UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012
OR
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to ___________
Commission file number 1-33377
Stewardship Financial Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| New Jersey | 22-3351447 |
| (State of other jurisdiction | (I.R.S. Employer |
| of incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
| 630 Godwin Avenue, Midland Park, NJ | 07432 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (201) 444-7100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common Stock, no par value
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No ý
Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | o | Accelerated filer | o |
| Non-accelerated filer | o | Smaller reporting company | ý |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No ý
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, 2012 was $21,378,000. As of March 22, 2013, 5,933,028 shares of the registrant’s common stock, net of treasury stock, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates certain information by reference from the registrant's definitive proxy statement for the registrant's 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
FORM 10-K
STEWARDSHIP FINANCIAL CORPORATION
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of Stewardship Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”). Such statements are not historical facts and may involve risks and uncertainties. Such statements include expressions about the Corporation’s confidence, strategies and expectations about earnings, new and existing programs and products, relationships, opportunities, technology and market conditions and are based on current beliefs and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. These statements may be identified by forward-looking terminology such as “expect,” “believe,” or “anticipate,” or expressions of confidence like “strong,” or “on-going,” or similar statements or variations of such terms. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities:
| § | impairment charges with respect to securities, |
| § | unanticipated costs in connection with new branch openings, |
| § | further deterioration of the economy, |
| § | acts of war, acts of terrorism and natural disasters, |
| § | decline in commercial and residential real estate values, |
| § | unexpected changes in interest rates, |
| § | inability to manage growth in commercial loans, |
| § | unexpected loan prepayment volume, |
| § | unanticipated exposure to credit risks, |
| § | insufficient allowance for loan losses, |
| § | competition from other financial institutions, |
| § | adverse effects of government regulation or different than anticipated effects from existing regulations, |
| § | passage by Congress of a law which unilaterally amends the terms of the Treasury’s investment in us in a way that adversely affects us, |
| § | a decline in the levels of loan quality and origination volume, |
| § | a decline in deposits, and |
| § | other unexpected events. |
The Corporation undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements in the future.
General
Stewardship Financial Corporation (the “Corporation” or the “Registrant”) is a one-bank holding company, which was incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey in January 1995 to serve as a holding company for Atlantic Stewardship Bank (the “Bank”). The Corporation was organized at the direction of the Board of Directors of the Bank for the purpose of acquiring all of the capital stock of the Bank (the “Acquisition”). Pursuant to the New Jersey Banking Act of 1948, as amended (the “New Jersey Banking Act”), and pursuant to approval of the shareholders of the Bank, the Corporation acquired the Bank and became its holding company on November 22, 1996. As part of the Acquisition, shareholders of the Bank received one share of common stock, no par value of the Corporation (“Common Stock”), for each outstanding share of the common stock of the Bank held. The only significant activity of the Corporation is ownership and supervision of the Bank.
The Bank is a commercial bank formed under the laws of the State of New Jersey on April 26, 1984. Throughout 2012 the Bank operated from its main office at 630 Godwin Avenue, Midland Park, New Jersey, and its twelve branches located in the State of New Jersey.
The Corporation is subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”). The Bank’s deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) up to applicable limits. The operations of the Corporation and the Bank are subject to the supervision and regulation of the FRB, the FDIC and the New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance (the “Department”).
Stewardship Investment Corp. is a wholly-owned, non-bank subsidiary of the Bank, whose primary business is to own and manage an investment portfolio. Stewardship Realty, LLC is a wholly-owned, non-bank subsidiary of the Bank, whose primary business is to own and manage property at 612 Godwin Avenue, Midland Park, New Jersey. Atlantic Stewardship Insurance Company, LLC is a wholly-owned, non-bank subsidiary of the Bank, whose primary business is insurance. The Bank also has several other wholly-owned, non-bank subsidiaries formed to hold title to properties acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure. In addition to the Bank, in 2003, the Corporation formed, Stewardship Statutory Trust I, a wholly-owned, non-bank subsidiary for the purpose of issuing trust preferred securities.
The principal executive offices of the Corporation are located at 630 Godwin Avenue, Midland Park, New Jersey 07432. Our telephone number is (201) 444-7100 and our website address is http://www.asbnow.com.
Business of the Corporation
The Corporation’s primary business is the ownership and supervision of the Bank. The Corporation, through the Bank, conducts a traditional commercial banking business, and offers services including personal and business checking accounts and time deposits, money market accounts and regular savings accounts. The Corporation structures the Bank’s specific products and services in a manner designed to attract the business of the small and medium-sized business and professional community as well as that of individuals residing, working and shopping in Bergen, Morris and Passaic counties, New Jersey. The Corporation engages in a wide range of lending activities and offers commercial, consumer, residential real estate, home equity and personal loans.
In addition, in forming the Bank, the members of the Board of Directors envisioned a community-based institution which would serve the local communities surrounding its branches, while also providing a return to its shareholders. This vision has been reflected in the Bank’s tithing policy, under which the Bank tithes 10% of its pre-tax profits to worthy Christian and civic organizations in the communities where the Bank maintains branches.
Service Area
The Bank’s service area primarily consists of Bergen, Morris and Passaic counties in New Jersey, although the Corporation makes loans throughout New Jersey. Throughout 2012, the Bank operated from its main office in Midland Park, New Jersey and twelve existing branch offices in Hawthorne (2), Ridgewood, Montville, North Haledon, Pequannock, Waldwick, Wayne (3), Westwood and Wyckoff, New Jersey.
| 1 |
Recent Developments
On October 3, 2008, in response to the financial crises affecting the banking system and financial markets and going concern threats to investment banks and other financial institutions, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) was signed into law. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) was given the authority to, among other things, purchase up to $700 billion of mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and certain other financial instruments from financial institutions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets. On October 14, 2008, the Treasury announced that it would purchase equity stakes, in the form of preferred stock, in a wide variety of banks and thrifts under a program, known as the Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”) under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”), from the $700 billion authorized by the EESA. Although we believed that our capital position was sound, we concluded that the CPP would allow us to raise additional capital on favorable terms in comparison with other available alternatives. Accordingly, on January 30, 2009, the Treasury purchased 10,000 shares of cumulative perpetual preferred stock of the Corporation with a liquidation value of $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) and a ten-year warrant to purchase up to 127,119 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $11.80 per share (the “Warrant”) under the TARP CPP for an aggregate purchase price of $10 million in cash. The Warrant was subsequently adjusted to apply to 133,475 shares of our Common Stock with an exercise price of $11.24 per share to reflect the 5% stock dividend paid in November 2009. The terms of the Series A Preferred Shares issued to the Treasury provided for a dividend of 5% for the first five years and 9% thereafter.
Subsequently, the Corporation elected to repurchase the Series A Preferred Shares through participation in the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund program (“SBLF”), a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 that encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion. Accordingly, on September 1, 2011, the Treasury purchased 15,000 shares of the Corporation’s Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B stock (the “Series B Preferred Shares”), having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $15 million in cash.
The terms of the newly-established Series B Preferred Shares impose restrictions on the Corporation’s ability to declare or pay dividends or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, shares of our Common Stock and any class or series of stock of the Corporation the terms of which do not expressly provide that such class or series will rank senior or junior to the Series B Preferred Shares as to dividend rights and/or rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation. Specifically, the terms provide for the payment of a non-cumulative quarterly dividend, payable in arrears, which the Corporation accrues as earned over the period that the Series B Preferred Shares are outstanding. The dividend rate can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first ten quarters during which the Series B Preferred Shares are outstanding, based upon changes in the level of Qualified Small Business Lending (“QSBL” as defined in the Securities Purchase Agreement) from 1% to 5% per annum and, thereafter, for the eleventh through the first half of the nineteenth dividend periods, from 1% to 7%. In general, the dividend rate decreases as the level of the Bank’s QSBL increases. In the event that the Series B Preferred Shares remain outstanding for more than four and one half years, the dividend rate will be fixed at 9%. Based upon the Bank’s level of QSBL over a baseline level, the dividend rate for the initial dividend period was 1%. During 2012, the dividend rate ranged between 1% and 3.39%. Such dividends are not cumulative but the Corporation may only declare and pay dividends on its Common Stock (or any other equity securities junior to the Series B Preferred Stock) if it has declared and paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Shares for the current dividend period and, if, after payment of such dividend, the dollar amount of the Corporation’s Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Tier 1 Capital on the date of entering into the SBLF program, excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the Series B Preferred Shares (the “Tier 1 Dividend Threshold”). The Tier 1 Dividend Threshold is subject to reduction, beginning on the second anniversary of the issuance and ending on the tenth anniversary, by 10% for each 1% increase in QSBL over the baseline level.
In addition, the Series B Preferred Shares are non-voting except in limited circumstances and, in the event that the Company has not timely declared and paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Shares for six dividend periods or more, whether or not consecutive, and shares of Series B Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of at least $25 million are still outstanding, the Treasury may designate two additional directors to be elected to the Company’s Board of Directors. Subject to the approval of the Bank’s federal banking regulator, the Federal Reserve, the Corporation may redeem the Series B Preferred Shares at any time at the Corporation’s option, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference per share plus the per share amount of any unpaid dividends for the then-current period through the date of the redemption. The Series B Preferred Shares are includable in Tier I capital for regulatory capital.
| 2 |
Using the proceeds of the issuance of the Series B Preferred Shares, the Corporation simultaneously repurchased all 10,000 shares of the Series A Preferred Shares previously issued under the TARP CPP for an aggregate purchase price of $10,022,222, in cash, including accrued but unpaid dividends through the date of repurchase. Thereafter, on October 26, 2011, the Corporation completed the repurchase of the Warrant held by the Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $107,398, in cash.
Competition
The Bank competes for deposits and loans with commercial banks, thrifts and other financial institutions, many of which have greater financial resources than the Bank. Many large financial institutions in New York City and other parts of New Jersey compete for the business of New Jersey residents and companies located in the Bank’s service area. Certain of these institutions have significantly higher lending limits than the Bank and provide services to their customers that the Bank does not offer.
Management believes the Bank is able to compete on a substantially equal basis with its competitors because it provides responsive, personalized services through management’s knowledge and awareness of the Bank’s service area, customers and business.
Employees
At December 31, 2012, the Corporation employed 122 full-time employees and 37 part-time employees. None of these employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement and the Corporation believes that its employee relations are good.
Supervision and Regulation
General
Bank holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. These laws and regulations are intended to protect depositors, not shareholders. To the extent that the following information describes statutory and regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to the Corporation’s business. Any change in the applicable law or regulation may have a material effect on the business and prospects of the Corporation and the Bank.
Dodd-Frank Act
On July 21, 2010, financial regulatory reform legislation entitled the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act imposes extensive changes across the financial regulatory landscape, including provisions that, among other things, have:
| · | centralized responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, responsible for implementing, examining, and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws; |
| · | applied to most bank holding companies, the same leverage and risk-based capital requirements applicable to insured depository institutions. The Corporation’s existing trust preferred securities will continue to be treated as Tier 1 capital; |
| · | changed the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated assets less tangible equity, eliminated the ceiling on the size of the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) and increased the floor on the size of the DIF, which generally requires an increase in the level of assessments for institutions with assets in excess of $10 billion; |
| · | implemented corporate governance revisions, including with regard to executive compensation and proxy access by shareholders, that apply to all public companies, not just financial institutions; |
| · | made permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance and increased the cash limit of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection from $100,000 to $250,000 and provided unlimited federal deposit insurance until January 1, 2013 for non-interest bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions; |
| · | repealed the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest on business transactions and other accounts; and |
| 3 |
| · | restricted the interchange fees payable on debit card transactions for issuers with $10 billion in assets or greater. |
Additional aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to implementation through rulemaking and will take effect over several years, making it difficult to anticipate the overall financial impact on the Corporation, the Bank and its customers or the financial industry in general. Provisions in the legislation that affect deposit insurance assessments, payment of interest on demand deposits, and interchange fees could increase the costs associated with deposits as well as place limitations on certain revenues that those deposits may generate.
Regulation of the Corporation
BANK HOLDING COMPANY ACT. As a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”), the Corporation is subject to the regulation and supervision of the FRB. The Corporation is required to file with the FRB annual reports and other information showing that its business operations and those of its subsidiaries are limited to banking, managing or controlling banks, furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries or engaging in any other activity which the FRB determines to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be properly incident thereto.
The BHCA requires, among other things, the prior approval of the FRB in any case where a bank holding company proposes to (i) acquire all or substantially all of the assets of any other bank, (ii) acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of any bank (unless it owns a majority of such bank’s voting shares), or (iii) merge or consolidate with any other bank holding company. The FRB will not approve any merger, acquisition, or consolidation that would have a substantially anti-competitive effect, unless the anti-competitive impact of the proposed transaction is clearly outweighed by a greater public interest in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served. The FRB also considers capital adequacy and other financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the companies and the banks concerned, together with the convenience and needs of the community to be served.
Additionally, the BHCA prohibits, with certain limited exceptions, a bank holding company from (i) acquiring or retaining direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company, or (ii) engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or performing services for its subsidiaries; unless such non-banking business is determined by the FRB to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be properly incident thereto. In making such determinations, the FRB is required to weigh the expected benefits to the public, such as greater convenience, increased competition or gains in efficiency, against the possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest, or unsound banking practices.
The BHCA prohibits depository institutions whose deposits are insured by the FDIC and bank holding companies, among others, from transferring and sponsoring and investing in private equity funds and hedge funds.
There are a number of obligations and restrictions imposed on bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries by law and regulatory policy that are designed to minimize potential loss to the depositors of such depository institutions and the FDIC insurance funds in the event the depository institution becomes in danger of default. Under a policy of the FRB with respect to bank holding company operations, a bank holding company is required to commit resources to support such institutions in circumstances where it might not do so absent such a policy. The FRB also has the authority under the BHCA to require a bank holding company to terminate any activity or to relinquish control of a non-bank subsidiary upon the FRB’s determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness and stability of any bank subsidiary of the bank holding company.
CAPITAL ADEQUACY GUIDELINES FOR BANK HOLDING COMPANIES. The FRB has adopted risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies. The risk-based capital guidelines are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies, to account for off-balance sheet exposure, and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Under these guidelines, assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items.
| 4 |
The risk-based guidelines apply on a consolidated basis to bank holding companies with consolidated assets of $500 million or more. The minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) is 8%. At least 4% of the total capital is required to be “Tier I” capital, consisting of common shareholders’ equity and certain preferred stock, less certain goodwill items and other intangible assets. The remainder, “Tier II Capital,” may consist of (a) the allowance for loan losses of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, (b) excess of qualifying preferred stock, (c) hybrid capital instruments, (d) debt, (e) mandatory convertible securities, and (f) qualifying subordinated debt. Total capital is the sum of Tier I and Tier II capital less reciprocal holdings of other banking organizations’ capital instruments, investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries and any other deductions as determined by the FRB (determined on a case-by-case basis or as a matter of policy after formal rule-making).
Bank holding company assets are given risk-weights of 0%, 20%, 50%, and 100%. In addition, certain off-balance sheet items are given similar credit conversion factors to convert them to asset equivalent amounts to which an appropriate risk-weight will apply. These computations result in the total risk-weighted assets. Most loans are assigned to the 100% risk category, except for performing first mortgage loans fully secured by residential property which carry a 50% risk-weighting. Most investment securities (including, primarily, general obligation claims of states or other political subdivisions of the United States) are assigned to the 20% category, except for municipal or state revenue bonds, which have a 50% risk-weight, and direct obligations of the U.S. treasury or obligations backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, which have a 0% risk-weight. In converting off-balance sheet items, direct credit substitutes, including general guarantees and standby letters of credit backing nonfinancial obligations, and undrawn commitments (including commercial credit lines with an initial maturity of more than one year) have a 50% risk-weighting. Short-term commercial letters of credit have a 20% risk-weighting and certain short-term unconditionally cancelable commitments have a 0% risk-weighting.
In addition to the risk-based capital guidelines, the FRB has adopted a minimum Tier I capital (leverage) ratio, under which a bank holding company must maintain a minimum level of Tier I capital to average total consolidated assets of at least 3% in the case of a bank holding company that has the highest regulatory examination rating and is not contemplating significant growth or expansion. All other bank holding companies are expected to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 100 to 200 basis points above the stated minimum.
Regulation of the Bank
As a New Jersey-chartered commercial bank, the Bank is subject to the regulation, supervision, and control of the Department. As an FDIC-insured institution, the Bank is also subject to regulation, supervision and control by the FDIC, an agency of the federal government. The regulations of the FDIC and the Department impact virtually all activities of the Bank, including the minimum level of capital the Bank must maintain, the ability of the Bank to pay dividends, the ability of the Bank to expand through new branches or acquisitions, and various other matters.
INSURANCE OF DEPOSITS. Substantially all of the deposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the DIF of the FDIC and are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the DIF. The Dodd-Frank Act permanently raised the standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000. On November 9, 2010, the FDIC Board of Directors issued a final rule to implement the Dodd-Frank Act that provides temporary unlimited deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing accounts from December 31, 2010, through December 31, 2012. This temporary unlimited coverage was in addition to, and separate from, the coverage of at least $250,000 available to depositors under the FDIC's general deposit insurance rules.
The FDIC redefined its deposit insurance premium assessment base to be an institution’s average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity as required by the Dodd-Frank Act and revised deposit insurance assessment rate schedules in light of the changes to the assessment base. The rate schedule and other revisions to the assessment rules, which were adopted by the FDIC Board of Directors on February 7, 2011, become effective April 1, 2011 and were first used to calculate the June 30, 2011 assessment. As of December 31, 2012, the Bank’s assessment rate averaged $0.09 per $100 in assessable assets minus average tangible equity.
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to make payments on bonds issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) issued in connection with the failure of certain savings and loan associations. This payment is established quarterly and averaged 0.66% and 0.84% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Corporation paid $42,000 and $50,000 under this assessment for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These assessments will continue until the FICO bonds mature in 2017.
| 5 |
The amount of FDIC assessments paid by each DIF member institution is based on its relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other supervisory factors. Since 2008, there have been higher levels of bank failures which has dramatically increased resolution costs of the FDIC and depleted the DIF. In order to maintain a strong funding position and restore reserve ratios of the DIF, the FDIC has increased assessment rates of insured institutions and may continue to do so in the future. On November 12, 2009, the FDIC adopted a requirement for institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly insurance premium for the fourth quarter of 2009 and all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The Bank prepaid $3.2 million of such premium on December 30, 2009. At December 31, 2012 and 2011 the prepaid premium was $1.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
Capital Adequacy Guidelines FOR BANKS. Similar to the FRB, the FDIC has promulgated risk-based capital guidelines for banks that are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profile among banks, to account for off-balance sheet exposure, and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. These guidelines are substantially the same as those put in place by the FRB for bank holding companies.
DIVIDEND RIGHTS. Under the New Jersey Banking Act, a bank may declare and pay dividends only if, after payment of the dividend, the capital stock of the bank will be unimpaired and either the bank will have a surplus of not less than 50% of its capital stock or the payment of the dividend will not reduce the bank’s surplus.
USA PATRIOT ACT OF 2001 (the “Patriot Act”). On October 26, 2001, the Patriot Act was signed into law. Enacted in response to the terrorist attacks in New York, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001, the Patriot Act is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. law enforcement and the intelligence community to work cohesively to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The Patriot Act contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires various regulations, including, but not limited to: (a) due diligence requirements for financial institutions that administer, maintain, or manage private bank accounts or correspondent accounts for non-U.S. persons; (b) standards for verifying customer identification at account opening; (c) rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering; (d) reports of nonfinancial trades and business filed with the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network for transactions exceeding $10,000; and (e) filing of suspicious activities reports by brokers and dealers if they believe a customer may be violating U.S. laws and regulations.
Regulations promulgated under the Patriot Act impose obligations on financial institutions to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the Patriot Act’s requirements could have serious legal consequences for the institution and adversely affect its reputation.
Investments in the Common Stock of Stewardship Financial Corporation involve risk. The following discussion highlights the risks management believes are material for our Corporation, but does not necessarily include all risks that we may face.
Our operations are subject to interest rate risk and changes in interest rates may negatively affect financial performance.
Our earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon our net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowed money. To be profitable we must earn more interest from our interest-earning assets than we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in the general level of interest rates may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control, including general economic conditions and the policies of governmental and regulatory agencies such as the Federal Reserve Bank. Changes in monetary policy and interest rates can also adversely affect our ability to originate loans and deposits, the fair value of financial assets and liabilities and the average duration of our assets and liabilities.
Our allowance for loan losses may be insufficient.
There are inherent risks associated with our lending activities. There are risks inherent in making any loan, including dealing with individual borrowers, nonpayment, uncertainties as to the future value of collateral and changes in economic and industry conditions. We attempt to mitigate and manage credit risk through prudent loan underwriting and approval procedures, monitoring of loan concentrations and periodic independent review of outstanding loans. We cannot be assured that these procedures will reduce credit risk inherent in the business.
| 6 |
We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio, including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and assets serving as collateral for loan repayments. In determining the size of our allowance for loan loss, we rely on our experience and our evaluation of economic conditions. If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, our current allowance may not be sufficient to cover probable incurred loan losses and adjustments may be necessary to allow for different economic conditions or adverse developments in our portfolio. Significant additions to our allowance for loan losses would materially decrease our net income.
A continuing economic recession and struggling financial markets have adversely affected our industry and, because of our geographic concentration in northern New Jersey, we could be impacted by adverse changes in local economic conditions.
Our success depends on the general economic conditions of the nation, the State of New Jersey, and the northern New Jersey area. The nation’s current economic environment and the related struggling financial markets have severely adversely affected the banking industry and may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price. We believe recovery will continue to be slow and do not believe these difficult economic conditions are likely to improve dramatically in the near term. Unlike larger banks that are more geographically diversified, we provide financial services to customers primarily in the market areas in which we operate. The local economic conditions of these areas have a significant impact on our commercial, real estate and construction loans, the ability of our borrowers to repay these loans and the value of the collateral securing these loans. While we did not and do not have a sub-prime lending program, any further significant decline in the real estate market in our primary market area would hurt our business and mean that collateral for our loans would have less value. As a consequence, our ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate securing the loan would be diminished and we would be more likely to suffer losses on defaulted loans. Any of the foregoing events and conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Competition within the financial services industry could adversely affect our profitability.
We face strong competition from banks, other financial institutions, money market mutual funds and brokerage firms within the New York metropolitan area. A number of these entities have substantially greater resources and lending limits, larger branch systems and a wider array of banking services. Competition among depository institutions for customer deposits has increased significantly in the current continuing difficult economic situation. If we are unsuccessful in competing effectively, we will lose market share and may suffer a reduction in our margins and suffer adverse consequences to our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Federal and State regulations could restrict our business and increase our costs and non-compliance would result in penalties, litigation and damage to our reputation.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and are subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and examination by the FDIC, the FRB and the State of New Jersey. The significant federal and state banking regulations that we are subject to are described herein under “Item 1. Business.” Such regulation and supervision of the activities in which bank and bank holding companies may engage is primarily intended for the protection of the depositors and the federal deposit insurance funds. These regulations affect our lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy and overall operations. These statutes, regulations, regulatory policies, and interpretations of policies and regulations are constantly evolving and may change significantly over time. Any such changes could subject the Corporation to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer and/or increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Due to our nation’s current economic situation and a low level of confidence in the financial markets, new federal and/or state laws and regulations of lending and funding practices and liquidity standards continue to be implemented. Bank regulatory agencies are being very aggressive in responding to concerns and trends identified in bank examinations with respect to bank capital requirements. Any increased government oversight, including the full implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act, may increase our costs and limit our business opportunities. Our failure to comply with laws, regulations or policies applicable to our business could result in sanctions against us by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we have policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurances that such violations will not occur.
| 7 |
A breach of our information systems through a security breach, computer virus or disruption of service or a compliance breach by one of our vendors could negatively affect our reputation and business.
