mainbody.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-KSB
[X] |
ANNUAL
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
|
|
For the fiscal year
ended December
31, 2007 |
[X] |
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
|
|
|
|
For the transition
period from _________ to ________ |
|
|
|
|
|
Commission file
number 000-25911 |
Skinvisible,
Inc.
|
(Name
of small business issuer in its charter)
|
|
|
Nevada
|
88-0344219
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
6320 South Sandhill
Road Suite 10, Las Vegas, Nevada
|
89120
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
|
Issuer’s telephone
number: 702-433-7154 |
|
|
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
Title
of each class
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
None
|
Not
Applicable
|
|
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par
value $0.001
|
|
(Title
of class)
|
|
Check
whether the Issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes [X] No
[ ]
Check if
disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not
contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to
this Form 10-KSB [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
[ ] No [X]
State
issuer’s revenue for its most recent fiscal
year. $777,685
State the
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the average bid and asked price of such
common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days.
$6,361,259.03
as of April 11, 2008
State the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity,
as of the latest practicable date. 75,487,238 Common Shares as
of March 31, 2008.
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One): Yes
[ ] No [X]
|
|
Page
|
PART
I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I
We
develop innovative polymer delivery vehicles and related compositions that
hold active ingredients on the skin for up to four hours when applied
topically. We designed a process for combining water soluble and insoluble
polymers that is specifically formulated to carry water insoluble active
ingredients in water-based products without the use of alcohol, silicones,
waxes, or other organic solvents. This enables active agents the ability to
perform their intended functions for an extended period of time. Our polymer
delivery vehicles trademarked Invisicare® allow normal skin respiration and
perspiration. The polymer compositions we develop wear off as part of the
natural exfoliation process of the skin's outer layer cells.
Products
that successfully incorporate Invisicare to date include antimicrobial hand
sanitizer lotions, suncare products, skincare moisturizers, sunless tanning
products as well as various dermatology products for various skin
disorders. On an ongoing basis, we are seeking to develop polymer
formulations that can successfully be incorporated into other
products.
Our
primary objective is to license Invisicare to established brand
manufacturers and marketers of prescription and over-the-counter
products in the dermatological, medical, cosmetic, and skincare
markets. With the exception of sales to one vendor, our management’s policy is
to only sell Invisicare to vendors that have executed a license agreement with
us. We conduct our research and development in-house. We engage an outside party
that currently handles all of our manufacturing and distribution
needs.
Developments
in our Current Products and Agreements
Aside
from disclosures provided below, we have no developments to report in our
current product line or distribution agreements in place for those
products.
Patent
Developments
On
January 4, 2000, we filed a patent application for our antimicrobial dermal
barrier composition. We received patent approval (US Patent No. 6,582,683) for
our antimicrobial dermal barrier formulation in February 2003 and received the
patent certificate in June 2003.
We filed
a patent application on August 20, 2001 titled “Topical Compositions, Topical
Composition Precursors, and Methods for Manufacturing and Using” for our Invisicare®
topical compositions and our methodology for manufacturing and
utilization of numerous delivery systems and related applications. The United
States Patent and Trademark Office split this application into three different
applications as follows: (a) Methods of Manufacturing (b) Topical Compositions
and (c) Methods of Use. We received patent approval for the application on
Methods of Manufacturing (US Patent No. 6,756,059). However, as the Patent
approval of June 2003 already was covered on one of the polymer compositions
noted in the Methods of Manufacturing the Patent Office further split this
application into 2 distinct patents. Topical Compositions and Methods of Use are
pending.
We have
also filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) the Patent titled “Topical
Compositions, Topical Composition Precursors, and Methods for Manufacturing and
Using” for certain foreign countries. As of December 31, 2005, this patent
application is still pending.
In
addition to the United States patents currently pending on the core patent
technology, we have filed 6 more patents which cover product classes including
sunless tanning spray, sunless tanning lotion, sunscreens, chlorhexidine
antimicrobial hand lotion, anti-fungal and acne formulations..
During
the current reporting period, we have been granted a comprehensive patent in
India. The patent grants protection for our Invisicare product in the areas of
“Topical Composition,” “Topical Composition Precursor,” and “Methods for
Manufacturing and Using.” These key patent components now allow for the
protected manufacturing, marketing and distribution of our Invisicare technology
in India. We are also seeking patent protection for our dermatology products
formulated with Invisicare for India. Management believes that India, with a
population of over 1.1 billion people, will be a key market for our
company.
Trademarks
In
January 2002, we received trademark approval in the United States for the name
"Invisicare" to
identify our family of polymer delivery systems. We have filed this trade name
with the Cosmetic, Fragrance and Toiletries Association ("CFTA") as an
ingredient for use in skincare and cosmetic formulations.
We have
also applied and received trademark approval for the corporate logo “Skinvisible” and for our
sunless and sun tanning products under the name “Solerra” both in the US and
Canada.
We are
seeking to extend the protection of our trademarks in additional countries where
we currently conduct business and those additional countries where we intend to
conduct business.
