FORM N-CSR
Investment Company Act file number: 811-04875
Name of Registrant: Royce Value Trust, Inc.
Name and address of agent for service: | John E. Denneen, Esq. |
745 Fifth Avenue | |
New York, NY 10151 |
Item 1. Reports to Shareholders.
SEMIANNUAL
REVIEW AND REPORT
TO STOCKHOLDERS
Royce Value Trust Royce Micro-Cap Trust Royce Focus Trust |
|||
A Few Words on Closed-End Funds |
Royce & Associates, LLC
manages three closed-end funds: Royce Value Trust, the first small-cap value
closed-end fund offering; Royce Micro-Cap Trust, the only micro-cap closed-end fund; and Royce Focus
Trust, a closed-end fund that invests in a limited number of primarily small-cap companies. |
||
A closed-end fund is an investment company whose shares are listed and traded on a stock exchange. Like all investment
companies, including open-end mutual funds, the assets of a closed-end fund are professionally managed in accordance
with the investment objectives and policies approved by the Funds Board of Directors. A closed-end fund raises cash for
investment by issuing a fixed number of shares through initial and other public offerings that may include shelf offerings
and periodic rights offerings. Proceeds from the offerings are invested in an actively managed portfolio of securities.
Investors wanting to buy or sell shares of a publicly traded closed-end fund after the offerings must do so on a stock
exchange, as with any publicly traded stock. This is in contrast to open-end mutual funds, in which the fund sells and
redeems its shares on a continuous basis. |
||
A Closed-End Fund Offers Several Distinct Advantages Not Available From an Open-End Fund Structure
| Since a closed-end fund does not issue redeemable
securities or offer its securities on a continuous basis, it
does not need to liquidate securities or hold uninvested
assets to meet investor demands for cash redemptions, as
an open-end fund must. |
| In a closed-end fund, not having to meet investor
redemption requests or invest at inopportune times is ideal
for value managers who attempt to buy stocks when prices
are depressed and sell securities when prices are high. |
| A closed-end fund may invest more freely in less liquid
portfolio securities because it is not subject to potential
stockholder redemption demands. This is particularly
beneficial for Royce-managed closed-end funds, which
invest in small- and micro-cap securities. |
| The fixed capital structure allows permanent leverage to be
employed as a means to enhance capital appreciation potential. |
| Unlike Royces open-end funds, our closed-end funds are
able to distribute capital gains on a quarterly basis. Each of
the Funds has adopted a quarterly distribution policy for
its common stock. Please see page 16-18 for more details. |
We believe that the closed-end fund
structure is very suitable for the long-term investor who understands the benefits of a
stable pool of capital. |
Why Dividend Reinvestment Is Important | ||
A very important component of an investors total return comes from the reinvestment of distributions. By reinvesting
distributions, our investors can maintain an undiluted investment in a Fund. To get a fair idea of the impact of reinvested
distributions, please see the charts on pages 11, 13 and 15. For additional information on the Funds Distribution
Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Options and the benefits for stockholders, please see page 18 or visit our website at
www.roycefunds.com. |
||
This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Table of Contents | |
Semiannual Review | |
Performance Table | 2 |
Letter to Our Stockholders | 3 |
2012: In Quotes | 60 |
Postscript: Is the Business Cycle Dead? | Inside Back Cover |
Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 9 |
For nearly 40 years, we have used a value approach to invest in small-cap securities. We focus primarily on the quality of a
companys balance sheet, its ability to generate free cash flow and other measures of profitability or sound financial condition.
We then use these factors to assess the companys current worth, basing the assessment on either what we believe a knowledgeable
buyer might pay to acquire the entire company, or what we think the value of the company should be in the stock market. |
This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 1 |
Performance Table | |
NAV Average Annual Total Returns | Through June 30, 2012 |
Royce | Royce | Royce | Russell | Russell | ||||||||||||||||
Value Trust | Micro-Cap Trust | Focus Trust | 2000 Index | 2500 Index | ||||||||||||||||
Year-to-Date1 | 4.09 | % | 6.48 | % | -0.07 | % | 8.53 | % | 8.31 | % | ||||||||||
One-Year | -11.17 | -4.68 | -13.77 | -2.08 | -2.29 | |||||||||||||||
Three-Year | 16.41 | 15.95 | 12.55 | 17.80 | 19.06 | |||||||||||||||
Five-Year | -1.72 | -1.45 | -1.45 | 0.54 | 1.18 | |||||||||||||||
10-Year | 6.53 | 7.17 | 9.46 | 7.00 | 3.01 | |||||||||||||||
15-Year | 8.27 | 8.81 | 8.70 | 6.14 | 7.62 | |||||||||||||||
20-Year | 10.18 | n.a. | n.a. | 8.96 | 10.27 | |||||||||||||||
25-Year | 9.90 | n.a. | n.a. | 8.12 | 9.65 | |||||||||||||||
Since Inception | 10.10 | 10.14 | 9.62 | n.a. | n.a. | |||||||||||||||
Inception Date | 11/26/86 | 12/14/93 | 11/1/962 | n.a. | n.a. | |||||||||||||||
1 | Not annualized |
2 | Date Royce & Associates, LLC assumed investment management responsibility for the Fund. |
2 | This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
|
I Read the News Today, Oh Boy. |
Another dismal summer has dawned with spring having brought a wave of worries back to
the market for the third consecutive year. Karl Marxas canny an observer of the global
scene as he was a checkered prognosticator of its futurewrote in 1852 that all events in
history occur twice: the first time as tragedy, the second as farce. Allowing for the accuracy of
this observation, what are we then to make of this third round of wobbly recovery, sluggish
markets, panic-stuffed headlines, and the by now reflexive anxiety about the potential
horrors of European debt for the world economy? What lies beyond farce, other than lousy
returns, high correlation, and growing numbers of investors disenchanted with equities?
To this kind of question, too many investors have no answer, having lost not only their
belief in the viability of investing in stocks, but also in the prospects for the global economy. Indeed, one unfortunate result of the contagion of uncertainty has been the erosion of confidence in the ability of equities to deliver returns that will beat inflation and build wealth over the long term. On May 7, a USA Today headline asked and answered, Invest in stocks? Forget About It. It was not quite as damning as the now infamous Business Week cover from August 1979 that proclaimed The Death of Equities, but the overall message was not much happier: Wall Streets long-running story about how stocks are the best way to build wealth seems tired, dated and less believable to many individual investors. And the USA Today piece was published early in May, just before the current bear bit down most sharply. The implicit assumption that the best days for the stock market may be (way) behind it seems to us to be the distinguishing feature of this third round of poor results for most equities. Panic has given way to a shrug of resignation. This stance sees equity investing as a mugs game, even if the alternativesTreasuries, bonds, money markets, etc.are not much more attractive or profitable. |
Our collective experience tells us that
this highly volatile, tightly correlated,
range-bound market will be remembered
as being as anomalous as it has
been painful, one that tends to occur
once or twice a century. It does not, in
our view, change the fact that stocks
remain the single best way of building
wealth over the long run. |
This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 3 |
Charles M. Royce, President We have often stressed the importance of capital preservation in asset management, arguing that not losing money is as critical as making it grow. Implicit in this belief is the idea that capital preservation is mostly synonymous with preserving purchasing power. However, we now find ourselves in a very non- traditional investment environment, an age marked by near-zero interest rates; regular, short-term bursts of volatility for equities; and relentless money printing on the part of the developed worlds central banks. While this has not altered our view of the significance of risk aversion, it has led us to ask if at this moment in history capital preservation and preservation of purchasing power should be defined differently. The answer approaches what we think is one of the most underappreciated risks to which investors are now subject: the potential for meaningful loss in the future purchasing power of investments. With so much attention being paid to preservation of capital, too little has been placed on what that capital, once returned, will actually be worth. Continued on page 6... |
Letter to Our Stockholders |
Such a beliefas ultimately wrong-headed as we think it ishas the advantage that
recent history, as far back as five years, is on its side. With a few exceptions, there is simply
not much of a defense for equity investing as a whole since the respective index peaks in
2007. The explanation for why the market has been so troublesome and unprofitable seems
simple: The world is still emerging from the most serious economic crisis since the Great
Depression. Yet this account may be in equal parts true and unhelpful, at least to anyone
who had been looking for a way to safely and effectively grow capital during the last few
years, which helps to explain why panic and resignation are symptoms of the same fatalism
that has gripped investors since the early days of the mortgage and banking crisis in 2008.
We understand the pessimism and the unwillingness to take risks on the part of so many investors today. At the same time, we still see many of the same positive signs that have been inspiring our confidence about stocks and the economy as a whole since the spring of 2010. By taking the long view (a common perspective for us), we can offer, in addition to a Nostra Culpa for much recent fund performance, the benefit of nearly 40 years of small-cap value investing. Our collective experience tells us that this highly volatile, tightly correlated, range-bound market will be remembered as being as anomalous as it has been painful, one that tends to occur once or twice a century. It does not, in our view, change the fact that stocks remain the single best way of building wealth over the long run. We know that in the current environment these words may sound hollow or even self-serving. We are more than willing to assume that risk in the hope that investors will continue to look to equities (and to our portfolios) as effective and ultimately successful ways to invest in the years to come. |
Theyve Been Going in and out of Style |
The kind of dynamic rally that ushered out the first half of 2012 is always guaranteed to raise a
smile, even if it could not completely erase earlier losses in the second quarter, losses that spoiled
a promising upswing that lasted through most of the years opening quarter. Indeed, lack of
direction has arguably been the most distinguishing characteristic of the recent market. Still, the
major U.S. indexes finished the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2012 in decent condition, as
did their overseas counterparts. Domestic small-caps brought up the rear. The Russell 2000 Index
was up 8.5% in the first half, compared to respective gains of 9.4% and 9.5% for the large-cap
Russell 1000 and S&P 500 Indexes and an electrifying 12.7% for the Nasdaq Composite.
It was an interesting road for each index. The first quarter extended a rally that began following the October 2011 lows. Small-cap trailed, though its 12.4% gain was its best opening quarter since 2006. It was also not far behind its large-cap counterparts. The Russell 1000 rose 12.9%, and the S&P 500 gained 12.6%. The Nasdaq was especially impressive, notching an 18.7% increase for the quarter. We were among those hopeful souls who saw a nearly six-month bull run and thought that maybe the market was ready for some consistent recovery. Yet April and May were cruel months, the latter especially so, as the now-traditional spring downturn caused by concerns about European debt and the state of the American and Chinese economies spoiled the party and tamped down returns. (If not for the rally on the final trading day of June, that month |
4 | This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
would also have been less solidly in the black.)
That rally was
welcomethey always arebut second-quarter returns were still
negative. The Nasdaq led on the downside, falling 5.1%, while the Russell 2000
slipped 3.5%. Large-caps held their value a bit better, with the Russell 1000
losing 3.1% and the S&P 500 declining 2.8%. So the first half concluded with a
bang, but still left investors whimpering about the
future. Looking at longer-term returns, this uncertainty has been well-earned. While three- and 10-year average annual total returns for the major indexes were solid-to-strong, one-, five-, and 12-year results for the periods ended June 30, 2012 were generally poor. The 12-year periodnot a period that we, or anyone else, usually discussesis instructive because it encompasses the Internet Bubble, the subsequent recovery, the recession that was followed by the financial crisis, and the markets herky-jerky, volatile aftermath. So we think it is worth pointing out that for the 12-year period ended December 31, 2011, the average annual total return for the S&P 500 was its lowest since the end of World War II (beginning with the period from the end of 1945 through the end of 1957). Small-cap returns for that same period ended December 31, 2011 for the Russell 2000 and the CRSP 6-10, a small-cap proxy that dates back to the 1920s, were among the worst for both since the launch of the Russell 2000 on December 31, 1978 and since the end of 1945 for the CRSP 6-10. Recent performance for the two non-U.S. indexes that we track followed patterns similar to their domestic cousins, though with more muted results. This was not entirely surprising considering both Europes ongoing travails and worries about the pace of growth in China. Non-U.S. small-caps enjoyed an advantage over their large-cap siblings, with the Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap up 4.8% for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2012 versus a 2.7% gain for the Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap Index. Both indexes enjoyed strong first-quarter results. The Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap Index rose 14.4%, and the Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap Index was up 11.5% in the first three months of 2012. Each indexs second quarter was far more difficult, as Europes troubles registered more dramatically outside the U.S. Small-cap lost a bit more in the downturn, with the Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap Index falling 8.5%, while the Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap Index was down 7.9%. U.S. mid-caps performed well on an absolute basis, though they were behind the domestic micro-cap, small-cap, and large-cap indexes in the first half. The Russell Midcap Index gained 8.0% through the end of June. Like the domestic indexes, they enjoyed a strong first quarter, up 12.9%, before slipping in the second quarter with a loss of 4.4%. Considering both the significant volatility and the unpopularity of stocks, the strength of micro-cap stocks was something of a surprise in the first half. Year-to-date through June 30, 2012, the Russell Microcap Index gained an impressive 13.0%. That the index accomplished this feat with stronger and steadier quarterly performances was equally notable: the Russell Microcap climbed 15.3% in the first quarter and fell only 2.0% in the bearish second. |
Our expectation is for a less extreme,
more historically normal phase,
without so many of the stomach-churning
drops followed by equally
steep upticks that we saw last
summer and fall and have seen so
far in 2012. It is worth noting that
a more historically normal range is
one in which we think our funds can
generate strong absolute and relative
performance over the long run. |
This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 5 |
For more than three decades, an investment vehicle provided highly consistent returns with such low volatility that they were nearly devoid of riskU.S. government bonds, specifically Treasury securities. They were the instruments that possessed that highly desired standard, the risk-free rate of return. The currently volatile investment climate has greatly expanded the appeal of this designation. Investors trying to cope with the economic uncertainty and asset-price volatility caused by the bursting credit bubble have grown increasingly sensitive to the possibilities of capital loss. Yet if history is any proxyand we believe that it isa healthy degree of skepticism should greet the notion that Treasuries remain risk free or provide an acceptable rate of return. If nothing else, the lens through which we see them needs to be adjusted to include the growing uncertainty of ultimate purchasing power (of real goods and services) of the currency in which they are denominated. This risk, one for which we have a healthy respect over the intermediate term, is the ominous combination of ongoing currency debasement and acceleration in inflationary pressures. These could erode the purchasing power of non- productive assets. Central banks around the world, with the U.S. Federal Reserve a primary contributor, have been pumping liquidity into the capital markets through a combination of historically low interest rates and quantitative easing or, more simply stated, money printing. Continued on page 8... |
Letter to Our Stockholders | ||
The Act Youve Known for all these Years... If only our own portfolios had done as well. On an absolute basis, our three closed-end funds posted results that ranged from uninspiring to strong in the first half, but relative performance was a more significant issue. Normally, this does not trouble us. Long ago, we accepted that our disciplined approaches to stock selection would result in out-of-sync moments against our portfolios respective benchmarks. Our goal has always been strong absolute performance over long-term periods. If we met that standard, then relative results would most likely not be an issue, at least over long-term time spans. We have also been glad to accept the historical trade-off in which underperformance was more common for our Funds during short-term periods of 18 months or less, while outperformance was more typical over full market cycle and other long-term periods of three years or more. For too many time periods ended June 30, 2012, however, that history has become too exclusively long-term, even for us, with strong relative and absolute results coming only in periods of 10 years or longer. Three-year results were fine on an absolute basis, but trailed on a relative score, while the five-year returns were disappointing on both an absolute and relative basis. With significant investments in all three closed-end portfolios, we share our investors frustrations with recent results. |
||
2012 NAV YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL RETURNS FOR THE ROYCE FUNDS VS.
RUSSELL 2000 AND THE RUSSELL 2500 as of 6/30/12 |
||
Those areas of the market in which we have seen both
high quality and compelling
valuations during the last three-to-five yearsenergy and mining companies, in particularwere
among the worst performers in the first half, with net losses in some cases stretching
back even further. Many of these stocks remain in our portfolios, as their attractive valuations
and our ongoing high regard have combined to keep turnover low. In many cases, we have
been building or at least maintaining positions in those businesses in which we have the
highest conviction. As has been our practice since the 1970s, we are keeping our focus
on company fundamentals. We seek companies that look capable of surviving adversity |
6 | This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
and flourishing when their fortunes change.
Those that generate free cash via high returns
on capital can give investors a return in the form of dividends, take advantage of their low
valuation by buying back stock, or make acquisitions to grow their business when organic
growth is harder to come by. Strong fundamentals mean these companies have the necessary
tools to make it through difficult periods and emerge stronger. While many of our recent
efforts have not been successful, nothing about the way that we select stocks has changed,
including our insistence on rock-solid fundamentals in the companies that we choose.
Selectiveness, patience, and discipline remain our watchwords. |
|||
Getting Better We do not know how much longer markets and economies will remain so uncertain. The fiscal turmoil that continues to haunt Europe has been hampering equity markets across the globe and contributing to the tight range of returns that have nonetheless demonstrated ample levels of volatility. The fragile recovery here in the U.S. has also played a role, as has the recent deceleration of the Chinese economy. These major macro events, which have been the dominant influence on investors behavior over the last three years, largely account for why stocks have struggled to create any direction for longer than a few months. Instead, markets have been mired in a pattern of short-term swings in which they have moved straight up or straight down, and for no longer than a few months at a time. One consequence of this closely correlated, range-bound cycle is that our Funds have not had the time to create the spread that we would usually seek to build through a full market cycle. However, we think that as Europe meets its challenges and as the U.S. begins to get its own fiscal house in order, which is not likely to happen until after the election, we will escape this range and move toward a more lasting upswing. Our expectation is for a less extreme, more historically normal phase, without so many of the stomach-churning drops followed by equally steep upticks that we saw last summer and fall and have seen so far in 2012. It is worth noting that a more historically normal range is one in which we think our Funds can generate strong absolute and relative performance over the long run. We would like to think that long-term history is on our side in this assessment. |
Through all manner of marketsmany of which were thought to establish a New Normalwe have never wavered in our convictions. We still believe that equities remain the best waymaybe the only wayto beat inflation and build wealth over the long term. | ||
Good Morning, Good Morning Obviously, we would all like to reach a more hospitable market climate soon. As always, patience is critical. Indeed, the ability to be patient is probably the single most important quality that an investor who seeks strong long-term returns can possess. It is easy to talk about the importance of patience and discipline when markets are solid and portfolios are doing well. Yet at some point, these things will change, and both will be tested, as they have been in this market. It has been a very difficult time, but we believe it will pass. When it does, our disciplined approach will remain and, we believe, be effective. |
This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 7 |
Headline inflation numbers have remained subdued due to the continuing struggles in the labor market and stubbornly weak housing markets, but commodity inflation has been on the rise. With the recent uptick in U.S. leading economic indicators and encouraging signs of stability and improvement in the housing market, it would not take much to see a more broad-based uptick in inflation. So while U.S. government bonds are likely to continue to pay their meager coupons and return principal on schedule, the value of what is being returned to investors will be declining. For the first time in almost 30 years, we think that investors risk meaningful losses in that portion of their investment portfolio they deem to be the safest. Commodities offer one possible way to protect against the loss of purchasing power caused by currency debasement. Unsurprisingly, however, we prefer assets that are inherently productive and flexible and can adjust quickly to changing pricing environments. To us, investments in quality companies that possess embedded pricing power and high returns on their invested capital look to be some of the best investments to protect, and grow, purchasing power. We believe they need much broader representation in investors asset allocation. |
|
Letter to Our Stockholders
|
||
As we approach our 40th anniversary as a firm
this coming November, we look back at what
we have seenthe Nifty Fifty market of the 70s, Black Friday in the 80s, the first stirrings
of the Internet boom in the 90s, the horrific events of 9/11, our current era of uncertainty, and
much, much more. Through all manner of marketsmany of which were thought to establish a
New Normalwe have never wavered in our convictions. We still believe that equities remain
the best waymaybe the only wayto beat inflation and build wealth over the long term.
(We also think that equities are capable of beating the fixed income markets over the next five
years.) Our guess is that stocks can deliver returns in the mid- to upper-single digits, which
we think would be respectable on an absolute basis and, equally important, higher than the
rate of inflation. When things are working well, the underlying parts of an equity portfolio,
the companies themselves, can act as compounding machinescompounding book value.
We are confident that we can create portfolios that can grow commendably, especially in the
more historically typical market climate that we believe we will eventually see. |
||
Sincerely, | ||
Charles M. Royce | W. Whitney George | Jack E. Fockler, Jr. |
President | Vice President | Vice President |
July 31, 2012 |
8 | This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Table of Contents |
Semiannual Report to Stockholders | ||||||||||
Managers Discussions of Fund Performance | ||||||||||
Royce Value Trust | 10 | |||||||||
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | 12 | |||||||||
Royce Focus Trust | 14 | |||||||||
History Since Inception | 16 | |||||||||
Distribution Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Options | 18 | |||||||||
Schedules of Investments and Other Financial Statements | ||||||||||
Royce Value Trust | 19 | |||||||||
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | 34 | |||||||||
Royce Focus Trust | 47 | |||||||||
Directors and Officers | 56 | |||||||||
Notes to Performance and Other Important Information | 57 | |||||||||
Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreements | 58 | |||||||||
The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 9 |
Royce Value Trust |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS Through 6/30/12 |
||||||||||
Jan-June 20121 | 4.09 | % | ||||||||
One-Year | -11.17 | |||||||||
Three-Year | 16.41 | |||||||||
Five-Year | -1.72 | |||||||||
10-Year | 6.53 | |||||||||
15-Year | 8.27 | |||||||||
20-Year | 10.18 | |||||||||
25-Year | 9.90 | |||||||||
Since Inception (11/26/86) | 10.10 | |||||||||
1 Not annualized | ||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||
Year | RVT | Year | RVT | |||||||
2011 | -10.1 | % | 2003 | 40.8 | % | |||||
2010 | 30.3 | 2002 | -15.6 | |||||||
2009 | 44.6 | 2001 | 15.2 | |||||||
2008 | -45.6 | 2000 | 16.6 | |||||||
2007 | 5.0 | 1999 | 11.7 | |||||||
2006 | 19.5 | 1998 | 3.3 | |||||||
2005 | 8.4 | 1997 | 27.5 | |||||||
2004 | 21.4 | 1996 | 15.5 | |||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
||||||||||
Advisory Board (The) | 1.2 | % | ||||||||
Carters | 1.1 | |||||||||
Nordson Corporation | 1.1 | |||||||||
HEICO Corporation | 1.0 | |||||||||
Coherent | 1.0 | |||||||||
Mohawk Industries | 1.0 | |||||||||
MAXIMUS | 1.0 | |||||||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings | 0.9 | |||||||||
PAREXEL International | 0.9 | |||||||||
E-L Financial | 0.8 | |||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN
% of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
||||||||||
Industrials | 27.5 | % | ||||||||
Information Technology | 21.9 | |||||||||
Financials | 20.7 | |||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 14.3 | |||||||||
Materials | 9.1 | |||||||||
Health Care | 7.8 | |||||||||
Energy | 4.9 | |||||||||
Consumer Staples | 2.4 | |||||||||
Telecommunication Services | 0.8 | |||||||||
Diversified Investment Companies | 0.4 | |||||||||
Miscellaneous | 2.2 | |||||||||
Bond and Preferred Stock | 0.1 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 10.1 | |||||||||
Managers Discussion
Difficulties continued for Royce Value Trust (RVT) in the first half. The Fund gained 4.1% on an NAV (net asset value) basis and 4.5% on a market price basis for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2012, in both cases trailing its unleveraged small-cap benchmarks, the Russell 2000 Index, which gained 8.5%, and the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, which rose 8.0%, for the same period. So while RVTs semiannual performance was solid on an absolute basis, it was disappointing on a relative score. Our dissatisfaction with the portfolios first-half showing was exacerbated by the fact that, combined with a poor showing compared to its benchmarks in 2011, it was a factor in erasing once-pronounced relative advantages, especially on an NAV basis, for several intermediate- and long-term periods, to say nothing of the deleterious effect it had on absolute results for the same periods. During the more bullish first quarter, all was well. The Fund gained 13.9% on an NAV basis and 14.7% on a market price basis for the quarter, in both cases ahead of its small-cap benchmarks, the Russell 2000 Index (+12.4%), and the S&P SmallCap 600 (+12.0%). This advantage proved as short-lived as the rally that helped to produce it. A recurring wave of worry about European debt, decelerating growth in China, and the pace of economic recovery here in the U.S. conspired to throw the bull off course following the first-half small-cap high on March 26. The result was a dismal second quarter that featured a brutal May, though it was admittedly a worse month for RVT (down 9.7% on an NAV basis) than it was for the small-cap indexes. For the second quarter as a whole, RVT fell 8.6% on an NAV basis and 8.9% based on its market price, behind both the Russell 2000, which declined 3.5%, and the S&P SmallCap 600, which lost 3.6%. As mentioned, current intermediate- and long-term results were not much better until one goes back 15 years or longer. Market cycle results were also underwhelming, though the Fund did remain ahead of both benchmarks on an NAV and market price basis from the small-cap bottom on March 9, 2009 through June 30, 2012. During this period, RVT gained 159.0% on an NAV basis and 176.1% on a market price basis versus respective gains of 143.4% and 155.0% for the Russell 2000 and S&P SmallCap 600 Indexes. On an NAV basis, the Fund outpaced each benchmark for the 15-, 25-year, and since inception (11/26/86) periods ended June 30, 2012. (RVT was also ahead of the Russell 2000 for the 20-year span on an NAV and market price basis.) The Funds NAV average annual total return since inception was 10.1%. |
GOOD IDEAS THAT WORKED
Top Contributors to Performance Year-to-Date through 6/30/121 |
|||||||||||
Carters | 0.26% | ||||||||||
Advisory Board (The) | 0.24 | ||||||||||
PAREXEL International | 0.23 | ||||||||||
MAXIMUS | 0.21 | ||||||||||
Emulex Corporation | 0.20 | ||||||||||
1 Includes dividends | |||||||||||
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund invests primarily in securities of small- and micro-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investing in a more diversified portfolio of larger-cap companies. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2012. |
10 | The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
Three equity sectorsFinancials, Health Care, and Information Technologyposted solid net
gains in the first half, while four others made smaller contributions. Three sectors detracted from
performance, though only Energy posted net losses beyond a modest measure. At the individual
company level, the largest net losses were clustered mostly in the otherwise-solid Industrials and
Information Technology sectors. Shares of PMFG, a business we have owned since 1990, fell
more than 70% between early February and the end of June, mostly driven by the issuing of a
secondary offering priced at a sizable discount to its stock. As a manufacturer of custom products
primarily for the natural gas industry, the company was also adversely affected by declining
energy prices in the second quarter. Fond of its growing business and attractive valuation, we
increased our stake in the first half. We were similarly optimistic about the long-term prospects
for old favorite and top-ten position Coherent. The company makes precision optics and other
laser-based products. An earnings miss for its fiscal second quarter was announced in April,
which kept its share price on a downward trajectory for the remainder of the first half. Although
the company faces increased competition from fiber-optic laser makers, we like its long history
of business success and potential to rebound. Sapient Corporation is a top-25 holding that
specializes in tech-based management consulting services. Its share price was trending downward
in a slow but not alarming fashion until the company announced disappointing quarterly results
in early May. Higher operating costs ate into revenues and earnings, prompting investors to flee.