We rely heavily upon a variety of computing platforms and networks over the Internet for the purpose of data processing, communication and information exchange and to conduct our business and provide our customers with the ability to bank online. Despite the safeguards instituted by management, our systems are susceptible to a breach of security through unauthorized access, phishing schemes, computer viruses and other security problems. In addition, we rely on the service of a variety of third-party vendors to meet our processing needs. If confidential information is compromised, we could be exposed to claims, litigation, financial losses, costs and damages. Such damages could materially affect our earnings. In addition, any failure, interruption or breach in security could also result in failures or disruptions in our general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems and could subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny. In addition, the negative affect on our reputation could affect our ability to deliver products and services successfully to new and existing customers.
The trading volume of our stock remains low which could impact stock prices.
The trading history of our Common Stock has been characterized by relatively low trading volume. The value of a shareholder’s investment may be subject to decreases due to the volatility of the price of our Common Stock which trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market.
The market price of our Common Stock may be volatile and subject to fluctuations in response to numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the factors discussed in the other risk factors and the following:
| · | actual or anticipated fluctuation in operating results; |
| · | press releases, publicity, or announcements; |
| · | changes in expectation of our future financial performance; |
| · | future sales of our Common Stock; and |
| · | other developments affecting us or our competitors. |
These factors may adversely affect the trading price of our Common Stock, regardless of our actual operating performance, and could prevent a shareholder from selling Common Stock at or above the current market price.
Because of our participation in the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund, the Corporation is subject to certain restrictions including limitations on the payment of dividends.
The Series B Preferred Shares issued in connection with our participation in the SBLF pay a non-cumulative quarterly dividend in arrears. Such dividends are not cumulative but the Corporation may only declare and pay dividends on its Common Stock (or any other equity securities junior to the Series B Preferred Stock) if it has declared and paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Shares for the current dividend period and, if, after payment of such dividend, the dollar amount of the Corporation’s Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Tier 1 Capital on the date of entering into the SBLF program, excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the Series B Preferred Shares (the “Tier 1 Dividend Threshold”). The Tier 1 Dividend Threshold is subject to reduction, beginning on the second anniversary of the issuance and ending on the tenth anniversary, by 10% for each 1% increase in QSBL over the baseline level. This restriction on declaring or paying dividends could negatively affect the value of our Common Stock.
Moreover, our ability to pay dividends is always subject to legal and regulatory restrictions. Any payment of dividends in the future will depend, in large part, on the Corporation’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors considered relevant by the Corporation’s Board of Directors. Although we have historically paid cash dividends on our Common Stock, we are not required to do so and our Board of Directors could further reduce or eliminate our Common Stock dividend in the future.
If we are unable to redeem the Series B Preferred Shares issued to the Treasury in connection with our participation in the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund and Series B Preferred Shares remain outstanding for more than four and one half years, the cost of the capital received will increase.
The Series B Preferred Shares pay a non-cumulative quarterly dividend in arrears. As discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K, the dividend rate can fluctuate from 1% to 5% per annum on a quarterly basis during the first ten quarters during which the Series B Preferred Shares are outstanding. In addition, for the eleventh through the first half of the nineteenth dividend periods such dividend rate may vary from 1% to 7%. In the event that we are unable to redeem the Series B Preferred Shares and such shares remain outstanding for more than four and one-half years, the dividend rate will be fixed at 9%. This increase in the annual dividend rate on the Series B Preferred Shares could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.
| 8 |
The Series B Preferred Shares issued to the Treasury in connection with our participation in the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund reduces our net income available to common shareholders and earnings per share of Common Stock.
As discussed elsewhere in the Form 10-K, the Series B Preferred Shares pay non-cumulative dividends at the rate of 1% to 5% per annum during the first ten quarters, based upon changes in the level of our QSBL over the base line level. Such dividend rate may vary from 1% to 5% per annum for the second through tenth dividend periods and from 1% to 7% for the eleventh through the first half of the nineteenth dividend periods, to reflect the amount of change in the Bank’s level of QBSL. The dividend rate for the initial dividend period was 1% and, during 2012, the dividend rate ranged between 1% and 3.39%. In the event that the Series B Preferred Shares remain outstanding for more than four and one-half years, the dividend rate will be fixed at 9%. Such dividends are not cumulative but the Corporation may only declare and pay dividends on our Common Stock (or any other equity securities junior to the Series B Preferred Stock) if it has declared and paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Shares for the current dividend period and will be subject to other restrictions on its ability to repurchase or redeem other securities. These dividends will reduce our net income and earnings per common share. The Series B Preferred Shares ranks senior to the Common Stock and, as such, will receive preferential treatment in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation.
External factors, many of which we cannot control, may result in liquidity concerns for us.
Liquidity risk is the potential that the Corporation will be unable to: meet its obligations as they come due; capitalize on growth opportunities as they arise; or pay regular dividends, because of an inability to liquidate assets or obtain adequate funding in a timely basis, at a reasonable cost and within acceptable risk tolerances.
Liquidity is required to fund various obligations, including credit commitments to borrowers, loan originations, withdrawals by depositors, repayment of borrowings, operating expenses, capital expenditures and dividends to shareholders.
Liquidity is derived primarily from deposit growth and retention; principal and interest payments on loans; principal and interest payments on investment securities; sale, maturity and prepayment of investment securities; net cash provided from operations and access to other funding sources.
Our access to funding sources in amounts adequate to finance our activities could be impaired by factors that affect us specifically or the financial services industry in general. Factors that could detrimentally impact our access to liquidity sources include a decrease in the level of our business activity due to a prolonged economic downturn or adverse regulatory action against us. Our ability to borrow could also be impaired by factors that are not specific to us, such as a severe disruption of the financial markets or negative views and expectations about the prospects for the financial services industry as a whole.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
| 9 |
The Corporation conducts its business through its main office located at 630 Godwin Avenue, Midland Park, New Jersey and its twelve branch offices. The property located at 612 Godwin Avenue is intended to be used for future administrative offices. The property located at 121 Franklin Avenue is a remote drive-up location. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Corporation’s properties as of December 31, 2012.
| Leased | Date of Lease | |
| Location | or Owned | Expiration |
| 612 Godwin Avenue | Owned | — |
| Midland Park, NJ | ||
| 630 Godwin Avenue | Owned | — |
| Midland Park, NJ | ||
| 386 Lafayette Avenue | Owned | — |
| Hawthorne, NJ | ||
| 87 Berdan Avenue | Leased | 06/30/14 |
| Wayne, NJ | ||
| 64 Franklin Turnpike | Owned | — |
| Waldwick, NJ | ||
| 190 Franklin Avenue | Leased | 09/30/17 |
| Ridgewood, NJ | ||
| 121 Franklin Avenue | Leased | 01/31/15 |
| Ridgewood, NJ | ||
| 311 Valley Road | Leased | 11/30/13 |
| Wayne, NJ | ||
| 249 Newark Pompton Turnpike | Owned | — |
| Pequannock, NJ | ||
| 1111 Goffle Road | Leased | 05/31/13 |
| Hawthorne, NJ | ||
| 400 Hamburg Turnpike | Leased | 04/30/14 |
| Wayne, NJ | ||
| 2 Changebridge Road | Leased | 06/30/15 |
| Montville, NJ | ||
| 378 Franklin Avenue | Leased | 05/31/26 |
| Wyckoff, NJ | ||
| 200 Kinderkamack Road | Leased | 05/30/26 |
| Westwood, NJ | ||
| 33 Sicomac Avenue | Leased | 10/31/14 |
| North Haledon, NJ |
We believe that our properties are in good condition, well maintained and adequate for the present and anticipated needs of our business.
| 10 |
The Corporation and the Bank are parties to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business from time to time, such as claims to enforce liens, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans, and other issues incident to the Bank’s business. Management does not believe that there is any pending or threatened proceeding against the Corporation or the Bank which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on the business or financial position of the Corporation or the Bank.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Corporation’s Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “SSFN”. As of March 22, 2013, there were approximately 1,000 shareholders of record of the Common Stock.
The following table sets forth the quarterly high and low sale prices of the Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market for the quarterly periods presented and cash dividends declared and paid in the quarterly periods presented. The prices below reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.
| Sales Price | Cash | |||||||||||
| High | Low | Dividend | ||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Fourth quarter | $ | 4.84 | $ | 3.40 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
| Third quarter | 5.25 | 4.07 | 0.04 | |||||||||
| Second quarter | 5.35 | 4.22 | 0.04 | |||||||||
| First quarter | 6.30 | 4.75 | 0.05 | |||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Fourth quarter | $ | 6.50 | $ | 4.70 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||
| Third quarter | 7.00 | 4.51 | 0.05 | |||||||||
| Second quarter | 7.40 | 4.71 | 0.05 | |||||||||
| First quarter | 7.90 | 5.73 | 0.05 |
The Corporation may pay dividends as declared from time to time by the Corporation’s Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefore, subject to certain restrictions. Since dividends from the Bank are a major source of income for the Corporation, any restriction on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends will act as a restriction on the Corporation’s ability to pay dividends. Under the New Jersey Banking Act, the Bank may not pay a cash dividend unless, following the payment of such dividend, the capital stock of the Bank will be unimpaired and (i) the Bank will have a surplus of no less than 50% of its capital stock or (ii) the payment of such dividend will not reduce the surplus of the Bank. In addition, the Bank cannot pay dividends if doing so would reduce its capital below the regulatory imposed minimums.
Also, our ability to pay future cash dividends is subject to the terms of our Series B Preferred Stock issued in connection with the Corporation’s participation in the SBLF program which provide that we may only declare and pay dividends on our Common Stock if we have declared and paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Shares for the current dividend period and, if, after payment of such dividend, the dollar amount of the Corporation’s Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Tier 1 Capital on the date of entering into the SBLF program, excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the Series B Preferred Shares.
During fiscal 2012, the Corporation paid quarterly cash dividends totaling $0.15 per share compared to quarterly cash dividends totaling $0.20 per share during fiscal 2011.
We did not repurchase any shares of our Common Stock during the fourth quarter of 2012.
| 11 |
STEWARDSHIP FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total return on a hypothetical $100 investment made on December 31, 2007 in: (a) Stewardship Financial Corporation’s common stock; (b) NASDAQ Composite; (c) NASDAQ Bank; and (d) Peer Group 2012. The Peer Group 2012 index consists of New Jersey-based commercial banks with total asset size and operating performance comparable with the Corporation. The Peer Group 2012 index consists of the following companies: 1st Colonial Bancorp, Inc., 1st Constitution Bancorp, Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc., BCB Bancorp, Inc., Center Bancorp, Inc., Community Partners Bancorp, Parke Bancorp, Inc., Somerset Hills Bancorp, Sussex Bancorp, and Unity Bancorp, Inc. The information provided is not necessarily indicative of the Corporation’s future performance.
STEWARDSHIP FINANCIAL CORPORATION
| Period Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Index | 12/31/07 | 12/31/08 | 12/31/09 | 12/31/10 | 12/31/11 | 12/31/12 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Stewardship Financial Corporation | $ | 100.00 | $ | 81.47 | $ | 75.06 | $ | 53.16 | $ | 50.71 | $ | 39.33 | ||||||||||||
| NASDAQ Composite | $ | 100.00 | $ | 60.02 | $ | 87.24 | $ | 103.08 | $ | 102.26 | $ | 120.42 | ||||||||||||
| NASDAQ Bank | $ | 100.00 | $ | 78.46 | $ | 65.67 | $ | 74.97 | $ | 67.10 | $ | 79.64 | ||||||||||||
| Peer Group 2012 | $ | 100.00 | $ | 56.08 | $ | 55.12 | $ | 65.75 | $ | 64.95 | $ | 76.49 | ||||||||||||
| 12 |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data of the Corporation is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the consolidated financial statements, including notes, thereto, included elsewhere in this document.
STEWARDSHIP FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings Summary: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 23,532 | $ | 24,610 | $ | 24,206 | $ | 23,345 | $ | 22,303 | ||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses | 9,995 | 10,845 | 9,575 | 3,575 | 3,585 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 13,537 | 13,765 | 14,631 | 19,770 | 18,718 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 6,389 | 5,170 | 4,387 | 3,133 | 4,217 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense | 19,653 | 18,666 | 17,950 | 17,790 | 17,986 | |||||||||||||||
| Income before income tax expense (benefit) | 273 | 269 | 1,068 | 5,113 | 4,949 | |||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | (247 | ) | (415 | ) | (165 | ) | 1,479 | 1,448 | ||||||||||||
| Net income | 520 | 684 | 1,233 | 3,634 | 3,501 | |||||||||||||||
| Dividends on preferred stock and accretion | 352 | 558 | 550 | 504 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 168 | $ | 126 | $ | 683 | $ | 3,130 | $ | 3,501 | ||||||||||
| Common Share Data: (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic net income | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.54 | $ | 0.60 | ||||||||||
| Diluted net income | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.54 | 0.60 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.34 | |||||||||||||||
| Book value at year end | 6.98 | 7.28 | 7.24 | 7.50 | 7.31 | |||||||||||||||
| Average shares outstanding net of treasury stock | 5,909 | 5,861 | 5,843 | 5,832 | 5,854 | |||||||||||||||
| Shares outstanding at year end | 5,925 | 5,883 | 5,846 | 5,835 | 5,854 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Consolidated Ratios: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Return on average assets | 0.07 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.18 | % | 0.57 | % | 0.58 | % | ||||||||||
| Return on average common shareholders' equity | 0.39 | % | 0.29 | % | 1.55 | % | 7.25 | % | 8.34 | % | ||||||||||
| Average shareholders' equity as a percentage of average total assets | 8.33 | % | 7.92 | % | 7.99 | % | 8.23 | % | 6.98 | % | ||||||||||
| Leverage (Tier-I) capital (2) | 9.09 | % | 8.86 | % | 8.58 | % | 9.22 | % | 8.01 | % | ||||||||||
| Tier-I risk based capital (3) | 13.63 | % | 12.65 | % | 12.20 | % | 11.99 | % | 10.50 | % | ||||||||||
| Total risk based capital (3) | 14.89 | % | 13.91 | % | 13.45 | % | 13.24 | % | 11.60 | % | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan loss to total loans | 2.42 | % | 2.54 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.18 | % | ||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans to total loans | 4.14 | % | 6.08 | % | 4.98 | % | 4.36 | % | 1.04 | % | ||||||||||
| Selected Year-end Balances: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 688,388 | $ | 708,818 | $ | 688,118 | $ | 663,844 | $ | 611,816 | ||||||||||
| Total loans, net of allowance for loan loss | 429,832 | 444,803 | 443,245 | 453,119 | 434,103 | |||||||||||||||
| Total deposits | 590,254 | 593,552 | 575,603 | 529,930 | 506,531 | |||||||||||||||
| Shareholders' equity | 56,346 | 57,792 | 52,132 | 53,511 | 42,796 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | All share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect 5% stock dividends paid November 2008 and 2009. |
| (2) | As a percentage of average quarterly assets. |
| (3) | As a percentage of total risk-weighted assets. |
| 13 |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This section provides an analysis of the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The analysis should be read in conjunction with the related audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere herein.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report contains certain “forward looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which forward looking statements may be identified by the use of such words as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “should,” “plan,” “estimate,” and “potential.” Examples of forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, estimates with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of the Corporation that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include: changes in general economic and market conditions, legislative and regulatory conditions, or the development of an interest rate environment that adversely affects the Corporation’s interest rate spread or other income anticipated from operations and investments. As used in this annual report, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Stewardship Financial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiary, Atlantic Stewardship Bank, depending on the context.
Introduction
The Corporation’s primary business is the ownership and supervision of the Bank and, through the Bank, the Corporation has been, and intends to continue to be, a community-oriented financial institution offering a variety of financial services to meet the needs of the communities it serves. The Corporation currently has 13 full service branches offices located in Bergen, Passaic and Morris counties in New Jersey. The Corporation conducts a general commercial and retail banking business encompassing a wide range of traditional deposit and lending functions along with the other customary banking services. The Corporation earns income and generates cash primarily through the deposit gathering activities of the branch network. These deposits gathered from the general public are then utilized to fund the Corporation’s lending and investing activities.
The Corporation has developed a strong deposit base with good franchise value. A mix of a variety of different deposit products and electronic services, along with a strong focus on customer service, is used to attract customers and build depositor relationships. Challenges facing the Corporation include our ability to continue to grow the branch deposit levels, provide adequate technology enhancements to achieve efficiencies, offer a competitive product line, and provide the highest level of customer service.
The Corporation is affected by the overall economic conditions in northern New Jersey, the interest rate and yield curve environment, and the overall national economy. These factors are relevant because they will affect our ability to attract specific deposit products, our ability to invest in loan and investment products, and our ability to earn acceptable profits without incurring increased risks.
When evaluating the financial condition and operating performance of the Corporation, management reviews historical trends, peer comparisons, asset and deposit concentrations, interest margin analysis, adequacy of loan loss reserve and loan quality performance, adequacy of capital under current positions as well as to support future expansion, adequacy of liquidity, and overall quality of earnings performance.
The branch network coupled with our online services provides for solid coverage in both existing and new markets in key towns in the three counties in which we operate. The Corporation continually evaluates the need to further develop the infrastructure, including electronic products and services, to enable it to continue to build franchise value and expand its existing and future customer base.
In 2011 and 2012, the Corporation, like all financial institutions, continued to experience a difficult and complicated economic and operating environment. The Corporation’s results have been affected by the economic downturn through higher loan loss provisions and managing credit risk remains a significant challenge for the Bank. In addition, competition in the northern New Jersey market remained intense and the challenges of operating throughout these years in a flat interest rate market continued to make it somewhat difficult to attract deposits at appropriate interest rate levels. While the Bank has seen growth in deposits, management continues to find strong competition for low cost, core deposits. Furthermore, while the current economic conditions and softness in the real estate market have contributed to an increase in loan delinquencies, new lending opportunities are being appropriately evaluated. The Corporation has not been involved in the subprime lending area.
| 14 |
In an effort to address the strong competition in attracting deposit balances, the Corporation continues to evaluate product and services offerings. Improvements and upgrades of our electronic / online banking products and services continue to be a priority. Within the last several years we introduced an online banking / cash management product as well as remote deposit capture services for businesses. In early 2012 we enhanced our security for online banking customers by upgrading to multi-factor authentication sign-on. In April, 2012, after a significant amount of preparation and testing, we introduced both our application for smartphones and our application for the iPad providing additional means for our customers to access their accounts conveniently. By December, 2012, our mobile banking application had been upgraded to include mobile deposit allowing customers to deposit checks remotely by taking pictures of checks and transmitting them. Plans for the offering of business mobile banking are in place.
Beginning in mid-2010 the Corporation began to experience an increase in mortgage loan refinance activity due to the Corporation’s promotion of a ‘no cost closing’ program and the lower rate environment. This activity has allowed the Corporation to sell a larger volume into the secondary market resulting in increased gains from the sale of mortgage loans. In addition to concentrating on increasing noninterest income, expense control continues to be a focus. However, the increase in noninterest expense for 2012 is reflective of increasing regulatory compliance requirements and the staffing necessary to oversee all compliance-related issues. In addition, an increase in salary and employee benefits expense is the result of an increased focus on commercial lending opportunities as well as costs associated with enhancements to the credit review function. Finally, noninterest expense reflects increased costs associated with the workout of problem loans, primarily legal costs, as well as costs related to holding other real estate owned that is acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure.
In September 2011, the Corporation received $15 million in connection with its participation in the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund (“SBLF”) program. In exchange, the Corporation issued to the Treasury 15,000 shares of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B. The Corporation used the proceeds to simultaneously repurchase the Corporation’s shares of cumulative perpetual preferred stock, Series A previously issued under the Treasury’s Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”). In addition, the Corporation completed the repurchase of a warrant held by the Treasury that had been issued as part of the Corporation's participation in the TARP CPP. The additional capital provided by the SBLF further solidified our already well capitalized position, thereby enhancing our ability to continue to grow assets and increasing our ability to make new loans. Accordingly, we can better serve the lending needs of consumers and businesses in our market.
The Corporation will continue to concentrate its efforts on improving asset quality, developing its existing branch network, introducing new products and services, capitalizing on technology and focusing on improved efficiencies during 2012.
Recent Storm Related Events
On October 29, 2012, Super Storm Sandy struck the Northeastern United States and significantly impacted the region including the primary operating areas of the Corporation. While we experienced no substantial damage to any of our facilities, we were affected by power outages and certain limitations on operational capabilities and many of our customers have been negatively impacted. We have completed an assessment of the impact of Super Storm Sandy on our business and based upon our assessment, we do not believe there has been significant adverse effect on the collateral of our borrowers and/or their ability to repay their obligations to the Bank. Furthermore, we do not believe that the prolonged power outages caused by the storm, that temporarily interrupted our ability to open some of our branches, has had a significant or lasting impact on our business. Nevertheless, these impacts were not favorable to our business and our assessment is preliminary and, as such, there could be an adverse effect from the storm on our future earnings.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
A discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and their effect on the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements can be found in Note 1 of the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| 15 |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation,” as well as disclosures found elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are based upon the Corporation’s audited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity of U. S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires the Corporation to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Note 1 to the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 contains a summary of the Corporation’s significant accounting policies. Management believes the Corporation’s policy with respect to the methodology for the determination of the allowance for loan losses involves a higher degree of complexity and requires management to make difficult and subjective judgments, which often require assumptions or estimates about highly uncertain matters. Changes in these judgments, assumptions or estimates could materially impact results of operations. This critical policy and its application are periodically reviewed with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors.
The allowance for loan losses is based upon management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance, including an assessment of known and inherent risks in the portfolio, giving consideration to the size and composition of the loan portfolio, actual loan loss experience, level of delinquencies, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectability may not be assured, the existence and estimated net realizable value of any underlying collateral and guarantees securing the loans, and current economic and market conditions. Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate, which is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to make additional provisions for loan losses based upon information available to them at the time of their examination. Furthermore, the majority of the Corporation’s loans are secured by real estate in the State of New Jersey. Accordingly, the collectability of a substantial portion of the carrying value of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in local market conditions and may be adversely affected should real estate values decline or the northern New Jersey area experience adverse economic changes. Future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond the Corporation’s control.
Earnings Summary
The Corporation reported net income of $520,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $684,000 for 2011. Earnings in both 2012 and 2011 reflected a large provision for loan loss. After dividends on preferred stock and accretion, net income available to common shareholders was $168,000 for 2012, or $0.03 per diluted common share, compared to $126,000, or $0.02 per diluted common share for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The return on average assets was 0.07% in 2012 compared to 0.10% in 2011. The return on average common equity was 0.39% for 2012 as compared to 0.29% in 2011.
Results of Operations
Net Interest Income
The Corporation’s principal source of revenue is the net interest income derived from the Bank, which represents the difference between the interest earned on assets and interest paid on funds acquired to support those assets. Net interest income is affected by the balances and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, changes in their corresponding yields and costs, and by the volume of interest-earning assets funded by noninterest-bearing deposits. The Corporation’s principal interest-earning assets are loans made to businesses and individuals and investment securities.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased to $24.1 million from $25.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, reflecting a decrease of $1.1 million, or 4.3%. The net interest rate spread and net yield on interest earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2012 were 3.44% and 3.66%, respectively, compared to 3.58% and 3.83% for the year ended December 31, 2011. The net interest rate spread and net yield on interest earning assets for the current year reflect a decline in loan interest rates and yields on securities as well as a decline in the interest rates on deposits. The Corporation continues in its efforts to proactively manage deposit costs in an effort to mitigate the lower asset yields earned. The reduced yields on assets reflect both an elevated level of nonperforming loans as well as historically low market rates in the current environment.
| 16 |
For the year ended December 31, 2012, total interest income, on a tax equivalent basis, decreased $2.9 million, or 8.9%, when compared to the prior year. The decrease was due to a decrease in yields on interest-earning assets partially offset by a small increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets. The average rate earned on interest-earning assets decreased 45 basis points from 4.89% for the year ended December 31, 2011 to 4.44% in the current year. The decline in the asset yield reflects the effect of a prolonged low interest rate environment as well as the impact of nonaccrual loans. Average interest-earning assets increased $2.4 million in 2012 over the 2011 amount with average investment securities increasing $14.7 million partially offset by a decrease of $12.4 million in average loans.