Antibacterial/Antimicrobial
Hand Sanitizer Lotion
Last
quarter, we reported attempts to negotiate with JD Nelson to acquire rights from
us to distribute, market, sell, and promote our antimicrobial hand sanitizer
lotion that utilizes the active ingredient Triclosan 1% in every country in the
world except Canada, the United States, and Mexico. (JD Nelson currently has
rights to market and distribute our antimicrobial hand sanitizer lotion
composition in the United States of America, Canada and Mexico.) We offered to
JD Nelson these acquisition rights in exchange for $500,000 and a 10% royalty
payment. We extended the termination date of our offer to JD Nelson to acquire
these rights to August 31, 2007. As of the date of this report, no agreement
with JD Nelson has been reached. As such, we have abandoned
negotiations with JD Nelson and we are currently looking to establish
relationships with potential distributors in countries other than North
America. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to execute
any agreement with a potential distributor for these rights.
Sunless Tanning Spray
Product
On June
9, 2004, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc., entered
into a Trademark License Agreement and Distribution Agreement ("Distribution
Agreement") with Cross Global, Inc. ("Cross Global"), a Delaware corporation, to
grant Cross Global the exclusive right to distribute, market, sell, and promote
our proprietary sunless tanning spray products in Canada, the United States,
Mexico, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland,
Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Israel.
Cross Global is also utilizing our proprietary polymer formula to manufacture
nine additional sun care related products.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Distribution Agreement, Cross Global paid us the license fee
of $1,000,000. Under the terms of this agreement, we are to receive a minimum
royalty fee quarterly of not less than 5% of gross revenue of all sales of our
proprietary sunless tanning spray products or $25,000, whichever is greater. We
extended the minimum royalty payments terms on 3 different occasions in an
effort to accommodate and assist Cross Global in the early stage of their
operations. Despite our efforts, Cross Global remains delinquent for the minimum
payments due at the present time in the amount of $120,000. We have the ability
to terminate the Distribution Agreement as a result of this material breach upon
providing notice to Cross Global. Cross Global is prohibited under this
agreement from manufacturing, marketing, distributing, or selling any competing
product while the Distribution Agreement is in full force and
effect.
We have
negotiated a new agreement with Sunless Beauty Inc. (“Sunless Beauty”), a
company with the same shareholder base as Cross Global, which will replace the
existing agreement with Cross Global regarding this matter. The new agreement
releases and forever discharges Cross Global from the $120,000 delinquency and
requirement to pay a minimum royalty payment monthly. The new agreement offers
Sunless Beauty the exclusive right to utilize our proprietary polymer formula in
connection with the distribution, marketing, and sale of sunless tanning
products in the applicable territory, but only for use in their proprietary
product called Solerra Mitt, which is a sunless tanning mitt. They are required
to purchase the Invisicare exclusively form Skinvisible and pay a royalty of 5%
on Mitt sales within the territory. Further information on Sunless
Beauty and the sunless tanning products they sell can be obtained at www.solerra.com.
Acne
Formulation
On
January 30, 2008 , our wholly-owned subsidiary, Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., entered into a Trademark License Agreement and Distribution Agreement
("Distribution Agreement") with Panalab Internacional S.A. ("Panalab"). The
Agreement is for the right to develop and commercialize Skinvisible's
prescription anti-acne products formulated with adapalene and Invisicare® in
Argentina, Brazil and Chile.
Under the
terms of the agreement Panalab, a multi-national dermatology company
headquartered in Panama with subsidiaries and partners in most Latin American
countries, will be responsible for filing and obtaining marketing approval in
the countries they have licensed. While all terms of the agreement were not
disclosed, Skinvisible will receive a research and development fee
plus a
licensing fee allocated as an upfront fee plus milestone payments. In addition
the Company will receive royalties based on revenues generated by the sale of
the products. According to the agreement, Panalab will have the right to
manufacture, distribute, market, sell and promote the adapalene formulations in
the specified territory.
Sunscreen and Skin Care
Products
We
developed and successfully tested the application of Invisicare in sunscreen
products with SPF 15 and SPF 30, sunless tanning lotions, moisturizing creams,
aloe after-sun products, and other skin care products. We currently offer
Invisicare for incorporation into these products on a private label basis and
have multiple agreements in place.
During
the reporting period, we developed two additional sunscreen
products. One of the products utilizes the active ingredient
Parsol 1789. The other product utilizes the active ingredient
Tinasorb which has been approved for distribution in Europe, Japan, Australia
and recently Canada. Tinasorb has not yet have approval in the US.
Tinasorb is a broad spectrum UVA/UVB ingredient. The manufacturer of Tinasorb is
Ciba Chemicals. It is our intention to license out the distribution of both of
these formulas where approved.
