Edgar Filing: FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP /OH/

Q2-10Q-2013.6.30

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________________ to ____________________

Commission file number 0-12379

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Ohio		31-1042001
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

255 East Fifth Street, Suite 700 Cincinnati, Ohio		45202
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (877) 322-9530

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.



Class		Outstanding at August 5, 2013
Common stock, No par value		57,707,718

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP.

INDEX



	Page No.

Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	1

Consolidated Statements of Income - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	2

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	3

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity - Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6

Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	39

Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	57

Item 4 - Controls and Procedures	58

Part II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings	59

Item 1A - Risk Factors	59

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	60

Item 6 - Exhibits	61

Signatures	62

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands)



	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	114,745		$	134,502
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks	2,671			24,341
Investment securities available-for-sale, at market value (cost $900,068 at June 30, 2013 and $1,017,104 at December 31, 2012)	884,694			1,032,096
Investment securities held-to-maturity (market value $664,398 at June 30, 2013 and $778,474 at December 31, 2012)	670,246			770,755
Other investments	75,645			71,492
Loans held for sale	18,650			16,256
Loans
Commercial	940,420			861,033
Real estate-construction	97,246			73,517
Real estate-commercial	1,477,226			1,417,008
Real estate-residential	343,016			318,210
Installment	50,781			56,810
Home equity	370,206			367,500
Credit card	33,222			34,198
Lease financing	70,011			50,788
Total loans - excluding covered loans	3,382,128			3,179,064
Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses - uncovered	47,047			47,777
Net loans - excluding covered loans	3,335,081			3,131,287
Covered loans	622,265			748,116
Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses - covered	32,961			45,190
Net loans – covered	589,304			702,926
Net loans	3,924,385			3,834,213
Premises and equipment	142,675			146,716
Goodwill	95,050			95,050
Other intangibles	6,620			7,648
FDIC indemnification asset	88,966			119,607
Accrued interest and other assets	250,228			244,372
Total assets	$	6,274,575		$	6,497,048

Liabilities
Deposits
Interest-bearing	$	1,131,466		$	1,160,815
Savings	1,601,122			1,623,614
Time	978,680			1,068,637
Total interest-bearing deposits	3,711,268			3,853,066
Noninterest-bearing	1,059,368			1,102,774
Total deposits	4,770,636			4,955,840
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase	114,030			122,570
Federal Home Loan Bank short-term borrowings	505,900			502,000
Total short-term borrowings	619,930			624,570
Long-term debt	73,957			75,202
Total borrowed funds	693,887			699,772
Accrued interest and other liabilities	114,600			131,011
Total liabilities	5,579,123			5,786,623

Shareholders' equity
Common stock - no par value
Authorized - 160,000,000 shares; Issued - 68,730,731 shares in 2013 and 2012	576,641			579,293
Retained earnings	329,633			330,004
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(25,645		)	(18,677		)
Treasury stock, at cost, 11,032,387 shares in 2013 and 10,684,496 shares in 2012	(185,177		)	(180,195		)
Total shareholders' equity	695,452			710,425
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	6,274,575		$	6,497,048

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)



	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	55,022		$	63,390		$	111,047		$	129,826
Investment securities
Taxable	8,295			10,379			16,671			20,896
Tax-exempt	560			121			1,140			255
Total interest on investment securities	8,855			10,500			17,811			21,151
Other earning assets	(1,556		)	(1,967		)	(3,028		)	(3,957		)
Total interest income	62,321			71,923			125,830			147,020
Interest expense
Deposits	3,284			6,381			7,144			14,097
Short-term borrowings	305			37			634			49
Long-term borrowings	654			675			1,308			1,355
Total interest expense	4,243			7,093			9,086			15,501
Net interest income	58,078			64,830			116,744			131,519
Provision for loan and lease losses - uncovered	2,409			8,364			5,450			11,622
Provision for loan and lease losses - covered	(8,283		)	6,047			759			18,998
Net interest income after provision for loan and lease losses	63,952			50,419			110,535			100,899

Noninterest income
Service charges on deposit accounts	5,205			5,376			9,922			10,285
Trust and wealth management fees	3,497			3,377			7,447			7,168
Bankcard income	3,145			2,579			5,578			5,115
Net gains from sales of loans	1,089			1,132			1,795			2,072
Gains on sales of investment securities	188			0			1,724			0
FDIC loss sharing income	(7,384		)	8,280			1,550			21,096
Accelerated discount on covered loans	1,935			3,764			3,870			7,409
Other	3,940			9,037			6,427			12,325
Total noninterest income	11,615			33,545			38,313			65,470

Noninterest expenses
Salaries and employee benefits	26,216			29,048			53,545			57,909
Pension settlement charges	4,316			0			4,316			0
Net occupancy	5,384			5,025			11,549			10,407
Furniture and equipment	2,250			2,323			4,621			4,567
Data processing	2,559			2,076			5,028			3,977
Marketing	1,182			1,238			2,079			2,392
Communication	781			913			1,614			1,807
Professional services	1,764			2,151			3,567			4,298
State intangible tax	1,004			970			2,018			1,996
FDIC assessments	1,148			1,270			2,273			2,433
Loss (gain) - other real estate owned	216			313			718			1,309
Loss (gain) - covered other real estate owned	(2,212		)	1,233			(2,369		)	2,525
Loss sharing expense	1,578			3,085			3,864			4,836
Other	7,097			7,814			13,566			14,781
Total noninterest expenses	53,283			57,459			106,389			113,237
Income before income taxes	22,284			26,505			42,459			53,132
Income tax expense	6,455			8,703			12,806			18,336
Net income	$	15,829		$	17,802		$	29,653		$	34,796

Net earnings per common share - basic	$	0.28		$	0.31		$	0.52		$	0.60
Net earnings per common share - diluted	$	0.27		$	0.30		$	0.51		$	0.59
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.24		$	0.29		$	0.52		$	0.60
Average common shares outstanding - basic	57,291,994			57,933,281			57,365,105			57,864,269
Average common shares outstanding - diluted	58,128,349			58,958,279			58,206,503			58,921,689

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents



FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)

	Three months ended					Six months ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2013			2012		2013			2012
Net income	$	15,829		$	17,802	$	29,653		$	34,796
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Unrealized (losses) gains on investment securities arising during the period	(15,210		)	157		(18,567		)	2,596
Change in retirement obligation	10,365			355		10,810			710
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives	690			0		816			0
Unrealized (loss) gain on foreign currency exchange	(15		)	3		(27		)	12
Other comprehensive (loss) income	(4,170		)	515		(6,968		)	3,318
Comprehensive income	$	11,659		$	18,317	$	22,685		$	38,114

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands except per share data)

(Unaudited)




	Common Stock	Common Stock			Retained			Accumulated other comprehensive			Treasury stock
	Shares	Amount			Earnings			income (loss)			Shares		Amount			Total
Balance at January 1, 2012	68,730,731	$	579,871		$	331,351		$	(21,490	)	(10,463,677	)	$	(177,511	)	$	712,221
Net income					34,796											34,796
Other comprehensive income								3,318								3,318
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock at $0.60 per share					(34,832		)									(34,832		)
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation		348														348
Exercise of stock options, net of shares purchased		(914		)							57,604		977			63
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures		(4,318		)							188,735		3,250			(1,068		)
Share-based compensation expense		1,942														1,942
Balance at June 30, 2012	68,730,731	$	576,929		$	331,315		$	(18,172	)	(10,217,338	)	$	(173,284	)	$	716,788
Balance at January 1, 2013	68,730,731	$	579,293		$	330,004		$	(18,677	)	(10,684,496	)	$	(180,195	)	$	710,425
Net income					29,653											29,653
Other comprehensive loss								(6,968		)						(6,968		)
Cash dividends declared:
Common stock at $0.52 per share					(30,024		)									(30,024		)
Purchase of common stock											(540,400	)	(8,339		)	(8,339		)
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation		30														30
Exercise of stock options, net of shares purchased		(503		)							21,526		362			(141		)
Restricted stock awards, net of forfeitures		(4,316		)							170,983		2,995			(1,321		)
Share-based compensation expense		2,137														2,137
Balance at June 30, 2013	68,730,731	$	576,641		$	329,633		$	(25,645	)	(11,032,387	)	$	(185,177	)	$	695,452

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Six months ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Operating activities
Net income	$	29,653		$	34,796
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan and lease losses	6,209			30,620
Depreciation and amortization	7,630			7,669
Stock-based compensation expense	2,137			1,942
Pension expense (income)	4,185			(285		)
Net amortization of premiums/accretion of discounts on investment securities	8,856			4,902
Gains on sales of investment securities	(1,724		)	0
Originations of loans held for sale	(93,248		)	(102,950		)
Net gains from sales of loans held for sale	(1,795		)	(2,072		)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale	91,340			106,803
Deferred income taxes	(4,454		)	(2,670		)
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable	(570		)	3,341
(Increase) decrease in cash surrender value of life insurance	(333		)	2,039
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses	(3,178		)	1,109
Decrease in indemnification asset	30,641			26,244
Decrease in accrued expenses	(4,199		)	(2,932		)
Decrease in interest payable	(267		)	(993		)
Other	8,848			4,928
Net cash provided by operating activities	79,731			112,491

Investing activities
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale	92,684			0
Proceeds from calls, paydowns and maturities of securities available-for-sale	128,606			126,901
Purchases of securities available-for-sale	(109,767		)	(331,300		)
Proceeds from calls, paydowns and maturities of securities held-to-maturity	95,020			50,122
Net decrease in interest-bearing deposits with other banks	21,670			366,211
Net increase in loans and leases - excluding covered loans	(210,630		)	(62,600		)
Net decrease in covered assets	99,995			128,100
Proceeds from disposal of other real estate owned	19,995			22,537
Purchases of premises and equipment	(5,440		)	(10,779		)
Net cash provided by investing activities	132,133			289,192

Financing activities
Net decrease in total deposits	(185,204		)	(541,091		)
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings	(4,640		)	150,488
Payments on long-term borrowings	(1,231		)	(1,410		)
Cash dividends paid on common stock	(32,237		)	(33,571		)
Treasury stock purchase	(8,339		)	0
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	0			292
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation	30			348
Net cash used in financing activities	(231,621		)	(424,944		)

Cash and due from banks:
Net decrease in cash and due from banks	(19,757		)	(23,261		)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period	134,502			149,653
Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	114,745		$	126,392

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2013

(Unaudited)

The consolidated financial statements for interim periods are unaudited; however, in the opinion of the management of First Financial Bancorp. (First Financial or the Company), all material adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

NOTE 1: BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The Consolidated Financial Statements of First Financial, a bank holding company principally serving Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, include the accounts and operations of First Financial and its wholly-owned subsidiary – First Financial Bank, N.A. (First Financial Bank or the Bank). All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications of prior periods’ amounts have been made to conform to the current period’s presentation and had no effect on net earnings.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes. Actual realized amounts could differ materially from those estimates.

These interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and serve to update the First Financial Bancorp. Annual Report on Form 10-K (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2012. These interim financial statements may not include all information and notes necessary to constitute a complete set of financial statements under GAAP applicable to annual periods and accordingly should be read in conjunction with the financial information contained in the Form 10-K. Management believes these unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year or any other interim period. The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2012, has been derived from the audited financial statements in the Company’s 2012 Form 10-K.

NOTE 2: RECENTLY ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In December 2011, the FASB issued an update (ASU 2011-11, Disclosures About Offsetting Assets and Liabilities) which creates new disclosure requirements about the nature of an entity's rights of offset and related arrangements associated with its financial instruments and derivative instruments. These disclosure requirements are required for recognized financial and derivative instruments that are offset in accordance with the guidance in FASB ASC Topic 210-20-45, Balance Sheet - Offsetting - Other Presentation Matters, FASB ASC Topic 815-10-45, Derivatives and Hedging - Other Presentation Matters, or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU 2013-01, Scope Clarification of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which limits the scope of ASU 2011-11 to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions. Companies are required to disclose information to enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on its financial position, including the effect or potential effect of rights of set-off associated with certain financial instruments and derivative instruments. The provisions of ASU 2011-11 became effective for the interim reporting period ended March 31, 2013 and resulted in additional disclosures related to the Company's derivatives programs. For further detail, see Note 6 - Derivatives.

In July 2012, the FASB issued an update (ASU 2012-02, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment) which allows an entity testing an indefinite-lived intangible asset for impairment the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the asset. This update also addresses circumstances that a company should consider in interim periods, but does not remove the requirement for testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually and between annual tests if there is a change in events and circumstances. The provisions of ASU 2012-02 became effective for the interim reporting period ended March 31, 2013 and did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In October 2012, the FASB issued an update (ASU 2012-06, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Subsequent Accounting for an Indemnification Asset Recognized at the Acquisition Date as a Result of a Government-Assisted Acquisition of a Financial Institution) which clarifies the applicable guidance for subsequently measuring an indemnification asset recognized as a result of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution. When a company recognizes an indemnification asset as a result

Table of Contents

of a government-assisted acquisition of a financial institution and subsequently a change in the cash flows expected to be collected on the indemnification asset occurs (as a result of a change in cash flows expected to be collected on the assets subject to indemnification), the company should subsequently account for the change in the measurement of the indemnification asset on the same basis as the change in the assets subject to indemnification. Any amortization of changes in value should be limited to the contractual term of the indemnification agreement (that is, the lesser of the term of the indemnification agreement and the remaining life of the indemnified assets). The provisions of ASU 2012-06 became effective for the interim reporting period ended March 31, 2013 and did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

On February 5, 2013, the FASB issued an update (ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)) which requires preparers to report in one place information about reclassifications out of AOCI. The ASU also requires companies to report changes in AOCI balances and expands the disclosure requirements in FASB ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income (ASC 220), for presentation of changes in AOCI. This ASU requires companies to disaggregate the total change of each component of other comprehensive income and separately present (1) reclassification adjustments and (2) current-period OCI. ASU 2013-02 also requires companies to present information about significant items reclassified out of AOCI by component either (1) on the face of the statement where net income is presented or (2) as a separate disclosure in the notes to the financial statements. The provisions of ASU 2013-02 became effective for the interim reporting period ended March 31, 2013 and resulted in additional disclosures related to reclassifications from AOCI. For further detail, see Note 14 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).

NOTE 3: GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill. Assets and liabilities of acquired entities are recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The excess cost of the acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Goodwill is not amortized, but is measured for impairment on an annual basis as of October 1 of each year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit may be below its carrying value. First Financial performed its most recent annual impairment test as of October 1, 2012 and no impairment was indicated. As of June 30, 2013, no events or changes in circumstances indicated that the fair value of a reporting unit was below its carrying value. First Financial had goodwill of $95.1 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Other intangible assets. Other intangible assets consist primarily of core deposit intangibles. Core deposit intangibles are recorded at their estimated fair value as of the acquisition date and are then amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives. Core deposit intangibles were $6.6 million and $7.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. First Financial's core deposit intangibles have an estimated weighted average remaining life of 7.3 years. Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

Amortization expense recognized on intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, was $0.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

NOTE 4: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In the normal course of business, First Financial offers a variety of financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk to its clients to assist them in meeting their requirements for liquidity and credit enhancement. These financial instruments include standby letters of credit and outstanding commitments to extend credit. GAAP does not require these financial instruments to be recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

First Financial’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for standby letters of credit, and outstanding commitments to extend credit, is represented by the contractual amounts of those instruments. First Financial uses the same credit policies in issuing commitments and conditional obligations as it does for credit instruments recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Letters of credit. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by First Financial to guarantee the performance of a client to a third party. First Financial’s portfolio of standby letters of credit consists primarily of performance assurances made on behalf of clients who have a contractual commitment to produce or deliver goods or services. The risk to First Financial arises from its obligation to make payment in the event of the client's contractual default to produce the contracted good or service to a third party. First Financial has issued letters of credit (including standby letters of credit) aggregating $14.6 million and $14.8 million at June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, respectively. Management conducts regular reviews of these instruments on an individual client basis.

Table of Contents

Loan commitments. Loan commitments are agreements to extend credit to a client as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the commitment agreement. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by First Financial upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the client. The collateral held varies, but may include securities, real estate, inventory, plant or equipment. First Financial had commitments outstanding to extend credit totaling $1.3 billion at June 30, 2013, and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2012.

First Financial utilizes the allowance for loan and lease losses methodology to maintain a reserve that it considers sufficient to absorb probable losses inherent in standby letters of credit and outstanding loan commitments and records the reserve within Accrued interest and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Contingencies/Litigation. First Financial and its subsidiaries are engaged in various matters of litigation, other assertions of improper or fraudulent loan practices or lending violations and other matters from time to time, and have a number of unresolved claims pending. Additionally, as part of the ordinary course of business, First Financial and its subsidiaries are parties to litigation involving claims to the ownership of funds in particular accounts, the collection of delinquent accounts, challenges to security interests in collateral and foreclosure interests, that is incidental to our regular business activities. While the ultimate liability with respect to these other litigation matters and claims cannot be determined at this time, First Financial believes that damages, if any, and other amounts relating to pending matters are not probable or cannot be reasonably estimated as of June 30, 2013. Reserves are established for these various matters of litigation, when appropriate under FASB ASC Topic 450, Contingencies, based in part upon the advice of legal counsel.

