OMB APPROVAL
	OMB Number:	3235-0059
	Expires:	January 31, 2008
	Estimated average burden hours per response	14.

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant To Section 14(a) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ___)

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		CONFIDENTIAL, FOR USE OF THE COMMISSION ONLY (AS PERMITTED BY RULE 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials

GLACIER BANCORP, INC.

(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ		Fee not required.
o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

	(1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)		Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)		Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)		Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)		Total fee paid:

SEC 1913 (04-05)		Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.

o		Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o		Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

	(1)		Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)		Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)		Filing Party:
	(4)		Date Filed:

GLACIER BANCORP, INC.
49 Commons Loop
Kalispell, Montana 59901

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held April 27, 2011
9:00 a.m. Mountain Time

To the Shareholders of Glacier Bancorp, Inc:

     We cordially invite you to attend the 2011 Annual Shareholders Meeting of Glacier Bancorp, Inc., at The Hilton Garden Inn, 1840 Highway 93 South, Kalispell, Montana. The meeting’s purpose is to vote on the following proposals, together with any other business that may properly come before the meeting:

	1.		To elect 10 directors to serve on the Board of Directors until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
	2.		To vote on an advisory (non-binding) resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.
	3.		To vote, in an advisory (non-binding) capacity, on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s executive officers.
	4.		To ratify the appointment of BKD, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.
	5.		To transact such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements.

     If you were a shareholder of record on March 1, 2011, you may vote on the proposals presented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy. We encourage you to promptly complete and return the enclosed proxy card or phone in your vote, in order to ensure that your shares will be represented and voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. If you attend the meeting in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote your shares.

     Further information regarding voting rights and the business to be transacted at the Annual Meeting is included in the accompanying Proxy Statement. The directors, officers, and employees who serve you genuinely appreciate your continued interest and support as a shareholder in the affairs of the Company and in its growth and development.

March 29, 2011		BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
		LeeAnn Wardinsky, Secretary

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING			1
Voting on Matters Presented			1
Voting in Person at the Annual Meeting			3
PROPOSAL NO. 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS			3
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			6
Corporate Governance Guidelines			6
Board Leadership Structure			6
Director Qualifications			6
Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Documents			7
Director Independence			7
Stock Ownership Guidelines			7
Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors			8
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS			8
Board Authority for Risk Oversight			8
Committee Membership			8
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS			11
2010 Director Compensation			11
Cash Compensation			12
Equity Compensation			12
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			12
Compensation Discussion and Analysis			13
Executive Compensation Philosophy			13
Process for Determining Compensation			14
Discussion of Executive Compensation Components			15
2010 Executive Compensation for Named Executive Officers			18
Employee Stock Plans			22
Post Employment and Termination Benefits			23
Employment Arrangements			24
MANAGEMENT			27
Executive Officers who are not Directors			27
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT			28
Beneficial Owners			29
PROPOSAL NO. 2 - ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			30
PROPOSAL NO. 3 - ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF SHAREHOLDER VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			31

		Page
AUDITORS			31
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			31
Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors			32
PROPOSAL NO. 4 - RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM			34
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) FILING REQUIREMENTS			34
TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT			34
Certain Transactions			34
Accounting Fees Paid to Affiliate of Director			35
OTHER BUSINESS			35
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS			35
Shareholder Proposals			35
Director Nominations			35
Copy of Bylaw Provisions			36
ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS			36
DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO SHAREHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS			36

GLACIER BANCORP, INC.
49 Commons Loop
Kalispell, Montana 59901
(406) 756-4200

PROXY STATEMENT

     Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2011 Shareholder Meeting:

     A copy of this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2010, are available at www.glacierbancorp.com.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING

     Meeting Information. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying Proxy are being sent to shareholders on or about March 29, 2011, for use in connection with the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Glacier Bancorp, Inc., (the “Company” or “Glacier”) to be held on Wednesday, April 27, 2011. In this Proxy Statement, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Glacier Bancorp, Inc.

     Solicitation of Proxies. Our Board of Directors is soliciting shareholder proxies, and we will pay the associated costs. Solicitation may be made by our directors and officers and by our banking subsidiaries:

•    Glacier Bank of Kalispell		•    Valley Bank of Helena
•    Mountain West Bank of Coeur d’Alene		•    First National Bank & Trust of Powell
•    First Security Bank of Missoula		•    Citizens Community Bank of Pocatello
•    1st Bank of Evanston		•    First Bank of Montana (Lewistown)
•    Western Security Bank of Billings		•    Bank of the San Juans (Durango)
•    Big Sky Western Bank of Bozeman

     We do not expect to engage an outside proxy solicitation firm to render proxy solicitation services. However, if we do, we will pay a fee for such services. Solicitation may be made through the mail, or by telephone, facsimile, or personal interview.

     Record Date. If you were a shareholder on March 1, 2011, you are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. There were approximately 71,915,073 shares of common stock outstanding on the Record Date.

     Quorum. The quorum requirement for holding the Annual Meeting and transacting business is a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to be voted. The shares may be present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes (as defined below) are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

Voting on Matters Presented

     Proposal No. 1 -Election of Directors. The ten director nominees who receive the highest number of affirmative votes will be elected. Shareholders are not permitted to cumulate their votes for the election of directors. Votes may be cast FOR or WITHHELD from each nominee. Votes that are withheld and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

     Proposal No. 2 — Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Executive Compensation. The affirmative vote FOR by a majority of those shares present in person or by proxy and voting on this matter is required to approve the advisory (non-binding) resolution on the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. You

may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN from approving the advisory (non-binding) resolution on executive compensation. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

     Proposal No. 3 — Advisory (Non-Binding) Vote on Frequency of Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation. Shareholders must vote, in an advisory (non-binding) capacity, whether future advisory votes on executive compensation will occur every one, two or three years. The frequency receiving the greatest number of votes (every one, two or three years) will be considered the frequency recommended by shareholders. Shareholders may also abstain from voting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

     For the reasons discussed under “Proposal No. 3” on page 31, the Board of Directors has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is the most appropriate alternative for the Company. Therefore, the Board recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for advisory votes on executive compensation.

     Proposal No. 4 — Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The proposal to ratify the appointment of BKD, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 will be adopted if a majority of the votes are present and entitled to vote are cast FOR the proposal. You may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN from approving the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposal.

     Voting of Proxies. Shares represented by properly executed proxies that are received in time and not revoked will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated on the proxies. If no instructions are indicated, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares represented by the proxy FOR the director nominees listed in this Proxy Statement and FOR the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm. Any proxy given by a shareholder may be revoked before its exercise by:

	•		giving notice to us in writing;
	•		delivering to us a subsequently dated proxy; or
	•		notifying us at the Annual Meeting before the shareholder vote is taken.

     Voting of Proxies by Shareholders of Record and by Beneficial Owners. A significant percentage of Glacier shareholders hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are some differences between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

     Shareholders of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with Glacier’s transfer agent, American Stock Transfer, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent to you directly by Glacier. As the shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to Glacier or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card for you to use.

     Beneficial Owner. If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, the shareholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote. Your broker or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for you to use in directing your broker or nominee as to how to vote your shares.

     Brokers cannot vote on behalf of beneficial owners on “non-routine” proposals (known as broker non-votes). Generally, broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker for a beneficial owner are

not voted with respect to a particular proposal because (i) the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and (ii) the broker lacks discretionary voting power to vote such shares.

     If your shares are held in street name and you do not submit voting instructions to your broker, your broker may vote your shares at this meeting on the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm only. If no instructions are given with respect to the election of directors, approval of the (non-binding) resolution on executive compensation or advisory (non-binding) vote on the frequency of future shareholder advisory votes on the Company’s executive compensation, your broker cannot vote your shares on these proposals.

Voting in Person at the Annual Meeting

     Shareholders of Record. Shares held directly in your name as the shareholder of record may be voted in person at the Annual Meeting. If you choose to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, please bring the enclosed proxy card or proof of identification. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

     Beneficial Owner. Shares held in street name may be voted in person by you only if you bring an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on the record date.

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     Information regarding each of the nominees is provided below, including each nominee’s name, age as of January 26, 2011, principal occupation and public company directorships during the past five years, and the year first elected or appointed as a director of Glacier. All of the nominees are presently directors of Glacier. Information regarding the amount and nature of each nominee’s ownership of Glacier common stock is provided under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Ownership and Management.”

     At the Annual Meeting, Ms. Sherry Cladouhos, who was appointed to the board of directors in October 2010, will stand for election. Mr. Jon Hippler, who has served on the board of directors since 2000, is retiring effective at the Annual Meeting and will not stand for re-election.

     Michael J. Blodnick, 58, is a graduate of the University of Montana, the Pacific Coast Banking School and the Sheshunoff Professional Master of Banking School. He has broad experience having worked in all aspects of banking during his career. Mr. Blodnick has been employed by the Company or Glacier Bank since 1978. He served as the Secretary of the Company in 1993 and was appointed Executive Vice President in 1994. In July of 1998 he was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Glacier Bancorp. He currently serves as a director of the following Company subsidiaries: Mountain West Bank and First Security Bank. Mr. Blodnick brings leadership skills, his long career in the banking industry, and his 33-year tenure at Glacier, which enable him to advise the Board in its deliberations on a wide variety of topics.

     Sherry L. Cladouhos, 55, was appointed to the Glacier Board in October 2010. She was employed by the Blue Cross Blue Shield Montana for 36 years and served in a variety of leadership and executive roles, including Director of Customer Service and Administration, Vice President of Member Services and Support, Senior Vice President of Marketing and Operations, Co-Chief Operating Officer,

and in 2005 was named President and CEO. She was responsible for the overall strategic direction of the company and worked with others to provide affordable healthcare coverage to Montanans. Ms. Cladouhos is a Certified Health Insurance Executive and is a graduate of the Berkeley Healthcare Executive Program. Ms. Cladouhos also served on the boards of numerous business and community-related organizations and currently serves on the Montana Chamber of Commerce Board as past Chairman and the Montana Meth Board. Ms. Cladouhos brings extensive experience in executive level leadership and strategic business decision-making to the Board.

