UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[x] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to ____________
Commission file number: 0-53574
Nevada Processing Solutions
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada 20-4959207
------------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
9646 Giddings, Las Vegas, NV 89148
------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (702) 334-4008
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. [ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate by checkmark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. [X]
Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and
"smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
[ ] Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer
[ ] Non-accelerated filer [X] Smaller reporting company
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes[X] No [ ]
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity
held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common
equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common
equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently
completed second fiscal quarter:
The aggregate market value of the Company's common shares of voting stock held
by non-affiliates of the Company at November 12, 2009, computed by reference to
the $0.01 Registration Statement per-share price on January 27, 2009 (date of
effectiveness), was $2,750.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes
of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
As of November 12, 2009, the registrant's outstanding common stock consisted
of 3,375,000 shares, $0.001 par value, authorized - 195,000,000 common
voting shares. The registrant's outstanding convertible preferred stock
consisted of 872,690 shares, $0.001 par value, authorized - 5,000,000
preferred shares.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
None.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: Yes [ ] No [X]
INDEX
Title Page
ITEM 1. BUSINESS 5
ITEM 1A RISK FACTORS 10
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 19
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 19
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS 19
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 20
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF 21
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 25
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON 26
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 26
ITEM 10. DIRECTOR, EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 29
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 34
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS, 36
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS 37
AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES 38
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 39
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This document contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other
than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking statements" for
purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to,
any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements
of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations;
any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any
statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements
or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.
Forward-looking statements may include the words "may", "could", "estimate",
"intend", "continue", "believe", "expect" or "anticipate" or other similar
words. These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions
only as of the date of this report. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
dates on which they are made. We do not undertake to update forward-looking
statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after
the dates they are made. You should, however, consult further disclosures we
make in future filings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in any of our forward-
looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from
those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. Our future
financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking
statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The
factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited
to:
o inability to raise additional financing for working capital and product
development;
o inability to process loans for mortgage companies;
o deterioration in general or regional economic, market and political
conditions;
o the fact that our accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how we
report our financial condition and results of operations, and they may
require management to make estimates about matters that are inherently
uncertain;
o adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs
of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing
operations;
o changes in U.S. GAAP or in the legal, regulatory and legislative
environments in the markets in which we operate;
3
o inability to efficiently manage our operations;
o inability to achieve future operating results;
o our ability to recruit and hire key employees;
o the inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and
business plans; and
o the other risks and uncertainties detailed in this report.
In this form 10-K references to "Nevada Processing Solutions", "the
Company", "we", "us", and "our" refer to Nevada Processing Solutions.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the
SEC. You can read these SEC filings and reports over the Internet at the SEC's
website at www.sec.gov. You can also obtain copies of the documents at
prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 am and 3:00 pm. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further
information on the operations of the public reference facilities. We will
provide a copy of our annual report to security holders, including audited
financial statements, at no charge upon receipt to of a written request to us
at Nevada Processing Solutions, 9646 Giddings, Las Vegas, NV 89148.
4
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
History and Organization
------------------------
We were formed on May 30, 2006. Nevada Processing Solutions is a startup
company that processes loan for mortgage companies. Activities to date
have been limited primarily to organization, initial capitalization,
establishing an appropriate operating facility in Las Vegas, Nevada, and
commencing its initial operational plans.
Our Business
------------
Nevada Processing Solutions is a startup company that processes loans for
mortgage companies.
We serve as an extension of a mortgage broker's loan processing team. It is
our goal to process mortgage loans through to closing. This begins when the
order is received and continues until the broker/originator has a complete
hard copy or electronic file in their hands after closing. We serve as an
extension of a mortgage broker's staff, so therefore, it is important that we
have an open channel of communications with the mortgage broker to understand
the expected roles of each party in the transaction, as well as the process
flow and expected time frames to complete the application process. We are
not a mortgage broker nor lender and are not involved in originations of
mortgages or loans.
Our offices are currently located at 9646 Giddings, Las Vegas, NV 89148.
Our telephone number is (702) 334-4008.
Market
------
We offer loan mortgage processing and our tracking services to mortgage
companies. According to the U.S. Census Bureau 2005 Report, there are
approximately 8,967 mortgage and non-mortgage loan brokers in the U.S. In
the State of Nevada alone there are 96 mortgage and non-mortgage loan brokers.
These loan brokers represent the future customer base of Nevada Processing
Solutions.
5
Business Strategy
-----------------
Our goal is to develop long-term business partnerships by providing mortgage
processing services to mortgage brokers. It is our goal to handle loan
processing from submission to funding. We plan to handle all types of loan
programs. We plan to develop the procedures necessary to process loans
accurately and professionally. We plan to strive for a 10-day close. The
loan processor fee is billed at closing on the as a third party loan
processing fee. We plan to charge approximately $500 for each loan we
process. Our services include:
o Expedite Closing Cycles. Nevada Processing Solutions will handle all
"back-end" loan processing activities associated with closing a loan:
appraisal and title/escrow ordering and follow-up, submission to
underwriting, obtaining stips, clearing of conditions, coordination
of closing and confirmation of funding.
o Upon receiving a loan package and Nevada Processing Solutions will
upload it into our system, verify that ratios, income, accuracy of
data and notify the broker of any deficiencies.
o We will review a broker's file for compliance issues and/or missing
documentation.
o We will order (depending on the Brokers needs) title work, payoffs,
appraisals, and surveys that will be required.
o We will keep the mortgage broker up to date as the loan progresses
through underwriting.
o Immediately upon receiving an approval, we will fax a copy and contact
the broker to discuss any conditions of the loan approval.
o After meeting the conditions, the we will monitor the status of the
file in the lender's closing department to insure the closing documents
are sent to the title company.
Further, we utilize a software program designed to track all of the steps
required to approve a mortgage loan application. As each step is completed,
the software updates the information in the applicants' file. The loan
applicant is able to determine the progress of their loan by checking the
status of the loan approval process through a secure internet site.
6
We plan to provide information to loan applicants as to the approval status
of their individual mortgage loan. Via a user name and password, the loan
applicants can check daily through a secure website on the progress of their
mortgage loan(s). A mortgage loan, on average, goes through twenty steps
before it is approved. The loan applicant can check the status of the
mortgage approval process as it passes through these twenty steps. It allows
the loan applicant to understand what has taken place and what needs to take
place before their mortgage funds are released.
We have designed a software program to track all of the steps required to
approve a mortgage loan application: We now have the infrastructure and
software program in place and ready to use.
Marketing
---------
We plan to develop a strategic marketing plan by working together with
mortgage brokers to generate awareness about our services. The marketing
plan will cover the following:
o Active promotional program including printing promotional materials,
educating mortgage brokers about our services
o Media relations program by developing a website that markets our
services;
o Developing an advertising campaign to market our services.
Financing
---------
As of the date of this annual report we have raised $31,138 from contributed
capital and two private placements, management believes that we will need to
raise an additional $100,000 to meet our capital requirements for at least
the next 12 months and plans to keep operating costs to a minimum until cash
is available through financing or operating activities. We plan to continue
to seek other sources of financing on favorable terms; however, there are no
assurances that any such financing can be obtained on favorable terms, if at
all. If we are unable to generate profits or unable to obtain additional
funds for our working capital needs, we may need to cease or curtail
operations.
7
Competition
-----------
We have developed a software program to track the process of mortgage
approvals. Our software program is not trademarked or protect by any
patents. Any who can develop a similar software program can infringe on the
Company's business, by offering the same service to the Company's customers
at a lower price. Many other companies are better funded and more
established than Nevada Processing Solutions.
Nevada Processing Solutions's Funding Requirements
--------------------------------------------------------
We do not have sufficient capital fully execute our business plan.
Management anticipates Nevada Processing Solutions will require at least
$100,000 to move its business plan forward. There is no assurance that we
will have revenue in the future or that we will be able to secure the
necessary funding to develop our business. Without additional funding, it
is most likely that our business model will fail, and we shall be forced to
cease operations.
Future funding could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity
securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities and/or
amortization expenses related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which
could materially adversely affect the Company's business, results of
operations and financial condition. Any future acquisitions of other
businesses, technologies, services or product(s) might require the Company to
obtain additional equity or debt financing, which might not be available on
terms favorable to the Company, or at all, and such financing, if available,
might be dilutive.
Patent, Trademark, License and Franchise Restrictions and Contractual
Obligations and Concessions
---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have no current plans for any registrations such as patents, trademarks,
copyrights, franchises, concessions, royalty agreements or labor contracts.
We will assess the need for any copyright, trademark or patent applications
on an ongoing basis.
Research and Development Activities and Costs
---------------------------------------------
Nevada Processing Solutions did not incur any research and development costs
for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and has no plans to
undertake any research and development activities during the next year of
operations.
