DAL 9.30.2012 10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
R | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
|
| |
Or |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-5424
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
State of Incorporation: Delaware
I.R.S. Employer Identification No.: 58-0218548
Post Office Box 20706, Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001
Telephone: (404) 715-2600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes R No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes R No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | R | Accelerated filer | o | Non-accelerated filer | o | Smaller reporting company | o |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No R
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes R No o
Number of shares outstanding by each class of common stock, as of September 30, 2012:
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value - 850,450,321 shares outstanding
This document is also available through our website at http://www.delta.com/about_delta/investor_relations.
Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “Delta,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Delta Air Lines, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Form 10-Q (or otherwise made by us or on our behalf) that are not historical facts, including statements about our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions, projections or strategies for the future, may be “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or our present expectations. Known material risk factors applicable to Delta are described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (“Form 10-K”) and in "Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors" in this Form 10-Q, other than risks that could apply to any issuer or offering. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report.
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
(in millions, except share data) | September 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
ASSETS |
Current Assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,274 |
| | $ | 2,657 |
|
Short-term investments | 959 |
| | 958 |
|
Restricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments | 401 |
| | 305 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $36 and $33 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 1,785 |
| | 1,563 |
|
Expendable parts and supplies inventories, net of an allowance for obsolescence of $122 and $101 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 403 |
| | 367 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net | 465 |
| | 461 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other | 1,876 |
| | 1,418 |
|
Total current assets | 8,163 |
| | 7,729 |
|
Property and Equipment, Net: | | | |
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $6,337 and $5,472 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 20,599 |
| | 20,223 |
|
Other Assets: | | | |
Goodwill | 9,794 |
| | 9,794 |
|
Identifiable intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $651 and $600 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 4,697 |
| | 4,751 |
|
Other noncurrent assets | 1,099 |
| | 1,002 |
|
Total other assets | 15,590 |
| | 15,547 |
|
Total assets | $ | 44,352 |
| | $ | 43,499 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT |
Current Liabilities: | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases | $ | 1,546 |
| | $ | 1,944 |
|
Air traffic liability | 4,264 |
| | 3,480 |
|
Accounts payable | 2,325 |
| | 1,600 |
|
Frequent flyer deferred revenue | 1,584 |
| | 1,849 |
|
Accrued salaries and related benefits | 1,491 |
| | 1,367 |
|
Taxes payable | 638 |
| | 594 |
|
Fuel card obligation | 391 |
| | 318 |
|
Other accrued liabilities | 985 |
| | 1,549 |
|
Total current liabilities | 13,224 |
| | 12,701 |
|
Noncurrent Liabilities: | | | |
Long-term debt and capital leases | 11,111 |
| | 11,847 |
|
Pension, postretirement and related benefits | 13,688 |
| | 14,200 |
|
Frequent flyer deferred revenue | 2,617 |
| | 2,700 |
|
Deferred income taxes, net | 2,049 |
| | 2,028 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities | 1,711 |
| | 1,419 |
|
Total noncurrent liabilities | 31,176 |
|
| 32,194 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies | | | |
Stockholders' Deficit: | | | |
Common stock at $0.0001 par value; 1,500,000,000 shares authorized, 866,884,968 and 861,499,734 shares issued at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | — |
| | — |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 14,045 |
| | 13,999 |
|
Accumulated deficit | (7,395 | ) | | (8,398 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (6,464 | ) | | (6,766 | ) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 16,434,647 and 16,253,791 shares at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | (234 | ) | | (231 | ) |
Total stockholders' deficit | (48 | ) | | (1,396 | ) |
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit | $ | 44,352 |
| | $ | 43,499 |
|
| | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions, except per share data) | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Operating Revenue: | | | | | | | |
Passenger: | | | | | | | |
Mainline | $ | 7,017 |
| | $ | 6,852 |
| | $ | 19,323 |
| | $ | 18,186 |
|
Regional carriers | 1,675 |
| | 1,716 |
| | 5,046 |
| | 4,848 |
|
Total passenger revenue | 8,692 |
| | 8,568 |
| | 24,369 |
| | 23,034 |
|
Cargo | 243 |
| | 257 |
| | 749 |
| | 771 |
|
Other | 988 |
| | 991 |
| | 2,950 |
| | 2,911 |
|
Total operating revenue | 9,923 |
| | 9,816 |
| | 28,068 |
| | 26,716 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Operating Expense: | | | | | | | |
Aircraft fuel and related taxes | 2,221 |
| | 2,881 |
| | 7,759 |
| | 7,710 |
|
Salaries and related costs | 1,850 |
| | 1,717 |
| | 5,438 |
| | 5,183 |
|
Contract carrier arrangements | 1,447 |
| | 1,432 |
| | 4,238 |
| | 4,142 |
|
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs | 493 |
| | 428 |
| | 1,602 |
| | 1,398 |
|
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses | 440 |
| | 480 |
| | 1,213 |
| | 1,289 |
|
Contracted services | 402 |
| | 419 |
| | 1,177 |
| | 1,259 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 392 |
| | 384 |
| | 1,166 |
| | 1,141 |
|
Landing fees and other rents | 360 |
| | 342 |
| | 1,012 |
| | 975 |
|
Passenger service | 201 |
| | 207 |
| | 559 |
| | 552 |
|
Profit sharing | 174 |
| | 167 |
| | 309 |
| | 175 |
|
Aircraft rent | 65 |
| | 72 |
| | 208 |
| | 224 |
|
Restructuring and other items | 149 |
| | 3 |
| | 330 |
| | 154 |
|
Other | 421 |
| | 424 |
| | 1,233 |
| | 1,265 |
|
Total operating expense | 8,615 |
| | 8,956 |
| | 26,244 |
| | 25,467 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Operating Income | 1,308 |
| | 860 |
| | 1,824 |
| | 1,249 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Other (Expense) Income: |
| |
| |
| |
|
Interest expense, net | (195 | ) | | (229 | ) | | (623 | ) | | (683 | ) |
Amortization of debt discount, net | (48 | ) | | (48 | ) | | (148 | ) | | (141 | ) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt | (12 | ) | | (5 | ) | | (12 | ) | | (38 | ) |
Miscellaneous, net | (1 | ) | | (31 | ) | | (27 | ) | | (35 | ) |
Total other expense, net | (256 | ) | | (313 | ) | | (810 | ) | | (897 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
Income Before Income Taxes | 1,052 |
| | 547 |
| | 1,014 |
| | 352 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit | (5 | ) | | 2 |
| | (11 | ) | | 77 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Net Income | $ | 1,047 |
| | $ | 549 |
| | $ | 1,003 |
| | $ | 429 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Basic Earnings Per Share | $ | 1.24 |
| | $ | 0.66 |
| | $ | 1.19 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 1.23 |
| | $ | 0.65 |
| | $ | 1.18 |
| | $ | 0.51 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income | $ | 1,073 |
| | $ | 418 |
| | $ | 1,305 |
| | $ | 283 |
|
| | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2012 | | 2011 |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | $ | 1,926 |
| | $ | 1,676 |
|
| | | |
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | | |
Property and equipment additions: | | | |
Flight equipment, including advance payments | (885 | ) | | (676 | ) |
Ground property and equipment, including technology | (545 | ) | | (210 | ) |
Purchase of investments | (719 | ) | | (719 | ) |
Redemption of investments | 757 |
| | 503 |
|
Other, net | (37 | ) | | 16 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities | (1,429 | ) |
| (1,086 | ) |
| | | |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | | |
Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations | (1,410 | ) | | (3,426 | ) |
Proceeds from long-term obligations | 480 |
| | 2,380 |
|
Debt issuance costs | (8 | ) | | (62 | ) |
Restricted cash and cash equivalents | (31 | ) | | (84 | ) |
Fuel card obligation, net | 73 |
| | — |
|
Other, net | 16 |
| | 17 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities | (880 | ) | | (1,175 | ) |
| | | |
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents | (383 | ) | | (585 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 2,657 |
| | 2,892 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 2,274 |
| | $ | 2,307 |
|
| | | |
Non-Cash Transactions: | | | |
SkyMiles used pursuant to advance purchase under American Express Agreements | $ | 250 |
| | $ | — |
|
Build-to-suit leased facilities | 141 |
| | 70 |
|
Flight equipment under capital leases | — |
| | 98 |
|
| | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. Consistent with these requirements, this Form 10-Q does not include all the information required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As a result, this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes in our Form 10-K.
Management believes the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring items and restructuring and other items, considered necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented.