Status
of Research and Development for New Applications
We
believe that the enhancement and extension of our existing products and the
development of new product categories have contributed significantly to our
growth to date and are necessary for our continued growth. Our management
evaluates new ideas and seeks to develop new products and improvements to
existing products to satisfy industry requirements and changing consumer
preferences. We seek to identify trends in consumer preferences and to generate
new product ideas. Specific to the objective of generating new products, we are
continuing our research and development toward developing additional
applications with Invisicare. We are currently at various development stages for
the following potential applications using Invisicare:
Skinvisible’s Formulas with
Invisicare: |
|
ACTIVE
INGREDIENT
|
TYPE
|
Availability
|
Patent
|
Acne
|
|
|
|
Adapalene
Cream (0.1% & 0.3%)
|
Rx
|
yes
|
pending
|
Adapalene
Gel (0.1% & 0.3%)
|
Rx
|
yes
|
pending
|
Clindamycin
Hydrochloride Cream (1%)
|
Rx
|
yes
|
pending
|
Retinoic
Acid Cream (0.1%)
|
Rx
|
yes
|
pending
|
Analgesics
|
|
|
|
Topical
Spray with Menthol (6% & 8%)
|
OTC
|
yes
|
technology
|
Topical
Roll-On with Menthol (6% & 8%)
|
OTC
|
yes
|
technology
|
Topical
Cream with Salicylate (10%)
|
OTC
|
yes
|
technology
|
Anti-Aging
|
|
|
|
Retinol
Cream & Lotion (0.15% )
|
Cosmetic
|
yes
|
technology
|
Retinol
Cream (0.3%)
|
Cosmetic
|
yes
|
technology
|
Anti-Fungal
|
|
|
|
Terbinafine
Cream, Gel (1%)
|
OTC
|
yes
|
pending
|
Naftifine
Cream (1%)
|
Rx
|
yes
|
pending
|
Clotrimazole
Cream (1%)
|
OTC
|
yes
|
pending
|
Anti-Inflammatory
|
|
|
|
Hydrocortisone
Cream (1%)
|
OTC
|
yes
|
technology
|
Triamcinolone
(1%)
|
Rx
|
yes
|
technology
|
Triamcinolone
Acetonide (1%)
|
Rx
|
yes
|
technology
|
Clobetasole
Proprionate (0.3%)
|
Rx
|
in-progress
|
technology
|
Betamethasone
(1%)
|
Rx
|
yes
|
technology
|
Antimicrobial
Hand Sanitizing Lotion
|
|
|
|
Triclosan
Lotion (1%) with Nonoxynol-9
|
OTC
|
yes*
|
granted
|
Triclosan
Lotion (1%) with Tomadol 901
|
OTC
|
yes*
|
granted
|
Benzalkonium
Chloride Lotion (0.13%)
|
OTC
|
yes*
|
granted
|
Chlorhexidine
Gluconate Lotion (4%)
|
OTC
/ NDA
|
in-progress
|
pending
|
Moisturizers
|
|
|
|
Non-Steroidal
Atopic Dermatitis Cream
|
Rx
/ Cosmetic
|
yes
|
technology
|
Skin
Protectant Lotion with Allantoin (0.5%)
|
OTC
|
yes
|
technology
|
Super
Moisturizer with Ectoin
|
Cosmetic
|
yes
|
technology
|
UVA
/ UVB Sunscreen
|
|
|
|
Parsol
1789 - SPF 30 Lotion
|
OTC
|
in-progress
|
pending
|
Tinosorb
S – SPF 30 Lotion
|
OTC
|
in-progress
|
pending
|
Other
Skin / Hair
|
|
|
|
Skin
Whitening, Hyperpigmentation
|
Cosmetic
|
in-progress
|
technology
|
Scar
Lotion with Onion Bulb
|
Cosmetic
|
yes
|
technology
|
Glycolic
Acid Cream (5% & 10%)
|
Cosmetic
|
yes
|
technology
|
Fragrance
– Long Lasting Gel
|
Cosmetic
|
yes
|
technology
|
*excludes North America
Competition
Our
primary business objective is to license our technology and formulated products
to manufacturers of Rx and OTC skincare products. Market research
undertaken to date has indicated that, at present, there is reasonably limited
competition for our polymer-based delivery systems and related technologies such
as delivery vehicles and technologies that offer the same performance
capabilities for topically administered products.
Research and Development
Expenditures
We
incurred research and development expenditures in the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007 of $20,291 and $172,674 for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006.
Existing
and Probable Governmental Regulation
We are
not subject to any significant or material federal or state government
regulation in connection with the research and development and licensing of our
innovative topical polymer-based delivery systems and technologies.
With
respect to our products under development, our licensing agreements require the
licensee to seek all required approvals for marketing, distribution, and sale in
the jurisdictions for which it is desired to make the product available should
we succeed in developing a successful product.
We are
not subject to any significant or material environmental regulation in the
normal operation of our business.
Compliance
with Environmental Laws
We did
not incur any costs in connection with the compliance with any federal, state,
or local environmental laws.
Employees
We
currently have 5 total employees, including our sole executive officer, and all
are full-time employees.
Currently,
we do not own any real estate. We are leasing our executive offices and research
facility. We are located at 6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas,
Nevada 89120.
Skinvisible
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., our wholly owed subsidiary, owns the manufacturing and
laboratory equipment at this location.
We are
not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending
legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial
holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a
material interest adverse to us.