Interest expense decreased $1.8 million, or 25.7%, during the year ended December 31, 2012 to $5.2 million. The decline is due to general decreases in rates paid on deposits and borrowings coupled with decreases in average interest-bearing liabilities. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 1.00% for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 1.31% during 2011, reflecting a general decline in rates paid on deposits. Average interest-bearing liabilities were $518.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, reflecting a decrease of $11.6 million, or 2.2%, when compared to $529.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. While the Corporation experienced an increase in core deposits, the decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities reflects a decline in time deposits and a reduced reliance on borrowings. The Corporation continues to supplement its branch deposit network with a mix of wholesale repurchase agreements and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. The Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings in particular provide an alternative funding source that help to lower cost of funds and provide for better management of interest rate risk. There were no brokered certificates of deposit utilized during 2012.
| 17 |
The following table reflects the components of the Corporation’s net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 including: (1) average assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity based on average daily balances, (2) interest income earned on interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities, (3) average yields earned on interest-earning assets and average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities, and (4) net yield on interest-earning assets. Nontaxable income from investment securities and loans is presented on a tax-equivalent basis assuming a statutory tax rate of 34% for the years presented. This was accomplished by adjusting non-taxable income upward to make it equivalent to the level of taxable income required to earn the same amount after taxes.
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest | Rates | Interest | Rates | Interest | Rates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average | Income/ | Earned/ | Average | Income/ | Earned/ | Average | Income/ | Earned/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance | Expense | Paid | Balance | Expense | Paid | Balance | Expense | Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans (1) | $ | 449,362 | $ | 24,099 | 5.36 | % | $ | 461,808 | $ | 26,357 | 5.71 | % | $ | 460,721 | $ | 27,336 | 5.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable investment securities | 174,044 | 3,518 | 2.02 | 162,035 | 4,125 | 2.55 | 142,146 | 4,593 | 3.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt investment securities (2) | 34,856 | 1,624 | 4.66 | 32,162 | 1,625 | 5.05 | 31,107 | 1,587 | 5.10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 940 | 41 | 4.36 | 796 | 42 | 5.28 | 2,055 | 26 | 1.27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | 659,202 | 29,282 | 4.44 | 656,801 | 32,149 | 4.89 | 636,029 | 33,542 | 5.27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-interest-earning assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | (12,518 | ) | (10,921 | ) | (8,399 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other assets | 55,501 | 55,690 | 45,886 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 702,185 | $ | 701,570 | $ | 673,516 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing demand deposits | $ | 246,731 | $ | 1,050 | 0.43 | % | $ | 248,887 | $ | 1,740 | 0.70 | % | $ | 237,616 | $ | 2,904 | 1.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 62,767 | 102 | 0.16 | 52,370 | 136 | 0.26 | 47,251 | 169 | 0.36 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Time deposits | 162,129 | 2,250 | 1.39 | 172,791 | 2,984 | 1.73 | 171,745 | 3,551 | 2.07 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase agreements | 12,468 | 636 | 5.10 | 15,246 | 735 | 4.82 | 15,221 | 736 | 4.84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FHLB-NY borrowings | 26,867 | 631 | 2.35 | 33,339 | 865 | 2.59 | 38,486 | 970 | 2.52 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subordinated debentures | 7,217 | 506 | 7.01 | 7,217 | 504 | 6.98 | 7,217 | 448 | 6.21 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | 518,179 | 5,175 | 1.00 | 529,850 | 6,964 | 1.31 | 517,536 | 8,778 | 1.70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Demand deposits | 122,548 | 112,646 | 98,507 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities | 2,991 | 3,503 | 3,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shareholders' equity | 58,467 | 55,571 | 53,824 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and Shareholders’ equity | $ | 702,185 | $ | 701,750 | $ | 673,516 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income (taxable equivalent basis) | 24,107 | 25,185 | 24,764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tax equivalent adjustment | (575 | ) | (575 | ) | (558 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income | $ | 23,532 | $ | 24,610 | $ | 24,206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest spread (taxable equivalent basis) | 3.44 | % | 3.58 | % | 3.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net yield on interest-earning assets (taxable equivalent basis) (3) | 3.66 | % | 3.83 | % | 3.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | For purpose of these calculations, nonaccruing loans are included in the average balance. Fees are included in loan interest. |
| (2) | The tax equivalent adjustments are based on a marginal tax rate of 34%. Loans and total interest-earning assets are net of unearned income. Securities are included at amortized cost. |
| (3) | Net interest income (taxable equivalent basis) divided by average interest-earning assets. |
| 18 |
The following table compares net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2012 over the year ended December 31, 2011 in terms of changes from the prior year in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and changes in yields earned and rates paid on such assets and liabilities on a tax-equivalent basis. The table reflects the extent to which changes in the Corporation’s interest income and interest expense are attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior year rate) and changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior year volume). Changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to changes due to volume and changes due to rate.
| 2012 Versus 2011 | 2011 Versus 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (Decrease) | Increase (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Due to Change in | Due to Change in | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Volume | Rate | Net | Volume | Rate | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans | $ | (697 | ) | $ | (1,561 | ) | $ | (2,258 | ) | $ | 64 | $ | (1,043 | ) | $ | (979 | ) | |||||||
| Taxable investment securities | 289 | (896 | ) | (607 | ) | 589 | (1,057 | ) | (468 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Tax-exempt investment securities | 131 | (132 | ) | (1 | ) | 53 | (15 | ) | 38 | |||||||||||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 7 | (8 | ) | (1 | ) | (24 | ) | 40 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets | (270 | ) | (2,597 | ) | (2,867 | ) | 682 | (2,075 | ) | (1,393 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing demand deposits | (15 | ) | (675 | ) | (690 | ) | 132 | (1296 | ) | (1,164 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Savings deposits | 24 | (58 | ) | (34 | ) | 17 | (50 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Time deposits | (176 | ) | (558 | ) | (734 | ) | 22 | (589 | ) | (567 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Repurchase agreements | (140 | ) | 41 | (99 | ) | 1 | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| FHLB borrowings | (157 | ) | (77 | ) | (234 | ) | (133 | ) | 28 | (105 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Subordinated debentures | — | 2 | 2 | — | 56 | 56 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities | (464 | ) | (1,325 | ) | (1,789 | ) | 39 | (1,853 | ) | (1,814 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net change in net interest income | $ | 194 | $ | (1,272 | ) | $ | (1,078 | ) | $ | 643 | $ | (222 | ) | $ | 421 | |||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level considered by management to be adequate to cover the probable incurred losses associated with its loan portfolio. On an ongoing basis, management analyzes the adequacy of this allowance by considering the nature and volume of the Corporation’s loan activity, financial condition of the borrower, fair market value of underlying collateral, and changes in general market conditions. Additions to the allowance for loan losses are charged to operations in the appropriate period. Actual loan losses, net of recoveries, serve to reduce the allowance. The appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates, and ultimate losses may vary from current estimates.
The loan loss provision of $10.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compares to a $10.8 million loan loss provision recorded for the year ended December 31, 2011. The allowance for loan loss was $10.6 million, or 2.42% of total loans as of December 31, 2012 compared to $11.6 million, or 2.54% of total loans a year earlier.
The loan loss provision takes into account any growth or contraction in the loan portfolio and any changes in nonperforming loans as well as the impact of charge-offs. In determining the level of the allowance for loan loss, the Corporation also considered the types of loans as well as the overall seasoning of new loans to determine the risk that was inherent in the portfolio.
Nonperforming loans decreased from $27.7 million, or 6.08% of total loans at December 31, 2011 to $18.2 million, or 4.14% of total loans at December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Corporation charged-off $11.2 million of loan balances and recovered $252,000 in previously charged-off loans compared to $7.8 million and $38,000, respectively, in the prior year. The allowance for loan losses related to the impaired loans decreased from $3.1 million at December 31, 2011 to $266,000 at December 31, 2012 primarily due to charge-offs down to the net realizable value of collateral for some of the impaired loans.
| 19 |
In addition to these factors, the Corporation evaluated the economic conditions and overall real estate climate in the primary business markets in which it operates when considering the overall risk of the lending portfolio. The asset quality issues, caused by the national economic downturn which began in 2008, and the current year charge-offs and provision for loan losses are reflective of current economic conditions that contributed to an increase in loan delinquencies and the softness in the real estate market. The Corporation monitors its loan portfolio and intends to continue to provide for loan loss reserves based on its ongoing periodic review of the loan portfolio and general market conditions.
See “Asset Quality” section below for further information concerning the allowance for loan losses and nonperforming assets.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income consists of all income other than interest income and is principally derived from service charges on deposits, income derived from bank-owned life insurance, gains from calls and sales of securities, gains on sales of mortgage loans and income derived from debit cards and ATM usage. In addition, gains on sales of other real estate owned (“OREO”) are reflected as noninterest income.
Noninterest income increased $1.2 million to $6.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to $5.2 million for the prior year. For the year ended December 31, 2012, noninterest income included $2.3 million from gains on calls and sales of securities compared to $1.2 million in 2011. Gains on sales of mortgage loans totaled $887,000 for 2012, a decrease from $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 reflective of retaining a higher amount of mortgage loans for portfolio. Gains on sales of other real estate owned represent a net amount resulting from increased OREO activity.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $19.7 million and $18.7 million, respectively. Noninterest expense for 2012 reflects higher salary and employee benefits expense, reflective of increasing regulatory compliance and the attendant staffing necessary to oversee all compliance-related issues. In addition, the increase in salary and employee benefits expense is the result of an increased focus on commercial lending opportunities as well as costs associated with an enhanced credit review function. An increase in expense related to other real estate owned is reflective of increased activity. Included in miscellaneous expense for the current year period is $691,000 related to a prepayment premium resulting from the repayment of $7 million of a wholesale repurchase agreement.
Income Taxes
For the year ended December 31, 2012, income taxes represented a benefit of $247,000 compared to a benefit of $415,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. The tax benefit for both years reflects a decrease in our overall projected effective tax rate as a result of our tax exempt income representing a larger percentage of pretax income due to lower earnings. In addition, the tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes the write-off of certain deferred tax assets which will not be realized related to contribution carryovers and expired stock options.
Financial Condition
Total assets at December 31, 2012 were $688.4 million, a decrease of $20.4 million, or 2.9%, over the $708.8 million at December 31, 2011. Cash and cash equivalents increased $7.3 million to $21.0 million at December 31, 2012 from $13.7 million at December 31, 2011. Securities available-for-sale increased $3.8 million to $174.7 million while securities held to maturity decreased $8.6 million to $29.7 million. Net loans decreased $15.0 million from $444.8 million at December 31, 2011 to $429.8 million at December 31, 2012. Increases due to new loans originated were more than offset by regular principal payments and payoffs in 2012. In addition, $2.8 million of loans were transferred to other real estate owned. Loans held for sale totaled $784,000 at December 31, 2012, a decrease from $4.7 million at December 31, 2011. OREO reflected a net decline of $4.2 million primarily reflecting sales of properties partially offset by the foreclosure on additional properties.
| 20 |
Loan Portfolio
The Corporation’s loan portfolio at December 31, 2012, net of allowance for loan losses, totaled $429.8 million, a decrease of $15.0 million, or a 3.4% decrease over the $444.8 million at December 31, 2011. Residential real estate mortgages increased $12.3 million. Although the Corporation continued its policy of selling the majority of its residential real estate loans in the secondary market, certain residential real estate loans were placed into portfolio to partially compensate for payoffs and normal amortization. Of the loans sold, all have been sold with servicing of the loan transferring to the purchaser. Commercial real estate mortgage loans consisting of $252.1 million, or 57.2% of the total portfolio, represent the largest portion of the loan portfolio. These loans reflected a decrease of $7.4 million from $259.5 million, or 56.8% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2011. Commercial loans decreased $13.1 million to $89.4 million, representing 20.3% of the total loan portfolio. Consumer installment loans and home equity loans decreased $4.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively, partially attributable to borrowers continuing to consolidate secondary liens on their homes as they refinance in the lower interest rate environment.
The Corporation’s lending activities are concentrated in loans secured by real estate located in northern New Jersey. Accordingly, the collectability of a substantial portion of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in real estate market conditions in northern New Jersey. The Corporation has not made loans to borrowers outside the United States.
At December 31, 2012, aside from the real estate concentration described above, there were no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans outstanding. Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to a multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar activities which would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other related conditions.
The following table sets forth the classification of the Corporation’s loans by major category at the end of each of the last five years:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential (1) | $ | 67,200 | $ | 54,946 | $ | 43,020 | $ | 36,246 | $ | 40,337 | ||||||||||
| Commercial (1) | 252,087 | 259,462 | 248,527 | 246,212 | 226,183 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial loans | 89,414 | 102,500 | 109,527 | 114,893 | 100,282 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Installment (2) | 16,544 | 21,310 | 29,522 | 41,006 | 51,290 | |||||||||||||||
| Home equity | 14,912 | 17,889 | 20,965 | 21,779 | 21,208 | |||||||||||||||
| Other | 266 | 306 | 305 | 340 | 356 | |||||||||||||||
| Total gross loans | 440,423 | 456,413 | 451,866 | 460,476 | 439,656 | |||||||||||||||
| Less: Allowance for loan losses | 10,641 | 11,604 | 8,490 | 6,920 | 5,166 | |||||||||||||||
| Deferred loan (fees) costs | (50 | ) | 6 | 131 | 437 | 387 | ||||||||||||||
| Net loans | $ | 429,832 | $ | 444,803 | $ | 443,245 | $ | 453,119 | $ | 434,103 | ||||||||||
(1) Includes construction loans.
(2) Includes automobile, home improvement, second mortgages and unsecured loans.
| 21 |
The following table sets forth certain categories of gross loans as of December 31, 2012 by contractual maturity. Borrowers may have the right to prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties. This might cause actual maturities to differ from the contractual maturities summarized below.
| Within 1 Year | After 1 Year But Within 5 Years | After 5 Years | Total | |||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage | $ | 8,754 | $ | 12,872 | $ | 297,661 | $ | 319,287 | ||||||||
| Commercial | 37,265 | 28,833 | 23,316 | 89,414 | ||||||||||||
| Consumer | 262 | 3,420 | 28,040 | 31,722 | ||||||||||||
| Total gross loans | $ | 46,281 | $ | 45,125 | $ | 349,017 | $ | 440,423 | ||||||||
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all gross loans due one year or more after December 31, 2012, which have predetermined interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates:
| Predetermined Rates | Floating or Adjustable Rates | Total | ||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage | $ | 75,294 | $ | 235,239 | $ | 310,533 | ||||||
| Commercial | 29,214 | 22,935 | 52,149 | |||||||||
| Consumer | 16,946 | 14,514 | 31,460 | |||||||||
| $ | 121,454 | $ | 272,688 | $ | 394,142 | |||||||
Asset Quality
The Corporation’s principal earning asset is its loan portfolio. Inherent in the lending function is the risk of deterioration in a borrower’s ability to repay loans under existing loan agreements. To address this risk, reserves are maintained to absorb probable incurred loan losses. In determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management of the Corporation considers the risks inherent in its loan portfolio and changes in the nature and volume of its loan activities, along with general economic and real estate market conditions. Although management attempts to establish a reserve sufficient to offset probable incurred losses in the portfolio, changes in economic conditions, regulatory policies and borrower’s performance could require future changes to the allowance.
In establishing the allowance for loan losses, the Corporation utilizes a two-tiered approach by (1) identifying problem loans and allocating specific loss allowances to such loans and (2) establishing a general valuation allowance on the remainder of its loan portfolio. The Corporation maintains a loan review system that allows for a periodic review of its loan portfolio and the early identification of potential problem loans. Such a system takes into consideration, among other things, delinquency status, size of loans, type of collateral and financial condition of the borrowers.
Allocations of specific loan loss allowances are established for identified loans based on a review of various information including appraisals of underlying collateral. Appraisals are performed by independent licensed appraisers to determine the value of impaired, collateral-dependent loans. Appraisals are periodically updated to ascertain any further decline in value. General loan loss allowances are based upon a combination of factors including, but not limited to, actual loss experience, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and management’s judgment.
The Corporation’s accounting policies are set forth in Note 1 to the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The application of some of these policies requires significant management judgment and the utilization of estimates. Actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates resulting in a significant impact on the financial statements. A critical accounting policy for the Corporation is the policy utilized in determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate which is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to make additional provisions for loan losses based upon information available to them at the time of their examination. Furthermore, the Corporation’s lending activities are concentrated in loans secured by real estate located in northern New Jersey. Accordingly, the collectability of a substantial portion of the Corporation’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in real estate market conditions in northern New Jersey. Future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to economic, operating, regulatory, and other conditions beyond the Corporation’s control. In management’s opinion, the allowance for loan losses totaling $10.6 million is adequate to cover probable incurred losses inherent in the portfolio at December 31, 2012.
| 22 |
Nonperforming Assets
Risk elements include nonaccrual loans, past due and restructured loans, potential problem loans, loan concentrations and other real estate owned (i.e., property acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure). The Corporation’s loans are generally placed in a nonaccrual status when they become past due in excess of 90 days as to payment of principal and interest or earlier if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Interest previously accrued on these loans and not yet paid is charged against income during the current period. Interest earned thereafter is only included in income to the extent that it is received in cash. Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing represent those loans which are in the process of collection, adequately collateralized and management believes all interest and principal owed will be collected. Restructured loans are loans that have been renegotiated to permit a borrower, who has incurred adverse financial circumstances, to continue to perform. Management can make concessions to the terms of the loan or reduce the contractual interest rates to below market rates in order for the borrower to continue to make payments.
| 23 |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the Corporation’s nonperforming assets as of December 31 of each of the preceding five years:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual loans: (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | $ | 3,080 | $ | 8,092 | $ | 2,303 | $ | 8,581 | $ | 2,575 | ||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 413 | 779 | 1,106 | 1,131 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 10,083 | 9,302 | 10,540 | 5,109 | 291 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 3,735 | 8,672 | 7,722 | 3,638 | 825 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 800 | 891 | 829 | 1,197 | 539 | |||||||||||||||
| Total nonaccrual loans | 18,011 | 27,736 | 22,500 | 19,656 | 4,230 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans past due 90 days or more and accruing: (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | — | — | — | 415 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 237 | — | — | — | 353 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total loans past due ninety days or more and Accruing | 237 | — | — | 415 | 353 | |||||||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans | 18,248 | 27,736 | 22,500 | 20,071 | 4,583 | |||||||||||||||
| Other real estate owed | 1,058 | 5,288 | 615 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total nonperforming assets | $ | 19,306 | $ | 33,024 | $ | 23,115 | $ | 20,071 | $ | 4,583 | ||||||||||
| Restructured loans: (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | $ | 3,244 | $ | 561 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 2,425 | 3,386 | — | 665 | 1,483 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 4,704 | 2,032 | 130 | 2,181 | 372 | |||||||||||||||
| Total restructured loans | $ | 10,373 | $ | 5,979 | $ | 130 | $ | 2,846 | $ | 1,855 | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | $ | 10,641 | $ | 11,604 | $ | 8,490 | $ | 6,920 | $ | 5,166 | ||||||||||
| Nonaccrual loans to total gross loans | 4.09 | % | 6.08 | % | 4.98 | % | 4.27 | % | 0.96 | % | ||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans to total gross loans | 4.14 | % | 6.08 | % | 4.98 | % | 4.36 | % | 1.04 | % | ||||||||||
| Nonperforming assets to total assets | 2.80 | % | 4.66 | % | 3.36 | % | 3.02 | % | 0.75 | % | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans | 58.31 | % | 41.84 | % | 37.73 | % | 34.48 | % | 112.72 | % | ||||||||||
| (1) | Restructured loans classified in the nonaccrual category totaled $1.3 million, $9.1 million, $4.0 million, $23,000 and $22,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
| (2) | There were no restructured loans classified in the past due 90 days or more and accruing for any years presented. |
| (3) | Any restructured loans that are on nonaccrual status are only reported in nonaccrual loans and not reflected in restructured loans. |
A loan is generally placed on nonaccrual when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The identification of nonaccrual loans reflects careful monitoring of the loan portfolio. The Corporation is focused on resolving the nonperforming loans and mitigating future losses in the portfolio. All delinquent loans continue to be reviewed by management.
At December 31, 2012, the nonaccrual loans were comprised of 55 loans, primarily commercial real estate loans, commercial loans and construction loans. While the Corporation maintains strong underwriting requirements, the number and amount of nonaccrual loans is a reflection of the prolonged weakened economic conditions and the corresponding effects it has had on our commercial borrowers and the current real estate environment. Certain loans, including restructured loans, are current, but in accordance with applicable guidance and cautious review, management has continued to keep these loans on nonaccrual.
| 24 |
Since December 31, 2011, nonperforming loans have decreased $9.5 million to $18.2 million at December 31, 2012. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans increased to 58.31% at December 31, 2012 from 41.84% at December 31, 2011. The ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans is reflective of detailed analysis and the probable incurred losses we have identified with these nonperforming loans. This metric reflects the effect of the decrease in nonaccrual loans partially offset by a decrease in the allowance for loan losses.
Evaluation of all nonperforming loans includes the updating of appraisals and specific evaluation of such loans to determine estimated cash flows from business and/or collateral. We have assessed these loans for collectability and considered, among other things, the borrower’s ability to repay, the value of the underlying collateral, and other market conditions to ensure the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb probable incurred losses. The majority of our nonperforming loans are secured by real estate collateral. While our nonperforming loans have remained elevated, we have recorded appropriate charge-offs and the underlying collateral coverage for a considerable portion of the nonperforming loans currently supports the collection of our remaining principal.
For loans not included in nonperforming loans, at December 31, 2012, the level of loans past due 30-89 days was $3.1 million, an increase from $1.0 million at December 31, 2011. We will continue to monitor delinquencies for early identification of new problem loans. While not comprising a significantly large portion of the loan portfolio, a number of problem loans are commercial construction loans which have been affected by the struggling construction industry. As such, the entire commercial construction portfolio is being actively monitored.
The Corporation maintains an allowance for loan losses at a level considered by management to be adequate to cover the probable incurred losses associated with its loan portfolio. The Corporation’s policy with respect to the methodology for the determination of the allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of complexity and requires management to make difficult and subjective judgments.
The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based upon management’s evaluation of the known and inherent risks in the portfolio, consideration of the size and composition of the loan portfolio, actual loan loss experience, the level of delinquencies, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectability may not be assured, the existence and estimated net realizable value of any underlying collateral and guarantees securing the loans, and current economic and market conditions.
Primarily as a result of the continuing higher level of nonperforming loans, the Corporation continues to record an elevated provision for loan losses. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the provision for loan losses was $9.995 million and $10.845 million, respectively. The total allowance for loan losses represented 2.42% of total loans at December 31, 2012 compared to a ratio of 2.54% at December 31, 2011.
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Corporation had $11.7 million and $15.1 million, respectively, of loans whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings. Of these loans, $10.4 million and $6.0 million were performing in accordance with their new terms at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The remaining troubled debt restructures are reported as nonaccrual loans. Specific reserves of $246,000 and $1.2 million have been allocated for the troubled debt restructurings at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Corporation had committed $241,000 and $416,000, respectively, of additional funds to a single customer with an outstanding construction loan that is classified as a troubled debt restructuring.
Included in performing restructured loans as of December 31, 2011 is a loan for $2.3 million for which the estate of our borrower was provided with a forbearance to allow time to market for sale the underlying commercial real estate collateral. The property was sold in 2012 and the Corporation collected all outstanding principal and accrued interest owed under the loan.
The balance in performing restructured loans also includes two loans to a related borrower for $1.1 million at both December 31, 2012 and 2011. While these loans are current under their restructured terms, because of the below market rate of interest, these loans will continue to be reflected as restructured loans in accordance with accounting practices.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, gross interest income which would have been recorded had the restructured and non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms amounted to $815,000 million, of which $394,000 was included in interest income for the year ended December 31, 2012.
| 25 |
When it is believed that some portion or all of a loan balance will not be collected, that amount is charged-off as loss against the allowance for loan losses. For the year ended December 31, 2012, net charge-offs were $11.0 million compared to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Included in charge-offs for the current year is one loan for $3.0 million. During the second quarter of 2012, management placed the loan on nonaccrual status based on developments relating to the borrower which have impacted the borrower’s repayment ability. During the fourth quarter of 2012, management made the decision to charge-off this loan in its entirety as collectability was believed to be remote.