8
Compliance with Environmental Laws
----------------------------------
We are not aware of any environmental laws that have been enacted, nor are we
aware of any such laws being contemplated for the future, that impact issues
specific to our business. In our industry, environmental laws are anticipated
to apply directly to the owners and operators of companies. They do not apply
to companies or individuals providing consulting services, unless they have
been engaged to consult on environmental matters. We are not planning to
provide environmental consulting services.
Employees
---------
We have no full time employees at this time. All functions including
development, strategy, negotiations and clerical work is being provided by
our sole officer on a voluntary basis, without compensation.
9
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Risk Factors Relating to Our Company
------------------------------------
1. SINCE WE ARE A DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AND WE HAVE NOT GENERATED ANY
REVENUES, THERE ARE NO ASSURANCE THAT OUR BUSINESS PLAN WILL EVER BE
SUCCESSFUL.
Our company was incorporated on May 30, 2006. We have realized no revenues
since our inception. We have no solid operating history upon which an
evaluation of our future prospects can be made. Based upon current plans,
we expect to incur operating losses in future periods as we incur significant
expenses associated with the initial startup of our business. Further, there
are no assurances that we will be successful in realizing revenues or in
achieving or sustaining positive cash flow at any time in the future. Any
such failure could result in the possible closure of our business or force us
to seek additional capital through loans or additional sales of our equity
securities to continue business operations, which would dilute the value of
any shares you purchase in this distribution.
2. IF OUR BUSINESS PLAN IS NOT SUCCESSFUL, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO CONTINUE
OPERATIONS AS A GOING CONCERN AND OUR STOCKHOLDERS MAY LOSE THEIR ENTIRE
INVESTMENT IN US.
As discussed in the Notes to Financial Statements included in this
annual report, at September 30, 2009 we had no working capital, $1,000 in
prepaid assets, $775 in accounts payable and stockholders' equity of
approximately $3,375. In addition, we had a net loss of approximately
$(737,791) for the period May 30, 2006 (inception) to September 30, 2009.
These factors raise substantial doubt that we will be able to continue
operations as a going concern, and our independent auditors included an
explanatory paragraph regarding this uncertainty in their report on our
financial statements for the period May 30, 2006 (inception) to September 30,
2009. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our
generating cash flow sufficient to fund operations and reducing operating
expenses. Our business plans may not be successful in addressing these
issues. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our stockholders may lose
their entire investment in us.
10
3. WE EXPECT LOSSES IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE WE HAVE GENERATED NO REVENUE.
We have generated no revenues, we are expect losses over the next eighteen
(18) to twenty-four (24) months since we have no revenues to offset the
expenses associated in executing our business plan. We cannot guarantee that
we will ever be successful in generating revenues in the future. We
recognize that if we are unable to generate revenues, we will not be able to
earn profits or continue operations as a going concern. There is no history
upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will prove
successful, and we can provide investors with no assurance that we will
generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations.
4. SINCE OUR OFFICER WORKS OR CONSULTS FOR OTHER COMPANIES, HIS OTHER
ACTIVITIES COULD SLOW DOWN OUR OPERATIONS.
Chad Guidry, our sole officer, does not work for us exclusively and
does not devote all of his time to our operations. Therefore, it is possible
that a conflict of interest with regard to her time may arise based on his
employment in other activities. His other activities will prevent him from
devoting full-time to our operations which could slow our operations and may
reduce our financial results because of the slow down in operations.
Chad Guidry, the President and Director of the company, currently
devotes approximately 15-20 hours per week to company matters. The
responsibility of developing the company's business, the offering and selling
of the shares through this prospectus and fulfilling the reporting
requirements of a public company all fall upon Mr. Guidry. He has no
prior experience serving as a principal accounting officer or principal
financial officer in a public company. We have not formulated a plan to
resolve any possible conflict of interest with her other business
activities. Mr. Guidry intends to limit his role in his other business
activities and devote more of his time to Nevada Processing Solutions after
we attain a sufficient level of revenue and are able to provide sufficient
officers' salaries per our business plan. In the event he is unable to
fulfill any aspect of his duties to the company we may experience a shortfall
or complete lack of sales resulting in little or no profits and eventual
closure of the business.
11
5. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FUNDING, OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS
WILL BE HARMED. EVEN IF WE DO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FINANCING OUR THEN EXISTING
SHAREHOLDERS MAY SUFFER SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION.
We will require additional funds to obtain the resources to develop and
implement a marketing and sales program and address all necessary
infrastructure concerns. We anticipate that we will require up to
approximately $100,000 to fund our continued operations. Such funds may come
from the sale of equity and/or debt securities and/or loans. It is possible
that additional capital will be required to effectively support the
operations and to otherwise implement our overall business strategy. The
inability to raise the required capital will restrict our ability to grow and
may reduce our ability to continue to conduct business operations. If we are
unable to obtain necessary financing, we will likely be required to curtail
our development plans which could cause the company to become dormant. Any
additional equity financing may involve substantial dilution to our then
existing shareholders.
6. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO RAISE SUFFICIENT CAPITAL OR GENERATE ADEQUATE
REVENUE TO MEET OUR OBLIGATIONS AND FUND OUR OPERATING EXPENSES.
As of September 30, 2008, the Company had no working cash and equivalents.
The Company needs at least one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) in order
advance its business plan.
There are no guarantees given that the Company will be able to find the
necessary financing or the necessary financing will be available, if required
or if available, will be on terms and conditions satisfactory to management.
The above outlined capital problems which could significantly affect the
value of any Common Shares and could result in the loss of an investor's
entire investment.
Failure to raise adequate capital and generate adequate sales revenues to
meet our obligations and develop and sustain our operations could result in
reducing or ceasing our operations. Additionally, even if we do raise
sufficient capital and generate revenues to support our operating expenses,
there can be no assurances that the revenue will be sufficient to enable us
to develop business to a level where it will generate profits and cash flows
from operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern. Our independent auditors currently included an
explanatory paragraph in their report on our financial statements regarding
concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern.
12
7. WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO COMPETE WITH OTHER LOAN PROCESSING COMPANIES, WHO
HAVE GREATER RESOURCES AND EXPERIENCE THAN WE DO.
The loan processing industry is highly competitive, and subject to rapid
change. We do not have the resources to compete with the large mortgage loan
processors. Competition by existing and future competitors could
result in our inability to secure profitable events. This competition from
other entities with greater resources and reputations may result in our
failure to maintain or expand our business as we may never be able to
successfully execute our business plan. Further, Nevada Processing
Services, Inc. cannot be assured that it will be able to compete successfully
against present or future competitors or that the competitive pressure it may
face will not force it to cease operations.
8. OUR PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS, OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OWN A CONTROLLING
INTEREST IN OUR VOTING STOCK AND INVESTORS WILL NOT HAVE ANY VOICE IN OUR
MANAGEMENT, WHICH COULD RESULT IN DECISIONS ADVERSE TO OUR GENERAL
SHAREHOLDERS.
Our sole officer beneficially owns approximately or have the right to vote
approximately 92% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, our sole
officer will have the ability to control substantially all matters submitted
to our stockholders for approval including:
a) election of our board of directors;
b) removal of any of our directors;
c) amendment of our Articles of Incorporation or bylaws; and
d) adoption of measures that could delay or prevent a change in control or
impede a merger, takeover or other business combination involving us.
As a result of her ownership and positions, this individual has the ability
to influence all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the
election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. In
addition, the future prospect of sales of significant amounts of shares held
by our director and executive officer could affect the market price of our
common stock if the marketplace does not orderly adjust to the increase in
shares in the market and the value of your investment in the company may
decrease. Management's stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer
from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us,
which in turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our stockholders from
realizing a premium over our stock price.
13
9. CHANGES IN CONSUMER PREFERENCES COULD REDUCE DEMAND FOR OUR SERVICES.
Any change in the preferences of our potential corporate customers that we
fail to anticipate could reduce the demand for the loan processing services we
intend to provide. Decisions about our focus and the specific services we
plan to offer are often made in advance of customers contracting us. Failure
to anticipate and respond to changes in consumer preferences and demands
could lead to, among other things, customer dissatisfaction, failure to
attract demand for our services and lower profit margins.
10. OUR BUSINESS MAY SUFFER IF WE FAIL TO MEET THE EXPECTATIONS OF OUR
CUSTOMERS.
Our business model will rely in part on referrals to, and operating in
concert with, various third parties, such as mortgage brokers, banks,
and other financial institutions. If we fail to meet the expectations of our
future customers, who include these third parties, who at the present time
are unidentified, our reputation and results of operation will be negatively
impacted.
11. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FACED BY THE TOP MANAGEMENT OF NEVADA PROCESSING
SOLUTIONS MAY JEOPARDIZE THE BUSINESS CONTINUITY OF NEVADA PROCESSING
SOLUTIONS.