No
matters have been submitted to our security holders for a vote, through the
solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007.
PART II
Market
Information
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), which is
sponsored by the NASD. The OTCBB is a network of security dealers who
buy and sell stock. The dealers are connected by a computer network
that provides information on current "bids" and "asks", as well as volume
information. Our shares are quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol
“SKVI.”
The
following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations for our
common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by the
OTCBB. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual
transactions.
Fiscal
Year Ending December 31, 2007
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
High
$
|
|
Low
$
|
March
31, 2007
|
|
0.25
|
|
0.23
|
June
30, 2007
|
|
0.35
|
|
0.20
|
September
30, 2007
|
|
0.32
|
|
0.18
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
0.30
|
|
0.13
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
High
$
|
|
Low
$
|
March
31, 2006
|
|
0.72
|
|
0.18
|
June
30, 2006
|
|
0.62
|
|
0.362
|
September
30, 2006
|
|
0.37
|
|
0.30
|
December
31, 2006
|
|
0.75
|
|
0.24
|
Penny
Stock
The SEC
has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with
transactions
in penny
stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a market price of less
than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities
exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume
information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the
exchange or system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a
transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document
prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of
risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary
trading; (b) contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the
customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect
to a violation of such duties or other requirements of the securities laws; (c)
contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid
and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the
bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on
disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document
or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other
information and is in such form, including language, type size and format, as
the SEC shall require by rule or regulation.
The
broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny
stock, the customer with (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b)
the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction;
(c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other
comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for
such stock; and (d) a monthly account statement showing the market value of each
penny stock held in the customer's account.
In
addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny
stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a
special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for
the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgment of the receipt
of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement as to transactions involving
penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability
statement.
These
disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity for
our common stock. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling our
securities.
Holders
of Our Common Stock
As of
March 31, 2008, we had approximately one hundred eighty-four (184) holders of
record of our common stock and several hundred other stockholders who hold
shares in street name.
Dividends
There are
no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that restrict us from
declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from
declaring dividends where, after giving effect to the distribution of the
dividend:
|
1.
|
We
would not be able to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course
of business; or
|
|
2.
|
Our
total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities, plus the
amount that would be needed to satisfy the rights of shareholders who have
preferential rights superior to those receiving the
distribution.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
The
information set forth below relates to our issuances of securities without
registration under the Securities Act of 1933 during the reporting period which
were not previously included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB or Current
Report on Form 8-K.
On
October 19, 2007, we entered into a loan conversion agreement at a rate of $0.15
per share with five shareholders, converting total principal debt balances of
$129,450 into 863,000 restricted shares of our common stock. These shares were
issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The shareholders
represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and
not with a view towards distribution. The shareholders were given adequate
information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage
in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to
issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to
the restricted stock.
On
November 27, 2007, entered into debt conversion agreements at a rate of $0.10
per share with four shareholders, converting total principal debt balances of
$229,000 into 2,290,000 restricted shares of our common stock. These shares were
issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. The shareholders
represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and
not with a view towards distribution. The shareholders were given adequate
information about us to make an informed investment decision. We did not engage
in any general solicitation or advertising. We directed our transfer agent to
issue the stock certificates with the appropriate restrictive legend affixed to
the restricted stock.
On
November 30, 2007, one shareholder exercised warrants to purchase 210,000 shares
at a price of $0.05 per share. These shares were issued pursuant to the terms of
the Company’s applicable Private Offering Memorandum dated September 30,
2002.
On
October 11, 2007, we granted options to purchase 200,000 shares of our common
stock, exercisable at $0.20 per share for a period of 5 years from the date of
issuance, to shareholder Dr. George Korkos in exchange for consulting services
to be rendered. These options were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act. We did not engage in any general solicitation or
advertising.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The
following table provides information about our compensation plans under which
shares of common stock may be issued upon the exercise of options as of December
31, 2007.
In July
2006, we adopted the 2006 Skinvisible, Inc. Stock Option Plan, which provides
for the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted
stock,
performance shares and performance units, and stock awards our officers,
directors or employees of, as well as advisers and consultants. This plan was
confirmed by our stockholders on August 7, 2006 at the annual shareholders
meeting.
Under the
2006 Skinvisible, Inc. Stock Option Plan, we reserved 10,000,000 shares of
common stock for the granting of options and rights.
Equity
Compensation Plans as of December 31, 2007
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
Plan
Category
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and right
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(A))
|
Equity
compensation plans
approved
by security
holders
|
4,345,000
|
0.24
|
5,655,000
|
Equity
compensation plans
not
approved by security
holders
|
4,210,000
|
0.0785
|
-
|
Total
|
8,555,000
|
$0.16
|
5,655,000
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
Certain
statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates,
projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected
operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based,
are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified
by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,”
“intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will
continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend
such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with
those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on
current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties
which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking
statements. Our ability to predict results or
the
actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently
uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our
operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not
limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes,
availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally
accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be
considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should
not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or
revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. Further information
concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially
affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings
with the SEC.
