TRANSCAT, INC. 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark one)
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the fiscal year ended:
March 31, 2007
|
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission File Number:
000-03905
TRANSCAT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
16-0874418
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)
(585) 352-7777
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the
Act:
Common Stock, $0.50 par value per share
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act). (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on
September 23, 2006 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
was approximately $31 million. The market value calculation
was determined using the closing sale price of the
Registrants Common Stock on September 23, 2006, as
reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
The number of shares of Common Stock of the Registrant
outstanding as of June 20, 2007 was 7,084,289.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III, Items 10, 11,
12, 13 and 14, of this report, to the extent not set forth
herein, is incorporated by reference from the Registrants
definitive proxy statement relating to the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on August 21, 2007, which
definitive proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) within 120 days of
the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
2
PART I.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This report and, in particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations section of this report, contains forward-looking
statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These include statements concerning
expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat, we, us, or
our). Words such as anticipates,
expects, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, estimates,
and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to forecast. Therefore, our actual results and
outcomes may materially differ from those expressed or forecast
in any such forward-looking statements. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
INTRODUCTION
Transcat is a leading global distributor of professional grade
test, measurement, and calibration instruments and a provider of
calibration and repair services primarily throughout the
process, life science, and manufacturing industries. We conduct
our business through two segments: Distribution Products and
Calibration Services. Our reportable business segments offer
different products and services to the same customer base.
Through our distribution products segment, we market and
distribute national and proprietary brand instruments to
approximately 11,000 global customers. Our catalog (Master
Catalog) offers access to more than 25,000 process and
electrical instruments, including: calibrators, insulation
testers, multimeters, pressure and temperature devices,
oscilloscopes, recorders and related accessories, from over 200
of the industrys leading manufacturers including Agilent,
Fluke, GE, Emerson, and Hart Scientific. In addition, we are the
exclusive worldwide distributor for Transmation and Altek
products. The majority of the instrumentation we sell requires
expert calibration service to ensure that it maintains the most
exacting measurements.
Through our calibration services segment, we offer precise,
reliable, fast calibration and repair services. As of the end of
our fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, (fiscal year
2007), we operated eleven Calibration Centers of
Excellence strategically located across the United States,
Puerto Rico, and Canada servicing approximately 8,000 customers.
Each of our calibration laboratories is ISO-9001:2000 and our
scope of accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 is the widest in the
industry for the market segments we serve. See Calibration
Services Segment Quality below in Item 1
for more information.
CalTrak®,
our proprietary documentation and asset management system, is
used to manage the workflow at our Calibration Centers of
Excellence. Additionally,
CalTrak®
provides calibration certificates, calibration data, and access
to other key documents required in the calibration process.
CalTrak®
has been validated to U.S federal regulation 21CFR 820.75,
which is important to the life science industry, where federal
regulations are especially stringent. See Calibration
Services Segment
CalTrak®
below in Item 1 for more information.
At Transcat, our attention to quality goes beyond the products
and services we deliver. Our sales, customer service and support
teams stand ready to provide expert advice, application
assistance and technical support wherever and whenever our
customers need it. Since calibration is an intangible service,
we believe that our customers trust the integrity of our people
and processes and that forms the foundation of our relationships
with our customers.
Among our customers, and representing approximately 32% of our
consolidated sales, are Fortune 500/Global 500 companies,
including Wyeth, Johnson & Johnson, DuPont, Exxon
Mobil, Dow Chemical, and Duke Energy. Transcat has focused on
the process and life science markets since its founding in 1964.
We are the leading supplier of calibrators in the markets we
serve. We believe these customers do business with us
3
because of our integrity, commitment to quality service, our
CalTrak®
asset management system, and our broad range of product
offerings.
Transcats website address is www.transcat.com. The
information contained on our website is not a part of this
report. On our investor relations webpage,
www.transcat.com/about/investor-relations.aspx, we post the
following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they
are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: annual
reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. All such filings on our investor relations webpage are
available free of charge.
Transcat is an Ohio corporation founded in 1964. We are
headquartered in Rochester, New York and employ more than
200 people. Our executive offices are located at 35 Vantage
Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624. Our telephone number is
585-352-7777.
STRATEGY
We are an accredited provider of calibration services and a
distributor of test and measurement equipment. Our strategy is
to focus on gaining sales and market share in markets where
companies value quality systems
and/or
operate in regulated environments. We strive to differentiate
ourselves and build barriers to competitive entry by offering
and stocking the best products, through the trusted integrity of
our calibration and repair services and integrating those
products and services to benefit our customers operations
and lower their costs.
SEGMENTS
We service our customers through two business segments:
Distribution Products and Calibration Services. Note 8 of
our Consolidated Financial Statements in this report presents
financial information for these segments. We serve approximately
15,000 customers, with no customer or controlled group of
customers accounting for 5% or more of our consolidated net
sales for fiscal years 2005 through 2007. We are not dependent
on any single customer, the loss of which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet, or
results of operations.
We market and sell to our customers through multiple sales
channels consisting of direct catalog marketing, the
transcat.com website, a direct field sales organization,
proactive outbound sales, and an inbound call center. Our direct
field sales team, outbound sales team, and inbound sales team
are each staffed with technically trained personnel. Our
domestic and international sales organization covers territories
in North America, Latin America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and the
Middle East. Our calibration and repair services are offered
only in North America and Puerto Rico. We concentrate on
attracting new customers and increasing product, calibration and
repair sales to existing customers. Sales efforts are also
focused on cross selling. Approximately 29% of our customers
utilize both segments of our business, which provides us with an
opportunity to increase our average sales per customer, while
adding to our value as a single source supplier. Our sales to
customers in the following geographic areas during the periods
indicated, expressed as a percentage of total sales, were as
follows (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
Canada
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Other International
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We focus primarily on the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries. The process industry has been and
continues to be the foundation of our business competency. The
process industry, as we define it, includes petroleum refining,
chemical, water treatment, industrial power, steel,
petrochemical, gas and pipeline, textile, pulp and paper, food
and dairy, and utility companies. The life science industry, as
we define it, includes pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies, medical device manufacturers, and healthcare service
providers.
4
The approximate percentage of our business in these industry
segments for the periods indicated was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
Life Science
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Other Non-Manufacturing
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCTS SEGMENT
Summary. Our customers in the process,
life science, and manufacturing industries use test, measurement
and calibration equipment to ensure that their processes, and
ultimately their end product(s), are within specification.
Utilization of such diagnostic equipment also allows for
continuous improvement processes to be in place, increasing the
accuracies of their measurements. The industrial distribution
products industry for test and measurement instrumentation, in
those geographic markets where we predominately operate, is
serviced by broad based national distributors and niche or
specialty-focused organizations such as Transcat.
Most industrial customers find that maintaining an in-house
inventory of
back-up
test, measurement, and calibration equipment is cost prohibitive
due to the large volume of units. As a result, the distribution
of test and measurement instrumentation has traditionally been
characterized by frequent, small quantity orders combined with a
need for rapid, reliable, and substantially complete order
fulfillment. The purchasing decision is generally made by plant
engineers, quality managers, or their purchasing personnel.
Products are generally purchased from more than one distributor.
The majority of our products are not consumables but are
purchased as replacement, upgrades, or for expansion of
manufacturing and research and development facilities. Our
catalog and sales activities are designed to maintain a constant
presence in front of the customer to ensure we receive the order
when they are ready to purchase. As a result, we evaluate sales
trends over at least a four quarter cycle as any individual
months sales can be impacted by numerous factors, many of
which are unpredictable and potentially non-recurring.
We believe that a distribution product customer chooses a
distributor based on a number of different criteria including
the timely delivery and the accuracy of orders, consistent
product quality, value added services and price. Value added
services include providing technical support to insure our
customer receives the right product for their specific need
through application knowledge and product compatibility. We also
provide calibration of product purchases, on-line procurement,
same day shipment of products for in-stock items, a variety of
custom product offerings and training programs. Our customers
also get the operational efficiency of dealing with one
distributor for most or all of their product needs.
Our distribution products segment accounted for approximately
68% (calculated on dollars in thousands) of our sales in fiscal
year 2007. Within the distribution products segment, our routine
business is comprised of customers who place orders to acquire
or to replace specific instruments, which typically range from
$100 to $5,000 per order, with an average of approximately
$1,500 per order.
Marketing and Sales. Through our
comprehensive Master Catalog, supplemental catalogs, opt-in
email newsletter, and other direct sales and marketing programs,
we offer our customers a broad selection of highly recognized
branded products at competitive prices. The instruments
typically range in price from $100 to over $20,000 and are sold
and marketed to approximately 11,000 customers.
During fiscal year 2007, we distributed approximately 900,000
pieces of direct marketing materials including catalogs,
brochures, supplements and other promotional materials to
approximately 100,000 customer contacts and 400,000 potential
customer contacts. Some of the key factors that determine the
number of catalogs and other direct marketing materials received
by each customer include new product introductions, their market
segments and the recency, frequency and monetary value of past
purchases.
5
The majority of our product sales are derived from catalog
marketing. Our Master Catalog consists of approximately 700
pages of products relevant to the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries. We distribute our Master Catalog to
approximately 75,000 existing and prospective customers in the
United States and Canada approximately every 12 months. The
Master Catalog provides standard make/model and related
information and is also available in an electronic format upon
request and on-line at our website: www.transcat.com. Our new
customer acquisition program utilizes smaller catalog
supplements which feature new products, promotions,
or specific product categories. The catalog supplements are
launched at varying periods throughout the year; the
publications are mailed to approximately 600,000 customers and
targeted prospects.
The approximate percentage of our distribution products business
by industry segment for the periods indicated was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
Life Science
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Other Non-Manufacturing
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. The markets we serve are
highly competitive. Competition for sales in distribution
products is quite fragmented and ranges from large national
distributors and manufacturers to small local distribution
organizations. Key competitive factors typically include
customer service and support, quality, turn around time,
inventory availability, product brand name, and price. To
address our customers needs for technical support and
product application assistance, and to differentiate ourselves
from competitors, we employ a staff of highly trained technical
application specialists. To maintain our competitive position
with respect to such products and services, we continually
demonstrate our commitment to our customers by providing
employee training in the areas described above.
Suppliers and Purchasing. We believe
that effective purchasing is a key element to maintaining and
enhancing our position as a provider of high quality test and
measurement equipment. We frequently evaluate our purchase
requirements and suppliers price offerings to obtain
products at the best possible cost. We obtain our products from
more than 200 suppliers of brand name and private labeled
equipment. In fiscal year 2007, our top 10 vendors accounted for
approximately 70% of our aggregate business. Approximately 30%
of our product purchases on an annual basis are from Fluke
Electronics Corporation (Fluke), which is believed
to be consistent with Flukes share of the markets we
service.
We plan our product mix, including stocked and non-stocked
inventory items, to best serve the anticipated needs of our
customers whose individual purchases vary in size. We can
usually ship our customers our top selling products the same day
they are ordered. During fiscal year 2007, approximately 86% of
our product orders were filled with planned inventory items
already in stock.
Operations. Our distribution operations
take place within an approximate 27,000 square-foot
facility located in Rochester, New York. This location is our
headquarters and also houses the customer service, sales and
administrative functions as well as a calibration laboratory.
Approximately 30,000 product orders are shipped from this
facility annually with an average order size of approximately
$1,500 per order in fiscal year 2007, $1,400 per order in fiscal
year 2006 and $1,200 per order in fiscal year 2005.
Distribution. We distribute our
products in the United States, Canada, and internationally from
our distribution center in Rochester, New York. We maintain
appropriate inventory levels in order to satisfy anticipated
customer demand for prompt delivery and complete order
fulfillment of their product needs. These inventory levels are
managed on a daily basis with the aid of our sophisticated
purchasing and stock management information system. Our
automated freight manifesting and laser bar code scanning
facilitates
6
prompt and accurate order fulfillment. We ship our United States
orders predominantly by a worldwide express carrier.
International orders are shipped by a number of different
carriers.
Distribution Agreement. In connection
with the sale of Transmation Products Group (TPG) to
Fluke in December 2001, we entered into a distribution agreement
(the 2001 Distribution Agreement) with Fluke to be
the exclusive worldwide distributor of Transmation and Altek
products until December 31, 2006. Under the 2001
Distribution Agreement, we also agreed to purchase a
pre-determined amount of inventory from Fluke.
On October 31, 2002, with an effective date of
September 1, 2002, we entered into a new distribution
agreement (the 2002 Distribution Agreement) with
Fluke, which replaced the 2001 Distribution Agreement. Under the
terms of the 2002 Distribution Agreement, among other items, we
agreed to purchase a pre-determined amount of inventory across a
broader array of products and brands during each calendar year
through 2006. Our purchases for calendar years 2002 through 2006
exceeded the commitment under the 2002 Distribution Agreement.
On March 31, 2007, we entered into a new distribution
agreement (the 2007 Distribution Agreement) with
Fluke. The 2007 Distribution Agreement does not require us to
purchase a minimum amount of inventory. However, the 2007
Distribution Agreement continues our right to be the exclusive
worldwide distributor of Altek and Transmation branded products
in exchange for our commitment to purchase a minimum amount of
those products. The minimum amount for calendar year 2007 is
$3.8 million. We believe this will be achieved based on
historical sales trends. Minimum purchase commitments for future
years will be determined by June 30 of each year. In the event
that Transcat fails to make the required purchases, it may lose
its right to be the exclusive worldwide distributor.
Backlog. Customer product orders
include orders for products that we routinely stock in our
inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less
frequently, which we do not stock.
Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but also
include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, and orders required to be shipped at a
future date.