     James M. English, 66, was appointed to the Glacier Board in February 2004. He has also served as a Director for the Company’s subsidiary, Mountain West Bank of Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, since 1996. He earned a BS Degree in Finance and then a Law Degree from the University of Idaho. From 1996-2000 Mr. English served as the President and Chief Operating Officer for Idaho Forest Industries, Inc., a lumber manufacturing, real estate development and building products retail sales company. Mr. English has been an attorney in limited private practice as a sole practitioner of the English Law Firm in Hayden, Idaho, since 2000. He is a partner in Great Sky Development of Boise, Idaho, sits on the board of Bennett Industries, Inc., and also serves on the board of a non-profit organization. Mr. English brings experience and expertise to the Board based on a legal career of over 40 years and experience as a business executive.

     Allen J. Fetscher, 65, was appointed to the Glacier Board in December 1996. He serves as the Chairman of the Company’s Compensation Committee. He also serves as the Vice-Chairman of Glacier Bancorp’s subsidiary, First Security Bank, where he served as Chairman of the Board from its beginning in 1993 through its merger with the Company in 1996 until his resignation from the office in 2008. Mr. Fetscher received a BS degree in Business Administration from the University of Montana in 1968. He is the President of Fetscher’s, Inc., an investment and real estate development company. He is also the Vice President of American Public Land Exchange Co., Inc., and the owner of Associated Agency, a company involved in real estate. Mr. Fetscher has been in the real estate development business since 1970. During the last 40 years he has developed subdivisions, office buildings, apartment complexes and mixed use developments, primarily in Montana. Mr. Fetscher brings extensive knowledge of local and regional real estate markets and development to the Board.

     Dallas I. Herron, 66, was appointed to the Glacier Board in June 2008. Mr. Herron had previously served as a director of Glacier’s subsidiary, Glacier Bank, from 1998 through 2008. He received his BS degree in Aeronautical Engineering from Northrop University in 1966. Mr. Herron has worked in the oil industry for 40 years and is the CEO of CityServiceValcon, LLC, which markets petroleum products in Montana, Idaho, Washington and ten other states. He is a past president of the Western Petroleum Marketing Association, a seven-state trade association. He serves on Chevron’s Western U.S. Advisory Council. He has also served as Senior Director of the Petroleum Marketer Association of America. Mr. Herron is active in the community, forest products and transportation industries. As our banks become more involved in the energy business, Mr. Herron brings to the Board over 30 years of experience in the energy sector, which is also a regulated business, and also his experience as a business executive.

     Craig A. Langel, 60, was appointed to the Glacier Board in December 2005. He was appointed Chair of the Audit Committee following Mr. Sliter’s resignation from the Committee in 2009. Mr. Langel received his education at Montana State University graduating with a BS degree in Accounting in 1973. He received his CPA license in 1974. Mr. Langel has served the accounting profession for 37 years and is a Certified Public Accountant Accredited in Business Valuation and a Certified Valuation Analyst. He is president and shareholder of Langel & Associates, P.C., providing consulting and tax services throughout the United States. Through the auspices of Western CPE, Mr. Langel also teaches continuing education courses for Certified Public Accountants including annual tax updates, tax planning,

valuation issues, and business advisory services. In addition, Mr. Langel is the owner and CEO of CLC Restaurants, Inc., which owns and operates Taco Bell and KFC restaurants in Montana, Idaho, and Washington, and a part owner of Mustard Seed Restaurants. Mr. Langel served as a director of Glacier’s subsidiary, First Security Bank from 1984-2005, and was re-elected to the board in February 2009. He also serves on the boards of two non-profit organizations. With a career of over 30 years as a Certified Public Accountant, Mr. Langel brings extensive financial acumen to the Board, in addition to his experience as a business owner and executive.

     L. Peter Larson, 72, has served as a director of Glacier Bancorp and/or Glacier Bank since 1985. He is the Chairman of the Company’s Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Larson received a BS degree in 1961 from Principia College in Illinois. He was the Owner/CEO/COO of several small forest products companies, including L. Peter Larson Co. and American Timber Company, until his retirement in 2002. He has served on the boards of directors of a number of non-profit organizations during his career. Currently he is serving on the Northwest Healthcare Board of Trustees and The HealthCenter Board of Managers. Mr. Larson brings to the Board extensive experience in management, including expertise in purchasing, marketing, human resources, distribution and accounting.

     Douglas J. McBride, 58, was appointed to the Glacier Board in September 2006. Dr. McBride has been an optometrist in Billings for 32 years. He received his BA at Linfield College and his OD at the Illinois College of Optometry graduating in 1978. Dr. McBride is the former President of the Montana State Board of Examiners for Optometry, of which he has been a member since 1993. He is also the former chairman of the Advisory Board for TLC Laser Eye Center in Billings and is the current administrator for the State of Montana for Vision Source, an optometric franchise. He is a past President of the Montana Optometric Association. Dr. McBride also serves as a director of the Company’s subsidiary, Western Security Bank. Dr. McBride’s expertise in the healthcare community is unique to the Board and allows him to provide insight into the Company’s healthcare and medical benefit issues, as well as the healthcare industry generally.

     John W. Murdoch, 68, was appointed to the Glacier Board in September 2005. Mr. Murdoch graduated from Doane College with a BA degree in 1964. He has worked in the ranch and home industry for the past 40 years. Since 1994 he has been an owner of Murdoch’s Ranch & Home Supply, LLC, a ranch and home retail operation, and served as its President from its founding until 2006 when he sold a majority ownership to key employees. As President, he coordinated the efforts required to run a 1700 employee, multi-location, multi-state retail operation including the oversight of purchasing, marketing, human resources, distribution and accounting. Mr. Murdoch served as a director of the Company’s subsidiary Big Sky Western Bank until February 2010, as well as Eagle Mount (a non-profit organization dedicated to rehabilitation for the disabled), Montana State University Foundation and Bozeman Deaconess Hospital. Mr. Murdoch was also President of Mid-States Distributing Co., Inc., from 2006-2008. Mid-States is a buying cooperative for farm supply stores with over 500 stores and a billion dollars in retail sales. Mr. Murdoch brings to the Board broad experience and expertise based on his management and oversight of substantial consumer businesses.

     Everit A. Sliter, 72, has served as a director of Glacier Bancorp and/or Glacier Bank since 1973, and was appointed Chairman of the Glacier Bancorp Board in December 2005. Mr. Sliter served as the Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee until his resignation from the Committee in 2009. He also serves as Chairman of the Company’s subsidiary Glacier Bank. Mr. Sliter received his BS degree in Business Administration and Accounting from the University of Montana in 1966 and he maintains a Certified Public Accountant License. From 1965 to 2003 he was a partner in the certified public accounting firm of Jordahl & Sliter, PLLC. Since August 2003, he has been an employee of Jordahl & Sliter. Mr. Sliter serves on the boards of numerous non-profit organizations including Northwest Healthcare Foundation and Bigfork Community Development Foundation. Mr. Sliter brings to the Board

broad ranging expertise on a wide variety of lending and tax matters. Mr. Sliter’s experience as a director of numerous public and civic organizations is also valuable to the Board in connection with the Company’s civic involvement.

     The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” each of the nominees to the Board.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

     The Board of Directors is committed to good business practices, transparency in financial reporting and high standards of corporate governance. Glacier operates within a comprehensive plan of corporate governance for the purpose of defining responsibilities, setting high standards of professional and personal conduct and assuring compliance with such responsibilities and standards. Glacier regularly monitors developments in the area of corporate governance. The Board periodically reviews Glacier’s governance policies and practices against those suggested by various groups or authorities active in corporate governance and practices of other companies, as well as the requirements of the related SEC rules and the listing standards of The NASDAQ Global Select Stock Market (“NASDAQ”).

Board Leadership Structure

     The Board of Directors is committed to maintaining an independent Board. In that context, it has been the practice of Glacier to separate the duties of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In keeping with good corporate governance practices, at this time the Board believes that the separation of duties of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer eliminates any inherent conflict of interest that may arise when the roles are combined, and that a non-employee director who is not serving as an executive of Glacier can best provide the necessary leadership and objectivity required as Chairman.

Director Qualifications

     The Board of Directors believes that it is necessary for each of Glacier’s directors to possess many qualities and skills. All of our directors bring to our Board a wealth of leadership experience derived from their service in a variety of professional and executive positions and extensive board experience.

     The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the oversight and nomination process for director nominees. The Committee has not historically adopted formal director qualification standards for Committee-recommended nominees. However, the Committee annually reviews the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of each director and nominee as part of its evaluation as to whether these are the right individuals to serve on Glacier’s Board to help Glacier successfully meet its long-term strategic plans. Because each director of Glacier must be re-elected annually, the Committee has an annual opportunity to assess these factors and, if appropriate, determine not to re-nominate any director. A more detailed discussion regarding the considerations given by the Committee when considering director nominees is set forth below in the section entitled “Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.”

     The director biographical information set forth above in the section entitled “Election of Directors” summarizes the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that Glacier believes qualifies each director to serve on the Board.

Code of Ethics and Corporate Governance Documents

     Glacier has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, which applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and any persons performing similar functions.

     You can access Glacier’s current Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, its Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee charters and its Corporate Governance Policy by visiting the Company’s Website and clicking on the Corporate Governance link on the Company’s home page at www.glacierbancorp.com, or by writing to: LeeAnn Wardinsky, Corporate Secretary, 49 Commons Loop, Kalispell, Montana, 59901.