Results
of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Revenues
Our total
revenue reported for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $777,685, a 12.47%
increase from $691,452for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
increase in revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year is
attributable to increased sales of polymers to our licensees. During the year
ending 2006 we sold finished product formulations with the polymers incorporated
into the finished formulas. We no longer supply finished product formulas as our
licensees now manufacture themselves.
Cost
of Revenues
Our cost
of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased to $140,875 from the
prior year when cost of revenues was $77,465. The increase in our cost of
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year is
attributable to a shift in our business during the reporting period where we
primarily sold the polymers and not completed formulated products that
incorporate the polymers.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $636,810, or approximately 82%
of sales. Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $613,987, or
approximately 89% of sales. The increase in total gross profit for the
for year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year is attributable
to higher sales of polymers and increased revenue generated from
royalties.
Operating
Expenses
Operating
expenses decreased to $2,001,955 for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$2,710,840 for the year ended December 31, 2006. Our operating expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2007 consisted of depreciation and amortization expenses
of $18,176 and selling, stock based compensation of $475,006 and general and
administrative expenses of $1,508,773. Our operating expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2006 consisted of depreciation and amortization expenses of
$21,187, stock based compensation of $859,160 and selling, general
and
administrative expenses of $1,830,493. The decrease in operating
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year is primarily
attributable to not manufacturing finished product formulas and only selling
polymers.
Net
Loss
Net loss
for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $1,606,922, compared to net loss of
$2,097,604 for the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease in our net loss
was primarily attributable to not manufacturing finished product formulas and
only selling polymers.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
December 31, 2007, we had total current assets of $425,528 and total assets in
the amount of $712,841. Our total current liabilities as of December 31, 2007
were $1,069,805. We had a working capital deficit of $644,277 as of
December 31, 2007.
Operating
activities used $743,872 in cash for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our net
loss of $1,606,922 was the primary component of our negative operating cash
flow. Cash flows used by investing activities during the year ended December 31,
2007 was $4,662. Cash flows provided by financing activities during
the year ended December 31, 2007 consisted of $153,132 as proceeds from related
party loans, $410,500 as proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes
payable, and $198,000 as proceeds from the issuance of common
stock.
Based
upon our current financial condition, we do not have insufficient cash to
operate our business at the current level for the next twelve months. We intend
to fund operations through increased sales and debt and/or equity financing
arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund expenditures or other cash
requirements. We plan to seek additional financing in a private equity offering
to secure funding for operations. There can be no assurance that we will be
successful in raising additional funding. If we are not able to secure
additional funding, the implementation of our business plan will be impaired.
There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us
on acceptable terms or at all.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
December 31, 2007, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities
in the normal course of business. We have incurred cumulative net losses of
approximately $15,296,848 since our inception
and require capital for our contemplated operational and marketing activities to
take place. Our ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances
of the common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the
successful development of our contemplated plan of operations, and our
transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary
for us to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these
factors
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result
from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In
December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their three to five
most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis.
The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both
important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and
requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as
a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain. We believe that the following accounting policies fit this
definition.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenues
are recognized during the period in which the revenues are earned. Costs and
expenses are recognized during the period in which they are
incurred.
Fixed
Assets
Fixed
assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is
provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets, which are generally 3 to 10 years. The cost of repairs and
maintenance is charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for property
betterments and renewals are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition of a
depreciable asset, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in other income
(expense).
We
periodically evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that may
warrant revision of the estimated useful life of fixed assets or whether the
remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment.
We use an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining
life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverability.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Beginning
January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. According to this statement,
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to
amortization, but rather an annual assessment of impairment by applying a
fair-value based test. Fair value for goodwill is based on discounted cash
flows, market multiples and/or appraised values as appropriate. Under SFAS No.
142, the carrying value of assets are calculated at the lowest level for which
there are identifiable cash flows.
SFAS 142
requires us to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying
amount on an annual basis to determine if there is potential impairment. If the
fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment
loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the
goodwill
within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Upon adoption and
during 2002, we completed an impairment review and did not recognize any
impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets already included in the
financial statements. We expect to receive future benefits from previously
acquired goodwill over an indefinite period of time. Accordingly, beginning
January 1, 2002, we have foregone all related amortization expense. Prior to
January 1, 2002, we amortized goodwill over an estimated useful life ranging
from 3 to 15 years using the straight-line method.
Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value
Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosure about fair values. This statement is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management
believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on
our consolidated financial results.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)" (FAS 158). FAS 158 requires that
employers recognize the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other
postretirement plans on the balance sheet and recognize as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of tax, the plan-related gains or losses and prior
service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as
components of net periodic benefit cost. We will prospectively adopt FAS 158 on
April 30, 2007. Management believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 158
will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial results of the
Company.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159 become effective as of the beginning of
our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will
have on our financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 which applies to
all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except
not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an
outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that
deconsolidate a subsidiary. The statement is effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2008.
