Health Care REIT, Inc. 10-K
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
Commission File No. 1-8923
 
(HEALTHCARE REIT LOGO)
 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  34-1096634
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
One SeaGate, Suite 1500, Toledo, Ohio
(Address of principal executive office)
  43604
(Zip Code)
 
(419) 247-2800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
     
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $1.00 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
7.875% Series D Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
7.625% Series F Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
7.5% Series G Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value
  New York Stock Exchange
 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months; and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment of this Form 10-K.  þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
The aggregate market value of the shares of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the closing sales price of such shares on the New York Stock Exchange as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $2,185,114,647.
 
As of February 16, 2007, there were 73,535,305 shares of common stock outstanding.
 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
 
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the annual stockholders’ meeting to be held May 3, 2007, are incorporated by reference into Part III.
 


 

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
2006 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
                 
       
Page
 
  Business   3
  Risk Factors   26
  Unresolved Staff Comments   32
  Properties   32
  Legal Proceedings   34
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   34
 
  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities   35
  Selected Financial Data   37
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   39
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk   61
  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data   62
  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure   91
  Controls and Procedures   91
  Other Information   94
 
  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance   94
  Executive Compensation   94
  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters   94
  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence   94
  Principal Accountant Fees and Services   94
 
  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules   95
 EX-10.39
 EX-21
 EX-23
 EX-24.1
 EX-24.2
 EX-24.3
 EX-24.4
 EX-24.5
 EX-24.6
 EX-24.7
 EX-24.8
 EX-24.9
 EX-24.10
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2


2


Table of Contents

 
PART I
 
Item 1.   Business
 
General
 
Health Care REIT, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a self-administered, equity real estate investment trust that invests across the full spectrum of senior housing and health care real estate, including independent living/continuing care retirement communities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals and medical office buildings. Founded in 1970, we were the first real estate investment trust to invest exclusively in health care properties. Through the Windrose Medical Properties Division, we have property management capabilities and expertise in the medical office and hospital sector. Through our HADC subsidiary, we offer project management, facility planning and property development services. As of December 31, 2006, we had $4,132,749,000 of net real estate investments, inclusive of credit enhancements, in 578 properties located in 37 states. At that date, the portfolio included 204 assisted living facilities, 221 skilled nursing facilities, 47 independent living/continuing care retirement communities, 89 medical office buildings and 17 specialty care facilities.
 
Our primary objectives are to protect stockholder capital and enhance stockholder value. We seek to pay consistent cash dividends to stockholders and create opportunities to increase dividend payments to stockholders as a result of annual increases in rental and interest income and portfolio growth. To meet these objectives, we invest in the full spectrum of senior housing and health care real estate and diversify our investment portfolio by property type, operator/tenant and geographic location.
 
Depending on the availability and cost of external capital, we anticipate investing in additional properties and providing loans to qualified obligors. Capital for future investments may be provided by borrowing under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements, public or private offerings of debt or equity securities, or the incurrence or assumption of secured indebtedness.
 
References herein to “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Health Care REIT, Inc. and its subsidiaries unless specifically noted otherwise.
 
Windrose Medical Properties Trust Merger
 
On December 20, 2006, we completed our merger with Windrose Medical Properties Trust, a self-managed real estate investment trust based in Indianapolis, Indiana. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $1,018,345,000, including direct acquisition costs of approximately $29,918,000. The Windrose merger diversified our portfolio of investments throughout the health care delivery system. Windrose shareholders received approximately 9,679,000 shares of our common stock (valued at $41.00 per share) and Windrose preferred shareholders received 2,100,000 shares of our 7.5% Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (valued at $29.58 per share). Additionally, our investment in Windrose includes $183,139,000 of cash provided to Windrose to extinguish secured debt, the assumption of $301,641,000 of debt and the assumption of other liabilities and minority interests totaling $44,683,000. The results of operations for Windrose have been included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition.


3


Table of Contents

Portfolio of Properties
 
The following table summarizes our portfolio as of December 31, 2006:
 
                                                                         
    Investments(1)
    Percentage of
    Revenues(2)
    Percentage of
    Number of
    # Beds/Units
    Investment per
    Operators/
       
Type of Property
  (In thousands)     Investments     (In thousands)     Revenues(2)     Properties     or Sq. Ft.     metric (3)     Tenants     States  
 
Independent living/CCRCs
  $ 533,950       13 %   $ 39,475       12 %     47       5,887 units     $ 123,073 unit       18       19  
Assisted living facilities
    1,024,219       25 %     107,165       33 %     204       12,538 units       90,697 unit       25       33  
Skilled nursing facilities
    1,414,115       34 %     157,945       48 %     221       30,218 beds       47,279 bed       22       28  
Medical office buildings
    900,132       22 %     3,247       1 %     89       3,297,370 sq. ft.       273 sq. ft.       642       12  
Specialty care facilities
    260,333       6 %     16,632       5 %     17       1,351 beds       210,969 bed       9       9  
Other income
                    3,924       1 %                                        
                                                                         
Totals
  $ 4,132,749       100 %   $ 328,388       100 %     578                                  
                                                                         
 
 
(1) Investments include real estate investments and credit enhancements which amounted to $4,130,299,000 and $2,450,000, respectively.
 
(2) Revenues include gross revenues and revenues from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
(3) Investment per metric was computed by using the total investment amount of $4,475,503,000 which includes real estate investments, credit enhancements and unfunded construction commitments for which initial funding has commenced which amounted to $4,130,299,000, $2,450,000 and $342,754,000, respectively.
 
Property Types
 
Our primary property types include investment properties and operating properties. Investment properties are those in which we do not participate in the management of the property and include skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, independent living/continuing care retirement communities and specialty care facilities. Our operating properties are those in which we are responsible for the management of the property and are primarily medical office buildings. Our properties include stand-alone facilities that provide one level of service, combination facilities that provide multiple levels of service, and communities or campuses that provide a wide range of services. The following is a summary of our various property types.
 
Assisted Living Facilities
 
Assisted living facilities are state regulated rental properties that provide the same services as independent living facilities, but also provide supportive care from trained employees to residents who require assistance with activities of daily living, including management of medications, bathing, dressing, toileting, ambulating and eating.
 
Alzheimer’s/Dementia Care Facilities  Certain assisted living facilities may include state licensed settings that specialize in caring for those afflicted with Alzheimer’s disease and/or similar forms of dementia.
 
Skilled Nursing Facilities
 
Skilled nursing facilities are licensed daily rate or rental properties where the majority of individuals require 24-hour nursing and/or medical care. Generally, these properties are licensed for Medicaid and/or Medicare reimbursement.
 
Independent Living/Continuing Care Retirement Communities
 
These communities may include one or more of the following property types.
 
Continuing Care Retirement Communities   Continuing care retirement communities include a combination of detached homes, an independent living facility, an assisted living facility and/or a skilled nursing facility on one campus. These communities are appealing to residents because there is no need for relocating when health and medical needs change. Resident payment plans vary, but can include entrance fees, condominium fees and rental fees.


4


Table of Contents

Active Adult Communities  Active adult communities contain primarily for-sale single-family homes, townhomes, cluster homes, mobile homes and/or condominiums with no specialized services. These communities are typically restricted or targeted to adults at least 55 years of age or older. Residents generally lead an independent lifestyle. Communities may include amenities such as a clubhouse, golf course and recreational spaces.
 
Independent Living Facilities  Independent living facilities are age-restricted multifamily properties with central dining facilities that provide residents access to meals and other services such as housekeeping, linen service, transportation and social and recreational activities.
 
Specialty Care Facilities
 
Our specialty care facilities include acute care hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals and other specialty care hospitals. Acute care hospitals provide a wide range of inpatient and outpatient services, including, but not limited to, surgery, rehabilitation, therapy and clinical laboratories. Long-term acute care hospitals provide inpatient services for patients with complex medical conditions that require more intensive care, monitoring or emergency support than that available in most skilled nursing facilities. Other specialty care hospitals provide specialized inpatient and outpatient care for specific illnesses or diseases, including, among others, orthopedic, neurosurgical and behavioral care.
 
Medical Office Buildings
 
Medical office buildings are office and clinic facilities, often located near hospitals or on hospital campuses, specifically constructed and designed for the use of physicians and other health care personnel to provide services to their patients. They may also include ambulatory surgery centers that are used for general or specialty surgical procedures not requiring an overnight stay in a hospital. Medical office buildings typically contain sole and group physician practices and may provide laboratory and other patient services.
 
Investments
 
We invest across the full spectrum of senior housing and health care real estate. We diversify our investment portfolio by property type, operator/tenant and geographic location. In determining whether to invest in a property, we focus on the following: (1) the experience of the tenant’s or borrower’s management team; (2) the historical and projected financial and operational performance of the property; (3) the credit of the tenant or borrower; (4) the security for the lease or loan; and (5) the capital committed to the property by the tenant or borrower. We conduct market research and analysis for all potential investments. In addition, we review the value of all properties, the interest rates and covenant requirements of any debt to be assumed and the anticipated sources of repayment of any existing debt that is not to be assumed.
 
We monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of property and operator/tenant. Our asset management process generally includes review of monthly financial statements and other operating data for each property, periodic review of obligor creditworthiness, periodic property inspections and review of covenant compliance relating to licensure, real estate taxes, letters of credit and other collateral. In monitoring our portfolio, our personnel use a proprietary database to collect and analyze property-specific data. Additionally, we conduct extensive research to ascertain industry trends and risks.
 
Through asset management and research, we evaluate the operating environment in each property’s market to determine whether payment risk is likely to increase. When we identify unacceptable levels of payment risk, we seek to mitigate, eliminate or transfer the risk. We categorize the risk as obligor, property or market risk. For obligor risk, we typically find a substitute operator/tenant to run the property. For property risk, we usually work with the operator/tenant to institute property-level management changes to address the risk. Finally, for market risk, we often encourage an obligor to change its capital structure, including refinancing the property or raising additional equity. Through these asset management and research efforts, we are generally able to intervene at an early stage to address payment risk, and in so doing, support both the collectibility of revenue and the value of our investment.
 
Depending upon market conditions, we believe that new investments will be available in the future with spreads over our cost of capital that will generate appropriate returns to our stockholders.


5


Table of Contents

 
Investment Properties
 
Our investment properties are those in which we do not participate in the management of the property and are primarily land, building, improvements and related rights that are leased to operators under long-term operating leases. The net value of our investment properties aggregated approximately $2,823,331,000 at December 31, 2006. The leases generally have a fixed contractual term of 12 to 15 years and contain one or more five to 15-year renewal options. Most of our rents are received under triple-net leases requiring the operator to pay rent and all additional charges incurred in the operation of the leased property. The tenants are required to repair, rebuild and maintain the leased properties. Substantially all of these operating leases are designed with either fixed or contingent escalating rent structures. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectibility assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period.
 
At December 31, 2006, 86% of our investment properties were subject to master leases. A master lease is a lease of multiple properties to one tenant entity under a single lease agreement. From time to time, we may acquire additional properties that are then leased to the tenant under the master lease. The tenant is required to make one monthly payment that represents rent on all the properties that are subject to the master lease. Typically, the master lease tenant can exercise its right to purchase the properties or to renew the master lease only with respect to all leased properties at the same time. This bundling feature benefits us because the tenant cannot limit the purchase or renewal to the better performing properties and terminate the leasing arrangement with respect to the poorer performing properties. This spreads our risk among the entire group of properties within the master lease. The bundling feature may provide a similar advantage if the master lease tenant is in bankruptcy. Subject to certain restrictions, a debtor in bankruptcy has the right to assume or reject each of its leases. It is our intent that a tenant in bankruptcy would be required to assume or reject the master lease as a whole, rather than deciding on a property by property basis.
 
We currently provide for the construction of properties for tenants as part of long-term operating leases. We capitalize certain interest costs associated with funds used to pay for the construction of properties owned by us. The amount capitalized is based upon the amount advanced during the construction period using the rate of interest that approximates our cost of financing. Our interest expense is reduced by the amount capitalized. We also typically charge a transaction fee at the commencement of construction. The construction period commences upon funding and terminates upon the earlier of the completion of the applicable property or the end of a specified period. During the construction period, we advance funds to the tenants in accordance with agreed upon terms and conditions which require, among other things, site visits by a Company representative prior to advancement of funds. During the construction period, we generally require an additional credit enhancement in the form of payment and performance bonds and/or completion guaranties. At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding construction investments of $138,222,000 and were committed to providing additional funds of approximately $342,754,000 to complete construction.
 
Hospital Affiliates Development Corporation (“HADC”) is a taxable REIT subsidiary of the Company that was incorporated in 1989 in Indiana. The primary objective of HADC is to develop quality specialty medical properties for the Company, but HADC also provides a select amount of these services for third-parties, especially those that are expected to be a source of long-term relationships and potential property acquisitions. HADC develops and constructs new “build-to-suit” and multi-tenant facilities. HADC earns fees from third-parties by providing services such as property development, facility planning, medical equipment planning and implementation services, leasing services and property management. As a taxable REIT subsidiary, HADC pays income taxes at regular corporate rates on its taxable income.
 
Operating Properties
 
Our operating properties are those in which we are responsible for the property and are typically multi-tenant medical office buildings that are leased to multiple health care providers (typically hospitals and physician practices) under a gross, modified gross or triple-net lease structure. Under a gross or modified gross lease, all or a portion of our operating expenses are not reimbursed by tenants. Accordingly, we incur certain property operating expenses, such as real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, property management fees, utilities and insurance. At


6


Table of Contents

December 31, 2006, 39% of our owned medical office buildings are managed by a third party property management company. At December 31, 2006, 36% of our operating property leases are leased to multiple tenants under gross or modified gross leases pursuant to which we are responsible for certain operating expenses. Substantially all of our leases at operating properties include annual base rent escalation clauses that are either predetermined fixed increases or are a function of an inflation index, and typically have an initial term ranging from one to 20 years, with a weighted average remaining term of approximately five years as of December 31, 2006. Operating property leases are normally credit enhanced by guaranties and/or letters of credit. The net value of our operating properties aggregated approximately $974,298,000 at December 31, 2006.
 
Mortgage Loans
 
Our investments in mortgage loans are typically structured to provide us with interest income, principal amortization and transaction fees and are generally secured by a first or second mortgage lien or leasehold mortgage. At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding mortgage loans of $177,615,000. The interest yield (excluding any loans on non-accrual) averaged approximately 9.0% per annum on our outstanding mortgage loan balances. Our yield on mortgage loans depends upon a number of factors, including the stated interest rate, average principal amount outstanding during the term of the loan and any interest rate adjustments. The mortgage loans outstanding at December 31, 2006 are generally subject to three to 20-year terms with principal amortization schedules and/or balloon payments of the outstanding principal balances at the end of the term. Typically, mortgage loans are cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized with other mortgage loans, operating leases or agreements between us and the obligor and its affiliates.
 
Working Capital Loans
 
Working capital loans are generally either unsecured or secured by the obligor’s leasehold rights, corporate guaranties and/or personal guaranties. These loans have terms generally ranging from three months to ten years. At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding working capital loans of $16,833,000. The average interest yield (excluding any loans on non-accrual) was approximately 8.7% per annum on our outstanding working capital loan balances. At December 31, 2006, we had provided working capital loans to nine obligors.
 
Equity Investments
 
Equity investments consist primarily of investments in private companies where we do not have the ability to exercise influence. Under the cost method of accounting, investments in private companies are carried at cost and are adjusted only for other-than-temporary declines in fair value, distributions of earnings and additional investments. For investments in public companies, if any, that have readily determinable fair market values, we classify our equity investments as available-for-sale and, accordingly, record these investments at their fair market values with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity. These investments represent a minimal ownership interest in these companies. In connection with the Windrose merger, we assumed a $1,000,000 investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary that holds trust preferred securities and is accounted for under the cost method.
 
Segment Reporting
 
Our business consists of two business segments — investment properties and operating properties. For additional information regarding business segments, see Note 18 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
 
Borrowing Policies
 
We utilize a combination of debt and equity to fund the purchase of new properties and to provide loan financing. Our debt and equity levels are determined by management to maintain a conservative credit profile. Generally, we intend to issue unsecured, fixed rate public debt with long-term maturities to approximate the maturities on our leases and loans. For short-term purposes, we may borrow on our unsecured lines of credit arrangements. We replace these borrowings with long-term capital such as senior unsecured notes, common stock or preferred stock. When terms are deemed favorable, we may invest in properties subject to existing mortgage indebtedness. In addition, we may obtain secured financing for unleveraged properties in which we have invested or


7


Table of Contents

may refinance properties acquired on a leveraged basis. It is our intent to limit secured indebtedness. In our agreements with our lenders, we are subject to restrictions with respect to secured and unsecured indebtedness.
 
Customer Concentrations
 
The following table summarizes certain information about our customer concentrations as of December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
 
                         
    Number of
    Total
    Percent of
 
    Properties     Investment(1)     Investment(2)  
 
Concentration by investment:
                       
Emeritus Corporation
    50     $ 353,641       9 %
Brookdale Senior Living Inc. 
    87       284,161       7 %
Home Quality Management, Inc. 
    37       244,449       6 %
Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 
    26       238,610       6 %
Merrill Gardens L.L.C. 
    13       183,841       4 %
Remaining portfolio
    365       2,828,047       68 %
                         
Totals
    578     $ 4,132,749       100 %
                         
 
                         
    Number of
    Total
    Percent of
 
    Properties     Revenue(3)     Revenue  
 
Concentration by revenue(4):
                       
Emeritus Corporation
    50     $ 36,878       11 %
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
    87       33,581       10 %
Home Quality Management, Inc. 
    37       27,318       8 %
Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 
    26       23,261       7 %
Delta Health Group, Inc. 
    25       22,861       7 %
Remaining portfolio
    353       180,565       56 %
Other income
    n/a       3,924       1 %
                         
Totals
    578     $ 328,388       100 %
                         
 
 
(1) Investments include real estate investments and credit enhancements which amounted to $4,130,299,000 and $2,450,000, respectively.
 
(2) Investments with our top five customers comprised 41% of total investments at December 31, 2005.
 
(3) Revenues include gross revenues and revenues from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
(4) Revenues from our top five customers were 43% and 46% for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. All of our top five customers are in our investment properties segment.
 
Competition
 
We compete with other real estate investment trusts, real estate partnerships, banks, insurance companies, finance companies, government-sponsored agencies, taxable and tax-exempt bond funds and other investors in the acquisition, development, leasing and financing of health care and senior housing properties. We compete for investments based on a number of factors including rates, financings offered, underwriting criteria and reputation. The operators/tenants of our properties compete on a local and regional basis with operators/tenants of properties that provide comparable services. Operators/tenants compete for patients and residents based on a number of factors including quality of care, reputation, physical appearance of properties, services offered, family preferences, physicians, staff and price. We also face competition from other health care facilities for tenants, such as physicians and other health care providers, that provide comparable facilities and services.
 
Employees
 
As of December 31, 2006, we employed 113 full-time employees.


8


Table of Contents

Certain Government Regulations
 
Health Law Matters — Generally
 
We invest in assisted living, skilled nursing, independent living facilities/continuing care retirement communities, medical office buildings and specialty care facilities, which represented approximately 25%, 34%, 13%, 22% and 6%, respectively, of our investments at December 31, 2006.
 
Typically, operators of assisted living and independent living facilities do not receive significant funding from governmental programs and are regulated by the states, not the federal government. Operators of skilled nursing and specialty care facilities are subject to federal and state laws that regulate the type and quality of the medical and/or nursing care provided, ancillary services (e.g., respiratory, occupational, physical and infusion therapies), qualifications of the administrative personnel and nursing staff, the adequacy of the physical plant and equipment, distribution of pharmaceuticals, reimbursement and rate, setting and operating policies. In addition, as described below, some of our property operators are subject to extensive laws and regulations pertaining to health care fraud and abuse, including kickbacks, physician self-referrals and false claims. Hospitals, physician group practice clinics, and other health care facilities in our portfolio are subject to extensive federal, state and local licensure, certification, and inspection laws and regulations. Our tenants’ failure to comply with any of these laws could result in loss of accreditation, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines, suspension or decertification from federal and state health care programs, loss of license or closure of the facility.
 
Licensing and Certification
 
The primary regulations that affect assisted living facilities are the states’ licensing laws. In granting and renewing these licenses, the regulatory authorities consider numerous factors relating to a property’s physical plant and operations including, but not limited to, admission and discharge standards and staffing and training. A decision to grant or renew a license is also affected by a property’s record with respect to consumer rights and medication guidelines and rules.
 
Generally, our skilled nursing and specialty care facilities are required to be licensed on an annual or bi-annual basis and to be certified for participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The failure of our operators to maintain or renew any required license or regulatory approval or the failure to correct serious survey deficiencies could prevent them from continuing operations at a property. In addition, if a property is found out of compliance with the conditions of participation in Medicare, Medicaid or other health care programs, the property may be barred from participation in government reimbursement programs. Any of these occurrences may impair the ability of our operators to meet their obligations to us. If we have to replace a property operator, our ability to replace the operator may be affected by federal and state rules and policies governing changes in control. This may result in payment delays, an inability to find a replacement operator, a significant working capital commitment from us to a new operator or other difficulties.
 
Reimbursement
 
Assisted Living Facilities.  Approximately 33% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006, were attributable to assisted living facilities. The majority of the revenues received by the operators of our assisted living facilities are from private pay sources. The remaining revenue source is primarily Medicaid waiver programs. As a part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“OBRA”) of 1981, Congress established a waiver program enabling some states to offer Medicaid reimbursement to assisted living facilities as an alternative to institutional long-term care services. The provisions of OBRA and the subsequent OBRA Acts of 1987 and 1990 permit states to seek a waiver from typical Medicaid requirements to develop cost-effective alternatives to long-term care, including Medicaid payments for assisted living and home health. At December 31, 2006, seven of our 25 assisted living operators received Medicaid reimbursement pursuant to Medicaid waivers programs. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2006, approximately 13% of the revenues at our assisted living facilities were from Medicaid reimbursement.
 
Rates paid by self-pay residents are set by the facilities and are largely determined by local market conditions and operating costs. Generally, facilities receive a higher payment per day for a private pay resident than for a Medicaid beneficiary who requires a comparable level of care. The level of Medicaid reimbursement varies from


9


Table of Contents

state to state. Thus, the revenues generated by operators of our assisted living facilities may be adversely affected by payor mix, acuity level, and changes in Medicaid eligibility and reimbursement levels. In addition, a state could lose its Medicaid waiver and no longer be permitted to utilize Medicaid dollars to reimburse for assisted living services. Changes in revenues could in turn have a material adverse effect on an operator’s ability to meet its obligations to us.
 
Skilled Nursing Facilities and Specialty Care Facilities.  Skilled nursing and specialty care facilities typically receive most of their revenues from Medicare and Medicaid, with the balance representing private pay, including private insurance. Consequently, changes in federal or state reimbursement policies may also adversely affect an operator’s ability to cover its expenses, including our rent or debt service. Skilled nursing and specialty care facilities are subject to periodic pre- and post-payment reviews and other audits by federal and state authorities. A review or audit of claims of a property operator could result in recoupments, denials or delays of payments in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on the operator’s ability to meet its obligations to us. Due to the significant judgments and estimates inherent in payor settlement accounting, no assurance can be given as to the adequacy of any reserves maintained by our property operators for potential adjustments to reimbursements for payor settlements. Due to budgetary constraints, governmental payors may limit or reduce payments to skilled nursing and specialty care facilities. As a result of government reimbursement programs being subject to such budgetary pressures and legislative and administrative actions, an operator’s ability to meet its obligations to us may be significantly impaired.
 
Medicare Reimbursement and Skilled Nursing Facilities.  For the twelve months ended September 30, 2006, approximately 29% of the revenues at our skilled nursing facilities (which comprised 48% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006) were from Medicare reimbursement. In an effort to reduce federal spending on health care, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (“BBA”) fundamentally altered Medicare payment methodologies for skilled nursing facilities by mandating the institution of the skilled nursing property prospective payment system. The prospective payment system caused Medicare per diem reimbursement for skilled nursing property services to decrease. The reductions in Medicare payments resulted in immediate financial difficulties for skilled nursing facilities and caused a number of operators to seek bankruptcy protection. The federal government subsequently passed legislation to lessen the negative financial impact from the prospective payment system. These payment increases have since expired.
 
Skilled nursing facilities received a 3.1% inflationary market basket increase in Medicare payments for federal fiscal year 2007, which represents $560 million of additional Medicare spending. However, Section 5004 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (“DRA”) reduced Medicare reimbursement to skilled nursing facilities for bad debt costs. Section 5008 of the DRA directs the Secretary (as defined in that statute) to conduct a demonstration program beginning January 1, 2008 assessing the costs and outcomes of patients discharged from hospitals in a variety of post-acute care settings, including skilled nursing facilties, home care and other settings. The outcome of that demonstration program could lead to significant changes in Medicare coverage and reimbursement for post-acute care. It is not known how either the deomonstration program, or as yet unannounced changes in Medicare reimbursement, might impact tenants of the Company’s properties.
 
The moratorium on the therapy caps for Part B outpatient rehabilitation services, which had applied through December 31, 2005, expired. The therapy caps were mandated by the BBA. The annual payment cap of $1,780 per patient applies to occupational therapy and a separate $1,780 cap applies to speech and physical therapy. Patients exceeding the cap will be able to obtain additional Medicare coverage through a waiver program if the therapy is deemed medically necessary; however, the program is set to expire in December 2007. Otherwise, the patient would need to use private funds to pay for the cost of therapy above the caps.
 
Medicare Reimbursement and Specialty Care Facilities.  For the twelve months ended September 30, 2006, approximately 59% of the revenues at our specialty care facilities (which comprised 5% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006) were from Medicare. Specialty care facilities generally are reimbursed by Medicare under either the diagnosis related group prospective payment system reimbursement methodology for inpatient hospitals, or the long-term acute care hospital prospective payment system for long-term acute care hospitals. Acute care hospitals provide a wide range of inpatient and outpatient services including, but not limited to, surgery, rehabilitation, therapy and clinical laboratories. Long-term acute care hospitals provide inpatient services for


10


Table of Contents

patients with complex medical conditions that require more intensive care, monitoring or emergency support than that available in most skilled nursing facilities.
 
With respect to Medicare’s diagnosis related group/outpatient prospective payment system methodology for regular hospitals, reimbursement for inpatient services is on the basis of a fixed, prospective rate based on the principal diagnosis of the patient. Diagnoses are grouped into more than 500 diagnosis related groups. In some cases, a hospital might be able to qualify for an outlier payment if the hospital’s losses exceed a threshold.
 
Medicaid Reimbursement.  Medicaid is a major payor source for residents in our skilled nursing and specialty care facilities. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2006, approximately 53% of the revenues of our skilled nursing facilities and 25% of the revenues of our specialty care facilities were attributable to Medicaid payments. The federal government and the states share responsibility for financing Medicaid. The federal matching rate, known as the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage, varies by state based on relative per capita income. On average, Medicaid is the largest component of total state spending, representing approximately 22.2% of total state spending. The percentage of Medicaid dollars used for long-term care varies from state to state due in part to different ratios of elderly population and eligibility requirements. With certain federal guidelines, states have a wide range of discretion to determine eligibility and reimbursement methodology. Many states reimburse long-term care facilities using fixed daily rates, which are applied prospectively based on patient acuity and the historical costs incurred in providing patient care. Reasonable costs typically include allowances for staffing, administrative and general, and property and equipment (e.g., real estate taxes, depreciation and fair rental).
 
In most states, Medicaid does not fully reimburse the cost of providing skilled nursing services. Certain states are attempting to slow the rate of growth in Medicaid expenditures by freezing rates or restricting eligibility and benefits. States in which we have skilled nursing property investments increased their per diem Medicaid rates roughly 3.5% on average for fiscal year 2007. Four of our states effectively froze rates in fiscal year 2007, which impacts profitability to the extent that expenses continue to rise. In addition, Medicaid rates may decline if revenues in a particular state are not sufficient to fund budgeted expenditures.
 
The Medicare Part D drug benefit became effective January 1, 2006. The direct impact on nursing facilities is that residents dually eligible for Medicare (and enrolled in one of the new Part D Plans) and Medicaid now receive reimbursement for drugs through Medicare Part D rather than through Medicaid. Participants began enrolling in the new Part D prescription drug plans on November 15, 2005. Part D will result in increased administrative responsibilities for nursing home operators because residents have the choice of multiple prescription drug plans. Operators may also experience increased expenses to the extent that patients’ drugs are not covered by their prescription drug plan formulary.
 
The reimbursement methodologies applied to health care facilities continue to evolve. Federal and state authorities have considered and may seek to implement new or modified reimbursement methodologies that may negatively impact health care property operations. The impact of any such change, if implemented, may result in a material adverse effect on our skilled nursing and specialty care property operations. No assurance can be given that current revenue sources or levels will be maintained. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that payments under a government reimbursement program are currently, or will be in the future, sufficient to fully reimburse the property operators for their operating and capital expenses. As a result, an operator’s ability to meet its obligations to us could be adversely impacted.
 
Other Related Laws
 
Skilled nursing and specialty care facilities (and assisted living facilities that receive Medicaid payments) are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations that govern the operations and financial and other arrangements that may be entered into by health care providers. Certain of these laws prohibit direct or indirect payments of any kind for the purpose of inducing or encouraging the referral of patients for medical products or services reimbursable by governmental programs. Other laws require providers to furnish only medically necessary services and submit to the government valid and accurate statements for each service. Still other laws require providers to comply with a variety of safety, health and other requirements relating to the condition of the licensed property and the quality of care provided. Sanctions for violation of these laws and regulations may include, but are not limited to, criminal and/or civil penalties and fines and a loss of licensure and immediate termination of


11


Table of Contents

governmental payments. In certain circumstances, violation of these rules (such as those prohibiting abusive and fraudulent behavior) with respect to one property may subject other facilities under common control or ownership to sanctions, including disqualification from participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. In the ordinary course of its business, a property operator is regularly subjected to inquiries, investigations and audits by federal and state agencies that oversee these laws and regulations.
 
Each skilled nursing and specialty care property (and any assisted living property that receives Medicaid payments) is subject to the federal anti-kickback statute that generally prohibits persons from offering, providing, soliciting or receiving remuneration to induce either the referral of an individual or the furnishing of a good or service for which payment may be made under a federal health care program such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Skilled nursing and specialty care facilities are also subject to the federal Ethics in Patient Referral Act of 1989, commonly referred to as the Stark Law. The Stark Law generally prohibits the submission of claims to Medicare for payment if the claim results from a physician referral for certain designated services and the physician has a financial relationship with the health service provider that does not qualify under one of the exceptions for a financial relationship under the Stark Law. Similar prohibitions on physician self-referrals and submission of claims apply to state Medicaid programs. Further, skilled nursing and specialty care facilities (and assisted living facilities that receive Medicaid payments) are subject to substantial financial penalties under the Civil Monetary Penalties Act and the False Claims Act and, in particular, actions under the False Claims Act’s “whistleblower” provisions. Private enforcement of health care fraud has increased due in large part to amendments to the False Claims Act that encourage private individuals to sue on behalf of the government. These whistleblower suits by private individuals, known as qui tam actions, may be filed by almost anyone, including present and former patients, nurses and other employees. Recent action under the federal False Claims Act have asserted claims for treble damages and up to $11,000 per claim on the basis of the alleged failure of a property to meet applicable regulations relating to the operation of the property. Prosecutions, investigations or qui tam actions could have a material adverse effect on a property operator’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations which could adversely affect the ability of the operator to meet its obligations to us. Finally, various state false claim and anti-kickback laws also may apply to each property operator. Violation of any of the foregoing statutes can result in criminal and/or civil penalties that could have a material adverse effect on the ability of an operator to meet its obligations to us.
 
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which became effective January 1, 1997, greatly expanded the definition of health care fraud and related offenses and broadened its scope to include private health care plans in addition to government payors. It also greatly increased funding for the Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services to audit, investigate and prosecute suspected health care fraud.
 
Additionally, the administrative simplification provisions of this law provide for communication of health information through standard electronic transaction formats and for the privacy and security of health information. In order to comply with the regulations, health care providers must undergo significant operational and technical changes.
 
Finally, government investigation and enforcement of health care laws has increased dramatically over the past several years and is expected to continue. Some of these enforcement actions represent novel legal theories and expansions in the application of false claims laws. The costs for an operator of a health care property associated with both defending such enforcement actions and the undertakings in settlement agreements can be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on the ability of an operator to meet its obligations to us.
 
Environmental Laws
 
A wide variety of federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations affect health care facility operations or special medical properties. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, an owner of real property or a secured lender (such as the Company) may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances at, under or disposed of in connection with such property, as well as other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property). The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and the owner’s or secured lender’s liability


12


Table of Contents

therefor could exceed the value of the property, and/or the assets of the owner or secured lender. In addition, the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remediate such substances, may adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or rent such property or to borrow using such property as collateral which, in turn, would reduce our revenue.
 
Taxation
 
Federal Income Tax Considerations
 
The following summary of the taxation of the Company and the material federal tax consequences to the holders of our debt and equity securities is for general information only and is not tax advice. This summary does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to certain types of holders of stock or securities (including, but not limited to, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, financial institutions or broker-dealers, persons holding shares of common stock as part of a hedging, integrated conversion, or constructive sale transaction or a straddle, traders in securities that use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities, investors in pass-through entities and foreign corporations and persons who are not citizens or residents of the United States).
 
This summary does not discuss all of the aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to you in light of your particular investment or other circumstances. In addition, this summary does not discuss any state or local income taxation or foreign income taxation or other tax consequences. This summary is based on current U.S. federal income tax law. Subsequent developments in U.S. federal income tax law, including changes in law or differing interpretations, which may be applied retroactively, could have a material effect on the U.S. federal income tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our securities as set forth in this summary. Before you purchase our securities, you should consult your own tax advisor regarding the particular U.S. federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences of acquiring, owning and selling our securities.
 
General
 
We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (or “REIT”) commencing with our first taxable year. We intend to continue to operate in such a manner as to qualify as a REIT, but there is no guarantee that we will qualify or remain qualified as a REIT for subsequent years. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon our ability to meet a variety of qualification tests imposed under federal income tax law with respect to income, assets, distribution level and diversity of share ownership as discussed below under “— Qualification as a REIT.” There can be no assurance that we will be owned and organized and will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified.
 
In any year in which we qualify as a REIT, in general, we will not be subject to federal income tax on that portion of our REIT taxable income or capital gain that is distributed to stockholders. We may, however, be subject to tax at normal corporate rates on any taxable income or capital gain not distributed. If we elect to retain and pay income tax on our net long-term capital gain, stockholders are required to include their proportionate share of our undistributed long-term capital gain in income, but they will receive a refundable credit for their share of any taxes paid by us on such gain.
 
Despite the REIT election, we may be subject to federal income and excise tax as follows:
 
  •  To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, we will be subject to tax on the undistributed amount at regular corporate tax rates;
 
  •  We may be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on certain items of tax preference to the extent that this tax exceeds our regular tax;
 
  •  If we have net income from the sale or other disposition of “foreclosure property” that is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business or other non-qualifying income from foreclosure property, we will be subject to tax at the highest corporate rate on this income;


13


Table of Contents

 
  •  Any net income from prohibited transactions (which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than dispositions of foreclosure property and dispositions of property due to an involuntary conversion) will be subject to a 100% tax;
 
  •  If we fail to satisfy either the 75% or 95% gross income tests (as discussed below), but nonetheless maintain our qualification as a REIT because certain other requirements are met, we will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount equal to (1) the gross income attributable to the greater of (i) 75% of our gross income over the amount of qualifying gross income for purposes of the 75% gross income test (discussed below) or (ii) 95% of our gross income (90% of our gross income for taxable years beginning on or before October 22, 2004) over the amount of qualifying gross income for purposes of the 95% gross income test (discussed below) multiplied by (2) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability;
 
  •  If we fail to distribute during each year at least the sum of (1) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for the year, (2) 95% of our REIT capital gain net income for such year (other than capital gain that we elect to retain and pay tax on) and (3) any undistributed taxable income from preceding periods, we will be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over amounts actually distributed; and
 
  •  We will also be subject to a tax of 100% on the amount of any rents from real property, deductions or excess interest paid to us by any of our “taxable REIT subsidiaries” that would be reduced through reallocation under certain federal income tax principles in order to more clearly reflect income of the taxable REIT subsidiary. See “— Qualification as a REIT — Investments in Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.”
 
If we acquire any assets from a corporation which is or has been a “C” corporation in a carryover basis transaction, we could be liable for specified liabilities that are inherited from the “C” corporation. A “C” corporation is generally defined as a corporation that is required to pay full corporate level federal income tax. If we recognize gain on the disposition of the assets during the ten-year period beginning on the date on which the assets were acquired by us, then to the extent of the assets’ “built-in gain” (i.e., the excess of the fair market value of the asset over the adjusted tax basis in the asset, in each case determined as of the beginning of the ten-year period), we will be subject to tax on the gain at the highest regular corporate rate applicable. The results described in this paragraph with respect to the recognition of built-in gain assume that the built-in gain assets, at the time the built-in gain assets were subject to a conversion transaction (either where a “C” corporation elected REIT status or a REIT acquired the assets from a “C” corporation), were not treated as sold to an unrelated party and gain recognized.
 