RVTs two largest holdings at the end of June were also its two biggest contributors to first-half returns. The share price of Carters suffered when cotton prices were on the rise and began to grow in the first quarter when the cost of cotton declined. The company, which markets branded childrens wear, then reaped the benefit of investors cottoning to its growing revenues and solid financials. The Funds top gainer in 2011, The Advisory Board, offers programs, services, and software focused on best practices research services while also providing management and advisory services. Strong execution and innovative technology, bolstered by growing revenues and steady earnings, appeared to boost the health of its stock price through the first half. |
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (11/26/86) through 6/30/12 | |
1 | Reflects the cumulative total return of an investment made by a stockholder who purchased one share at inception ($10.00 IPO), reinvested all annual distributions and fully participated in primary subscriptions of the Funds rights offerings. |
2 | Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on the NYSE. |
FUND INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS |
|||
Fund Total Net Assets | $1,212 million | ||
Number of Holdings | 519 | ||
Turnover Rate | 13% | ||
Symbol | |||
Market Price | RVT | ||
NAV | XRVTX | ||
Net Leverage1 | 12% | ||
Average Market Capitalization2 |
$1,334 million | ||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio3,4 |
14.6x | ||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio3 |
1.6x | ||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) |
84.6% | ||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) |
27.5% | ||
1 Net leverage is the percentage, in excess of 100%, of the total value of equity type investments, divided by net assets applicable to Common Stockholders. |
|||
2 Geometric average | |||
3 Harmonic average | |||
4 The Funds P/E ratio calculation excludes companies with zero or negative earnings (8% of portfolio holdings as of 6/30/12). |
|||
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Publicly Traded Securities Outstanding at 6/30/12 at NAV or Liquidation Value |
|||
69.0 million shares of Common Stock |
$992 million | ||
5.90% Cumulative Preferred Stock |
$220 million | ||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater Over the Last 7 Years, in Percentages(%) |
|||
The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 11 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS Through 6/30/12 |
||||||||||
Jan-June 20121 | 6.48 | % | ||||||||
One-Year | -4.68 | |||||||||
Three-Year | 15.95 | |||||||||
Five-Year | -1.45 | |||||||||
10-Year | 7.17 | |||||||||
15-Year | 8.81 | |||||||||
Since Inception (12/14/93) | 10.14 | |||||||||
1 Not annualized | ||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | ||||||||||
Year | RMT | Year | RMT | |||||||
2011 | -7.7 | % | 2003 | 55.5 | % | |||||
2010 | 28.5 | 2002 | -13.8 | |||||||
2009 | 46.5 | 2001 | 23.4 | |||||||
2008 | -45.5 | 2000 | 10.9 | |||||||
2007 | 0.6 | 1999 | 12.7 | |||||||
2006 | 22.5 | 1998 | -4.1 | |||||||
2005 | 6.8 | 1997 | 27.1 | |||||||
2004 | 18.7 | 1996 | 16.6 | |||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
||||||||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings | 2.2 | % | ||||||||
Epoch Holding Corporation | 1.5 | |||||||||
Advisory Board (The) | 1.4 | |||||||||
Raven Industries | 1.4 | |||||||||
Seneca Foods | 1.3 | |||||||||
Tennant Company | 1.3 | |||||||||
Americas Car-Mart | 1.2 | |||||||||
Sapient Corporation | 1.2 | |||||||||
Flexsteel Industries | 1.2 | |||||||||
Quaker Chemical | 1.2 | |||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN % of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
||||||||||
Industrials | 27.7 | % | ||||||||
Information Technology | 21.0 | |||||||||
Financials | 20.4 | |||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 12.4 | |||||||||
Materials | 8.6 | |||||||||
Health Care | 8.4 | |||||||||
Energy | 3.8 | |||||||||
Consumer Staples | 3.5 | |||||||||
Utilities | 0.1 | |||||||||
Miscellaneous | 3.4 | |||||||||
Preferred Stock | 0.4 | |||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 10.8 | |||||||||
Managers Discussion The diversified portfolio of Royce Micro-Cap Trust (RMT) was up 6.5% on an NAV (net asset value) basis and 4.7% on a market price basis for the year-to-date period ended June 30, 2012 compared to gains of 8.5% for its unleveraged benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index, and 13.0% for the unleveraged Russell Microcap Index for the same period. Following the rally that began off the most recent small-cap low on October 3, 2011, the Fund lagged in the bullish first quarter. For the quarter, the Fund rose 11.4% on an NAV basis and 8.8% on a market price basis, compared to a 12.4% increase for its benchmark and a gain of 15.3% for the microcap index. The rally slackened after small-caps reached a first-half high on March 26, only to be thrown off course for the third straight year by the same three worriessovereign debt in Europe and the pace of economic growth in the U.S. and China. These anxieties drove share prices down through most of the second quarter, with May seeing the largest losses. RMT fell 4.4% on an NAV basis and 3.8% based on its market price in the second quarter. That same period saw the Russell 2000 down 3.5%, while the Russell Microcap lost 2.0%. Three consecutive quarters of relative underperformance have eroded some of the portfolios recent market cycle advantage, though RMT remained ahead of both indexes from the last small-cap low on March 9, 2009 through June 30, 2012, up 170.2% on an NAV basis and 189.1% on a market price basis. During the same period, the Russell 2000 was up 143.4%, and the Russell Microcap rose 145.7%. For the periods ended June 30, 2012, RMT outpaced the micro-cap index (for which data only goes back to 2000) on an NAV basis for the five- and 10-year periods. On an NAV basis, the Fund also outperformed the Russell 2000 for the 10-, 15-year and since inception (12/14/93) periods ended June 30, 2012. The Funds NAV average annual total return since inception was 10.1%. Correlation and a relatively narrow performance range have hindered recent results for equities in general, but RMTs poor relative performance had less to do with those phenomena and more to do with two other factors. First, two areas that helped to drive the terrific results for the Russell Microcap Index during the first half were areas that the Fund has avoided through its long history: utilities, banks, and REITs (real estate investment trusts). Utilities by and large fail to meet our disciplined value criteria. Many bank stocks were beaten down to very low valuations during late 2008 and early 2009, but the lack of balance sheet strength and other fundamental factors led us to avoid making any significant investments in the industry. Similarly, REITs often boast attractive yields, which was a key driver of first-half results, but do not offer much else in the way of strong business fundamentals, so we have |
Important Performance and Risk Information
All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Returns as of the most recent month-end may be obtained at www.roycefunds.com. The market price of the Funds shares will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when sold. The Fund normally invests in micro-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investing in a more diversified portfolio of larger-cap companies. Regarding the two Good Ideas tables shown above, the sum of all contributors to, and all detractors from, performance for all securities in the portfolio would approximate the Funds year-to-date performance for 2012. |
12 | The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
|
generally stayed away. A more important reason is that many of those companies in which we have been seeing attractive valuations and excellent potential over the last year fell further out of favor in a market that has been largely indifferent to quality and uninterested in those sectors in which we have seen the most compelling bargains. Energy was the only equity sector that detracted from first-half results, though its net losses were slight. Financials led portfolio contributors by a wide margin. The sector was boosted by strong results from holdings in the real estate management & development group, capital markets stocks, insurance companies, and commercial banks. Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, RMTs largest position on June 30, manages and invests in real estate in the U.S. and Japan. As banks continue to shed troubled real estate from their portfolios, the company has been acting in our view like a value investor, taking on low-priced properties and waiting for a rebound. While its stock price was volatile during the first half, the company ended the half on a high note. In May, we finished selling our shares of womens apparel retailer Charming Shoppes shortly after the announcement of its acquisition by Ascena Retail Group (a stock that we own in other Royce-managed portfolios). We first bought shares of Charming Shoppes in RMTs portfolio in 2003 and repurchased shares in 2008. Shares of PMFG, a business we have owned since 1994, plummeted more than 70% between early February and the end of June, mostly driven by the issuing of a secondary offering priced at a sizable discount to its stock. As a manufacturer of custom products primarily for the natural gas industry, the company was also adversely affected by declining energy prices in the second quarter. Fond of its growing business and attractive valuation, we increased our stake in the first half. Sapient Corporation is a top-10 holding that specializes in tech-based management consulting services. Its share price was trending downward in a slow but not alarming fashion until the company announced disappointing quarterly results in early May. Higher operating costs ate into revenues and earnings, prompting investors to flee, though we were content to hold a good-sized position. |
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (12/14/93) through 6/30/12 | |
1 | Reflects the cumulative total return of an investment made by a stockholder who purchased one share at inception ($7.50 IPO), reinvested distributions and fully participated in the primary subscription of the 1994 rights offering. |
2 | Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on the NYSE and, prior to 12/1/03, on the Nasdaq. |
FUND INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS |
|||
Fund Total Net Assets | $353 million | ||
Number of Holdings | 338 | ||
Turnover Rate | 13% | ||
Symbol | |||
Market Price | RMT | ||
NAV | XOTCX | ||
Net Leverage1 | 10% | ||
Average Market Capitalization2 |
$315 million | ||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio3,4 |
15.6 | ||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio3 |
1.3x | ||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) |
95.9% | ||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) |
13.8% | ||
1 Net leverage is the percentage, in excess of 100%, of the total value of equity type investments, divided by net assets applicable to Common Stockholders. |
|||
2 Geometric average |
|||
3 Harmonic average |
|||
4 The Funds P/E ratio calculation excludes companies with zero or negative earnings (21% of portfolio holdings as of 6/30/12). |
|||
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Publicly Traded Securities Outstanding at 6/30/12 at NAV or Liquidation Value |
|||
29 million shares of Common Stock |
$293 million | ||
6.00% Cumulative Preferred Stock |
$60 million | ||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater Over the Last 7 Years, in Percentages(%) |
|||
The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 13 |
Royce Focus Trust |
AVERAGE ANNUAL NAV TOTAL RETURNS Through 6/30/12 |
|||||||||||
Jan-June 20121 | -0.07 | % | |||||||||
One-Year | -13.77 | ||||||||||
Three-Year | 12.55 | ||||||||||
Five-Year | -1.45 | ||||||||||
10-Year | 9.46 | ||||||||||
15-Year | 8.70 | ||||||||||
Since Inception (11/1/96)2 | 9.62 | ||||||||||
1 Not annualized | |||||||||||
2 Royce & Associates assumed investment management responsibility for the Fund on 11/1/96. | |||||||||||
CALENDAR YEAR NAV TOTAL RETURNS | |||||||||||
Year | FUND | Year | FUND | ||||||||
2011 | -10.5 | % | 2003 | 54.3 | % | ||||||
2010 | 21.8 | 2002 | -12.5 | ||||||||
2009 | 54.0 | 2001 | 10.0 | ||||||||
2008 | -42.7 | 2000 | 20.9 | ||||||||
2007 | 12.2 | 1999 | 8.7 | ||||||||
2006 | 15.8 | 1998 | -6.8 | ||||||||
2005 | 13.3 | 1997 | 20.5 | ||||||||
2004 | 29.3 | ||||||||||
TOP 10 POSITIONS % of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|||||||||||
Berkshire Hathaway Cl. B | 4.2 | % | |||||||||
Microsoft Corporation | 4.1 | ||||||||||
Analog Devices | 3.6 | ||||||||||
Buckle (The) | 3.2 | ||||||||||
Exxon Mobil | 3.2 | ||||||||||
Mosaic Company (The) | 3.1 | ||||||||||
Western Digital | 3.1 | ||||||||||
Franklin Resources | 3.0 | ||||||||||
Allied Nevada Gold | 2.9 | ||||||||||
MKS Instruments | 2.5 | ||||||||||
PORTFOLIO SECTOR BREAKDOWN
% of Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
|||||||||||
Materials | 31.2 | % | |||||||||
Financials | 18.8 | ||||||||||
Information Technology | 18.8 | ||||||||||
Energy | 11.7 | ||||||||||
Industrials | 6.7 | ||||||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 6.3 | ||||||||||
Consumer Staples | 4.8 | ||||||||||
Health Care | 1.6 | ||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 16.9 | ||||||||||
Managers Discussion
Although correlation has been the order of the day for most stocks recently, the limited portfolio of Royce Focus Trust (FUND) proved an unhappy exception to the rule in the first half. The Fund was down 0.1% on an NAV (net asset value) basis and gained 2.7% on a market price basis, in each case trailing both its new unleveraged benchmark, the Russell 2500 Index, which climbed 8.3%, and the small-cap Russell 2000 Index, which was up 8.5%, for the same period. Coming in the aftermath of a dismal performance in 2011, these were disappointing results on both an absolute and relative basis. The year began with a continuation of the rally that began off the small-cap low on October 3, 2011, making the first quarter of 2012 a highly rewarding one for stocks across asset classes and around the globe. FUND gained 11.0% on an NAV basis and 12.0% on a market price basis in the first quarter. While this was a strong absolute showing, the Fund trailed both the Russell 2500, which was up 13.0%, and the Russell 2000, which rose 12.4%. Coupled with improving U.S. economic numbers, we were cheered by these strong quarterly results, thinking that both the market and economy were establishing more lasting and positive directions. However, spring brought a spate of negative news centered on European debt, concerns over the pace and strength of the U.S. recovery, and fears of decelerating growth in China for the third consecutive year. The effects on share prices were slightly less damaging than what they were in 2010 and 2011, but negative all the same. There was also the unfortunate reality that many more economically sensitive areas of the stock marketincluding energy and materials companieswere among the hardest hit in the first half. These are the sectors in which we have been seeing especially compelling valuations in what we deem to be high-quality businesses, so their punishment by investors led to a significant second-quarter tailspin for the portfolio, which declined 10.0% on an NAV basis and 8.3% on a market price basis from the beginning of April through the end of June. FUNDs investments in non-U.S. companies also made an outsized contribution to its second-quarter loss. During the same period, the Funds new benchmark lost 4.1%, and the Russell 2000 fell 3.5%. Market cycle and long-term results were better, though for periods ended June 30, 2012 the long term means going back 10 years or more. During the most recent full market cycle periodfrom the previous small-cap peak on July 13, 2007 through the small-cap peak on April 29, 2011the Fund gained 10.2% on an NAV basis versus 9.2% for its new benchmark and 6.6% for the Russell 2000. On both an NAV and market price basis, FUND outperformed the Russell 2500 and the Russell 2000 for the 10-, 15-year, and since inception of our management (11/1/96) periods ended June 30, 2012. The Funds NAV average annual total return since inception was 9.6%. |
14 | The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Performance and Portfolio Review
Information Technology and Financials led all sectors in net gains for the period. Top
contributor Veeco Instruments was one of 2011s largest detractors, and its then-declining
share price led us to re-initiate and then bolster our position in the second half of last year.
The company manufactures equipment used to make high brightness light emitting diodes
(HB LEDs), solar panels, hard-disk drives, and other devices. The combination of its strong
balance sheet and high-growth potential businesses first drew us to the company. Its shares
began to rebound in 2012 on signs that MOCVDa key piece of equipment used to make
LEDshad bottomed. The company has been gaining market share, LED manufacturer
utilization rates have been improving, and there is a growing tailwind for the early adoption
phase of LEDs into the $100 billion general lighting market. We think these events have all
set the stage for second-half momentum and renewed sales and profit growth in 2013. Apple
continues to be the favorite of many investors otherwise disinclined to buy stocks. Its towering
success with such ubiquitous devices as the iPad and iPhone makes it easy to see why. After
adding shares in January, we took some gains in April.