While regular monthly payments continue to be made on many of the nonaccrual loans, certain charge-offs result, nevertheless, from the borrowers’ inability to provide adequate documentation evidencing their ability to continue to service their debt. Therefore, consideration has been given to any underlying collateral and appropriate charge-offs recorded based, in general, on the deficiency of such collateral. In general, the charge-offs reflect partial writedowns and full charge-offs on nonaccrual loans due to the initial evaluation of market values of the underlying real estate collateral in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310-40. In addition, the current year reflects an increased level of charge-offs of previously established reserves that were based on analysis of the discounted cash flows for non-real estate collateral dependent loans. Management believes the charge-off of these reserves provides a clearer indication of the value of nonaccrual loans. The charge-off of reserves increases the average historical charge-off experience, thereby resulting in an increase in Corporation’s level of general reserves on performing loans. In addition to our actions of recording partial and full charge-offs on loans, we continue to aggressively pursue collection, including legal action.
As of December 31, 2012, there were $44.2 million of other loans not included in the preceding risk elements table, compared to $36.1 million at December 31, 2011, where credit conditions of borrowers, including real estate tax delinquencies, caused management to have concerns about the possibility of the borrowers not complying with the present terms and conditions of repayment and which may result in disclosure of such loans as nonperforming loans at a future date. These loans have been considered by management in conjunction with the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
| 26 |
The following table sets forth, for each of the preceding five years, the historical relationships among the amount of loans outstanding, the allowance for loan losses, the provision for loan losses, the amount of loans charged-off and the amount of loan recoveries:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 11,604 | $ | 8,490 | $ | 6,920 | $ | 5,166 | $ | 4,457 | ||||||||||
| Loans charged-off: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | 394 | 839 | 1,231 | 1,003 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 21 | 112 | 25 | 85 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 3,577 | 1,911 | 1,241 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 7,144 | 4,603 | 5,082 | 623 | 2,841 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 74 | 304 | 519 | 215 | 61 | |||||||||||||||
| Total loans charged-off | 11,210 | 7,769 | 8,098 | 1,926 | 2,902 | |||||||||||||||
| Recoveries of loans previously charged-off: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Construction | 6 | 3 | 72 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 240 | 29 | 10 | 93 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 6 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 26 | |||||||||||||||
| Total recoveries of loans previously charged-off | 252 | 38 | 93 | 105 | 26 | |||||||||||||||
| Net loans charged-off | 10,958 | 7,731 | 8,005 | 1,821 | 2,876 | |||||||||||||||
| Provisions charged to operations | 9,995 | 10,845 | 9,575 | 3,575 | 3,585 | |||||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 10,641 | $ | 11,604 | $ | 8,490 | $ | 6,920 | $ | 5,166 | ||||||||||
| Net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period | 2.44 | % | 1.67 | % | 1.74 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.66 | % | ||||||||||
| Balance of allowance for loan losses at the end of year to gross year end loans | 2.42 | % | 2.54 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.18 | % | ||||||||||
The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses, for each of the preceding five years, as indicated by loan categories:
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percent to Total (1) | Amount | Percent to Total (1) | Amount | Percent to Total (1) | Amount | Percent to Total (1) | Amount | Percen to Total (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate – Residential | $ | 308 | 15.3 | % | $ | 303 | 12.0 | % | $ | 188 | 9.5 | % | $ | 155 | 7.9 | % | $ | 245 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate – commercial | 5,105 | 57.2 | % | 5,423 | 56.8 | % | 4,038 | 55.0 | % | 2,677 | 53.5 | % | 2,164 | 51.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 4,832 | 20.3 | % | 5,368 | 22.5 | % | 3,745 | 24.2 | % | 3,148 | 24.9 | % | 2,086 | 22.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 355 | 7.2 | % | 500 | 8.7 | % | 512 | 11.3 | % | 940 | 13.7 | % | 671 | 16.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unallocated | 41 | — | % | 10 | — | % | 7 | — | % | — | — | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total allowance for loan losses | $ | 10,641 | 100.0 | % | $ | 11,604 | 100.0 | % | $ | 8,490 | 100.0 | % | $ | 6,920 | 100.0 | % | $ | 5,166 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Represents percentage of loan balance in category to total gross loans.
Investment Portfolio
The Corporation maintains an investment portfolio to enhance its yields and to provide a secondary source of liquidity. The portfolio is comprised of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government and agency obligations, state and political subdivision obligations, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, corporate debt securities and other equity investments, and has been classified as held to maturity or available-for-sale. Investments in debt securities that the Corporation has the intention and the ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity securities and reported at amortized cost. All other securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and reported at fair value, with unrealized holding gains or losses reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Securities in the available-for-sale category may be held for indefinite periods of time and include securities that management intends to use as part of its Asset/Liability strategy or that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risks, the need to provide liquidity, the need to increase regulatory capital or similar factors. Securities available-for-sale increased to $174.7 million at December 31, 2012, from $170.9 million at December 31, 2011, an increase of $3.8 million, or 2.2%. The increase in securities available-for-sale reflects the Corporation’s focus on liquidity in the current economic environment. Securities held to maturity decreased $8.6 million, or 22.5%, to $29.7 million at December 31, 2012 from $38.4 million at December 31, 2011.
| 27 |
The following table sets forth the classification of the Corporation’s investment securities by major category at the end of the last three years:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying Value | Percent | Carrying Value | Percent | Carrying Value | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Securities available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury | $ | 4,006 | 2.3 | % | $ | 4,050 | 2.4 | % | $ | 9,249 | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agencies | 37,255 | 21.3 | 20,744 | 12.1 | 13,586 | 9.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Obligations of state and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| political subdivisions | 14,170 | 8.1 | 9,318 | 5.4 | 4,279 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities-residential | 105,428 | 60.3 | 133,467 | 78.1 | 108,327 | 78.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (a) | 9,884 | 5.7 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate debt | 495 | 0.3 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other equity investments | 3,462 | 2.0 | 3,346 | 2.0 | 3,187 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 174,700 | 100.0 | % | $ | 170,925 | 100.0 | % | $ | 138,628 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Securities held to maturity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 260 | 0.9 | % | $ | 2,770 | 7.2 | % | $ | 4,208 | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of state and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| political subdivisions | 22,787 | 76.7 | 24,575 | 64.1 | 26,148 | 57.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities-residential | 6,671 | 22.4 | 11,009 | 28.7 | 15,038 | 33.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 29,718 | 100.0 | % | $ | 38,354 | 100.0 | % | $ | 45,394 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| (a) | Collateralized by student loans |
| 28 |
The following table sets forth the maturity distribution and weighted average yields (calculated on the basis of stated yields to maturity, considering applicable premium or discount) of the Corporation’s debt securities available-for-sale as of December 31, 2012. Issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. This might cause actual maturities to differ from contractual maturities.
| Within 1 Year | After 1 Year Through 5 Years | After 5 Years Through 10 Years | After 10 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying value | $ | 4,006 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,006 | ||||||||||
| Yield | 0.70 | % | — | % | — | % | — | % | 0.70 | % | ||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying value | — | 2,505 | 10,999 | 23,751 | 37,255 | |||||||||||||||
| Yield | — | % | 0.96 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.66 | % | 1.58 | % | ||||||||||
| Obligations of state and political subdivisions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying value | — | 1,993 | 10,741 | 1,436 | 14,170 | |||||||||||||||
| Yield | — | % | 1.69 | % | 2.11 | % | 4.00 | % | 2.25 | % | ||||||||||
| Corporate debt: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying value | — | 495 | — | — | 495 | |||||||||||||||
| Yield | — | % | 1.05 | % | — | % | — | % | 1.05 | % | ||||||||||
| Total carrying value | $ | 4,006 | $ | 4,993 | $ | 21,740 | $ | 25,187 | $ | 55,926 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average yield | 0.70 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.83 | % | 1.79 | % | 1.68 | % | ||||||||||
The following table sets forth the maturity distribution and weighted average yields (calculated on the basis of stated yields to maturity, considering applicable premium or discount) of the Corporation’s debt securities held to maturity as of December 31, 2012. Issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. This might cause actual maturities to differ from contractual maturities.
| Within 1 Year | After 1 Year Through 5 Years | After 5 Years Through 10 Years | After 10 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agencies: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying value | $ | — | $ | 255 | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | 260 | ||||||||||
| Yield | — | % | 4.59 | % | 1.75 | % | — | % | 4.54 | % | ||||||||||
| Obligations of state and political subdivisions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying value | 906 | 14,735 | 6,968 | 178 | 22,787 | |||||||||||||||
| Yield | 3.25 | % | 3.30 | % | 3.87 | % | 3.75 | % | 3.48 | % | ||||||||||
| Total carrying value | $ | 906 | $ | 14,990 | $ | 6,973 | $ | 178 | $ | 23,047 | ||||||||||
| Weighted average yield | 3.25 | % | 3.32 | % | 3.87 | % | 3.75 | % | 3.49 | % | ||||||||||
Deposits
The Corporation had deposits at December 31, 2012 totaling $590.3 million, a decrease of $3.3 million, or 0.6%, over the comparable period of 2011, when deposits totaled $593.6 million. The Corporation relied on its branch network and current competitive products and services to maintain deposits during 2012. There were no brokered certificates of deposit at December 31, 2012 or 2011.
| 29 |
The following table sets forth the classification of the Corporation’s deposits by major category as of December 31 of each of the three preceding years:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing demand | $ | 124,286 | 21.1 | % | $ | 115,776 | 19.5 | % | $ | 99,723 | 17.3 | % | ||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing demand | 241,471 | 40.8 | % | 249,058 | 41.9 | % | 248,240 | 43.1 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Saving deposits | 68,338 | 11.6 | % | 57,967 | 9.8 | % | 47,692 | 8.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Certificates of deposit | 156,159 | 26.5 | % | 170,751 | 28.8 | % | 179,948 | 31.3 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 590,254 | 100.0 | % | $ | 593,552 | 100.0 | % | $ | 575,603 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2012, the aggregate amount of outstanding time deposits issued in amounts of $100,000 or more, broken down by time remaining to maturity, was as follows (in thousands):
| Three months or less | $ | 20,247 | ||
| Four months through six months | 15,646 | |||
| Seven months through twelve months | 19,731 | |||
| Over twelve months | 39,259 | |||
| Total | $ | 94,883 |
Borrowings
Although deposits with the Bank are the Corporation’s primary source of funds, the Corporation’s policy has been to utilize borrowings to the extent that they are a less costly source of funds, when the Corporation desires additional capacity to fund loan demand, or to extend the life of its liabilities as a means of managing exposure to interest rate risk. The Corporation’s borrowings are a combination of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB-NY”), including overnight repricing lines of credit, and, to a lesser extent, securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
Interest rate movements have made managing the Corporation’s interest rate sensitivity increasingly important. The Corporation attempts to maintain stable net interest margins by generally matching the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities maturing, or subject to repricing, by adjusting interest rates to market conditions, and by developing new products. One method of measuring the Corporation’s exposure to changes in interest rates is the maturity and repricing gap analysis. The difference or mismatch between the amount of assets and liabilities that mature or reprice in a given period is defined as the interest rate sensitivity gap. A “negative” gap results when the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within a specified time period exceeds the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing within the same period of time. Conversely, a “positive” gap results when the amount of interest-earning assets maturing or repricing exceed the amount of interest-bearing liabilities maturing or repricing in the same given time frame. The smaller the gap, the less the effect of the market volatility on net interest income. During a period of rising interest rates, an institution with a negative gap position would not be in as favorable a position, as compared to an institution with a positive gap, to invest in higher yielding assets. This may result in yields on its assets increasing at a slower rate than the increase in its costs of interest-bearing liabilities than if it had a positive gap. During a period of falling interest rates, an institution with a negative gap would experience a repricing of its assets at a slower rate than its interest-bearing liabilities, which consequently may result in its net interest income growing at a faster rate than an institution with a positive gap position.
The following table sets forth estimated maturity/repricing structure of the Corporation’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2012. The amounts of assets or liabilities shown which reprice or mature during a particular period were determined in accordance with the contractual terms of each asset or liability and adjusted for prepayment assumptions where applicable. The table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the Corporation’s net interest income because the repricing of certain categories of assets and liabilities, for example, prepayments of loans and withdrawal of deposits, is beyond the Corporation’s control. As a result, certain assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within a period may in fact reprice at different times and at different rate levels.
| 30 |
| Three Months or Less | More than Three Months Through One Year | After One Year | Noninterest Sensitive | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate mortgage | $ | 28,686 | $ | 43,541 | $ | 247,060 | $ | — | $ | 319,287 | ||||||||||
| Commercial | 40,004 | 7,352 | 42,058 | — | 89,414 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 14,707 | 2,053 | 14,962 | — | 31,722 | |||||||||||||||
| Mortgage loans held for sale | 784 | — | — | — | 784 | |||||||||||||||
| Investment securities (1) | 37,520 | 38,959 | 130,152 | — | 206,631 | |||||||||||||||
| Other assets | 1,054 | — | — | 39,496 | 40,550 | |||||||||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 122,755 | $ | 91,905 | $ | 434,232 | $ | 39,496 | $ | 688,388 | ||||||||||
| Source of funds: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing demand | $ | 241,471 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 241,471 | ||||||||||
| Savings | 68,338 | — | — | — | 68,338 | |||||||||||||||
| Certificate of deposit | 31,522 | 57,893 | 66,744 | — | 156,159 | |||||||||||||||
| FHLB of NY advances | — | — | 25,000 | — | 25,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Repurchase agreements | 7,343 | — | — | — | 7,343 | |||||||||||||||
| Subordinated debenture | — | — | 7,217 | — | 7,217 | |||||||||||||||
| Other liabilities | — | — | — | 126,514 | 126,514 | |||||||||||||||
| Shareholders' equity | — | — | — | 56,346 | 56,346 | |||||||||||||||
| Total source of funds | $ | 348,674 | $ | 57,893 | $ | 98,961 | $ | 182,860 | $ | 688,388 | ||||||||||
| Interest rate sensitivity gap | $ | (225,919 | ) | $ | 34,012 | $ | 335,271 | $ | (143,364 | ) | ||||||||||
| Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap | $ | (225,919 | ) | $ | (191,907 | ) | $ | 143,364 | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Ratio of GAP to total assets | -32.8 | % | 4.9 | % | 48.7 | % | -20.8 | % | ||||||||||||
| Ratio of cumulative GAP assets to total assets | -32.8 | % | -27.9 | % | 20.8 | % | -— | % | ||||||||||||
(1) Includes securities held to maturity, securities available-for-sale and FHLB-NY stock.
The Corporation also uses a simulation model to analyze the sensitivity of net interest income to movements in interest rates. The simulation model projects net interest income, net income, net interest margin, and capital to asset ratios based on various interest rate scenarios over a twelve-month period. The model is based on the actual maturity and repricing characteristics of all rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Management incorporates into the model certain assumptions regarding prepayments of certain assets and liabilities. Assumptions have been built into the model for prepayments for assets and decay rates for nonmaturity deposits such as savings and interest bearing demand. The model assumes an immediate rate shock to interest rates without management’s ability to proactively change the mix of assets or liabilities. Based on the reports generated for December 31, 2012, an immediate interest rate increase of 200 basis points would have resulted in a decrease in net interest income of 4.1%, or $966,000, and an immediate interest rate decrease of 200 basis points would have resulted in a decrease in net interest income of 5.4% or $1.3 million. Management cannot provide any assurance about the actual effect of changes in interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income.
Liquidity
The Corporation’s primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization and prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed securities, maturities of investment securities and funds provided by operations. While scheduled loan and mortgage-backed securities amortization and maturities of investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flow and prepayments on loans and mortgage-backed securities are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions, and competition.
| 31 |
The Corporation’s liquidity, represented by cash and cash equivalents, is a product of its operating, investing and financing activities. These activities are summarized below:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents – beginning | $ | 13,698 | $ | 19,983 | ||||
| Operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net income | 520 | 684 | ||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities | 12,263 | 15,385 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 12,783 | 16,069 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 13,584 | (40,160 | ) | |||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (19,049 | ) | 17,806 | |||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 7,318 | (6,285 | ) | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents – ending | $ | 21,016 | $ | 13,698 | ||||
Cash was generated by operating activities in each of the above periods. The primary source of cash from operating activities during each period was operating income.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. Excess liquidity is generally invested in short-term investments, such as federal funds sold.
The Corporation enters into commitments to extend credit, such as letters of credit, which are not reflected in the Corporation’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Corporation has various contractual obligations that may require future cash payments. The following table summarizes the Corporation’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2012 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.
| Payment Due By Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Less than 1 Year | 1 – 3 Years | 4 – 5 Years | After 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Contractual obligations | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease obligations | $ | 4,745 | $ | 1,006 | $ | 1,121 | $ | 606 | $ | 2,012 | ||||||||||
| Total contracted cost obligations | $ | 4,745 | $ | 1,006 | $ | 1,121 | $ | 606 | $ | 2,012 | ||||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities/long-term debt | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Time deposits | $ | 156,159 | $ | 89,470 | $ | 54,784 | $ | 11,905 | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank advances | 25,000 | — | — | 15,000 | 10,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 7,343 | 343 | 7,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Subordinated debentures | 7,217 | — | — | 7,217 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total other long-term liabilities/long-term debt | $ | 195,719 | $ | 89,813 | $ | 61,784 | $ | 34,122 | $ | 10,000 | ||||||||||
| Other commitments - off balance sheet | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Letters of credit | $ | 1,396 | $ | 1,344 | $ | 52 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Commitments to extend credit | 11,610 | 11,610 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Unused lines of credit | 59,959 | 59,959 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total off balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations | $ | 72,965 | $ | 72,913 | $ | 52 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Management believes that a significant portion of the time deposits will remain with the Corporation. In addition, management does not believe that all of the unused lines of credit will be exercised. We anticipate that the Corporation will have sufficient funds available to meet its current contractual commitments. Should we need temporary funding, the Corporation has the ability to borrow overnight with the FHLB-NY. The overall borrowing capacity is contingent on available collateral to secure borrowings and the ability to purchase additional activity-based capital stock of the FHLB-NY. The Corporation may also borrow from the Discount Window of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York based on the market value of collateral pledged. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the borrowing capacity at the Discount Window was $5.1 million. In addition, the Corporation had available overnight variable repricing lines of credit with other correspondent banks totaling $11 million on an unsecured basis. There were no borrowings under these lines of credit at December 31, 2012 and 2011.
| 32 |
The Corporation's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Of the $1.4 million commitments under standby and commercial letters of credit, $1.3 million expire within one year. Should any letter of credit be drawn on, the interest rate charged on the resulting note would fluctuate with the Corporation's base rate. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Corporation evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counter-party. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee payment or performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Corporation obtains collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.
At December 31, 2012, the Corporation had residential mortgage commitments to extend credit aggregating approximately $417,000 at variable rates averaging 3.13% and $1.8 million at fixed rates averaging 3.87%. Approximately $1.8 million of these loan commitments will be sold to investors upon closing. Commercial, construction, and home equity loan commitments of approximately $9.3 million were extended with variable rates averaging 3.88% and $140,000 were extended at fixed rates averaging 4.88%. Generally, commitments were due to expire within approximately 60 days.
The unused lines of credit consist of $13.5 million relating to a home equity line of credit program and an unsecured line of credit program (cash reserve), $4.8 million relating to an unsecured overdraft protection program, and $41.7 million relating to commercial and construction lines of credit. Amounts drawn on the unused lines of credit are predominantly assessed interest at rates which fluctuate with the base rate.
Capital
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Regulations of the Board of Governors of the FRB require bank holding companies to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Under the regulations in effect at December 31, 2012, the Corporation was required to maintain (i) a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total adjusted assets of 4.0% and (ii) minimum ratios of Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively. The Bank must comply with substantially similar capital regulations promulgated by the FDIC.
| 33 |
The following table summarizes the capital ratios for the Corporation and the Bank at December 31, 2012.
| Actual | Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes | To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action | ||||||||||
| Leverage ratio * | ||||||||||||
| Consolidated | 9.09 | % | 4.00 | % | N/A | |||||||
| Bank | 8.91 | % | 4.00 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||||
| Risk-based capital | ||||||||||||
| Tier I | ||||||||||||
| Consolidated | 13.63 | % | 4.00 | % | N/A | |||||||
| Bank | 13.35 | % | 4.00 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||
| Consolidated | 14.89 | % | 8.00 | % | N/A | |||||||
| Bank | 14.62 | % | 8.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||
* The minimum leverage ratio set by the FRB and the FDIC is 3.00%. Institutions, which are not “top-rated”, will be expected to maintain a ratio of approximately 100 to 200 basis points above this ratio.
On September 1, 2011, in exchange for issuing 15,000 shares of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Shares”), having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, the Corporation received $15.0 million as part of the Treasury’s SBLF program. The SBLF is a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 that encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion.
Using proceeds of the issuance of the Series B Preferred Shares, the Corporation simultaneously repurchased all 10,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, liquidation amount $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) previously issued under the TARP CPP, for a purchase price of $10,022,222, including accrued but unpaid dividends through the date of repurchase.
The Series B Preferred Shares pay a non-cumulative quarterly dividend in arrears. The Corporation accrues the preferred dividends as earned over the period the Series B Preferred Shares are outstanding. The dividend rate can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first ten quarters during which the Series B Preferred Shares are outstanding, based upon changes in the level of Qualified Small Business Lending (“QSBL” as defined in the Securities Purchase Agreement). In general, the dividend rate decreases as the level of the Bank’s QSBL increases. Based upon the Bank’s level of QSBL over a baseline level, the dividend rate for the initial dividend period was 1%. During 2012, the dividend rate ranged between 1% and 3.39%.The dividend rate for future dividend periods will be set based upon changes in the level of QSBL as compared to the baseline level. Such dividend rate may vary from 1% to 5% per annum for the second through tenth dividend periods and from 1% to 7% for the eleventh through the first half of the nineteenth dividend periods, to reflect the amount of change in the Bank’s level of QSBL. In the event that the Series B Preferred Shares remain outstanding for more than four and one half years, the dividend rate will be fixed at 9%. Such dividends are not cumulative but the Corporation may only declare and pay dividends on its common stock (or any other equity securities junior to the Series B Preferred Stock) if it has declared and paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Shares for the current dividend period and will be subject to other restrictions on its ability to repurchase or redeem other securities.
Subject to regulatory approval, the Corporation may redeem the Series B Preferred Shares at any time. The Series B Preferred Shares are includable in Tier I capital for regulatory capital.