NOTE 5: INVESTMENTS

The following is a summary of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investment securities as of June 30, 2013:



	Held-to-Maturity									Available-for-Sale
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Market Value		Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Market Value
U.S. Treasuries	$	0	$	0	$	0		$	0	$	97	$	0	$	(3	)	$	94
Securities of U.S. government agencies and corporations	19,854		0		(276		)	19,578		10,272		0		(125		)	10,147
Mortgage-backed securities	641,491		694		(5,835		)	636,350		681,529		6,777		(17,974		)	670,332
Obligations of state and other political subdivisions	8,901		166		(597		)	8,470		34,693		52		(1,608		)	33,137
Asset-backed securities	0		0		0			0		60,873		0		(388		)	60,485
Other securities	0		0		0			0		112,604		193		(2,298		)	110,499
Total	$	670,246	$	860	$	(6,708	)	$	664,398	$	900,068	$	7,022	$	(22,396	)	$	884,694

The following is a summary of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investment securities as of December 31, 2012:



	Held-to-Maturity									Available-for-Sale
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Market Value		Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized Loss			Market Value
Securities of U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	20,512	$	679	$	0		$	21,191	$	15,562	$	333	$	0		$	15,895
Mortgage-backed securities	740,891		8,077		(1,290		)	747,678		854,150		14,564		(1,485		)	867,229
Obligations of state and other political subdivisions	9,352		265		(12		)	9,605		35,913		169		(84		)	35,998
Asset-backed securities	0		0		0			0		57,000		90		(1		)	57,089
Other securities	0		0		0			0		54,479		1,569		(163		)	55,885
Total	$	770,755	$	9,021	$	(1,302	)	$	778,474	$	1,017,104	$	16,725	$	(1,733	)	$	1,032,096

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of investment securities by estimated maturity as of June 30, 2013:



	Held-to-Maturity				Available-for-Sale
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Market Value		Amortized Cost		Market Value
Due in one year or less	$	215	$	218	$	14,244	$	14,779
Due after one year through five years	553,586		550,083		356,449		355,526
Due after five years through ten years	107,195		104,818		219,699		214,398
Due after ten years	9,250		9,279		309,676		299,991
Total	$	670,246	$	664,398	$	900,068	$	884,694

The following tables present the age of gross unrealized losses and associated fair value by investment category:



	June 30, 2013
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Securities of U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	19,625	$	(225	)	$	0	$	0		$	19,625	$	(225	)
Mortgage-backed securities	865,450		(21,140		)	23,867		(231		)	889,317		(21,371		)
Obligations of state and other political subdivisions	68,190		(2,648		)	0		0			68,190		(2,648		)
Asset-backed securities	60,486		(388		)	0		0			60,486		(388		)
Other securities	66,453		(1,737		)	1,252		(119		)	67,705		(1,856		)
Total	$	1,080,204	$	(26,138	)	$	25,119	$	(350	)	$	1,105,323	$	(26,488	)



	December 31, 2012
	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Value		Loss
Mortgage-backed securities	$	240,641	$	(1,635	)	$	25,513	$	(405	)	$	266,154	$	(2,040	)
Obligations of state and other political subdivisions	21,341		(96		)	0		0			21,341		(96		)
Asset-backed securities	9,999		(1		)	0		0			9,999		(1		)
Other securities	8,454		(163		)	0		0			8,454		(163		)
Total	$	280,435	$	(1,895	)	$	25,513	$	(405	)	$	305,948	$	(2,300	)

Gains and losses on debt securities are generally due to higher current market yields relative to the yields of the debt securities at their amortized cost. All securities with unrealized losses are reviewed quarterly to determine if any impairment is considered other than temporary, requiring a write-down to fair market value. First Financial considers the percentage loss on a security, duration of the loss, average life or duration of the security, credit rating of the security and payment performance, as well as the Company's intent and ability to hold the security to maturity when determining whether any impairment is other than temporary. At this time First Financial does not intend to sell, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell debt securities temporarily impaired prior to maturity or recovery of the recorded value. First Financial had no other than temporary impairment related to its investment securities portfolio as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

For further detail on the fair value of investment securities, see Note 13 – Fair Value Disclosures.

NOTE 6: DERIVATIVES

First Financial uses derivative instruments, including interest rate caps, floors and swaps, to meet the needs of its clients while managing the interest rate risk associated with certain transactions. First Financial does not use derivatives for speculative purposes.

Table of Contents

While authorized to use a variety of derivative products, First Financial primarily utilizes interest rate swaps as a means to offer borrowers credit-based products that meet their needs and may from time to time utilize interest rate swaps to manage the interest rate risk profile of the Company. The interest rate swap agreements establish the basis on which interest rate payments are exchanged with counterparties referred to as the notional amount.

The following table summarizes the notional values of derivative financial instruments utilized by First Financial by the nature of the underlying asset or liability:



(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Fair value hedges
Instruments associated with loans	$	910,175	$	935,493

As only interest rate payments are exchanged, the cash requirements and credit risk associated with interest rate swaps are significantly less than the notional amount and the Company’s credit risk exposure is limited to the market value of the instruments. First Financial manages the market value credit risk associated with counterparties through counterparty credit policies. These policies require the Company to maintain a total derivative notional position of less than 35% of assets, total credit exposure of less than 3% of capital and no single counterparty credit risk exposure greater than $20.0 million. The Company is currently well below all single counterparty and portfolio limits. At June 30, 2013, the Company had a total counterparty notional amount outstanding of approximately $495.4 million, spread among eight counterparties, with an outstanding liability from these contracts of $12.6 million. At December 31, 2012, the Company had a total counterparty notional amount outstanding of approximately $509.1 million, spread among eight counterparties, with an outstanding liability from these contracts of $26.0 million.

First Financial’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of nonperformance by a borrower, is limited to the market value of the derivative instrument associated with that borrower. First Financial monitors its derivative credit exposure to borrowers through the normal credit review processes the Company performs on all borrowers. Additionally, the Company monitors derivative credit risk exposure related to problem loans through the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses committee. First Financial considers the market value of a derivative instrument to be part of the carrying value of the related loan for these purposes as the borrower is contractually obligated to pay First Financial this amount in the event the derivative contract is terminated.

The following table summarizes the derivative financial instruments utilized by First Financial and their balances:



		June 30, 2013							December 31, 2012
				Estimated fair value							Estimated fair value
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance Sheet Classification	Notional amount		Gain		Loss			Notional amount		Gain		Loss
Fair value hedges
Pay fixed interest rate swaps with counterparty	Accrued interest and other liabilities	$	10,675	$	0	$	(1,082	)	$	12,739	$	0	$	(1,445	)
Matched interest rate swaps with borrower	Accrued interest and other assets	449,750		14,328		(1,169		)	461,377		24,135		0
Matched interest rate swaps with counterparty	Accrued interest and other liabilities	449,750		1,169		(14,418		)	461,377		0		(24,978		)
Total		$	910,175	$	15,497	$	(16,669	)	$	935,493	$	24,135	$	(26,423	)

In connection with its use of derivative instruments, from time to time First Financial and its counterparties are required to post cash collateral to offset the market position of the derivative instruments. First Financial maintains the right to offset these derivative positions with the collateral posted against them by or with the relevant counterparties. First Financial classifies the derivative cash collateral outstanding with its counterparties as an adjustment to the fair value of the derivative contracts within Accrued interest and other assets or Accrued interest and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Table of Contents

The following table discloses the gross and net amounts of liabilities recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:



	June 30, 2013							December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Gross amounts of recognized liabilities		Gross amounts offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets			Net amounts of liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets		Gross amounts of recognized liabilities		Gross amounts offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets			Net amounts of liabilities presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
Fair value hedges
Pay fixed interest rate swaps with counterparty	$	1,082	$	(444	)	$	638	$	1,445	$	(669	)	$	776
Matched interest rate swaps with counterparty	15,587		(13,552		)	2,035		24,978		(23,057		)	1,921
Total	$	16,669	$	(13,996	)	$	2,673	$	26,423	$	(23,726	)	$	2,697

The following table details the derivative financial instruments, the average remaining maturities and the weighted-average interest rates being paid and received by First Financial at June 30, 2013:



							Weighted-average rate
(Dollars in thousands)	Notional amount		Average maturity (years)	Fair value			Receive		Pay
Asset conversion swaps
Pay fixed interest rate swaps with counterparty	$	10,675	3.3	$	(1,082	)	2.21	%	6.85	%
Receive fixed, matched interest rate swaps with borrower	449,750		4.2	13,159			4.94	%	2.93	%
Pay fixed, matched interest rate swaps with counterparty	449,750		4.2	(13,249		)	2.93	%	4.94	%
Total asset conversion swaps	$	910,175	4.2	$	(1,172	)	3.91	%	3.97	%

The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative instrument and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

Fair Value Hedges. First Financial utilizes interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges as a means to offer commercial borrowers products that meet their needs, but are also designed to achieve First Financial’s desired interest rate risk profile. First Financial accomplishes this by entering into swap agreements with commercial borrowers and simultaneously entering into offsetting swap agreements, with substantially matching terms, with institutional counterparties. These interest rate swap agreements generally involve the receipt by First Financial of floating rate amounts from counterparties in exchange for payments to these counterparties by First Financial of fixed rate amounts received from commercial borrowers over the life of the agreements. These interest rate swap agreements do not involve an exchange of the underlying principal or notional amount. This results in First Financial’s loan customers receiving fixed rate funding, while providing First Financial with a floating rate asset. First Financial's matched interest rate swaps economically hedge offsetting "receive fixed" and "pay fixed" exposures, but do not qualify for hedge accounting.

The net interest receivable or payable on matched interest rate swaps is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to the interest income of the hedged item. The fair value of matched interest rate swaps is included within Accrued interest and other assets and Accrued interest and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

For the unmatched, pay fixed interest rate swaps, which qualify for hedge accounting, the corresponding fair-value adjustment is included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in the carrying value of the hedged item. The net interest receivable or payable on unmatched interest rate swaps is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to the interest income of the hedged item. Gains and losses from derivatives not considered effective in hedging the change in fair value of the hedged item, if any, are recognized in income immediately.

Table of Contents

The following table details the location and amounts recognized for fair value hedges:



		Decrease to Interest income
(Dollars in thousands)		Three months ended						Six months ended
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships	Location of change in fair value	June 30,						June 30,
		2013			2012			2013			2012
Interest rate contracts
Loans	Interest income - loans	$	(129	)	$	(192	)	$	(271	)	$	(388	)
Total		$	(129	)	$	(192	)	$	(271	)	$	(388	)

Cash Flow Hedges. First Financial utilizes interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges to manage the variability of cash flows, primarily net interest income, attributable to changes in interest rates. The net interest receivable or payable on an interest rate swap designated as a cash flow hedge is accrued and recognized as an adjustment to interest income or interest expense. The fair value of interest rate swaps is included within accrued interest and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Gains and losses from derivatives not considered effective in hedging the cash flows related to the hedged items, if any, are recognized in income immediately.

In 2012, First Financial executed a cash flow hedge utilizing an interest rate swap to hedge against interest rate volatility on $35.0 million of floating rate interest-bearing deposits indexed to the U.S. Federal Funds Target Rate. This interest rate swap involves the receipt by First Financial of variable-rate interest amounts in exchange for fixed-rate interest payments by First Financial for a period of 7 years and does qualify for hedge accounting. Accrued interest and other assets included $1.1 million at June 30, 2013 and accrued interest and other liabilities included $0.2 million at December 31, 2012 reflecting the fair value of this cash flow hedge.

NOTE 7: BORROWINGS

Short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheets include repurchase agreements utilized for corporate sweep accounts with cash management account agreements in place as well as overnight advances from the Federal Loan Home Bank (FHLB). All repurchase agreements are subject to terms and conditions of repurchase/security agreements between First Financial Bank and the client. To secure the Bank's liability to the client, First Financial Bank is authorized to sell or repurchase U. S. Treasury, government agency and mortgage-backed securities.

First Financial had $505.9 million in short-term borrowings with the FHLB at June 30, 2013 and $502.0 million as of December 31, 2012. These short-term borrowings are used to manage the Company's normal liquidity needs and support the Company's asset and liability management strategies.

Long-term debt primarily consists of FHLB long-term advances and repurchase agreements utilizing investment securities pledged as collateral. These instruments are primarily utilized to reduce overnight liquidity risk and to mitigate interest rate sensitivity on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. First Financial has $65.0 million in repurchase agreements which have remaining maturities of less than 3 years and a weighted average rate of 3.50%. Securities pledged as collateral in conjunction with the repurchase agreements are included within Investment securities available-for-sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following is a summary of long-term debt:



	June 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Average Rate		Amount		Average Rate
Federal Home Loan Bank	$	8,182	3.77	%	$	9,427	3.74	%
National Market Repurchase Agreement	65,000		3.50	%	65,000		3.50	%
Capital loan with municipality	775		0.00	%	775		0.00	%
Total long-term debt	$	73,957	3.50	%	$	75,202	3.49	%

Under Federal Reserve Board guidelines, a company can issue qualifying debentures up to 25% of qualifying Tier I capital. First Financial has the capacity to issue approximately $159.4 million in additional qualifying debentures under these guidelines.

Table of Contents

NOTE 8: LOANS - EXCLUDING COVERED LOANS

First Financial offers clients a variety of commercial and consumer loan and lease products with various interest rates and payment terms. Lending activities are primarily concentrated in Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, where the Bank currently operates banking centers. Additionally, First Financial provides equipment and leasehold improvement financing for franchisees in the quick service and casual dining restaurant sector throughout the United States.

Credit Quality. To facilitate the monitoring of credit quality for commercial loans, and for purposes of determining an appropriate allowance for loan and lease losses, First Financial utilizes the following categories of credit grades:

Pass - Higher quality loans that do not fit any of the other categories described below.

Special Mention - First Financial assigns a Special Mention rating to loans and leases with potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or lease or in First Financial's credit position at some future date.

Substandard - First Financial assigns a substandard rating to loans or leases that are inadequately protected by the current sound financial worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard loans and leases have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize repayment of the debt. Substandard loans and leases are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not addressed.

Doubtful - First Financial assigns a doubtful rating to loans and leases with all the attributes of a substandard rating with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors that may work to the advantage and strengthening of the credit quality of the loan or lease, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral and refinancing plans.

The credit grades described above, which are derived from standard regulatory rating definitions, are assigned upon initial approval of credit to borrowers and updated periodically thereafter.

First Financial considers repayment performance as the best indicator of credit quality for consumer loans. Consumer loans that have principal and interest payments that are past due by ninety days or more are generally classified as nonperforming. Additionally, consumer loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) are classified as nonperforming unless such loans have a sustained period of repayment performance of six months or greater and are reasonably assured of repayment in accordance with the restructured terms.

Table of Contents

Commercial and consumer credit exposure by risk attribute was as follows:



	As of June 30, 2013
			Real Estate
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Total
Pass	$	887,396	$	91,897	$	1,373,521	$	2,352,814
Special Mention	28,523		65		31,091		59,679
Substandard	24,501		5,284		72,614		102,399
Doubtful	0		0		0		0
Total	$	940,420	$	97,246	$	1,477,226	$	2,514,892



(Dollars in thousands)	Real Estate Residential		Installment		Home Equity		Other		Total
Performing	$	333,647	$	50,532	$	367,392	$	102,737	$	854,308
Nonperforming	9,369		249		2,814		496		12,928
Total	$	343,016	$	50,781	$	370,206	$	103,233	$	867,236



	As of December 31, 2012
			Real Estate
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Total
Pass	$	803,351	$	64,866	$	1,307,370	$	2,175,587
Special Mention	29,663		65		38,516		68,244
Substandard	28,019		8,586		71,122		107,727
Doubtful	0		0		0		0
Total	$	861,033	$	73,517	$	1,417,008	$	2,351,558



(Dollars in thousands)	Real Estate Residential		Installment		Home Equity		Other		Total
Performing	$	310,341	$	56,358	$	364,248	$	84,490	$	815,437
Nonperforming	7,869		452		3,252		496		12,069
Total	$	318,210	$	56,810	$	367,500	$	84,986	$	827,506

Delinquency. Loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the date of the scheduled payment.

Table of Contents

Loan delinquency, including nonaccrual loans, was as follows:



	As of June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	30 – 59 days past due		60 – 89 days past due		> 90 days past due		Total past due		Current		Total		> 90 days past due and accruing
Loans
Commercial	$	723	$	3	$	10,551	$	11,277	$	929,143	$	940,420	$	0
Real estate - construction	0		0		1,104		1,104		96,142		97,246		0
Real estate - commercial	7,397		2,504		28,314		38,215		1,439,011		1,477,226		0
Real estate - residential	4,618		0		6,460		11,078		331,938		343,016		0
Installment	414		131		197		742		50,039		50,781		0
Home equity	1,247		524		1,520		3,291		366,915		370,206		0
Other	261		160		654		1,075		102,158		103,233		158
Total	$	14,660	$	3,322	$	48,800	$	66,782	$	3,315,346	$	3,382,128	$	158



	As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	30 - 59 days past due		60 - 89 days past due		> 90 days past due		Total past due		Current		Total		> 90 days past due and accruing
Loans
Commercial	$	1,770	$	832	$	4,197	$	6,799	$	854,234	$	861,033	$	0
Real estate - construction	0		0		892		892		72,625		73,517		0
Real estate - commercial	2,549		1,931		27,966		32,446		1,384,562		1,417,008		0
Real estate - residential	6,071		1,463		6,113		13,647		304,563		318,210		0
Installment	280		148		344		772		56,038		56,810		0
Home equity	1,311		869		1,440		3,620		363,880		367,500		0
Other	386		168		708		1,262		83,724		84,986		212
Total	$	12,367	$	5,411	$	41,660	$	59,438	$	3,119,626	$	3,179,064	$	212

Nonaccrual. Loans are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful or when principal or interest payments are ninety days or more past due. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual status due to the continued failure to adhere to contractual payment terms by the borrower coupled with other pertinent factors such as insufficient collateral value. The accrual of interest income is discontinued and previously accrued, but unpaid interest is reversed when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status. Any payments received while a loan is on nonaccrual status are applied as a reduction to the carrying value of the loan. A loan may be placed back on accrual status if all contractual payments have been received and collection of future principal and interest payments is no longer doubtful.

Troubled Debt Restructurings. A loan modification is considered a TDR when two conditions are met: 1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and 2) concessions are made by the Company that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower with similar credit characteristics. The most common types of modifications include interest rate reductions, maturity extensions and modifications to principal amortization, including interest only structures. Modified terms are dependent upon the financial position and needs of the individual borrower. If the modification agreement is violated, the loan is managed by the Company’s credit administration group for resolution, which may result in foreclosure in the case of real estate.

TDRs are generally classified as nonaccrual for a minimum period of six months and may qualify for return to accrual status once they have demonstrated performance with the terms of the loan modification.

Table of Contents

First Financial had 207 TDRs totaling $32.9 million at June 30, 2013, including $12.9 million on accrual status and $19.9 million classified as nonaccrual. First Financial had $2.6 million of commitments outstanding to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified through TDRs. At June 30, 2013, the allowance for loan and lease losses included reserves of $2.9 million related to TDRs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, First Financial charged off $0.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively, for the portion of TDRs determined to be uncollectible. Additionally, at June 30, 2013, approximately $5.7 million of the accruing TDRs have been performing in accordance with the restructured terms for more than one year.

