could result in adjustments not
related to our returns as well as those related to our returns.
Partnerships generally are treated as separate entities for
purposes of federal tax audits, judicial review of
administrative adjustments by the IRS and tax settlement
proceedings. The tax treatment of partnership items of income,
gain, loss and deduction are determined in a partnership
proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with the
partners. The Internal Revenue Code requires that one partner be
designated as the Tax Matters Partner for these
purposes. The partnership agreement names our general partner as
our Tax Matters Partner.
The Tax Matters Partner will make some elections on our behalf
and on behalf of unitholders. In addition, the Tax Matters
Partner can extend the statute of limitations for assessment of
tax deficiencies against unitholders for items in our returns.
The Tax Matters Partner may bind a unitholder with less than a
1% profits interest in us to a settlement with the IRS unless
that unitholder elects, by filing a statement with the IRS, not
to give that authority to the Tax Matters Partner. The Tax
Matters Partner may seek judicial review, by which all the
unitholders are bound, of a final partnership administrative
adjustment and, if the Tax Matters Partner fails to seek
judicial review, judicial review may be sought by any unitholder
having at least a 1% interest in profits or by any group of
unitholders having in the aggregate at least a 5% interest in
profits. However, only one action for judicial review will go
forward, and each unitholder with an interest in the outcome may
participate.
A unitholder must file a statement with the IRS identifying the
treatment of any item on his federal income tax return that is
not consistent with the treatment of the item on our return.
Intentional or negligent disregard of this consistency
requirement may subject a unitholder to substantial penalties.
Nominee Reporting. Persons who hold an interest in us as
a nominee for another person are required to furnish to us:
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the name, address and taxpayer identification number of the
beneficial owner and the nominee; |
|
|
(b) |
whether the beneficial owner is |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
a person that is not a United States person, |
|
|
(2) |
a foreign government, an international organization or any
wholly owned agency or instrumentality of either of the
foregoing, or |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
the amount and description of units held, acquired or
transferred for the beneficial owner; and |
S-45
|
|
|
|
(d) |
specific information including the dates of acquisitions and
transfers, means of acquisitions and transfers, and acquisition
cost for purchases, as well as the amount of net proceeds from
sales. |
Brokers and financial institutions are required to furnish
additional information, including whether they are United States
persons and specific information on units they acquire, hold or
transfer for their own account. A penalty of $50 per
failure, up to a maximum of $100,000 per calendar year, is
imposed by the Internal Revenue Code for failure to report that
information to us. The nominee is required to supply the
beneficial owner of the units with the information furnished to
us.
Accuracy-related Penalties. An additional tax equal to
20% of the amount of any portion of an underpayment of tax that
is attributable to one or more specified causes, including
negligence or disregard of rules or regulations, substantial
understatements of income tax and substantial valuation
misstatements, is imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. No
penalty will be imposed,however, for any portion of an
underpayment if it is shown that there was a reasonable cause
for that portion and that the taxpayer acted in good faith
regarding that portion.
A substantial understatement of income tax in any taxable year
exists if the amount of the understatement exceeds the greater
of 10% of the tax required to be shown on the return for the
taxable year or $5,000. The amount of any understatement subject
to penalty generally is reduced if any portion is attributable
to a position adopted on the return:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
for which there is, or was, substantial
authority, or |
|
|
(2) |
as to which there is a reasonable basis and the pertinent facts
of that position are disclosed on the return. |
If any item of income, gain, loss or deduction included in the
distributive shares of unitholders might result in that kind of
an understatement of income for which no
substantial authority exists, we must disclose the
pertinent facts on our return. In addition, we will make a
reasonable effort to furnish sufficient information for
unitholders to make adequate disclosure on their returns to
avoid liability for this penalty. More stringent rules apply to
tax shelters, but we believe we are not a tax
shelter.
A substantial valuation misstatement exists if the value of any
property, or the adjusted basis of any property, claimed on a
tax return is 200% or more of the amount determined to be the
correct amount of the valuation or adjusted basis. No penalty is
imposed unless the portion of the underpayment attributable to a
substantial valuation misstatement exceeds $5,000. If the
valuation claimed on a return is 400% or more than the correct
valuation, the penalty imposed increases to 40%.
Reportable Transactions. If we were to engage in a
reportable transaction, we (and possibly you and
others) would be required to make a detailed disclosure of the
transaction to the IRS. A transaction may be a reportable
transaction based upon any of several factors, including the
fact that it is a type of tax avoidance transaction publicly
identified by the IRS as a listed transaction or
that it produces certain kinds of losses in excess of
$2 million. Our participation in a reportable transaction
could increase the likelihood that our federal income tax
information return (and possibly your tax return) would be
audited by the IRS. Please read Information Returns
and Audit Procedures above.
Moreover, if we were to participate in a reportable transaction
with a significant purpose to avoid or evade tax, or in any
listed transaction, you may be subject to the following
provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
accuracy-related penalties with a broader scope, significantly
narrower exceptions, and potentially greater amounts than
described above at Accuracy-related Penalties, |
|
|
|
for those persons otherwise entitled to deduct interest on
federal tax deficiencies, nondeductibility of interest on any
resulting tax liability, and |
|
|
|
in the case of a listed transaction, an extended statute of
limitations. |
S-46
We do not expect to engage in any reportable
transactions.
State, Local, Foreign and Other Tax Considerations
In addition to federal income taxes, you will likely be subject
to other taxes, including state, local and foreign income taxes,
unincorporated business taxes, and estate, inheritance or
intangible taxes that may be imposed by the various
jurisdictions in which we do business or own property or in
which you are a resident. Although an analysis of those various
taxes is not presented here, each prospective unitholder should
consider their potential impact on his investment in us. You
will be required to file state income tax returns and to pay
state income taxes in some or all of the states in which we do
business or own property and may be subject to penalties for
failure to comply with those requirements. In some states, tax
losses may not produce a tax benefit in the year incurred and
also may not be available to offset income in subsequent taxable
years. Some of the states may require us, or we may elect, to
withhold a percentage of income from amounts to be distributed
to a unitholder who is not a resident of the state. Withholding,
the amount of which may be greater or less than a particular
unitholders income tax liability to the state, generally
does not relieve a nonresident unitholder from the obligation to
file an income tax return. Amounts withheld may be treated as if
distributed to unitholders for purposes of determining the
amounts distributed by us. Please read Tax
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Entity-Level Collections. Based on current law and
our estimate of our future operations, our general partner
anticipates that any amounts required to be withheld will not be
material. We may also own property or do business in other
states in the future.
It is the responsibility of each unitholder to investigate
the legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent
jurisdictions, of his investment in us. Accordingly, we strongly
recommend that each prospective unitholder consult, and depend
upon, his own tax counsel or other advisor with regard to those
matters. Further, it is the responsibility of each unitholder to
file all state, local, and foreign as well as United States
federal tax returns, that may be required of him. Andrews Kurth
LLP has not rendered an opinion on the state, local or foreign
tax consequences of an investment in us.
S-47
INVESTMENT IN US BY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
An investment in our units by an employee benefit plan is
subject to additional considerations because the investments of
these plans are subject to the fiduciary responsibility and
prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA, and restrictions
imposed by Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. For
these purposes, the term employee benefit plan
includes, but is not limited to, qualified pension,
profit-sharing and stock bonus plans, Keogh plans, simplified
employee pension plans and tax deferred annuities or IRAs
established or maintained by an employer or employee
organization. Among other things, consideration should be
given to:
|
|
|
|
|
whether the investment is prudent under
Section 404(a)(l)(B) of ERISA; |
|
|
|
whether in making the investment, that plan will satisfy the
diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(l)(C) of
ERISA; and |
|
|
|
whether the investment will result in recognition of unrelated
business taxable income (please read Material Tax
Consequences Tax-Exempt Organizations and Other
Investors) by the plan and, if so, the potential after-tax
investment return. |
In addition, the person with investment discretion with respect
to the assets of an employee benefit plan, often called a
fiduciary, should determine whether an investment in our units
is authorized by the appropriate governing instrument and is a
proper investment for the plan.
Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal
Revenue Code prohibit employee benefit plans, and IRAs that are
not considered part of an employee benefit plan, from engaging
in specified transactions involving plan assets with
parties that are parties in interest under ERISA or
disqualified persons under the Internal Revenue Code
with respect to the plan. Therefore, a fiduciary of an employee
benefit plan or an IRA accountholder that is considering an
investment in our units should consider whether the
entitys purchase or ownership of such units would or could
result in the occurrence of such a prohibited transaction.
In addition to considering whether the purchase of units is or
could result in a prohibited transaction, a fiduciary of an
employee benefit plan should consider whether the plan will, by
investing in our units, be deemed to own an undivided interest
in our assets, with the result that our general partner also
would be a fiduciary of the plan and our operations would be
subject to the regulatory restrictions of ERISA, including
fiduciary standard and its prohibited transaction rules, as well
as the prohibited transaction rules of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Department of Labor regulations provide guidance with
respect to whether the assets of an entity in which employee
benefit plans acquire equity interests would be deemed
plan assets under some circumstances. Under these
regulations, an entitys assets would not be considered to
be plan assets if, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the equity interests acquired by employee benefit plans are
publicly offered securities; i.e., the equity interests are
widely held by 100 or more investors independent of the issuer
and each other, freely transferable and registered under some
provisions of the federal securities laws; |
S-48
|
|
|
|
|
the entity is an operating company; i.e., it is
primarily engaged in the production or sale of a product or
service other than the investment of capital either directly or
through a majority owned subsidiary or subsidiaries; or |
|
|
|
there is no significant investment by benefit plan investors,
which is defined to mean that less than 25% of the value of each
class of equity interest, disregarding some interests held by
our general partner, its affiliates, and some other persons, is
held by the employee benefit plans referred to above, IRAs and
other employee benefit plans not subject to ERISA, including
governmental plans. |
Our assets should not be considered plan assets
under these regulations because it is expected that the
investment will satisfy the requirements in the first bullet
point above.
Plan fiduciaries contemplating a purchase of units should
consult with their own counsel regarding the consequences under
ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code in light of the serious
penalties imposed on persons who engage in prohibited
transactions or other violations.
S-49
UNDERWRITING
Lehman Brothers Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated are acting as representatives of the underwriters.
Under the terms of an underwriting agreement, which will be
filed as an exhibit to our current report on
Form 8-K and
incorporated by reference in this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus, each of the underwriters named below
has severally agreed to purchase from us the respective number
of common units shown opposite its name below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
Underwriter |
|
Common Units | |
|
|
| |
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Sanders Morris Harris Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Banc of America Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Natexis Bleichroeder Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters
obligation to purchase common units depends on the satisfaction
of the conditions contained in the underwriting agreement
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the obligation to purchase all of the common units offered
hereby, if any of the common units are purchased; |
|
|
|
the representations and warranties made by us to the
underwriters are true; |
|
|
|
there is no material change in the financial markets; and |
|
|
|
we deliver customary closing documents to the underwriters. |
Commissions and Expenses
The following table summarizes the underwriting discounts and
commissions we will pay to the underwriters. These amounts are
shown assuming both no exercise and full exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional common units.
The underwriting fee is the difference between the initial price
to the public and the amount the underwriters pay to us for the
common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Exercise | |
|
Full Exercise | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Per unit
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
The representatives of the underwriters have advised us that the
underwriters propose to offer the common units directly to the
public at the public offering price on the cover of this
prospectus supplement and to selected dealers, which may include
the underwriters, at such offering price less a selling
concession not in excess of
$ per
unit. After the offering, the representatives may change the
offering price and other selling terms.
The expenses of the offering that are payable by us are
estimated to be $750,000 (exclusive of underwriting discounts
and commissions).
S-50
Option to Purchase Additional Common Units
We have granted the underwriters an option exercisable for
30 days after the date of the underwriting agreement to
purchase, from time to time, in whole or in part, up to an
aggregate of 2,250,000 common units at the public offering price
less underwriting discounts and commissions. This option may be
exercised if the underwriters sell more than 15,000,000 common
units in connection with this offering. To the extent that this
option is exercised, each underwriter will be obligated, subject
to certain conditions, to purchase its pro rata portion of these
additional common units based on the underwriters
percentage underwriting commitment in the offering as indicated
in the table at the beginning of this Underwriting section.
Lock-Up Agreements
We, certain of our affiliates, Shell and all of the directors
and executive officers of our general partner have agreed that,
without the prior written consent of Lehman Brothers Inc. and
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, we and they will
not, directly or indirectly, offer for sale, sell, pledge, or
otherwise dispose of any common units or any securities
convertible into or exchangable for any common units, or sell or
grant options, rights or warrants with respect to any common
units or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common
units, or enter into any swap or other derivative transaction
that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the
economic benefits or risks of ownership of the common units,
file or cause to be filed a registration statement with respect
to the registration of any common units or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for common units or publicly
disclose the intention to do any of the foregoing for a period
of 60 days from the date of this prospectus supplement.
The restrictions described in this paragraph do not apply to:
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance and sale of common units by us to the underwriter
pursuant to the underwriting agreement; |
|
|
|
the issuance and sale of common units, phantom units, restricted
units and options under our existing employee benefits plans,
including sales pursuant to cashless-broker
exercises of options to purchase common units in accordance with
such plans as consideration for the exercise price and
withholding taxes applicable to such exercises; |
|
|
|
the issuance and sale of common units pursuant to our
distribution reinvestment plan; or |
|
|
|
the filing of a universal shelf registration
statement on Form S-3,
which may also include common units of selling unitholders;
provided, that (1) we and our affiliates remain subject to
the 60-day lock-up period with respect to any common units
registered under any such registration statement, (2) such
registration statement contains only a generic and undetermined
plan of distribution with respect to the common units during the
60-day lock-up period, and (3) any selling unitholders
registering common units under such registration statement agree
in writing to be subject to the 60-day lock-up period. |
Lehman Brothers Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated, in their sole discretion, may release the common
units and other securities subject to the
lock-up agreements
described above in whole or in part at any time with or without
notice. When determining whether or not to release common units
and other securities from
lock-up agreements, the
representatives will consider, among other factors, the
holders reasons for requesting the release, the number of
common units and other securities for which the release is being
requested and market conditions at the time.
Indemnification
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of
1933, and to contribute to payments that the underwriters may be
required to make for these liabilities.
S-51
Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids
The representatives may engage in stabilizing transactions,
short sales and purchases to cover positions created by short
sales, and penalty bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging,
fixing or maintaining the price of the common units, in
accordance with Regulation M under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934:
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum. |
|
|
|
A short position involves a sale by the underwriters of common
units in excess of the number of common units the underwriters
are obligated to purchase in the offering, which creates the
syndicate short position. This short position may be either a
covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered
short position, the number of common units involved in the sales
made by the underwriters in excess of the number of common units
they are obligated to purchase is not greater than the number of
common units that they may purchase by exercising their option
to purchase additional common units. In a naked short position,
the number of common units involved is greater than the number
of common units in their option to purchase additional common
units. The underwriters may close out any short position by
either exercising their option to purchase additional common
units and/or purchasing common units in the open market. In
determining the source of common units to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of common units available for purchase in the open
market as compared to the price at which they may purchase
common units through their option to purchase additional common
units. A naked short position is more likely to be created if
the underwriters are concerned that there could be downward
pressure on the price of the common units in the open market
after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase
in the offering. |
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
units in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. |
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common units
originally sold by the syndicate member are purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions. |
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common units or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common units. As a result,
the price of the common units may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on The New York Stock Exchange or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time. Prior to purchasing
the common units being offered pursuant to this prospectus
supplement, one of the underwriters purchased, on behalf of the
syndicate, common
units at an average price of
$ per
unit in stabilizing transactions.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation
or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect
that the transactions described above may have on the price of
the common units. In addition, neither we nor any of the
underwriters make any representation that the representatives
will engage in these stabilizing transactions or that any
transaction, once commenced, will not be discontinued without
notice.
Electronic Distribution
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
Internet sites or through other online services maintained by
one or more of the underwriters and/or selling group members
participating in this offering, or by their affiliates. In those
cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and,
depending upon the particular underwriter or selling group
member, prospective investors may be allowed to place orders
online. The underwriters may agree with us to allocate a
specific number of common units for sale to online brokerage
account holders. Any such allocation for online distributions
will be made by the representatives on the same basis as other
allocations.
S-52
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information
on any underwriters or selling group members web
site and any information contained in any other web site
maintained by an underwriter or selling group member is not part
of the prospectus or the registration statement of which this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus forms a
part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or any
underwriter or selling group member in its capacity as
underwriter or selling group member and should not be relied
upon by investors.
Stamp Taxes
If you purchase common units offered in this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus, you may be required
to pay stamp taxes and other charges under the laws and
practices of the country of purchase, in addition to the
offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus.
NASD Conduct Rule 2810
Because the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or
NASD, views the common units offered by this prospectus as
interests in a direct participation program, this offering is
being made in compliance with Rule 2810 of the Conduct
Rules of the NASD.
Relationships
Certain of the underwriters and their related entities have
engaged and may engage in commercial and investment banking
transactions with us in the ordinary course of their business.
They have received customary compensation and expenses for these
commercial and investment banking transactions. Affiliates of
Lehman Brothers Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., UBS Securities
LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, RBC Capital
Markets Corporation and Banc of America Securities LLC are
lenders under our multi-year revolving credit facility. These
affiliates will also receive their respective share of any
temporary repayment of amounts outstanding under the facility
using proceeds of this offering. Because we intend to use more
than 10% of the net proceeds from this offering to reduce
indebtedness owed by us to affiliates of the underwriters, this
offering is being conducted in compliance with the requirements
of Rule 2710(h) of the Conduct Rules of the NASD.
Discretionary Sales
The underwriters have advised us that they will not confirm
sales to discretionary accounts without the prior written
approval of the customer.
S-53
LEGAL MATTERS
Andrews Kurth LLP, Houston, Texas, will pass upon the
validity of the common units being offered and certain federal
income tax matters related to the common units. Certain legal
matters with respect to the common units will be passed upon for
the underwriters by Baker Botts L.L.P., Houston, Texas.
EXPERTS
The (1) consolidated financial statements and the related
consolidated financial statement schedule and managements
report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and subsidiaries
incorporated in this prospectus supplement, by reference from
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, and (2) the balance
sheet of Enterprise Products GP, LLC as of December 31,
2005, incorporated in this prospectus supplement by reference
from Enterprise Products Partners L.P.s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 27, 2006, have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are
incorporated herein by reference, and have been so incorporated
in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their
authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
INFORMATION INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, and other
information with the Commission under the Exchange Act. You may
read and copy any document we file at the Commissions
public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the Commission at
1-800-732-0330 for
further information on the public reference room. Our filings
are also available to the public at the Commissions web
site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, documents filed by us
can be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. 20 Broad Street, New York,
New York 10002.
The Commission allows us to incorporate by reference into this
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus the
information we file with it, which means that we can disclose
important information to you by referring you to those
documents. The information incorporated by reference is
considered to be part of this prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus, and later information that we file with
the Commission will automatically update and supersede this
information. We incorporate by reference the document listed
below and any future filings we make with the Commission under
section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 until our offering is completed (other than
information furnished under Items 2.02 or 7.01 of any
Form 8-K that is
filed in the future and which is not deemed filed under the
Exchange Act):
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005, Commission
File No. 1-14323;
and |
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on February 16, 2006, February 17,
2006 and February 27, 2006. |
S-54
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus supplement, the related prospectus and some of
the documents we have incorporated herein and therein by
reference contain various forward-looking statements and
information that are based on our beliefs and those of our
general partner, as well as assumptions made by and information
currently available to us. These forward-looking statements are
identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to
historical or current facts. When used in this prospectus
supplement, the accompanying prospectus or the documents we have
incorporated herein or therein by reference, words such as
anticipate, project, expect,
plan, goal, forecast,
intend, could, believe,
may, and similar expressions and statements
regarding our plans and objectives for future operations, are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we and
our general partner believe that such expectations reflected in
such forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither we nor
our general partner can give assurances that such expectations
will prove to be correct. Such statements are subject to a
variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If one or more
of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary
materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or
expected. Among the key risk factors that may have a direct
bearing on our results of operations and financial condition are:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in oil, natural gas and NGL prices and production
due to weather and other natural and economic forces; |
|
|
|
a reduction in demand for our products by the petrochemical,
refining or heating industries; |
|
|
|
the effects of our debt level on our future financial and
operating flexibility; |
|
|
|
a decline in the volumes of NGLs delivered by our facilities; |
|
|
|
the failure of our credit risk management efforts to adequately
protect us against customer non-payment; |
|
|
|
terrorist attacks aimed at our facilities; and |
|
|
|
our failure to successfully integrate our operations with assets
or companies we acquire. |
You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements. When considering forward-looking statements, please
review the risk factors described under Risk Factors
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005 we filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 27, 2006.
S-55
PROSPECTUS
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
Enterprise Products Operating L.P.
COMMON UNITS
DEBT SECURITIES
We may offer up to $4,000,000,000 of the following securities
under this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
common units representing limited partner interests in
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.; and |
|
|
|
debt securities of Enterprise Products Operating L.P., which
will be guaranteed by its parent company, Enterprise Products
Partners L.P. |
This prospectus provides you with a general description of the
securities we may offer. Each time we sell securities we will
provide a prospectus supplement that will contain specific
information about the terms of that offering. The prospectus
supplement may also add, update or change information contained
in this prospectus. You should read carefully this prospectus
and any prospectus supplement before you invest. You should also
read the documents we have referred you to in the Where
You Can Find More Information section of this prospectus
for information about us, including our financial statements.
In addition, up to 41,000,000 common units may be offered from
time to time by the selling unitholders named herein. Specific
terms of certain offerings by such selling unitholders may be
specified in a prospectus supplement to this prospectus. We will
not receive proceeds of any sale of common units by any such
selling unitholders unless otherwise indicated in a prospectus
supplement. For a more detailed discussion of selling
unitholders, please read Selling Unitholders.
Our common units are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the trading symbol EPD.
Unless otherwise specified in a prospectus supplement, the
senior debt securities, when issued, will be unsecured and will
rank equally with our other unsecured and unsubordinated
indebtedness. The subordinated debt securities, when issued,
will be subordinated in right of payment to our senior debt.
Limited partnerships are inherently different from
corporations. You should review carefully Risk
Factors beginning on page 3 for a discussion of
important risks you should consider before investing on our
securities.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of
securities by the registrants unless accompanied by a prospectus
supplement.
The date of this prospectus is March 23, 2005.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iv |
|
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
54 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
60 |
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this prospectus or any prospectus
supplement. We have not authorized any other person to provide
you with different information. If anyone provides you with
different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on
it. You should not assume that the information incorporated by
reference or provided in this prospectus or any prospectus
supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the
front of each document.
Our, we, us and
Enterprise as used in this prospectus refer to
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and Enterprise Products
Operating L.P. and their wholly owned subsidiaries.
GulfTerra as used in this prospectus supplement
refers to Enterprise GTM Holdings L.P. (formerly known as
GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P.) and its wholly owned
subsidiaries.
iii
ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS
This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) using a shelf registration
process. Under this shelf process, we may offer from time to
time up to $4,000,000,000 of our securities and the selling
unitholders may offer from time to time up to 41,000,000 of
their common units. Each time we offer securities, we will
provide you with a prospectus supplement that will describe,
among other things, the specific amounts and prices of the
securities being offered and the terms of the offering. The
selling unitholders may offer common units pursuant to this
prospectus or may provide you with a prospectus supplement that
will describe, among other things, the specific amounts and
prices of the securities being offered and the terms of the
offering. Any prospectus supplement may add, update or change
information contained in this prospectus. Any statement that we
make in this prospectus will be modified or superseded by any
inconsistent statement made by us in a prospectus supplement.
Therefore, you should read this prospectus and any attached
prospectus supplement before you invest in our securities.
iv
OUR COMPANY
We are a publicly traded limited partnership that was formed in
April 1998 to acquire, own, and operate all of the NGL
processing and distribution assets of EPCO, Inc., or EPCO,
formerly known as Enterprise Products Company. We conduct all of
our business through our 100% owned subsidiary, Enterprise
Products Operating L.P. (our Operating Partnership)
and its subsidiaries and joint ventures. Our general partner,
Enterprise Products GP, LLC, owns a 2% interest in us.