Qualification as a REIT
 
A REIT is defined as a corporation, trust or association:
 
  (1)  which is managed by one or more trustees or directors;
 
  (2)  the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;
 
  (3)  which would be taxable as a domestic corporation but for the federal income tax law relating to REITs;
 
(4) which is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company;
 
  (5)  the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons in each taxable year of the REIT except for its first taxable year;
 
  (6)  not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of which is owned during the last half of each taxable year, excluding its first taxable year, directly or indirectly, by or for five or fewer individuals (which includes certain entities) (the “Five or Fewer Requirement”); and
 
  (7)  which meets certain income and asset tests described below.
 
Conditions (1) to (4), inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. For purposes of conditions (5) and (6), pension funds and certain other tax-exempt entities are treated as individuals, subject to a “look-through” exception in the case of condition (6).


14


Table of Contents

 
Based on publicly available information, we believe we have satisfied the share ownership requirements set forth in (5) and (6) above. In addition, Article VI of our Amended and Restated By-Laws provides for restrictions regarding ownership and transfer of shares. These restrictions are intended to assist us in continuing to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in (5) and (6) above. These restrictions, however, may not ensure that we will, in all cases, be able to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in (5) and (6) above.
 
We have complied with, and will continue to comply with, regulatory rules to send annual letters to certain of our stockholders requesting information regarding the actual ownership of our stock. If despite sending the annual letters, we do not know, or after exercising reasonable diligence would not have known, whether we failed to meet the Five or Fewer Requirement, we will be treated as having met the Five or Fewer Requirement. If we fail to comply with these regulatory rules, we will be subject to a monetary penalty. If our failure to comply was due to intentional disregard of the requirement, the penalty would be increased. However, if our failure to comply were due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, no penalty would be imposed.
 
We may own a number of properties through wholly owned subsidiaries. A corporation will qualify as a “qualified REIT subsidiary” if 100% of its stock is owned by a REIT and the REIT does not elect to treat the subsidiary as a taxable REIT subsidiary. A “qualified REIT subsidiary” will not be treated as a separate corporation, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deductions and credits of a “qualified REIT subsidiary” will be treated as assets, liabilities and items (as the case may be) of the REIT. A “qualified REIT subsidiary” is not subject to federal income tax, and our ownership of the voting stock of a qualified REIT subsidiary will not violate the restrictions against ownership of securities of any one issuer which constitute more than 10% of the value or total voting power of such issuer or more than 5% of the value of our total assets, as described below under “— Asset Tests.”
 
If we invest in a partnership, a limited liability company or a trust taxed as a partnership or as a disregarded entity, we will be deemed to own a proportionate share of the partnership’s, limited liability company’s or trust’s assets. Likewise, we will be treated as receiving our share of the income and loss of the partnership, limited liability company or trust, and the gross income will retain the same character in our hands as it has in the hands of the partnership, limited liability company or trust. These “look-through” rules apply for purposes of the income tests and assets tests described below.
 
Income Tests.  There are two separate percentage tests relating to our sources of gross income that we must satisfy for each taxable year.
 
  •  At least 75% of our gross income (excluding gross income from certain sales of property held primarily for sale) must be directly or indirectly derived each taxable year from “rents from real property,” other income from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property or certain income from qualified temporary investments.
 
  •  At least 95% of our gross income (excluding gross income from certain sales of property held primarily for sale) must be directly or indirectly derived each taxable year from any of the sources qualifying for the 75% gross income test and from dividends (including dividends from taxable REIT subsidiaries) and interest.
 
For taxable years beginning on or before October 22, 2004, (1) payments to us under an interest rate swap or cap agreement, option, futures contract, forward rate agreement or any similar financial instrument entered into by us to reduce interest rate risk on indebtedness incurred or to be incurred and (2) gain from the sale or other disposition of any such investment are treated as income qualifying under the 95% gross income test. As to transactions entered into in taxable years beginning after October 22, 2004, any of our income from a “clearly identified” hedging transaction that is entered into by us in the normal course of business, directly or indirectly, to manage the risk of interest rate movements, price changes or currency fluctuations with respect to borrowings or obligations incurred or to be incurred by us, or such other risks that are prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service, is excluded from the 95% gross income test. In general, a hedging transaction is “clearly identified” if (1) the transaction is identified as a hedging transaction before the end of the day on which it is entered into and (2) the items or risks being hedged are identified “substantially contemporaneously” with the hedging transaction. An identification is not substantially contemporaneous if it is made more than 35 days after entering into the hedging transaction.


15


Table of Contents

 
Rents received by us will qualify as “rents from real property” for purposes of satisfying the gross income tests for a REIT only if several conditions are met:
 
  •  The amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person, although rents generally will not be excluded merely because they are based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or sales.
 
  •  Rents received from a tenant will not qualify as rents from real property if the REIT, or an owner of 10% or more of the REIT, also directly or constructively owns 10% or more of the tenant, unless the tenant is our taxable REIT subsidiary and certain other requirements are met with respect to the real property being rented.
 
  •  If rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property is greater than 15% of the total rent received under the lease, then the portion of rent attributable to such personal property will not qualify as “rents from real property.”
 
  •  For rents to qualify as rents from real property, we generally must not furnish or render services to tenants, other than through a taxable REIT subsidiary or an “independent contractor” from whom we derive no income, except that we may directly provide services that are “usually or customarily rendered” in the geographic area in which the property is located in connection with the rental of real property for occupancy only, or are not otherwise considered “rendered to the occupant for his convenience.”
 
For taxable years beginning after August 5, 1997, a REIT has been permitted to render a de minimis amount of impermissible services to tenants and still treat amounts received with respect to that property as rent from real property. The amount received or accrued by the REIT during the taxable year for the impermissible services with respect to a property may not exceed 1% of all amounts received or accrued by the REIT directly or indirectly from the property. The amount received for any service or management operation for this purpose shall be deemed to be not less than 150% of the direct cost of the REIT in furnishing or rendering the service or providing the management or operation. Furthermore, impermissible services may be furnished to tenants by a taxable REIT subsidiary subject to certain conditions, and we may still treat rents received with respect to the property as rent from real property.
 
The term “interest” generally does not include any amount if the determination of the amount depends in whole or in part on the income or profits of any person, although an amount generally will not be excluded from the term “interest” solely by reason of being based on a fixed percentage of receipts or sales.
 
If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for such year if we are eligible for relief. For taxable years beginning on or before October 22, 2004, these relief provisions generally will be available if (1) our failure to meet such tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect; (2) we attach a schedule of the sources of our income to our return; and (3) any incorrect information on the schedule was not due to fraud with intent to evade tax. For taxable years beginning after October 22, 2004, these relief provisions generally will be available if (1) following our identification of the failure, we file a schedule for such taxable year describing each item of our gross income and (2) the failure to meet such tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
 
It is not now possible to determine the circumstances under which we may be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions. If these relief provisions apply, a 100% tax is imposed on an amount equal to (a) the gross income attributable to (1) 75% of our gross income over the amount of qualifying gross income for purposes of the 75% income test and (2) 95% of our gross income (90% of our gross income for taxable years beginning on or before October 22, 2004) over the amount of qualifying gross income for purposes of the 95% income test, multiplied by (b) a fraction intended to reflect our profitability.
 
Asset Tests.  Within 30 days after the close of each quarter of our taxable year, we must also satisfy several tests relating to the nature and diversification of our assets determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. At least 75% of the value of our total assets must be represented by real estate assets, cash, cash items (including receivables arising in the ordinary course of our operation), government securities and qualified temporary investments. Although the remaining 25% of our assets generally may be invested without restriction, we are prohibited from owning securities representing more than 10% of either the vote (the “10% vote


16


Table of Contents

test”) or value (the “10% value test”) of the outstanding securities of any issuer other than a qualified REIT subsidiary, another REIT or a taxable REIT subsidiary. Further, no more than 20% of the total assets may be represented by securities of one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries (the “20% asset test”) and no more than 5% of the value of our total assets may be represented by securities of any non-governmental issuer other than a qualified REIT subsidiary (the “5% asset test”), another REIT or a taxable REIT subsidiary. Each of the 10% vote test, the 10% value test and the 20% and 5% asset tests must be satisfied at the end of each quarter. There are special rules which provide relief if the value related tests are not satisfied due to changes in the value of the assets of a REIT.
 
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, certain items are excluded from the 10% value test, including (1) straight debt securities of an issuer (including straight debt that provides certain contingent payments); (2) any loan to an individual or an estate; (3) any rental agreement described in Section 467 of the Internal Revenue Code, other than with a “related person”; (4) any obligation to pay rents from real property; (5) certain securities issued by a state or any subdivision thereof, the District of Columbia, a foreign government, or any political subdivision thereof, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; (6) any security issued by a REIT; and (7) any other arrangement that, as determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, is excepted from the definition of security (“excluded securities”). Special rules apply to straight debt securities issued by corporations and entities taxable as partnerships for federal income tax purposes. If a REIT, or its taxable REIT subsidiary, holds (1) straight debt securities of a corporate or partnership issuer and (2) securities of such issuer that are not excluded securities and have an aggregate value greater than 1% of such issuer’s outstanding securities, the straight debt securities will be included in the 10% value test.
 
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, a REIT’s interest as a partner in a partnership is not treated as a security for purposes of applying the 10% value test to securities issued by the partnership. Further, any debt instrument issued by a partnership will not be a security for purposes of applying the 10% value test (1) to the extent of the REIT’s interest as a partner in the partnership and (2) if at least 75% of the partnership’s gross income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions) would qualify for the 75% gross income test. For taxable years beginning after October 22, 2004, for purposes of the 10% value test, a REIT’s interest in a partnership’s assets is the REIT’s proportionate interest in any securities issued by the partnership (other than the excluded securities described in the preceding paragraph).
 
With respect to corrections of failures for which the requirements for corrections are satisfied after October 22, 2004, regardless of whether such failures occurred in taxable years beginning on, before or after such date, as to violations of the 10% vote test, the 10% value test or the 5% asset test, a REIT may avoid disqualification as a REIT by disposing of sufficient assets to cure a violation that does not exceed the lesser of 1% of the REIT’s assets at the end of the relevant quarter or $10,000,000, provided that the disposition occurs within six months following the last day of the quarter in which the REIT first identified the assets. For violations of any of the REIT asset tests due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect that exceed the thresholds described in the preceding sentence, a REIT can avoid disqualification as a REIT after the close of a taxable quarter by taking certain steps, including disposition of sufficient assets within the six month period described above to meet the applicable asset test, paying a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the non-qualifying assets during the period of time that the assets were held as non-qualifying assets and filing a schedule with the Internal Revenue Service that describes the non-qualifying assets.
 
Investments in Taxable REIT Subsidiaries.  For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2000, REITs may own more than 10% of the voting power and value of securities in taxable REIT subsidiaries. We and any taxable corporate entity in which we own an interest are allowed to jointly elect to treat such entity as a “taxable REIT subsidiary.”
 
Several of our subsidiaries have elected to be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary. Taxable REIT subsidiaries are subject to full corporate level federal taxation on their earnings but are permitted to engage in certain types of activities that cannot be performed directly by REITs without jeopardizing their REIT status. Our taxable REIT subsidiaries will attempt to minimize the amount of these taxes, but there can be no assurance whether or the extent to which measures taken to minimize taxes will be successful. To the extent our taxable REIT subsidiaries are required to pay federal, state or local taxes, the cash available for distribution as dividends to us from our taxable REIT subsidiaries will be reduced.


17


Table of Contents

 
The amount of interest on related-party debt that a taxable REIT subsidiary may deduct is limited. Further, a 100% tax applies to any interest payments by a taxable REIT subsidiary to its affiliated REIT to the extent the interest rate is not commercially reasonable. A taxable REIT subsidiary is permitted to deduct interest payments to unrelated parties without any of these restrictions.
 
The Internal Revenue Service may reallocate costs between a REIT and its taxable REIT subsidiary where there is a lack of arm’s-length dealing between the parties. Any deductible expenses allocated away from a taxable REIT subsidiary would increase its tax liability. Further, any amount by which a REIT understates its deductions and overstates those of its taxable REIT subsidiary will, subject to certain exceptions, be subject to a 100% tax. Additional taxable REIT subsidiary elections may be made in the future for additional entities in which we own an interest.
 
Annual Distribution Requirements.  In order to avoid being taxed as a regular corporation, we are required to make distributions (other than capital gain distributions) to our stockholders which qualify for the dividends paid deduction in an amount at least equal to (1) the sum of (i) 90% of our “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and our net capital gain) and (ii) 90% of the after-tax net income, if any, from foreclosure property, minus (2) a portion of certain items of non-cash income. These distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our tax return for that year and if paid on or before the first regular distribution payment after such declaration. The amount distributed must not be preferential. This means that every stockholder of the class of stock to which a distribution is made must be treated the same as every other stockholder of that class, and no class of stock may be treated otherwise than in accordance with its dividend rights as a class. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain or distribute at least 90%, but less than 100%, of our “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, we will be subject to tax on the undistributed amount at regular corporate tax rates. Finally, as discussed above, we may be subject to an excise tax if we fail to meet certain other distribution requirements. We intend to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy these annual distribution requirements.
 
It is possible that, from time to time, we may not have sufficient cash or other liquid assets to meet the 90% distribution requirement, or to distribute such greater amount as may be necessary to avoid income and excise taxation, due to, among other things, (1) timing differences between (i) the actual receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses and (ii) the inclusion of income and deduction of expenses in arriving at our taxable income, or (2) the payment of severance benefits that may not be deductible to us. In the event that timing differences occur, we may find it necessary to arrange for borrowings or, if possible, pay dividends in the form of taxable stock dividends in order to meet the distribution requirement.
 
Under certain circumstances, in the event of a deficiency determined by the Internal Revenue Service, we may be able to rectify a resulting failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to stockholders in a later year, which may be included in our deduction for distributions paid for the earlier year. Thus, we may be able to avoid being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency distributions; however, we will be required to pay applicable penalties and interest based upon the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency distributions.
 
Failure to Qualify as a REIT
 
If we fail to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which we fail to qualify as a REIT will not be deductible nor will any particular amount of distributions be required to be made in any year. All distributions to stockholders will be taxable as ordinary income to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits allocable to these distributions and, subject to certain limitations, will be eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporate stockholders. Unless entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, we also will be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to statutory relief. Failure to qualify for even one year could result in our need to incur indebtedness or liquidate investments in order to pay potentially significant resulting tax liabilities.


18


Table of Contents

 
In addition to the relief described above under “— Income Tests” and ‘‘— Asset Tests,” relief is available in the event that we violate a provision of the Internal Revenue Code that would result in our failure to qualify as a REIT if (1) the violation is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, (2) we pay a penalty of $50,000 for each failure to satisfy the provision, and (3) the violation does not include a violation described under “— Income Tests” or “— Asset Tests” above. It is not now possible to determine the circumstances under which we may be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions.
 
Federal Income Taxation of Holders of Our Stock
 
Treatment of Taxable U.S. Stockholders.  The following summary applies to you only if you are a “U.S. stockholder.” A “U.S. stockholder” is a stockholder of shares of stock who, for United States federal income tax purposes, is:
 
  •  a citizen or resident of the United States;
 
  •  a corporation, partnership or other entity classified as a corporation or partnership for these purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision of the United States, including any state;
 
  •  an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
 
  •  a trust, if, in general, a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons, within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code, has the authority to control all of the trust’s substantial decisions.
 
So long as we qualify for taxation as a REIT, distributions on shares of our stock made out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits allocable to these distributions (and not designated as capital gain dividends) will be includable as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes. None of these distributions will be eligible for the dividends received deduction for U.S. corporate stockholders.
 
Generally, for taxable years ending after May 6, 2003 through December 31, 2008, the maximum marginal rate of tax payable by individuals on dividends received from corporations that are subject to a corporate level of tax is 15%. Except in limited circumstances, this tax rate will not apply to dividends paid to you by us on our shares, because generally we are not subject to federal income tax on the portion of our REIT taxable income or capital gains distributed to our stockholders. The reduced maximum federal income tax rate will apply to that portion, if any, of dividends received by you with respect to our shares that are attributable to: (1) dividends received by us from non-REIT corporations or other taxable REIT subsidiaries; (2) income from the prior year with respect to which we were required to pay federal corporate income tax during the prior year (if, for example, we did not distribute 100% of our REIT taxable income for the prior year); or (3) the amount of any earnings and profits that were distributed by us and accumulated in a non-REIT year.
 
Distributions that are designated as capital gain dividends will be taxed as long-term capital gains (to the extent they do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year), without regard to the period for which you held our stock. However, if you are a corporation, you may be required to treat a portion of some capital gain dividends as ordinary income.
 
If we elect to retain and pay income tax on any net long-term capital gain, you would include in income, as long-term capital gain, your proportionate share of this net long-term capital gain. You would also receive a refundable tax credit for your proportionate share of the tax paid by us on such retained capital gains and you would have an increase in the basis of your shares of our stock in an amount equal to your includable capital gains less your share of the tax deemed paid.
 
You may not include in your federal income tax return any of our net operating losses or capital losses. Federal income tax rules may also require that certain minimum tax adjustments and preferences be apportioned to you. In addition, any distribution declared by us in October, November or December of any year on a specified date in any such month shall be treated as both paid by us and received by you on December 31 of that year, provided that the distribution is actually paid by us no later than January 31 of the following year.


19


Table of Contents

 
We will be treated as having sufficient earnings and profits to treat as a dividend any distribution up to the amount required to be distributed in order to avoid imposition of the 4% excise tax discussed under “— General” and “— Qualification as a REIT — Annual Distribution Requirements” above. As a result, you may be required to treat as taxable dividends certain distributions that would otherwise result in a tax-free return of capital. Moreover, any “deficiency dividend” will be treated as a dividend (an ordinary dividend or a capital gain dividend, as the case may be), regardless of our earnings and profits. Any other distributions in excess of current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to you to the extent these distributions do not exceed the adjusted tax basis of your shares of our stock. You will be required to reduce the tax basis of your shares of our stock by the amount of these distributions until the basis has been reduced to zero, after which these distributions will be taxable as capital gain, if the shares of our stock are held as a capital asset. The tax basis as so reduced will be used in computing the capital gain or loss, if any, realized upon sale of the shares of our stock. Any loss upon a sale or exchange of shares of our stock which were held for six months or less (after application of certain holding period rules) will generally be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent you previously received capital gain distributions with respect to these shares of our stock.
 
Upon the sale or exchange of any shares of our stock to or with a person other than us or a sale or exchange of all shares of our stock (whether actually or constructively owned) with us, you will generally recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and your adjusted tax basis in these shares of our stock. This gain will be capital gain if you held these shares of our stock as a capital asset.
 
If we redeem any of your shares in us, the treatment can only be determined on the basis of particular facts at the time of redemption. In general, you will recognize gain or loss (as opposed to dividend income) equal to the difference between the amount received by you in the redemption and your adjusted tax basis in your shares redeemed if such redemption results in a “complete termination” of your interest in all classes of our equity securities, is a “substantially disproportionate redemption” or is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” with respect to you. In applying these tests, there must be taken into account your ownership of all classes of our equity securities (e.g., common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares and warrants). You also must take into account any equity securities that are considered to be constructively owned by you.
 
If, as a result of a redemption by us of your shares, you no longer own (either actually or constructively) any of our equity securities or only own (actually and constructively) an insubstantial percentage of our equity securities, then it is probable that the redemption of your shares would be considered “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” and, thus, would result in gain or loss to you. However, whether a distribution is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” depends on all of the facts and circumstances, and if you rely on any of these tests at the time of redemption, you should consult your tax advisor to determine their application to the particular situation.
 
Generally, if the redemption does not meet the tests described above, then the proceeds received by you from the redemption of your shares will be treated as a distribution taxable as a dividend to the extent of the allocable portion of current or accumulated earnings and profits. If the redemption is taxed as a dividend, your adjusted tax basis in the redeemed shares will be transferred to any other shareholdings in us that you own. If you own no other shareholdings in us, under certain circumstances, such basis may be transferred to a related person, or it may be lost entirely.
 
Gain from the sale or exchange of our shares held for more than one year is taxed at a maximum long-term capital gain rate, which is currently 15%. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service guidance, we may classify portions of our capital gain dividends as gains eligible for the long-term capital gains rate or as gain taxable to individual stockholders at a maximum rate of 25%.
 
Treatment of Tax-Exempt U.S. Stockholders.  Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts (“Exempt Organizations”), generally are exempt from federal income taxation. However, they are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”). The Internal Revenue Service has issued a published revenue ruling that dividend distributions from a REIT to an exempt employee pension trust do not constitute UBTI, provided that the shares of the REIT are not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business of the exempt employee pension trust. Based on this ruling, amounts distributed by us to Exempt Organizations generally should not constitute UBTI. However, if an Exempt Organization finances its acquisition of the shares of our stock with debt, a portion of its income from us will constitute UBTI pursuant to the


20


Table of Contents

“debt financed property” rules. Likewise, a portion of the Exempt Organization’s income from us would constitute UBTI if we held a residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit.
 
In addition, in certain circumstances, a pension trust that owns more than 10% of our stock is required to treat a percentage of our dividends as UBTI. This rule applies to a pension trust holding more than 10% of our stock only if (1) the percentage of our income that is UBTI (determined as if we were a pension trust) is at least 5%, (2) we qualify as a REIT by reason of the modification of the Five or Fewer Requirement that allows beneficiaries of the pension trust to be treated as holding shares in proportion to their actuarial interests in the pension trust, and (3) either (i) one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of our stock or (ii) a group of pension trusts individually holding more than 10% of the value of our stock collectively own more than 50% of the value of our stock.
 
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting.  Under certain circumstances, you may be subject to backup withholding at applicable rates on payments made with respect to, or cash proceeds of a sale or exchange of, shares of our stock. Backup withholding will apply only if you: (1) fail to provide a correct taxpayer identification number, which if you are an individual, is ordinarily your social security number; (2) furnish an incorrect taxpayer identification number; (3) are notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you have failed to properly report payments of interest or dividends; or (4) fail to certify, under penalties of perjury, that you have furnished a correct taxpayer identification number and that the Internal Revenue Service has not notified you that you are subject to backup withholding.
 
Backup withholding will not apply with respect to payments made to certain exempt recipients, such as corporations and tax-exempt organizations. You should consult with a tax advisor regarding qualification for exemption from backup withholding, and the procedure for obtaining an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding with respect to payment to a stockholder will be allowed as a credit against such stockholder’s United States federal income tax liability and may entitle such stockholder to a refund, provided that the required information is provided to the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, withholding a portion of capital gain distributions made to stockholders may be required for stockholders who fail to certify their non-foreign status.
 
Taxation of Foreign Stockholders.  The following summary applies to you only if you are a foreign person. The federal taxation of foreign persons is a highly complex matter that may be affected by many considerations.
 
Except as discussed below, distributions to you of cash generated by our real estate operations in the form of ordinary dividends, but not by the sale or exchange of our capital assets, generally will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30%, unless an applicable tax treaty reduces that tax and you file with us the required form evidencing the lower rate.
 
In general, you will be subject to United States federal income tax on a graduated rate basis rather than withholding with respect to your investment in our stock if such investment is “effectively connected” with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. A corporate foreign stockholder that receives income that is, or is treated as, effectively connected with a United States trade or business may also be subject to the branch profits tax, which is payable in addition to regular United States corporate income tax. The following discussion will apply to foreign stockholders whose investment in us is not so effectively connected. We expect to withhold United States income tax, as described below, on the gross amount of any distributions paid to you unless (1) you file an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI with us claiming that the distribution is “effectively connected” or (2) certain other exceptions apply.
 
Distributions by us that are attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest will be taxed to you under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”) as if these distributions were gains “effectively connected” with a United States trade or business. Accordingly, you will be taxed at the normal capital gain rates applicable to a U.S. stockholder on these amounts, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals. Distributions subject to FIRPTA may also be subject to a branch profits tax in the hands of a corporate foreign stockholder that is not entitled to treaty exemption.


21


Table of Contents

 
We will be required to withhold from distributions subject to FIRPTA, and remit to the Internal Revenue Service, 35% of designated capital gain dividends, or, if greater, 35% of the amount of any distributions that could be designated as capital gain dividends. In addition, if we designate prior distributions as capital gain dividends, subsequent distributions, up to the amount of the prior distributions not withheld against, will be treated as capital gain dividends for purposes of withholding.
 
For taxable years beginning after October 22, 2004, any capital gain dividend with respect to any class of stock that is “regularly traded” on an established securities market will be treated as an ordinary dividend if the foreign stockholder did not own more than 5% of such class of stock at any time during the taxable year. Once this provision takes effect, foreign stockholders generally will not be required to report distributions received from us on U.S. federal income tax returns and all distributions treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes including any capital gain dividend will be subject to a 30% U.S. withholding tax (unless reduced under an applicable income tax treaty) as discussed above. In addition, the branch profits tax will no longer apply to such distributions.
 
Unless our shares constitute a “United States real property interest” within the meaning of FIRPTA or are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, a sale of our shares by you generally will not be subject to United States taxation. Our shares will not constitute a United States real property interest if we qualify as a “domestically controlled REIT.” We do, and expect to continue to, qualify as a domestically controlled REIT. A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which at all times during a specified testing period less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by foreign stockholders. However, if you are a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and certain other conditions apply, you will be subject to a 30% tax on such capital gains. In any event, a purchaser of our shares from you will not be required under FIRPTA to withhold on the purchase price if the purchased shares are “regularly traded” on an established securities market or if we are a domestically controlled REIT. Otherwise, under FIRPTA, the purchaser may be required to withhold 10% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the Internal Revenue Service.
 
Backup withholding tax and information reporting will generally not apply to distributions paid to you outside the United States that are treated as (1) dividends to which the 30% or lower treaty rate withholding tax discussed above applies; (2) capital gains dividends; or (3) distributions attributable to gain from the sale or exchange by us of U.S. real property interests. Payment of the proceeds of a sale of stock within the United States or conducted through certain U.S. related financial intermediaries is subject to both backup withholding and information reporting unless the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that he or she is not a U.S. person (and the payor does not have actual knowledge that the beneficial owner is a U.S. person) or otherwise established an exemption. You may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by filing the appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
 
U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Holders of Depositary Shares
 
Owners of our depositary shares will be treated as if you were owners of the series of preferred stock represented by the depositary shares. Thus, you will be required to take into account the income and deductions to which you would be entitled if you were a holder of the underlying series of preferred stock.
 
Conversion or Exchange of Shares for Preferred Stock.  No gain or loss will be recognized upon the withdrawal of preferred stock in exchange for depositary shares and the tax basis of each share of preferred stock will, upon exchange, be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the depositary shares exchanged. If you held your depositary shares as a capital asset at the time of the exchange for shares of preferred stock, the holding period for your shares of preferred stock will include the period during which you owned the depositary shares.
 
U.S. Federal Income and Estate Taxation of Holders of Our Debt Securities
 
The following is a general summary of the United States federal income tax consequences and, in the case that you are a holder that is a non-U.S. holder, as defined below, the United States federal estate tax consequences, of purchasing, owning and disposing of debt securities periodically offered under one or more indentures, the forms of which have been filed as exhibits to this registration statement (the “notes”). This summary assumes that you hold the notes as capital assets. This summary applies to you only if you are the initial holder of the notes and you acquire


22


Table of Contents

the notes for a price equal to the issue price of the notes. The issue price of the notes is the first price at which a substantial amount of the notes is sold other than to bond houses, brokers or similar persons or organizations acting in the capacity of underwriters, placement agents or wholesalers. In addition, this summary does not consider any foreign, state, local or other tax laws that may be applicable to us or a purchaser of the notes.
 
U.S. Holders
 
The following summary applies to you only if you are a U.S. holder, as defined below.
 
Definition of a U.S. Holder.  A “U.S. holder” is a beneficial owner of a note or notes that is for United States federal income tax purposes:
 
  •  a citizen or resident of the United States;
 
  •  a corporation or partnership, or other entity classified as a corporation or partnership for these purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision of the United States, including any state;
 
  •  an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
 
  •  a trust, if, in general, a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more U.S. persons, within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code, has the authority to control all of the trust’s substantial decisions.
 
Payments of Interest.  Stated interest on the notes generally will be taxed as ordinary interest income from domestic sources at the time it is paid or accrues in accordance with your method of accounting for tax purposes.
 
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Notes.  The adjusted tax basis in your note acquired at a premium will generally be your cost. You generally will recognize taxable gain or loss when you sell or otherwise dispose of your notes equal to the difference, if any, between:
 
  •  the amount realized on the sale or other disposition, less any amount attributable to any accrued interest, which will be taxable in the manner described under “— Payments of Interest” above; and
 
  •  your adjusted tax basis in the notes.
 
Your gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss. This capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if at the time of the sale or other disposition you have held the notes for more than one year. Subject to limited exceptions, your capital losses cannot be used to offset your ordinary income.
 
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting.  In general, “backup withholding” may apply to any payments made to you of principal and interest on your note, and to payment of the proceeds of a sale or other disposition of your note before maturity, if you are a non-corporate U.S. holder and (1) fail to provide a correct taxpayer identification number, which if you are an individual, is ordinarily your social security number; (2) furnish an incorrect taxpayer identification number; (3) are notified by the Internal Revenue Service that you have failed to properly report payments of interest or dividends; or (4) fail to certify, under penalties of perjury, that you have furnished a correct taxpayer identification number and that the Internal Revenue Service has not notified you that you are subject to backup withholding.
 
The amount of any reportable payments, including interest, made to you (unless you are an exempt recipient) and the amount of tax withheld, if any, with respect to such payments will be reported to you and to the Internal Revenue Service for each calendar year. You should consult your tax advisor regarding your qualification for an exemption from backup withholding and the procedures for obtaining such an exemption, if applicable. The backup withholding tax is not an additional tax and will be credited against your U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that correct information is provided to the Internal Revenue Service.
 
Non-U.S. Holders
 
The following summary applies to you if you are a beneficial owner of a note and are not a U.S. holder, as defined above (a “non-U.S. holder”).


23


Table of Contents

 
Special rules may apply to certain non-U.S. holders such as “controlled foreign corporations,” “passive foreign investment companies” and “foreign personal holding companies.” Such entities are encouraged to consult their tax advisors to determine the United States federal, state, local and other tax consequences that may be relevant to them.
 
U.S. Federal Withholding Tax.  Subject to the discussion below, U.S. federal withholding tax will not apply to payments by us or our paying agent, in its capacity as such, of principal and interest on your notes under the “portfolio interest” exception of the Internal Revenue Code, provided that:
 
  •  you do not, directly or indirectly, actually or constructively, own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of our stock entitled to vote;
 
  •  you are not (1) a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes that is related, directly or indirectly, to us through sufficient stock ownership, as provided in the Internal Revenue Code, or (2) a bank receiving interest described in Section 881(c)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code;
 
  •  such interest is not effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business; and
 
  •  you provide a signed written statement, under penalties of perjury, which can reliably be related to you, certifying that you are not a U.S. person within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code and providing your name and address to:
 
  •  us or our paying agent; or
 
  •  a securities clearing organization, bank or other financial institution that holds customers’ securities in the ordinary course of its trade or business and holds your notes on your behalf and that certifies to us or our paying agent under penalties of perjury that it, or the bank or financial institution between it and you, has received from you your signed, written statement and provides us or our paying agent with a copy of such statement.
 
Treasury regulations provide that:
 
  •  if you are a foreign partnership, the certification requirement will generally apply to your partners, and you will be required to provide certain information;
 
  •  if you are a foreign trust, the certification requirement will generally be applied to you or your beneficial owners depending on whether you are a “foreign complex trust,” “foreign simple trust,” or “foreign grantor trust” as defined in the Treasury regulations; and
 
  •  look-through rules will apply for tiered partnerships, foreign simple trusts and foreign grantor trusts.
 
If you are a foreign partnership or a foreign trust, you should consult your own tax advisor regarding your status under these Treasury regulations and the certification requirements applicable to you.
 
If you cannot satisfy the portfolio interest requirements described above, payments of interest will be subject to the 30% United States withholding tax, unless you provide us with a properly executed (1) Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN claiming an exemption from or reduction in withholding under the benefit of an applicable treaty or (2) Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI stating that interest paid on the note is not subject to withholding tax because it is effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States. Alternative documentation may be applicable in certain circumstances.
 
If you are engaged in a trade or business in the United States and interest on a note is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business, you will be required to pay United States federal income tax on that interest on a net income basis (although you will be exempt from the 30% withholding tax provided the certification requirement described above is met) in the same manner as if you were a U.S. person, except as otherwise provided by an applicable tax treaty. If you are a foreign corporation, you may be required to pay a branch profits tax on the earnings and profits that are effectively connected to the conduct of your trade or business in the United States.
 
Sale, Exchange or other Disposition of Notes.  You generally will not have to pay U.S. federal income tax on any gain or income realized from the sale, redemption, retirement at maturity or other disposition of your notes, unless:


24


Table of Contents

  •  in the case of gain, you are an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of the sale or other disposition of your notes, and specific other conditions are met;
 
  •  you are subject to tax provisions applicable to certain United States expatriates; or
 
  •  the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business.
 
If you are engaged in a trade or business in the United States and gain with respect to your notes is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business, you generally will be subject to U.S. income tax on a net basis on the gain. In addition, if you are a foreign corporation, you may be subject to a branch profits tax on your effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year, as adjusted for certain items.
 
U.S. Federal Estate Tax.  If you are an individual and are not a U.S. citizen or a resident of the United States, as specially defined for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, at the time of your death, your notes will generally not be subject to the U.S. federal estate tax, unless, at the time of your death (1) you owned actually or constructively 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all our classes of stock entitled to vote or (2) interest on the notes is effectively connected with your conduct of a U.S. trade or business.
 
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting.  Backup withholding will not apply to payments of principal or interest made by us or our paying agent, in its capacity as such, to you if you have provided the required certification that you are a non-U.S. holder as described in “— U.S. Federal Withholding Tax” above, and provided that neither we nor our paying agent have actual knowledge that you are a U.S. holder, as described in “— U.S. Holders” above. We or our paying agent may, however, report payments of interest on the notes.
 
The gross proceeds from the disposition of your notes may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax. If you sell your notes outside the United States through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker and the sales proceeds are paid to you outside the United States, then the U.S. backup withholding and information reporting requirements generally will not apply to that payment. However, U.S. information reporting, but not backup withholding, will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even if that payment is made outside the United States, if you sell your notes through a non-U.S. office of a broker that:
 
  •  is a U.S. person, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code;
 
  •  derives 50% or more of its gross income in specific periods from the conduct of a trade or business in the United States;
 
  •  is a “controlled foreign corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes; or
 
  •  is a foreign partnership, if at any time during its tax year, one or more of its partners are U.S. persons who in the aggregate hold more than 50% of the income or capital interests in the partnership, or the foreign partnership is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that you are a non-U.S. person and certain other conditions are met or you otherwise establish an exemption. If you receive payments of the proceeds of a sale of your notes to or through a U.S. office of a broker, the payment is subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information reporting unless you provide a Form W-8BEN certifying that you are a non-U.S. person or you otherwise establish an exemption.
 
You should consult your own tax advisor regarding application of backup withholding in your particular circumstance and the availability of and procedure for obtaining an exemption from backup withholding. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to you will be allowed as a refund or credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
 
U.S. Federal Income and Estate Taxation of Holders of Our Warrants
 
Exercise of Warrants.  You will not generally recognize gain or loss upon the exercise of a warrant. Your basis in the debt securities, preferred stock, depositary shares or common stock, as the case may be, received upon the exercise of the warrant will be equal to the sum of your adjusted tax basis in the warrant and the exercise price paid. Your holding period in the debt securities, preferred stock, depositary shares or common stock, as the case may be, received upon the exercise of the warrant will not include the period during which the warrant was held by you.


25


Table of Contents

 
Expiration of Warrants.  Upon the expiration of a warrant, you will recognize a capital loss in an amount equal to your adjusted tax basis in the warrant.
 
Sale or Exchange of Warrants.  Upon the sale or exchange of a warrant to a person other than us, you will recognize gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the sale or exchange and your adjusted tax basis in the warrant. Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the warrant was held for more than one year. Upon the sale of the warrant to us, the Internal Revenue Service may argue that you should recognize ordinary income on the sale. You are advised to consult your own tax advisors as to the consequences of a sale of a warrant to us.
 
Potential Legislation or Other Actions Affecting Tax Consequences
 
Current and prospective securities holders should recognize that the present federal income tax treatment of an investment in us may be modified by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time and that any such action may affect investments and commitments previously made. The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department, resulting in revisions of regulations and revised interpretations of established concepts as well as statutory changes. Revisions in federal tax laws and interpretations of these laws could adversely affect the tax consequences of an investment in us.
 