At the end of fiscal year 2007, the value of our unshippable
product orders was approximately $1.8 million, compared to
approximately $1.4 million and $1.3 million at the end
of the fiscal years ending March 25, 2006 (fiscal
year 2006) and March 26, 2005 (fiscal year
2005), respectively. At March 31, 2007, unshippable
product orders included a $0.4 million remaining balance on
an order related to a single customer. At the request of the
customer, this specific order is being shipped across several
months. In general, this order accounted for a significant part
of the increase in product backorders for fiscal quarters two
through four of fiscal year 2007, compared to the same quarters
in fiscal year 2006. During fiscal year 2007, the month-end
level of unshippable product orders varied between a low of
$1.3 million and a high of $2.4 million. This
variation is due primarily to seasonality, supplier delivery
schedules, and variations in customer ordering patterns, as well
as the impact of the aforementioned order.
The following graph shows the quarter end trend of unshippable
product orders and backorders for fiscal years 2006 through 2007.
7
CALIBRATION
SERVICES SEGMENT
Summary. Calibration is the act of
comparing a unit or instrument of unknown value to a standard of
known value and reporting the result in some rigorously defined
form. After the calibration has been completed, a decision is
made, again based on rigorously defined parameters, on what is
to be done to the unit. The decision may be to adjust, optimize,
repair, limit its use, range or rating, scrap the unit, or leave
the unit as is. The purpose of calibration is to significantly
reduce the risk of product or process failures caused by
inaccurate measurements.
Transcats calibration strategy encompasses two methods to
manage a customers calibration and repair needs:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
If a company wishes to outsource its calibration needs, we offer
an Integrated Calibration Services Solution that
provides a complete wrap-around service:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program management;
|
|
|
Calibration;
|
|
|
Logistics; and
|
|
|
Consultation services.
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
If a company has an in-house calibration operation, we can
provide:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration of primary standards;
|
|
|
Overflow capability either
on-site or
at one of our facilities during periods of high demand; and
|
|
|
Consultation and training services.
|
In either case, we intend to have the broadest accredited
calibration offering to our targeted markets which includes
certification of our technicians to the American Society for
Quality standards, complete calibration management encompassing
the entire metrology function, and access to our service
offerings.
The billion-dollar commercial calibration services industry in
the U.S. is extremely fragmented with an estimated
750 companies participating, ranging from nationally
accredited organizations, such as Transcat, to one-person
organizations, in addition to companies that do not currently
outsource their calibrations. Our typical customer contact is a
technically based individual who is employed in a quality,
engineering, or manufacturing position.
The calibration services industry has its origins in the
military; approximately 65% of our calibration technicians and
laboratory managers received metrology training in the military
or have calibration experience with the military prior to
joining Transcat.
Calibration sourcing decisions are based on quality, customer
service, turn-around time, location, documentation, price, and a
one-source solution. We believe that our success with customers
who value quality is based on the trust they have in the
integrity of our people and processes.
Our calibration services segment provides periodic calibration
and repair services for our customers test, measurement,
and diagnostic instruments. We perform over 110,000 in-house
calibrations annually. These are performed at one of our eleven
Calibration Centers of Excellence, or at the customers
physical location. Our calibration services segment accounted
for approximately 32% (calculated on dollars in thousands) of
our total fiscal year 2007 sales.
The calibration services segment of the market is critically
aligned with our strategic focus on quality accreditations. Our
calibration services are of the highest technical and quality
levels, with broad ranges of accreditation and registration. Our
quality systems are further detailed below in
Quality.
Acquisition. In February 2006, we
acquired N.W. Calibration Inspection, Inc. (NWCI) in
Fort Wayne, Indiana. NWCI provides dimensional calibration,
first part inspection, and reverse engineering services to the
pharmaceutical, medical device, and automotive industries. We
paid $0.8 million in cash and $0.1 million in stock to
purchase NWCI. We allocated the initial purchase price to the
estimated fair value of the fixed assets acquired
($0.5 million) with the excess of $0.4 million
allocated to goodwill. The purchase agreement provides for
additional performance-based payments to the sellers up to a
maximum of $0.3 million, of which $0.1 million was
earned in fiscal year 2007. The results of the acquired business
have been included in our
8
calibration services segment of the Consolidated Financial
Statements since the acquisition date. Pro-forma information for
this acquisition is not included as it did not have a material
impact on the consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Marketing and Sales. Calibration allows
for maximum productivity and efficiency by assuring accurate,
reliable equipment and processes. Through our calibration
services segment, we perform periodic calibrations on new and
used equipment as well as repair services for our customers. All
of our Calibration Centers of Excellence provide accredited
calibration of common measurement parameters.
We utilize our Master Catalog, supplements, mailings, journal
advertising, trade shows, and the Internet to market our
calibration services to customers with a strategic focus in the
highly regulated industries including process, life science, and
manufacturing. Our quality process and standards are designed to
meet the needs of companies that are highly regulated (e.g., the
Food and Drug Administration, or FDA),
and/or have
a strong commitment to quality and a comprehensive calibration
program.
The approximate percentage of our calibration services business
by industry segment for the periods indicated was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Life Science
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
Other Non-Manufacturing
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. The calibration outsource
industry is highly fragmented and is composed of companies
ranging in size from non-accredited, sole proprietorships to
internationally recognized and accredited corporations, such as
Transcat, resulting in a tremendous range of service levels and
capabilities. A large percentage of calibration companies are
small businesses that provide only basic measurements and
service markets in which quality requirements may not be as
demanding as the markets that we strategically target. Very few
of these companies are structured to compete on the same scale
and level of quality as us. There are also several competitors
with whom we compete who have national or regional operations.
Certain of these competitors may have greater resources than we
have and many of them have accreditations that are similar to
ours. We differentiate ourselves from our competitors by
demonstrating our commitment to quality and by having a wide
range of capabilities that are tailored to the markets we serve.
Customers also see the value in using
CalTrak®
to monitor their equipment status. We are also fundamentally
different than most of our competitors because we have the
ability to bundle product, calibration and repair as a single
source for our customers.
Quality. The accreditation process is
the only system currently in existence that assures measurement
competence. Each of our laboratories is audited and reviewed by
external accreditation bodies proficient in the technical
aspects of the chemistry and physics that underlie metrology,
ensuring that measurements are properly made. Accreditation also
requires that all standards used for accredited measurements
have a fully documented path, known as the traceability chain,
either directly or through other accredited laboratories, back
to the national or international standard for that measurement
parameter. This ensures that our measurement process is
consistent with the global metrology network that is designed to
standardize measurements worldwide.
To ensure the quality and consistency of our calibrations to
customers, we have sought and achieved several international
levels of quality and accreditation. Our calibration
laboratories are ISO 9001:2000 registered through
Underwriters Laboratories, which itself has international
oversight from the ANSI-ASQ National Accreditation Board
(ANAB). Our scope of accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025
is the widest in the industries we serve. The accreditation
process also ensures that our calibrations are traceable to the
National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) or the National Research Council
(NRC) (these are the National Measurement Institutes
for the U.S. and Canada, respectively), or to other
national or international standards bodies, or to measurable
conditions created in our laboratory, or accepted fundamental
and/or
natural physical
9
constants, ratio type of calibration, or by comparison to
consensus standards. Our laboratories, with the exception of
Fort Wayne which has been audited and is in a pending
accreditation status, are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and
ANSI/NCSL Z540-1-1994 using two of the four accrediting bodies
(ABs) in the United States that are
signatories to the International Laboratory Accreditation
Cooperation (ILAC). These two ABs are:
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
(A2LA) and National Voluntary Laboratory
Accreditation Program (NVLAP). These ABs
provide an objective, third party, internationally accepted
evaluation of the quality, consistency, and competency of our
calibration processes.
The importance of this international oversight, ILAC, to our
customers is the assurance that our calibrations will be
accepted worldwide, removing one of the barriers to trade that
they may experience if using a non-ILAC traceable calibration
service provider.
To provide the widest range of service to our customers in our
target markets, our ISO-17025 accreditations extend across a
wide range of technical disciplines. The following table
represents Transcats capabilities for each Center of
Excellence as of March 31, 2007 (A=Accredited;
N=Non-accredited):
WORKING-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Metrology Disciplines
|
|
Dimensional Metrology Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RF/
|
|
Luminance/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inspection
|
|
|
DC/ACLF
|
|
HF/UHF
|
|
Microwave
|
|
Illuminance
|
|
Length
|
|
Optics
|
|
(GD&T)
|
|
Boston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Ottawa
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Rochester
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
San Juan, PR
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Ft. Wayne(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
Particle
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
Relative
|
|
Mass
|
|
Pressure,
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
Counters
|
|
Force
|
|
Analysis
|
|
Humidity
|
|
Weight
|
|
Vacuum
|
|
Boston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Dayton
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Ottawa
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Philadelphia
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Rochester
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
San Juan, PR(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
St. Louis
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Ft. Wayne(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Metrology Disciplines (continued)
|
|
Life Sciences Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RPM,
|
|
Vibration,
|
|
Chemical/
|
|
|
Torque
|
|
Temperature
|
|
Speed
|
|
Acceleration
|
|
Biological
|
|
Boston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Houston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Los Angeles
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Ottawa
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
Rochester
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
San Juan, PR
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Ft. Wayne(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REFERENCE-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional
|
|
Electrical
|
|
Humidity
|
|
Mass
|
|
Pressure
|
|
Temperature
|
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dayton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
Rochester
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ft. Wayne(2)
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our San Juan, Puerto Rico laboratory has recently acquired
the Thunder Scientific 2500ST Humidity Standard and is capable
of performing non-accredited calibrations. The relative humidity
capability will become accredited during their next A2LA audit. |
|
(2) |
|
Our Fort Wayne, Indiana laboratory has been audited by A2LA
and is in a pending accreditation status, which is
expected to be finalized within the next two to three months. |
CalTrak®. CalTrak®
and CalTrak-Online is our proprietary metrology management
system that provides a comprehensive calibration quality
program. Many of our customers have unique calibration service
requirements to which we have tailored specific services.
CalTrak®
allows our customers to track calibration cycles via the
Internet and provides the customer with a safe and secure
off-site archive of calibration records that can be accessed
24 hours a day. Access to records data is managed through
our secure password protected website. Calibration assets are
tracked with records that are automatically cross-referenced to
the equipment that was used to calibrate.
CalTrak®
has also been validated to meet the most stringent requirements
within the industry.
CUSTOMER
SERVICE AND SUPPORT
Our breadth of distribution products and calibration services
along with our strong commitment to customer sales, service and
support enable us to satisfy our customer needs through
convenient selection and ordering, rapid, accurate, and complete
order fulfillment and on-time delivery.
A key element of our customer service approach is our
technically trained direct field sales team, outbound sales
team, inbound sales team and customer service organization. Most
customer orders are placed through our customer service
organization which often provides technical assistance to our
customers to facilitate the purchasing decision. To ensure the
quality of service provided, we frequently monitor our customer
service through customer surveys, interpersonal communication,
and daily statistical reports.
11
Customers may place orders via:
|
|
|
Mail at Transcat, Inc., 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, NY
14624;
|
|
Fax at
1-800-395-0543;
|
|
Telephone at
1-800-828-1470;
|
|
Email at sales@transcat.com; or
|
|
Our website at www.transcat.com.
|
INFORMATION
REGARDING EXPORT SALES
Approximately 17% of our sales in fiscal year 2007 and 16% in
fiscal years 2006 and 2005 resulted from sales to customers
outside the United States (calculated on dollars in millions).
Of those sales in fiscal year 2007, 46.8% were denominated in
U.S. dollars and the remaining 53.2% were in Canadian
dollars. Our sales are subject to the customary risks of
operating in an international environment, including the
potential imposition of trade or foreign exchange restrictions,
tariff and other tax increases, fluctuations in exchange rates
and unstable political situations, any one or more of which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash
flows, balance sheet or results of operations. See Foreign
Currency in Item 7A for further details.
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
We utilize a basic software platform, Application Plus, to
manage our business and operations segments. We also utilize a
turnkey enterprise software solution. This software includes a
suite of fully integrated modules to manage our business
functions, including customer service, warehouse management,
inventory management, financial management, customer management,
and business intelligence. This solution is a fully mature
business package and has been subject to more than 20 years
of refinement.
SEASONALITY
We believe that our line of business has certain historical
seasonal factors. Our fiscal second quarter is generally weaker
and the fiscal fourth quarter historically stronger due to
typical industrial operating cycles.
ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
We believe that compliance with federal, state, or local
provisions relating to the protection of the environment will
not have any material effect on our capital expenditures,
earnings, or competitive position.
EMPLOYEES
At the end of fiscal year 2007, we had 228 employees,
compared to 238 and 209 employees at the end of fiscal
years 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease of
10 employees from fiscal year end 2006 to fiscal year end
2007 is primarily attributed to changes in our sales structure.
12
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
executive officers and certain key employees as of
March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Carl E. Sassano
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Charles P. Hadeed
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer
|
John J. Zimmer
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
|
John A. De Voldre
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources
|
Jay F. Woychick
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Vice President of Marketing
|
Andrew M. Weir
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Vice President of Field Sales
|
Derek C. Hurlburt
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Corporate Controller
|
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, Charles P. Hadeed was
named as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Hadeed will
continue to serve as our President and Chief Operating Officer.
Also during the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, Carl E.
Sassano was named as Executive Chairman of our Board of
Directors.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risks and all other
information included in this report. The risks and uncertainties
described below and elsewhere in this report are not the only
ones facing our business. If any of the following risks were to
actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of
operations would likely suffer. In that case, the trading price
of our common stock could fall and you could lose all or part of
your investment.