We are a leading North American midstream energy company that
provides a wide range of services to producers and consumers of
natural gas, natural gas liquids, or NGLs, and crude oil, and we
are an industry leader in the development of midstream
infrastructure in the deepwater trend of the Gulf of Mexico. We
have the only integrated North American midstream network, which
includes natural gas transportation, gathering, processing and
storage; NGL fractionation (or separation), transportation,
storage and import and export terminalling; and crude oil
transportation and offshore production platform services. Our
midstream network links producers of natural gas, NGLs and crude
oil from the largest supply basins in the United States, Canada
and the Gulf of Mexico with the largest consumers and
international markets. NGLs are used by the petrochemical and
refining industries to produce plastics, motor gasoline and
other industrial and consumer products and also are used as
residential, agricultural and industrial fuels. We provide
integrated services to our customers and generate fee-based cash
flow from multiple sources along our midstream energy
value chain.
Our midstream energy services include:
|
|
|
|
|
gathering and transportation of raw natural gas from both
onshore and offshore Gulf of Mexico developments; |
|
|
|
gathering and transportation of crude oil from offshore Gulf of
Mexico developments; |
|
|
|
offshore production platform services; |
|
|
|
processing of raw natural gas into a marketable product that
meets industry quality specifications by removing mixed NGLs and
impurities; |
|
|
|
purchase of natural gas for resale to our industrial, utility
and municipal customers; |
|
|
|
transportation of mixed NGLs to fractionation facilities by
pipeline; |
|
|
|
fractionation (or separation) of mixed NGLs produced as
by-products of crude oil refining and natural gas production
into component NGL products: ethane, propane, isobutane, normal
butane and natural gasoline; |
|
|
|
transportation of NGL products to end-users by pipeline, railcar
and truck; |
|
|
|
import and export of NGL products and petrochemical products
through our dock facilities; |
|
|
|
fractionation of refinery-sourced propane/propylene mix into
high-purity propylene, propane and mixed butane; |
|
|
|
transportation of high-purity propylene to end-users by pipeline; |
|
|
|
storage of natural gas, mixed NGLs, NGL products and
petrochemical products; |
|
|
|
conversion of normal butane to isobutane through the process of
isomerization; |
|
|
|
production of high-octane additives for motor gasoline from
isobutane; and |
|
|
|
sale of NGLs and petrochemical products we produce and/or
purchase for resale. |
In addition to our current strategic position in the Gulf of
Mexico, we have access to major natural gas and NGL supply
basins throughout the United States and Canada, including the
Rocky Mountains, the San Juan and Permian basins, the
Mid-Continent region and, through third-party pipeline
connections, north into Canadas Western Sedimentary basin.
Our system of assets in the Gulf Coast region of the
1
United States, combined with our Mid-America and Seminole
pipeline systems, create the only integrated North American
midstream network.
Certain of our facilities are owned jointly by us and other
industry partners, either through co-ownership arrangements or
joint ventures. Some of our jointly owned facilities are
operated by other owners.
We do not have any employees. All of our management,
administrative and operating functions are performed by
employees of EPCO, our ultimate parent company, pursuant to the
Administrative Services Agreement. For a discussion of the
Administrative Services Agreement, please read Item 13 of
our latest Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our principal executive offices are located at 2727 North Loop
West, Houston, Texas 77008-1038, and our telephone number is
(713) 880-6500.
2
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves risks. You should
consider carefully the following risk factors, together with all
of the other information included in, or incorporated by
reference into, this prospectus and any prospectus supplement in
evaluating an investment in our securities. This prospectus also
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Please read Forward-Looking
Statements. Our actual results could differ materially
from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a
result of certain factors, including the risks described below
and the other information included in, or incorporated by
reference into, this prospectus. If any of these risks occur,
our business, financial condition or results of operations could
be adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
Changes in the prices of hydrocarbon products may
materially adversely affect our results of operations, cash
flows and financial condition. |
We operate predominantly in the midstream energy sector which
includes gathering, transporting, processing, fractionating and
storing natural gas, NGLs and crude oil. As such, our results of
operations, cash flows and financial condition may be materially
adversely affected by changes in the prices of these hydrocarbon
products and by changes in the relative price levels among these
hydrocarbon products. In general terms, the prices of natural
gas, NGLs, crude oil and other hydrocarbon products are subject
to fluctuations in response to changes in supply, market
uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are
impossible to control. These factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of domestic production; |
|
|
|
the availability of imported oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
actions taken by foreign oil and natural gas producing nations; |
|
|
|
the availability of transportation systems with adequate
capacity; |
|
|
|
the availability of competitive fuels; |
|
|
|
fluctuating and seasonal demand for oil, natural gas and
NGLs; and |
|
|
|
conservation and the extent of governmental regulation of
production and the overall economic environment. |
We are also exposed to natural gas and NGL commodity price risk
under natural gas processing and gathering and NGL fractionation
contracts that provide for our fee to be calculated based on a
regional natural gas or NGL price index or to be paid in-kind by
taking title to natural gas or NGLs. A decrease in natural gas
and NGL prices can result in lower margins from these contracts,
which may materially adversely affect our results of operations,
cash flows and financial position.
|
|
|
A decline in the volume of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil
delivered to our facilities could adversely affect our results
of operations, cash flows and financial condition. |
Our profitability could be materially impacted by a decline in
the volume of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil transported,
gathered or processed at our facilities. A material decrease in
natural gas or crude oil production or crude oil refining, as a
result of depressed commodity prices, a decrease in exploration
and development activities or otherwise, could result in a
decline in the volume of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil handled
by our facilities.
The crude oil, natural gas and NGLs available to our facilities
will be derived from reserves produced from existing wells,
which reserves naturally decline over time. To offset this
natural decline, our facilities will need access to additional
reserves. Additionally, some of our facilities will be dependent
on reserves that are expected to be produced from newly
discovered properties that are currently being developed.
3
Exploration and development of new oil and natural gas reserves
is capital intensive, particularly offshore in the Gulf of
Mexico. Many economic and business factors are out of our
control and can adversely affect the decision by producers to
explore for and develop new reserves. These factors could
include relatively low oil and natural gas prices, cost and
availability of equipment, regulatory changes, capital budget
limitations or the lack of available capital. For example, a
sustained decline in the price of natural gas and crude oil
could result in a decrease in natural gas and crude oil
exploration and development activities in the regions where our
facilities are located. This could result in a decrease in
volumes to our offshore platforms, natural gas processing
plants, natural gas, crude oil and NGL pipelines, and NGL
fractionators which would have a material adverse affect on our
results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
Additional reserves, if discovered, may not be developed in the
near future or at all.
|
|
|
A reduction in demand for NGL products by the
petrochemical, refining or heating industries could materially
adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and
financial position. |
A reduction in demand for NGL products by the petrochemical,
refining or heating industries, whether because of general
economic conditions, reduced demand by consumers for the end
products made with NGL products, increased competition from
petroleum-based products due to pricing differences, adverse
weather conditions, government regulations affecting prices and
production levels of natural gas or the content of motor
gasoline or other reasons, could materially adversely affect our
results of operations, cash flows and financial position. For
example:
Ethane. If natural gas prices increase significantly in
relation to ethane prices, it may be more profitable for natural
gas producers to leave the ethane in the natural gas stream to
be burned as fuel than to extract the ethane from the mixed NGL
stream for sale.
Propane. The demand for propane as a heating fuel is
significantly affected by weather conditions. Unusually warm
winters could cause the demand for propane to decline
significantly and could cause a significant decline in the
volumes of propane that the combined company transports.
Isobutane. Any reduction in demand for motor gasoline
additives may reduce demand for isobutane. During periods in
which the difference in market prices between isobutane and
normal butane is low or inventory values are high relative to
current prices for normal butane or isobutane, our operating
margin from selling isobutane could be reduced.
Propylene. Any downturn in the domestic or international
economy could cause reduced demand for propylene, which could
cause a reduction in the volumes of propylene that we produce
and expose our investment in inventories of propane/ propylene
mix to pricing risk due to requirements for short-term price
discounts in the spot or short-term propylene markets.
|
|
|
We face competition from third parties in our midstream
businesses. |
Even if reserves exist in the areas accessed by our facilities
and are ultimately produced, we may not be chosen by the
producers in these areas to gather, transport, process,
fractionate, store or otherwise handle the hydrocarbons that are
produced. We compete with others, including producers of oil and
natural gas, for any such production on the basis of many
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
geographic proximity to the production; |
|
|
|
costs of connection; |
|
|
|
available capacity; |
|
|
|
rates; and |
|
|
|
access to markets. |
4
|
|
|
Our debt level may limit our future financial and
operating flexibility. |
As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately
$4.3 billion of consolidated debt outstanding. The amount
of our debt could have significant effects on our future
operations, including, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
a significant portion of our cash flow from operations will be
dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on
outstanding debt and will not be available for other purposes,
including payment of distributions on our common units and
capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
credit rating agencies may view our debt level negatively; |
|
|
|
covenants contained in our existing debt arrangements will
require us to continue to meet financial tests that may
adversely affect our flexibility in planning for and reacting to
changes in our business; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital,
capital expenditures, acquisitions and general partnership
purposes may be limited; |
|
|
|
we may be at a competitive disadvantage relative to similar
companies that have less debt; and |
|
|
|
we may be more vulnerable to adverse economic and industry
conditions as a result of our significant debt level. |
Our public debt indentures currently do not limit the amount of
future indebtedness that we can create, incur, assume or
guarantee. Our revolving credit facilities, however, restrict
our ability to incur additional debt, though any debt we may
incur in compliance with these restrictions may still be
substantial.
Our multi-year revolving credit facility and the indentures
governing our public debt contain conventional financial
covenants and other restrictions. A breach of any of these
restrictions by us could permit the lenders to declare all
amounts outstanding under those debt agreements to be
immediately due and payable and, in the case of the credit
facility, to terminate all commitments to extend further credit.
Our ability to access the capital markets to raise capital on
favorable terms will be affected by our debt level, the amount
of our debt maturing in the next several years and current
maturities, and by adverse market conditions resulting from,
among other things, general economic conditions, contingencies
and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and impossible
to control. Moreover, if the rating agencies were to downgrade
our corporate credit, then we could experience an increase in
our borrowing costs, difficulty assessing capital markets or a
reduction in the market price of our common units. Such a
development could adversely affect our ability to obtain
financing for working capital, capital expenditures or
acquisitions or to refinance existing indebtedness. If we are
unable to access the capital markets on favorable terms in the
future, we might be forced to seek extensions for some of our
short-term securities or to refinance some of our debt
obligations through bank credit, as opposed to long-term public
debt securities or equity securities. The price and terms upon
which we might receive such extensions or additional bank
credit, if at all, could be more onerous than those contained in
existing debt agreements. Any such arrangements could, in turn,
increase the risk that our leverage may adversely affect our
future financial and operating flexibility and our ability to
pay cash distributions at expected rates.
|
|
|
We may not be able to fully execute our growth strategy if
we encounter illiquid capital markets or increased competition
for qualified assets. |
Our strategy contemplates growth through the development and
acquisition of a wide range of midstream and other energy
infrastructure assets while maintaining a strong balance sheet.
This strategy includes constructing and acquiring additional
assets and businesses to enhance our ability to compete
effectively and diversify our asset portfolio, thereby providing
more stable cash flow. We regularly consider and enter into
discussions regarding, and are currently contemplating,
potential joint ventures, stand alone projects or other
transactions that we believe will present opportunities to
realize synergies, expand our role in the energy infrastructure
business and increase our market position.
5
We may require substantial new capital to finance the future
development and acquisition of assets and businesses.
Limitations on our access to capital will impair our ability to
execute this strategy. Expensive capital will limit our ability
to develop or acquire accretive assets. We may not be able to
raise the necessary funds on satisfactory terms, if at all.
In addition, we are experiencing increased competition for the
assets we purchase or contemplate purchasing. Increased
competition for a limited pool of assets could result in our
losing to other bidders more often or acquiring assets at higher
prices. Either occurrence would limit our ability to fully
execute our growth strategy. Our inability to execute our growth
strategy may materially adversely impact the market price of our
securities.
|
|
|
Our growth strategy may adversely affect our results of
operations if we do not successfully integrate the businesses
that we acquire, including GulfTerra, or if we substantially
increase our indebtedness and contingent liabilities to make
acquisitions. |
Our growth strategy includes making accretive acquisitions. As a
result, from time to time, we will evaluate and acquire assets
and businesses that we believe complement our existing
operations. Similar to the risks associated with integrating our
operations with GulfTerras operations, we may be unable to
integrate successfully businesses we acquire in the future. We
may incur substantial expenses or encounter delays or other
problems in connection with our growth strategy that could
negatively impact our results of operations, cash flows and
financial condition. Moreover, acquisitions and business
expansions involve numerous risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in the assimilation of the operations,
technologies, services and products of the acquired companies or
business segments; |
|
|
|
establishing the internal controls and procedures that we are
required to maintain under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; |
|
|
|
managing relationships with new joint venture partners with whom
we have not previously partnered; |
|
|
|
inefficiencies and complexities that can arise because of
unfamiliarity with new assets and the businesses associated with
them, including with their markets; and |
|
|
|
diversion of the attention of management and other personnel
from day-to-day
business to the development or acquisition of new businesses and
other business opportunities. |
If consummated, any acquisition or investment would also likely
result in the incurrence of indebtedness and contingent
liabilities and an increase in interest expense and
depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses. As a result,
our capitalization and results of operations may change
significantly following an acquisition. A substantial increase
in our indebtedness and contingent liabilities could have a
material adverse effect on our business. In addition, any
anticipated benefits of a material acquisition, such as expected
cost savings, may not be fully realized, if at all.
|
|
|
Our operating cash flows from our capital projects may not
be immediate. |
We are engaged in several capital expansion projects and
greenfield projects for which significant capital
has been expended, and our operating cash flow from a particular
project may not increase immediately following its completion.
For instance, if we build a new pipeline or platform or expand
an existing facility, the design, construction, development and
installation may occur over an extended period of time, and we
may not receive any material increase in operating cash flow
from that project until after it is placed in service. If we
experience unanticipated or extended delays in generating
operating cash flow from these projects, we may be required to
reduce or reprioritize our capital budget, sell non-core assets,
access the capital markets or decrease distributions to
unitholders in order to meet our capital requirements.
6
|
|
|
Our actual construction, development and acquisition costs
could exceed forecasted amounts. |
We will have significant expenditures for the development,
construction or other acquisition of energy infrastructure
assets, including some construction and development projects
with significant technological challenges. For example,
underwater operations, especially those in water depths in
excess of 600 feet, are very expensive and involve much
more uncertainty and risk, and if a problem occurs, the
solution, if one exists, may be very expensive and time
consuming. We may not be able to complete our projects, whether
in deepwater or otherwise, at the costs estimated at the time of
initiation.
|
|
|
We may be unable to cause our joint ventures to take or
not to take certain actions unless some or all of our joint
venture participants agree. |
We participate in several joint ventures. Due to the nature of
some of these joint ventures, each participant in each of these
joint ventures has made substantial investments in the joint
venture and, accordingly, has required that the relevant
organizational documents contain certain features designed to
provide each participant with the opportunity to participate in
the management of the joint venture and to protect its
investment in that joint venture, as well as any other assets
which may be substantially dependent on or otherwise affected by
the activities of that joint venture. These participation and
protective features include a corporate governance structure
that requires at least a majority in interest vote to authorize
many basic activities and requires a greater voting interest
(sometimes up to 100%) to authorize more significant activities.
Examples of these more significant activities are large
expenditures or contractual commitments, the construction or
acquisition of assets, borrowing money or otherwise raising
capital, transactions with affiliates of a joint venture
participant, litigation and transactions not in the ordinary
course of business, among others. Thus, without the concurrence
of joint venture participants with enough voting interests, we
may be unable to cause any of our joint ventures to take or not
to take certain actions, even though those actions may be in the
best interest of us or the particular joint venture.
Moreover, any joint venture owner may sell, transfer or
otherwise modify its ownership interest in a joint venture,
whether in a transaction involving third parties or the other
joint venture owners. Any such transaction could result in our
partnering with different or additional parties.
|
|
|
The interruption of distributions to us from our
subsidiaries and joint ventures may affect our ability to
satisfy our obligations and to make cash distributions to our
unitholders. |
We are a holding company with no business operations. Our only
significant assets are the equity interests we own in our
subsidiaries and joint ventures. As a result, we depend upon the
earnings and cash flow of our subsidiaries and joint ventures
and the distribution of that cash to us in order to meet our
obligations and to allow us to make distributions to our
unitholders.
In addition, the management committees of the joint ventures in
which we participate typically have sole discretion regarding
the occurrence and amount of distributions. Some of the joint
ventures in which we participate have separate credit
arrangements that contain various restrictive covenants. Among
other things, those covenants may limit or restrict the joint
ventures ability to make distributions to us under certain
circumstances. Accordingly, our joint ventures may be unable to
make distributions to us at current levels or at all.
|
|
|
A natural disaster, catastrophe or other event could
result in severe personal injury, property damage and
environmental damage, which could curtail our operations and
otherwise materially adversely affect our cash flow. |
Some of our operations involve risks of personal injury,
property damage and environmental damage, which could curtail
our operations and otherwise materially adversely affect our
cash flow. For example, natural gas facilities operate at high
pressures, sometimes in excess of 1,100 pounds per square inch.
We also operate oil and natural gas facilities located
underwater in the Gulf of Mexico, which can involve
complexities, such as extreme water pressure. Virtually all of
our operations are exposed to potential natural disasters,
including hurricanes, tornadoes, storms, floods and/or
earthquakes.
7
If one or more facilities that are owned by us or that deliver
oil, natural gas or other products to us are damaged by severe
weather or any other disaster, accident, catastrophe or event,
our operations could be significantly interrupted. Similar
interruptions could result from damage to production or other
facilities that supply our facilities or other stoppages arising
from factors beyond our control. These interruptions might
involve significant damage to people, property or the
environment, and repairs might take from a week or less for a
minor incident to six months or more for a major interruption.
Additionally, some of the storage contracts that we are a party
to obligate us to indemnify our customers for any damage or
injury occurring during the period in which the customers
natural gas is in our possession. Any event that interrupts the
fees generated by our energy infrastructure assets, or which
causes us to make significant expenditures not covered by
insurance, could reduce our cash available for paying our
interest obligations as well as unitholder distributions and,
accordingly, adversely affect the market price of our securities.
We believe that we maintain adequate insurance coverage,
although insurance will not cover many types of interruptions
that might occur. As a result of market conditions, premiums and
deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase
substantially, and in some instances, certain insurance may
become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of
coverage. As a result, we may not be able to renew our existing
insurance policies or procure other desirable insurance on
commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we were to incur a
significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position
and results of operations. In addition, the proceeds of any such
insurance may not be paid in a timely manner and may be
insufficient if such an event were to occur.
|
|
|
An impairment of goodwill could reduce our
earnings. |
We had recorded $445.9 million of goodwill and
$961.9 million of intangible assets on our consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2004. Goodwill is
recorded when the purchase price of a business exceeds the fair
market value of the tangible and separately measurable
intangible net assets. GAAP will require us to test goodwill for
impairment on an annual basis or when events or circumstances
occur indicating that goodwill might be impaired. Long-lived
assets such as intangible assets with finite useful lives are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. If we determine that any of our goodwill or
intangible assets were impaired, we would be required to take an
immediate charge to earnings with a correlative effect on
partners equity and balance sheet leverage as measured by
debt to total capitalization.
|
|
|
Increases in interest rates could adversely affect our
business and may cause the market price of our common units to
decline. |
In addition to our exposure to commodity prices, we have
significant exposure to increases in interest rates. As of
December 31, 2004, we had approximately $4.3 billion
of consolidated debt, of which approximately $2.9 billion
was at fixed interest rates and approximately $1.4 billion
was at variable interest rates, after giving effect to existing
interest swap arrangements. We may from time to time enter into
additional interest rate swap arrangements, which could increase
our exposure to variable interest rates. As a result, our
results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, could
be materially adversely affected by significant increases in
interest rates.
An increase in interest rates may also cause a corresponding
decline in demand for equity investments in general, and in
particular for yield-based equity investments such as our common
units. Any such reduction in demand for our common units
resulting from other more attractive investment opportunities
may cause the trading price of our common units to decline.
|
|
|
The use of derivative financial instruments could result
in material financial losses by us. |
We historically have sought to limit a portion of the adverse
effects resulting from changes in oil and natural gas commodity
prices and interest rates by using financial derivative
instruments and other hedging mechanisms from time to time. To
the extent that we hedge our commodity price and interest rate
exposures, we will forego the benefits we would otherwise
experience if commodity prices or interest rates
8
were to change in our favor. In addition, even though monitored
by management, hedging activities can result in losses. Such
losses could occur under various circumstances, including if a
counterparty does not perform its obligations under the hedge
arrangement, the hedge is imperfect, or hedging policies and
procedures are not followed.
|
|
|
Our pipeline integrity program may impose significant
costs and liabilities on us. |
In December 2003, the U.S. Department of Transportation
issued a final rule (effective as of February 14, 2004)
requiring pipeline operators to develop integrity management
programs to comprehensively evaluate their pipelines, and take
measures to protect pipeline segments located in what the rule
refers to as high consequence areas. The final rule
resulted from the enactment of the Pipeline Safety Improvement
Act of 2002. At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of this
rule on us. However, we will continue our pipeline integrity
testing programs, which are intended to assess and maintain the
integrity of our pipelines. While the costs associated with the
pipeline integrity testing itself are not large, the results of
these tests could cause us to incur significant and
unanticipated capital and operating expenditures for repairs or
upgrades deemed necessary to ensure the continued safe and
reliable operation of our pipelines.
|
|
|
Environmental costs and liabilities and changing
environmental regulation could materially affect our cash
flow. |
Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local
regulatory requirements relating to environmental affairs,
health and safety, waste management and chemical and petroleum
products. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce
compliance with applicable regulations and permits and to
subject violators to civil and criminal penalties, including
substantial fines, injunctions or both. Third parties may also
have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce compliance.
We will make expenditures in connection with environmental
matters as part of normal capital expenditure programs. However,
future environmental law developments, such as stricter laws,
regulations, permits or enforcement policies, could
significantly increase some costs of our operations, including
the handling, manufacture, use, emission or disposal of
substances and wastes. Moreover, as with other companies engaged
in similar or related businesses, our operations have some risk
of environmental costs and liabilities because we handle
petroleum products.
|
|
|
Federal, state or local regulatory measures could
materially adversely affect our business. |
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, regulates our
interstate natural gas pipelines, interstate natural gas storage
facilities and interstate NGL and petrochemical pipelines, while
state regulatory agencies regulate our intrastate natural gas
and NGL pipelines, intrastate storage facilities and gathering
lines. This federal and state regulation extends to such matters
as:
|
|
|
|
|
rate structures; |
|
|
|
rates of return on equity; |
|
|
|
recovery of costs; |
|
|
|
the services that our regulated assets are permitted to perform; |
|
|
|
the acquisition, construction and disposition of assets; and |
|
|
|
to an extent, the level of competition in that regulated
industry. |
Our latest Annual Report on
Form 10-K, which
is incorporated by reference into this prospectus, contains a
general overview of FERC and state regulation applicable to our
energy infrastructure assets. This regulatory oversight can
affect certain aspects of our business and the market for our
products and could materially adversely affect our cash flow.
Please read Business and Properties Regulation
and Environmental Matters in our latest Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
9
Under the Natural Gas Act, FERC has authority to regulate our
natural gas companies that provide natural gas pipeline
transportation services in interstate commerce. Its authority to
regulate those services includes the rates charged for the
services, terms and conditions of service, certification and
construction of new facilities, the acquisition, extension,
disposition or abandonment of facilities, the maintenance of
accounts and records, the initiation and discontinuation of
services, and various other matters. Pursuant to FERCs
jurisdiction over interstate gas pipeline rates, existing
pipeline rates may be challenged by customer complaint or by the
FERC and proposed rate increases may be challenged by protest.
For example, in December 2002, High Island Offshore System,
L.L.C., or HIOS, an interstate natural gas pipeline owned by us,
filed a rate case pursuant to Section 4 of the Natural Gas
Act before FERC to increase its transportation rates. FERC
accepted HIOS tariff sheets implementing the new rates,
subject to refund, and set certain issues for hearing before an
Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ. The ALJ issued an initial
decision on the issues set for hearing on April 22, 2004,
proposing rates lower than the rate initially proposed by HIOS.
In response to the ALJs initial decision, HIOS filed, on
August 5, 2004, a settlement agreement whereby HIOS
proposed to implement its rates in effect prior to this
proceeding for a prospective three-year period.
On January 24, 2005, FERC issued an order rejecting
HIOSs settlement offer and generally affirming the
ALJs initial decision, resulting in rates significantly
lower than the rate proposed in HIOS settlement offer.