First Financial had 145 TDRs totaling $25.0 million at December 31, 2012, including $10.9 million of loans on accrual status and $14.1 million classified as nonaccrual. First Financial had $3.5 million of commitments outstanding to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified through TDRs. At December 31, 2012, the allowance for loan and lease losses included reserves of $3.0 million related to TDRs. For the year ended December 31, 2012, First Financial charged off $7.2 million for the portion of TDRs determined to be uncollectible. At December 31, 2012, approximately $2.7 million of the accruing TDRs had been performing in accordance with the restructured terms for more than one year.

The following tables provide information on loan modifications classified as TDRs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.



	Three months ended
	June 30, 2013					June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of loans	Pre-modification loan balance		Period end balance		Number of loans	Pre-modification loan balance		Period end balance
Commercial	4	$	171	$	171	2	$	66	$	66
Real estate - construction	0	0		0		0	0		0
Real estate - commercial	3	659		657		8	909		901
Real estate - residential	9	596		594		2	164		166
Installment	3	17		16		0	0		0
Home equity	6	82		81		0	0		0
Total	25	$	1,525	$	1,519	12	$	1,139	$	1,133



	Six months ended
	June 30, 2013					June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of loans	Pre-modification loan balance		Period end balance		Number of loans	Pre-modification loan balance		Period end balance
Commercial	10	$	7,738	$	7,047	10	$	4,571	$	4,562
Real estate - construction	0	0		0		0	0		0
Real estate - commercial	7	2,251		2,242		14	4,749		4,718
Real estate - residential	30	1,969		1,850		2	164		166
Installment	11	154		97		0	0		0
Home equity	30	883		763		0	0		0
Total	88	$	12,995	$	11,999	26	$	9,484	$	9,446

Table of Contents

The following table provides information on how TDRs were modified during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.



	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,⁽²⁾				June 30,⁽²⁾
(Dollars in thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Extended maturities	$	268	$	406	$	8,068	$	7,260
Adjusted interest rates	0		166		562		166
Combination of rate and maturity changes	135		468		236		563
Forbearance	0		93		0		1,236
Other ⁽¹⁾	1,116		0		3,133		221
Total	$	1,519	$	1,133	$	11,999	$	9,446

(1) Includes covenant modifications and other concessions, or combination of concessions, that do not consist of interest rate adjustments, forbearance and maturity extensions

(2) Balances are as of period end

First Financial considers repayment performance as an indication of the effectiveness of the Company's loan modifications. A borrower that is ninety days or more past due on any principal or interest payments for a TDR, or who prematurely terminates a restructured loan agreement without satisfying the contractual principal balance (for example, in a deed-in-lieu arrangement), is considered to be in payment default of the terms of the TDR agreement.

The following table provides information on TDRs for which there was a payment default during the period that occurred within twelve months of the loan modification:



	June 30,
	2013			2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Loans	Period End Balance		Number of Loans	Period End Balance
Commercial	3	$	6,238	1	$	984
Real estate - construction	0	0		0	0
Real estate - commercial	1	72		0	0
Real estate - residential	3	185		0	0
Installment	3	14		0	0
Home equity	3	17		0	0
Total	13	$	6,526	1	$	984

Table of Contents

Impaired Loans. Loans placed on nonaccrual status and TDRs are considered impaired. The following table provides information on nonaccrual, TDRs and total impaired loans.



(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Impaired loans
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial	$	2,904	$	10,562
Real estate-construction	808		950
Real estate-commercial	30,977		31,002
Real estate-residential	5,149		5,045
Installment	153		376
Home equity	1,576		2,499
Other	496		496
Nonaccrual loans	42,063		50,930
Troubled debt restructurings
Accruing	12,924		10,856
Nonaccrual	19,948		14,111
Total troubled debt restructurings	32,872		24,967
Total impaired loans	$	74,935	$	75,897



	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Interest income effect on impaired loans
Gross amount of interest that would have been recorded under original terms	$	1,135	$	1,259	$	2,257	$	2,589
Interest included in income
Nonaccrual loans	70		140		142		349
Troubled debt restructurings	158		148		401		231
Total interest included in income	228		288		543		580
Net impact on interest income	$	907	$	971	$	1,714	$	2,009

Commitments outstanding to borrowers with nonaccrual loans					$	2,351	$	288

First Financial individually reviews all impaired commercial loan relationships greater than $250,000, as well as consumer loan TDRs greater than $100,000, to determine if a specific allowance based on the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support from guarantors and the realizable value of any collateral is necessary. Specific allowances are based on expected cash flows, discounted using the loan's initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans.

Table of Contents

First Financial's investment in impaired loans was as follows:



	As of June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Current Balance		Contractual Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Current Balance		YTD Interest Income Recognized		Quarterly Interest Income Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded
Commercial	$	13,909	$	16,034	$	0	$	13,976	$	124	$	51
Real estate - construction	750		1,052		0		557		0		0
Real estate - commercial	20,473		27,322		0		17,958		209		97
Real estate - residential	10,818		12,650		0		9,931		72		37
Installment	319		357		0		394		3		1
Home equity	2,920		3,687		0		3,138		21		10
Other	0		0		0		217		0		0

Loans with an allowance recorded
Commercial	2,194		2,716		1,076		4,030		50		5
Real estate - construction	354		624		35		1,210		7		0
Real estate - commercial	20,565		23,614		6,158		22,243		39		18
Real estate - residential	2,037		2,092		348		1,980		18		9
Installment	0		0		0		0		0		0
Home equity	100		100		2		101		0		0
Other	496		496		378		279		0		0

Total
Commercial	16,103		18,750		1,076		18,006		174		56
Real estate - construction	1,104		1,676		35		1,767		7		0
Real estate - commercial	41,038		50,936		6,158		40,201		248		115
Real estate - residential	12,855		14,742		348		11,911		90		46
Installment	319		357		0		394		3		1
Home equity	3,020		3,787		2		3,239		21		10
Other	496		496		378		496		0		0
Total	$	74,935	$	90,744	$	7,997	$	76,014	$	543	$	228

Table of Contents



	As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Current Balance		Contractual Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Current Balance		Interest Income Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded
Commercial	$	14,961	$	17,269	$	0	$	9,337	$	215
Real estate - construction	462		672		0		3,857		15
Real estate - commercial	15,782		21,578		0		15,554		277
Real estate - residential	9,222		10,817		0		8,463		81
Installment	452		556		0		452		2
Home equity	3,251		4,132		0		2,423		19
Other	326		326		0		65		0

Loans with an allowance recorded
Commercial	3,560		4,252		1,151		5,350		161
Real estate - construction	1,640		2,168		838		5,033		81
Real estate - commercial	24,014		25,684		7,155		25,499		235
Real estate - residential	1,956		2,003		290		2,278		38
Installment	0		0		0		0		0
Home equity	101		101		2		81		1
Other	170		170		92		34		0

Total
Commercial	18,521		21,521		1,151		14,687		376
Real estate - construction	2,102		2,840		838		8,890		96
Real estate - commercial	39,796		47,262		7,155		41,053		512
Real estate - residential	11,178		12,820		290		10,741		119
Installment	452		556		0		452		2
Home equity	3,352		4,233		2		2,504		20
Other	496		496		92		99		0
Total	$	75,897	$	89,728	$	9,528	$	78,426	$	1,125

OREO. Other real estate owned (OREO) is comprised of properties acquired by the Company through the loan foreclosure or repossession process, or other resolution activity that results in partial or total satisfaction of problem loans. The acquired properties are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs of disposal (net realizable value) upon acquisition. Losses arising at the time of acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Subsequent write-downs in the carrying value of OREO properties are expensed as incurred. Improvements to the properties may be capitalized if the improvements contribute to the overall value of the property, but may not be capitalized in excess of the net realizable value of the property.

Table of Contents

Changes in OREO were as follows:



	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	11,993	$	15,036	$	12,526	$	11,317
Additions
Commercial	1,759		808		2,316		5,349
Residential	233		992		380		1,914
Total additions	1,992		1,800		2,696		7,263
Disposals
Commercial	1,641		550		1,882		1,012
Residential	357		313		651		612
Total disposals	1,998		863		2,533		1,624
Write-downs
Commercial	156		182		561		1,140
Residential	33		103		330		128
Total write-downs	189		285		891		1,268
Balance at end of period	$	11,798	$	15,688	$	11,798	$	15,688

NOTE 9: COVERED LOANS

Loans acquired in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-assisted transactions initially covered under loss sharing agreements whereby the FDIC will reimburse First Financial for the majority of any losses incurred are referred to as covered loans. Pursuant to the terms of each loss sharing agreement, covered loans are subject to a stated loss threshold whereby the FDIC will reimburse First Financial for 80% of losses up to the stated loss threshold and 95% of losses in excess of the threshold. First Financial will reimburse the FDIC for its pro rata share of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid First Financial a reimbursement under the loss sharing agreement. The FDIC’s obligation to reimburse First Financial for losses with respect to covered loans began with the first dollar of loss incurred.

First Financial accounts for the majority of covered loans under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, except loans with revolving privileges, which are outside the scope of this guidance, and loans for which cash flows could not be estimated, which are accounted for under the cost recovery method. Loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 are referred to as purchased impaired loans.

Purchased impaired loans are not classified as nonperforming assets as the loans are considered to be performing under FASB ASC Topic 310-30. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying value of the loans and the expected cash flows (accretable difference) is recognized on all covered purchased impaired loans.

Table of Contents

The following table reflects the carrying value of all covered purchased impaired and nonimpaired covered loans:



	June 30, 2013						December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30		Loans excluded from FASB ASC Topic 310-30		Total purchased loans		Loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30		Loans excluded from FASB ASC Topic 310-30		Total purchased loans
Commercial	$	67,718	$	1,844	$	69,562	$	94,775	$	7,351	$	102,126
Real estate - construction	9,647		0		9,647		10,631		0		10,631
Real estate - commercial	382,547		6,735		389,282		458,066		7,489		465,555
Real estate - residential	90,707		0		90,707		100,694		0		100,694
Installment	6,409		648		7,057		7,911		763		8,674
Home equity	1,372		51,842		53,214		2,080		55,378		57,458
Other covered loans	0		2,796		2,796		0		2,978		2,978
Total covered loans	$	558,400	$	63,865	$	622,265	$	674,157	$	73,959	$	748,116

The balance of all loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, including all contractual principal, interest, fees and penalties, was $0.9 billion and $1.1 billion as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. These balances include $187.1 million and $220.4 million of contractual interest not yet accrued as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Changes in the carrying amount of accretable difference for covered purchased impaired loans were as follows:



	Three Months Ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	208,670		$	313,669		$	224,694		$	344,410
Reclassification (to)/from nonaccretable difference	(8,459		)	9,058			(708		)	23,442
Accretion	(15,252		)	(24,025		)	(33,199		)	(49,944		)
Other net activity ⁽¹⁾	(11,039		)	(15,406		)	(16,867		)	(34,612		)
Balance at end of period	$	173,920		$	283,296		$	173,920		$	283,296

(1) Includes the impact of loan repayments and charge-offs

First Financial regularly reviews its forecast of expected cash flows for covered purchased impaired loans. During the second quarter, the Company implemented certain enhancements to its valuation methodology and the estimation of impairment to place greater emphasis on changes in total expected cash flows and less emphasis on changes in the net present value of expected cash flows. These enhancements contributed to a net reclassification from accretable difference to nonaccretable difference of $8.5 million and resulted in lower yields on certain loan pools during the quarter. Conversely, First Financial recognized a $9.1 million reclassification from nonaccretable difference to accretable difference and higher yields on certain loan pools during the second quarter of 2012 related to improvement in the cash flow expectations for certain loan pools. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized a net reclassification of $0.7 million from accretable difference to nonaccretable difference as a result of the enhancements made during the second quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized a net reclassification of $23.4 million from nonaccretable difference to accretable difference. For further detail on impairment and provision expense related to covered purchased impaired loans, see "Covered Loans" in Note 10 - Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses.

Table of Contents

Credit Quality. For further discussion of First Financial's monitoring of credit quality for commercial and consumer loans, including discussion of the risk attributes noted below, please see Note 8 - Loans, excluding covered loans.

Covered commercial and consumer credit exposure by risk attribute was as follows:



	As of June 30, 2013
			Real Estate
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Total
Pass	$	33,317	$	1,714	$	200,641	$	235,672
Special Mention	9,716		0		45,491		55,207
Substandard	25,679		7,933		143,150		176,762
Doubtful	850		0		0		850
Total	$	69,562	$	9,647	$	389,282	$	468,491



(Dollars in thousands)	Real estate residential		Installment		Home equity		Other		Total
Performing	$	90,707	$	7,054	$	50,640	$	2,787	$	151,188
Nonperforming	0		3		2,574		9		2,586
Total	$	90,707	$	7,057	$	53,214	$	2,796	$	153,774



	As of December 31, 2012
			Real Estate
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Total
Pass	$	48,213	$	2,304	$	213,143	$	263,660
Special Mention	16,293		7		70,894		87,194
Substandard	35,596		8,320		181,345		225,261
Doubtful	2,024		0		173		2,197
Total	$	102,126	$	10,631	$	465,555	$	578,312



(Dollars in thousands)	Real estate residential		Installment		Home equity		Other		Total
Performing	$	100,694	$	8,674	$	53,231	$	2,967	$	165,566
Nonperforming	0		0		4,227		11		4,238
Total	$	100,694	$	8,674	$	57,458	$	2,978	$	169,804

Delinquency. Covered loans are considered past due or delinquent when the contractual principal or interest due in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement or any portion thereof remains unpaid after the due date of the scheduled payment.

Table of Contents

Covered loan delinquency, excluding loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, was as follows:



	As of June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	30 - 59 days past due		60 - 89 days past due		> 90 days past due		Total past due		Current		Total		> 90 days past due and accruing
Loans
Commercial	$	136	$	0	$	469	$	605	$	1,239	$	1,844	$	0
Real estate - commercial	506		0		1,331		1,837		4,898		6,735		0
Installment	0		0		6		6		642		648		0
Home equity	826		0		2,062		2,888		48,954		51,842		0
All other	61		0		33		94		2,702		2,796		24
Total	$	1,529	$	0	$	3,901	$	5,430	$	58,435	$	63,865	$	24



	As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	30 - 59 days past due		60 - 89 days past due		> 90 days past due		Total past due		Current		Total		> 90 days past due and accruing
Loans
Commercial	$	351	$	148	$	3,781	$	4,280	$	3,071	$	7,351	$	0
Real estate - commercial	138		1,149		2,201		3,488		4,001		7,489		0
Installment	0		0		0		0		763		763		0
Home equity	286		296		3,697		4,279		51,099		55,378		0
All other	19		26		42		87		2,891		2,978		31
Total	$	794	$	1,619	$	9,721	$	12,134	$	61,825	$	73,959	$	31

Nonaccrual. Covered purchased impaired loans are classified as performing, even though they may be contractually past due, as any nonpayment of contractual principal or interest is considered in the periodic re-estimation of expected cash flows and is included in the resulting recognition of current period covered loan loss provision or prospective yield adjustments.

Similar to uncovered loans, covered loans accounted for outside FASB ASC Topic 310-30 are classified as nonaccrual when, in the opinion of management, collection of principal or interest is doubtful or when principal or interest payments are ninety days or more past due. Generally, these loans are placed on nonaccrual status due to the continued failure to adhere to contractual payment terms by the borrower coupled with other pertinent factors, such as insufficient collateral value. The accrual of interest income is discontinued and previously accrued, but unpaid interest is reversed when a loan is placed in nonaccrual status. Any payments received while a loan is in nonaccrual status are applied as a reduction to the carrying value of the loan. A loan may be returned to accrual status if all contractual payments have been received and collection of future principal and interest payments is no longer doubtful.

Table of Contents

Information on covered nonaccrual loans was as follows:



(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Impaired loans
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial	$	449	$	4,498
Real estate-commercial	1,413		2,986
Installment	3		0
Home equity	2,574		4,227
All other	9		11
Nonaccrual loans	4,448		11,722
Troubled debt restructurings
Accruing	365		0
Nonaccrual	323		0
Total troubled debt restructurings	688		0
Total impaired loans	$	5,136	$	11,722



	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Interest income effect on impaired loans
Gross amount of interest that would have been recorded under original terms	$	115	$	150	$	253	$	358
Interest included in income
Nonaccrual loans	6		13		13		61
Troubled debt restructurings	4		0		4		0
Total interest included in income	10		13		17		61
Net impact on interest income	$	105	$	137	$	236	$	297

Impaired Loans. Covered loans placed in nonaccrual status, excluding loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, are considered impaired. First Financial’s investment in covered impaired loans, excluding loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, was as follows:



	As of June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Current Balance		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		YTD Interest Income Recognized		Quarterly Interest Income Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded
Commercial	$	449	$	2,468	$	0	$	2,348	$	5	$	2
Real estate - commercial	1,413		2,827		0		1,894		2		1
Installment	3		3		0		1		0		0
Home equity	2,574		3,784		0		2,972		6		3
All other	9		9		0		11		0		0
Total	$	4,448	$	9,091	$	0	$	7,226	$	13	$	6

Table of Contents



	As of December 31, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Current Balance		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Loans with no related allowance recorded
Commercial	$	4,498	$	4,660	$	0	$	4,526	$	62
Real estate - commercial	2,986		3,216		0		2,153		18
Home equity	4,227		5,260		0		2,006		5
All other	11		11		0		13		0
Total	$	11,722	$	13,147	$	0	$	8,698	$	85

Covered OREO. Covered OREO is comprised of properties acquired by the Company through the loan foreclosure or repossession process, or other resolution activities that result in partial or total satisfaction of problem covered loans. These properties remain subject to loss sharing agreements whereby the FDIC reimburses First Financial for the majority of any losses incurred. The acquired properties are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value upon acquisition. Losses arising at the time of acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Subsequent write-downs in the carrying value of covered OREO properties are expensed as incurred. Estimated reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to any losses upon acquisition or subsequent write-downs in the carrying value of covered OREO are recorded as noninterest income and an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset in the same period. Improvements to the properties may be capitalized if the improvements contribute to the overall value of the property, but may not be capitalized in excess of the net realizable value of the property.