Director Independence

     With the assistance of legal counsel to the Company, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has reviewed the applicable legal standards for Board and Board committee member independence. The Committee has also reviewed a summary of the answers to annual questionnaires completed by each of the directors, which also included any potential director-affiliated transactions.

     The Board then analyzed the independence of each director and nominee and determined that the following members of the Board meet the standards regarding “independence” required by applicable law, regulation and NASDAQ listing standards, and that each such director is free of relationships that would interfere with the individual exercise of independent judgment. In determining the independence of each director, the Board considered many factors, including any loans to the directors, each of which were made on the same terms as comparable transactions made with persons not related to Glacier or its subsidiary banks. Such arrangements are discussed in detail under “Transactions with Management.”

     Based on these standards, the Board determined that each of the following non-employee directors is independent:

Sherry L. Cladouhos		Craig A. Langel
James M. English		L. Peter Larson
Allen J. Fetscher		Douglas J. McBride
Dallas I. Herron		John W. Murdoch

     Based on the standards described above, the Board determined that Michael J. Blodnick and Jon W. Hippler, each of whom serves or served as an executive officer of Glacier or one of its bank subsidiaries in 2010 respectively, and Everit A. Sliter, whose former firm provides accounting services to the Company, are not independent. As noted above, Mr. Hippler will retire from the Board effective on the date of the Annual Meeting.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

     The Board of Directors has approved stock ownership guidelines for its members, which are intended to help closely align the financial interests of directors with those of Glacier’s shareholders. Within three years after they are first appointed or elected to the Board, directors are required to own shares of Glacier common stock with a market value of at least $100,000. All of the current Glacier directors have exceeded this ownership requirement with the exception of Ms. Cladouhos, who was appointed to the Board in late 2010.

Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors

     The Company and the Board welcome communication from shareholders and other interested parties. Communications may be made by writing to the Chairman of the Board, c/o the Corporate Secretary, Glacier Bancorp, Inc., 49 Commons Loop, Kalispell, Montana 59901. A copy of any such written communication will also be sent to our CEO. If the Chairman and the CEO determine that such communication is relevant to and consistent with Glacier’s operations and policies, such communication will be forwarded to the entire Board for review and consideration.

MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

     The Board met 19 times during the fiscal year. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the committees on which he served. Glacier encourages, but does not require the directors to attend Annual Shareholder Meetings. Last year, all but one of our directors attended the Annual Shareholder Meeting.

Board Authority for Risk Oversight

     The Board has the ultimate authority and responsibility for overseeing risk management at Glacier. Some aspects of risk oversight are fulfilled at the full Board level. For example, the Board regularly receives reports from management; specifically from enterprise risk management on numerous risk components that impact the operations and reputation of the Company. The Board delegates other aspects of its risk oversight function to its committees. The Audit Committee oversees financial, accounting and internal control risk management. The head of the Company’s internal audit function reports directly to the Audit Committee. The executive officers regularly report directly to the entire Board and to appropriate Board committees with respect to the risks they are responsible for managing.

     The Compensation Committee oversees the management of risks that may be posed by the Company’s compensation practices and programs. As part of this process, the Compensation Committee is responsible for analyzing the compensation policies and practices for all employees, not just executive management. In its review of these policies and practices, the Compensation Committee has determined that the current policies and practices do not create or encourage employees to take risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Committee Membership

     The Board has established, among others, an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.

     The following table shows the membership of these committees.

Name		Audit		Compensation		Nominating
Sherry L. Cladouhos		þ		þ		þ
James M. English		þ		þ		þ
Allen J. Fetscher		¨		þ*		þ
Dallas I. Herron		þ		þ		þ
Craig A. Langel		þ*		þ		þ
L. Peter Larson		þ		þ		þ*

Name		Audit		Compensation		Nominating
Douglas J. McBride		þ		þ		þ
John W. Murdoch		þ		þ		þ

     Audit Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Audit Committee was comprised of 6 directors (7 upon the appointment of Ms. Cladouhos in October 2010), each of whom is considered “independent” as defined by NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC rules. Mr. Langel served as the Chairman of the Audit Committee and qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

     The Audit Committee operates under a formal written charter adopted by the Board. As part of its periodic review of audit committee-related matters, the Audit Committee has received updates on the relevant requirements of applicable SEC rules and the corporate governance listing standards of NASDAQ.

     The Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of the quality and integrity of Glacier’s financial statements, its compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of its independent auditors, the performance of its internal audit function and independent auditors and other significant financial matters. In discharging its duties, the Audit Committee is expected to, among other things:

	•		have the sole authority to appoint, retain, compensate, oversee, evaluate and replace the independent auditors;
	•		review and approve the engagement of Glacier’s independent auditors to perform audit and non-audit services and related fees;
	•		meet independently with Glacier’s internal auditing department, independent auditors and senior management;
	•		review the integrity of Glacier’s financial reporting process;
	•		review Glacier’s financial reports and disclosures submitted to Bank regulatory authorities;
	•		maintain procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding financial matters; and
	•		review and approve related person transactions.

     The Audit Committee held 12 regular meetings and 6 special meetings during 2010.

     Compensation Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Compensation Committee was comprised of 7 directors (8 upon the appointment of Ms. Cladouhos in October 2010), each of whom are considered “independent” as defined by NASDAQ listing standards and applicable SEC and IRS rules. The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other key employees and determines, approves and reports to the Board on the elements of their compensation and long-term equity based incentives. In determining the CEO’s compensation, the Compensation Committee evaluates several performance factors, including the Company’s financial results, levels of compensation of peer financial institutions and the report of our compensation consultants, Watson-Wyatt. In 2005, the Compensation Committee independently retained Watson Wyatt to assist the

Compensation Committee in its deliberations regarding executive compensation. The mandate of the consultant was to work for the Compensation Committee in its review of executive compensation practices, including designing our long-term incentive program. Although the Compensation Committee has not subsequently retained Watson Wyatt to review the performance of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other key employees, however, it continues to consider the suggestions made in 2005 and has incorporated those suggestions into its compensation analysis in subsequent years. A complete description of the executive compensation process is described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

     In addition, the Compensation Committee:

	•		recommends, if appropriate, new employee benefit plans to the Board of Directors;
	•		reviews all employee benefit plans;
	•		makes determinations in connection with compensation matters as may be necessary or advisable; and
	•		recommends, if appropriate, revisions to the compensation and benefit arrangements for directors.

     The Compensation Committee operates under a formal written charter. The Compensation Committee met three times during the year for the purposes of reviewing salary and incentive compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and certain other executive officers, and reviewing and recommending to the full Board the grant of stock awards for executive officers.

     Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee (“Nominating Committee”) was comprised of 7 directors (8 upon the appointment of Ms. Cladouhos in October 2010), each of whom is considered “independent” as defined by NASDAQ listing standards. The Nominating Committee is responsible for nominating a slate of directors for election at Glacier’s annual meeting and appointing directors to fill vacancies as they occur. It is also responsible for (i) considering management succession plans, the appropriate Board size and committee structure and appointments; and (ii) developing and reviewing corporate governance principles applicable to Glacier and its subsidiaries, including its Corporate Governance Policy, in light of emerging standards and best practices and the needs of Glacier and its shareholders, and make such recommendations to the full Board as the Nominating Committee considers appropriate. The Nominating Committee operates under a formal written charter approved by the Board. The Nominating Committee met 10 times during 2010.

     The Nominating Committee will consider nominees recommended by shareholders, if the recommendations are made in accordance with the procedures described in this Proxy Statement under “Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations.”

     In deciding whether to recommend incumbent directors for re-nomination, the Nominating Committee evaluates Glacier’s evolving needs, and assesses the effectiveness and contributions of its existing directors. The Nominating Committee is authorized to establish guidelines for the qualification, evaluation and selection of new directors to serve on the Board. The Nominating Committee has not adopted, nor does it anticipate adopting, specific qualifications for Nominating Committee recommended nominees, nor has the Nominating Committee adopted a formal policy relating to Board diversity, although the Nominating Committee and Board value a diversity of backgrounds, professional experience and skills among directors. The Nominating Committee will instead evaluate each nominee on a case-by-case basis, including assessment of each nominee’s business experience and special skills. The Nominating Committee will also evaluate whether a nominee’s skills are complementary to existing

Board members’ skills, and the Board’s need for operational, management, financial, technological or other expertise.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

     The Compensation Committee has authority over director compensation subject to the Board’s authority to approve changes. Our directors receive compensation in the form of cash and, as applicable, awards in the form of restricted stock or stock options. Glacier does not pay directors who are also employees of the Company additional compensation for their service as directors.

     The following table shows compensation paid or accrued for the last fiscal year to Glacier’s non-employee directors. Neither Mr. Blodnick nor Mr. Hippler is included in the table as they are employees of Glacier or a subsidiary and thus receive no compensation for their services as a director. The footnotes to the table describe the details of each form of compensation paid to directors.

2010 Director Compensation Table

		Fees Earned or				Option
		Paid in Cash				Awards				Total
Name		($)				($)				($)
(a)		(b)(1)				(c)(2)				(d)
Sherry L. Cladouhos		$	4,120			$	0			$	4,120
James M. English			41,320				0				41,320
Allen J. Fetscher			43,795				0				43,795
Dallas I. Herron			24,720				0				24,720
Jon W. Hippler			33,900				0				33,900
Craig A. Langel			37,520				0				37,520
L. Peter Larson			28,029				0				28,029
Douglas J. McBride			37,520				0				37,520
John W. Murdoch			25,370				0				25,370
Everit A. Sliter			59,229				0				59,229

2010 Director Compensation

     In 2008 the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approved an increase in directors’ fees based upon recommendations made by Watson Wyatt in 2008. The proposed fee schedule provided for an annual retainer (to $28,000), equity awards (to $17,000) and committee chairpersons’ fees (to $3,000 for committee chairs and $7,000 for the Board chair). The new fee schedule was to become effective on January 1, 2009. However, because of changes since early 2008 in the banking environment, the Board has indefinitely suspended the proposed increase in directors’ fees.