Due to seasonal variations in the demand for air travel, the volatility of aircraft fuel prices, changes in global economic conditions and other factors, operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year.
Recent Accounting Standards
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued "Presentation of Comprehensive Income." The standard revises the presentation and prominence of the items reported in other comprehensive income and is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. We adopted this standard in the March 2012 quarter and have presented comprehensive income on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment
In July 2012, the FASB issued "Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment." The standard gives companies the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired rather than calculating the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset. It is effective prospectively for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, with early adoption permitted. We adopted this standard and will apply the provisions to our annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests in the December 2012 quarter. The adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 2. OIL REFINERY
Jet fuel costs have continued to increase in recent years, making fuel expense our single largest expense. Because global demand for jet fuel and related products is increasing at the same time that jet fuel refining capacity is decreasing in the U.S. (particularly in the Northeast), the refining margin reflected in the prices we pay for jet fuel has increased. We purchased an oil refinery in June 2012 as part of our strategy to mitigate the increasing cost of the refining margin we are paying.
Acquisition
On June 22, 2012 (the "Closing Date"), our wholly-owned subsidiary, Monroe Energy, LLC (“Monroe”), acquired the Trainer refinery located near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from Phillips 66. Monroe invested $180 million to acquire the refinery. Monroe received a $30 million grant from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The acquisition includes pipelines and terminal assets that will allow the refinery to supply jet fuel to our airline operations throughout the Northeastern U.S., including our New York hubs at LaGuardia Airport and John F. Kennedy International Airport.
Prior to the transaction, Phillips 66 had shut down operations at the refinery. Monroe is making required capital improvements totaling approximately $100 million to restart the refinery and bring it to its desired operating state.
We accounted for the refinery acquisition as a business combination. The refinery, pipelines, and terminal assets acquired were recorded in property and equipment, net at $180 million based on their respective fair values on the Closing Date.
Refinery Operations and Strategic Agreements
The facility is capable of refining 185,000 barrels of crude oil per day. BP will supply crude oil used by the refinery under a three year agreement. The refinery will produce approximately 30% jet fuel after the capital improvements are completed. The refinery's remaining production will consist of gas, diesel and refined products ("non-jet fuel products"). Under a multi-year agreement, we will exchange a significant portion of the non-jet fuel products with Phillips 66 for jet fuel to be used in our airline operations. Substantially all of the remaining production of non-jet fuel products will be sold to BP under a long-term buy/ sale agreement effectively exchanging those non-jet fuel products for jet fuel. Our agreement with Phillips 66 requires us to deliver specified quantities of non-jet fuel products and they are required to deliver jet fuel to us. If we or Phillips 66 do not have the specified quantity and type of product available, the delivering party is required to procure any such shortage to fulfill its obligation under the agreement. Substantially all of the refinery's expected production of non-jet fuel products is included in these agreements.
Refinery Start-Up
Production at the refinery restarted in September 2012. It is expected to reach its full refining capacity during the fourth quarter, at which time we expect to begin to realize the benefits of ownership of the refinery. The results of the refinery's operations were not material in the September 2012 quarter. Our future financial statements will disclose two operating segments: our airline segment and our refinery segment.
NOTE 3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Assets (Liabilities) Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | September 30, 2012 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
Cash equivalents | $ | 1,996 |
| $ | 1,996 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Short-term investments | 959 |
| 959 |
| — |
| — |
|
Restricted cash equivalents and investments | 400 |
| 400 |
| — |
| — |
|
Long-term investments | 209 |
| 94 |
| 26 |
| 89 |
|
Hedge derivatives, net | | | | |
Fuel hedge contracts | 252 |
| 50 |
| 202 |
| — |
|
Interest rate contracts | (70 | ) | — |
| (70 | ) | — |
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts | (33 | ) | — |
| (33 | ) | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | December 31, 2011 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
Cash equivalents | $ | 2,357 |
| $ | 2,357 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Short-term investments | 958 |
| 958 |
| — |
| — |
|
Restricted cash equivalents and investments | 341 |
| 341 |
| — |
| — |
|
Long-term investments | 188 |
| 55 |
| 24 |
| 109 |
|
Hedge derivatives, net | | | | |
Fuel hedge contracts | 70 |
| — |
| 70 |
| — |
|
Interest rate contracts | (91 | ) | — |
| (91 | ) | — |
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts | (89 | ) | — |
| (89 | ) | — |
|
Cash Equivalents, Short-term Investments and Restricted Cash Equivalents and Investments. Cash equivalents and short-term investments generally consist of money market funds and treasury bills. Restricted cash equivalents and investments are primarily held to meet certain projected self-insurance obligations and generally consist of money market funds and time deposits. These investments are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Fair value is based on a market approach using prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets.
Long-term Investments. Our long-term investments, primarily consisting of equity investments in GOL and Aeroméxico and auction rate securities, are classified in other noncurrent assets.
Hedge Derivatives. Our derivative contracts are generally negotiated with counterparties without going through a public exchange. Accordingly, our fair value assessments give consideration to the risk of counterparty default (as well as our own credit risk).
| |
• | Fuel Derivatives. Our fuel hedge portfolio consists of call options; put options; combinations of two or more call options and put options; swap contracts; and futures contracts. The products underlying the hedge contracts include heating oil, crude oil, jet fuel and diesel fuel, as these commodities are highly correlated with the price of jet fuel that we consume. Option contracts are valued under an income approach using option pricing models based on data either readily observable in public markets, derived from public markets or provided by counterparties who regularly trade in public markets. Volatilities used in these valuations ranged from 14% to 39% depending on the maturity dates, underlying commodities and strike prices of the option contracts. Swap contracts are valued under an income approach using a discounted cash flow model based on data either readily observable or derived from public markets. Discount rates used in these valuations vary with the maturity dates of the respective contracts and are based on LIBOR. Futures contracts and options on futures contracts are traded on a public exchange and valued based on quoted market prices. |
| |
• | Interest Rate Derivatives. Our interest rate derivatives consist primarily of swap contracts and are valued primarily based on data readily observable in public markets. |
| |
• | Foreign Currency Derivatives. Our foreign currency derivatives consist of Japanese yen and Canadian dollar forward contracts and are valued based on data readily observable in public markets. |
NOTE 4. DERIVATIVES
Our results of operations are impacted by changes in aircraft fuel prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. In an effort to manage our exposure to these risks, we enter into derivative contracts and adjust our derivative portfolio as market conditions change.
Aircraft Fuel Price Risk
Our results of operations are materially impacted by changes in aircraft fuel prices. We actively manage our fuel price risk through a hedging program intended to reduce the financial impact on us from changes in the price of jet fuel. The objective of the fuel hedging program is to generate a positive cash position to defray the cost of jet fuel purchases. This fuel hedging program utilizes several different contract and commodity types. The economic effectiveness of this hedge portfolio is frequently tested against our financial targets. The hedge portfolio is rebalanced from time to time according to market conditions, which may result in locking in gains or losses on hedge contracts prior to their settlement dates.
Effective June 2011, we stopped designating substantially all of our new fuel derivative contracts as accounting hedges and discontinued hedge accounting for our then existing fuel derivative contracts that previously had been designated as accounting hedges. As a result, we record market adjustments for changes in fair value to earnings in aircraft fuel and related taxes. Prior to this change in accounting designation, gains or losses on these contracts were deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") until contract settlement. We will reclassify to earnings all amounts relating to our fuel derivative contracts in AOCI on the original contract settlement dates.