Changes in covered OREO were as follows:



	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	29,345	$	41,489	$	28,862	$	44,818
Additions
Commercial	6,029		2,349		12,491		5,099
Residential	161		62		377		2,686
Total additions	6,190		2,411		12,868		7,785
Disposals
Commercial	12,027		13,554		16,648		18,559
Residential	470		1,811		814		2,354
Total disposals	12,497		15,365		17,462		20,913
Write-downs
Commercial	557		2,332		1,682		5,416
Residential	6		795		111		866
Total write-downs	563		3,127		1,793		6,282
Balance at end of period	$	22,475	$	25,408	$	22,475	$	25,408

NOTE 10: ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES

Loans - excluding covered loans. For each reporting period, management maintains the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that it considers sufficient to absorb probable loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on historical loss experience as well as other significant factors such as composition of the portfolio, economic conditions, geographic footprint, the results of periodic internal and external evaluations of delinquent, nonaccrual and classified loans and any other adverse situations that may affect a specific borrower's ability to repay (including the timing of future payments). This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires utilizing material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change.

Table of Contents

In the commercial portfolio, which includes commercial loans, construction and commercial real estate loans and lease financing, impaired loan relationships greater than $250,000 are evaluated to determine the need for a specific allowance based on the borrower's overall financial condition, resources and payment record, support from guarantors and the realizable value of any collateral. Loans are considered impaired when, in the judgment of management, based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected.

The allowance for non-impaired commercial loans and impaired commercial loan relationships less than $250,000 includes a process of estimating the probable losses inherent in the portfolio by category, based on First Financial's internal system of credit risk ratings and historical loss data. These estimates may also be adjusted for management's estimate of probable losses on specific loan types dependent upon trends in the values of the underlying collateral, delinquent and nonaccrual loans, prevailing economic conditions, changes in lending strategies and other influencing factors.

With the exception of loans modified as TDRs, consumer loans are evaluated by loan type (i.e. residential real estate, installment, etc.), as these loans exhibit homogeneous characteristics. The allowance for consumer loans, which includes residential real estate, installment, home equity, credit card loans and overdrafts, is established by estimating losses inherent in each particular category of consumer loans. The estimate of losses is primarily based on historical loss rates for each category, as well as trends in delinquent and nonaccrual loans, prevailing economic conditions and other significant influencing factors. Consumer loans modified as TDRs greater than $100,000 are individually reviewed to determine if a specific allowance is necessary.

There were no material changes to First Financial's accounting policies or methodology related to the allowance for loan and lease losses during the first six months of 2013, however certain modifications were made to the estimation process in the third quarter of 2012 to place greater emphasis on quantitative factors such as historical loan losses and less emphasis on qualitative factors. This resulted in a shift in the allocation of the allowance between certain consumer and commercial loan types but had no significant impact on the total allowance for loan and lease losses at June 30, 2013.

The allowance is increased by provision expense and decreased by actual charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously charged-off. First Financial's policy is to charge-off all or a portion of a loan when, in management's opinion, it is unlikely to collect the principal amount owed in full either through payments from the borrower or from the liquidation of collateral.

Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the previous five quarters are presented in the table that follows:



	Three Months Ended															Six months ended
	2013						2012									June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,			Mar. 31,			Dec. 31,			Sep. 30,			June 30,			2013			2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	48,306		$	47,777		$	49,192		$	50,952		$	49,437		$	47,777		$	52,576
Provision for loan and lease losses	2,409			3,041			3,882			3,613			8,364			5,450			11,622
Loans charged off	(4,194		)	(3,210		)	(5,548		)	(5,804		)	(7,138		)	(7,404		)	(13,960		)
Recoveries	526			698			251			431			289			1,224			714
Balance at end of period	$	47,047		$	48,306		$	47,777		$	49,192		$	50,952		$	47,047		$	50,952
Allowance for loan and lease losses to total ending loans	1.39		%	1.49		%	1.50		%	1.60		%	1.69		%	1.39		%	1.69		%

Table of Contents

Year-to-date changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses by loan category were as follows:



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
			Real Estate
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Construction			Commercial		Residential		Installment			Home Equity		Other		Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Balance at beginning of period	$	7,926	$	3,268		$	24,151	$	3,599	$	522		$	5,173	$	3,138	$	47,777
Provision for loan and lease losses	2,144		(1,655		)	2,934		613		(136		)	1,013		537		5,450
Gross charge-offs	1,640		0			3,039		549		197			1,292		687		7,404
Recoveries	386		136			96		9		187			277		133		1,224
Total net charge-offs	1,254		(136		)	2,943		540		10			1,015		554		6,180
Ending allowance for loan and lease losses	$	8,816	$	1,749		$	24,142	$	3,672	$	376		$	5,171	$	3,121	$	47,047
Ending allowance on loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,076	$	35		$	6,158	$	348	$	0		$	2	$	378	$	7,997
Ending allowance on loans collectively evaluated for impairment	7,740		1,714			17,984		3,324		376			5,169		2,743		39,050
Ending allowance for loan and lease losses	$	8,816	$	1,749		$	24,142	$	3,672	$	376		$	5,171	$	3,121	$	47,047
Loans - excluding covered loans
Ending balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	14,450	$	1,104		$	35,082	$	3,652	$	0		$	517	$	496	$	55,301
Ending balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	925,970		96,142			1,442,144		339,364		50,781			369,689		102,737		3,326,827
Total loans - excluding covered loans	$	940,420	$	97,246		$	1,477,226	$	343,016	$	50,781		$	370,206	$	103,233	$	3,382,128



	Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2012
			Real Estate
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Residential		Installment			Home Equity			Other		Total
Allowance for loan and lease losses:
Balance at beginning of period	$	10,289	$	4,424	$	18,228	$	4,994	$	1,659		$	10,751		$	2,231	$	52,576
Provision for loan and lease losses	1,556		1,528		16,670		346		(883		)	(2,032		)	1,932		19,117
Gross charge-offs	4,312		2,684		11,012		1,814		577			3,661			1,252		25,312
Recoveries	393		0		265		73		323			115			227		1,396
Total net charge-offs	3,919		2,684		10,747		1,741		254			3,546			1,025		23,916
Ending allowance for loan and lease losses	$	7,926	$	3,268	$	24,151	$	3,599	$	522		$	5,173		$	3,138	$	47,777
Ending allowance on loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,151	$	838	$	7,155	$	290	$	0		$	2		$	92	$	9,528
Ending allowance on loans collectively evaluated for impairment	6,775		2,430		16,996		3,309		522			5,171			3,046		38,249
Ending allowance for loan and lease losses	$	7,926	$	3,268	$	24,151	$	3,599	$	522		$	5,173		$	3,138	$	47,777
Loans - excluding covered loans
Ending balance of loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	16,661	$	2,076	$	35,422	$	2,604	$	0		$	101		$	496	$	57,360
Ending balance of loans collectively evaluated for impairment	844,372		71,441		1,381,586		315,606		56,810			367,399			84,490		3,121,704
Total loans - excluding covered loans	$	861,033	$	73,517	$	1,417,008	$	318,210	$	56,810		$	367,500		$	84,986	$	3,179,064

Covered Loans. In accordance with the accounting guidance for business combinations, there was no allowance brought forward on covered loans as any credit deterioration evident in the loans at the time of acquisition was included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date.

The majority of covered loans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, whereby First Financial is required to periodically re-estimate the expected cash flows on the loans. For purposes of applying the guidance under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, First Financial grouped acquired loans into pools based on common risk characteristics. Generally, a decline in expected cash flows for a pool of loans is referred to as impairment and recorded as provision expense, and a related allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans, on a discounted basis during the period. Estimated reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to any declines in expected cash flows for a pool of loans are recorded as noninterest income and an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset in the same period. Improvement in expected cash flows

Table of Contents

for a pool of loans, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the yield on the loans in the pool and a related adjustment to the yield on the FDIC indemnification asset.

First Financial performs periodic valuation procedures to re-estimate the expected cash flows on covered loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 and compare the present value of expected cash flows to the carrying value of the loans at the pool level. In order to estimate expected cash flows, First Financial specifically reviews a sample of these covered loans to assist in the determination of appropriate probability of default and loss given default assumptions to be applied to the remainder of the portfolio. The estimate of expected cash flows may also be adjusted for management's estimate of probable losses on specific loan types dependent upon trends in observable market and industry data, such as prepayment speeds and collateral values. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

During the second quarter, the Company implemented certain enhancements to its valuation methodology and the estimation of impairment to place greater emphasis on changes in total expected cash flows and less emphasis on changes in the net present value of expected cash flows. The Company recognized negative provision expense, or impairment recapture, of $8.3 million and realized net charge-offs of $4.3 million during the quarter, resulting in an allowance for covered loan losses of $33.0 million as of June 30, 2013. First Financial recognized provision expense on covered loans of $0.8 million and realized net charge-offs of $13.0 million for the first six months of 2013. For the second quarter of 2012, First Financial recognized provision expense on covered loans of $6.0 million related to net charge-offs of $3.9 million during the period. Likewise, for the first six months of 2012, the Company recognized provision expense on covered loans of $19.0 million and net charge-offs of $13.5 million.

Additionally, the Company recognized loss sharing expenses of $1.6 million and $3.1 million for the second quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively, primarily related to attorney fees, appraisal costs and delinquent taxes during the periods. The Company also recognized gains on sales of covered OREO of $2.2 million for the second quarter of 2013 and losses on covered OREO of $1.2 million for the second quarter of 2012. The payable due to the FDIC under loss sharing agreements, related to covered loan provision expenses, gains/losses on covered OREO and loss sharing expenses, of $7.4 million was recognized as negative FDIC loss sharing income and a corresponding decrease to the FDIC indemnification asset during the second quarter of 2013. The receivable due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements of $8.3 million for the second quarter of 2012, was recognized as FDIC loss sharing income and a corresponding increase to the FDIC indemnification asset. On a year-to-date basis, First Financial recognized loss sharing expenses of $3.9 million and $4.8 million for 2013 and 2012 respectively. Similarly, on a year-to-date basis, the Company recognized gains on covered OREO of $2.4 million for 2013 and losses on covered OREO of $2.5 million for 2012. The receivable due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to covered loan provision expenses, gains/losses on covered OREO and loss sharing expenses of $1.6 million for the first six months of 2013 and $21.1 million for the comparable period in 2012, was recognized as FDIC loss sharing income and a corresponding increase to the FDIC indemnification asset.

The allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans is presented in the tables below:



	June 30, 2013
			Real Estate
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Commercial		Residential		Installment		Total
Ending allowance on loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (ASC 310-30)	$	14,259	$	16,195	$	2,263	$	244	$	32,961
Ending allowance on acquired loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30	0		0		0		0		0
Ending allowance on covered loans	$	14,259	$	16,195	$	2,263	$	244	$	32,961



	December 31, 2012
			Real Estate
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial		Commercial		Residential		Installment		Total
Ending allowance on loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (ASC 310-30)	$	19,136	$	22,918	$	2,599	$	537	$	45,190
Ending allowance on acquired loans outside the scope of ASC 310-30	0		0		0		0		0
Ending allowance on covered loans	$	19,136	$	22,918	$	2,599	$	537	$	45,190

Table of Contents

Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans for the previous five quarters were as follows:



	Three Months Ended															Six months ended
	2013						2012									June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,			Mar. 31,			Dec. 31,			Sep. 30,			June 30,			2013			2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	45,496		$	45,190		$	48,895		$	48,327		$	46,156		$	45,190		$	42,835
Provision for loan and lease losses	(8,283		)	9,042			5,283			6,622			6,047			759			18,998
Loans charged-off	(4,681		)	(9,684		)	(9,568		)	(9,058		)	(5,163		)	(14,365		)	(15,281		)
Recoveries	429			948			580			3,004			1,287			1,377			1,775
Balance at end of period	$	32,961		$	45,496		$	45,190		$	48,895		$	48,327		$	32,961		$	48,327

NOTE 11: INCOME TAXES

For the second quarter 2013, income tax expense was $6.5 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 29.0%, compared with income tax expense of $8.7 million and an effective tax rate of 32.8% for the comparable period in 2012. For the first six months of 2013, income tax expense was $12.8 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 30.2%, compared with income tax expense of $18.3 million and an effective tax rate of 34.5% for the comparable period in 2012. The declines in the effective tax rates for the second quarter 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same periods in 2012, were primarily the result of higher income earned on tax-exempt investment securities, favorable tax reversals related to an intercompany tax obligation associated with an unconsolidated former Irwin subsidiary and an adjustment to deferred tax liabilities relating to a favorable change in state tax laws.

At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, First Financial had no FASB ASC Topic 740-10 unrecognized tax benefits recorded. First Financial does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase within the next twelve months.

First Financial recognizes interest and penalties on income tax assessments or income tax refunds in the Consolidated Financial Statements as a component of noninterest expense.

First Financial regularly reviews its tax positions and establishes reserves for income tax-related uncertainties based on estimates of whether it is more likely than not that the tax uncertainty would be sustained upon challenge by the appropriate tax authorities which would then result in additional taxes, penalties and interest due. These evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates and may be susceptible to significant change. Provision for tax reserves, if any, is included in income tax expense in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Management determined that no reserve for income tax-related uncertainties was necessary as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

First Financial and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as state and local income tax in several jurisdictions. Tax years prior to 2010 have been closed and are no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations. Tax years 2010 and 2011 remain open to examination by the federal taxing authority.

First Financial is no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations for years prior to 2009. Tax years 2009 through 2011 remain open to state and local examination in various jurisdictions.

NOTE 12: EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

First Financial sponsors a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all employees and uses a December 31 measurement date for its defined benefit pension plan.

First Financial made no cash contributions to fund the pension plan during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and does not expect to make cash contributions to the plan through the remainder of the year. First Financial made no cash contributions to fund the pension plan in 2012.

During the second quarter 2013, First Financial re-measured the Company's pension assets and liabilities, and recognized $4.3 million of pension settlement charges, as a result of the year-to-date level of lump sum distributions from the Company's pension plan. Consistent with FASB ASC Topic 715, Compensation - Retirement Benefits, pension settlement charges are an acceleration of previously deferred costs that would have been recognized in future periods and are triggered when lump sum

Table of Contents

distributions exceed an annual accounting threshold for the plan. These pension settlement charges were a result of employee-related actions, including staff retirements as well as recent efficiency initiatives, and the resulting lump sum distributions from the plan.

Primarily as a result of the pension plan re-measurement and pension settlement charges during the second quarter, First Financial recorded $17.4 million of pre-tax adjustments to other comprehensive income related to changes in the values of the Company's pension assets and pension obligations for the six months ended June 30, 2013. As a result of the plan’s updated actuarial projections for 2013 as well as the previously mentioned settlement charges, First Financial recorded expenses related to its pension plan of $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to income of $0.3 million for the same period in 2012. Similarly, First Financial recorded pension plan expenses of $4.2 million in the second quarter of 2013 compared to pension plan income of $0.1 million in the second quarter of 2012.

As First Financial has exceeded the annual accounting threshold for lump sum distributions, the Company will recognize a proportionate share of any further lump sum distributions from its pension plan as additional pension settlement charges through the remainder of 2013. The accounting threshold for lump sum distributions will reset at the beginning of 2014.

The following table sets forth information concerning amounts recognized in First Financial’s Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Income:



	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Service cost	$	898		$	833		$	1,873		$	1,665
Interest cost	567			690			1,186			1,380
Expected return on assets	(2,230		)	(2,235		)	(4,524		)	(4,470		)
Amortization of prior service cost	(107		)	(105		)	(212		)	(210		)
Net actuarial loss	726			675			1,546			1,350
Settlement charge	4,316			0			4,316			0
Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	4,170		$	(142	)	$	4,185		$	(285	)

NOTE 13: FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Fair Value Measurement

The fair value framework as disclosed in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Topic of FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments (Fair Value Topic) includes a hierarchy which focuses on prioritizing the inputs used in valuation techniques. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), a lower priority to observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 2) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, First Financial looks to active markets to price identical assets or liabilities whenever possible and classifies such items in Level 1. When identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, First Financial looks to observable market data for similar assets and liabilities and classifies such items as Level 2. Certain assets and liabilities are not actively traded in observable markets and First Financial must use alternative techniques, based on unobservable inputs, to determine the fair value and classifies such items as Level 3. The level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant in the fair value measurement.

The following methods, assumptions and valuation techniques were used by First Financial to measure different financial assets and liabilities at fair value and in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments.

Cash and short-term investments. The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and short-term investments, such as federal funds sold, approximated the fair value of those instruments. The Company classifies cash and short-term investments in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

Investment securities. Investment securities classified as trading and available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar investment securities. First Financial compiles prices from various sources who may apply such techniques as matrix pricing to determine

Table of Contents

the value of identical or similar investment securities (Level 2). Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique widely used in the banking industry to value investment securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific investment securities but rather relying on the investment securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted investment securities. Any investment securities not valued based upon the methods above are considered Level 3.

First Financial utilizes information provided by a third-party investment securities administrator in analyzing the investment securities portfolio in accordance with the fair value hierarchy of the Fair Value Topic. The administrator’s evaluation of investment security portfolio pricing is performed using a combination of prices and data from other sources, along with internally developed matrix pricing models and assistance from the administrator’s internal fixed income analysts and trading desk. The administrator’s month-end pricing process includes a series of quality assurance activities where prices are compared to recent market conditions, previous evaluation prices and between the various pricing services. These processes produce a series of quality assurance reports on which price exceptions are identified, reviewed and where appropriate, securities are repriced. In the event of a materially different price, the administrator will report the variance as a “price challenge” and review the pricing methodology in detail. The results of the quality assurance process are incorporated into the selection of pricing providers by the portfolio manager.

First Financial reviews the pricing methodologies utilized by the administrator to ensure the fair value determination is consistent with the applicable accounting guidance and that the investments are properly classified in the fair value hierarchy. Further, the Company periodically validates the fair values for a sample of securities in the portfolio by comparing the fair values provided by the administrator to prices from other independent sources for the same or similar securities. First Financial analyzes unusual or significant variances, conducts additional research with the administrator, if necessary, and takes appropriate action based on its findings.

Loans held for sale. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential real estate loans originated for sale to qualified third parties. Fair value is based on the contractual price to be received from these third parties, which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). As such, First Financial records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis. Gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded as net gains from sales of loans within noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Loans - excluding covered loans. The fair value of commercial, commercial real estate, residential real estate and consumer loans were estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities or repricing frequency. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of uncovered loans as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. Impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost or fair value for purposes of determining the appropriate amount of impairment to be allocated to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Fair value is generally measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed third party appraiser (Level 3). The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable borrower financial statements if not considered significant. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on borrower financial statement balances or aging reports on a discounted basis as appropriate (Level 3). Impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan and lease losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan and lease losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Covered loans. Fair values for covered loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 are based on a discounted cash flow methodology that considers factors including the type of loan and related collateral, classification status, fixed or variable interest rate, term of the loan and whether or not the loan was amortizing and a discount rate reflecting the Company's assessment of risk inherent in the cash flow estimates. These covered loans are grouped together according to similar characteristics and were treated in the aggregate when applying various valuation techniques. First Financial estimated the cash flows expected to be collected on these loans based upon the expected remaining life of the underlying loans, which includes the effects of estimated prepayments. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change.