     In its review in 2010 of comparable financial companies in the context of revising Glacier’s peer group (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Process for Determining Compensation” below), the Compensation Committee also reviewed compensation paid to directors of companies in the peer group. As is the case with executive compensation, the Compensation Committee does not target director compensation at any specific benchmark among the levels paid within the peer group. However, the Committee noted that total compensation paid to Glacier’s directors in 2010 was approximately 61% of the average total compensation paid to directors of companies within the peer group.

Cash Compensation

     Non-employee directors of Glacier were paid an annual retainer of $24,720 in 2010 as compensation for their services as directors. Chairs of the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees received an additional retainer of $1,200, and the Chairman of Board receives an additional retainer of $5,562. Non-employee directors may elect to defer the receipt of meeting and/or director fees in accordance with the terms of Glacier’s Deferred Compensation Plan, the material terms of which are described under the section “Executive Compensation — Deferred Compensation Plan.”

Equity Compensation

     Directors’ Stock Option Plan. Glacier previously maintained a Directors’ Stock Option Plan (“Director Plan”) for non-employee directors. Under the Director Plan, a set number of shares of common stock were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of nonqualified stock options granted to non-employee directors of the Company and each of the Company’s subsidiary banks. Nonqualified options allow a director to purchase shares of common stock at a price equal to the fair market value (closing price) of the common stock on the date of grant. Each option granted under the Director Plan vests six months following the date of grant and expires upon the earlier of five years following the date of grant or three years following the date the optionee ceases to be a director, except in the event of death, in which case the period is one year from the date of death.

     The Director Plan expired in March 2009. Although no new options may be issued under the Director Plan, there are previously granted but unexercised options outstanding under that plan. Glacier’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the grant of equity awards to directors. Accordingly, Glacier determined not to renew the Director Plan when it expired, and will make subsequent grants to directors under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.

     No stock options were awarded to Glacier’s directors for the year 2010.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     The following section describes the compensation that Glacier pays its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and each other executive officer who in 2010 earned total compensation exceeding $100,000 (the “Named Executive Officers”), consisting of the following persons:

	•		Michael J. Blodnick, President and Chief Executive Officer and a Glacier Director
	•		Ron J. Copher, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	•		Don J. Chery, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
	•		Jon W. Hippler, Chief Executive Officer of Mountain West Bank and a Glacier Director

     Glacier has only four Named Executive Officers rather than five, as typically disclosed under SEC rules, because Glacier has only three executive officers and only one executive of a subsidiary who performs a policy-making function for Glacier.

This section includes:

	•		Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”);
	•		Summary Compensation Table and other tables detailing the compensation of the Named Executive Officers;
	•		Report of Compensation Committee; and
	•		Narrative disclosure about various compensation plans and arrangements and post-employment and termination benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

     The Board has established a Compensation Committee which is responsible for planning, establishing, and monitoring overall compliance with our compensation policies. The Compensation Committee consists only of independent non-employee directors and operates under a written charter approved by the Board.

Executive Compensation Philosophy

     The quality of our employees, including our executive team, is critical to executing our community banking philosophy, emphasizing personalized service combined with the full resources of a larger banking organization. To meet our primary goal of attracting, retaining and incentivizing highly-qualified executives and employees within the context of our corporate culture, our compensation programs are designed with the following principles in mind:

	•		We are committed to providing effective compensation and benefit programs that are competitive within our industry and with other relevant organizations with whom Glacier and our banking subsidiaries compete for employees.
	•		Our programs are designed to encourage and reward behaviors that ultimately contribute to the achievement of organizational goals.
	•		Pay programs and practices reinforce our commitment to providing a work environment that promotes respect, teamwork, and individual growth opportunities.

     Consistent with this overall philosophy, we have designed our compensation programs to be relatively straightforward and transparent to shareholders, while providing benefits attractive enough to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified employees. The principal components of our compensation package for executives are:

	•		Base salary
	•		Annual incentive bonus
	•		Long-term incentives — equity grants
	•		Retirement, termination and change of control benefits
	•		Other general employee benefits

     The Compensation Committee designs our overall compensation program and makes decisions regarding individual executive compensation, in the content of a “total compensation policy” that takes into account the overall package of compensation benefits provided to each executive. Except as described below, we have not adopted any specific policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between short-term and long-term incentives or between cash and non-cash compensation. However, our philosophy is to tie a significant percentage of an executive’s compensation to the achievement of Company financial and performance goals. Accordingly, base salaries are set at competitive levels, with an opportunity for each executive to be well-rewarded through the annual incentive bonus and stock option grants if Glacier meets its performance objectives.

Process for Determining Compensation

     The Compensation Committee typically meets at least annually to perform a strategic review of our executive officers’ overall compensation packages, including determination of awards for the past fiscal year based on satisfaction of previously established performance objectives, and adjustment of base salaries, establishment of target bonuses and performance objectives and granting of stock options for the current fiscal year. Among other things, the Compensation Committee evaluates total executive compensation and the role of various elements of compensation within that total.

     Our Chief Executive Officer performs an annual performance review for executive officers of the Company and subsidiary bank presidents and provides a recommendation to the Committee regarding base salary and bonus targets for each other executive officer, which the Committee has discretion to approve or modify. The Compensation Committee then submits a recommendation regarding compensation for all executive officers to the Board for approval. The Compensation Committee meets separately on an annual basis with our Chief Executive Officer to determine his compensation.

     In 2005, the Compensation Committee retained Watson-Wyatt, a multi-national employee benefits consulting firm, to have them help design a new long-term incentive program and to review compensation levels throughout the Company. We did not engage Watson-Wyatt for 2010 for executive compensation, but the Compensation Committee still considered the recommendations made by Watson-Wyatt in 2005 in determining the compensation packages for executives in 2010. In addition, the Compensation Committee also compares executive compensation levels against a peer group of publicly-traded financial companies (the “Compensation Peer Group”).

     The Compensation Peer Group is periodically updated by the Compensation Committee and consists of companies which the Committee believes are comparable in size to the Company and with whom we may compete against. In 2010, the Compensation Committee, at the direction of the Board, conducted an extensive review of the process by which the Compensation Peer Group is established, with emphasis on asset size, profitability and location as the measures of comparability, in that order of importance.

     Potential comparable companies were initially filtered by asset size, then evaluated for profitability, including provisions for assets quality and other performance standards believed to best generally align with Glacier’s goals. The Compensation Committee relied on profitability data provided by Bank Director Magazine’s list of the top 150 financial institutions, as Glacier has been in this group for the past five years.

     Potential comparable companies were analyzed for compensation, utilizing data from the SNL Financial Executive Compensation Review, and other information compiled by the Compensation Committee. Finally, executive compensation data was analyzed by region. The compensation for each region was then compared and assigned points based on the relative similarity to compensation in the

region in which the Company operates. Points were assigned to each the three designated comparability measures and the companies with the 20 highest point totals were selected as the Compensation Peer Group, which is listed in footnote 1 on page 18. Although the Compensation Committee does not specifically target total compensation at any specific total benchmark among the Compensation Peer Group, it does consider comparative compensation levels in assessing overall compensation.

Discussion of Executive Compensation Components

Base Salary — All Senior Officers

     We provide executives and other employees with a base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Base salary ranges for executives are determined for each position based on market data. Base salary is designed so that the salary opportunities for a given position will be between 75% and 125% of the midpoint of the established range, depending upon, among other things, the executive’s experience and the relative market demand for the skill set needed to fulfill responsibilities of the position. In its review of base salaries for executives, the Compensation Committee considers:

	•		Internal review of salary range based on available market data;
	•		Market data provided by consultants;
	•		Internal review relative to others within the Company;
	•		Individual performance; and
	•		The experience and qualifications of each individual.

     Salary levels are reviewed annually as part of the executive performance review and at the time of changes in job responsibility or promotion.

Annual Incentive Bonus— All Senior Officers

     Performance-based bonuses are generally intended to comprise a significant component of the overall compensation package for each executive officer. The annual bonus for senior officers of Glacier, other than the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer, and the annual bonus for senior executives of Glacier’s subsidiary banks, is contingent upon satisfaction of both quantifiable and nonquantifiable performance measures established by the Compensation Committee, with the nonquantifiable component typically limited to no more than 5% of the overall bonus. The quantifiable measures are established at the beginning of each fiscal year and can be monitored by us and the executive throughout the year. These performance measures are tracked and evaluated as follows:

•

For each quantifiable performance measure selected, three levels of goals are defined to determine the amount of incentive that will be paid.

	–		Acceptable — At or below this level of performance, no incentive values are payable.
	–		Expected — At this level of performance, 100% of target incentive values are payable.
	–		Outstanding — At this level of performance, 200% of target incentive values are payable.

•

For each non-quantifiable performance measures, discretionary judgment is applied across a spectrum ranging from minimally acceptable to clearly outstanding.

     The types of performance measures, the target performance measure levels and the weighting of each performance measure is predetermined at the beginning of each fiscal year with weights typically ranging from 5% to 30%. Performance measures include Earnings Growth, Deposit Growth, Asset Quality, Loan Growth, Holding Company Performance, regulatory performance and others as needed, and are based on the performance of the bank at which the executive serves.

Annual Incentive Bonus — Named Executive Officers

     The formulas determined by the Compensation Committee as referred to above are applied directly in evaluating the performance of senior officers of the Company and executive officers of the Company’s subsidiary banks, but applied only indirectly in evaluating the performance, for purposes of the annual incentive bonus, to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. Incentive bonuses for these Named Executive Officers are determined in a separate process, tied to subjective, as well as objective, factors, as described below.