On October 26, 2011, the Corporation completed the repurchase of the 10-year warrant held by the Treasury which was issued as part of the Corporation's participation in the TARP CPP, and entitled the Treasury to purchase 133,475 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock at an exercise price of $11.24 per share. The Corporation paid a total of $107,398 to the Treasury to repurchase the warrant.
| 34 |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
| 35 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Midland Park, New Jersey
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
| /s/ Crowe Horwath LLP |
Livingston, New Jersey
March 28, 2013
| 36 |
Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | $ | 19,962,000 | $ | 13,289,000 | ||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 1,054,000 | 409,000 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 21,016,000 | 13,698,000 | ||||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 174,700,000 | 170,925,000 | ||||||
| Securities held to maturity; estimated fair value | ||||||||
| of $31,768,000 (2012) and $40,984,000 (2011) | 29,718,000 | 38,354,000 | ||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank of New York stock, at cost | 2,213,000 | 2,478,000 | ||||||
| Mortgage loans held for sale | 784,000 | 4,711,000 | ||||||
| Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $10,641,000 (2012) | ||||||||
| and $11,604,000 (2011) | 429,832,000 | 444,803,000 | ||||||
| Premises and equipment, net | 5,645,000 | 6,101,000 | ||||||
| Accrued interest receivable | 2,372,000 | 2,618,000 | ||||||
| Other real estate owned, net | 1,058,000 | 5,288,000 | ||||||
| Bank owned life insurance | 10,470,000 | 10,145,000 | ||||||
| Other assets | 10,580,000 | 9,697,000 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 688,388,000 | $ | 708,818,000 | ||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders' equity | ||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||
| Deposits: | ||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing | $ | 124,286,000 | $ | 115,776,000 | ||||
| Interest-bearing | 465,968,000 | 477,776,000 | ||||||
| Total deposits | 590,254,000 | 593,552,000 | ||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances | 25,000,000 | 32,700,000 | ||||||
| Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 7,343,000 | 14,342,000 | ||||||
| Subordinated debentures | 7,217,000 | 7,217,000 | ||||||
| Accrued interest payable | 560,000 | 775,000 | ||||||
| Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 1,668,000 | 2,440,000 | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 632,042,000 | 651,026,000 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies | ||||||||
| Shareholders' equity | ||||||||
| Preferred stock, no par value; 2,500,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||
| 15,000 and 15,000 shares issued and outstanding at | ||||||||
| December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Liquidation | ||||||||
| preference of $15,000,000 and $15,000,000, respectively | 14,964,000 | 14,955,000 | ||||||
| Common stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||
| 5,924,865 and 5,882,504 shares issued and outstanding | ||||||||
| at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively | 40,606,000 | 40,420,000 | ||||||
| Retained earnings | 316,000 | 1,043,000 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income, net | 460,000 | 1,374,000 | ||||||
| Total Shareholders' equity | 56,346,000 | 57,792,000 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and Shareholders' equity | $ | 688,388,000 | $ | 708,818,000 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 37 |
Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Interest income: | ||||||||
| Loans | $ | 24,056,000 | $ | 26,312,000 | ||||
| Securities held to maturity: | ||||||||
| Taxable | 487,000 | 687,000 | ||||||
| Nontaxable | 817,000 | 878,000 | ||||||
| Securities available-for-sale: | ||||||||
| Taxable | 2,923,000 | 3,316,000 | ||||||
| Nontaxable | 275,000 | 217,000 | ||||||
| FHLB dividends | 108,000 | 122,000 | ||||||
| Other interest-earning assets | 41,000 | 42,000 | ||||||
| Total interest income | 28,707,000 | 31,574,000 | ||||||
| Interest expense: | ||||||||
| Deposits | 3,402,000 | 4,860,000 | ||||||
| Borrowed money | 1,773,000 | 2,104,000 | ||||||
| Total interest expense | 5,175,000 | 6,964,000 | ||||||
| Net interest income before provision for loan losses | 23,532,000 | 24,610,000 | ||||||
| Provision for loan losses | 9,995,000 | 10,845,000 | ||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 13,537,000 | 13,765,000 | ||||||
| Noninterest income: | ||||||||
| Fees and service charges | 1,998,000 | 2,074,000 | ||||||
| Bank owned life insurance | 325,000 | 325,000 | ||||||
| Gain on calls and sales of securities, net | 2,340,000 | 1,161,000 | ||||||
| Gain on sales of mortgage loans | 887,000 | 1,209,000 | ||||||
| Gain on sales of other real estate owned | 429,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
| Miscellaneous | 410,000 | 391,000 | ||||||
| Total noninterest income | 6,389,000 | 5,170,000 | ||||||
| Noninterest expense: | ||||||||
| Salaries and employee benefits | 9,470,000 | 8,983,000 | ||||||
| Occupancy, net | 1,967,000 | 2,023,000 | ||||||
| Equipment | 971,000 | 970,000 | ||||||
| Data processing | 1,291,000 | 1,351,000 | ||||||
| Advertising | 537,000 | 446,000 | ||||||
| FDIC insurance premium | 612,000 | 714,000 | ||||||
| Charitable contributions | 86,000 | 398,000 | ||||||
| Stationery and supplies | 208,000 | 196,000 | ||||||
| Legal | 485,000 | 502,000 | ||||||
| Bank-card related services | 546,000 | 496,000 | ||||||
| Other real estate owned | 603,000 | 95,000 | ||||||
| Miscellaneous | 2,877,000 | 2,492,000 | ||||||
| Total noninterest expenses | 19,653,000 | 18,666,000 | ||||||
| Income before income tax benefit | 273,000 | 269,000 | ||||||
| Income tax benefit | (247,000 | ) | (415,000 | ) | ||||
| Net income | 520,000 | 684,000 | ||||||
| Dividends on preferred stock and accretion | 352,000 | 558,000 | ||||||
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 168,000 | $ | 126,000 | ||||
| Basic earnings per common share | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 5,908,503 | 5,861,465 | ||||||
| Weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding | 5,908,503 | 5,861,465 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 38 |
Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Net income | $ | 520,000 | $ | 684,000 | ||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||
| Change in unrealized holding gains on securities Available-for-sale arising during the period | 763,000 | 3,837,000 | ||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for gains in net income | (2,340,000 | ) | (1,161,000 | ) | ||||
| Net unrealized gain (losses) | (1,577,000 | ) | 2,676,000 | |||||
| Tax effect | 614,000 | (1,038,000 | ) | |||||
| Net unrealized gain (losses), net of tax amount | (963,000 | ) | 1,638,000 | |||||
| Change in fair value of interest rate swap | 81,000 | (230,000 | ) | |||||
| Tax effect | (32,000 | ) | 92,000 | |||||
| Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net of tax amount | 49,000 | (138,000 | ) | |||||
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | (914,000 | ) | 1,500,000 | |||||
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (394,000 | ) | $ | 2,184,000 | |||
The following is a summary of the accumulated other comprehensive income balances, net of tax:
| Balance at December 31, 2012 | Current Year Change | Balance at December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||
| Unrealized gain on securities available-for-sale | $ | 947,000 | $ | (963,000 | ) | $ | 1,910,000 | |||||
| Unrealized loss on fair value of interest rate swap | (487,000 | ) | 49,000 | (536,000 | ) | |||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income, net | $ | 460,000 | $ | (914,000 | ) | $ | 1,374,000 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 39 |
Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
| Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Compre- hensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred | Common Stock | Retained | Treasury Stock | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock | Shares | Amount | Earnings | Shares | Amount | (Loss), Net | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance – January 1, 2011 | $ | 9,796,000 | 5,846,927 | $ | 40,516,000 | $ | 1,959,000 | (917 | ) | $ | (13,000 | ) | $ | (126,000 | ) | $ | 52,132,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock | 15,000,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Preferred stock issuance costs | (48,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (48,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase of preferred stock | (10,000,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (10,000,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redemption of common stock warrants | — | — | (269,000 | ) | 161,000 | — | — | — | (108,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared ($0.20 per share) | — | — | — | (1,171,000 | ) | — | — | — | (1,171,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment of discount on dividend reinvestment plan | — | — | (15,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | (15,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared on preferred stock | — | — | — | (383,000 | ) | — | — | — | (383,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan | — | 19,298 | 94,000 | — | — | — | — | 94,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued under stock plans | — | 16,279 | 75,000 | — | 917 | 13,000 | — | 88,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock option compensation expense | — | — | 19,000 | — | — | — | — | 19,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Accretion of discount on preferred stock | 174,000 | — | — | (174,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of issuance costs | 33,000 | — | — | (33,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income | 684,000 | 1,500,000 | 2,184,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance -- December 31, 2011 | 14,955,000 | 5,882,504 | 40,420,000 | 1,043,000 | — | — | 1,374,000 | 57,792,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared ($0.15 per share) | — | — | — | (886,000 | ) | — | — | — | (886,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Payment of discount on dividend reinvestment plan | — | — | (8,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | (8,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared on preferred stock | — | — | — | (352,000 | ) | — | — | — | (352,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan | — | 32,574 | 148,000 | — | — | — | — | 148,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued under stock plans | — | 9,787 | 46,000 | — | — | — | — | 46,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of issuance costs | 9,000 | — | — | (9,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss) | 520,000 | (914,000 | ) | (394,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance -- December 31, 2012 | $ | 14,964,000 | 5,924,865 | $ | 40,606,000 | $ | 316,000 | — | $ | — | $ | 460,000 | $ | 56,346,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 40 |
Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net income | $ | 520,000 | $ | 684,000 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to | ||||||||
| net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment | 532,000 | 594,000 | ||||||
| Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, net | 1,628,000 | 1,372,000 | ||||||
| Accretion (amortization) of deferred loan fees | 49,000 | (16,000 | ) | |||||
| Provision for loan losses | 9,995,000 | 10,845,000 | ||||||
| Originations of mortgage loans held for sale | (61,431,000 | ) | (85,615,000 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans | 66,245,000 | 91,931,000 | ||||||
| Gain on sale of mortgage loans | (887,000 | ) | (1,209,000 | ) | ||||
| Gains on sales and calls of securities | (2,340,000 | ) | (1,161,000 | ) | ||||
| Gain on sale of OREO | (429,000 | ) | (10,000 | ) | ||||
| Deferred income tax benefit | 115,000 | (1,850,000 | ) | |||||
| Decrease in accrued interest receivable | 246,000 | 188,000 | ||||||
| Decrease in accrued interest payable | (215,000 | ) | (202,000 | ) | ||||
| Earnings on bank owned life insurance | (325,000 | ) | (325,000 | ) | ||||
| Stock option expense | — | 19,000 | ||||||
| (Increase) decrease in other assets | 950,000 | (442,000 | ) | |||||
| Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | (1,870,000 | ) | 1,266,000 | |||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 12,783,000 | 16,069,000 | ||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of securities available-for-sale | (134,832,000 | ) | (97,018,000 | ) | ||||
| Proceeds from maturities and principal repayments on securities available-for-sale | 27,964,000 | 21,148,000 | ||||||
| Proceeds from sales and calls on securities available-for-sale | 102,300,000 | 46,245,000 | ||||||
| Proceeds from maturities and principal repayments on securities held to maturity | 4,147,000 | 4,938,000 | ||||||
| Proceeds from sales and calls of securities held to maturity | 4,418,000 | 1,895,000 | ||||||
| Sale of FHLB-NY stock | 265,000 | 19,000 | ||||||
| Net (increase) decrease in loans | 2,106,000 | (17,453,000 | ) | |||||
| Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned | 7,292,000 | 366,000 | ||||||
| Additions to premises and equipment | (76,000 | ) | (300,000 | ) | ||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 13,584,000 | (40,160,000 | ) | |||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits | 8,510,000 | 16,053,000 | ||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in interest-bearing deposits | (11,808,000 | ) | 1,896,000 | |||||
| Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase | (6,999,000 | ) | (300,000 | ) | ||||
| Net increase (decrease) in borrowings | (7,700,000 | ) | 4,700,000 | |||||
| Repayment of long term borrowings | — | (18,000,000 | ) | |||||
| Proceeds from long term borrowings | — | 10,000,000 | ||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs | — | 14,952,000 | ||||||
| Repurchase of preferred stock and warrant | — | (10,108,000 | ) | |||||
| Cash dividends paid on common stock | (886,000 | ) | (1,171,000 | ) | ||||
| Cash dividends paid on preferred stock | (352,000 | ) | (383,000 | ) | ||||
| Payment of discount on dividend reinvestment plan | (8,000 | ) | (15,000 | ) | ||||
| Issuance of common stock | 194,000 | 182,000 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (19,049,000 | ) | 17,806,000 | |||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 7,318,000 | (6,285,000 | ) | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents - beginning | 13,698,000 | 19,983,000 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents - ending | $ | 21,016,000 | $ | 13,698,000 | ||||
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | ||||||||
| Cash paid during the year for interest | $ | 5,390,000 | $ | 7,165,000 | ||||
| Cash paid during the year for income taxes | $ | 1,316,000 | $ | 1,880,000 | ||||
| Transfers from loans to other real estate owned | $ | 2,821,000 | $ | 5,067,000 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements. 41 |
Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of operations and principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Stewardship Financial Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Atlantic Stewardship Bank (“the Bank”), together referred to as “the Corporation”. The Bank includes its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Stewardship Investment Corporation (whose primary business is to own and manage an investment portfolio), Stewardship Realty LLC (whose primary business is to own and manage property at 612 Godwin Avenue, Midland Park, New Jersey), Atlantic Stewardship Insurance Company, LLC (whose primary business is insurance) and several other subsidiaries formed to hold title to properties acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure. The Bank’s subsidiaries have an insignificant impact on the daily operations. All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
The Corporation provides financial services through the Bank’s offices in Bergen, Passaic, and Morris Counties, New Jersey. Its primary deposit products are checking, savings, and term certificate accounts, and its primary lending products are commercial, residential mortgage and installment loans. Substantially all loans are secured by specific items of collateral including business assets, consumer assets, and commercial and residential real estate. Commercial loans are expected to be repaid from cash flow generated from the operations of businesses. There are no significant concentrations of loans to any one industry or customer. The Corporation’s lending activities are concentrated in loans secured by real estate located in northern New Jersey and, therefore, collectability of the loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in real estate market conditions in the northern New Jersey market. The Corporation has not made loans to borrowers outside the United States.
Basis of consolidated financial statements presentation
The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions, based on available information, that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. The allowance for loan losses and fair values of financial instruments are particularly subject to change.
Cash flows
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and deposits with other financial institutions under 90 days and interest-bearing deposits in other banks with original maturities under 90 days. Net cash flows are reported for customer loan and deposit transactions, and short term borrowings and securities sold under agreement to repurchase.
Securities available-for-sale and held to maturity
The Corporation classifies its securities as held to maturity or available-for-sale. Investments in debt securities that the Corporation has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as securities held to maturity and are carried at amortized cost. All other securities are classified as securities available-for-sale. Securities available-for-sale may be sold prior to maturity in response to changes in interest rates or prepayment risk, for asset/liability management purposes, or other similar factors. These securities are carried at fair value with unrealized holding gains or losses reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of the related tax effects.
Interest income includes amortization of purchase premium or discount. Premiums and discounts on securities are amortized on the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments except for mortgage-backed securities where prepayments are anticipated. Gains and losses on sales are recorded on the trade date and determined using the specific identification method.
| 42 |
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. For securities in an unrealized loss position, management considers the extent and duration of the unrealized loss, and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer. Management also assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell, a security in an unrealized loss position before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the entire difference between amortized cost and fair value is recognized as impairment through earnings. For debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, the amount of impairment is split into two components as follows: (1) OTTI related to credit loss, which must be recognized in the income statement and (2) OTTI related to other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. The credit loss is defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis. For equity securities, the entire amount of impairment is recognized through earnings.
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) Stock
The Bank is a member of the FHLB system. Members are required to own a certain amount of FHLB stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors. FHLB stock is carried at cost, classified as a restricted security, and periodically evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recovery of par value. Cash dividends are reported as income.
Mortgage loans held for sale
Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value on an aggregate basis. Mortgage loans held for sale are carried net of deferred fees, which are recognized as income at the time the loans are sold to permanent investors. Gains or losses on the sale of mortgage loans held for sale are recognized at the settlement date and are determined by the difference between the net proceeds and the amortized cost. All loans are sold with loan servicing rights released to the buyer.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of deferred loan fees and costs and an allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments. The recorded investment in loans represents the outstanding principal balance after charge-offs and does not include accrued interest receivable as the inclusion is not significant to the reported amounts.
Interest income on loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days delinquent unless the loan is adequately secured and in process of collection. Past due status is based on the contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or are charged-off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful. Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans.
All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on nonaccrual is reversed against interest income. Interest received on such loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to an accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Allowance for loan losses
The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable incurred credit losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Management estimates the allowance balance required using past loan loss experience, the nature and volume of the portfolio, information about specific borrower situations and estimated collateral values, economic conditions and other factors. Allocations of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, should be charged-off.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired.
| 43 |
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans for which the terms have been modified and for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties are considered troubled debt restructuring and classified as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral-dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans are collectively evaluated for impairment and, accordingly, they are not separately identified for impairment disclosures. Troubled debt restructurings are separately identified for impairment disclosures and are measured at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s effective rate at inception. If a troubled debt restructuring is considered to be a collateral dependent loan, the loan is reported, net, at the fair value of the collateral. For troubled debt restructurings that subsequently default, the Corporation determines the amount of reserve in accordance with the accounting policy for the allowance for loan losses.
The general component of the allowance is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current factors. The historical loss experience is determined for each portfolio segment and class, and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company over the most recent 3 years. For each portfolio segment the Bank prepares a migration analysis which analyzes the historical loss experience. The migration analysis is updated quarterly for the purpose of determining the assigned allocation factors which are essential components of the allowance for loan losses calculation. This actual loss experience is supplemented with other qualitative factors based on the risks present for each portfolio segment or class. These qualitative factors include consideration of the following: levels of and trends in charge-offs; levels of and trends in delinquencies and impaired loans; levels and trends in loan size; levels of real estate concentrations; national and local economic trends and conditions; the depth and experience of lending management and staff; and other changes in lending policies, procedures, and practices.
For purposes of determining the allowance for loan losses, loans in the portfolio are segregated by product type into the following segments: commercial, commercial real estate, construction, residential real estate, consumer and other. The Corporation also sub-divides these segments into classes based on the associated risks within those segments. Commercial loans are divided into the following two classes: secured by real estate and other. Construction loans are divided into the following two classes: commercial and residential. Consumer loans are divided into two classes: secured by real estate and other. The models and assumptions used to determine the allowance require management’s judgment. Assumptions, data and computations are appropriately reviewed and properly documented.
The risk characteristics of each of the identified portfolio segments are as follows:
Commercial – Commercial loans are generally of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value.
Commercial Real Estate – Commercial real estate loans are secured by multi-family and nonresidential real estate and generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than residential real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans depend on the global cash flow analysis of the borrower and the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the value of the underlying property. Of primary concern in commercial real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the cash flow from the property. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject, to a greater extent than residential real estate loans, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. Commercial Real Estate is also subject to adverse market conditions that cause a decrease in market value or lease rates, obsolescence in location or function and market conditions associated with over supply of units in a specific region.
| 44 |
Construction – Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, additional funds may be required to be advanced in excess of the amount originally committed to permit completion of the building. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the value of the building may be insufficient to assure full repayment if liquidation is required. If foreclosure is required on a building before or at completion due to a default, there can be no assurance that all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs will be recovered.
Residential Real Estate – Residential real estate loans are generally made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment income or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable. Repayment of residential real estate loans is subject to adverse employment conditions in the local economy leading to increased default rate and decreased market values from oversupply in a geographic area. In general, residential real estate loans depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, therefore, are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.
Consumer loans – Consumer loans secured by real estate may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans due to a lower lien position. In addition, other consumer loans, particularly loans secured by assets that depreciate rapidly, such as motor vehicles, are subject to greater risk. In all cases, collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and a small remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. Consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability and, therefore, are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.
Generally, when it is probable that some portion or all of a loan balance will not be collected, regardless of portfolio segment, that amount is charged-off as a loss against the allowance for loan losses. On loans secured by real estate, the charge-offs reflect partial writedowns due to the initial valuation of market values of the underlying real estate collateral in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 310-40. Consumer loans are generally charged-off in full when they reach 90 – 120 days past due.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been relinquished. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when the assets have been isolated from the Corporation, the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and the Corporation does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Premises and equipment
Land is stated at cost. Buildings and improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation computed on the straight-line method over the estimated lives of each type of asset. Estimated useful lives are three to forty years for buildings and improvements and three to twenty-five years for furniture, fixtures and equipment. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost less accumulated amortization computed on the straight-line method over the shorter of the term of the lease or useful life.
Long-Term Assets
Premises and equipment and other long-term assets are reviewed for impairment when events indicate their carrying amount may not be recovered from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.
| 45 |
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned (OREO) consists of property acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure and property that is in-substance foreclosed. OREO is initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs. When a property is acquired, the excess of the carrying amount over fair value, if any, is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent adjustments to the carrying value are recorded in an allowance for OREO and charged to OREO expense.
Bank owned life insurance
The Corporation has purchased life insurance policies on certain key officers. Bank owned life insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts due that are probable at settlement.
Treasury Stock
Repurchases of common stock are recorded as treasury stock at cost. Treasury stock is reissued using the first in first out method. Treasury stock may be reissued for exercise of stock options, dividend reinvestment plans, stock dividends or other stock issuances. The difference between the cost and the market value at the time the treasury stock is reissued is shown as an adjustment to common stock.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan
The Corporation offers shareholders the opportunity to participate in a dividend reinvestment plan. Plan participants may reinvest cash dividends to purchase new shares of stock at 95% of the market value, based on the most recent trades. Cash dividends due to the plan participants are utilized to acquire shares from either, or a combination of, the issuance of authorized shares or purchases of shares in the open market through an approved broker. The Corporation reimburses the broker for the 5% discount when the purchase of the Corporation’s stock is completed. The plan is considered to be non-compensatory
Stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation cost is recognized using the fair value method. Compensation cost is recognized for stock options issued based on the fair value of these awards at the date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period.
Income taxes
Income tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are the expected future tax amounts for the temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. A valuation allowance, if needed, reduces deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
A tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. The Corporation recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, and unrealized gains or losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax, which are also recognized as separate components of equity.
| 46 |
Earnings per common share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalents are not included in the calculation.
Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to that of the basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all potential dilutive common shares and common stock warrants were issued.
Loan Commitments and Related Financial Instruments
Financial instruments include off-balance sheet credit instruments, such as commitments to make loans and commercial letters of credit, issued to meet customer financing needs. The face amount for these items represents the exposure to loss, before considering customer collateral or ability to repay. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.
Loss contingencies
Loss contingencies, including claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business, are recorded as liabilities when the likelihood of loss is probable and an amount or range of loss can be reasonably estimated. Management does not believe there are such matters that will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Dividend restriction
Banking regulations require maintaining certain capital levels and may limit the dividends paid by the Bank to the Corporation or by the Corporation to its shareholders. The Corporation's ability to pay cash dividends is based, among other things, on its ability to receive cash from the Bank. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of regulatory agencies. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year's profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years. At December 31, 2012 the Bank could have paid dividends totaling approximately $1.4 million. At December 31, 2012, this restriction did not result in any effective limitation in the manner in which the Corporation is currently operating. Also, please see Note 11 with respect to restrictions on the Corporation’s ability to declare and pay dividends resulting from the terms of the Corporation’s Series B Preferred Shares.
Derivatives
Derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities at fair value. The Corporation’s only derivative consists of an interest rate swap agreement, which is used as part of its asset liability management strategy to help manage interest rate risk related to its subordinated debentures. The Corporation does not use derivatives for trading purposes.
The Corporation designated the interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge, which is a hedge of a forecasted transaction or the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability. For a cash flow hedge, the change in the fair value on the derivative is reported in other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Net cash settlements on this interest rate swap that qualify for hedge accounting are recorded in interest expense. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not highly effective in hedging the changes in fair value or expected cash flows of the hedged item are recognized immediately in current earnings.
The Corporation formally documented the risk-management objective and the strategy for undertaking the hedge transaction at the inception of the hedging relationship. This documentation includes linking the fair value of the cash flow hedge to the subordinated debt on the balance sheet. The Corporation formally assessed, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative instrument used is highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the subordinated debt.
When a cash flow hedge is discontinued but the hedged cash flows or forecasted transactions are still expected to occur, gains or losses that would be accumulated in other comprehensive income are amortized into earnings over the same periods which the hedged transactions will affect earnings.
| 47 |
Fair value of financial instruments
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions, as more fully disclosed in a separate note. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments, and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This ASU represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (together, “the Boards”) on fair value measurement. The collective efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflected in ASU 2011-04, have resulted in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including a consistent meaning of the term “fair value.” The Boards have concluded the common requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments of this ASU are to be applied prospectively. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income”. This ASU provides that an entity that reports items of other comprehensive income has the option to present comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial statements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a significant impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
Note 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS
Prior to July 26, 2012, cash reserves were required to be maintained on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank based on the Bank’s deposits. The average amounts of the reserves on deposit for 2012 through this date as well as for the year ended December 31, 2011 were approximately $25,000. After July 26, 2012 no required reserves were held at the Federal Reserve Bank.