Table of Contents

Fair values for covered loans accounted for outside of FASB ASC Topic 310-30 were estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities or repricing frequency. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value.

The Company classifies the estimated fair value of covered loans as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

FDIC indemnification asset. The accounting for FDIC indemnification assets is closely related to the accounting for the underlying, indemnified assets. Fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements based on the expected reimbursements for losses and the applicable loss sharing percentages. First Financial re-estimates the expected indemnification asset cash flows in conjunction with the periodic re-estimation of cash flows on covered loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30. Improvements in cash flow expectations on covered loans generally result in a related decline in the expected indemnification cash flows while declines in cash flow expectations on covered loans generally result in an increase in expected indemnification cash flows.

The expected cash flows are discounted to reflect the uncertainty of the timing and receipt of the loss sharing reimbursement from the FDIC. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of the indemnification asset as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

Deposit liabilities. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money-market deposits was the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The carrying amounts for variable-rate certificates of deposit approximated their fair values at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposit was estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation which applies the interest rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of deposit liabilities as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Borrowings. The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings approximate their fair values. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of short-term borrowings as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

The fair value of long-term debt is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation which utilizes the interest rates currently offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities. Third-party valuations are used for long-term debt with embedded options, such as call features. The Company classifies the estimated fair value of long-term debt as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Pricing of these financial instruments is based on the credit quality and relationship, fees, interest rates, probability of funding and compensating balance and other covenants or requirements. Loan commitments generally have fixed expiration dates, are variable rate and contain termination and other clauses which provide for relief from funding in the event that there is a significant deterioration in the credit quality of the client. Many loan commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon. The rates and terms of the commitments to extend credit and the standby letters of credit are competitive with those in First Financial’s market area. The carrying amounts are reasonable estimates of the fair value of these financial instruments. Carrying amounts, which are comprised of the

unamortized fee income and, where necessary, reserves for any expected credit losses from these financial instruments, are immaterial.

Derivatives. The fair values of derivative instruments are based primarily on a net present value calculation of the cash flows related to the interest rate swaps at the reporting date, using primarily observable market inputs such as interest rate yield curves. The discounted net present value calculated represents the cost to terminate the swap if First Financial should choose to do so. Additionally, First Financial utilizes a vendor-developed, proprietary model to value the credit risk component of both the derivative assets and liabilities. The credit valuation adjustment is recorded as an adjustment to the fair value of the derivative asset or liability on the reporting date. Derivative instruments are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Table of Contents

The estimated fair values of First Financial’s financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis in the consolidated financial statements were as follows:



	Carrying		Estimated Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	value		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2013
Financial assets
Cash and short-term investments	$	117,416	$	117,416	$	117,416	$	0	$	0
Investment securities held-to-maturity	670,246		664,398		0		664,398		0
Other investments	75,645		75,645		0		75,645		0
Loans held for sale	18,650		18,650		0		18,650		0
Loans - excluding covered loans	3,335,081		3,341,766		0		0		3,341,766
Covered loans	589,304		597,231		0		0		597,231
FDIC indemnification asset	88,966		79,518		0		0		79,518

Financial liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	1,059,368	$	1,059,368	$	0	$	1,059,368	$	0
Interest-bearing demand	1,131,466		1,131,466		0		1,131,466		0
Savings	1,601,122		1,601,122		0		1,601,122		0
Time	978,680		976,084		0		976,084		0
Total deposits	4,770,636		4,768,040		0		4,768,040		0
Short-term borrowings	619,930		619,930		619,930		0		0
Long-term debt	73,957		76,491		0		76,491		0

Table of Contents



	Carrying		Estimated Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	value		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2012
Financial assets
Cash and short-term investments	$	158,843	$	158,843	$	158,843	$	0	$	0
Investment securities held-to-maturity	770,755		778,474		0		778,474		0
Other investments	71,492		71,492		0		71,492		0
Loans held for sale	16,256		16,256		0		16,256		0
Loans - excluding covered loans	3,131,287		3,145,120		0		0		3,145,120
Covered loans	702,926		713,797		0		0		713,797
FDIC indemnification asset	119,607		106,380		0		0		106,380

Financial liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing	$	1,102,774	$	1,102,774	$	0	$	1,102,774	$	0
Interest-bearing demand	1,160,815		1,160,815		0		1,160,815		0
Savings	1,623,614		1,623,614		0		1,623,614		0
Time	1,068,637		1,072,201		0		1,072,201		0
Total deposits	4,955,840		4,959,404		0		4,959,404		0
Short-term borrowings	624,570		624,570		624,570		0		0
Long-term debt	75,202		78,941		0		78,941		0

The financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated financial statements were as follows:



	Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting Adjustments ⁽¹⁾			Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value
June 30, 2013
Assets
Derivatives	$	0	$	15,497	$	0	$	(15,497	)	$	0
Available-for-sale investment securities	189		884,505		0		0			884,694
Total	$	189	$	900,002	$	0	$	(15,497	)	$	884,694

Liabilities
Derivatives	$	0	$	16,669	$	0	$	(15,497	)	$	1,172

Table of Contents



	Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Netting Adjustments ⁽¹⁾			Assets/Liabilities at Fair Value
December 31, 2012
Assets
Derivatives	$	0	$	24,135	$	0	$	(24,135	)	$	0
Available-for-sale investment securities	144		1,031,952		0		0			1,032,096
Total	$	144	$	1,056,087	$	0	$	(24,135	)	$	1,032,096

Liabilities
Derivatives	$	0	$	26,652	$	0	$	(24,135	)	$	2,517

(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting arrangements that allow First Financial to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral held with the same counterparties.

Certain financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Adjustments to the fair market value of these assets usually result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The following table summarizes financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.



	Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2013
Assets
Impaired loans ⁽¹⁾	$	0	$	0	$	14,600
OREO	0		0		6,396
Covered OREO	0		0		8,706



	Fair Value Measurements Using
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
December 31, 2012
Assets
Impaired loans ⁽¹⁾	$	0	$	0	$	19,564
OREO	0		0		5,651
Covered OREO	0		0		14,059

(1) Amounts represent the fair value of collateral for impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan and lease losses. Fair values are determined using actual market prices (Level 1), independent third party valuations and borrower records, discounted as appropriate (Level 3).

Table of Contents

NOTE 14: ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Shareholders’ equity is affected by transactions and valuations of asset and liability positions that require adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The related tax effects allocated to other comprehensive income and reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:



	June 30, 2013
	Total other comprehensive income															Total accumulated other comprehensive income
(Dollars in thousands)	Prior to Reclassification			Reclassification from			Pre-tax			Tax-effect			Net of tax			Beginning Balance			Net Activity			Ending Balance
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities	$	(28,256	)	$	1,724		$	(29,980	)	$	11,413		$	(18,567	)	$	12,802		$	(18,567	)	$	(5,765	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives	1,177			(134		)	1,311			(495		)	816			(143		)	816			673
Retirement obligation	11,719			(5,650		)	17,369			(6,559		)	10,810			(31,338		)	10,810			(20,528		)
Foreign currency translation	(27		)	0			(27		)	0			(27		)	2			(27		)	(25		)
Total	$	(15,387	)	$	(4,060	)	$	(11,327	)	$	4,359		$	(6,968	)	$	(18,677	)	$	(6,968	)	$	(25,645	)



	June 30, 2012
	Total other comprehensive income							Total accumulated other comprehensive income
(Dollars in thousands)	Pre-tax		Tax-effect			Net of tax		Beginning Balance			Net Activity		Ending Balance
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities	$	4,171	$	(1,575	)	$	2,596	$	12,669		$	2,596	$	15,265
Retirement obligation	1,140		(430		)	710		(34,136		)	710		(33,426		)
Foreign currency translation	12		0			12		(23		)	12		(11		)
Total	$	5,323	$	(2,005	)	$	3,318	$	(21,490	)	$	3,318	$	(18,172	)

The following table details the activity reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into income during the period:



	June 30, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ⁽¹⁾			Affected Line Item in the Consolidated Statements of Income
Gains and loss on cash flow hedges
Interest rate contracts	$	(134	)	Interest expense - deposits

Realized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale	1,724			Gains on sales of investments securities

Defined benefit pension plan
Amortization of prior service cost	212			⁽²⁾
Recognized net actuarial loss	(1,546		)	⁽²⁾
Pension settlement charges	(4,316		)	Pension settlement charges
Amortization and settlement charges of defined benefit pension items	(5,650		)

Total reclassifications for the period, before tax	$	(4,060	)

(1) Negative amount are debits to profit/loss.

(2) Included in the computation of net periodic pension cost (see employee benefit footnote for additional details).

Table of Contents

NOTE 15: EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:



	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Numerator
Net income available to common shareholders	$	15,829	$	17,802	$	29,653	$	34,796

Denominator
Basic earnings per common share - weighted average shares	57,291,994		57,933,281		57,365,105		57,864,269
Effect of dilutive securities —
Employee stock awards	735,440		915,301		739,927		936,550
Warrants	100,915		109,697		101,471		120,870
Diluted earnings per common share - adjusted weighted average shares	58,128,349		58,958,279		58,206,503		58,921,689

Earnings per share available to common shareholders
Basic	$	0.28	$	0.31	$	0.52	$	0.60
Diluted	$	0.27	$	0.30	$	0.51	$	0.59

Warrants to purchase 465,117 shares of the Company's common stock were outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 2012. These warrants, each representing the right to purchase one share of common stock, no par value per share, have an exercise price of $12.20 and expire on December 23, 2018.

Stock options and warrants, where the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares were not included in the computation of net income per diluted share as they would have been antidilutive. These out-of-the-money options were 654,616 and 737,228 at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2-MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MD&A)

FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Unaudited)

Reclassifications of prior period amounts, if applicable, have been made to conform to the current period’s presentation and had no effect on previously reported net income amounts or financial condition.

SUMMARY

First Financial Bancorp. (First Financial or the Company) is a $6.3 billion bank holding company headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. As of June 30, 2013 First Financial, through its subsidiaries, operated primarily in Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky. These subsidiaries include a commercial bank, First Financial Bank, N.A. (First Financial Bank or the Bank) with 110 banking centers and 139 ATMs. First Financial conducts three primary activities through its bank subsidiary: commercial banking, retail banking and wealth management. First Financial Bank provides credit-based products, deposit accounts, corporate cash management support and other services to commercial and retail clients. Additionally, the Bank provides franchise lending products, primarily equipment and leasehold improvement financing, for select franchisees and concepts in the quick service and casual dining restaurant sector throughout the United States. First Financial Wealth Management provides wealth planning, portfolio management, trust and estate, brokerage and retirement plan services.

First Financial acquired the banking operations of Peoples Community Bank (Peoples), and Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company and Irwin Union Bank, F.S.B. (collectively, Irwin), through Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)-assisted transactions in 2009. The acquisitions of the Peoples and Irwin franchises significantly expanded the First Financial footprint, opened new markets and strengthened the Company through the generation of additional capital.

In connection with the Peoples and Irwin FDIC-assisted transactions, First Financial entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC. Under the terms of these agreements the FDIC reimburses First Financial for a percentage of losses with respect to certain loans (covered loans) and other real estate owned (covered OREO) (collectively, covered assets). These agreements provide for loss protection on single-family, residential loans for a period of ten years and First Financial is required to share any recoveries of previously charged-off amounts for the same time period, on the same pro-rata basis with the FDIC. All other loans are provided loss protection for a period of five years and recoveries of previously charged-off amounts must be shared with the FDIC for an additional three year period, again on the same pro-rata basis. The FDIC's obligation to reimburse First Financial for losses with respect to covered assets for all three assisted transactions began with the first dollar of loss incurred.

Covered assets represent approximately 10% of First Financial’s total assets at June 30, 2013.

MARKET STRATEGY

First Financial serves a combination of metropolitan and non-metropolitan markets in Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky through its full-service banking centers, while providing franchise lending services to borrowers throughout the United States. First Financial’s market selection process includes a number of factors, but markets are primarily chosen for their potential for growth and long-term profitability. First Financial’s goal is to develop a competitive advantage utilizing a local market focus, building long-term relationships with clients to help them reach greater levels of success in their financial life and providing a superior level of service. First Financial intends to continue to concentrate future growth plans and capital investments in its metropolitan markets. Smaller markets have historically provided stable, low-cost funding sources to First Financial and remain an important part of its funding base.

OVERVIEW OF OPERATIONS

Second quarter 2013 net income was $15.8 million and earnings per diluted common share were $0.27. This compares with second quarter 2012 net income of $17.8 million and earnings per diluted common share of $0.30.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net income was $29.7 million, and earnings per diluted common share were $0.51. This compares with net income of $34.8 million and earnings per diluted common share of $0.59 for the first six months of 2012.

Return on average assets for the second quarter of 2013 was 1.01% compared to 1.13% for the comparable period in 2012. Return on average shareholders’ equity for the second quarter of 2013 was 9.02% compared to 9.98% for the comparable period in 2012.

Table of Contents

Return on average assets for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was 0.94% compared to 1.09% for the same period in 2012. Return on average shareholders' equity was 8.47% and 9.83% for the same periods in 2013 and 2012, respectively.

A discussion of First Financial's results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 follows.

NET INTEREST INCOME

Net interest income, First Financial’s principal source of income, is the excess of interest received from earning assets over interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities. For analytical purposes, net interest income is also presented in the table that follows, adjusted to a tax equivalent basis assuming a 35% marginal tax rate for interest earned on tax-exempt assets such as municipal loans and investments. This is to recognize the income tax savings that facilitates a comparison between taxable and tax-exempt assets. Management believes that it is a standard practice in the banking industry to present net interest margin and net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis. Therefore, management believes these measures provide useful information to make peer comparisons.



	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net interest income	$	58,078		$	64,830		$	116,744		$	131,519
Tax equivalent adjustment	514			216			991			434
Net interest income - tax equivalent	$	58,592		$	65,046		$	117,735		$	131,953

Average earning assets	$	5,791,715		$	5,813,267		$	5,839,497		$	5,881,709

Net interest margin ⁽¹⁾	4.02		%	4.49		%	4.03		%	4.50		%
Net interest margin (fully tax equivalent) ⁽¹⁾	4.06		%	4.50		%	4.07		%	4.51		%

⁽¹⁾ Margins are calculated using annualized net interest income divided by average earning assets.

Net interest income for the second quarter 2013 was $58.1 million, declining $6.8 million or 10.4% from second quarter 2012 net interest income of $64.8 million. Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the second quarter 2013 was $58.6 million as compared to $65.0 million for the second quarter 2012. Net interest margin was 4.02% for the second quarter 2013 as compared to 4.49% for the second quarter 2012. The declines in net interest income and net interest margin were primarily related to changes in the composition of the Company's earning assets as well as the current low interest rate environment for loans and investment securities.

The decline in net interest income in the second quarter 2013 as compared to the second quarter 2012 was the result of a $9.6 million or 13.4% decline in total interest income, partially offset by a $2.9 million or 40.2% decline in total interest expense. The decline in total interest income resulted from a decline in interest income and fees earned on loans, primarily as a result of continued amortization and paydowns in the Company's high-yielding covered loan portfolio, as well as lower interest income earned on the investment portfolio due to the current low rate environment.

Contributing to the lower interest income earned on loans, and a related decline in net interest margin, was a $296.3 million or 31.2% decline in the average balance of covered loans as compared to the second quarter 2012. Declines in covered loan balances are a result of payments received, including full payoffs, charge-offs and other loan resolution activities. The decline in covered loan balances was partially offset by growth in lower yielding assets as average uncovered loan balances increased $318.3 million or 10.7% from the second quarter of 2012.

While average uncovered loan balances increased from the second quarter 2012 as a result of strong new loan origination activity in recent periods, payoff activity has also been elevated. As a result of the low interest rate environment and heightened competition, recent loan originations have been recorded at yields significantly lower than the yields on loans that paid off during the same period, muting the impact of increased balances on interest income earned and net interest margin.

The decline in total interest income was also due to lower interest income earned on investment securities. While the average balance of investment securities decreased modestly in the second quarter 2013 as compared to the second quarter 2012, the average yield on investment securities declined 38 basis points, to 2.08% in the second quarter 2013 from 2.46% in the second

Table of Contents

quarter 2012. The lower yields on investment securities are primarily related to elevated prepayment activity on higher yielding mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and lower reinvestment rates in recent periods.

Interest expense and net interest margin continued to benefit from the impact of the Company's deposit pricing and rationalization strategies as the average balance of interest-bearing deposits declined $417.2 million or 9.9% and the cost of funds related to these deposits decreased 26 basis points to 35 basis points for the second quarter 2013 compared to 61 basis points for the comparable quarter in 2012. However, interest expense and net interest margin were also impacted by a $410.2 million increase in the average balance of short-term borrowings for the second quarter 2013 as compared with the comparable quarter in 2012. Short-term borrowings, which are utilized to manage the Company's normal liquidity needs, increased as a result of loan demand as well as deposit rationalization, banking center consolidation and investment portfolio strategies during 2012 and 2013.

For the six month period ended June 30, 2013, net interest income was $116.7 million, a decline of $14.8 million, from $131.5 million for the comparable period in 2012. Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the period ended June 30, 2013, was $117.7 million as compared to $132.0 million for the comparable period in 2012. Similar to the quarterly year-over-year items discussed above, these declines were primarily related to lower covered loan balances, a reduced yield on the FDIC indemnification asset and declining yields on recent loan originations.

Net interest margin for the six month period ended June 30, 2013 declined 47 bps to 4.03% from 4.50% for the comparable period in 2012.