Internet Access to Our SEC Filings
 
Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as well as our proxy statements and other materials that are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission are made available, free of charge, on our Web site at www.hcreit.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
 
Item 1A.   Risk Factors
 
Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors
 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference contain statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those regarding:
 
  •  the possible expansion of our portfolio;
 
  •  the sale of properties;
 
  •  the performance of our operators/tenants and properties;
 
  •  our ability to enter into agreements with new viable tenants for properties that we take back from financially troubled tenants, if any;
 
  •  our ability to retain or increase occupancies in our medical office buildings at similar or higher rates;
 
  •  our ability to make distributions to stockholders;
 
  •  our policies and plans regarding investments, financings and other matters;
 
  •  our tax status as a real estate investment trust;
 
  •  our ability to appropriately balance the use of debt and equity;
 
  •  our ability to access capital markets or other sources of funds; and
 
  •  our ability to meet our earnings guidance.
 
When we use words such as “may,” “will,” “intend,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of


26


Table of Contents

future performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Our expected results may not be achieved, and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. This may be a result of various factors, including, but not limited to:
 
  •  the status of the economy;
 
  •  the status of capital markets, including prevailing interest rates;
 
  •  issues facing the health care industry, including compliance with, and changes to, regulations and payment policies and operators’/tenants’ difficulty in cost-effectively obtaining and maintaining adequate liability and other insurance;
 
  •  changes in financing terms;
 
  •  competition within the health care and senior housing industries;
 
  •  negative developments in the operating results or financial condition of operators, including, but not limited to, their ability to pay rent and repay loans;
 
  •  our ability to transition or sell facilities with profitable results;
 
  •  the failure to make new investments as and when anticipated;
 
  •  the failure of closings to occur as and when anticipated;
 
  •  acts of God affecting our properties;
 
  •  our ability to re-lease space at similar rates as vacancies occur;
 
  •  our ability to timely reinvest sale proceeds at similar rates to assets sold;
 
  •  operator bankruptcies or insolvencies;
 
  •  government regulations affecting Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates;
 
  •  liability or contract claims by or against operators;
 
  •  unanticipated difficulties and/or expenditures relating to future acquisitions;
 
  •  environmental laws affecting our properties;
 
  •  changes in rules or practices governing our financial reporting;
 
  •  other legal and operational factors, including REIT qualification and key management personnel recruitment and retention; and
 
  •  the risks described below:
 
Risk factors related to our operators’ revenues and expenses
 
Our investment property operators’ revenues are primarily driven by occupancy, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, if applicable, and private pay rates. Expenses for these facilities are primarily driven by the costs of labor, food, utilities, taxes, insurance and rent or debt service. Revenues from government reimbursement have, and may continue to, come under pressure due to reimbursement cuts and state budget shortfalls. Liability insurance and staffing costs continue to increase for our operators. To the extent that any decrease in revenues and/or any increase in operating expenses result in a property not generating enough cash to make payments to us, the credit of our operator and the value of other collateral would have to be relied upon.
 
Risk factors related to obligor bankruptcies
 
We are exposed to the risk that our obligors may not be able to meet the rent, principal and interest or other payments due us, which may result in an obligor bankruptcy or insolvency, or that an obligor might become subject to bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings for other reasons. Although our operating lease agreements provide us with the right to evict a tenant, demand immediate payment of rent and exercise other remedies, and our loans


27


Table of Contents

provide us with the right to terminate any funding obligation, demand immediate repayment of principal and unpaid interest, foreclose on the collateral and exercise other remedies, the bankruptcy and insolvency laws afford certain rights to a party that has filed for bankruptcy or reorganization. An obligor in bankruptcy or subject to insolvency proceedings may be able to limit or delay our ability to collect unpaid rent in the case of a lease or to receive unpaid principal and interest in the case of a loan, and to exercise other rights and remedies.
 
We may be required to fund certain expenses (e.g., real estate taxes and maintenance) to preserve the value of an investment property, avoid the imposition of liens on a property and/or transition a property to a new tenant. In some instances, we have terminated our lease with a tenant and relet the property to another tenant. In some of those situations, we have provided working capital loans to and limited indemnification of the new obligor. If we cannot transition a leased property to a new tenant, we may take possession of that property, which may expose us to certain successor liabilities. Should such events occur, our revenue and operating cash flow may be adversely affected.
 
Transfers of health care facilities may require regulatory approvals and these facilities may not have efficient alternative uses
 
Transfers of health care facilities to successor operators may be subject to regulatory approvals that are not required for transfers of other types of real estate. The replacement of an operator could be delayed by the approval process of any federal, state or local agency necessary for the transfer of the facility or the replacement of the operator licensed to manage the facility. Alternatively, given the specialized nature of our facilities, we may be required to spend substantial time and funds to adapt these properties to other uses. If we are unable to timely transfer properties to successor operators or find efficient alternative uses, our revenue and operations may be adversely affected.
 
Risk factors related to government regulations
 
Our obligors’ businesses are affected by government reimbursement and private payor rates. To the extent that an operator/tenant receives a significant portion of its revenues from governmental payors, primarily Medicare and Medicaid, such revenues may be subject to statutory and regulatory changes, retroactive rate adjustments, recovery of program overpayments or set-offs, administrative rulings, policy interpretations, payment or other delays by fiscal intermediaries, government funding restrictions (at a program level or with respect to specific facilities) and interruption or delays in payments due to any ongoing governmental investigations and audits at such property. In recent years, governmental payors have frozen or reduced payments to health care providers due to budgetary pressures. Health care reimbursement will likely continue to be of paramount importance to federal and state authorities. We cannot make any assessment as to the ultimate timing or effect any future legislative reforms may have on the financial condition of our obligors and properties. There can be no assurance that adequate reimbursement levels will continue to be available for services provided by any property operator, whether the property receives reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid or private payors. Significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees could have a material adverse effect on an obligor’s liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, which could adversely affect the ability of an obligor to meet its obligations to us. See “Item 1 — Business — Certain Government Regulations — Reimbursement” above.
 
Our operators and tenants generally are subject to extensive federal, state and local licensure, certification and inspection laws and regulations. Our operators’ or tenants’ failure to comply with any of these laws could result in loss of accreditation, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines, suspension or decertification from federal and state health care programs, loss of license or closure of the facility. Such actions may have an effect on our operators’ or tenants’ ability to make lease payments to us and, therefore, adversely impact us.
 
Many of our medical properties may require a license and/or certificate of need to operate. Failure to obtain a license or certificate of need, or loss of a required license or certificate of need would prevent a facility from operating in the manner intended by the operators or tenants. These events could materially adversely affect our operators’ or tenants’ ability to make rent payments to us. State and local laws also may regulate expansion, including the addition of new beds or services or acquisition of medical equipment, and the construction of health care facilities, by requiring a certificate of need or other similar approval.


28


Table of Contents

 
Risk factors related to liability claims and insurance costs
 
Long-term care property operators (skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, and independent living/continuing care retirement communities) have experienced substantial increases in both the number and size of patient care liability claims in recent years, particularly in the states of Texas and Florida. As a result, general and professional liability costs have increased and may continue to increase. Long-term care liability insurance rates are increasing nationwide because of large jury awards. Over the past four years, both Texas and Florida have adopted skilled nursing property liability laws that modify or limit tort damages. Despite some of these reforms, the long-term care industry overall continues to experience very high general and professional liability costs. Insurance companies have responded to this claims crisis by severely restricting their capacity to write long-term care general and professional liability policies. No assurances can be given that the climate for long-term care general and professional liability insurance will improve in any of the foregoing states or any other states where the property operators conduct business. Insurance companies may continue to reduce or stop writing general and professional liability policies for long-term care facilities. Thus, general and professional liability insurance coverage may be restricted or very costly, which may adversely affect the property operators’ future operations, cash flows and financial condition, and may have a material adverse effect on the property operators’ ability to meet their obligations to us.
 
Risk factors related to acquisitions
 
We are exposed to the risk that our future acquisitions may not prove to be successful. We could encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties, including contingent liabilities, and newly acquired properties might require significant management attention that would otherwise be devoted to our ongoing business. If we agree to provide construction funding to an operator/tenant and the project is not completed, we may need to take steps to ensure completion of the project. Moreover, if we issue equity securities or incur additional debt, or both, to finance future acquisitions, it may reduce our per share financial results. These costs may negatively affect our results of operations.
 
Risk factors related to environmental laws
 
Under various federal and state laws, owners or operators of real estate may be required to respond to the presence or release of hazardous substances on the property and may be held liable for property damage, personal injuries or penalties that result from environmental contamination or exposure to hazardous substances. We may become liable to reimburse the government for damages and costs it incurs in connection with the contamination. Generally, such liability attaches to a person based on the person’s relationship to the property. Our tenants or borrowers are primarily responsible for the condition of the property. Moreover, we review environmental site assessments of the properties that we own or encumber prior to taking an interest in them. Those assessments are designed to meet the “all appropriate inquiry” standard, which we believe qualifies us for the innocent purchaser defense if environmental liabilities arise. Based upon such assessments, we do not believe that any of our properties are subject to material environmental contamination. However, environmental liabilities may be present in our properties and we may incur costs to remediate contamination, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition or the business or financial condition of our obligors.
 
Risk factors related to facilities that require entrance fees
 
Certain of our senior housing facilities require the payment of an upfront entrance fee by the resident, a portion of which may be refundable by the operator. Some of these facilities are subject to substantial oversight by state regulators. As a result of this oversight, residents of these facilities may have a variety of rights, including, for example, the right to cancel their contracts within a specified period of time and certain lien rights. The oversight and rights of residents within these facilities may have an effect on the revenue or operations of the operators of such facilities and therefore may negatively impact us.


29


Table of Contents

 
Risk factors related to facilities under construction or development
 
At any given time, we may be in the process of constructing one or more new facilities that ultimately will require a license before they can be utilized by the operator for their intended use. The operator also will need to obtain Medicare and Medicaid provider agreements or third party payor contracts. In the event that the operator is unable to obtain the necessary licensure, provider agreements on contracts after the completion of construction, there is a risk that we will not be able to earn any revenues on the facility until either the initial operator obtains a license to operate the new facility and the necessary provider agreements or contracts or we can find and contract with a new operator that is able to obtain a license to operate the facility for its intended use and the necessary provider agreements or contracts.
 
In connection with our renovation, redevelopment, development and related construction activities, we may be unable to obtain, or suffer delays in obtaining, necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy and other required governmental permits and authorizations. These factors could result in increased costs or our abandonment of these projects. In addition, we may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, which may render us unable to proceed with our development activities, and we may not be able to complete construction and lease-up of a property on schedule, which could result in increased debt service expense or construction costs.
 
Additionally, the time frame required for development, construction and lease-up of these properties means that we may have to wait years for significant cash returns. Because we are required to make cash distributions to our stockholders, if the cash flow from operations or refinancing is not sufficient, we may be forced to borrow additional money to fund such distributions. Newly developed and acquired properties may not produce the cash flow that we expect, which could adversely affect our overall financial performance.
 
In deciding whether to acquire or develop a particular property, we make assumptions regarding the expected future performance of that property. In particular, we estimate the return on our investment based on expected occupancy and rental rates. If our financial projections with respect to a new property are inaccurate, and the property is unable to achieve the expected occupancy and rental rates, it may fail to perform as we expected in analyzing our investment. Our estimate of the costs of repositioning or redeveloping an acquired property may prove to be inaccurate, which may result in our failure to meet our profitability goals. Additionally, we may acquire new properties not fully leased, and the cash flow from existing operations may be insufficient to pay the operating expenses and debt service associated with that property.
 
We do not know if our tenants will renew their existing leases, and if they do not, we may be unable to lease the properties on as favorable terms, or at all
 
We cannot predict whether our tenants will renew existing leases at the end of their lease terms, which expire at various times through 2021. If these leases are not renewed, we would be required to find other tenants to occupy those properties. There can be no assurance that we would be able to identify suitable replacement tenants or enter into leases with new tenants on terms as favorable to us as the current leases or that we would be able to lease those properties at all.
 
Our ownership of properties through ground leases exposes us to the loss of such properties upon breach or termination of the ground leases
 
We have acquired an interest in certain of our properties by acquiring a leasehold interest in the property on which the building is located, and we may acquire additional properties in the future through the purchase of interests in ground leases. As the lessee under a ground lease, we are exposed to the possibility of losing the property upon termination of the ground lease or an earlier breach of the ground lease by us.


30


Table of Contents

 
Illiquidity of real estate investments could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties
 
Real estate investments are relatively illiquid. Our ability to quickly sell or exchange any of our properties in response to changes in economic and other conditions will be limited. No assurances can be given that we will recognize full value for any property that we are required to sell for liquidity reasons. Our inability to respond rapidly to changes in the performance of our investments could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
 
Risk factors related to reinvestment of sale proceeds
 
From time to time, we will have cash available from (1) the proceeds of sales of our securities, (2) principal payments on our loans receivable and (3) the sale of properties, including non-elective dispositions, under the terms of master leases or similar financial support arrangements. We must re-invest these proceeds, on a timely basis, in properties or in qualified short-term investments. We compete for real estate investments with a broad variety of potential investors. This competition for attractive investments may negatively affect our ability to make timely investments on terms acceptable to us. Delays in acquiring properties may negatively impact revenues and perhaps our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
 
Failure to properly manage our rapid growth could distract our management or increase our expenses
 
We have experienced rapid growth and development in a relatively short period of time and expect to continue this rapid growth in the future. Our rapid growth has resulted in increased levels of responsibility for our management. Future property acquisitions could place significant additional demands on, and require us to expand, our management, resources and personnel. Our failure to manage any such rapid growth effectively could harm our business and, in particular, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, which could negatively affect our ability to make distributions to stockholders. Our rapid growth could also increase our capital requirements, which may require us to issue potentially dilutive equity securities and incur additional debt.
 
Other risk factors
 
We are also subject to a number of other risks. First, we might fail to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. We intend to operate as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and believe we have and will continue to operate in such a manner. Since REIT qualification requires us to meet a number of complex requirements, it is possible that we may fail to fulfill them, and if we do, our earnings will be reduced by the amount of federal taxes owed. A reduction in our earnings would affect the amount we could distribute to our stockholders. Also, if we were not a REIT, we would not be required to make distributions to stockholders since a non-REIT is not required to pay dividends to stockholders amounting to at least the sum of (1) 85% of our REIT ordinary income for such year (other than capital gain that we elect to retain and pay tax on) and (2) any undistributed taxable income from preceding periods. See “Item 1 — Business — Taxation” for a discussion of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that apply to us and the effects of non-qualification.
 
Second, our Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-Laws contain anti-takeover provisions (staggered board provisions, restrictions on share ownership and transfer and super majority stockholder approval requirements for business combinations) that could make it more difficult for or even prevent a third party from acquiring us without the approval of our incumbent Board of Directors. Provisions and agreements that inhibit or discourage takeover attempts could reduce the market value of our common stock.
 
Third, we are dependent on key personnel. Although we have entered into employment agreements with our executive officers, losing any one of them could, at least temporarily, have an adverse impact on our operations. We believe that losing more than one would have a material adverse impact on our business.


31


Table of Contents

 
Item 1B.   Unresolved Staff Comments
 
None.
 
Item 2.   Properties
 
We lease our corporate headquarters located at One SeaGate, Suite 1500, Toledo, Ohio 43604. We also lease corporate offices in Florida, Indiana and Tennessee. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the properties that comprise our investments as of December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
 
                                         
    Number of
    Number of
    Total
    Annualized
       
Property Location
  Properties     Beds/Units     Investment(1)     Income(2)        
 
Assisted Living Facilities:
                                       
Arizona
    4       247     $ 17,512     $ 2,231          
California
    8       592       52,757       7,659          
Colorado
    1       46       4,161       556          
Connecticut
    6       591       52,147       5,892          
Delaware
    1       97       20,537       2,047          
Florida
    15       1,162       77,213       10,011          
Georgia
    2       107       4,388       541          
Idaho
    3       234       14,638       1,710          
Illinois
    7       560       37,161       1,752          
Indiana
    2       78       4,898       685          
Iowa
    1       208       5,974                  
Kansas
    1       120       10,559       1,568          
Kentucky
    1       80       7,383       871          
Louisiana
    1       124       7,668       1,437          
Maryland
    2       164       9,094       1,100          
Massachusetts
    7       525       66,411       7,892          
Mississippi
    2       158       13,053       1,560          
Montana
    3       205       14,869       1,748          
Nevada
    3       262       24,081       2,965          
New Jersey
    2       90       7,188       977          
New York
    3       185       35,451       3,261          
North Carolina
    41       1,867       174,623       22,353          
Ohio
    9       627       44,311       4,925          
Oklahoma
    16       549       19,098       3,139          
Oregon
    3       123       10,154       1,485          
Pennsylvania
    2       135       15,580       1,458          
South Carolina
    5       266       24,485       3,327          
Tennessee
    4       216       11,329       1,315          
Texas
    29       1,615       106,377       8,946          
Utah
    2       138       13,386       1,548          
Virginia
    4       326       40,019       4,220          
Washington
    8       472       31,808       3,676          
Wisconsin
    6       369       45,906       3,219          
                                         
Total Assisted Living Facilities
    204       12,538       1,024,219       116,074          
 


32


Table of Contents

                                         
    Number of
    Number of
    Total
    Annualized
       
Property Location
  Properties     Beds/Units     Investment(1)     Income(2)        
 
Skilled Nursing Facilities:
                                       
Alabama
    8       1,202     $ 41,516     $ 4,767          
Arizona
    3       505       20,369       2,169          
Colorado
    5       816       47,568       4,424          
Connecticut
    6       753       21,013       2,298          
Florida
    45       5,942       318,947       36,255          
Georgia
    3       499       16,692       1,818          
Idaho
    3       393       17,298       2,582          
Illinois
    4       406       26,851       2,550          
Indiana
    8       865       45,748       4,436          
Kansas
    1       163       9,228       901          
Kentucky
    10       1,343       65,340       7,808          
Louisiana
    7       854       34,905       3,770          
Maryland
    1       100       3,885       524          
Massachusetts
    23       3,226       206,277       21,503          
Michigan
    1       99       4,431       438          
Mississippi
    11       1,527       48,663       5,571          
Missouri
    3       407       23,709       1,991          
Nevada
    1       60       1,984       440          
New Hampshire
    1       68       4,514       529          
New Jersey
    1       176       4,643       529          
Ohio
    21       2,797       184,092       18,634          
Oklahoma
    3       668       21,056       2,415          
Oregon
    1       111       4,174       639          
Pennsylvania
    5       734       26,943       3,498          
Tennessee
    22       3,025       121,490       16,429          
Texas
    21       3,043       76,967       8,741          
Utah
    1       120       7,633       745          
Virginia
    2       316       8,179       1,194          
                                         
Total Skilled Nursing Facilities
    221       30,218       1,414,115       157,598          
                                         
Independent Living / CCRC Facilities:
                                       
Arizona
    2       376       12,954       1,332          
California
    7       1,118       147,284       9,512          
Colorado
    2       373       33,228       1,773          
Florida
    3       547       65,762       7,420          
Georgia
    3       226       19,294       2,603          
Idaho
    1       254       13,616       1,791          
Illinois
    1       89       6,498       796          
Indiana
    3       541       42,918       1,436          
Kansas
    1       107       12,400                
Maryland
    3             9,379       750          
Massachusetts
    3             10,556       1,070          
Missouri
    1       65       6,000       540          
Montana
    1       18       1,964       223          
Nevada
    1       103       7,805       1,031          
New York
    2       108       11,196       1,259          
North Carolina
    2       349       23,055       2,021          
Pennsylvania
    1             5,350       428          
South Carolina
    7       1,011       79,998       6,804          
Texas
    2       532       19,217       2,326          
Washington
    1       70       5,476       530          
                                         
Total Independent Living/CCRC Facilities
    47       5,887       533,950       43,645          

33


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Number of
          Total
    Annualized
             
Property Location
  Properties     Sq. Ft.     Investment(1)     Income(2)              
 
Medical Office Buildings:
                                               
Alabama
    5       303,306     $ 44,813     $ 4,672                  
Arizona
    1       152,600       48,057       5,034                  
California
    5       269,913       89,897       6,772                  
Florida
    24       836,104       243,668       17,254                  
Georgia
    14       311,003       84,102       6,599                  
Illinois
    3       71,345       17,269       1,709                  
North Carolina
    10       154,930       34,051       2,533                  
New Jersey
    3       116,451       32,543       4,644                  
Nevada
    6       259,579       90,458       7,628                  
New York
    1       100,496       20,873       2,926                  
Tennessee
    4       129,737       35,401       3,511                  
Texas
    13       591,906       159,000       10,547                  
                                                 
Total Medical Office Buildings
    89       3,297,370       900,132       73,829                  
                                                 
              Number of
Beds/Units
                                 
Specialty Care Facilities:
                                               
California
    1       231       7,472       523                  
Idaho
    1       60       4,849                        
Illinois
    1       72       49,077       5,573                  
Indiana
    1       50       2,110       60                  
Louisiana
    1       50       9,685       744                  
Massachusetts
    3       493       46,124       5,194                  
Ohio
    1       55       27,540       3,905                  
Oklahoma
    2       91       11,568       1,102                  
Texas
    6       249       101,908       10,625                  
                                                 
Total Specialty Care Facilities
    17       1,351       260,333       27,726                  
                                                 
Total All Properties:
    578             $ 4,132,749     $ 418,872                  
                                                 
 
 
(1) Investments include real estate investments and credit enhancements which amounted to $4,130,299,000 and $2,450,000, respectively.
 
(2) Reflects contract rate of interest for loans, annual straight-line rent for leases with fixed escalators or annual cash rent for leases with contingent escalators, net of collectibility reserves if applicable.
 
Item 3.   Legal Proceedings
 
From time to time, there are various legal proceedings pending to which we are a party or to which some of our properties are subject arising in the normal course of business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
 
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
 
None.


34


Table of Contents

 
PART II
 
Item 5.   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
There were 5,802 stockholders of record as of February 16, 2007. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low prices of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange, as reported on the Composite Tape, and common dividends paid per share:
 
                         
    Sales Price     Dividends
 
    High     Low     Paid  
 
2006
                       
First Quarter
  $ 38.50     $ 33.68     $ 0.620  
Second Quarter
    38.09       32.80       0.640  
Third Quarter
    40.12       34.55       0.640  
Fourth Quarter
    43.02       38.60       0.9809 (1)
2005
                       
First Quarter
  $ 38.04     $ 31.15     $ 0.600  
Second Quarter
    37.99       31.69       0.620  
Third Quarter
    39.20       35.13       0.620  
Fourth Quarter
    37.37       33.35       0.620  
 
 
(1) Includes $0.3409 prorated dividend paid on December 28, 2006 in connection with the Windrose merger.
 
Our Board of Directors approved a new quarterly dividend rate of $0.66 per share of common stock per quarter, commencing with the May 2007 dividend. Our dividend policy is reviewed annually by the Board of Directors. The declaration and payment of quarterly dividends remains subject to the review and approval of the Board of Directors.
 
On September 29, 2003, we issued 1,060,000 shares of 6% Series E Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock as partial consideration for an acquisition of assets by us, with the shares valued at $26,500,000 for such purposes. The shares were issued to Southern Assisted Living, Inc. and certain of its shareholders without registration in reliance upon the federal statutory exemption of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The shares have a liquidation value of $25 per share. The preferred stock, which has no stated maturity, may be redeemed by us on or after August 15, 2008. The preferred shares are convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $32.66 per share at any time. There were 74,989 of such shares outstanding at December 31, 2006. These shares are not included in the following table:
 
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
 
                                 
                Total Number
    Maximum Number
 
                of Shares Purchased
    of Shares that May
 
    Total Number
          as Part of Publicly
    Yet Be Purchased
 
    of Shares
    Average Price
    Announced Plans
    Under the Plans or
 
Period
  Purchased(1)     Paid per Share     or Programs(2)     Programs  
 
October 1, 2006 through October 31, 2006
                               
November 1, 2006 through November 30, 2006
                               
December 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006
    3,677     $ 41.48                  
                                 
Totals
    3,677     $ 41.48                  
                                 
 
 
(1) During the three months ended December 31, 2006, the only securities purchased by the Company were shares of common stock held by employees who tendered owned shares to satisfy the tax withholding on the lapse of certain restrictions on restricted stock.
 
(2) No shares were purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs.


35


Table of Contents

Stockholder Return Performance Presentation
 
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change and the cumulative total stockholder return on our shares of common stock against the cumulative total return of the S & P Composite-500 Stock Index and the NAREIT Equity Index. As of December 31, 2006, 138 companies comprised the NAREIT Equity Index. The Index consists of REITs identified by NAREIT as equity (those REITs which have at least 75% of real property investments). Upon written request sent to the Senior Vice President-Administration and Corporate Secretary, Health Care REIT, Inc., One SeaGate, Suite 1500, P.O. Box 1475, Toledo, Ohio, 43603-1475, we will provide stockholders with the names of the component issuers. The data are based on the closing prices as of December 31 for each of the five years. 2001 equals $100 and dividends are assumed to be reinvested.
 
 
                                     
      12/31/01     12/31/02     12/31/03     12/31/04     12/31/05     12/31/06
S & P 500
    100.00     77.90     100.24     111.15     116.61     135.02
Health Care REIT
    100.00     120.70     167.06     185.69     178.34     226.22
NAREIT Equity
    100.00     103.82     142.37     187.33     210.12     283.78
                                     
 
Except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this information by reference, the foregoing Stockholder Return Performance Presentation shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Annual Report on Form 10-K into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This information shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such acts.


36


Table of Contents

 
Item 6.   Selected Financial Data
 
The following selected financial data for the five years ended December 31, 2006 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements (in thousands, except per share data):
 
                                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004     2005     2006  
 
Operating Data
                                       
Revenues(1)
  $ 130,449     $ 176,461     $ 230,482     $ 273,538     $ 322,824  
Expenses:
                                       
Interest expense(1)
    32,900       46,516       65,888       77,319       94,802  
Depreciation and amortization(1)
    27,310       40,277       61,681       74,816       93,131  
Property operating expenses
                                    1,115  
Other expenses(2)
    13,038       17,274       20,391       20,073       30,259  
Impairment of assets
    2,298       2,792       314                  
Loss on extinguishment of debt(3)
    403                       21,484          
                                         
Total expenses
    75,949       106,859       148,274       193,692       219,307  
Income before minority interests
    54,500       69,602       82,208       79,846       103,517  
Minority interests
                                    (13 )
                                         
Income from continuing operations
    54,500       69,602       82,208       79,846       103,504  
Income from discontinued operations, net(1)
    13,159       13,138       3,163       4,440       (754 )
                                         
Net income
    67,659       82,740       85,371       84,286       102,750  
Preferred stock dividends
    12,468       9,218       12,737       21,594       21,463  
Preferred stock redemption charge
            2,790                          
                                         
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 55,191     $ 70,732     $ 72,634     $ 62,692     $ 81,287  
                                         
Other Data
                                       
Average number of common shares outstanding:
                                       
Basic
    36,702       43,572       51,544       54,110       61,661  
Diluted
    37,301       44,201       52,082       54,499       62,045  
Per Share Data
                                       
Basic:
                                       
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders
  $ 1.15     $ 1.32     $ 1.35     $ 1.08     $ 1.33  
Discontinued operations, net
    0.36       0.30       0.06       0.08       (0.01 )
                                         
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 1.50     $ 1.62     $ 1.41     $ 1.16     $ 1.32  
                                         
Diluted:
                                       
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders
  $ 1.13     $ 1.30     $ 1.33     $ 1.07     $ 1.32  
Discontinued operations, net
    0.35       0.30       0.06       0.08       (0.01 )
                                         
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 1.48     $ 1.60     $ 1.39     $ 1.15     $ 1.31  
                                         
Cash distributions per common share
  $ 2.34     $ 2.34     $ 2.385     $ 2.46     $ 2.8809  
 
 
(1) In accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, we have reclassified the income and expenses attributable to the properties sold subsequent to January 1, 2002 and attributable to the properties held for sale at December 31, 2006, to discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 16 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
 
(2) Other expenses include loan expense, provision for loan losses and general and administrative expenses.
 
(3) Effective January 1, 2003, in accordance with FASB Statement No. 145, we reclassified the losses on extinguishments of debt in 2002 to income from continuing operations rather than as extraordinary items as previously required under FASB Statement No. 4.


37


Table of Contents

                                         
    December 31,  
    2002     2003     2004     2005     2006  
 
Balance Sheet Data
                                       
Net real estate investments
  $ 1,524,457     $ 1,992,446     $ 2,441,972     $ 2,849,518     $ 4,122,893  
Total assets
    1,591,482       2,184,088       2,552,171       2,972,164       4,280,610  
Total debt
    673,703       1,014,541       1,192,958       1,500,818       2,198,001  
Total liabilities and minority interest
    694,250       1,034,409       1,216,892       1,541,408       2,301,817  
Total stockholders’ equity
    897,232       1,149,679       1,335,279       1,430,756       1,978,793  


38


Table of Contents

 
Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of Health Care REIT, Inc. for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other important factors are identified in “Item 1 — Business” and “Item 1A — Risk Factors” above.
 
Executive Overview
 
Business
 
Health Care REIT, Inc. is a self-administered, equity real estate investment trust that invests in the full spectrum of senior housing and health care real estate. Founded in 1970, we were the first REIT to invest exclusively in health care properties. The following table summarizes our portfolio as of December 31, 2006:
 
                                                                         
    Investments(1)
    Percentage of
    Revenues(2)
    Percentage of
    Number of
    # Beds/Units
    Investment per
    Operators/
       
Type of Property   (in thousands)     Investments     (in thousands)     Revenues(2)     Properties     or Sq. Ft.     metric (3)     Tenants     States  
 
Independent living/CCRCs
  $ 533,950       13 %   $ 39,475       12 %     47       5,887 units   $ 123,073 unit     18       19  
Assisted living facilities
    1,024,219       25 %     107,165       33 %     204       12,538 units     90,697 unit     25       33  
Skilled nursing facilities
    1,414,115       34 %     157,945       48 %     221       30,218 beds     47,279 bed     22       28  
Medical office buildings
    900,132       22 %     3,247       1 %     89       3,297,370 sq. ft.     273 sq.ft.     642       12  
Specialty care facilities
    260,333       6 %     16,632       5 %     17       1,351 beds     210,969 bed     9       9  
Other income
                    3,924       1 %                                        
                                                                         
Totals
  $ 4,132,749       100 %   $ 328,388       100 %     578                                  
                                                                         
 
 
(1) Investments include real estate investments and credit enhancements which amounted to $4,130,299,000 and $2,450,000, respectively.
 
(2) Revenues include gross revenues and revenues from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
(3) Investment per metric was computed by using the total investment amount of $4,475,503,000 which includes real estate investments, credit enhancements and unfunded construction commitments for which initial funding has commenced which amounted to $4,130,299,000, $2,450,000 and $342,754,000, respectively.
 
Our primary objectives are to protect stockholder capital and enhance stockholder value. We seek to pay consistent cash dividends to stockholders and create opportunities to increase dividend payments to stockholders as a result of annual increases in rental and interest income and portfolio growth. To meet these objectives, we invest across the full spectrum of senior housing and health care real estate and diversify our investment portfolio by property type, operator/tenant and geographic location.
 
Substantially all of our revenues and sources of cash flows from operations are derived from operating lease rentals and interest earned on outstanding loans receivable. These items represent our primary source of liquidity to fund distributions and are dependent upon our obligors’ continued ability to make contractual rent and interest payments to us. To the extent that our obligors experience operating difficulties and are unable to generate sufficient cash to make payments to us, there could be a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. To mitigate this risk, we monitor our investments through a variety of methods determined by the type of property and operator/tenant. Our asset management process includes review of monthly financial statements for each property, periodic review of obligor credit, periodic property inspections and review of covenant compliance relating to licensure, real estate taxes, letters of credit and other collateral. In monitoring our portfolio, our personnel use a proprietary database to collect and analyze property-specific data. Additionally, we conduct extensive research to ascertain industry trends and risks. Through these asset management and research efforts, we are typically able to intervene at an early stage to address payment risk, and in so doing, support both the collectibility of revenue and the value of our investment.
 
In addition to our asset management and research efforts, we also structure our investments to help mitigate payment risk. We typically limit our investments to no more than 90% of the appraised value of a property.


39


Table of Contents

Operating leases and loans are normally credit enhanced by guaranties and/or letters of credit. In addition, operating leases are typically structured as master leases and loans are generally cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized with other loans, operating leases or agreements between us and the obligor and its affiliates.
 
For the year ended December 31, 2006, rental income and interest income represented 93% and 6%, respectively, of total gross revenues (including discontinued operations). Substantially all of our operating leases are designed with either fixed or contingent escalating rent structures. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectibility assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period. Our yield on loans receivable depends upon a number of factors, including the stated interest rate, the average principal amount outstanding during the term of the loan and any interest rate adjustments.
 
Depending upon the availability and cost of external capital, we anticipate investing in additional properties. New investments are generally funded from temporary borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements, internally generated cash and the proceeds from sales of real property. Our investments generate internal cash from rent and interest receipts and principal payments on loans receivable. Permanent financing for future investments, which replaces funds drawn under the unsecured lines of credit arrangements, is expected to be provided through a combination of public and private offerings of debt and equity securities and the incurrence or assumption of secured debt. We believe our liquidity and various sources of available capital are sufficient to fund operations, meet debt service obligations (both principal and interest), make dividend distributions and finance future investments.
 
Depending upon market conditions, we believe that new investments will be available in the future with spreads over our cost of capital that will generate appropriate returns to our stockholders. We expect to complete gross new investments of $1,000,000,000 to $1,200,000,000 in 2007, including acquisitions of $700,000,000 to $800,000,000 and funded new development of $300,000,000 to $400,000,000. We anticipate the sale of real property and the repayment of loans receivable totaling approximately $100,000,000 to $200,000,000 during 2007. It is possible that additional loan repayments or sales of real property may occur in the future. To the extent that loan repayments and real property sales exceed new investments, our revenues and cash flows from operations could be adversely affected. We expect to reinvest the proceeds from any loan repayments and real property sales in new investments. To the extent that new investment requirements exceed our available cash on-hand, we expect to borrow under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements. At December 31, 2006, we had $36,216,000 of cash and cash equivalents and $515,000,000 of available borrowing capacity under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements. Our investment activity may exceed our borrowing capacity under our unsecured lines of credit. To the extent that we are unable to issue equity or debt securities to provide additional capital, we may not be able to fund all of our potential investments, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and cash flows from operations.
 
Key Transactions in 2006
 
We completed the following key transactions during the year ended December 31, 2006:
 
  •  our Board of Directors increased our quarterly dividend to $0.64 per share, which represented a two cent increase from the quarterly dividend of $0.62 paid for 2005. The dividend declared for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 represented the 143rd consecutive dividend payment;
 
  •  we completed a $1.0 billion merger with Windrose Medical Properties Trust on December 20, 2006;
 
  •  we completed $559,209,000 of gross investments offset by $140,791,000 of investment payoffs;
 
  •  we completed a public offering of 3,222,800 shares of common stock with net proceeds of approximately $109,749,000 in April 2006;
 
  •  we extended our $40,000,000 unsecured line of credit which matured in May 2006 to May 2007 and reduced pricing by 40 basis points;
 
  •  we closed on a $700,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility to replace our $500,000,000 facility, which was scheduled to mature in June 2008. Among other things, the new facility provides us with additional


40


Table of Contents

  financial flexibility and borrowing capacity, extends our agreement to July 2009 and adds two new lenders to the bank group in addition to commitment increases by eight of the ten existing lenders; and
 
  •  we issued $345,000,000 of 4.75% convertible notes due December 2026 in November and December 2006.
 
Windrose Medical Properties Trust Merger
 
On December 20, 2006, we completed our merger with Windrose Medical Properties Trust, a self-managed real estate investment trust based in Indianapolis, Indiana. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $1,018,345,000, including direct acquisition costs of approximately $29,918,000. The Windrose merger diversified our portfolio of investments throughout the health care delivery system. Windrose shareholders received approximately 9,679,000 shares of our common stock (valued at $41.00 per share) and Windrose preferred shareholders received 2,100,000 shares of our 7.5% Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (valued at $29.58 per share). Additionally, our investment in Windrose includes $183,139,000 of cash provided to Windrose to extinguish secured debt, the assumption of $301,641,000 of debt and the assumption of other liabilities and minority interests totaling $44,683,000. The results of operations for Windrose have been included in our consolidated results of operations from the date of acquisition.
 
Key Performance Indicators, Trends and Uncertainties
 
We utilize several key performance indicators to evaluate the various aspects of our business. These indicators are discussed below and relate to operating performance, credit strength and concentration risk. Management uses these key performance indicators to facilitate internal and external comparisons to our historical operating results, in making operating decisions and for budget planning purposes.
 