Note 3. SECURITIES - AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE AND HELD TO MATURITY
The fair value of the available-for-sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury | $ | 4,003,000 | $ | 3,000 | $ | — | $ | 4,006,000 | ||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agencies | 37,287,000 | 35,000 | 67,000 | 37,255,000 | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 13,724,000 | 468,000 | 22,000 | 14,170,000 | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities-residential | 104,341,000 | 1,176,000 | 89,000 | 105,428,000 | ||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (a) | 9,874,000 | 22,000 | 12,000 | 9,884,000 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate debt | 492,000 | 3,000 | — | 495,000 | ||||||||||||
| Total debt securities | 169,721,000 | 1,707,000 | 190,000 | 171,238,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other equity investments | 3,425,000 | 37,000 | — | 3,462,000 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 173,146,000 | $ | 1,744,000 | $ | 190,000 | $ | 174,700,000 | |||||||||
| 48 |
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury | $ | 4,027,000 | $ | 23,000 | $ | — | $ | 4,050,000 | ||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agencies: | 20,702,000 | 46,000 | 4,000 | 20,744,000 | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 8,866,000 | 461,000 | 9,000 | 9,318,000 | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities-residential | 130,912,000 | 2,583,000 | 28,000 | 133,467,000 | ||||||||||||
| Total debt securities | 164,507,000 | 3,113,000 | 41,000 | 167,579,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other equity investments | 3,287,000 | 59,000 | — | 3,346,000 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 167,794,000 | $ | 3,172,000 | $ | 41,000 | $ | 170,925,000 | |||||||||
| (a) | Collateralized by student loans |
Cash proceeds realized from sales and calls of securities available-for-sale for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $102,300,000 and $46,245,000, respectively. There were gross gains totaling $2,290,000 and gross losses totaling $8,000 realized on sales or calls during the year ended December 31, 2012. The tax provision related to these realized gains was $892,000. There were gross gains totaling $1,157,000 and gross losses totaling $1,000 realized on sales or calls during the year ended December 31, 2011. The tax provision related to these realized gains was $455,000.
The fair value of available-for-sale securities pledged to secure public deposits for the year ending December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1,246,000 and $1,440,000, respectively. See also Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements regarding securities pledged as collateral for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
The following is a summary of the held to maturity securities and related unrecognized gains and losses:
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrecognized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 260,000 | $ | 46,000 | $ | — | $ | 306,000 | ||||||||
| Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 22,787,000 | 1,407,000 | — | 24,194,000 | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities-residential | 6,671,000 | 597,000 | — | 7,268,000 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 29,718,000 | $ | 2,050,000 | $ | — | $ | 31,768,000 | |||||||||
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Gross Unrecognized | Fair | ||||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
| U.S. government-sponsored agencies | $ | 2,770,000 | $ | 80,000 | $ | — | $ | 2,850,000 | ||||||||
| Obligations of state and political subdivisions | 24,575,000 | 1,705,000 | — | 26,280,000 | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities-residential | 11,009,000 | 845,000 | — | 11,854,000 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 38,354,000 | $ | 2,630,000 | $ | — | $ | 40,984,000 | |||||||||
Cash proceeds realized from sales and calls of securities held to maturity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $4,418,000 and $1,895,000, respectively. There were gross gains totaling $58,000 and no gross losses realized from sales and calls for the year ended December 31, 2012. The tax provision related to these realized gains was $22,000. There were gross gains totaling $5,000 and no gross losses realized from calls for the year ended December 31, 2011. The tax provision related to these realized gains was $2,000.
See also Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements regarding securities pledged as collateral for Federal Home Loan Bank of New York advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
| 49 |
Issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. This might cause actual maturities to differ from the contractual maturities.
Mortgage-backed securities are comprised primarily of government agencies such as the Government National Mortgage Association and government sponsored agencies such as the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA"), the Federal Home Loan Banks and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. At year end 2012 and 2011, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer other than the U.S. government and its agencies in an amount greater than 10% of shareholders' equity.
The following tables summarize the fair value and unrealized losses in the available-for-sale securities portfolio of those investment securities which reported an unrealized loss at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and if the unrealized loss position was continuous for the twelve months prior to December 31, 2012 and 2011. There were no investment securities in the held to maturity portfolio which reported an unrealized loss at December 31, 2012 or 2011.
Available-for-Sale
| 2012 | Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
| Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
| U.S. government- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| sponsored agencies | 20,716,000 | (67,000 | ) | — | — | 20,716,000 | (67,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Obligations of state and political | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| subdivisions | 3,257,000 | (22,000 | ) | — | — | 3,257,000 | (22,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities-residential | 23,715,000 | (89,000 | ) | — | — | 23,715,000 | (89,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities | 3,047,000 | (12,000 | ) | — | — | 3,047,000 | (12,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Corporate debt | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other equity investments | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total temporarily impaired securities | $ | 50,735,000 | $ | (190,000 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 50,735,000 | $ | (190,000 | ) | ||||||||||
| 2011 | Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
| Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
| U.S. government- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| sponsored agencies | 1,993,000 | (4,000 | ) | — | — | 1,993,000 | (4,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Obligations of state and political | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| subdivisions | 1,335,000 | (9,000 | ) | — | — | 1,335,000 | (9,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities-residential | 10,637,000 | (28,000 | ) | — | — | 10,637,000 | (28,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Other equity investments | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total temporarily impaired securities | $ | 13,965,000 | $ | (41,000 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 13,965,000 | $ | (41,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
At December 31, 2012, there were no securities in a continuous loss position for 12 months or longer. The Corporation’s unrealized losses are primarily due to market conditions. These securities have not been considered other than temporarily impaired as scheduled principal and interest payments have been made and management anticipates collecting the entire principal balance as scheduled. Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in market conditions, and not credit quality, and because the Corporation does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, the Corporation does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2012.
| 50 |
Note 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, the loan portfolio consisted of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 58,160,000 | $ | 60,650,000 | ||||
| Other | 31,254,000 | 41,850,000 | ||||||
| Commercial real estate | 242,763,000 | 246,549,000 | ||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||
| Commercial | 9,324,000 | 12,913,000 | ||||||
| Residential | — | 252,000 | ||||||
| Residential real estate | 67,200,000 | 54,694,000 | ||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 30,982,000 | 38,278,000 | ||||||
| Other | 624,000 | 1,086,000 | ||||||
| Other | 116,000 | 141,000 | ||||||
| Total gross loans | 440,423,000 | 456,413,000 | ||||||
| Less: Deferred loan (fees) costs, net | (50,000 | ) | 6,000 | |||||
| Allowance for loan losses | 10,641,000 | 11,604,000 | ||||||
| 10,591,000 | 11,610,000 | |||||||
| Loans, net | $ | 429,832,000 | $ | 444,803,000 | ||||
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, loans participated by the Corporation to other organizations totaled approximately $20,559,000 and $31,060,000, respectively. These amounts are not included in the totals presented above.
The Corporation has entered into lending transactions with directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of the Corporation and their affiliates. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, these loans aggregated approximately $2,927,000 and $2,905,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2012, new loans totaling $1,228,000 were granted and repayments totaled approximately $1,206,000. The loans, at December 31, 2012, were current as to principal and interest payments.
Activity in the allowance for loan losses is summarized as follows:
| For the year ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance beginning of period | Provision charged to operations | Loans charged-off | Recoveries of loans charged-off | Balance end of period | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | 5,368,000 | $ | 6,368,000 | $ | (7,144,000 | ) | $ | 240,000 | $ | 4,832,000 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 4,943,000 | 3,570,000 | (3,577,000 | ) | — | 4,936,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Construction | 480,000 | 78,000 | (394,000 | ) | 5,000 | 169,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 303,000 | 25,000 | (21,000 | ) | 1,000 | 308,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 498,000 | (79,000 | ) | (69,000 | ) | 2,000 | 352,000 | |||||||||||||
| Other | 2,000 | 2,000 | (5,000 | ) | 4,000 | 3,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Unallocated | 10,000 | 31,000 | — | — | 41,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, ending | $ | 11,604,000 | $ | 9,995,000 | $ | (11,210,000 | ) | $ | 252,000 | $ | 10,641,000 | |||||||||
| 51 |
| For the year ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance beginning of period | Provision charged to operations | Loans charged-off | Recoveries of loans charged-off | Balance end of period | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | $ | 3,745,000 | $ | 6,197,000 | $ | (4,603,000 | ) | $ | 29,000 | $ | 5,368,000 | |||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 3,112,000 | 3,742,000 | (1,911,000 | ) | — | 4,943,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Construction | 930,000 | 386,000 | (839,000 | ) | 3,000 | 480,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 184,000 | 231,000 | (112,000 | ) | — | 303,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Consumer | 510,000 | 281,000 | (296,000 | ) | 3,000 | 498,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | 2,000 | 5,000 | (8,000 | ) | 3,000 | 2,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Unallocated | 7,000 | 3,000 | — | — | 10,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, ending | $ | 8,490,000 | $ | 10,845,000 | $ | (7,769,000 | ) | $ | 38,000 | $ | 11,604,000 | |||||||||
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on the impairment method as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | Commercial
Real Estate | Construction | Residential
Real Estate | Consumer | Other | Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending Allowance balance attributable to loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 251,000 | $ | 15,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 266,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Collectively evaluated for impairment | 4,581,000 | 4,921,000 | 169,000 | 308,000 | 352,000 | 3,000 | 41,000 | 10,375,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending allowance balance | $ | 4,832,000 | $ | 4,936,000 | $ | 169,000 | $ | 308,000 | $ | 352,000 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 41,000 | $ | 10,641,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 8,641,000 | $ | 12,803,000 | $ | 6,029,000 | $ | 413,000 | $ | 800,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 28,686,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans collectively evaluated for impairment | 80,773,000 | 229,960,000 | 3,295,000 | 66,787,000 | 30,806,000 | 116,000 | — | 411,737,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending Loan balance | $ | 89,414,000 | $ | 242,763,000 | $ | 9,324,000 | $ | 67,200,000 | $ | 31,606,000 | $ | 116,000 | $ | — | $ | 440,423,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| 52 |
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | Commercial Real Estate | Construction | Residential Real Estate | Consumer | Other Loans | Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ending Allowance balance attributable to loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 1,908,000 | $ | 947,000 | $ | 266,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,121,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Collectively evaluated for impairment | 3,460,000 | 3,996,000 | 214,000 | 303,000 | 498,000 | 2,000 | 10,000 | 8,483,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending allowance balance | $ | 5,368,000 | $ | 4,943,000 | $ | 480,000 | $ | 303,000 | $ | 498,000 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 11,604,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans individually evaluated for impairment | $ | 10,265,000 | $ | 13,128,000 | $ | 8,653,000 | $ | 779,000 | $ | 891,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 33,716,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Loans collectively evaluated for impairment | 92,235,000 | 233,421,000 | 4,512,000 | 53,915,000 | 38,473,000 | 141,000 | — | 422,697,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total ending Loan balance | $ | 102,500,000 | $ | 246,549,000 | $ | 13,165,000 | $ | 54,694,000 | $ | 39,364,000 | $ | 141,000 | $ | — | $ | 456,413,000 | ||||||||||||||||
The following table presents the recorded investment in nonaccrual loans at the dates indicated:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 3,374,000 | $ | 6,178,000 | ||||
| Other | 261,000 | 2,494,000 | ||||||
| Commercial real estate | 10,083,000 | 9,302,000 | ||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||
| Commercial | 3,080,000 | 7,840,000 | ||||||
| Residential | — | 252,000 | ||||||
| Residential real estate | 413,000 | 779,000 | ||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 800,000 | 891,000 | ||||||
| Other | — | — | ||||||
| Other | — | — | ||||||
| Total nonaccrual loans | $ | 18,011,000 | $ | 27,736,000 | ||||
At December 31, 2012 there was one Commercial – Secured by real estate loan for $237,000 that was past due 90 days and still accruing. This loan is in the process of collection and adequately collateralized. Management believes all interest and principal owed will be collected. There were no loans past due 90 days and still accruing at December 31, 2011.
| 53 |
The following presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans as of the periods indicated:
| At and for the year ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unpaid Principal Balance | Recorded Investment | Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated | Average Recorded Investment | Interest Income Recognized | ||||||||||||||||
| With no related allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 9,689,000 | $ | 6,557,000 | $ | 4,221,000 | $ | 92,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 424,000 | 146,000 | 109,000 | 5,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 17,211,000 | 12,149,000 | 10,054,000 | 158,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 7,300,000 | 6,029,000 | 6,041,000 | 53,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 451,000 | 413,000 | 393,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 834,000 | 800,000 | 922,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| With an allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 965,000 | 781,000 | $ | 176,000 | 2,589,000 | 25,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | 1,163,000 | 1,157,000 | 75,000 | 2,195,000 | 43,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 923,000 | 654,000 | 15,000 | 2,940,000 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | — | — | — | 1,224,000 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | — | 596,000 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | — | — | — | 239,000 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans | $ | 38,960,000 | $ | 28,686,000 | $ | 266,000 | $ | 31,523,000 | $ | 394,000 | ||||||||||
During the year ended December 31, 2012, no interest income was recognized on a cash basis.
| 54 |
| At and for the year ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unpaid Principal Balance | Recorded Investment | Allowance for Loan Losses Allocated | Average Recorded Investment | Interest Income Recognized | ||||||||||||||||
| With no related allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 3,306,000 | $ | 2,831,000 | $ | 2,260,000 | $ | 22,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | 396,000 | 23,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 10,691,000 | 8,523,000 | 7,110,000 | 52,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 8,453,000 | 7,609,000 | 2,888,000 | 26,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | 219,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 866,000 | 779,000 | 404,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 911,000 | 891,000 | 811,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| With an allowance recorded: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 7,287,000 | 4,590,000 | $ | 468,000 | 4,788,000 | 34,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | 2,876,000 | 2,844,000 | 1,440,000 | 1,822,000 | 5,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 4,747,000 | 4,605,000 | 947,000 | 5,962,000 | 63,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 1,085,000 | 792,000 | 264,000 | 643,000 | 12,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Residential | 273,000 | 252,000 | 2,000 | 50,000 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | — | — | — | 537,000 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | — | — | — | 31,000 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans | $ | 40,495,000 | $ | 33,716,000 | $ | 3,121,000 | $ | 27,921,000 | $ | 237,000 | ||||||||||
| 55 |
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Nonaccrual loans are included in the disclosure by payment status:
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30-59 Days Past Due | 60-89 Days
Past Due | Greater than 90 Days Past Due | Total Past Due | Loans Not
Past Due | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 101,000 | $ | 179,000 | $ | 2,674,000 | $ | 2,954,000 | $ | 55,206,000 | $ | 58,160,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 25,000 | 98,000 | 52,000 | 175,000 | 31,079,000 | 31,254,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 2,582,000 | — | 9,023,000 | 11,605,000 | 231,158,000 | 242,763,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | — | 460,000 | 815,000 | 1,275,000 | 8,049,000 | 9,324,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 161,000 | — | 413,000 | 574,000 | 66,626,000 | 67,200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 67,000 | — | 647,000 | 714,000 | 30,268,000 | 30,982,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | 624,000 | 624,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | 116,000 | 116,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,936,000 | $ | 737,000 | $ | 13,624,000 | $ | 17,297,000 | $ | 423,126,000 | $ | 440,423,000 | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30-59 Days Past Due | 60-89 Days Past Due | Greater than 90 Days Past Due | Total Past Due | Loans Not Past Due | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 875,000 | $ | 546,000 | $ | 3,977,000 | $ | 5,398,000 | $ | 55,252,000 | $ | 60,650,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 53,000 | 260,000 | 1,752,000 | 2,065,000 | 39,785,000 | 41,850,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | — | 736,000 | 5,352,000 | 6,088,000 | 240,461,000 | 246,549,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | — | 561,000 | 2,640,000 | 3,201,000 | 9,712,000 | 12,913,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | 252,000 | 252,000 | — | 252,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | — | — | 779,000 | 779,000 | 53,915,000 | 54,694,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 581,000 | — | 719,000 | 1,300,000 | 36,978,000 | 38,278,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other | 4,000 | — | — | 4,000 | 1,082,000 | 1,086,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | 141,000 | 141,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 1,513,000 | $ | 2,103,000 | $ | 15,471,000 | $ | 19,087,000 | $ | 437,326,000 | $ | 456,413,000 | ||||||||||||
Troubled Debt Restructurings
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Corporation had $11.7 million and $15.1 million, respectively, of loans whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings. Of these loans, $10.4 million and $6.0 million were performing in accordance with their new terms at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The remaining troubled debt restructurings are reported as nonaccrual loans. Specific reserves of $246,000 and $1.2 million have been allocated for the troubled debt restructurings at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Corporation had committed $241,000 and $416,000, respectively, of additional funds to a single customer with an outstanding construction loan that is classified as a troubled debt restructuring.
| 56 |
During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the terms of certain loans were modified as troubled debt restructurings. The modification of the terms of such loans primarily represents an extension of the maturity date at terms more favorable than the current market terms for new debt with similar risk, including a lower interest rate. Many of the modifications represent the term out of previous lines of credit that were not renewed. Modifications involving an extension of the maturity date were for periods ranging from 3 months to 15 years.
The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:
| December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Loans | Pre- Modification Recorded Investment | Post- Modification Recorded Investment | Number of Loans | Pre- Modification Recorded Investment | Post- Modification Recorded Investment | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 9 | $ | 1,875,000 | $ | 1,875,000 | 15 | $ | 3,002,000 | $ | 3,002,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Other | 7 | 3,735,000 | 3,735,000 | 11 | 678,000 | 678,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 1 | 755,000 | 755,000 | 3 | 2,864,000 | 2,864,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 1 | 300,000 | 300,000 | 7 | 5,961,000 | 5,961,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 18 | $ | 6,655,000 | $ | 6,655,000 | 36 | $ | 12,505,000 | $ | 12,505,000 | ||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012, the troubled debt restructurings described above increased the allowance for loan losses by $2.4 million. There were $3.3 million of charge-offs in 2012 related to these troubled debt restructurings. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the troubled debt restructurings described above increased the allowance for loan losses by $1.6 million. There were $1.1 million of charge-offs in 2011 related to these troubled debt restructurings.
A loan is considered to be in payment default once it is contractually 90 days past due under the modified terms. There are no troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification.
In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the Corporation’s internal underwriting policy.
Credit Quality Indicators
The Corporation categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Corporation analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial, commercial real estate and commercial construction loans. This analysis is performed at the time the loan is originated and annually thereafter. The Corporation uses the following definitions for risk ratings.
| 57 |
| Special Mention – A Special Mention asset has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention, which, if left uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or the Bank’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the Bank to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. |
| Substandard – Substandard loans are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the repayment and liquidation of the debt. These loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. |
| Doubtful – A Doubtful loan with all weaknesses inherent in those classified as Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable or improbable. The likelihood of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific factors, an estimated loss is deferred until a more exact status can be determined. |
| Loss – A loan classified Loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance as an asset is not warranted. This classification does not necessarily mean that an asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off a basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future. |
Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and based on the most recent analysis performed at those times, the risk category of loans by class is as follows:
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pass | Special Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 47,524,000 | $ | 7,368,000 | $ | 3,268,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 58,160,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 29,484,000 | 1,508,000 | 185,000 | 77,000 | — | 31,254,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 215,158,000 | 16,003,000 | 9,007,000 | 2,595,000 | — | 242,763,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 3,294,000 | 2,950,000 | 3,080,000 | — | — | 9,324,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 295,460,000 | $ | 27,829,000 | $ | 15,540,000 | $ | 2,672,000 | $ | — | $ | 341,501,000 | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pass | Special Mention | Substandard | Doubtful | Loss | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 52,004,000 | $ | 3,234,000 | $ | 5,248,000 | $ | 164,000 | $ | — | $ | 60,650,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 38,790,000 | 566,000 | 617,000 | 1,877,000 | — | 41,850,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 233,295,000 | 3,512,000 | 7,333,000 | 2,409,000 | — | 246,549,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 4,512,000 | 1,656,000 | 6,745,000 | — | — | 12,913,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | 252,000 | — | — | 252,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 328,601,000 | $ | 8,968,000 | $ | 20,195,000 | $ | 4,450,000 | $ | — | $ | 362,214,000 | ||||||||||||
| 58 |
The Corporation considers the performance of the loan portfolio and its impact on the allowance for loan losses. For residential real estate and consumer loan segments, the Corporation evaluates credit quality based on payment activity. The following table presents the recorded investment in residential real estate and consumer loans based on payment activity as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Current | Past Due and Nonaccrual | Total | ||||||||||
| Residential real estate | $ | 66,626,000 | $ | 574,000 | $ | 67,200,000 | ||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 30,268,000 | 714,000 | 30,982,000 | |||||||||
| Other | 624,000 | — | 624,000 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 97,518,000 | $ | 1,288,000 | $ | 98,806,000 | ||||||
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Current | Past Due and Nonaccrual | Total | ||||||||||
| Residential real estate | $ | 53,915,000 | $ | 779,000 | $ | 54,694,000 | ||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 36,978,000 | 1,300,000 | 38,278,000 | |||||||||
| Other | 1,082,000 | 4,000 | 1,086,000 | |||||||||
| Total | $ | 91,975,000 | $ | 2,083,000 | $ | 94,058,000 | ||||||
Note 5. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT, NET
The balance of premises and equipment consists of the following at December 31, 2012 and 2011:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Land | $ | 2,999,000 | $ | 2,999,000 | ||||
| Buildings and improvements | 2,883,000 | 2,936,000 | ||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 2,244,000 | 2,244,000 | ||||||
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 3,034,000 | 3,219,000 | ||||||
| 11,160,000 | 11,398,000 | |||||||
| Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | 5,515,000 | 5,297,000 | ||||||
| Total premises & equipment, net | $ | 5,645,000 | $ | 6,101,000 | ||||
Amounts charged to net occupancy expense for depreciation and amortization of banking premises and equipment amounted to $532,000 and $594,000 in 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Note 6. OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED
The balance of other real estate owned consists of the following at December 31, 2012 and 2011:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Acquired by foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure | $ | 1,058,000 | $ | 3,873,000 | ||||
| In-substance foreclosure | — | 1,453,000 | ||||||
| Allowance for losses on other real estate owned | — | (38,000 | ) | |||||
| Other real estate owned, net | $ | 1,058,000 | $ | 5,288,000 | ||||
| 59 |
Activity in the allowance for losses on other real estate owned was as follows:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Beginning of year | $ | 38,000 | $ | — | ||||
| Additions charged to expense | 188,000 | 38,000 | ||||||
| Reductions from sales of other real estate owned | (226,000 | ) | — | |||||
| End of year | $ | — | $ | 38,000 | ||||
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned totaled $429,000 and $10,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Expenses related to other real estate owned include:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Provision for unrealized losses | $ | 188,000 | $ | 38,000 | ||||
| Operating expenses, net of rental income | 415,000 | 57,000 | ||||||
| $ | 603,000 | $ | 95,000 | |||||
Note 7. DEPOSITS
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Noninterest-bearing demand | $ | 124,286,000 | $ | 115,776,000 | ||||
| Interest-bearing checking accounts | 177,516,000 | 175,514,000 | ||||||
| Money market accounts | 63,955,000 | 73,544,000 | ||||||
| Total interest-bearing demand | 241,471,000 | 249,058,000 | ||||||
| Statement savings and clubs | 60,478,000 | 51,769,000 | ||||||
| Business savings | 7,860,000 | 6,198,000 | ||||||
| Total savings | 68,338,000 | 57,967,000 | ||||||
| IRA investment and variable rate savings | 35,058,000 | 38,257,000 | ||||||
| Money market certificates | 121,101,000 | 132,494,000 | ||||||
| Total certificates of deposit | 156,159,000 | 170,751,000 | ||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits | 465,968,000 | 477,776,000 | ||||||
| Total deposits | $ | 590,254,000 | $ | 593,552,000 | ||||
Certificates of deposit with balances of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2012 and 2011, totaled $94,883,000 and $102,348,000, respectively.
| 60 |
The scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit were as follows:
| December 31, | ||||
| 2013 | $ | 89,470,000 | ||
| 2014 | 45,159,000 | |||
| 2015 | 9,625,000 | |||
| 2016 | 8,858,000 | |||
| 2017 | 3,047,000 | |||
| $ | 156,159,000 | |||
Note 8. BORROWINGS
Federal Home Loan Bank of New York Advances
The following table presents Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLB-NY") advances by maturity date:
| December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||
| Advances maturing | Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | ||||||||||||
| Within one year | $ | — | — | % | $ | 7,700,000 | 1.30 | % | ||||||||
| After one year, but within two years | — | — | % | — | — | % | ||||||||||
| After two years, but within three years | — | — | % | 5,000,000 | 1.72 | % | ||||||||||
| After three years, but within four years | 10,000,000 | 1.64 | % | — | — | % | ||||||||||
| After four years, but within five years | 5,000,000 | 1.16 | % | 10,000,000 | 1.64 | % | ||||||||||
| After five years | 10,000,000 | 1.85 | % | 10,000,000 | 1.85 | % | ||||||||||
| $ | 25,000,000 | 1.63 | % | $ | 32,700,000 | 1.64 | % | |||||||||
During the fiscal years 2012 and 2011, the maximum amount of FHLB-NY advances outstanding at any month end was $36.8 million and $36.0 million, respectively. The average amount of advances outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $26.9 million and $33.3 million, respectively.