The operations of Nevada Processing Solutions depend substantially on the
skills and experience of Chad Guidry. Without employment contracts, we
may lose Ms. Guidry to other pursuits without a sufficient warning and,
consequently, go out of business. Mr. Guidry may, in the future, become
involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity
becomes available, this individual may face a conflict in selecting between
Nevada Processing Solutions and his other business interests. Nevada
Processing Solutions has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such
conflicts.
12. IF OUR MARKETING EFFORTS ARE NOT EFFECTIVE, OUR SERVICES MAY NOT ACHIEVE
THE BROAD RECOGNITION NECESSARY TO OUR SUCCESS IN THE TARGET TERRITORIES.
We may not be able to build successfully recognition and favorable perception
of our services in a manner that will enable us to expand our business in a
cost-effective or timely manner. If our services will not be received
favorably by our customers, our reputation could be damaged. The lack of
market acceptance of our services will not allow us to generate satisfactory
net sales and could harm our business.
13. AN INCREASE IN INTEREST RATES COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS.
An increase in interest rates could result in a reduction of loan volume and
subsequently a decrease in demand for our loan processing services. Our
business is sensitive to market conditions. As the market for mortgage loans
decrease, the demand for our services would decrease accordingly.
14
14. TECHNOLOGY FAILURES COULD DAMAGE OUR BUSINESS OPERATIONS AND INCREASE
OUR COSTS.
The financial services industry as a whole is characterized by rapidly
changing technologies, and system disruptions and failures may interrupt or
delay our ability to provide services to our customers. The secure
transmission of confidential information over the Internet is essential to
our maintaining consumer confidence in certain of our services. Security
breaches, acts of vandalism and developments in computer capabilities could
result in a compromise or breach of the technology that we use to protect our
customers' personal information and transaction data. Consumers generally
are concerned with security breaches and privacy on the Internet, and
Congress or individual states could enact new laws regulating the electronic
commerce market that could adversely affect us.
15. FAILURE TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROLS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL
ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS.
It may be time consuming, difficult, and costly for us to develop and
implement the additional internal controls, processes and reporting
procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional
financial reporting, internal auditing, and other finance staff in order to
develop and implement appropriate additional internal controls, processes,
and reporting procedures. If we are unable to comply with these requirements
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may not be able to obtain the independent
accountant certifications that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires of publicly
traded companies.
If we fail to comply in a timely manner with the requirements of Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal control over financial reporting
or to remedy any material weaknesses in our internal controls that we may
identify, such failure could result in material misstatements in our
financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported
financial information and have a negative effect on the trading price of our
common stock.
In addition, in connection with our on-going assessment of the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting, we may discover "material
weaknesses" in our internal controls as defined in standards established by the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or the PCAOB. A material weakness is
a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that
results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the
annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
15
The PCAOB defines "significant deficiency" as a deficiency that results in
more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the financial statements
that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.
In the event that a material weakness is identified, we will employ
qualified personnel and adopt and implement policies and procedures to
address any material weaknesses that we identify. However, the process of
designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort
that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the
economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to
maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our
reporting obligations as a public company. We cannot assure you that the
measures we will take will remediate any material weaknesses that we may
identify or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our
financial process and reporting in the future. Any failure to complete our
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any
material weaknesses that we may identify or to implement new or improved
controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our
operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, or
result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such
failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management
evaluations of our internal controls and, in the case of a failure to
remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, would adversely
affect the annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting that are required under Section
404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Inadequate internal controls could also cause
investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which
could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Risks Relating To Our Common Shares
-----------------------------------
16. WE MAY, IN THE FUTURE, ISSUE ADDITIONAL COMMON SHARES, WHICH WOULD REDUCE
INVESTORS' PERCENT OF OWNERSHIP AND MAY DILUTE OUR SHARE VALUE.
Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 195,000,000 shares of
common stock and 5,000,000 preferred shares. The future issuance of common
stock may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common
stock held by our then existing shareholders. We may value any common stock
issued in the future on an arbitrary basis. The issuance of common stock for
future services or acquisitions or other corporate actions may have the
effect of diluting the value of the shares held by our investors, and might
have an adverse effect on any trading market for our common stock.
16
17. OUR COMMON SHARES ARE SUBJECT TO THE "PENNY STOCK" RULES OF THE SEC AND
THE TRADING MARKET IN OUR SECURITIES IS LIMITED, WHICH MAKES TRANSACTIONS IN
OUR STOCK CUMBERSOME AND MAY REDUCE THE VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT IN OUR STOCK.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which
establishes the definition of a "penny stock," for the purposes relevant to
us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per
share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to
certain exceptions.
For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules
require: (a) that a broker or dealer approve a person's account for
transactions in penny stocks; and (b) the broker or dealer receive from the
investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity
and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.
In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stocks, the
broker or dealer must: (a) obtain financial information and investment
experience objectives of the person; and (b) make a reasonable determination
that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the
person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be
capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny
stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the
penny stock market, which, in highlight form: (a) sets forth the basis on
which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and (b) that
the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor
prior to the transaction. Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute
transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock" rules. This may make
it more difficult for investors to dispose of our Common shares and cause a
decline in the market value of our stock.
Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks
in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions
payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current
quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an
investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly
statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny
stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny
stocks.
17
18. BECAUSE WE DO NOT INTEND TO PAY ANY CASH DIVIDENDS ON OUR COMMON STOCK,
OUR STOCKHOLDERS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO RECEIVE A RETURN ON THEIR SHARES UNLESS
THEY SELL THEM.
We intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and
expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on
our common stock in the foreseeable future. Unless we pay dividends, our
stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they
sell them. There is no assurance that stockholders will be able to sell
shares when desired.
19. WE MAY ISSUE SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK IN THE FUTURE THAT MAY ADVERSELY
IMPACT YOUR RIGHTS AS HOLDERS OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
Our articles of incorporation authorize us to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of
"blank check" preferred stock. Accordingly, our board of directors will have
the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of
preferred shares, as well as the authority to issue such shares, without
further stockholder approval. As a result, our board of directors could
authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to
holders preferred rights to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive
dividends before dividends are declared to holders of our common stock, and
the right to the redemption of such preferred shares, together with a
premium, prior to the redemption of the common stock. To the extent that we
do issue such additional shares of preferred stock, your rights as holders of
common stock could be impaired thereby, including, without limitation,
dilution of your ownership interests in us. In addition, shares of preferred
stock could be issued with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in
control or make removal of management more difficult, which may not be in
your interest as holders of common stock.
20. WE WILL INCUR ONGOING COSTS AND EXPENSES FOR SEC REPORTING AND
COMPLIANCE, WITHOUT REVENUE WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE,
MAKING IT DIFFICULT FOR INVESTORS TO SELL THEIR SHARES, IF AT ALL.
We are currently listed on the OTC-Bulletin Board. Securities quoted on the
OTCBB that become delinquent in their required filings will be removed
following a 30 or 60 day grace period if they do not make their required filing
during that time. In order for us to remain in compliance we will require
future revenues to cover the cost of these filings, which could comprise a
substantial portion of our available cash resources. If we are unable to
generate sufficient revenues to remain in compliance, it may be
difficult for any our shareholders to find a buyer for their stock in our
company.
18
21. ALTHOUGH OUR STOCK IS LISTED ON THE OTC-BB, A TRADING MARKET HAS NOT
DEVELOP, PURCHASERS OF OUR SECURITIES MAY HAVE DIFFICULTY SELLING THEIR SHARES.
There is currently no active trading market in our securities and there are no
assurances that a market may develop or, if developed, may not be sustained.
If no market is ever developed for our common stock, it will be difficult for
you to sell any shares in our Company. In such a case, you may find that you
are unable to achieve any benefit from your investment or liquidate your shares
without considerable delay, if at all.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties.
Our offices are currently located at 9646 Giddings, Las Vegas, NV 89148.
Our telephone number is (702) 334-4008. Management believes that its current
facilities are adequate for its needs through the next twelve months, and
that, should it be needed, suitable additional space will be available to
accommodate expansion of the Company's operations on commercially reasonable
terms, although there can be no assurance in this regard. Our officer will
not seek reimbursement for past office expenses.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal
proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However,
litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in
these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our
business.
We are not presently a party to any material litigation, nor to the knowledge
of management is any litigation threatened against us, which may materially
affect us.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
We did not submit any matters to a vote of our security holders during the
past fiscal year.
19
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
(a) Market Information
Nevada Processing Solutions' Common Stock, $0.001 par value, is traded on
the OTC-Bulletin Board under the symbol: NEPR. The stock was cleared for
trading on the OTC-Bulletin Board on April 20, 2009.
Since the Company has been cleared for trading, through November 12, 2009,
there have been no trades of the Company's stock. There are no assurances that
a market will ever develop for the Company's stock.