Operating Performance.  We believe that net income available to common stockholders (“NICS”) is the most appropriate earnings measure. Other useful supplemental measures of our operating performance include funds from operations (“FFO”) and funds available for distribution (“FAD”); however, these supplemental measures are not defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principals (“U.S. GAAP”). Please refer to the section entitled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for further discussion of FFO and FAD and for reconciliations of FFO and FAD to NICS. These earning measures and their relative per share amounts are widely used by investors and analysts in the valuation, comparison and investment recommendations of REITs. The following table reflects the recent historical trends of our operating performance measures (in thousands, except per share data):
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2004     2005     2006  
 
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 72,634     $ 62,692     $ 81,287  
Funds from operations
    146,742       144,293       177,580  
Funds available for distribution
    136,343       147,730       191,885  
Per share data (fully diluted):
                       
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 1.39     $ 1.15     $ 1.31  
Funds from operations
    2.82       2.65       2.86  
Funds available for distribution
    2.62       2.71       3.09  
 
Credit Strength.  We measure our credit strength both in terms of leverage ratios and coverage ratios. Our leverage ratios include debt to book capitalization, debt to gross assets and debt to market capitalization. The leverage ratios indicate how much of our balance sheet capitalization is related to long-term debt. Our coverage ratios include interest coverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio. The coverage ratios indicate our ability to service interest and fixed charges (interest plus preferred dividends and secured debt principal amortizations). We expect to maintain capitalization ratios and coverage ratios sufficient to maintain investment grade ratings with Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Fitch Ratings. The coverage ratios are based on earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) which is discussed in further detail, and reconciled to net income, below in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” Leverage ratios and coverage ratios are


41


Table of Contents

widely used by investors, analysts and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, investment recommendations and rating of companies. The following table reflects the recent historical trends for our credit strength measures:
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2004     2005     2006  
 
Debt to book capitalization ratio
    47 %     51 %     53 %
Debt to market capitalization ratio
    34 %     40 %     39 %
Interest coverage ratio
    3.22 x     3.06 x     2.97x  
Fixed charge coverage ratio
    2.66 x     2.37 x     2.39x  
 
Concentration Risk.  We evaluate our concentration risk in terms of asset mix, investment mix, customer mix and geographic mix. Concentration risk is a valuable measure in understanding what portion of our investments could be at risk if certain sectors were to experience downturns. Asset mix measures the portion of our investments that are real property. In order to qualify as an equity REIT, at least 75% of our real estate investments must be real property whereby each property, which includes the land, buildings, improvements, intangibles and related rights, is owned by us and leased to an operator pursuant to a long-term operating lease. Investment mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our various property types. Customer mix measures the portion of our investments that relate to our top five customers. The following table reflects our recent historical trends of concentration risk:
 
                         
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2004     2005     2006  
 
Asset mix:
                       
Real property
    90 %     93 %     95 %
Loans receivable
    10 %     7 %     5 %
Investment mix:
                       
Assisted living facilities
    54 %     34 %     25 %
Skilled nursing facilities
    39 %     44 %     34 %
Independent/CCRC(1)
            15 %     13 %
Medical office buildings
                    22 %
Specialty care facilities
    7 %     7 %     6 %
Customer mix:
                       
Emeritus Corporation
    15 %     13 %     9 %
Brookdale Senior Living Inc. 
                    7 %
Home Quality Management, Inc. 
    7 %             6 %
Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 
            7 %     6 %
Merrill Gardens L.L.C. 
            7 %     4 %
Southern Assisted Living, Inc.(2)
    8 %     7 %        
Commonwealth Communities Holdings LLC
    8 %     7 %        
Delta Health Group, Inc. 
    7 %                
Remaining portfolio
    55 %     59 %     68 %
Geographic mix:
                       
Florida
    15 %     14 %     17 %
Texas
    6 %     8 %     11 %
Massachusetts
    14 %     13 %     8 %
California
            7 %     7 %
Ohio
    6 %             6 %
North Carolina
    8 %     8 %        
Remaining portfolio
    51 %     50 %     51 %


42


Table of Contents

 
(1) As a result of our significant independent living/continuing care retirement community acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2005, we began to separately disclose this property classification in our portfolio reporting. We adopted the National Investment Center definitions and reclassified certain of our existing facilities to this classification.
 
(2) In September 2005, Alterra Healthcare Corporation, one of our tenants, became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Brookdale Senior Living Inc. as a result of Brookdale’s merger with FEBC-ALT Investors LLC. In April 2006, Brookdale completed the acquisition of Southern Assisted Living, Inc.
 
We evaluate our key performance indicators in conjunction with current expectations to determine if historical trends are indicative of future results. Our expected results may not be achieved and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. Management regularly monitors various economic and other factors to develop strategic and tactical plans designed to improve performance and maximize our competitive position. Our ability to achieve our financial objectives is dependent upon our ability to effectively execute these plans and to appropriately respond to emerging economic and company-specific trends. Please refer to “Item 1A — Risk Factors” above for further discussion.
 
Portfolio Update
 
Investment Properties
 
Payment coverages of the operators in our investment property portfolio continue to improve. Our overall payment coverage is at 1.93 times and represents an increase of one basis point from 2005 and 15 basis points from 2004. The following table reflects our recent historical trends of portfolio coverages. Coverage data reflects the 12 months ended for the periods presented. CBMF represents the ratio of facilities’ earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and management fees to contractual rent or interest due us. CAMF represents the ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and rent (but after imputed management fees) to contractual rent or interest due us.
 
                                                 
    September 30, 2004     September 30, 2005     September 30, 2006  
    CBMF     CAMF     CBMF     CAMF     CBMF     CAMF  
 
Independent living/CCRCs
                    1.43 x     1.21 x     1.41 x     1.21x  
Assisted living facilities
    1.45 x     1.23 x     1.52 x     1.30 x     1.54 x     1.33x  
Skilled nursing facilities
    2.11 x     1.62 x     2.18 x     1.61 x     2.17 x     1.55x  
Specialty care facilities
    2.69 x     2.08 x     3.36 x     2.77 x     2.88 x     2.34x  
                                                 
Weighted averages
    1.78 x     1.44 x     1.92 x     1.53 x     1.93 x     1.50x  
 
Operating Properties
 
Our consolidated financial results for the year ended December 31, 2006 include twelve days of revenues and expenses from operating properties due to the Windrose merger completed on December 20, 2006. The primary performance measure for our operating properties is net operating income (“NOI”) as discussed below in Non-GAAP Financial Measures. For the twelve days ended December 31, 2006, our operating properties generated $2,359,000 of net operating income which represents $3,474,000 of rental income less $1,115,000 of property operating expenses.
 
Corporate Governance
 
Maintaining investor confidence and trust has become increasingly important in today’s business environment. Our Board of Directors and management are strongly committed to policies and procedures that reflect the highest level of ethical business practices. Our corporate governance guidelines provide the framework for our business operations and emphasize our commitment to increase stockholder value while meeting all applicable legal requirements. The Board of Directors adopted and annually reviews its Corporate Governance Guidelines. These guidelines meet the listing standards adopted by the New York Stock Exchange and are available on our Web site at www.hcreit.com and from us upon written request sent to the Senior Vice President — Administration and Corporate Secretary, Health Care REIT, Inc., One SeaGate, Suite 1500, P.O. Box 1475, Toledo, Ohio, 43603-1475.


43


Table of Contents

 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Sources and Uses of Cash
 
Our primary sources of cash include rent and interest receipts, borrowings under unsecured lines of credit arrangements, public and private offerings of debt and equity securities, proceeds from the sales of real property and principal payments on loans receivable. Our primary uses of cash include dividend distributions, debt service payments (including principal and interest), real property acquisitions, loan advances and general and administrative expenses. These sources and uses of cash are reflected in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and are discussed in further detail below.
 
The following is a summary of our sources and uses of cash flows (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                                         
    Year Ended     One Year Change     Year Ended     One Year Change     Two Year Change  
    Dec. 31, 2004     Dec. 31, 2005     $     %     Dec. 31, 2006     $     %     $     %  
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  $ 124,496     $ 19,763     $ (104,733 )     (84 )%   $ 36,237     $ 16,474       83 %   $ (88,259 )     (71 )%
Cash provided from (used in) operating activities
    144,025       173,755       29,730       21 %     216,446       42,691       25 %     72,421       50 %
Cash provided from (used in) investing activities
    (507,362 )     (449,069 )     58,293       (11 )%     (560,815 )     (111,746 )     25 %     (53,453 )     11 %
Cash provided from (used in) financing activities
    258,604       291,788       33,184       13 %     344,348       52,560       18 %     85,744       33 %
                                                                         
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 19,763     $ 36,237     $ 16,474       83 %   $ 36,216     $ (21 )     0 %   $ 16,453       83 %
                                                                         
 
Operating Activities.  The increases in net cash provided from operating activities are primarily attributable to increases in net income, excluding depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation and net straight-line rental income. Net income and the provisions for depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of net new investments in properties owned by us. See the discussion of investing activities below for additional details. To the extent that we acquire or dispose of additional properties in the future, our net income and provisions for depreciation and amortization will change accordingly.
 
The following is a summary of our straight-line rent (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                                         
    Year Ended     One Year Change     Year Ended     One Year Change     Two Year Change  
    Dec. 31, 2004     Dec. 31, 2005     $     %     Dec. 31, 2006     $     %     $     %  
 
Gross straight-line rental income
  $ 21,936     $ 13,142     $ (8,794 )     (40 )%   $ 9,432     $ (3,710 )     (28 )%   $ (12,504 )     (57 )%
Cash receipts due to real property sales
    (3,756 )     (9,384 )     (5,628 )     (150 )%     (3,544 )     5,840       (62 )%     212       (6 )%
Prepaid rent receipts
    (4,388 )     (4,485 )     (97 )     2 %     (17,017 )     (12,532 )     279 %     (12,629 )     288 %
Rental income related to above/below markett leases
                                    60       60       n/a       60       n/a  
                                                                         
Cash receipts in excess of (less than) rental income
  $ 13,792     $ (727 )   $ (14,519 )     n/a     $ (11,069 )   $ (10,342 )     1,423 %   $ (24,861 )     n/a  
                                                                         
 
Gross straight-line rental income represents the non-cash difference between contractual cash rent due and the average rent recognized pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13 Accounting for Leases (“SFAS 13”) for leases with fixed rental escalators, net of collectibility reserves, if any. This amount is positive in the first half of a lease term (but declining every year due to annual increases in cash rent due) and is negative in the second half of a lease term. The decrease in gross straight-line rental income is primarily due to annual increases in cash rent due on leases with fixed increases. The increase in non-recurring cash receipts is primarily attributable to cash received upon renegotiation of a lease in connection to the acquisition of Commonwealth Communities Holdings LLC by Kindred Healthcare, Inc. in February 2006.


44


Table of Contents

Investing Activities.  The changes in net cash used in investing activities are primarily attributable to the Windrose merger and net changes in loans receivable and real property investments. The following is a summary of our investment and disposition activities, excluding the Windrose merger (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Year Ended  
    December 31, 2004     December 31, 2005     December 31, 2006  
    Facilities     Amount     Facilities     Amount     Facilities     Amount  
 
Real property acquisitions:
                                               
Assisted living
    22     $ 179,940       4     $ 47,660       8     $ 77,600  
Skilled nursing
    52       338,951       45       262,084       18       148,955  
Independent/CCRC
                    11       230,225       5       56,417  
Specialty care
                    5       51,000                  
Land parcels
                                            10,250  
                                                 
Total acquisitions
    74       518,891       65       590,969       31       293,222  
Less:
                                               
Assumed debt
            (14,555 )             (22,309 )             (25,049 )
Preferred stock issuance
                                               
                                                 
Cash disbursed for acquisitions
            504,336               568,660               268,173  
Additions to CIP
            11,883               8,790               149,843  
Capital improvements to existing properties
            26,328               21,841               11,167  
                                                 
Total cash invested in real property
            542,547               599,291               429,183  
Real property dispositions:
                                               
Assisted living
    4       20,271       15       90,485       12       58,479  
Skilled nursing
    2       6,076                       3       7,827  
Independent/CCRC
                                    1       3,095  
Specialty care
    1       11,220                                  
Land parcels
                            840               486  
                                                 
Proceeds from real property sales
    7       37,567       15       91,325       16       69,887  
                                                 
Net cash investments in real property
    67     $ 504,980       50     $ 507,966       15     $ 359,296  
                                                 
Advances on loans receivable:
                                               
Investments in new loans
          $ 47,826             $ 26,554             $ 75,209  
Draws on existing loans
            14,062               13,833               11,781  
                                                 
Total investments in loans
            61,888               40,387               86,990  
Receipts on loans receivable:
                                               
Loan payoffs
            38,450               82,379               65,002  
Principal payments on loans
            17,023               16,259               17,253  
                                                 
Total principal receipts on loans
            55,473               98,638               82,255  
                                                 
Net cash advances/(receipts) on loans receivable
          $ 6,415             $ (58,251 )           $ 4,735  
                                                 
 
The investment in Windrose primarily represents $183,139,000 of cash provided to Windrose to extinguish secured debt and cash used to pay advisory fees, lender consents and other merger-related costs totaling $15,301,000. These cash uses have been offset by $15,591,000 of cash assumed from Windrose on the merger effective date.


45


Table of Contents

 
Financing Activities.  The changes in net cash provided from or used in financing activities are primarily attributable to changes related to our long-term debt, common stock issuances, preferred stock issuances and cash distributions to stockholders.
 
The following is a summary of our senior unsecured note issuances (dollars in thousands):
 
                             
Date Issued
  Maturity Date   Interest Rate     Face Amount     Net Proceeds  
 
September 2004
  November 2013     6.000 %   $ 50,000     $ 50,708  
                             
April 2005
  May 2015     5.875 %   $ 250,000     $ 246,859  
November 2005
  June 2016     6.200 %     300,000       297,194  
                             
2005 Totals
              $ 550,000     $ 544,053  
                             
November 2006
  December 2006     4.750 %   $ 345,000     $ 337,517  
                             
 
We repaid $40,000,000 of 8.0% senior unsecured notes upon maturity in April 2004. In May 2005, we redeemed all of our outstanding $50,000,000 8.17% senior unsecured notes due March 2006, we completed a public tender offer for $57,670,000 of our outstanding $100,000,000 7.625% senior unsecured notes due March 2008, and we redeemed $122,500,000 of our outstanding $175,000,000 7.5% senior unsecured notes due August 2007. The increase in principal payments on secured debt during 2005 is primarily due to early extinguishments of outstanding mortgages. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we paid off mortgages with outstanding balances of $72,309,000 and average interest rates of 7.481%.
 
The change in common stock is primarily attributable to public and private issuances and common stock issuances related to our dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan (“DRIP”). The remaining difference in common stock issuances is primarily due to issuances pursuant to stock incentive plans.
 
The following is a summary of our common stock issuances (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
                                 
Date Issued
  Shares Issued     Issue Price     Gross Proceeds     Net Proceeds  
 
2004 DRIP
    1,532,819     $ 33.65     $ 51,575     $ 51,575  
                                 
November 2005
    3,000,000     $ 34.15     $ 102,450     $ 100,977  
2005 DRIP
    1,546,959     $ 34.59       53,505       53,505  
                                 
      4,546,959             $ 155,955     $ 154,482  
                                 
April 2006
    3,222,800     $ 36.00     $ 116,021     $ 109,748  
2006 DRIP
    1,876,377     $ 36.34       68,184       68,184  
                                 
      5,099,177             $ 184,205     $ 177,932  
                                 
 
In September 2004, we closed on a public offering of 7,000,000 shares of 7.625% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, which generated net proceeds of approximately $169,107,000. The proceeds were used to repay borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements and to invest in additional properties.
 
In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income (including 100% of capital gains) to our stockholders. The increases in dividends are primarily attributable to increases in outstanding common and preferred stock shares as discussed above and increases in our annual common stock dividend per share and the payment of a prorated dividend of $0.3409 in December 2006 in conjunction with the Windrose merger.


46


Table of Contents

The following is a summary of our dividend payments (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
                                                 
    Year Ended  
    December 31, 2004     December 31, 2005     December 31, 2006  
    Per Share     Amount     Per Share     Amount     Per Share     Amount  
 
Common Stock
  $ 2.385     $ 122,987     $ 2.46     $ 132,548     $ 2.8809     $ 178,365  
Series D Preferred Stock
    1.97       7,875       1.97       7,875       1.97       7,875  
Series E Preferred Stock
    1.50       933       1.50       375       1.50       112  
Series F Preferred Stock
    1.50       3,929       1.91       13,344       1.91       13,344  
Series G Preferred Stock
                                    0.0625       132  
                                                 
Totals
          $ 135,724             $ 154,142             $ 199,828  
                                                 
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have an outstanding letter of credit issued for the benefit of certain insurance companies that provide workers’ compensation insurance to one of our tenants. Our obligation under the letter of credit matures in 2009. At December 31, 2006, our obligation under the letter of credit was $2,450,000.
 
We are exposed to various market risks, including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. We may or may not elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. These decisions are principally based on the general trend in interest rates at the applicable dates, our perception of the future volatility of interest rates and our relative levels of variable rate debt and variable rate investments. As of December 31, 2006, we participated in two interest rate swap agreements related to our long-term debt. Our interest rate swaps are discussed below in “Contractual Obligations.”
 
We have a $52,215,000 liability to a subsidiary trust issuing trust preferred securities that was assumed in the Windrose merger. On March 24, 2006, Windrose’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Windrose Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), completed the issuance and sale in a private placement of $50,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of fixed/floating rate preferred securities. The trust preferred securities mature on March 30, 2036, are redeemable at our option beginning March 30, 2011, and require quarterly distributions of interest to the holders of the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities bear a fixed rate per annum equal to 7.22% through March 30, 2011, and a variable rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.05% thereafter.
 
The common stock of the Trust was purchased by an operating partnership of Windrose for $1,000,000. The Trust used the proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities together with the proceeds from the sale of the common stock to purchase $51,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of unsecured fixed/floating junior subordinated notes due March 30, 2036 issued by an operating partnership. The operating partnership received approximately $49,000,000 in net proceeds, after the payment of fees and expenses, from the sale of the junior subordinated notes to the Trust. In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, we have not consolidated the trust because the operating partnership is not considered the primary beneficiary.


47


Table of Contents

 
Contractual Obligations
 
The following table summarizes our payment requirements under contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
 
                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
Contractual Obligations
  Total     2007     2008-2009     2010-2011     Thereafter  
 
Unsecured lines of credit arrangements(1)
  $ 740,000     $ 40,000     $ 700,000     $ 0     $ 0  
Senior unsecured notes
    1,539,830       52,500       42,330       0       1,445,000  
Secured debt
    378,400       19,199       85,176       62,013       212,012  
Trust preferred liability
    51,000       0       0       0       51,000  
Contractual interest obligations
    1,114,788       143,201       254,340       219,379       497,868  
Capital lease obligations
    0       0       0       0       0  
Operating lease obligations
    37,378       2,756       4,664       4,005       25,953  
Purchase obligations
    375,036       80,907       245,924       48,205       0  
Other long-term liabilities
    0       0       0       0       0  
                                         
Total contractual obligations
  $ 4,236,432     $ 338,563     $ 1,332,434     $ 333,602     $ 2,231,833  
                                         
 
 
(1) Unsecured lines of credit arrangements reflected at 100% capacity.
 
We have an unsecured credit arrangement with a consortium of twelve banks providing for a revolving line of credit (“revolving credit facility”) in the amount of $700,000,000, which expires on July 26, 2009 (with the ability to extend for one year at our discretion if we are in compliance with all covenants). The agreement specifies that borrowings under the revolving credit facility are subject to interest payable in periods no longer than three months at either the agent bank’s prime rate of interest or the applicable margin over LIBOR interest rate, at our option (6.275% at December 31, 2006). The applicable margin is based on our ratings with Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and was 0.9% at December 31, 2006. In addition, we pay a facility fee annually to each bank based on the bank’s commitment under the revolving credit facility. The facility fee depends on our ratings with Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and was 0.015% at December 31, 2006. We also pay an annual agent’s fee of $50,000. Principal is due upon expiration of the agreement. We have another unsecured line of credit arrangement with a bank for a total of $40,000,000, which expires May 31, 2007. Borrowings under this line of credit are subject to interest at either the bank’s prime rate of interest (8.25% at December 31, 2006) or 0.9% over LIBOR interest rate, at our option. Principal is due upon expiration of the agreement. At December 31, 2006, we had $225,000,000 outstanding under the unsecured lines of credit arrangements and estimated total contractual interest obligations of $35,196,000. Contractual interest obligations are estimated based on the assumption that the balance of $225,000,000 at December 31, 2006 is constant until maturity at interest rates in effect at December 31, 2006.
 
We have $1,539,830,000 of senior unsecured notes principal outstanding with fixed annual interest rates ranging from 4.75% to 8.0%, payable semi-annually. Total contractual interest obligations on senior unsecured notes totaled $890,675,000 at December 31, 2006. Additionally, we have 63 mortgage loans totaling with total outstanding principal of $378,400,000, collateralized by owned properties, with annual interest rates ranging from 4.89% to 8.5%, payable monthly. The carrying values of the properties securing the mortgage loans totaled $559,513,000 at December 31, 2006. Total contractual interest obligations on mortgage loans totaled $146,427,000 at December 31, 2006.
 
On May 6, 2004, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements (the “Swaps”) for a total notional amount of $100,000,000 to hedge changes in fair value attributable to changes in the LIBOR swap rate of $100,000,000 of fixed rate debt with a maturity date of November 15, 2013. The Swaps are treated as fair-value hedges for accounting purposes and we utilize the short-cut method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. The Swaps are with highly rated counterparties in which we receive a fixed rate of 6% and pay a variable rate based on six-month


48


Table of Contents

LIBOR plus a spread. At December 31, 2006, total contractual interest obligations were estimated to be $42,490,000 at interest rates in effect at that time.
 
At December 31, 2006, we had operating lease obligations of $37,378,000 relating to our ground leases at certain of our properties and office space leases.
 
Purchase obligations are comprised of unfunded construction commitments and contingent purchase obligations. At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding construction financings of $138,222,000 for leased properties and were committed to providing additional financing of approximately $342,754,000 to complete construction. At December 31, 2006, we had contingent purchase obligations totaling $32,282,000. These contingent purchase obligations primarily relate to deferred acquisition fundings and capital improvements. Deferred acquisition fundings are contingent upon a tenant satisfying certain conditions in the lease. Upon funding, amounts due from the tenant are increased to reflect the additional investment in the property.
 
Capital Structure
 
As of December 31, 2006, we had stockholders’ equity of $1,978,793,000 and a total outstanding debt balance of $2,198,001,000, which represents a debt to total book capitalization ratio of 53%. Our ratio of debt to market capitalization was 39% at December 31, 2006. For the year ended December 31, 2006, our coverage ratio of EBITDA to interest was 2.97 to 1.00. For the year ended December 31, 2006, our coverage ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges was 2.39 to 1.00. Also, at December 31, 2006, we had $36,216,000 of cash and cash equivalents and $515,000,000 of available borrowing capacity under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements.
 
Our debt agreements contain various covenants, restrictions and events of default. Among other things, these provisions require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions. As of December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements. None of our debt agreements contain provisions for acceleration that could be triggered by our debt ratings. However, under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements, the ratings on our senior unsecured notes are used to determine the fees and interest payable.
 
Our senior unsecured notes are rated Baa3 (ratings watch positive), BBB- (stable) and BBB- (positive) by Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and Fitch Ratings, respectively. We plan to manage the Company to maintain investment grade status with a commensurate capital structure consistent with our current profile. Any downgrades in terms of ratings or outlook by any or all of the noted rating agencies could have a material adverse impact on our cost and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition.
 
On May 12, 2006, we filed an open-ended automatic or “universal” shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering an indeterminate amount of future offerings of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants and units. Also, as of February  16, 2007, we had an effective registration statement on file in connection with our enhanced DRIP program under which we may issue up to 6,314,213 shares of common stock. As of February 16, 2007, 1,101,020 shares of common stock remained available for issuance under this registration statement. Depending upon market conditions, we anticipate issuing securities under our registration statements to invest in additional properties and to repay borrowings under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements.
 
Results of Operations
 
                                                                         
    Year Ended     One Year Change     Year Ended     One Year Change     Two Year Change  
    Dec. 31, 2004     Dec. 31, 2005     $     %     Dec. 31, 2006     $     %     $     %  
 
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 72,634     $ 62,692     $ (9,942 )     (14 )%   $ 81,287     $ 18,595       30 %   $ 8,653       12 %
Funds from operations
    146,742       144,293       (2,449 )     (2 )%     177,580       33,287       23 %     30,838       21 %
Funds available for distribution
    136,343       147,730       11,387       8 %     191,885       44,155       30 %     55,542       41 %
EBITDA
    236,231       254,731       18,500       8 %     300,485       45,754       18 %     64,254       27 %


49


Table of Contents

The components of the changes in revenues, expenses and other items are discussed in detail below. The following is a summary of certain items that impact the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006:
 
  •  $5,213,000 ($0.08 per diluted share) of merger-related expenses;
 
  •  $1,287,000 ($0.02 per diluted share) of additional compensation costs related to accelerated vesting requirements of certain stock-based compensation awards;
 
  •  $1,267,000 ($0.02 per diluted share) of gains on the sales of real property; and
 
  •  $20,561,000 ($0.33 per diluted share) prepaid/straight-line rent cash receipts for FAD only.
 
The following is a summary of certain items that impact the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005:
 
  •  $20,662,000 ($0.38 per diluted share) of net losses on extinguishments of debt;
 
  •  $4,523,000 ($0.08 per diluted share) of additional interest income related to the payoffs of loans that were either on non-accrual or partial accrual and all contractual interest due was received from the borrowers;
 
  •  $3,227,000 ($0.06 per diluted share) of gains on the sales of real property; and
 
  •  $13,869,000 ($0.25 per diluted share) prepaid/straight-line rent cash receipts for FAD only.
 
The following is a summary of certain items that impact the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2004:
 
  •  $314,000 ($0.01 per diluted share) of impairment charges;
 
  •  $143,000 ($0.00 per diluted share) of losses on the sales of real property; and
 
  •  $8,144,000 ($0.16 per diluted share) prepaid/straight-line rent cash receipts for FAD only.
 
The increase in fully diluted average common shares outstanding is primarily the result of the Windrose merger, public and private common stock offerings and common stock issuances pursuant to our DRIP. The following table represents the changes in outstanding common stock for the period from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006 (in thousands):
 
                                 
    Year Ended        
    Dec. 31,
    Dec. 31,
    Dec. 31,
       
    2004     2005     2006     Totals  
 
Beginning balance
    50,361       52,925       58,125       50,361  
Windrose merger
                    9,679       9,679  
Public/private offerings
            3,000       3,223       6,223  
DRIP issuances
    1,533       1,547       1,877       4,957  
Preferred stock conversions
    369       210               579  
Other issuances
    662       443       288       1,393  
                                 
Ending balance
    52,925       58,125       73,192       73,192  
                                 
Average number of common shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    51,544       54,110       61,661          
Diluted
    52,082       54,449       62,045          


50


Table of Contents

Revenues were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                                         
    Year Ended     One Year Change     Year Ended     One Year Change     Two Year Change  
    Dec. 31, 2004     Dec. 31, 2005     $     %     Dec. 31, 2006     $     %     $     %  
 
Rental income
  $ 205,182     $ 244,997     $ 39,815       19 %   $ 300,071     $ 55,074       22 %   $ 94,889       46 %
Interest income
    22,818       23,993       1,175       5 %     18,829       (5,164 )     (22 )%     (3,989 )     (17 )%
Other income
    2,432       4,548       2,116       87 %     3,924       (624 )     (14 )%     1,492       61 %
Prepayment fees
    50               (50 )     n/a                       n/a       (50 )     (100 )%
                                                                         
Totals
  $ 230,482     $ 273,538     $ 43,056       19 %   $ 322,824     $ 49,286       18 %   $ 92,342       40 %
                                                                         
 
The increase in gross revenues is primarily attributable to increased rental income resulting from the acquisitions of new properties from which we receive rent. See the discussion of investing activities in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above for further information. Certain of our leases contain annual rental escalators that are contingent upon changes in the Consumer Price Index and/or changes in the gross operating revenues of the tenant’s properties. These escalators are not fixed, so no straight-line rent is recorded; however, rental income is recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period. While this change does not affect our cash flow or our ability to pay dividends, it is anticipated that we will generate additional organic growth and minimize non-cash straight-line rent over time. If gross operating revenues at our facilities and/or the Consumer Price Index do not increase, a portion of our revenues may not continue to increase. Sales of real property would offset revenue increases and, to the extent that they exceed new acquisitions, could result in decreased revenues. Our leases could renew above or below current rent rates, resulting in an increase or decrease in rental income.
 
Interest income decreased in 2006 primarily due to recognition of additional interest income of approximately $4,523,000 in 2005. The additional interest income related to the payoffs of loans that were either on non-accrual or partial accrual and all contractual interest was received from the borrowers. The decrease from 2004 to 2006 is primarily due to the decrease in outstanding loans receivable from $258,734,000 at December 31, 2003 to $194,448,000 at December 31, 2006.
 
Expenses were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                                         
    Year Ended     One Year Change     Year Ended     One Year Change     Two Year Change  
    Dec. 31, 2004     Dec. 31, 2005     $     %     Dec. 31, 2006     $     %     $     %  
 
Interest expense
  $ 65,888     $ 77,319     $ 11,431       17 %   $ 94,802     $ 17,483       23 %   $ 28,914       44 %
Property operating expenses
                                    1,115       1,115       n/a       1,115       n/a  
Depreciation and amortization
    61,681       74,816       13,135       21 %     93,131       18,315       24 %     31,450       51 %
General and administrative
    15,798       16,163       365       2 %     26,004       9,841       61 %     10,206       65 %
Loan expense
    3,393       2,710       (683 )     (20 )%     3,255       545       20 %     (138 )     (4 )%
Impairment of assets
    314               (314 )     n/a                       n/a       (314 )     (100 )%
Loss on extinguishment of debt
            21,484       21,484       100 %             (21,484 )     (100 )%             n/a  
Provision for loan losses
    1,200       1,200       0       0 %     1,000       (200 )     (17 )%     (200 )     (17 )%
                                                                         
Totals
  $ 148,274     $ 193,692     $ 45,418       31 %   $ 219,307     $ 25,615       13 %   $ 71,033       48 %
                                                                         
 
The increase in total expenses is primarily attributable to increases in interest expense and the provisions for depreciation and amortization offset by the recognition of losses on extinguishment of debt in 2005. The increases in interest expense are primarily due to higher average borrowings and changes in the amount of capitalized interest offsetting interest expense. If we borrow under our unsecured lines of credit arrangements, issue additional senior unsecured notes or assume additional secured debt, our interest expense will increase.


51


Table of Contents

 
The following is a summary of our interest expense (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                                         
    Year Ended     One Year Change     Year Ended     One Year Change     Two Year Change  
    Dec. 31, 2004     Dec. 31, 2005     $     %     Dec. 31, 2006     $     %     $     %  
 
Senior unsecured notes
  $ 61,216     $ 63,080     $ 1,864       3 %   $ 80,069     $ 16,989       27 %   $ 18,853       31 %
Secured debt
    11,069       11,769       700       6 %     9,641       (2,128 )     (18 )%     (1,428 )     (13 )%
Unsecured lines of credit
    2,916       9,412       6,496       223 %     11,398       1,986       21 %     8,482       291 %
Capitalized interest
    (875 )     (665 )     210       (24 )%     (4,470 )     (3,805 )     572 %     (3,595 )     411 %
SWAP losses (savings)
    (1,770 )     (972 )     798       (45 )%     197       1,169       n/a       1,967       n/a  
Discontinued operations
    (6,668 )     (5,305 )     1,363       (20 )%     (2,033 )     3,272       (62 )%     4,635       (70 )%
                                                                         
Totals
  $ 65,888     $ 77,319     $ 11,431       17 %   $ 94,802     $ 17,483       23 %   $ 28,914       44 %
                                                                         
 
The change in interest expense on senior unsecured notes is due to the net effect and timing of issuances and extinguishments. See the discussion of financing activities in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above for further information.
 
The following is a summary of our senior unsecured notes activity (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2004     Year Ended December 31, 2005     Year Ended December 31, 2006  
          Weighted Average
          Weighted Average
          Weighted Average
 
    Amount     Interest Rate     Amount     Interest Rate     Amount     Interest Rate  
 
Beginning balance
  $ 865,000       7.291 %   $ 875,000       7.181 %   $ 1,194,830       6.566 %
Debt issued
    50,000       6.000 %     550,000       6.052 %     345,000       4.750 %
Debt extinguished
    (40,000 )     8.090 %     (230,170 )     7.677 %                
                                                 
Ending balance
  $ 875,000       7.181 %   $ 1,194,830       6.566 %   $ 1,539,830       6.159 %
                                                 
Monthly averages
  $ 852,692       7.242 %   $ 961,469       6.829 %   $ 1,244,445       6.494 %
 
The change in interest expense on secured debt is due to the net effect and timing of assumptions, extinguishments and principal amortizations. The following is a summary of our secured debt activity (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2004     Year Ended December 31, 2005     Year Ended December 31, 2006  
          Weighted Average
          Weighted Average
          Weighted Average
 
    Amount     Interest Rate     Amount     Interest Rate     Amount     Interest Rate  
 
Beginning balance
  $ 148,184       7.512 %   $ 160,225       7.508 %   $ 107,540       7.328 %
Debt assumed
    14,555       7.500 %     22,309       6.561 %     273,893       6.053 %
Debt extinguished
                    (72,309 )     7.481 %                
Principal payments
    (2,514 )     7.709 %     (2,685 )     7.584 %     (3,033 )     7.226 %
                                                 
Ending balance
  $ 160,225       7.508 %   $ 107,540       7.328 %   $ 378,400       6.406 %
                                                 
Monthly averages
  $ 148,141       7.510 %   $ 156,027       7.452 %   $ 144,512       7.021 %
 
The change in interest expense on unsecured lines of credit arrangements is due primarily to higher average interest rates. The following is a summary of our unsecured lines of credit arrangements (dollars in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31  
    2004     2005     2006  
 
Balance outstanding at December 31
  $ 151,000     $ 195,000     $ 225,000  
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end
    159,000       318,000       276,000  
Average amount outstanding (total of daily principal balances divided by days in year)
    54,770       181,232       164,905  
Weighted average interest rate (actual interest expense divided by average borrowings outstanding)
    5.32 %     5.19 %     6.91 %


52


Table of Contents

We capitalize certain interest costs associated with funds used to finance the construction of properties owned directly by us. The amount capitalized is based upon the borrowings outstanding during the construction period using the rate of interest that approximates our cost of financing. Our interest expense is reduced by the amount capitalized. Capitalized interest for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 totaled $875,000, $665,000 and $4,470,000, respectively.
 
On May 6, 2004, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements (the “Swaps”) for a total notional amount of $100,000,000 to hedge changes in fair value attributable to changes in the LIBOR swap rate of $100,000,000 of fixed rate debt with a maturity date of November 15, 2013. We receive a fixed rate of 6.0% and pay a variable rate based on six-month LIBOR plus a spread. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we incurred $197,000 of losses related to our Swaps that was recorded as an addition to interest expense. For the years ended December 31, 2005, and 2004, we generated $972,000 and $1,770,000, respectively, of savings related to our Swaps that was recorded as a reduction of interest expense.
 
Property operating expenses represent 12 days of expenses in 2006 related to Windrose’s operating properties acquired on December 20, 2006. These expenses include ground leases, property taxes and other expenses not reimbursed by tenants.
 
Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of additional investments in properties owned directly by us. See the discussion of investing activities in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above for further information. To the extent that we acquire or dispose of additional properties in the future, our provision for depreciation will change accordingly.
 
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues (including discontinued operations) for the year ended December 31, 2006, were 8.27% as compared with 5.89% and 6.54% for the same periods in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The 2006 increase is directly attributable to $5,213,000 of merger related expenses and $1,287,000 of accelerated stock-based compensation expenses. The change from 2004 to 2005 is due to increased costs to attract and retain appropriate personnel to achieve our business objectives offset by a decrease in professional service fees and other operating costs as a result of focused expense control.
 
The change in loan expense was primarily due to increased costs in 2006 related to amending our primary unsecured line of credit arrangement and costs related to the issuance of senior unsecured notes.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2004, it was determined that the projected undiscounted cash flows from one of our properties did not exceed its related net book value and an impairment charge of $314,000 was recorded to reduce the property to its estimated fair market value. The estimated fair market value of the property was determined by an independent appraisal. We did not record any impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2005 or December 31, 2006.
 
The provision for loan losses is related to our critical accounting estimate for the allowance for loan losses and is discussed below in “Critical Accounting Policies.”
 
Other items were comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
                                                                         
    Year Ended     One Year Change     Year Ended     One Year Change     Two Year Change  
    Dec. 31, 2004     Dec. 31, 2005     $     %     Dec. 31, 2006     $     %     $     %  
 
Minority interests
                                  $ (13 )   $ (13 )     n/a     $ (13 )     n/a  
Gain (loss) on sales of properties
    (143 )     3,227       3,370       n/a       1,267       (1,960 )     (61 )%     1,410       n/a  
Discontinued operations, net
    3,306       1,213       (2,093 )     (63 )%     (2,021 )     (3,234 )     n/a       (5,327 )     n/a  
Preferred dividends
    (12,737 )     (21,594 )     (8,857 )     70 %     (21,463 )     131       (1 )%     (8,726 )     69 %
                                                                         
Totals
  $ (9,574 )   $ (17,154 )   $ (7,580 )     44 %   $ (22,230 )   $ (5,076 )     30 %   $ (12,656 )     132 %
                                                                         
 
Three assisted living facilities were held for sale at December 31, 2006 and were sold subsequent to year-end. During the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, we sold properties with carrying values of $37,710,000, $88,098,000 and $75,989,000 for net losses of $143,000 and net gains of $3,227,000 and $1,267,000, respectively.