     In light of the expectation that 2010 would be a challenging year for Glacier, the Board and Compensation Committee proceeded on the assumption that annual incentive bonuses would not be awarded to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Chief Administrative Officer for 2010 (see “2010 Executive Compensation for Named Executive Officers” below). However, the Compensation Committee continues to believe that incentive compensation should generally comprise a significant component of overall compensation going forward.

     Chief Executive Officer. In setting compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee relies heavily on the financial performance of Glacier and its subsidiary banks. Consistent with our performance-based philosophy, incentive compensation is generally considered to a significant component in determining his overall total compensation, notwithstanding that, as noted above, no annual incentive bonus was paid for 2010.

     In years in which an annual incentive bonus will or may be paid to our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee considers our financial performance as compared to our Compensation Peer Group as well as his achievement of individual objectives and accomplishments. In addition, the Compensation Committee considers other measures such as:

	Ø		credit quality;
	Ø		effective communication of our overall goals and objectives to employees;
	Ø		regulatory performance;
	Ø		continued growth of the Company, both internal and through acquisitions; and
	Ø		continuation of good shareholder relations.

     Although the Compensation Committee does not, in determining the total compensation package for our Chief Executive Officer, rely upon the multiple of that compensation package compared to those of the other Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee did note that the multiple of his total compensation to the average total compensation of such other executive officers is approximately 1.7.

     Chief Financial Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer typically makes a recommendation to the Committee with respect to the base salary and bonus for our Chief Financial Officer. This

recommendation is based on a variety of objective and subjective factors, including the same Company performance factors listed above for the Chief Executive Officer, as well as individual performance.

     Chief Administrative Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer typically makes a recommendation to the Committee with respect to the base salary and bonus for our Chief Administrative Officer. This recommendation is based on a variety of objective and subjective factors, including the same Company performance factors listed above for the Chief Executive Officer, as well as individual performance.

Long-term Incentives — Equity Grants

     The compensation package of each executive includes a long-term incentive component in the form of annual equity grants. We believe stock ownership more closely aligns executive and Company long-term goals, and in particular provides an incentive for executives to help build shareholder value. We also believe this program provides a retentive effect through multi-year vesting and by enabling executives to share in the benefits of stock price appreciation for up to five years.

     In 2005, the Board adopted, and our shareholders approved, a Stock Incentive Plan. Each year the Board establishes target levels of stock options for executive officers, other management positions and employees generally. Following year end, we award stock options at levels that are either below, at or above the target levels. The levels are based on the Company’s achievement of predetermined goals based on three-year average return on average equity, which we believe is an important criterion in measuring our success and the performance of our executives. As discussed below under “2010 Compensation for Named Executive Officers,” no stock options were awarded to the Named Executive Officers for 2010.

Retirement Benefits

     As part of our “total compensation policy” we offer executives the opportunity to participate in both a tax-deferred compensation plan and a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”). The SERP is intended to supplement payments due to participants upon retirement under our other qualified plans. The deferred compensation plan allows certain Company and bank executives to defer a portion of their salary and bonus and thereby defer tax payable on that income. Members of the Board are also entitled to participate in the deferred compensation plan, but not the SERP. Participation in these plans is elective.

Termination and Change of Control Benefits

     As an additional part of our “total compensation policy” we have entered into employment contracts with certain executive officers that allow for continuation of current base salary upon termination without cause, or upon termination under certain circumstances following a change in control of the Company. These agreements provide for payments ranging from one times annual base salary to 2.99 times annual base salary. These arrangements are intended to retain our executives who could have other job alternatives that may appear to them to be less risky absent these arrangements.

     Effective January 1, 2011, all of our change in control arrangements are “double trigger,” meaning that benefits are not awarded upon a change of control unless the executive’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason within a specified period of time following the transaction. We believe this structure strikes a balance between the incentives and the executive retention effects described above, without providing these benefits to executives who continue to enjoy employment with an acquiring company in the event of a change of control transaction.

     The terms of these plans are described under the heading “Post Employment and Termination Benefits” beginning on page 23. That section also contains tables showing the amounts that the executive officers would have received if their employment was terminated at fiscal year-end in connection with a change in control.

Other General Employee Benefits

     Executive officers are eligible to participate in all employee benefit plans that are available to eligible employees generally, including health insurance, life and disability insurance, 401(k) matching contributions, and profit sharing.

2010 Executive Compensation for Named Executive Officers

     This year, as we have in past years (except for 2005, when we retained Watson-Wyatt), we compared our executive compensation levels against a Compensation Peer Group¹. As discussed above under “Process for Determining Compensation,” the 2010 Compensation Peer Group was adjusted from the previous year to better reflect institutions of comparable size, profitability and geographic location.

     Also as noted above, although the Compensation Committee does not specifically target total compensation at any specific benchmark among the Compensation Peer Group, it does consider comparative compensation levels in assessing overall compensation. Although the base salaries for each of the Named Executive Officers were not increased in 2010 over the prior year, the Compensation Committee recognized that for Mr. Blodnick, his 2010 base salary was approximately 65% of the average base salary of chief executive officers among the Compensation Peer Group and was the lowest base salary among that group, and his total compensation for 2010 was approximately 34% of the average total compensation of such chief executive officers and the second lowest total compensation among that group. The Compensation Committee also recognized that Glacier’s five-year total return (to and including 2009) was in the top one-third of the companies comprising the Compensation Peer Group.

2010 Base Salary

     The 2010 base salaries as provided in their respective employment agreements for Messrs. Blodnick, Copher and Chery were retained at the 2009 level.

     Mr. Hippler’s 2010 base salary was established in accordance with compensation programs applicable to Glacier’s subsidiary banks generally and was paid by Mountain West Bank, of which he was the Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hippler’s base salary for 2010 was $172,617. Mr. Hippler’s reduced base salary in 2010 reflects his transition to retirement from his position as Chief Executive Officer, which occurred effective December 31, 2010. As described above, Mr. Hippler will retire from his position as a member of the Glacier Board effective on the date of the Annual Meeting.

2010 Annual Incentive Bonus

     As discussed above, Glacier’s compensation philosophy is to align executive officer compensation with the Company’s performance and the interests of our shareholders. Since late 2008, in the context of a difficult national and regional economic environment that has particularly impacted community banks, the Company has been in the process of working through and resolving increased levels of problem assets and its financial performance has thus been below historical standards. Accordingly, the Board and the Compensation Committee proceeded on the assumption in 2010 that no annual incentive bonuses would be awarded to Messrs. Blodnick, Copher or Chery for 2010.

     Mr. Hippler did not receive a bonus for 2010. Mr. Hippler’s annual bonus, in years in which payable, is based on the performance of Mr. Hippler’s bank relative to pre-established performance targets set by the Compensation Committee for Glacier’s subsidiary banks generally.

Long-term Incentives

     The Committee established the following targets for option grants to our Named Executive Officers during 2010:

		Objective (3 Yr. ROE)
Position		10%				12%				14%				16%				18%
CEO			3,750				7,500				11,250				15,000				18,750
CFO and CAO			2,000				4,000				6,000				8,000				10,000
President, Subsidiary Banks >$500 million			2,000				4,000				6,000				8,000				10,000

     Our long-term incentive (stock option) grants to executive officers are based on the Company’s achievement of specified levels of three-year average return on equity (“ROE”) as set by the Committee each year and shown in the table above. The three-year average ROE applicable to performance during 2010 (the years 2007, 2008 and 2009) did not reach the 10% level. Accordingly, none of our Named Executive Officers received long-term incentive grants for the year 2010.

Tax Considerations

     Under federal income tax law, a public company may not deduct non-performance based compensation in excess of $1 million paid to its chief executive officer or any of its other three highest-paid executive officers (excluding the Chief Financial Officer). No executive officer of Glacier received non-performance based compensation in excess of this limit in fiscal 2010. The Compensation Committee currently intends to continue to manage Glacier’s executive compensation program in a manner that will maximize federal income tax deductions. However, the Compensation Committee may from time to time exercise its discretion to award compensation that may not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code when in its judgment such award would be appropriate to achieve Glacier’s compensation objectives and otherwise in the best interests of the Company.

     In addition, the change in control provisions described in the section entitled “Executive Compensation” are designed to reduce the amounts payable that otherwise would be subject to an excise tax applicable to payments known as “excess golden parachute payments” as defined under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code.

Report of Compensation Committee

      The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors makes the following report which, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, will not be incorporated by reference into any such filings and will not otherwise be deemed to be proxy soliciting materials or to be filed under such Acts.

     The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) as required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management, and, based on that review and those discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included as part of this Proxy Statement and 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Compensation Committee Members

Allen J. Fetscher (Chairperson) u Sherry L. Cladouhos u James M. English u Craig A. Langel
u Dallas I. Herron u L. Peter Larson u Douglas J. McBride u John W. Murdoch

Compensation Tables

     The following table shows compensation paid or accrued for the last three fiscal years to the Named Executive Officers.