The following table shows the impact of fuel hedge gains (losses) for both designated and undesignated contracts on aircraft fuel and related taxes:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 |
Market adjustments for changes in fair value | $ | 414 |
| $ | (179 | ) | $ | (121 | ) | $ | (99 | ) |
Effective portion reclassified from AOCI to earnings | — |
| 68 |
| 15 |
| 202 |
|
Gain (loss) recorded in aircraft fuel and related taxes | $ | 414 |
| $ | (111 | ) | $ | (106 | ) | $ | 103 |
|
During the September 2012 quarter, we recorded gains of $414 million due to changes in the fair value of our fuel hedges. The gains partially offset mark-to-market ("MTM") losses recorded during the June 2012 quarter on these fuel hedges. These MTM adjustments are based on market prices as of the end of the reporting period for contracts settling in future periods. The following tables reflect the estimated fair value asset (liability) positions, notional balances and maturity dates of our hedge contracts:
Hedge Position as of September 30, 2012
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | Notional Balance | Final Maturity Date | Prepaid Expenses and Other | Other Noncurrent Assets | Other Accrued Liabilities | Other Noncurrent Liabilities | Hedge Derivatives, Net |
Designated as hedges | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts (cash flow hedges) | $ | 762 |
| U.S. dollars | May 2019 | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | (23 | ) | $ | (53 | ) | $ | (76 | ) |
Interest rate contracts (fair value hedges) | $ | 469 |
| U.S. dollars | August 2022 | 6 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 6 |
|
Foreign currency exchange contracts | 93,960 |
| Japanese yen | August 2015 | 1 |
| 2 |
| (30 | ) | (6 | ) | (33 | ) |
456 |
| Canadian dollars | | | | | |
Not designated as hedges | | | | | | | | |
Fuel hedge contracts | 2,666 |
| gallons - heating oil, crude oil, jet fuel and diesel | December 2013 | 549 |
| 86 |
| (283 | ) | (100 | ) | 252 |
|
Total derivative contracts | | | $ | 556 |
| $ | 88 |
| $ | (336 | ) | $ | (159 | ) | $ | 149 |
|
Hedge Position as of December 31, 2011
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | Notional Balance | Final Maturity Date | Prepaid Expenses and Other | Other Noncurrent Assets | Other Accrued Liabilities | Other Noncurrent Liabilities | Hedge Derivatives, Net |
Designated as hedges | | | | | | | | |
Interest rate contracts (cash flow hedges) | $ | 989 |
| U.S. dollars | May 2019 | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | (27 | ) | $ | (57 | ) | $ | (84 | ) |
Interest rate contracts (fair value hedges) | $ | 500 |
| U.S. dollars | August 2022 | — |
| — |
| — |
| (7 | ) | (7 | ) |
Foreign currency exchange contracts | 126,993 |
| Japanese yen | April 2014 | 7 |
| 5 |
| (58 | ) | (43 | ) | (89 | ) |
313 |
| Canadian dollars | | | | | |
Not designated as hedges | | | | | | | | |
Fuel hedge contracts | 1,225 |
| gallons - heating oil, crude oil, jet fuel and diesel | December 2012 | 570 |
| — |
| (500 | ) | — |
| 70 |
|
Total derivative contracts | | | $ | 577 |
| $ | 5 |
| $ | (585 | ) | $ | (107 | ) | $ | (110 | ) |
Hedge Gains (Losses)
Gains (losses) related to our designated hedge contracts, including those previously designated as accounting hedges, are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Effective Portion Reclassified from AOCI to Earnings | | Effective Portion Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | | 2012 | 2011 |
Three Months Ended September 30 | | | | | |
Fuel hedge contracts | $ | — |
| $ | 68 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | (70 | ) |
Interest rate contracts | (5 | ) | — |
| | 5 |
| (51 | ) |
Foreign currency exchange contracts | (8 | ) | (31 | ) | | (27 | ) | (22 | ) |
Total designated | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 37 |
| | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (143 | ) |
Nine Months Ended September 30 | | | | | |
Fuel hedge contracts | $ | 15 |
| $ | 202 |
| | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (136 | ) |
Interest rate contracts | (5 | ) | — |
| | 8 |
| (44 | ) |
Foreign currency exchange contracts | (21 | ) | (53 | ) | | 56 |
| 4 |
|
Total designated | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 149 |
| | $ | 49 |
| $ | (176 | ) |
Credit Risk
To manage credit risk associated with our aircraft fuel price, interest rate and foreign currency hedging programs, we select counterparties based on their credit ratings and limit our exposure to any one counterparty.
Our hedge contracts contain margin funding requirements. The margin funding requirements may cause us to post margin to counterparties or may cause counterparties to post margin to us as market prices in the underlying hedged items change. Due to the fair value position of our hedge contracts, we posted margin of $10 million and $30 million as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These amounts are recorded in prepaid expenses and other.
NOTE 5. LONG-TERM DEBT
Fair Value of Debt
Market risk associated with our fixed and variable rate long-term debt relates to the potential reduction in fair value and negative impact to future earnings, respectively, from an increase in interest rates. In the table below, the aggregate fair value of debt is based primarily on reported market values, recently completed market transactions and estimates based on interest rates, maturities, credit risk and underlying collateral and is classified primarily as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
|
| | | | | | |
(in millions) | September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 |
Total debt at par value | $ | 12,546 |
| $ | 13,797 |
|
Unamortized discount, net | (566 | ) | (737 | ) |
Net carrying amount | $ | 11,980 |
| $ | 13,060 |
|
Fair value | $ | 12,800 |
| $ | 13,600 |
|
Certificates
In July 2012, we completed a $480 million offering of Pass Through Certificates, Series 2012-1 ("2012-1 EETC") through a pass through trust. During the September 2012 quarter, we used the proceeds to refinance aircraft securing the Delta 2002-1 EETC, a portion of which matured on July 2, 2012. We also used the proceeds to refinance aircraft securing the Northwest 2001-2 EETC, which was scheduled to mature in August 2013 but was prepaid in the September 2012 quarter. The details of the offering are shown in the table below:
|
| | | | | | | |
(in millions) | Total Principal | Fixed Interest Rate | Offering Completion Date | Final Maturity Date | Collateral |
2012-1A | $ | 354 |
| 4.750% | July 2012 | May 2020 | 31 aircraft |
2012-1B | 126 |
| 6.875% | July 2012 | May 2019 | 31 aircraft(1) |
| $ | 480 |
|
|
| | |
| |
(1) | The B tranche certificates are secured by the same aircraft that secure the A tranche certificates. |
Covenants
We were in compliance with all covenants in our financing agreements at September 30, 2012.
NOTE 6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Aircraft Commitments
Future aircraft purchase commitments at September 30, 2012 total approximately $6.8 billion and include 100 B-737-900ER aircraft, 18 B-787-8 aircraft and seven previously owned MD-90 aircraft. We have obtained long-term financing commitments for a substantial portion of the purchase price of these aircraft.
In July 2012, we finalized agreements with Southwest Airlines and The Boeing Company to lease 88 B-717-200 aircraft with deliveries beginning in 2013 and continuing through 2015. Including the B-717-200 aircraft, we estimate that our total lease payments will be approximately $1.6 billion in 2013, $1.6 billion in 2014, $1.5 billion in 2015, $1.4 billion in 2016 and $8.8 billion after 2016.
Legal Contingencies
We are involved in various legal proceedings related to employment practices, environmental issues, antitrust matters and other matters concerning our business. We record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. We cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss for certain legal proceedings because, for example, the litigation is in its early stages or the plaintiff does not specify the damages being sought. Although the outcome of the legal proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Other Contingencies
General Indemnifications
We are the lessee under many commercial real estate leases. It is common in these transactions for us, as the lessee, to agree to indemnify the lessor and the lessor's related parties for tort, environmental and other liabilities that arise out of or relate to our use or occupancy of the leased premises. This type of indemnity would typically make us responsible to indemnified parties for liabilities arising out of the conduct of, among others, contractors, licensees and invitees at, or in connection with, the use or occupancy of the leased premises. This indemnity often extends to related liabilities arising from the negligence of the indemnified parties, but usually excludes any liabilities caused by either their sole or gross negligence or their willful misconduct.
Our aircraft and other equipment lease and financing agreements typically contain provisions requiring us, as the lessee or obligor, to indemnify the other parties to those agreements, including certain of those parties' related persons, against virtually any liabilities that might arise from the use or operation of the aircraft or such other equipment.
We believe that our insurance would cover most of our exposure to liabilities and related indemnities associated with the commercial real estate leases and aircraft and other equipment lease and financing agreements described above. While our insurance does not typically cover environmental liabilities, we have certain insurance policies in place as required by applicable environmental laws.
Certain of our aircraft and other financing transactions include provisions that require us to make payments to preserve an expected economic return to the lenders if that economic return is diminished due to certain changes in law or regulations. In certain of these financing transactions, we also bear the risk of certain changes in tax laws that would subject payments to non-U.S. lenders to withholding taxes.
We cannot reasonably estimate our potential future payments under the indemnities and related provisions described above because we cannot predict (1) when and under what circumstances these provisions may be triggered and (2) the amount that would be payable if the provisions were triggered because the amounts would be based on facts and circumstances existing at such time.
Employees Under Collective Bargaining Agreements
At September 30, 2012, we had approximately 77,000 full-time equivalent employees. Approximately 14% of these employees were represented by unions.
During the June 2012 quarter, we reached an agreement with the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”) to modify the existing collective bargaining agreement, which covers approximately 10,700 Delta pilots. The agreement, which was ratified by the pilots in June 2012 and took effect on July 1, 2012, becomes amendable on December 31, 2015.