53


Table of Contents

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, we have reclassified the income and expenses attributable to the properties sold subsequent to January 1, 2002 and attributable to assets held for sale at December 31, 2006 to discontinued operations. These properties generated $3,306,000 and $1,213,000 of income after deducting depreciation and interest expense from rental revenue for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively and a loss of $2,021,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006. Please refer to Note 16 of our audited consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
 
The increase in preferred dividends is primarily due to the increase in average outstanding preferred shares. The following is a summary of our preferred stock activity:
 
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2004     Year Ended December 31, 2005     Year Ended December 31, 2006  
          Weighted Average
          Weighted Average
          Weighted Average
 
    Shares     Dividend Rate     Shares     Dividend Rate     Shares     Dividend Rate  
 
Beginning balance
    4,830,444       7.553 %     11,350,045       7.663 %     11,074,989       7.704 %
Shares issued
    7,000,000       7.625 %                     2,100,000       7.500 %
Shares redeemed
                                               
Shares converted
    (480,399 )     6.000 %     (275,056 )     6.000 %                
                                                 
Ending balance
    11,350,045       7.663 %     11,074,989       7.704 %     13,174,989       7.672 %
                                                 
Monthly averages
    6,786,481       7.621 %     11,245,073       7.679 %     11,236,527       7.701 %
 
In conjunction with the acquisition of Windrose Medical Properties Trust in December 2006, we issued 2,100,000 shares of 7.5% Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. These shares have a liquidation value of $25.00 per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears. The preferred stock, which has no stated maturity, may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares to the redemption date, on or after June 30, 2010. Each Series G Preferred Share is convertible by the holder into our common stock at a conversion price of $34.93, equivalent to a conversion rate of 0.7157 common shares per Series G Preferred Share. These shares were recorded at $29.58 per share, which was deemed to be the fair value at the date of issuance.
 
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
 
We believe that net income available to common stockholders, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measurement. However, we consider FFO and FAD to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time as evidenced by the provision for depreciation. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentations of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. In response, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for REITs that excludes historical cost depreciation from net income. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, means net income, computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP, excluding gains (or losses) from sales of real estate, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. FAD represents FFO excluding the net straight-line rental adjustments, rental income related to above/below market leases and amortization of deferred loan expenses and less cash used to fund capital expenditures, tenant improvements and lease commissions.
 
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 145 that requires gains and losses on extinguishment of debt to be classified as income or loss from continuing operations rather than as extraordinary items as previously required under Statement No. 4. We adopted the standard effective January 1, 2003 and have properly reflected the $21,484,000, or $0.39 per diluted share, of losses on extinguishment of debt for the year ended December 31, 2005. These charges have not been added back for the calculations of FFO, FAD or EBITDA.
 
In October 2003, NAREIT informed its member companies that the SEC had changed its position on certain aspects of the NAREIT FFO definition, including impairment charges. Previously, the SEC accepted NAREIT’s view that impairment charges were effectively an early recognition of an expected loss on an impending sale of


54


Table of Contents

property and thus should be added back to net income in the calculation of FFO and FAD similar to other gains and losses on sales. However, the SEC’s clarified interpretation is that recurring impairments taken on real property may not be added back to net income in the calculation of FFO and FAD. We have adopted this interpretation and have not added back impairment charges of $314,000, or $0.01 per diluted share, recorded for the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We believe that EBITDA, along with net income and cash flow provided from operating activities, is an important supplemental measure because it provides additional information to assess and evaluate the performance of our operations. Additionally, restrictive covenants in our long-term debt arrangements contain financial ratios based on EBITDA. We primarily utilize EBITDA to measure our interest coverage ratio, which represents EBITDA divided by total interest, and our fixed charge coverage ratio, which represents EBITDA divided by fixed charges. Fixed charges include total interest, secured debt principal amortization and preferred dividends.
 
FFO, FAD and EBITDA are financial measures that are widely used by investors, equity and debt analysts and rating agencies in the valuation, comparison, rating and investment recommendations of companies. Management uses these financial measures to facilitate internal and external comparisons to our historical operating results and in making operating decisions. Additionally, FFO and FAD are utilized by the Board of Directors to evaluate management. FFO, FAD and EBITDA do not represent net income or cash flow provided from operating activities as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternative measures of profitability or liquidity. Finally, FFO, FAD and EBITDA, as defined by us, may not be comparable to similarly entitled items reported by other real estate investment trusts or other companies.
 
Net operating income (“NOI”) is used to evaluate the operating performance of certain real estate properties such as medical office buildings. We define NOI as rental revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less property level operating expenses, which exclude depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, impairments, interest expense and discontinued operations. We believe NOI provides investors relevant and useful information because it measures the operating performance of our medical office buildings at the property level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess the property level performance of our medical office buildings.
 
The table below reflects the reconciliation of FFO to net income available to common stockholders, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented. The provisions for depreciation and amortization includes provisions for depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations. Amounts are in thousands except for per share data.
 


55


Table of Contents

                         
    Year Ended  
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2004     2005     2006  
 
FFO Reconciliation:
                       
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 72,634     $ 62,692     $ 81,287  
Depreciation and amortization
    74,015       84,828       97,564  
Loss (gain) on sales of properties
    143       (3,227 )     (1,267 )
Minority interests
                    (4 )
Prepayment fees
    (50 )                
                         
Funds from operations
  $ 146,742     $ 144,293     $ 177,580  
Average common shares outstanding:
                       
Basic
    51,544       54,110       61,661  
Diluted
    52,082       54,499       62,045  
Per share data:
                       
Net income available to common stockholders
                       
Basic
  $ 1.41     $ 1.16     $ 1.32  
Diluted
    1.39       1.15       1.31  
Funds from operations
                       
Basic
  $ 2.85     $ 2.67     $ 2.88  
Diluted
    2.82       2.65       2.86  

56


Table of Contents

The table below reflects the reconciliation of FAD to net income available to common stockholders, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented. The provisions for depreciation and amortization includes provisions for depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations. Amounts are in thousands except for per share data.
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2004     2005     2006  
 
FAD Reconciliation:
                       
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 72,634     $ 62,692     $ 81,287  
Depreciation and amortization
    74,015       84,828       97,564  
Loss (gain) on sales of properties
    143       (3,227 )     (1,267 )
Prepayment fees
    (50 )                
Gross straight-line rental income
    (21,936 )     (13,142 )     (9,432 )
Prepaid/straight-line rent receipts
    8,144       13,869       20,561  
Rental income related to above/(below) market leases, net
                    (60 )
Amortization of deferred loan expenses
    3,393       2,710       3,255  
Cap Ex, tenant improvements, lease commissions
                    (21 )
Minority interests
                    (2 )
                         
Funds available for distribution
  $ 136,343     $ 147,730     $ 191,885  
Average common shares outstanding:
                       
Basic
    51,544       54,110       61,661  
Diluted
    52,082       54,499       62,045  
Per share data:
                       
Net income available to common stockholders
                       
Basic
  $ 1.41     $ 1.16     $ 1.32  
Diluted
    1.39       1.15       1.31  
Funds available for distribution
                       
Basic
  $ 2.65     $ 2.73     $ 3.11  
Diluted
    2.62       2.71       3.09  


57


Table of Contents

The table below reflects the reconciliation of EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, for the periods presented. Interest expense and the provisions for depreciation and amortization includes discontinued operations. Tax expense represents income-based taxes. Amortization represents the amortization of deferred loan expenses. Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA as adjusted below for items pursuant to covenant provisions of our unsecured lines of credit arrangements. Dollars are in thousands.
 
                         
    Year Ended  
    December 31,
    December 31,
    December 31,
 
    2004     2005     2006  
 
EBITDA Reconciliation:
                       
Net income
  $ 85,371     $ 84,286     $ 102,750  
Interest expense
    72,556       82,625       96,834  
Tax expense(benefit)
    42       282       82  
Depreciation and amortization
    74,015       84,828       97,564  
Amortization of deferred loan expenses
    4,247       2,710       3,255  
                         
EBITDA
    236,231       254,731       300,485  
Stock-based compensation expense
    2,887       2,948       6,980  
Provision for loan losses
    1,200       1,200       1,000  
Loss on extinguishment of debt, net
            20,662          
                         
EBITDA - adjusted
  $ 240,318     $ 279,541     $ 308,465  
Interest Coverage Ratio:
                       
Interest expense
  $ 72,556     $ 82,625     $ 96,834  
Capitalized interest
    875       665       4,470  
                         
Total interest
    73,431       83,290       101,304  
EBITDA
  $ 236,231     $ 254,731     $ 300,485  
                         
Interest coverage ratio
    3.22 x     3.06 x     2.97 x
EBITDA - adjusted
  $ 240,318     $ 279,541     $ 308,465  
                         
Interest coverage ratio - adjusted
    3.27 x     3.36 x     3.04 x
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio:
                       
Total interest
  $ 73,431     $ 83,290     $ 101,304  
Secured debt principal amortization
    2,514       2,685       3,033  
Preferred dividends
    12,737       21,594       21,463  
                         
Total fixed charges
    88,682       107,569       125,800  
EBITDA
  $ 236,231     $ 254,731     $ 300,485  
                         
Fixed charge coverage ratio
    2.66 x     2.37 x     2.39 x
EBITDA - adjusted
  $ 240,318     $ 279,541     $ 308,465  
                         
Fixed charge coverage ratio - adjusted
    2.71 x     2.60 x     2.45 x
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions. Management considers an accounting estimate or assumption critical if:
 
  •  the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and
 
  •  the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.


58


Table of Contents

 
Management has discussed the development and selection of its critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed the disclosure presented below relating to them. Management believes the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements are appropriate and are not reasonably likely to change in the future. However, since these estimates require assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made, they bear the risk of change. If actual experience differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in our consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, liquidity and/or financial condition. Please refer to Note 1 of our audited consolidated financial statements for further information on significant accounting policies that impact us. There were no material changes to these policies in 2006.
 
We adopted the fair value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective January 1, 2003 using the prospective method described in FASB Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure. Because Statement 123(R) must be applied not only to new awards but to previously granted awards that are not fully vested on the effective date of Statement 123(R), and because we adopted Statement 123 using the prospective transition method (which applied only to awards granted, modified or settled after the adoption date of Statement 123), compensation cost for some previously granted awards that were not recognized under Statement 123 has been recognized under Statement 123(R). Additionally, we amortize compensation cost for share based payments to the date that the awards become fully vested or to the expected retirement date, if sooner. Effective with the adoption of Statement 123(R) we began recognizing compensation cost to the date the awards become fully vested or to the retirement eligible date, if sooner. Had we adopted Statement 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of Statement 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share to our audited consolidated financial statements. The adoption of Statement 123(R) increased compensation cost by approximately $1,287,000 for 2006 as a result of amortizing share based awards to the retirement eligible date.
 
The following table presents information about our critical accounting policies, as well as the material assumptions used to develop each estimate:
 
     
Nature of Critical
  Assumptions/
Accounting Estimate
 
Approach Used
 
Allowance for Loan Losses    
We maintain an allowance for loan losses in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, as amended, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102, Selected Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses in our loans receivable. The determination of the allowance is based on a quarterly evaluation of all outstanding loans. If this evaluation indicates that there is a greater risk of loan charge-offs, additional allowances or placement on non-accrual status may be required. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due as scheduled according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. Consistent with this definition, all loans on non-accrual are deemed impaired. To the extent circumstances improve and the risk of collectibility is diminished, we will return these loans to full accrual status.  
The determination of the allowance is based on a quarterly evaluation of all outstanding loans, including general economic conditions and estimated collectibility of loan payments and principal. We evaluate the collectibility of our loans receivable based on a combination of factors, including, but not limited to, delinquency status, historical loan charge-offs, financial strength of the borrower and guarantors and value of the underlying property or other collateral.

For the year ended December 31, 2006 we recorded $1,000,000 as provision for loan losses, resulting in an allowance for loan losses of $7,406,000 relating to loans with outstanding balances of $78,113,000 at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, we had loans with outstanding balances of $10,529,000 on non- accrual status.
     
Depreciation and Amortization and Useful Lives    
Substantially all of the properties owned by us are leased under operating leases and are recorded at cost. The cost of our real property is allocated to land, buildings, improvements and intangibles in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations. The allocation of the acquisition costs of properties is based on appraisals commissioned from independent real estate appraisal firms.  
We compute depreciation and amortization on our properties using the straight-line method based on their estimated useful lives which range from 15 to 40 years for buildings, five to 15 years for improvements and five years for intangibles.

For the year ended December 31, 2006, we recorded $79,284,000, $17,955,000 and $325,000 as provisions for depreciation and amortization relating to buildings, improvements and intangibles, respectively, including amounts reclassified as discontinued


59


Table of Contents

     
Nature of Critical
  Assumptions/
Accounting Estimate
 
Approach Used
 
     
    operations. The average useful life of our buildings and improvements was 32.1 years and 11.5 years, respectively, at December 31, 2006. The amortization of lease intangibles represents 12 days of amortization expenses due to the Windrose merger on December 20, 2006.
     
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets    
We review our long-lived assets for potential impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. An impairment charge must be recognized when the carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable. The carrying value is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. If it is determined that a permanent impairment of a long-lived asset has occurred, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to its fair value and an impairment charge is recognized for the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.  
The net book value of long-lived assets is reviewed quarterly on a property by property basis to determine if there are indicators of impairment. These indicators may include anticipated operating losses at the property level, the tenant’s inability to make rent payments, a decision to dispose of an asset before the end of its estimated useful life and changes in the market that may permanently reduce the value of the property. If indicators of impairment exist, then the undiscounted future cash flows from the most likely use of the property are compared to the current net book value. This analysis requires us to determine if indicators of impairment exist and to estimate the most likely stream of cash flows to be generated from the property during the period the property is expected to be held.

We did not record any impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2006.
     
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments    
The valuation of derivative instruments is accounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (‘SFAS133”), as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities. SFAS133, as amended, requires companies to record derivatives at fair market value on the balance sheet as assets or liabilities.   The valuation of derivative instruments requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. Fair values for our derivatives are estimated by a third party consultant, which utilizes pricing models that consider forward yield curves and discount rates. Such amounts and the recognition of such amounts are subject to significant estimates which may change in the future. At December 31, 2006, we participated in two interest rate swap agreements related to our long-term debt. At December 31, 2006, the swaps were reported at their fair value as a $902,000 other asset. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we incurred $197,000 of losses related to our swaps that was recorded as an addition to interest expense.
     
Revenue Recognition    
Revenue is recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as amended (‘SAB104‘). SAB104 requires that revenue be recognized after four basic criteria are met. These four criteria include persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectibility. If the collectibility of revenue is determined incorrectly, the amount and timing of our reported revenue could be significantly affected. Interest income on loans is recognized as earned based upon the principal amount outstanding subject to an evaluation of collectibility risk. Substantially all of our operating leases contain either fixed or contingent escalating rent structure. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight- line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period.  
We evaluate the collectibility of our revenues and related receivables on an on-going basis. We evaluate collectibility based on assumptions and other considerations including, but not limited to, the certainty of payment, payment history, the financial strength of the investment’s underlying operations as measured by cash flows and payment coverages, the value of the underlying collateral and guaranties and current economic conditions.

If our evaluation indicates that collectibility is not reasonably assured, we may place an investment on non-accrual or reserve against all or a portion of current income as an offset to revenue.

For the year ended December 31, 2006 we recognized $18,829,000 of interest income and $305,635,000 of rental income, including discontinued operations. Cash receipts on leases with deferred revenue provisions were $20,561,000 as compared to gross straight-line rental income recognized of $9,432,000. At December 31, 2006, our straight-line receivable balance was $53,281,000, net of reserves totaling $5,902,000. Also at December 31, 2006, we had loans with outstanding balances of $10,529,000 on non-accrual status.
 
Impact of Inflation
 
During the past three years, inflation has not significantly affected our earnings because of the moderate inflation rate. Additionally, our earnings are primarily long-term investments with fixed rates of return. These investments are mainly financed with a combination of equity, senior unsecured notes and borrowings under our

60


Table of Contents

unsecured lines of credit arrangements. During inflationary periods, which generally are accompanied by rising interest rates, our ability to grow may be adversely affected because the yield on new investments may increase at a slower rate than new borrowing costs. Presuming the current inflation rate remains moderate and long-term interest rates do not increase significantly, we believe that inflation will not impact the availability of equity and debt financing for us.
 
Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 
We are exposed to various market risks, including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. We seek to mitigate the effects of fluctuations in interest rates by matching the terms of new investments with new long-term fixed rate borrowings to the extent possible. We may or may not elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. These decisions are principally based on our policy to fund our fixed rate investments with long-term fixed rate debt and equity, but are also based on the general trend in interest rates at the applicable dates and our perception of the future volatility of interest rates. The following section is presented to provide a discussion of the risks associated with potential fluctuations in interest rates.
 
We historically borrow on our unsecured lines of credit arrangements to acquire, construct or make loans relating to health care and senior housing properties. Then, as market conditions dictate, we will issue equity or long-term fixed rate debt to repay the borrowings under the unsecured lines of credit arrangements.
 
A change in interest rates will not affect the interest expense associated with our fixed rate debt. Interest rate changes, however, will affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt. At December 31, 2006, we had $1,539,830,000 of outstanding principal balances related to our senior unsecured notes. A 1% increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in fair value of our senior unsecured notes by approximately $71,108,000 at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2005, we had $1,194,830,000 of outstanding principal balances related to our senior unsecured notes. A 1% increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in fair value of our senior unsecured notes by approximately $36,770,000 at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2006, we had $363,848,000 of outstanding principal balances related to our fixed rate secured debt. A 1% increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in fair value of our fixed rate secured debt by approximately $17,214,000 at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2005, we had $107,540,000 of outstanding principal balances related to our fixed rate secured debt. A 1% increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in fair value of our fixed rate secured debt by approximately $3,962,000 at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2006, we had $51,000,000 of outstanding principal balances related to our liability to a subsidiary trust issuing preferred securities. A 1% increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in fair value of this liability by approximately $1,891,000 at December 31, 2006. Changes in the interest rate environment upon maturity of this fixed rate debt could have an effect on our future cash flows and earnings, depending on whether the debt is replaced with other fixed rate debt, variable rate debt or equity, or repaid by the sale of assets.
 
On May 6, 2004, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements (the “Swaps”) for a total notional amount of $100,000,000 to hedge changes in fair value attributable to changes in the LIBOR swap rate of $100,000,000 of fixed rate debt with a maturity date of November 15, 2013. The Swaps are treated as fair-value hedges for accounting purposes and we utilize the short-cut method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. The Swaps are with highly rated counterparties in which we receive a fixed rate of 6.0% and pay a variable rate based on six-month LIBOR plus a spread. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Swaps were reported at their fair values as a $902,000 and $2,211,000 other asset, respectively. A 1% increase in interest rates would result in a decrease in fair value of our Swaps by approximately $4,659,000 and $6,435,000 at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
 
Our variable rate debt, including our unsecured lines of credit arrangements and one mortgage loan, is reflected at fair value. At December 31, 2006, we had $239,552,000 outstanding related to our variable rate debt and assuming no changes in outstanding balances, a 1% increase in interest rates would result in increased annual interest expense of $2,396,000. At December 31, 2005, we had $195,000,000 outstanding related to our variable rate debt and assuming no changes in outstanding balances, a 1% increase in interest rates would have resulted in increased annual interest expense of $1,950,000.


61


Table of Contents

 
We are subject to risks associated with debt financing, including the risk that existing indebtedness may not be refinanced or that the terms of refinancing may not be as favorable as the terms of current indebtedness. The majority of our borrowings were completed under indentures or contractual agreements that limit the amount of indebtedness we may incur. Accordingly, in the event that we are unable to raise additional equity or borrow money because of these limitations, our ability to acquire additional properties may be limited.
 
For additional information regarding fair values of financial instruments, see “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies” and Note 15 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
 
Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
Stockholders and Directors
Health Care REIT, Inc.
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Health Care REIT, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Health Care REIT, Inc. at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
As discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.”
 
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Health Care REIT, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
Toledo, Ohio
February 28, 2007


62


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2006     2005  
    (In thousands)  
 
ASSETS
Real estate investments:
               
Real property owned
               
Land and land improvements
  $ 386,693     $ 261,236  
Buildings & improvements
    3,659,065       2,659,746  
Acquired lease intangibles
    84,082       0  
Real property held for sale, net of accumulated depreciation
    14,796       11,912  
Construction in progress
    138,222       3,906  
                 
      4,282,858       2,936,800  
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (347,007 )     (274,875 )
                 
Total real property owned
    3,935,851       2,661,925  
Loans receivable
    194,448       194,054  
Less allowance for losses on loans receivable
    (7,406 )     (6,461 )
                 
      187,042       187,593  
                 
Net real estate investments
    4,122,893       2,849,518  
Other assets:
               
Equity investments
    4,700       2,970  
Deferred loan expenses
    20,657       12,228  
Cash and cash equivalents
    36,216       36,237  
Receivables and other assets
    96,144       71,211  
                 
      157,717       122,646  
                 
Total assets
  $ 4,280,610     $ 2,972,164  
                 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
               
Borrowings under unsecured lines of credit arrangements
  $ 225,000     $ 195,000  
Senior unsecured notes
    1,541,814       1,198,278  
Secured debt
    378,972       107,540  
Liability to subsidiary trust issuing preferred securities
    52,215       0  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    101,588       40,590  
                 
Total liabilities
    2,299,589       1,541,408  
Minority interests
    2,228       0  
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value:
    338,993       276,875  
Authorized — 25,000,000 shares
               
Issued and outstanding — 13,174,989 in 2006 and 11,074,989 shares in 2005 at liquidation preference
               
Common stock, $1.00 par value:
    73,152       58,050  
Authorized — 125,000,000 shares
               
Issued — 73,272,052 shares in 2006 and 58,182,592 shares in 2005
               
Outstanding — 73,192,128 shares in 2006 and 58,124,657 shares in 2005
               
Capital in excess of par value
    1,873,811       1,306,471  
Treasury stock
    (2,866 )     (2,054 )
Cumulative net income
    932,853       830,103  
Cumulative dividends
    (1,238,860 )     (1,039,032 )
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (135 )     0  
Other equity
    1,845       343  
                 
Total stockholders’ equity
    1,978,793       1,430,756  
                 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 4,280,610     $ 2,972,164  
                 
 
See accompanying notes


63


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
    (In thousands, except per share data)  
 
Revenues:
                       
Rental income
  $ 300,071     $ 244,997     $ 205,182  
Interest income
    18,829       23,993       22,818  
Other income
    3,924       4,548       2,432  
Prepayment fees
                    50  
                         
      322,824       273,538       230,482  
Expenses:
                       
Interest expense
    94,802       77,319       65,888  
Property operating expenses
    1,115                  
Depreciation and amortization
    93,131       74,816       61,681  
General and administrative
    26,004       16,163       15,798  
Loan expense
    3,255       2,710       3,393  
Impairment of assets
                    314  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
            21,484          
Provision for loan losses
    1,000       1,200       1,200  
                         
      219,307       193,692       148,274  
                         
Income before minority interests
    103,517       79,846       82,208  
Minority interests
    (13 )                
                         
Income from continuing operations
    103,504       79,846       82,208  
Discontinued operations:
                       
Net gain (loss) on sales of properties
    1,267       3,227       (143 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
    (2,021 )     1,213       3,306  
                         
      (754 )     4,440       3,163  
                         
Net income
    102,750       84,286       85,371  
Preferred stock dividends
    21,463       21,594       12,737  
                         
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 81,287     $ 62,692     $ 72,634  
                         
Average number of common shares outstanding:
                       
Basic
    61,661       54,110       51,544  
Diluted
    62,045       54,499       52,082  
Earnings per share:
                       
Basic:
                       
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders
  $ 1.33     $ 1.08     $ 1.35  
Discontinued operations, net
    (0.01 )     0.08       0.06  
                         
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 1.32     $ 1.16     $ 1.41  
                         
Diluted:
                       
Income from continuing operations and after preferred stock dividends
  $ 1.32     $ 1.07     $ 1.33  
Discontinued operations, net
    (0.01 )     0.08       0.06  
                         
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 1.31     $ 1.15     $ 1.39  
                         
 
See accompanying notes


64


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
                                                                         
                                        Accumulated
             
                Capital in
                      Other
             
    Preferred
    Common
    Excess of
    Treasury
    Cumulative
    Cumulative
    Comprehensive
    Other
       
    Stock     Stock     Par Value     Stock     Net Income     Dividends     Loss     Equity     Total  
          (In thousands, except per share data)                          
 
Balances at December 31, 2003
  $ 120,761     $ 50,298     $ 1,069,887     $ (523 )   $ 660,446     $ (749,166 )   $ 1     $ (2,025 )   $ 1,149,679  
Comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Net income
                                    85,371                               85,371  
Other comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Unrealized loss on equity investments
                                                                    0  
                                                                         
Total comprehensive income
                                                                    85,371  
                                                                         
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from dividend reinvestment and stock incentive plans, net of forfeitures
            2,194       64,087       (763 )                                     65,518  
Restricted stock amortization
                                                            949       949  
Option compensation expense
                                                            379       379  
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
    175,000               (5,893 )                                             169,107  
Redemption of preferred stock
    (12,010 )     368       11,642                                               0  
Cash dividends:
                                                                       
Common stock-$2.385 per share
                                            (122,987 )                     (122,987 )
Preferred stock, Series D-$1.97 per share
                                            (7,875 )                     (7,875 )
Preferred stock, Series E-$1.50 per share
                                            (933 )                     (933 )
Preferred stock, Series F-$1.50 per share
                                            (3,929 )                     (3,929 )
                                                                         
Balances at December 31, 2004
    283,751       52,860       1,139,723       (1,286 )     745,817       (884,890 )     1       (697 )     1,335,279  
Comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Net income
                                    84,286                               84,286  
Other comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Unrealized loss on equity investments
                                                    (1 )             (1 )
                                                                         
Total comprehensive income
                                                                    84,285  
                                                                         
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from dividend reinvestment and stock incentive plans, net of forfeitures
            1,980       62,105       (768 )                                     63,317  
Restricted stock amortization
                                                            728       728  
Option compensation expense
                                                            312       312  
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
            3,000       97,977                                               100,977  
Conversion of preferred stock
    (6,876 )     210       6,666                                               0  
Cash dividends:
                                                                       
Common stock-$2.46 per share
                                            (132,548 )                     (132,548 )
Preferred stock, Series D-$1.97 per share
                                            (7,875 )                     (7,875 )
Preferred stock, Series E-$1.50 per share
                                            (375 )                     (375 )
Preferred stock, Series F-$1.91 per share
                                            (13,344 )                     (13,344 )
                                                                         
Balances at December 31, 2005
    276,875       58,050       1,306,471       (2,054 )     830,103       (1,039,032 )     0       343       1,430,756  
Net income
                                    102,750                               102,750  
Other comprehensive income:
                                                                    0  
                                                                         
Total comprehensive income
                                                                    102,750  
                                                                         
Adjustment to adopt SFAS 158
                                                    (135 )             (135 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock from dividend reinvestment and stock incentive plans, net of forfeitures
            2,200       75,081       (812 )                             (85 )     76,384  
Option compensation expense
                                                            1,066       1,066  
Shares issued in Windrose Medical Properties Trust merger
    62,118       9,679       386,255                                               458,052  
Net proceeds from sale of common stock
            3,223       106,525                                               109,748  
SFAS 123(R) reclassification
                    (521 )                                     521       0  
Cash dividends:
                                                                       
Common stock-$2.8809 per share
                                            (178,365 )                     (178,365 )
Preferred stock, Series D-$1.97 per share
                                            (7,875 )                     (7,875 )
Preferred stock, Series E-$1.50 per share
                                            (112 )                     (112 )
Preferred stock, Series F-$1.91 per share
                                            (13,344 )                     (13,344 )
Preferred stock, Series G-$0.06 per share
                                            (132 )                     (132 )
                                                                         
Balances at December 31, 2006
  $ 338,993     $ 73,152     $ 1,873,811     $ (2,866 )   $ 932,853     $ (1,238,860 )   $ (135 )   $ 1,845     $ 1,978,793  
                                                                         
 
See accompanying notes


65


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
    (In thousands)  
 
Operating activities
                       
Net income
  $ 102,750     $ 84,286     $ 85,371  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    97,564       84,828       74,015  
Other amortization expenses
    3,090       3,935       3,393  
Stock-based compensation expense
    6,980       2,948       2,887  
Capitalized interest
    (4,470 )     (665 )     (875 )
Provision for loan losses
    1,000       1,200       1,200  
Minority interests
    13                  
Impairment of assets
                    314  
Rental income less than (in excess of) cash received
    11,069       727       (13,792 )
Loss (gain) on sales of properties
    (1,267 )     (3,227 )     143  
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses and other liabilities
    5,810       (3,375 )     2,030  
Decrease (increase) in receivables and other assets
    (6,093 )     3,098       (10,661 )
                         
Net cash provided from (used in) operating activities
    216,446       173,755       144,025  
Investing activities
                       
Investment in real property
    (429,183 )     (599,291 )     (542,547 )
Investment in loans receivable
    (86,990 )     (40,387 )     (61,888 )
Other investments, net of payments
    (11,761 )     328          
Principal collected on loans receivable
    82,255       98,638       55,473  
Investment in Windrose, net of cash assumed
    (182,571 )                
Proceeds from sales of properties
    69,887       91,325       37,567  
Other
    (2,452 )     318       4,033  
                         
Net cash provided from (used in) investing activities
    (560,815 )     (449,069 )     (507,362 )
Financing activities
                       
Net increase under unsecured lines of credit arrangements
    30,000       44,000       151,000  
Proceeds from issuance of senior unsecured notes
    337,517       544,053       50,708  
Principal payments on senior unsecured notes
            (230,170 )     (40,000 )
Principal payments on secured debt
    (3,033 )     (74,994 )     (2,514 )
Net proceeds from the issuance of common stock
    182,069       165,062       66,281  
Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock
                    169,107  
Increase in deferred loan expense
    (2,377 )     (2,021 )     (254 )
Cash distributions to stockholders
    (199,828 )     (154,142 )     (135,724 )
                         
Net cash provided from (used in) financing activities
    344,348       291,788       258,604  
                         
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (21 )     16,474       (104,733 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    36,237       19,763       124,496  
                         
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 36,216     $ 36,237     $ 19,763  
                         
Supplemental cash flow information-interest paid
  $ 94,461     $ 85,123     $ 73,308  
                         
Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:
                       
Secured debt assumed from real property acquisitions
    25,049       22,309       14,555  
Assets and liabilities assumed from the Windrose acquisition:
                       
Real estate investments
  $ 975,475                  
Other assets acquired
    21,154                  
Secured debt
    249,424                  
Liability to subsidiary trust issuing preferred securities
    52,217                  
Other liabilities
    42,468                  
Minority interests
    2,215                  
Issuance of common stock
    396,846                  
Issuance of preferred stock
    62,118                  
 
See accompanying notes


66


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
1.   Accounting Policies and Related Matters
 
Industry
 
We are a self-administered, equity real estate investment trust that invests across the full spectrum of senior housing and health care real estate including skilled nursing facilities, independent living facilities/continuing care retirement communities, assisted living facilities, hospitals, long-term acute care hospitals and medical office buildings.
 
Principles of Consolidation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our wholly owned subsidiaries after the elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Revenue is recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as amended (“SAB 104”). SAB 104 requires that revenue be recognized after four basic criteria are met. These four criteria include persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectibility. Interest income on loans is recognized as earned based upon the principal amount outstanding subject to an evaluation of collectibility risk. Substantially all of our operating leases contain either fixed or contingent escalating rent structures. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectibility assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less.
 
Loans Receivable
 
Loans receivable consist of mortgage loans, construction loans and working capital loans. Interest income on loans is recognized as earned based upon the principal amount outstanding subject to an evaluation of collectibility risks. The mortgage loans and construction loans are primarily collateralized by a first or second mortgage lien or leasehold mortgage on, or an assignment of the partnership interest in, the related properties. Working capital loans are generally either unsecured or secured by the operator’s leasehold rights, corporate guaranties and/or personal guaranties.
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
 
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate to absorb potential losses in our loans receivable. The determination of the allowance is based on a quarterly evaluation of these loans, including general economic conditions and estimated collectibility of loan payments. We evaluate the collectibility of our loans receivable based on a combination of factors, including, but not limited to, delinquency status, historical loan charge-offs, financial strength of the borrower and guarantors and value of the underlying collateral. If such factors


67


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

indicate that there is greater risk of loan charge-offs, additional allowances or placement on non-accrual status may be required. A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due as scheduled according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. Consistent with this definition, all loans on non-accrual are deemed impaired. At December 31, 2006, we had loans with outstanding balances of $10,529,000 on non-accrual status ($16,770,000 at December 31, 2005). To the extent circumstances improve and the risk of collectibility is diminished, we will return these loans to full accrual status. While a loan is on non-accrual status, any cash receipts are applied against the outstanding balance.
 
Real Property Owned
 
Real property developed by us is recorded at cost, including the capitalization of construction period interest. The cost of real property acquired is allocated to net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on their respective fair values in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations. The allocation of the acquisition costs of tangible assets (land, building and equipment) is based on appraisals commissioned from independent real estate appraisal firms. Substantially all of the properties owned by us are leased under operating leases and are recorded at cost. These properties are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives which range from 15 to 40 years for buildings and five to 15 years for improvements.
 
The remaining purchase price is allocated among identifiable intangible assets primarily consisting of the above or below market component of in-place leases and the value of in-place leases.
 
The value allocable to the above or below market component of the acquired in-place lease is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the lease over its remaining term, and (ii) management’s estimate of the amounts that would be paid using fair market rates over the remaining term of the lease. The amounts allocated to above market leases are included in acquired lease intangibles and below market leases are included in other liabilities in the balance sheet and are amortized to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
 
The total amount of other intangible assets acquired is further allocated to in-place lease values and customer relationship values based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics considered by management in allocating these values include the nature and extent of the Company’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors. The estimated aggregate amortization expense for acquired lease intangibles is approximately $16,816,000 for each of the next five years.
 
The net book value of long-lived assets is reviewed quarterly on a property by property basis to determine if facts and circumstances suggest that the assets may be impaired or that the depreciable life may need to be changed. We consider external factors relating to each asset. If these external factors and the projected undiscounted cash flows of the asset over the remaining depreciation period indicate that the asset will not be recoverable, the carrying value may be reduced to the estimated fair market value.
 
Capitalization of Construction Period Interest
 
We capitalize interest costs associated with funds used to finance the construction of properties owned directly by us. The amount capitalized is based upon the balance outstanding during the construction period using the rate of interest which approximates our cost of financing. We capitalized interest costs of $4,470,000, $665,000, and $875,000, during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to construction of real property owned by us. Our interest expense reflected in the consolidated statements of income has been reduced by the amounts capitalized.


68


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
Deferred Loan Expenses
 
Deferred loan expenses are costs incurred by us in connection with the issuance, assumption and amendments of short-term and long-term debt. We amortize these costs over the term of the debt using the straight-line method, which approximates the interest yield method.
 
Equity Investments
 
Equity investments consist of investments in private companies where we do not have the ability to exercise influence and are accounted for under the cost method. Under the cost method of accounting, investments in private companies are carried at cost and are adjusted only for other-than-temporary declines in fair value, distributions of earnings and additional investments. For investments in public companies, if any that have readily determinable fair market values, we classify our equity investments as available-for-sale and, accordingly, record these investments at their fair market values with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of stockholders’ equity. These investments represent a minimal ownership interest in these companies. In connection with the Windrose merger, we assumed a $1,000,000 investment in an unconsolidated subsidiary that holds trust preferred securities and is accounted for under the cost method.
 
Segment Reporting
 
We report consolidated financial statements in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Segments are based on our method of internal reporting which classifies operations by leasing activities. Our segments include investment properties and operating properties. See Note 18 for additional information.
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains or losses on our equity investments and unrecognized actuarial losses from the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — An amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) on December 31, 2006. Accumulated unrealized gains and losses totaled $0, $0 and $1,000 at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and is included as a component of stockholders’ equity.
 
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
 
We are exposed to various market risks, including the potential loss arising from adverse changes in interest rates. We may or may not elect to use financial derivative instruments to hedge interest rate exposure. These decisions are principally based on our policy to fund our fixed rate investments with long-term fixed rate debt and equity, but are also based on the general trend in interest rates at the applicable dates and our perception of the future volatility of interest rates.
 
On May 6, 2004, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements (the “Swaps”) for a total notional amount of $100,000,000 to hedge changes in fair value attributable to changes in the LIBOR swap rate of $100,000,000 of fixed rate debt with a maturity date of November 15, 2013. The Swaps are treated as fair-value hedges for accounting purposes and we utilize the short-cut method in accordance with Statement No. 133, as amended. The Swaps are with highly rated counterparties in which we receive a fixed rate of 6.0% and pay a variable rate based on six-month LIBOR plus a spread. The hedging arrangement is considered highly effective and, as such, changes in the Swaps’ fair values exactly offset the corresponding changes in the fair value of senior unsecured notes and, as a result, the changes in fair value do not result in an impact on net income. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Swaps were reported at their fair value of $902,000 and $2,211,000, respectively, in other assets with an offsetting adjustment to the underlying senior unsecured notes. For the year ended December 31, 2006, we incurred $197,000 of losses related to the Swaps that was recorded as an addition to interest expense. For the years ended December 31,


69


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

2005 and 2004, we generated $972,000 and $1,770,000, respectively, of savings related to the Swaps that was recorded as a reduction in interest expense.
 