The Consolidated Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Income Analysis that follows are presented on a GAAP basis.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS AND NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS



	Quarterly Averages															Year-to Date Averages
	June 30, 2013					March 31, 2013					June 30, 2012					June 30, 2013					June 30, 2012
(Dollars in thousands)	Balance			Yield		Balance			Yield		Balance			Yield		Balance			Yield		Balance			Yield
Earning assets
Investments:
Investment securities	$	1,705,219		2.08	%	$	1,838,783		1.98	%	$	1,713,503		2.46	%	$	1,771,632		2.03	%	$	1,689,073		2.53	%
Interest-bearing deposits with other banks	13,890			0.32	%	3,056			0.53	%	4,454			0.18	%	8,503			0.36	%	65,392			0.28	%
Gross loans ⁽¹⁾	4,072,606			5.26	%	4,045,971			5.47	%	4,095,310			6.02	%	4,059,362			5.37	%	4,127,244			6.15	%
Total earning assets	5,791,715			4.32	%	5,887,810			4.37	%	5,813,267			4.96	%	5,839,497			4.35	%	5,881,709			5.04	%

Nonearning assets
Allowance for loan and lease losses	(92,033		)			(95,512		)			(98,317		)			(93,763		)			(99,491		)
Cash and due from banks	119,909					111,599					121,114					115,777					122,374
Accrued interest and other assets	491,011					487,152					498,909					489,093					502,360
Total assets	$	6,310,602				$	6,391,049				$	6,334,973				$	6,350,604				$	6,406,952

Interest-bearing liabilities
Deposits:
Interest-bearing demand	$	1,141,767		0.09	%	$	1,112,664		0.12	%	$	1,192,868		0.11	%	$	1,127,296		0.10	%	$	1,239,032		0.12	%
Savings	1,639,834			0.10	%	1,618,239			0.10	%	1,610,411			0.12	%	1,629,096			0.10	%	1,646,459			0.13	%
Time	1,011,290			1.04	%	1,054,499			1.20	%	1,406,800			1.60	%	1,032,775			1.12	%	1,492,124			1.66	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	3,792,891			0.35	%	3,785,402			0.41	%	4,210,079			0.61	%	3,789,167			0.38	%	4,377,615			0.65	%
Borrowed fund:
Short-term borrowings	569,929			0.21	%	660,587			0.20	%	159,681			0.09	%	615,008			0.21	%	122,786			0.08	%
Long-term debt	74,129			3.54	%	74,740			3.55	%	75,314			3.59	%	74,433			3.54	%	75,667			3.61	%
Total borrowed funds	644,058			0.60	%	735,327			0.54	%	234,995			1.22	%	689,441			0.57	%	198,453			1.43	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	4,436,949			0.38	%	4,520,729			0.43	%	4,445,074			0.64	%	4,478,608			0.41	%	4,576,068			0.68	%

Noninterest-bearing liabilities
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	1,063,102					1,049,943					1,044,405					1,056,559					987,876
Other liabilities	106,747					111,515					128,383					109,118					131,179
Shareholders' equity	703,804					708,862					717,111					706,319					711,829
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	6,310,602				$	6,391,049				$	6,334,973				$	6,350,604				$	6,406,952

Net interest income	$	58,078				$	58,666				$	64,830				$	116,744				$	131,519

Net interest spread				3.94	%				3.94	%				4.32	%				3.94	%				4.36	%
Contribution of noninterest-bearing sources of funds				0.08	%				0.10	%				0.17	%				0.09	%				0.14	%
Net interest margin ⁽²⁾				4.02	%				4.04	%				4.49	%				4.03	%				4.50	%


(1)	Loans held for sale, nonaccrual loans, covered loans, and indemnification asset are included in gross loans.


(2)	Because noninterest-bearing funding sources, demand deposits, other liabilities and shareholders' equity also support earning assets, the net interest margin exceeds the interest spread.

Table of Contents

RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS

The impact of changes in the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and interest rates on net interest income is illustrated in the table below:



	Changes for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Linked Qtr. Income Variance									Comparable Qtr. Income Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	Rate			Volume			Total			Rate			Volume			Total
Earning assets
Investment securities	$	488		$	(589	)	$	(101	)	$	(1,602	)	$	(43	)	$	(1,645	)
Other earning assets	(2		)	9			7			2			7			9
Gross loans ⁽¹⁾	(2,027		)	933			(1,094		)	(7,668		)	(298		)	(7,966		)
Total earning assets	(1,541		)	353			(1,188		)	(9,268		)	(334		)	(9,602		)
Interest-bearing liabilities
Total interest-bearing deposits	$	(619	)	$	43		$	(576	)	$	(2,736	)	$	(361	)	$	(3,097	)
Borrowed funds
Short-term borrowings	21			(45		)	(24		)	48			220			268
Federal Home Loan Bank long-term debt	(2		)	2			0			(11		)	(10		)	(21		)
Total borrowed funds	19			(43		)	(24		)	37			210			247
Total interest-bearing liabilities	(600		)	0			(600		)	(2,699		)	(151		)	(2,850		)
Net interest income	$	(941	)	$	353		$	(588	)	$	(6,569	)	$	(183	)	$	(6,752	)

(1) Loans held for sale, nonaccrual loans, covered loans and indemnification asset are included in gross loans.



	Changes for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
	Year-to-Date Income Variance
(Dollars in thousands)	Rate			Volume			Total
Earning assets
Investment securities	$	(4,170	)	$	830		$	(3,340	)
Other earning assets	24			(100		)	(76		)
Gross loans ⁽¹⁾	(15,968		)	(1,806		)	(17,774		)
Total earning assets	(20,114		)	(1,076		)	(21,190		)
Interest-bearing liabilities
Total interest-bearing deposits	$	(5,844	)	$	(1,109	)	$	(6,953	)
Borrowed funds
Short-term borrowings	78			507			585
Federal Home Loan Bank long-term debt	(25		)	(22		)	(47		)
Total borrowed funds	53			485			538
Total interest-bearing liabilities	(5,791		)	(624		)	(6,415		)
Net interest income	$	(14,323	)	$	(452	)	$	(14,775	)

(1) Loans held for sale, nonaccrual loans, covered loans and indemnification asset are included in gross loans.

NONINTEREST INCOME

Second quarter 2013 noninterest income was $11.6 million, a $21.9 million or 65.4% decrease from noninterest income of $33.5 million in the second quarter 2012. The decline in noninterest income from the comparable quarter in 2012 was due primarily to a $15.7 million decline in FDIC loss sharing income, a $1.8 million decline in accelerated discount on covered loans and a $5.1 million decline in other noninterest income. These declines were partially offset by a $0.6 million increase in bankcard income in the second quarter 2013 from the comparable quarter in 2012.

When losses are incurred on covered loans, the Company recognizes those credit losses as provision expense, while losses incurred on covered OREO are recognized as noninterest expense. Reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to these credit losses are referred to as FDIC loss sharing income and are recorded as noninterest income.

Table of Contents

The impact on earnings of this offsetting activity is the net effect of the credit losses and FDIC reimbursement, representing the Company’s proportionate share of the credit losses realized on covered assets.

Lower FDIC loss sharing income during the second quarter 2013 was primarily the result of a decline in the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans during the period reflecting lower estimated impairment on covered loans and lower loss reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC as a result.

Accelerated discount is recognized when covered loans, which are recorded on the Company’s balance sheet at an amount less than the unpaid principal balance, prepay at an amount greater than their recorded book value. Prepayments can occur either through customer driven payments before the maturity date or loan sales. The amount of discount attributable to the credit loss component of each loan varies and the recognized amount is offset by a related reduction in the FDIC indemnification asset. Lower income from the accelerated discount on covered loans during the second quarter 2013 was related to declines in both the volume and size of covered loans prepaying during the period as well as declines in the size of the remaining discounts on these loans at the time of prepayment.

The decrease in other noninterest income was primarily related to a $5.0 million litigation settlement received by the Bank in the second quarter 2012.

Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $38.3 million, a $27.2 million or 41.5% decrease from noninterest income of $65.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decline in noninterest income from the comparable period in 2012 was due primarily to a $19.5 million decline in FDIC loss sharing income, a $3.5 million decline in accelerated discount on covered loans and a $5.9 million decline in other noninterest income primarily related to the previously mentioned $5.0 million litigation settlement received in the second quarter of 2012. These declines were partially offset by $1.7 million of gains on sales of investment securities during 2013.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

Second quarter 2013 noninterest expense was $53.3 million compared with $57.5 million in the second quarter of 2012. The $4.2 million or 7.3% decrease from the comparable quarter in 2012 was primarily attributable to a $2.8 million decline in salaries and benefits expense, a $3.5 million decline in losses recorded on both covered and uncovered OREO, a $0.4 million decline in professional services expense, a $1.5 million decline in loss sharing expenses and a $0.7 million decline in other noninterest expense. These declines were partially offset by increases of $0.4 million in net occupancy expenses, $0.5 million in data processing expenses and $4.3 million of pension settlement charges.

The decline in salaries and benefits expenses was primarily attributable to staffing reductions and branch consolidations throughout 2012 and into 2013. The Company recognized net gains on covered OREO of $2.2 million during the quarter, which were partially offset by losses on uncovered OREO of $0.2 million during the quarter. Gains or losses on OREO are generally the result of declines in the estimated fair value of, and gains or losses on final disposition of, OREO properties during the period. Loss sharing expense represents costs incurred to resolve problem covered assets, including legal fees, appraisal costs and delinquent taxes. The decrease in loss sharing expense relates to a decline in collection costs incurred on covered assets. Losses on covered OREO and loss sharing expenses are partially reimbursed by the FDIC.

First Financial views the combination of provision expense on covered loans, gains or losses on covered OREO and loss sharing expense, net of the related reimbursements due under loss sharing agreements recorded as FDIC loss sharing income, as the total net credit costs associated with covered assets during the period. For additional discussion of the credit costs associated with covered assets, see "Allowance for loan and lease losses - covered loans."

The decline in other noninterest expenses was primarily due to $0.5 million of accelerated amortization expense recognized in the second quarter 2012 related to intangible assets associated with the disposal of certain acquired branches.

Higher net occupancy expenses during the second quarter of 2013 were primarily attributable to $0.3 million of additional costs associated with facilities that the Company began utilizing during 2012. The increase in data processing expense was due to software and system implementations, including new internet and mobile banking platforms introduced in late 2012.

During the second quarter 2013, First Financial recognized $4.3 million of pension settlement charges as a result of the year to date level of lump sum distributions from the Company's pension plan. Consistent with FASB ASC Topic 715, Compensation - Retirement Benefits, pension settlement charges are an acceleration of previously deferred costs that would have been recognized in future periods and are triggered when lump sum distributions exceed an annual accounting threshold for the plan. First Financial incurred these pension settlement charges as a result of employee-related actions, including staff retirements as

Table of Contents

well as recent efficiency initiatives, and the resulting lump sum distributions from the plan. As First Financial has exceeded the annual accounting threshold for lump sum distributions, the Company will recognize a proportionate share of any further lump sum distributions from its pension plan as additional pension settlement charges through the remainder of 2013. The accounting threshold for lump sum distributions will reset at the beginning of 2014.

During the third quarter 2012, First Financial completed a comprehensive efficiency study across all business lines and support functions. As a result, the Company identified approximately $17.1 million of annualized cost savings impacting several expense categories. In the second quarter 2013, the Company incurred certain pre-tax expenses resulting from its efficiency initiative and other staffing-related changes of $1.5 million. Approximately $0.5 million was related to employee benefit expenses associated with staffing reductions and $1.0 million was related to real estate expenses associated with previously announced banking center consolidation and closure plans. Realization of the identified cost savings began during the fourth quarter 2012, and the Company recognized annualized net savings of approximately $15.0 million through the end of the second quarter 2013 as one-time costs associated with implementing the efficiency plan offset estimated expense reductions. Ultimately, the achievement of these cost savings will be contingent upon management's ability to successfully implement the efficiency plan while managing external factors, such as regulatory changes and a dynamic business environment, without impacting service levels throughout the Company and to our customers.

Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $106.4 million compared with $113.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012. The $6.8 million or 6.0% decrease from the comparable period in 2012 was primarily attributable to a $4.4 million decline in salaries and benefits expense as a result of staffing reductions and branch consolidations throughout 2012 and into 2013, a $5.5 million decline in losses recorded on both covered and uncovered OREO as the Company recorded gains of $2.4 million on covered OREO in 2013, a $0.7 million decline in professional services expense, a $1.0 million decline in loss sharing expenses and a $1.2 million decline in other noninterest expense. These declines were partially offset by increases of $1.1 million in net occupancy expenses associated with facilities that the Company began utilizing during 2012, $1.1 million in data processing expenses related to software and system implementations, including new internet and mobile banking platforms introduced in late 2012 and $4.3 million of pension settlement charges.

INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $6.5 million and $8.7 million for the second quarters of 2013 and 2012, respectively. The effective tax rates for the second quarters of 2013 and 2012 were 29.0% and 32.8%, respectively. Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $12.8 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The year-to-date effective tax rate through June 30, 2013 was 30.2% compared to 34.5% for the comparable period in 2012.

The declines in the effective tax rates for the second quarter 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2013, as compared to the same periods in 2012, were primarily the result of higher income earned on tax-exempt investment securities, favorable tax reversals related to an intercompany tax obligation associated with an unconsolidated former Irwin subsidiary and an adjustment to deferred tax liabilities relating to a favorable change in state tax laws. The Company anticipates this will be the last meaningful adjustment related to the resolution of the former Irwin subsidiary and that a normalized effective tax rate in future periods is estimated to be 34.5%.

LOANS - EXCLUDING COVERED LOANS

Loans, excluding covered loans and loans held for sale, totaled $3.4 billion as of June 30, 2013, increasing $203.1 million, or 12.9% on an annualized basis, compared to December 31, 2012. The increase in loan balances from December 31, 2012 was primarily related to a $79.4 million increase in commercial loans and a $60.2 million increase in commercial real estate loans, with contributions also coming from residential mortgage, construction lending and lease financing, which increased $24.8 million, $23.7 million and $19.2 million, respectively.

Second quarter 2013 average loans, excluding covered loans and loans held for sale, increased $318.3 million or 10.7% from the second quarter of 2012. The increase in average loans, excluding covered loans and loans held for sale, was primarily the result of a $165.8 million increase in commercial real estate loans, a $76.3 million increase in commercial loans, a $44.3 million increase in residential real estate loans and a $39.0 million increase in lease financing, partially offset by decreases of$10.5 million and $5.3 million in installment and real estate construction loans, respectively.

Table of Contents

LOANS - COVERED

Covered loans continued to decline during the quarter, totaling $622.3 million at June 30, 2013, a $125.9 million or 16.8% decline compared to December 31, 2012. Declines in covered loan balances were expected as there were no acquisitions of loans subject to loss sharing agreements during the period. The covered loan portfolio will continue to decline through payoffs, loan sales, charge-offs and termination or expiration of loss share coverage unless First Financial acquires additional loans subject to loss sharing agreements in the future. Loans with coverage terminated, or removed, generally represent loans to primarily high quality borrowers involving a change in loan terms which caused the respective loans to no longer qualify for reimbursement from the FDIC in the event of credit losses.

INVESTMENTS

First Financial's investment portfolio totaled $1.6 billion or 26.0% of total assets at June 30, 2013, compared with $1.9 billion or 28.8% of total assets at December 31, 2012. Securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2013, totaled $884.7 million, compared with $1.0 billion at December 31, 2012, while held-to-maturity securities totaled $670.2 million at June 30, 2013 compared to $770.8 million at December 31, 2012.

The investment portfolio decreased $243.8 million, or 13.0%, during the first six months of 2013 as $109.6 million of purchases were offset by amortizations and paydowns in the portfolio, driven partially by continued elevated prepayment activity. The Company also sold of $90.3 million of agency MBSs and collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) during the year in order to enhance liquidity and reduce prepayment and premium risks, resulting in a gain of $1.7 million. The overall duration of the investment portfolio increased to 4.0 years as of June 30, 2013 from 2.8 years as of December 31, 2012 primarily due to rising long-term interest rates, which are impactful to mortgage related assets and the primary driver of extension risk.

First Financial had previously implemented a strategy during 2012 to pre-fund the next twelve months of estimated securities portfolio with short-term borrowings. The Company began to unwind this strategy late in the first quarter of 2013 by slowing the pace of reinvestment in the securities portfolio in order to balance loan demand and deposit outflows. This strategy continued through the second quarter of 2013 as a result of sustained loan demand and as part of the Company's strategies to manage the potential impact of rising long-term interest rates on balance sheet sensitivity and capital. First Financial routinely monitors these components of interest rate risk and could accelerate the decline in the size of the securities portfolio in future periods.

First Financial recorded, as a component of equity in accumulated other comprehensive income, a $5.8 million unrealized after-tax loss on the investment portfolio at June 30, 2013, which declined $18.6 million from a $12.8 million unrealized after-tax gain at December 31, 2012. The declines in value of the Company's investment portfolio at June 30, 2013 is primarily due to rising interest rates during 2013.

DEPOSITS AND FUNDING

Total deposits as of June 30, 2013 were $4.8 billion, a decrease of $185.2 million or 3.7% compared to December 31, 2012. The decrease in total deposits at June 30, 2013 as compared to December 31, 2012 was driven by a $90.0 million or 8.4% decline in total time deposits as well as a $95.2 million or 2.5% decline in total non-time deposit balances. The decline in time deposit balances was primarily the result of lower consumer balances stemming from the Company's continued efforts to manage deposit funding costs, as well as declines in certain public fund deposits. The decline in non-time deposit balances was driven primarily by a $64.7 million decrease in public fund balances.

Year-to-date average deposits declined to $4.8 billion at June 30, 2013 from $5.4 billion at June 30, 2012 primarily due to decreases in average interest-bearing demand deposits of $111.7 million and average time deposits of $459.3 million, partially offset by an increase in noninterest-bearing deposits of $68.7 million. The year-over-year decline in average time deposits was a result of the Company's continued efforts to reduce higher-cost time deposits.

Borrowed funds decreased to $693.9 million at June 30, 2013 from $699.8 million at December 31, 2012, due to an $8.5 million decrease in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, slightly offset by a $3.9 million increase in long-term borrowings as a result of the Bank's funding needs.

For further discussion of First Financial's borrowing capacity and liquidity management, see the Liquidity section of Management's Discussion and Analysis.

Table of Contents

RISK MANAGEMENT

First Financial manages risk through a structured enterprise risk management (ERM) approach that routinely assesses the overall level of risk, identifies specific risks and evaluates the steps being taken to mitigate those risks. First Financial continues to enhance its risk management capabilities and the development of risk awareness as a component of the culture of the Company and the operating policies of its business lines. First Financial has identified nine types of risk that it monitors in its ERM framework. These risks include information technology, market, legal, strategic, reputation, credit, regulatory (compliance), operational and external/environmental.