Summary Compensation Table

																		Change in
																		Pension Value
																		and
																		Nonqualified
																		Deferred
														Option				Compensation				All Other
Name and Principal						Salary				Bonus				Awards				Earnings				Compensation				Total
Position		Year				($)				($)				($)				($)				($)				($)
(a)		(b)				(c)(1)				(d)(2)				(e)(3)				(f)(4)				(g)(5)				(h)
Michael J. Blodnick			2010			$	334,183			$	0			$	0			$	21,976			$	20,051			$	376,210
President and CEO			2009				346,662				0				31,913				22,163				20,800				421,537
			2008				324,450				0				40,073				43,929				25,927				434,378
Ron J. Copher,			2010			$	201,571			$	0			$	0			$	89			$	12,096			$	213,755
Senior Vice President			2009				209,098				0				17,020				87				12,313				238,518
and CFO			2008				195,700				35,000				21,372				1,395				18,376				271,842
Don J. Chery,			2010			$	201,571			$	0			$	0			$	2			$	12,096			$	213,668
Executive Vice			2009				209,098				0				17,020				2				12,547				238,667
President and Chief			2008				195,700				25,000				21,372				4				17,638				259,714
Administrative Officer
Jon W. Hippler,			2010			$	172,617			$	0			$	0			$	1,576			$	10,183			$	184,376
President, Mountain			2009				273,800				53,504				17,020				5,512				19,638				369,475
West Bank			2008				256,256				67,045				21,372				10,285				25,856				380,814

2010 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

		Option Awards
		Number of Shares Acquired
		on Exercise				Value Realized on Exercise
Name		(#)				($)
(a)		(b)				(c)
Michael J. Blodnick			0				N/A
Ron J. Copher			0				N/A
Don J. Chery			0				N/A
Jon W. Hippler			0				N/A

2010 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

		Option Awards
						Number of Securities
		Number of Securities				Underlying Unexercised				Option Exercise
		Underlying Options				Options				Price				Option
Name		(#) Exercisable				(#) Unexercisable				($)				Expiration Date
(a)		(b)(1)				(c)(1)				(d)(1)				(e)
Michael J. Blodnick			22,500							$	20.96			01/25/2011
			15,000								23.47			01/31/2012
			11,250								18.19			01/30/2013
							7,500	(2)			15.37			01/28/2014
Ron J. Copher			15,000								24.40			12/18/2011
			8,000								23.47			01/31/2012
			6,000								18.19			01/30/2013
							4,000	(2)			15.37			01/28/2014
Don J. Chery			7,500								20.96			01/25/2011
			5,000								23.47			01/31/2012
			6,000								18.19			01/30/2013
							4,000	(2)			15.37			01/28/2014
Jon W. Hippler			12,000								20.96			01/25/2011
			8,000								23.47			01/31/2012
			6,000								18.19			01/30/2013
							4,000	(2)			15.37			01/28/2014

Employee Stock Plans

     Glacier has previously maintained an employee stock option plan, including the 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan (“1995 Plan”), which was approved by the Board and the shareholders. The 1995 Plan provided for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options, had a term of 10 years, and expired in February of 2005. Although no options may be issued under the 1995 Plan, the plan has granted but unexercised options outstanding.

     At the 2005 Annual Meeting, shareholders of Glacier approved the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (“2005 Plan”), the successor to the 1995 Plan. The 2005 Plan provides for awards of stock based incentive compensation to eligible employees, consultants, and directors of the Company or its affiliates. Shares of Glacier common stock are issuable under the 2005 Plan in the form of stock options, share

appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units and unrestricted shares, deferred share units, and performance awards.

     The 2005 Plan is effective for ten years and limits the grant of shares to any one eligible individual to a maximum of 562,500 shares during the term of the 2005 Plan, as well as limiting the number of shares that may be granted in a form other than stock options and stock appreciation rights. The aggregate number of shares available for issuance under the 2005 Plan is 3,076,178. All share amounts have been adjusted for applicable stock splits and stock dividends.

Post Employment and Termination Benefits

2010 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

		Executive				Aggregate				Aggregate
		Contributions in				Earnings in Last				Balance at Last
		Last FY				FY				FYE
Name		($)				($)				($)
(a)		(b)(1)				(c)(2)				(d)
Michael J. Blodnick		$	0			$	19,122			$	784,008
Ron J. Copher			0				0				0
Don J. Chery			0				0				0
Jon W. Hippler			0				4,206				172,460

     Deferred Compensation Plan. Since December 1995, Glacier has maintained a non-qualified and non-funded deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Plan”) for directors and key employees. The Deferred Plan permits eligible directors and officers of the Company to defer certain income that would otherwise be taxable as earned and paid in the ordinary course. The Deferred Plan was subsequently amended principally in response to the enactment of Section 409A of Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and permit participants to elect cash-out distributions and to make new distribution elections on terms that conform with the restrictions set forth in Section 409A.

     As amended and restated, the Plan permits a designated officer or key employee to annually defer up to 50% of his or her salary, as well as up to 100% of any cash bonuses. A non-employee director may elect to have any portion of his or her director’s fees deferred into an account. The restated Deferred Plan also provides that the post-2004 rate of return on deferred compensation accounts will equal fifty percent (50%) of the Company’s return-on-average-equity (whether positive or negative) as of December 31 for such year. This change is expected to limit the Company’s future compensation expense while retaining the Deferred Plan’s performance-based nature.

Pension Benefits

Present Value of

Number of Years

Accumulated

Payments During

Credited Service

Benefit

Last Fiscal Year

Name

Plan Name

(#)

($)

($)

(a)

(b)(1)

(c)(2)

(d)(3)

(e)

Michael J. Blodnick

SERP

N/A

$

658,177

$

0

Ron J. Copher

SERP

N/A

3,639

0

Don J. Chery

SERP

N/A

68

0

Jon W. Hippler

SERP

N/A

64,608

0

     Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. In December 1995, the Board adopted a nonqualified and nonfunded SERP for senior executive officers, and entered into separate SERPs with the executives. The SERP is intended to supplement payments due to participants upon retirement under the Company’s other qualified plans. In general, the SERP provides that Glacier will credit each participating executive’s account on an annual basis, an amount equal to employer contributions that would have otherwise been allocated to the executive’s account under the tax-qualified plans were it not for limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, or participation in the Deferred Plan. Payments under the SERP could be paid in a lump sum or made in five annual installments upon the executive leaving employment, the first of which will be paid on the first day of the second month upon retirement, at age sixty-five, anniversary dates of sixty-five or separation of service. In the event of a change in control, the amounts in the individual SERP accounts will be deposited into a trust, and the Company will continue to be obligated to provide for the benefits under the SERP. In the event the executive is terminated for Just Cause (as defined), no benefits will be payable to the executive under the SERP and all obligations of the Company with respect to the executive’s SERP cease.

     In 2005, the SERP was amended to principally mirror those changes described above for the Company’s Deferred Plan, namely permitting participants to make cash-out elections and new distribution elections, and providing that, for years after 2004, the account balance for each participant will be credited with a rate of return that is equal to fifty (50%) of the Company’s return-on-average equity.

Employment Arrangements

     Below are summaries of certain agreements between executive officers listed in the compensation table and the Company or its subsidiaries. These summaries are qualified in their entirety by the individual agreements which are filed as exhibits to our 2010 Form 10-K.

     Michael J. Blodnick Employment Agreement. During calendar year 2010, Mr. Blodnick’s employment was governed by an employment agreement that became effective January 1, 2010. The agreement terminated December 31, 2010 and a new agreement was entered into effective January 1, 2011. Mr. Blodnick’s agreement provides that his annual salary for 2011 will be retained at the 2010 level ($334,183). Subsequent increases will be subject to the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and the Board’s review of Mr. Blodnick’s compensation and performance. Incentive

compensation is to be determined by the Board, as recommended by the Compensation Committee, and any bonus will be payable not later than January 31 of the year following the year in which the bonus is earned. If Mr. Blodnick’s employment is terminated by the Company without cause (as defined) or by Mr. Blodnick for good reason (as defined) during the term of the agreement, Mr. Blodnick will receive a payment having a present value equal to the compensation and other benefits to which he would have been entitled for the remainder of the term if his employment had not terminated. All such payments must be completed no later than March 15 of the calendar year following the year in which employment was terminated. Mr. Blodnick is prohibited from competing with the Company or its subsidiaries during the term of the agreement and for a three-year period following his termination of employment.

     If Mr. Blodnick’s employment is terminated by the Company or its successor without cause following the announcement of a change in control (as defined) that subsequently occurs, or within three years following a change in control, Mr. Blodnick will be entitled to receive an amount equal to 2.99 times his then current annual salary, payable in 36 monthly installments, plus continued employment benefits for 2.99 years following the occurrence of the change in control or termination, as the case may be. This amount (2.99 times annual salary plus continuation of benefits) would also be payable if Mr. Blodnick terminates his employment for good reason within three years of a change in control. The agreement provides that the payments to be received by Mr. Blodnick will be limited to less than the amount that would cause them to be an “excess parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, the payments and benefits to be received by Mr. Blodnick will be reduced by any compensation that he receives from the Company or its successor following a change in control and/or after his termination of employment.

     Ron J. Copher Employment Agreement. During calendar year 2010, Mr. Copher’s employment was governed by an employment agreement that became effective January 1, 2010. The agreement terminated December 31, 2010, and a new agreement was entered into effective January 1, 2011. Except as described below, the employment agreement for Mr. Copher is substantially the same as the agreement for Mr. Blodnick. Mr. Copher’s agreement provides that his annual salary for 2011 is $205,602, a 2% increase over 2010. Subsequent increases are subject to the Board of Directors’ annual review of Mr. Copher’s compensation and performance. Mr. Copher is prohibited from competing with the Company or any of its subsidiaries during the term of the agreement and for a two-year period following termination of employment.

     If Mr. Copher’s employment is terminated by the Company or its successor without cause either following the announcement of a change in control that subsequently occurs, or without cause within two years following a change in control, Mr. Copher will be entitled to receive an amount equal to two times his then current annual salary, plus continued employment benefits for two years following the occurrence of the change in control or termination, as the case my be. This amount (two times annual salary plus continuation of benefits) would also be payable if Mr. Copher terminates his employment for good reason within two years following a change in control.

     The table below shows the maximum amounts that could be paid to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under their respective agreements. The following information is based on (i) the executives’ compensation at December 31, 2010; and (ii) assumes the triggering event was December 31, 2010.