War-Risk Insurance Contingency
As a result of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, aviation insurers significantly (1) reduced the maximum amount of insurance coverage available to commercial air carriers for liability to persons (other than employees or passengers) for claims from acts of terrorism, war or similar events and (2) increased the premiums for such coverage and for aviation insurance in general. Since September 24, 2001, the U.S. government has been providing U.S. airlines with war-risk insurance to cover losses, including those resulting from terrorism, to passengers, third parties (ground damage) and the aircraft hull. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation has extended coverage through September 30, 2013, and we expect the coverage to be further extended. The withdrawal of government support of airline war-risk insurance would require us to obtain war-risk insurance coverage commercially, if available. Such commercial insurance could have substantially less desirable coverage than currently provided by the U.S. government, may not be adequate to protect our risk of loss from future acts of terrorism, may result in a material increase to our operating expense or may not be obtainable at all, resulting in an interruption to our operations.
Other
We have certain contracts for goods and services that require us to pay a penalty, acquire inventory specific to us or purchase equipment specific to a contract, if we terminate this type of contract without cause prior to its expiration date. Because these obligations are contingent on our termination of a contract without cause prior to its expiration date, no obligation would exist unless such a termination occurs.
NOTE 7. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER ITEMS
The following table shows amounts recorded in restructuring and other items on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 |
Facilities, fleet and other | $ | 122 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 171 |
| $ | 71 |
|
Severance and related costs | 66 |
| 3 |
| 237 |
| 83 |
|
Gain on slot exchange | (39 | ) | — |
| (78 | ) | — |
|
Total restructuring and other items | $ | 149 |
| $ | 3 |
| $ | 330 |
| $ | 154 |
|
Facilities, Fleet and Other. We recently announced plans to reduce the total number of regional jets in our network while adding more mainline flying. This includes reducing the number of 50-seat regional jets in our fleet over the next few years. As a result of this reduction and changes to our business strategy, we announced our decision on July 27, 2012 to cease the operations of Comair, a wholly-owned regional airline subsidiary, as of September 29, 2012. We recorded a restructuring charge in the September 2012 quarter related to remaining lease payments for grounded aircraft, the acceleration of aircraft lease return costs and aircraft and related equipment and asset disposals.
Severance and Related Costs. We accrued $66 million in severance and related costs in the September 2012 quarter, related both to ceasing operations at Comair and providing severance benefits to Comair's 1,700 employees as well as a voluntary severance program. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we offered voluntary severance programs in which more than 2,000 employees elected to participate. These participants became eligible for retiree healthcare benefits. For all of these programs, we recognized a total charge of $237 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, which includes $110 million of special termination benefits (see Note 8).
Gain on Slot Exchange. During December 2011, we closed transactions with US Airways where we received takeoff and landing rights (each a "slot pair") at LaGuardia in exchange for slot pairs at Reagan National. In approving these transactions, the Department of Transportation restricted our use of the exchanged slots. We recorded a $78 million deferred gain in December 2011. We recognized $39 million of this deferred gain in the March 2012 quarter as half of the restrictions lapsed and recognized the remainder of the deferred gain in the September 2012 quarter as the remaining restrictions lapsed.
The following table shows the balances and activity for restructuring charges: |
| | | | | | |
(in millions) | Severance and Related Costs | Lease Restructuring |
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | $ | 46 |
| $ | 64 |
|
Additional costs and expenses | 126 |
| 44 |
|
Payments | (40 | ) | (11 | ) |
Balance as of September 30, 2012 | $ | 132 |
| $ | 97 |
|
NOTE 8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The following table shows the components of net periodic cost:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement and Postemployment Benefits |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 |
Three Months Ended September 30 | | | | |
Service cost | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 14 |
| $ | 13 |
|
Interest cost | 232 |
| 242 |
| 41 |
| 45 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (176 | ) | (181 | ) | (19 | ) | (22 | ) |
Amortization of prior service benefit | — |
| — |
| (7 | ) | (1 | ) |
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) | 36 |
| 14 |
| 6 |
| (3 | ) |
Special termination benefits | — |
| — |
| 6 |
| — |
|
Net periodic cost | $ | 92 |
| $ | 75 |
| $ | 41 |
| $ | 32 |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30 | | | | |
Service cost | $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 43 |
| $ | 39 |
|
Interest cost | 696 |
| 726 |
| 123 |
| 135 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | (528 | ) | (543 | ) | (57 | ) | (67 | ) |
Amortization of prior service benefit | — |
| — |
| (16 | ) | (2 | ) |
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain) | 108 |
| 42 |
| 18 |
| (9 | ) |
Special termination benefits | — |
| — |
| 110 |
| — |
|
Net periodic cost | $ | 276 |
| $ | 225 |
| $ | 221 |
| $ | 96 |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we remeasured our postretirement healthcare obligation to account for changes to retiree medical benefits resulting from the final integration of wages and benefits following our merger with Northwest Airlines and the voluntary workforce reduction programs offered to eligible employees. As a result, we recorded $110 million of special termination benefits in restructuring and other items (see Note 7).
NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES
Valuation Allowance
We periodically assess whether it is more likely than not that we will generate sufficient taxable income to realize our deferred income tax assets. We establish valuation allowances if it is not likely we will realize our deferred income tax assets. In making this determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence and make certain assumptions. We consider, among other things, our deferred tax liabilities, the overall business environment, our historical financial results, our industry's historically cyclical financial results and potential current and future tax planning strategies.
We recorded a full valuation allowance in 2004 due to our cumulative three year loss position at that time, compounded by the negative industry-wide business trends and outlook. At September 30, 2012, we had a $10.2 billion valuation allowance established against our deferred income tax assets, which represents a full valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax asset.
During the March 2012 quarter, we moved from a cumulative loss position over the previous three years to a cumulative income position for the first time since we established the full valuation allowance. We have concluded as of September 30, 2012 that the valuation allowance was still needed on our net deferred tax assets based upon the weight of the factors described above. We continue to evaluate our cumulative income position and income trend as well as our future projections of sustained profitability. We will evaluate whether this profitability trend constitutes sufficient positive evidence to support a reversal of our valuation allowance (in full or in part).
Income Tax Allocation
We consider all income sources, including other comprehensive income, in determining the amount of tax benefit allocated to continuing operations (the "Income Tax Allocation"). During 2009, as a result of the Income Tax Allocation, we recorded a non-cash deferred income tax expense of $321 million on other comprehensive income as a result of hedge gains on fuel derivatives and an offsetting non-cash income tax benefit of $321 million. This deferred income tax expense will remain in AOCI until all amounts in AOCI that relate to fuel derivatives which are designated as accounting hedges are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. We will reclassify to earnings all amounts relating to our fuel derivative contracts in AOCI on the original contract settlement dates. As a result, a non-cash income tax expense of $321 million will be recognized upon the settlement of the fuel derivative contracts designated as accounting hedges.
NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Shares issuable upon the satisfaction of certain conditions are considered outstanding and included in the computation of basic earnings per share. The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions, except per share data) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 |
Net income | $ | 1,047 |
| $ | 549 |
| $ | 1,003 |
| $ | 429 |
|
| | | | |
Basic weighted average shares outstanding | 846 |
| 838 |
| 845 |
| 838 |
|
Dilutive effect of share based awards | 4 |
| 6 |
| 4 |
| 6 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 850 |
| 844 |
| 849 |
| 844 |
|
| | | | |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 1.24 |
| $ | 0.66 |
| $ | 1.19 |
| $ | 0.51 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 1.23 |
| $ | 0.65 |
| $ | 1.18 |
| $ | 0.51 |
|
| | | | |
Antidilutive common stock equivalents excluded from diluted earnings per share | 19 |
| 26 |
| 19 |
| 25 |
|
NOTE 11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
October 2012 Senior Secured Credit Facilities
In October 2012, we entered into senior secured credit facilities (the "Pacific Facilities") to borrow up to $2.0 billion. The Pacific Facilities consist of two first lien term loan facilities (the "Pacific Term Loans") and a $450 million revolving credit facility (the "Pacific Revolving Facility"). In connection with entering into the Pacific Facilities, we retired $1.2 billion principal amount of outstanding debt, including an existing term loan and senior secured and senior second lien notes, and terminated an existing undrawn $500 million revolving credit facility. These transactions are summarized in the table below:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | October 2012 |
| Final Maturity Date | Interest Rate(s) per Annum | Proceeds Received | Principal Retired |
Entered into in October 2012 | | | | | |
Pacific Term Loan B-1 | October 2018 | 5.25% | variable(1)(2) | $ | 1,100 |
| $ | — |
|
Pacific Term Loan B-2 | April 2016 | 4.25% | variable(1)(2) | 400 |
| — |
|
Pacific Revolving Facility ($450 million) | October 2017 | undrawn | variable(3) | — |
| — |
|
Retired/Terminated in October 2012 | | | | | |
Pacific Routes Term Facility | March 2016 | 4.25% | variable(1)(4) | — |
| 246 |
|
Pacific Routes Revolving Facility ($500 million) | March 2013 | undrawn | variable(1) | — |
| — |
|
Senior Secured Notes(5) | September 2014 | 9.5% | fixed | — |
| 600 |
|
Senior Second Lien Notes(5) | March 2015 | 12.25% | fixed | — |
| 306 |
|
Total | | | | $ | 1,500 |
| $ | 1,152 |
|
(1) Interest rate equal to LIBOR (subject to a floor) or another index rate, in each case plus a specified margin
(2) Represents the rate as of October 26, 2012
(3) Interest rate equal to LIBOR or another index rate, in each case plus a specified margin
(4) Represents the rate as of September 30, 2012
(5) Includes amounts that will be redeemed in November 2012 pursuant to an irrevocable notice of redemption
Borrowings under the Pacific Term Loans must be repaid annually in an amount equal to 1% per year of the original principal amount of the respective loans (to be paid in equal quarterly installments). The remaining unamortized principal amounts under the Pacific Term Loans are due on their final maturity dates. The Pacific Revolving Facility is currently undrawn.