For further discussion of these risks, see the Risk Management section of the Management's Discussion and Analysis of First Financial’s 2012 Annual Report and the information below.

CREDIT RISK

Credit risk represents the risk of loss due to failure of a customer or counterparty to meet its financial obligations in accordance with contractual terms. First Financial manages credit risk through its underwriting process and periodically reviewing and approving its credit exposures using credit policies and guidelines approved by its board of directors. Due to the significant differences in the accounting for covered loans and the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, management believes that asset quality measures excluding covered loans are generally more meaningful. Therefore, management has included asset quality measures that exclude covered loans in this section.

Allowance for loan and lease losses - excluding covered loans. Management maintains the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level that it considers sufficient to absorb probable loan and lease losses inherent in the portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based on historical loss experience and other significant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires utilizing material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change. See Note 10, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of First Financial's allowance for uncovered loans.

The allowance for uncovered loan and lease losses was $47.0 million as of June 30, 2013 compared to $47.8 million as of December 31, 2012. As a percentage of period-end loans, the allowance for loan and lease losses was 1.39% as of June 30, 2013 compared to 1.50% as of December 31, 2012. The decrease in the allowance for uncovered loan and lease losses from December 31, 2012 was primarily the result of paydowns, charge-offs and other resolution activities related to impaired loans that resulted in lower specific reserves as well as modest improvement in historical loss rates and consumer loan credit expectations. The decrease in the allowance as a percentage of loans was also impacted by loan growth as newly originated loans are generally reserved for at lower rates.

Second quarter 2013 net charge-offs were $3.7 million or 0.45% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis, compared with $6.8 million or 0.93% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis for the comparable quarter in 2012. The $3.2 million decrease from the comparable period in 2012 was primarily the result of declines in commercial, commercial real estate and construction real estate charge-offs.

Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2013, were $6.2 million or 0.38% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis compared to $13.2 million or 0.90% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis for the same period in 2012. The $7.1 million decrease in net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to June 30, 2012 was also primarily related to declines in commercial, commercial real estate and construction real estate charge-offs.

Significant items driving net charge-offs during the six month period ended June 30, 2013 included a $0.9 million charge-off during the second quarter related to a single commercial real estate credit as well as $0.8 million related to three commercial real estate credits and $0.7 million related to two commercial credits charged off during the first quarter, none of which were individually significant. Significant items driving net charge-offs during the comparable period in 2012 included $2.0 million related to the dispositions of a commercial real estate credit and a construction and land development credit and $1.2 million related to valuation adjustments of two commercial real estate credits during the second quarter of 2012 and $1.7 million related to a commercial construction and land development credit, $1.1 million related to a hotel real estate loan and three commercial credits totaling $0.9 million in the aggregate during the first quarter of 2012. The timing and amount of net charge-offs are dependent on the individual credit characteristics of each loan relationship as well as the Company's resolution strategies and can vary from period to period.

Provision expense related to uncovered loans and leases is a product of the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses model as well as net charge-off activity during the period. Second quarter 2013 provision expense related to uncovered loans

Table of Contents

and leases was $2.4 million as compared to $8.4 million during the comparable quarter in 2012. Provision expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $5.5 million compared to $11.6 million for the comparable period in 2012.

The table that follows includes the activity in the allowance for loan losses, excluding covered loans, for the quarterly periods presented.



	Three months ended															Six months ended
	2013						2012									June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,			Mar. 31,			Dec. 31,			Sep. 30,			June 30,			2013			2012
Allowance for loan and lease loss activity
Balance at beginning of period	$	48,306		$	47,777		$	49,192		$	50,952		$	49,437		$	47,777		$	52,576
Provision for loan losses	2,409			3,041			3,882			3,613			8,364			5,450			11,622
Gross charge-offs
Commercial	859			781			657			1,340			1,129			1,640			2,315
Real estate-construction	0			0			0			180			717			0			2,504
Real estate-commercial	2,044			995			2,221			2,736			3,811			3,039			6,055
Real estate-residential	326			223			454			565			191			549			795
Installment	97			100			267			134			116			197			176
Home equity	591			701			1,722			380			915			1,292			1,559
All other	277			410			227			469			259			687			556
Total gross charge-offs	4,194			3,210			5,548			5,804			7,138			7,404			13,960
Recoveries
Commercial	67			319			71			202			48			386			120
Real estate-construction	0			136			0			0			0			136			0
Real estate-commercial	57			39			46			38			68			96			181
Real estate-residential	5			4			3			33			9			9			37
Installment	110			77			53			72			75			187			198
Home equity	225			52			32			31			28			277			52
All other	62			71			46			55			61			133			126
Total recoveries	526			698			251			431			289			1,224			714
Total net charge-offs	3,668			2,512			5,297			5,373			6,849			6,180			13,246
Ending allowance for loan and lease losses	$	47,047		$	48,306		$	47,777		$	49,192		$	50,952		$	47,047		$	50,952

Net charge-offs to average loans and leases (annualized)
Commercial	0.35		%	0.22		%	0.28		%	0.56		%	0.53		%	0.29		%	0.53		%
Real estate-construction	0.00		%	(0.68		)%	0.00		%	0.78		%	2.91		%	(0.31		)%	4.75		%
Real estate-commercial	0.55		%	0.27		%	0.63		%	0.81		%	1.18		%	0.42		%	0.94		%
Real estate-residential	0.38		%	0.27		%	0.58		%	0.72		%	0.25		%	0.33		%	0.53		%
Installment	(0.10		)%	0.17		%	1.46		%	0.41		%	0.26		%	0.04		%	(0.07		)%
Home equity	0.40		%	0.72		%	1.82		%	0.38		%	0.99		%	0.56		%	0.84		%
All other	0.90		%	1.63		%	0.94		%	2.51		%	1.46		%	1.24		%	1.66		%
Total net charge-offs	0.45		%	0.32		%	0.68		%	0.71		%	0.93		%	0.38		%	0.90		%

Allowance for loan and lease losses - covered loans. The majority of the Company's covered loans are accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, whereby First Financial is required to periodically re-estimate the expected cash flows on the loans. For purposes of applying the guidance under FASB ASC Topic 310-30, First Financial grouped acquired loans into pools based on common risk characteristics. A decline in expected cash flows for a pool of loans is referred to as impairment and recorded as provision expense, and a related allowance for loan and lease losses on covered loans, on a discounted basis during the period. Estimated reimbursements due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to any declines in expected loan cash flows are recorded as noninterest income and an increase to the FDIC indemnification asset in the same period. Improvement in expected cash flows for a pool of loans, once any previously recorded impairment is recaptured, is recognized prospectively as an adjustment to the yield on the loans in the pool and a related adjustment to the yield on the FDIC

Table of Contents

indemnification asset. These cash flow evaluations are inherently subjective as they require material estimates, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. See Note 10, Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of First Financial's allowance for covered loans.

During the second quarter 2013, the Company implemented certain enhancements to its valuation methodology and the estimation of impairment to place greater emphasis on changes in total expected cash flows and less emphasis on changes in the net present value of expected cash flows. As a result of these enhancements, the allowance for loan losses related to covered loans was reduced by $7.8 million with an equivalent amount reflected in the negative provision for covered loan losses for the quarter. Additionally, the Company also recognized a corresponding reduction in the FDIC indemnification asset of $6.3 million with an equivalent amount reflected in the negative FDIC loss sharing income for the quarter. These enhancements also resulted in a decline in the yield on covered loans during the second quarter and are expected to result in lower yields on certain covered loan pools on a prospective basis.

The Company recognized negative provision expense, or impairment recapture, of $8.3 million and realized net charge-offs of $4.3 million during the quarter, resulting in an allowance for covered loan losses of $33.0 million as of June 30, 2013. For the second quarter of 2012, First Financial recognized provision expense on covered loans of $6.0 million and realized net charge-offs of $3.9 million during the period, resulting in an allowance for covered loan losses of $48.3 million as of June 30, 2012. The difference between provision expense and net charge-offs primarily relates to the quarterly re-estimation of cash flow expectations required under FASB ASC Topic 310-30.

First Financial recognized provision expense on covered loans of $0.8 million and realized net charge-offs of $13.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The Company recognized total provision expense related to covered loans of $19.0 million and net charge-offs of $13.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

During the second quarter 2013, the Company also incurred loss sharing and covered asset expenses of $1.6 million, consisting primarily of credit expenses, offset by $2.2 million of net gains related to covered OREO. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company incurred loss sharing and covered asset expenses of $3.9 million offset by $2.4 million of net gains related to covered OREO. The negative FDIC loss sharing income for the quarter reflects the quarterly re-estimation of expected cash flows, including the enhancements to the quarterly estimation discussed above, as well as the corresponding offset related to the net gains on covered OREO and loss sharing and covered asset expenses.

The receivables due from the FDIC under loss sharing agreements related to covered provision expense, loss sharing expense and losses on covered OREO of $1.6 million and $21.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, were recognized as FDIC loss sharing income and corresponding increases to the FDIC indemnification asset in those periods.



	Three months ended															Six months ended
	2013						2012									June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,			Mar. 31,			Dec. 31,			Sep. 30,			June 30,			2013			2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	45,496		$	45,190		$	48,895		$	48,327		$	46,156		$	45,190		$	42,835
Provision for loan and lease losses	(8,283		)	9,042			5,283			6,622			6,047			759			18,998
Loans charged-off	(4,681		)	(9,684		)	(9,568		)	(9,058		)	(5,163		)	(14,365		)	(15,281		)
Recoveries	429			948			580			3,004			1,287			1,377			1,775
Ending allowance for covered loan losses	$	32,961		$	45,496		$	45,190		$	48,895		$	48,327		$	32,961		$	48,327

Nonperforming/Underperforming Assets - excluding covered assets. Nonperforming loans totaled $74.9 million and nonperforming assets totaled $86.7 million as of June 30, 2013 compared with $75.9 million and $88.4 million, respectively, at December 31, 2012. Nonaccrual loans, including troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) classified as nonaccrual, totaled $62.0 million as of June 30, 2013 compared to $65.0 million as of December 31, 2012, representing a $3.0 million, or 4.7% decrease.

The second quarter 2013 allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of nonaccrual loans, including nonaccrual TDRs was 75.9% compared with 73.5% at December 31, 2012. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans, which include TDRs classified as accrual, was 62.8% at June 30, 2013 compared with 63.0% at December 31, 2012.

Total classified assets as of June 30, 2013 totaled $129.8 million compared to $129.0 million at December 31, 2012. Classified assets are defined by the Company as nonperforming assets plus performing loans internally rated substandard or worse.

Table of Contents

Troubled Debt Restructurings - excluding covered loans. TDRs totaled $32.9 million at June 30, 2013, a $7.9 million increase from December 31, 2012. Accruing TDRs increased $2.1 million from December 31, 2012, generally as a result of renewals and term extensions of performing, substandard-rated loans that are experiencing operating cash flow stress but have strong underlying collateral and guarantor support. TDRs classified as nonaccrual increased $5.8 million from December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of modified borrowing terms related to a $6.9 million commercial nonaccrual credit in the first quarter 2013.

Delinquent Loans - excluding covered loans. At June 30, 2013, loans 30-to-89 days past due decreased to $13.4 million, or 0.40% of period end loans, as compared to $16.3 million, or 0.51%, at December 31, 2012. The decrease in delinquent loans compared to December 31, 2012 was driven primarily by the reclassification of a $2.0 million commercial real estate credit to nonaccrual status as well as a commercial real estate credit and an equipment finance credit, totaling $1.9 million in the aggregate, where the borrowers made payments to bring the loans current.

Other Real Estate Owned. At June 30, 2013, First Financial had OREO properties originating from uncovered loans totaling $11.8 million, compared with $12.5 million at December 31, 2012. Uncovered OREO decreased $0.7 million from December 31, 2012 to June 30, 2013 as resolutions and valuation adjustments of $3.4 million exceeded $2.7 million of additions during the first half of 2013. There were two large commercial loans included in the additions and seven property resolutions during the first half of 2013.

OREO originating from covered loans was $22.5 million at June 30, 2013, compared with $28.9 million at December 31, 2012. Covered OREO decreased $6.4 million, or 22.1%, from December 31, 2012 as resolutions and valuation adjustments of $19.3 million exceeded additions of $12.9 million during the first half of 2013.

The table that follows shows the categories that are included in nonperforming and underperforming assets, excluding covered assets, as well as related credit quality ratios as of June 30, 2013, and the four previous quarters.

Table of Contents



	Quarter ended
	2013						2012
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,			Mar. 31,			Dec. 31,			Sep. 30,			June 30,
Nonperforming loans, nonperforming assets, and underperforming assets
Nonaccrual loans
Commercial	$	2,904		$	4,044		$	10,562		$	4,563		$	12,065
Real estate - construction	808			945			950			2,536			7,243
Real estate - commercial	30,977			30,311			31,002			33,961			36,116
Real estate - residential	5,149			4,371			5,045			5,563			5,069
Installment	153			211			376			284			319
Home equity	1,576			1,750			2,499			2,497			2,281
Lease financing	496			496			496			0			0
Nonaccrual loans	42,063			42,128			50,930			49,404			63,093
Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs)
Accruing	12,924			12,757			10,856			11,604			9,909
Nonaccrual	19,948			22,324			14,111			13,017			10,185
Total TDRs	32,872			35,081			24,967			24,621			20,094
Total nonperforming loans	74,935			77,209			75,897			74,025			83,187
Other real estate owned (OREO)	11,798			11,993			12,526			13,912			15,688
Total nonperforming assets	86,733			89,202			88,423			87,937			98,875
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	158			157			212			108			143
Total underperforming assets	$	86,891		$	89,359		$	88,635		$	88,045		$	99,018
Total classified assets	$	129,832		$	130,436		$	129,040		$	133,382		$	145,621

Credit quality ratios (excluding covered assets)
Allowance for loan and lease losses to
Nonaccrual loans	111.85		%	114.66		%	93.81		%	99.57		%	80.76		%
Nonaccrual loans plus nonaccrual TDRs	75.87		%	74.95		%	73.46		%	78.81		%	69.53		%
Nonperforming loans	62.78		%	62.57		%	62.95		%	66.45		%	61.25		%
Total ending loans	1.39		%	1.49		%	1.50		%	1.60		%	1.69		%
Nonperforming loans to total loans	2.22		%	2.38		%	2.39		%	2.41		%	2.76		%
Nonperforming assets to
Ending loans, plus OREO	2.56		%	2.74		%	2.77		%	2.86		%	3.27		%
Total assets, including covered assets	1.38		%	1.40		%	1.36		%	1.41		%	1.57		%
Nonperforming assets, excluding accruing TDRs to
Ending loans, plus OREO	2.17		%	2.34		%	2.43		%	2.48		%	2.94		%
Total assets, including covered assets	1.18		%	1.20		%	1.19		%	1.22		%	1.42		%

MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. The primary source of market risk for First Financial is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and the value of equity arising from changes in market interest rates, and arises in the normal course of business to the extent that there is a divergence between the amount of First Financial’s interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid/withdrawn, re-price or mature in specified periods. First Financial seeks to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and equity while managing volatility arising from shifts in market interest rates. First Financial’s board of directors establishes policy limits with respect to interest rate risk and changes in the economic value of equity. First Financial’s Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO), a group of senior officers from the lending, deposit gathering, finance, risk management and treasury areas, oversees market risk management, monitoring risk measures, limits and policy guidelines for managing the amount of interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital.

Table of Contents

Interest rate risk management is an active process that encompasses monitoring loan and deposit flows complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective interest rate risk management begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate interest rate risk position given business activities, management objectives, market expectations and ALCO policy limits and guidelines.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity management is the process by which First Financial manages the continuing flow of funds necessary to meet its financial commitments on a timely basis and at a reasonable cost. These funding commitments include withdrawals by depositors, credit commitments to borrowers, shareholder dividends, operating and capital expenditures. Liquidity is monitored and closely managed by ALCO. It is ALCO’s responsibility to ensure First Financial has the necessary level of funds available for normal operations as well as to maintain a contingency funding policy to ensure that liquidity stress events are quickly identified and management plans to respond are in place. This is accomplished through the use of policies which establish limits and require measurements to monitor liquidity trends, including modeling and management reporting that identifies the amounts and costs of all available funding sources. These sources are periodically tested for funding availability.

Liquidity is derived primarily from deposit growth, principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, maturing loans and investment securities, access to wholesale funding sources and collateralized borrowings. First Financial’s most stable source of liability-funded liquidity for both short and long-term needs is deposit growth and retention of the core deposit base. The deposit base is diversified among individuals, partnerships, corporations, public entities and geographic markets. This diversification helps First Financial minimize dependence on large concentrations of wholesale funding sources.

Capital expenditures, such as banking center expansions and technology investments were $5.4 million and $10.8 million for the first six months of 2013 and 2012, respectively. Management believes that First Financial has sufficient liquidity to fund its future capital expenditure commitments.

First Financial utilizes its short-term line of credit and longer-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) as funding sources. At June 30, 2013, the Company had $505.9 million in short-term borrowings from the FHLB. At December 31, 2012, the Company had $502.0 million in short-term borrowings from the FHLB. At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, total long-term borrowings from the FHLB were $8.2 million and $9.4 million, respectively. First Financial's total remaining borrowing capacity from the FHLB was $391.9 million at June 30, 2013.

First Financial had pledged certain eligible residential and farm real estate loans, home equity lines of credit and government and agency securities, totaling $3.1 billion as collateral for borrowings from the FHLB as of June 30, 2013. For ease of borrowing execution, First Financial utilizes a blanket collateral agreement with the FHLB.

First Financial's principal source of asset-funded liquidity is marketable investment securities, particularly those of shorter maturities. The market value of investment securities classified as available-for-sale totaled $884.7 million at June 30, 2013. Securities classified as held-to-maturity that are maturing within a short period of time are also a source of liquidity and totaled $0.2 million at June 30, 2013. Other types of assets such as cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with other banks, as well as loans maturing within one year, are also sources of liquidity.

In addition to liquidity on hand at June 30, 2013 of $117.4 million, First Financial had unused and available overnight wholesale funding of $2.0 billion, or 31.6%, of total assets to fund new loans, any deposit runoff that may occur as a result of continued deposit rationalization efforts and from markets that the Company is exiting or for general corporate requirements.