(b) Holders of Common Stock
As of November 12, 2009, there were approximately twenty-six (26) holders of
record of our Common Stock and 3,375,000 shares issued and outstanding.
(c) Dividends
In the future we intend to follow a policy of retaining earnings, if any, to
finance the growth of the business and do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of future
dividends on the Common Stock will be the sole discretion of board of
directors and will depend on our profitability and financial condition,
capital requirements, statutory and contractual restrictions, future prospects
and other factors deemed relevant.
(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
There are no outstanding grants or rights or any equity compensation plan in
place.
(e) Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, there have been no sales
of the Company's securities.
(f) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the years ended
September 30, 2008 or 2007.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
Not applicable.
20
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
Overview of Current Operations
------------------------------
Nevada Processing Solutions is a startup company that processes loan for
mortgage companies.
Results of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2009
------------------------------------------------------
We earned no revenues since our inception on May 30, 2006 through
September 30, 2009. We do not anticipate earning any significant revenues
until such time as we fully initiate our business operations. We are
presently in the development stage of our business and we can provide no
assurance that we will be successful in becoming a provider to the mortgage
industry to process their loan applications.
For the period of May 30, 2006 (inception) through September 30, 2009 we
generated no income. Since our inception we experienced a net loss of
$(737,791). The bulk of our net loss ($706,878) represents the accounting
of the beneficial conversion feature of our preferred stock to common
stock. Most of the actual general and administrative expenses $(30,913),
since our inception, represented legal and audit fees. For the year ending
September 30, 2009 we lost $(19,400) as compared to a loss of $2,750 for the
same period last year. We anticipate our operating expenses will increase as
we build our operations. We anticipate our ongoing operating expenses will
increase as we are now a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
Revenues
--------
We generated no revenues for the period from May 30, 2006 (inception)
through September 30, 2009. We do not anticipate generating any revenues for
at least 24 months.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
-------------------------------
Our balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 reflects current assets of $1,000
and $775 in current liabilities.
Notwithstanding, we anticipate generating losses and therefore we may be
unable to continue operations in the future. We anticipate we will require
additional capital up to approximately $100,000 and we would have to issue
debt or equity or enter into a strategic arrangement with a third party.
There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us.
We currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any
person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other
sources.
21
Our sole officer/director has agreed to donate funds to the operations of the
Company, in order to keep it fully reporting for the next twelve (12) months,
without seeking reimbursement for funds donated.
Future Financings
-----------------
We anticipate continuing to rely on equity sales of our common shares in
order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional
shares will result in dilution to our existing shareholders. There is no
assurance that we will achieve any of additional sales of our equity
securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our exploration and
development activities.
We are seeking to raise a $100,000 in a future offering of our common
stock. In the event we are unable to raise $100,000, we may be unable to
conduct any operations and may consequently go out of business. There are no
formal or informal agreements to attain such financing and we can not assure
you that any financing can be obtained. Management has been seeking funding
from a number of sources, but has yet to secure any funding, especially
during this current economic downturn. Management continues to seek
different funding sources in order to initiate its business plan. The
downturn in the economy has limited various sources of financing. Management
continues to seek financing with no success. If we are unable to raise these
funds, we will not be able to implement any of our proposed business
activities and may be forced to cease operations.
Going Concern
-------------
The financial conditions evidenced by the accompanying financial statements
raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our
plans include obtaining additional capital through debt or equity financing.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be
necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.
Summary of any product research and development that we will perform for the
term of our plan of operation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
We do not anticipate performing any product research and development under our
current plan of operation.
Expected purchase or sale of property and significant equipment
---------------------------------------------------------------
We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any property or significant
equipment; as such items are not required by us at this time.
22
Significant changes in the number of employees
----------------------------------------------
As of September 30, 2009, we did not have any employees. We are dependent upon
our sole officer and director for our future business development. As our
operations expand we anticipate the need to hire additional employees,
consultants and professionals; however, the exact number is not quantifiable
at this time.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
------------------------------
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably
likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes
in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results or operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material
to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
------------------------------------------
Revenue Recognition: The Company recognizes revenue on an accrual basis as
it invoices for services. Revenue is generally realized or realizable and
earned when all of the following criteria are met: 1) persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists between the Company and our customer(s); 2) services
have been rendered; 3) our price to our customer is fixed or determinable;
and 4) collectability is reasonably assured.
New Accounting Standards
------------------------
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, "Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140" ("SFAS
166"). The provisions of SFAS 166, in part, amend the derecognition
guidance in FASB Statement No. 140, eliminate the exemption from
consolidation for qualifying special-purpose entities and require
additional disclosures. SFAS 166 is effective for financial asset
transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal
year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect
the provisions of SFAS 166 to have a material effect on the financial
position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) ("SFAS 167"). SFAS 167 amends the
consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The
provisions of SFAS 167 significantly affect the overall consolidation
analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS 167 is effective as
of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November
15, 2009. SFAS 167 will be effective for the Company beginning in 2010.
The Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS 167 to have a
material effect on the financial position, results of operations or
cash flows of the Company.
23
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, "The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162" ("SFAS
No. 168"). Under SFAS No. 168 the "FASB Accounting Standards
Codification" ("Codification") will become the source of authoritative
U. S. GAAP to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. On the effective date, the Codification will
supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.
All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included
in the Codification will become non-authoritative. SFAS No. 168 is
effective for the Company's interim quarterly period beginning July 1,
2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 168 to have
an impact on the financial statements.
In June 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission's Office of the
Chief Accountant and Division of Corporation Finance announced the
release of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 112. This staff
accounting bulletin amends or rescinds portions of the interpretive
guidance included in the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series in order to
make the relevant interpretive guidance consistent with current
authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and regulations. Specifically, the staff is
updating the Series in order to bring existing guidance into conformity
with recent pronouncements by the Financial Accounting Standards Board,
namely, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations, and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. The statements in staff accounting bulletins are not rules
or interpretations of the Commission, nor are they published as bearing
the Commission's official approval. They represent interpretations and
practices followed by the Division of Corporation Finance and the
Office of the Chief Accountant in administering the disclosure
requirements of the Federal securities laws.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Not applicable.
24
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
Index to Financial Statements
Nevada Processing Solutions
Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
September 30, 2008
Financial Statement
-------------------
PAGE
----
Independent Auditors' Report F-1
Balance Sheet F-2
Statements of Operations F-3
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity F-4-6
Statements of Cash Flows F-7
Notes to Financials F-8-19
25
SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs
PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS
--------------------------------
www.sealebeers.com
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
-------------------------------------------------------
To the Board of Directors
Nevada Processing Solutions
(A Development Stage Company)
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Nevada Processing
Solutions (A Development Stage Company) as of September 30, 2009 and 2008,
and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and
cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and since
inception on May 30, 2006 through September 30, 2009. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We conduct our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Nevada Processing Solutions
(A Development Stage Company) as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and since inception on
May 30, 2006 through September 30, 2009, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the
financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $30,913,
which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in
Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Seale and Beers, CPAs
-------------------------
Seale and Beers, CPAs
Las Vegas, Nevada
November 6, 2009
50 South Jones Blvd., Suite 202 Las Vegas, NV 89107
888-727-8251 Fax: 888-782-2351
F-1
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
Balance Sheets
September 30, September 30,
2009 2008
------------ ------------
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Prepaid expense $ 1,000 $ -
------------ ------------
Total current assets 1,000 -
------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,000 $ -
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 775 $ -
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 775 -
------------ ------------
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000
shares authorized, 872,690 shares issued and
outstanding as of 9/30/09 and 9/30/08,