General Economic Conditions May Have A Material Adverse
Effect On Our Operating Results, Financial Condition, Or Our
Ability To Meet Our Commitments. The
electronic instrumentation distribution industry is affected by
changes in economic conditions, which are outside our control.
Economic slowdowns, adverse economic conditions or cyclical
trends in certain customer markets may have a material adverse
effect on our operating results, financial condition, or our
ability to meet our commitments.
We Depend On Manufacturers To Supply Our Inventory And
Rely On One Vendor Group To Supply A Significant Amount Of Our
Inventory Purchases. If They Fail To Provide Desired Products To
Us, Increase Prices, Or Fail To Timely Deliver Products, Our
Sales Could Suffer. A significant amount of
our inventory purchases are made from one vendor, Fluke. Our
reliance on this vendor leaves us vulnerable to having an
inadequate supply of required products, price increases, late
deliveries, and poor product quality. Like other distributors in
our industry, we occasionally experience supplier shortages and
are unable to purchase our desired volume of products. If we are
unable to enter into and maintain satisfactory distribution
arrangements with leading manufacturers, if we are unable to
maintain an adequate supply of products, or if manufacturers do
not regularly invest in, introduce to us,
and/or make
available to us for distribution new products, our sales could
suffer considerably. Finally, we cannot provide any assurance
that particular products, or product lines, will be available to
us, or available in quantities sufficient to meet customer
demand. This is of particular significance to our business
because the products we sell are often only available from one
source. Any limits to product access could materially and
adversely affect our business.
Our Future Success May Be Affected By
Indebtedness. Under our Revolving Credit
Facility, as of March 31, 2007, we owed $2.9 million
to our secured creditor. We are required to meet financial tests
on a quarterly basis and comply with other covenants customary
in secured financings. Although we believe that we will continue
to be in compliance with such covenants, if we do not remain in
compliance with such covenants, our lender may demand immediate
repayment of amounts outstanding. Changes in interest rates may
have a significant effect on our payment obligations and
operating results. Furthermore, we are dependent on credit from
manufacturers of our products to fund our inventory purchases.
If our debt burden increases to high levels, such manufacturers
may restrict our credit. Our cash requirements will depend on
numerous factors,
13
including the rate of growth of our sales, the timing and levels
of products purchased, payment terms, and credit limits from
manufacturers, the timing and level of our accounts receivable
collections and our ability to manage our business profitably.
Our ability to satisfy our existing obligations, whether or not
under our secured credit facility, will depend upon our future
operating performance, which may be impacted by prevailing
economic conditions and financial, business, and other factors
described in this report, many of which are beyond our control.
If Existing Shareholders Sell Large Numbers Of Shares Of
Our Common Stock, Our Stock Price Could
Decline. The market price of our Common Stock
could decline as a result of sales by our existing shareholders
or holders of stock options of a large number of shares of our
Common Stock in the public market or the perception that these
sales could occur.
Our Stock Price Has Been, And May Continue To Be,
Volatile. The stock market, from time to
time, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations
that are both related and unrelated to the operating performance
of companies. As our stock may be affected by market volatility,
and by our own performance, the following factors, among others,
may have a significant effect on the market price of our Common
Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Developments in our relationships with current or future
manufacturers of products we distribute;
|
|
|
Announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
commitments;
|
|
|
Litigation or governmental proceedings or announcements
involving us or our industry;
|
|
|
Economic and other external factors, such as disasters or other
crises;
|
|
|
Sales of our Common Stock or other securities in the open market;
|
|
|
Period-to-period fluctuations in our operating results; and
|
|
|
Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations.
|
We Expect That Our Quarterly Results Of Operations Will
Fluctuate. Such Fluctuation Could Cause Our Stock Price To
Decline. A large portion of our expenses for
calibration services, including expenses for facilities,
equipment and personnel, are relatively fixed. Accordingly, if
sales decline or do not grow as we anticipate, we may not be
able to correspondingly reduce our operating expenses in any
particular quarter. Our quarterly sales and operating results
have fluctuated in the past and are likely to do so in the
future. If our operating results in some quarters fail to meet
the expectations of stock market analysts and investors, our
stock price would likely decline. Some of the factors that could
cause our sales and operating results to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in industrial demand for products we sell
and/or
services we provide; and
|
|
|
Fluctuations in geographic conditions, including currency and
other economic conditions.
|
If We Fail To Attract And Retain Qualified Personnel, We
May Not Be Able To Achieve Our Stated Corporate
Objectives. Our ability to manage our
anticipated growth, if realized, effectively depends on our
ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive
officers and technical personnel. If we fail to attract and
retain qualified individuals, we will not be able to achieve our
stated corporate objectives.
Changes In Accounting Standards, Legal Requirements And
The NASDAQ Stock Market Listing Standards, Or Our Ability To
Comply With Any Existing Requirements Or Standards, Could
Adversely Affect Our Operating
Results. Extensive reforms relating to public
company financial reporting, corporate governance and ethics,
the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and oversight of the
accounting profession have been implemented over the past
several years. Compliance with the new rules, regulations and
standards that have resulted from such reforms has increased our
accounting and legal costs and has required significant
management time and attention. In the event that additional
rules, regulations or standards are implemented or any of the
existing rules, regulations or standards to which we are subject
undergo additional material modification, we could be forced to
spend significant financial and management resources to ensure
our continued compliance, which could have an adverse affect on
our results of operations. In addition, although we believe we
are in full compliance with all such existing rules, regulations
and standards, should we be or become unable to comply with any
of such rules, regulations and standards, as they presently
exist or as they may exist in the future, our results of
operations could be adversely effected and the market price of
our Common Stock could decline.
14
The Distribution Products Industry Is Highly Competitive,
And We May Not Be Able To Compete
Successfully. We compete with numerous
companies, including several major manufacturers and
distributors. Some of our competitors have greater financial and
other resources than we do, which could allow them to compete
more successfully. Most of our products are available from
several sources and our customers tend to have relationships
with several distributors. Competitors could obtain exclusive
rights to market particular products, which we would then be
unable to market. Manufacturers could also increase their
efforts to sell directly to end-users and bypass distributors
like us. Industry consolidation among product distributors, the
unavailability of products, whether due to our inability to gain
access to products or interruptions in supply from
manufacturers, or the emergence of new competitors could also
increase competition. In the future, we may be unable to compete
successfully and competitive pressures may reduce our sales.
Our Sales Depend On Our Relationships With Capable Sales
Personnel As Well As Key Customers, Vendors And Manufacturers Of
The Products That We Distribute. Our future
operating results depend on our ability to maintain satisfactory
relationships with qualified sales personnel who appreciate the
value of our services as well as key customers, vendors and
manufacturers. If we fail to maintain our existing relationships
with such persons or fail to acquire relationships with such key
persons in the future, our business may suffer.
Our Future Success Is Substantially Dependent Upon Our
Senior Management. Our future success is
substantially dependent upon the efforts and abilities of
members of our existing senior management. Competition for
senior management is intense, and we may not be successful in
attracting and retaining key personnel.
Our Acquisitions May Not Result In The Benefits And Sales
Growth We Expect. We may acquire other
companies in order to expand our market presence in either or
both of the product distribution market or the calibration
services market. We cannot be sure that we will achieve the
benefits of sales growth that we expect from these acquisitions
or that we will not incur unforeseen additional costs or
expenses in connection with these acquisitions. To effectively
manage our expected future growth, we must continue to
successfully manage our integration of these companies and
continue to improve our operational systems, internal
procedures, accounts receivable and management, financial and
operational controls. If we fail in any of these areas, our
business could be adversely affected.
Tax Legislation Initiatives Could Adversely Affect The
Companys Net Earnings And Tax
Liabilities. We are subject to the tax laws
and regulations of the United States federal, state and local
governments, as well as foreign jurisdictions. From time to
time, various legislative initiatives may be proposed that could
adversely affect our tax positions. There can be no assurance
that our effective tax rate will not be adversely affected by
these initiatives. In addition, tax laws and regulations are
extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations.
Although we believe that our historical tax positions are sound
and consistent with applicable laws, regulations and existing
precedent, there can be no assurance that our tax positions will
not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that we would
be successful in any such challenge.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
15
We lease the following properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Property
|
|
Location
|
|
Square Footage
|
|
|
Corporate Headquarters,
Distribution Center and Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Rochester, NY
|
|
|
27,250
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Boston, MA
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Charlotte, NC
|
|
|
4,860
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Dayton, OH
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Anaheim, CA
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Ottawa, ON
|
|
|
3,990
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Philadelphia, NJ
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
St. Louis, MO
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Fort Wayne, IN
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
San Juan, PR
|
|
|
700
|
|
We also lease office space in Shanghai, China. We believe that
our properties are generally in good condition, are well
maintained, and are generally suitable and adequate to carry on
our business in its current form.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during
the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
PART II.
ITEM 5. MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under
the symbol TRNS. As of June 20, 2007, we had
approximately 700 shareholders of record.
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth, on a per share basis, for the
periods indicated, the high and low reported sales prices of our
Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market for each
quarterly period in fiscal years 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
5.52
|
|
|
$
|
6.08
|
|
|
$
|
5.71
|
|
|
$
|
5.87
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
4.75
|
|
|
$
|
4.95
|
|
|
$
|
4.64
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.73
|
|
|
$
|
5.38
|
|
|
$
|
5.40
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
4.15
|
|
|
$
|
4.19
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
DIVIDENDS
We have not declared any cash dividends since our inception and
do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future.
16
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table provides selected financial data for fiscal
year 2007 and the previous four fiscal years (in thousands,
except per share data). Certain reclassifications of prior
fiscal years financial information have been made to
conform to the current fiscal year presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
FY 2003(1)
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
$
|
60,471
|
|
|
$
|
55,307
|
|
|
$
|
53,317
|
|
|
$
|
57,172
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
49,783
|
|
|
|
45,372
|
|
|
|
41,415
|
|
|
|
39,919
|
|
|
|
43,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
16,690
|
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
13,398
|
|
|
|
13,319
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
14,341
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
12,850
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture(2)
|
|
|
(1,544
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
Other Expense (Income), net
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
3,276
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from)
Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Cumulative Effect of
a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
Cumulative Effect of a Change in
Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
(4,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share Before
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Basic Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,914
|
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
|
|
6,252
|
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share Before
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
Diluted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
Closing Price Per Share
|
|
$
|
5.25
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the Fiscal Years Ended March
|
|
|
|
31, 2007
|
|
|
25, 2006
|
|
|
26, 2005
|
|
|
27, 2004
|
|
|
31, 2003
|
|
|
Balance Sheets and Working Capital
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
$
|
4,336
|
|
|
$
|
3,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
3,736
|
|
|
$
|
2,842
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
22,422
|
|
|
|
21,488
|
|
|
|
20,207
|
|
|
|
18,385
|
|
|
|
16,758
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
5,498
|
|
|
|
6,441
|
|
|
|
5,248
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
11,229
|
|
|
|
8,647
|
|
|
|
4,314
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
17
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In fiscal year 2003, we recorded a $6.5 million impairment
charge from the implementation of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets, as a change in accounting principle. |
|
(2) |
|
In fiscal year 2007, we recognized a previously deferred pre-tax
gain of $1.5 million from the sale of TPG to Fluke. See
Note 9 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
disclosure. |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
RECLASSIFICATION
OF AMOUNTS
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal years financial
information have been made to conform with current fiscal
years presentation. In addition, certain reclassifications
of prior fiscal quarters financial information have been
made to conform with current fiscal quarter presentation.
ROUNDING
Certain percentages may vary depending on the basis used for the
calculation, such as dollars in thousands and dollars in
millions.
OVERVIEW
Operational Overview. We are a leading
distributor of professional grade test, measurement, and
calibration equipment and provider of nationally recognized and
accredited calibration and repair services across a wide array
of measurement disciplines.
We operate our business through two reportable business segments
that offer different products and services to the same customer
base. Those two segments are Distribution Products and
Calibration Services.
In our distribution products segment, our Master Catalog is
widely recognized by both original equipment manufacturers and
customers as the ultimate source for test, measurement and
calibration equipment. Additionally, because we specialize in
test, measurement and calibration equipment, as opposed to a
wide array of industrial products, our sales and customer
service personnel can provide value added technical assistance
to our customers to assist them in determining what product best
meets their particular application requirements.
Our sales in our distribution products segment can be heavily
impacted by changes in the economic environment. As industrial
customers increase or curtail capital and discretionary
spending, our product sales will typically be directly impacted.
The majority of our products are not consumables but are
purchased as replacements, upgrades, or for expansion of
manufacturing and research and development facilities. Year over
year sales growth in any one quarter can be impacted by a number
of factors including the addition of new product lines or
channels of distribution.
Our strength in our calibration services segment is based upon
our wide range of disciplines and our investment in the quality
systems that are required in our targeted market segments. Our
services range from the calibration and repair of a single unit
to managing a customers entire calibration program. We
believe our calibration services segment offers long term growth
opportunity and the potential for continuing sales from
established customers from what is typically an annual
calibration cycle.
We evaluate sales growth in both of our business segments
against a four quarter trend analysis, and not by analyzing any
single quarter.