FERCs January 24 order may be subject to requests for
rehearing and appeal to federal court. We are not able to
predict the outcome of the HIOS proceeding, but an adverse
outcome in this proceeding or any other rate case proceedings to
which we may be a party in the future could adversely affect our
results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
FERC also has authority under the Interstate Commerce Act, or
ICA, to regulate the rates, terms, and conditions applied to our
interstate pipelines engaged in the transportation of NGLs and
petrochemicals (commonly known as oil pipelines).
Pursuant to the ICA, oil pipeline rates can be challenged at
FERC either by protest, when they are initially filed or
increased, or by complaint at any time they remain on file with
the jurisdictional agency.
We have interests in natural gas pipeline facilities offshore
from Texas and Louisiana. These facilities are subject to
regulation by FERC and other federal agencies, including the
Department of Interior, under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands
Act, and by the Department of Transportations Office of
Pipeline Safety under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act.
Our intrastate NGL and natural gas pipelines are subject to
regulation in Alabama, Colorado, Louisiana, Mississippi, New
Mexico and Texas. We also have natural gas underground storage
facilities in Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas. Some of our
intrastate natural gas pipelines and storage facilities are
subject to regulation by the FERC pursuant to Section 311
of the Natural Gas Policy Act, or NGPA. Although state
regulation is typically less onerous than at FERC, proposed and
existing rates subject to state regulation are also subject to
challenge by protest and complaint, respectively.
On July 20, 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit issued its opinion in BP West
Coast Products, LLC v. FERC, which upheld FERCs
determination that SFPPs rates were grandfathered rates
under the Energy Policy Act and that SFPPs shippers had
not demonstrated substantially changed circumstances that would
justify modification of those rates. The court also stated that
FERC had not provided reasonable decision-making in support of
its Lakehead policy. In Lakehead, the FERC allowed a regulated
entity organized as a master limited partnership to include in
its cost of service an income tax allowance to the extent that
its unitholders were corporations subject to income tax. The
court remanded the issue of the appropriate income tax allowance
for a pipeline owned by a master limited partnership and the
issue of whether SFPPs revised cost of service without the
tax allowance would qualify as a substantially changed
circumstance that would justify modification of SFPPs
rates. Because the court remanded to the FERC and because the
FERCs ruling will focus on the facts and record presented
to it, it is not clear what impact, if any, the opinion will
have on our rates or on the rates of other FERC-jurisdictional
pipelines organized as tax pass-through entities. On
December 2, 2004, the FERC issued a Notice of Inquiry in
Docket No. PL05-5 suggesting that BP West Coast may not be
10
limited to the specific facts. Specifically, FERC requested
comments regarding whether the courts opinion should apply
only to the specific facts of that case, or whether it should
apply more broadly, and, if the latter, what effect that ruling
might have on energy infrastructure investments. It is not clear
what action the FERC will take in response to BP West Coast
after considering comments filed, to what extent such action
will be challenged and, if so, whether it will withstand further
FERC or judicial review.
Parties could challenge the rates of our common carrier
interstate liquid pipelines and our interstate natural gas
pipelines and argue that the rationale in the BP West Coast
decision, regarding tax allowances, should be applied. While it
is possible that party might challenge these rates, it is not
possible to predict the likelihood that such a challenge would
succeed at the FERC.
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks aimed at our facilities could adversely
affect our business. |
Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the
United States, the United States government has issued warnings
that energy assets, including our nations pipeline
infrastructure, may be the future target of terrorist
organizations. Any terrorist attack on our facilities, those of
our customers and, in some cases, those of other pipelines,
could have a material adverse effect on our business. An
escalation of political tensions in the Middle East and
elsewhere, such as the recent commencement of United States
military action in Iraq, could result in increased volatility in
the worlds energy markets and result in a material adverse
effect on our business.
Risks Related to Our Common Units as a Result of Our
Partnership Structure
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations to pay
distributions at the current level following establishment of
cash reserves and payments of fees and expenses, including
payments to our general partner. |
Because distributions on our common units are dependent on the
amount of cash we generate, distributions may fluctuate based on
our performance. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to
pay distributions at the current level each quarter. The actual
amount of cash that is available to be distributed each quarter
will depend upon numerous factors, some of which are beyond our
control and the control of our general partner. These factors
include but are not limited to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our operating costs; |
|
|
|
the level of competition in our business segments; |
|
|
|
prevailing economic conditions; |
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make; |
|
|
|
the restrictions contained in our debt agreements and our debt
service requirements; |
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
the cost of acquisitions, if any; and |
|
|
|
the amount, if any, of cash reserves established by our general
partner, in its discretion. |
In addition, you should be aware that our ability to pay the
minimum quarterly distribution each quarter depends primarily on
our cash flow, including cash flow from financial reserves and
working capital borrowings, and not solely on profitability,
which is affected by non-cash items. As a result, we may make
cash distributions during periods when we record losses and we
may not make distributions during periods when we record net
income.
|
|
|
We do not have the same flexibility as other types of
organizations to accumulate cash and equity to protect against
illiquidity in the future. |
Unlike a corporation, our partnership agreement requires us to
make quarterly distributions to our unitholders of all available
cash reduced by any amounts of reserves for commitments and
contingencies,
11
including capital and operating costs and debt service
requirements. The value of our common units may decrease in
direct correlation with decreases in the amount we distribute
per common unit. Accordingly, if we experience a liquidity
problem in the future, we may not be able to issue more equity
to recapitalize.
|
|
|
Cost reimbursements due our general partner may be
substantial and will reduce our cash available for distribution
to holders of common units. |
Prior to making any distribution on our common units, we will
reimburse our general partner and its affiliates, including
officers and directors of our general partner, for expenses they
incur on our behalf. The reimbursement of expenses could
adversely affect our ability to pay cash distributions to
holders of common units. Our general partner has sole discretion
to determine the amount of these expenses, subject to an annual
limit. In addition, our general partner and its affiliates may
provide us other services for which we will be charged fees as
determined by our general partner.
|
|
|
Our general partner and its affiliates have limited
fiduciary responsibilities and conflicts of interest with
respect to our partnership. |
The directors and officers of our general partner and its
affiliates have duties to manage the general partner in a manner
that is beneficial to its members. At the same time, our general
partner has duties to manage our partnership in a manner that is
beneficial to us. Therefore, our general partners duties
to us may conflict with the duties of its officers and directors
to its members.
Such conflicts may include, among others, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
decisions of our general partner regarding the amount and timing
of asset purchases and sales, cash expenditures, borrowings,
issuances of additional units and reserves in any quarter may
affect the level of cash available to pay quarterly
distributions to unitholders and the general partner; |
|
|
|
under our partnership agreement, our general partner determines
which costs incurred by it and its affiliates are reimbursable
by us; |
|
|
|
our general partner is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us, such as EPCO, in resolving
conflicts of interest, which has the effect of limiting its
fiduciary duty to unitholders; |
|
|
|
affiliates of our general partner may compete with us in certain
circumstances; |
|
|
|
our general partner may limit its liability and reduce its
fiduciary duties, while also restricting the remedies available
to unitholders for actions that might, without the limitations,
constitute breaches of fiduciary duty. As a result of purchasing
units, you are deemed to consent to some actions and conflicts
of interest that might otherwise constitute a breach of
fiduciary or other duties under applicable law; |
|
|
|
we do not have any employees and we rely solely on employees of
the general partner and its affiliates; and |
|
|
|
in some instances, our general partner may cause us to borrow
funds in order to permit the payment of distributions, even if
the purpose or effect of the borrowing is to make incentive
distributions. |
|
|
|
Even if unitholders are dissatisfied, they cannot easily
remove our general partner. |
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
managements decisions regarding our business. Unitholders
did not elect our general partner or the directors of the
general partner and will have no right to elect our general
partner or the directors of our general partner on an annual or
other continuing basis.
12
Furthermore, if unitholders are dissatisfied with the
performance of our general partner, they will have little
ability to remove our general partner without its consent. Our
general partner may not be removed except upon the vote of the
holders of at least 64% of the outstanding units voting together
as a single class. Because affiliates of our general partner own
more than 36% of our outstanding units, the general partner
currently cannot be removed without the consent of the general
partner and its affiliates.
Unitholders voting rights are further restricted by the
partnership agreement provision stating that any units held by a
person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then
outstanding, other than our general partner and its affiliates,
cannot be voted on any matter. In addition, the partnership
agreement contains provisions limiting the ability of
unitholders to call meetings or to acquire information about our
operations, as well as other provisions limiting the
unitholders ability to influence the manner or direction
of management.
As a result of these provisions, the price at which the common
units will trade may be lower because of the absence or
reduction of a takeover premium in the trading price.
|
|
|
We may issue additional common units without the approval
of common unitholders, which would dilute their existing
ownership interests. |
The issuance of additional common units or other equity
securities of equal or senior rank will have the following
effects:
|
|
|
|
|
the proportionate ownership interest of common unitholders in us
will decrease; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may
decrease; |
|
|
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit
may be diminished; and |
|
|
|
the market price of the common units may decline. |
|
|
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may
require common unitholders to sell their units at an undesirable
time or price. |
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own 85%
more of the common units then outstanding, our general partner
will have the right, but not the obligation, which it may assign
to any of its affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less
than all, of the remaining common units held by unaffiliated
persons at a price not less than their then current market
price. As a result, common unitholders may be required to sell
their common units at an undesirable time or price and may
therefore not receive any return on their investment. They may
also incur a tax liability upon a sale of their units. Under our
partnership agreement, Shell is not deemed to be an affiliate of
our general partner for purposes of this limited call right.
|
|
|
Common unitholders may not have limited liability if a
court finds that limited partner actions constitute control of
our business. |
Under Delaware law, common unitholders could be held liable for
our obligations to the same extent as a general partner if a
court determined that the right of limited partners to remove
our general partner or to take other action under the
partnership agreement constituted participation in the
control of our business.
Under Delaware law, the general partner generally has unlimited
liability for the obligations of the partnership, such as its
debts and environmental liabilities, except for those
contractual obligations of the partnership that are expressly
made without recourse to the general partner.
In addition, Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform
Limited Partnership Act provides that, under some circumstances,
a limited partner may be liable to us for the amount of a
distribution for a period of three years from the date of the
distribution.
13
|
|
|
A large number of our outstanding common units may be sold
in the market, which may depress the market price of our common
units. |
Sales of a substantial number of our common units in the public
market could cause the market price of our common units to
decline. As of March 1, 2005, a total of approximately
381.3 million of our common units were outstanding. Shell
owns 36,572,122 of our common units, representing approximately
9.6% of our outstanding common units at March 1, 2005, and
has publicly announced its intention to reduce its holdings of
our common units on an orderly schedule over a period of years,
taking into account market conditions. Under a registration
rights agreement, we are obligated, subject to certain
limitations and conditions, to register the common units held by
Shell for resale. All of the common units held by Shell are
registered for resale under the registration statement of which
this prospectus is a part. Please read Selling
Unitholders and Plan of Distribution
Distribution by Selling Unitholders.
Sales of a substantial number of these common units in the
trading markets, whether in a single transaction or series of
transactions, or the possibility that these sales may occur,
could reduce the market price of our outstanding common units.
In addition, these sales, or the possibility that these sales
may occur, could make it more difficult for us to sell our
common units in the future.
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
You are urged to read Material Tax Consequences
beginning on page 41 for a more complete discussion of the
expected material federal income tax consequences of owning and
disposing of common units.
|
|
|
The IRS could treat us as a corporation for tax purposes,
which would substantially reduce the cash available for
distribution to common unitholders. |
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in
the common units depends largely on our being treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes. We have not
requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the IRS on
this matter.
If we were classified as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our income at the
corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35%, and we
likely would pay state taxes as well. Distributions to you would
generally be taxed again to you as corporate distributions, and
no income, gains, losses or deductions would flow through to
you. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a corporation,
the cash available for distribution to you would be
substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a
corporation would result in a material reduction in the
after-tax return to you, likely causing a substantial reduction
in the value of the common units.
A change in current law or a change in our business could cause
us to be taxed as a corporation for federal income tax purposes
or otherwise subject us to entity-level taxation. Our
partnership agreement provides that, if a law is enacted or
existing law is modified or interpreted in a manner that
subjects us to taxation as a corporation or otherwise subjects
us to entity-level taxation for federal, state or local income
tax purposes, then the minimum quarterly distribution and the
target distribution levels will be decreased to reflect that
impact on us.
|
|
|
A successful IRS contest of the federal income tax
positions we take may adversely impact the market for common
units, and the costs of any contests will be borne by our
unitholders and our general partner. |
We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to any
matter affecting us. The IRS may adopt positions that differ
from the conclusions of our counsel expressed in the
accompanying prospectus or from the positions we take. It may be
necessary to resort to administrative or court proceedings to
sustain some or all of our counsels conclusions or the
positions we take. A court may not agree with some or all of our
counsels conclusions or the positions we take. Any contest
with the IRS may materially and adversely impact the market for
common units and the price at which they trade. In addition, the
costs of
14
any contest with the IRS, principally legal, accounting and
related fees, will be borne indirectly by our unitholders and
our general partner.
|
|
|
Common unitholders may be required to pay taxes even if
they do not receive any cash distributions. |
Common unitholders will be required to pay federal income taxes
and, in some cases, state, local and foreign income taxes on
their share of our taxable income even if they do not receive
any cash distributions from us. They may not receive cash
distributions from us equal to their share of our taxable income
or even equal to the actual tax liability that results from
their share of our taxable income.
|
|
|
Tax gain or loss on the disposition of common units could
be different than expected. |
If you sell your common units, you will recognize gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount realized and your tax
basis in those common units. Prior distributions to you in
excess of the total net taxable income you were allocated for a
common unit, which decreased your tax basis in that common unit,
will, in effect, become taxable income to you if the common unit
is sold at a price greater than your tax basis in that common
unit, even if the price you receive is less than your original
cost. A substantial portion of the amount realized, whether or
not representing gain, may be ordinary income to you.
|
|
|
Tax-exempt entities, regulated investment companies and
foreign persons face unique tax issues from owning common units
that may result in adverse tax consequences to them. |
Investment in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as
individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs), regulated
investment companies (known as mutual funds) and foreign persons
raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all of our
income allocated to unitholders who are organizations exempt
from federal income tax, including individual retirement
accounts and other retirement plans, will be unrelated business
taxable income and will be taxable to them. Recent legislation
treats net income derived from the ownership of certain publicly
traded partnerships (including us) as qualifying income to a
regulated investment company. However, this legislation is only
effective for taxable years beginning after October 22,
2004, the date of enactment. For taxable years beginning prior
to the date of enactment, very little of our income will be
qualifying income to a regulated investment company.
Distributions to
non-U.S. persons
will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable
effective tax rate, and
non-U.S. persons
will be required to file United States federal income tax
returns and pay tax on their share of our taxable income.
|
|
|
We will treat each purchaser of common units as having the
same tax benefits without regard to the units purchased. The IRS
may challenge this treatment, which could adversely affect the
value of our common units. |
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common
units, we adopt depreciation and amortization positions that may
not conform with all aspects of applicable Treasury regulations.
A successful IRS challenge to those positions could adversely
affect the amount of tax benefits available to a common
unitholder. It also could affect the timing of these tax
benefits or the amount of gain from a sale of common units and
could have a negative impact on the value of the common units or
result in audit adjustments to the common unitholders tax
returns.
|
|
|
Common unitholders will likely be subject to state and
local taxes and return filing requirements in states where they
do not live as a result of an investment in our common
units. |
In addition to federal income taxes, common unitholders will
likely be subject to other taxes, including state and local
income taxes, unincorporated business taxes and estate,
inheritance or intangible taxes that are imposed by the various
jurisdictions in which we do business or own property and in
which they do not reside. Common unitholders will likely be
required to file state and local income tax returns and pay
state and local income taxes in some or all of the various
jurisdictions in which we do business or own property. Further,
they may be subject to penalties for failure to comply with
those requirements. It is
15
the responsibility of the common unitholder to file all United
States federal, state and local tax returns. Our counsel has not
rendered an opinion on the state or local tax consequences of an
investment in the common units.
USE OF PROCEEDS
We will use the net proceeds from any sale of securities
described in this prospectus for future business acquisitions
and other general corporate purposes, such as working capital,
investments in subsidiaries, the retirement of existing debt
and/or the repurchase of common units or other securities. The
prospectus supplement will describe the actual use of the net
proceeds from the sale of securities. The exact amounts to be
used and when the net proceeds will be applied to corporate
purposes will depend on a number of factors, including our
funding requirements and the availability of alternative funding
sources.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of common units
by any selling unitholders unless otherwise indicated in a
prospectus supplement.
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The ratios of earnings to fixed charges for Enterprise Products
Partners for each of the periods indicated are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
1999 |
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges, earnings is the aggregate of the following
items:
|
|
|
|
|
pre-tax income or loss from continuing operations before
adjustment for minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries
or income or loss from equity investees; |
|
|
|
plus fixed charges; |
|
|
|
plus distributed income of equity investees; |
|
|
|
less capitalized interest; and |
|
|
|
less minority interest in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that
have not incurred fixed charges. |
The term fixed charges means the sum of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
interest expensed and capitalized, including amortized premiums,
discounts and capitalized expenses related to
indebtedness; and |
|
|
|
an estimate of the interest within rental expenses. |
DESCRIPTION OF DEBT SECURITIES
In this Description of Debt Securities references to the
Issuer mean only Enterprise Products Operating L.P.
and not its subsidiaries. References to the
Guarantor mean only Enterprise Products Partners
L.P. and not its subsidiaries. References to we and
us mean the Issuer and the Guarantor collectively.
The debt securities will be issued under an Indenture dated as
of October 4, 2004 (the Indenture), among
the Issuer, the Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as trustee (the Trustee). The terms of
the debt securities will include those expressly set forth in
the Indenture and those made part of the Indenture by reference
to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (the Trust
Indenture
16
Act). Capitalized terms used in this Description of Debt
Securities have the meanings specified in the Indenture.
This Description of Debt Securities is intended to be a useful
overview of the material provisions of the debt securities and
the Indenture. Since this Description of Debt Securities is only
a summary, you should refer to the Indenture for a complete
description of our obligations and your rights.
General
The Indenture does not limit the amount of debt securities that
may be issued thereunder. Debt securities may be issued under
the Indenture from time to time in separate series, each up to
the aggregate amount authorized for such series. The debt
securities will be general obligations of the Issuer and the
Guarantor and may be subordinated to Senior Indebtedness of the
Issuer and the Guarantor. See
Subordination.
A prospectus supplement and a supplemental indenture (or a
resolution of our Board of Directors and accompanying
officers certificate) relating to any series of debt
securities being offered will include specific terms relating to
the offering. These terms will include some or all of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the form and title of the debt securities; |
|
|
|
the total principal amount of the debt securities; |
|
|
|
the portion of the principal amount which will be payable if the
maturity of the debt securities is accelerated; |
|
|
|
the currency or currency unit in which the debt securities will
be paid, if not U.S. dollars; |
|
|
|
any right we may have to defer payments of interest by extending
the dates payments are due whether interest on those deferred
amounts will be payable as well; |
|
|
|
the dates on which the principal of the debt securities will be
payable; |
|
|
|
the interest rate which the debt securities will bear and the
interest payment dates for the debt securities; |
|
|
|
any optional redemption provisions; |
|
|
|
any sinking fund or other provisions that would obligate us to
repurchase or otherwise redeem the debt securities; |
|
|
|
any changes to or additional Events of Default or covenants; |
|
|
|
whether the debt securities are to be issued as Registered
Securities or Bearer Securities or both; and any special
provisions for Bearer Securities; |
|
|
|
the subordination, if any, of the debt securities and any
changes to the subordination provisions of the
Indenture; and |
|
|
|
any other terms of the debt securities. |
The prospectus supplement will also describe any material United
States federal income tax consequences or other special
considerations applicable to the applicable series of debt
securities, including those applicable to:
|
|
|
|
|
Bearer Securities; |
|
|
|
debt securities with respect to which payments of principal,
premium or interest are determined with reference to an index or
formula, including changes in prices of particular securities,
currencies or commodities; |
|
|
|
debt securities with respect to which principal, premium or
interest is payable in a foreign or composite currency; |
17
|
|
|
|
|
debt securities that are issued at a discount below their stated
principal amount, bearing no interest or interest at a rate that
at the time of issuance is below market rates; and |
|
|
|
variable rate debt securities that are exchangeable for fixed
rate debt securities. |
At our option, we may make interest payments, by check mailed to
the registered holders thereof or, if so stated in the
applicable prospectus supplement, at the option of a holder by
wire transfer to an account designated by the holder. Except as
otherwise provided in the applicable prospectus supplement, no
payment on a Bearer Security will be made by mail to an address
in the United States or by wire transfer to an account in the
United States.
Registered Securities may be transferred or exchanged, and they
may be presented for payment, at the office of the Trustee or
the Trustees agent in New York City indicated in the
applicable prospectus supplement, subject to the limitations
provided in the Indenture, without the payment of any service
charge, other than any applicable tax or governmental charge.
Bearer Securities will be transferable only by delivery.
Provisions with respect to the exchange of Bearer Securities
will be described in the applicable prospectus supplement.
Any funds we pay to a paying agent for the payment of amounts
due on any debt securities that remain unclaimed for two years
will be returned to us, and the holders of the debt securities
must thereafter look only to us for payment thereof.
Guarantee
The Guarantor will unconditionally guarantee to each holder and
the Trustee the full and prompt payment of principal of,
premium, if any, and interest on the debt securities, when and
as the same become due and payable, whether at maturity, upon
redemption or repurchase, by declaration of acceleration or
otherwise.
Certain Covenants
Except as set forth below or as may be provided in a prospectus
supplement and supplemental indenture, neither the Issuer nor
the Guarantor is restricted by the Indenture from incurring any
type of indebtedness or other obligation, from paying dividends
or making distributions on its partnership interests or capital
stock or purchasing or redeeming its partnership interests or
capital stock. The Indenture does not require the maintenance of
any financial ratios or specified levels of net worth or
liquidity. In addition, the Indenture does not contain any
provisions that would require the Issuer to repurchase or redeem
or otherwise modify the terms of any of the debt securities upon
a change in control or other events involving the Issuer which
may adversely affect the creditworthiness of the debt securities.
Limitations on Liens. The Indenture provides that the
Guarantor will not, nor will it permit any Subsidiary to,
create, assume, incur or suffer to exist any mortgage, lien,
security interest, pledge, charge or other encumbrance
(liens) other than Permitted Liens (as defined
below) upon any Principal Property (as defined below) or upon
any shares of capital stock of any Subsidiary owning or leasing,
either directly or through ownership in another Subsidiary, any
Principal Property (a Restricted Subsidiary),
whether owned or leased on the date of the Indenture or
thereafter acquired, to secure any indebtedness for borrowed
money (debt) of the Guarantor or the Issuer or any
other person (other than the debt securities), without in any
such case making effective provision whereby all of the debt
securities outstanding shall be secured equally and ratably
with, or prior to, such debt so long as such debt shall be so
secured.
In the Indenture, the term Consolidated Net Tangible
Assets means, at any date of determination, the total
amount of assets of the Guarantor and its consolidated
subsidiaries after deducting therefrom:
|
|
|
(1) all current liabilities (excluding (A) any current
liabilities that by their terms are extendable or renewable at
the option of the obligor thereon to a time more than
12 months after the time as of which the amount thereof is
being computed, and (B) current maturities of long-term
debt); and |
18
|
|
|
(2) the value (net of any applicable reserves) of all
goodwill, trade names, trademarks, patents and other like
intangible assets, |
all as set forth, or on a pro forma basis would be set forth, on
the consolidated balance sheet of the Guarantor and its
consolidated subsidiaries for the Guarantors most recently
completed fiscal quarter, prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.