respectively 873 873
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 195,000,000
shares authorized, 3,375,000, 3,375,000
issued and outstanding as of
9/30/09 and 9/30/08, respectively 3,375 3,375
Additional paid-in capital 733,768 714,143
(Deficit) accumulated during development stage (737,791) (718,391)
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity 225 -
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 1,000 $ -
============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-2
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
Statements of Operations
For the Period
from
For the years ending May 30, 2006
September 30, (Inception) to
-------------------- September 30,
2009 2008 2009
--------- --------- --------------
REVENUE $ - $ - $ -
EXPENSES
General and administrative expenses 19,400 2,750 30,913
--------- --------- --------------
Total Expenses 19,400 2,750 30,913
--------- --------- --------------
Net (Loss) before beneficial interest
and provision for income taxes $(19,400) $ (2,750) $ (30,913)
--------- --------- --------------
Beneficial Conversion Feature of
Preferred stock (706,878)
--------- ---------- -------------
Income tax expense - - -
--------- ---------- -------------
NET (LOSS) $(19,400) $ (2,750) $ (737,791)
========= ========== =============
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING -
BASIC AND FULLY DILUTED 3,375,000 3,375,000
========= =========
(LOSS) PER SHARE - BASIC AND
FULLY DILUTED $ (0.01) $ (0.00)
========= ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements
F-3
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Deficit)
Preferred Accumulated
Common Stock Stock Additional During Total
------------------ ----------------- Paid-in Development Stockholders
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Stage Equity
---------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------
Founders
initial
investment,
5/30/06
$0.001 per
share 3,100,000 $ 3,100 $ $ $ $ 3,100
June 2006
Preferred
shares
issued
for
cash at
$0.01 per
share plus
embedded
interest of
$706,878 872,690 873 706,878 707,751
June 2006
Contributed
Capital 4,790 4,790
Net
(loss)
for the
year
ending
9/30/06 (706,878) (706,878)
---------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance,
9/30/06
3,100,000 $ 3,100 872,690 $ 873 $711,668 $ (706,878) $ 8,763
F-4
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Continued)
(Deficit)
Preferred Accumulated
Common Stock Stock Additional During Total
------------------ ----------------- Paid-in Development Stockholders
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Stage Equity
---------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance,
9/30/06
3,100,000 $ 3,100 872,690 $ 873 $711,668 $ (706,878) $ 8,763
Net
(loss)
for the
year
ending
9/30/07 (8,763) (8,763)
---------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance,
9/30/07
3,100,000 $ 3,100 872,690 $ 873 $711,668 $ (715,641) $ -
June 2008
Common
shares
issued
for
cash at
$0.01 per
share 275,000 275 2,475 2,750
Net
(loss)
for the
year
ending
9/30/08 (2,750) (2,750)
---------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance,
9/30/08
3,375,000 3,375 872,690 873 714,143 (718,391) -
F-5
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Continued)
(Deficit)
Preferred Accumulated
Common Stock Stock Additional During Total
------------------ ----------------- Paid-in Development Stockholders
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Stage Equity
---------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance,
9/30/08
3,375,000 3,375 872,690 873 714,143 (718,391) -
December
2008
Contributed
Capital 3,250 3,250
January
2009
Contributed
Capital 875 875
February
2009
Contributed
Capital 5,500 5,500
September
2009
Contributed
Services 10,000 10,000
Net
(loss)
for the
year
ending
9/30/09 (19,400) (19,400)
---------- ------- --------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------
Balance,
9/30/09
3,375,000 $ 3,375 872,690 $ 873 $733,768 $ (737,791) $ 225
========== ======= ========= ======= ========= ============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-6
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Period
from
For the years ending May 30, 2006
September 30, (Inception) to
-------------------- September 30,
2009 2008 2009
--------- --------- --------------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (Loss) $(19,400) $ (2,750) $ (737,791)
Adjustments to reconcile
net loss to net cash
used by operating activities
Beneficial Interest on
Conversion - - 706,878
Contributed services 10,000 - 10,000
(Increase) in prepaid expense (1,000) - (1,000)
Increase (Decrease) in
accounts payable 775 - 775
--------- --------- --------------
Cash (Used) by operating activities (9,625) (2,750) (21,138)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Sale of Common Stock - 2,750 5,850
Sale of Preferred Stock - - 873
Contributed Capital 9,625 - 14,415
--------- --------- --------------
Cash Provided by financing activities 9,625 2,750 21,138
--------- --------- --------------
NET CHANGE IN CASH - - -
CASH - BEGINNING OF PERIOD - - -
--------- --------- --------------
CASH - END OF PERIOD $ - $ - $ -
========= ========= ==============
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:
Interest paid $ - $ - $ -
Income taxes paid $ - $ - $ -
Non-cash transactions $ - $ - $ -
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-7
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. GENERAL ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
Nevada Processing Solutions (the "Company") was incorporated under the
laws of the state of Nevada on May 30, 2006. The Company was organized to
conduct any lawful business and plans to provide a unique database solution
for loan processors in the mortgage industry.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRACTICES
The Company has assets of $1,000 and liabilities of $775 as of September 30,
2009. The relevant accounting policies are listed below.
Basis of Accounting
-------------------
The basis is United States generally accepted accounting principles.
Earnings per Share
------------------
The basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the Company's
net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average
number of common shares during the year. The diluted earnings (loss) per
share is calculated by dividing the Company's net income (loss) available to
common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares
outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted as of the first
of the year for any potentially dilutive debt or equity.
The Company has not issued any options or warrants or similar securities
since inception.
Dividends
---------
The Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends.
No Dividends have been paid during the period shown.
Income Taxes
------------
The provision for income taxes is the total of the current taxes payable and
the net of the change in the deferred income taxes. Provision is made for
the deferred income taxes where differences exist between the period in which
transactions affect current taxable income and the period in which they enter
into the determination of net income in the financial statements.
Year end
--------
The Company's year-end is September 30.
F-8
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRACTICES-CONTINUED
Advertising
-----------
Advertising is expensed when incurred. There has been no advertising
during the period.
Use of Estimates
----------------
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which
contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities
and commitments in the normal course of business. As at September 30, 2009,
the Company has not recognized revenue to date and has accumulated operating
losses of approximately $(30,913) since inception. The Company's ability to
continue as a going concern is contingent upon the successful completion of
additional financing arrangements and its ability to achieve and maintain
profitable operations. Management plans to raise equity capital to finance
the operating and capital requirements of the Company. Amounts raised will
be used to further development of the Company's products, to provide
financing for marketing and promotion, to secure additional property and
equipment, and for other working capital purposes. While the Company is
expending its best efforts to achieve the above plans, there is no
assurance that any such activity will generate funds that will be available
for operations.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.
F-9
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred Stock
---------------
On June 1, 2006, the Company issued 872,690 shares of its $0.001 par value
preferred stock for $8,727 at $0.01 per share.
Each share of the Convertible Preferred Stock can be exchanged for ten
hundred (10) shares of Common Stock of the corporation. This Series A
preferred stock was issued with a beneficial conversion feature totaling
$706,878 measured as the difference between the $0.01 offering price of the
underlying common stock and the conversion benefit price of $0.10 per
share. This non-cash expense related to the beneficial conversion features
of those securities and is recorded with a corresponding credit to
paid-in-capital. If the preferred stock were to be converted into common
stock, the common stock would be increased by 7,854,210 to a total of
8,726,900 shares. These 8,726,900 shares would represent 72.1% of all
common stock outstanding.
Common Stock
------------
On May 30, 2006 (inception), the Company issued 3,100,000 shares of its
$0.001 par value common stock for $3,100 at $0.001 per share.
On June 30, 2008, the Company issued 275,000 shares of its $0.001
par value common stock for $2,750 at $0.01 per share.
There were no other issuances of common or preferred stock or equivalents
since May 30, 2006 (inception) through September 30, 2009.
NOTE 5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The officer and director of the Company is involved in other business
activities. This person may face a conflict in selecting between the Company
and their other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy
for the resolution of such conflicts.
NOTE 6. CONTRIBUTED SERVICES
During the fiscal year ending September, 2009, the Company's corporate counsel
agreed to prepare, write, EDGARize and provide legal opinion for the Company's
interim reports and Form 10-K filing, which the law firm valued at $10,000.
The law firm decided to contribute these services based on its recommendation
that the Company engage the services of an auditor, who had his licensed
revoked and was not able to complete the Company's audit for the past fiscal
year. Based on this decision, the Company needed to engage a new auditor.
The Company's corporate counsel believes this action will help build
goodwill for its law firm.
F-10
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 7. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
The Company uses an asset and liability approach in accounting for income
taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and the tax rates in effect when these differences are expected
to reverse.
The provision for income taxes is comprised of the net changes in deferred
taxes less the valuation account plus the current taxes payable as shown in
the chart below.
Net changes in Deferred Tax Benefit less than
valuation account 0
Current Taxes Payable 0
-----
Net Provision for Income Taxes 0
-----
NOTE 8. REVENUE AND EXPENSES
Revenue recognition
-------------------
The Company recognizes revenue on an accrual basis as it invoices for
services." Revenue is generally realized or realizable and earned when all
of the following criteria are met: 1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists between the Company and our customer(s); 2) services have been
rendered; 3) our price to our customer is fixed or determinable; and 4)
collectability is reasonably assured. For the period from May 30, 2006
(inception) to September 30, 2009, the Company recognized no revenues.
The Company currently has no revenues.
NOTE 9. OPERATING LEASES AND OTHER COMMITMENTS:
The Company also has no lease obligations or employment agreements.
F-11
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Historical net (loss) per common share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include
additional dilution from common stock equivalents, such as stock issuable
pursuant to the exercise of securities or other contracts to issue common
stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common stock that shared in the earnings of the entity, but these
potential common stock equivalents were determined to be antidilutive.