At
December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any derivative instruments or
hedging activities. Management is aware of the requirements of SFAS 161 and will
disclose when appropriate.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” (SFAS “161”)
as amended and interpreted, which requires enhanced disclosures about an
entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the transparency
of financial reporting. Disclosing the fair values of derivative
instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format provides a more
complete picture of the location in an entity’s financial statements of both the
derivative positions existing at period end and the effect of using derivatives
during the reporting period. Entities are required to provide
enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. Early adoption is
permitted.
Index to
Financial Statements:
Audited
Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SARNA &
COMPANY
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certified
Public
Accountants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310
N. Westlake
Boulevard
Suite 270
|
Westlake
Village
California
91362
|
805
371-8900
Fax
805
379-0140
|
To the
Board of Directors
Skinvisible,
Inc.
Las
Vegas, Nevada
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Skinvisible, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Skinvisible, Inc. as of
December 31, 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and cash flows
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial
statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. Absent
the successful completion of one of these alternatives, the Company’s operating
results will increasingly become uncertain. The financial statements
do not contain any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
/s/Sarna & Company
Sarna
& Company
April 10,
2008
Westlake
Village, California
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
(AUDITED)
ASSETS
|
December
31, 2007
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
Cash
|
$ |
63,168 |
Accounts
receivable
|
|
42,088 |
Inventory
|
|
20,455 |
Due
from related party
|
|
1,196 |
Financing
cost, net of accumulated amortization of $344
|
|
53,484 |
Prepaid
royalty fees - current portion
|
|
240,000 |
Prepaid
expense and other current assets
|
|
5,137 |
Total
current assets
|
|
425,528 |
|
|
|
Fixed
assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $317,657
|
|
22,440 |
|
|
|
Intangible
and other assets
|
|
|
Patents
and trademarks, net of accumulated amortization of $40,021
|
|
34,873 |
License
and distributor rights
|
|
50,000 |
Prepaid
royalty fees - long term portion
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$ |
712,841 |
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ |
479,554 |
Accrued
interest payable
|
|
6,948 |
Loans
from related party
|
|
78,860 |
Convertible
notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount of $95,557
|
|
54,443 |
Unearned
revenue
|
|
450,000 |
Total
current liabilities
|
|
1,069,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
1,069,805 |
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
Stockholders'
deficit
|
|
|
Common
stock; $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares 70,739,248 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
70,739 |
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
14,869,145 |
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
(15,296,848) |
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
|
(356,964) |
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$ |
712,841 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
|
For
the year ended December 31,
2007
|
|
For
the year ended
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$ |
777,685 |
|
$ |
691,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenues
|
|
140,875 |
|
|
77,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
636,810 |
|
|
613,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
18,176 |
|
|
21,187 |
Stock
based compensation
|
|
475,006 |
|
|
859,160 |
Selling
general and administrative
|
|
1,508,773 |
|
|
1,830,493 |
Total
operating expenses
|
|
2,001,955 |
|
|
2,710,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
|
(1,365,145) |
|
|
(2,096,853) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense)
|
|
-- |
|
|
192 |
Interest
expense
|
|
(241,777) |
|
|
(943) |
Total
other income (expense)
|
|
(241,777) |
|
|
(751) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$ |
(1,606,922) |
|
$ |
(2,097,604) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
loss per common share
|
$ |
(0.02) |
|
$ |
(0.03) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
66,150,436 |
|
|
61,925,163 |
See
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
Common
Stock
Shares
Amount
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Stock
Subscription
Receivable
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Stockholders'
Equity
(Deficit)
|
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
58,225,248 |
|
$ |
58,225 |
|
$ |
11,486,002 |
|
$ |
134,873 |
|
|
|
$ |
(11,592,322) |
|
$ |
86,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.15 per share
|
3,415,000 |
|
|
3,415 |
|
|
508,708 |
|
|
(134,873) |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
377,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.03 per share
|
50,000 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.05 per share
|
75,000 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for services, $0.05 per share
|
50,000 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.08 per share
|
75,000 |
|
|
75 |
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.10 per share
|
112,500 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
11,137 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
11,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.18 per share
|
110,000 |
|
|
110 |
|
|
19,690 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
19,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.20 per share
|
915,000 |
|
|
915 |
|
|
182,056 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
182,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock options for services
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
643,051 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
643,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock options to employees and directors
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
120,131 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
120,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock options for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,002 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
73,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for debt , $ 0.25 per share
|
20,000 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
4,980 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for debt , $ 0.25 per share
|
56,000 |
|
|
56 |
|
|
13,944 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.20 share
|
1,340,000 |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
266,660 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
268,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock options for services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,995 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
8,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock option to employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
11,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect
of foreign currency translation
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
|
(2,097,604) |
|
|
(2,097,604) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
64,443,748 |
|
|
64,444 |
|
|
13,363,317 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(13,689,926) |
|
|