The valuation of derivative instruments requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. Fair values for our derivatives are estimated by a third party consultant, which utilizes pricing models that consider forward yield curves and discount rates. Such amounts and the recognition of such amounts are subject to significant estimates that may change in the future.
 
Earnings Per Share
 
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock. The computation of diluted earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except that the number of shares is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.
 
Federal Income Tax
 
No provision has been made for federal income taxes since we have elected to be treated as a real estate investment trust under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, and we believe that we have met the requirements for qualification as such for each taxable year. See Note 12.
 
New Accounting Standards
 
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. See Note 9 for a discussion of our adoption of Statement 123(R) as of January 1, 2006.
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — An amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). The statement requires employers to recognize the overfunded and underfunded portion of a defined benefit plan as an asset or liability, respectively, and any unrecognized gains and losses or prior service costs as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. It also requires that a plan’s funded status to be measured at the employer’s fiscal year-end. The new statement, which is effective as of December 31, 2006, increased accrued pension costs and accumulated other comprehensive loss by $135,000.
 
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. The Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, and will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year 2007. The interpretation prescribes guidance for recognizing, measuring, reporting and disclosing a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We are currently evaluating the effects the interpretation will have on our financial position.
 
In September 2006, the FASB also issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement will be effective for fiscal year 2008. Adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, although additional disclosures may be required.
 
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No, 108. The guidance requires registrants to evaluate adjusting entries using both the roll-over method and the iron curtain method. Previously, registrants would use one method to perform their evaluation of an error’s materiality, even though their conclusion may be different under the other method. If an adjustment is deemed quantitatively and


70


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

qualitatively material to the financial statements under either method, correction of the error is required. The adoption of the guidance during the fourth quarter of 2006 did not have a material impact on our financial position.
 
Reclassifications
 
Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
 
2.   Windrose Medical Properties Trust Merger
 
On December 20, 2006, we completed our merger with Windrose Medical Properties Trust, a self-managed real estate investment trust based in Indianapolis, Indiana. The aggregate purchase price was approximately $1,018,345,000, including direct acquisition costs of approximately $29,918,000. The Windrose merger diversified our portfolio of investments throughout the health care delivery system. Windrose shareholders received approximately 9,679,000 shares of our common stock (valued at $41.00 per share) and Windrose preferred shareholders received 2,100,000 shares of our 7.5% Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (valued at $29.58 per share). Additionally, our investment in Windrose includes $183,139,000 of cash provided to Windrose to extinguish secured debt, the assumption of $301,641,000 of debt and the assumption of other liabilities and minority interests totaling $44,683,000. The total purchase price for Windrose has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities based upon their respective fair values. Such allocations have not been finalized and as such, the allocation of the purchase consideration included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2006, is preliminary and subject to adjustment.
 
The following table presents the allocation of the purchase price, net of merger-related expenses and capitalized equity issuance costs of $5,213,000 and $912,000, respectively, to assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on their fair values (in thousands):
 
         
Land and land improvements
  $ 102,328  
Buildings & improvements
    758,599  
Acquired lease intangibles
    80,883  
Above market lease intangibles
    33,665  
Cash and cash equivalents
    15,591  
Receivables and other assets
    21,154  
         
Total assets acquired
    1,012,220  
Secured debt
    249,424  
Liability to subsidiary trust issuing preferred securities
    52,217  
Below market lease intangibles
    23,491  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    18,977  
         
Total liabilities assumed
    344,109  
Minority interests
    2,215  
         
Net assets acquired
  $ 665,896  
         


71


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following pro forma consolidated results of operations have been prepared as if the acquisition of Windrose had occurred as of January 1, 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):
 
                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005  
    (unaudited)  
 
Revenues
  $ 416,311     $ 358,350  
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders
    62,481       38,095  
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders per share — basic
    0.88       0.60  
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders per share — diluted
    0.87       0.59  
 
3.   Loans Receivable
 
The following is a summary of loans receivable (in thousands):
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2006     2005  
 
Mortgage loans
  $ 177,615     $ 141,467  
Working capital loans
    16,833       52,587  
                 
Totals
  $ 194,448     $ 194,054  
                 
 
Loans to related parties (an entity whose ownership included one Company director) that existed in prior years were at rates comparable to loans to other third-party borrowers and were equal to or greater than our net interest cost on borrowings to support such loans. There were no such loans outstanding during 2006 or 2005. The amount of interest income and commitment fees from related parties amounted to $682,000 for 2004.


72


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
The following is a summary of mortgage loans at December 31, 2006:
 
                                 
Final
    Number
        Principal
       
Payment
    of
        Amount at
    Carrying
 
Due
    Loans     Payment Terms   Inception     Amount  
                (In thousands)  
 
  2007       7     Monthly payments from $1,478 to $234,525,
including interest from 7.52% to 19.26%
  $ 38,704     $ 32,171  
  2008       7     Monthly payments from $2,552 to $91,547,
including interest from 8.96% to 19.00%
    46,496       30,254  
  2009       10     Monthly payments from $185 to $48,165,
including interest from 3.90% to 19.26%
    19,141       19,155  
  2010       5     Monthly payments from $46,525 to $275,000, including interest from 9.13% to 13.69%     20,645       19,174  
  2011       4     Monthly payments from $802 to $4,495,
including interest from 10.14% to 15.21%
    386       782  
  2012       2     Monthly payments from $73,954 to $128,975, including interest from 7.00% to 11.50%     25,891       16,991  
  2013       1     Monthly payments of $30,938,
including interest of 8.25%
    4,500       4,500  
  2014       1     Monthly payments of $44,
including interest of 9.25%
    6       6  
  2015       1     Monthly payments of $21,327,
including interest of 11.38%
    2,016       1,964  
  2016       2     Monthly payments from $91 to $7,496,
including interest from 10.14% to 10.75%
    51       848  
  2017       1     Monthly payments of $211,
including interest of 10.14%
    75       25  
  2018       1     Monthly payments of $52,708,
including interest of 5.75%
    11,000       11,000  
  2019       1     Monthly payments of $20,865,
including interest of 10.35%
    2,419       2,419  
  2020       3     Monthly payments from $40,512 to $184,969, including interest from 9.885% to 9.89%     38,500       38,326  
                                 
                Totals   $ 209,830     $ 177,615  
                                 
 
4.   Allowance for Loan Losses
 
The following is a summary of the allowance for loan losses (in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
 
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 6,461     $ 5,261     $ 7,825  
Provision for loan losses
    1,000       1,200       1,200  
Charge-offs
    (55 )     0       (3,764 )
                         
Balance at end of year
  $ 7,406     $ 6,461     $ 5,261  
                         


73


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following is a summary of our loan impairments (in thousands):
 
                         
    December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
 
Balance of impaired loans at year end
  $ 10,529     $ 16,770     $ 35,918  
Allowance for loan losses
    7,406       6,461       5,261  
                         
Balance of impaired loans not reserved
  $ 3,123     $ 10,309     $ 30,657  
                         
Average impaired loans for the year
  $ 13,650     $ 26,344     $ 33,221  
 
Interest income recognized on non-accrual loans was $2,495,000 and $2,391,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We did not recognize any interest on non-accrual loans for the year ended December 31, 2004.
 
5.   Real Property Owned
 
The following table summarizes certain information about our real property owned as of December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
 
                                         
                            Accumulated
 
    Number of
          Building &
    Gross
    Depreciation
 
    Properties     Land     Improvements     Investment     and Amortization  
 
Assisted Living Facilities:
                                       
Arizona
    4     $ 2,100     $ 17,563     $ 19,663     $ 2,410  
California
    8       8,050       49,994       58,044       7,353  
Colorado
    1       940       3,721       4,661       500  
Connecticut
    5       8,030       36,799       44,829       4,396  
Delaware
    1       560       21,220       21,780       1,243  
Florida
    15       8,797       82,894       91,691       15,260  
Georgia
    2       1,080       3,688       4,768       451  
Idaho
    3       1,125       14,875       16,000       1,362  
Illinois
    4       8,063       15,300       23,363          
Indiana
    2       220       5,520       5,740       842  
Kansas
    1       600       10,590       11,190       631  
Kentucky
    1       490       7,610       8,100       717  
Louisiana
    1       1,100       10,161       11,261       3,593  
Maryland
    2       870       9,155       10,025       931  
Massachusetts
    7       8,160       62,490       70,650       4,875  
Mississippi
    2       1,080       13,470       14,550       1,497  
Montana
    3       1,460       14,772       16,232       1,664  
Nevada
    3       1,820       25,126       26,946       3,383  
New Jersey
    2       740       7,447       8,187       999  
New York
    3       2,320       34,452       36,772       1,322  
North Carolina
    41       15,863       181,932       197,795       23,170  
Ohio
    7       3,293       30,985       34,278       6,335  
Oklahoma
    16       1,928       24,346       26,274       7,176  
Oregon
    3       1,167       11,099       12,266       2,112  
Pennsylvania
    2       2,234       13,409       15,643       1,466  
South Carolina
    5       2,002       26,584       28,586       4,215  
Tennessee
    4       1,526       9,152       10,678       1,561  
Texas
    23       6,736       88,147       94,883       12,443  
Utah
    2       1,420       12,842       14,262       1,431  
Virginia
    4       2,300       40,486       42,786       2,767  
Washington
    8       5,940       28,696       34,636       2,829  
Wisconsin
    4       3,140       31,387       34,527       922  
Construction in progress
    12                       55,197          
Assets held for sale
    3                       14,796          
                                         
      204       105,154       945,912       1,121,059       119,856  
 


74


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

                                         
                            Accumulated
 
    Number of
          Building &
    Gross
    Depreciation
 
    Properties     Land     Improvements     Investment     and Amortization  
 
Skilled Nursing Facilities:
                                       
Alabama
    8     $ 3,000     $ 41,419     $ 44,419     $ 4,540  
Arizona
    3       2,050       19,965       22,015       1,647  
Colorado
    5       6,060       37,152       43,212       2,696  
Connecticut
    6       2,700       18,941       21,641       628  
Florida
    42       23,312       280,501       303,813       31,502  
Georgia
    3       2,650       14,932       17,582       1,354  
Idaho
    3       2,010       20,662       22,672       5,374  
Illinois
    4       1,110       24,700       25,810       7,644  
Indiana
    8       2,289       40,342       42,631       5,367  
Kansas
    1       1,120       8,360       9,480       252  
Kentucky
    10       3,015       65,432       68,447       4,483  
Louisiana
    7       783       34,717       35,500       1,175  
Maryland
    1       390       4,010       4,400       515  
Massachusetts
    23       19,318       212,574       231,892       31,619  
Mississippi
    11       1,625       52,651       54,276       6,860  
Missouri
    3       1,247       23,827       25,074       5,444  
Nevada
    1       182       2,503       2,685       701  
New Hampshire
    1       340       4,360       4,700       186  
New Jersey
    1       1,850       3,050       4,900       257  
Ohio
    20       11,520       184,199       195,719       14,230  
Oklahoma
    3       1,427       21,920       23,347       2,293  
Oregon
    1       300       5,316       5,616       1,442  
Pennsylvania
    4       3,179       21,414       24,593       5,045  
Tennessee
    22       8,730       122,604       131,334       16,740  
Texas
    15       8,346       69,545       77,891       5,462  
Utah
    1       991       6,850       7,841       208  
Virginia
    2       1,891       7,312       9,203       1,022  
Construction in progress
    1                       14,852          
                                         
      210       111,435       1,349,258       1,475,545       158,686  
 

75


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

                                         
    Number of
          Building &
    Gross
    Accumulated Depreciation
 
    Properties     Land     Improvements     Investment     and Amortization  
 
Independent Living/CCRC Facilities:
                                       
Arizona
    1     $ 950     $ 9,087     $ 10,037     $ 1,583  
California
    7       17,960       123,505       141,465       2,952  
Colorado
    1       5,029       14,906       19,935       98  
Florida
    3       6,843       68,173       75,016       9,717  
Georgia
    3       3,256       24,759       28,015       8,733  
Idaho
    1       550       14,740       15,290       1,674  
Illinois
    1       670       6,780       7,450       952  
Indiana
    2       670       13,591       14,261       1,980  
Kansas
    1       1,400       11,000       12,400          
Missouri
    1       510       5,490       6,000          
Nevada
    1       1,144       10,831       11,975       4,170  
New York
    1       1,510       9,490       11,000       1,238  
North Carolina
    2       3,120       20,155       23,275       538  
South Carolina
    4       7,190       62,345       69,535       2,445  
Texas
    2       5,670       16,620       22,290       3,073  
Washington
    1       620       4,780       5,400       407  
Construction in progress
    3                       61,709          
                                         
      35       57,092       416,252       535,053       39,560  
Medical Office Buildings:
                                       
Alabama
    5       1,447       43,431       44,878       64  
Arizona
    1               48,134       48,134       76  
California
    5       4,796       85,196       89,992       96  
Florida
    23       28,745       202,868       231,613       313  
Georgia
    14       19,137       65,080       84,217       114  
Illinois
    3       3,205       14,088       17,293       23  
North Carolina
    10       4,963       29,131       34,094       43  
New Jersey
    3       9,582       22,995       32,577       34  
Nevada
    7       8,702       94,245       102,947       122  
New York
    1               20,915       20,915       42  
Tennessee
    4       4,472       30,974       35,446       45  
Texas
    13       8,977       150,237       159,214       216  
                                         
      89       94,026       807,294       901,320       1,188  
Specialty Care Facilities:
                                       
Illinois
    1       3,650       18,559       22,209       3,333  
Louisiana
    1       1,383       8,318       9,701       15  
Massachusetts
    3       3,375       62,101       65,476       19,352  
Ohio
    1       3,020       27,445       30,465       2,924  
Oklahoma
    2       2,101       9,651       11,752       184  
Texas
    6       5,457       98,357       103,814       1,907  
Construction in progress
    2                       6,464          
                                         
      16       18,986       224,431       249,881       27,717  
                                         
Total Real Property Owned
    554     $ 386,693     $ 3,743,147     $ 4,282,858     $ 347,007  
                                         

76


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

At December 31, 2006, future minimum lease payments receivable under operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
 
         
2007
  $ 380,170  
2008
    372,888  
2009
    368,000  
2010
    368,064  
2011
    354,637  
Thereafter
    2,395,209  
         
Totals
  $ 4,238,968  
         
 
We purchased $11,204,000, $3,908,000 and $8,500,000 of real property that had previously been financed by the Company with loans in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We converted $24,330,000 and $29,238,000 of completed construction projects into operating lease properties in 2006 and 2005, respectively. We acquired properties which included the assumption of mortgages totaling $274,473,000, $22,309,000 and $14,555,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Certain of our 2006 and 2005 acquisitions included deferred acquisition payments totaling $2,000,000 and $18,125,000, respectively. These non-cash activities are appropriately not reflected in the accompanying statements of cash flows. See the accompanying statement of cash flows for non-cash investing activity related to the Windrose merger.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2004, it was determined that the projected undiscounted cash flows from a property did not exceed its related net book value and an impairment charge of $314,000 was recorded to reduce the property to its estimated fair market value. The estimated fair market value was determined by an offer to purchase received from a third party. We did not record any impairment charges during the years ended December 31, 2006 or 2005.
 
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had $14,796,000 and $11,912,000, respectively, related to assets held for sale. See Note 16 for further discussion of discontinued operations.
 
6.   Concentration of Risk
 
As of December 31, 2006, long-term care facilities, which include skilled nursing, independent living/continuing care retirement communities and assisted living facilities, comprised 72% (93% at December 31, 2005) of our real estate investments and were located in 37 states. The following table summarizes certain information about our customer concentration as of December 31, 2006 (dollars in thousands):
 
                         
    Number of
    Total
    Percent of
 
    Properties     Investment(1)     Investment(2)  
 
Concentration by investment:
                       
Emeritus Corporation
    50     $ 353,641       9 %
Brookdale Senior Living Inc. 
    87       284,161       7 %
Home Quality Management, Inc. 
    37       244,449       6 %
Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 
    26       238,610       6 %
Merrill Gardens L.L.C. 
    25       183,841       4 %
Remaining portfolio
    353       2,828,047       68 %
                         
Totals
    578     $ 4,132,749       100 %
                         
 


77


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

                         
    Number of
    Total
    Percent of
 
    Properties     Revenue(3)     Revenue  
 
Concentration by revenue(4):
                       
Emeritus Corporation
    50     $ 36,878       11 %
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
    87       33,581       10 %
Home Quality Management, Inc. 
    37       27,318       8 %
Life Care Centers of America, Inc. 
    26       23,261       7 %
Delta Health Group, Inc. 
    25       22,861       7 %
Remaining portfolio
    353       180,565       56 %
Other income
    n/a       3,924       1 %
                         
Totals
    578     $ 328,388       100 %
                         
 
 
(1) Investments include real estate investments and credit enhancements which amounted to $4,130,299,000 and $2,450,000, respectively.
 
(2) Investments with top five customers comprised 41% of total investments at December 31, 2005.
 
(3) Revenues include gross revenues and revenues from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
(4) Revenues from top five customers were 43% and 46% for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. All of our top five customers are in our investment segment.
 
7.   Borrowings Under Lines of Credit Arrangements and Related Items
 
We have an unsecured credit arrangement with a consortium of twelve banks providing for a revolving line of credit (“revolving credit”) in the amount of $700,000,000, which expires on July 26, 2009 (with the ability to extend for one year at our discretion if we are in compliance with all covenants). The agreement specifies that borrowings under the revolving credit are subject to interest payable in periods no longer than three months at either the agent bank’s prime rate of interest (8.25% at December 31, 2006) or the applicable margin over LIBOR interest rate, at our option (6.275% at December 31, 2006). The applicable margin is based on our ratings with Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and was 0.9% at December 31, 2006. In addition, we pay a facility fee annually to each bank based on the bank’s commitment under the revolving credit facility. The facility fee depends on our ratings with Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services and was 0.15% at December 31, 2006. We also pay an annual agent’s fee of $50,000. Principal is due upon expiration of the agreement. We have another unsecured line of credit arrangement with a bank for a total of $40,000,000, which expires May 31, 2007. Borrowings under this line of credit are subject to interest at either the bank’s prime rate of interest (8.25% at December 31, 2006) or 0.9% over LIBOR interest rate (6.25% at December 31, 2006), at our option. Principal is due upon expiration of the agreement.
 
The following information relates to aggregate borrowings under the unsecured lines of credit arrangements (dollars in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
 
Balance outstanding at December 31
  $ 225,000     $ 195,000     $ 151,000  
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end
  $ 276,000     $ 318,000     $ 159,000  
Average amount outstanding (total of daily principal balances divided by days in year)
  $ 164,905     $ 181,232     $ 54,770  
Weighted average interest rate (actual interest expense divided by average borrowings outstanding)
    6.91 %     5.19 %     5.32 %

78


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

8.   Senior Unsecured Notes and Secured Debt
 
We have $1,541,814,000 of senior unsecured notes with annual interest rates ranging from 4.75% to 8.00%. The carrying amounts of the senior unsecured notes represent the par value of $1,539,830,000 adjusted for any unamortized premiums or discounts and other basis adjustments related to hedging the debt with derivative instruments. See Note 1 for further discussion regarding derivative instruments.
 
In November and December 2006, we issued $345,000,000 of 4.75% senior unsecured convertible notes due December 2026, generating net proceeds of $337,517,000. The notes will be convertible, in certain circumstances, into cash and, if applicable, shares of Health Care REIT’s common stock at an initial conversion rate of 20.8833 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $47.89 per share. In general, upon conversion, the holder of each note would receive, in respect of the conversion value of such note, cash up to the principal amount of such note and Health Care REIT common stock for the note’s conversion value in excess of such principal amount.
 
We have 63 mortgage loans totaling $378,972,000, collateralized by owned properties with annual interest rates ranging from 4.89% to 8.50%. The carrying amounts of the mortgage loans represent the outstanding principal balance of $378,400,000 adjusted for any unamortized fair market value adjustments. The carrying values of the properties securing the mortgage loans totaled $559,513,000 at December 31, 2006.
 
We have a $52,215,000 liability to a subsidiary trust issuing trust preferred securities that was assumed in the Windrose merger. On March 24, 2006, Windrose’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Windrose Capital Trust I (the “Trust”), completed the issuance and sale in a private placement of $50,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of fixed/floating rate preferred securities. The trust preferred securities mature on March 30, 2036, are redeemable at our option beginning March 30, 2011, and require quarterly distributions of interest to the holders of the trust preferred securities. The trust preferred securities bear a fixed rate per annum equal to 7.22% through March 30, 2011, and a variable rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.05% thereafter.
 
The common stock of the Trust was purchased by an operating partnership of Windrose for $1,000,000. The Trust used the proceeds from the sale of the trust preferred securities together with the proceeds from the sale of the common stock to purchase $51,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of unsecured fixed/floating junior subordinated notes due March 30, 2036 issued by an operating partnership. The operating partnership received approximately $49,000,000 in net proceeds, after the payment of fees and expenses, from the sale of the junior subordinated notes to the Trust. In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, we have not consolidated the trust because the operating partnership is not considered the primary beneficiary.
 
Our debt agreements contain various covenants, restrictions and events of default. Among other things, these provisions require us to maintain certain financial ratios and minimum net worth and impose certain limits on our ability to incur indebtedness, create liens and make investments or acquisitions.


79


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
At December 31, 2006, the annual principal payments on these long-term obligations are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
                Trust
       
    Senior
    Mortgage
    Preferred
       
    Unsecured Notes     Loans     Liability     Totals  
 
2007
  $ 52,500     $ 19,199     $ 0     $ 71,699  
2008
    42,330       40,115               82,445  
2009
            45,061               45,061  
2010
            12,504               12,504  
2011
            49,509               49,509  
2012
    250,000       18,558               268,558  
2013
    300,000       56,972               356,972  
Thereafter
    895,000       136,482       51,000       1,082,482  
                                 
Totals
  $ 1,539,830     $ 378,400     $ 51,000     $ 1,969,230  
                                 
 
9.   Stock Incentive Plans
 
Our 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan authorizes up to 2,200,000 shares of common stock to be issued at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The 2005 Plan replaced the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan and the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors. The options granted to officers and key salaried employees under the 1995 Plan continue to vest through 2015 and expire ten years from the date of grant. Our non-employee directors, officers and key salaried employees are eligible to participate in the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan allows for the issuance of, among other things, stock options, restricted stock, deferred stock units and dividend equivalent rights.
 
The following summarizes the activity in the plans (shares in thousands):
 
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31  
    2006     2005     2004  
    Number
    Average
    Number
    Average
    Number
    Average
 
    of
    Exercise
    of
    Exercise
    of
    Exercise
 
Stock Options
  Shares     Price     Shares     Price     Shares     Price  
 
Options at beginning of year
    685     $ 26.87       1,015     $ 24.86       1,503     $ 23.15  
Options granted
    460       32.42       60       34.88       112       36.92  
Options exercised
    (227 )     22.24       (380 )     22.84       (600 )     22.83  
Options terminated
    (1 )     36.50       (10 )     25.24                  
                                                 
Options at end of year
    917     $ 30.79       685     $ 26.87       1,015     $ 24.86  
                                                 
Options exercisable at end of year
    462     $ 28.83       257     $ 23.16       639     $ 23.54  
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year
          $ 5.26             $ 12.48             $ 12.09  


80


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
 
                         
    2006     2005     2004  
 
Dividend yield(1)
    0%-6.79%       0.0 %     0.6 %
Expected volatility
    20.3%       22.8 %     22.4 %
Risk-free interest rate
    4.35%       4.25 %     4.11 %
Expected life (in years)
          7       7  
Weighted-average fair value(1)
    $5.26      $ 12.48     $ 12.09  
 
 
(1) Certain options granted to employees include dividend equivalent rights. These options are assumed to have a dividend yield of 0% for purposes of the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model and result in higher fair values than options without dividend equivalent rights.
 
Vesting periods for options and restricted shares range from three years for directors to five years for officers and key salaried employees. Options expire ten years from the date of grant. We granted 98,000, 85,000 and 112,000 restricted shares during 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, including 13,000, 16,000 and 10,000 shares to non-employee directors in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Expense, which is recognized as the shares vest based on the market value at the date of the award, totaled $6,980,000, $2,948,000 and $2,887,000, in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
 
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2006 (options in thousands):
                                         
    Options Outstanding     Options Exercisable  
                Weighted
             
Range of Per
        Weighted
    Average
          Weighted
 
Share Exercise
  Number
    Average
    Remaining
    Number
    Average
 
Prices
  Outstanding     Exercise Price     Contract Life     Exercisable     Exercise Price  
 
$16-$20
    11     $ 16.81       4.0       11     $ 16.81  
$20-$25
    111       24.42       5.0       98       24.42  
$25-$30
    290       26.20       7.0       152       26.55  
$30-$40
    505       35.13       9.2       201       33.36  
                                         
Totals
    917     $ 30.79       7.9       462     $ 28.83  
                                         
 
The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the quoted price of our common stock for the options that were in-the-money at December 31, 2006. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under our stock incentive plans was $3,140,000 determined as of the date of option exercise. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under our stock incentive plans was $4,705,000 determined as of the date of option exercise. Cash received from option exercises under our stock incentive plans for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $4,872,000. Cash received from option exercises under our stock incentive plans for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $8,690,000.
 
As of December 31, 2006, there was approximately $2,349,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted under our stock incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years. As of December 31, 2006, there was approximately $4,761,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock granted under our stock incentive plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years.


81


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
The following table summarizes information about non-vested stock incentive awards as of December 31, 2006 and changes for the year ended December 31, 2006:
 
                                 
    Stock Options     Restricted Stock  
    Number of
    Weighted Average
    Number of
    Weighted Average
 
    Shares
    Grant Date
    Shares
    Grant Date
 
    (000’s)     Fair Value     (000’s)     Fair Value  
 
Non-vested at December 31, 2005
    428     $ 5.36       222     $ 31.56  
Vested
    (105 )     5.23       (72 )     29.64  
Granted
    155       5.26       98       36.51  
Terminated
    0               0          
                                 
Non-vested at December 31, 2006
    478     $ 5.35       248     $ 34.07  
                                 
 
We adopted the fair value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective January 1, 2003 using the prospective method described in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure. Currently, we use the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to estimate the value of stock option grants and expect to continue to use this acceptable option valuation model. Because we adopted Statement No. 123 using the prospective transition method (which applied only to awards granted, modified or settled after the adoption date of Statement No. 123), compensation cost for some previously granted awards that were not recognized under Statement No. 123 will now be recognized effective with the adoption of Statement No. 123(R) on January 1, 2006. In addition, we previously amortized compensation cost for share-based payments to the date that the awards became fully vested or to the expected retirement date, if sooner. Effective with the adoption of Statement No.  123(R), we began recognizing compensation cost to the date the awards become fully vested or to the retirement eligible date, if sooner. Compensation cost totaled $6,980,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006.


82


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
The following table illustrates the effect on net income available to common stockholders if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement 123 to stock-based compensation for options granted since 1995 but prior to adoption at January 1, 2003 (in thousands, except per share data):
 
                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2005     2004  
 
Numerator:
               
Net income available to common stockholders — as reported
  $ 62,692     $ 72,634  
Deduct: Additional stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards
    181       274  
                 
Net income available to common stockholders — pro forma
  $ 62,511     $ 72,360  
                 
Denominator:
               
Basic weighted average shares — as reported and pro forma
    54,110       51,544  
Effect of dilutive securities:
               
Employee stock options — pro forma
            365  
Non-vested restricted shares
    208       161  
                 
Dilutive potential common shares
    208       526  
                 
Diluted weighted average shares — pro forma
    54,318       52,070  
                 
Net income available to common stockholders per share — as reported
               
Basic
  $ 1.16     $ 1.41  
                 
Diluted
  $ 1.15     $ 1.39  
                 
Net income available to common stockholders per share — pro forma
               
Basic
  $ 1.16     $ 1.40  
                 
Diluted
  $ 1.15     $ 1.39  
                 
 
10.   Other Equity
 
Other equity consists of the following (in thousands):
 
                         
    December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
 
Accumulated compensation expense related to stock options
  $ 1,845     $ 864     $ 552  
Unamortized restricted stock
    0       (521 )     (1,249 )
                         
Totals
  $ 1,845     $ 343     $ (697 )
                         
 
Unamortized restricted stock represented the unamortized value of restricted stock granted to employees and non-employee directors prior to January 1, 2003. Expense related to these grants, which is recognized as the shares vest based on the market value at the date of the award, totaled $521,000, $728,000 and $949,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
 
11.   Preferred Stock
 
In July 2003, we closed a public offering of 4,000,000 shares of 7.875% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. These shares have a liquidation value of $25.00 per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in


83


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

arrears. The preferred stock, which has no stated maturity, may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares to the redemption date, on or after July 9, 2008.
 
In September 2003, we issued 1,060,000 shares of 6% Series E Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock as partial consideration for an acquisition of assets by the Company, with the shares valued at $26,500,000 for such purposes. The shares were issued to Southern Assisted Living, Inc. and certain of its stockholders without registration in reliance upon the federal statutory exemption of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The shares have a liquidation value of $25.00 per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears. The preferred stock, which has no stated maturity, may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares to the redemption date, on or after August 15, 2008. The preferred shares are convertible into common stock at a conversion price of $32.66 per share at any time. During the year ended December 31, 2005, certain holders of our Series E Preferred Stock converted 275,056 shares into 210,541 shares of our common stock, leaving 74,989 of such shares outstanding at December 31, 2006 and 2005.
 
In September 2004, we closed a public offering of 7,000,000 shares of 7.625% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. These shares have a liquidation value of $25.00 per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears. The preferred stock, which has no stated maturity, may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares to the redemption date, on or after September 14, 2009.
 
In conjunction with the acquisition of Windrose Medical Properties Trust in December 2006, we issued 2,100,000 shares of 7.5% Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. These shares have a liquidation value of $25.00 per share. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears. The preferred stock, which has no stated maturity, may be redeemed by us at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends on such shares to the redemption date, on or after June 30, 2010. Each Series G Preferred Share is convertible by the holder into our common stock at a conversion price of $34.93, equivalent to a conversion rate of 0.7157 common shares per Series G Preferred Share. The shares were recorded at $29.58 per share, which was deemed to be the fair value at the date of the issuance.
 
12.   Income Taxes and Distributions
 
To qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes, 90% of taxable income (including 100% of capital gains) must be distributed to stockholders. Real estate investment trusts that do not distribute a certain amount of current year taxable income in the current year are also subject to a 4% federal excise tax. The principal differences between undistributed net income for federal income tax purposes and financial statement purposes are the recognition of straight-line rent for reporting purposes, differing useful lives and depreciation and amortization methods for real property and the provision for loan losses for reporting purposes versus bad debt expense for tax purposes.
 
Cash distributions paid to common stockholders, for federal income tax purposes, are as follows:
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
 
Per Share:
                       
Ordinary income
  $ 1.7461     $ 1.266     $ 1.189  
Return of capital
  $ 1.1348       1.194       1.196  
                         
Totals
  $ 2.8809     $ 2.460     $ 2.385  
                         


84


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

13.   Commitments and Contingencies
 
We have an outstanding letter of credit issued for the benefit of certain insurance companies that provide workers’ compensation insurance to one of our tenants. Our obligation under the letter of credit matures in 2009. At December 31, 2006, our obligation under the letter of credit was $2,450,000.
 
At December 31, 2006, we had outstanding construction financings of $138,222,000 for leased properties and were committed to providing additional financing of approximately $342,754,000 to complete construction. At December 31, 2006, we had contingent purchase obligations totaling $32,282,000. These contingent purchase obligations primarily relate to deferred acquisition fundings and capital improvements. Deferred acquisition fundings are contingent upon an operator satisfying certain conditions such as payment coverage and value tests. Amounts due from the tenant are increased to reflect the additional investment in the property.
 
At December 31, 2006, we had operating lease obligations of $37,378,000 relating to certain ground leases and Company office space. We incurred rental expense relating to our Company office space of $939,000, $283,000 and $292,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Regarding the property leases, we have sublease agreements with certain of our operators that require the operators to reimburse us for our monthly operating lease obligations. At December 31, 2006, aggregate future minimum rentals to be received under these noncancelable subleases totaled $12,982,000.
 
At December 31, 2006, future minimum lease payments due under operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
 
         
2007
  $ 2,756  
2008
    2,374  
2009
    2,290  
2010
    2,138  
2011
    1,867  
Thereafter
    25,953  
         
Totals
  $ 37,378  
         


85


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

14.   Earnings Per Share
 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share data):
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31  
    2006     2005     2004  
 
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share — net income available to common stockholders
  $ 81,287     $ 62,692     $ 72,634  
                         
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted average shares
    61,661       54,110       51,544  
Effect of dilutive securities:
                       
Employee stock options
    136       181       377  
Non-vested restricted shares
    248       208       161  
                         
Dilutive potential common shares
    384       389       538  
                         
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted average shares
    62,045       54,499       52,082  
                         
Basic earnings per share
  $ 1.32     $ 1.16     $ 1.41  
                         
Diluted earnings per share
  $ 1.31     $ 1.15     $ 1.39  
                         
 
The diluted earnings per share calculation excludes the dilutive effect of 0, 112,000 and 112,000 options for 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, because the exercise price was greater than the average market price. The Series E Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock was not included in the calculations for 2006, 2005 and 2004 as the effect of the conversions was anti-dilutive. The $345,000,000 senior unsecured convertible notes due December 2026 and the Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock were not included in the calculation for 2006 as the effect of the conversion was anti-dilutive.
 
15.   Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
 
Mortgage Loans Receivable — The fair value of all mortgage loans receivable is estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.
 
Working Capital Loans and Construction Loans — The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value based on the interest rates received, which approximates current market rates.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents — The carrying amount approximates fair value.
 
Equity Investments — Equity investments are recorded at their fair market value.
 
Borrowings Under Lines of Credit Arrangements — The carrying amount of the lines of credit arrangements approximates fair value because the borrowings are interest rate adjustable.
 
Senior Unsecured Notes — The fair value of the senior unsecured notes payable was estimated by discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current borrowing rate available to the Company for similar debt.
 
Mortgage Loans Payable — Mortgage loans payable is a reasonable estimate of fair value based on the interest rates paid, which approximates current market rates.


86


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
Interest Rate Swap Agreements — Our interest rate swap agreements are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair market value. Fair market value is estimated by a third party consultant, which utilizes pricing models that consider forward yield curves and discount rates.
 
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
    December 31, 2006     December 31, 2005  
    Carrying
    Fair
    Carrying
    Fair
 
    Amount     Value     Amount     Value  
 
Financial Assets:
                               
Mortgage loans receivable
  $ 177,615     $ 180,537     $ 141,467     $ 150,105  
Working capital loans
    16,833       16,833       52,587       52,587  
Equity investments
    4,700       4,700       2,970       2,970  
Cash and cash equivalents
    36,216       36,216       36,237       36,237  
Interest rate swap agreements
    902       902       2,211       2,211  
Financial Liabilities:
                               
Borrowings under lines of credit arrangements
  $ 225,000     $ 225,000     $ 195,000     $ 195,000  
Senior unsecured notes
    1,541,814       1,895,672       1,198,278       1,271,370  
Mortgage loans payable
    378,972       378,972       107,540       107,540  
Trust preferred liability
    52,215       52,215                  
 
16.   Discontinued Operations
 
Three assisted living facilities were held for sale at December 31, 2006 and were sold subsequent to year-end. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, we sold properties with carrying values of $75,789,000, $88,098,000 and $37,710,000 for net gains of $1,267,000 and $3,227,000 and net losses of $143,000, respectively. In accordance with Statement No. 144, we have reclassified the income and expenses attributable to these properties to discontinued operations. Expenses include an allocation of interest expense based on property carrying values and our weighted average cost of debt. The following illustrates the reclassification impact of Statement No. 144 as a result of classifying the properties as discontinued operations (in thousands):
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
 
Revenues:
                       
Rental Income
  $ 5,564     $ 17,617     $ 23,095  
Expenses:
                       
Interest expense
    2,032       5,306       6,668  
Depreciation and amortization
    4,433       10,012       12,334  
General and adminstrative
    1,120       1,086       787  
                         
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
  $ (2,021 )   $ 1,213     $ 3,306  
                         
 
17.   Retirement Arrangements
 
As a result of the merger with Windrose Properties Trust in December 2006, we now have two retirement plans and trusts (the “401(k) Plans”) covering all eligible employees. Under the 401(k) Plans, eligible employees may make contributions, and we may make matching contributions and a profit sharing contribution. Our contributions to the Health Care REIT, Inc. 401(k) Plan totaled $413,000, $337,000 and $289,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We did not make any contributions to the Windrose Medical Properties Trust 401(k) Plan in 2006.