Calculation of net income (loss) per share is as follows:
For the year ended
----------------------------
Sep. 30, Sep. 30,
2009 2008
------------- -------------
Net loss (numerator) $ (19,400) $ (2,750)
============= =============
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding 3,375,000 3,375,000
============= =============
Basic Loss per Share $ (0.01) $ (0.00)
============= =============
NOTE 11. RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, "Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140" ("SFAS
166"). The provisions of SFAS 166, in part, amend the derecognition
guidance in FASB Statement No. 140, eliminate the exemption from
consolidation for qualifying special-purpose entities and require
additional disclosures. SFAS 166 is effective for financial asset
transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity's first fiscal
year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect
the provisions of SFAS 166 to have a material effect on the financial
position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, "Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) ("SFAS 167"). SFAS 167 amends the
consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The
provisions of SFAS 167 significantly affect the overall consolidation
analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS 167 is effective as
of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November
15, 2009. SFAS 167 will be effective for the Company beginning in 2010.
The Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS 167 to have a
material effect on the financial position, results of operations or
cash flows of the Company.
F-12
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11. Recent Pronouncements (Continued)
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, "The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles - a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162" ("SFAS
No. 168"). Under SFAS No. 168 the "FASB Accounting Standards
Codification" ("Codification") will become the source of authoritative
U. S. GAAP to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and
interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. On the effective date, the Codification will
supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.
All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included
in the Codification will become non-authoritative. SFAS No. 168 is
effective for the Company's interim quarterly period beginning July 1,
2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 168 to have
an impact on the financial statements.
In June 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission's Office of the
Chief Accountant and Division of Corporation Finance announced the
release of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 112. This staff
accounting bulletin amends or rescinds portions of the interpretive
guidance included in the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series in order to
make the relevant interpretive guidance consistent with current
authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and regulations. Specifically, the staff is
updating the Series in order to bring existing guidance into conformity
with recent pronouncements by the Financial Accounting Standards Board,
namely, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations, and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements. The statements in staff accounting bulletins are not rules
or interpretations of the Commission, nor are they published as bearing
the Commission's official approval. They represent interpretations and
practices followed by the Division of Corporation Finance and the
Office of the Chief Accountant in administering the disclosure
requirements of the Federal securities laws.
F-13
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11. Recent Pronouncements (Continued)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FSP amends
FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial
instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies
as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB
Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those
disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting
periods. This FSP shall be effective for interim reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not have any fair value of
financial instruments to disclose.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This
FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP
for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to
improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary
impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements.
The FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance
related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities. The
FSP shall be effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company currently does not have any financial
assets that are other-than-temporarily impaired.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for
Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That
Arise from Contingencies, to address some of the application issues
under SFAS 141(R). The FSP deals with the initial recognition and
measurement of an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business
combination that arises from a contingency provided the asset or
liability's fair value on the date of acquisition can be determined.
When the fair value can-not be determined, the FSP requires using the
guidance under SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and FASB
Interpretation (FIN) No. 14, Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a
Loss. This FSP was effective for assets or liabilities arising from
contingencies in business combinations for which the acquisition date
is on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption of this FSP has not had a
material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or
cash flows during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
F-14
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11. Recent Pronouncements (Continued)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair
Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability
Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not
Orderly" ("FSP FAS 157-4"). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance on
estimating fair value when market activity has decreased and on
identifying transactions that are not orderly. Additionally, entities
are required to disclose in interim and annual periods the inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This FSP is effective
for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company
does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 will have a material
impact on its financial condition or results of operation.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8,
"Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of
Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities." This
disclosure-only FSP improves the transparency of transfers of financial
assets and an enterprise's involvement with variable interest entities,
including qualifying special-purpose entities. This FSP is effective
for the first reporting period (interim or annual) ending after
December 15, 2008, with earlier application encouraged. The Company
adopted this FSP effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of the FSP had
no impact on the Company's results of operations, financial condition
or cash flows.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, "Employers'
Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets" ("FSP FAS 132(R)-
1"). FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires additional fair value disclosures about
employers' pension and postretirement benefit plan assets consistent
with guidance contained in SFAS 157. Specifically, employers will be
required to disclose information about how investment allocation
decisions are made, the fair value of each major category of plan
assets and information about the inputs and valuation techniques used
to develop the fair value measurements of plan assets. This FSP is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The Company
does not expect the adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will have a material
impact on its financial condition or results of operation.
In November 1208, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, "Determining the
Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not
Active," ("FSP FAS 157-3"), which clarifies application of SFAS 157 in
a market that is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon
issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have
not been issued. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-3 had no impact on the
Company's results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
F-15
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11. Recent Pronouncements (Continued)
In September 2008, the FASB issued exposure drafts that eliminate
qualifying special purpose entities from the guidance of SFAS No. 140,
"Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities," and FASB Interpretation 46 (revised
December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - an
interpretation of ARB No. 51," as well as other modifications. While
the proposed revised pronouncements have not been finalized and the
proposals are subject to further public comment, the Company
anticipates the changes will not have a significant impact on the
Company's financial statements. The changes would be effective March
1, 2010, on a prospective basis.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities, ("FSP EITF 03-6-1"). FSP
EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting, and
therefore need to be included in the computation of earnings per share
under the two-class method as described in FASB Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share." FSP EITF 03-6-1 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning on
or after December 15, 2008 and earlier adoption is prohibited. We are
not required to adopt FSP EITF 03-6-1; neither do we believe that FSP
EITF 03-6-1 would have material effect on our consolidated financial
position and results of operations if adopted.
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 163, "Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-
and interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60". SFAS No. 163 clarifies
how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts,
including the recognition and measurement of premium revenue and claims
liabilities. This statement also requires expanded disclosures about
financial guarantee insurance contracts. SFAS No. 163 is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those years. SFAS No. 163 has no effect on the Company's
financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at this
time.
F-16
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11. Recent Pronouncements (Continued)
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles". SFAS No. 162 sets forth the level of authority to a given
accounting pronouncement or document by category. Where there might be
conflicting guidance between two categories, the more authoritative
category will prevail. SFAS No. 162 will become effective 60 days after
the SEC approves the PCAOB's amendments to AU Section 411 of the AICPA
Professional Standards. SFAS No. 162 has no effect on the Company's
financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at this
time.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. This
standard requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a)
how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement
133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments
and related hedged items affect an entity's financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged.
The Company has not yet adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161, but
does not expect it to have a material impact on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No.
110 regarding the use of a "simplified" method, as discussed in SAB No.
107 (SAB 107), in developing an estimate of expected term of "plain
vanilla" share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based
Payment. In particular, the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will
accept a company's election to use the simplified method, regardless of
whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined
estimates of expected term. At the time SAB 107 was issued, the staff
believed that more detailed external information about employee
exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industry and/or
other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily
available to companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB 107 that it
would not expect a company to use the simplified method for share
option grants after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such
detailed information about employee exercise behavior may not be widely
available by December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the staff will continue to
accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond
December 31, 2007. The Company currently uses the simplified method for
F-17
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11. Recent Pronouncements (Continued)
"plain vanilla" share options and warrants, and will assess the impact of
SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It is not believed that this will have an
impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement
amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as
equity in the consolidated financial statements. Before this statement was
issued, limited guidance existed for reporting noncontrolling interests. As a
result, considerable diversity in practice existed. So-called minority
interests were reported in the consolidated statement of financial position
as liabilities or in the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity.
This statement improves comparability by eliminating that diversity. This
statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1,
2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited.
The effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related
Statement 141 (revised 2007). The Company will adopt this Statement beginning
March 1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an impact on the
Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In December 2007, the FASB, issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business
Combinations'. This Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141, Business
Combinations, but retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141.
This Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer:
(a) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in
the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the
business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (c) determines
what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to
evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This
statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it
before that date. The effective date of this statement is the same as that of
the related FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements. The Company will adopt this statement beginning March
1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company's
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
F-18
NEVADA PROCESSING SOLUTIONS
(a development stage company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 12. CONCENTRATIONS OF RISKS
Cash Balances
-------------
The Company maintains its cash in institutions insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This government corporation insured balances
up to $100,000 through October 13, 2008. As of October 14, 2008 all non-
interest bearing transaction deposit accounts at an FDIC-insured institution,
including all personal and business checking deposit accounts that do not
earn interest, are fully insured for the entire amount in the deposit
account. This unlimited insurance coverage is temporary and will remain in
effect for participating institutions until December 31, 2009.
All other deposit accounts at FDIC-insured institutions are insured up to at
least $250,000 per depositor until December 31, 2009.
F-19
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants On Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
------------------------------------------------
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the
effectiveness of those internal controls. As defined by the SEC, internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed by our principal
executive officer/principal financial officer, who is also the sole member
of our Board of Directors, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the reparation of the financial
statements in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we initially carried out
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief
executive officer (who is also our principal financial and accounting
officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer initially concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective.