18
Financial Overview. In evaluating the
Companys results for fiscal year 2007 and the fiscal year
2007 fourth quarter, the following factors should be taken into
account:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year 2007 and the fiscal year 2007 fourth quarter
operating results include 53 weeks and 14 weeks,
respectively, compared to 52 weeks and 13 weeks for
the corresponding periods for fiscal year 2006.
|
|
|
|
The fiscal year 2007 operating results include the recognition
of a previously deferred pre-tax gain of $1.5 million from
the sale of TPG to Fluke. Although the sale of TPG occurred in
fiscal year 2002, Transcat had entered into a distribution
agreement in connection with the transaction and was precluded
from recognizing the gain at that time because the distribution
agreement required us to purchase a pre-determined amount of
inventory during each calendar year from 2002 to 2006. In
December 2006, Transcats purchases exceeded the required
amount for calendar year 2006, as they had in each of the prior
four years, which fulfilled the obligation and triggered the
recognition of the gain in the fiscal year 2007 third quarter.
|
|
|
|
We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R),
which requires the expensing of stock awards, at the beginning
of fiscal year 2007. Approximately $0.3 million of stock
expense was recorded in fiscal year 2007. There was no stock
expense recorded in fiscal year 2006.
|
|
|
|
Net income for fiscal year 2007 and the fiscal year 2007 fourth
quarter includes income tax provisions of $1.2 million and
$0.2 million, respectively. Approximately $0.6 million
of the full year amount relates to the gain on the sale of TPG.
The results for fiscal year 2006 and the fiscal year 2006 fourth
quarter included a benefit from income taxes of
$2.6 million that resulted from the reversal of a large
portion of the Companys deferred tax asset valuation
allowance.
|
The end of fiscal year 2007s fourth quarter marked eight
consecutive quarters of year-over-year quarterly net sales
growth in both our product distribution and calibration services
segments. Taking the additional week in fiscal year 2007 into
account, our overall product growth rate of 11.3% (calculated on
dollars in thousands) was in line with our expectations for the
year. During fiscal year 2007, we experienced 33.5% growth
within our indirect channel. Our direct channel continued to
grow, with year-over-year sales growth of 9.0%. Calibration
services sales grew by 7.1% in fiscal year 2007 compared to
fiscal year 2006 (calculated on dollars in thousands).
Our overall gross margin, as a percent of sales, was relatively
consistent with the prior fiscal year. On a segment basis, our
distribution products gross margin ratio improved by 2.4 points,
driven primarily by increased vendor rebates and continued focus
on controlling promotional pricing, offset to a degree by
increased sales to indirect markets which generated lower
margins. In our calibration services segment, gross margin
declined 4.6 points due to the rate of investment in lab
operating expenses exceeding the rate of growth in sales.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies
to include a discussion of critical accounting principles or
methods used in the preparation of financial statements.
Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements includes a
complete discussion of the significant accounting policies and
methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements. A summary of our most critical accounting policies
follows:
Use of Estimates. The preparation of
our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of sales and
expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and
assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns, depreciable lives of fixed
assets, estimated lives of our Master Catalog, and deferred tax
asset valuation allowances. Future events and their effects
cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, our
19
accounting estimates require the exercise of judgment. The
accounting estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated
Financial Statements will change as new events occur, as more
experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained,
and as our operating environment changes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Such changes and refinements in
estimation methodologies are reflected in reported results of
operations in the period in which the changes are made and, if
material, their effects are disclosed in the Notes to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accounts Receivable. Accounts
receivable represent receivables from customers in the ordinary
course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the
allowance for doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based
upon the expected collectibility of accounts receivable. We
apply a specific formula to our accounts receivable aging, which
may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula
may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all
attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to sales over a specific timeframe. The returns
reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the
level of sales
and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventory. Inventory consists of
products purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost
or market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of
inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items
not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss
factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories
of our inventory. We evaluate the adequacy of the reserve on a
quarterly basis.
Property and Equipment, Depreciation, and
Amortization. Property and equipment are
stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed
primarily under the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
|
2 - 6
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
4 - 10
|
|
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written
off at their then remaining net book value. We account for
software costs in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Leasehold improvements are amortized
under the straight-line method over the estimated useful life or
the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs
are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for further details.
Goodwill. We estimate the fair value of
our reporting units in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, using the fair market
value measurement requirement, rather than the undiscounted cash
flows approach. We test our goodwill for impairment on an annual
basis, or immediately if conditions indicate that such
impairment could exist. The evaluation of our reporting units on
a fair value basis indicated that no impairment existed as of
March 31, 2007, March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005.
Catalog Costs. We capitalize the cost
of each Master Catalog mailed and amortize the cost over the
respective catalogs estimated productive life. We review
response results from catalog mailings on a continuous basis;
and if warranted, modify the period over which costs are
recognized. We amortize the cost of each Master Catalog over an
eighteen month period and amortize the cost of each catalog
supplement over a three month period. Total unamortized catalog
costs in prepaid expenses and deferred charges on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets were $0.5 million as of
March 31, 2007 and March 25, 2006.
Deferred Taxes. We account for certain
income and expense items differently for financial reporting
purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes
are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. A
valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is provided for items
for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of such
items will not be realized, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
SFAS No. 109 requires an assessment of both positive
and negative evidence when measuring the need for a deferred tax
valuation allowance. See Taxes below in this section
and Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
further details.
20
Stock-Based Compensation. Effective
March 26, 2006, we adopted SFAS 123R, which requires
us to measure the cost of services received in exchange for all
equity awards granted, including stock options and warrants,
based on the fair market value of the award as of the grant
date. SFAS 123R supersedes SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25). We have adopted
SFAS 123R using the modified prospective application method
which requires us to record compensation cost related to
unvested stock awards as of March 25, 2006 by recognizing
the unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over the
remaining service periods of those awards with no change in
historical reported earnings. Awards granted after
March 25, 2006 will be valued at fair value in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 123R and recognized on a
straight line basis over the service periods of each award.
SFAS 123R also requires excess tax benefits from the
exercise of stock awards to be presented in the consolidated
statements of cash flows as a financing activity rather than an
operating activity, as presented prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from
tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred
tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for
such awards. We did not have any stock-based compensation costs
capitalized as part of an asset. We estimated forfeiture rates
for fiscal year 2007 based on our historical experience.
Prior to fiscal year 2007, we accounted for stock-based
compensation in accordance with APB 25, using the intrinsic
value method, which did not require that compensation cost be
recognized for our stock awards provided the exercise price was
equal to or greater than the common stock fair market value on
the date of grant. Prior to fiscal year 2007, we provided pro
forma disclosure amounts in accordance with
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure
(SFAS 148), as if the fair value method defined
in SFAS 123 had been applied to its stock-based
compensation. Our net income and net income per share for the
fiscal years 2006 and 2005 would have been reduced if
compensation cost related to stock awards had been recorded in
the financial statements based on fair value at the grant dates.
See Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for our
disclosure regarding the effects of SFAS 123R. See
Note 7 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for further
disclosure regarding our stock-based compensation.
Revenue Recognition. Sales are recorded
when products are shipped or services are rendered to customers,
as we generally have no significant post delivery obligations.
Our prices are fixed and determinable, collection of the
resulting receivable is probable, and returns are reasonably
estimated. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in
the period the related sales are recorded based upon historical
data. We recognize the majority of our service revenues based
upon when the calibration or repair activity is performed and
then shipped
and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of our service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which we recognize revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals.
Our shipments are generally free on board shipping point and our
customers are generally invoiced for freight, shipping, and
handling charges.
Gain on TPG Divestiture. During the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, we sold TPG. As a result
of certain post closing commitments, we deferred recognition of
a $1.5 million gain on the sale. During fiscal year 2007,
we satisfied those commitments and consequently realized the
gain as a component of operating income in our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We do
not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements.
21
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the prior three fiscal
years, the components of our Consolidated Statements of
Operations (calculated on dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Gross Profit
Percentage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit
|
|
|
26.4
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
Service Gross Profit
|
|
|
22.3
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
As a Percentage of Net
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
|
68.3
|
%
|
|
|
67.5
|
%
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
Service Sales
|
|
|
31.7
|
%
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
Expenses
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Provision for (Benefit from)
Income Taxes
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH
25,
2006
(dollars in millions):
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
45.4
|
|
|
$
|
40.8
|
|
Service
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
66.5
|
|
|
$
|
60.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $6.0 million, or 9.9% (calculated on
dollars in millions), from fiscal year 2006 to 2007.
Our distribution products net sales growth, which accounted for
68.3% of our sales in fiscal year 2007 and 67.5% of our sales in
fiscal year 2006 (calculated on dollars in thousands), reflects
customer response to our sales and marketing activities and an
additional weeks worth of shipments. Our fiscal years 2007
and 2006 product sales in relation to prior fiscal year quarter
comparisons, is as follows (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales Growth
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
We experienced distribution products net sales growth in our
direct and indirect distribution channels in fiscal year 2007
compared to fiscal year 2006. The growth in our indirect
distribution channels, primarily from high-volume electrical and
instrumentation wholesalers, caused a shift in our mix by
distribution channel. The following table provides the percent
of net sales and approximate gross profit percentage for
significant product distribution channels (calculated on dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(1)
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
82.6
|
%
|
|
|
25.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
Government
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Indirect
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
Customer product orders include orders for products that we
routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other
products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock.
Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but also
include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, and orders required to be shipped at a
future date. Our total unshippable product orders for fiscal
year 2007 increased by approximately $0.4 million, or 28.6%
(calculated on dollars in millions) from fiscal year 2006. This
was mainly the result of a single, large product order being
placed by a customer during our fiscal 2007 second quarter, but
is being shipped across multiple months based on an agreed upon
delivery schedule with that customer. As of March 31, 2007,
the remaining balance to be shipped on this order was
$0.4 million. The following table reflects the percentage
of total unshippable product orders that are backorders at the
end of each fiscal quarter and our historical trend of total
unshippable product orders (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Total Unshippable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Orders
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
% of Unshippable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Orders that are Backorders
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
|
|
90.5
|
%
|
|
|
90.5
|
%
|
|
|
78.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
92.9
|
%
|
|
|
84.6
|
%
|
|
|
72.1
|
%
|
|
|
78.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration services net sales increased $1.4 million, or
7.1% (calculated on dollars in millions), from fiscal year 2006
to fiscal year 2007. This increase is primarily attributable to
incremental sales as a result of our acquisition of NWCI during
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, increased order volume
and an additional week in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2007. In addition, within any year, while we may add new
customers, we may also have customers from the prior year whose
calibrations may not repeat for any number of factors. Among
those factors are the variations in the timing of customer
periodic calibrations on equipment and repair services, customer
capital expenditures and customer outsourcing decisions. Our
fiscal years 2007 and 2006 calibration service sales in relation
to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is as follows
(calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Sales Growth
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Gross
Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
12.0
|
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16.7
|
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of net sales, slightly increased from
25.0% in fiscal year 2006 to 25.1% in fiscal year 2007
(calculated on dollars in thousands).
Product gross profit increased $2.2 million from fiscal
year 2006 to fiscal year 2007, primarily attributable to the
11.3% (calculated on dollars in millions) increase in product
net sales. As a percent of net sales, product gross profit
increased 2.4 points (calculated on dollars in thousands) from
fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007. This percentage increase
is primarily the result of $0.7 million in additional
vendor rebates and $0.2 million in additional cooperative
advertising received from suppliers during fiscal year 2007
compared to fiscal year 2006.
Our product gross profit can be influenced by a number of
factors that can impact quarterly comparisons. Among those
factors are sales to certain channels that do not support the
margins of our direct customer base, periodic rebates on
purchases discussed above, and the aforementioned cooperative
advertising received from suppliers. The following table
reflects the quarterly historical trend of our product gross
profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Gross Profit%(1)
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
Other Income (Expense)%(2)
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit%
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
Calibration services gross profit decreased $0.6 million
from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007. During fiscal year
2007, our continued investment in our calibration capabilities
grew at a faster rate than our calibration services sales. As a
percent of net sales, calibration services gross profit
decreased 4.6 points (calculated on dollars in thousands) from
fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007, primarily due to
investment in calibration services capacity. We anticipate that
our gross profit margin should increase as sales volume grows.
The following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of
our calibration services gross profit as a percent of net sales
(calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Gross Profit%
|
|
|
24.2
|
%
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14.4
|
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $0.8 million, or 5.9%
(calculated on dollars in millions), from fiscal year 2006 to
fiscal year 2007. Selling, marketing, and warehouse expenses
decreased $0.1 million, primarily as a result of changes
made within our sales organization. Administrative expenses
increased $0.9 million from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year
2007 and increased as a percent of net sales from 8.3% in fiscal
year 2006 to 8.8% in fiscal year 2007 (calculated on dollars in
thousands). We incurred $0.3 million in stock expense
associated with our adoption of SFAS 123R in fiscal year
2007, which contributed to this increase. The balance of the
increase is primarily due to employee-related expenses and
benefits.
Gain on TPG Divestiture:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
This one-time gain represents the recognition of a previously
deferred gain on the sale of TPG to Fluke, which occurred in
fiscal year 2002. Although the sale of TPG occurred in fiscal
year 2002, we were precluded from recognizing the gain at that
time because we had entered into a distribution agreement with
Fluke in connection with the transaction that required us to
purchase a pre-determined amount of inventory during each
calendar year from 2002 to 2006. In December 2006, our purchases
exceeded the required amount for calendar year 2006, as they had
in each of the prior four years, which fulfilled our contractual
purchase obligations under the distribution agreement and
triggered the recognition of the gain in the fiscal year 2007
third quarter.
Other
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense decreased $0.1 million from fiscal year
2006 to fiscal year 2007 due to declining total debt balances
during fiscal year 2007. Other expense increased
$0.1 million from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007,
primarily attributable to expenses incurred in connection with
our debt refinancing which occurred in the fiscal year 2007
third quarter.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from)
Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
25
In fiscal year 2007, we recognized a $1.2 million provision
for income taxes of which approximately $0.6 million
relates to taxes associated with the gain on the sale of TPG.