Key Financial Covenants. Our obligations under the Pacific Facilities are guaranteed by substantially all of our domestic subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”) and secured by a first lien on our Pacific route authorities and certain related assets. Like our other secured debt instruments, the Pacific Facilities include affirmative, negative and financial covenants that restrict our ability to, among other things, make investments, sell or otherwise dispose of collateral if we are not in compliance with the collateral coverage ratio test described below, pay dividends or repurchase stock. The financial covenants require us to maintain the minimum levels shown in the table below:
|
| |
Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio(1) | 1.20:1 |
Minimum Unrestricted Liquidity | |
Unrestricted cash, permitted investments, and undrawn revolving credit facilities | $2.0 billion |
Minimum Collateral Coverage Ratio(2) | 1.60:1 |
| |
(1) | Defined as the ratio of (a) earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and aircraft rent, and other adjustments to net income to (b) the sum of gross cash interest expense (including the cash interest portion of our capitalized lease obligations) and cash aircraft rent expense, for the 12-month period ending as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. |
| |
(2) | Defined as the ratio of (a) the value of the collateral to (b) the sum of the aggregate outstanding obligations under the Pacific Facilities and certain other obligations. |
Under the Pacific Facilities, if the Minimum Collateral Coverage Ratio is not maintained, we must either provide additional collateral to secure our obligations, or we must repay the loans under the facilities by an amount necessary to maintain compliance with the collateral coverage ratio. The value of the collateral that has been pledged may change over time, which may be reflected in appraisals of collateral required by the Pacific Facilities. These changes could result from factors that are not under our control. A decline in the value of collateral could result in a situation where we may not be able to maintain the collateral coverage ratio.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
September 2012 Quarter Financial Highlights
Our net income for the September 2012 quarter was $1.0 billion, or $1.23 per diluted share. Total operating revenue increased $107 million, or 1%, over the September 2011 quarter, primarily due to higher passenger revenue due to yield improvement. Fuel expense decreased due to fuel hedge results and a 2% decline in consumption.
Passenger revenue increased $124 million due to a 3% year over year improvement in passenger mile yield on 1% lower traffic, while capacity declined 2%. Passenger revenue per available seat mile ("PRASM") increased 3% over the September 2011 quarter, reflecting higher revenue under corporate travel contracts and improvements in our products and services.
Total operating expense decreased $341 million over the September 2011 quarter, driven primarily by lower fuel expense. Our fuel expense decreased $672 million (including our contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements) compared to the September 2011 quarter due to fuel hedge gains and a 2% decrease in consumption. During the September 2012 quarter, we recorded gains of $414 million due to changes in the fair value of our fuel hedge portfolio. The majority of these gains relate to mark-to-market adjustments for fuel hedges settling in future periods. Excluding mark-to-market adjustments recorded in periods other than the settlement period ("MTM adjustments"), our average fuel price for the quarter was $3.14 per gallon, compared to $3.09 per gallon for the September 2011 quarter.
Our consolidated operating cost per available seat mile ("CASM") for the September 2012 quarter decreased 2.3% to 13.83 cents from 14.16 cents in the September 2011 quarter, primarily reflecting the market gain on fuel hedges. For the September 2012 quarter, CASM-Ex was 8.55 cents, or 5.6% higher than the September 2011 quarter. The non-GAAP financial measures used in this paragraph are defined in "Supplemental Information" below.
Strengthening the Balance Sheet
We will continue to focus on cash flow generation toward our goal of further strengthening our balance sheet. We finished the September 2012 quarter with $5.1 billion in unrestricted liquidity (consisting of cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and undrawn revolving credit facility capacity). During the first nine months of 2012, we generated $1.9 billion in cash from operating activities, and we reduced debt by $1.1 billion and funded capital expenditures while maintaining a solid liquidity position.
Oil Refinery Acquisition
Jet fuel costs have continued to increase in recent years, making fuel expense our single largest expense. Because global demand for jet fuel and related products is increasing at the same time that jet fuel refining capacity is decreasing in the U.S. (particularly in the Northeast), the refining margin reflected in the prices we pay for jet fuel has increased. We purchased an oil refinery in June 2012 as part of our strategy to mitigate the increasing cost of the refining margin we are paying.
Acquisition
On June 22, 2012 (the "Closing Date"), our wholly-owned subsidiary, Monroe Energy, LLC (“Monroe”), acquired the Trainer refinery located near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania from Phillips 66. Monroe invested $180 million to acquire the refinery. Monroe received a $30 million grant from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The acquisition includes pipelines and terminal assets that will allow the refinery to supply jet fuel to our airline operations throughout the Northeastern U.S., including our New York hubs at LaGuardia Airport and John F. Kennedy International Airport.
Prior to the transaction, Phillips 66 had shut down operations at the refinery. Monroe is making required capital improvements totaling approximately $100 million to restart the refinery and bring it to its desired operating state.
Refinery Operations and Strategic Agreements
The facility is capable of refining 185,000 barrels of crude oil per day. BP will supply crude oil used by the refinery under a three year agreement. The refinery will produce approximately 30% jet fuel after the capital improvements are completed. The refinery's remaining production will consist of gas, diesel and refined products ("non-jet fuel products"). Under a multi-year agreement, we will exchange a significant portion of the non-jet fuel products with Phillips 66 for jet fuel to be used in our airline operations. Substantially all of the remaining production of non-jet fuel products will be sold to BP under a long-term buy/ sale agreement effectively exchanging those non-jet fuel products for jet fuel. Our agreement with Phillips 66 requires us to deliver specified quantities of non-jet fuel products and they are required to deliver jet fuel to us. If we or Phillips 66 do not have the specified quantity and type of product available, the delivering party is required to procure any such shortage to fulfill its obligation under the agreement. Substantially all of the refinery's expected production of non-jet fuel products is included in these agreements.
Refinery Start-Up
Production at the refinery restarted in September 2012. It is expected to reach its full refining capacity during the fourth quarter, at which time we expect to begin to realize the benefits of ownership of the refinery. We expect these benefits to be $300 million on an annual basis. The results of the refinery's operations were not material in the September 2012 quarter.
Pilot Agreement
During the June 2012 quarter, we reached an agreement with the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”) to modify the existing collective bargaining agreement covering Delta’s pilots. The agreement, which was ratified by the pilots in June 2012, provides career growth opportunities as well as pay and benefits improvements for our pilots including increases to base pay and changes to our profit sharing program. The agreement will also provide Delta with productivity gains and support our domestic fleet restructuring.
Domestic Fleet Restructuring
Our ongoing domestic fleet restructuring is focused on lowering unit costs while investing in our fleet to enhance the customer experience. As part of this effort, in July 2012, we finalized agreements with Southwest Airlines and The Boeing Company ("Boeing") to lease 88 B-717-200 aircraft. Delivery of the aircraft will begin next year, with 16 aircraft scheduled to enter our fleet in 2013. We will receive 36 aircraft deliveries in each of 2014 and 2015. The B-717-200 aircraft will primarily replace 50-seat regional jets on a capacity neutral basis. These B-717-200 are 110-seat aircraft and will feature new, fully upgraded interiors, with 12 First Class seats, 15 Economy Comfort seats and in-flight WiFi throughout the cabin. Including the B-717-200 aircraft, we estimate that our total lease payments will be approximately $1.6 billion in 2013, $1.6 billion in 2014, $1.5 billion in 2015, $1.4 billion in 2016 and $8.8 billion after 2016.