Permitted Liens means:
|
|
|
(1) liens upon
rights-of-way for
pipeline purposes; |
|
|
(2) any statutory or governmental lien or lien arising by
operation of law, or any mechanics, repairmens,
materialmens, suppliers, carriers,
landlords, warehousemens or similar lien incurred in
the ordinary course of business which is not yet due or which is
being contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings and any
undetermined lien which is incidental to construction,
development, improvement or repair; or any right reserved to, or
vested in, any municipality or public authority by the terms of
any right, power, franchise, grant, license, permit or by any
provision of law, to purchase or recapture or to designate a
purchaser of, any property; |
|
|
(3) liens for taxes and assessments which are (a) for
the then current year, (b) not at the time delinquent, or
(c) delinquent but the validity or amount of which is being
contested at the time by the Guarantor or any Subsidiary in good
faith by appropriate proceedings; |
|
|
(4) liens of, or to secure performance of, leases, other
than capital leases; or any lien securing industrial
development, pollution control or similar revenue bonds; |
|
|
(5) any lien upon property or assets acquired or sold by
the Guarantor or any Subsidiary resulting from the exercise of
any rights arising out of defaults on receivables; |
|
|
(6) any lien in favor of the Guarantor or any Subsidiary;
or any lien upon any property or assets of the Guarantor or any
Subsidiary in existence on the date of the execution and
delivery of the Indenture; |
|
|
(7) any lien in favor of the United States of America or
any state thereof, or any department, agency or instrumentality
or political subdivision of the United States of America or any
state thereof, to secure partial, progress, advance, or other
payments pursuant to any contract or statute, or any debt
incurred by the Guarantor or any Subsidiary for the purpose of
financing all or any part of the purchase price of, or the cost
of constructing, developing, repairing or improving, the
property or assets subject to such lien; |
|
|
(8) any lien incurred in the ordinary course of business in
connection with workmens compensation, unemployment
insurance, temporary disability, social security, retiree health
or similar laws or regulations or to secure obligations imposed
by statute or governmental regulations; |
|
|
(9) liens in favor of any person to secure obligations
under provisions of any letters of credit, bank guarantees,
bonds or surety obligations required or requested by any
governmental authority in connection with any contract or
statute; or any lien upon or deposits of any assets to secure
performance of bids, trade contracts, leases or statutory
obligations; |
|
|
(10) any lien upon any property or assets created at the
time of acquisition of such property or assets by the Guarantor
or any Subsidiary or within one year after such time to secure
all or a portion of the purchase price for such property or
assets or debt incurred to finance such purchase price, whether
such debt was incurred prior to, at the time of or within one
year after the date of such acquisition; or any lien upon any
property or assets to secure all or part of the cost of
construction, development, repair or improvements thereon or to
secure debt incurred prior to, at the time of, or within one
year after completion of such construction, development, repair
or improvements or the commencement of full operations thereof
(whichever is later), to provide funds for any such purpose; |
|
|
(11) any lien upon any property or assets existing thereon
at the time of the acquisition thereof by the Guarantor or any
Subsidiary and any lien upon any property or assets of a person
existing |
19
|
|
|
thereon at the time such person becomes a Subsidiary by
acquisition, merger or otherwise; provided that, in each case,
such lien only encumbers the property or assets so acquired or
owned by such person at the time such person becomes a
Subsidiary; |
|
|
(12) liens imposed by law or order as a result of any
proceeding before any court or regulatory body that is being
contested in good faith, and liens which secure a judgment or
other court-ordered award or settlement as to which the
Guarantor or the applicable Subsidiary has not exhausted its
appellate rights; |
|
|
(13) any extension, renewal, refinancing, refunding or
replacement (or successive extensions, renewals, refinancing,
refunding or replacements) of liens, in whole or in part,
referred to in clauses (1) through (12) above;
provided, however, that any such extension, renewal,
refinancing, refunding or replacement lien shall be limited to
the property or assets covered by the lien extended, renewed,
refinanced, refunded or replaced and that the obligations
secured by any such extension, renewal, refinancing, refunding
or replacement lien shall be in an amount not greater than the
amount of the obligations secured by the lien extended, renewed,
refinanced, refunded or replaced and any expenses of the
Guarantor and its Subsidiaries (including any premium) incurred
in connection with such extension, renewal, refinancing,
refunding or replacement; or |
|
|
(14) any lien resulting from the deposit of moneys or
evidence of indebtedness in trust for the purpose of defeasing
debt of the Guarantor or any Subsidiary. |
Principal Property means, whether owned or
leased on the date of the Indenture or thereafter acquired:
|
|
|
(1) any pipeline assets of the Guarantor or any Subsidiary,
including any related facilities employed in the transportation,
distribution, storage or marketing of refined petroleum
products, natural gas liquids, and petrochemicals, that are
located in the United States of America or any territory or
political subdivision thereof; and |
|
|
(2) any processing or manufacturing plant or terminal owned
or leased by the Guarantor or any Subsidiary that is located in
the United States or any territory or political subdivision
thereof, |
except, in the case of either of the foregoing clauses (1)
or (2):
|
|
|
(a) any such assets consisting of inventories, furniture,
office fixtures and equipment (including data processing
equipment), vehicles and equipment used on, or useful with,
vehicles; and |
|
|
(b) any such assets, plant or terminal which, in the
opinion of the board of directors of the general partner of the
Issuer, is not material in relation to the activities of the
Issuer or of the Guarantor and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole. |
Subsidiary means:
|
|
|
(1) the Issuer; or |
|
|
(2) any corporation, association or other business entity
of which more than 50% of the total voting power of the equity
interests entitled (without regard to the occurrence of any
contingency) to vote in the election of directors, managers or
trustees thereof or any partnership of which more than 50% of
the partners equity interests (considering all
partners equity interests as a single class) is, in each
case, at the time owned or controlled, directly or indirectly,
by the Guarantor, the Issuer or one or more of the other
Subsidiaries of the Guarantor or the Issuer or combination
thereof. |
Notwithstanding the preceding, under the Indenture, the
Guarantor may, and may permit any Subsidiary to, create, assume,
incur, or suffer to exist any lien (other than a Permitted Lien)
upon any Principal Property or capital stock of a Restricted
Subsidiary to secure debt of the Guarantor, the Issuer or any
other person (other than the debt securities), without securing
the debt securities, provided that the aggregate principal
amount of all debt then outstanding secured by such lien and all
similar liens, together with all Attributable Indebtedness from
Sale-Leaseback Transactions (excluding Sale-Leaseback Transac-
20
tions permitted by clauses (1) through (4), inclusive, of
the first paragraph of the restriction on sale-leasebacks
covenant described below) does not exceed 10% of Consolidated
Net Tangible Assets.
Restriction on Sale-Leasebacks. The Indenture provides
that the Guarantor will not, and will not permit any Subsidiary
to, engage in the sale or transfer by the Guarantor or any
Subsidiary of any Principal Property to a person (other than the
Issuer or a Subsidiary) and the taking back by the Guarantor or
any Subsidiary, as the case may be, of a lease of such Principal
Property (a Sale-Leaseback Transaction), unless:
|
|
|
(1) such Sale-Leaseback Transaction occurs within one year
from the date of completion of the acquisition of the Principal
Property subject thereto or the date of the completion of
construction, development or substantial repair or improvement,
or commencement of full operations on such Principal Property,
whichever is later; |
|
|
(2) the Sale-Leaseback Transaction involves a lease for a
period, including renewals, of not more than three years; |
|
|
(3) the Guarantor or such Subsidiary would be entitled to
incur debt secured by a lien on the Principal Property subject
thereto in a principal amount equal to or exceeding the
Attributable Indebtedness from such Sale-Leaseback Transaction
without equally and ratably securing the debt securities; or |
|
|
(4) the Guarantor or such Subsidiary, within a one-year
period after such Sale-Leaseback Transaction, applies or causes
to be applied an amount not less than the Attributable
Indebtedness from such Sale-Leaseback Transaction to
(a) the prepayment, repayment, redemption, reduction or
retirement of any debt of the Guarantor or any Subsidiary that
is not subordinated to the debt securities, or (b) the
expenditure or expenditures for Principal Property used or to be
used in the ordinary course of business of the Guarantor or its
Subsidiaries. |
Attributable Indebtedness, when used with respect to
any Sale-Leaseback Transaction, means, as at the time of
determination, the present value (discounted at the rate set
forth or implicit in the terms of the lease included in such
transaction) of the total obligations of the lessee for rental
payments (other than amounts required to be paid on account of
property taxes, maintenance, repairs, insurance, assessments,
utilities, operating and labor costs and other items that do not
constitute payments for property rights) during the remaining
term of the lease included in such Sale-Leaseback Transaction
(including any period for which such lease has been extended).
In the case of any lease that is terminable by the lessee upon
the payment of a penalty or other termination payment, such
amount shall be the lesser of the amount determined assuming
termination upon the first date such lease may be terminated (in
which case the amount shall also include the amount of the
penalty or termination payment, but no rent shall be considered
as required to be paid under such lease subsequent to the first
date upon which it may be so terminated) or the amount
determined assuming no such termination.
Notwithstanding the preceding, under the Indenture the Guarantor
may, and may permit any Subsidiary to, effect any Sale-Leaseback
Transaction that is not excepted by clauses (1) through
(4), inclusive, of the first paragraph under
Restrictions on Sale-Leasebacks,
provided that the Attributable Indebtedness from such
Sale-Leaseback Transaction, together with the aggregate
principal amount of all other such Attributable Indebtedness
deemed to be outstanding in respect of all Sale-Leaseback
Transactions and all outstanding debt (other than the debt
securities) secured by liens (other than Permitted Liens) upon
Principal Properties or upon capital stock of any Restricted
Subsidiary, do not exceed 10% of Consolidated Net Tangible
Assets.
Merger, Consolidation or Sale of Assets. The Indenture
provides that each of the Guarantor and the Issuer may, without
the consent of the holders of any of the debt securities,
consolidate with or sell, lease,
21
convey all or substantially all of its assets to, or merge with
or into, any partnership, limited liability company or
corporation if:
|
|
|
(1) the entity surviving any such consolidation or merger
or to which such assets shall have been transferred (the
successor) is either the Guarantor or the Issuer, as
applicable, or the successor is a domestic partnership, limited
liability company or corporation and expressly assumes all the
Guarantors or the Issuers, as the case may be,
obligations and liabilities under the Indenture and the debt
securities (in the case of the Issuer) and the Guarantee (in the
case of the Guarantor); |
|
|
(2) immediately after giving effect to the transaction no
Default or Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing; and |
|
|
(3) the Issuer and the Guarantor have delivered to the
Trustee an officers certificate and an opinion of counsel,
each stating that such consolidation, merger or transfer
complies with the Indenture. |
The successor will be substituted for the Guarantor or the
Issuer, as the case may be, in the Indenture with the same
effect as if it had been an original party to the Indenture.
Thereafter, the successor may exercise the rights and powers of
the Guarantor or the Issuer, as the case may be, under the
Indenture, in its name or in its own name. If the Guarantor or
the Issuer sells or transfers all or substantially all of its
assets, it will be released from all liabilities and obligations
under the Indenture and under the debt securities (in the case
of the Issuer) and the Guarantee (in the case of the Guarantor)
except that no such release will occur in the case of a lease of
all or substantially all of its assets.
Events of Default
Each of the following will be an Event of Default under the
Indenture with respect to a series of debt securities:
|
|
|
(1) default in any payment of interest on any debt
securities of that series when due, continued for 30 days; |
|
|
(2) default in the payment of principal of or premium, if
any, on any debt securities of that series when due at its
stated maturity, upon optional redemption, upon declaration or
otherwise; |
|
|
(3) failure by the Guarantor or the Issuer to comply for
60 days after notice with its other agreements contained in
the Indenture; |
|
|
(4) certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or
reorganization of the Issuer or the Guarantor (the
bankruptcy provisions); or |
|
|
(5) the Guarantee ceases to be in full force and effect or
is declared null and void in a judicial proceeding or the
Guarantor denies or disaffirms its obligations under the
Indenture or the Guarantee. |
However, a default under clause (3) of this paragraph will
not constitute an Event of Default until the Trustee or the
holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding
debt securities of that series notify the Issuer and the
Guarantor of the default such default is not cured within the
time specified in clause (3) of this paragraph after
receipt of such notice.
An Event of Default for a particular series of debt securities
will not necessarily constitute an Event of Default for any
other series of debt securities that may be issued under the
Indenture. If an Event of Default (other than an Event of
Default described in clause (4) above) occurs and is
continuing, the Trustee by notice to the Issuer, or the holders
of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding debt
securities of that series by notice to the Issuer and the
Trustee, may, and the Trustee at the request of such holders
shall, declare the principal of, premium, if any, and accrued
and unpaid interest, if any, on all the debt securities of that
series to be due and payable. Upon such a declaration, such
principal, premium and accrued and unpaid interest will be due
and payable immediately. If an Event of Default described in
clause (4) above occurs and is continuing, the principal
of, premium, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest on all the
debt securities will become and be immediately due and payable
without any declaration
22
or other act on the part of the Trustee or any holders. However,
the effect of such provision may be limited by applicable law.
The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding
debt securities of a series may rescind any such acceleration
with respect to the debt securities of that series and its
consequences if rescission would not conflict with any judgment
or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction and all existing
Events of Default with respect to that series, other than the
nonpayment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on
the debt securities of that series that have become due solely
by such declaration of acceleration, have been cured or waived.
Subject to the provisions of the Indenture relating to the
duties of the Trustee, if an Event of Default with respect to a
series of debt securities occurs and is continuing, the Trustee
will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or
powers under the Indenture at the request or direction of any of
the holders of debt securities of that series, unless such
holders have offered to the Trustee reasonable indemnity or
security against any loss, liability or expense. Except to
enforce the right to receive payment of principal, premium, if
any, or interest when due, no holder of debt securities of any
series may pursue any remedy with respect to the Indenture or
the debt securities of that series unless:
|
|
|
(1) such holder has previously given the Trustee notice
that an Event of Default with respect to the debt securities of
that series is continuing; |
|
|
(2) holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the
outstanding debt securities of that series have requested the
Trustee to pursue the remedy; |
|
|
(3) such holders have offered the Trustee reasonable
security or indemnity against any loss, liability or expense; |
|
|
(4) the Trustee has not complied with such request within
60 days after the receipt of the request and the offer of
security or indemnity; and |
|
|
(5) the holders of a majority in principal amount of the
outstanding debt securities of that series have not given the
Trustee a direction that, in the opinion of the Trustee, is
inconsistent with such request within such
60-day period. |
Subject to certain restrictions, the holders of a majority in
principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of each
series have the right to direct the time, method and place of
conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the
Trustee or of exercising any trust or power conferred on the
Trustee with respect to that series of debt securities. The
Trustee, however, may refuse to follow any direction that
conflicts with law or the Indenture or that the Trustee
determines is unduly prejudicial to the rights of any other
holder of debt securities of that series or that would involve
the Trustee in personal liability.
The Indenture provides that if a Default (that is, an event that
is, or after notice or the passage of time would be, an Event of
Default) with respect to the debt securities of a particular
series occurs and is continuing and is known to the Trustee, the
Trustee must mail to each holder of debt securities of that
series notice of the Default within 90 days after it
occurs. Except in the case of a Default in the payment of
principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the debt
securities of that series, the Trustee may withhold notice, but
only if and so long as the Trustee in good faith determines that
withholding notice is in the interests of the holders of debt
securities of that series. In addition, the Issuer is required
to deliver to the Trustee, within 120 days after the end of
each fiscal year, an officers certificate as to compliance
with all covenants in the Indenture and indicating whether the
signers thereof know of any Default or Event of Default that
occurred during the previous year. The Issuer also is required
to deliver to the Trustee, within 30 days after the
occurrence thereof, an officers certificate specifying any
Default or Event of Default, its status and what action the
Issuer is taking or proposes to take in respect thereof.
Amendments and Waivers
Amendments of the Indenture may be made by the Issuer, the
Guarantor and the Trustee with the consent of the holders of a
majority in principal amount of all debt securities of each
series affected thereby then outstanding under the Indenture
(including consents obtained in connection with a tender
23
offer or exchange offer for the debt securities). However,
without the consent of each holder of outstanding debt
securities affected thereby, no amendment may, among other
things:
|
|
|
(1) reduce the percentage in principal amount of debt
securities whose holders must consent to an amendment; |
|
|
(2) reduce the stated rate of or extend the stated time for
payment of interest on any debt securities; |
|
|
(3) reduce the principal of or extend the stated maturity
of any debt securities; |
|
|
(4) reduce the premium payable upon the redemption of any
debt securities or change the time at which any debt securities
may be redeemed; |
|
|
(5) make any debt securities payable in money other than
that stated in the debt securities; |
|
|
(6) impair the right of any holder to receive payment of,
premium, if any, principal of and interest on such holders
debt securities on or after the due dates therefor or to
institute suit for the enforcement of any payment on or with
respect to such holders debt securities; |
|
|
(7) make any change in the amendment provisions which
require each holders consent or in the waiver provisions; |
|
|
(8) release any security that may have been granted in
respect of the debt securities; or |
|
|
(9) release the Guarantor or modify the Guarantee in any
manner adverse to the holders. |
The holders of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the
outstanding debt securities of each series affected thereby, may
waive compliance by the Issuer and the Guarantor with certain
restrictive covenants on behalf of all holders of debt
securities of such series, including those described under
Certain Covenants Limitations on
Liens and Certain Covenants
Restriction on Sale-Leasebacks. The holders of a majority
in principal amount of the outstanding debt securities of each
series affected thereby, on behalf of all such holders, may
waive any past Default or Event of Default with respect to that
series (including any such waiver obtained in connection with a
tender offer or exchange offer for the debt securities), except
a Default or Event of Default in the payment of principal,
premium or interest or in respect of a provision that under the
Indenture that cannot be amended without the consent of all
holders of the series of debt securities that is affected.
Without the consent of any holder, the Issuer, the Guarantor and
the Trustee may amend the Indenture to:
|
|
|
(1) cure any ambiguity, omission, defect or inconsistency; |
|
|
(2) provide for the assumption by a successor of the
obligations of the Guarantor or the Issuer under the Indenture; |
|
|
(3) provide for uncertificated debt securities in addition
to or in place of certificated debt securities (provided that
the uncertificated debt securities are issued in registered form
for purposes of Section 163(f) of the Code, or in a manner
such that the uncertificated debt securities are described in
Section 163(f)(2)(B) of the Code); |
|
|
(4) add or release guarantees by any Subsidiary with
respect to the debt securities, in either case as provided in
the Indenture; |
|
|
(5) secure the debt securities or a guarantee; |
|
|
(6) add to the covenants of the Guarantor or the Issuer for
the benefit of the holders or surrender any right or power
conferred upon the Guarantor or the Issuer; |
|
|
(7) make any change that does not adversely affect the
rights of any holder; |
24
|
|
|
(8) comply with any requirement of the Commission in
connection with the qualification of the Indenture under the
Trust Indenture Act; and |
|
|
(9) issue any other series of debt securities under the
Indenture. |
The consent of the holders is not necessary under the Indenture
to approve the particular form of any proposed amendment. It is
sufficient if such consent approves the substance of the
proposed amendment. After an amendment requiring consent of the
holders becomes effective, the Issuer is required to mail to the
holders of an affected series a notice briefly describing such
amendment. However, the failure to give such notice to all such
holders, or any defect therein, will not impair or affect the
validity of the amendment.
Defeasance and Discharge
The Issuer at any time may terminate all its obligations under
the Indenture as they relate to a series of debt securities
(legal defeasance), except for certain obligations,
including those respecting the defeasance trust and obligations
to register the transfer or exchange of the debt securities of
that series, to replace mutilated, destroyed, lost or stolen
debt securities of that series and to maintain a registrar and
paying agent in respect of such debt securities.
The Issuer at any time may terminate its obligations under
covenants described under Certain
Covenants (other than Merger, Consolidation or Sale
of Assets) and the bankruptcy provisions with respect to
the Guarantor, and the Guarantee provision, described under
Events of Default above with respect to
a series of debt securities (covenant defeasance).
The Issuer may exercise its legal defeasance option
notwithstanding its prior exercise of its covenant defeasance
option. If the Issuer exercises its legal defeasance option,
payment of the defeased series of debt securities may not be
accelerated because of an Event of Default with respect thereto.
If the Issuer exercises its covenant defeasance option, payment
of the affected series of debt securities may not be accelerated
because of an Event of Default specified in clause (3),
(4), (with respect only to the Guarantor) or (5) under
Events of Default above. If the Issuer
exercises either its legal defeasance option or its covenant
defeasance option, each guarantee will terminate with respect to
the debt securities of the defeased series and any security that
may have been granted with respect to such debt securities will
be released.
In order to exercise either defeasance option, the Issuer must
irrevocably deposit in trust (the defeasance trust)
with the Trustee money, U.S. Government Obligations (as
defined in the Indenture) or a combination thereof for the
payment of principal, premium, if any, and interest on the
relevant series of debt securities to redemption or maturity, as
the case may be, and must comply with certain other conditions,
including delivery to the Trustee of an opinion of counsel
(subject to customary exceptions and exclusions) to the effect
that holders of that series of debt securities will not
recognize income, gain or loss for federal income tax purposes
as a result of such deposit and defeasance and will be subject
to federal income tax on the same amounts and in the same manner
and at the same times as would have been the case if such
defeasance had not occurred. In the case of legal defeasance
only, such opinion of counsel must be based on a ruling of the
Internal Revenue Service or other change in applicable federal
income tax law.
In the event of any legal defeasance, holders of the debt
securities of the relevant series would be entitled to look only
to the trust fund for payment of principal of and any premium
and interest on their debt securities until maturity.
Although the amount of money and U.S. Government
Obligations on deposit with the Trustee would be intended to be
sufficient to pay amounts due on the debt securities of a
defeased series at the time of their stated maturity, if the
Issuer exercises its covenant defeasance option for the debt
securities of any series and the debt securities are declared
due and payable because of the occurrence of an Event of
Default, such amount may not be sufficient to pay amounts due on
the debt securities of that series at the
25
time of the acceleration resulting from such Event of Default.
The Issuer would remain liable for such payments, however.
In addition, the Issuer may discharge all its obligations under
the Indenture with respect to debt securities of any series,
other than its obligation to register the transfer of and
exchange notes of that series, provided that it either:
|
|
|
|
|
delivers all outstanding debt securities of that series to the
Trustee for cancellation; or |
|
|
|
all such debt securities not so delivered for cancellation have
either become due and payable or will become due and payable at
their stated maturity within one year or are called for
redemption within one year, and in the case of this bullet point
the Issuer has deposited with the Trustee in trust an amount of
cash sufficient to pay the entire indebtedness of such debt
securities, including interest to the stated maturity or
applicable redemption date. |
Subordination
Debt securities of a series may be subordinated to our
Senior Indebtedness, which we define generally to
include all notes or other evidences of indebtedness for money
borrowed by the Issuer, including guarantees, that are not
expressly subordinate or junior in right of payment to any other
indebtedness of the Issuer. Subordinated debt securities and the
Guarantors guarantee thereof will be subordinate in right
of payment, to the extent and in the manner set forth in the
Indenture and the prospectus supplement relating to such series,
to the prior payment of all indebtedness of the Issuer and
Guarantor that is designated as Senior Indebtedness
with respect to the series.
The holders of Senior Indebtedness of the Issuer will receive
payment in full of the Senior Indebtedness before holders of
subordinated debt securities will receive any payment of
principal, premium or interest with respect to the subordinated
debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
upon any payment of distribution of our assets of the Issuer to
its creditors; |
|
|
|
upon a total or partial liquidation or dissolution of the
Issuer; or |
|
|
|
in a bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceeding relating to
the Issuer or its property. |
Until the Senior Indebtedness is paid in full, any distribution
to which holders of subordinated debt securities would otherwise
be entitled will be made to the holders of Senior Indebtedness,
except that such holders may receive units representing limited
partner interests and any debt securities that are subordinated
to Senior Indebtedness to at least the same extent as the
subordinated debt securities.
If the Issuer does not pay any principal, premium or interest
with respect to Senior Indebtedness within any applicable grace
period (including at maturity), or any other default on Senior
Indebtedness occurs and the maturity of the Senior Indebtedness
is accelerated in accordance with its terms, the Issuer may not:
|
|
|
|
|
make any payments of principal, premium, if any, or interest
with respect to subordinated debt securities; |
|
|
|
make any deposit for the purpose of defeasance of the
subordinated debt securities; or |
|
|
|
repurchase, redeem or otherwise retire any subordinated debt
securities, except that in the case of subordinated debt
securities that provide for a mandatory sinking fund, we may
deliver subordinated debt securities to the Trustee in
satisfaction of our sinking fund obligation, |
unless, in either case,
|
|
|
|
|
the default has been cured or waived and the declaration of
acceleration has been rescinded; |
|
|
|
the Senior Indebtedness has been paid in full in cash; or |
26
|
|
|
|
|
the Issuer and the Trustee receive written notice approving the
payment from the representatives of each issue of
Designated Senior Indebtedness. |
Generally, Designated Senior Indebtedness will
include any specified issue of Senior Indebtedness of at least
$100 million.
During the continuance of any default, other than a default
described in the immediately preceding paragraph, that may cause
the maturity of any Senior Indebtedness to be accelerated
immediately without further notice, other than any notice
required to effect such acceleration, or the expiration of any
applicable grace periods, the Issuer may not pay the
subordinated debt securities for a period called the
Payment Blockage Period. A Payment Blockage Period
will commence on the receipt by us and the Trustee of written
notice of the default, called a Blockage Notice,
from the representative of any Designated Senior Indebtedness
specifying an election to effect a Payment Blockage Period.