(262,165) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for cash, $0.20 per share
|
775,000 |
|
|
775 |
|
|
154,225 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for services, $0.20 per share
|
242,500 |
|
|
242 |
|
|
50,758 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
51,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock upon exercise of options for cash, $0.10 per
share
|
300,000 |
|
|
300 |
|
|
29,700 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return
of stock for accounts receivable
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(48,931) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(48,931) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of 150,000 shares of treasury stock for services, $0.25 per
share
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(11,431) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
48,931 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock upon exercise of options for accounts payable, $0.05 per
share
|
200,000 |
|
|
200 |
|
|
9,800 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for accounts payable, $0.10 per share
|
130,000 |
|
|
130 |
|
|
12,870 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for accounts payable $0.20 share
|
70,000 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
13,930 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock upon exercise of options for cash, $0.05 per
share
|
260,000 |
|
|
260 |
|
|
12,740 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for services, $0.10 per share
|
160,000 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
15,840 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock upon exercise of warrants in lieu of debt, $0.05 per
share
|
500,000 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
24,500 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock in lieu of debt, $0.10 per share
|
750,000 |
|
|
750 |
|
|
74,250 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for conversion of loan, $0.10 per share
|
250,000 |
|
|
250 |
|
|
24,750 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock upon exercise of warrants for conversion of loan, $0.10 per
share
|
210,000 |
|
|
210 |
|
|
10,290 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
10,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for conversion of loan, $0.15 per share
|
863,000 |
|
|
863 |
|
|
128,587 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
129,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for conversion of loan, $0.20 per share
|
500,000 |
|
|
500 |
|
|
99,500 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for services, $0.25 per share
|
20,000 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
4,980 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for accounts payable, $0.25 per share
|
40,000 |
|
|
40 |
|
|
9,960 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for donation, $0.20 per share
|
25,000 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
4,975 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock for salaries owed, $0.10 per share
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
99,000 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
Conversion feature related to convertible notes
payable
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
311,655 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
311,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
costs related to convertible notes payable
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
54,443 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
54,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting
of employee stock options
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
78,441 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
78,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of stock options for services
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
292,065 |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
292,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
|
|
(1,606,922) |
|
|
(1,606,922) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
70,739,248 |
|
$ |
70,739 |
|
|
14,869,145 |
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ |
(15,296,848) |
|
$ |
(356,964) |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
For
the year ended
December
31, 2007
|
|
For
the year ended
December
31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$ |
(1,606,922) |
|
$ |
(2,097,604) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash
used by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
18,176 |
|
|
21,187 |
Stock
based compensation
|
|
475,006 |
|
|
859,160 |
Stock
issued for donation
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
-- |
Interest
expense related to beneficial conversion feature
|
|
217,056 |
|
|
943 |
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
in inventory
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
50,892 |
Increase
in accounts receivable
|
|
(37,207) |
|
|
99,177 |
Decrease
in prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
13,324 |
|
|
2,883 |
Increase
in related party receivable
|
|
(77) |
|
|
-- |
Decrease
in prepaid royalty fees
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
240,000 |
Increase
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
317,927 |
|
|
113,322 |
Increase
in accrued interest
|
|
11,398 |
|
|
-- |
Decrease
in unearned revenue
|
|
(400,000) |
|
|
(153,000) |
Net
cash provided (used) by operating activities
|
|
(743,872) |
|
|
(863,040) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of fixed assets and untangible assets
|
|
(4,662) |
|
|
(13,847) |
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
|
(4,662) |
|
|
(13,847) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from related party loans
|
|
153,132 |
|
|
25,728 |
Proceeds
from convertible notes payable
|
|
410,500 |
|
|
-- |
proceeds
from stock subscription payable
|
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
|
198,000 |
|
|
870,500 |
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
761,632 |
|
|
896,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash
|
|
13,098 |
|
|
19,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
beginning of period
|
|
50,070 |
|
|
30,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash,
end of period
|
$ |
63,168 |
|
$ |
50,070 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
(AUDITED)
1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF
BUSINESS, HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
POLICIES
|
Description of business
- Skinvisible, Inc., (referred to as the “Company”) is focused on the
development and manufacture of innovative topical polymer-based delivery system
technologies and formulations incorporating its patent-pending formula/process
for combining hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymer emulsions. The technologies
and formulations have broad industry applications within the pharmaceutical,
over-the-counter, personal skincare and cosmetic arenas. The Company’s
antibacterial/antimicrobial hand sanitizer formulations, available for private
label commercialization opportunities, offer skincare solutions for the
healthcare, food service, industrial, cosmetic and salon industries, as well as
for personal use in the retail marketplace. The Company maintains manufacturing,
executive and sales offices in Las Vegas, Nevada.
History -
Skinvisible, Inc. ( referred to as the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on
March 6, 1998 under the name of Microbial Solutions, Inc. The Company underwent
a name change on February 26, 1999, when it changed its name to Skinvisible,
Inc. The Company’s subsidiary’s name of Manloe Labs, Inc. was also changed to
Skinvisible Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Skinvisible,
Inc. together with its subsidiary shall herein be collectively referred to as
the “Company”.