Our domestic fleet restructuring also includes replacing older, less efficient mainline aircraft. During 2011, we entered into an agreement with Boeing to purchase 100 new fuel efficient B-737-900ER aircraft. We will add these aircraft to our fleet between 2013 and 2018, primarily replacing older B-757 and B-767 aircraft. The state-of-the-art B-737-900ER will offer an industry leading customer experience, including expanded carry-on baggage space and a spacious cabin. Additionally, we continue to upgrade our fleet with the addition of previously owned MD-90 jets.
We continue to assess our fleet and expect to add the aircraft discussed above on a capacity neutral basis, as we retire older less efficient aircraft. We continue to evaluate older, retiring fleets and related equipment for changes in depreciable life and/or impairment.
New York Strategy
Strengthening our position in New York City continues to be an important part of our network strategy. As discussed below, key components of this strategy are operating a domestic hub at LaGuardia and creating a state-of-the-art facility at JFK. In May 2012, we announced new and expanded service to 10 popular leisure destinations (in addition to the service expansion discussed below) in the Caribbean, Bermuda, and Florida from LaGuardia and JFK. These flights are expected to begin operating in the December quarter of 2012.
LaGuardia. During December 2011, we closed transactions with US Airways where we received takeoff and landing rights (each a "slot pair") at LaGuardia in exchange for slot pairs at Reagan National. This exchange allows us to operate a new domestic hub at LaGuardia.
We have increased capacity at LaGuardia by 42%, adding 100 new flights and a total of 26 new destinations. The first phase of new flights began on March 25 and the second phase commenced on July 11. We currently operate about 260 daily flights between LaGuardia and 60 cities, which is more than any other airline.
We are also investing $160 million in a renovation and expansion project at LaGuardia to enhance the customer experience. In early 2012, we broke ground on the connector linking Terminals C and D and in September 2012 we opened a new SkyClub in Terminal C. Ongoing investments include expanded security lanes and baggage handling system in both terminals as well as an expanded SkyClub in Terminal D.
JFK. While our expanded LaGuardia schedule is focused on providing industry-leading domestic service, we are optimizing our international and trans-continental flight schedule at JFK during 2012 to facilitate convenient connections for our passengers and improve coordination with our SkyTeam alliance partners.
At JFK, we currently operate domestic flights primarily at Terminal 2 and international flights at Terminal 3 and, to a lesser extent, Terminal 4. Our five-year $1.2 billion renovation project at JFK, which began in 2010, is on schedule. The expansion and enhancement of Terminal 4, which includes the construction of nine new international gates, commenced in 2011 and is expected to be open in the spring of 2013. Upon completion of the Terminal 4 expansion, we will relocate our operations from Terminal 3 to Terminal 4, proceed with the demolition of Terminal 3, and thereafter conduct coordinated flight operations from Terminals 2 and 4. Once our project is complete, we expect that passengers will benefit from an enhanced customer experience and improved operational performance, including reduced taxi times and better on-time performance.
Results of Operations - Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
Operating Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Increase (Decrease) | % Increase (Decrease) |
Passenger: | | | | |
Mainline | $ | 7,017 |
| $ | 6,852 |
| $ | 165 |
| 2 | % |
Regional carriers | 1,675 |
| 1,716 |
| (41 | ) | (2 | )% |
Total passenger revenue | 8,692 |
| 8,568 |
| 124 |
| 1 | % |
Cargo | 243 |
| 257 |
| (14 | ) | (5 | )% |
Other | 988 |
| 991 |
| (3 | ) | — | % |
Total operating revenue | $ | 9,923 |
| $ | 9,816 |
| $ | 107 |
| 1 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Increase (Decrease) vs. Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
(in millions) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 | Passenger Revenue | RPMs(1) (Traffic) | ASMs(2) (Capacity) | Passenger Mile Yield | PRASM(3) | Load Factor |
Domestic | $ | 3,690 |
| 4 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 4 | % | 3 | % | (0.7 | ) pts |
Atlantic | 1,751 |
| (2 | )% | (4 | )% | (5 | )% | 2 | % | 3 | % | 1.0 | pts |
Pacific | 1,108 |
| 5 | % | 1 | % | (1 | )% | 3 | % | 6 | % | 2.0 | pts |
Latin America | 468 |
| 3 | % | 6 | % | 3 | % | (3 | )% | — | % | 2.4 | pts |
Total Mainline | 7,017 |
| 2 | % | — | % | (1 | )% | 3 | % | 3 | % | 0.3 | pts |
Regional carriers | 1,675 |
| (2 | )% | (8 | )% | (8 | )% | 6 | % | 6 | % | (0.5 | ) pts |
Total passenger revenue | $ | 8,692 |
| 1 | % | (1 | )% | (2 | )% | 3 | % | 3 | % | 0.3 | pts |
| |
(1) | Revenue passenger miles (“RPMs”) |
| |
(2) | Available seat miles (“ASMs”) |
| |
(3) | Passenger revenue per ASM (“PRASM”) |
Passenger Revenue. Passenger revenue increased $124 million, or 1%, due to an improvement in the passenger mile yield due to higher revenue under corporate travel contracts and improvements in our products and services. Capacity decreased 1% in the domestic region and 3% in international regions.
International mainline passenger revenue increased $19 million. Atlantic PRASM was up 3%, driven by a 2% increase in yield and a 5% reduction in capacity. Pacific passenger revenue increased 5% due to a 3% increase in yield.
Operating Expense |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Increase (Decrease) | % Increase (Decrease) |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 |
Aircraft fuel and related taxes | $ | 2,221 |
| $ | 2,881 |
| $ | (660 | ) | (23 | )% |
Salaries and related costs | 1,850 |
| 1,717 |
| 133 |
| 8 | % |
Contract carrier arrangements | 1,447 |
| 1,432 |
| 15 |
| 1 | % |
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs | 493 |
| 428 |
| 65 |
| 15 | % |
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses | 440 |
| 480 |
| (40 | ) | (8 | )% |
Contracted services | 402 |
| 419 |
| (17 | ) | (4 | )% |
Depreciation and amortization | 392 |
| 384 |
| 8 |
| 2 | % |
Landing fees and other rents | 360 |
| 342 |
| 18 |
| 5 | % |
Passenger service | 201 |
| 207 |
| (6 | ) | (3 | )% |
Profit sharing | 174 |
| 167 |
| 7 |
| 4 | % |
Aircraft rent | 65 |
| 72 |
| (7 | ) | (10 | )% |
Restructuring and other items | 149 |
| 3 |
| 146 |
| NM |
|
Other | 421 |
| 424 |
| (3 | ) | (1 | )% |
Total operating expense | $ | 8,615 |
| $ | 8,956 |
| $ | (341 | ) | (4 | )% |
Fuel Expense. Including contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements, fuel expense decreased $672 million primarily due to fuel hedge gains and a 2% decline in consumption. The table below presents fuel expense, gallons consumed, and our average price per fuel gallon, including the impact of fuel hedge gains of $414 million in the September 2012 quarter:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Increase (Decrease) | % Increase (Decrease) |
(in millions, except per gallon data) | 2012 | 2011 |
Aircraft fuel and related taxes(1) | $ | 2,221 |
| $ | 2,881 |
| $ | (660 | ) | |
Aircraft fuel and related taxes included within contract carrier arrangements | 540 |
| 552 |
| (12 | ) |
|
|
Total fuel expense | $ | 2,761 |
| $ | 3,433 |
| $ | (672 | ) | (20 | )% |
| | | | |
Total fuel consumption (gallons) | 1,021 |
| 1,044 |
| (23 | ) | (2 | )% |
Average price per fuel gallon | $ | 2.71 |
| $ | 3.29 |
| $ | (0.58 | ) | (18 | )% |
| |
(1) | Includes the impact of fuel hedge activity described further in the table below. |
The table below shows the impact of hedging on fuel expense and average price per fuel gallon: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average Price Per Gallon |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Change | Three Months Ended September 30, | Change |
(in millions, except per gallon data) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 |
Fuel purchase cost | $ | 3,175 |
| $ | 3,322 |
| $ | (147 | ) | $ | 3.11 |
| $ | 3.18 |
| $ | (0.07 | ) |
Fuel hedge (gains) losses | (414 | ) | 111 |
| (525 | ) | (0.40 | ) | 0.11 |
| (0.51 | ) |
Total fuel expense | $ | 2,761 |
| $ | 3,433 |
| $ | (672 | ) | $ | 2.71 |
| $ | 3.29 |
| $ | (0.58 | ) |
MTM adjustments | 440 |
| (208 | ) | 648 |
| 0.43 |
| (0.20 | ) | 0.63 |
|
Total fuel expense, adjusted | $ | 3,201 |
| $ | 3,225 |
| $ | (24 | ) | $ | 3.14 |
| $ | 3.09 |
| $ | 0.05 |
|
During the three months ended September 30, 2012, our fuel hedge gains of $414 million included $440 million in gains for MTM adjustments. These MTM adjustments are based on market prices as of the end of the reporting period for contracts settling in future periods. Such market prices are not necessarily indicative of the actual future value of the underlying hedge in the contract settlement period. Therefore, we adjust fuel expense for these items to arrive at a more meaningful measure of fuel cost. Our average price per fuel gallon, adjusted (a non-GAAP financial measure as defined in "Supplemental Information" below), was $3.14 for the September 2012 quarter.