The Payment Blockage Period may be terminated before its
expiration:
|
|
|
|
|
by written notice from the person or persons who gave the
Blockage Notice; |
|
|
|
by repayment in full in cash of the Senior Indebtedness with
respect to which the Blockage Notice was given; or |
|
|
|
if the default giving rise to the Payment Blockage Period is no
longer continuing. |
Unless the holders of Senior Indebtedness shall have accelerated
the maturity of the Senior Indebtedness, we may resume payments
on the subordinated debt securities after the expiration of the
Payment Blockage Period.
Generally, not more than one Blockage Notice may be given in any
period of 360 consecutive days. The total number of days during
which any one or more Payment Blockage Periods are in effect,
however, may not exceed an aggregate of 179 days during any
period of 360 consecutive days.
After all Senior Indebtedness is paid in full and until the
subordinated debt securities are paid in full, holders of the
subordinated debt securities shall be subrogated to the rights
of holders of Senior Indebtedness to receive distributions
applicable to Senior Indebtedness.
By reason of the subordination, in the event of insolvency, our
creditors who are holders of Senior Indebtedness, as well as
certain of our general creditors, may recover more, ratably,
than the holders of the subordinated debt securities.
Book-Entry System
We will issue the debt securities in the form of one or more
global securities in fully registered form initially in the name
of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, or such other name as
may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC. The
global securities will be deposited with the Trustee as
custodian for DTC and may not be transferred except as a whole
by DTC to a nominee of DTC or by a nominee of DTC to DTC or
another nominee of DTC or by DTC or any nominee to a successor
of DTC or a nominee of such successor.
DTC has advised us as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
DTC is a limited-purpose trust company organized under the New
York Banking Law, a banking organization within the
meaning of the New York Banking Law, a member of the Federal
Reserve System, a clearing corporation within the
meaning of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, and a
clearing agency registered pursuant to the
provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange Act. |
27
|
|
|
|
|
DTC holds securities that its participants deposit with DTC and
facilitates the settlement among direct participants of
securities transactions, such as transfers and pledges, in
deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry
changes in direct participants accounts, thereby
eliminating the need for physical movement of securities
certificates. |
|
|
|
Direct participants include securities brokers and dealers,
banks, trust companies, clearing corporations and certain other
organizations. |
|
|
|
DTC is owned by a number of its direct participants and by the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc., the American Stock Exchange LLC
and the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. |
|
|
|
Access to the DTC system is also available to others such as
securities brokers and dealers, banks and trust companies that
clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a direct
participant, either directly or indirectly. |
|
|
|
The rules applicable to DTC and its direct and indirect
participants are on file with the Commission. |
Purchases of debt securities under the DTC system must be made
by or through direct participants, which will receive a credit
for the debt securities on DTCs records. The ownership
interest of each actual purchaser of debt securities is in turn
to be recorded on the direct and indirect participants
records. Beneficial owners of the debt securities will not
receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase, but
beneficial owners are expected to receive written confirmations
providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic
statements of their holdings, from the direct or indirect
participants through which the beneficial owner entered into the
transaction. Transfers of ownership interests in the debt
securities are to be accomplished by entries made on the books
of direct and indirect participants acting on behalf of
beneficial owners. Beneficial owners will not receive
certificates representing their ownership interests in the debt
securities, except in the event that use of the book-entry
system for the debt securities is discontinued.
To facilitate subsequent transfers, all debt securities
deposited by direct participants with DTC are registered in the
name of DTCs partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or
such other name as may be requested by an authorized
representative of DTC. The deposit of debt securities with DTC
and their registration in the name of Cede & Co. or
such other nominee do not effect any change in beneficial
ownership. DTC has no knowledge of the actual beneficial owners
of the debt securities; DTCs records reflect only the
identity of the direct participants to whose accounts such debt
securities are credited, which may or may not be the beneficial
owners. The direct and indirect participants will remain
responsible for keeping account of their holdings on behalf of
their customers.
Conveyance of notices and other communications by DTC to direct
participants, by, direct participants to indirect participants,
and by direct participants and indirect participants to
beneficial owners will be governed by arrangements among them,
subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in
effect from time to time.
Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee)
will consent or vote with respect to the global securities.
Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an omnibus proxy to the
issuer as soon as possible after the record date. The omnibus
proxy assigns Cede & Co.s consenting or voting
rights to those direct participants to whose accounts the debt
securities are credited on the record date (identified in the
listing attached to the omnibus proxy).
All payments on the global securities will be made to
Cede & Co., as holder of record, or such other nominee
as may be requested by an authorized representative of DTC.
DTCs practice is to credit direct participants
accounts upon DTCs receipt of funds and corresponding
detail information from us or the Trustee on payment dates in
accordance with their respective holdings shown on DTCs
records. Payments by participants to beneficial owners will be
governed by standing instructions and customary practices, as is
the case with securities held for the accounts of customers in
bearer form or registered in street name, and will
be the responsibility of such participant and not of DTC, us or
the Trustee, subject to any
28
statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in effect from
time to time. Payment of principal, premium, if any, and
interest to Cede & Co. (or such other nominee as may be
requested by an authorized representative of DTC) shall be the
responsibility of us or the Trustee. Disbursement of such
payments to direct participants shall be the responsibility of
DTC, and disbursement of such payments to the beneficial owners
shall be the responsibility of direct and indirect participants.
DTC may discontinue providing its service as securities
depositary with respect to the debt securities at any time by
giving reasonable notice to us or the Trustee. In addition, we
may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry
transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depositary).
Under such circumstances, in the event that a successor
securities depositary is not obtained, note certificates in
fully registered form are required to be printed and delivered
to beneficial owners of the global securities representing such
debt securities.
Neither we nor the Trustee will have any responsibility or
obligation to direct or indirect participants, or the persons
for whom they act as nominees, with respect to the accuracy of
the records of DTC, its nominee or any participant with respect
to any ownership interest in the debt securities, or payments
to, or the providing of notice to participants or beneficial
owners.
So long as the debt securities are in DTCs book-entry
system, secondary market trading activity in the debt securities
will settle in immediately available funds. All payments on the
debt securities issued as global securities will be made by us
in immediately available funds.
Limitations on Issuance of Bearer Securities
The debt securities of a series may be issued as Registered
Securities (which will be registered as to principal and
interest in the register maintained by the registrar for the
debt securities) or Bearer Securities (which will be
transferable only by delivery). If the debt securities are
issuable as Bearer Securities, certain special limitations and
conditions will apply.
In compliance with United States federal income tax laws and
regulations, we and any underwriter, agent or dealer
participating in an offering of Bearer Securities will agree
that, in connection with the original issuance of the Bearer
Securities and during the period ending 40 days after the
issue date, they will not offer, sell or deliver any such Bearer
Securities, directly or indirectly, to a United States Person
(as defined below) or to any person within the United States,
except to the extent permitted under United States Treasury
regulations.
Bearer Securities will bear a legend to the following effect:
Any United States person who holds this obligation will be
subject to limitations under the United States federal income
tax laws, including the limitations provided in
Sections 165(j) and 1287(a) of the Internal Revenue
Code. The sections referred to in the legend provide that,
with certain exceptions, a United States taxpayer who holds
Bearer Securities will not be allowed to deduct any loss with
respect to, and will not be eligible for capital gain treatment
with respect to any gain realized on the sale, exchange,
redemption or other disposition of, the Bearer Securities.
For this purpose, United States includes the United
States of America and its possessions, and United States
person means a citizen or resident of the United States, a
corporation, partnership or other entity created or organized in
or under the laws of the United States, or an estate or trust
the income of which is subject to United States federal income
taxation regardless of its source.
Pending the availability of a definitive global security or
individual Bearer Securities, as the case may be, debt
securities that are issuable as Bearer Securities may initially
be represented by a single temporary global security, without
interest coupons, to be deposited with a common depositary for
the Euroclear System as operated by Euroclear Bank S.A./ N.V.
(Euroclear) and Clearstream Banking S.A.
(Clearstream, formerly Cedelbank), for credit to the
accounts designated by or on behalf of the purchasers thereof.
Following the availability of a definitive global security in
bearer form, without coupons attached, or individual Bearer
Securities and subject to any further limitations described in
the applicable prospectus supplement, the temporary global
security will be exchangeable for interests in the definitive
29
global security or for the individual Bearer Securities,
respectively, only upon receipt of a Certificate of
Non-U.S. Beneficial
Ownership, which is a certificate to the effect that a
beneficial interest in a temporary global security is owned by a
person that is not a United States Person or is owned by or
through a financial institution in compliance with applicable
United States Treasury regulations. No Bearer Security will be
delivered in or to the United States. If so specified in the
applicable prospectus supplement, interest on a temporary global
security will be paid to each of Euroclear and Clearstream with
respect to that portion of the temporary global security held
for its account, but only upon receipt as of the relevant
interest payment date of a Certificate of
Non-U.S. Beneficial
Ownership.
No Recourse Against General Partner
The Issuers general partner, the Guarantors general
partner and their respective directors, officers, employees and
members, as such, shall have no liability for any obligations of
the Issuer or the Guarantor under the debt securities, the
Indenture or the guarantee or for any claim based on, in respect
of, or by reason of, such obligations or their creation. Each
holder by accepting a note waives and releases all such
liability. The waiver and release are part of the consideration
for issuance of the debt securities. Such waiver may not be
effective to waive liabilities under the federal securities
laws, and it is the view of the Commission that such a waiver is
against public policy.
Concerning the Trustee
The Indenture contains certain limitations on the right of the
Trustee, should it become our creditor, to obtain payment of
claims in certain cases, or to realize for its own account on
certain property received in respect of any such claim as
security or otherwise. The Trustee is permitted to engage in
certain other transactions. However, if it acquires any
conflicting interest within the meaning of the Trust Indenture
Act, it must eliminate the conflict or resign as Trustee.
The holders of a majority in principal amount of all outstanding
debt securities (or if more than one series of debt securities
under the Indenture is affected thereby, all series so affected,
voting as a single class) will have the right to direct the
time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for
exercising any remedy or power available to the Trustee for the
debt securities or all such series so affected.
If an Event of Default occurs and is not cured under the
Indenture and is known to the Trustee, the Trustee shall
exercise such of the rights and powers vested in it by the
Indenture and use the same degree of care and skill in its
exercise as a prudent person would exercise or use under the
circumstances in the conduct of his own affairs. Subject to such
provisions, the Trustee will not be under any obligation to
exercise any of its rights or powers under the Indenture at the
request of any of the holders of debt securities unless they
shall have offered to such Trustee reasonable security and
indemnity.
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association is the Trustee under the
Indenture and has been appointed by the Issuer as Registrar and
Paying Agent with regard to the debt securities. Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association is a lender under the Issuers
credit facilities.
Governing Law
The Indenture, the debt securities and the guarantee are
governed by, and will be construed in accordance with, the laws
of the State of New York.
DESCRIPTION OF OUR COMMON UNITS
Generally, our common units represent limited partner interests
that entitle the holders to participate in our cash
distributions and to exercise the rights and privileges
available to limited partners under our partnership agreement.
For a description of the relative rights and preferences of
holders of common units
30
and our general partner in and to cash distributions, please
read Cash Distribution Policy elsewhere in this
prospectus:
|
|
|
Our outstanding common units are listed on the NYSE under the
symbol EPD. Any additional common units we issue
will also be listed on the NYSE. |
|
|
The transfer agent and registrar for our common units is Mellon
Investor Services LLC. |
Meetings/ Voting
Each holder of common units is entitled to one vote for each
common unit on all matters submitted to a vote of the
unitholders.
Status as Limited Partner or Assignee
Except as described below under Limited
Liability, the common units will be fully paid, and
unitholders will not be required to make additional capital
contributions to us.
Each purchaser of our common units must execute a transfer
application whereby the purchaser requests admission as a
substituted limited partner and makes representations and agrees
to provisions stated in the transfer application. If this action
is not taken, a purchaser will not be registered as a record
holder of common units on the books of our transfer agent or
issued a common unit certificate. Purchasers may hold common
units in nominee accounts.
An assignee, pending its admission as a substituted limited
partner, is entitled to an interest in us equivalent to that of
a limited partner with respect to the right to share in
allocations and distributions, including liquidating
distributions. Our general partner will vote and exercise other
powers attributable to common units owned by an assignee who has
not become a substituted limited partner at the written
direction of the assignee. Transferees who do not execute and
deliver transfer applications will be treated neither as
assignees nor as record holders of common units and will not
receive distributions, federal income tax allocations or reports
furnished to record holders of common units. The only right the
transferees will have is the right to admission as a substituted
limited partner in respect of the transferred common units upon
execution of a transfer application in respect of the common
units. A nominee or broker who has executed a transfer
application with respect to common units held in street name or
nominee accounts will receive distributions and reports
pertaining to its common units.
Limited Liability
Assuming that a limited partner does not participate in the
control of our business within the meaning of the Delaware
Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the Delaware
Act) and that he otherwise acts in conformity with the
provisions of our partnership agreement, his liability under the
Delaware Act will be limited, subject to some possible
exceptions, generally to the amount of capital he is obligated
to contribute to us in respect of his units plus his share of
any undistributed profits and assets.
Under the Delaware Act, a limited partnership may not make a
distribution to a partner to the extent that at the time of the
distribution, after giving effect to the distribution, all
liabilities of the partnership, other than liabilities to
partners on account of their partnership interests and
liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to
specific property of the partnership, exceed the fair value of
the assets of the limited partnership.
For the purposes of determining the fair value of the assets of
a limited partnership, the Delaware Act provides that the fair
value of the property subject to liability of which recourse of
creditors is limited shall be included in the assets of the
limited partnership only to the extent that the fair value of
that property exceeds the nonrecourse liability. The Delaware
Act provides that a limited partner who receives a distribution
and knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution
was in violation of the Delaware Act is liable to the limited
partnership for the amount of the distribution for three years
from the date of the distribution.
31
Reports and Records
As soon as practicable, but in no event later than 120 days
after the close of each fiscal year, our general partner will
furnish or make available to each unitholder of record (as of a
record date selected by our general partner) an annual report
containing our audited financial statements for the past fiscal
year. These financial statements will be prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, no
later than 45 days after the close of each quarter (except
the fourth quarter), our general partner will furnish or make
available to each unitholder of record (as of a record date
selected by our general partner) a report containing our
unaudited financial statements and any other information
required by law.
Our general partner will use all reasonable efforts to furnish
each unitholder of record information reasonably required for
tax reporting purposes within 90 days after the close of
each fiscal year. Our general partners ability to furnish
this summary tax information will depend on the cooperation of
unitholders in supplying information to our general partner.
Each unitholder will receive information to assist him in
determining his U.S. federal and state and Canadian federal
and provincial tax liability and filing his U.S. federal
and state and Canadian federal and provincial income tax returns.
A limited partner can, for a purpose reasonably related to the
limited partners interest as a limited partner, upon
reasonable demand and at his own expense, have furnished to him:
|
|
|
|
|
a current list of the name and last known address of each
partner; |
|
|
|
a copy of our tax returns; |
|
|
|
information as to the amount of cash and a description and
statement of the agreed value of any other property or services,
contributed or to be contributed by each partner and the date on
which each became a partner; |
|
|
|
copies of our partnership agreement, our certificate of limited
partnership, amendments to either of them and powers of attorney
which have been executed under our partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
information regarding the status of our business and financial
condition; and |
|
|
|
any other information regarding our affairs as is just and
reasonable. |
Our general partner may, and intends to, keep confidential from
the limited partners trade secrets and other information the
disclosure of which our general partner believes in good faith
is not in our best interest or which we are required by law or
by agreements with third parties to keep confidential.
CASH DISTRIBUTION POLICY
Distributions of Available Cash
General. Within approximately 45 days after the end
of each quarter, we will distribute all of our available cash to
unitholders of record on the applicable record date.
Definition of Available Cash. Available cash is defined
in our partnership agreement and generally means, with respect
to any calendar quarter, all cash on hand at the end of such
quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves that is necessary or
appropriate in the reasonable discretion of the general partner
to: |
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business; |
|
|
|
comply with applicable law or any debt instrument or other
agreement (including reserves for future capital expenditures
and for our future credit needs); or |
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to unitholders and our general
partner in respect of any one or more of the next four quarters; |
32
|
|
|
|
|
plus all cash on hand on the date of determination of available
cash for the quarter resulting from working capital borrowings
made after the end of the quarter. Working capital borrowings
are generally borrowings that are made under our credit
facilities and in all cases are used solely for working capital
purposes or to pay distributions to partners. |
Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus
General. Cash distributions are characterized as
distributions from either operating surplus or capital surplus.
We distribute available cash from operating surplus differently
than available cash from capital surplus.
Definition of Operating Surplus. Operating surplus is
defined in the partnership agreement and generally means:
|
|
|
|
|
our cash balance on July 31, 1998, the closing date of our
initial public offering of common units (excluding
$46.5 million to fund certain capital commitments existing
at such closing date); plus |
|
|
|
all of our cash receipts since the closing of our initial public
offering, excluding cash from interim capital transactions such
as borrowings that are not working capital borrowings, sales of
equity and debt securities and sales or other disposition of
assets for cash, other than inventory, accounts receivable and
other assets sold in the ordinary course of business or as part
of normal retirements or replacements of assets; plus |
|
|
|
up to $60.0 million of cash from interim capital
transactions; plus |
|
|
|
working capital borrowings made after the end of a quarter but
before the date of determination of operating surplus for the
quarter; less |
|
|
|
all of our operating expenditures since the closing of our
initial public offering, including the repayment of working
capital borrowings, but not the repayment of other borrowings,
and including maintenance capital expenditures; less |
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserved that we deem necessary or advisable
to provide funds for future operating expenditures. |
Definition of Capital Surplus. Capital surplus is
generally generated only by borrowings (other than borrowings
for working capital purposes), sales of debt and equity
securities and sales or other dispositions of assets for cash
(other than inventory, accounts receivable and other assets
disposed of in the ordinary course of business).
Characterization of Cash Distributions. To avoid the
difficulty of trying to determine whether available cash we
distribute is from operating surplus or from capital surplus,
all available cash we distribute from any source will be treated
as distributed from operating surplus until the sum of all
available cash distributed since July 31, 1998 equals the
operating surplus as of the end of the quarter prior to such
distribution. Any available cash in excess of such amount
(irrespective of its source) will be deemed to be from capital
surplus and distributed accordingly.
If available cash from capital surplus is distributed in respect
of each common unit in an aggregate amount per common unit equal
to the $11.00 initial public offering price of the common units,
the distinction between operating surplus and capital surplus
will cease, and all distributions of available cash will be
treated as if they were from operating surplus. We do not
anticipate that there will be significant distributions from
capital surplus.
33
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus
Commencing with the quarter ending on September 30, 2003,
we will make distributions of available cash from operating
surplus with respect to any quarter in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all common unitholders, pro rata and 2% to
the general partner, until there has been distributed in respect
of each unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution of $0.225; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, in the manner described in Incentive
Distributions below. |
Incentive Distributions
Incentive distributions represent the right to receive an
increasing percentage of quarterly distributions of available
cash from operating surplus after the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels have been
achieved. For any quarter for which available cash from
operating surplus is distributed to the common unitholders in an
amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.225 per unit on all units, then any additional available
cash from operating surplus in respect of such quarter will be
distributed among the common unitholders and the general partner
in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
the general partner, until the common unitholders have received
a total of $0.253 for such quarter in respect of each
outstanding unit (the First Target Distribution); |
|
|
|
second, 85% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 15%
to the general partner, until the unitholders have received a
total of $0.3085 for such quarter in respect of each outstanding
unit (the Second Target Distribution); and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 75% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and
25% to the general partner. |
Distributions from Capital Surplus
How Distributions from Capital Surplus Will Be Made. We
will make distributions of available cash from capital surplus
in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
the general partner, until we have distributed, in respect of
each outstanding common unit issued in our initial public
offering, available cash from capital surplus in an aggregate
amount per common unit equal to the initial unit price of
$11.00; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, all distributions of available cash from
capital surplus will be distributed as if they were from
operating surplus. |
Effect of a Distribution from Capital Surplus. Our
partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital surplus
on a common unit as the repayment of the common unit price from
its initial public offering, which is a return of capital. The
initial public offering price less any distributions of capital
surplus per common unit is referred to as the unrecovered
initial common unit price. Each time a distribution of capital
surplus is made on a common unit, the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels for all units
will be reduced in the same proportion as the corresponding
reduction in the unrecovered initial common unit price. Because
distributions of capital surplus will reduce the minimum
quarterly distribution, after any of these distributions are
made, it may be easier for our general partner to receive
incentive distributions. However, any distribution by us of
capital surplus before the unrecovered initial common unit price
is reduced to zero cannot be applied to the payment of the
minimum quarterly distribution.
Once we distribute capital surplus on a common unit in any
amount equal to the unrecovered initial common unit price, it
will reduce the minimum quarterly distribution and the target
distribution levels to
34
zero and it will make all future distributions of available cash
from operating surplus, with 25% being paid to the holders of
units, as applicable, and 75% to our general partner.
Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target
Distribution Levels
In addition to reductions of the minimum quarterly distribution
and target distribution levels made upon a distribution of
available cash from capital surplus, if we combine our units
into fewer units or subdivide our units into a greater number of
units, we will proportionately adjust:
|
|
|
|
|
the minimum quarterly distribution; |
|
|
|
the target distribution levels; and |
|
|
|
the unrecovered initial common unit price. |
For example, in the event of a two-for-one split of the common
units (assuming no prior adjustments), the minimum quarterly
distribution, each of the target distribution levels and the
unrecovered capital of the common units would each be reduced to
50% of its initial level.
In addition, if legislation is enacted or if existing law is
modified or interpreted in a manner that causes us to become
taxable as a corporation or otherwise subject to taxation as an
entity for federal, state or local income tax purposes, then we
will reduce the minimum quarterly distribution and the target
distribution levels by multiplying the same by one minus the sum
of the highest effective federal corporate income tax rate that
could apply and any increase in the effective overall state and
local income tax rates. For example, if we became subject to a
maximum effective federal, state and local income tax rate of
35%, then the minimum quarterly distribution and the target
distribution levels would each be reduced to 65% of their
previous levels.
Distributions of Cash upon Liquidation
If we dissolve in accordance with the partnership agreement, we
will sell or otherwise dispose of our assets in a process called
a liquidation. We will first apply the proceeds of liquidation
to the payment of our creditors in the order of priority
provided in the partnership agreement and by law and,
thereafter, we will distribute any remaining proceeds to the
common unitholders and our general partner in accordance with
their respective capital account balances as so adjusted.
Manner of Adjustments for Gain. The manner of the
adjustment is set forth in the partnership agreement. Upon our
liquidation, we will allocate any net gain (or unrealized gain
attributable to assets distributed in kind to the partners) as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
first, to the general partner and the holders of common
units having negative balances in their capital accounts to the
extent of and in proportion to such negative balances: |
|
|
|
second, 98% to the holders of common units, pro rata, and
2% to the general partner, until the capital account for each
common unit is equal to the sum of |
|
|
|
|
|
the unrecovered capital in respect of such common unit; plus |
|
|
|
the amount of the minimum quarterly distribution for the quarter
during which our liquidation occurs. |
|
|
|
|
|
third, 98% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
the general partner, until there has been allocated under this
paragraph third an amount per unit equal to: |
|
|
|
|
|
the sum of the excess of the First Target Distribution per unit
over the minimum quarterly distribution per unit for each
quarter of our existence; less |
|
|
|
the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of available
cash from operating surplus in excess of the minimum quarterly
distribution per unit that were distributed 98% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence; |
35
|
|
|
|
|
fourth, 85% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and 15%
to the general partner, until there has been allocated under
this paragraph fourth an amount per unit equal to: |
|
|
|
|
|
the sum of the excess of the Second Target Distribution per unit
over the First Target Distribution per unit for each quarter of
our existence; less |
|
|
|
the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of available
cash from operating surplus in excess of the First Target
Distribution per unit that were distributed 85% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence; and |
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter, 75% to all common unitholders, pro rata, and
25% to the general partner. |
Manner of Adjustments for Losses. Upon our liquidation,
any loss will generally be allocated to the general partner and
the unitholders as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
first, 98% to the holders of common units in proportion
to the positive balances in their respective capital accounts
and 2% to the general partner, until the capital accounts of the
common unitholders have been reduced to zero; and |
|
|
|
thereafter, 100% to the general partner. |
Adjustments to Capital Accounts. In addition, interim
adjustments to capital accounts will be made at the time we
issue additional partnership interests or make distributions of
property. Such adjustments will be based on the fair market
value of the partnership interests or the property distributed
and any gain or loss resulting therefrom will be allocated to
the common unitholders and the general partner in the same
manner as gain or loss is allocated upon liquidation. In the
event that positive interim adjustments are made to the capital
accounts, any subsequent negative adjustments to the capital
accounts resulting from the issuance of additional partnership
interests in us, distributions of property by us, or upon our
liquidation, will be allocated in a manner which results, to the
extent possible, in the capital account balances of the general
partner equaling the amount that would have been the general
partners capital account balances if no prior positive
adjustments to the capital accounts had been made.