		Chief Executive Officer (1)								Chief Financial Officer (1)
						Termination (without								Termination (without
		Termination				cause) or Termination				Termination				cause) or Termination
		(without cause) or by				by Executive (with				(without cause) or by				by Executive (with
		Executive (with				good reason) Due to a				Executive (with				good reason) Due to a
		good reason)				Change in Control (2)				good reason)				Change in Control (2)
Base salary		$	334,183			$	999,209			$	201,571			$	403,142
Healthcare and other benefits			5,626				16,822				6,525				13,049
Fair market values of accelerated equity vesting (3)			0				0				0				0
Perquisites			0				0				0				0
Total		$	339,810			$	1,016,031			$	208,096			$	416,191

     Don J. Chery Employment Agreement. During calendar year 2010, Mr. Chery’s employment was governed by an employment agreement that became effective January 1, 2010. The Agreement terminated December 31, 2010 and a new agreement was entered into effective January 1, 2010. Except as described below, the employment agreement for Mr. Chery is substantially the same as the agreement for Mr. Copher. Mr. Chery’s agreement provides that his annual salary for 2011 is $205,602, a 2% increase over 2010. Subsequent increases are subject to the Board of Directors’ annual review of Mr. Chery’s compensation and performance. The provisions of Mr. Chery’s employment agreement regarding incentive compensation, termination by the Company without cause or termination by Mr. Chery for good reason, non-competition, and payments to which Mr. Chery may be entitled in connection with a change in control, are the same as described above with respect to the agreement for Mr. Copher.

     The table below shows the maximum amount that could be paid to Mr. Chery under his employment agreement. In the event of death or disability, Mr. Chery, or if applicable his estate, would be paid any amounts earned through the termination date. The following information is based on (i) the executive’s compensation at December 31, 2010; and (ii) assumes the triggering event was December 31, 2010.

						Termination
						(without cause) or
						Termination by
		Termination				Executive (with
		(without cause) or				good reason) Due
		by Executive (with				to a Change in
		good reason)				Control (1)
Base salary		$	201,571			$	403,142
Healthcare and other benefits			5,516				11,032
Fair market values of accelerated equity vesting (2)			0				0
Perquisites			0				0
Total		$	207,087			$	414,173

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers who are not Directors

     The following table sets forth information with respect to executive officers during 2010 who are not directors or nominees for director of Glacier, including employment history for the last five years. All executive officers are appointed annually and serve at the discretion of the Board.

								Has Served as an
								Officer of the
Name		Age				Position		Company since
Don J. Chery			48			Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer of the Company(1)			1989
Ron J. Copher			53			Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary(2)			2006

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The following table shows, as of January 26, 2011, the amount of Glacier common stock beneficially owned by (a) each director of the Company, (b) the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table above, and (c) all of Glacier’s directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership is a technical term broadly defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission to mean more than ownership in the usual sense. In general, beneficial ownership includes any shares a director or executive officer can vote or transfer and stock options or other rights that are exercisable currently or become exercisable within 60 days. Except as noted below, each holder has sole voting and investment power for all shares beneficially owned.

				Amount and Nature of
				Beneficial Ownership of
				Common Stock as of
Name		Position		January 26, 2011(1)
Michael J. Blodnick		Director, President and CEO			426,919				.594	%(2)
Don J. Chery		Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer of the Company			45,584				.063	%(3)
Sherry L. Cladouhos		Director			2,000				.003	%(4)
Ron J. Copher		Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary			43,915				.061	%(5)
James M. English		Director, Director of Mountain West Bank			41,127				.057	%(6)
Allen J. Fetscher		Director, Vice Chairman of First Security Bank of Missoula			258,774				.360	% (7)
Dallas I. Herron		Director			22,325				.031	%(8)
Jon W. Hippler		Director, Director/CEO of Mountain West Bank			38,957				.054	%(9)
Craig A. Langel		Director, Director of First Security Bank			70,089				.097	%(10)
L. Peter Larson		Director			885,853				1.232	%(11)
Dr. Douglas J. McBride		Director, Director of Western Security Bank			10,829				.015	%(12)
John W. Murdoch		Director			16,877				.023	%(13)
Everit A. Sliter		Chairman of Glacier and Glacier Bank			395,078				.549	%(14)
Executive officers and directors as a group (13 individuals)					2,258,327				3.14	%(15)

Beneficial Owners

     The following table includes information as of December 31, 2010 concerning the only persons or entities, including any “group” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), who or which was known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock on the Annual Meeting record date.

		Amount and Nature
Name and Address of		of Beneficial
Beneficial Owner		Ownership (1)				Percent of Class
BlackRock Inc. (2)			6,043,345				8.40	%
40 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (3)			6,027,528				8.03	%
100 E. Pratt Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202

PROPOSAL NO. 2

ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     Under recently enacted law and implementing regulations, we are providing you the opportunity, as a shareholder, to endorse or not endorse our executive pay program through the following non-binding resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of Glacier’s Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure in this Proxy Statement.”

     We invite you to consider the details of our executive compensation provided under “Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement. That section will provide you with information about the structure of our executive compensation program and the objectives that the compensation program is intended to achieve. Some of the key aspects of 2010 executive compensation include:

	•		We have established a total compensation policy for our executive officers that is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders.
	•		Our compensation programs are designed to be relatively straightforward and transparent to shareholders, while attractive enough to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified executive officers.
	•		Although the Compensation Committee does not specifically target total compensation against any compensation “benchmark” among Glacier’s Compensation Peer Group, as an example the base salary paid to our Chief Executive Officer in 2010 was approximately 65% of the average base salary for chief executive officers in the Compensation Peer Group, and was the lowest base salary within that group, and his total compensation was approximately 35% of the average total compensation of such chief executive officers, and was the second lowest within that group.
	•		The Compensation Committee also recognized that Glacier’s five-year total return (to and including 2009) was in the top third of the companies comprising the Compensation Peer Group.
	•		Effective January 1, 2011, all of our executive change in control arrangements are “double trigger,” meaning that benefits are not awarded upon a change in control unless the executive’s employment is terminated without cause or for good reason within a specified period following the transaction.

     Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee values the opinions that our shareholders express in their votes and will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

     The proposal to approve the advisory (non-binding) vote on executive compensation requires the affirmative vote FOR a majority of the shares present and voting on this matter.

     The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” approval of the compensation of executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the accompanying compensation tables and the related narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement.

PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF
SHAREHOLDER VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     Shareholders are being asked whether the advisory vote on executive compensation, as described in Proposal No. 2 above, should be held every one, two or three years. Under recently enacted law and implementing regulations, shareholders must vote on executive officer compensation at least every three years, and that a vote on the frequency of such vote must occur every six years.

     Our Board of Directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for the Company, and therefore the Board recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation.

     Our Board values and encourages constructive dialogue on executive compensation and other important governance topics with our shareholders, to whom it is ultimately accountable. Our Board has concluded that providing our shareholders with an advisory resolution on executive compensation every year will enhance shareholder communication by providing another avenue to obtain information on shareholder sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy, policies, and procedures. Accordingly, our Board has determined to recommend an annual advisory vote on executive compensation.

     Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board of Directors. However, the Board values the opinions that our shareholders express in their votes and will take into account the outcome of the vote in determining the frequency in which the shareholder vote on executive compensation will be held. Such decision will be disclosed in a Form 8-K that will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission following the annual meeting, and will be reflected in a policy adopted by the Compensation Committee.

     The frequency of the vote on executive compensation will be based upon which option receives the greatest number of votes. Shareholders will have the opportunity to vote for one year, two years, three years or to abstain.

     For the reasons described above, the Board of Directors unanimously recommends you choose a vote to approve executive compensation every year. Your vote is to choose the frequency of the vote (one, two or three years), not to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation.

AUDITORS

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     The following table sets forth the aggregate fees charged to Glacier by BKD, LLP for audit services rendered in connection with the audited consolidated financial statements and reports for the 2010 and 2009 fiscal years.

Fee Category		Fiscal 2010				% of Total				Fiscal 2009				% of Total
Audit Fees		$	967,397				85.4	%		$	932,700				84.9	%
Audit-Related Fees			165,295				14.6	%			165,895				15.1	%
Tax Fees			0				00.0	%			0				00.0	%
All Other Fees			0				00.0	%			0				00.0	%
Total Fees		$	1,132,692				100.0	%		$	1,098,595				100.0	%

     Audit Fees. Consists of fees billed to Glacier for professional services rendered by BKD, LLP in connection with the audits of the Company’s financial statements, the effectiveness of internal controls over financial accounting, the reviews of financial statements included in Glacier’s Form 10-Qs, and the services to Glacier in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.

     Audit-Related Fees. Fees in 2010 include technical accounting research and accounting matters relating to implementation of new and revised accounting standards and SEC filings in connection with Glacier’s financial institution acquisition. Fees in 2009 also relate to technical accounting research and accounting matters in connection with Glacier’s public equity offering and financial institution acquisition.

     Tax Fees. There were no fees incurred for tax services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

     All Other Fees. There were no fees for services not included above for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

     In considering the nature of the services provided by BKD, LLP, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with BKD, LLP and Company management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the SEC to implement the Sarbanes Act, as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

     The services performed by BKD, LLP in 2010 were pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval policy and procedures adopted by the Audit Committee. This policy describes the permitted audit, audit-related, tax, and other services (collectively, the “Disclosure Categories”) that BKD, LLP may perform. The policy requires that prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, a description of the services (the “Service List”) expected to be performed by BKD, LLP in each of the Disclosure Categories in the following fiscal year be presented to the Audit Committee for approval.

     Services provided by BKD, LLP during the following year that are included in the Service List were pre-approved following the policies and procedures of the Audit Committee.

     Any requests for audit, audit-related, tax, and other services not contemplated on the Service List must be submitted to the Audit Committee for specific pre-approval and cannot commence until such approval has been granted. Normally, pre-approval is provided at regularly scheduled meetings. However, the authority to grant specific pre-approval between meetings, as necessary, has been delegated to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Chairman must update the Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting of any services that were granted specific pre-approval.