The Energy and Materials sectors detracted most from first-half results. A growing business, talented management, and a pristine balance sheet helped to draw us to Trican Well Service, which we first purchased in the portfolio in 2004. The company provides specialized equipment and services for drilling, completion, and reworking oil and gas wells. Confident in its long-term prospects and secure in the belief that the market was punishing it disproportionately, we were happy to hold a good-sized position at the end of the period. We have also owned shares of steel and scrap metal recycler Schnitzer Steel Industries since 2004. Demand for recycled metals slackened amid the slow pace of growth in the U.S. Along with lower-than-normal spring scrap flows and margins compressed from increases in raw materials and transport costs, this helped keep investors selling, while we continued to hold our shares in anticipation of a rebound in industrial activity that should help to spark demand. |
MARKET PRICE PERFORMANCE HISTORY SINCE INCEPTION (11/1/96)3 through 6/30/12 | |
1 | Reflects the cumulative total return experience of a continuous common stockholder who reinvested all distributions and fully participated in the primary subscription of the 2005 rights offering. |
2 | Reflects the actual market price of one share as it traded on Nasdaq. |
3 | Royce & Associates assumed investment management responsibility for the Fund on 11/1/96. |
FUND INFORMATION AND PORTFOLIO DIAGNOSTICS |
|||
Fund Total Net Assets | $174 million | ||
Number of Holdings | 53 | ||
Turnover Rate | 11% | ||
Symbol | |||
Market Price | FUND | ||
NAV | XFUNX | ||
Net Leverage1 | 0% | ||
Average Market Capitalization2 |
$5,043 million | ||
Weighted Average P/E Ratio3,4 |
12.0x | ||
Weighted Average P/B Ratio3 |
1.7x | ||
U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) |
74.7% | ||
Non-U.S. Investments (% of Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders) |
25.2% | ||
1 Net leverage is the percentage, in excess of 100%, of the total value of equity type investments, divided by net assets applicable to Common Stockholders. |
|||
2 Geometrically calculated |
|||
3 Harmonic average |
|||
4 The Funds P/E ratio calculation excludes companies with zero or negative earnings (7% of portfolio holdings as of 6/30/12). |
|||
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Publicly Traded Securities Outstanding at 6/30/12 at NAV or Liquidation Value |
|||
21 million shares of Common Stock |
$149 million | ||
6.00% Cumulative Preferred Stock |
$25 million | ||
DOWN MARKET PERFORMANCE COMPARISON All Down Periods of 7.5% or Greater Over the Last 7 Years, in Percentages(%) |
|||
The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 15 |
History Since Inception |
The following table details the share accumulations by an initial investor in the Funds who reinvested all distributions and participated fully in primary subscriptions for each of the rights offerings. Full participation in distribution reinvestments and rights offerings can maximize the returns available to a long-term investor. This table should be read in conjunction with the Performance and Portfolio Reviews of the Funds. |
Amount | Purchase | NAV | Market | ||||||||||||||||||
History | Invested | Price1 | Shares | Value2 | Value2 | ||||||||||||||||
Royce Value Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||
11/26/86 | Initial Purchase | $ | 10,000 | $ | 10.000 | 1,000 | $ | 9,280 | $ | 10,000 | |||||||||||
10/15/87 | Distribution $0.30 | 7.000 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||
12/31/87 | Distribution $0.22 | 7.125 | 32 | 8,578 | 7,250 | ||||||||||||||||
12/27/88 | Distribution $0.51 | 8.625 | 63 | 10,529 | 9,238 | ||||||||||||||||
9/22/89 | Rights Offering | 405 | 9.000 | 45 | |||||||||||||||||
12/29/89 | Distribution $0.52 | 9.125 | 67 | 12,942 | 11,866 | ||||||||||||||||
9/24/90 | Rights Offering | 457 | 7.375 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||
12/31/90 | Distribution $0.32 | 8.000 | 52 | 11,713 | 11,074 | ||||||||||||||||
9/23/91 | Rights Offering | 638 | 9.375 | 68 | |||||||||||||||||
12/31/91 | Distribution $0.61 | 10.625 | 82 | 17,919 | 15,697 | ||||||||||||||||
9/25/92 | Rights Offering | 825 | 11.000 | 75 | |||||||||||||||||
12/31/92 | Distribution $0.90 | 12.500 | 114 | 21,999 | 20,874 | ||||||||||||||||
9/27/93 | Rights Offering | 1,469 | 13.000 | 113 | |||||||||||||||||
12/31/93 | Distribution $1.15 | 13.000 | 160 | 26,603 | 25,428 | ||||||||||||||||
10/28/94 | Rights Offering | 1,103 | 11.250 | 98 | |||||||||||||||||
12/19/94 | Distribution $1.05 | 11.375 | 191 | 27,939 | 24,905 | ||||||||||||||||
11/3/95 | Rights Offering | 1,425 | 12.500 | 114 | |||||||||||||||||
12/7/95 | Distribution $1.29 | 12.125 | 253 | 35,676 | 31,243 | ||||||||||||||||
12/6/96 | Distribution $1.15 | 12.250 | 247 | 41,213 | 36,335 | ||||||||||||||||
1997 | Annual distribution total $1.21 | 15.374 | 230 | 52,556 | 46,814 | ||||||||||||||||
1998 | Annual distribution total $1.54 | 14.311 | 347 | 54,313 | 47,506 | ||||||||||||||||
1999 | Annual distribution total $1.37 | 12.616 | 391 | 60,653 | 50,239 | ||||||||||||||||
2000 | Annual distribution total $1.48 | 13.972 | 424 | 70,711 | 61,648 | ||||||||||||||||
2001 | Annual distribution total $1.49 | 15.072 | 437 | 81,478 | 73,994 | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | Annual distribution total $1.51 | 14.903 | 494 | 68,770 | 68,927 | ||||||||||||||||
1/28/03 | Rights Offering | 5,600 | 10.770 | 520 | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | Annual distribution total $1.30 | 14.582 | 516 | 106,216 | 107,339 | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | Annual distribution total $1.55 | 17.604 | 568 | 128,955 | 139,094 | ||||||||||||||||
2005 | Annual distribution total $1.61 | 18.739 | 604 | 139,808 | 148,773 | ||||||||||||||||
2006 | Annual distribution total $1.78 | 19.696 | 693 | 167,063 | 179,945 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | Annual distribution total $1.85 | 19.687 | 787 | 175,469 | 165,158 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | Annual distribution total $1.723 | 12.307 | 1,294 | 95,415 | 85,435 | ||||||||||||||||
3/11/09 | Distribution $0.323 | 6.071 | 537 | 137,966 | 115,669 | ||||||||||||||||
12/2/10 | Distribution $0.03 | 13.850 | 23 | 179,730 | 156,203 | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | Annual distribution total $0.783 | 13.043 | 656 | 161,638 | 139,866 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | Year-to-Date distribution total $0.38 | 13.057 | 334 | ||||||||||||||||||
6/30/12 | $ | 21,922 | 11,733 | $ | 168,251 | $ | 146,193 | ||||||||||||||
1 | The purchase price used for annual distribution totals is a weighted average of the distribution reinvestment prices for the year. |
2 | Other than for initial purchase, values are stated as of December 31 of the year indicated, after reinvestment of distributions. |
3 | Includes a return of capital. |
16 | The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
The following table details the share accumulations by an initial investor in the Funds who reinvested all distributions and participated fully in primary subscriptions for each of the rights offerings. Full participation in distribution reinvestments and rights offerings can maximize the returns available to a long-term investor. This table should be read in conjunction with the Performance and Portfolio Reviews of the Funds. |
Amount | Purchase | NAV | Market | ||||||||||||||||||
History | Invested | Price1 | Shares | Value2 | Value2 | ||||||||||||||||
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||
12/14/93 | Initial Purchase | $ | 7,500 | $ | 7.500 | 1,000 | $ | 7,250 | $ | 7,500 | |||||||||||
10/28/94 | Rights Offering | 1,400 | 7.000 | 200 | |||||||||||||||||
12/19/94 | Distribution $0.05 | 6.750 | 9 | 9,163 | 8,462 | ||||||||||||||||
12/7/95 | Distribution $0.36 | 7.500 | 58 | 11,264 | 10,136 | ||||||||||||||||
12/6/96 | Distribution $0.80 | 7.625 | 133 | 13,132 | 11,550 | ||||||||||||||||
12/5/97 | Distribution $1.00 | 10.000 | 140 | 16,694 | 15,593 | ||||||||||||||||
12/7/98 | Distribution $0.29 | 8.625 | 52 | 16,016 | 14,129 | ||||||||||||||||
12/6/99 | Distribution $0.27 | 8.781 | 49 | 18,051 | 14,769 | ||||||||||||||||
12/6/00 | Distribution $1.72 | 8.469 | 333 | 20,016 | 17,026 | ||||||||||||||||
12/6/01 | Distribution $0.57 | 9.880 | 114 | 24,701 | 21,924 | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | Annual distribution total $0.80 | 9.518 | 180 | 21,297 | 19,142 | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | Annual distribution total $0.92 | 10.004 | 217 | 33,125 | 31,311 | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | Annual distribution total $1.33 | 13.350 | 257 | 39,320 | 41,788 | ||||||||||||||||
2005 | Annual distribution total $1.85 | 13.848 | 383 | 41,969 | 45,500 | ||||||||||||||||
2006 | Annual distribution total $1.55 | 14.246 | 354 | 51,385 | 57,647 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | Annual distribution total $1.35 | 13.584 | 357 | 51,709 | 45,802 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | Annual distribution total $1.193 | 8.237 | 578 | 28,205 | 24,807 | ||||||||||||||||
3/11/09 | Distribution $0.223 | 4.260 | 228 | 41,314 | 34,212 | ||||||||||||||||
12/2/10 | Distribution $0.08 | 9.400 | 40 | 53,094 | 45,884 | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | Annual distribution total $0.533 | 8.773 | 289 | 49,014 | 43,596 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | Year-to-Date distribution total $0.26 | 8.975 | 145 | ||||||||||||||||||
6/30/12 | $ | 8,900 | 5,116 | $ | 52,183 | $ | 45,635 | ||||||||||||||
Royce Focus Trust | |||||||||||||||||||||
10/31/96 | Initial Purchase | $ | 4,375 | $ | 4.375 | 1,000 | $ | 5,280 | $ | 4,375 | |||||||||||
12/31/96 | 5,520 | 4,594 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/5/97 | Distribution $0.53 | 5.250 | 101 | 6,650 | 5,574 | ||||||||||||||||
12/31/98 | 6,199 | 5,367 | |||||||||||||||||||
12/6/99 | Distribution $0.145 | 4.750 | 34 | 6,742 | 5,356 | ||||||||||||||||
12/6/00 | Distribution $0.34 | 5.563 | 69 | 8,151 | 6,848 | ||||||||||||||||
12/6/01 | Distribution $0.14 | 6.010 | 28 | 8,969 | 8,193 | ||||||||||||||||
12/6/02 | Distribution $0.09 | 5.640 | 19 | 7,844 | 6,956 | ||||||||||||||||
12/8/03 | Distribution $0.62 | 8.250 | 94 | 12,105 | 11,406 | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | Annual distribution total $1.74 | 9.325 | 259 | 15,639 | 16,794 | ||||||||||||||||
5/6/05 | Rights offering | 2,669 | 8.340 | 320 | |||||||||||||||||
2005 | Annual distribution total $1.21 | 9.470 | 249 | 21,208 | 20,709 | ||||||||||||||||
2006 | Annual distribution total $1.57 | 9.860 | 357 | 24,668 | 27,020 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | Annual distribution total $2.01 | 9.159 | 573 | 27,679 | 27,834 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | Annual distribution total $0.473 | 6.535 | 228 | 15,856 | 15,323 | ||||||||||||||||
3/11/09 | Distribution $0.093 | 3.830 | 78 | 24,408 | 21,579 | ||||||||||||||||
12/31/10 | 29,726 | 25,806 | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | Annual distribution total $0.413 | 6.894 | 207 | 26,614 | 22,784 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | Year-to-Date distribution total $0.20 | 6.681 | 109 | ||||||||||||||||||
6/30/12 | $ | 7,044 | 3,725 | $ | 26,597 | $ | 23,393 | ||||||||||||||
1 | The purchase price used for annual distribution totals is a weighted average of the distribution reinvestment prices for the year. |
2 | Other than for initial purchase, values are stated as of December 31 of the year indicated, after reinvestment of distributions. |
3 | Includes a return of capital. |
The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 17 |
18 | The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Value Trust | June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
COMMON STOCKS 112.0% | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary 14.3% | |||||||
Auto Components - 1.1% | |||||||
China XD Plastics 1,2 |
99,100 | $ | 453,878 | ||||
Drew Industries 2 |
46,591 | 1,297,559 | |||||
Gentex Corporation |
76,600 | 1,598,642 | |||||
Minth Group |
1,028,900 | 1,116,630 | |||||
WABCO Holdings 2 |
103,800 | 5,494,134 | |||||
Williams Controls |
37,499 | 453,738 | |||||
Xinyi Glass Holdings |
700,000 | 374,259 | |||||
10,788,840 | |||||||
Automobiles - 0.4% | |||||||
Thor Industries |
77,500 | 2,124,275 | |||||
Winnebago Industries 2 |
222,500 | 2,267,275 | |||||
4,391,550 | |||||||
Distributors - 0.8% | |||||||
LKQ Corporation 1,2 |
184,000 | 6,145,600 | |||||
Weyco Group |
97,992 | 2,271,455 | |||||
8,417,055 | |||||||
Diversified Consumer Services - 1.8% | |||||||
Anhanguera Educacional Participacoes |
80,000 | 1,019,667 | |||||
Career Education 1,2 |
28,900 | 193,341 | |||||
ChinaCast Education 2 |
46,842 | 30,447 | |||||
Corinthian Colleges 1,2 |
59,500 | 171,955 | |||||
MegaStudy |
31,150 | 2,136,197 | |||||
Regis Corporation |
233,800 | 4,199,048 | |||||
Sothebys |
212,400 | 7,085,664 | |||||
Steiner Leisure 2 |
10,042 | 466,049 | |||||
Universal Technical Institute |
153,521 | 2,074,069 | |||||
17,376,437 | |||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure - 0.2% | |||||||
Benihana |
3,300 | 53,163 | |||||
CEC Entertainment |
64,100 | 2,331,317 | |||||
Lotto24 2,3 |
6,800 | 17,211 | |||||
2,401,691 | |||||||
Household Durables - 2.8% | |||||||
Desarrolladora Homex ADR 2 |
14,100 | 217,140 | |||||
Ekornes |
70,000 | 1,003,915 | |||||
Ethan Allen Interiors |
345,800 | 6,891,794 | |||||
Hanssem |
39,100 | 632,612 | |||||
Harman International Industries |
121,400 | 4,807,440 | |||||
Mohawk Industries 2 |
144,200 | 10,069,486 | |||||
NVR 2 |
1,875 | 1,593,750 | |||||
Tupperware Brands |
10,700 | 585,932 | |||||
Woongjin Coway |
50,000 | 1,558,315 | |||||
27,360,384 | |||||||
Internet & Catalog Retail - 0.3% | |||||||
Manutan International |
43,900 | 1,667,235 | |||||
Takkt |
120,000 | 1,493,354 | |||||
3,160,589 | |||||||
Leisure Equipment & Products - 0.4% | |||||||
Beneteau |
80,000 | 770,523 | |||||
Shimano |
45,500 | 2,976,149 | |||||
3,746,672 | |||||||
Media - 1.1% | |||||||
Global Sources 1,2 |
64,671 | 426,829 | |||||
Morningstar |
109,800 | 6,350,832 | |||||
Pico Far East Holdings |
13,179,000 | 3,266,461 | |||||
Television Broadcasts |
75,000 | 523,120 | |||||
10,567,242 | |||||||
Multiline Retail - 0.3% | |||||||
New World Department Store China |
4,774,700 | 2,584,701 | |||||
Specialty Retail - 1.5% | |||||||
Abercrombie & Fitch Cl. A |
7,400 | 252,636 | |||||
Dickson Concepts (International) |
434,300 | 233,837 | |||||
Dover Saddlery 2 |
17,821 | 74,492 | |||||
Guess? |
19,100 | 580,067 | |||||
Hengdeli Holdings |
2,112,250 | 677,015 | |||||
Lewis Group |
200,000 | 1,723,665 | |||||
LOccitane International |
100,000 | 276,971 | |||||
Luk Fook Holdings (International) |
387,400 | 812,779 | |||||
Mens Wearhouse (The) |
65,300 | 1,837,542 | |||||
Oriental Watch Holdings |
2,098,900 | 560,554 | |||||
OSIM International |
1,400,000 | 1,338,871 | |||||
Sa Sa International Holdings |
700,000 | 441,354 | |||||
Stein Mart 2 |
167,800 | 1,334,010 | |||||
Systemax 2 |
194,000 | 2,293,080 | |||||
USS |
10,000 | 1,080,175 | |||||
West Marine 2 |
131,100 | 1,540,425 | |||||
15,057,473 | |||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods - 3.6% | |||||||
Anta Sports Products 1 |
928,200 | 565,865 | |||||
Carters 1,2 |
211,200 | 11,109,120 | |||||
China Xiniya Fashion ADR 2 |
95,700 | 136,851 | |||||
Columbia Sportswear |
41,297 | 2,214,345 | |||||
Daphne International Holdings |
510,700 | 521,405 | |||||
Gildan Activewear |
19,800 | 544,896 | |||||
Grendene |
300,000 | 1,568,335 | |||||
J.G. Boswell Company 4 |
2,292 | 1,650,240 | |||||
K-Swiss Cl. A 1,2 |
163,600 | 503,888 | |||||
Li Ning 2 |
535,000 | 301,345 | |||||
Pacific Textiles Holdings |
3,921,000 | 2,410,223 | |||||
Stella International Holdings |
633,700 | 1,572,478 | |||||
Texwinca Holdings |
1,277,000 | 1,213,553 | |||||
Van de Velde |
8,423 | 363,499 | |||||
Warnaco Group (The) 2 |
160,500 | 6,834,090 | |||||
Wolverine World Wide |
100,000 | 3,878,000 | |||||
Xtep International Holdings |
750,000 | 262,696 | |||||
35,650,829 | |||||||
Total (Cost $121,442,744) | 141,503,463 | ||||||
Consumer Staples 2.4% | |||||||
Beverages - 0.0% | |||||||
MGP Ingredients |
127,400 | 408,954 | |||||
Food & Staples Retailing - 0.4% | |||||||
FamilyMart |
83,500 | 3,823,232 | |||||
Food Products - 2.0% | |||||||
Alico |
27,000 | 824,580 | |||||
Asian Citrus Holdings |
287,800 | 162,056 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 19 |
Royce Value Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Consumer Staples (continued) | |||||||
Food Products (continued) | |||||||
Binggrae |
23,796 | $ | 1,496,250 | ||||
Cal-Maine Foods |
34,848 | 1,362,557 | |||||
Cerebos Pacific |
257,000 | 1,074,315 | |||||
First Resources |
1,059,800 | 1,619,940 | |||||
Industrias Bachoco ADR |
5,000 | 109,750 | |||||
Origin Agritech 1,2 |
76,800 | 109,824 | |||||
Seneca Foods Cl. A 2 |
110,000 | 2,959,000 | |||||
Seneca Foods Cl. B 2 |
13,251 | 359,102 | |||||
Super Group |
890,000 | 1,479,565 | |||||
Tootsie Roll Industries |
322,058 | 7,684,304 | |||||
Waterloo Investment Holdings 2,3 |
598,676 | 84,413 | |||||
Westway Group |
31,500 | 188,685 | |||||
19,514,341 | |||||||
Total (Cost $20,595,129) | 23,746,527 | ||||||
Diversified Investment Companies 0.4% | |||||||
Closed-End Funds - 0.4% | |||||||
Central Fund of Canada Cl. A |
226,000 | 4,472,540 | |||||
Total (Cost $2,031,252) | 4,472,540 | ||||||
Energy 4.9% | |||||||
Energy Equipment & Services - 4.2% | |||||||
Cal Dive International 2 |
456,250 | 1,323,125 | |||||
CARBO Ceramics |
4,500 | 345,285 | |||||
Ensco Cl. A |
50,600 | 2,376,682 | |||||
Ensign Energy Services |
225,100 | 3,095,374 | |||||
Heckmann Corporation 1,2 |
50,000 | 169,000 | |||||
Helmerich & Payne |
121,100 | 5,265,428 | |||||
ION Geophysical 1,2 |
361,500 | 2,382,285 | |||||
Oil States International 2 |
93,023 | 6,158,123 | |||||
Pason Systems |
105,400 | 1,540,469 | |||||
SEACOR Holdings 2 |
88,866 | 7,942,843 | |||||
ShawCor Cl. A |
58,000 | 2,099,303 | |||||
TETRA Technologies 1,2 |
68,000 | 484,840 | |||||
TGS-NOPEC Geophysical |
50,000 | 1,347,666 | |||||
Tidewater |
36,000 | 1,668,960 | |||||
Trican Well Service |
282,400 | 3,259,208 | |||||
Unit Corporation 2 |
34,000 | 1,254,260 | |||||
Willbros Group 2 |
103,800 | 670,548 | |||||
41,383,399 | |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 0.7% | |||||||
Africa Oil 1,2 |
97,400 | 750,040 | |||||
Bill Barrett 1,2 |
50,000 | 1,071,000 | |||||
Cimarex Energy |
61,300 | 3,378,856 | |||||
Green Plains Renewable Energy 1,2 |
65,000 | 405,600 | |||||
Resolute Energy 1,2 |
181,134 | 1,733,453 | |||||
7,338,949 | |||||||
Total (Cost $39,976,537) | 48,722,348 | ||||||
Financials 20.7% | |||||||
Capital Markets - 9.2% | |||||||
A.F.P. Provida ADR |
14,960 | 1,248,113 | |||||
Affiliated Managers Group 2 |
47,600 | 5,209,820 | |||||
AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. |
514,600 | 6,530,274 | |||||
AP Alternative Assets L.P. 2 |
233,200 | 2,449,734 | |||||
Artio Global Investors Cl. A |
235,000 | 822,500 | |||||
ASA Gold and Precious Metals |
117,501 | 2,619,097 | |||||
Ashmore Group |
806,000 | 4,423,148 | |||||
Bank Sarasin & Co. Cl. B 2 |
1 | 28 | |||||
BT Investment Management |
163,717 | 298,820 | |||||
Cowen Group Cl. A 2 |
1,154,458 | 3,070,858 | |||||
Dubai Investments |
8,900,000 | 1,690,527 | |||||
Eaton Vance |
85,300 | 2,298,835 | |||||
Egyptian Financial Group-Hermes Holding Company 2 |
51,625 | 87,682 | |||||
Epoch Holding Corporation |
25,000 | 569,500 | |||||
FBR & Co. 2 |
576,200 | 1,596,074 | |||||
Federated Investors Cl. B |
224,700 | 4,909,695 | |||||
Fiducian Portfolio Services |
227,000 | 225,364 | |||||
GAMCO Investors Cl. A |
80,575 | 3,576,724 | |||||
GFI Group |
166,247 | 591,839 | |||||
GIMV |
22,500 | 1,023,377 | |||||
Gleacher & Company 2 |
200,000 | 160,000 | |||||
Jupiter Fund Management |
75,000 | 253,265 | |||||
KKR & Co. L.P. |
415,000 | 5,349,350 | |||||
Lazard Cl. A |
319,700 | 8,309,003 | |||||
MVC Capital |
254,200 | 3,291,890 | |||||
Oppenheimer Holdings Cl. A |
75,000 | 1,179,000 | |||||
Paris Orleans |
198,359 | 4,255,479 | |||||
Partners Group Holding |
14,600 | 2,595,612 | |||||
Reinet Investments 2 |
164,948 | 3,013,467 | |||||
Reinet Investments DR 2 |
500,000 | 923,752 | |||||
SEI Investments |
338,600 | 6,734,754 | |||||
SHUAA Capital 2 |
485,000 | 88,253 | |||||
SPARX Group 2 |
730 | 61,588 | |||||
Sprott |
269,600 | 1,310,795 | |||||
Treasury Group |
42,250 | 174,110 | |||||
UOB-Kay Hian Holdings |
135,000 | 167,833 | |||||
Value Partners Group |
7,511,700 | 3,680,321 | |||||
VZ Holding |
12,800 | 1,212,697 | |||||
Waddell & Reed Financial Cl. A |
139,300 | 4,218,004 | |||||
Westwood Holdings Group |
23,460 | 874,120 | |||||
91,095,302 | |||||||
Commercial Banks - 1.7% | |||||||
Bank of N.T. Butterfield & Son 2 |
882,304 | 1,120,526 | |||||
BCB Holdings 2 |
598,676 | 178,147 | |||||
Center Bancorp |
2,419 | 27,214 | |||||
Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach |
1,200 | 5,280,000 | |||||
Fauquier Bankshares |
160,800 | 2,090,400 | |||||
First Citizens BancShares Cl. A |
35,596 | 5,932,074 | |||||
Hawthorn Bancshares |
23,056 | 210,965 | |||||
Mechanics Bank |
200 | 2,300,000 | |||||
Old Point Financial |
17,573 | 189,788 | |||||
17,329,114 | |||||||
Consumer Finance - 0.3% | |||||||
World Acceptance 2 |
42,000 | 2,763,600 | |||||
20 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2012 (unaudited) |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Financials (continued) | |||||||
Diversified Financial Services - 1.2% | |||||||
Banca Finnat Euramerica |
1,060,000 | $ | 345,706 | ||||
Interactive Brokers Group |
100,000 | 1,472,000 | |||||
PICO Holdings 2 |
83,060 | 1,861,374 | |||||
RHJ International 2 |
232,500 | 1,049,066 | |||||
Sofina |
89,000 | 6,873,949 | |||||
State Bank of Mauritius |
36,000 | 94,920 | |||||
11,697,015 | |||||||
Insurance - 5.0% | |||||||
Alleghany Corporation 2 |
24,197 | 8,220,931 | |||||
Argo Group International Holdings |
64,751 | 1,895,262 | |||||
Brown & Brown |
151,800 | 4,139,586 | |||||
Discovery Holdings |
120,000 | 765,131 | |||||
eHealth 2 |
32,000 | 515,520 | |||||
E-L Financial |
20,400 | 8,315,490 | |||||
Erie Indemnity Cl. A |
50,000 | 3,580,500 | |||||
Independence Holding |
349,423 | 3,441,816 | |||||
Platinum Underwriters Holdings |
149,000 | 5,676,900 | |||||
Primerica |
170,000 | 4,544,100 | |||||
ProAssurance Corporation |
22,000 | 1,959,980 | |||||
RLI |
80,724 | 5,505,377 | |||||
White Mountains Insurance Group |
1,550 | 808,712 | |||||
49,369,305 | |||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) - 0.5% | |||||||
Colony Financial |
275,461 | 4,765,475 | |||||
Vestin Realty Mortgage II 1,2 |
214,230 | 247,436 | |||||
5,012,911 | |||||||
Real Estate Management & Development - 2.4% | |||||||
Altisource Portfolio Solutions 2 |
41,199 | 3,017,003 | |||||
Consolidated-Tomoka Land |
63,564 | 1,829,372 | |||||
E-House China Holdings ADR |
471,100 | 2,591,050 | |||||
Forestar Group 1,2 |
177,000 | 2,267,370 | |||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings |
150,000 | 2,101,500 | |||||
Midland Holdings |
3,138,800 | 1,534,511 | |||||
St. Joe Company (The) 1,2 |
167,000 | 2,640,270 | |||||
Tejon Ranch 2 |
264,400 | 7,567,128 | |||||
23,548,204 | |||||||
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance - 0.4% | |||||||
CFS Bancorp |
150,000 | 670,500 | |||||
HopFed Bancorp |
108,521 | 749,880 | |||||
Kearny Financial |
70,862 | 686,653 | |||||
MyState 2 |
100,578 | 314,520 | |||||
Timberland Bancorp 2,5 |
444,200 | 2,203,232 | |||||
4,624,785 | |||||||
Total (Cost $220,667,144) | 205,440,236 | ||||||
Health Care 7.8% | |||||||
Biotechnology - 0.1% | |||||||
3SBio ADR 1,2 |
33,200 | 453,180 | |||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies - 2.2% | |||||||
Allied Healthcare Products 2 |
174,712 | 545,101 | |||||
Analogic Corporation |
40,135 | 2,488,370 | |||||
Atrion Corporation |
15,750 | 3,228,435 | |||||
bioMerieux |
13,800 | 1,134,795 | |||||
Carl Zeiss Meditec |
80,000 | 1,928,183 | |||||
CONMED Corporation |
81,500 | 2,255,105 | |||||
DiaSorin 1 |
50,000 | 1,458,254 | |||||
DynaVox Cl. A 1,2 |
55,000 | 61,600 | |||||
IDEXX Laboratories 1,2 |
40,201 | 3,864,522 | |||||
Kossan Rubber Industries |
473,968 | 481,311 | |||||
Nihon Kohden |
25,100 | 764,305 | |||||
Straumann Holding |
4,000 | 587,476 | |||||
Top Glove |
375,000 | 613,631 | |||||
Urologix 1,2 |
261,200 | 201,124 | |||||
Young Innovations |
62,550 | 2,157,350 | |||||
21,769,562 | |||||||
Health Care Providers & Services - 0.9% | |||||||
Accretive Health 1,2 |