DESCRIPTION OF OUR PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material provisions of our
partnership agreement. Our amended and restated partnership
agreement has been filed with the Commission. The following
provisions of our partnership agreement are summarized elsewhere
in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of our available cash are described under
Cash Distribution Policy; |
|
|
|
rights of holders of common units are described under
Description of Our Common Units; and |
|
|
|
allocations of taxable income and other matters are described
under Tax Consequences. |
Purpose
Our purpose under our partnership agreement is to serve as a
partner of our operating partnership and to engage in any
business activities that may be engaged in by our operating
partnership or that are approved by our general partner. The
partnership agreement of our operating partnership provides that
it may engage in any activity that was engaged in by our
predecessors at the time of our initial public offering or
reasonably related thereto and any other activity approved by
our general partner.
Power of Attorney
Each limited partner, and each person who acquires a unit from a
unitholder and executes and delivers a transfer application,
grants to our general partner and, if appointed, a liquidator, a
power of attorney to, among other things, execute and file
documents required for our qualification, continuance or
dissolution. The power of attorney also grants the authority for
the amendment of, and to make consents and waivers under, our
partnership agreement.
36
Voting Rights
Unitholders will not have voting rights except with respect to
the following matters, for which our partnership agreement
requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the units,
unless otherwise indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger of our partnership or a sale, exchange or other
disposition of all or substantially all of our assets; |
|
|
|
the withdrawal of our general partner prior to December 31,
2008 (requires a majority of the units outstanding, excluding
units held by our general partner and its affiliates); |
|
|
|
the removal of our general partner (requires 64% of the
outstanding units, including units held by our general partner
and its affiliates); |
|
|
|
the election of a successor general partner; |
|
|
|
the dissolution of our partnership or the reconstitution of our
partnership upon dissolution; |
|
|
|
approval of certain actions of our general partner (including
the transfer by the general partner of its general partner
interest under certain circumstances); and |
|
|
|
certain amendments to the partnership agreement, including any
amendment that would cause us to be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation. |
Under the partnership agreement, our general partner generally
will be permitted to effect, without the approval of
unitholders, amendments to the partnership agreement that do not
adversely affect unitholders.
Reimbursements of Our General Partner
Our general partner does not receive any compensation for its
services as our general partner. It is, however, entitled to be
reimbursed for all of its costs incurred in managing and
operating our business. Our partnership agreement provides that
our general partner will determine the expenses that are
allocable to us in any reasonable manner determined by our
general partner in its sole discretion.
Issuance of Additional Securities
Our partnership agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited
number of additional limited partner interests and other equity
securities that are equal in rank with or junior to our common
units on terms and conditions established by our general partner
in its sole discretion without the approval of any limited
partners.
It is possible that we will fund acquisitions through the
issuance of additional common units or other equity securities.
Holders of any additional common units we issue will be entitled
to share equally with the then-existing holders of common units
in our cash distributions. In addition, the issuance of
additional partnership interests may dilute the value of the
interests of the then-existing holders of common units in our
net assets.
In accordance with Delaware law and the provisions of our
partnership agreement, we may also issue additional partnership
interests that, in the sole discretion of our general partner,
may have special voting rights to which common units are not
entitled.
Our general partner has the right, which it may from time to
time assign in whole or in part to any of its affiliates, to
purchase common units or other equity securities whenever, and
on the same terms that, we issue those securities to persons
other than our general partner and its affiliates, to the extent
necessary to maintain their percentage interests in us that
existed immediately prior to the issuance. The holders of common
units will not have preemptive rights to acquire additional
common units or other partnership interests in us.
37
Amendments to Our Partnership Agreement
Amendments to our partnership agreement may be proposed only by
our general partner. Any amendment that materially and adversely
affects the rights or preferences of any type or class of
limited partner interests in relation to other types or classes
of limited partner interests or our general partner interest
will require the approval of at least a majority of the type or
class of limited partner interests or general partner interests
so affected. However, in some circumstances, more particularly
described in our partnership agreement, our general partner may
make amendments to our partnership agreement without the
approval of our limited partners or assignees to reflect:
|
|
|
|
|
a change in our names, the location of our principal place of
business, our registered agent or our registered office; |
|
|
|
the admission, substitution, withdrawal or removal of partners; |
|
|
|
a change to qualify or continue our qualification as a limited
partnership or a partnership in which our limited partners have
limited liability under the laws of any state or to ensure that
neither we, our operating partnership, nor any of our
subsidiaries will be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation or otherwise taxed as an entity for federal income
tax purposes; |
|
|
|
a change that does not adversely affect our limited partners in
any material respect; |
|
|
|
a change to (i) satisfy any requirements, conditions or
guidelines contained in any opinion, directive, order, ruling or
regulation of any federal or state agency or judicial authority
or contained in any federal or state statute or
(ii) facilitate the trading of our limited partner
interests or comply with any rule, regulation, guideline or
requirement of any national securities exchange on which our
limited partner interests are or will be listed for trading; |
|
|
|
a change in our fiscal year or taxable year and any changes that
are necessary or advisable as a result of a change in our fiscal
year or taxable year; |
|
|
|
an amendment that is necessary to prevent us, or our general
partner or its directors, officers, trustees or agents from
being subjected to the provisions of the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended, or plan asset regulations adopted under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended; |
|
|
|
an amendment that is necessary or advisable in connection with
the authorization or issuance of any class or series of our
securities; |
|
|
|
any amendment expressly permitted in our partnership agreement
to be made by our general partner acting alone; |
|
|
|
an amendment effected, necessitated or contemplated by a merger
agreement approved in accordance with our partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
an amendment that is necessary or advisable to reflect, account
for and deal with appropriately our formation of, or investment
in, any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited
liability company or other entity other than our operating
partnership, in connection with our conduct of activities
permitted by our partnership agreement; |
|
|
|
a merger or conveyance to effect a change in our legal
form; or |
|
|
|
any other amendments substantially similar to the foregoing. |
Withdrawal or Removal of Our General Partner
Our general partner has agreed not to withdraw voluntarily as
our general partner prior to December 31, 2008 without
obtaining the approval of the holders of a majority of our
outstanding common units, excluding those held by our general
partner and its affiliates, and furnishing an opinion of counsel
stating that such withdrawal (following the selection of the
successor general partner) would not result in
38
the loss of the limited liability of any of our limited partners
or of a member of our operating partnership or cause us or our
operating partnership to be treated as an association taxable as
a corporation or otherwise to be taxed as an entity for federal
income tax purposes (to the extent not previously treated as
such).
On or after December 31, 2008, our general partner may
withdraw as general partner without first obtaining approval of
any unitholder by giving 90 days written notice, and
that withdrawal will not constitute a violation of our
partnership agreement. In addition, our general partner may
withdraw without unitholder approval upon 90 days
notice to our limited partners if at least 50% of our
outstanding common units are held or controlled by one person
and its affiliates other than our general partner and its
affiliates.
Upon the voluntary withdrawal of our general partner, the
holders of a majority of our outstanding common units, excluding
the common units held by the withdrawing general partner and its
affiliates, may elect a successor to the withdrawing general
partner. If a successor is not elected, or is elected but an
opinion of counsel regarding limited liability and tax matters
cannot be obtained, we will be dissolved, wound up and
liquidated, unless within 90 days after that withdrawal,
the holders of a majority of our outstanding units, excluding
the common units held by the withdrawing general partner and its
affiliates, agree to continue our business and to appoint a
successor general partner.
Our general partner may not be removed unless that removal is
approved by the vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds
of our outstanding units, including units held by our general
partner and its affiliates, and we receive an opinion of counsel
regarding limited liability and tax matters. In addition, if our
general partner is removed as our general partner under
circumstances where cause does not exist and units held by our
general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of
such removal, our general partner will have the right to convert
its general partner interest into common units or to receive
cash in exchange for such interests. Cause is narrowly defined
to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction has entered a
final, non-appealable judgment finding the general partner
liable for actual fraud, gross negligence or willful or wanton
misconduct in its capacity as our general partner. Any removal
of this kind is also subject to the approval of a successor
general partner by the vote of the holders of a majority of our
outstanding common units, including those held by our general
partner and its affiliates.
While our partnership agreement limits the ability of our
general partner to withdraw, it allows the general partner
interest to be transferred to an affiliate or to a third party
in conjunction with a merger or sale of all or substantially all
of the assets of our general partner. In addition, our
partnership agreement expressly permits the sale, in whole or in
part, of the ownership of our general partner. Our general
partner may also transfer, in whole or in part, the common units
it owns.
Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds
Upon our dissolution, unless we are reconstituted and continued
as a new limited partnership, the person authorized to wind up
our affairs (the liquidator) will, acting with all the powers of
our general partner that the liquidator deems necessary or
desirable in its good faith judgment, liquidate our assets. The
proceeds of the liquidation will be applied as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
first, towards the payment of all of our creditors and
the creation of a reserve for contingent liabilities; and |
|
|
|
then, to all partners in accordance with the positive
balance in the respective capital accounts. |
Under some circumstances and subject to some limitations, the
liquidator may defer liquidation or distribution of our assets
for a reasonable period of time. If the liquidator determines
that a sale would be impractical or would cause a loss to our
partners, our general partner may distribute assets in kind to
our partners.
39
Transfer of Ownership Interests in Our General
Partner
At any time, the owners of our general partner may sell or
transfer all or part of their ownership interests in the general
partner without the approval of the unitholders.
Change of Management Provisions
Our partnership agreement contains the following specific
provisions that are intended to discourage a person or group
from attempting to remove our general partner or otherwise
change management:
|
|
|
|
|
any units held by a person that owns 20% or more of any class of
units then outstanding, other than our general partner and its
affiliates, cannot be voted on any matter; and |
|
|
|
the partnership agreement contains provisions limiting the
ability of unitholders to call meetings or to acquire
information about our operations, as well as other provisions
limiting the unitholders ability to influence the manner
or direction of management. |
Limited Call Right
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own 85% or
more of the issued and outstanding limited partner interests of
any class, our general partner will have the right to purchase
all, but not less than all, of the outstanding limited partner
interests of that class that are held by non-affiliated persons.
The record date for determining ownership of the limited partner
interests would be selected by our general partner on at least
10 but not more than 60 days notice. The purchase
price in the event of a purchase under these provisions would be
the greater of (1) the current market price (as defined in
our partnership agreement) of the limited partner interests of
the class as of the date three days prior to the date that
notice is mailed to the limited partners as provided in the
partnership agreement and (2) the highest cash price paid
by our general partner or any of its affiliates for any limited
partner interest of the class purchased within the 90 days
preceding the date our general partner mails notice of its
election to purchase the units.
As of February 15, 2005 our general partner and its
affiliates owned the 2% general partner interest in us and
143,373,314 common units, representing an aggregate 36.8%
limited partner interest in us.
Indemnification
Under our partnership agreement, in most circumstances, we will
indemnify our general partner, its affiliates and their officers
and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law, from and
against all losses, claims or damages any of them may suffer by
reason of their status as general partner, officer or director,
as long as the person seeking indemnity acted in good faith and
in a manner believed to be in or not opposed to our best
interest. Any indemnification under these provisions will only
be out of our assets. Our general partner shall not be
personally liable for, or have any obligation to contribute or
loan funds or assets to us to enable us to effectuate any
indemnification. We are authorized to purchase insurance against
liabilities asserted against and expenses incurred by persons
for our activities, regardless of whether we would have the
power to indemnify the person against liabilities under our
partnership agreement.
Registration Rights
Under our partnership agreement, we have agreed to register for
resale under the Securities Act and applicable state securities
laws any common units or other partnership securities proposed
to be sold by our general partner or any of its affiliates or
their assignees if an exemption from the registration
requirements is not otherwise available. We are obligated to pay
all expenses incidental to the registration, excluding
underwriting discounts and commissions.
40
MATERIAL TAX CONSEQUENCES
This section is a summary of the material tax consequences that
may be relevant to prospective unitholders who are individual
citizens or residents of the United States and, unless otherwise
noted in the following discussion, represents the opinion of
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., special counsel to the general
partner and us, insofar as it relates to matters of United
States federal income tax law matters. This section is based
upon current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, existing
and proposed regulations and current administrative rulings and
court decisions, all of which are subject to change. Later
changes in these authorities may cause the tax consequences to
vary substantially from the consequences described below.
The following discussion does not comment on all federal income
tax matters affecting us or the unitholders. Moreover, the
discussion focuses on unitholders who are individual citizens or
residents of the United States and has only limited application
to corporations, estates, trusts, nonresident aliens or other
unitholders subject to specialized tax treatment, such as
tax-exempt institutions, foreign persons, individual retirement
accounts (IRAs), real estate investment trusts (REITs)or mutual
funds. Accordingly, we recommend that each prospective
unitholder consult, and depend on, his own tax advisor in
analyzing the federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences
particular to him of the ownership or disposition of common
units.
All statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions, but
not as to factual matters, contained in this section, unless
otherwise noted, are the opinion of Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. and are based on the accuracy of the representations made
by us.
No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS regarding
any matter affecting us or prospective unitholders. Instead, we
will rely on opinions and advice of Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. Unlike a ruling, an opinion of counsel represents only
that counsels best legal judgment and does not bind the
IRS or the courts. Accordingly, the opinions and statements made
here may not be sustained by a court if contested by the IRS.
Any contest of this sort with the IRS may materially and
adversely impact the market for the common units and the prices
at which common units trade. In addition, the costs of any
contest with the IRS will be borne directly or indirectly by the
unitholders and the general partner. Furthermore, the tax
treatment of us, or of an investment in us, may be significantly
modified by future legislative or administrative changes or
court decisions. Any modifications may or may not be
retroactively applied.
For the reasons described below, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
has not rendered an opinion with respect to the following
specific federal income tax issues:
|
|
|
(1) the treatment of a unitholder whose common units are
loaned to a short seller to cover a short sale of common units
(please read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Treatment of Short Sales); |
|
|
(2) whether our monthly convention for allocating taxable
income and losses is permitted by existing Treasury Regulations
(please read Disposition of Common
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees); and |
|
|
(3) whether our method for depreciating Section 743
adjustments is sustainable (please read Tax
Consequences of Unit Ownership Section 754
Election). |
Partnership Status
A partnership is not a taxable entity and incurs no federal
income tax liability. Instead, each partner of a partnership is
required to take into account his share of items of income,
gain, loss and deduction of the partnership in computing his
federal income tax liability, regardless of whether cash
distributions are made to him by the partnership. Distributions
by a partnership to a partner are generally not taxable unless
the amount of cash distributed is in excess of the
partners adjusted basis in his partnership interest.
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that
publicly-traded partnerships will, as a general rule, be taxed
as corporations. However, an exception, referred to as the
Qualifying Income
41
Exception, exists with respect to publicly-traded
partnerships of which 90% or more of the gross income for every
taxable year consists of qualifying income.
Qualifying income includes income and gains derived from the
exploration, development, mining or production, processing,
refining, transportation and marketing of any mineral or natural
resource. Other types of qualifying income include interest
other than from a financial business, dividends, gains from the
sale of real property and gains from the sale or other
disposition of assets held for the production of income that
otherwise constitutes qualifying income. We estimate that less
than 2% of our current gross income is not qualifying income;
however, this estimate could change from time to time. Based
upon and subject to this estimate, the factual representations
made by us and the general partner and a review of the
applicable legal authorities, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is
of the opinion that at least 90% of our current gross income
constitutes qualifying income.
No ruling has been or will be sought from the IRS and the IRS
has made no determination as to our status or the status of the
Operating Partnership as partnerships for federal income tax
purposes. Instead, we will rely on the opinion of
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. that, based upon the Internal
Revenue Code, its regulations, published revenue rulings and
court decisions and the representations described below, we and
the Operating Partnership will be classified as a partnership
for federal income tax purposes.
In rendering its opinion, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has
relied on factual representations made by us and the general
partner. The representations made by us and our general partner
upon which Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has relied are:
|
|
|
(a) Neither we nor the Operating Partnership will elect to
be treated as a corporation; and |
|
|
(b) For each taxable year, more than 90% of our gross
income will be income that Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has
opined or will opine is qualifying income within the
meaning of Section 7704(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
If we fail to meet the Qualifying Income Exception, other than a
failure that is determined by the IRS to be inadvertent and that
is cured within a reasonable time after discovery, we will be
treated as if we had transferred all of our assets, subject to
liabilities, to a newly formed corporation, on the first day of
the year in which we fail to meet the Qualifying Income
Exception, in return for stock in that corporation, and then
distributed that stock to the unitholders in liquidation of
their interests in us. This contribution and liquidation should
be tax-free to unitholders and us so long as we, at that time,
do not have liabilities in excess of the tax basis of our
assets. Thereafter, we would be treated as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes.
If we were taxable as a corporation in any taxable year, either
as a result of a failure to meet the Qualifying Income Exception
or otherwise, our items of income, gain, loss and deduction
would be reflected only on our tax return rather than being
passed through to the unitholders, and our net income would be
taxed to us at corporate rates. In addition, any distribution
made to a unitholder would be treated as either taxable dividend
income, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, or, in the absence of earnings and profits, a
nontaxable return of capital, to the extent of the
unitholders tax basis in his common units, or taxable
capital gain, after the unitholders tax basis in his
common units is reduced to zero. Accordingly, taxation as a
corporation would result in a material reduction in a
unitholders cash flow and after-tax return and thus would
likely result in a substantial reduction of the value of the
units.
The discussion below is based on the conclusion that we will be
classified as a partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Limited Partner Status
Unitholders who have become limited partners of the Company will
be treated as partners of the Company for federal income tax
purposes. Also:
|
|
|
(a) assignees who have executed and delivered transfer
applications, and are awaiting admission as limited
partners, and |
42
|
|
|
(b) unitholders whose common units are held in street name
or by a nominee and who have the right to direct the nominee in
the exercise of all substantive rights attendant to the
ownership of their common units, will be treated as partners of
the Company for federal income tax purposes. As there is no
direct authority addressing assignees of common units who are
entitled to execute and deliver transfer applications and
thereby become entitled to direct the exercise of attendant
rights, but who fail to execute and deliver transfer
applications, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.s opinion
does not extend to these persons. Furthermore, a purchaser or
other transferee of common units who does not execute and
deliver a transfer application may not receive some federal
income tax information or reports furnished to record holders of
common units unless the common units are held in a nominee or
street name account and the nominee or broker has executed and
delivered a transfer application for those common units. |
A beneficial owner of common units whose units have been
transferred to a short seller to complete a short sale would
appear to lose his status as a partner with respect to those
units for federal income tax purposes. Please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Treatment of Short Sales.
Income, gains, deductions or losses would not appear to be
reportable by a unitholder who is not a partner for federal
income tax purposes, and any cash distributions received by a
unitholder who is not a partner for federal income tax purposes
would therefore be fully taxable as ordinary income. We strongly
recommend that prospective unitholders consult their own tax
advisors with respect to their status as partners in the Company
for federal income tax purposes.
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Flow-through of Taxable Income. We will not pay any
federal income tax. Instead, each unitholder will be required to
report on his income tax return his share of our income, gains,
losses and deductions without regard to whether corresponding
cash distributions are received by him. Consequently, we may
allocate income to a unitholder even if he has not received a
cash distribution. Each unitholder will be required to include
in income his allocable share of our income, gains, losses and
deductions for our taxable year ending with or within his
taxable year. Our taxable year ends on December 31.
Treatment of Distributions. Distributions by us to a
unitholder generally will not be taxable to the unitholder for
federal income tax purposes to the extent of his tax basis in
his common units immediately before the distribution. Our cash
distributions in excess of a unitholders tax basis
generally will be considered to be gain from the sale or
exchange of the common units, taxable in accordance with the
rules described under Disposition of Common
Units below. Any reduction in a unitholders share of
our liabilities for which no partner, including the general
partner, bears the economic risk of loss, known as
nonrecourse liabilities, will be treated as a
distribution of cash to that unitholder. To the extent our
distributions cause a unitholders at risk
amount to be less than zero at the end of any taxable year, he
must recapture any losses deducted in previous years. Please
read Limitations on Deductibility of
Losses.
A decrease in a unitholders percentage interest in us
because of our issuance of additional common units will decrease
his share of our nonrecourse liabilities, and thus will result
in a corresponding deemed distribution of cash. A non-pro rata
distribution of money or property may result in ordinary income
to a unitholder, regardless of his tax basis in his common
units, if the distribution reduces the unitholders share
of our unrealized receivables, including
depreciation recapture, and/or substantially appreciated
inventory items, both as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code, and collectively, Section 751
Assets. To that extent, he will be treated as having been
distributed his proportionate share of the Section 751
Assets and having exchanged those assets with us in return for
the non-pro rata portion of the actual distribution made to him.
This latter deemed exchange will generally result in the
unitholders realization of ordinary income, which will
equal the excess of (1) the non-pro rata portion of that
distribution over (2) the unitholders tax basis for
the share of Section 751 Assets deemed relinquished in the
exchange.
Basis of Common Units. A unitholders initial tax
basis for his common units will be the amount he paid for the
common units plus his share of our nonrecourse liabilities. That
basis will be increased by his
43
share of our income and by any increases in his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities. That basis will be decreased, but not
below zero, by distributions from us, by the unitholders
share of our losses, by any decreases in his share of our
nonrecourse liabilities and by his share of our expenditures
that are not deductible in computing taxable income and are not
required to be capitalized. A unitholder will have no share of
our debt which is recourse to the general partner, but will have
a share, generally based on his share of profits, of our
nonrecourse liabilities. Please read
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses. The deduction by
a unitholder of his share of our losses will be limited to the
tax basis in his units and, in the case of an individual
unitholder or a corporate unitholder, if more than 50% of the
value of the corporate unitholders stock is owned directly
or indirectly by five or fewer individuals or some tax-exempt
organizations, to the amount for which the unitholder is
considered to be at risk with respect to our
activities, if that is less than his tax basis. A unitholder
must recapture losses deducted in previous years to the extent
that distributions cause his at risk amount to be less than zero
at the end of any taxable year. Losses disallowed to a
unitholder or recaptured as a result of these limitations will
carry forward and will be allowable to the extent that his tax
basis or at risk amount, whichever is the limiting factor, is
subsequently increased. Upon the taxable disposition of a unit,
any gain recognized by a unitholder can be offset by losses that
were previously suspended by the at risk limitation but may not
be offset by losses suspended by the basis limitation. Any
excess loss above that gain previously suspended by the at risk
or basis limitations is no longer utilizable.
In general, a unitholder will be at risk to the extent of the
tax basis of his units, excluding any portion of that basis
attributable to his share of our nonrecourse liabilities,
reduced by any amount of money he borrows to acquire or hold his
units, if the lender of those borrowed funds owns an interest in
us, is related to the unitholder or can look only to the units
for repayment. A unitholders at risk amount will increase
or decrease as the tax basis of the unitholders units
increases or decreases, other than tax basis increases or
decreases attributable to increases or decreases in his share of
our nonrecourse liabilities.
The passive loss limitations generally provide that individuals,
estates, trusts and some closely-held corporations and personal
service corporations can deduct losses from passive activities,
which are generally corporate or partnership activities in which
the taxpayer does not materially participate, only to the extent
of the taxpayers income from those passive activities. The
passive loss limitations are applied separately with respect to
each publicly-traded partnership. Consequently, any passive
losses we generate will be available to offset only our passive
income generated in the future and will not be available to
offset income from other passive activities or investments,
including our investments or investments in other
publicly-traded partnerships, or salary or active business
income. Passive losses that are not deductible because they
exceed a unitholders share of income we generate may be
deducted in full when he disposes of his entire investment in us
in a fully taxable transaction with an unrelated party. The
passive activity loss rules are applied after other applicable
limitations on deductions, including the at risk rules and the
basis limitation.
A unitholders share of our net income may be offset by any
suspended passive losses, but it may not be offset by any other
current or carryover losses from other passive activities,
including those attributable to other publicly-traded
partnerships.