In the fiscal year 2006 fourth quarter, we reversed a
significant portion, $2.7 million, of our deferred tax
valuation reserve as a result of our income before taxes over
the previous four years and our belief that our future
performance will result in sustained profitability and taxable
income, which is more fully described in Note 4 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 25, 2006 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR
ENDED MARCH 26, 2005 (dollars in millions):
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
40.8
|
|
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60.5
|
|
|
$
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $5.2 million, or 9.4% (calculated on
dollars in millions), from fiscal year 2005 to 2006.
Our distribution products net sales results, which accounted for
67.5% of our sales in fiscal year 2006 and 67.1% of our sales in
fiscal year 2005 (calculated on dollars in thousands), reflect
year over year customer response to our sales and marketing
activities. Our fiscal years 2006 and 2005 product sales in
relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is as follows
(calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
Product Sales Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We experienced distribution products net sales growth in our
direct and indirect distribution channels in fiscal year 2006
compared to fiscal year 2005. The growth in our indirect
distribution channels, primarily from high-volume electrical and
instrumentation wholesalers, caused a shift in our mix by
distribution channel. The following table provides the percent
of net sales and approximate gross profit percentage for
significant product distribution channels (calculated on dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005(1)
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(2)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(2)
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
84.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
86.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
Government
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Indirect
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain prior year reclassifications have been made to conform
with fiscal year 2006 channel definitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
Customer product orders include orders for products that we
routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other
products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock.
Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but also
include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, and orders required to be shipped at a
future date. Our total unshippable product orders for fiscal
year 2006 increased by approximately $0.1 million,
26
or 7.7% (calculated on dollars in millions) from fiscal year
2005. We experienced an increase in the number of backorders in
fiscal year 2006 compared to fiscal year 2005 as we experienced
an increase in customer special orders, which we do not carry in
inventory. The following table reflects this increase in the
percentage of total unshippable product orders that are
backorders at the end of each fiscal quarter and our historical
trend of total unshippable product orders (calculated on dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Total Unshippable Product Orders
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
% of Unshippable Product Orders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that are Backorders
|
|
|
92.9
|
%
|
|
|
84.6
|
%
|
|
|
72.1
|
%
|
|
|
78.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
|
|
80.0
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration services net sales increased $1.5 million, or
8.2% (calculated on dollars in millions), from fiscal year 2005
to 2006. This increase is primarily attributable to customer
acquisition in our regulated industry markets. In addition,
within any quarter there is typically a netting of new customers
against existing customers whose calibrations may not repeat for
any number of factors. Among those factors are the timing of
customer periodic calibrations on equipment and repair services,
customer capital expenditure budgets, and customer outsourcing
decisions. Our fiscal years 2006 and 2005 calibration service
sales in relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is
as follows (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
Service Sales Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of net sales, slightly decreased from
25.1% in fiscal year 2005 to 25.0% in fiscal year 2006
(calculated on dollars in thousands).
Product gross profit increased $1.0 million from fiscal
year 2005 to fiscal year 2006, primarily attributable to the
10.0% (calculated on dollars in millions) increase in product
net sales. As a percent of net sales, product gross profit
increased 0.3 points (calculated on dollars in thousands) from
fiscal year 2005 to fiscal year 2006. This increase is primarily
the result of the product net sales growth we experienced in our
direct distribution channels, partially offset by product net
sales growth in our indirect distribution channels that
typically support lower margins discussed in Sales
above in this section.
Our product gross profit can be impacted by a number of factors
that can impact quarterly comparisons. Among those factors are
sales to certain channels that do not support the margins of our
direct customer base, periodic rebates on purchases discussed
above, and cooperative advertising received from suppliers,
which are reported as a reduction of cost of sales in accordance
with EITF Issue
No. 02-16
(see Note 1 to our
27
Consolidated Financial Statements). The following table reflects
the quarterly historical trend of our product gross profit as a
percent of net sales (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006(3)
|
|
|
|
FY 2005(3)
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Gross Profit%(1)
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
Other (Expense)Income%(2)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs divided by net sales. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
|
(3) |
|
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal quarters
financial information have been made to conform with current
fiscal quarter presentation. |
Calibration services gross profit increased $0.2 million
(calculated on dollars in thousands) from fiscal year 2005 to
fiscal year 2006, primarily from an 8.2% (calculated on dollars
in millions) increase in calibration service sales and a
concerted effort to control costs. As a percent of net sales,
calibration services gross profit decreased 1.2 points
(calculated on dollars in thousands) from fiscal year 2005 to
fiscal year 2006, primarily due to calibration service sales mix
and investment in calibration services capacity. The following
table reflects the quarterly historical trend of our calibration
services gross profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on
dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
Service Gross Profit%
|
|
|
29.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
%
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.9
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $0.7 million, or 5.4%
(calculated on dollars in millions), from fiscal year 2005 to
fiscal year 2006. Selling, marketing, and warehouse expenses
increased $0.7 million primarily as a result of an increase
in payroll and related costs. Administrative expenses were
relatively consistent from fiscal year 2005 to fiscal year 2006
and declined as a percent of net sales from 9.1% in the fiscal
year 2005 to 8.3% in fiscal year 2006 (calculated on dollars in
thousands).
Other
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Interest expense was relatively consistent from fiscal year 2005
to fiscal year 2006 resulting from higher interest rates applied
to lower average debt. Other expense decreased in fiscal year
2005 to fiscal year 2006 primarily attributable to a decrease in
net losses in Canadian currency transactions.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Benefit from Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, we reversed a
significant portion, $2.7 million, of our deferred tax
valuation reserve as a result of our income before taxes over
the previous four years and our belief that our future
performance will result in sustained profitability and taxable
income, which is more fully described in Note 4 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. We did not recognize any
provision for income taxes in fiscal year 2005, as pretax income
was offset by a reduction in our deferred tax asset valuation
reserve.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows. The following table is a
summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
2,645
|
|
|
$
|
4,435
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
Operating Activities: Cash provided by
operating activities for fiscal year 2007 was $2.6 million,
compared to $4.4 million for fiscal year 2006. Comparing
fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2006, the $1.8 million
decrease in cash provided by operations was primarily the result
of increases in accounts receivable, inventory and prepaid
expenses offset somewhat by increased accounts payable and
higher operating income. Significant working capital
fluctuations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories/Accounts Payable: Our inventory used
$0.4 million in cash in fiscal year 2007, compared to the
$2.0 million provided in fiscal year 2006, in anticipation
of increased sales. Our inventory decreased $2.0 million
from the end of fiscal year 2005 to the end of fiscal year 2006,
as we made a concerted effort to lower inventory levels while
continuing to meet customer expectations. This reduction in
inventory provided $2.0 million in cash during fiscal year
2006.
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable provided $1.1 million in cash in fiscal
year 2007 compared to a usage of $0.3 million in fiscal
year 2006. The driver of the accounts payable increase was an
increase of $1.1 million in inventory receipts in March of
fiscal year 2007, compared to March of fiscal year 2006. The
increase in both inventory and accounts payable from
March 25, 2006 to March 31, 2007 resulted in an
increase in our payables to inventory ratio, as the following
table illustrates (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
Accounts Payable/Inventory Ratio
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables: Our receivables increased
$1.3 million in fiscal year 2007. The increase in trade
receivables is primarily due to the increased sales in March of
fiscal year 2007, compared to March of fiscal year 2006. In
addition, we had $0.4 million in Other Receivables as of
March 31, 2007, compared
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
to none as of March 25, 2006. This was due to the
achievement of a vendor rebate during fiscal year 2007 fourth
quarter, compared to none in fiscal year 2006 fourth quarter.
|
|
|
|
As the following table illustrates, our days sales outstanding
was consistent from fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2007
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal
months
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
Days Sales Outstanding
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Investing Activities: The $1.2 million of
cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2007 was
primarily a result of expenditures for our calibration
laboratories, but also included $0.2 million in
improvements for our external website. The $1.8 million of
cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2006 resulted
from $0.9 million of capital expenditures, primarily for
our calibration laboratories and $0.9 million to purchase
NWCI.
Financing Activities: The $1.2 million of
cash used in financing activities in fiscal year 2007 primarily
resulted from decreasing our overall debt. As the table below
illustrates (in millions), we were able to reduce our overall
debt by $1.4 million from cash provided by operating
activities. This $1.4 million use of cash was offset by
$0.2 million of cash received primarily from the exercise
of employee stock options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinancing
of Debt.
Description. On November 21, 2006, we
entered into a Credit Agreement (the Chase Credit
Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. The Chase Credit
Agreement provides for a three-year revolving credit facility in
the amount of $10 million. The Chase Credit Agreement
replaced our Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement
(the GMAC Credit Agreement) with GMAC Commercial
Finance LLC.
The Chase Credit Agreement has certain covenants with which we
must comply, including a fixed charge ratio covenant and a
leverage ratio covenant. We were in compliance with all loan
covenants and requirements, including those of the GMAC Credit
Agreement, throughout fiscal year 2007. We expect to meet the
covenants on an on-going basis.
See Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information on our debt. See Item 7A, Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, for a discussion of
interest rates on our debt.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial
Commitments. The table below contains
aggregated information about contractual obligations and
commercial commitments that we must make future payments under
for contracts such as debt and lease agreements (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.9
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Due to the uncertainty of forecasting expected variable rate
interest payments, amount excludes interest portion of the debt
obligation. |
30
Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards.
FIN 48: In July 2006, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48), to clarify certain
aspects of accounting for uncertain tax positions, including
issues related to the recognition and measurement of those tax
positions. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. We are in the process of
evaluating the impact of the adoption of this interpretation on
our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SAB 108: In September 2006, the
SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when
Qualifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108), which became effective for years
ending on or before November 15, 2006. SAB 108
requires that public companies utilize a
dual-approach to assessing the quantitative effects
of financial misstatements. This dual approach includes both an
income statement focused assessment and a balance sheet focused
assessment. The implementation of SAB 108 did not have a
material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 157: In September 2006, FASB
issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). This statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact
of adopting SFAS 157 on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
SFAS 159: In February 2007, FASB
issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159). This statement permits companies to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to
improve financial reporting by providing companies with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without
having to apply complex hedging accounting provisions.
SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 159 on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
OUTLOOK
As we enter fiscal year 2008, we are well positioned to continue
our growth in both the distribution products and calibration
services segments through focused efforts that leverage our
investments and the identification of opportunities consistent
with our existing product and service segments. We expect the
business should experience growth in both business segments,
assuming a stable economy. One thing to consider, particularly
when evaluating fiscal year 2008 fourth quarter performance,
will be a return to a 52 week fiscal year, compared to the
53 week fiscal year in 2007. Sales growth in any individual
quarter is effected by a number of factors, some beyond our
control and others that we can plan for, as described in
Item 1A of this report.
We have seen positive results from the operational changes we
made in our sales processes and organization during the second
half of fiscal year 2007. In fiscal year 2008, we anticipate a
continued, positive response to these changes. With these
changes in place, we will continue focusing on growth in our
calibration services business in order to leverage the
investments we have made and improve our gross margin and
operating cash flow. Within our distribution products segment,
we will place continued emphasis on sales efforts in our more
profitable direct channels. At the same time, we anticipate
sales within our indirect channels could decline as we continue
to control promotional pricing in an effort to improve
profitability percentages. This increasing mix of business in
our direct channels should increase our overall product gross
margin.
We anticipate that operating expenses, primarily targeted to
support increased sales growth, will increase at a rate similar
to that of our sales growth. Overall, continued sales growth,
along with controlled spending, should result in growth in
operating earnings. Capital expenditures are expected to be
consistent with fiscal year 2007s spending.
31
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
INTEREST
RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from borrowing
activities. In the event interest rates were to move by 1%, our
yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less than
$0.1 million assuming our average-borrowing levels remained
constant. On March 31, 2007 and March 25, 2006, we had
no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to upward
movements in interest rates.
Under our Chase Credit Agreement described in Note 3 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements, interest is adjusted on a
quarterly basis based upon our calculated leverage ratio. The
base rate, as defined in the Chase Credit Agreement, and the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as of
March 31, 2007 were 8.3% and 5.3%, respectively. Our
interest rate for fiscal year 2007, including interest
associated with the now terminated GMAC Credit Agreement, ranged
from 6.0% to 8.4%.
FOREIGN
CURRENCY
Approximately 90% of our net sales for fiscal years 2007 and
2006 were denominated in United States dollars, with the
remainder denominated in Canadian dollars. A 10% change in the
value of the Canadian dollar to the United States dollar would
impact our net sales by approximately 1%. We monitor the
relationship between the United States and Canadian currencies
on a continuous basis and adjust sales prices for products and
services sold in Canadian dollars as we believe to be
appropriate. On March 31, 2007 and March 25, 2006, we
had no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to
foreign currency fluctuations.
32
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Transcat, Inc.
Rochester, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007
and March 25, 2006 and the related consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended March 31, 2007. We have also audited the schedule
listed in the accompanying index for each of the three years in
the period ended March 31, 2007. These financial statements
and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
schedule are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of
its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit
included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements and schedule, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements and schedule. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries at
March 31, 2007 and March 25, 2006, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended March 31, 2007, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States.
Also, in our opinion, the schedule presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein for each of
the three years in the period ended March 31, 2007.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York
June 21, 2007
34
TRANSCAT,
INC.