244,700 | 2,681,912 | |||||
Cross Country Healthcare 2 |
30,000 | 131,100 | |||||
Landauer |
75,500 | 4,328,415 | |||||
MWI Veterinary Supply 1,2 |
10,000 | 1,027,700 | |||||
VCA Antech 2 |
39,900 | 877,002 | |||||
9,046,129 | |||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services - 3.3% | |||||||
Bio-Rad Laboratories Cl. A 2 |
22,888 | 2,289,029 | |||||
EPS |
512 | 1,399,841 | |||||
Furiex Pharmaceuticals 2 |
8,333 | 174,576 | |||||
ICON ADR 2 |
207,650 | 4,678,354 | |||||
Luminex Corporation 1,2 |
20,000 | 489,800 | |||||
Mettler-Toledo International 2 |
33,500 | 5,220,975 | |||||
PAREXEL International 2 |
312,400 | 8,819,052 | |||||
PerkinElmer |
185,800 | 4,793,640 | |||||
Techne Corporation |
71,000 | 5,268,200 | |||||
33,133,467 | |||||||
Pharmaceuticals - 1.3% | |||||||
Adcock Ingram Holdings |
215,000 | 1,583,327 | |||||
Almirall |
140,000 | 1,006,833 | |||||
Boiron |
55,000 | 1,428,330 | |||||
Daewoong Pharmaceutical |
14,843 | 316,526 | |||||
Green Cross |
5,000 | 652,160 | |||||
Hikma Pharmaceuticals |
60,000 | 613,879 | |||||
Kalbe Farma |
800,000 | 322,062 | |||||
Recordati |
230,000 | 1,636,514 | |||||
Santen Pharmaceutical |
76,000 | 3,116,937 | |||||
Vetoquinol |
30,000 | 779,682 | |||||
Virbac |
9,000 | 1,487,100 | |||||
12,943,350 | |||||||
Total (Cost $51,846,190) | 77,345,688 | ||||||
Industrials 27.5% | |||||||
Aerospace & Defense - 1.9% | |||||||
AeroVironment 2 |
22,900 | 602,499 | |||||
Alliant Techsystems |
9,300 | 470,301 | |||||
Cubic Corporation |
11,800 | 567,344 | |||||
Ducommun 1,2 |
117,200 | 1,149,732 | |||||
HEICO Corporation |
210,351 | 8,313,072 | |||||
HEICO Corporation Cl. A |
64,647 | 2,085,512 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 21 |
Royce Value Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Industrials (continued) | |||||||
Aerospace & Defense (continued) | |||||||
Hexcel Corporation 2 |
47,500 | $ | 1,225,025 | ||||
Moog Cl. A 2 |
25,000 | 1,033,750 | |||||
National Presto Industries |
3,000 | 209,310 | |||||
Teledyne Technologies 2 |
59,930 | 3,694,684 | |||||
19,351,229 | |||||||
Air Freight & Logistics - 1.8% | |||||||
C. H. Robinson Worldwide |
50,000 | 2,926,500 | |||||
Forward Air |
209,750 | 6,768,633 | |||||
Hub Group Cl. A 2 |
149,400 | 5,408,280 | |||||
UTi Worldwide |
175,000 | 2,556,750 | |||||
17,660,163 | |||||||
Building Products - 1.2% | |||||||
American Woodmark 2 |
123,335 | 2,109,029 | |||||
Apogee Enterprises |
71,100 | 1,142,577 | |||||
Burnham Holdings Cl. B 4 |
36,000 | 543,600 | |||||
Simpson Manufacturing |
258,400 | 7,625,384 | |||||
11,420,590 | |||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies - 2.5% | |||||||
Brinks Company (The) |
206,320 | 4,782,498 | |||||
CompX International Cl. A |
185,300 | 2,334,780 | |||||
Copart 2 |
149,780 | 3,548,288 | |||||
Kimball International Cl. B |
286,180 | 2,203,586 | |||||
Moshi Moshi Hotline |
240,000 | 2,470,277 | |||||
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers |
337,700 | 7,176,125 | |||||
Tetra Tech 2 |
87,400 | 2,279,392 | |||||
TMS International Cl. A 2 |
45,500 | 453,635 | |||||
25,248,581 | |||||||
Construction & Engineering - 1.6% | |||||||
EMCOR Group |
199,400 | 5,547,308 | |||||
Integrated Electrical Services 1,2 |
266,349 | 729,796 | |||||
Jacobs Engineering Group 2 |
81,400 | 3,081,804 | |||||
KBR |
180,000 | 4,447,800 | |||||
Raubex Group |
1,065,000 | 1,743,769 | |||||
15,550,477 | |||||||
Electrical Equipment - 3.2% | |||||||
AZZ |
43,900 | 2,689,314 | |||||
Belden |
57,800 | 1,927,630 | |||||
Elektrobudowa |
16,392 | 477,773 | |||||
Franklin Electric |
104,600 | 5,348,198 | |||||
Fushi Copperweld 2 |
97,931 | 851,021 | |||||
GrafTech International 2 |
530,031 | 5,114,799 | |||||
Jinpan International |
96,284 | 781,826 | |||||
Powell Industries 2 |
92,400 | 3,452,064 | |||||
Preformed Line Products |
91,600 | 5,304,556 | |||||
Regal-Beloit |
100,000 | 6,226,000 | |||||
32,173,181 | |||||||
Industrial Conglomerates - 0.7% | |||||||
Raven Industries |
99,500 | 6,924,205 | |||||
Machinery - 9.6% | |||||||
Armstrong Industrial |
1,514,500 | 319,483 | |||||
Astec Industries 1,2 |
21,900 | 671,892 | |||||
Burckhardt Compression Holding |
15,400 | 3,952,921 | |||||
Chen Hsong Holdings |
1,615,000 | 481,061 | |||||
China Automation Group |
844,800 | 201,958 | |||||
CLARCOR |
92,500 | 4,454,800 | |||||
Columbus McKinnon 1,2 |
133,700 | 2,017,533 | |||||
Donaldson Company |
185,600 | 6,193,472 | |||||
EVA Precision Industrial Holdings |
6,393,600 | 526,753 | |||||
FAG Bearings India |
28,000 | 730,752 | |||||
Flowserve Corporation |
5,200 | 596,700 | |||||
Gardner Denver |
36,700 | 1,941,797 | |||||
Graco |
116,376 | 5,362,606 | |||||
IDEX Corporation |
67,400 | 2,627,252 | |||||
Industrea |
1,004,725 | 1,325,090 | |||||
Kennametal |
193,500 | 6,414,525 | |||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
210,860 | 9,233,559 | |||||
Lindsay Corporation |
6,400 | 415,360 | |||||
NN 2 |
197,100 | 2,012,391 | |||||
Nordson Corporation |
204,200 | 10,473,418 | |||||
Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology |
18,500 | 1,883,100 | |||||
PMFG 1,2 |
378,352 | 2,954,929 | |||||
Rational |
7,000 | 1,668,661 | |||||
RBC Bearings 2 |
47,000 | 2,223,100 | |||||
Rotork |
12,500 | 386,142 | |||||
Semperit AG Holding |
84,000 | 3,069,743 | |||||
Spirax-Sarco Engineering |
65,000 | 2,025,394 | |||||
Sun Hydraulics |
8,600 | 208,894 | |||||
Valmont Industries |
49,800 | 6,024,306 | |||||
Wabtec Corporation |
87,725 | 6,843,427 | |||||
Woodward |
208,400 | 8,219,296 | |||||
95,460,315 | |||||||
Marine - 0.4% | |||||||
Kirby Corporation 2 |
80,000 | 3,766,400 | |||||
Professional Services - 2.6% | |||||||
Advisory Board (The) 2 |
231,200 | 11,465,208 | |||||
CRA International 2 |
64,187 | 942,907 | |||||
eClerx Services |
35,900 | 395,528 | |||||
FTI Consulting 2 |
7,850 | 225,688 | |||||
JobStreet Corporation |
600,000 | 418,817 | |||||
ManpowerGroup |
78,600 | 2,880,690 | |||||
Michael Page International |
200,000 | 1,178,685 | |||||
On Assignment 2 |
375,400 | 5,991,384 | |||||
Robert Half International |
78,900 | 2,254,173 | |||||
25,753,080 | |||||||
Road & Rail - 1.2% | |||||||
Frozen Food Express Industries 2 |
286,635 | 315,299 | |||||
Landstar System |
99,400 | 5,140,968 | |||||
Patriot Transportation Holding 2 |
212,958 | 5,010,902 | |||||
Universal Truckload Services |
121,876 | 1,843,374 | |||||
12,310,543 | |||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors - 0.7% | |||||||
AerCap Holdings 1,2 |
45,000 | 507,600 | |||||
Air Lease Cl. A 1,2 |
40,700 | 789,173 | |||||
Lawson Products |
161,431 | 1,493,237 | |||||
MSC Industrial Direct Cl. A |
56,448 | 3,700,166 | |||||
6,490,176 | |||||||
22 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2012 (unaudited) |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Industrials (continued) | |||||||
Transportation Infrastructure - 0.1% | |||||||
Wesco Aircraft Holdings 1,2 |
68,400 | $ | 870,732 | ||||
Total (Cost $167,315,025) | 272,979,672 | ||||||
Information Technology 21.9% | |||||||
Communications Equipment - 1.8% | |||||||
AAC Technologies Holdings |
206,700 | 598,540 | |||||
ADTRAN |
127,700 | 3,855,263 | |||||
Bel Fuse Cl. A |
36,672 | 664,130 | |||||
Black Box |
43,798 | 1,257,003 | |||||
Cogo Group 1,2 |
87,715 | 154,378 | |||||
Comba Telecom Systems Holdings 1 |
2,880,928 | 1,207,349 | |||||
Comtech Telecommunications |
30,000 | 857,400 | |||||
EVS Broadcast Equipment |
37,298 | 1,756,332 | |||||
Globecomm Systems 2 |
183,700 | 1,862,718 | |||||
Sonus Networks 1,2 |
1,124,000 | 2,416,600 | |||||
Tellabs |
650,000 | 2,164,500 | |||||
VTech Holdings |
64,050 | 762,782 | |||||
Zhone Technologies 2 |
256,878 | 168,255 | |||||
17,725,250 | |||||||
Computers & Peripherals - 1.5% | |||||||
Asustek Computer |
50,000 | 462,509 | |||||
Catcher Technology |
85,600 | 579,379 | |||||
China Digital TV Holding Co. ADR |
5,000 | 14,700 | |||||
Diebold |
151,600 | 5,595,556 | |||||
Electronics for Imaging 1,2 |
8,517 | 138,401 | |||||
Foxconn Technology |
81,100 | 297,151 | |||||
Intermec 2 |
23,000 | 142,600 | |||||
Intevac 2 |
57,450 | 432,024 | |||||
Simplo Technology |
83,300 | 576,487 | |||||
SMART Technologies Cl. A 2 |
75,000 | 136,500 | |||||
STEC 1,2 |
345,500 | 2,694,900 | |||||
Steel Excel 2,4 |
156,880 | 4,212,228 | |||||
15,282,435 | |||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components - 8.9% | |||||||
Agilysys 2 |
165,125 | 1,431,633 | |||||
Anixter International |
61,795 | 3,278,225 | |||||
Benchmark Electronics 2 |
165,200 | 2,304,540 | |||||
China High Precision Automation Group 1,3 |
2,720,300 | 480,386 | |||||
Chroma Ate |
269,982 | 614,495 | |||||
Cognex Corporation |
236,200 | 7,475,730 | |||||
Coherent 2 |
233,300 | 10,101,890 | |||||
Dolby Laboratories Cl. A 2 |
128,500 | 5,307,050 | |||||
FEI Company 2 |
103,000 | 4,927,520 | |||||
FLIR Systems |
105,000 | 2,047,500 | |||||
Hana Microelectronics |
1,391,300 | 838,532 | |||||
Hollysys Automation Technologies 2 |
65,727 | 559,994 | |||||
Inficon Holding |
1,100 | 224,470 | |||||
IPG Photonics 1,2 |
74,620 | 3,252,686 | |||||
Kingboard Chemical Holdings |
311,900 | 606,451 | |||||
Mercury Computer Systems 2 |
40,500 | 523,665 | |||||
Molex |
72,600 | 1,738,044 | |||||
National Instruments |
251,850 | 6,764,691 | |||||
Newport Corporation 2 |
523,500 | 6,292,470 | |||||
Perceptron 2 |
357,700 | 1,974,504 | |||||
Plexus Corporation 2 |
176,100 | 4,966,020 | |||||
Pulse Electronics 1,2 |
286,200 | 563,814 | |||||
Richardson Electronics |
395,712 | 4,879,129 | |||||
Rofin-Sinar Technologies 1,2 |
320,200 | 6,061,386 | |||||
Tech Data 1,2 |
122,800 | 5,915,276 | |||||
TTM Technologies 2 |
211,400 | 1,989,274 | |||||
Vaisala Cl. A |
164,833 | 3,128,637 | |||||
88,248,012 | |||||||
Internet Software & Services - 1.0% | |||||||
Active Network 1,2 |
21,500 | 330,885 | |||||
Perficient 2 |
10,000 | 112,300 | |||||
RealNetworks |
61,350 | 530,064 | |||||
ValueClick 2 |
145,000 | 2,376,550 | |||||
VistaPrint 1,2 |
187,000 | 6,040,100 | |||||
9,389,899 | |||||||
IT Services - 3.5% | |||||||
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation Cl. A |
22,300 | 340,744 | |||||
Convergys Corporation |
121,000 | 1,787,170 | |||||
CSE Global |
1,886,100 | 1,189,298 | |||||
Forrester Research |
40,300 | 1,364,558 | |||||
Gartner 2 |
86,000 | 3,702,300 | |||||
Hackett Group 2 |
655,000 | 3,648,350 | |||||
ManTech International Cl. A |
35,400 | 830,838 | |||||
MAXIMUS |
188,400 | 9,749,700 | |||||
MoneyGram International 2 |
164,962 | 2,408,445 | |||||
NeuStar Cl. A 2 |
64,287 | 2,147,186 | |||||
Sapient Corporation |
706,602 | 7,115,482 | |||||
34,284,071 | |||||||
Office Electronics - 0.1% | |||||||
Zebra Technologies Cl. A 2 |
29,658 | 1,019,049 | |||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 3.2% | |||||||
Aixtron ADR |
75,158 | 1,075,511 | |||||
Analog Devices |
8,000 | 301,360 | |||||
ASM Pacific Technology |
90,000 | 1,148,275 | |||||
ATMI 2 |
63,315 | 1,302,390 | |||||
BCD Semiconductor Manufacturing ADR 1,2 |
195,500 | 842,605 | |||||
BE Semiconductor Industries 4 |
58,000 | 406,580 | |||||
Cabot Microelectronics |
34,500 | 1,007,745 | |||||
Cymer 2 |
13,700 | 807,615 | |||||
Diodes 1,2 |
252,450 | 4,738,487 | |||||
Exar Corporation 1,2 |
157,576 | 1,285,820 | |||||
Integrated Silicon Solution 2 |
180,200 | 1,818,218 | |||||
International Rectifier 1,2 |
120,000 | 2,398,800 | |||||
Miraial |
26,170 | 418,619 | |||||
Nanometrics 2 |
140,100 | 2,151,936 | |||||
OmniVision Technologies 2 |
57,300 | 765,528 | |||||
Power Integrations |
49,000 | 1,827,700 | |||||
RDA Microelectronics ADR 2 |
103,800 | 1,042,152 | |||||
Teradyne 2 |
262,200 | 3,686,532 | |||||
TriQuint Semiconductor 2 |
350,000 | 1,925,000 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 23 |
Royce Value Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Information Technology (continued) | |||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment (continued) | |||||||
Veeco Instruments 1,2 |
83,000 | $ | 2,851,880 | ||||
31,802,753 | |||||||
Software - 1.9% | |||||||
ACI Worldwide 2 |
131,150 | 5,798,142 | |||||
ANSYS 1,2 |
105,600 | 6,664,416 | |||||
Aspen Technology 2 |
42,100 | 974,615 | |||||
Blackbaud |
31,400 | 806,038 | |||||
JDA Software Group 2 |
49,900 | 1,481,531 | |||||
Majesco Entertainment 1,2 |
36,255 | 72,510 | |||||
Net 1 UEPS Technologies 1,2 |
50,000 | 418,500 | |||||
NetScout Systems 2 |
23,100 | 498,729 | |||||
SimCorp |
15,000 | 2,579,527 | |||||
19,294,008 | |||||||
Total (Cost $194,871,406) | 217,045,477 | ||||||
Materials 9.1% | |||||||
Chemicals - 2.1% | |||||||
Agrium |
7,500 | 663,525 | |||||
C. Uyemura & Co. |
18,000 | 680,990 | |||||
Cabot Corporation |
67,200 | 2,735,040 | |||||
Fufeng Group |
693,400 | 263,438 | |||||
Hawkins |
86,178 | 3,290,276 | |||||
Huchems Fine Chemical |
40,056 | 792,680 | |||||
Intrepid Potash 2 |
132,766 | 3,021,754 | |||||
KMG Chemicals |
53,285 | 1,027,335 | |||||
LSB Industries 2 |
79,200 | 2,448,072 | |||||
Minerals Technologies |
28,930 | 1,845,155 | |||||
Mosaic Company (The) |
11,000 | 602,360 | |||||
OM Group 2 |
90,000 | 1,710,000 | |||||
Stepan Company |
7,500 | 706,350 | |||||
Victrex |
70,000 | 1,396,094 | |||||
21,183,069 | |||||||
Construction Materials - 0.8% | |||||||
Ash Grove Cement Cl. B 4 |
50,518 | 6,819,930 | |||||
Mardin Cimento Sanayii |
350,000 | 1,080,938 | |||||
7,900,868 | |||||||
Containers & Packaging - 1.1% | |||||||
Broadway Industrial Group |
1,485,200 | 425,159 | |||||
Greif Cl. A |
116,344 | 4,770,104 | |||||
Mayr-Melnhof Karton |
65,000 | 5,959,598 | |||||
11,154,861 | |||||||
Metals & Mining - 5.0% | |||||||
Allied Nevada Gold 2 |
72,200 | 2,049,036 | |||||
AuRico Gold 2 |
258,300 | 2,068,983 | |||||
Centamin 2 |
1,165,000 | 1,281,603 | |||||
Central Steel & Wire 4 |
6,062 | 4,091,850 | |||||
Cliffs Natural Resources |
22,500 | 1,109,025 | |||||
Coeur dAlene Mines 2 |
27,400 | 481,144 | |||||
Commercial Metals |
36,600 | 462,624 | |||||
Endeavour Mining 2 |
300,000 | 654,160 | |||||
Fresnillo |
40,000 | 918,002 | |||||
Globe Specialty Metals |
45,600 | 612,408 | |||||
Hecla Mining |
300,000 | 1,425,000 | |||||
Hochschild Mining |
300,000 | 2,213,445 | |||||
Kimber Resources 2 |
560,000 | 411,600 | |||||
Kinross Gold |
29,200 | 237,980 | |||||
Maharashtra Seamless |
330,000 | 2,011,278 | |||||
Major Drilling Group International |
367,600 | 4,249,731 | |||||
Medusa Mining |
300,000 | 1,488,066 | |||||
Northam Platinum |
460,000 | 1,317,092 | |||||
Pretium Resources 2 |
39,000 | 538,200 | |||||
Randgold Resources ADR 1 |
33,000 | 2,970,330 | |||||
Reliance Steel & Aluminum |
151,920 | 7,671,960 | |||||
Schnitzer Steel Industries Cl. A |
100,000 | 2,802,000 | |||||
Silvercorp Metals |
116,500 | 644,245 | |||||
Sims Metal Management ADR |
218,383 | 2,161,992 | |||||
Synalloy Corporation |
178,800 | 2,038,320 | |||||
Worthington Industries |
185,000 | 3,786,950 | |||||
49,697,024 | |||||||
Paper & Forest Products - 0.1% | |||||||
China Forestry Holdings 3 |
3,563,800 | 268,734 | |||||
Qunxing Paper Holdings 3 |
3,296,000 | 175,380 | |||||
444,114 | |||||||
Total (Cost $85,129,469) | 90,379,936 | ||||||
Telecommunication Services 0.8% | |||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services - 0.1% | |||||||
ORBCOMM 2 |
93,400 | 304,484 | |||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services - 0.7% | |||||||
Telephone and Data Systems |
338,270 | 7,201,768 | |||||
Total (Cost $8,586,851) | 7,506,252 | ||||||
Miscellaneous6 2.2% | |||||||
Total (Cost $22,601,924) | 22,164,135 | ||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||||||
(Cost $935,063,671) |
1,111,306,274 | ||||||
PREFERRED STOCK 0.1% | |||||||
Seneca Foods Conv. 2,3 |
|||||||
(Cost $796,469) |
55,000 | 1,331,550 | |||||
PRINCIPAL | |||||||
AMOUNT | |||||||
CORPORATE BOND 0.0% | |||||||
GAMCO Investors (Debentures) 0.00% |
|||||||
due 12/31/15 |
|||||||
(Cost $289,828) |
$ | 289,800 | 252,314 | ||||
24 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2012 (unaudited) |
VALUE | |||||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 8.0% | |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, | |||||||
0.11% dated 6/29/12, due 7/2/12, |
|||||||
maturity value $79,013,724 (collateralized |
|||||||
by obligations of various U.S. Government |
|||||||
Agencies, 0.875% due 11/30/16, valued at |
|||||||
$80,598,000) |
|||||||
(Cost $79,013,000) |
$ | 79,013,000 | |||||
COLLATERAL RECEIVED FOR SECURITIES | |||||||
LOANED 3.5% |
|||||||
Money Market Funds | |||||||
Federated Government Obligations Fund |
|||||||
(7 day yield-0.0115%) |
|||||||
(Cost $34,162,585) |
34,162,585 | ||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 123.6% | |||||||
(Cost $1,049,325,553) |
1,226,065,723 | ||||||
LIABILITIES LESS CASH | |||||||
AND OTHER ASSETS (1.4)% |
(14,124,876 | ) | |||||
PREFERRED STOCK (22.2)% | (220,000,000 | ) | |||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS 100.0% |
$ | 991,940,847 | |||||
| New additions in 2012. |
1 | All or a portion of these securities were on loan at June 30, 2012. Total market value of loaned securities at June 30, 2012, was $34,221,501. |
2 | Non-income producing. |
3 | Securities for which market quotations are not readily available represent 0.2% of net assets. These securities have been valued at their fair value under procedures approved by the Funds Board of Directors. These securities are defined as Level 3 securities due to the use of significant unobservable inputs in the determination of fair value. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
4 | These securities are defined as Level 2 securities due to fair value being based on quoted prices for similar securities. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
5 | At June 30, 2012, the Fund owned 5% or more of the Companys outstanding voting securities thereby making the Company an Affiliated Company as that term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
6 | Includes securities first acquired in 2012 and less than 1% of net assets applicable to Common Stockholders. |
Bold indicates the Funds 20 largest equity holdings in terms of June 30, 2012, market value. |
|
TAX INFORMATION: The cost of total investments for Federal income tax purposes was $1,050,543,499. At June 30, 2012, net unrealized appreciation for all securities was $175,522,224, consisting of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation of $302,938,768 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation of $127,416,544. The primary difference between book and tax basis cost is the timing of the recognition of losses on securities sold. |
|
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 25 |
Royce Value Trust | June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
ASSETS: | |||||
Investments at value (including collateral on loaned securities) | |||||
Non-Affiliated Companies (cost $964,879,987) |
$ | 1,144,849,491 | |||
Affiliated Companies (cost $5,432,566) |
2,203,232 | ||||
Total investments at value | 1,147,052,723 | ||||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) | 79,013,000 | ||||
Cash and foreign currency | 1,354,533 | ||||
Receivable for investments sold | 23,193,974 | ||||
Receivable for dividends and interest | 1,088,873 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 472,554 | ||||
Total Assets |
1,252,175,657 | ||||
LIABILITIES: | |||||
Payable for collateral on loaned securities | 34,162,585 | ||||
Payable for investments purchased | 5,090,419 | ||||
Payable for investment advisory fee | 487,469 | ||||
Preferred dividends accrued but not yet declared | 288,452 | ||||
Accrued expenses | 205,885 | ||||
Total Liabilities |
40,234,810 | ||||
PREFERRED STOCK: | |||||
5.90% Cumulative Preferred Stock - $0.001 par value, $25 liquidation value per share; 8,800,000 shares outstanding | 220,000,000 | ||||
Total Preferred Stock |
220,000,000 | ||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | $ | 991,940,847 | |||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||
Common Stock paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 69,170,978 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) | $ | 805,986,320 | |||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | 8,605,037 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 33,400,395 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 176,721,304 | ||||
Unallocated and accrued distributions | (32,772,209 | ) | |||
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders (net asset value per share - $14.34) |
$ | 991,940,847 | |||
Investments at identified cost (including $34,162,585 of collateral on loaned securities) |
$ | 970,312,553 | |||
Market value of loaned securities |
34,221,501 |
26 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Value Trust | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Operations |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | |||||
Income: | |||||
Dividends1 |
$ | 9,367,401 | |||
Interest |
51,692 | ||||
Securities lending |
182,424 | ||||
Total income | 9,601,517 | ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Investment advisory fees |
2,948,872 | ||||
Stockholder reports |
202,217 | ||||
Custody and transfer agent fees |
174,182 | ||||
Administrative and office facilities |
65,771 | ||||
Directors fees |
62,123 | ||||
Professional fees |
55,587 | ||||
Other expenses |
42,277 | ||||
Total expenses | 3,551,029 | ||||
Compensating balance credits | (82 | ) | |||
Fees waived by investment adviser | (25,000 | ) | |||
Net expenses | 3,525,947 | ||||
Net investment income (loss) | 6,075,570 | ||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: | |||||
Net realized gain (loss): | |||||
Investments |
31,970,519 | ||||
Foreign currency transactions |
(105,015 | ) | |||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): | |||||
Investments and foreign currency translations |
6,782,833 | ||||
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
(6,899 | ) | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 38,641,438 | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | 44,717,008 | ||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS | (6,490,000 | ) | |||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | 38,227,008 |
1 | Net of foreign withholding tax of $463,080. |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 27 |
Royce Value Trust | ||
Statement of Changes in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
Six months ended | ||||||||||
6/30/12 | Year ended | |||||||||
(unaudited) | 12/31/11 | |||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | ||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 6,075,570 | $ | 6,739,838 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 31,865,504 | 35,713,778 | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 6,775,934 | (143,670,265 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | 44,717,008 | (101,216,649 | ) | |||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||
Net investment income | | (2,024,508 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (10,955,492 | ) | |||||||
Unallocated distributions1 | (6,490,000 | ) | | |||||||
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders | (6,490,000 | ) | (12,980,000 | ) | ||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
38,227,008 | (114,196,649 | ) | |||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||
Net investment income | | (5,275,650 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (28,548,829 | ) | |||||||
Return of capital | | (18,288,444 | ) | |||||||
Unallocated distributions1 | (25,993,760 | ) | | |||||||
Total distributions to Common Stockholders | (25,993,760 | ) | (52,112,923 | ) | ||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | ||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions to Common Stockholders | 13,067,726 | 27,070,308 | ||||||||
Total capital stock transactions | 13,067,726 | 27,070,308 | ||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | 25,300,974 | (139,239,264 | ) | |||||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period |
966,639,873 | 1,105,879,137 | ||||||||
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $8,605,037 at 6/30/12 and $2,529,467 at 12/31/11) |
$ | 991,940,847 | $ | 966,639,873 | ||||||
1 | To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
28 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Value Trust | ||
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Funds performance for the periods presented. |
Six months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2012 | Years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | $ | 14.18 | $ | 16.73 | $ | 12.87 | $ | 9.37 | $ | 19.74 | $ | 20.62 | ||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
0.09 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency |
0.57 | (1.62 | ) | 3.85 | 3.87 | (8.50 | ) | 1.13 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total investment operations |
0.66 | (1.52 | ) | 4.09 | 4.04 | (8.36 | ) | 1.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| (0.03 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (0.16 | ) | | | (0.20 | ) | (0.21 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| | | (0.02 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated distributions1 |
(0.09 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
(0.09 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.22 | ) | ||||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
0.57 | (1.71 | ) | 3.89 | 3.84 | (8.57 | ) | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| (0.08 | ) | (0.03 | ) | | (0.06 | ) | (0.09 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (0.43 | ) | | | (1.18 | ) | (1.76 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| (0.27 | ) | | (0.32 | ) | (0.48 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Unallocated distributions1 |
(0.38 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
(0.38 | ) | (0.78 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.32 | ) | (1.72 | ) | (1.85 | ) | ||||||||||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
(0.03 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total capital stock transactions |
(0.03 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 14.34 | $ | 14.18 | $ | 16.73 | $ | 12.87 | $ | 9.37 | $ | 19.74 | ||||||||||||||
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 12.46 | $ | 12.27 | $ | 14.54 | $ | 10.79 | $ | 8.39 | $ | 18.58 | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN:2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Value | 4.52 | %3 | (10.46 | )% | 35.05 | % | 35.39 | % | (48.27 | )% | (8.21 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | 4.09 | %3 | (10.06 | )% | 30.27 | % | 44.59 | % | (45.62 | )% | 5.04 | % | ||||||||||||||
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fee expense4 |
0.56 | %5 | 0.86 | % | 0.11 | % | 0.00 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.29 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
0.12 | %5 | 0.12 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.16 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total expenses (net)6 | 0.68 | %5 | 0.98 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.38 | % | ||||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers and balance credits | 0.69 | %5 | 0.98 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.38 | % | ||||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers | 0.69 | %5 | 0.98 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.16 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.38 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | 1.17 | %5 | 0.63 | % | 1.69 | % | 1.66 | % | 0.94 | % | 0.43 | % | ||||||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$991,941 | $966,640 | $ | 1,105,879 | $849,777 | $603,234 | $ | 1,184,669 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$220,000 | $220,000 | $220,000 | $220,000 | $220,000 | $220,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13 | % | 26 | % | 30 | % | 31 | % | 25 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 8,800,000 | 8,800,000 | 8,800,000 | 8,800,000 | 8,800,000 | 8,800,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per share | $ | 137.72 | $ | 134.88 | $ | 150.67 | $ | 121.57 | $ | 93.55 | $ | 159.62 | ||||||||||||||
Liquidation preference per share | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | ||||||||||||||
Average month-end market value per share | $ | 25.67 | $ | 25.37 | $ | 25.06 | $ | 23.18 | $ | 22.51 | $ | 23.68 | ||||||||||||||
1 | To be allocated
to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
2 | The Market
Value Total Return is calculated assuming a purchase of Common Stock on the opening
of the first business day and a sale on the closing of the last business day of
each period. Dividends and distributions are assumed for the purposes of this calculation
to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds Distribution Reinvestment
and Cash Purchase Plan. Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated on the same basis,
except that the Funds net asset value is used on the purchase and sale dates
instead of market value. |
3 | Not annualized |
4 | The investment
advisory fee is calculated based on average net assets over a rolling 60-month basis,
while the above ratios of investment advisory fee expenses are based on the average
net assets applicable to Common Stockholders over a 12-month basis. |
5 | Annualized |
6 | Expense ratios
based on total average net assets including liquidation value of Preferred Stock
were 0.56%, 0.82%, 0.18%, 0.12%, 1.13% and 1.17% for the periods ended June 30,
2012, and December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 29 |
Royce Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Level |
1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
Level |
2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, foreign securities that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table below includes all Level 2 securities. Level 2 securities with values based on quoted prices for similar securities are noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
Level |
3 significant unobservable inputs (including last trade price before trading was suspended, or at a discount thereto for lack of marketability or otherwise, market price information regarding other securities, information received from the company and/or published documents, including SEC filings and financial statements, or other publicly available information). |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 887,712,798 | $ | 222,567,352 | $ | 1,026,124 | $ | 1,111,306,274 | ||||
Preferred Stocks | | | 1,331,550 | 1,331,550 | ||||||||
Corporate Bonds | | 252,314 | | 252,314 | ||||||||
Cash Equivalents | 34,162,585 | 79,013,000 | | 113,175,585 |
30 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Realized and Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of 12/31/11 | Purchases | Gain (Loss)1 | Balance as of 6/30/12 | |||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 1,701,029 | $17,052 | $ | (691,957 | ) | $ | 1,026,124 | ||||||||||||
Preferred Stocks | 1,278,090 | | 53,460 | 1,331,550 |
1 | The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is included in the accompanying Statement of Operations. Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) includes net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) resulting from changes in investment values during the reporting period and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation (depreciation) when gains or losses are realized. Net realized gain (loss) from investments and foreign currency transactions is included in the accompanying Statement of Operations. |
2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 31 |
Royce Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
32 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Value Trust |
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Shares | Market Value | Cost of | Cost of | Realized | Dividend | Shares | Market Value | |
Affiliated Company | 12/31/11 | 12/31/11 | Purchases | Sales | Gain (Loss) | Income | 6/30/12 | 6/30/12 |
Timberland Bancorp | 444,200 | $1,710,170 | | | | | 444,200 | $2,203,232 |
$1,710,170 | $2,203,232 |
2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 33 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
COMMON STOCKS 109.3% | ||||||
Consumer Discretionary 12.4% | ||||||
Auto Components - 1.8% | ||||||
China XD Plastics 1,2 |
91,600 | $ | 419,528 | |||
China Zenix Auto International ADR |
50,000 | 121,500 | ||||
Drew Industries 2 |
111,200 | 3,096,920 | ||||
Fuel Systems Solutions 1,2 |
60,000 | 1,001,400 | ||||
Spartan Motors |
41,000 | 214,840 | ||||
Williams Controls |
31,000 | 375,100 | ||||
5,229,288 | ||||||
Distributors - 0.4% | ||||||
Weyco Group |
48,000 | 1,112,640 | ||||
Diversified Consumer Services - 0.3% | ||||||
ChinaCast Education 2 |
44,000 | 28,600 | ||||
Lincoln Educational Services |
112,500 | 731,250 | ||||
Spectrum Group International 2,3 |
6,925 | 13,019 | ||||
772,869 | ||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure - 0.4% | ||||||
Benihana |
72,800 | 1,172,808 | ||||
Household Durables - 3.2% | ||||||
Cavco Industries 2 |
3,091 | 158,506 | ||||
Ethan Allen Interiors |
81,600 | 1,626,288 | ||||
Flexsteel Industries |
172,500 | 3,412,050 | ||||
Koss Corporation |
73,400 | 391,222 | ||||
Natuzzi ADR 2 |
409,800 | 995,814 | ||||
Skullcandy 1,2 |
65,100 | 921,165 | ||||
Universal Electronics 2 |
152,400 | 2,007,108 | ||||
9,512,153 | ||||||
Internet & Catalog Retail - 0.3% | ||||||
Geeknet 2 |
1,500 | 29,730 | ||||
NutriSystem |
21,800 | 252,008 | ||||
US Auto Parts Network 2 |
140,900 | 588,962 | ||||
870,700 | ||||||
Leisure Equipment & Products - 0.2% | ||||||
Leapfrog Enterprises Cl. A 1,2 |
48,400 | 496,584 | ||||
Sturm, Ruger & Co. |
6,400 | 256,960 | ||||
753,544 | ||||||
Media - 0.7% | ||||||
Global Sources 2 |
59,655 | 393,723 | ||||
Rentrak Corporation 2 |
87,000 | 1,796,550 | ||||
2,190,273 | ||||||
Specialty Retail - 3.1% | ||||||
Americas Car-Mart 2 |
92,800 | 3,605,280 | ||||
Le Chateau Cl. A 2 |
73,100 | 86,160 | ||||
Lewis Group |
57,000 | 491,245 | ||||
Oriental Watch Holdings |
545,100 | 145,580 | ||||
Shoe Carnival |
35,028 | 752,752 | ||||
Stein Mart 2 |
178,900 | 1,422,255 | ||||
Systemax 2 |
84,000 | 992,880 | ||||
West Marine 2 |
86,000 | 1,010,500 | ||||
Wet Seal (The) Cl. A 2 |
149,279 | 471,722 | ||||
8,978,374 | ||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods - 2.0% | ||||||
China Xiniya Fashion ADR 2 |
40,000 | 57,200 | ||||
G-III Apparel Group 2 |
30,200 | 715,438 | ||||
J.G. Boswell Company 3 |
2,490 | 1,792,800 | ||||
K-Swiss Cl. A 1,2 |
72,400 | 222,992 | ||||
Marimekko |
25,300 | 413,815 | ||||
Movado Group |
77,633 | 1,942,378 | ||||
True Religion Apparel |
21,100 | 611,478 | ||||
5,756,101 | ||||||
Total (Cost $28,419,288) | 36,348,750 | |||||
Consumer Staples 3.5% | ||||||
Food & Staples Retailing - 0.5% | ||||||
Arden Group Cl. A |
16,000 | 1,395,360 | ||||
Food Products - 2.7% | ||||||
Asian Citrus Holdings |
1,060,000 | 596,871 | ||||
Binggrae |
9,700 | 609,919 | ||||
Calavo Growers |
17,300 | 442,534 | ||||
Farmer Bros. 2 |
41,400 | 329,544 | ||||
Griffin Land & Nurseries 2 |
70,274 | 1,966,969 | ||||
Origin Agritech 1,2 |
121,488 | 173,728 | ||||
Seneca Foods Cl. A 2 |
51,400 | 1,382,660 | ||||
Seneca Foods Cl. B 2 |
42,500 | 1,151,750 | ||||
Waterloo Investment Holdings 2,4 |
806,207 | 113,675 | ||||
Westway Group |
220,000 | 1,317,800 | ||||
8,085,450 | ||||||
Personal Products - 0.3% | ||||||
Inter Parfums |
26,400 | 455,928 | ||||
Schiff Nutrition International Cl. A 2 |
17,015 | 305,419 | ||||
761,347 | ||||||
Total (Cost $8,874,885) | 10,242,157 | |||||
Energy 3.8% | ||||||
Energy Equipment & Services - 2.8% | ||||||
Dawson Geophysical 2 |
53,213 | 1,267,533 | ||||
Geodrill 2 |
177,700 | 375,263 | ||||
Global Geophysical Services 2 |
35,000 | 214,200 | ||||
Gulf Island Fabrication |
29,116 | 821,362 | ||||
Heckmann Corporation 1,2 |
200,000 | 676,000 | ||||
Lamprell |
202,400 | 320,157 | ||||
North American Energy Partners 2 |
50,000 | 129,000 | ||||
OYO Geospace 1,2 |
7,130 | 641,629 | ||||
Pason Systems |
139,200 | 2,034,472 | ||||
Pioneer Drilling 1,2 |
57,500 | 458,275 | ||||
Tesco Corporation 2 |
50,000 | 600,000 | ||||
Willbros Group 2 |
131,100 | 846,906 | ||||
8,384,797 | ||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 1.0% | ||||||
Approach Resources 1,2 |
12,000 | 306,480 | ||||
Resolute Energy 1,2 |
40,000 | 382,800 | ||||
Sprott Resource 2 |
172,600 | 673,040 | ||||
VAALCO Energy 2 |
92,900 | 801,727 |
34 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2012 (unaudited) |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
Energy (continued) | ||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (continued) | ||||||
Warren Resources 2 |
290,000 | $ | 696,000 | |||
2,860,047 | ||||||
Total (Cost $9,532,174) | 11,244,844 | |||||
Financials 20.4% | ||||||
Capital Markets - 8.1% | ||||||
ASA Gold and Precious Metals |
35,000 | 780,150 | ||||
BKF Capital Group 2,3 |
130,200 | 130,200 | ||||
Cohen & Steers |
27,900 | 962,829 | ||||
Diamond Hill Investment Group |
34,479 | 2,699,361 | ||||
Duff & Phelps Cl. A |
50,000 | 725,000 | ||||
Edelman Financial Group (The) |
209,000 | 1,818,300 | ||||
Epoch Holding Corporation |
196,500 | 4,476,270 | ||||
FBR & Co. 2 |
215,000 | 595,550 | ||||
Fiera Capital |
78,000 | 622,100 | ||||
INTL FCStone 2 |
32,910 | 636,808 | ||||
JZ Capital Partners |
363,999 | 2,081,644 | ||||
MVC Capital |
151,200 | 1,958,040 | ||||
NGP Capital Resources |
167,077 | 1,182,905 | ||||
Queen City Investments 3 |
948 | 957,480 | ||||
SHUAA Capital 2 |
1,100,000 | 200,162 | ||||
U.S. Global Investors Cl. A |
91,500 | 399,855 | ||||
Urbana Corporation 2 |
237,600 | 251,856 | ||||
Virtus Investment Partners 1,2 |
35,000 | 2,835,000 | ||||
Westwood Holdings Group |
8,800 | 327,888 | ||||
23,641,398 | ||||||
Commercial Banks - 2.1% | ||||||
BCB Holdings 2 |
806,207 | 239,902 | ||||
Chemung Financial |
40,000 | 1,020,000 | ||||
Fauquier Bankshares |
140,200 | 1,822,600 | ||||
Financial Institutions |
36,000 | 607,680 | ||||
First Bancorp |
40,200 | 683,400 | ||||
LCNB Corporation |
20,000 | 265,000 | ||||
Peapack-Gladstone Financial |
88,868 | 1,378,343 | ||||
6,016,925 | ||||||
Consumer Finance - 0.1% | ||||||
Regional Management 1,2 |
26,100 | 429,345 | ||||
Diversified Financial Services - 1.0% | ||||||
Banca Finnat Euramerica |
1,310,000 | 427,241 | ||||
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores |
300,000 | 591,018 | ||||
GAIN Capital Holdings |
25,000 | 124,750 | ||||
PICO Holdings 2 |
45,700 | 1,024,137 | ||||
RHJ International 2 |
170,000 | 767,059 | ||||
2,934,205 | ||||||
Insurance - 3.3% | ||||||
Hallmark Financial Services 2 |
118,000 | 920,400 | ||||
Independence Holding |
105,380 | 1,037,993 | ||||
Presidential Life |
241,100 | 2,370,013 | ||||
SeaBright Holdings |
191,000 | 1,697,990 | ||||
State Auto Financial |
139,264 | 1,956,659 | ||||
United Fire Group |
73,603 | 1,569,952 | ||||
9,553,007 | ||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) - 0.5% | ||||||
BRT Realty Trust 2 |
228,681 | 1,486,426 | ||||
Real Estate Management & Development - 4.4% | ||||||
Consolidated-Tomoka Land |
62,750 | 1,805,945 | ||||
Forestar Group 2 |
111,000 | 1,421,910 | ||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings |
465,358 | 6,519,666 | ||||
Tejon Ranch 2 |
110,162 | 3,152,836 | ||||
ZipRealty 2 |
25,000 | 36,500 | ||||
12,936,857 | ||||||
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance - 0.9% | ||||||
Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania |
41,344 | 510,599 | ||||
BofI Holding 2 |
91,262 | 1,803,337 | ||||
HopFed Bancorp |
57,222 | 395,404 | ||||
2,709,340 | ||||||
Total (Cost $49,620,709) | 59,707,503 | |||||
Health Care 8.4% | ||||||
Biotechnology - 1.7% | ||||||
Acadia Pharmaceuticals 1,2 |
499,400 | 878,944 | ||||
Celsion Corporation 1,2 |
550,000 | 1,688,500 | ||||
Chelsea Therapeutics International 1,2 |
540,000 | 799,200 | ||||
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals 1,2 |
364,203 | 655,566 | ||||
3SBio ADR 2 |
45,880 | 626,262 | ||||
Vical 1,2 |
120,000 | 432,000 | ||||
5,080,472 | ||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies - 4.4% | ||||||
Allied Healthcare Products 2 |
226,798 | 707,610 | ||||
AngioDynamics 2 |
116,940 | 1,404,449 | ||||
Atrion Corporation |
7,557 | 1,549,034 | ||||
CryoLife 2 |
50,573 | 264,497 | ||||
DynaVox Cl. A 2 |
20,000 | 22,400 | ||||
Exactech 2 |
132,100 | 2,215,317 | ||||
Medical Action Industries 2 |
125,250 | 435,870 | ||||
STRATEC Biomedical |
14,000 | 621,989 | ||||
Syneron Medical 2 |
69,200 | 718,296 | ||||
Theragenics Corporation 1,2 |
336,900 | 677,169 | ||||
Trinity Biotech ADR 1 |
49,900 | 598,800 | ||||
Utah Medical Products |
42,300 | 1,418,319 | ||||
Young Innovations |
61,450 | 2,119,410 | ||||
12,753,160 | ||||||
Health Care Providers & Services - 1.4% | ||||||
CorVel Corporation 2 |
20,000 | 980,000 | ||||
Cross Country Healthcare 2 |
300,773 | 1,314,378 | ||||
Gentiva Health Services 2 |
23,000 | 159,390 | ||||
PDI 2 |
65,383 | 538,756 | ||||
PharMerica Corporation 2 |
40,000 | 436,800 | ||||
Psychemedics Corporation |
37,500 | 385,875 | ||||
U.S. Physical Therapy |
10,000 | 254,300 | ||||
4,069,499 | ||||||
Life Sciences Tools & Services - 0.7% | ||||||
Affymetrix 2 |
150,000 | 703,500 | ||||
Furiex Pharmaceuticals 1,2 |
23,758 | 497,730 | ||||
PAREXEL International 2 |
28,800 | 813,024 | ||||
2,014,254 | ||||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 35 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
Health Care (continued) | ||||||
Pharmaceuticals - 0.2% | ||||||
Daewoong Pharmaceutical |
357 | $ | 7,613 | |||
XenoPort 1,2 |
102,000 | 616,080 | ||||
623,693 | ||||||
Total (Cost $20,743,415) | 24,541,078 | |||||
Industrials 27.7% | ||||||
Aerospace & Defense - 2.2% | ||||||
Astronics Corporation 2 |
26,017 | 734,720 | ||||
CPI Aerostructures 1,2 |
38,335 | 421,685 | ||||
Ducommun 2 |
78,700 | 772,047 | ||||
HEICO Corporation |
65,625 | 2,593,500 | ||||
Innovative Solutions and Support 2 |
100,000 | 329,000 | ||||
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions 1,2 |
72,324 | 422,372 | ||||
SIFCO Industries |
45,800 | 1,052,484 | ||||
6,325,808 | ||||||
Air Freight & Logistics - 0.6% | ||||||
Forward Air |
50,700 | 1,636,089 | ||||
Pacer International 2 |
35,000 | 189,700 | ||||
1,825,789 | ||||||
Building Products - 3.5% | ||||||
AAON |
109,500 | 2,064,075 | ||||
American Woodmark 2 |
72,000 | 1,231,200 | ||||
Apogee Enterprises |
57,900 | 930,453 | ||||
Burnham Holdings Cl. A 3 |
121,000 | 1,827,100 | ||||
Griffon Corporation |
89,500 | 767,910 | ||||
Trex Company 2 |
90,000 | 2,708,100 | ||||
WaterFurnace Renewable Energy |
53,400 | 852,323 | ||||
10,381,161 | ||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies - 2.4% | ||||||
Acorn Energy |
60,000 | 499,200 | ||||
CompX International Cl. A |
107,500 | 1,354,500 | ||||
Heritage-Crystal Clean 2 |
113,301 | 1,852,471 | ||||
Interface Cl. A |
27,000 | 368,010 | ||||
Team 2 |
69,940 | 2,180,729 | ||||
US Ecology |
52,000 | 922,480 | ||||
7,177,390 | ||||||
Construction & Engineering - 1.8% | ||||||
Comfort Systems USA |
27,096 | 271,502 | ||||
Integrated Electrical Services 2,5 |
1,122,500 | 3,075,650 | ||||
Layne Christensen 2 |
36,000 | 744,840 | ||||
MYR Group 2 |
28,500 | 486,210 | ||||
Pike Electric 2 |
90,900 | 701,748 | ||||
5,279,950 | ||||||
Electrical Equipment - 2.7% | ||||||
AZZ |
16,147 | 989,165 | ||||
Deswell Industries 1 |
544,371 | 1,480,689 | ||||
Encore Wire |
15,000 | 401,700 | ||||
Fushi Copperweld 2 |
74,163 | 644,477 | ||||
Global Power Equipment Group |
32,500 | 709,800 | ||||
Jinpan International |
97,821 | 794,307 | ||||
LSI Industries |
79,812 | 568,261 | ||||
Powell Industries 2 |
36,000 | 1,344,960 | ||||
Preformed Line Products |
16,000 | 926,560 | ||||
7,859,919 | ||||||
Industrial Conglomerates - 1.4% | ||||||
Raven Industries |
58,400 | 4,064,056 | ||||
Machinery - 6.4% | ||||||
Armstrong Industrial |
1,085,500 | 228,985 | ||||
Cascade Corporation |
10,900 | 512,845 | ||||
CIRCOR International |
14,000 | 477,260 | ||||
Columbus McKinnon 2 |
26,950 | 406,676 | ||||
Eastern Company (The) |
39,750 | 641,963 | ||||
FAG Bearings India |
23,700 | 618,529 | ||||
Foster (L.B.) Company |
66,200 | 1,893,982 | ||||
FreightCar America |
44,300 | 1,017,571 | ||||
Graham Corporation |
43,900 | 817,418 | ||||
Hurco Companies 2 |
52,666 | 1,079,126 | ||||
Industrea |
932,854 | 1,230,302 | ||||
NN 2 |
164,300 | 1,677,503 | ||||
PMFG 2 |
223,245 | 1,743,543 | ||||
Semperit AG Holding |
12,500 | 456,807 | ||||
Sun Hydraulics |
93,087 | 2,261,083 | ||||
Tennant Company |
92,300 | 3,687,385 | ||||
18,750,978 | ||||||
Professional Services - 4.0% | ||||||
Advisory Board (The) 2 |
82,800 | 4,106,052 | ||||
CBIZ 1,2 |
47,000 | 279,180 | ||||
eClerx Services |
25,100 | 276,539 | ||||
Exponent 2 |
58,400 | 3,085,272 | ||||
GP Strategies 2 |
18,485 | 341,418 | ||||
Heidrick & Struggles International |
115,600 | 2,023,000 | ||||
JobStreet Corporation |
50,000 | 34,902 | ||||
Kforce 2 |
60,000 | 807,600 | ||||
On Assignment 2 |
41,100 | 655,956 | ||||
11,609,919 | ||||||
Road & Rail - 1.6% | ||||||
Frozen Food Express Industries 2 |
157,000 | 172,700 | ||||
Patriot Transportation Holding 2 |
111,681 | 2,627,854 | ||||
Universal Truckload Services |
134,200 | 2,029,775 | ||||
4,830,329 | ||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors - 0.6% | ||||||
Aceto Corporation |
72,219 | 652,138 | ||||
Houston Wire & Cable |
67,375 | 736,409 | ||||
Lawson Products |
50,269 | 464,988 | ||||
1,853,535 | ||||||
Transportation Infrastructure - 0.5% | ||||||
Touax |
47,000 | 1,320,756 | ||||
Total (Cost $56,822,354) | 81,279,590 | |||||
Information Technology 21.0% | ||||||
Communications Equipment - 1.0% | ||||||
Bel Fuse Cl. A |
67,705 | 1,226,137 | ||||
ClearOne Communications 2 |
25,000 | 102,250 | ||||
Cogo Group 1,2 |
48,035 | 84,542 | ||||
Globecomm Systems 2 |
42,700 | 432,978 |
36 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
June 30, 2012 (unaudited) |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||||
Communications Equipment (continued) | ||||||
Oplink Communications 2 |
49,951 | $ | 675,837 | |||
PC-Tel |
44,100 | 285,327 | ||||
2,807,071 | ||||||
Computers & Peripherals - 1.4% | ||||||
Imation Corporation 2 |
112,312 | 663,764 | ||||
Rimage Corporation |
79,200 | 633,600 | ||||
STEC 2 |
189,900 | 1,481,220 | ||||
Super Micro Computer 2 |
42,754 | 678,079 | ||||
TransAct Technologies 2 |
78,600 | 606,006 | ||||
4,062,669 | ||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components - 6.6% | ||||||
Agilysys 2 |
90,000 | 780,300 | ||||
Checkpoint Systems 2 |
52,300 | 455,533 | ||||
Diploma |
50,000 | 349,295 | ||||
Domino Printing Sciences |
80,000 | 677,142 | ||||
Frequency Electronics 2 |
34,600 | 279,568 | ||||
Hana Microelectronics |
763,700 | 460,280 | ||||
Hollysys Automation Technologies 2 |
248,400 | 2,116,368 | ||||
Inficon Holding |
3,600 | 734,629 | ||||
Mercury Computer Systems 2 |
71,956 | 930,391 | ||||
Mesa Laboratories |
48,267 | 2,243,933 | ||||
Methode Electronics |
118,613 | 1,009,397 | ||||
Multi-Fineline Electronix 1,2 |
25,400 | 625,856 | ||||
Newport Corporation 2 |
80,900 | 972,418 | ||||
Parametric Sound 1,2 |
75,000 | 684,000 | ||||
Park Electrochemical |
14,200 | 367,496 | ||||
Pulse Electronics 1,2 |
150,000 | 295,500 | ||||
Richardson Electronics |
250,900 | 3,093,597 | ||||
Rogers Corporation 2 |
58,400 | 2,313,224 | ||||
TTM Technologies 2 |
114,400 | 1,076,504 | ||||
19,465,431 | ||||||
Internet Software & Services - 0.9% | ||||||
Bitauto Holdings ADR 2 |
50,000 | 204,500 | ||||
Marchex Cl. B |
95,000 | 342,950 | ||||
Stamps.com 2 |
6,600 | 162,822 | ||||
Support.com 2 |
417,500 | 1,331,825 | ||||
WebMediaBrands 2 |
525,000 | 330,750 | ||||
World Energy Solutions 2 |
72,920 | 226,781 | ||||
2,599,628 | ||||||
IT Services - 4.4% | ||||||
Cass Information Systems |
16,500 | 664,125 | ||||
Computer Task Group 2 |
211,800 | 3,174,882 | ||||
CSE Global |
1,066,300 | 672,365 | ||||
Dynamics Research 2 |
108,269 | 629,043 | ||||
Forrester Research |
54,900 | 1,858,914 | ||||
Innodata 1,2 |
153,832 | 1,052,211 | ||||
Official Payments Holdings 2 |
333,414 | 1,300,315 | ||||
Sapient Corporation |
350,000 | 3,524,500 | ||||
12,876,355 | ||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 4.5% | ||||||
Advanced Energy Industries 2 |
47,600 | 638,792 | ||||
Alpha & Omega Semiconductor 2 |
211,800 | 1,937,970 | ||||
Amtech Systems 1,2 |
92,000 | 345,920 | ||||
AXT 2 |
46,600 | 184,070 | ||||
BCD Semiconductor Manufacturing ADR 2 |
158,414 | 682,764 | ||||
Exar Corporation 2 |
341,208 | 2,784,257 | ||||
GSI Technology 2 |
39,471 | 187,093 | ||||
Integrated Silicon Solution 2 |
86,500 | 872,785 | ||||
LTX-Credence Corporation 2 |
72,200 | 483,740 | ||||
Miraial |
22,030 | 352,395 | ||||
MoSys 1,2 |
400,000 | 1,296,000 | ||||
O2Micro International ADR 1,2 |
80,000 | 352,800 | ||||
Photronics 2 |
173,000 | 1,055,300 | ||||
RDA Microelectronics ADR 2 |
94,800 | 951,792 | ||||
Rubicon Technology 1,2 |
36,899 | 376,370 | ||||
Rudolph Technologies 2 |
34,800 | 303,456 | ||||
Silicon Motion Technology ADR 1,2 |
35,400 | 499,494 | ||||
13,304,998 | ||||||
Software - 2.2% | ||||||
ACI Worldwide 2 |
69,600 | 3,077,016 | ||||
Actuate Corporation 2 |
100,300 | 695,079 | ||||
American Software Cl. A |
62,800 | 499,260 | ||||
BSQUARE Corporation 1,2 |
163,875 | 478,515 | ||||
Pegasystems |