Limitations on Interest Deductions. The deductibility of
a non-corporate taxpayers investment interest
expense is generally limited to the amount of that
taxpayers net investment income. Investment
interest expense includes:
|
|
|
|
|
interest on indebtedness properly allocable to property held for
investment; |
|
|
|
our interest expense attributed to portfolio income; and |
|
|
|
the portion of interest expense incurred to purchase or carry an
interest in a passive activity to the extent attributable to
portfolio income. |
44
The computation of a unitholders investment interest
expense will take into account interest on any margin account
borrowing or other loan incurred to purchase or carry a unit.
Net investment income includes gross income from property held
for investment and amounts treated as portfolio income under the
passive loss rules, less deductible expenses, other than
interest, directly connected with the production of investment
income, but generally does not include gains attributable to the
disposition of property held for investment. The IRS has
indicated that net passive income earned by a publicly-traded
partnership will be treated as investment income to its
unitholders. In addition, the unitholders share of our
portfolio income will be treated as investment income.
Entity-Level Collections. If we are required or
elect under applicable law to pay any federal, state, local or
foreign income tax on behalf of any unitholder or the general
partner or any former unitholder, we are authorized to pay those
taxes from our funds. That payment, if made, will be treated as
a distribution of cash to the partner on whose behalf the
payment was made. If the payment is made on behalf of a person
whose identity cannot be determined, we are authorized to treat
the payment as a distribution to all current unitholders. We are
authorized to amend the partnership agreement in the manner
necessary to maintain uniformity of intrinsic tax
characteristics of units and to adjust later distributions, so
that after giving effect to these distributions, the priority
and characterization of distributions otherwise applicable under
the partnership agreement is maintained as nearly as is
practicable. Payments by us as described above could give rise
to an overpayment of tax on behalf of an individual partner in
which event the partner would be required to file a claim in
order to obtain a credit or refund.
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction. In
general, if we have a net profit, our items of income, gain,
loss and deduction will be allocated among the general partner
and the unitholders in accordance with their percentage
interests in us. At any time that incentive distributions are
made to the general partner, gross income will be allocated to
the recipients to the extent of these distributions. If we have
a net loss for the entire year, that loss will be allocated
first to the general partner and the unitholders in accordance
with their percentage interests in us to the extent of their
positive capital accounts and, second, to the general partner.
Specified items of our income, gain, loss and deduction will be
allocated to account for the difference between the tax basis
and fair market value of property contributed to us by the
general partner and its affiliates, referred to in this
discussion as Contributed Property. The effect of
these allocations to a unitholder purchasing common units in
this offering will be essentially the same as if the tax basis
of our assets were equal to their fair market value at the time
of an offering. In addition, items of recapture income will be
allocated to the extent possible to the partner who was
allocated the deduction giving rise to the treatment of that
gain as recapture income in order to minimize the recognition of
ordinary income by some unitholders. Finally, although we do not
expect that our operations will result in the creation of
negative capital accounts, if negative capital accounts
nevertheless result, items of our income and gain will be
allocated in an amount and manner to eliminate the negative
balance as quickly as possible.
An allocation of items of our income, gain, loss or deduction,
other than an allocation required by the Internal Revenue Code
to eliminate the difference between a partners
book capital account, credited with the fair market
value of Contributed Property, and tax capital
account, credited with the tax basis of Contributed Property,
referred to in this discussion as the Book-Tax
Disparity, will generally be given effect for federal
income tax purposes in determining a partners share of an
item of income, gain, loss or deduction only if the allocation
has substantial economic effect. In any other case, a
partners share of an item will be determined on the basis
of his interest in us, which will be determined by taking into
account all the facts and circumstances, including:
|
|
|
|
|
his relative contributions to us; |
|
|
|
the interests of all the partners in profits and losses; |
|
|
|
the interest of all the partners in cash flow and other
nonliquidating distributions; and |
|
|
|
the rights of all the partners to distributions of capital upon
liquidation. |
45
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is of the opinion that, with the
exception of the issues described in Tax
Consequences of Unit Ownership Section 754
Election and Disposition of Common
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees, allocations under our partnership agreement
will be given effect for federal income tax purposes in
determining a partners share of an item of income, gain,
loss or deduction.
Treatment of Short Sales. A unitholder whose units are
loaned to a short seller to cover a short sale of
units may be considered as having disposed of those units. If
so, he would no longer be a partner for those units during the
period of the loan and may recognize gain or loss from the
disposition. As a result, during this period:
|
|
|
|
|
any of our income, gain, loss or deduction with respect to those
units would not be reportable by the unitholder; |
|
|
|
any cash distributions received by the unitholder as to those
units would be fully taxable; and |
|
|
|
all of these distributions would appear to be ordinary income. |
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has not rendered an opinion
regarding the treatment of a unitholder where common units are
loaned to a short seller to cover a short sale of common units;
therefore, unitholders desiring to assure their status as
partners and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a loan to a
short seller are urged to modify any applicable brokerage
account agreements to prohibit their brokers from borrowing
their units. The IRS has announced that it is actively studying
issues relating to the tax treatment of short sales of
partnership interests. Please also read
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Alternative Minimum Tax. Each unitholder will be required
to take into account his distributive share of any items of our
income, gain, loss or deduction for purposes of the alternative
minimum tax. The current minimum tax rate for noncorporate
taxpayers is 26% on the first $175,000 of alternative minimum
taxable income in excess of the exemption amount and 28% on any
additional alternative minimum taxable income. We strongly
recommend that prospective unitholders consult with their tax
advisors as to the impact of an investment in units on their
liability for the alternative minimum tax.
Tax Rates. In general the highest effective United States
federal income tax rate for individuals currently is 35.0% and
the maximum United States federal income tax rate for net
capital gains of an individual is currently 15.0% if the asset
disposed of was held for more than 12 months at the time of
disposition.
Section 754 Election. We have made the election
permitted by Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code. That
election is irrevocable without the consent of the IRS. The
election generally permits us to adjust a common unit
purchasers tax basis in our assets (inside
basis) under Section 743(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code to reflect his purchase price. This election does not apply
to a person who purchases common units directly from us. The
Section 743(b) adjustment belongs to the purchaser and not
to other unitholders. For purposes of this discussion, a
unitholders inside basis in our assets will be considered
to have two components: (1) his share of our tax basis in
our assets (common basis) and (2) his
Section 743(b) adjustment to that basis.
Treasury regulations under Section 743 of the Internal
Revenue Code require that, if the remedial allocation method is
adopted (which we have adopted), a portion of the
Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to recovery property
be depreciated over the remaining cost recovery period for the
Section 704(c) built-in gain. Under Treasury regulation
Section 1.167(c)-l(a)(6), a Section 743(b) adjustment
attributable to property subject to depreciation under
Section 167 of the Internal Revenue Code, rather than cost
recovery deductions under Section 168, is generally
required to be depreciated using either the straight-line method
or the 150% declining balance method. Under our partnership
agreement, our general partner is authorized to take a position
to preserve the uniformity of units even if that position is not
consistent with these Treasury Regulations. Please read
Tax Treatment of Operations
Uniformity of Units.
46
Although Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is unable to opine as
to the validity of this approach because there is no clear
authority on this issue, we intend to depreciate the portion of
a Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to unrealized
appreciation in the value of Contributed Property, to the extent
of any unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, using a rate of
depreciation or amortization derived from the depreciation or
amortization method and useful life applied to the common basis
of the property, or treat that portion as non-amortizable to the
extent attributable to property the common basis of which is not
amortizable. This method is consistent with the regulations
under Section 743 of the Internal Revenue Code but is
arguably inconsistent with Treasury regulation
Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6). To the extent this
Section 743(b) adjustment is attributable to appreciation
in value in excess of the unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, we
will apply the rules described in the Treasury regulations and
legislative history. If we determine that this position cannot
reasonably be taken, we may take a depreciation or amortization
position under which all purchasers acquiring units in the same
month would receive depreciation or amortization, whether
attributable to common basis or a Section 743(b)
adjustment, based upon the same applicable rate as if they had
purchased a direct interest in our assets. This kind of
aggregate approach may result in lower annual depreciation or
amortization deductions than would otherwise be allowable to
some unitholders. Please read Tax Treatment of
Operations Uniformity of Units.
A Section 754 election is advantageous if the
transferees tax basis in his units is higher than the
units share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets
immediately prior to the transfer. In that case, as a result of
the election, the transferee would have, among other items, a
greater amount of depreciation and depletion deductions and his
share of any gain or loss on a sale of our assets would be less.
Conversely, a Section 754 election is disadvantageous if
the transferees tax basis in his units is lower than those
units share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets
immediately prior to the transfer. Thus, the fair market value
of the units may be affected either favorably or unfavorably by
the election.
The calculations involved in the Section 754 election are
complex and will be made on the basis of assumptions as to the
value of our assets and other matters. For example, the
allocation of the Section 743(b) adjustment among our
assets must be made in accordance with the Internal Revenue
Code. The IRS could seek to reallocate some or all of any
Section 743(b) adjustment allocated by us to our tangible
assets to goodwill instead. Goodwill, as an intangible asset, is
generally amortizable over a longer period of time or under a
less accelerated method than our tangible assets. We cannot
assure you that the determinations we make will not be
successfully challenged by the IRS and that the deductions
resulting from them will not be reduced or disallowed
altogether. Should the IRS require a different basis adjustment
to be made, and should, in our opinion, the expense of
compliance exceed the benefit of the election, we may seek
permission from the IRS to revoke our Section 754 election.
If permission is granted, a subsequent purchaser of units may be
allocated more income than he would have been allocated had the
election not been revoked.
Tax Treatment of Operations
Accounting Method and Taxable Year. We use the year
ending December 31 as our taxable year and the accrual
method of accounting for federal income tax purposes. Each
unitholder will be required to include in income his share of
our income, gain, loss and deduction for our taxable year ending
within or with his taxable year. In addition, a unitholder who
has a taxable year ending on a date other than December 31
and who disposes of all of his units following the close of our
taxable year but before the close of his taxable year must
include his share of our income, gain, loss and deduction in
income for his taxable year, with the result that he will be
required to include in income for his taxable year his share of
more than one year of our income, gain, loss and deduction.
Please read Disposition of Common
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees.
Tax Basis, Depreciation and Amortization. The tax basis
of our assets will be used for purposes of computing
depreciation and cost recovery deductions and, ultimately, gain
or loss on the disposition of these assets. The federal income
tax burden associated with the difference between the fair
market value of our assets and their tax basis immediately prior
to an offering will be borne by our general partner, its
47
affiliates and our unitholders immediately prior to that
offering. Please read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and
Deduction.
To the extent allowable, we may elect to use the depreciation
and cost recovery methods that will result in the largest
deductions being taken in the early years after assets are
placed in service. We are not entitled to any amortization
deductions with respect to any goodwill conveyed to us on
formation. Property we subsequently acquire or construct may be
depreciated using accelerated methods permitted by the Internal
Revenue Code.
If we dispose of depreciable property by sale, foreclosure, or
otherwise, all or a portion of any gain, determined by reference
to the amount of depreciation previously deducted and the nature
of the property, may be subject to the recapture rules and taxed
as ordinary income rather than capital gain. Similarly, a common
unitholder who has taken cost recovery or depreciation
deductions with respect to property we own will likely be
required to recapture some or all, of those deductions as
ordinary income upon a sale of his interest in us. Please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction and
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
The costs incurred in selling our units (called
syndication expenses) must be capitalized and cannot
be deducted currently, ratably or upon our termination. There
are uncertainties regarding the classification of costs as
organization expenses, which may be amortized by us, and as
syndication expenses, which may not be amortized by us. The
underwriting discounts and commissions we incur will be treated
as syndication expenses.
Valuation and Tax Basis of Our Properties. The federal
income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of
units will depend in part on our estimates of the relative fair
market values, and the tax bases, of our assets. Although we may
from time to time consult with professional appraisers regarding
valuation matters, we will make many of the relative fair market
value estimates ourselves. These estimates and determinations of
basis are subject to challenge and will not be binding on the
IRS or the courts. If the estimates of fair market value or
basis are later found to be incorrect, the character and amount
of items of income, gain, loss or deductions previously reported
by unitholders might change, and unitholders might be required
to adjust their tax liability for prior years and incur interest
and penalties with respect to those adjustments.
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss. Gain or loss will be
recognized on a sale of units equal to the difference between
the amount realized and the unitholders tax basis for the
units sold. A unitholders amount realized will be measured
by the sum of the cash or the fair market value of other
property received by him plus his share of our nonrecourse
liabilities. Because the amount realized includes a
unitholders share of our nonrecourse liabilities, the gain
recognized on the sale of units could result in a tax liability
in excess of any cash received from the sale.
Prior distributions from us in excess of cumulative net taxable
income for a common unit that decreased a unitholders tax
basis in that common unit will, in effect, become taxable income
if the common unit is sold at a price greater than the
unitholders tax basis in that common unit, even if the
price received is less than his original cost.
Except as noted below, gain or loss recognized by a unitholder,
other than a dealer in units, on the sale or
exchange of a unit held for more than one year will generally be
taxable as capital gain or loss. Capital gain recognized by an
individual on the sale of units held more than 12 months
will generally be taxed at a maximum rate of 15%. A portion of
this gain or loss, which will likely be substantial, however,
will be separately computed and taxed as ordinary income or loss
under Section 751 of the Internal Revenue Code to the
extent attributable to assets giving rise to depreciation
recapture or other unrealized receivables or to
inventory items we own. The term unrealized
receivables includes potential recapture items, including
depreciation recapture. Ordinary income attributable to
unrealized receivables, inventory items and depreciation
recapture may exceed net taxable gain realized upon the sale of
a unit
48
and may be recognized even if there is a net taxable loss
realized on the sale of a unit. Thus, a unitholder may recognize
both ordinary income and a capital loss upon a sale of units.
Net capital losses may offset capital gains and no more than
$3,000 of ordinary income, in the case of individuals, and may
only be used to offset capital gains in the case of corporations.
The IRS has ruled that a partner who acquires interests in a
partnership in separate transactions must combine those
interests and maintain a single adjusted tax basis for all those
interests. Upon a sale or other disposition of less than all of
those interests, a portion of that tax basis must be allocated
to the interests sold using an equitable
apportionment method. Treasury Regulations under
Section 1223 of the Internal Revenue Code allow a selling
unitholder who can identify common units transferred with an
ascertainable holding period to elect to use the actual holding
period of the common units transferred. Thus, according to the
ruling, a common unitholder will be unable to select high or low
basis common units to sell as would be the case with corporate
stock, but, according to the Treasury regulations, may designate
specific common units sold for purposes of determining the
holding period of units transferred. A unitholder electing to
use the actual holding period of common units transferred must
consistently use that identification method for all subsequent
sales or exchanges of common units. We strongly recommend that a
unitholder considering the purchase of additional units or a
sale of common units purchased in separate transactions consult
his tax advisor as to the possible consequences of this ruling
and application of the final regulations.
Specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code affect the
taxation of some financial products and securities, including
partnership interests, by treating a taxpayer as having sold an
appreciated partnership interest, one in which gain
would be recognized if it were sold, assigned or terminated at
its fair market value, if the taxpayer or related persons
enter(s) into:
|
|
|
|
|
a short sale; |
|
|
|
an offsetting notional principal contract; or |
|
|
|
a futures or forward contract with respect to the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. |
Moreover, if a taxpayer has previously entered into a short
sale, an offsetting notional principal contract or a futures or
forward contract with respect to the partnership interest, the
taxpayer will be treated as having sold that position if the
taxpayer or a related person then acquires the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. The Secretary of
the Treasury is also authorized to issue regulations that treat
a taxpayer that enters into transactions or positions that have
substantially the same effect as the preceding transactions as
having constructively sold the financial position.
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees. In
general, our taxable income and losses will be determined
annually, will be prorated on a monthly basis and will be
subsequently apportioned among the unitholders in proportion to
the number of units owned by each of them as of the opening of
the applicable exchange on the first business day of the month
(the Allocation Date). However, gain or loss
realized on a sale or other disposition of our assets other than
in the ordinary course of business will be allocated among the
unitholders on the Allocation Date in the month in which that
gain or loss is recognized. As a result, a unitholder
transferring units may be allocated income, gain, loss and
deduction realized after the date of transfer.
The use of this method may not be permitted under existing
Treasury Regulations. Accordingly, Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. is unable to opine on the validity of this method of
allocating income and deductions between unitholders. If this
method is not allowed under the Treasury Regulations, or only
applies to transfers of less than all of the unitholders
interest, our taxable income or losses might be reallocated
among the unitholders. We are authorized to revise our method of
allocation between unitholders, as well as among unitholders
whose interests vary during a taxable year, to conform to a
method permitted under future Treasury Regulations.
49
A unitholder who owns units at any time during a quarter and who
disposes of them prior to the record date set for a cash
distribution for that quarter will be allocated items of our
income, gain, loss and deductions attributable to that quarter
but will not be entitled to receive that cash distribution.
Notification Requirements. A unitholder who sells or
exchanges units is required to notify us in writing of that sale
or exchange within 30 days after the sale or exchange. We
are required to notify the IRS of that transaction and to
furnish specified information to the transferor and transferee.
However, these reporting requirements do not apply to a sale by
an individual who is a citizen of the United States and who
effects the sale or exchange through a broker. Failure to
satisfy these reporting obligations may lead to the imposition
of substantial penalties.
Constructive Termination. We will be considered to have
been terminated for tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange
of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital and profits
within a 12-month
period. A constructive termination results in the closing of our
taxable year for all unitholders. In the case of a unitholder
reporting on a taxable year other than a fiscal year ending
December 31, the closing of our taxable year may result in
more than 12 months of our taxable income or loss being
includable in his taxable income for the year of termination. We
would be required to make new tax elections after a termination,
including a new election under Section 754 of the Internal
Revenue Code, and a termination would result in a deferral of
our deductions for depreciation. A termination could also result
in penalties if we were unable to determine that the termination
had occurred. Moreover, a termination might either accelerate
the application of, or subject us to, any tax legislation
enacted before the termination.
Uniformity of Units
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of units, we
must maintain uniformity of the economic and tax characteristics
of the units to a purchaser of these units. In the absence of
uniformity, we may be unable to completely comply with a number
of federal income tax requirements, both statutory and
regulatory. A lack of uniformity can result from a literal
application of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6). Any
non-uniformity could have a negative impact on the value of the
units. Please read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election.
We intend to depreciate the portion of a Section 743(b)
adjustment attributable to unrealized appreciation in the value
of Contributed Property, to the extent of any unamortized
Book-Tax Disparity, using a rate of depreciation or amortization
derived from the depreciation or amortization method and useful
life applied to the common basis of that property, or treat that
portion as nonamortizable, to the extent attributable to
property the common basis of which is not amortizable,
consistent with the regulations under Section 743 of the
Internal Revenue Code, even though that position may be
inconsistent with Treasury regulation
Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6). Please read Tax
Consequences of Unit Ownership Section 754
Election. To the extent that the Section 743(b)
adjustment is attributable to appreciation in value in excess of
the unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, we will apply the rules
described in the Treasury Regulations and legislative history.
If we determine that this position cannot reasonably be taken,
we may adopt a depreciation and amortization position under
which all purchasers acquiring units in the same month would
receive depreciation and amortization deductions, whether
attributable to a common basis or Section 743(b)
adjustment, based upon the same applicable rate as if they had
purchased a direct interest in our property. If this position is
adopted, it may result in lower annual depreciation and
amortization deductions than would otherwise be allowable to
some unitholders and risk the loss of depreciation and
amortization deductions not taken in the year that these
deductions are otherwise allowable. This position will not be
adopted if we determine that the loss of depreciation and
amortization deductions will have a material adverse effect on
the unitholders. If we choose not to utilize this aggregate
method, we may use any other reasonable depreciation and
amortization method to preserve the uniformity of the intrinsic
tax characteristics of any units that would not have a material
adverse effect on the unitholders. The IRS may challenge any
method of depreciating the Section 743(b) adjustment
described in this paragraph. If this challenge were sustained,
the uniformity of units might be affected, and the gain from the
sale of units might be increased without the benefit of
additional deductions. Please read Disposition
of Common Units Recognition of Gain or Loss.
50
Tax-Exempt Organizations and Other Investors
Ownership of units by employee benefit plans, other tax-exempt
organizations, regulated investment companies, non-resident
aliens, foreign corporations, and other foreign persons raises
issues unique to those investors and, as described below, may
have substantially adverse tax consequences to them.
Employee benefit plans and most other organizations exempt from
federal income tax, including individual retirement accounts and
other retirement plans, are subject to federal income tax on
unrelated business taxable income. Virtually all of our income
allocated to a unitholder that is a tax-exempt organization will
be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them.
A regulated investment company or mutual fund is
required to derive 90% or more of its gross income from
interest, dividends and gains from the sale of stocks or
securities or foreign currency or specified related sources.
Recent legislation treats net income derived from the ownership
of certain publicly traded partnerships (including us) as
qualifying income to a regulated investment company. However,
this legislation is only effective for taxable years beginning
after October 22, 2004, the date of enactment. For taxable
years beginning prior to the date of enactment, very little of
our income will be qualifying income to a regulated investment
company.
Non-resident aliens and foreign corporations, trusts or estates
that own units will be considered to be engaged in business in
the United States because of the ownership of units. As a
consequence they will be required to file federal tax returns to
report their share of our income, gain, loss or deduction and
pay federal income tax at regular rates on their share of our
net income or gain. Moreover, under rules applicable to publicly
traded partnerships, we will withhold at the highest applicable
effective rate on cash distributions made quarterly to foreign
unitholders. Each foreign unitholder must obtain a taxpayer
identification number from the IRS and submit that number to our
transfer agent on a Form W-8 BEN or applicable substitute
form in order to obtain credit for these withholding taxes.
In addition, because a foreign corporation that owns units will
be treated as engaged in a United States trade or business, that
corporation may be subject to the United States branch profits
tax at a rate of 30%, in addition to regular federal income tax,
on its share of our income and gain, as adjusted for changes in
the foreign corporations U.S. net equity,
which are effectively connected with the conduct of a United
States trade or business. That tax may be reduced or eliminated
by an income tax treaty between the United States and the
country in which the foreign corporate unitholder is a
qualified resident. In addition, this type of
unitholder is subject to special information reporting
requirements under Section 6038C of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Under a ruling of the IRS, a foreign unitholder who sells or
otherwise disposes of a unit will be subject to federal income
tax on gain realized on the sale or disposition of that unit to
the extent that this gain is effectively connected with a United
States trade or business of the foreign unitholder. Apart from
the ruling, a foreign unitholder will not be taxed or subject to
withholding upon the sale or disposition of a unit if he has
owned less than 5% in value of the units during the five-year
period ending on the date of the disposition and if the units
are regularly traded on an established securities market at the
time of the sale or disposition.
Administrative Matters
Information Returns and Audit Procedures. We intend to
furnish to each unitholder, within 90 days after the close
of each calendar year, specific tax information, including a
Schedule K-1, which describes his share of our income,
gain, loss and deduction for our preceding taxable year. In
preparing this information, which will not be reviewed by
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., we will take various accounting
and reporting positions, some of which have been mentioned
earlier, to determine his share of income, gain, loss and
deduction. We cannot assure you that those positions will yield
a result that conforms to the requirements of the Internal
Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations or administrative
interpretations of the IRS. Neither we nor Vinson &
Elkins L.L.P. can assure prospective unitholders that the IRS
will not
51
successfully contend in court that those positions are
impermissible. Any challenge by the IRS could negatively affect
the value of the units.
The IRS may audit our federal income tax information returns.
Adjustments resulting from an IRS audit may require each
unitholder to adjust a prior years tax liability, and
possibly may result in an audit of his own return. Any audit of
a unitholders return could result in adjustments not
related to our returns as well as those related to our returns.
Partnerships generally are treated as separate entities for
purposes of federal tax audits, judicial review of
administrative adjustments by the IRS and tax settlement
proceedings. The tax treatment of partnership items of income,
gain, loss and deduction are determined in a partnership
proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with the
partners. The Internal Revenue Code requires that one partner be
designated as the Tax Matters Partner for these
purposes. The partnership agreement names our general partner as
our Tax Matters Partner.
The Tax Matters Partner will make some elections on our behalf
and on behalf of unitholders. In addition, the Tax Matters
Partner can extend the statute of limitations for assessment of
tax deficiencies against unitholders for items in our returns.