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
|
$
|
40,814
|
|
|
$
|
37,086
|
|
Service Sales
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
18,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
60,471
|
|
|
|
55,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold
|
|
|
33,411
|
|
|
|
31,002
|
|
|
|
28,307
|
|
Cost of Services Sold
|
|
|
16,372
|
|
|
|
14,370
|
|
|
|
13,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products and
Services Sold
|
|
|
49,783
|
|
|
|
45,372
|
|
|
|
41,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
16,690
|
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
Expenses
|
|
|
8,469
|
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
7,948
|
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
5,872
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
5,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
14,341
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
3,276
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from)
Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$
|
1,921
|
|
|
$
|
3,662
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,914
|
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,335
|
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
Accounts Receivable, less
allowance for doubtful accounts of $47 and $63 as of
March 31, 2007 and March 25, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
8,846
|
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
Other Receivables
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current
Assets
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
15,504
|
|
|
|
13,826
|
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
2,814
|
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
22,422
|
|
|
$
|
21,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
5,307
|
|
|
$
|
4,219
|
|
Accrued Compensation and Other
Liabilities
|
|
|
2,578
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Short-Term Borrowings and Current
Portion of Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
7,927
|
|
|
|
10,826
|
|
Long-Term Debt, less current
portion
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
11,193
|
|
|
|
12,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.50 per
share, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 7,286,119 and
7,048,028 shares issued as of March 31, 2007 and
March 25, 2006, respectively; 7,010,337 and
6,791,240 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2007 and
March 25, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
3,643
|
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
|
|
5,268
|
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Gain
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
2,934
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost,
275,782 and 256,788 shares as of March 31, 2007 and
March 25, 2006, respectively
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(888
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
11,229
|
|
|
|
8,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
22,422
|
|
|
$
|
21,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net
Income to Net Cash Provided by (Used in)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Disposal of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,622
|
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
Provision for Accounts Receivable
and Inventory Reserves
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Common Stock Expense
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Amortization of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
(1,544
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other
Receivables
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
|
|
|
(547
|
)
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
405
|
|
Accrued Compensation and Other
Liabilities
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in)
Operating Activities
|
|
|
2,645
|
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property and Equipment
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
Purchase of N.W. Calibration
Inspection, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing
Activities
|
|
|
(1,194
|
)
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chase Revolving Line of Credit, net
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GMAC Revolving Line of Credit, net
|
|
|
(3,252
|
)
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
(943
|
)
|
Payments on Other Debt Obligations
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
Proceeds from Term Loan Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on
Cash
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
Cash at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosures of
Cash Flow Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (received) during the
period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
347
|
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
316
|
|
Income Taxes, net
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
Supplemental Disclosure of
Non-Cash Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock Acquired in
Cashless Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
Expiration of Warrants from Debt
Retirement
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
Stock Issued in Connection with
Business Acquisition
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
In
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value
|
|
|
of Par
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
at Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of March 27, 2004
|
|
|
6,352
|
|
|
$
|
3,176
|
|
|
$
|
3,235
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,958
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
(453
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,428
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
318
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Amortization of Unearned
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Expired Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 26, 2005
|
|
|
6,700
|
|
|
$
|
3,350
|
|
|
$
|
3,995
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
(2,702
|
)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
(838
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,314
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
581
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Amortization of Unearned
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Expired Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 25, 2006
|
|
|
7,048
|
|
|
$
|
3,524
|
|
|
$
|
4,641
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
(888
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,647
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
218
|
|
Reversal of Unearned Compensation
Upon Adoption of SFAS 123R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Amortization of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Unrecognized Prior Service Cost,
net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
7,286
|
|
|
$
|
3,643
|
|
|
$
|
5,268
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
2,934
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
(988
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
|
|
NOTE 1
|
NATURE OF
BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat or the Company) is a leading
distributor of professional grade test, measurement, and
calibration instruments and a provider of calibration and repair
services, primarily throughout the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries.
Principles of Consolidation: The Consolidated
Financial Statements of Transcat include the accounts of
Transcat, Inc. and the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries,
Transmation (Canada) Inc. and metersandinstruments.com, Inc.
(M&I). All significant intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
On December 11, 2006, the Company commenced the process of
dissolving and liquidating M&I. Subsequent to
March 31, 2007, the dissolution was completed. Accordingly,
the accounts of M&I were absorbed by the Company. Because
the subsidiary was inactive, the dissolution does not have an
effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of
Transcats Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States requires that the Company make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of sales
and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates
and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns, depreciable lives of fixed
assets, estimated lives of major catalogs (Master
Catalog), and deferred tax asset valuation allowances.
Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with
certainty; accordingly, accounting estimates require the
exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements will change
as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained, and as the operating
environment changes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. Such changes and refinements in estimation
methodologies are reflected in reported results of operations in
the period in which the changes are made and, if material, their
effects are disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Fiscal Year: Transcat operates on a
52/53 week fiscal year, ending the last Saturday in March.
In a 52-week fiscal year, each of the four quarters is a 13-week
period. In a 53-week fiscal year, the last quarter is a 14-week
period. The fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 (fiscal
year 2007) consisted of 53 weeks and the fiscal years
ended March 25, 2006 (fiscal year 2006) and
March 26, 2005 (fiscal year 2005) consisted of
52 weeks.
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable
represent receivables from customers in the ordinary course of
business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the
expected collectibility of accounts receivable. Transcat applies
a specific formula to its accounts receivable aging, which may
be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may
not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts
to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to sales over a specific timeframe. The returns
reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the
level of sales
and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventory: Inventory consists of products
purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost or
market. Costs are determined using the average cost method of
inventory valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items
not saleable at or above cost by applying a specific loss
factor, based on historical experience, to specific categories
of inventory. The Company evaluates the adequacy of the reserve
on a quarterly basis.
39
Property and Equipment, Depreciation, and
Amortization: Property and equipment are stated
at cost. Depreciation and amortization is computed primarily
under the straight-line method over the following estimated
useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
|
2 - 6
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
4 - 10
|
|
Property and equipment determined to have no value are written
off at their then remaining net book value. Transcat accounts
for software costs in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Leasehold improvements are amortized
under the straight-line method over the estimated useful life or
the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance and repairs
are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 of the Consolidated
Statements for further details.
Goodwill: Transcat estimates the fair value of
the Companys reporting units in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, using the
fair market value measurement requirement, rather than the
undiscounted cash flows approach. The Company tests goodwill for
impairment on an annual basis, or immediately if conditions
indicate that such impairment could exist. The evaluation of the
Companys reporting units on a fair value basis indicated
that no impairment existed as of March 31, 2007,
March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005.
Catalog Costs: Transcat capitalizes the cost
of each Master Catalog mailed and amortizes the cost over the
respective catalogs estimated productive life. The Company
reviews response results from catalog mailings on a continuous
basis, and if warranted, modifies the period over which costs
are recognized. The Company amortizes the cost of each Master
Catalog over an eighteen month period and amortizes the cost of
each catalog supplement over a three month period. Total
unamortized catalog costs in prepaid expenses and other current
assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $0.5 million
as of March 31, 2007 and March 25, 2006.
Deferred Taxes: Transcat accounts for certain
income and expense items differently for financial reporting
purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes
are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. A
valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is provided for
items for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of
such items will not be realized, in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires an assessment of both
positive and negative evidence when measuring the need for a
deferred tax valuation allowance. See Note 4 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Transcat
has determined the fair value of debt and other financial
instruments using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies. The carrying amount of debt on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value due to
variable interest rate pricing and the carrying amounts for
cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair
value, due to their short-term nature.
Stock-Based Compensation: Effective
March 26, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), which requires the Company to
measure the cost of services received in exchange for all equity
awards granted, including stock options and warrants, based on
the fair market value of the award as of the grant date.
SFAS 123R supersedes SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25). The Company has adopted SFAS 123R
using the modified prospective application method which requires
the Company to record compensation cost related to unvested
stock awards as of March 25, 2006 by recognizing the
unamortized grant date fair value of these awards over the
remaining service periods of those awards with no change in
historical reported earnings. Awards granted after
March 25, 2006 will be valued at fair value in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 123R and recognized on a
straight line basis over the service periods of each award.
SFAS 123R also requires excess tax benefits from the
40
exercise of stock awards to be presented in the consolidated
statements of cash flows as a financing activity rather than an
operating activity, as presented prior to the adoption of
SFAS 123R. Excess tax benefits are realized benefits from
tax deductions for exercised awards in excess of the deferred
tax asset attributable to stock-based compensation costs for
such awards. The Company did not have any stock-based
compensation costs capitalized as part of an asset. The Company
estimated forfeiture rates for fiscal year 2007 based on its
historical experience.
Prior to fiscal year 2007, the Company accounted for stock-based
compensation in accordance with APB 25, using the intrinsic
value method, which did not require that compensation cost be
recognized for the Companys stock awards provided the
exercise price was equal to or greater than the common stock
fair market value on the date of grant. Prior to fiscal year
2007, the Company provided pro forma disclosure amounts in
accordance with SFAS No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure
(SFAS 148), as if the fair value method defined
in SFAS 123 had been applied to its stock-based
compensation. The Companys net income and net income per
share for the fiscal years 2006 and 2005 would have been reduced
if compensation cost related to stock awards had been recorded
in the financial statements based on fair value at the grant
dates.
The estimated fair value of the awards granted during fiscal
year 2007 and prior years was calculated using the
Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model (Black-Scholes),
which produced a weighted average fair value of awards granted
of $4.04 per share in fiscal year 2007, $3.52 per share in
fiscal year 2006 and $2.38 per share in fiscal year 2005.
The following summarizes the assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
Expected life
|
|
6 years
|
|
10 years
|
|
10 years
|
Annualized volatility rate
|
|
79.7%
|
|
76.3%
|
|
76.9%
|
Risk-free rate of return
|
|
4.7%
|
|
4.3%
|
|
4.2%
|
Dividend rate
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
The Black-Scholes model incorporates assumptions to value
stock-based awards. The risk-free rate of return for periods
within the contractual life of the award is based on a
zero-coupon U.S. government instrument over the contractual
term of the equity instrument. Expected volatility is based on
historical volatility of the Companys stock. The expected
term of all awards granted is estimated by taking the average of
the weighted average vesting term and the contractual term, as
illustrated in the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107. This
methodology is not materially different from the Companys
historical data on exercise timing. Separate groups having
similar historical exercise behavior with regard to award
exercise timing and forfeiture rates are considered separately
for valuation and attribution purposes.
41
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R, net income included
$0.3 million for stock-based compensation during fiscal
year 2007 and was recorded as an Administrative Expense in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations. Pro forma net income as if
the fair value based method had been applied to all stock awards
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net Income, as reported
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
Add: Stock-based compensation
expense included in reported net income, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based
compensation expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Net Income
|
|
$
|
3,382
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic - as reported
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Basic - pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
Diluted - as reported
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
Diluted - pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
Revenue Recognition: Sales are recorded when
products are shipped or services are rendered to customers, as
the Company generally has no significant post delivery
obligations. The Companys prices are fixed and
determinable, collection of the resulting receivable is
probable, and returns are reasonably estimated. Provisions for
customer returns are provided for in the period the related
sales are recorded based upon historical data. The Company
recognizes the majority of service revenue based upon when the
calibration or repair activity is performed and then shipped
and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of the service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which the Company recognizes revenue in equal amounts at fixed
intervals. Shipments are generally free on board shipping point
and customers are generally invoiced for freight, shipping, and
handling charges.
Vendor Rebates: Vendor rebates are based on a
specified cumulative level of purchases and are recorded as a
reduction of cost of sales as the milestone is achieved.
Cooperative Advertising Income: Transcat
follows the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received from a
Vendor, which provides that cash consideration received from a
vendor by a reseller be reported as a reduction of cost of sales
as the related inventory is sold. During fiscal years 2007, 2006
and 2005, the Company recorded, as a reduction of cost of sales,
consideration in the amount of $0.9 million,
$0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs: Freight expense
and direct shipping costs are included in cost of sales. These
costs were approximately $1.2 million, $1.4 million
and $1.3 million for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Direct handling costs, the majority of which
represent direct compensation of employees who pick, pack, and
otherwise prepare, if necessary, merchandise for shipment to
customers are reflected in selling, marketing, and warehouse
expenses. These costs were approximately $0.4 million for
fiscal years 2007 and 2006 and $0.3 million for fiscal year
2005.
Gain on TPG Divestiture: During the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2002, the Company sold Transmation
Products Group (TPG). As a result of certain post
closing commitments, the Company deferred recognition of a
$1.5 million gain on the sale. During fiscal year 2007, the
Company satisfied those commitments and consequently realized
the gain as a component of operating income in the accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 9 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure.
42
Foreign Currency Translation and
Transactions: The accounts of Transmation
(Canada) Inc. are maintained in the local currency and have been
translated to United States dollars in accordance with
SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.
Accordingly, the amounts representing assets and liabilities,
except for long-term intercompany accounts and equity, have been
translated at the period-end rates of exchange and related sales
and expense accounts have been translated at average rates of
exchange during the period. Gains and losses arising from
translation of Transmation (Canada) Inc.s balance sheets
into United States dollars are recorded directly to the
accumulated other comprehensive income component of
stockholders equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian
business transactions. The net loss in each of the fiscal years
2007, 2006 and 2005 was less than $0.1 million.
Comprehensive Income: Transcat reports
comprehensive income under SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income. Other comprehensive income is comprised of
net income, currency translation adjustments and unrecognized
prior service costs, net of tax. At March 31, 2007,
accumulated other comprehensive gain consisted of cumulative
currency translation gains of $0.2 million and unrecognized
prior service costs, net of tax, of less than $0.2 million.
At March 25, 2006, accumulated other comprehensive gain
consisted solely of cumulative currency translation gains.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share
of Common Stock are computed based on the weighted average
number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share of Common Stock reflect the assumed
conversion of dilutive stock options, warrants, and unvested
restricted stock awards. In computing the per share effect of
assumed conversion, funds which would have been received from
the exercise of options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock
are considered to have been used to purchase shares of Common
Stock at the average market prices during the period, and the
resulting net additional shares of Common Stock are included in
the calculation of average shares of Common Stock outstanding.