49,000 | 1,616,020 | ||||
6,365,890 | ||||||
Total (Cost $49,297,068) | 61,482,042 | |||||
Materials 8.6% | ||||||
Chemicals - 2.8% |
||||||
Balchem Corporation |
63,375 | 2,066,659 | ||||
C. Uyemura & Co. |
10,300 | 389,677 | ||||
Hawkins |
29,697 | 1,133,832 | ||||
Landec Corporation 2 |
60,300 | 516,168 | ||||
Quaker Chemical |
73,100 | 3,377,951 | ||||
Zoltek Companies 2 |
70,000 | 632,100 | ||||
8,116,387 | ||||||
Construction Materials - 0.8% | ||||||
Ash Grove Cement 3 |
8,000 | 1,080,000 | ||||
Monarch Cement |
52,303 | 1,150,666 | ||||
2,230,666 | ||||||
Containers & Packaging - 0.1% | ||||||
Broadway Industrial Group |
1,347,200 | 385,655 | ||||
Metals & Mining - 4.7% | ||||||
AuRico Gold 2 |
91,250 | 730,912 | ||||
Aurizon Mines 2 |
47,000 | 211,970 | ||||
Central Steel & Wire 3 |
1,088 | 734,400 | ||||
Comstock Mining 1,2 |
325,000 | 802,750 | ||||
Endeavour Mining 2 |
642,400 | 1,400,774 | ||||
Endeavour Mining (Warrants) 2 |
50,000 | 22,837 | ||||
Exeter Resource 2 |
140,000 | 233,800 | ||||
Golden Star Resources 1,2 |
640,000 | 742,400 | ||||
Haynes International |
16,000 | 815,040 | ||||
Horsehead Holding Corporation 2 |
67,888 | 676,164 | ||||
Kingsrose Mining |
224,000 | 264,613 | ||||
MAG Silver 2 |
74,750 | 650,325 | ||||
Midway Gold 2 |
345,000 | 479,550 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 37 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | June 30, 2012 (unaudited) |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | ||||||
Materials (continued) | |||||||
Metals & Mining (continued) | |||||||
Richmont Mines 2 |
93,100 | $ | 431,053 | ||||
RTI International Metals 2 |
55,000 | 1,244,650 | |||||
Scorpio Mining 2 |
136,000 | 85,493 | |||||
Seabridge Gold 2 |
16,700 | 241,983 | |||||
Synalloy Corporation |
58,200 | 663,480 | |||||
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products 2 |
40,199 | 1,652,179 | |||||
Victoria Gold 2 |
1,000,000 | 299,578 | |||||
Vista Gold 2 |
498,000 | 1,449,180 | |||||
13,833,131 | |||||||
Paper & Forest Products - 0.2% | |||||||
Pope Resources L.P. |
12,205 | 672,129 | |||||
Qunxing Paper Holdings 4 |
1,500,000 | 79,815 | |||||
751,944 | |||||||
Total (Cost $22,777,618) | 25,317,783 | ||||||
Utilities 0.1% | |||||||
Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders - 0.1% | |||||||
Alterra Power 2 |
450,000 | 201,110 | |||||
China Hydroelectric ADS 1,2 |
73,100 | 51,543 | |||||
Total (Cost $754,614) | 252,653 | ||||||
Miscellaneous 6 3.4% | |||||||
Total (Cost $9,682,941) | 9,816,332 | ||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||||||
(Cost $256,525,066) |
320,232,732 | ||||||
PREFERRED STOCK 0.4% | |||||||
Seneca Foods Conv. 2,3 |
|||||||
(Cost $578,719) |
45,409 | 1,163,379 | |||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 11.0% | |||||||
Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, | |||||||
0.11% dated 6/29/12, due 7/2/12, |
|||||||
maturity value $32,076,294 (collateralized |
|||||||
by obligations of various U.S. Government |
|||||||
Agencies, 0.875% due 11/30/16, valued at |
|||||||
$32,718,950) |
|||||||
(Cost $32,076,000) |
32,076,000 | ||||||
COLLATERAL RECEIVED FOR SECURITIES | |||||||
LOANED 4.2% |
|||||||
Money Market Funds | |||||||
Federated Government Obligations Fund |
|||||||
(7 day yield-0.0115%) |
|||||||
(Cost $12,358,059) |
12,358,059 | ||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 124.9% | |||||||
(Cost $301,537,844) |
365,830,170 | ||||||
LIABILITIES LESS CASH | |||||||
AND OTHER ASSETS (4.4)% |
(12,823,065 | ) | |||||
PREFERRED STOCK (20.5)% | (60,000,000 | ) | |||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS 100.0% |
$ | 293,007,105 | |||||
| New additions in 2012. |
1 | All or a portion of these securities were on loan at June 30, 2012. Total market
value of loaned securities at June 30, 2012, was $11,927,021. |
2 | Non-income producing. |
3 | These securities are defined as Level 2 securities due to fair value being based
on quoted prices for similar securities. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
4 | Securities for which market quotations are not readily available represent 0.1%
of net assets. These securities have been valued at their fair value under procedures
approved by the Funds Board of Directors. These securities are defined as
Level 3 securities due to the use of significant unobservable inputs in the determination
of fair value. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
5 | At June 30, 2012, the Fund owned 5% or more of the Companys outstanding voting
securities thereby making the Company an Affiliated Company as that term is defined
in the Investment Company Act of 1940. See Notes to Financial Statements. |
6 | Includes securities first acquired in 2012 and less than 1% of net assets applicable
to Common Stockholders. |
Bold indicates
the Funds 20 largest equity holdings in terms of June 30, 2012, market value.
|
|
TAX INFORMATION:
The cost of total investments for Federal income tax purposes was $302,399,108.
At June 30, 2012, net unrealized appreciation for all securities
was $63,431,062, consisting of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation of $92,492,956
and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation of $29,061,894.
The primary difference between book and tax basis cost is the timing of the recognition
of losses on securities sold. |
|
38 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |||
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
ASSETS: | ||||
Investments at value (including collateral on loaned securities) | ||||
Non-Affiliated Companies (cost $267,339,619) |
$ | 330,678,520 | ||
Affiliated Companies (cost $2,122,225) |
3,075,650 | |||
Total investments at value | 333,754,170 | |||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) | 32,076,000 | |||
Cash and foreign currency | 38,610 | |||
Receivable for investments sold | 1,275,565 | |||
Receivable for dividends and interest | 334,546 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 36,569 | |||
Total Assets |
367,515,460 | |||
LIABILITIES: | ||||
Payable for collateral on loaned securities | 12,358,059 | |||
Payable for investments purchased | 1,811,288 | |||
Payable for investment advisory fee | 171,185 | |||
Preferred dividends accrued but not yet declared | 80,000 | |||
Accrued expenses | 87,823 | |||
Total Liabilities |
14,508,355 | |||
PREFERRED STOCK: | ||||
6.00% Cumulative Preferred Stock - $0.001 par value, $25 liquidation value per share; 2,400,000 shares outstanding | 60,000,000 | |||
Total Preferred Stock |
60,000,000 | |||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | $ | 293,007,105 | ||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||
Common Stock paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 28,728,978 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) | $ | 230,803,869 | ||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | (2,141,601 | ) | ||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 9,324,816 | |||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 64,291,876 | |||
Unallocated and accrued distributions | (9,271,855 | ) | ||
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders (net asset value per share - $10.20) |
$ | 293,007,105 | ||
Investments at identified cost (including $12,358,059 of collateral on loaned securities) |
$ | 269,461,844 | ||
Market value of loaned securities |
11,927,021 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 39 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |||
Statement of Operations |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | ||||
Income: | ||||
Dividends1 |
$ | 2,003,684 | ||
Interest |
9,966 | |||
Securities lending |
60,114 | |||
Total income | 2,073,764 | |||
Expenses: | ||||
Investment advisory fees |
2,027,135 | |||
Stockholder reports |
60,584 | |||
Custody and transfer agent fees |
55,103 | |||
Professional fees |
33,504 | |||
Directors fees |
30,836 | |||
Administrative and office facilities |
18,500 | |||
Other expenses |
21,384 | |||
Total expenses | 2,247,046 | |||
Compensating balance credits | (8 | ) | ||
Fees waived by investment adviser | (26,666 | ) | ||
Net expenses | 2,220,372 | |||
Net investment income (loss) | (146,608 | ) | ||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: | ||||
Net realized gain (loss): | ||||
Investments |
10,564,653 | |||
Foreign currency transactions |
(12,891 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): | ||||
Investments and foreign currency translations |
8,956,877 | |||
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
1,019 | |||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 19,509,658 | |||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | 19,363,050 | |||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS | (1,800,000 | ) | ||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ||||
FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
$ | 17,563,050 |
1 | Net of foreign withholding tax of $28,809. |
40 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | ||||
Statement of Changes in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
Six months ended | |||||||||
6/30/12 | Year ended | ||||||||
(unaudited) | 12/31/11 | ||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | |||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | (146,608 | ) | $ | 1,181,694 | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 10,551,762 | 5,899,117 | |||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 8,957,896 | (28,491,445 | ) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | 19,363,050 | (21,410,634 | ) | ||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||
Net investment income | | (660,851 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (2,939,149 | ) | ||||||
Unallocated distributions1 | (1,800,000 | ) | | ||||||
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders | (1,800,000 | ) | (3,600,000 | ) | |||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | |||||||||
FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
17,563,050 | (25,010,634 | ) | ||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||
Net investment income | | (1,505,199 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (6,694,405 | ) | ||||||
Return of capital | | (6,511,252 | ) | ||||||
Unallocated distributions1 | (7,391,855 | ) | | ||||||
Total distributions to Common Stockholders | (7,391,855 | ) | (14,710,856 | ) | |||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | |||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions to Common Stockholders | 3,543,691 | 7,734,894 | |||||||
Total capital stock transactions | 3,543,691 | 7,734,894 | |||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | 13,714,886 | (31,986,596 | ) | ||||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | |||||||||
Beginning of period |
279,292,219 | 311,278,815 | |||||||
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $(2,141,601) at 6/30/12 and |
|||||||||
$(1,994,992) at 12/31/11) |
$ | 293,007,105 | $ | 279,292,219 |
1 | To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 41 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | ||||
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Funds performance for the periods presented.
Six months ended | Years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | $ | 9.86 | $ | 11.34 | $ | 8.90 | $ | 6.39 | $ | 13.48 | $ | 14.77 | ||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
(0.00 | ) | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.02 | (0.00 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency |
0.68 | (0.82 | ) | 2.58 | 2.88 | (5.70 | ) | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investment operations |
0.68 | (0.78 | ) | 2.66 | 2.88 | (5.68 | ) | 0.24 | ||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| (0.02 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (0.11 | ) | (0.03 | ) | | (0.13 | ) | (0.14 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| | | (0.09 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Unallocated distributions1 |
(0.06 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
(0.06 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.15 | ) | ||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
0.62 | (0.91 | ) | 2.53 | 2.75 | (5.82 | ) | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| (0.05 | ) | (0.06 | ) | | (0.09 | ) | (0.08 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (0.24 | ) | (0.02 | ) | | (0.83 | ) | (1.27 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| (0.24 | ) | | (0.22 | ) | (0.27 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Unallocated distributions1 |
(0.26 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
(0.26 | ) | (0.53 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.22 | ) | (1.19 | ) | (1.35 | ) | ||||||||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
(0.02 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total capital stock transactions |
(0.02 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 10.20 | $ | 9.86 | $ | 11.34 | $ | 8.90 | $ | 6.39 | $ | 13.48 | ||||||||||||
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 8.92 | $ | 8.77 | $ | 9.80 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 5.62 | $ | 11.94 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN: 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Value | 4.69 | %3 | (4.99 | )% | 34.10 | % | 37.91 | % | (45.84 | )% | (20.54 | )% | ||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | 6.48 | %3 | (7.69 | )% | 28.50 | % | 46.47 | % | (45.45 | )% | 0.64 | % | ||||||||||||
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fee expense4 |
1.35 | %5 | 0.97 | % | 0.97 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
0.15 | %5 | 0.15 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.16 | % | 0.12 | % | ||||||||||||
Total expenses (net)6 | 1.50 | %5 | 1.12 | % | 1.12 | % | 1.59 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.56 | % | ||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers and balance credits | 1.52 | %5 | 1.15 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.56 | % | ||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers | 1.52 | %5 | 1.15 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.74 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.56 | % | ||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | (0.10 | )%5 | 0.40 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.02 | % | 0.15 | % | (0.07 | )% | ||||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$293,007 | $279,292 | $311,279 | $243,156 | $169,854 | $331,476 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$60,000 | $60,000 | $60,000 | $60,000 | $60,000 | $60,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 13 | % | 30 | % | 27 | % | 30 | % | 42 | % | 41 | % | ||||||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | 2,400,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per share | $ | 147.09 | $ | 141.37 | $ | 154.70 | $ | 126.32 | $ | 95.77 | $ | 163.11 | ||||||||||||
Liquidation preference per share | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | ||||||||||||
Average month-end market value per share | $ | 25.69 | $ | 25.41 | $ | 25.11 | $ | 23.47 | $ | 23.08 | $ | 24.06 | ||||||||||||
1 | To be allocated
to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
2 | The Market
Value Total Return is calculated assuming a purchase of Common Stock on the opening
of the first business day and a sale on the closing of the last business day of
each period. Dividends and distributions are assumed for the purposes of this calculation
to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds Distribution Reinvestment
and Cash Purchase Plan. Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated on the same basis,
except that the Funds net asset value is used on the purchase and sale dates
instead of market value. |
3 | Not annualized |
4 | The investment
advisory fee is calculated based on average net assets over a rolling 36-month basis,
while the above ratios of investment advisory fee expenses are based on the average
net assets applicable to Common Stockholders over a 12-month basis. |
5 | Annualized |
6 | Expense ratios
based on total average net assets including liquidation value of Preferred Stock
were 1.25%, 0.93%, 0.91%, 1.21%, 1.26% and 1.33% for the periods ended June 30,
2012, and December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
42 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | ||||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Level |
1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
Level |
2 other significant
observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, foreign securities
that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table below includes all
Level 2 securities. Level 2 securities with values based on quoted prices for similar
securities are noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
Level |
3 significant
unobservable inputs (including last trade price before trading was suspended, or
at a discount thereto for lack of marketability or otherwise, market price information
regarding other securities, information received from the company and/or published
documents, including SEC filings and financial statements, or other publicly available
information). |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 288,966,924 | $ | 31,072,318 | $ | 193,490 | $ | 320,232,732 | |||||
Preferred Stocks | | 1,163,379 | | 1,163,379 | |||||||||
Cash Equivalents | 12,358,059 | 32,076,000 | | 44,434,059 |
2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 43 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | ||||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Valuation of Investments (continued): | |||||||||||
Level 3 Reconciliation: | |||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized | |||||||||||
Balance as of 12/31/11 | Gain (Loss)1 | Balance as of 6/30/12 | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $347,895 | $(154,405) | $193,490 |
1 | The net change
in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is included in the accompanying Statement
of Operations. Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) includes net unrealized
appreciation (depreciation) resulting from changes in investment values during the
reporting period and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) when gains or losses are realized. Net realized gain (loss) from
investments and foreign currency transactions is included in the accompanying Statement
of Operations. |
44 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | ||||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 45 |
Royce Micro-Cap Trust | ||||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) (continued) |
Shares | Market Value | Cost of | Cost of | Realized | Dividend | Shares | Market Value | |||||||||
Affiliated Company | 12/31/11 | 12/31/11 | Purchases | Sales | Gain (Loss) | Income | 6/30/12 | 6/30/12 | ||||||||
Integrated Electrical Services | 1,122,500 | $2,155,200 | | | | | 1,122,500 | $3,075,650 | ||||||||
$2,155,200 | $3,075,650 |
46 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Royce Focus Trust |
June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |
Schedule of Investments |
SHARES | VALUE | |||||
COMMON STOCKS 99.9% | ||||||
Consumer Discretionary 6.3% | ||||||
Automobiles - 1.3% | ||||||
Thor Industries |
70,000 | $ | 1,918,700 | |||
Specialty Retail - 5.0% | ||||||
Buckle (The) |
120,000 | 4,748,400 | ||||
GameStop Corporation Cl. A |
150,000 | 2,754,000 | ||||
7,502,400 | ||||||
Total (Cost $9,312,642) | 9,421,100 | |||||
Consumer Staples 4.8% | ||||||
Food Products - 3.7% | ||||||
Cal-Maine Foods |
50,000 | 1,955,000 | ||||
Industrias Bachoco ADR |
90,000 | 1,975,500 | ||||
Sanderson Farms |
35,000 | 1,603,700 | ||||
5,534,200 | ||||||
Personal Products - 1.1% | ||||||
Nu Skin Enterprises Cl. A |
35,000 | 1,641,500 | ||||
Total (Cost $7,026,608) | 7,175,700 | |||||
Energy 11.7% | ||||||
Energy Equipment & Services - 8.5% | ||||||
C&J Energy Services 1,2 |
120,000 | 2,220,000 | ||||
Helmerich & Payne |
70,000 | 3,043,600 | ||||
Pason Systems |
180,000 | 2,630,783 | ||||
Trican Well Service |
250,000 | 2,885,276 | ||||
Unit Corporation 2 |
50,000 | 1,844,500 | ||||
12,624,159 | ||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels - 3.2% | ||||||
Exxon Mobil |
55,000 | 4,706,350 | ||||
Total (Cost $15,739,927) | 17,330,509 | |||||
Financials 18.8% | ||||||
Capital Markets - 12.2% | ||||||
Affiliated Managers Group 2 |
20,000 | 2,189,000 | ||||
Ashmore Group |
600,000 | 3,292,666 | ||||
Franklin Resources |
40,000 | 4,439,600 | ||||
Knight Capital Group Cl. A 2 |
100,000 | 1,194,000 | ||||
Partners Group Holding |
12,000 | 2,133,380 | ||||
Sprott |
500,000 | 2,430,999 | ||||
Value Partners Group |
4,900,000 | 2,400,731 | ||||
18,080,376 | ||||||
Insurance - 4.2% | ||||||
Berkshire Hathaway Cl. B 2 |
75,000 | 6,249,750 | ||||
Real Estate Management & Development - 2.4% | ||||||
Kennedy-Wilson Holdings |
260,000 | 3,642,600 | ||||
Total (Cost $24,965,531) | 27,972,726 | |||||
Health Care 1.6% | ||||||
Biotechnology - 1.6% | ||||||
Myriad Genetics 2 |
100,000 | 2,377,000 | ||||
Total (Cost $2,334,558) | 2,377,000 | |||||
Industrials 6.7% | ||||||
Construction & Engineering - 1.3% | ||||||
Jacobs Engineering Group 2 |
50,000 | 1,893,000 | ||||
Electrical Equipment - 1.0% | ||||||
GrafTech International 2 |
150,000 | 1,447,500 | ||||
Machinery - 3.0% | ||||||
Lincoln Electric Holdings |
50,000 | 2,189,500 | ||||
Semperit AG Holding |
65,000 | 2,375,397 | ||||
4,564,897 | ||||||
Road & Rail - 1.4% | ||||||
Patriot Transportation Holding 2 |
90,000 | 2,117,700 | ||||
Total (Cost $9,147,819) | 10,023,097 | |||||
Information Technology 18.8% | ||||||
Computers & Peripherals - 7.2% | ||||||
Apple 2 |
6,000 | 3,504,000 | ||||
SanDisk Corporation 2 |
70,000 | 2,553,600 | ||||
Western Digital 2 |
150,000 | 4,572,000 | ||||
10,629,600 | ||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 7.5% | ||||||
Analog Devices |
142,000 | 5,349,140 | ||||
MKS Instruments |
130,000 | 3,760,900 | ||||
Veeco Instruments 1,2 |
60,000 | 2,061,600 | ||||
11,171,640 | ||||||
Software - 4.1% | ||||||
Microsoft Corporation |
200,000 | 6,118,000 | ||||
Total (Cost $24,646,858) | 27,919,240 | |||||
Materials 31.2% | ||||||
Chemicals - 7.3% | ||||||
LSB Industries 2 |
100,000 | 3,091,000 | ||||
Mosaic Company (The) |
85,000 | 4,654,600 | ||||
Westlake Chemical |
60,000 | 3,135,600 | ||||
10,881,200 | ||||||
Metals & Mining - 22.5% | ||||||
Alamos Gold |
120,000 | 1,874,079 | ||||
Allied Nevada Gold 2 |
150,000 | 4,257,000 | ||||
Centamin 2 |
1,200,000 | 1,320,106 | ||||
Endeavour Mining 2 |
450,000 | 981,239 | ||||
Fresnillo |
70,000 | 1,606,504 | ||||
Globe Specialty Metals |
200,000 | 2,686,000 | ||||
Major Drilling Group International |
200,000 | 2,312,150 | ||||
Newmont Mining |
75,000 | 3,638,250 | ||||
Nucor Corporation |
50,000 | 1,895,000 | ||||
Pan American Silver |
160,000 | 2,702,400 | ||||
Pretium Resources 2 |
200,000 | 2,760,000 | ||||
Reliance Steel & Aluminum |
70,000 | 3,535,000 | ||||
Schnitzer Steel Industries Cl. A |
75,000 | 2,101,500 | ||||
Seabridge Gold 2 |
120,000 | 1,738,800 | ||||
33,408,028 | ||||||
Paper & Forest Products - 1.4% | ||||||
Stella-Jones |
40,000 | 2,103,919 | ||||
Total (Cost $45,293,559) | 46,393,147 | |||||
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 47 |
Royce Focus Trust |
June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |
Schedule of Investments |
VALUE | |||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCKS | |||||||
(Cost $138,467,502) |
$ | 148,612,519 | |||||
REPURCHASE AGREEMENT 17.0% | |||||||
Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation, 0.11% dated 6/29/12, due 7/2/12, maturity value $25,251,231
(collateralized by obligations of various U.S. Government Agencies, 3.25% due 6/30/16,
valued at $25,760,000) |
25,251,000 | ||||||
COLLATERAL RECEIVED FOR SECURITIES | |||||||
LOANED 2.8% |
|||||||
Money
Market Funds |
4,229,011 | ||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 119.7% | |||||||
(Cost $167,947,513) |
178,092,530 | ||||||
LIABILITIES LESS CASH | |||||||
AND OTHER ASSETS (2.9)% |
(4,249,859 | ) | |||||
PREFERRED STOCK (16.8)% | (25,000,000 | ) | |||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS 100.0% |
$ | 148,842,671 | |||||
|
New additions in 2012. |
1 | All or a portion
of these securities were on loan at June 30, 2012. Total market value of loaned
securities at June 30, 2012, was $4,178,585. |
2 | Non-income producing. |
Bold indicates the Funds 20 largest equity holdings in terms of June 30, 2012, market value. | |
TAX INFORMATION:
The cost of total investments for Federal income tax purposes was $167,947,513.