Certain restrictions exist regarding the ability of First Financial’s subsidiaries to transfer funds to First Financial in the form of cash dividends, loans, other assets or advances. The approval of the subsidiaries’ respective primary federal regulators is required for First Financial’s subsidiaries to pay dividends in excess of regulatory limitations. Dividends paid to First Financial from its subsidiaries totaled $28.9 million for the first six months of 2013. As of June 30, 2013, First Financial’s subsidiaries had retained earnings of $354.4 million of which $29.2 million was available for distribution to First Financial without prior regulatory approval. Additionally, First Financial had $89.8 million in cash as of June 30, 2013, which is approximately two times the Company’s annual regular shareholder dividend (currently $0.60 per share) and operating expenses.

Management is not aware of any other events or regulatory requirements that, if implemented, are likely to have a material effect on First Financial’s liquidity.

Table of Contents

CAPITAL

Risk-Based Capital. First Financial and its subsidiary, First Financial Bank, are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate regulatory action.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require First Financial to maintain minimum amounts and ratios as defined by the regulations of Total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and to average assets. Management believes, as of June 30, 2013, that First Financial met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject. At June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, regulatory notifications categorized First Financial as well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well-capitalized, First Financial must maintain minimum Total risk-based capital, Tier 1 risk-based capital, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There have been no conditions or events since those notifications that management believes has changed the Company's category.

First Financial’s Tier I capital is comprised of total shareholders’ equity less unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 320, Investments-Debt and Equity Securities, and any amounts resulting from the application of FASB ASC Topic 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits, that is recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), intangible assets and any valuation related to mortgage servicing rights. Total risk-based capital consists of Tier I capital plus qualifying allowance for loan and lease losses and gross unrealized gains on equity securities.

For purposes of calculating the leverage ratio, average assets represents quarterly average assets less assets not qualifying for total risk-based capital including intangible assets and non-qualifying mortgage servicing rights and allowance for loan and lease losses.

Consolidated regulatory capital ratios at June 30, 2013, included the leverage ratio of 10.12%, Tier 1 capital ratio of 15.41%, and total capital ratio of 16.68%. All regulatory capital ratios exceeded the amounts necessary to be classified as “well capitalized,” and total regulatory capital exceeded the “minimum” requirement by $355.4 million, on a consolidated basis. First Financial’s tangible common equity ratio increased to 9.62% at June 30, 2013 as compared to 9.50% at December 31, 2012.

First Financial's Tier I and Total capital ratios were negatively impacted by an increase in risk weighted assets during 2013 primarily as a result of declines in lower risk weighted covered assets offset by increases in higher risk weighted uncovered loans and investment securities. First Financial's Leverage ratio was positively impacted by a decline in average assets in the first half of 2013. Contributions to shareholders’ equity from earnings were limited in both 2013 and 2012 as a result of the Company's variable dividend payout.

On July 2, 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved a final rule implementing changes intended to strengthen the regulatory capital framework for all banking organizations (Basel III). The final rule includes transition periods to ease the potential burden, with community banks such as First Financial subject to the final rule beginning January 1, 2015. While First Financial continues to evaluate this final rule and its potential impact, preliminary assessments indicate that the Company will continue to exceed all regulatory capital requirements under Basel III.

The following tables illustrate the actual and required capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Table of Contents



	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
June 30, 2013
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	$	682,927	16.68	%	$	327,492	8.00	%	N/A		N/A
First Financial Bank	593,627		14.54	%	326,646		8.00	%	$	408,308	10.00	%

Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	630,819		15.41	%	163,746		4.00	%	N/A		N/A
First Financial Bank	534,722		13.10	%	163,323		4.00	%	244,985		6.00	%

Tier 1 capital to average assets
Consolidated	630,819		10.12	%	249,267		4.00	%	N/A		N/A
First Financial Bank	534,722		8.59	%	248,898		4.00	%	311,123		5.00	%



	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
December 31, 2012
Total capital to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	$	686,961	17.60	%	$	312,328	8.00	%	N/A		N/A
First Financial Bank	586,023		15.04	%	311,618		8.00	%	$	389,523	10.00	%

Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
Consolidated	637,176		16.32	%	156,164		4.00	%	N/A		N/A
First Financial Bank	529,196		13.59	%	155,809		4.00	%	233,714		6.00	%

Tier 1 capital to average assets
Consolidated	637,176		10.25	%	248,761		4.00	%	N/A		N/A
First Financial Bank	529,196		8.52	%	248,408		4.00	%	310,511		5.00	%

Shareholder Dividends. First Financial's board of directors authorized a regular dividend of $0.15 per common share and a variable dividend of $0.12 per common share for the next regularly scheduled dividend, payable on October 1, 2013 to shareholders of record as of August 30, 2013. As previously disclosed, this will be the last variable dividend paid with subsequent quarterly dividends expected to be comprised solely of the regular dividend.

Share Repurchases. In October 2012, First Financial's board of directors approved a share repurchase plan under which the Company has the ability to repurchase up to 5,000,000 shares. Under the plan, the Company expects to repurchase approximately 1,000,000 shares annually. This annual target will be subject to market conditions and quarterly evaluation by the board as well as balance sheet composition and growth. Subsequent to the expiration of the variable dividend in 2013, the Company expects to return to shareholders a target range of 60% - 80% of earnings through a combination of its regular dividend and share repurchases while still maintaining capital ratios that exceed internal target thresholds, current regulatory capital requirements and proposed capital requirements under the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's final framework for strengthening international capital and liquidity regulation released in December 2010 (Basel III). The Company repurchased 590,400 shares under this plan at an average price of $15.43 per share during the first six months of 2013, which

Table of Contents

included 291,400 shares at an average price of $15.47 during the second quarter. At June 30, 2013, 3,999,100 common shares remained available for repurchase under this plan.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

First Financial’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared based on the application of accounting policies. These policies require the reliance on estimates and assumptions. Changes in underlying factors, assumptions or estimates in any of these areas could have a material impact on First Financial’s future financial condition and results of operations. In management’s opinion, some of these areas have a more significant impact than others on First Financial’s financial reporting. For First Financial, these areas currently include accounting for the allowance for loan and lease losses (excluding covered loans), covered loans, the allowance for loan and lease losses - covered loans, the FDIC indemnification asset, goodwill, pension and income taxes. These accounting policies are discussed in detail in the Critical Accounting Policies section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in First Financial’s 2012 Annual Report. There were no material changes to these accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

ACCOUNTING AND REGULATORY MATTERS

Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements discusses new accounting standards adopted by First Financial during 2013 and the expected impact of accounting standards recently issued but not yet required to be adopted. To the extent the adoption of new accounting standards materially affects financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, the impacts are discussed in the applicable section(s) of Management’s Discussion and Analysis and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Certain statements contained in this report which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (the Act). In addition, certain statements in future filings by First Financial with the SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of First Financial which are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, projections of revenues, income or loss, earnings or loss per share, the payment or non-payment of dividends, capital structure and other financial items, statements of plans and objectives of First Financial or its management or board of directors and statements of future economic performances and statements of assumptions underlying such statements. Words such as "believes," "anticipates," "likely," "expected," "intends," and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. Management's analysis contains forward-looking statements that are provided to assist in the understanding of anticipated future financial performance. However, such performance involves risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:


▪	management's ability to effectively execute its business plan;


▪	the risk that the strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct operations may continue to deteriorate resulting in, among other things, a further deterioration in credit quality or a reduced demand for credit, including the resultant effect on our loan portfolio, allowance for loan and lease losses and overall financial performance;


▪	U.S. fiscal debt and budget matters;


▪	the ability of financial institutions to access sources of liquidity at a reasonable cost;

▪

the impact of recent upheaval in the financial markets and the effectiveness of domestic and international governmental actions taken in response, and the effect of such governmental actions on us, our competitors and counterparties, financial markets generally and availability of credit specifically, and the U.S. and international economies, including potentially higher FDIC premiums arising from increased payments from FDIC insurance funds as a result of depository institution failures;


▪	the effect of and changes in policies and laws or regulatory agencies (notably the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act);


▪	the effect of the current low interest rate environment or changes in interest rates on our net interest margin and our loan originations and securities holdings;


▪	our ability to keep up with technological changes;


▪	failure or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third party vendors or other service providers;


▪	our ability to comply with the terms of loss sharing agreements with the FDIC;

Table of Contents


▪	mergers and acquisitions, including costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquired companies and the wind-down of non-strategic operations that may be greater than expected, such as the risks and uncertainties associated with the Irwin Mortgage Corporation bankruptcy proceedings and other acquired subsidiaries;


▪	the risk that exploring merger and acquisition opportunities may detract from management's time and ability to successfully manage our Company;


▪	expected cost savings in connection with the consolidation of recent acquisitions may not be fully realized or realized within the expected time frames, and deposit attrition, customer loss and revenue loss following completed acquisitions may be greater than expected;


▪	our ability to increase market share and control expenses;


▪	the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies as well as the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the SEC;


▪	adverse changes in the creditworthiness of our borrowers and lessees, collateral values, the value of investment securities and asset recovery values, including the value of the FDIC indemnification asset and related assets covered by FDIC loss sharing agreements;


▪	adverse changes in the securities, debt and/or derivatives markets;


▪	our success in recruiting and retaining the necessary personnel to support business growth and expansion and maintain sufficient expertise to support increasingly complex products and services;


▪	monetary and fiscal policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) and the U.S. government and other governmental initiatives affecting the financial services industry;


▪	unpredictable natural or other disasters could have an adverse effect on us in that such events could materially disrupt our operations or our vendors' operations or willingness of our customers to access the financial services we offer;


▪	our ability to manage loan delinquency and charge-off rates and changes in estimation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; and


▪	the costs and effects of litigation and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigation.

In addition, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as well as our other filings with the SEC, for a more detailed discussion of these risks and uncertainties and other factors. Such forward-looking statements are meaningful only on the date when such statements are made, and First Financial undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such a statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments due to changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. The primary source of market risk for First Financial is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and the value of equity arising from changes in market interest rates and arises in the normal course of business to the extent that there is a divergence between the amount of First Financial's interest-earning assets and the amount of interest-bearing liabilities that are prepaid, withdrawn, re-priced or mature in specified periods. First Financial seeks to achieve consistent growth in net interest income and equity while managing volatility arising from shifts in market interest rates. First Financial's board of directors establishes policy limits with respect to interest rate risk. First Financial's ALCO oversees market risk management, monitoring risk measures, limits and policy guidelines for managing the amount of interest rate risk and its effect on net interest income and capital.

Interest rate risk for First Financial's Consolidated Balance Sheets consists of repricing, option and basis risks. Repricing risk results from differences in the maturity, or repricing, of interest-bearing assets and liabilities. Option risk in financial instruments arises from embedded options such as loan prepayments, early withdrawal of certificates of deposits and calls on investments and debt instruments that are primarily driven by third party or client behavior. Basis risk refers to the potential for changes in the underlying relationship between market rates or indices, which subsequently result in a narrowing of the net interest margin. Basis risk is also present in managed rate liabilities, such as interest-bearing checking accounts and savings accounts, where historical pricing relationships to market rates may change due to the level or directional change in market interest rates or competitive pressures.

The interest rate risk position is measured and monitored using income simulation models and economic value of equity (EVE) sensitivity analysis that capture both short-term and long-term interest rate risk exposure. Income simulation involves forecasting net interest income (NII) under a variety of interest rate scenarios including instantaneous shocks. First Financial uses EVE sensitivity analysis to understand the impact of changes in interest rates on long-term cash flows, income and capital. EVE is calculated by discounting the cash flows for all balance sheet instruments under different interest-rate scenarios.

Presented below is the estimated impact on First Financial’s NII and EVE position as of June 30, 2013, assuming immediate, parallel shifts in interest rates:



	% Change from Base Case for Immediate Parallel Changes in Rates
	-100 BP ⁽¹⁾		+100 BP		+200 BP
NII-Year 1	(5.79	)%	(0.30	)%	1.39	%
NII-Year 2	(6.17	)%	1.21	%	4.12	%
EVE	(10.63	)%	0.75	%	5.87	%

(1)Because certain current interest rates are at or below 1.00%, the 100 basis point downward shock assumes that certain corresponding interest rates approach an implied floor that, in effect, reflects a decrease of less than the full 100 basis point downward shock.

Modeling the sensitivity of NII and EVE to changes in market interest rates is highly dependent on the assumptions incorporated into the modeling process. These assumptions are periodically reviewed in the context of balance sheet changes, product offerings, external economic factors and anticipated client behavior. In addition, the Company internally evaluates the impact of yield curve twist scenarios (i.e. flattening, steepening and inversions of the yield curve) on NII and EVE. First Financial's projected results for near-term earnings at risk indicate a risk-neutral to modestly asset-sensitive position. Long-term NII and EVE modeling indicate the Company is asset sensitive. First Financial is actively managing its balance sheet with a bias toward asset sensitivy while simultaneously balancing the potential earnings impact of this strategy.

First Financial's NII position became more asset sensitive, from both a near-term and long-term perspective, during the second quarter 2013 as a result of ongoing balance sheet management efforts. Similarly, the Company's EVE sensitivity to a +100 basis point interest rate shock also became more asset sensitive during the quarter. The Company's EVE sensitivity to a +200 basis point interest rate shock became modestly less asset sensitive as a result of rising long-term interest rates leading to higher

Table of Contents

discount rates, coupled with a shift in the Company's deposit mix away from time deposits toward market-driven deposit products, during the quarter.

"Risk-neutral position" refers to the absence of a strong bias toward either asset or liability sensitivity. “Asset sensitive position” refers to an increase in interest rates, primarily short-term rates, that is expected to generate higher net interest income as rates earned on our interest-earning assets would reprice upward more quickly or in greater quantities than rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities would reprice. Conversely, “liability sensitive position” refers to an increase in short-term interest rates that is expected to generate lower net interest income as rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities would reprice upward more quickly or in greater quantities than rates earned on our interest-earning assets.

The interest rate risk analysis provides a framework as to what First Financial's overall sensitivity is as of the Company's most recent reported position. Management strategies may impact future reporting periods, as actual results may differ from simulated results due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, the difference between actual experience and the characteristics assumed, as well as changes in portfolio composition and market conditions. Market based and historical experience prepayment speeds are factored into the analysis for loan and securities portfolios. Deposit premiums and rate sensitivity for transactional deposit accounts are modeled based on both historical experience and external industry studies. Due to the current low interest rate environment, funding rates on deposit and wholesale funding instruments were not reduced below 0.0% in the down 100 basis point scenario. First Financial continues to refine the assumptions used in its interest rate risk modeling.

See also “Item 2-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Net Interest Income.”

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that are designed to cause the material information required to be disclosed by First Financial in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to be recorded, processed, summarized, and reported to the extent applicable within the time periods required by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, First Financial performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes were made to the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.

Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the disclosure in response to "Part I - Item 3. Legal Proceedings" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

With respect to the matter titled Irwin Mortgage Corporation Bankruptcy, on April 1, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order confirming IMC's plan. IMC and First Financial reached a global settlement with respect to all claims which did not have a material adverse effect on the financial statements of First Financial. The effective date of the plan was on June 28, 2013. Pursuant to the plan, a liquidating trust has been established to administer the liquidation of all remaining assets of IMC in accordance with law.


Item 1A.	Risk Factors.

There are a number of factors that may adversely affect the Company's business, financial results, or stock price. See "Risk Factors" as disclosed in response to "Item 1A. to Part I - Risk Factors" of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Table of Contents


Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


(c)	The following table shows the total number of shares repurchased in the second quarter of 2013.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities



	(a)	(b)		(c)	(d)
Period	Total Number Of Shares Purchased ⁽¹⁾	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans ⁽²⁾	Maximum Number of Shares that may yet be purchased Under the Plans
April 1 to April 30, 2013
Share repurchase program	87,400	$	15.65	87,400	4,203,100
Director Fee Stock Plan	3,129	15.74		NA	NA
Stock Plans	125	15.37		NA	NA
May 1 to May 31, 2013
Share repurchase program	127,500	$	15.54	127,500	4,075,600
Director Fee Stock Plan	0	0.00		0	NA
Stock Plans	3,576	15.67		NA	NA
June 1 to June 30, 2013
Share repurchase program	76,500	$	15.15	76,500	3,999,100
Director Fee Stock Plan	0	0.00		0	NA
Stock Plans	2,050	15.01		0	NA
Total
Share repurchase program	291,400	$	15.47	291,400
Director Fee Stock Plan	3,129	$	15.74	NA
Stock Plans	5,751	$	15.43	NA

(1)

Except with respect to the share repurchase program, the number of shares purchased in column (a) and the average price paid per share in column (b) include the purchase of shares other than through publicly announced plans. The shares purchased other than through publicly announced plans were purchased pursuant to First Financial’s Director Fee Stock Plan, 1999 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan for Officers and Employees, 2009 Employee Stock Plan, Amended and Restated 2009 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan and 2012 Stock Plan (the last five plans are referred to hereafter as the Stock Plans.) The table shows the number of shares purchased pursuant to those plans and the average price paid per share. The purchases for the Director Fee Stock Plan were made in open-market transactions. Under the Stock Plans, shares were purchased from plan participants at the then current market value in satisfaction of stock option exercise prices.


(2)	First Financial has one previously announced stock repurchase plan under which it is authorized to purchase shares of its common stock. The plan has no expiration date. The table that follows provides additional information regarding this plan.



Announcement Date	Total Shares Approved for Repurchase	Total Shares Repurchased Under the Plan	Expiration Date
10/25/2012	5,000,000	1,000,900	None

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits



(a)	Exhibits:

Exhibit Number
10.1		Form of Agreement for Restricted Stock Awards under the First Financial Bancorp. 2012 Stock Plan (3-year vesting/accrual of dividends).⁽¹⁾

10.2		Agreement for Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards under the First Financial Bancorp. 2012 Stock Plan between Bancorp and Claude E. Davis.⁽¹⁾

31.1		Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith.

31.2		Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 filed herewith.

32.1		Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 furnished herewith.

32.2		Certification of Periodic Financial Report by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 furnished herewith.

101.1		Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, as blocks of text and in detail.⁽²⁾

First Financial will furnish, without charge, to a security holder upon request a copy of the documents and will furnish any other Exhibit upon payment of reproduction costs. Unless as otherwise noted, documents incorporated by reference involve File No. 000-12379.

(1) Compensation plan(s) or arrangement(s).


(2)	As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



		FIRST FINANCIAL BANCORP.
		(Registrant)

/s/ Anthony M. Stollings		/s/ John M. Gavigan
Anthony M. Stollings		John M. Gavigan
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer		First Vice President and Corporate Controller
		(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date	8/6/2013	Date	8/6/2013