87


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
We have a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan, which provides certain executive officers with supplemental deferred retirement benefits. The SERP provides an opportunity for participants to receive retirement benefits that cannot be paid under our tax-qualified plans because of the restrictions imposed by ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Benefits are based on compensation and length of service and the SERP is unfunded. No contributions by the Company are anticipated for the 2006 fiscal year. No benefit payments are expected to occur during the next five fiscal years and total $1,713,000 during the succeeding five fiscal years. We use a December 31 measurement date for the SERP. The accrued liability on our balance sheet for the SERP was $1,597,000 at December 31, 2006 ($1,032,000 at December 31, 2005).
 
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the SERP’s benefit obligations and a statement of the funded status for the periods indicated (in thousands):
 
                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005  
 
Reconciliation of benefit obligation:
               
Obligation at January 1
  $ 1,255     $ 729  
Service cost
    352       286  
Interest cost
    72       44  
Actuarial (gain)/loss
    (82 )     196  
                 
Obligation at December 31
  $ 1,597     $ 1,255  
                 
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2006     2005  
 
Funded status:
               
Funded status at December 31
  $ (1,597 )   $ (1,255 )
Unrecognized (gain)/loss
    0       223  
                 
Prepaid/(accrued) benefit cost
  $ (1,597 )   $ (1,032 )
                 
 
The accrued benefit cost increased $135,000 during 2006 as a result of adopting SFAS 158. See Note 1 for additional information.
 
The following table shows the components of net periodic benefit costs for the periods indicated (in thousands):
 
                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005  
 
Service cost
  $ 352     $ 286  
Interest cost
    72       44  
Net actuarial loss
    8       0  
                 
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 432     $ 330  
                 


88


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table provides information for the SERP, which has an accumulated benefit in excess of plan assets (in thousands):
 
                 
    December 31,  
    2006     2005  
 
Projected benefit obligation
  $ 1,597     $ 1,255  
Accumulated benefit obligation
    1,121       831  
Fair value of assets
    n/a       n/a  
 
The following table reflects the weighted-average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost for the SERP:
 
                                 
    Benefit Obligations     Net Periodic Benefit Cost  
    December 31,     Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
 
Discount rate
    6.00 %     5.75 %     5.75 %     6.00 %
Rate of compensation increase
    4.25 %     4.00 %     4.00 %     4.25 %
Expected long-term return on plan assets
    n/a       n/a       n/a       n/a  
 
18.   Segment Reporting
 
Our business consists primarily of financing and leasing senior housing and health care real estate. We evaluate our business and make resource allocations on our two business segments — investment properties and operating properties. Under the investment property segment, we invest in senior housing and health care real estate through acquisition and financing of primarily single tenant properties. Properties acquired are primarily leased under triple-net leases and we are not involved in the management of the property. Our primary investment property types include skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, independent living/continuing care retirement communities and specialty care facilities. Under the operating property segment, we primarily invest in medical office buildings that are typically leased under gross leases, modified gross leases or triple-net leases, to multiple tenants, and generally require a certain level of property management. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 1). There are no intersegment sales or transfers. We evaluate performance based upon net operating income of the combined properties in each segment.
 
Non-segment revenue consists mainly of interest income on non-real estate investments and other income. Non-segment assets consist of corporate assets including cash, accounts receivable and deferred financing costs among others. Non-property specific revenues and expenses are not allocated to individual segments in determining our performance measure.
 
Summary information for the reportable segments during the year ended December 31, 2006 is as follows (in thousands):
 
                                                                         
                            Property
    Net
    Real Estate
             
    Rental
    Interest
    Other
    Total
    Operating
    Operating
    Depreciation/
    Interest
    Total
 
    Income(1)     Income     Income     Revenues     Expenses     Income(2)     Amortization     Expense     Assets  
 
Investment Properties
  $ 302,161     $ 18,829             $ 320,990             $ 320,990     $ 96,351     $ 9,041     $ 3,156,001  
Operating Properties
    3,474                       3,474       1,115       2,359       1,213       600       974,298  
Non-segment/Corporate
                    3,924       3,924                               87,193       150,311  
                                                                         
    $ 305,635     $ 18,829     $ 3,924     $ 328,388     $ 1,115     $ 323,349     $ 97,564     $ 96,834     $ 4,280,610  
                                                                         
 
 
(1) Rental income includes rent from discontinued operations
 
(2) Net operating income (“NOI”) is used to evaluate the operating performance of certain real estate properties such as medical office buildings. We define NOI as rental revenues, including tenant reimbursements, less property level operating expenses, which exclude depreciation and amortization, general and administrative expenses, impairments, interest expense and discontinued operations. We believe


89


Table of Contents

 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

NOI provides investors relevant and useful information because it measures the operating performance of our medical office buildings at the property level on an unleveraged basis. We use NOI to make decisions about resource allocations and to assess the property level performance of our medical office buildings.
 
All assets, revenues and expenses for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were attributable to our investment property segment.
 
19.   Quarterly Results of Operations (Unaudited)
 
The following is a summary of our unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands, except per share data):
 
                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2006  
    1st Quarter     2nd Quarter     3rd Quarter     4th Quarter(2)  
 
Revenues — as reported
  $ 77,413     $ 80,176     $ 80,745     $ 87,787  
Discontinued operations
    (1,405 )     (1,533 )     (359 )     0  
                                 
Revenues — as adjusted(1)
  $ 76,008     $ 78,643     $ 80,386     $ 87,787  
                                 
Net income available to common stockholders
  $ 19,645     $ 22,668     $ 21,480     $ 17,494  
                                 
Net income available to common stockholders per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.34     $ 0.37     $ 0.34     $ 0.27  
Diluted
    0.34       0.37       0.34       0.27  
 
                                         
    Year Ended December 31, 2005        
    1st Quarter     2nd Quarter(3)     3rd Quarter     4th Quarter        
 
Revenues — as reported
  $ 68,379     $ 68,607     $ 73,065     $ 77,967          
Discontinued operations
    (4,615 )     (4,674 )     (3,237 )     (1,954 )        
                                         
Revenues — as adjusted(1)
  $ 63,764     $ 63,933     $ 69,828     $ 76,013          
                                         
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
  $ 17,803     $ (1,606 )   $ 19,908     $ 26,587          
                                         
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders per share:
                                       
Basic
  $ 0.34     $ (0.03 )   $ 0.37     $ 0.47          
Diluted
    0.33       (0.03 )     0.37       0.47          
 
 
(1) In accordance with FASB Statement No. 144, we have reclassified the income attributable to the properties sold subsequent to January 1, 2002 and attributable to the properties held for sale at December 31, 2006 to discontinued operations. See Note 16.
 
(2) The decrease in net income and amounts per share are primarily attributable to costs associated with the Windrose merger ($5,213,000) and the write-off of a straight-line rent receivable ($5,143,000), offset by the favorable impact of prior period adjustments resulting from reassessment of straight-line rent revenue recognition policies ($3,266,000).
 
(3) The net loss and amounts per share are primarily attributable to the loss on extinguishment of debt recorded in second quarter 2005.
 
20.   Subsequent Events
 
On January 11, 2007, we announced an agreement to purchase a portfolio of medical office buildings from affiliates of Rendina Companies. As part of the transaction, we also agreed to acquire Paramount Real Estate Services, the property management group of Rendina Companies. The property portfolio includes 18 medical office buildings in ten states. The transactions are subject to standard due diligence and are anticipated to close in the second quarter of 2007.


90


Table of Contents

 
Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 
Not applicable.
 
Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
 
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 based on the criteria established by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in a report entitled Internal Control — Integrated Framework. The scope of management’s assessment as of December 31, 2006 did not include an assessment of the internal control over financial reporting for Windrose Medical Properties Trust in a purchase business combination on December 20, 2006. The acquired business represents 23.7% of the Company’s consolidated total assets at December 31, 2006 and 0.4% of the Company’s net income available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2006. The scope of management’s assessment on internal control over financial reporting for fiscal year 2007 will include the acquired Windrose Medical Properties Trust operations.
 
Based on this assessment, using the criteria above, management concluded that the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.
 
The registered independent public accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP, as auditors of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) occurred during the fourth quarter of the one-year period covered by this report that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


91


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
Stockholders and Directors
Health Care REIT, Inc.
 
We have audited management’s assessment, included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Health Care REIT, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Health Care REIT Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Property, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Windrose Medical Properties Trust, which is included in the consolidated financial statements of Health Care REIT, Inc. and constitute 23.7% of consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2006 and 1.0% of consolidated revenues for the year then ended. Management did not include an assessment of the internal control over financial reporting of Windrose Medical Properties Trust because it was acquired in a business combination on December 19, 2006.
 
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Health Care REIT, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Health Care REIT, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria.


92


Table of Contents

 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Health Care REIT, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006 of Health Care REIT, Inc. and our report dated February 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
 
/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
Toledo, Ohio
February 28, 2007


93


Table of Contents

 
Item 9B.   Other Information
 
None.
 
PART III
 
Item 10.   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Board and Committees” and “Security Ownership of Directors and Management and Certain Beneficial Owners — Section 16(a) Compliance” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) prior to April 30, 2007.
 
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct & Ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees. The code is posted on our Web site at www.hcreit.com and is available from the Company upon written request to the Senior Vice President — Administration and Corporate Secretary, Health Care REIT, Inc., One SeaGate, Suite 1500, P.O. Box 1475, Toledo, Ohio 43603-1475. Any amendment to, or waivers from, the code that relate to any officer or director of the Company will be promptly disclosed on our Internet Web site at www.hcreit.com.
 
In addition, the Board has adopted charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees. These charters are posted on our Web site at www.hcreit.com and are available from the Company upon written request to the Senior Vice President — Administration and Corporate Secretary, Health Care REIT, Inc., One SeaGate, Suite 1500, P.O. Box 1475, Toledo, Ohio 43603-1475.
 
Item 11.   Executive Compensation
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Committee Report” and “Director Compensation” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission prior to April 30, 2007.
 
Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Security Ownership of Directors and Management and Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission prior to April 30, 2007.
 
Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the headings “Board and Committees — Independence and Meetings” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission prior to April 30, 2007.
 
Item 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the heading “Ratification of the Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures” in our definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Commission prior to April 30, 2007.


94


Table of Contents

 
PART IV
 
Item 15.   Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
 
(a)1. Our Consolidated Financial Statements are included in Part II, Item 8:
 
         
  62
  63
  64
  65
  66
  67
 
2. The following Financial Statement Schedules are included in Item 15(c):
 
III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
 
IV — Mortgage Loans on Real Estate
 
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
 
3. Exhibit Index:
 
         
  2 .1   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 12, 2006, by and among Health Care REIT, Inc., Heat Merger Sub, LLC, Heat OP Merger Sub, L.P., Windrose Medical Properties Trust and Windrose Medical Properties, L.P. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 15, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  2 .2   Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 12, 2006, by and among Health Care REIT, Inc., Heat Merger Sub, LLC, Heat OP Merger Sub, L.P., Windrose Medical Properties Trust and Windrose Medical Properties, L.P. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .1   Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .2   Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A, of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .3   Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .4   Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 13, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .5   Certificate of Designation of 77/8% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A/A filed July 8, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .6   Certificate of Designation of 6% Series E Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 1, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .7   Certificate of Designation of 75/8% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A filed September 10, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).


95


Table of Contents

         
  3 .8   Certificate of Designation of 7.5% Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .9   Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 8, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .1   The Company, by signing this Report, agrees to furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request a copy of any instrument that defines the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company and authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Company.
  4 .2   Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997 between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 21, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .3   First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 17, 1997, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 21, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .4   Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 13, 1998, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 11, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .5   Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 18, 1999, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 17, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .6   Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2001, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 9, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .7   Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated September 10, 2003, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .8   Amendment No. 1, dated September 16, 2003, to Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated September 10, 2003, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .9   Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 9, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .10   Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of September 6, 2002, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 9, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .11   Amendment No. 1, dated March 12, 2003, to Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of September 6, 2002, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 14, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .12   Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 10, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .13   Amendment No. 1, dated September 16, 2003, to Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 10, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .14   Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of October 29, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

96


Table of Contents

         
  4 .15   Amendment No. 1, dated September 13, 2004, to Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of October 29, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor to Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 13, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .16   Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of April 27, 2005, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 28, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .17   Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of November 30, 2005, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 30, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .18   Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2006, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .19   Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of November 20, 2006, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .20   Form of Indenture for Senior Subordinated Debt Securities (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Form S-3 (File No. 333-73936) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .21   Form of Indenture for Junior Subordinated Debt Securities (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Form S-3 (File No. 333-73936) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .1   Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2006, by and among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the banks signatory thereto, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as syndication agent, and UBS Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agents (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .2   Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement by and among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the banks signatory thereto, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as syndication agent, and UBS Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agents, dated as of September 20, 2006 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 26, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .3   Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2006, by and among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 5, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto).
  10 .4   ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule dated as of May 6, 2004 by and between Bank of America, N.A. and Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .5   Interest Rate Swap Confirmation dated May 10, 2004 between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .6   Interest Rate Swap Confirmation dated May 6, 2004 between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Deutsche Bank AG (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .7   Health Care REIT, Inc. Interest Rate & Currency Risk Management Policy adopted on May 6, 2004 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).

97


Table of Contents

         
  10 .8   The 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Appendix II to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed September 29, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .9   First Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-40771) filed November 21, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .10   Second Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-73916) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .11   Third Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .12   Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .13   First Amendment to the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Health Care REIT, Inc. effective April 21, 1998 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .14   Health Care REIT, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed March 28, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .15   Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executive Officers under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .16   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .17   Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A filed October 27, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .18   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .19   Form of Stock Option Agreement (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .20   Form of Stock Option Agreement (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .21   Form of Stock Option Agreement (without Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .22   Form of Stock Option Agreement (without Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .23   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .24   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*

98


Table of Contents

         
  10 .25   Form of Deferred Stock Unit Grant Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .26   Restricted Stock Agreement, dated January 22, 2007, by and between Health Care REIT and Raymond W. Braun (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 25, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .27   Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 22, 2007, by and between the Company and George L. Chapman (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 25, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .28   Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2004, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Raymond W. Braun (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .29   Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2004, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Erin C. Ibele (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .30   Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2004, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Charles J. Herman, Jr. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .31   Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective March 17, 2006, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Scott A. Estes (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .32   Employment Agreement, effective July 1, 2004, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Jeffrey H. Miller (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .33   Consulting Agreement dated as of September 12, 2006 between the Company and Fred S. Klipsch (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form S-4 filed October 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .34   Consulting Agreement dated as of September 12, 2006 between the Company and Frederick L. Farrar (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form S-4 filed October 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .35   Employment Agreement dated as of September 12, 2006 between the Company and Daniel R. Loftus (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form S-4 filed October 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .36   Health Care REIT, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of January 1, 2001 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .37   Health Care REIT, Inc. Executive Loan Program, effective as of August 1999 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .38   Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each director, executive officer and officer of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .39   Summary of Director Compensation.*
  14     Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  21     Subsidiaries of the Company.
  23     Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.
  24 .1   Power of Attorney executed by Pier C. Borra (Director).
  24 .2   Power of Attorney executed by Thomas J. DeRosa (Director).
  24 .3   Power of Attorney executed by Jeffrey H. Donahue (Director).
  24 .4   Power of Attorney executed by Peter J. Grua (Director).

99


Table of Contents

         
  24 .5   Power of Attorney executed by Fred S. Klipsch (Director).
  24 .6   Power of Attorney executed by Sharon M. Oster (Director).
  24 .7   Power of Attorney executed by R. Scott Trumbull (Director).
  24 .8   Power of Attorney executed by George L. Chapman (Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer).
  24 .9   Power of Attorney executed by Scott A. Estes (Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer).
  24 .10   Power of Attorney executed by Paul D. Nungester, Jr. (Vice President and Controller and Principal Accounting Officer).
  31 .1   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
  31 .2   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
  32 .1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Chief Executive Officer.
  32 .2   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Chief Financial Officer.
 
 
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.
 
  (b)  Exhibits:
 
The exhibits listed in Item 15(a)(3) above are either filed with this Form 10-K or incorporated by reference in accordance with Rule 12b-32 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
  (c)  Financial Statement Schedules:
 
Financial statement schedules are included on pages 100 through 111.

100


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
  By: 
/s/  George L. Chapman
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on March 1, 2007, by the following person on behalf of the Company and in the capacities indicated.
 
 
     
/s/  Pier C. Borra*

 
/s/  Sharon M. Oster*

Pier C. Borra, Director
  Sharon M. Oster, Director
     
/s/  Thomas J. Derosa*

 
/s/  R. Scott Trumbull*

Thomas J. DeRosa, Director
  R. Scott Trumbull, Director
     
/s/  Jeffrey H. Donahue*

 
/s/  George L. Chapman

Jeffrey H. Donahue, Director
  George L. Chapman, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
     
/s/  Peter J. Grua*

 
/s/  Scott A. Estes*

Peter J. Grua, Director
  Scott A. Estes, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
     
/s/  Fred S. Klipsch*

 
/s/  Paul D. Nungester, Jr.*

Fred S. Klipsch, Vice Chairman
  Paul D. Nungester, Jr., Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
     
    *By:
/s/  George L. Chapman

George L. Chapman, Attorney-in-Fact


101


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.

SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
December 31, 2006
 
                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Assisted Living Facilities:
                                                                       
Alhambra, CA
          $ 420     $ 2,534             $ 420     $ 2,534     $ 410       1999       1999  
Amarillo, TX
            390       5,100               390       5,100       302       2004       1996  
Asheboro, NC(3)
  $ 3,548       290       5,032     $ 21       290       5,053       464       2003       1998  
Asheville, NC
            204       3,489               204       3,489       795       1999       1999  
Asheville, NC
            280       1,955       351       280       2,306       234       2003       1992  
Auburn, MA(1)
    4,446       1,050       7,950               1,050       7,950       746       2003       1997  
Azusa, CA
            570       3,141               570       3,141       531       1998       1988  
Baltimore, MD
            510       4,515               510       4,515       485       2003       1999  
Bartlesville, OK
            100       1,380               100       1,380       432       1996       1995  
Beaumont, TX
            520       6,050               520       6,050       378       2004       1997  
Bellevue, WI
            1,740       18,260               1,740       18,260       243       2006       2004  
Bellingham, WA
            300       3,200               300       3,200       285       2003       1994  
Bluffton, SC
            700       5,598       3,085       700       8,683       1,226       1999       2000  
Bradenton, FL
            252       3,298               252       3,298       1,051       1996       1995  
Bradenton, FL
            100       1,700       942       100       2,642       863       1999       1996  
Brandon, FL
            860       7,140               860       7,140       609       2003       1990  
Bremerton, WA
            390       2,210               390       2,210               2006       1999  
Burlington, NC
            280       4,297       707       280       5,004       446       2003       2000  
Burlington, NC(3)
    2,787       460       5,501       5       460       5,506       503       2003       1997  
Butte, MT
            550       3,957       43       550       4,000       667       1998       1999  
Canton, OH
            300       2,098               300       2,098       483       1998       1998  
Cape Coral, FL
            530       3,281               530       3,281       437       2002       2000  
Cary, NC
            1,500       4,350       986       1,500       5,336       1,100       1998       1996  
Cedar Hill, TX
            171       1,490               171       1,490       436       1997       1996  
Chapel Hill, NC
            354       2,646       783       354       3,429       396       2002       1997  
Chelmsford, MA(2)
    9,019       1,040       10,960               1,040       10,960       944       2003       1997  
Chickasha, OK
            85       1,395               85       1,395       430       1996       1996  
Chubbuck, ID
            125       5,375               125       5,375       488       2003       1996  
Claremore, OK
            155       1,428               155       1,428       415       1996       1996  
Clarksville, TN
            330       2,292               330       2,292       522       1998       1998  
Coeur D’ Alene, ID
            530       7,570               530       7,570       681       2003       1987  
Columbia, TN
            341       2,295               341       2,295       519       1999       1999  
Concord, NC(3)
    4,698       550       3,921       78       550       3,998       404       2003       1997  
Corpus Christi, TX
            155       2,935       15       155       2,950       1,221       1997       1996  
Corpus Christi, TX
            420       4,796       139       420       4,935       2,475       1996       1997  
Danville, VA
            410       3,954       722       410       4,676       433       2003       1998  
Dayton, OH
            690       2,970       1,428       690       4,398       743       2003       1994  
Desoto, TX
            205       1,383               205       1,383       394       1996       1996  
Duncan, OK
            103       1,347               103       1,347       408       1995       1996  
Durham, NC
            1,476       10,659       2,196       1,476       12,855       4,517       1997       1999  
Eden, NC(3)
    3,049       390       5,039       89       390       5,128       464       2003       1998  
Edmond, OK
            175       1,564               175       1,564       465       1995       1996  
Elizabeth City, NC
            200       2,760       2,010       200       4,771       813       1998       1999  
Encinitas, CA
            1,460       7,721               1,460       7,721       1,420       2000       2000  
Enid, OK
            90       1,390               90       1,390       435       1995       1995  
Everett, WA
            1,400       5,476               1,400       5,476       1,160       1999       1999  
Fairfield, CA
            1,460       14,040               1,460       14,040       1,906       2002       1998  
Fairhaven, MA
            770       6,230               770       6,230       455       2004       1999  
Fayetteville, NY
            410       3,962       500       410       4,462       581       2001       1997  
Federal Way, WA
            540       3,960               540       3,960       352       2003       1978  
Findlay, OH
            200       1,800               200       1,800       489       1997       1997  
Flagstaff, AZ
            540       4,460               540       4,460       406       2003       1999  
Florence, NJ
            300       2,978               300       2,978       394       2002       1999  
Forest City, NC(3)
    3,121       320       4,576       51       320       4,628       429       2003       1999  
Fort Myers, FL
            440       2,560               440       2,560       240       2003       1980  
Fort Worth, TX
            64       3,881               64       3,881       1,635       1996       1984  
Fredricksburg, VA(4)
    7,424       1,000       20,000               1,000       20,000       918       2005       1999  
Gastonia, NC(3)
    4,153       470       6,129       9       470       6,138       559       2003       1998  
Gastonia, NC(3)
    1,944       310       3,096       38       310       3,134       305       2003       1994  
Gastonia, NC(3)
    3,900       400       5,029       1       400       5,029       467       2003       1996  


102


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Georgetown, TX
          $ 200     $ 2,100             $ 200     $ 2,100     $ 557       1997       1997  
Grand Terrace, CA
            530       2,770               530       2,770       196       2004       1982  
Greensboro, NC
            330       2,970     $ 555       330       3,524       334       2003       1996  
Greensboro, NC
            560       5,507       1,013       560       6,520       614       2003       1997  
Greenville, NC(3)
  $ 3,639       290       4,393       20       290       4,413       407       2003       1998  
Greenville, SC
            310       4,750               310       4,750       314       2004       1997  
Hagerstown, MD
            360       4,640               360       4,640       445       2003       1999  
Hamden, CT
            1,470       4,530               1,470       4,530       699       2002       1998  
Hamilton, NJ
            440       4,469               440       4,469       605       2001       1998  
Happy Valley, OR
            628       3,585       232       628       3,817       787       1998       1999  
Harlingen, TX
            92       2,057       127       92       2,184       866       1997       1989  
Hattiesburg, MS
            560       5,790               560       5,790       823       2002       1998  
Henderson, NV
            380       9,220       65       380       9,285       1,965       1998       1998  
Henderson, NV
            380       4,360       41       380       4,401       723       1999       2000  
Hickory, NC
            290       987       232       290       1,219       155       2003       1994  
High Point, NC
            560       4,443       793       560       5,236       488       2003       2000  
High Point, NC
            370       2,185       410       370       2,595       259       2003       1999  
High Point, NC(3)
    2,655       330       3,395       34       330       3,429       323       2003       1994  
High Point, NC(3)
    2,996       430       4,147       3       430       4,150       387       2003       1998  
Highlands Ranch, CO
            940       3,721               940       3,721       500       2002       1999  
Hilton Head Island, SC
            510       6,037       2,380       510       8,417       1,437       1998       1999  
Hopedale, MA
            130       8,170               130       8,170       416       2005       1999  
Houston, TX
            360       2,640               360       2,640       321       2002       1999  
Houston, TX
            360       2,640               360       2,640       317       2002       1999  
Hutchinson, KS
            600       10,590               600       10,590       631       2004       1997  
Jackson, TN
            540       1,633       177       540       1,810       199       2003       1998  
Jonesboro, GA
            460       1,304               460       1,304       131       2003       1992  
Kalispell, MT
            360       3,282               360       3,282       739       1998       1998  
Kenner, LA
            1,100       10,036       125       1,100       10,161       3,593       1998       2000  
Kirkland, WA(2)
    4,937       1,880       4,320               1,880       4,320       396       2003       1996  
Knoxville, TN
            314       2,756               315       2,754       320       2002       1998  
Lake Havasu City, AZ
            450       4,223               450       4,223       874       1998       1999  
Lake Havasu City, AZ
            110       2,244       136       110       2,380       531       1998       1994  
Lakeland, FL
            520       4,580               520       4,580       410       2003       1991  
Lakewood, NY
            470       8,530               470       8,530       740       2003       1999  
Lawton, OK
            144       1,456               144       1,456       436       1995       1996  
Lecanto, FL
            200       6,900               200       6,900       438       2004       1986  
Lenoir, NC
            190       3,748       641       190       4,389       407       2003       1998  
Lexington, NC
            200       3,900       1,015       200       4,915       554       2002       1997  
Longview, TX
            320       4,440               320       4,440       280       2004       1997  
Louisville, KY(1)
    3,305       490       7,610               490       7,610       717       2003       1997  
Lubbock, TX
            280       6,220       1,660       280       7,880       591       2003       1996  
Manassas, VA(2)
    3,757       750       7,450               750       7,450       653       2003       1996  
Margate, FL
            500       7,303       2,459       500       9,762       4,246       1998       1972  
Martinsville, NC
            349                       349                       2003          
Marysville, CA
            450       4,172       44       450       4,216       706       1998       1999  
Matthews, NC(3)
    3,811       560       4,869       183       560       5,051       468       2003       1998  
McHenry, IL
            1,632                       1,632                       2006          
McHenry, IL
            3,550       15,300               3,550       15,300               2006       2004  
Middleburg Heights, OH
            960       7,780               960       7,780       473       2004       1998  
Middleton, WI
            420       4,006               420       4,006       525       2001       1991  
Midland, TX
            400       4,930               400       4,930       303       2004       1997  
Midwest City, OK
            95       1,385               95       1,385       434       1996       1995  
Missoula, MT(5)
    6,516       550       7,490               550       7,490       258       2005       1998  
Monroe, NC
            470       3,681       648       470       4,329       412       2003       2001  
Monroe, NC
            310       4,799       857       310       5,656       506       2003       2000  
Monroe, NC(3)
    3,343       450       4,021       13       450       4,033       388       2003       1997  
Morehead City, NC
            200       3,104       1,648       200       4,752       799       1999       1999  
Moses Lake, WA
            260       5,940               260       5,940       536       2003       1986  
Mt. Vernon, WA
            400       2,200               400       2,200               2006       2001  
New York, NY
            1,440       21,460               1,440       21,460               2006       1997  
Newark, DE
            560       21,220               560       21,220       1,243       2004       1998  
Newburyport, MA
            960       8,290               960       8,290       1,033       2002       1999  
Norman, OK
            55       1,484               55       1,484       533       1995       1995  
North Augusta, SC
            332       2,558               332       2,558       570       1999       1998  
North Miami Beach, FL
            300       5,709       2,006       300       7,715       3,177       1998       1987  
North Oklahoma City, OK
            87       1,508               87       1,508       432       1996       1996  


103


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Ocean Shores, WA
          $ 770     $ 1,390             $ 770     $ 1,390     $ 101       2004       1996  
Ogden, UT
            360       6,700               360       6,700       412       2004       1998  
Oklahoma City, OK
            130       1,350               130       1,350       412       1995       1996  
Oklahoma City, OK
            220       2,943               220       2,943       592       1999       1999  
Ontario, OR
            90       2,110               90       2,110       188       2003       1985  
Orlando, FL
            1,390       4,630               1,390       4,630       344       2004       1973  
Oshkosh, WI
            900       3,800               900       3,800       81       2006       2005  
Owasso, OK
            215       1,380               215       1,380       400       1996       1996  
Palestine, TX
            173       1,410               173       1,410       411       1996       1996  
Palestine, TX
            180       4,320               180       4,320       51       2006       2005  
Paris, TX
            490       5,452               490       5,452       59       2006       2006  
Paso Robles, CA
            1,770       8,630               1,770       8,630       1,163       2002       1998  
Phoenix, AZ
            1,000       6,500               1,000       6,500       598       2003       1999  
Pinehurst, NC
            290       2,690     $ 484       290       3,174       312       2003       1998  
Piqua, OH
            204       1,885               204       1,885       461       1997       1997  
Pittsburgh, PA
            1,750       8,572       115       1,750       8,687       426       2005       1998  
Pocatello, ID
            470       1,930               470       1,930       193       2003       1991  
Ponca City, OK
            114       1,536               114       1,536       480       1995       1995  
Quincy, MA
            2,690       15,410               2,690       15,410       812       2004       1999  
Reidsville, NC
            170       3,830       857       170       4,687       537       2002       1998  
Reno, NV
            1,060       11,440               1,060       11,440       695       2004       1998  
Ridgeland, MS(2)
  $ 4,772       520       7,680               520       7,680       674       2003       1997  
Rocky Hill, CT
            1,460       7,040               1,460       7,040       983       2002       1998  
Rocky Hill, CT(1)
    4,561       1,090       6,710               1,090       6,710       637       2003       1996  
Romeoville, IL
            1,895                       1,895                       2006          
Roswell, GA
            620       2,200       184       620       2,384       320       2002       1997  
Salem, OR
            449       5,172               449       5,172       1,137       1999       1998  
Salisbury, NC(3)
    3,621       370       5,697       57       370       5,754       528       2003       1997  
Salt Lake City, UT
            1,060       6,142               1,060       6,142       1,019       1999       1986  
San Angelo, TX
            260       8,800               260       8,800       524       2004       1997  
San Juan Capistrano, CA
            1,390       6,942               1,390       6,942       1,022       2000       2001  
Sarasota, FL
            475       3,175               475       3,175       1,012       1996       1995  
Sarasota, FL
            1,190       4,810               1,190       4,810       455       2003       1988  
Seven Fields, PA
            484       4,663       63       484       4,725       1,040       1999       1999  
Shawnee, OK
            80       1,400               80       1,400       435       1996       1995  
Sheboygan, WI
            80       5,320               80       5,320       74       2006       2006  
Sherman, TX
            700       5,221               700       5,221               2006       2006  
Smithfield, NC(3)
    3,554       290       5,777       52       290       5,830       529       2003       1998  
St. Charles, IL
            986                       986                       2006          
Statesville, NC
            150       1,447       267       150       1,713       168       2003       1990  
Statesville, NC(3)
    2,895       310       6,183       32       310       6,215       551       2003       1996  
Statesville, NC(3)
    2,494       140       3,798       33       140       3,832       341       2003       1999  
Staunton, VA
            140       8,360               140       8,360       763       2003       1999  
Stillwater, OK
            80       1,400               80       1,400       438       1995       1995  
Sunrise, FL
            1,480       15,950               1,480       15,950       1,010       2004       1988  
Tewksbury, MA
            1,520       5,480               1,520       5,480       468       2003       1989  
Texarkana, TX
            192       1,403               192       1,403       406       1996       1996  
Troy, OH
            200       2,000               200       2,000       533       1997       1997  
Valparaiso, IN
            112       2,558               112       2,558       395       2001       1998  
Valparaiso, IN
            108       2,962               108       2,962       447       2001       1999  
Vero Beach, FL
            262       3,189               262       3,189       477       2001       1999  
Vero Beach, FL
            297       3,263               297       3,263       493       2001       1996  
W. Hartford, CT
            2,650       5,980               2,650       5,980       467       2004       1905  
Waco, TX
            180       4,500               180       4,500       295       2004       1997  
Wake Forest, NC
            200       3,003       1,742       200       4,745       874       1998       1999  
Walterboro, SC
            150       1,838       337       150       2,175       667       1999       1992  
Waterford, CT
            1,360       12,540               1,360       12,540       1,611       2002       2000  
Waxahachie, TX
            154       1,430               154       1,430       416       1996       1996  
Westerville, OH
            740       8,287       2,736       740       11,023       3,152       1998       2001  
Wichita Falls, TX
            470       3,010               470       3,010       205       2004       1997  
Wilmington, NC
            210       2,991               210       2,991       651       1999       1999  
Winston-Salem, NC
            360       2,514       459       360       2,973       282       2003       1996  
                                                                         
Total Assisted Living Facilities:
    104,945       105,153       906,738       39,131       105,154       945,912       119,856                  
Skilled Nursing Facilities:
                                                                       
Agawam, MA
            880       16,112       2,133       880       18,246       2,076       2002       1993  
Akron, OH
            290       8,219               290       8,219       250       2005       1961  
Akron, OH
            630       7,535               630       7,535       106       2006       1915  


104


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Alliance, OH(6)
  $ 5,055     $ 270     $ 7,723             $ 270     $ 7,723     $ 169       2006       1982  
Amarillo, TX
            540       7,260               540       7,260       319       2005       1986  
Arcadia, LA
            240       5,460               240       5,460       126       2006       2006  
Atlanta, GA
            460       5,540               460       5,540       265       2005       1972  
Auburndale, FL
            750       5,950               750       5,950       270       2005       1983  
Aurora, CO
            2,600       5,906               2,600       5,906       132       2006       1988  
Baltic, OH(6)
    4,145       50       8,709               50       8,709       185       2006       1983  
Baytown, TX
            450       6,150               450       6,150       781       2002       2000  
Beachwood, OH
            1,260       23,478               1,260       23,478       3,264       2001       1990  
Beattyville, KY
            100       6,900               100       6,900       241       2005       1972  
Bernice, LA
            16       1,017               16       1,017       69       2005       1969  
Birmingham, AL
            390       4,902               390       4,902       542       2003       1977  
Birmingham, AL
            340       5,734               340       5,734       586       2003       1974  
Boise, ID
            810       5,401               810       5,401       1,542       1998       1966  
Boise, ID
            600       7,383               600       7,383       1,863       1998       1997  
Boonville, IN
            190       5,510               190       5,510       724       2002       2000  
Bountiful, UT
            991       6,850               991       6,850       208       2005       1987  
Boynton Beach, FL
            980       8,112               980       8,112       578       2004       1999  
Braintree, MA
            170       7,157     $ 1,290       170       8,447       3,895       1997       1968  
Brandon, MS
            115       9,549               115       9,549       1,000       2003       1963  
Bridgewater, NJ
            1,850       3,050               1,850       3,050       257       2004       1970  
Brighton, MA
            240       3,859       1,497       240       5,356       232       2005       1982  
Broadview Heights, OH
            920       12,400               920       12,400       1,729       2001       1984  
Bunnell, FL
            260       7,118               260       7,118       537       2004       1985  
Butler, AL
            90       3,510               90       3,510       282       2004       1960  
Byrdstown, TN
                    2,414                       2,414       443       2004       1982  
Canton, MA
            820       8,201       263       820       8,464       1,126       2002       1993  
Carrollton, TX
            730       2,770               730       2,770       152       2005       1976  
Centerville, MA
            1,490       9,650       307       1,490       9,957       553       2004       1982  
Cheswick, PA
            384       6,041       1,293       384       7,334       1,805       1998       1933  
Clarksville, TN
            480       5,020               480       5,020       65       2006       1989  
Clearwater, FL
            160       7,218               160       7,218       493       2004       1961  
Clearwater, FL
            1,260       2,740               1,260       2,740       162       2005       1983  
Cleveland, MS
                    1,850                       1,850       648       2003       1977  
Cleveland, TN
            350       5,000       122       350       5,122       768       2001       1987  
Coeur d’Alene, ID
            600       7,878               600       7,878       1,969       1998       1996  
Colorado Springs, CO
            310       6,290               310       6,290       294       2005       1985  
Columbia, TN
            590       3,787               590       3,787       450       2003       1974  
Columbus, IN
            530       5,170       1,540       530       6,710       751       2002       2001  
Columbus, OH
            1,070       11,726       205       1,070       11,930       339       2005       1968  
Columbus, OH(6)
    4,774       1,010       4,931               1,010       4,931       119       2006       1983  
Columbus, OH(6)
    10,699       1,860       16,624               1,860       16,624       363       2006       1978  
Corpus Christi, TX
            307       443               307       443       55       2005       1985  
Corpus Christi, TX
            400       1,916               400       1,916       86       2005       1985  
Dade City, FL
            250       7,150               250       7,150       495       2004       1975  
Daytona Beach, FL
            470       5,930               470       5,930       447       2004       1986  
Daytona Beach, FL
            490       5,710               490       5,710       446       2004       1961  
Daytona Beach, FL
            1,850       2,650               1,850       2,650       162       2005       1964  
DeBary, FL
            440       7,460               440       7,460       514       2004       1965  
Dedham, MA
            1,790       12,936               1,790       12,936       1,768       2002       1996  
Defuniak Springs, FL
            1,350       10,250               1,350       10,250       98       2006       1980  
DeLand, FL
            220       7,080               220       7,080       492       2004       1967  
Denton, MD
            390       4,010               390       4,010       515       2003       1982  
Denver, CO
            2,530       9,514               2,530       9,514       281       2005       1987  
Douglasville, GA
            1,350       7,471               1,350       7,471       830       2003       1975  
Easton, PA
            285       6,315               285       6,315       2,745       1993       1959  
Eight Mile, AL
            410       6,110               410       6,110       707       2003       1973  
El Paso, TX
            539       8,961               539       8,961       397       2005       1970  
El Paso, TX
            642       3,958               642       3,958       210       2005       1969  
Elizabethton, TN
            310       4,604       336       310       4,940       794       2001       1980  
Erin, TN
            440       8,060       134       440       8,194       1,180       2001       1981  
Eugene, OR
            300       5,316               300       5,316       1,442       1998       1972  
Fairfield, AL
            530       9,134               530       9,134       962       2003       1965  
Fall River, MA
            620       5,829       4,856       620       10,685       2,341       1996       1973  
Farmerville, LA
            147       4,087               147       4,087       161       2005       1984  
Florence, AL
            320       3,975               320       3,975       495       2003       1972  
Fort Myers, FL
            636       6,026               636       6,026       2,197       1998       1984  
Fort Pierce, FL
            440       3,560               440       3,560       141       2005       1973  


105


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Gardnerville, NV
          $ 182     $ 1,718     $ 785     $ 182     $ 2,503     $ 701       2004       2000  
Goshen, IN
            210       6,160               210       6,160       82       2006       2006  
Graceville, FL
            150       13,000               150       13,000       121       2006       1980  
Grand Prairie, TX
            574       3,426               574       3,426       182       2005       1982  
Granite City, IL
            610       7,143       842       610       7,985       2,781       1998       1973  
Granite City, IL
            400       4,303       707       400       5,010       1,700       1999       1964  
Greeneville, TN
            400       8,290               400       8,290       663       2004       1979  
Hanover, IN
            210       4,430               210       4,430       325       2004       2000  
Hardin, IL
            50       5,350       135       50       5,485       1,506       2002       1996  
Harriman, TN
            590       8,060       158       590       8,218       1,260       2001       1972  
Herculaneum, MO
            127       10,373       393       127       10,766       2,852       2002       1984  
Hilliard, FL
            150       6,990               150       6,990       1,657       1999       1990  
Homestead, FL
            2,750       11,750               2,750       11,750       112       2006       1994  
Houston, TX
            600       2,700               600       2,700       150       2005       1974  
Houston, TX
            630       5,970       750       630       6,720       811       2002       1995  
Huron, OH
            160       6,088       252       160       6,340       177       2005       1983  
Indianapolis, IN
            255       2,473               255       2,473       63       2006       1981  
Indianapolis, IN
            75       925               75       925       106       2004       1942  
Jackson, MS
            410       1,814               410       1,814       234       2003       1968  
Jackson, MS
                    4,400                       4,400       1,540       2003       1980  
Jackson, MS
                    2,150                       2,150       753       2003       1970  
Jamestown, TN
                    6,707                       6,707       1,230       2004       1966  
Jefferson City, MO
            370       6,730       301       370       7,031       1,852       2002       1982  
Jefferson, OH
            80       9,120               80       9,120       246       2006       1984  
Jonesboro, GA
            840       1,921               840       1,921       260       2003       1992  
Kent, OH
            215       3,367               215       3,367       1,339       1989       1983  
Kissimmee, FL
            230       3,854               230       3,854       273       2004       1972  
LaBelle, FL
            60       4,946               60       4,946       380       2004       1986  
Lake Placid, FL
            150       12,850               150       12,850       910       2004       1984  
Lakeland, FL
            696       4,843               696       4,843       1,784       1998       1984  
Lee, MA
            290       18,135       926       290       19,061       2,440       2002       1998  
Littleton, MA
            1,240       2,910               1,240       2,910       445       1996       1975  
Longview, TX
            293       1,707               293       1,707       105       2005       1971  
Longwood, FL
            480       7,520               480       7,520       530       2004       1980  
Louisville, KY
            490       10,010               490       10,010       530       2005       1978  
Louisville, KY
            430       7,135       163       430       7,298       1,085       2002       1974  
Louisville, KY
            350       4,675       109       350       4,784       727       2002       1975  
Lowell, MA
            370       7,450               370       7,450       413       2004       1977  
Lufkin, TX
            416       1,184               416       1,184       106       2005       1919  
Manchester, NH
            340       4,360               340       4,360       186       2005       1984  
Marianna, FL
            340       8,910               340       8,910       83       2006       1997  
McComb, MS
            120       5,786               120       5,786       592       2003       1973  
Memphis, TN
            970       4,246               970       4,246       506       2003       1981  
Memphis, TN
            480       5,656               480       5,656       624       2003       1982  
Memphis, TN
            940       5,963               940       5,963       545       2004       1951  
Merrillville, IN
            643       7,084       3,526       643       10,610       3,045       1997       1999  
Mesa, AZ
            940       2,579               940       2,579       117       2005       1984  
Midwest City, OK
            470       5,673               470       5,673       1,898       1998       1958  
Midwest City, OK
            484       5,516               484       5,516       256       2005       1987  
Millbury, MA
            930       4,570               930       4,570       399       2004       1972  
Mobile, AL
            440       3,625               440       3,625       437       2003       1982  
Monteagle, TN
            310       3,318               310       3,318       367       2003       1980  
Monterey, TN
                    4,195                       4,195       769       2004       1977  
Monticello, FL
            140       4,471               140       4,471       354       2004       1986  
Morgantown, KY
            380       3,705               380       3,705       387       2003       1965  
Moss Point, MS
            120       7,280               120       7,280       524       2004       1933  
Mountain City, TN
            220       5,896       661       220       6,556       1,579       2001       1976  
Naples, FL
            550       5,450               550       5,450       351       2004       1968  
Natchitoches, LA
            190       4,096               190       4,096       153       2005       1965  
Needham, MA
            1,610       13,715       365       1,610       14,081       1,969       2002       1994  
New Haven, CT
            160       4,778               160       4,778       11       2006       1958  
New Haven, IN
            176       3,524               176       3,524       270       2004       1981  
New Port Richey, FL
            624       7,307               624       7,307       2,644       1998       1984  
North Miami, FL
            430       3,918               430       3,918       379       2004       1968  
North Miami, FL
            440       4,830               440       4,830       382       2004       1963  
Norwalk, CT
            410       2,118       1,782       410       3,900       210       2004       1971  
Oklahoma City, OK
            473       10,729               473       10,729       136       2006       1979  
Ormond Beach, FL
                    2,739       74               2,812       651       2002       1983  


106


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Overland Park, KS
          $ 1,120     $ 8,360             $ 1,120     $ 8,360     $ 252       2005       1970  
Owensboro, KY
            240       6,760               240       6,760       345       2005       1966  
Owensboro, KY
            225       13,275               225       13,275       582       2005       1964  
Owenton, KY
            100       2,400               100       2,400       129       2005       1979  
Panama City, FL
            300       9,200               300       9,200       653       2004       1992  
Payson, AZ
            180       3,988               180       3,988       1,145       1998       1985  
Pigeon Forge, TN
            320       4,180     $ 117       320       4,297       689       2001       1986  
Plano, TX
            1,305       9,095               1,305       9,095       412       2005       1977  
Pleasant Grove, AL
            480       4,429               480       4,429       529       2003       1964  
Plymouth, MA
            440       6,220               440       6,220       361       2004       1968  
Port St. Joe, FL
            370       2,055               370       2,055       271       2004       1982  
Prospect, CT
            820       1,441       2,118       820       3,559       151       2004       1970  
Pueblo, CO
            370       6,051               370       6,051       1,701       1998       1989  
Pueblo, CO
            250       9,391               250       9,391       289       2005       1986  
Quincy, FL
            200       5,333               200       5,333       425       2004       1983  
Quitman, MS
            60       10,340               60       10,340       701       2004       1976  
Rheems, PA
            200       1,575               200       1,575       169       2003       1996  
Richmond, VA
            1,210       2,889               1,210       2,889       434       2003       1995  
Ridgely, TN
            300       5,700       97       300       5,797       856       2001       1990  
Ringgold, LA
            30       4,174               30       4,174       150       2005       1984  
Rochdale, MA
            675       11,847       1,899       675       13,746       1,552       2002       1995  
Rockledge, FL
            360       4,117               360       4,117       815       2001       1970  
Rockwood, TN
            500       7,116       741       500       7,857       1,205       2001       1979  
Rogersville, TN
            350       3,278               350       3,278       363       2003       1980  
Royal Palm Beach, FL
            980       8,320               980       8,320       604       2004       1984  
Ruleville, MS
            0       50                       50       18       2003       1978  
Ruston, LA
            130       9,403               130       9,403       300       2005       1988  
San Antonio, TX
            560       7,315               560       7,315       936       2002       2000  
Sandwich, MA
            1,140       11,190       136       1,140       11,326       634       2004       1987  
Sarasota, FL
            560       8,474               560       8,474       1,685       1999       2000  
Sarasota, FL
            600       3,400               600       3,400       244       2004       1982  
Scituate, MA
            1,740       10,640               1,740       10,640       297       2005       1976  
Seville, OH
            230       1,770               230       1,770       105       2005       1981  
Shelby, MS
            60       5,340               60       5,340       373       2004       1979  
Shelbyville, KY
            630       3,870               630       3,870       172       2005       1965  
South Boston, MA
            385       2,002       5,218       385       7,220       1,666       1995       1961  
South Pittsburg, TN
            430       5,628               430       5,628       486       2004       1979  
Southbridge, MA
            890       8,110       762       890       8,872       671       2004       1976  
Spring City, TN
            420       6,085       2,579       420       8,664       1,232       2001       1987  
St. Louis, MO
            750       6,030               750       6,030       740       1995       1994  
Starke, FL
            120       10,180               120       10,180       717       2004       1990  
Stuart, FL
            390       8,110               390       8,110       566       2004       1985  
Swanton, OH
            330       6,370               330       6,370       388       2004       1950  
Tampa, FL
            830       6,370               830       6,370       554       2004       1968  
Torrington, CT
            360       1,261       624       360       1,885       112       2004       1966  
Troy, OH
            470       16,730               470       16,730       980       2004       1971  
Tucson, AZ
            930       13,399               930       13,399       385       2005       1985  
Tupelo, MS
            740       4,092               740       4,092       478       2003       1980  
Uhrichsville, OH
            24       6,716               24       6,716       159       2006       1977  
Venice, FL
            500       6,000               500       6,000       379       2004       1987  
Vero Beach, FL
            660       9,040       1,461       660       10,501       3,650       1998       1984  
Wareham, MA
            875       10,313       1,701       875       12,014       1,450       2002       1989  
Warren, OH
            240       3,810               240       3,810       180       2005       1973  
Waterbury, CT
            370       2,166               370       2,166       5       2006       1972  
Webster, MA
            234       3,580       713       500       4,026       2,186       1995       1986  
Webster, MA
            70       5,917               70       5,917       3,050       1995       1982  
Webster, TX
            360       5,940               360       5,940       757       2002       2000  
West Haven, CT
            580       1,620       1,034       580       2,654       138       2004       1971  
West Palm Beach, FL
            696       8,037               696       8,037       3,293       1998       1984  
West Worthington, OH
            510       5,090               510       5,090       135       2006       1980  
Westlake, OH
            1,320       17,936               1,330       17,926       2,532       2001       1985  
Westlake, OH
            571       5,411               571       5,411       1,464       1998       1957  
Westmoreland, TN
            330       1,822       2,635       330       4,456       669       2001       1994  
White Hall, IL
            50       5,550       670       50       6,220       1,658       2002       1971  
Whitemarsh, PA
            2,310       6,190               2,310       6,190       327       2005       1967  
Williamstown, KY
            70       6,430               70       6,430       285       2005       1987  
Winnfield, LA
            31       6,480               31       6,480       217       2005       1964  


107


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Woodbridge, VA
          $ 680     $ 4,423             $ 680     $ 4,423     $ 590       2002       1977  
Worcester, MA
            1,053       2,265     $ 268       1,053       2,533       1,580       1997       1961  
Worcester, MA
            1,100       5,400       2,497       1,100       7,897       516       2004       1962  
                                                                         
Total Skilled Nursing Facilities:
  $ 24,673       111,159       1,298,362       51,175       111,435       1,349,258       158,686                  
Independent Living / CCRC Facilities:
                                                                       
Amelia Island, FL
            3,290       24,310       1,342       3,290       25,652       632       2005       1998  
Anderson, SC
            710       6,290               710       6,290       589       2003       1986  
Atlanta, GA
            2,059       14,914               2,059       14,914       4,919       1997       1999  
Aurora, CO
            1,379                       1,379                       2006          
Austin, TX
            880       9,520               880       9,520       2,149       1999       1998  
Columbia, SC
            2,120       4,860       2,185       2,120       7,045       601       2003       2000  
Denver, CO
            3,650       14,906               3,650       14,906       98       2006       1987  
Douglasville, GA
            90       217               90       217       25       2003       1985  
Fremont, CA
            3,400       25,300               3,400       25,300       668       2005       1988  
Gardnerville, NV
            1,144       10,830               1,144       10,830       4,170       1998       1999  
Gilroy, CA
            760       13,880               760       13,880       30       2006       2006  
Houston, TX
            4,791       7,100               4,791       7,100       924       2003       1974  
Indianapolis, IN
            495       6,287               495       6,287       110       2006       1981  
Lauderhill, FL
            1,836       25,216               1,836       25,216       1,017       2005       1976  
Manteca, CA
            1,300       12,125               1,300       12,125       329       2005       1988  
Marysville, WA
            620       4,780               620       4,780       407       2003       1998  
Mesa, AZ
            950       9,087               950       9,087       1,584       1999       2000  
Mount Airy, NC
            270       6,430               270       6,430       170       2005       1998  
Naples, FL
            1,716       17,306               1,716       17,306       8,070       1997       1999  
Ossining, NY
            1,510       9,490               1,510       9,490       1,238       2002       1967  
Pawleys Island, SC
            1,010       32,590       670       1,010       33,260       844       2005       1998  
Raytown, MO
            510       5,490               510       5,490               2006       2000  
Rohnert Park, CA
            6,500       18,700               6,500       18,700       500       2005       1988  
Roswell, GA
            1,107       9,627               1,107       9,627       3,787       1997       1999  
Sonoma, CA
            1,100       18,400               1,100       18,400       489       2005       1988  
Spartanburg, SC
            3,350       15,750               3,350       15,750       410       2005       1998  
Terre Haute, IN
            175       3,499       3,806       175       7,305       1,870       1999       1999  
Twin Falls, ID
            550       14,740               550       14,740       1,674       2002       1991  
Urbana, IL
            670       6,780               670       6,780       952       2002       1998  
Vacaville, CA
            900       17,100               900       17,100       457       2005       1988  
Vallejo, CA
            4,000       18,000               4,000       18,000       479       2005       1988  
Wichita, KS
            1,400       11,000               1,400       11,000               2006       1997  
Winston-Salem, NC
            2,850       13,550       175       2,850       13,725       368       2005       1997  
                                                                         
Total Independent Living / CCRC Facilities:
    0       57,092       408,074       8,178       57,092       416,252       39,560                  
Specialty Care Facilities:
                                                                       
Amarillo, TX
            72       11,928               72       11,928       467       2005       1986  
Bellaire, TX
            3,740       36,966       3,828       3,740       40,793       53       2006       2005  
Braintree, MA
            300       13,781               300       13,781       4,103       2005       1918  
Chicago, IL
            3,650       7,505       11,054       3,650       18,559       3,333       2002       1979  
Corpus Christi, TX
            77       3,923               77       3,923       178       2005       1968  
El Paso, TX
            112       15,888               112       15,888       616       2005       1994  
Lafayette, LA
            1,383       6,644       1,674       1,383       8,318       15       2006       1993  
Midwest City, OK
            146       3,854               146       3,854       171       2005       1996  
New Albany, OH
            3,020       27,445               3,020       27,445       2,925       2002       2003  
Plano, TX
            195       14,805               195       14,805       574       2005       1995  
Springfield, MA
            2,100       22,913       160       2,100       23,073       7,202       2005       1952  
Stoughton, MA
            975       25,247               975       25,247       8,048       2005       1958  
Tulsa, OK
            1,954       3,809       1,988       1,954       5,798       13       2006       1992  
Webster, TX
            1,262       8,575       2,444       1,262       11,019       19       2006       1991  
                                                                         
Total Specialty Care Facilities:
    0       18,986       203,283       21,148       18,986       224,431       27,717                  
Medical Office Buildings:
                                                                       
Arcadia, CA(7)
    10,830       4,796       27,567       2,416       4,796       29,983       31       2006       1984  
Atlanta, GA
            10,760       12,774       3,311       10,790       16,056       30       2006       1992  
Aurora, IL
            482       7,859       1,021       482       8,880       13       2006       1996  
Aurora, IL
            1,740       1,177       1,062       1,740       2,239       5       2006       1989  
Austell, GA(7)
    4,551       2,704       5,197       3,341       2,704       8,538       23       2006       1999  
Bellaire, TX
            3,657       27,672       3,547       3,657       31,219       44       2006       2005  
Birmingham, AL
                    7,178       2,127               9,305       13       2006       1971  


108


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Birmingham, AL
                  $ 8,070     $ 1,905             $ 9,975     $ 13       2006       1985  
Birmingham, AL
                    15,278       3,393               18,672       27       2006       1989  
Boca Raton, FL(7)
  $ 14,729               23,852       2,760               26,612       35       2006       1995  
Boynton Beach, FL(7)
    4,910     $ 1,446       6,034       1,400     $ 1,446       7,434       11       2006       1993  
Boynton Beach, FL(7)
    4,404       1,451       6,425       1,096       1,451       7,521       10       2006       1995  
Charlotte, NC
            641       7,881       1,037       641       8,918       12       2006       1988  
Coral Springs, FL
            1,246       7,949       1,928       1,246       9,877       18       2006       1993  
Dallas, TX(7)
    16,571               29,208       5,401               34,608       58       2006       1995  
Decatur, GA
            508       974       979       508       1,953       6       2006       1971  
Delray Beach, FL(7)
    14,552               21,449       11,986               33,436       46       2006       1983  
Durham, NC(7)
    6,812       4,322       15,702       4,510       4,322       20,213       31       2006       1980  
Edinburg, TX(7)
    6,392       337       13,375       649       337       14,023       15       2006       1996  
El Paso, TX
            897       2,336       603       897       2,939       5       2006       1982  
El Paso, TX(7)
    11,088               21,915       2,867               24,782       28       2006       1997  
Fayetteville, GA(7)
    3,531       522       6,238       905       522       7,143       10       2006       1999  
Germantown, TN
            1,962       9,289       1,790       1,962       11,079       16       2006       2002  
Jupiter, FL(7)
    7,740       1,676       9,345       1,621       1,676       10,966       16       2006       2001  
Lakewood, CA
                    10,964       901               11,865       12       2006       1993  
Las Vegas, NV(7)
    4,789       2,052       9,378       906       2,052       10,283       11       2006       1991  
Las Vegas, NV(7)
    8,505       5,730       47,861       4,761       5,730       52,622       65       2006       1982  
Lawrenceville, GA
            1,274       8,140       1,585       1,274       9,725       14       2006       2001  
Lawrenceville, GA(7)
    2,511       603       3,862       750       603       4,612       7       2006       2002  
Lewisville, TX
                    8,133       914               9,047       12       2006       1997  
Los Gatos, CA
                    14,512       5,015               19,528       26       2006       1993  
Loxahatchee, FL(7)
    3,519       1,675       5,171       804       1,675       5,975       7       2006       1993  
Loxahatchee, FL(7)
    2,888       1,240       3,954       639       1,240       4,594       6       2006       1996  
Loxahatchee, FL
                    3,899       697               4,596       6       2006       1996  
Middletown, NY
                    13,156       7,759               20,915       42       2006       1998  
Nashville, TN
            1,505       5,469       1,218       1,505       6,687       11       2006       1986  
North Las Vegas, NV(7)
    6,491               10,696       1,689               12,385       18       2006       2000  
Ocala, FL
            1,708       4,095       1,044       1,708       5,139       9       2006       1991  
Palm Bay, FL(7)
    2,063       1,026       2,322       1,554       1,026       3,876       10       2006       1997  
Palm Springs, CA
                    9,870       1,384               11,254       14       2006       1998  
Palm Springs, FL
            832       5,474       1,112       840       6,578       10       2006       1997  
Palm Springs, FL(7)
    2,960       684       3,115       610       684       3,724       6       2006       1993  
Pearland, TX(7)
    2,547       458       4,309       752       458       5,060       7       2006       2000  
Pearland, TX(7)
    1,732       1,542       3,408       694       1,542       4,102       6       2006       2002  
Pelham, AL
            688       2,412       583       688       2,995       5       2006       1990  
Phoenix, AZ(7)
    31,380               38,216       9,917               48,133       77       2006       1998  
Plantation, FL(7)
    10,503       7,892       6,666       2,226       7,892       8,892       17       2006       1996  
Plantation, FL(7)
    9,807       7,860       3,500       4,559       7,860       8,058       29       2006       1995  
Reno, NV(7)
    8,600       921       16,489       2,465       921       18,955       28       2006       1991  
Sacramento, CA(7)
    5,230               9,015       3,552               12,566       15       2006       1990  
San Antonio, TX(7)
    6,881       1,320       11,395       3,558       1,320       14,954       28       2006       1999  
Suwanee, GA
            1,127       5,116       1,044       1,127       6,160       9       2006       1998  
Suwanee, GA
            967       4,746       1,115       967       5,860       9       2006       2001  
Suwanee, GA
            643       4,423       609       643       5,032       6       2006       2003  
Tomball, TX(7)
    3,116       766       8,167       1,335       766       9,503       12       2006       1982  
Trussville, AL
            759       1,495       990       759       2,485       6       2006       1990  
Union City, TN
            1,005       11,799       1,409       1,005       13,208       17       2006       1998  
Voorhees, NJ
            9,582       19,482       3,513       9,582       22,995       34       2006       1997  
Wellington, FL(7)
    7,574               12,960       1,417               14,377       16       2006       2002  
West Palm Beach, FL(7)
    6,498               10,185       4,068               14,254       17       2006       1995  
West Palm Beach, FL(7)
    7,838               10,373       3,247               13,621       24       2006       1993  
West Palm Beach, FL(7)
    7,240               11,034       2,305               13,339       20       2006       1991  
Yorkville, IL
            982       2,146       823       982       2,969       5       2006       1980  
                                                                         
Total Medical Office Buildings:
    248,782       93,988       662,151       145,178       94,026       807,294       1,188                  
Construction in Progress:
                    138,222                       138,222                          
                                                                         
      378,400       386,378       3,607,259       264,810       386,693       3,881,369       347,004                  
Assets Held for Sale
                                                                       
Litchfield, CT
            660       9,652       283       660       9,934       4,379       1997       1998  
Middletown, OH
            800       3,700               800       3,700       264       2004       2000  
Newark, OH
            410       5,711       409       410       6,120       2,185       1998       1987  
                                                                         
Total Assets Held for Sale
    0       1,870       19,063       692       1,870       19,754       6,828                  
                                                                         


109


Table of Contents

                                                                         
                      Gross Amount at Which
             
                            Carried at Close of Period              
                                        Accumulated
             
          Initial Cost to Company     Cost Capitalized
                Depreciation
             
                Buildings &
    Subsequent to
          Buildings &
    and
    Year
    Year
 
Description
  Encumbrances     Land     Improvements     Acquisition     Land     Improvements     Amortization     Acquired     Built  
 
Total Investment in Real Property Owned
  $ 378,400     $ 388,248     $ 3,635,938     $ 265,502     $ 388,563     $ 3,901,123     $ 353,832                  
                                                                         
 
 
(1) In June 2003, three wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisitions of three assisted living facilities from Emeritus Corporation. The properties were subject to existing mortgage debt of $13,981,000. The three wholly-owned subsidiaries are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Notwithstanding consolidation for financial statement purposes, it is the Company’s intention that the subsidiaries be separate legal entities wherein the assets and liabilities are not available to pay other debts or obligations of the consolidated Company.
 
(2) In September 2003, four wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisitions of four assisted living facilities from Emeritus Corporation. The properties were subject to existing mortgage debt of $24,291,000. The four wholly-owned subsidiaries are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Notwithstanding consolidation for financial statement purposes, it is the Company’s intention that the subsidiaries be separate legal entities wherein the assets and liabilities are not available to pay other debts or obligations of the consolidated Company.
 
(3) In September 2003, 17 wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisitions of 17 assisted living facilities from Southern Assisted Living, Inc. The properties were subject to existing mortgage debt of $59,471,000. The 17 wholly-owned subsidiaries are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Notwithstanding consolidation for financial statement purposes, it is the Company’s intention that the subsidiaries be separate legal entities wherein the assets and liabilities are not available to pay other debts or obligations of the consolidated Company.
 
(4) In September 2005, one wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company completed the acquisition of one assisted living facility from Emeritus Corporation. The property was subject to existing mortgage debt of $6,705,000. The wholly-owned subsidiary is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Notwithstanding consolidation for financial statement purposes, it is the Company’s intention that the subsidiary be a separate legal entity wherein the assets and liabilities are not available to pay other debts or obligations of the consolidated Company.
 
(5) In January 2005, one wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company completed the acquisition of one assisted living facility from Emeritus Corporation. The property was subject to existing mortgage debt of $7,875,000. The wholly-owned subsidiary is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Notwithstanding consolidation for financial statement purposes, it is the Company’s intention that the subsidiary be a separate legal entity wherein the assets and liabilities are not available to pay other debts or obligations of the consolidated Company.
 
(6) In March 2006, four wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company completed the acquisition of four skilled nursing facilities from Provider Services, Inc. The properties were subject to existing mortgage debt of $25,099. The wholly-owned subsidiaries are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Notwithstanding consolidation for financial statement purposes, it is the Company’s intention that the subsidiaries be separate legal entities wherein the assets and liabilities are not available to pay other debts or obligations of the consolidated Company.
 
(7) In December 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of Windrose Medical Properties Trust. Certain of the properties were subject to existing mortgage debt of $248,844,000 (principal only). Notwithstanding consolidation for financial statement purposes, it is the Company’s intention that the subsidiaries related to the aforementioned properties be separate legal entities wherein the assets and liabilities are not available to pay other debts or obligations of the consolidated Company.


110


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
          (In thousands)        
 
Investment in real estate:
                       
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 2,936,800     $ 2,409,963     $ 1,893,977  
Additions:
                       
Acquisitions
    1,239,289       568,660       504,336  
Improvements
    169,811       31,422       33,538  
Conversions from loans receivable
    11,204       3,908       8,500  
Deferred acquisition payments
    2,000       18,125          
Assumed debt
    25,049       22,309       14,555  
                         
Total additions
    1,447,353       644,424       560,929  
Deductions:
                       
Cost of real estate sold
    (94,466 )     (115,179 )     (44,629 )
Reclassification of accumulated depreciation for assets held for sale
    (6,829 )     (2,408 )        
Impairment of assets
                    (314 )
                         
Total deductions
    (101,295 )     (117,587 )     (44,943 )
                         
Balance at end of year(1)
  $ 4,282,858     $ 2,936,800     $ 2,409,963  
                         
Accumulated depreciation:
                       
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 274,875     $ 219,536     $ 152,440  
Additions:
                       
Depreciation and amortization expenses
    97,638       84,828       74,015  
Deductions:
                       
Sale of properties
    (18,677 )     (27,081 )     (6,919 )
Reclassification of accumulated depreciation for assets held for sale
    (6,829 )     (2,408 )        
                         
Balance at end of year
  $ 347,007     $ 274,875     $ 219,536  
                         
 
 
(1) The aggregate cost for tax purposes for real property equals $4,049,675 at December 31, 2006.


111


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
SCHEDULE IV — MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2006
 
                                                   
                        (In thousands)  
                                    Principal Amount
 
                                    of Loans Subject
 
        Final
                    Carrying
    to Delinquent
 
    Interest
  Maturity
    Periodic Payment
  Prior
    Face Amount
    Amount of
    Principal or
 
Description
  Rate   Date     Terms   Liens     of Mortgages     Mortgages     Interest  
 
Two skilled nursing facilities in Florida
    9.89%     09/30/20     Monthly Payments           $ 34,000     $ 33,894       None  
                  $306,326                                
Chicago, IL
    16.48%     6/30/07     Monthly Payments             20,355       18,330       None  
(Specialty care facility)
                $234,525                                
Lauderhill, FL
    11.50%     09/01/12     Monthly Payments             12,700       12,453       None  
(Skilled nursing facility)
                $128,975                                
Four assisted living facilities in Ohio
    8.96%     08/01/08     Monthly Payments             15,965       11,047       None  
and Pennsylvania
                $82,480                                
Six skilled nursing facilities
    5.75%     06/30/18     Monthly Payments             11,000       11,000       None  
in Illinois and Missouri
                $52,708                                
26 skilled nursing facilities and three
    13.69%     03/31/10     Monthly Payments             11,143       9,252       None  
assisted living facilities in Florida,
                $275,000                                
Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
                                                 
Tennessee and Kentucky
                                                 
Sun Valley, CA
    9.63%     05/01/08     Monthly Payments             18,800       7,472       None  
(Specialty care facility)
                $91,547                                
Bala, PA
    11.50%     07/01/08     Monthly Payments             7,400       7,145       None  
(Skilled nursing facility)
                $68,470                                
Plymouth, MA
    19.26%     09/09/09     Monthly Payments             6,175       6,175       None  
(Independent living facility)
                $52,179                                
Boalsburg, PA
    19.00%     06/01/07     Monthly Payments             5,938       5,350       None  
(Independent living facility)
                $35,666                                
28 mortgage loans relating to
19 skilled nursing facilities, 63
assisted living facilities, 12 independent living facilities and 2
specialty care facilities
    From
3.9% to
19.26%
    From
06/01/07
07/01/20
    Monthly Payments
from $45
to $99,787
            62,072       55,497       None  
                                                   
Totals
                            $ 204,316     $ 177,615     $ 0  
                                                   


112


Table of Contents

HEALTH CARE REIT, INC.
 
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
          (In thousands)        
 
Reconciliation of mortgage loans:
                       
Balance at beginning of year
  $ 141,467     $ 155,266     $ 164,139  
Additions:
                       
New mortgage loans
    87,563       36,055       30,057  
                         
      229,030       191,321       194,196  
Deductions:
                       
Collections of principal(1)
    40,155       45,946       20,197  
Conversions to real property
    11,204       3,908       8,500  
Charge-offs
    56                  
Other(2)
                    10,233  
                         
      51,415       49,854       38,930  
                         
Balance at end of year
  $ 177,615     $ 141,467     $ 155,266  
                         
 
 
(1) Includes collection of negative principal amortization.
 
(2) Includes mortgage loans that were reclassified to working capital loans during the periods indicated.


113


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
 
         
  2 .1   Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 12, 2006, by and among Health Care REIT, Inc., Heat Merger Sub, LLC, Heat OP Merger Sub, L.P., Windrose Medical Properties Trust and Windrose Medical Properties, L.P. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 15, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  2 .2   Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 12, 2006, by and among Health Care REIT, Inc., Heat Merger Sub, LLC, Heat OP Merger Sub, L.P., Windrose Medical Properties Trust and Windrose Medical Properties, L.P. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .1   Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .2   Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Junior Participating Preferred Stock, Series A, of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .3   Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .4   Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 13, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .5   Certificate of Designation of 77/8% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A/A filed July 8, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .6   Certificate of Designation of 6% Series E Cumulative Convertible and Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 1, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .7   Certificate of Designation of 75/8% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 2.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A filed September 10, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .8   Certificate of Designation of 7.5% Series G Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  3 .9   Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 8, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .1   The Company, by signing this Report, agrees to furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request a copy of any instrument that defines the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company and authorizes a total amount of securities not in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Company.
  4 .2   Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997 between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 21, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .3   First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 17, 1997, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 21, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .4   Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 13, 1998, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 11, 1998, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .5   Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 18, 1999, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 17, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .6   Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 10, 2001, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed August 9, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).


114


Table of Contents

         
  4 .7   Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated September 10, 2003, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .8   Amendment No. 1, dated September 16, 2003, to Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated September 10, 2003, to Indenture dated as of April 17, 1997, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .9   Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 9, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .10   Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of September 6, 2002, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 9, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .11   Amendment No. 1, dated March 12, 2003, to Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of September 6, 2002, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 14, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .12   Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 10, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .13   Amendment No. 1, dated September 16, 2003, to Supplemental Indenture No. 2, dated as of September 10, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 24, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .14   Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of October 29, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed October 30, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .15   Amendment No. 1, dated September 13, 2004, to Supplemental Indenture No. 3, dated as of October 29, 2003, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as successor to Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 13, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .16   Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of April 27, 2005, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 28, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .17   Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of November 30, 2005, to Indenture for Senior Debt Securities, dated as of September 6, 2002, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 30, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .18   Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2006, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .19   Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated as of November 20, 2006, between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed November 20, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  4 .20   Form of Indenture for Senior Subordinated Debt Securities (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Form S-3 (File No. 333-73936) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).


115


Table of Contents

         
  4 .21   Form of Indenture for Junior Subordinated Debt Securities (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Form S-3 (File No. 333-73936) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .1   Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2006, by and among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the banks signatory thereto, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as syndication agent, and UBS Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agents (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .2   Amendment No. 1 to Third Amended and Restated Loan Agreement by and among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, the banks signatory thereto, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., as syndication agent, and UBS Securities LLC, Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as documentation agents, dated as of September 20, 2006 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 26, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .3   Credit Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2006, by and among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and Fifth Third Bank (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed June 5, 2006, and incorporated by reference thereto).
  10 .4   ISDA Master Agreement and Schedule dated as of May 6, 2004 by and between Bank of America, N.A. and Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .5   Interest Rate Swap Confirmation dated May 10, 2004 between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .6   Interest Rate Swap Confirmation dated May 6, 2004 between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Deutsche Bank AG (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .7   Health Care REIT, Inc. Interest Rate & Currency Risk Management Policy adopted on May 6, 2004 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  10 .8   The 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Appendix II to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed September 29, 1995, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .9   First Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-40771) filed November 21, 1997, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .10   Second Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-73916) filed November 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .11   Third Amendment to the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .12   Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Health Care REIT, Inc. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .13   First Amendment to the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors of Health Care REIT, Inc. effective April 21, 1998 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .14   Health Care REIT, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed March 28, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .15   Form of Stock Option Agreement for Executive Officers under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*


116


Table of Contents

         
  10 .16   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .17   Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q/A filed October 27, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .18   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 16, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .19   Form of Stock Option Agreement (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .20   Form of Stock Option Agreement (with Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .21   Form of Stock Option Agreement (without Dividend Equivalent Rights) for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .22   Form of Stock Option Agreement (without Dividend Equivalent Rights) for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .23   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the Chief Executive Officer under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .24   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Executive Officers under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.23 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .25   Form of Deferred Stock Unit Grant Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the 2005 Long- Term Incentive Plan (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .26   Restricted Stock Agreement, dated January 22, 2007, by and between Health Care REIT and Raymond W. Braun (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 25, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .27   Third Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 22, 2007, by and between the Company and George L. Chapman (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 25, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .28   Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2004, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Raymond W. Braun (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .29   Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2004, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Erin C. Ibele (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .30   Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2004, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Charles J. Herman, Jr. (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .31   Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective March 17, 2006, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Scott A. Estes (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .32   Employment Agreement, effective July 1, 2004, by and between Health Care REIT, Inc. and Jeffrey H. Miller (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*


117


Table of Contents

         
  10 .33   Consulting Agreement dated as of September 12, 2006 between the Company and Fred S. Klipsch (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form S-4 filed October 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .34   Consulting Agreement dated as of September 12, 2006 between the Company and Frederick L. Farrar (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form S-4 filed October 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .35   Employment Agreement dated as of September 12, 2006 between the Company and Daniel R. Loftus (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form S-4 filed October 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .36   Health Care REIT, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, effective as of January 1, 2001 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .37   Health Care REIT, Inc. Executive Loan Program, effective as of August 1999 (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 10, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .38   Form of Indemnification Agreement between the Company and each director, executive officer and officer of the Company (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed February 18, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).*
  10 .39   Summary of Director Compensation.
  14     Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (filed with the Commission as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference thereto).
  21     Subsidiaries of the Company.
  23     Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.
  24 .1   Power of Attorney executed by Pier C. Borra (Director).
  24 .2   Power of Attorney executed by Thomas J. DeRosa (Director).
  24 .3   Power of Attorney executed by Jeffrey H. Donahue (Director).
  24 .4   Power of Attorney executed by Peter J. Grua (Director).
  24 .5   Power of Attorney executed by Fred S. Klipsch (Director).
  24 .6   Power of Attorney executed by Sharon M. Oster (Director).
  24 .7   Power of Attorney executed by R. Scott Trumbull (Director).
  24 .8   Power of Attorney executed by George L. Chapman (Director, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer).
  24 .9   Power of Attorney executed by Scott A. Estes (Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer).
  24 .10   Power of Attorney executed by Paul D. Nungester, Jr. (Vice President and Controller and Principal Accounting Officer).
  31 .1   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
  31 .2   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
  32 .1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Chief Executive Officer.
  32 .2   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by Chief Financial Officer.
 
 
* Management Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.


118