At June 30, 2012, net unrealized appreciation for all securities was $10,145,017,
consisting of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation of $23,799,973 and aggregate
gross unrealized depreciation of $13,654,956. |
|
48 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Focus Trust |
June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
ASSETS: | ||||
Total investments at value (including collateral on loaned securities) | $ | 152,841,530 | ||
Repurchase agreements (at cost and value) | 25,251,000 | |||
Cash and foreign currency | 5,749 | |||
Receivable for dividends and interest | 162,710 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 40,484 | |||
Total Assets |
178,301,473 | |||
LIABILITIES: | ||||
Payable for collateral on loaned securities | 4,229,011 | |||
Payable for investment advisory fee | 139,720 | |||
Preferred dividends accrued but not yet declared | 33,322 | |||
Accrued expenses | 56,749 | |||
Total Liabilities |
4,458,802 | |||
PREFERRED STOCK: | ||||
6.00% Cumulative Preferred Stock - $0.001 par value, $25 liquidation value per share; 1,000,000 shares outstanding | 25,000,000 | |||
Total Preferred Stock |
25,000,000 | |||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | $ | 148,842,671 | ||
ANALYSIS OF NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||
Common Stock paid-in capital - $0.001 par value per share; 20,859,655 shares outstanding (150,000,000 shares authorized) | $ | 133,981,152 | ||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | (72,289 | ) | ||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 9,690,244 | |||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | 10,142,631 | |||
Unallocated and accrued distributions | (4,899,067 | ) | ||
Net Assets applicable to Common Stockholders (net asset value per share - $7.14) |
$ | 148,842,671 | ||
Investments at identified cost (including $4,229,011 of collateral on loaned securities) |
$ | 142,696,513 | ||
Market value of loaned securities |
4,178,585 |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 49 |
Royce Focus Trust |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited) | |
Statement of Operations |
INVESTMENT INCOME: | ||||
Income: | ||||
Dividends1 |
$ | 1,066,326 | ||
Interest |
64,865 | |||
Securities lending |
15,573 | |||
Total income | 1,146,764 | |||
Expenses: | ||||
Investment advisory fees |
916,882 | |||
Stockholder reports |
39,453 | |||
Custody and transfer agent fees |
31,585 | |||
Professional fees |
24,188 | |||
Directors fees |
18,808 | |||
Administrative and office facilities |
9,888 | |||
Other expenses |
21,602 | |||
Total expenses | 1,062,406 | |||
Compensating balance credits | (4 | ) | ||
Net expenses | 1,062,402 | |||
Net investment income (loss) | 84,362 | |||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND FOREIGN CURRENCY: | ||||
Net realized gain (loss): | ||||
Investments |
8,878,782 | |||
Foreign currency transactions |
(3,037 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): | ||||
Investments and foreign currency translations |
(8,555,242 | ) | ||
Other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency |
(358 | ) | ||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 320,145 | |||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS | 404,507 | |||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS | (750,000 | ) | ||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ||||
FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
$ | (345,493 | ) | |
1 | Net of foreign withholding tax of $42,738. |
50 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Focus Trust | ||
Statement of Changes in Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders |
Six months ended | ||||||||
6/30/12 | Year ended | |||||||
(unaudited) | 12/31/11 | |||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | ||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 84,362 | $ | 449,951 | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | 8,875,745 | 7,961,607 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and foreign currency | (8,555,600 | ) | (25,251,663 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from investment operations | 404,507 | (16,840,105 | ) | |||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||
Net investment income | | | ||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (1,500,000 | ) | |||||
Unallocated distributions1 | (750,000 | ) | | |||||
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders | (750,000 | ) | (1,500,000 | ) | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | ||||||||
FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
(345,493 | ) | (18,340,105 | ) | ||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||
Net investment income | | | ||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency | | (5,749,656 | ) | |||||
Return of capital | | (2,456,896 | ) | |||||
Unallocated distributions1 | (4,115,734 | ) | | |||||
Total distributions to Common Stockholders | (4,115,734 | ) | (8,206,552 | ) | ||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | ||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions to Common Stockholders | 2,447,979 | 5,111,803 | ||||||
Total capital stock transactions | 2,447,979 | 5,111,803 | ||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS | (2,013,248 | ) | (21,434,854 | ) | ||||
NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||
Beginning of period |
150,855,919 | 172,290,773 | ||||||
End of period (including undistributed net investment income (loss) of $(72,289) at 6/30/12 and |
||||||||
$(156,651) at 12/31/11) |
$ | 148,842,671 | $ | 150,855,919 |
1 | To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 51 |
Royce Focus Trust | ||
Financial Highlights |
This table is presented to show selected data for a share of Common Stock outstanding throughout each period, and to assist stockholders in evaluating the Funds performance for the periods presented.
Six months ended | Years ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | $ | 7.36 | $ | 8.72 | $ | 7.16 | $ | 4.76 | $ | 8.92 | $ | 9.75 | ||||||||||||
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) |
0.00 | 0.02 | (0.01 | ) | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency |
0.04 | (0.86 | ) | 1.65 | 2.54 | (3.67 | ) | 1.12 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investment operations |
0.04 | (0.84 | ) | 1.64 | 2.57 | (3.60 | ) | 1.27 | ||||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| | (0.05 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (0.07 | ) | (0.03 | ) | | (0.07 | ) | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Unallocated distributions1 |
(0.04 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Preferred Stockholders |
(0.04 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.08 | ) | (0.09 | ) | ||||||||||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS FROM INVESTMENT OPERATIONS |
(0.00 | ) | (0.91 | ) | 1.56 | 2.49 | (3.68 | ) | 1.18 | |||||||||||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
| | | (0.00 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.44 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and foreign currency |
| (0.29 | ) | | | (0.37 | ) | (1.57 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Return of capital |
| (0.12 | ) | | (0.09 | ) | (0.03 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Unallocated distributions1 |
(0.20 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions to Common Stockholders |
(0.20 | ) | (0.41 | ) | | (0.09 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (2.01 | ) | |||||||||||||
CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of reinvestment of distributions by Common Stockholders |
(0.02 | ) | (0.04 | ) | | (0.00 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.00 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total capital stock transactions |
(0.02 | ) | (0.04 | ) | | (0.00 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.00 | ) | |||||||||||||
NET ASSET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 7.14 | $ | 7.36 | $ | 8.72 | $ | 7.16 | $ | 4.76 | $ | 8.92 | ||||||||||||
MARKET VALUE, END OF PERIOD | $ | 6.28 | $ | 6.30 | $ | 7.57 | $ | 6.33 | $ | 4.60 | $ | 8.97 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN:2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Market Value | 2.66 | %3 | (11.75 | )% | 19.59 | % | 40.84 | % | (44.94 | )% | 3.02 | % | ||||||||||||
Net Asset Value | (0.07 | )%3 | (10.51 | )% | 21.79 | % | 53.95 | % | (42.71 | )% | 12.22 | % | ||||||||||||
RATIOS BASED ON AVERAGE NET ASSETS APPLICABLE TO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory fee expense |
1.16 | %4 | 1.15 | % | 1.17 | % | 1.16 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.14 | % | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
0.18 | %4 | 0.18 | % | 0.20 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||||
Total expenses (net)5 | 1.34 | %4 | 1.33 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.34 | % | 1.32 | % | ||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers and balance credits | 1.34 | %4 | 1.33 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.31 | % | ||||||||||||
Expenses prior to fee waivers | 1.34 | %4 | 1.33 | % | 1.37 | % | 1.48 | % | 1.39 | % | 1.31 | % | ||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | 0.11 | %4 | 0.27 | % | (0.15 | )% | 0.49 | % | 0.72 | % | 1.13 | % | ||||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets Applicable to Common Stockholders, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$148,843 | $150,856 | $172,291 | $141,497 | $92,550 | $165,807 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liquidation Value of Preferred Stock, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End of Period (in thousands) |
$25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | $25,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 11 | % | 33 | % | 36 | % | 46 | % | 51 | % | 62 | % | ||||||||||||
PREFERRED STOCK: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total shares outstanding | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset coverage per share | $ | 173.84 | $ | 175.86 | $ | 197.29 | $ | 166.48 | $ | 117.55 | $ | 190.81 | ||||||||||||
Liquidation preference per share | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | $ | 25.00 | ||||||||||||
Average month-end market value per share | $ | 26.40 | $ | 25.65 | $ | 25.38 | $ | 23.56 | $ | 22.89 | $ | 24.37 | ||||||||||||
1 | To be allocated to net investment income, net realized gains and/or return of capital at year end. |
2 | The Market
Value Total Return is calculated assuming a purchase of Common Stock on the opening
of the first business day and a sale on the closing of the last business day of
each period. Dividends and distributions are assumed for the purposes of this calculation
to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Funds Distribution Reinvestment
and Cash Purchase Plan. Net Asset Value Total Return is calculated on the same basis,
except that the Funds net asset value is used on the purchase and sale dates
instead of market value. |
3 | Not annualized |
4 | Annualized |
5 | Expense ratios
based on total average net assets including liquidation value of Preferred Stock
were 1.16%, 1.16%, 1.17%, 1.16%, 1.14% and 1.15% for the periods ended June 30,
2012, and December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
52 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THESE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. |
Royce Focus Trust | ||
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: |
Royce Focus
Trust, Inc. (the Fund), is a diversified closed-end investment company incorporated
under the laws of the State of Maryland. The Fund commenced operations on March
2, 1988, and Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce) assumed investment
management responsibility for the Fund on November 1, 1996. |
Valuation of Investments: |
Securities are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) on the valuation date. Securities that trade on an exchange, and securities traded on Nasdaqs Electronic Bulletin Board, are valued at their last reported sales price or Nasdaq official closing price taken from the primary market in which each security trades or, if no sale is reported for such day, at their bid price. Other over-the-counter securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued at their highest bid price, except in the case of some bonds and other fixed income securities which may be valued by reference to other securities with comparable ratings, interest rates and maturities, using established independent pricing services. The Fund values its non-U.S. dollar denominated securities in U.S. dollars daily at the prevailing foreign currency exchange rates as quoted by a major bank. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available are valued at their fair value in accordance with the provisions of the 1940 Act, under procedures approved by the Funds Board of Directors, and are reported as Level 3 securities. As a general principle, the fair value of a security is the amount which the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale. However, in light of the judgment involved in fair valuations, there can be no assurance that a fair value assigned to a particular security will be the amount which the Fund might be able to receive upon its current sale. In addition, if, between the time trading ends on a particular security and the close of the customary trading session on the NYSE, events occur that are significant and may make the closing price unreliable, the Fund may fair value the security. The Fund uses an independent pricing service to provide fair value estimates for relevant non-U.S. equity securities on days when the U.S. market volatility exceeds a certain threshold. This pricing service uses proprietary correlations it has developed between the movement of prices of non-U.S. equity securities and indices of U.S.-traded securities, futures contracts and other indications to estimate the fair value of relevant non-U.S. securities. When fair value pricing is employed, the prices of securities used by the Fund may differ from quoted or published prices for the same security. Investments in money market funds are valued at net asset value per share. |
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds investments, as noted above. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels below: |
Level |
1 quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. |
Level |
2 other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities,
foreign securities that may be fair valued and repurchase agreements). The table
below includes all Level 2 securities. Any Level 2 securities with values based
on quoted prices for similar securities would be noted in the Schedule of Investments. |
Level |
3 significant unobservable inputs (including last trade price before trading was suspended,
or at a discount thereto for lack of marketability or otherwise, market price information
regarding other securities, information received from the company and/or published
documents, including SEC filings and financial statements, or other publicly available
information). |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. |
The following is a summary of the inputs used to value the Funds investments as of June 30, 2012. For a detailed breakout of common stocks by sector classification, please refer to the Schedule of Investments. |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||
Common Stocks | $120,265,290 | $28,347,229 | $ | $148,612,519 | ||||||
Cash Equivalents | 4,229,011 | 25,251,000 | | 29,480,011 | ||||||
Repurchase Agreements: |
The Fund may
enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that the Funds investment
adviser has determined are creditworthy. The Fund restricts repurchase agreements
to maturities of no more than seven days. Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase
agreements, which are held until maturity of the repurchase agreements, are marked-to-market
daily and maintained at a value at least equal to the principal amount of the repurchase
agreement (including accrued interest). Repurchase agreements could involve certain
risks in the event of default or insolvency of the counter-party, including possible
delays or restrictions upon the ability of the Fund to dispose of its underlying
securities. |
2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 53
54 | 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 55 |
Directors and Officers |
All Directors and Officers may be reached c/o The Royce Funds, 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151 |
Charles M. Royce, Director1, President |
Age: 72 | Number of Funds Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 1982 |
Non-Royce Directorships: Director of TICC Capital Corp. |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: President, Co-Chief Investment Officer and
Member of Board of Managers of Royce & Associates, LLC (Royce),
The Royce Funds investment adviser. |
Mark R. Fetting, Director1 |
Age: 57 | Number of Funds Overseen: 49 | Tenure: Since 2001 |
Non-Royce
Directorships: Director of Legg Mason, Inc. and Director/Trustee of registered investment
companies constituting the 14 Legg Mason Funds. |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years: President, CEO, Chairman and Director of Legg
Mason, Inc. and Chairman of Legg Mason Funds. Mr. Fettings prior business
experience includes having served as a member of the Board of Managers of Royce;
President of all Legg Mason Funds; Senior Executive Vice President of Legg Mason,
Inc.; Director and/or officer of various Legg Mason, Inc. affiliates; Division President
and Senior Officer of Prudential Financial Group, Inc. and related companies. |
Patricia W. Chadwick, Director |
Age: 63 | Number of Funds Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 2009 |
Non-Royce
Directorships: Trustee of ING Mutual Funds and Director of Wisconsin Energy Corp. |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years: Consultant and President of Ravengate Partners
LLC (since 2000). |
Richard M. Galkin, Director |
Age: 74 | Number of Funds Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 1982 |
Non-Royce Directorships: None |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Private investor. Mr. Galkins prior
business experience includes having served as President of Richard M. Galkin Associates,
Inc., telecommunications consultants, President of Manhattan Cable Television (a
subsidiary of Time, Inc.), President of Haverhills Inc. (another Time, Inc. subsidiary),
President of Rhode Island Cable Television and Senior Vice President of Satellite
Television Corp. (a subsidiary of Comsat). |
Stephen L. Isaacs, Director |
Age: 72 | Number of Funds Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 1989 |
Non-Royce Directorships: None |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: President of The Center for Health and Social
Policy (since September 1996); Attorney and President of Health Policy Associates,
Inc., consultants. Mr. Isaacss prior business experience includes having
served as Director of Columbia University Development Law and Policy Program and
Professor at Columbia University (until August 1996). |
Arthur S. Mehlman, Director |
Age: 70 | Number of Funds Overseen: 49 | Tenure: Since 2004 |
Non-Royce
Directorships: Director/Trustee of registered investment companies constituting
the 14 Legg Mason Funds. |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Director of The League for People with Disabilities,
Inc.; Director of University of Maryland Foundation (non-profits). Formerly: Director
of Municipal Mortgage & Equity, LLC (from October 2004 to April 1, 2011); Director
of University of Maryland College Park Foundation (non-profit) (from 1998 to 2005);
Partner, KPMG LLP (international accounting firm) (from 1972 to 2002); Director
of Maryland Business Roundtable for Education (from July 1984 to June 2002). |
David L. Meister, Director |
Age: 72 | Number of Funds Overseen: 35 | Tenure: Since 1982 |
Non-Royce Directorships: None |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Consultant. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of The Tennis Channel (from June 2000 to March 2005). Mr. Meisters prior business
experience includes having served as Chief Executive Officer of Seniorlife.com,
a consultant to the communications industry, President of Financial News Network,
Senior Vice President of HBO, President of Time-Life Films and Head of Broadcasting
for Major League Baseball. |
G. Peter OBrien, Director |
Age: 66 | Number of Funds Overseen: 49 | Tenure: Since 2001 |
Non-Royce
Directorships: Director/Trustee of registered investment companies constituting
the 14 Legg Mason Funds; Director of TICC Capital Corp. |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Trustee Emeritus of Colgate University (since
2005); Board Member of Hill House, Inc. (since 1999); Formerly: Trustee of Colgate
University (from 1996 to 2005), President of Hill House, Inc. (from 2001 to 2005)
and Managing Director/Equity Capital Markets Group of Merrill Lynch & Co. (from
1971 to 1999). |
John D. Diederich, Vice President and Treasurer |
Age: 60 | Tenure: Since 2001 |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Chief Operating Officer, Managing Director
and member of the Board of Managers of Royce; Chief Financial Officer of Royce;
Director of Administration of The Royce Funds; and President of Royce Fund Services, Inc. (RFS), having been employed
by Royce since April 1993. |
Jack E. Fockler, Jr., Vice President |
Age: 53 | Tenure: Since 1995 |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Managing Director and Vice President of Royce,
and Vice President of RFS, having been employed by Royce since October 1989. |
W. Whitney George, Vice President |
Age: 54 | Tenure: Since 1995 |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Co-Chief Investment Officer, Managing Director
and Vice President of Royce, having been employed by Royce since October 1991. |
Daniel A.
OByrne, Vice President and Assistant Secretary |
Age: 50 | Tenure: Since 1994 |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Principal and Vice President of Royce, having
been employed by Royce since October 1986. |
John E. Denneen, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
Age: 45 | Tenure: 1996-2001 and Since April 2002 |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: General Counsel, Principal, Chief Legal and
Compliance Officer and Secretary of Royce; Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of
The Royce Funds. |
Lisa Curcio, Chief Compliance Officer |
Age: 52 | Tenure: Since 2004 |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years: Chief Compliance Officer of The Royce Funds
(since October 2004) and Compliance Officer of Royce (since June 2004). |
1 Interested Director. |
Directors will hold office until their successors have been duly elected and
qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. |
56 | The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Notes to Performance and Other Important Information |
The thoughts expressed in this Review and Report concerning recent market
movements and future prospects for small company stocks are solely the
opinion of Royce at June 30, 2012, and, of course, historical market trends are
not necessarily indicative of future market movements. Statements regarding
the future prospects for particular securities held in the Funds portfolios and
Royces investment intentions with respect to those securities reflect Royces
opinions as of June 30, 2012 and are subject to change at any time without
notice. There can be no assurance that securities mentioned in this Review
and Report will be included in any Royce-managed portfolio in the future.