On September 21, 2012 the Corporation refinanced borrowings with the FHLB in the amount of $5 million. The FHLB amount that was repaid had a rate of 1.72% and a remaining average life of 1.9 years. The new borrowing has a stated rate of 1.16% and an average life of 5.0 years. In connection with the repayment, the Corporation incurred a prepayment premium of $135,000 which is being amortized into earnings over the life of the new borrowings resulting in an effective interest rate for the borrowings of 1.70%.
On August 19, 2011 the Corporation refinanced borrowings with the FHLB in the amount of $15.0 million. The FHLB advances repaid had a blended rate of 3.30% and an average life of 1.8 years. The new borrowings have a blended stated rate of 1.67% and an average life of 4.0 years. In connection with the repayment, the Corporation incurred a prepayment penalty of $814,000. The prepayment penalty is being amortized into earnings over the life of the new borrowings resulting in an effective interest rate for the borrowings of 2.75%. In addition, on December 14, 2011 the Corporation prepaid a borrowing with the FHLB in the amount of $5 million. This advance had a rate of 1.85% and a remaining life of 3.2 years. This transaction resulted in a prepayment penalty of $268,000 which was fully expensed in 2011 and is included in miscellaneous expense on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
At December 31, 2012, FHLB advances totaling $10.0 million had a quarterly call feature which has reached its first call date.
Advances from the FHLB-NY are all fixed rate borrowings and are secured by a blanket assignment of the Corporation's unpledged, qualifying mortgage loans and by mortgage-backed securities or investment securities. The loans remain under the control of the Corporation. Securities are maintained in safekeeping with the FHLB-NY. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the advances were collateralized by $55.2 million and $37.7 million, respectively, of first mortgage loans under the blanket lien arrangement. Additionally, the advances were collateralized by $5.3 million and $14.3 million of investment securities as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Based on the collateral the Corporation was eligible to borrow up to a total of $60.5 million at December 31, 2012 and $52.0 million at December 31, 2011.
| 61 |
The Corporation has the ability to borrow overnight with the FHLB-NY. There were no overnight borrowings with the FHLB-NY at December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2011 there was $4.7 million in overnight borrowings with the FHLB-NY. The overall borrowing capacity is contingent on available collateral to secure borrowings and the ability to purchase additional activity-based capital stock of the FHLB-NY.
The Corporation may also borrow from the Discount Window of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York based on the market value of collateral pledged. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the borrowing capacity at the Discount Window was $5.1 million. In addition, the Corporation had available overnight variable repricing lines of credit with other correspondent banks totaling $11 million on an unsecured basis. There were no borrowings under these lines of credit at December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent financing arrangements.
Included in the balance of securities sold under agreements to repurchase is a wholesale repurchase agreement with a broker with a maturity in 2014. The borrowing has a fixed interest rate of 3.25% for the first year and then converted to a floating rate at 9.00% minus 3-month LIBOR measured on a quarterly basis with a 5.15% cap and a 0.0% floor. This repurchase agreement is collateralized by agency securities maintained in safekeeping with the broker. On September 25, 2012 the Corporation repaid $7 million of the original $14 million wholesale repurchase agreement. In connection with the repayment, the Corporation incurred a prepayment premium of $691,000 which is included in noninterest expenses.
The remaining balances at December 31, 2012 as well as the balances at December 31, 2011 were securities sold to Bank customers at fixed rates with maturities varying from 6 months to one year. These securities were maintained in a separate safekeeping account within the Corporation's control.
At December 31, 2012 and 2011, securities sold under agreements to repurchase were collateralized by U.S. Treasury and U.S. government-sponsored agency securities having a carrying value of approximately $11,002,000 and $19,269,000, respectively.
Information concerning securities sold under agreements to repurchase is summarized as follows:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Balance | $ | 7,343,000 | $ | 14,342,000 | ||||
| Weighted average interest rate at year end | 4.92 | % | 5.04 | % | ||||
| Maximum amount outstanding at any month end | ||||||||
| during the year | $ | 14,342,000 | $ | 16,993,000 | ||||
| Average amount outstanding during the year | $ | 12,468,000 | $ | 15,246,000 | ||||
| Average interest rate during the year | 5.10 | % | 4.82 | % | ||||
Note 9. SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
In 2003, the Corporation formed Stewardship Statutory Trust I (the “Trust”), a statutory business trust, which on September 17, 2003 issued $7.0 million Fixed/Floating Rate Capital Securities (“Capital Securities”). The Trust used the proceeds to purchase from the Corporation, $7,217,000 of Fixed/Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (“Debentures”) maturing September 17, 2033. The Trust is obligated to distribute all proceeds of a redemption whether voluntary or upon maturity, to holders of the Capital Securities. The Corporation’s obligation with respect to the Capital Securities, and the Debentures, when taken together, provide a full and unconditional guarantee on a subordinated basis by the Corporation of the Trust’s obligations to pay amounts when due on the Capital Securities. The Corporation is not considered the primary beneficiary of this Trust (variable interest entity); therefore the trust is not consolidated in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as a liability.
| 62 |
Prior to September 17, 2008, the Capital Securities and the Debentures both had a fixed interest rate of 6.75%. Beginning September 17, 2008, the rate floats quarterly at a rate of three month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.95%. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the rate on both the Capital Securities and the Debentures was 3.26% and 3.51%, respectively. The Corporation has the right to defer payments of interest on the subordinated debentures by extending the interest payment period for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods.
The subordinated debentures may be included in Tier I capital (with certain limitations applicable) under current regulatory guidelines and interpretations.
Note 10. REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System require bank holding companies to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. Under the regulations in effect at December 31, 2012, the Corporation was required to maintain (i) a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total adjusted assets of 4.0% and (ii) minimum ratios of Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively. The Bank must comply with substantially similar capital regulations promulgated by the FDIC.
Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.
At year end 2012 and 2011, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events that have occurred since that notification that management believes would change the Bank's category.
| 63 |
Management believes that, as of December 31, 2012, the Bank and the Corporation have met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. The following is a summary of the Corporation's and the Bank's actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 compared to the minimum capital adequacy requirements and the requirements for classification as a well-capitalized institution under the prompt corrective action regulations:
| Actual | Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes | To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Regulations | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leverage (Tier 1) capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | $ | 62,887,000 | 9.09 | % | $ | 27,682,000 | 4.00 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
| Bank | 61,558,000 | 8.91 | % | 27,625,000 | 4.00 | % | $ | 34,531,000 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | 62,887,000 | 13.63 | % | 18,459,000 | 4.00 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
| Bank | 61,558,000 | 13.35 | % | 18,440,000 | 4.00 | % | 27,660,000 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | 68,715,000 | 14.89 | % | 36,917,000 | 8.00 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
| Bank | 67,380,000 | 14.62 | % | 36,880,000 | 8.00 | % | 46,100,000 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leverage (Tier 1) capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | $ | 63,418,000 | 8.86 | % | $ | 28,634,000 | 4.00 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
| Bank | 61,193,000 | 8.57 | % | 28,546,000 | 4.00 | % | $ | 35,683,000 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Risk-based capital: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | 63,418,000 | 12.65 | % | 20,051,000 | 4.00 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
| Bank | 61,193,000 | 12.22 | % | 20,023,000 | 4.00 | % | 30,034,000 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated | 69,750,000 | 13.91 | % | 40,103,000 | 8.00 | % | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
| Bank | 67,516,000 | 13.49 | % | 40,046,000 | 8.00 | % | 50,057,000 | 10.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
In February, 2013 the Bank agreed with its regulators to maintain a minimum Leverage (Tier 1) capital ratio of at least 8% and a minimum Total Risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%. As presented above, at December 31, 2012, the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios exceeded the established minimum capital requirements.
Note 11. PREFERRED STOCK
In connection with the Corporation’s participation in the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Small Business Lending Fund program (“SBLF”), a $30 billion fund established under the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 that encourages lending to small businesses by providing capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion, on September 1, 2011, the Corporation issued 15,000 shares of Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Shares”) to the Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $15 million, in cash.
Using the proceeds of the issuance of the Series B Preferred Shares, the Corporation simultaneously repurchased all 10,000 shares of its Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, having a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Series A Preferred Shares”) previously issued under the Treasury’s Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”) Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”) for an aggregate purchase price of $10,022,222, in cash, including accrued but unpaid dividends through the date of repurchase.
| 64 |
The terms of the newly-established Series B Preferred Shares provide for a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and impose restrictions on the Corporation’s ability to declare or pay dividends or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire for consideration, shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock and any class or series of stock of the Corporation the terms of which do not expressly provide that such class or series will rank senior or junior to the Series B Preferred Shares as to dividend rights and/or rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation. Specifically, the terms provide for the payment of a non-cumulative quarterly dividend, payable in arrears, which the Corporation accrues as earned over the period that the Series B Preferred Shares are outstanding. The dividend rate can fluctuate on a quarterly basis during the first ten quarters during which the Series B Preferred Shares are outstanding, based upon changes in the level of Qualified Small Business Lending (“QSBL” as defined in the Securities Purchase Agreement) from 1% to 5% per annum and, thereafter, for the eleventh through the first half of the nineteenth dividend periods, from 1% to 7%. In general, the dividend rate decreases as the level of the Bank’s QSBL increases. In the event that the Series B Preferred Shares remain outstanding for more than four and one half years, the dividend rate will be fixed at 9%. Based upon the Bank’s level of QSBL over a baseline level, the dividend rate for the initial dividend period was 1%. During 2012, the dividend rate ranged between 1% and 3.39%. Such dividends are not cumulative but the Corporation may only declare and pay dividends on its Common Stock (or any other equity securities junior to the Series B Preferred Stock) if it has declared and paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Shares for the current dividend period and, if, after payment of such dividend, the dollar amount of the Corporation’s Tier 1 Capital would be at least 90% of the Tier 1 Capital on the date of entering into the SBLF program, excluding any subsequent net charge-offs and any redemption of the Series B Preferred Shares (the “Tier 1 Dividend Threshold”). The Tier 1 Dividend Threshold is subject to reduction, beginning on the second anniversary of the issuance and ending on the tenth anniversary, by 10% for each 1% increase in QSBL over the baseline level.
In addition, the Series B Preferred Shares are non-voting except in limited circumstances. In the event that the Corporation has not timely declared and paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Shares for six dividend periods or more, whether or not consecutive, and shares of Series B Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation preference of at least $25,000,000 are still outstanding, the Treasury may designate two additional directors to be elected to the Corporation’s Board of Directors. Subject to the approval of the Bank’s federal banking regulator, the Federal Reserve, the Corporation may redeem the Series B Preferred Shares at any time at the Corporation’s option, at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference per share plus the per share amount of any unpaid dividends for the then-current period through the date of the redemption. The Series B Preferred Shares are includable in Tier I capital for regulatory capital.
On October 26, 2011, the Corporation completed the repurchase of a warrant held by the United States Treasury Department. The 10-year warrant was issued on January 29, 2009 as part of the Corporation's participation in the TARP CPP, and entitled the Treasury to purchase 133,475 shares of Stewardship Financial Corporation stock at an exercise price of $11.24 per share. The Corporation paid a total of $107,398 to the Treasury to repurchase the warrant.
Note 12. BENEFIT PLANS
The Corporation has a noncontributory profit sharing plan covering all eligible employees. Contributions are determined by the Corporation’s Board of Directors on an annual basis. There was no profit sharing plan expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 or 2011.
The Corporation also has a 401(k) plan which covers all eligible employees. Participants may elect to contribute up to 100% of their salaries, not to exceed the applicable limitations as per the Internal Revenue Code. The Corporation, on an annual basis, may elect to match 50% of the participant’s first 5% contribution. Total 401(k) expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 amounted to approximately $145,000 and $136,000, respectively.
During 1996, the Corporation adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan which allows all eligible employees to authorize a specific payroll deduction from his or her base compensation for the purchase of the Corporation’s Common Stock. Total stock purchases amounted to 7,589 and 8,824 shares during 2012 and 2011, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the Corporation had 194,519 shares reserved for issuance under this plan.
Note 13. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
At December 31, 2012, the Corporation had various types of stock award programs.
| 65 |
Director Stock Plan
The Director Stock Plan permits members of the Board of Directors of the Bank to receive any monthly Board of Directors’ fees in shares of the Corporation’s common stock, rather than in cash. Shares are purchased for directors in the open market and resulted in purchases of 5,591 and 3,715 shares for 2012 and 2011, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the Corporation had 540,316 shares authorized but unissued for this plan.
Employee Stock Option Plan
The Employee Stock Option Plan provided for options to purchase shares of common stock to be issued to employees of the Corporation at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. There were no options granted during 2012 or 2011. While there are still options outstanding under this plan, the plan does not allow for additional grants after May 2006. Under the plan, the exercise price of options may be paid in cash or with shares already owned. There were no options exercised during 2012 or 2011. A summary of the status of the qualified stock options as of December 31, 2012 and changes during the year then ended is presented as follows:
| 2012 | ||||||||
| Weighted | ||||||||
| Average | ||||||||
| Exercise | ||||||||
| Shares | Price | |||||||
| Outstanding at beginning of year | 7,598 | $ | 11.19 | |||||
| Exercised | — | — | ||||||
| Forfeited | 844 | 11.19 | ||||||
| Outstanding at end of year | 6,754 | $ | 11.19 | |||||
| Intrinsic value at year end | $ | — | ||||||
| Options exercisable at year end | 6,754 | |||||||
| Intrinsic value of options exercisable | $ | — | ||||||
| Weighted-average remaining contractual term (years) | 0.54 | |||||||
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
The 2006 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors provided for options to purchase shares of common stock to be granted to non-employee directors of the Corporation. The options granted under the plan had exercise prices which represented market price of the stock at the date of grant. No options have been granted since 2009. Under this plan, options vested in equal installments over a period of five years on an annual basis. Options expired on the earlier of the sixth anniversary of the date of the grant or May 15, 2012. Therefore, at December 31, 2012 all options had expired.
Total compensation cost that has been charged against income for this plan was $19,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. There was no compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2012.
A summary of the status of the nonqualified stock options issued under the 2006 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors as of December 31, 2012 is presented below:
| 2012 | ||||||||
| Weighted | ||||||||
| Average | ||||||||
| Exercise | ||||||||
| Shares | Price | |||||||
| Outstanding at beginning of year | 57,130 | $ | 11.02 | |||||
| Expired | (57,130 | ) | 11.02 | |||||
| Outstanding at end of year | — | $ | — | |||||
No options were exercised under the 2006 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
| 66 |
Stock Incentive Plan
The 2010 Stock Incentive Plan covers both employees and directors. The purpose of the plan is to promote the long-term growth and profitability of the Corporation by (i) providing key people with incentives to improve shareholder value and to contribute to the growth and financial success of the Corporation, and (ii) enabling the Corporation to attract, retain and reward the best available persons. During 2011 each non-employee director received an award of 250 shares under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan for a total of 2,500 shares. In addition, during 2011 5,145 shares were awarded to employees. Total cost that has been charged against income for this plan was $26,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. No awards were granted during the year ended December 31, 2012. At December 31, 2012 the Corporation had 192,355 shares authorized but unissued for this plan.
Note 14. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following reconciles the income available to common shareholders (numerator) and the weighted average common stock outstanding (denominator) for both basic and diluted earnings per share for 2012 and 2011:
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Net income | $ | 520,000 | $ | 684,000 | ||||
| Dividends on preferred stock and accretion | 352,000 | 558,000 | ||||||
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 168,000 | $ | 126,000 | ||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic | 5,908,503 | 5,861,465 | ||||||
| Effect of dilutive securities - stock options | — | — | ||||||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted | 5,908,503 | 5,861,465 | ||||||
| Earnings per common share: | ||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, stock options to purchase 31,683 and 64,728 average shares of common stock, respectively, were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share of common stock because they were antidilutive. The U.S. Treasury’s warrant to purchase 108,974 average shares of common stock was not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the year ended December 31, 2011 because it was antidilutive.
Note 15. INCOME TAXES
The components of income tax benefit are summarized as follows:
| Years ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Current tax expense (benefit): | ||||||||
| Federal | $ | (440,000 | ) | $ | 1,050,000 | |||
| State | 78,000 | 385,000 | ||||||
| (362,000 | ) | 1,435,000 | ||||||
| Deferred tax expense (benefit): | ||||||||
| Federal | 158,000 | (1,432,000 | ) | |||||
| State | (93,000 | ) | (432,000 | ) | ||||
| Valuation allowance | 50,000 | 14,000 | ||||||
| 115,000 | (1,850,000 | ) | ||||||
| $ | (247,000 | ) | $ | (415,000 | ) | |||
| 67 |
The following table presents a reconciliation between the reported income taxes and the income taxes which would be computed by applying the normal federal income tax rate (34%) to income before income taxes:
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Federal income tax | $ | 93,000 | $ | 92,000 | ||||
| Add (deduct) effect of: | ||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax effect | (2,000 | ) | (17,000 | ) | ||||
| Nontaxable interest income | (399,000 | ) | (401,000 | ) | ||||
| Life insurance | (113,000 | ) | (113,000 | ) | ||||
| Nondeductible expenses | 17,000 | 17,000 | ||||||
| Write-off of Federal deferred tax asset | 133,000 | — | ||||||
| Change in valuation reserve | 42,000 | — | ||||||
| Other items, net | (18,000 | ) | 7,000 | |||||
| Effective federal income taxes | $ | (247,000 | ) | $ | (415,000 | ) | ||
The tax effects of existing temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | ||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses | $ | 4,250,000 | $ | 4,635,000 | ||||
| Stock compensation | — | 107,000 | ||||||
| Nonaccrual loan interest | 1,112,000 | 1,136,000 | ||||||
| Depreciation | 425,000 | 406,000 | ||||||
| Contribution carry forward | 253,000 | 276,000 | ||||||
| State capital loss carry forward | 165,000 | 17,000 | ||||||
| Unrealized loss on fair value of interest rate swap | 295,000 | 325,000 | ||||||
| Alternate minimum tax | 307,000 | — | ||||||
| 6,807,000 | 6,902,000 | |||||||
| Valuation reserve | (179,000 | ) | (129,000 | ) | ||||
| 6,628,000 | 6,773,000 | |||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
| Unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale | 607,000 | 1,221,000 | ||||||
| Other | 4,000 | 4,000 | ||||||
| 611,000 | 1,225,000 | |||||||
| Net deferred tax assets | $ | 6,017,000 | $ | 5,548,000 | ||||
The Corporation has provided a full valuation allowance relating to all of the state tax benefits of both net operating loss carryforwards and contribution carryforwards. Management has determined that it is more likely than not that it will not be able to realize the deferred tax benefits described above. For the year ended December 31, 2012 the Corporation wrote-off deferred tax assets related to expired stock options and those associated with the expiration of certain contribution carryovers.
The Corporation has approximately $856,000 of taxes paid in the carryback period that could be utilized against the deferred tax asset. The remaining $5.2 million of net deferred tax assets more likely than not will be utilized through future earnings.
The Corporation has alternate minimum tax (AMT) credit carryforwards of approximately $307,000 to reduce regular Federal income taxes in future years to the extent that that regular tax exceeds AMT. The AMT credit carryforwards have no expiration date.
| 68 |
There were no unrecognized tax benefits during the years or at the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 and management does not expect a significant change in unrecognized benefits in the next twelve months. There were no tax interest and penalties recorded in the income statement for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. There were no tax interest and penalties accrued for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax of the State of New Jersey.
The Corporation is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2009.
Note 16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Loan Commitments
The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Corporation has in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Corporation's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
At December 31, 2012, the Corporation had residential mortgage commitments to extend credit aggregating approximately $417,000 at variable rates averaging 3.13% and $1.8 million at fixed rates averaging 3.87%. Approximately $1.8 million of these loan commitments will be sold to investors upon closing. Commercial, construction, and home equity loan commitments of approximately $9.3 million were extended with variable rates averaging 3.88% and $140,000 were extended at fixed rates averaging 4.88%. Generally, commitments were due to expire within approximately 60 days.
Additionally, at December 31, 2012, the Corporation was committed for approximately $60.0 million of unused lines of credit, consisting of $13.5 million relating to a home equity line of credit program and an unsecured line of credit program (cash reserve), $4.8 million relating to an unsecured overdraft protection program, and $41.7 million relating to commercial and construction lines of credit. Amounts drawn on the unused lines of credit are predominantly assessed interest at rates which fluctuate with the base rate.
Commitments under standby letters of credit were approximately $1.4 million at December 31, 2012, of which $1.3 million expires within one year. Should any letter of credit be drawn on, the interest rate charged on the resulting note would fluctuate with the Corporation's base rate. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Corporation evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee payment or performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Corporation obtains collateral supporting those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.
| 69 |
Lease Commitments
Rental expense under long-term operating leases for branch offices amounted to approximately $1,153,000 and $1,132,000 during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. At December 31, 2012, the minimum rental commitments on the noncancellable leases with an initial term of one year and expiring thereafter are as follows:
| Year Ending December 31 | Minimum Rent | |||
| 2013 | $ | 1,006,000 | ||
| 2014 | 740,000 | |||
| 2015 | 381,000 | |||
| 2016 | 313,000 | |||
| 2017 | 293,000 | |||
| Thereafter | 2,012,000 | |||
| $ | 4,745,000 | |||
Contingencies
The Corporation is also subject to litigation which arises primarily in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management the ultimate disposition of such litigation should not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Corporation.
Note 17. INTEREST RATE SWAP
The Corporation utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of its asset liability management strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position. The notional amount of the interest rate swap does not represent an amount exchanged by the parties. The amount exchanged is determined by reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the individual interest rate swap agreements.
Interest Rate Swap Designated as Cash Flow Hedge: The Corporation entered into a swap with a notional amount of $7 million. It was designated as a cash flow hedge of the subordinated debentures and was determined to be fully effective during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. As such, no amount of ineffectiveness has been included in net income. Therefore, the aggregate fair value of the swap is recorded in other assets (liabilities) with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) would be reclassified to current earnings should the hedge no longer be considered effective. The Corporation expects the hedge to remain fully effective during the remaining term of the swap. As of December 31, 2012, the interest rate swap is secured by investment securities with a fair value of $1,004,000.
Summary information as of December 31, 2012 about the interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge is as follows:
| Notional amount | $ 7,000,000 |
| Pay rate | 7.00% |
| Receive rate | 3 month LIBOR plus 2.95% |
| Maturity | March 17, 2016 |
| Unrealized loss | ($812,000) |
The net expense recorded on the swap transaction totaled $255,000 and $265,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and is reported as a component of interest expense – borrowed money.