The Tax Matters Partner may bind a unitholder with less than a
1% profits interest in us to a settlement with the IRS unless
that unitholder elects, by filing a statement with the IRS, not
to give that authority to the Tax Matters Partner. The Tax
Matters Partner may seek judicial review, by which all the
unitholders are bound, of a final partnership administrative
adjustment and, if the Tax Matters Partner fails to seek
judicial review, judicial review may be sought by any unitholder
having at least a 1% interest in profits or by any group of
unitholders having in the aggregate at least a 5% interest in
profits. However, only one action for judicial review will go
forward, and each unitholder with an interest in the outcome may
participate.
A unitholder must file a statement with the IRS identifying the
treatment of any item on his federal income tax return that is
not consistent with the treatment of the item on our return.
Intentional or negligent disregard of this consistency
requirement may subject a unitholder to substantial penalties.
Nominee Reporting. Persons who hold an interest in us as a
nominee for another person are required to furnish to us:
|
|
|
(a) the name, address and taxpayer identification number of
the beneficial owner and the nominee; |
|
|
(b) whether the beneficial owner is |
|
|
|
(1) a person that is not a United States person, |
|
|
(2) a foreign government, an international organization or
any wholly owned agency or instrumentality of either of the
foregoing, or |
|
|
(3) a tax-exempt entity; |
|
|
|
(c) the amount and description of units held, acquired or
transferred for the beneficial owner; and |
|
|
(d) specific information including the dates of
acquisitions and transfers, means of acquisitions and transfers,
and acquisition cost for purchases, as well as the amount of net
proceeds from sales. |
Brokers and financial institutions are required to furnish
additional information, including whether they are United States
persons and specific information on units they acquire, hold or
transfer for their own account. A penalty of $50 per
failure, up to a maximum of $100,000 per calendar year, is
imposed by the Internal Revenue Code for failure to report that
information to us. The nominee is required to supply the
beneficial owner of the units with the information furnished to
us.
Accuracy-related Penalties. An additional tax equal to
20% of the amount of any portion of an underpayment of tax that
is attributable to one or more specified causes, including
negligence or disregard of rules or regulations, substantial
understatements of income tax and substantial valuation
misstatements,
52
is imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. No penalty will be
imposed, however, for any portion of an underpayment if it is
shown that there was a reasonable cause for that portion and
that the taxpayer acted in good faith regarding that portion.
A substantial understatement of income tax in any taxable year
exists if the amount of the understatement exceeds the greater
of 10% of the tax required to be shown on the return for the
taxable year or $5,000 ($10,000 for most corporations). The
amount of any understatement subject to penalty generally is
reduced if any portion is attributable to a position adopted on
the return:
|
|
|
(1) for which there is, or was, substantial
authority, or |
|
|
(2) as to which there is a reasonable basis and the
pertinent facts of that position are disclosed on the return. |
More stringent rules, including additional penalties and
extended statutes of limitations, may apply as a result of our
participation in listed transactions or
reportable transactions with a significant tax-avoidance
purpose. While we do not anticipate participating in such
transactions, if any item of income, gain, loss or deduction
included in the distributive shares of unitholders for a given
year might result in an understatement of income
relating to such a transaction, we will disclose the pertinent
facts on our return. In addition, we will make a reasonable
effort to furnish such information for unitholders to make
adequate disclosure on their returns and to take other actions
as may be appropriate to permit unitholders to avoid liability
for penalties.
A substantial valuation misstatement exists if the value of any
property, or the adjusted basis of any property, claimed on a
tax return is 200% or more of the amount determined to be the
correct amount of the valuation or adjusted basis. No penalty is
imposed unless the portion of the underpayment attributable to a
substantial valuation misstatement exceeds $5,000 ($10,000 for
most corporations). If the valuation claimed on a return is 400%
or more than the correct valuation, the penalty imposed
increases to 40%.
State, Local, Foreign and Other Tax Considerations
In addition to federal income taxes, you will likely be subject
to other taxes, including state, local and foreign income taxes,
unincorporated business taxes, and estate, inheritance or
intangible taxes that may be imposed by the various
jurisdictions in which we do business or own property or in
which you are a resident. Although an analysis of those various
taxes is not presented here, each prospective unitholder should
consider their potential impact on his investment in us. You
will be required to file state income tax returns and to pay
state income taxes in some or all of the states in which we do
business or own property and may be subject to penalties for
failure to comply with those requirements. In some states, tax
losses may not produce a tax benefit in the year incurred and
also may not be available to offset income in subsequent taxable
years. Some of the states may require us, or we may elect, to
withhold a percentage of income from amounts to be distributed
to a unitholder who is not a resident of the state. Withholding,
the amount of which may be greater or less than a particular
unitholders income tax liability to the state, generally
does not relieve a nonresident unitholder from the obligation to
file an income tax return. Amounts withheld may be treated as if
distributed to unitholders for purposes of determining the
amounts distributed by us. Please read Tax
Consequences of Unit Ownership
Entity-Level Collections. Based on current law and
our estimate of our future operations, our general partner
anticipates that any amounts required to be withheld will not be
material. We may also own property or do business in other
states in the future.
It is the responsibility of each unitholder to investigate
the legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent
jurisdictions, of his investment in us. Accordingly, we strongly
recommend that each prospective unitholder consult, and
depend upon, his own tax counsel or other advisor with regard
to those matters. Further, it is the responsibility of each
unitholder to file all state, local, and foreign as well as
United States federal tax returns, that may be required of him.
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has not rendered an opinion on
the state, local or foreign tax consequences of an investment in
us.
53
Tax Consequences of Ownership of Debt Securities
A description of the material federal income tax consequences of
the acquisition, ownership and disposition of debt securities
will be set forth in the prospectus supplement relating to the
offering of debt securities.
SELLING UNITHOLDERS
In addition to covering our offering of securities, this
prospectus covers the offering for resale of up to 41,000,000
common units by selling unitholders. As used in this prospectus,
selling unitholders includes donees, pledgees,
transferees or other
successors-in-interest
selling units received after the date of this prospectus from a
named selling unitholder as a gift, pledge, partnership
distribution or other non-sale related transfer. The selling
unitholders may sell all, some or none of the common units
covered by this prospectus. See Plan of
Distribution Distribution by Selling
Unitholders. We will bear all costs, expenses and fees in
connection with the registration of the units offered by this
prospectus. Brokerage commissions and similar selling expenses,
if any, attributable to the sale of the units will be borne by
the selling unitholders. The following table sets forth
information relating to the selling unitholders beneficial
ownership of our common units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number and % |
|
|
|
Number and % |
|
|
of Outstanding |
|
|
|
of Outstanding |
|
|
Common Units |
|
|
|
Common Units |
|
|
Beneficially Owned |
|
Number of |
|
Owned after |
|
|
Prior to Completion |
|
Common Units |
|
Completion of |
Name of Selling Unitholder |
|
of Offering |
|
Offered Hereunder |
|
Offering |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shell US Gas & Power LLC
|
|
|
36,572,122 |
|
|
|
36,572,122 |
|
|
|
-0- |
|
|
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company
|
|
|
5,228,093 |
|
|
|
4,427,878 |
|
|
|
800,215 |
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Prior to December 29, 2004, Shell US Gas & Power
LLC, an affiliate of Shell Oil Company, owned 41,000,000 common
units that it had acquired from us in 1999 in connection with
its sale to us of its natural gas processing and related
businesses. In that transaction Shell also acquired a 30%
interest in our general partner, which it subsequently sold to a
subsidiary of EPCO on September 12, 2003. Prior to
Shells sale of its 30% interest in our general partner,
the board of directors of our general partner consisted of ten
members, three of which were designated by Shell, and certain
extraordinary transactions, such as mergers, large acquisitions
or dispositions and other transactions required the approval of
at least one of the Shell designees. The Shell designees
resigned from the board of directors of our general partner on
September 12, 2003.
Shell and its affiliates are one of our largest customers. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, Shell accounted for
approximately 7.3%, 5.5%, 7.9% and 10.6%, respectively, of our
consolidated revenues. Our revenues from Shell primarily reflect
the sale of NGL and petrochemical products to Shell and the fees
we charge Shell for natural gas processing, pipeline
transportation and NGL fractionation services. Our operating
costs and expenses with Shell primarily reflect the payment of
energy-related expenses related to the Shell natural gas
processing agreement described below and the purchase of NGL
products from Shell. We also lease from Shell its 45.4% interest
in one of our propylene fractionation facilities located in Mont
Belvieu, Texas.
The most significant contract affecting our natural gas
processing business is the Shell margin-band/keepwhole
processing agreement, which grants us the right to process
Shells current and future production within state and
federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico. The Shell processing
agreement includes a life of lease dedication, which may extend
the agreement well beyond its initial
20-year term ending in
54
2019. This contract was amended effective April 1,
2004. In general, the amended contract includes the following
rights and obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
the exclusive right, but not the obligation in all cases, to
process substantially all of Shells Gulf of Mexico natural
gas production; plus |
|
|
|
the exclusive right, but not the obligation in all cases, to
process all natural gas production from leases dedicated by
Shell for the life of such leases; plus |
|
|
|
the right to all title, interest and ownership in the mixed NGL
stream extracted by our gas processing plants from Shells
natural gas production from such leases; with |
|
|
|
the obligation to re-deliver to Shell the natural gas stream
after any mixed NGLs are extracted. |
The amended contract contains a mechanism (termed
Consideration Adjustment Outside of Normal
Operations or CAONO) to adjust the value of
the compensation we pay to Shell for (i) the NGLs we
extract and (ii) the natural gas we consume as fuel. The
CAONO, in effect, protects us from processing Shells
natural gas at an economic loss when the value of the mixed NGLs
we extract is less than the sum of the cost of the compensation,
operating costs of the gas processing facility and other costs
such as NGL fractionation and pipeline fees.
The following table summarizes our various transactions with
Shell for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the
years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from consolidated operations from Shell
|
|
$ |
397,805 |
|
|
$ |
293,109 |
|
|
$ |
282,820 |
|
|
$ |
333,333 |
|
Operating costs and expenses paid to Shell
|
|
$ |
536,284 |
|
|
$ |
607,277 |
|
|
$ |
531,712 |
|
|
$ |
705,440 |
|
Kayne Anderson MLP Investment Company has had no material
relationship with us or our affiliates within the last three
years. The 4,427,878 common units that may be offered hereunder
by Kayne Anderson were acquired by Kayne Anderson from Shell on
December 29, 2004 pursuant to a Purchase Agreement dated
December 28, 2004. Under the terms of that Purchase
Agreement, Shell granted Kayne Anderson an option to purchase an
additional number of common units from Shell, which additional
units (if so purchased) may also be offered by Kayne Anderson
hereunder. If Kayne Anderson exercises that purchase option, we
will file a prospectus supplement to this prospectus that
reflects that change in ownership of those common units from
Shell to Kayne Anderson.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
We may sell the common units or debt securities directly,
through agents, or to or through underwriters or dealers. Please
read the prospectus supplement to find the terms of the common
unit or debt securities offering including:
|
|
|
|
|
the names of any underwriters, dealers or agents; |
|
|
|
the offering price; |
|
|
|
underwriting discounts; |
|
|
|
sales agents commissions; |
|
|
|
other forms of underwriter or agent compensation; |
|
|
|
discounts, concessions or commissions that underwriters may pass
on to other dealers; and |
|
|
|
any exchange on which the common units or debt securities are
listed. |
55
We may designate agents who agree to use their reasonable
efforts to solicit purchases for the period of their appointment
or to sell securities on a continuing basis. We may engage
Brinson Patrick Securities Corporation and/or Cantor
Fitzgerald & Co. to act as our agent for one or more
offerings, from time to time, of our common units. If we reach
agreement with Brinson Patrick and/or Cantor with respect to a
specific offering, including the number of common units and any
minimum price below which sales may not be made, then Brinson
Patrick and/or Cantor, as the case may be, would agree to use
its reasonable efforts, consistent with its normal trading and
sales practices, to sell such common units on the agreed terms.
Brinson Patrick and/or Cantor could make sales in privately
negotiated transactions and/or any other method permitted by
law, including sales deemed to be an at the market
offering as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, including sales made on or through the
facilities of the New York Stock Exchange or sales made to or
through a market maker other than on an exchange. Brinson
Patrick and/or Cantor, as the case may be, will be deemed to be
an underwriter within the meaning of the Securities
Act, with respect to any sales effected through an at the
market offering, and the compensation paid to Brinson
Patrick and/or Cantor, as the case may be, with respect to such
sales will be deemed to be underwriting commissions or
discounts. Any commissions so paid will be set forth in a
prospectus supplement relating thereto.
We may change the offering price, underwriter discounts or
concessions, or the price to dealers when necessary. Discounts
or commissions received by underwriters or agents and any
profits on the resale of common units or debt securities by them
may constitute underwriting discounts and commissions under the
Securities Act.
Unless we state otherwise in the prospectus supplement,
underwriters will need to meet certain requirements before
purchasing common units or debt securities. Agents will act on a
best efforts basis during their appointment. We will
also state the net proceeds from the sale in the prospectus
supplement.
Any brokers or dealers that participate in the distribution of
the common units or debt securities may be
underwriters within the meaning of the Securities
Act for such sales. Profits, commissions, discounts or
concessions received by such broker or dealer may be
underwriting discounts and commissions under the securities act.
When necessary, we may fix common unit or debt securities
distribution using changeable, fixed prices, market prices at
the time of sale, prices related to market prices, or negotiated
prices.
We may, through agreements, indemnify underwriters, dealers or
agents who participate in the distribution of the common units
or debt securities against certain liabilities including
liabilities under the Securities Act. We may also provide funds
for payments such underwriters, dealers or agents may be
required to make. Underwriters, dealers and agents, and their
affiliates may transact with us and our affiliates in the
ordinary course of their business.
Distribution by Selling Unitholders
Distributions of the common units by the selling unitholders, or
by their partners, pledgees, donees (including charitable
organizations), transferees or other successors in interest, may
from time to time be offered for sale either directly by such
person or entities, or through underwriters, dealers or agents
or on any exchange on which the common units may from time to
time be traded, in the
over-the-counter
market, or in independently negotiated transactions or
otherwise. The methods by which the common units may be sold
include:
|
|
|
|
|
a block trade (which may involve crosses) in which the broker or
dealer so engaged will attempt to sell the securities as agent
but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal
to facilitate the transaction; |
|
|
|
purchases by a broker or dealer as principal and resale by such
broker or dealer for its own account pursuant to this prospectus; |
|
|
|
exchange distributions and/or secondary distributions; |
56
|
|
|
|
|
underwritten transactions; |
|
|
|
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the
broker solicits purchasers; and |
|
|
|
direct sales or privately negotiated transactions. |
Such transactions may be effected by the selling unitholder at
market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated
prices. The selling unitholders may effect such transactions by
selling the common units to underwriters or to or through
broker-dealers, and such underwriters or broker-dealers may
receive compensation in the form of discounts or commissions
from the selling unitholders and may receive commissions from
the purchasers of the common units for whom they may act as
agent.
In connection with sales of the common units under this
prospectus, the selling unitholders may enter into hedging
transactions with broker-dealers, who may in turn engage in
short sales of the common units in the course of hedging the
positions they assume. The selling unitholders also may engage
in short sales, short sales against the box, puts and calls and
other transactions in common units, or derivatives thereof, and
may sell and deliver their common units in connection therewith,
or loan or pledge the common units to broker-dealers that in
turn may sell them. In addition, the selling unitholders may
from time to time sell their common units in transactions
permitted by Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
The selling unitholders may agree to indemnify any underwriter,
broker-dealer or agent that participates in transactions
involving sales of the common units against certain liabilities,
including liabilities arising under the Securities Act. We have
agreed to register the common units for sale under the
Securities Act and to indemnify the selling unitholders against
certain civil liabilities, including certain liabilities under
the Securities Act.
As of the date of this prospectus, neither we nor any selling
unitholder has engaged any underwriter, broker, dealer or agent
in connection with the distribution of common units pursuant to
this prospectus by the selling unitholders. To the extent
required, the number of common units to be sold, the purchase
price, the name of any applicable agent, broker, dealer or
underwriter and any applicable commissions with respect to a
particular offer will be set forth in the applicable prospectus
supplement. The aggregate net proceeds to the selling
unitholders from the sale of their common units offered hereby
will be the sale price of those shares, less any commissions, if
any, and other expenses of issuance and distribution not borne
by us.
The selling unitholders and any brokers, dealers, agents or
underwriters that participate with the selling unitholders in
the distribution of shares may be deemed to be
underwriters within the meaning of the Securities
Act, in which event any discounts, concessions and commissions
received by such brokers, dealers, agents or underwriters and
any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be
deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions under the
Securities Act.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, and other
information with the Commission under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Securities Exchange
Act). You may read and copy any document we file at the
Commissions public reference room at 450 Fifth
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the
Commission at
1-800-732-0330 for
further information on the public reference room. Our filings
are also available to the public at the Commissions web
site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, documents filed by us
can be inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10002.
The Commission allows us to incorporate by reference into this
prospectus the information we file with it, which means that we
can disclose important information to you by referring you to
those documents. The information incorporated by reference is
considered to be part of this prospectus, and later information
that we file with the Commission will automatically update and
supersede this information. Therefore, before you decide to
invest in a particular offering under this shelf registration,
you should always check for reports we may have filed with the
Commission after the date of this prospectus. We
57
incorporate by reference the documents listed below filed by us
and any future filings we make with the Commission under
sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act until our offering is completed (other than information
furnished under Item 9 or Item 12 of any
Form 8-K
that is listed below, or under Item 2.02 or Item 2.02
or Item 7.01 of any
Form 8-K filed
after August 23, 2004 that is listed below or that is filed
in the future, which information is not deemed filed under the
Exchange Act).
|
|
|
|
|
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003 except for
Items 1, 2, 7 and 8, which have been superseded
by the Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on December 6, 2004, Commission File
No. 1-14323; |
|
|
|
Our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Commission on
March 15, 2005, Commission File
No. 1-14323;
|
|
|
|
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the
quarters ended March 31, 2004, June 30, 2004 and
September 30, 2004, Commission File Nos. 1-14323; |
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on December 15, 2003, January 6,
2004, February 10, 2004, March 22, 2004,
April 16, 2004, April 20, 2004, April 21, 2004,
April 26, 2004, April 27, 2004, May 3, 2004,
July 29, 2004, August 2, 2004, August 5, 2004,
August 11, 2004, August 30, 2004, September 1,
2004, September 7, 2004, September 8, 2004,
September 14, 2004, September 17, 2004,
September 21, 2004, September 27, 2004,
September 28, 2004, October 1, 2004, October 6,
2004, October 27, 2004, December 6, 2004,
December 15, 2004, January 4, 2005, January 18,
2005, February 11, 2005, February 14, 2005,
February 16, 2005, March 3, 2005 and March 23,
2005, Commission File Nos. 1-14323; |
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on June 16, 2004, as amended by the
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
(Amendment No. 1) filed with the Commission on
August 4, 2004, Commission File Nos. 1-14323; |
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on August 2, 2004, as amended by the
Current Report on
Form 8-K/A
(Amendment No. 1) filed with the Commission on
August 5, 2004, Commission File Nos. 1-14323; |
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the Commission on September 30, 2004, as amended by
the Current Reports on
Form 8-K/A filed
with the Commission on October 5, 2004 (Amendment
No. 1), October 18, 2004 (Amendment No. 2),
December 3, 2004 (Amendment No. 3), December 6,
2004 (Amendment No. 4) and December 27, 2004
(Amendment No. 5), Commission File Nos. 1-14323; and |
|
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
(containing the description of our common units, which
description amends and restates the description of our common
units contained in the Registration Statement on Form 8-A,
initially filed with the Commission on July 21, 1998) filed
with the Commission on February 10, 2004, Commission File
No. 1-14323.
|
We will provide without charge to each person, including any
beneficial owner, to whom this prospectus is delivered, upon
written or oral request, a copy of any document incorporated by
reference in this prospectus, other than exhibits to any such
document not specifically described above. Requests for such
documents should be directed to Investor Relations, Enterprise
Products Partners L.P., 2727 North Loop West, Suite 700,
Houston, Texas 77008-1038; telephone number: (713) 880-6812.
We intend to furnish or make available to our unitholders within
75 days (or such shorter period as the Commission may
prescribe) following the close of our fiscal year end annual
reports containing audited financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
furnish or make available within 40 days (or such shorter
period as the Commission may prescribe) following the close of
each fiscal quarter quarterly reports containing unaudited
interim financial information, including the information
required by
Form 10-Q, for the
first three fiscal quarters of each of our fiscal years. Our
annual report will include a description of any transactions
with our general partner or its affiliates, and of fees,
commissions, compensation and other benefits paid, or accrued to
our general partner or its affiliates
58
for the fiscal year completed, including the amount paid or
accrued to each recipient and the services performed.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus and some of the documents we incorporate by
reference contain various forward-looking statements and
information that are based on our beliefs and those of our
general partner, as well as assumptions made by and information
currently available to us. These forward-looking statements are
identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to
historical or current facts. When used in this prospectus or the
documents we have incorporated herein or therein by reference,
words such as anticipate, project,
expect, plan, goal,
forecast, intend, could,
believe, may, and similar expressions
and statements regarding our plans and objectives for future
operations, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Although we and our general partner believe that such
expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are
reasonable, neither we nor our general partner can give
assurances that such expectations will prove to be correct. Such
statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties
materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our
actual results may vary materially from those anticipated,
estimated, projected or expected. Among the key risk factors
that may have a direct bearing on our results of operations and
financial condition are:
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in oil, natural gas and NGL prices and production
due to weather and other natural and economic forces; |
|
|
|
a reduction in demand for our products by the petrochemical,
refining or heating industries; |
|
|
|
the effects of our debt level on our future financial and
operating flexibility; |
|
|
|
a decline in the volumes of NGLs delivered by our facilities; |
|
|
|
the failure of our credit risk management efforts to adequately
protect us against customer non-payment; |
|
|
|
terrorist attacks aimed at our facilities; |
|
|
|
the failure to successfully integrate our operations with
GulfTerras or any other companies we acquire; and |
|
|
|
the failure to realize the anticipated cost savings, synergies
and other benefits of our merger with GulfTerra. |
You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements. When considering forward-looking statements, please
review the risk factors described under Risk Factors
in this prospectus and any prospectus supplement.
LEGAL MATTERS
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., our counsel, will issue an
opinion for us about the legality of the common units and debt
securities and the material federal income tax considerations
regarding the common units. Any underwriter will be advised
about other issues relating to any offering by their own legal
counsel. Attorneys at Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. who have
participated in the preparation of this prospectus and the
registration statement of which it is a part beneficially own
approximately 3,200 common units of Enterprise.
59
EXPERTS
The (1) consolidated financial statements and the related
consolidated financial statement schedule of Enterprise Products
Partners L.P. and subsidiaries as incorporated in this
prospectus, by reference from Enterprise Products Partners
L.P.s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6,
2004, and (2) the balance sheet of Enterprise Products GP,
LLC as of December 31, 2003, incorporated in this
prospectus supplement by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.s Current Report on
Form 8-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22,
2004, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their reports, which are incorporated herein by reference (each
such report expresses an unqualified opinion and the report for
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. includes an explanatory
paragraph referring to a change in method of accounting for
goodwill in 2002 and derivative instruments in 2001 as discussed
in Notes 8 and 1, respectively, to Enterprise Products
Partners L.P.s consolidated financial statements), and
have been so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such
firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and
auditing.
The (1) consolidated financial statements of GulfTerra
Energy Partners, L.P. (GulfTerra), (2) the
financial statements of Poseidon Oil Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
(Poseidon) and (3) the combined financial
statements of El Paso Hydrocarbons, L.P. and El Paso
NGL Marketing Company, L.P. (the Companies) all
incorporated in this prospectus by reference to Enterprise
Products Partners L.P.s Current Reports on
Form 8-K dated
April 20, 2004 for (1) and (2) and April 16,
2004 for (3), have been so incorporated in reliance on the
reports (which (i) report on the consolidated financial
statements of GulfTerra contains an explanatory paragraph
relating to GulfTerras agreement to merge with Enterprise
Products Partners L.P. as described in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements, (ii) report on the
financial statements of Poseidon contains an explanatory
paragraph relating to Poseidons restatement of its prior
year financial statements as described in Note 1 to the
financial statements, and (iii) report on the combined
financial statements of the Companies contains an explanatory
paragraph relating to the Companies significant
transactions and relationships with affiliated entities as
described in Note 5 to the combined financial statements)
of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts
in auditing and accounting.
Information derived from the report of Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum
engineers and geologists, with respect to GulfTerras
estimated oil and natural gas reserves incorporated in this
prospectus by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K dated
April 20, 2004 has been so incorporated in reliance on the
authority of said firm as experts with respect to such matters
contained in their report.
60
15,000,000 Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests