UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report:
November 19, 2003
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
REPUBLIC OF PANAMA |
|
1-8430 |
|
72-0593134 |
|
|
(State or other jurisdictio | |
(Commission) | |
(IRS Employer | |
of incorporation) | |
File No.) | |
Identification No.) | |
1450 Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisian |
|
70112-6050 |
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) | |
(Zip Code) | |
Registrant's Telephone Number, including Area Code: (504) 587-5400
1
|
Items 9 and 12. Regulation FD Disclosure and Results of Operations and Financial Condition
|
On
November 19, 2003, McDermott International, Inc. (McDermott) plans to conduct
a presentation to members of the financial community in New York, New York. A copy of the
financial section of the presentation and the related appendixes is attached as Exhibit
99.1, and the information contained in Exhibit 99.1 is incorporated by reference herein. |
|
The
presentation includes several measures that do not comply with generally accepted
accounting principals (GAAP). McDermott management believes that certain non-GAAP
measurements used in the presentation provide the user of such information, including
investors and McDermotts management, useful information to evaluate the financial
results of McDermotts ongoing operations and allows for an easier comparison of
those ongoing operations to the similar components of it historical operations. The term
non-GAAP is used in this presentation to distinguish certain measurements from those
prepared on a GAAP basis. |
1. |
On page 2, a graphical chart displays both GAAP and non-GAAP operating income
provided by The Babcock and Wilcox Company (B&W) business for
each of the first three quarters of 2003. The reconciliation of the Non-GAAP to
the comparable GAAP measures is presented in Appendix I of the presentation. The
difference between the two measures is due to a mark-to-market, non-cash
expense/benefit associated with the proposed Chapter 11 settlement. Management
uses the non-GAAP measure to evaluate the business performance of B&W absent
the mark-to-market adjustments. |
2. |
On slide 3, both GAAP and non-GAAP revenues, operating income and operating
margins are presented for the J. Ray McDermott, S.A. (J. Ray)
subsidiary for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and 2003, with the
reconciliation contained within the same page. The difference between the
Non-GAAP and the comparable GAAP measures is the exclusion of the effects of
certain contracts for EPIC spar facilities and a contract relating to a project
in Argentina (together, the legacy projects). These contracts were
fixed-priced and substantial in size, and were first-of-a-kind projects from
which J. Ray has incurred substantial losses. In addition, the 2002 non-GAAP
measure excludes the 2002 non-cash write-off of goodwill associated with J. Ray.
Management uses the non-GAAP information as a means to evaluate J. Rays
remaining contract portfolio absent these large, loss generating contracts. |
3. |
On slide 6, a graphical chart displays both GAAP and non-GAAP revenues and
operating income provided by the J. Ray business for each of the first three
quarters of 2003. The reconciliation of the Non-GAAP to the comparable GAAP
measures is presented in Appendix II of the presentation. The difference between
the two measures is the exclusion of the legacy projects revenue and operating
income/(loss) in the non-GAAP measures. |
4. |
On slide 9, a graphical chart displays both GAAP and non-GAAP revenues and
operating income on a consolidated basis for each of the first three
quarters of 2003. The reconciliation of the Non-GAAP to the comparable GAAP
measures is presented in Appendix III of the presentation. The revenue bar
consists of BWXT GAAP revenues, and total GAAP J. Ray revenues but consisting of
two non-GAAP revenue measures. The non-GAAP operating income excludes losses on
the legacy projects. Management uses the non-GAAP measures as a means to
evaluate these businesses absent the legacy projects. |
5. |
On slide 10, a graphical chart displays both GAAP and non-GAAP earnings per
share for each of the first three quarters of 2003. The reconciliation of those
measures is presented in Appendix IV of the presentation. The non-GAAP earnings
per share exclude the after-tax effects of the legacy projects and the
revaluation relating to the B&W Chapter 11 settlement divided by the share
count listed. Management uses the non-GAAP earnings per share measure as a means
to evaluate the after-tax results of McDermotts consolidated businesses
absent the legacy projects and the non-cash, mark-to-market revaluation relating
to the B&W Chapter 11 settlement. |
6. |
On slide 17, a graphical chart displays liquidity as of 11/12/03 assuming the
completion of three financing transactions that are in negotiations but not yet
completed. Appendix 5 shows the reconciliation between actual liquidity as of
11/12/03 and the liquidity on that date assuming the transactions contemplated
were actually completed. |
|
Statements
in the presentation include forward looking statements. In accordance with the Safe Harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, McDermott
International, Inc. cautions that statements which a forward looking and provide other
than historical information, involves risks and uncertainties that may impact
McDermotts actual consolidated results of operations. The forward-looking statements
in this presentation include, among other things, statements about McDermotts and
certain subsidiaries liquidity and ability to obtain new financing arrangements, the
estimated cash flows and timing to complete certain projects and the estimated charges for
the proposed settlement of B&Ws Chapter 11 proceedings based on current
negotiations. Although McDermott believes that the expectations reflected in those
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that those
expectations will prove to have been correct. Those statements are made by using various
underlying assumptions and are subject to numerous uncertainties and risks. If one or more
of these risks materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results
may vary materially from those expected. For a more complete discussion of these risk
factors, please see McDermotts annual report for the year ended December 31, 2002
and its 2003 quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
The
information furnished pursuant to this report, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed
to be filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration
statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically
identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference. |
3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
McDERMOTT INTERNATIONAL
INC.
By: /s/ Thomas A. Henzler
Thomas A. Henzler
Vice President and Corporate Controller
November 19, 2003
|