For fiscal years 2007 and 2006, the net additional Common Stock
equivalents had a $0.02 per share effect and a $0.04 per share
effect, respectively, on the calculation of dilutive earnings
per share. For fiscal year 2005, the net additional Common Stock
equivalents had no effect on the calculation of dilutive
earnings per share. The total number of dilutive and
anti-dilutive Common Stock equivalents resulting from stock
options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Anti-dilutive
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
0.97-$5.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.80-$4.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.80-$2.92
|
|
Warrants
|
|
$
|
0.97-$5.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$4.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$2.91
|
|
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain
reclassifications of prior fiscal years financial
information have been made to conform to the current fiscal
years presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements: In
July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), to clarify certain aspects of
accounting for uncertain tax positions, including issues related
to the recognition and measurement of those tax positions. This
interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2006. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the impact of the adoption of this interpretation on
its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering
the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Qualifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial
43
Statements (SAB 108), which became effective
for years ending on or before November 15, 2006.
SAB 108 requires that public companies utilize a
dual-approach to assessing the quantitative effects
of financial misstatements. This dual approach includes both an
income statement focused assessment and a balance sheet focused
assessment. The implementation of SAB 108 did not have a
material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157). This statement
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 157 on its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS 159). This statement permits companies to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other
items at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to
improve financial reporting by providing companies with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused
by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without
having to apply complex hedging accounting provisions.
SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company
is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 159 on
its Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
$
|
12,509
|
|
|
$
|
11,368
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment
|
|
$
|
14,327
|
|
|
$
|
13,090
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and
Amortization
|
|
|
(11,513
|
)
|
|
|
(10,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Property and Equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense amounted to
$1.0 million, $0.8 million and $1.0 million in
fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Description. On November 21, 2006,
Transcat entered into a Credit Agreement (the Chase Credit
Agreement) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
(Chase). The Chase Credit Agreement provides for a
three-year revolving credit facility in the amount of
$10 million (the Revolving Credit Facility).
The Chase Credit Agreement replaced the Amended and Restated
Loan and Security Agreement dated November 1, 2004, as
further amended, (the GMAC Credit Agreement) with
GMAC Commercial Finance LLC (GMAC), which was set to
expire in October 2008.
The GMAC Credit Agreement consisted of two term loans in the
amount of $1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively,
a revolving line of credit (having a maximum available amount of
$9 million with availability determined by a formula based
on eligible accounts receivable (85%) and inventory (50%)), and
certain additional terms. Using funds drawn under the Revolving
Credit Facility, Transcat paid GMAC an aggregate amount of
$4.1 million to retire the GMAC Credit Agreement and the
outstanding borrowings thereunder, which included the amounts
due under the revolving line of credit, the two term loans and a
termination premium of less than $0.1 million (0.5% of the
sum of $9 million plus the aggregate non-revolving loan
balance).
44
Interest and Commitment Fees. Interest
on the Revolving Credit Facility accrues, at Transcats
election, at either a base rate (defined as the highest of
prime, a three month certificate of deposit plus 1%, or the
federal funds rate plus
1/2
of 1%) (the Base Rate) or the London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR), in each case, plus a margin.
Commitment fees accrue based on the average daily amount of
unused credit available on the Revolving Credit Facility.
Interest and commitment fees are adjusted on a quarterly basis
based upon the Companys calculated leverage ratio, as
defined in the Chase Credit Agreement. The Base Rate and the
LIBOR rates as of March 31, 2007 were 8.3% and 5.3%,
respectively. The Companys interest rate for fiscal year
2007, including interest associated with the GMAC Credit
Agreement, ranged from 6.0% to 8.4%.
Covenants. The Chase Credit Agreement
has certain covenants with which the Company has to comply,
including a fixed charge ratio covenant and a leverage ratio
covenant. The Company was in compliance with all loan covenants
and requirements, including those of the GMAC Credit Agreement,
throughout fiscal year 2007.
Loan Costs. In accordance with EITF
Issue
No. 98-14,
Debtors Accounting for Changes in Line-of-Credit or
Revolving-Debt Arrangements, costs associated with the Chase
Credit Agreement, totaling less than $0.1 million, are
being amortized over the term of the agreement. On
November 21, 2006, unamortized costs associated with the
GMAC Credit Agreement totaling $0.1 million, including the
termination premium of less than $0.1 million, were written
off and recorded as other expense in the Consolidated Statement
of Operations.
Other Terms. The Company has pledged
all of its U.S. tangible and intangible personal property
as collateral security for the loans made under the Revolving
Credit Facility.
In accordance with EITF Issue
No. 95-22,
Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under
Revolving Credit Agreements that include both a Subjective
Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement, the line of
credit included in the GMAC Credit Agreement was classified as
short-term in the accompanying Consolidated Financial
Statements. The Chase Credit Agreement does not include such
terms and therefore, is classified as non-current in the
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
Transcats net income (loss) before income taxes on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,276
|
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net provision for (benefit from) income taxes for fiscal
years 2007, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Current Tax Provision (Benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Provision (Benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
1,036
|
|
|
$
|
(2,453
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,118
|
|
|
$
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from)
Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
A reconciliation of the income tax provision computed by
applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate and
the income tax provision reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Federal Income Tax at Statutory
Rate
|
|
$
|
1,114
|
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
State Income Taxes, net of Federal
benefit
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,983
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current Deferred Tax Assets
(Liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward(1)
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
713
|
|
Other
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
851
|
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
(Liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward(1)
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
Foreign Tax Credits (expiring in
March 2013)
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Current Deferred Tax
Assets
|
|
$
|
1,610
|
|
|
$
|
2,443
|
|
Valuation Allowance(2)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
1,642
|
|
|
$
|
2,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of March 31, 2007, Transcat has net operating loss
carryforwards of $1.5 million, which are available to
offset future federal taxable income through March 2026. |
|
(2) |
|
For fiscal year 2005, the Company determined that it is more
likely than not that the benefits associated with the net
deferred tax assets would not be realized. Accordingly, the
Company booked a full valuation allowance against its net
deferred tax assets. |
|
|
|
In fiscal year 2006, the Company reassessed all available
evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets would be
realized. As a result, based on the Companys income before
taxes over the prior four years and the Companys belief
that its future performance would result in sustained
profitability and taxable income, the Company reversed a
significant portion of the deferred tax valuation allowance in
fiscal year 2006. |
|
|
|
The Companys utilization of U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards is dependent on related statutory limitations that
involve numerous factors beyond overall positive income. In
fiscal years 2007 and 2006, the Company determined that it is
more likely than not that the benefits associated with the
foreign tax credits would not be realized. |
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis
differences related to the investments in the Companys
foreign subsidiary. These basis differences were approximately
$2.1 million at March 31, 2007 and consisted primarily
of undistributed earnings. These earnings are considered
permanently invested in the
46
businesses. Determination of the deferred income tax liability
on these unremitted earnings is not practicable because such
liability, if any, is dependent on circumstances existing if and
when remittance occurs.
|
|
NOTE 5
|
DEFINED
CONTRIBUTION PLAN
|
All of Transcats United States employees are eligible to
participate in a plan providing certain qualifications are met.
Effective April 1, 1981, the Deferred Profit Sharing Plan
was adopted. Effective April 1, 1987, this plan was amended
from a non-contributory to a contributory defined contribution
plan and renamed the Long-Term Savings and Deferred Profit
Sharing Plan (the Plan).
In the Long-Term Savings portion of the Plan (the 401K
Portion), plan participants are entitled to a distribution
of their vested account balance upon termination of employment
or retirement. Plan participants are fully vested in their
contributions while Company contributions vest over a three year
period. The Companys matching contributions to the 401K
Portion were $0.2 million in each of the fiscal years 2007,
2006 and 2005.
In the Deferred Profit Sharing portion of the Plan, employer
contributions are made at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. The Company made no profit sharing contributions in
fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005.
|
|
NOTE 6
|
POSTRETIREMENT
HEALTH CARE PLANS
|
In December 2006, the Company adopted two defined benefit
postretirement health care plans. One plan provides limited
reimbursement to eligible non-officer participants for the cost
of individual medical insurance coverage purchased by the
participant following qualifying retirement from employment with
the Company (the Non-Officer Plan). The other plan
provides long term care insurance benefits, medical and dental
insurance benefits and medical premium reimbursement benefits to
eligible retired corporate officers and their eligible spouses
(the Officer Plan).
The Company accounts for the plans in accordance with
SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions
(SFAS 106) and SFAS No. 132 (revised
2003), Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits, an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, and 106 (SFAS 132R).
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans (SFAS 158). SFAS 158
requires that employers recognize on a prospective basis the
funded status of their defined benefit pension and other
postretirement plans on their consolidated balance sheet and
recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of
tax, the gains or losses and prior service costs or credits that
arise during the period but are not recognized as components of
net periodic benefit cost. The Consolidated Financial Statements
and the accompanying disclosures reflect the Companys
early adoption of SFAS 158.
The change in the postretirement benefit obligation from
inception to March 31, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligation
at inception
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
9
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
4
|
|
Actuarial gain
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit obligation
as of March 31, 2007
|
|
|
261
|
|
Fair value of plan assets as of
March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status as of March 31,
2007
|
|
$
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation as of March 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is included as
a component of other liabilities (non-current) in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. The components of net periodic
postretirement benefit cost and other amounts recognized in
other comprehensive loss from inception to March 31, 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement
benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
4
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations recognized in
other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Unrecognized prior service cost,
net of tax
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic
benefit cost and other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount recognized in accumulated
other comprehensive gain as of March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost,
net of tax
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The prior service cost is amortized on a straight-line basis
over the average remaining service period of active participants
for the Non-Officer Plan and over the average remaining life
expectancy of active participants for the Officer Plan. The
estimated prior service cost that will be amortized from
accumulated other comprehensive gain into net periodic
postretirement benefit cost during the fiscal year ending
March 29, 2008 is less than $0.1 million.
The postretirement benefit obligation was computed by an
independent third party actuary. Assumptions used to determine
the postretirement benefit obligation and the net periodic
benefit cost were as follows:
|
|
|
Weighted average
discount rate:
|
|
5.9% at inception and 6.1% at
March 31, 2007
|
Medical care cost
trend rate:
|
|
10% in calendar year 2007,
gradually declining to 5% by calendar year 2017 and remaining at
that level thereafter
|
Dental care cost trend
rate:
|
|
5% in calendar year 2007 and
remaining at that level thereafter
|
Increasing the assumed health care cost trend rate by one
percentage point would increase the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation and the annual net periodic cost by less than
$0.1 million. A one percentage point decrease in the
healthcare cost trend would decrease the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation and the annual net periodic
cost by less $0.1 million.
Benefit payments are funded by the Company as needed. Payments
toward the cost of a retirees medical and dental coverage,
which are initially determined as a percentage of a base
coverage plan in the year of retirement as defined in the plan
document, are limited to increase at a rate of no more than 3%
per year. The following benefit payments, which reflect expected
future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
2009
|
|
|
3
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4
|
|
2011
|
|
|
11
|
|
2012
|
|
|
16
|
|
2013-2017
|
|
|
129
|
|
48
|
|
NOTE 7
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
Stock Options: In June 2003, the Company
adopted the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (the 2003
Plan), which was approved by the Companys
shareholders in August 2003 and which was amended by the
Companys shareholders in August 2006 to permit directors
to participate in the plan. The 2003 Plan replaced the Transcat,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan (the 1993
Plan). The 0.9 million shares that were outstanding
as of the termination of the 1993 Plan were reserved for
issuance under the 2003 Plan. The 2003 Plan provides for grants
of options to directors, officers and key employees to purchase
Common Stock at no less than the fair market value at the date
of grant. Options generally vest over a period of up to four
years and expire up to ten years from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes the Companys options for
fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Term (in Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 27,
2004
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 26,
2005
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 25,
2006
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31,
2007
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of March 31,
2007
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the
total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of
fiscal year 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the
number of in-the-money stock options) that would have been
received by the option holders had all option holders exercised
their options on March 31, 2007. The amount of aggregate
intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of
the Companys stock.
Total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock
options as of March 31, 2007 was $0.2 million, which
is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options
exercised during fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 was
$0.7 million, $0.9 million and $0.3 million,
respectively. Cash receipts from the exercise of options was
less than $0.1 million in fiscal year 2007,
$0.3 million in fiscal year 2006 and $0.1 million in
fiscal year 2005.
49
The following table presents options outstanding and exercisable
as of March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.97-$2.00
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
$2.01-$3.25
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
2.43
|
|
$3.26-$4.52
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
$4.53-$5.80
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants: Under the Directors Warrant
Plan, as amended, warrants may be granted to non-employee
directors to purchase Common Stock at the fair market value at
the date of grant. Warrants vest over a period of three or four
years and expire in five years from the date of grant. The
following table summarizes warrants for fiscal years 2007, 2006
and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Term (in Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 27,
2004
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
2.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
3.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 26,
2005
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 25,
2006
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
2.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31,
2007
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of March 31,
2007
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the
total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the
Companys closing stock price on the last trading day of
fiscal year 2007 and the exercise price, multiplied by the
number of in-the-money warrants) that would have been received
by the warrant holders had all warrant holders exercised their
warrants on March 31, 2007. The amount of aggregate
intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of
the Companys stock.
The aggregate intrinsic value of warrants exercised during each
of the fiscal years 2007 and 2006 was $0.1 million. Cash
received from the exercise of warrants was less than
$0.1 million in each of the fiscal years 2007 and 2006.