Salaries and Related Costs. The increase in salaries and related costs is primarily due to employee pay increases, increases in pension expense and other benefits.
During the June 2012 quarter, we reached an agreement with ALPA that increases pay and benefits for our pilots. Our pilots and substantially all other employees received base pay increases on July 1, 2012 and will receive additional increases on January 1, 2013. These increases are designed both to recognize the upcoming change to the profit sharing program described below and to accelerate the planned 2013 pay increase for non-pilot employees.
Aircraft Maintenance Materials and Outside Repairs. Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs consists of costs associated with maintenance of aircraft used in our operations and maintenance sales to third parties by our MRO services business. The increase in maintenance costs is primarily due to our acceleration of certain maintenance events into the September 2012 quarter resulting in a lower total cost for those activities as well as initiatives to improve our operational reliability.
Passenger Commissions and Other Selling Expenses. The decrease in passenger commissions and other selling expenses is primarily due to lower booking fees and international commission rates.
Profit Sharing. Our broad based employee profit sharing program provides that, for each year in which we have an annual pre-tax profit, as defined by the terms of the program, we will pay a specified portion of that profit to employees. In determining the amount of profit sharing, the terms of the program specify the exclusion of special items, such as MTM adjustments and restructuring and other items, from pre-tax profit. During the June 2012 quarter, our profit sharing program was modified so that we will pay 10% of profits, on the first $2.5 billion of annual profits effective with the plan year beginning January 1, 2013 compared to paying 15% of annual profits for the 2012 plan year. Under the program, we will continue to pay 20% of annual profits above $2.5 billion.
Restructuring and Other Items. Due to the nature of amounts recorded within restructuring and other items, a year over year comparison is not meaningful. For a discussion of charges recorded in restructuring and other items, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Results of Operations - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
Operating Revenue
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | | |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | Increase (Decrease) | % Increase (Decrease) |
Passenger: | | | | |
Mainline | $ | 19,323 |
| $ | 18,186 |
| $ | 1,137 |
| 6 | % |
Regional carriers | 5,046 |
| 4,848 |
| 198 |
| 4 | % |
Total passenger revenue | 24,369 |
| 23,034 |
| 1,335 |
| 6 | % |
Cargo | 749 |
| 771 |
| (22 | ) | (3 | )% |
Other | 2,950 |
| 2,911 |
| 39 |
| 1 | % |
Total operating revenue | $ | 28,068 |
| $ | 26,716 |
| $ | 1,352 |
| 5 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Increase (Decrease) vs. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
(in millions) | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | Passenger Revenue | RPMs(1) (Traffic) | ASMs(2) (Capacity) | Passenger Mile Yield | PRASM(3) | Load Factor |
Domestic | $ | 10,611 |
| 7 | % | 1 | % | (1 | )% | 6 | % | 7 | % | 1.0 | pts |
Atlantic | 4,423 |
| 1 | % | (4 | )% | (7 | )% | 5 | % | 9 | % | 2.8 | pts |
Pacific | 2,825 |
| 12 | % | 5 | % | 3 | % | 7 | % | 9 | % | 1.9 | pts |
Latin America | 1,464 |
| 8 | % | 4 | % | 1 | % | 4 | % | 7 | % | 2.4 | pts |
Total Mainline | 19,323 |
| 6 | % | — | % | (2 | )% | 6 | % | 8 | % | 1.7 | pts |
Regional carriers | 5,046 |
| 4 | % | (3 | )% | (4 | )% | 8 | % | 9 | % | 0.9 | pts |
Total passenger revenue | $ | 24,369 |
| 6 | % | — | % | (2 | )% | 6 | % | 8 | % | 1.6 | pts |
| |
(1) | Revenue passenger miles (“RPMs”) |
| |
(2) | Available seat miles (“ASMs”) |
| |
(3) | Passenger revenue per ASM (“PRASM”) |
Passenger Revenue. Passenger revenue increased $1.3 billion, or 6%, due to an improvement in the passenger mile yield of 6%, despite a 2% decline in capacity. Passenger mile yield and unit revenue increased due to fare increases, higher revenue under corporate travel contracts and improvements in our products and services.
International mainline passenger revenue increased $469 million. Atlantic PRASM was up 9%, driven by a 5% increase in yield on a 7% decrease in capacity. In early 2011, we faced industry overcapacity in the transatlantic market and in connection with our joint venture partners, AirFrance-KLM and Alitalia, we have reduced capacity in underperforming markets. Pacific passenger revenue increased 12% on a 3% and 5% increase in capacity and traffic, respectively. These results reflect higher yield and traffic, as demand returned to levels seen prior to the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan.
Operating Expense |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | Increase (Decrease) | % Increase (Decrease) |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 |
Aircraft fuel and related taxes | $ | 7,759 |
| $ | 7,710 |
| $ | 49 |
| 1 | % |
Salaries and related costs | 5,438 |
| 5,183 |
| 255 |
| 5 | % |
Contract carrier arrangements | 4,238 |
| 4,142 |
| 96 |
| 2 | % |
Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs | 1,602 |
| 1,398 |
| 204 |
| 15 | % |
Passenger commissions and other selling expenses | 1,213 |
| 1,289 |
| (76 | ) | (6 | )% |
Contracted services | 1,177 |
| 1,259 |
| (82 | ) | (7 | )% |
Depreciation and amortization | 1,166 |
| 1,141 |
| 25 |
| 2 | % |
Landing fees and other rents | 1,012 |
| 975 |
| 37 |
| 4 | % |
Passenger service | 559 |
| 552 |
| 7 |
| 1 | % |
Profit sharing | 309 |
| 175 |
| 134 |
| NM |
|
Aircraft rent | 208 |
| 224 |
| (16 | ) | (7 | )% |
Restructuring and other items | 330 |
| 154 |
| 176 |
| NM |
|
Other | 1,233 |
| 1,265 |
| (32 | ) | (3 | )% |
Total operating expense | $ | 26,244 |
| $ | 25,467 |
| $ | 777 |
| 3 | % |
Fuel Expense. Including contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements, fuel expense increased $76 million because of an increase in our average price per fuel gallon, despite a 3% decrease in consumption. The table below presents fuel expense, gallons consumed, and our average price per fuel gallon, including the impact of fuel hedge losses of $106 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | Increase (Decrease) | % Increase (Decrease) |
(in millions, except per gallon data) | 2012 | 2011 |
Aircraft fuel and related taxes(1) | $ | 7,759 |
| $ | 7,710 |
| $ | 49 |
| |
Aircraft fuel and related taxes included within contract carrier arrangements | 1,587 |
| 1,560 |
| 27 |
| |
Total fuel expense | $ | 9,346 |
| $ | 9,270 |
| $ | 76 |
| 1 | % |
| | | | |
Total fuel consumption (gallons) | 2,875 |
| 2,955 |
| (80 | ) | (3 | )% |
Average price per fuel gallon | $ | 3.25 |
| $ | 3.14 |
| $ | 0.11 |
| 4 | % |
| |
(1) | Includes the impact of fuel hedge activity described further in the table below. |
The table below shows the impact of hedging on fuel expense and average price per fuel gallon:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Average Price Per Gallon |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Change |
(in millions, except per gallon data) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 |
Fuel purchase cost | $ | 9,240 |
| $ | 9,373 |
| $ | (133 | ) | $ | 3.21 |
| $ | 3.17 |
| $ | 0.04 |
|
Fuel hedge losses (gains) | 106 |
| (103 | ) | 209 |
| 0.04 |
| (0.03 | ) | 0.07 |
|
Total fuel expense | $ | 9,346 |
| $ | 9,270 |
| $ | 76 |
| $ | 3.25 |
| $ | 3.14 |
| $ | 0.11 |
|
MTM adjustments | 30 |
| (190 | ) | 220 |
| 0.01 |
| (0.07 | ) | 0.08 |
|
Total fuel expense, adjusted | $ | 9,376 |
| $ | 9,080 |
| $ | 296 |
| $ | 3.26 |
| $ | 3.07 |
| $ | 0.19 |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, our net fuel hedge losses of $106 million included $30 million in gains for MTM adjustments. These MTM adjustments are based on market prices as of the end of the reporting period for contracts settling in future periods. Such market prices are not necessarily indicative of the actual future value of the underlying hedge in the contract settlement period. Therefore, we adjust fuel expense for these items to arrive at a more meaningful measure of fuel cost. Our average price per fuel gallon, adjusted (a non-GAAP financial measure as defined in "Supplemental Information" below), was $3.26 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Salaries and Related Costs. The increase in salaries and related costs is primarily due to employee pay increases, increases in pension expense and other benefits.