The fair value of the interest rate swap of ($812,000) and ($893,000) at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, was included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
| 70 |
The following table presents the after tax net gains (losses) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and the Consolidated Statements of Income relating to the cash flow derivative instruments for the periods indicated.
| For the year ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (Effective Portion) | Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from OCI to interest income | Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other noninterest income (Ineffective Portion) | ||||||||||
| Interest rate contract | $ | 49,000 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| For the year ended December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (Effective Portion) | Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from OCI to interest income | Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other noninterest income (Ineffective Portion) | ||||||||||
| Interest rate contract | $ | (138,000 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Note 18. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) or identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The fair values of investment securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values of investment securities are determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
The interest rate swaps are reported at fair values obtained from brokers who utilize internal models with observable market data inputs to estimate the values of these instruments (Level 2 inputs).
The Corporation measures impairment of collateralized loans based on the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell the collateral, incorporating assumptions that experienced parties might use in estimating the value of such collateral (Level 3 inputs). At the time a loan is considered impaired, it is valued at the lower of cost or fair value. Generally, impaired loans carried at fair value have been partially charged-off or receive specific allocations of the allowance for loan losses. For collateral dependent loans, fair value is commonly based on real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, the net book value recorded for the collateral on the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports. Collateral is then adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the borrower and borrower’s business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.
| 71 |
Appraisals are generally obtained to support the fair value of collateral. Appraisals for both collateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned are performed by licensed appraisers whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Corporation. The Corporation utilizes a third party to order appraisals and, once received, review the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal as well as the resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics.
Real estate appraisals typically incorporate measures such as recent sales prices for comparable properties. In addition, appraisers may make adjustments to the sales price of the comparable properties as deemed appropriate based on the age, condition or general characteristics of the subject property. Management generally applies a 12% discount to real estate appraised values to cover disposition / selling costs and to reflect the potential price reductions in the market necessary to complete an expedient transaction and to factor in impact of the perception that a transaction being completed by a bank may result in further price reduction pressure.
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
| Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
| Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities | ||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasuries | $ | 4,006,000 | $ | 4,006,000 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| U.S. government - | ||||||||||||||||
| sponsored agencies | 37,255,000 | — | 37,255,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of state and | ||||||||||||||||
| political subdivisions | 14,170,000 | — | 14,170,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities- | ||||||||||||||||
| residential | 105,428,000 | — | 105,428,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities | 9,884,000 | — | 9,884,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds | 495,000 | — | 495,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Other equity investments | 3,462,000 | 3,402,000 | 60,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Total available-for- | ||||||||||||||||
| sale securities | $ | 174,700,000 | $ | 7,408,000 | $ | 167,292,000 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap | $ | 812,000 | $ | — | $ | 812,000 | $ | — | ||||||||
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities | ||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasuries | $ | 4,050,000 | $ | 4,050,000 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| U.S. government - | ||||||||||||||||
| sponsored agencies | 20,744,000 | — | 20,744,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of state and | ||||||||||||||||
| political subdivisions | 9,318,000 | — | 9,318,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities- | ||||||||||||||||
| residential | 133,467,000 | — | 133,467,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Other equity investments | 3,346,000 | 3,286,000 | 60,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Total available-for- | ||||||||||||||||
| sale securities | $ | 170,925,000 | $ | 7,336,000 | $ | 163,589,000 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap | $ | 893,000 | $ | — | $ | 893,000 | $ | — | ||||||||
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during 2012 and 2011.
| 72 |
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
| Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
| Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
| December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Impaired loans | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 6,490,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,490,000 | ||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 10,445,,000 | — | — | 10,445,000 | ||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 4,373,000 | — | — | 4,373,000 | ||||||||||||
| Residential | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 413,000 | — | — | 413- | ||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 800,000 | — | — | 800,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other real estate owned | 1,058,000 | — | — | 1,058,000 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 25,579,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 25,579,000 | |||||||||
| December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Impaired loans | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial: | ||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | $ | 5.106,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,106,000 | ||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Commercial real estate | 9,702,000 | — | — | 9,702,000 | ||||||||||||
| Construction: | ||||||||||||||||
| Commercial | 8,138,000 | — | — | 8,138,000 | ||||||||||||
| Residential | 250,000 | — | — | 250,000 | ||||||||||||
| Residential real estate | 779,000 | — | — | 779,000 | ||||||||||||
| Consumer: | ||||||||||||||||
| Secured by real estate | 891,000 | — | — | 891,000 | ||||||||||||
| Other real estate owned | 5,288,000 | — | — | 5,288,000 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 30,154,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 30,154,000 | |||||||||
Collateral dependent impaired loans measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral had a recorded investment of $22,699,000, with a valuation allowance of $178,000, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $4,501,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Collateral dependent impaired loans had a recorded investment of $25,478,000, with a valuation allowance of $612,000, resulting in an additional provision for loan losses of $4,915,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011.
OREO had a recorded investment of $1,058,000 with no valuation allowances at December 31, 2012. OREO had a recorded investment of $5,326,000 with a valuation allowance of $38,000 at December 31, 2011. Additional valuation allowances of $188,000 and $38,000 were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
| 73 |
For the Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at December 31, 2012, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:
| Assets | Fair Value | Valuation Technique | Unobservable Inputs | Range | ||||||
| Impaired loans | $ | 22,521,000 | Comparable real estate sales and / or the income approach. | Adjustments for differences between comparable sales and income data available. | 5% - 10% | |||||
| Estimated selling costs. | 7% | |||||||||
| Other real estate owned | $ | 1,058,000 | Comparable real estate sales and / or the income approach. | Adjustments for differences between comparable sales and income data available. | 5% - 10% | |||||
| Estimated selling costs. | 7% | |||||||||
Fair value estimates for the Corporation’s financial instruments are summarized below:
| Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
| Carrying Value | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
| Financial assets: | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 21,016,000 | $ | 21,016,000 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 174,700,000 | 7,408,000 | 167,292,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Securities held to maturity | 29,718,000 | — | 31,768,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| FHLB-NY stock | 2,213,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage loans held for sale | 784,000 | — | 784,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Loans, net | 429,832,000 | — | — | 449,041,000 | ||||||||||||
| Accrued interest receivable | 2,372,000 | 2,000 | 908,000 | 1,462,000 | ||||||||||||
| Financial liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
| Deposits | 590,254,000 | 434,569,000 | 157,219,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| FHLB-NY advances | 25,000,000 | — | 25,825,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Securities sold under | ||||||||||||||||
| agreements to repurchase | 7,343,000 | — | 7,883,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Subordinated debenture | 7,217,000 | — | — | 7,112,000 | ||||||||||||
| Accrued interest payable | 560,000 | 1,000 | 540,000 | 19,000 | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap | 812,000 | — | 812,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| 74 |
| At December 31, 2011 | ||||||||
| Carrying | Estimated | |||||||
| Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
| Financial Assets: | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 13,698,000 | $ | 13,698,000 | ||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 170,925,000 | 170,925,000 | ||||||
| Securities held to maturity | 38,354,000 | 40,984,000 | ||||||
| FHLB-NY stock | 2,478,000 | N/A | ||||||
| Net loans, including impaired loans | 444,803,000 | 453,604,000 | ||||||
| Accrued interest receivable | 2,618,000 | 2,618,000 | ||||||
| Financial liabilities: | ||||||||
| Deposits | 593,552,000 | 595,939,000 | ||||||
| FHLB-NY Advances | 32,700,000 | 33,482,000 | ||||||
| Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 14,342,000 | 14,786,000 | ||||||
| Subordinated debenture | 7,217,000 | 6,297,000 | ||||||
| Accrued interest payable | 775,000 | 775,000 | ||||||
| Interest rate swap | 893,000 | 893,000 | ||||||
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents – The carrying amount approximates fair value and is classified as Level 1.
Securities available-for-sale and held to maturity – The methods for determining fair values were described previously.
FHLB-NY stock – It is not practicable to determine the fair value of FHLB-NY stock due to restrictions placed on the transferability of the stock.
Mortgage loans held for sale – Loans in this category have been committed for sale to third party investors at the current carrying amount resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Loans, net – Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as residential and commercial mortgages, commercial and other installment loans. The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting cash flows using estimated market discount rates which reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loans resulting in a Level 3 classification.
Accrued interest receivable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Deposits – The fair value of deposits, with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand resulting in a Level 1 classification. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of cash flows resulting in a Level 2 classification. The discount rate is estimated using market discount rates which reflect interest rate risk inherent in the certificates of deposit.
FHLB-NY advances – With respect to FHLB-NY borrowings, the carrying amount of the borrowings which mature in one day approximates fair value. For borrowings with a longer maturity, the fair value is based on the discounted value of cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using market discount rates which reflect the interest rate risk and credit risk inherent in the term borrowings resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase – The carrying value approximates fair value due to the relatively short time before maturity resulting in a Level 2 classification.
| 75 |
Subordinated debenture – The fair value of the subordinated debenture is based on the discounted value of the cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using market rates which reflect the interest rate risk inherent in the debenture resulting in a Level 3 classification.
Accrued interest payable – The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Interest rate swap – The methods for determining fair values were described previously.
Commitments to extend credit – The fair value of commitments is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present credit worthiness of the counter parties, and at December 31, 2012 and 2011 the fair value of such commitments were not material.
Limitations
The preceding fair value estimates were made at December 31, 2012 and 2011 based on pertinent market data and relevant information on the financial instruments. These estimates do not include any premiums or discounts that could result from an offer to sell at one time the Corporation's entire holdings of a particular financial instrument or category thereof. Since no market exists for a substantial portion of the Corporation's financial instruments, fair value estimates were necessarily based on judgments with respect to future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk assessments of various financial instruments, and other factors. Given the subjective nature of these estimates, the uncertainties surrounding them and the matters of significant judgment that must be applied, these fair value estimates cannot be calculated with precision. Modifications in such assumptions could meaningfully alter these estimates.
Since these fair value approximations were made solely for on and off balance sheet financial instruments at December 31, 2012 and 2011, no attempt was made to estimate the value of anticipated future business. Furthermore, certain tax implications related to the realization of unrealized gains and losses could have a substantial impact on these fair value estimates and have not been incorporated into the estimates.
Note 19. PARENT COMPANY ONLY
The Corporation was formed in January 1995 as a bank holding company to operate its wholly-owned subsidiary, Atlantic Stewardship Bank. The earnings of the Bank are recognized by the Corporation using the equity method of accounting. Accordingly, the Bank dividends paid reduce the Corporation's investment in the subsidiary. Condensed financial statements are presented below:
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Cash and due from banks | $ | 263,000 | $ | 861,000 | ||||
| Securities available-for-sale | 1,004,000 | — | ||||||
| Securities held to maturity | — | 993,000 | ||||||
| Investment in subsidiary | 62,502,000 | 63,103,000 | ||||||
| Accrued interest receivable | 5,000 | 12,000 | ||||||
| Other assets | 452,000 | 646,000 | ||||||
| Total assets | $ | 64,226,000 | $ | 65,615,000 | ||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Subordinated debentures | $ | 7,217,000 | $ | 7,217,000 | ||||
| Other liabilities | 663,000 | 606,000 | ||||||
| Shareholders' equity | 56,346,000 | 57,792,000 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and Shareholders' equity | $ | 64,226,000 | $ | 65,615,000 | ||||
| 76 |
Condensed Statements of Income
| Years ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Interest income - securities available-for-sale | $ | 9,000 | $ | 23,000 | ||||
| Interest income - securities held to maturity | 15,000 | 54,000 | ||||||
| Dividend income | 675,000 | — | ||||||
| Other income | 15,000 | 27,000 | ||||||
| Total income | 714,000 | 104,000 | ||||||
| Interest expense | 506,000 | 504,000 | ||||||
| Other expenses | 319,000 | 306,000 | ||||||
| Total expenses | 825,000 | 810,000 | ||||||
| Loss before income tax benefit | (111,000 | ) | (706,000 | ) | ||||
| Tax benefit | (266,000 | ) | (239,000 | ) | ||||
| Income (loss) before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary | 155,000 | (467,000 | ) | |||||
| Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary | 365,000 | 1,151,000 | ||||||
| Net income | 520,000 | 684,000 | ||||||
| Dividends on preferred stock and accretion | 352,000 | 558,000 | ||||||
| Net income available to common shareholders | $ | 168,000 | $ | 126,000 | ||||
| 77 |
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
| Years ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||
| Net income | $ | 520,000 | $ | 684,000 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to | ||||||||
| net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||
| Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary | (365,000 | ) | (1,151,000 | ) | ||||
| Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, net | — | 4,000 | ||||||
| Gains on sales and calls of securities | (7,000 | ) | (19,000 | ) | ||||
| Decrease in accrued interest receivable | 7,000 | 4,000 | ||||||
| (Increase) decrease in other assets | 193,000 | (102,000 | ) | |||||
| Increase (decrease) in other liabilities | 105,000 | (29,000 | ) | |||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 453,000 | (609,000 | ) | |||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
| Purchase of securities available-for-sale | (1,499,000 | ) | — | |||||
| Proceeds from principal repayments on securities available-for-sale | — | 149,000 | ||||||
| Proceeds from calls on securities available-for-sale | 500,000 | 1,071,000 | ||||||
| Proceeds from calls on securities held to maturity | 1,000,000 | — | ||||||
| Investment in subsidiary bank | — | (5,000,000 | ) | |||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 1,000 | (3,780,000 | ) | |||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock | — | 14,952,000 | ||||||
| Repurchase of preferred stock and warrant | — | (10,108,000 | ) | |||||
| Cash dividends paid on common stock | (886,000 | ) | (1,171,000 | ) | ||||
| Cash dividends paid on preferred stock and accretion | (352,000 | ) | (383,000 | ) | ||||
| Payment of discount on dividend reinvestment plan | (8,000 | ) | (15,000 | ) | ||||
| Issuance of common stock | 194,000 | 182,000 | ||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | (1,052,000 | ) | 3,457,000 | |||||
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (598,000 | ) | (932,000 | ) | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents - beginning | 861,000 | 1,793,000 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents - ending | $ | 263,000 | $ | 861,000 | ||||
| 78 |
Note 20. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)
The following table contains quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands).
| First Quarter | Second Quarter | Third Quarter | Fourth Quarter | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2012: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 7,516 | $ | 7,317 | $ | 7,120 | $ | 6,754 | $ | 28,707 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense | 1,465 | 1,357 | 1,259 | 1,094 | 5,175 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest income before provision for loan losses | 6,051 | 5,960 | 5,861 | 5,660 | 23,532 | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses | 1,765 | 2,900 | 2,000 | 3,330 | 9,995 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 4,286 | 3,060 | 3,861 | 2,330 | 13,537 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 1,550 | 911 | 1,719 | 2,209 | 6,389 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expenses | 4,754 | 4,454 | 5,206 | 5,239 | 19,653 | |||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 1,082 | (483 | ) | 374 | (700 | ) | 273 | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 306 | (159 | ) | 46 | (440 | ) | (247 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 776 | (324 | ) | 328 | (260 | ) | 520 | |||||||||||||
| Dividends on preferred stock | 75 | 38 | 112 | 127 | 352 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | 701 | $ | (362 | ) | $ | 216 | $ | (387 | ) | $ | 168 | ||||||||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.12 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.03 | ||||||||
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.12 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | 0.03 | ||||||||
| Year ended December 31, 2011: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 7,775 | $ | 8,033 | $ | 8,018 | $ | 7,748 | $ | 31,574 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense | 1,826 | 1,812 | 1,732 | 1,594 | 6,964 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest income before provision for loan losses | 5,949 | 6,221 | 6,286 | 6,154 | 24,610 | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses | 1,675 | 1,915 | 2,330 | 4,925 | 10,845 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses | 4,274 | 4,306 | 3,956 | 1,229 | 13,765 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income | 1,094 | 943 | 1,350 | 1,783 | 5,170 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expenses | 4,694 | 4,536 | 4,615 | 4,821 | 18,666 | |||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) | 674 | 713 | 691 | (1,809 | ) | 269 | ||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 191 | 128 | 113 | (847 | ) | (415 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | 483 | 585 | 578 | (962 | ) | 684 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividends on preferred stock and accretion | 138 | 138 | 244 | 38 | 558 | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | 345 | $ | 447 | $ | 334 | $ | (1,000 | ) | $ | 126 | |||||||||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||||||||
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.02 | |||||||||
| 79 |
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A . Controls and Procedures
| (a) | Evaluation of internal controls and procedures |
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our internal disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
| (b) | Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment using those criteria, our management (including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2012.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Corporation to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| (c) | Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting |
There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
On March 27, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Corporation approved the amendment and restatement of the Corporation’s bylaws (as so amended, the “Amended and Restated Bylaws”), effective immediately. The purpose of the amendment and restatement was, among other things, to make certain technical and conforming amendments to the bylaws for consistency between them and the Corporation’s various committee charters, policies and guidelines as well as to clarify certain provisions. The principal amendments and clarifications contained in the Amended and Restated Bylaws include the following:
| · | clarification of advance notice and related provisions, consistent with their purpose of establishing an orderly process for shareholders seeking to propose business at shareholders’ meetings or to nominate directors; |
| · | clarification of the process for adjournment of shareholders’ meetings; and |
| · | clarification of the process of voting at shareholders’ meetings and the conduct of meetings generally. |
| 80 |
The preceding summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Amended and Restated Bylaws which are attached as Exhibit 3(ii) to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated by reference herein.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information concerning directors and executive officers contained under the captions “Election of Directors”: “Senior Executive Officers” and “Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,” in the Proxy Statement for the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Ethics
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Managers that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, controller and any other person performing similar functions. The Corporation’s Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Managers is posted on our website, www.asbnow.com. The Corporation intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of its Code of Ethical Conduct for Senior Financial Managers by filing an 8-K and by posting such information on its website.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert
The members of our Audit Committee as of December 31, 2012 were Howard Yeaton (Chairman), Harold Dyer, John L. Steen and Michael Westra. The Audit Committee determined that Howard Yeaton and Michael Westra were “audit committee financial experts” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. All members of our Audit Committee are “independent” as defined under Nasdaq listing rule 5605(a)(2).
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information concerning executive compensation under the caption “Executive Compensation” and director compensation under the heading “Director Compensation” in the Proxy Statement for the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table provides information with respect to the equity securities that are authorized for issuance under our compensation plans as of December 31, 2012:
| Equity Compensation Plan Information | ||||||||||||
| Plan Category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 6,754 | $ | 11.19 | 386,874 | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | — | — | 540,316 | |||||||||
| Total | 6,754 | $ | 11.19 | 927,190 | ||||||||
| 81 |
The only equity compensation plan not approved by security holders is the Director Stock Plan. The Director Stock Plan permits members of the Board of Directors to receive any monthly Board of Directors’ fees in shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock, rather than in cash. The Corporation purchased 5,591 shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock in the open market during 2012 for the benefit of the Director Stock Plan.
Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management under the caption “Stock Ownership of Management and Principal Shareholders” in the Proxy Statement for the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” in the Proxy Statement for the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services under the caption “Fees Billed by our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm During Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011,” in the Proxy Statement for the Corporation’s 2013 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Stewardship Financial Corporation and Subsidiary included in Item 8:
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 36 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 | 37 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 | 38 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 | 39 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 | 40 | |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 | 41 | |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 42 |
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
(3) Exhibits 1
| Exhibit | |
| Number | Description of Exhibits |
| 3(i) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Stewardship Financial Corporation (1) |
| 82 |
| 3(i).2 | Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Stewardship Financial Corporation (2) |
| 3(ii) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of Stewardship Financial Corporation |
| 4.1 | Form of Certificate for the Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (3) |
| 4.2 | Warrant to Purchase up to 127,119 Shares of Common Stock (4) |
| 4.3 | Form of Certificate for Senior Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (5) |
| 10.1 | 1995 Incentive Stock Option Plan (6) |
| 10.2 | 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (7) |
| 10.3 | Stewardship Financial Corporation Dividend Reinvestment Plan (8) |
| 10.4 | Stewardship Financial Corporation Director Stock Plan (9) |
| 10.5 | Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan (9) |
| 10.6 | Amended and Restated Director Stock Plan (10) |
| 10.7 | Dividend Reinvestment Plan (11) |
| 10.8 | 2001 Stock Option Plan For Non-Employee Directors (12) |
| 10.9 | Dividend Reinvestment Plan (13) |
| 10.10 | 2006 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (14) |
| 10.11 | Letter Agreement, dated January 30, 2009, including Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms incorporated by reference therein, between Stewardship Financial Corporation and the Treasury (15) |
| 10.12 | Waivers, executed January 30, 2009 by each of Paul Van Ostenbridge, Claire M. Chadwick, Julie E. Holland and Robert C. Vliet (16) |
| 10.13 | Dividend Reinvestment Plan, as amended and restated effective May 18, 2010 (17) |
| 10.14 | 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (18) |
| 10.15 | Small Business Lending Fund - Securities Purchase Agreement effective September 1, 2011 between the Corporation and the Secretary of the Treasury, and Repurchase Letter dated September 1, 2011 between the Corporation and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (19) |
| 13 | Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2012 |
| 16 | Letter dated February 1, 2013 from Crowe Horwath LLP to the Securities and Exchange Commission (20) |
| 21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant |
| 23 | Consent of Crowe Horwath LLP |
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| 99.1 | Press Release dated March 27, 2013 |
| 101 | The following materials from Stewardship Financial Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (21) |
| (1) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(i).1 to the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed May 15, 2009. |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 7, 2011. |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 4, 2009. |
| (4) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 4, 2009. |
| 83 |
| (5) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 7, 2011. |
| (6) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 5(B)(10)(a) to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form 8-B, Registration No. 0-21855, filed December 10, 1996. |
| (7) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibits 4(c) to 23(d) from the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-20793, filed January 31, 1997. |
| (8) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(a) from the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-20699, filed January 30, 1997. |
| (9) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(a) from the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-31245, filed July 11, 1997. |
| (10) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibits 10(vii) and 10(viii) from the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, filed March 31, 1999. |
| (11) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(a) from the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-54738, filed January 31, 2001. |
| (12) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(b) from the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-87842, filed May 8, 2002. |
| (13) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(a) from the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-133632, filed April 28, 2006. |
| (14) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 5(a) from the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-135462, filed June 29, 2006. |
| (15) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 4, 2009. |
| (16) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 4, 2009. |
| (17) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Registration No. 333-167374, filed June 8, 2010. |
| (18) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 19, 2010. |
| (19) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibits 10.1 and 10.2 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 7, 2011. |
| (20) | Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 16.1 to the Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 1, 2013. |
| (21) | This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filing, except to the extent the Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference. |
| 84 |
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| STEWARDSHIP FINANCIAL CORPORATION | ||
| By : | /s/ Paul Van Ostenbridge | |
| Paul Van Ostenbridge | ||
| Chief Executive Officer and Director | ||
Dated: March 28, 2013
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Name | Title | Date | |
| /s/ Paul Van Ostenbridge | Chief Executive Officer | March 28, 2013 | |
| Paul Van Ostenbridge | and Director | ||
| (Principal Executive Officer) | |||
| /s/ Claire M. Chadwick | Chief Financial Officer | March 28, 2013 | |
| Claire M. Chadwick | (Principal Financial Officer and | ||
| Principal Accounting Officer) | |||
| /s/ Richard W. Culp | Director | March 28, 2013 | |
| Richard W. Culp | |||
| /s/ Harold Dyer | Director | March 28, 2013 | |
| Harold Dyer | |||
| /s/ William Hanse | Chairman of the Board | March 28, 2013 | |
| William Hanse | |||
| /s/ Margo Lane | Director | March 28, 2013 | |
| Margo Lane | |||
| /s/ Arie Leegwater | Director | March 28, 2013 | |
| Arie Leegwater | |||
| /s/ John L. Steen | Director | March 28, 2013 | |
| John L. Steen | |||
| /s/ Robert Turner | Secretary and Director | March 28, 2013 | |
| Robert Turner | |||
| /s/ William J. Vander Eems | Director | March 28, 2013 | |
| William J. Vander Eems | |||
| /s/ Michael Westra | Vice Chairman of the Board | March 28, 2013 | |
| Michael Westra | |||
| /s/ Howard Yeaton | Director | March 28, 2013 | |
| Howard Yeaton |
| 85 |