There were no warrants exercised in fiscal year 2005.
50
The following table presents warrants outstanding and
exercisable as of March 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
|
(in Shares)
|
|
Exercise Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.97
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
$2.31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
$2.88
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
$4.26
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
$5.80
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2007, all warrants in the Directors
Warrant Plan had been granted. Warrants outstanding on
March 31, 2007 continue to vest and be exercisable in
accordance with the terms of the Directors Warrant Plan.
The Company granted warrants to purchase 0.5 million shares
of Common Stock on November 13, 2002 to certain of the
Companys prior lenders, Key Bank, N.A. and Citizens Bank,
in accordance with a termination agreement for refinancing the
debt with GMAC. See Note 3 for further disclosure regarding
debt. In each of the fiscal years 2005 and 2006,
0.1 million of the shares expired. As of March 31,
2007, there were 0.3 million shares outstanding with a
pricing model valuation of $0.3 million. These shares are
set to expire on November 13, 2007.
Restricted Stock: The 2003 Plan also allows
the Company to grant stock awards. The stock awards granted vest
over a period of one year. The following table summarizes stock
awards for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Balance, March 27, 2004
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
2.86
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 26, 2005
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
2.86
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
4.26
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 25, 2006
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
4.26
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
5.68
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2007
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
5.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense, based on fair market value, amounted to
$0.1 million, $0.2 million and $0.3 million in
fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Unearned
compensation was less than $0.1 million at March 31,
2007 and March 25, 2006.
51
|
|
NOTE 8
|
SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA
|
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution Products
(Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The accounting policies of the reportable
segments are the same as those described above in Note 1 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has no
inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment and
geographic data for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
45,411
|
|
|
$
|
40,814
|
|
|
$
|
37,086
|
|
Service
|
|
|
21,062
|
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
18,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
66,473
|
|
|
|
60,471
|
|
|
|
55,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
Service
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
5,287
|
|
|
|
5,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,690
|
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product(1)
|
|
|
8,475
|
|
|
|
7,934
|
|
|
|
8,090
|
|
Service(1)
|
|
|
5,866
|
|
|
|
5,647
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,341
|
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense, net
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
Provision for (Benefit from)
Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
12,764
|
|
|
$
|
10,703
|
|
|
$
|
12,785
|
|
Service
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
6,223
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,422
|
|
|
$
|
21,488
|
|
|
$
|
20,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
625
|
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
634
|
|
Service
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,622
|
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
$
|
914
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal years financial
information have been made to conform with current fiscal
years presentation.
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Geographic Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales to Unaffiliated
Customers(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(5)
|
|
$
|
59,673
|
|
|
$
|
54,778
|
|
|
$
|
50,170
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
6,800
|
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
66,473
|
|
|
$
|
60,471
|
|
|
$
|
55,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(5)
|
|
$
|
2,613
|
|
|
$
|
2,422
|
|
|
$
|
1,759
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,814
|
|
|
$
|
2,687
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating expense allocations between segments were based on
actual amounts, a percentage of sales, headcount, and
managements estimates. |
|
(2) |
|
Goodwill is allocated based on the percentage of segment revenue
acquired. For fiscal years 2007 and 2006, goodwill of
$3.0 million was allocated 51% product and 49% service. For
fiscal year 2005, goodwill of $2.5 million was allocated
60% product and 40% service. |
|
(3) |
|
Net sales are attributed to the countries based on the location
of the company making the sale. |
|
(4) |
|
Long-lived assets consist of property and equipment and are
entirely allocated to the United States with the exception of
Canadian fixed assets. |
|
(5) |
|
United States includes Puerto Rico. |
Leases: Transcat leases facilities, equipment,
and vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases. Total rental
expense was approximately $1.1 million for fiscal year 2007
and approximately $0.9 million for fiscal years 2006 and
2005. The minimum future annual rental payments under the
non-cancelable leases at March 31, 2007 are as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
2009
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
2010
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
2011
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligation: In fiscal
year 2002, in connection with the sale of TPG to Fluke
Electronics Corporation (Fluke), the Company entered
into a distribution agreement (Distribution
Agreement) with Fluke. Under the Distribution Agreement,
among other items, the Company agreed to purchase a
pre-determined amount of inventory during each calendar year
from 2002 to 2006. In December 2006, the Companys
purchases exceeded the required amount for calendar year 2006,
as they had in each of the prior four years, which fulfilled the
Companys contractual purchase obligations to Fluke under
the Distribution Agreement and triggered the recognition of the
previously deferred gain totaling $1.5 million in fiscal
year 2007.
By its terms, the Distribution Agreement was to terminate on
December 31, 2006. However, Fluke agreed to extend the
Distribution Agreement through March 31, 2007, but with no
minimum product purchase requirements. On March 31, 2007,
Transcat entered into a new distribution agreement (2007
Distribution
53
Agreement) with Fluke. The 2007 Distribution Agreement
does not require Transcat to purchase a minimum amount of
inventory. However, the 2007 Distribution Agreement continues
Transcats right to be the exclusive distributor of Altek
and Transmation branded products in exchange for Transcats
commitment to purchase a minimum amount of those products. The
minimum amount for calendar year 2007 is $3.8 million.
Minimum purchase commitments for future years will be determined
by June 30 of each year. In the event that Transcat fails to
make the required purchases, it may lose its right to be the
exclusive distributor.
|
|
NOTE 10
|
VENDOR
CONCENTRATION
|
Approximately 30% of Transcats product purchases on an
annual basis are from Fluke, which is believed to be consistent
with Flukes share of the markets the Company services.
In February 2006, Transcat acquired N.W. Calibration Inspection,
Inc. (NWCI) in Fort Wayne, Indiana. NWCI
provides dimensional calibration, first part inspection, and
reverse engineering services to the pharmaceutical, medical
device, and automotive industries. The Company paid
$0.8 million in cash and $0.1 million in stock for
NWCI. The Company allocated the initial purchase price to the
estimated fair value of the fixed assets acquired
($0.5 million) with the excess of $0.4 million
allocated to goodwill. The goodwill is deductible for tax
purposes. The purchase agreement provides for additional
performance-based payments to the sellers up to a maximum of
$0.3 million, of which $0.1 million was earned and
recorded in operating expenses in fiscal year 2007. If and when
additional payments come due, the amounts paid will be recorded
as an expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the
period in which they are incurred. The results of the acquired
business have been included in the calibration services segment
of the Consolidated Financial Statements since the acquisition
date. Pro-forma information for this acquisition is not included
as it did not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
|
|
NOTE 12
|
QUARTERLY
DATA (Unaudited)
|
The following table presents certain unaudited quarterly
financial data for fiscal years 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
FY 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
18,853
|
|
|
$
|
4,971
|
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Third Quarter(1)
|
|
|
17,240
|
|
|
|
4,311
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
14,860
|
|
|
|
3,548
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
15,519
|
|
|
|
3,859
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
FY 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter(2)
|
|
$
|
16,054
|
|
|
$
|
4,030
|
|
|
$
|
2,765
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
16,233
|
|
|
|
3,855
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
14,119
|
|
|
|
3,609
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
14,065
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company recognized
a previously deferred pre-tax gain of $1.5 million from the
sale of TPG to Fluke. See Note 9 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further disclosure. |
|
(2) |
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company reversed
a significant portion, $2.7 million, of its deferred tax
valuation allowance. See Note 4 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further disclosure. |
54
TRANSCAT,
INC.
SCHEDULE II: VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
(Reductions) to
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
(Reductions) to
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Statements
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
|
of the Year
|
|
|
of Operations
|
|
|
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
the Year
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
Reserve for Inventory Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2007
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
3,802
|
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(335
|
)
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,802
|
|
55
ITEM 9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our principal executive officer and
our principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based
on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the last fiscal quarter covered by this annual report (our
fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER
INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Executive Officers in Part I of this
Form 10-K
and the information set forth under the captions Election
of Directors, Executive Officers,
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance and Corporate Governance-Code of
Ethics in our definitive 2007 Proxy Statement to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Compensation of Named Executive Officers and
Directors in our definitive 2007 Proxy Statement to be
filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of
the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item, with the exception of the
information in the table below, is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information set forth under the captions
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Security Ownership of Management in our definitive
2007 Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this
report relates.
56
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans as of March 31, 2007:
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be issued
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
upon exercise of
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
remaining available for future
|
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
issuance under equity
|
|
|
|
warrants, and unvested
|
|
|
warrants, and unvested
|
|
|
compensation plans (excluding
|
|
|
|
restricted stock
|
|
|
restricted stock
|
|
|
securities reflected in column (a))
|
|
Plan category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in
our definitive 2007 Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the
fiscal year to which this report relates.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm in our definitive 2007 Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report
relates.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) See Index to Financial Statements included as
Item 8 of this report.
(b) Exhibits.
See Index to Exhibits beginning on page 59 of this report.
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: June 21, 2007
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Charles
P.
Hadeed Charles
P. Hadeed
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Charles
P. Hadeed
Charles
P. Hadeed
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President
and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ John
J. Zimmer
John
J. Zimmer
|
|
Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Carl
E. Sassano
Carl
E. Sassano
|
|
Executive Chairman and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Francis
R. Bradley
Francis
R. Bradley
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ E.
Lee
Garelick
E.
Lee Garelick
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Richard
J. Harrison
Richard
J. Harrison
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Nancy
D. Hessler
Nancy
D. Hessler
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Robert
G.
Klimasewski
Robert
G. Klimasewski
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Paul
D. Moore
Paul
D. Moore
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Cornelius
J. Murphy
Cornelius
J. Murphy
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Harvey
J. Palmer
Harvey
J. Palmer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ Alan
H. Resnick
Alan
H. Resnick
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 21, 2007
|
|
/s/ John
T. Smith
John
T. Smith
|
|
Director
|
|
|
58
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and
By-Laws
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
The Articles of Incorporation, as
amended, are incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995 and from Exhibit 3(i) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-Laws, as amended through
August 18, 1987, are incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit(3) to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1988. (SEC File
No. 000-03905)
|
(10)
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.1
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Directors
Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10(i) to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.2
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Amended and
Restated Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 99(b) to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.3
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 99(c) to the Companys
Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(Registration Statement
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.4
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Employees
Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated herein from
Exhibit 99(e) to the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(i) to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1995.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.6
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.7
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(b) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.8
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Transcat,
Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit II to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.9
|
|
Amendments No. 1 and
No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock
Option Plan are incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibits III and IV to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit V to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) of the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1997.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.12
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i) to
the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.13
|
|
Amendments No. 3 and 4 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan are
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(j) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.14
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(k) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1997.
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.15
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.16
|
|
Amendments No. 3 and 4 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan
are incorporated herein by reference from the Companys
definitive proxy statement filed on July 7, 1998 in
connection with the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 1998 and supercedes
Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.18
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.19
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the
Companys proxy statement filed on June 21, 1999 in
connection with the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix B to the
Companys 1999 preliminary proxy statement filed on
June 21, 1999 in connection with the 1999 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.21
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(b) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.22
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.23
|
|
Amendment No. 8 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.24
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.25
|
|
Amendment No. 8 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(b) to
the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.26
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2001.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated
December 26, 2001 by and among the Company, Altek
Industries Corp. and Fluke Electronics Corp. is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 10, 2002.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated as
of January 18, 2002 by and between the Company and Hughes
Corporation is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 22, 2002.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.29
|
|
Amendment No. 9 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.30
|
|
Amendment No. 10 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.31
|
|
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix A to the
Companys 2003 definitive proxy statement filed on
July 18, 2003.
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.32
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Incentive
Stock Options granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.33
|
|
Form of Award Notice for
Restricted Stock granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2
the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.34
|
|
Form of Warrant Certificate
representing warrants granted under the Amended and Restated
Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit 10.42 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2005.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.35
|
|
Form of Award Notice for
Non-Qualified Stock Options granted under the Transcat, Inc.
2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 24, 2005.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and
among Transcat, Inc., N.W. Calibration Inspection, Inc. and the
stockholders of N.W. Calibration Inspection, Inc. dated as of
February 28, 2006 is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated February 28, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.37
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated
Agreement for Severance Upon Change in Control for Carl E.
Sassano and Charles P. Hadeed is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 19, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.38
|
|
Certain compensation information
for Carl E. Sassano, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Charles P. Hadeed, President and
Chief Operating Officer of the Company, is incorporated herein
by reference from the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 16, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.39
|
|
Certain compensation information
for John J. Zimmer, Vice President of Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, is incorporated herein by
reference from the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 23, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.40
|
|
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive
Plan, as amended, is incorporated herein by reference from
Appendix D to the Companys definitive proxy statement
filed on July 10, 2006 in connection with the 2006 annual
meeting of shareholders.
|
|
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of
November 21, 2006 by and between Transcat, Inc. and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 21, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.42
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Post-Retirement
Benefit Plan for Officers is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit 10.2 the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 23, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.43
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Post-Retirement
Benefit Plan for Non-Officer Employees is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.3 the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 23, 2006.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.44
|
|
Certain compensation information
for Carl E. Sassano, Executive Chairman of the Board of the
Company, and Charles P. Hadeed, President, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, is
incorporated herein by reference from the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
dated April 19, 2007.
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.45
|
|
Certain compensation information
for the named executive officers of the Company is incorporated
herein by reference from the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 21, 2007.
|
(11)
|
|
Statement re computation of per
share earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation can be clearly
determined from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income included in this
Form 10-K
as Item 8.
|
(21)
|
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant
|
|
|
|
*21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
(23)
|
|
Consents of experts and counsel
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certifications
|
|
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
(32)
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibits filed with this report. |
|
# |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
62