     In addition, although not required by the rules and regulations of the SEC, the Audit Committee generally requests a range of fees associated with each proposed service on the Service List and any services that were not originally included on the Service List. Providing a range of fees for a service incorporates appropriate oversight and control of the independent auditor relationship, while permitting the Company to receive immediate assistance from BKD, LLP when time is of the essence.

     The Audit Committee reviews the status of services and fees incurred year-to-date against the original Service List and the forecast of remaining services and fees for the fiscal year.

Report of Audit Committee

     The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors makes the following report, which notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, will not be incorporated by reference into any such filings and will not otherwise be deemed to be proxy soliciting materials or to be filed under such Acts.

     The Board has determined that the current membership of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements as defined under the NASDAQ listing standards, and that Craig A. Langel meets the “audit committee financial expert” qualifications, as defined by SEC rules.

     Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing Glacier’s financial reporting processes on behalf of the Board.

     The Audit Committee has met and held discussions with management and Glacier’s independent auditors. Management represented to the Audit Committee that Glacier’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 114 (Communication with Audit Committees).

     Our independent auditors also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors that firm’s independence.

     Based on the Audit Committee’s review of the audited consolidated financial statements and the various discussions with management and the independent auditors noted above, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board include the audited consolidated financial statements in Glacier’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC.

Audit Committee Members

Craig A. Langel (Chairperson) u Sherry L. Cladouhos u James M. English u Dallas I. Herron
L. Peter Larson u Douglas J. McBride u John W. Murdoch

PROPOSAL NO. 4

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

     BKD, LLP currently serves as our independent registered public accounting firm, and that firm conducted the audit of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The Audit Committee has appointed BKD, LLP to serve as Glacier’s independent registered public accounting firm to conduct an audit of the financial statements for fiscal year 2011.

     Appointment of Glacier’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required to be submitted to a vote of our shareholders for ratification. However, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board has determined to submit the selection of auditors to our shareholders for ratification. In the event our shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee may reconsider whether to retain BKD, LLP, and may retain that firm or another without re-submitting the matter to our shareholders. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in Glacier’s and its shareholders’ best interest.

     Representatives of BKD, LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. It is also expected that they will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

     The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of BKD, LLP to serve as Glacier’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) FILING REQUIREMENTS

     Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires that all of Glacier’s executive officers and directors and all persons who beneficially own more than 10 percent of Glacier common stock file reports with the SEC regarding beneficial ownership of Company stock. Glacier has adopted procedures to assist its directors and executive officers in complying with the Section 16(a) filings.

     Based solely on Glacier’s review of the copies of the filings that it received for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, or written representations from certain reporting persons, Glacier believes that all reporting persons made all filings required by Section 16(a) on a timely basis.

TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT

Certain Transactions

     Transactions between Glacier or its affiliates and related persons (including directors and executive officers of Glacier or their immediate family) must generally be approved by the Audit Committee (or a comparable committee of independent disinterested directors), in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth in the policy governing Related Persons Transactions adopted by the Board of Directors. Under the Related Persons Transaction Policy, a transaction between a “related person” will be consummated only if the designated committee, or a majority of the disinterested independent members of the Board, approves or ratifies such transaction in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the policy and if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party.

     During 2010 certain directors and executive officers of Glacier and its subsidiaries, and their associates, were customers of one or more of Glacier’s subsidiary banks, and it is anticipated that such individuals will continue to be customers in the future. All transactions between Glacier’s subsidiary

banks and its executive officers and directors, and their associates, were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the lending bank, and, in the opinion of management, did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features.

Accounting Fees Paid to Affiliate of Director

     Everit A. Sliter, a director of Glacier, is a former partner in the public accounting firm of Jordahl & Sliter and his son is a current partner of the firm. During recent years, and including 2010, Jordahl & Sliter assisted Glacier in certain accounting matters, including preparation of tax returns, calculation of estimated tax payments and year end tax provision. Jordahl & Sliter was not involved in the preparation or review of the Company’s financial statements. The Company paid Jordahl & Sliter $207,850 for accounting services rendered during 2010. The Audit Committee approved the retention of Jordahl & Sliter and the payment of such fees.

OTHER BUSINESS

     The Board knows of no other matters to be brought before the shareholders at the 2010 Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote shares represented by properly executed proxies in their discretion in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

Shareholder Proposals

     In order for a shareholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in our Proxy Statement for next year’s annual meeting, the written proposal must be received by the Company no later than November 25, 2011 and should contain the information required under our Bylaws. Such proposals also need to comply with the SEC’s regulations regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. No shareholder proposal from the floor will be considered at the annual meeting. In addition, if we receive notice of a shareholder proposal after November 25, 2010, the persons named as proxies in such Proxy Statement and form of proxy will have discretionary authority to vote on such shareholder proposal.

Director Nominations

     Glacier’s Bylaws provide for the nomination of director candidates by its shareholders. In order to recommend that the Nominating Committee consider a person for inclusion as a director nominee in the Company’s Proxy Statement for next year’s annual meeting, we must receive a recommendation no later than November 25, 2011. In addition, the notice of recommendation must meet all other requirements contained in our Bylaws. Such recommendation should be sent to the attention of the Secretary of the Company, and should contain the following information: (a) the name and address of each proposed nominee and the number of shares of Glacier stock held by such nominee; (b) the principal occupation of each proposed nominee; (c) a description of any arrangements or understandings between the nominee and the nominating shareholder pursuant to which the nomination is being made; (d) your name and address; (e) the number of shares of stock of Glacier you own; and (f) a consent of the nominee agreeing to the nomination. The presiding officer of the annual meeting may disregard your nomination if it does not contain the above information and otherwise does not meet the requirements set forth in our Bylaws.

Copy of Bylaw Provisions

     You may contact Glacier’s Corporate Secretary for a copy of the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making shareholder proposals and nominating director candidates.

ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

     Any shareholder may obtain without charge a copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the year ended December 31, 2010, including financial statements. Written requests for the Form 10-K should be addressed to LeeAnn Wardinsky, Corporate Secretary, at 49 Commons Loop, Kalispell, Montana 59901. The Annual Report is also available at www.glacierbancorp.com.

DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS TO SHAREHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS

     In some cases, only one copy of this Proxy Statement is being delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless we have received contrary instructions from one or more of the shareholders. We will deliver promptly, upon written request, a separate copy of this Proxy Statement to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the document was delivered. To request a separate delivery of these materials now or in the future, a shareholder may submit a written or oral request to Glacier’s Corporate Secretary at the address above, or by calling (406) 756-4200. Additionally, any shareholders who are presently sharing an address and receiving multiple copies of either the Proxy Statement or the 2010 Annual Report and who would rather receive a single copy of such materials may instruct us accordingly by directing their request to us in the manner provided above

March 29, 2011		BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
		LeeAnn Wardinsky, Secretary

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF

GLACIER BANCORP, INC.

April 27, 2011

		PROXY VOTING INSTRUCTIONS

â        Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided IF you are not voting via telephone.        â

n     21030403000000000000      6			042711

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 4, AND “1 YR” ON PROPOSAL NUMBER 3. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.

2.

CONSIDER AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) RESOLUTION ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

o

o

o

NOMINEES:

o    o    o

FOR ALL NOMINEES WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below)

¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡

Michael J. Blodnick Sherry L. Cladouhos James M. English Allen J. Fetscher Dallas I. Herron Craig A. Langel L. Peter Larson Douglas J. McBride John W. Murdoch Everit A. Sliter

1 year

2 years

3 years

ABSTAIN

3.

TO VOTE IN AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) CAPACITY ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

o

o

o

o

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

4.

RATIFY APPOINTMENT OF ACCOUNTING FIRM. To approve the appointment of BKD, LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year December 31, 2011.

o

o

o

5.

OTHER BUSINESS. To act on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements.

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED OR, IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES LISTED HEREIN, “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 4, AND “1 YR” ON PROPOSAL NUMBER 3.

INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: l

Management knows of no other matters that may properly be, or which are likely to be, brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, this Proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of management.

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.

o

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Note:		Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

n

n

 

		o		n

GLACIER BANCORP, INC.

PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

     The undersigned shareholder of Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby appoints L. Peter Larson and Everit A. Sliter, and each of them (with full power to act alone), my Proxies, with full power of substitution as Proxy, and hereby authorizes such Proxies to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all the shares of common stock of the Company held of record by the undersigned on March 1, 2011, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 27, 2011, or any adjournment of such Annual Meeting.

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)

n			14475			n

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF

GLACIER BANCORP, INC.

April 27, 2011

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIAL:
The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement and Proxy Card
are available at www.glacierbancorp.com

Please sign, date and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.

â  Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided.   â

n     21030403000000000000      6			042711

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF DIRECTORS, “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 4, AND “1 YR” ON PROPOSAL NUMBER 3. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

1.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.

2.

CONSIDER AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) RESOLUTION ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

o

o

o

NOMINEES:

o

FOR ALL NOMINEES

¡ ¡

Michael J. Blodnick Sherry L. Cladouhos

1 year

2 years

3 years

ABSTAIN

o    o

WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below)

¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡

James M. English Allen J. Fetscher Dallas I. Herron Craig A. Langel L. Peter Larson Douglas J. McBride John W. Murdoch Everit A. Sliter

3.

TO VOTE IN AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) CAPACITY ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPANY’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

o

o

o

o

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

4.

RATIFY APPOINTMENT OF ACCOUNTING FIRM. To approve the appointment of BKD, LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year December 31, 2011.

o

o

o

5.

OTHER BUSINESS. To act on such other matters as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments or postponements.

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED OR, IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES LISTED HEREIN, “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 4, AND “1 YR” ON PROPOSAL NUMBER 3.

INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: l

Management knows of no other matters that may properly be, or which are likely to be, brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, this Proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of management.

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method.

o

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Signature of Stockholder

Date:

Note:		Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.

n

n