Investments in securities of micro-cap, small-cap and/or mid-cap companies
may involve considerably more risk than investments in securities of larger-cap
companies. All publicly released material information is always disclosed
by the Funds on the website at www.roycefunds.com.
Sector weightings are determined using the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). GICS was developed by, and is the exclusive property of, Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC (S&P) and MSCI Inc. (MSCI). GICS is the trademark of S&P and MSCI. Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) and GICS Direct are service marks of S&P and MSCI. All indexes referred to are unmanaged and capitalization weighted. Each indexs returns include net reinvested dividends and/or interest income. Russell Investment Group is the source and owner of the trademarks, service marks and copyrights related to the Russell Indexes. Russell® is a trademark of Russell Investment Group. The Russell 2000 Index is an index of domestic small-cap stocks. It measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell 2500 is an index of 2,500 smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell Microcap Index includes 1,000 of the smallest securities in the Russell 2000 Index. The Russell 1000 Index is an index of domestic large-cap stocks. It measures the performance of the 1,000 largest publicly traded companies in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell Midcap Index measures the performance of the mid-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. It includes approximately 800 of the smallest securities in the Russell 1000 Index. The Russell Global ex-U.S. Large Cap Index is an index of global large-cap stocks, excluding the United States. The Russell Global ex-U.S. Small Cap Index is an index of global small-cap stocks, excluding the United States. The S&P 500 and SmallCap 600 are indexes of U.S. large- and small-cap stocks, respectively, selected by Standard & Poors based on market size, liquidity and industry grouping, among other factors. The Nasdaq Composite is an index of the more than 3,000 common equities listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange. Returns for the market indexes used in this report were based on information supplied to Royce by Russell Investments. The CRSP (Center for Research in Security Pricing) equally divides the companies listed on the NYSE into 10 deciles based on market capitalization. Deciles 1-5 represent the largest domestic equity companies and Deciles 6-10 represent the smallest. CRSP then sorts all listed domestic equity companies based on these market cap ranges. By way of comparison, the CRSP 1-5 would have similar capitalization parameters to the S&P 500 Index and the CRSP 6-10 would have similar capitalization parameters to those of the Russell 2000 Index. Royce has not independently verified the above described information. |
Forward-Looking Statements | |
This material contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), that
involve risks and uncertainties, including, among others, statements as to: |
|
| the Funds future operating results |
| the prospects of the Funds portfolio companies |
| the impact
of investments that the Funds have made or may make |
| the dependence of the
Funds future success on the general economy and
its impact on the companies and industries in which the Funds invest, and |
| the ability of the
Funds portfolio companies to achieve their objectives.
|
This Review and Report uses words such as anticipates, believes,
expects, future, intends, and similar expressions to identify forward-looking
statements. Actual results may differ materially from those projected
in the forward-looking statements for any reason. |
|
The Royce Funds have based the forward-looking statements included in
this Review and Report on information available to us on the date of the report,
and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.
Although The Royce Funds undertake no obligation to revise or update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures
that we may make through future stockholder communications or reports. |
Authorized Share Transactions |
Royce Value Trust, Royce Micro-Cap Trust and Royce Focus Trust may each
repurchase up to 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of its respective
common stock and up to 10% of the issued and outstanding shares of its
respective preferred stock during the year ending December 31, 2012. Any
such repurchases would take place at then prevailing prices in the open
market or in other transactions. Common stock repurchases would be
effected at a price per share that is less than the shares then current net
asset value, and preferred stock repurchases would be effected at a price
per share that is less than the shares liquidation value. |
Royce Value Trust, Royce Micro-Cap Trust and Royce Focus Trust are also
authorized to offer their common stockholders an opportunity to subscribe
for additional shares of their common stock through rights offerings at a price
per share that may be less than the shares then current net asset value. The
timing and terms of any such offerings are within each Boards discretion. |
Annual Certifications |
As required, the Funds have submitted to the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) for Royce Value Trust and Royce Micro-Cap Trust and to Nasdaq
for Royce Focus Trust, respectively, the annual certification of the Funds
Chief Executive Officer that he is not aware of any violation of the NYSEs
or Nasdaqs Corporate Governance listing standards. The Funds also have
included the certification of the Funds Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer required by section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
as exhibits to the Funds form N-CSR for the period ended December 31, 2011,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Proxy Voting | |
A copy of the policies and procedures that The Royce Funds use to determine
how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities and information regarding
how each of The Royce Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities
during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available,
without charge, on The Royce Funds website at www.roycefunds.com, by
calling (800) 221-4268 (toll-free) and on the website of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), at www.sec.gov. |
|
Form N-Q Filing | |
The Funds file their complete schedules of investments with the SEC for the
first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds Forms N-Q
are available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov. The Royce Funds holdings
are also on the Funds website approximately 15 to 20 days after each calendar
quarter end and remain available until the next quarters holdings are posted.
The Funds Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public
Reference Room in Washington, D.C. To find out more about this public service,
call the SEC at (800) 732-0330. The Funds complete schedules of investments
are updated quarterly, and are available at www.roycefunds.com. |
|
The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 57 |
Board Approval of Investment Advisory Agreements |
At meetings held on June 6-7, 2012, each of the Funds respective Boards
of Directors, including all of the non-interested directors, approved the
continuance of the Investment Advisory Agreements between Royce &
Associates, LLC (R&A) and each of Royce Value Trust, Royce Micro-Cap
Trust and Royce Focus Trust (the Funds). In reaching these decisions,
the Board reviewed the materials provided by R&A, which included, among
other things, information prepared internally by R&A and independently by
Morningstar Associates, LLC (Morningstar) containing detailed expense
ratio and investment performance comparisons for the Funds with other
funds in their peer group, information regarding the past performance
of the Funds and other registered investment companies managed by R&A
and a memorandum outlining the legal duties of the Board prepared by
independent counsel to the non-interested directors. R&A also provided
the directors with an analysis of its profitability with respect to providing
investment advisory services to each of the Funds. In addition, the Board
took into account information furnished throughout the year at regular
Board meetings, including reports on investment performance, stockholder
services, regulatory compliance, brokerage commissions and research,
and brokerage and execution products and services provided to the Funds.
The Board also considered other matters they deemed important to the
approval process such as allocation of Fund brokerage commissions,
soft dollar research services R&A receives and other direct and indirect
benefits to R&A and its affiliates, from their relationship with the Fund. The
directors also met throughout the year with investment advisory personnel
from R&A. The Board, in its deliberations, recognized that, for many of
the Funds stockholders, the decision to purchase Fund shares included a
decision to select R&A as the investment adviser and that there was a strong
association in the minds of Fund stockholders between R&A and each Fund.
In considering factors relating to the approval of the continuance of the
Investment Advisory Agreements, the non-interested directors received
assistance and advice from, and met separately with, their independent
counsel. While the Investment Advisory Agreements were considered at
the same Board meetings, the Board dealt with each agreement separately.
Among other factors, the directors considered the following:
The nature, extent and quality of services provided by R&A: The Board
considered the following factors to be of fundamental importance to
their consideration of whether to approve the continuance of the Funds
Investment Advisory Agreements: (i) R&As more than 35 years of value
investing experience and track record; (ii) the history of long-tenured
R&A portfolio managers managing the Funds; (iii) R&As focus on mid-cap,
small-cap and micro-cap value investing; (iv) the consistency of R&As
approach to managing both the Funds and open-end mutual funds over
more than 35 years; (v) the integrity and high ethical standards adhered
to at R&A; (vi) R&As specialized experience in the area of trading small-
and micro-cap securities; (vii) R&As historical ability to attract and
retain portfolio management talent and (viii) R&As focus on stockholder
interests as exemplified by its voluntary fee waiver policy on preferred stock
assets in certain circumstances where the Funds total return performance
from the issuance of the preferred does not exceed the coupon rate on
the preferred, and expansive stockholder reporting and communications.
The Board reviewed the services that R&A provides to the Funds, including,
but not limited to, managing each Funds investments in accordance with
the stated policies of each Fund. The Board considered the fact that R&A
provided certain administrative services to the Funds at cost pursuant to
the Administration Agreement between the Funds and R&A which went into
effect on January 1, 2008. The Board determined that the services to be
provided to each Fund by R&A would be the same as those it previously
provided to the Funds. They also took into consideration the histories,
reputations and backgrounds of R&As portfolio managers for the Funds,
finding that these would likely have an impact on the continued success of
the Funds. Lastly, the Board noted R&As ability to attract and retain quality
and experienced personnel. The directors concluded that the investment
advisory services provided by R&A to each Fund compared favorably to
services provided by R&A to other R&A client accounts, including other
funds, in both nature and quality, and that the scope of services provided
by R&A would continue to be suitable for the Funds.
Investment performance of the Funds and R&A: In light of R&As risk-averse
approach to investing, the Board believes that risk-adjusted
performance continues to be an appropriate measure of each Funds
investment performance. One measure of risk-adjusted performance the
Board has historically used in its review of the Funds performance is the
Sharpe Ratio. The Sharpe Ratio is a risk-adjusted measure of performance
developed by Nobel Laureate William Sharpe. It is calculated by dividing a
funds annualized excess returns by its annualized standard deviation to
determine reward per unit of risk. The higher the Sharpe Ratio, the better
a funds historical risk-adjusted performance. The Board attaches primary
importance to risk-adjusted performance over relatively long periods of
time, typically three to ten years. Using Morningstar data, Royce Value
Trusts Sharpe Ratio placed in the middle quintile within the Small Blend
category assigned by Morningstar for the three-, five- and 10-year periods
ended December 31, 2011, as the Funds use of leverage through preferred
stock created higher volatility and, for the five-year period, brought down
market performance. Using Morningstar data, as measured against its
open-end peers, Royce Micro-Cap Trusts Sharpe Ratio placed in the 2nd
quartile within the Small Blend category assigned by Morningstar for the
three- and 10-year periods ended December 31, 2011 and at the 62nd
percentile for the five-year period within its category, as the Funds use
of leverage through preferred stock created higher volatility and brought
down market performance.
Finally, using Morningstar data, Royce Focus Trusts concentrated portfolio
led to its middle quintile performance in its category as measured by Sharpe
Ratio for the three-year period, 2nd quartile for the five-year period and top
quartile for the 10-year period ended December 31, 2011.
The Board noted that R&A manages a number of funds that invest in
small-cap and micro-cap issuers, many of which were outperforming their
benchmark indexes and their competitors. Although the Board recognized
that past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results, they
found that R&A had the necessary qualifications, experience and track record
in managing small-cap and micro-cap securities to manage the Funds. The
directors determined that R&A continued to be an appropriate investment
adviser for the Funds and concluded that each Funds performance supported
the continuation of its Investment Advisory Agreement.
Cost of the services provided and profits realized by R&A from its relationship
with the Funds: The Board considered the cost of the services provided by
R&A and profits realized by R&A from its relationship with each Fund. As
part of the analysis, the Board discussed with R&A its methodology in
allocating its costs to each Fund and concluded that its allocations were
reasonable. The Board concluded that R&As profits were reasonable in
relation to the nature and quality of services provided.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds
grow and whether fee levels would reflect such economies of scale: The Board
considered whether there have been economies of scale in respect of
the management of the Funds, whether the Funds have appropriately
benefited from any economies of scale and whether there is potential for
realization of any further economies of scale. The Board noted the time and
effort involved in managing portfolios of small- and micro-cap stocks and
58 | The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
that they did not involve the same efficiencies as do portfolios of large cap
stocks. The Board concluded that the current fee structure for each Fund
was reasonable, that stockholders sufficiently participated in economies of
scale and that no changes were currently necessary.
Comparison of services to be rendered and fees to be paid to those
under other investment advisory contracts, such as contracts of the same
and other investment advisers or other clients: The Board reviewed the
investment advisory fee paid by each Fund and compared both the services
to be rendered and the fees to be paid under the Investment Advisory
Agreements to other contracts of R&A and to contracts of other investment
advisers to registered investment companies investing in small- and
micro-cap stocks, as provided by Morningstar. The Board noted that, in the
case of Royce Value Trust, the Fund had a 1.00% basic fee that is subject
to adjustment up or down (up to 0.50% in either direction) based on the
Funds performance versus the S&P 600 SmallCap Index over a rolling
period of sixty months. The fee is charged on average net assets over that
rolling period. As a result, in a rising market, the fee will be smaller than
a fee calculated on the current years average net assets, and vice versa.
The Board determined that the performance adjustment feature continued
to serve as an appropriate incentive to R&A to manage the Fund for the
benefit of its long-term common stockholders. The Board noted that
R&A had also agreed to waive its management fee on that portion of the
Funds assets equal to the liquidation preference of the Funds outstanding
preferred stock if the Funds total return from issuance of the preferred on
such amount is less than the preferreds fixed dividend rate. The Board also
noted that the fee arrangement, which also includes a provision for no fee
in periods where the Funds trailing three-year performance is negative,
requires R&A to measure the Funds performance monthly against the
S&P 600, an unmanaged index. Instead of receiving a set fee regardless
of its performance, R&A is penalized for poor performance. The Board
noted that the Funds performance earned R&A no fee during the period
January 1, 2011 through November 30, 2011.
In the case of Royce Micro-Cap Trust, the Board noted that the Fund had
a 1.00% basic fee subject to adjustment up or down based on the Funds
performance versus the Russell 2000 Index over a rolling 36 month period.
The fee is charged on average net assets over that rolling period. As a
result, in a rising market, the fee will be smaller than a fee calculated on
the current years average net assets, and visa versa. The Board determined
that the performance adjustment feature continued to serve as an incentive
to R&A to manage the Fund for the benefit of its long-term stockholders.
The Board also noted R&As voluntary waiver of its fee on the liquidation
value of the outstanding preferred stock in circumstances where the Funds
total return performance from the issuance of the preferred is less than the
fixed dividend rate on the preferred for each month during the year. The
Board noted that if the Funds expense ratio were based on total average
net assets including net assets applicable to Preferred Stock, it would rank
in the second quartile when compared against its Morningstar-assigned
open-end peer group.
Finally, in the case of Royce Focus Trust, the Board noted that R&A had
agreed to waive its management fee on the liquidation value of outstanding
preferred stock if the Funds total return from issuance of the preferred is
less than the preferreds fixed dividend rate. The Board noted that if the
Funds expense ratio were based on total average net assets including net
assets applicable to Preferred Stock, it would place within four basis points
of the median of its Morningstar-assigned open-end peer group.
The Board also considered fees charged by R&A to institutional and
other clients and noted that, given the greater levels of services that
R&A provides to registered investment companies such as the Funds
as compared to other accounts, the Funds base advisory fees compared
favorably to the advisory fees charged to those other accounts.
It was noted that no single factor was cited as determinative to the
decision of the directors. Rather, after weighing all of considerations and
conclusions discussed above, the entire Board, including all the non-interested
directors, approved the continuation of the existing Investment
Advisory Agreements, concluding that a contract continuation on the
existing terms was in the best interest of the stockholders of each Fund and
that each investment advisory fee rate was reasonable in relation to the
services provided.
The Royce Funds 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders | 59 |
2012: In Quotes |
We dont have to be smarter than the rest. We have to be more disciplined than the rest. |
Warren Buffet, 2012 |
Points To Ponder Dividend-payers stand to benefit in coming decades from an event that has only just begun, the retirement of the baby boomers. Savita Subramanian, WSJ.com, January 4, 2012 Do not trust financial market risk models. Despite the predilection of some analysts to model the financial markets using sophisticated mathematics, the markets are governed by behavioral science, not physical science. Seth Klarman No matter how diversified you are, you probably arent as diversified as you think. As recently as 1997, it took 20 stocks to eliminate most of the likelihood of enduring more risk than the market as a whole; today it takes 40. If you hold the same number of stocks that you used to, you are about half as diversified as you were. You need to spread your bets wider. Jason Zweig, The Wall Street Journal, February 18, 2012 Leverage reduces the investors critical asset: patience. Jeremy Grantham, GMO Letter, February 2012 In Absolute Agreement In the fourth quarter of 1984, there were 32 FDIC-insured banks with assets greater than $10 billion, and they controlled 27.5% of the nations banking assets. In the fourth quarter of 2011, there were 107 banks with assets greater than $10 billion, and they controlled 79.6% of the nations banking assets. Jim Grant, Grants Interest Rate Observer, May 18, 2012 |
The disruptive technologies and government
policies have created an extremely highly
correlated environment with all financial
markets and all financial institutions. The
risks were manifest in 2008, but rather than
defuse them, government policies have since
increased the interconnectedness. Simon Mikhailovich, Barrons, June 2, 2012 We dont try to predict (the stock market)... Thats folly. We are looking at the macro picture, but it is best to focus on forward risk-adjusted returns at individual securities. We have learned that over and over again. Don Yacktman, Barrons, May 8, 2012 The public will only consider equities once they start to lose money in bonds. In an era of financial repression, this might take a long time but this moment will arrive just the same. Jason Trennert, Strategas Investment Strategy Viewpoint, May 25, 2012 It is important to recognize that results in the short term reflect a lot of randomness. Even skillful managers will slump, and unskillful managers will shine. But over the long haul, good process wins. Michael Mauboussin, Daily News & Analysis, June 4, 2012 Its never as good as you think it is when its great, and never as bad as you think it is when its bad. Preston Athey, Barrons, June 16, 2012 |
Cocktail Conversation Stocks were losers to bonds in 2011. But dont invest with a rear view mirror... Emerging markets offer the best prospects for both equity and bond returns over the next 10 years. Burton Malkiel, The Wall Street Journal, January 6, 2012 Apples iPhone business alone is now bigger than Microsoft. Not Windows. Not Office. Microsoft. Think about that. The iPhone did not exist five years ago. And now its bigger than a company that, 15 years ago, was dragged into court and threatened with forcible break-up because it had amassed an unassailable and unthinkably profitable monopoly...In the December quarter, Apples iPhone business generated $24.4 billion of revenue. Microsofts whole company, meanwhile, from Windows to Office to servers to XBox, generated $20.9 billion. Henry Blodget, BusinessInsider, February 7, 2012 Adjusted for inflation, current oil prices are below the levels that existed thirty years ago. William Strauss, Economic Outlook, April 26, 2012 Timeless Tidbits It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. Harry S. Truman In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing. The worst thing you can do is nothing. Theodore Roosevelt |
||
60 | This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
Is the Business Cycle Dead? |
Plus ça change, plus cest la même chose. (The more things change, the more they stay the same.) Alphonse Karr |
One striking effect of the financial crisis has been the apparent
disappearance of the traditional business cycle. The worlds developed
economiesheavily indebted, still deleveraging, and in some cases in
the midst of painful austerityare being supported by periodic and
unconventional interventions from increasingly leveraged central
banks. The result has been an anemic, albeit steady, pace of economic
activity marked by fits and starts that are increasingly difficult for
investors to interpret.
It makes sense, then, that market cycles have followed suit, with equities showing sudden, at times violent, moves that have alternated between strong rallies and steep declines over relatively short periods, each driven by marginal changes in the trajectory of economic expectations. Single-stock correlation remains high due to this uncertainty, with more cyclical market sectors the most disadvantaged. Several factors are at work: Deleveraging associated with the housing bust is a persistent and long-term headwind; personal savings remain elusive; rising commodity prices have affected consumer purchasing power and sentiment; unemployment remains stubbornly high; and, importantly, the primary source of economic stimulus is coming from central bank programs instead of traditional private business investment. As if all this were not enough, there is the backdrop of the sovereign debt crises in Europe and slower growth in the all-important emerging economies, especially China. Interestingly, none of these issues are new. They have been part of the landscape for several years now, and distinct patterns have developed around them that have been repeated in each of the last three years, giving investors the sense that cycles of economic activity have compressed dramatically. Previously marked in years, moves up and down in business momentum are now counted in months, if not weeks. Which leads to two questions: Has the business cycle fundamentally changed? Should traditionally cyclical businesses carry lower multiples as a result? It appears to us that in the short term, the market has answered with a resounding yes. Cyclical sectors, such as Industrials, Energy, Technology, and Materials, have become increasingly volatile and have borne the brunt of the selling during market downturns. Within these areas, even high-quality businesses (as measured by balance sheet strength and returns on invested capital) are suffering from the altered preferences of investors who once flocked to the perceived safety of more stable vehicles. Investors continue to abandon equities, gravitating instead toward fixed income securities even as they recognize the inevitable loss of purchasing power that comes with them. Today, it seems that we have a bubble in fear, which is manifesting itself in ways that have our contrarian pulses racing. We are finding what we think are excellent values in currently unpopular pro-cyclical businesses. Cycles have certainly become shorter over the past three years, but we hold the view that these are anomalous times and that the traditional business cycle will reemerge before long. The economy does not yet have sufficient self-sustaining business momentum that will allow it to be weaned off the artificial support currently being provided by central banks. The opportunity from our standpoint lies in looking where others are not while holding fast to our time-tested investment approach governed by absolute standards for valuation and return. In the short term, our interest in cyclical businesses has been putting us out of sync with the return patterns of the market. While unpleasant, it is a by-product of our contrarian nature. In fact, this period is somewhat reminiscent of the late 90s when investors were citing the demise of traditional value investing because of the emergence of the internet and the technology revolution. What was then a bubble in greed has become todays bubble in fear. Investing is a perennially dynamic endeavor requiring both patience and conviction. Those tenets are being sorely tested in the current market. Although business cycles have looked different of late, and the market has been reacting accordingly, our belief is that they will ultimately revert to the mean, benefiting higher-quality companies in cyclical sectors. We take heart from the timeless wisdom of Alphonse Karr, for indeed, the more things change, the more they stay the same. |
The thoughts in this essay concerning the stock market are solely those of Royce & Associates and, of course, there can be no assurance with regard to future market movements. |
This page is not part of the 2012 Semiannual Report to Stockholders |
About The Royce Funds
Wealth Of Experience With approximately $36 billion in total assets under management, Royce & Associates is committed to the same small-company investing principles that have served us well for nearly 40 years. Charles M. Royce, our President and Co-Chief Investment Officer, enjoys one of the longest tenures of any active mutual fund manager. Royces investment staff also includes Co-Chief Investment Officer W. Whitney George, 18 Portfolio Managers, five assistant portfolio managers and analysts, and nine traders. Multiple Funds, Common Focus Our goal is to offer both individual and institutional investors the best available smaller-cap portfolios. Unlike a lot of mutual fund groups with broad product offerings, we have chosen to concentrate on smaller-company investing by providing investors with a range of funds that take full advantage of this large and diverse sector. Consistent Discipline Our approach emphasizes paying close attention to risk and maintaining the same discipline, regardless of market movements and trends. The price we pay for a security must be significantly below our appraisal of its current worth. This requires a thorough analysis of the financial and business dynamics of an enterprise, as though we were purchasing the entire company. Co-Ownership Of Funds It is important that our employees and shareholders share a common financial goal; our officers, employees and their families currently have approximately $136 million invested in The Royce Funds. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Contact Us | |||||||||||||||||||
General Information Additional Report Copies and Prospectus Inquiries (800) 221-4268 |
RIA Services Fund Materials and Performance Updates (800) 33-ROYCE (337-6923) |
Broker/Dealer Services Fund Materials and Performance Updates (800) 59-ROYCE (597-6923) |
Computershare Transfer Agent and Registrar (800) 426-5523 |
|
|||||||||||||||
Item 2. Code(s) of Ethics. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
(a) | See Item 1. |
(b) | Not applicable. |
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. Not applicable to this semi-annual report.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers. Not Applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. Not Applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Principal Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrants Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on their evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There were no significant changes in Registrants internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control subsequent to the date of the evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report.
(a)(2) Separate certifications by the Registrants Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not Applicable
(b) Separate certifications by the Registrants Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BY: | /s/Charles M. Royce |
Charles M. Royce | |
President |
Date: August 15, 2012
ROYCE VALUE TRUST, INC. | ROYCE VALUE TRUST, INC. | |||
BY: | /s/Charles M. Royce | BY: | /s/John D. Diederich | |
Charles M. Royce | John D. Diederich | |||
President | Chief Financial Officer | |||
Date: August 15, 2012 | Date: August 15, 2012 |