During the June 2012 quarter, we reached an agreement with ALPA that increases pay and benefits for our pilots. Our pilots and substantially all other employees received base pay increases on July 1, 2012 and will receive additional increases on January 1, 2013. These increases are designed both to recognize the upcoming change to the profit sharing program described below and to accelerate the planned 2013 pay increase for non-pilot employees.
Aircraft Maintenance Materials and Outside Repairs. Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs consists of costs associated with maintenance of aircraft used in our operations and maintenance sales to third parties by our MRO services business. The increase in maintenance costs is primarily due to the cyclical timing of maintenance events on our fleet, our acceleration of certain maintenance events into the September 2012 quarter resulting in a lower total cost for those activities as well as initiatives to improve our operational reliability.
Passenger Commissions and Other Selling Expenses. The decrease in passenger commissions and other selling expenses is primarily due to lower booking fees and international commission rates, partially offset by increases in sales.
Contracted Services. Contracted services expense improved year-over-year due primarily to the impact of severe winter storms on our operations in the March 2011 quarter.
Profit Sharing. Our broad based employee profit sharing program provides that, for each year in which we have an annual pre-tax profit, as defined by the terms of the program, we will pay a specified portion of that profit to employees. In determining the amount of profit sharing, the terms of the program specify the exclusion of special items, such as MTM adjustments and restructuring and other items, from pre-tax profit. During the June 2012 quarter, our profit sharing program was modified so that we will pay 10% of profits, on the first $2.5 billion of annual profits effective with the plan year beginning January 1, 2013 compared to paying 15% of annual profits for the 2012 plan year. Under the program, we will continue to pay 20% of annual profits above $2.5 billion.
Restructuring and Other Items. Due to the nature of amounts recorded within restructuring and other items, a year over year comparison is not meaningful. For a discussion of charges recorded in restructuring and other items, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-Operating Results
The following table shows the components of other expense, net:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Favorable (Unfavorable) | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | Favorable (Unfavorable) |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | | 2012 | 2011 |
Interest expense, net | $ | (195 | ) | $ | (229 | ) | $ | 34 |
| | $ | (623 | ) | $ | (683 | ) | $ | 60 |
|
Amortization of debt discount, net | (48 | ) | (48 | ) | — |
| | (148 | ) | (141 | ) | (7 | ) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt | (12 | ) | (5 | ) | (7 | ) | | (12 | ) | (38 | ) | 26 |
|
Foreign currency exchange | 5 |
| (30 | ) | 35 |
| | (11 | ) | (25 | ) | 14 |
|
Miscellaneous, net | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | | (16 | ) | (10 | ) | (6 | ) |
Total other expense, net | $ | (256 | ) | $ | (313 | ) | $ | 57 |
| | $ | (810 | ) | $ | (897 | ) | $ | 87 |
|
Income Taxes
The following table shows the components of our income tax (provision) benefit:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in millions) | 2012 | 2011 | | 2012 | 2011 |
International and state income tax provision | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (6 | ) |
Alternative minimum tax refunds and other | — |
| 6 |
| | — |
| 83 |
|
Income tax (provision) benefit | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 2 |
| | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 77 |
|
We consider all income sources, including other comprehensive income, in determining the amount of tax benefit allocated to continuing operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not record an income tax provision for U.S. federal income tax purposes since our deferred tax assets are fully reserved by a valuation allowance. For a discussion of our valuation allowance, see Note 9 to the Notes of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Operating Statistics
The following table sets forth our operating statistics:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
Consolidated(1) | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 |
Revenue passenger miles (millions) | 53,828 |
| 54,497 |
| 147,699 |
| 147,792 |
|
Available seat miles (millions) | 62,283 |
| 63,262 |
| 176,073 |
| 179,622 |
|
Passenger mile yield |
| 16.15 | ¢ |
| 15.72 | ¢ |
| 16.50 | ¢ |
| 15.59 | ¢ |
Passenger revenue per available seat mile |
| 13.96 | ¢ |
| 13.54 | ¢ |
| 13.84 | ¢ |
| 12.82 | ¢ |
Operating cost per available seat mile (CASM) |
| 13.83 | ¢ |
| 14.16 | ¢ |
| 14.91 | ¢ |
| 14.18 | ¢ |
CASM-Ex(2) |
| 8.55 | ¢ |
| 8.10 | ¢ |
| 8.85 | ¢ |
| 8.49 | ¢ |
Passenger load factor | 86.4 | % | 86.1 | % | 83.9 | % | 82.3 | % |
Fuel gallons consumed (millions) | 1,021 |
| 1,044 |
| 2,875 |
| 2,955 |
|
Average price per fuel gallon(3) | $ | 2.71 |
| $ | 3.29 |
| $ | 3.25 |
| $ | 3.14 |
|
Average price per fuel gallon, adjusted(2) | $ | 3.14 |
| $ | 3.09 |
| $ | 3.26 |
| $ | 3.07 |
|
Full-time equivalent employees, end of period | 76,626 |
| 79,709 |
| | |
| |
(1) | Includes the operations of our contract carriers under capacity purchase agreements. Full-time equivalent employees exclude employees of contract carriers that we do not own. |
| |
(2) | Non-GAAP financial measure as defined in "Supplemental Information" below. |
| |
(3) | Includes the impact of fuel hedge activity. |
Fleet Information
Our operating aircraft fleet, commitments, and options at September 30, 2012 are summarized in the following table:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current Fleet(1) | | Commitments(2) | |
Aircraft Type | Owned | Capital Lease | Operating Lease | Total | Average Age | | Purchase | Lease | Options |
B-717-200 | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | — |
| 88 |
| — |
|
B-737-700 | 10 |
| — |
| — |
| 10 |
| 3.7 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
B-737-800 | 73 |
| — |
| — |
| 73 |
| 11.7 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
B-737-900ER | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 100 |
| — |
| 30 |
|
B-747-400 | 4 |
| 9 |
| 3 |
| 16 |
| 18.9 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
B-757-200 | 86 |
| 36 |
| 33 |
| 155 |
| 19.2 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
B-757-300 | 16 |
| — |
| — |
| 16 |
| 9.6 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
B-767-300 | 10 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 15 |
| 21.5 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
B-767-300ER | 50 |
| 5 |
| 3 |
| 58 |
| 16.5 |
| | — |
| — |
| 4 |
|
B-767-400ER | 21 |
| — |
| — |
| 21 |
| 11.6 |
| | — |
| — |
| 6 |
|
B-777-200ER | 8 |
| — |
| — |
| 8 |
| 12.7 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
B-777-200LR | 10 |
| — |
| — |
| 10 |
| 3.5 |
| | — |
| — |
| 11 |
|
B-787-8 | — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| | 18 |
| — |
| — |
|
A319-100 | 55 |
| — |
| 2 |
| 57 |
| 10.7 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
A320-200 | 41 |
| — |
| 28 |
| 69 |
| 17.6 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
A330-200 | 11 |
| — |
| — |
| 11 |
| 7.5 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
A330-300 | 21 |
| — |
| — |
| 21 |
| 7.1 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
MD-88 | 67 |
| 50 |
| — |
| 117 |
| 22.2 |
| | — |
| — |
| — |
|
MD-90 | 41 |
| 8 |
| — |
| 49 |
| 15.5 |
| | 7 |
| — |
| — | |