Management's Report On Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
----------------------------------------------------------------
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial
reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial
officers and effected by the company's board of directors, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and
procedures that:
- Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company;
26
- Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that
receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
- Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal
control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there
is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these
inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process.
Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce,
though not eliminate, this risk.
As of September 30, 2009 management assessed the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective
internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control-
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission ("COSO") and SEC guidance on conducting such
assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the
period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not
effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more
fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the
design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that
adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be
material weaknesses.
The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management
considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit
committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a
majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in
ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required
internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties
consistent with control objectives; and (3) ineffective controls over period
end financial disclosure and reporting processes. The aforementioned
material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in
connection with the review of our financial statements as of September 30,
2009.
27
Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2) and
(3) above did not have an effect on our financial results. However,
management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the
lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in
ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required
internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material
misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Corporation's
registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the
Corporation's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of
the SEC that permit the Corporation to provide only the management's report in
this annual report.
Management's Remediation Initiatives
------------------------------------
In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other
deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to
initiate, the following series of measures:
We will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control
objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting
expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to us.
And, we plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our board of
directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully
functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the
establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures
such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management
when funds are available to us.
Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors,
who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy
the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside
directors on our Board.
We anticipate that these initiatives will be at least partially, if not
fully implemented by September 30, 2010. Additionally, we plan to test our
updated controls and remediate our deficiencies by September 30, 2010.
Changes in internal controls over financial reporting
-----------------------------------------------------
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that
occurred during the period covered by this report, that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information.
None.
28
PART III
Item 10. Director, Executive Officer and Corporate Governance.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our current
director and executive officer. Our executive officers serve one-year terms.
Set forth below are the names, ages and present principal occupations or
employment, and material occupations, positions, offices or employments for
the past five years of our current director and executive officer.
Name Age Positions and Offices Held
---------------- ------ ----------------------------------------
J. Chad Guidry 33 President, Secretary, and Director
B. Work Experience
J. Chad Guidry, Director, President, CEO/CFO, Secretary
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Guidry has served as the Company's director, president, and secretary
since inception, and will serve on the board until the next annual
shareholders' meeting of the Company or until a successor is elected. There
are no agreements or understandings for the officer and director to resign
at the request of another person, and the above-named officer and director is
not acting on behalf of, nor will act at the direction of, any other person.
Set forth below is the name of the sole director and officer of the Company,
all positions and offices with the Company held, the period during which he
has served as such, and his business experience:
J. Chad Guidry - Work Background
Antony, Ltd., Audio Equipment Retailer
Crystal Beach, Texas
National Sales Representative, 1991-1999
Pennington Mortgage
Las Vegas, Nevada
Mortgage Loan Officer, 1999-Present
Nevada Processing Solutions
Las Vegas, Nevada
President. Company helps mortgage process loan applications,
2006-Present
29
EZ Credit Repair, Inc.
Las Vegas, Nevada
President. Company helps mortgage applicants repair their
credit ratings, 2002-Present
JCG, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV
President. A "blank check" company. February, 2003 to March, 2004
GCJ, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV
President. A "blank check" company. March, 2004 to December, 2004
Pavo Royal, Inc.
Las Vegas, NV
President. A "blank check" company. December, 2004 to December, 2005.
Education:
Thomas Jefferson High School
Port Arthur, Texas
Diploma, 1991
The SEC reporting blank check companies that Chad Guidry has served as
President and Director are listed in the following table:
Incorporation Form Date
Name Type File # of Filing Status(1)
------------- --------- ------- --------- ----------
JCG, Inc. 10SB12G 0-50344 July 16, 2003 Merger (2)
GCJ, Inc. 10SB12G 0-50738 May 5, 2004 Merger (3)
Pavo Royal, Inc. 10SB12G 0-51224 March 29, 2005 Merger (4)
(1) Under Merger Status "Merger" represents a merger has occurred and the
company ceased to be a blank check company by operating specific business.
More detailed information for the merger is disclosed in following paragraph:
(2) On March 19, 2004, JCG, Inc. merged with Neighborhood Connections, Inc.
("Neighborhood") whereby Neighborhood was the surviving corporation and JCG,
Inc. ceased to exist. Neighborhood was formed to provide management for the
collection of pay telephone coin revenues including the repair and maintenance
of existing pay telephone equipment, and the installation of new telephone
equipment. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger,
Neighborhood purchased all issued and outstanding 360,000 shares of restricted
common stock of JCG, Inc. from G. Chad Guidry, its sole shareholder for $3,600
cash.
30
(3) On December 27, 2004, GCJ, Inc. merged with APD Antiquities, Inc. ("APD")
whereby APD was the surviving corporation and GCJ, Inc. ceased to exist. APD
is an e-Commerce company engaged in the business of acquiring, importing and
marketing valuable antique products such as furniture, works of art, antiques,
glass works, porcelain, statues, pottery, sculptures and other collectibles and
collector items. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger,
APD purchased all issued and outstanding 430,000 shares of restricted common
stock of GCJ, Inc. from G. Chad Guidry, its sole shareholder for $3,600
cash.
(4) On December 28, 2005, Pavo Royal, Inc. merged with MyQuoteZone ("Zone")
whereby Zone was the surviving corporation and Pavo Royal, Inc. ceased to
exist. Zone is a technology based marketing firm that specializes in online
lead generation. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger,
Zone purchased all issued and outstanding 510,000 shares of restricted
common stock of Pavo Royal, Inc. from G. Chad Guidry, its sole shareholder
for $3,600 cash.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"), requires our executive officer and director, and persons who
beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC.
Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners
are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a)
forms they file. Based upon a review of the copies of such forms furnished to
us and written representations from our executive officer and director, we
believe that as of the date of this report they were not current in his 16(a)
reports.
Board of Directors
------------------
Our board of directors currently consists of one member, Mr. Chad Guidry.
Our directors serve one-year terms.
Audit Committee
---------------
The company does not presently have an Audit Committee. The sole member of the
Board sits as the Audit Committee. No qualified financial expert has been
hired because the company is too small to afford such expense.
31
Committees and Procedures
-------------------------
(1) The registrant has no standing audit, nominating and compensation
committees of the Board of Directors, or committees performing
similar functions. The Board acts itself in lieu of committees due
to its small size.
(2) The view of the board of directors is that it is appropriate for the
registrant not to have such a committee because its directors
participate in the consideration of director nominees and the
board and the company are so small.
(3) The members of the Board who acts as nominating committee is
not independent, pursuant to the definition of independence of a
national securities exchange registered pursuant to section 6(a)
of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78f(a).
(4) The nominating committee has no policy with regard to the
consideration of any director candidates recommended by security
holders, but the committee will consider director candidates
recommended by security holders.
(5) The basis for the view of the board of directors that it is
appropriate for the registrant not to have such a policy is that
there is no need to adopt a policy for a small company.
(6) The nominating committee will consider candidates recommended by
security holders, and by security holders in submitting such
recommendations.
(7) There are no specific, minimum qualifications that the nominating
committee believes must be met by a nominee recommended by security
holders except to find anyone willing to serve with a clean
background.
(8) The nominating committee's process for identifying and evaluation
of nominees for director, including nominees recommended by security
holders, is to find qualified persons willing to serve with a clean
backgrounds. There are no differences in the manner in which the
nominating committee evaluates nominees for director based on
whether the nominee is recommended by a security holder, or found
by the board.
Code of Ethics
--------------
We have not adopted a Code of Ethics for the Board and any salaried employees.
32
Limitation of Liability of Directors
------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Nevada General Corporation Law, our Articles of Incorporation
exclude personal liability for our Directors for monetary damages based upon
any violation of their fiduciary duties as Directors, except as to liability
for any breach of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or
which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any
transaction from which a Director receives an improper personal benefit. This
exclusion of liability does not limit any right which a Director may have to
be indemnified and does not affect any Director's liability under federal or
applicable state securities laws. We have agreed to indemnify our directors
against expenses, judgments, and amounts paid in settlement in connection with
any claim against a Director if he acted in good faith and in a manner he
believed to be in our best interests.
Nevada Anti-Takeover Law and Charter and By-law Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------
The anti-takeover provisions of Sections 78.411 through 78.445 of the Nevada
Corporation Law apply to Nevada Processing Solutions Section 78.438 of the
Nevada law prohibits the Company from merging with or selling more than 5%
of our assets or stock to any shareholder who owns or owned more than 10% of
any stock or any entity related to a 10% shareholder for three years after
the date on which the shareholder acquired the Nevada Processing Solutions
shares, unless the transaction is approved by Nevada Processing Solutions'
Board of Directors. The provisions also prohibit the Company from
completing any of the transactions described in the preceding sentence with
a 10% shareholder who has held the shares more than three years and its
related entities unless the transaction is approved by our Board of Directors
or a majority of our shares, other than shares owned by that 10% shareholder
or any related entity. These provisions could delay, defer or prevent a
change in control of Nevada Processing Solutions
33
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth summary compensation information for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 for our President and sole director. We
did not have any executive officer as of the fiscal year end of September 30,
2009 receive any compensation.
Compensation
------------
As a result of our the Company's current limited available cash, no officer
or director received compensation since May 30, 2006 (inception) of the
company through September 30, 2009. Nevada Processing Solutions has no
intention of paying any salaries at this time. We intend to pay salaries
when cash flow permits.
Summary Compensation Table
--------------------------
All
Fiscal Other
Year Compen-
ending Salary Bonus Awards sation Total
Name and Principal Position Sept 30 ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Chad Guidry CEO/Dir. 2008 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
2007 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
2006 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
We do not maintain key-man life insurance for our executive officer/
director. We do not have any long-term compensation plans or stock option
plans.
Stock Option Grants
-------------------
We did not grant any stock options to the executive officer or director from
inception through fiscal year end September 30, 2009.
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year-End
-------------------------------------------------
We did not have any outstanding equity awards as of September 30, 2009.
34
Option Exercises for Fiscal 2009
--------------------------------
There were no options exercised by our named executive officer in fiscal 2009.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
--------------------------------------------------------
We have not entered into any compensatory plans or arrangements with respect
to our named executive officer, which would in any way result in payments to
such officer because of her resignation, retirement, or other termination of
employment with us or our subsidiaries, or any change in control of, or a
change in his responsibilities following a change in control.
Director Compensation
---------------------
We did not pay our director any compensation during fiscal years ending
September 30, 2009 or 2008.
35
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following table presents information, to the best of our knowledge, about
the ownership of our common stock on November 12, 2009 relating to those
persons known to beneficially own more than 5% of our capital stock and by
our named executive officer and sole director.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and does not necessarily indicate
beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial
ownership includes those shares of common stock over which the stockholder has
sole or shared voting or investment power. It also includes shares of common
stock that the stockholder has a right to acquire within 60 days after January
12, 2009 pursuant to options, warrants, conversion privileges or other right.
The percentage ownership of the outstanding common stock, however, is based on
the assumption, expressly required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, that only the person or entity whose ownership is being reported
has converted options or warrants into shares of Nevada Processing Solutions'
common stock.
We do not have any outstanding options, warrants or other securities
exercisable for or convertible into shares of our common stock.
AMOUNT AND PERCENT OF PERCENT OF
NATURE OF CLASS CLASS
TITLE OF NAME OF BENEFICIAL BENEFICIAL BEFORE AFTER
CLASS OWNER AND POSITION OWNERSHIP CONVERSION(1) CONVERSION(2)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common J. Chad Guidry (3) 3,100,000 91.8% 25.6%
President,
Secretary, Director
Ownership upon conversion of
Shareholders' preferred stock
Common Processing Pros, Inc.(4) 8,726,900 0.0% 72.1%
-----------------------------------------
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS AS A GROUP
(1 person) 3,100,000 91.8% 25.6%
(1) Percent of Class based on 4,231,000 shares before conversion of Series
A Callable and Convertible Preferred shares.
(2) Percent of Class based on 154,231,000 after conversion of the 750,000
Series A Callable and Convertible Preferred shares.
(3) J. Chad Guidry, 9646 Giddings, Las Vegas, NV 89148
(4) Processing Pros, Inc., a Nevada corporation, beneficially controlled
and owned by David Gonzalez, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director,
Ignacio Zaragoza No. 3, Apdo. 44, Tijuana, B. C. Mexico.
36
We are not aware of any arrangements that may result in "changes in control"
as that term is defined by the provisions of Item 403(c) of Regulation S-B.
We believe that all persons named have full voting and investment power with
respect to the shares indicated, unless otherwise noted in the table. Under the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a person (or group of persons)
is deemed to be a "beneficial owner" of a security if he or she, directly or
indirectly, has or shares the power to vote or to direct the voting of such
security, or the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such
security. Accordingly, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial
owner of the same security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of
any security, which that person has the right to acquire within 60 days,
such as options or warrants to purchase our common stock.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
We have not entered into any transactions with our officers, Directors,
persons nominated for these positions, beneficial owners of 5% or more of
our common stock, or family members of these persons wherein the amount
involved in the transaction or a series of similar transactions exceeded
$60,000.
There is a potential conflict of interest between the Company and
Mr. J. Chad Guidry, the Company's sole officer and director. Mr. Guidry
has other business interests to which he currently devotes attention, and is
expected to continue to do so. As a result, conflicts of interest may arise
that can be resolved only through his exercise of judgment in a manner which
is consistent with his fiduciary duties to the Company. Insofar as the
officer and director is engaged in other business activities, management
anticipates that he will devote only a minor amount of time to our affairs.
However, should such a conflict arise, there is no assurance that Mr. Guidry
would not attend to other matters prior to those of the Company. Mr. Guidry
estimates that the business plan of the Company can be implemented in theory
by devoting approximately 10 to 15 hours per month over the course of
several months but such figure cannot be stated with precision.
Processing Pros, Inc., the Preferred shareholder, handles mortgage
applications. Once the Company becomes fully operational, Processing Pros,
Inc. plans to send business to Nevada Processing Solutions There are no
agreements between the two entities. And, there are no assurances that
Processing Pros, Inc. will have or direct any business to Nevada Processing
Solutions.
The company's sole officer/director has contributed office space for our
use. There is no charge to us for the space. Our officer will not seek
reimbursement for past office expenses.
Through a Board Resolution, the Company hired the professional services of
Seale and Beers, CPAs, Certified Public Accountants, to perform
audited financials for the Company. Seale and Beers, CPAs own no
stock in the Company. The company has no formal contracts with its
accountants, they are paid on a fee for service basis.
37
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Seale and Beers, CPAs served as our principal independent public accountants
for fiscal years ending September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, Aggregate
fees billed to us for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 by our
current and former auditor are as follows:
For the Years Ended
September 30,
-------------------
2009 2008
-------------------
(1) Audit Fees(1) $7,750 $2,750
(2) Audit-Related Fees -0- -0-
(3) Tax Fees -0- -0-
(4) All Other Fees -0- -0-
Total fees paid or accrued to our principal auditor
(1) Audit Fees include fees billed and expected to be billed for services
performed to comply with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS),
including the recurring audit of the Company's financial statements for such
period included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and for the reviews of the
quarterly financial statements included in the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit Committee Policies and Procedures
---------------------------------------
We do not have an audit committee; therefore our sole director pre-approves
all services to be provided to us by our independent auditor. This process
involves obtaining (i) a written description of the proposed services, (ii)
the confirmation of our Principal Accounting Officer that the services are
compatible with maintaining specific principles relating to independence, and
(iii) confirmation from our securities counsel that the services are not among
those that our independent auditors have been prohibited from performing under
SEC rules. Our sole director then makes a determination to approve or
disapprove the engagement of Seale and Beers, CPAs for the proposed
services. In the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, all fees paid to
Seale and Beers, CPAs were unanimously pre-approved in accordance with this
policy.
Less than 50 percent of hours expended on the principal accountant's
engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent
fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the
principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees.
38
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.
The following information required under this item is filed as part of this
report:
(a) 1. Financial Statements
Page
----
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 26
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm F-1
Balance Sheets F-2
Statements of Operations F-3
Statements of Stockholders' Equity F-4-6
Statements of Cash Flows F-7
(b) 2. Financial Statement Schedules
None.
39
(c) 3. Exhibit Index
Incorporated by reference
-------------------------
Filed Period Filing
Exhibit Exhibit Description herewith Form ending Exhibit date
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.1 Articles of Incorporation, S-1 9/30/08 3.1 11/04/08
dated May 30, 2006
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.2 Bylaws dated May 31, 2006 S-1 9/30/08 3.2 11/04/08
as currently in effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.3 Amended Articles of Incorporation S-1 9/30/08 3.3 11/04/08
dated February 23, 2007
as currently in effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.4 Articles/Designation dated S-1 9/30/08 3.4 11/04/08
April 29, 2008 as currently
in effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.1 Preferred share lock-up
agreement dated Apr. 1, 2009 10-Q 3/31/09 10.1 4/21/09
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23.1 Consent Letter from Seale X
and Beers, CPAs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
31.1 Certification of President X
and Principal Financial
Officer, pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
31.2 Certification of President X
and Principal Financial
Officer, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
40
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Nevada Processing Solutions
---------------------------------
Registrant
By: /s/ J. Chad Guidry
---------------------------
J. Chad Guidry
Chief Executive Officer
and Director
Date: November 12, 2009
-----------------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated have signed this report below.
Name
By: /s/ J. Chad Guidry
--------------------------------
J. Chad Guidry
President, Secretary,
Treasurer and Director
(Principal Executive,
Principal Financial and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: November 12, 2009
-----------------
41