Going concern - The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities
in the normal course of business. The Company has incurred cumulative net losses
of $15,296,848 since its inception and requires capital for its contemplated
operational and marketing activities to take place. The Company’s ability to
raise additional capital through the future issuances of common stock is
unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of
the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately,
to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to
continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any
adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned
uncertainties.
Principles of consolidation
- The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
Definition of fiscal year
- The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.
Use of estimates -
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Revenue
recognition
Product sales -
Revenues from the sale of products are recognized when title to the products are
transferred to the customer and only when no further contingencies or material
performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to
receive reasonably assured payments for products sold and
delivered.
Royalty sales – The
Company also recognizes royalty revenue from licensing its patent and
trademarks, only when earned, with no further contingencies or material
performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to
receive and retain reasonably assured payments.
Distribution and license
rights sales – The Company also recognizes revenue from distribution and
license rights only when earned, with no further contingencies or material
performance obligations are warranted, and thereby have earned the right to
receive and retain reasonably assured payments.
Costs of
Revenue – Cost of revenue
includes raw materials, component parts, and shipping supplies. Shipping and
handling costs is not a significant portion of the cost of
revenue.
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
1.
DESCRIPTION OF
BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES (continued)
Accounts Receivable –
Accounts receivable is comprised of uncollateralized customer obligations
due under normal trade terms requiring payment within 30 days from the invoice
date. The carrying amount of accounts receivable is reviewed
periodically for collectability. If management determines that
collection is unlikely, an allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of
the amounts that will not be collected is recorded. Management
reviews each accounts receivable balance that exceeds 30 days from the invoice
date and, based on an assessment of creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if
any, of the balance that will not be collected. At December 31, 2007
the Company did not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts.
Inventory -
Substantially all inventory consist of finished goods and are valued based upon
first-in first-out ("FIFO") cost, not in excess of market. The determination of
whether the carrying amount of inventory requires a write-down is based on an
evaluation of inventory.
Fixed assets - Fixed
assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is
provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets, which are generally 3 to 10 years. The cost of repairs and
maintenance is charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for property
betterments and renewals are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition of a
depreciable asset, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in other income
(expense).
The
Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred
that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life of fixed assets or
whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible
impairment. The Company uses an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows
over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their
recoverability.
Goodwill and intangible
assets - Beginning January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets”. According to this statement, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization, but rather an annual
assessment of impairment by applying a fair-value based test. Fair value for
goodwill is based on discounted cash flows, market multiples and/or appraised
values as appropriate. Under SFAS No. 142, the carrying value of assets are
calculated at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash
flows.
SFAS 142
requires the Company to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its
carrying amount on an annual basis to determine if there is potential
impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying
value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the fair value of the
goodwill within the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Upon
adoption and during 2002, the Company completed an impairment review and did not
recognize any impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets already
included in the financial statements. The Company expects to receive future
benefits from previously acquired goodwill over an indefinite period of time.
Accordingly, beginning January 1, 2002, the Company has foregone all related
amortization expense. Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company amortized goodwill
over an estimated useful life ranging from 3 to 15 years using the straight-line
method.
Fair value of financial
instruments - Financial accounting standards Statement No. 107,
“Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, requires the Company to
disclose, when reasonably attainable, the fair market values of its assets and
liabilities which are deemed to be financial instruments. The carrying amounts
and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments approximate
their fair value due to the short-term nature.
Income taxes - The
Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets
and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date.
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF
BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES
(continued)
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
- The Company has no components of other comprehensive income.
Accordingly, net loss equals comprehensive loss for all periods.
Segment information -
The Company discloses segment information in accordance with Statements of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information,” which uses the Management approach to
determine reportable segments. The Company operates under one
segment.
Advertising costs -
Advertising costs incurred in the normal course of operations are expensed as
incurred. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company
incurred advertising costs totaling $58,233 and $87,741,
respectively.
Research and development
costs - Research and development costs are charged to expense when
incurred. Costs incurred to internally develop the product, including costs
incurred during all phases of development, are charged to expense as
incurred.
Expenses of offering
- The Company accounts for specific incremental costs directly to a
proposed or actual offering of securities as a direct charge against the gross
proceeds of the offering.
Stock-based compensation
- On January 1, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (R) “Share-Based
Payment” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense
for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including
employee stock options and employee stock purchases related to a Employee Stock
Purchase Plan based on the estimated fair values.
The
Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective transition
method, which required the application of the accounting standard as of January
1, 2005. The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2007 reflect the impact of SFAS No.
123(R). In accordance with the modified prospective transition
method, the Company’s accompanying consolidated financial statements for the
prior periods have not been restated, and do not include the impact of SFAS No.
123(R). Stock based compensation expense recognized under SFAS No.
123(R) for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 totaled
$475,006 and $974,902, respectively.
Earnings (loss) per
share - The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with
SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed
by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is
computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator
is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have
been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the
additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has
not been presented since the effect of the assumed exercise of options and
warrants to purchase common shares (common stock equivalents) would have an
anti-dilutive effect. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
common stock equivalent shares excluded from the earnings (loss) per share
calculations totaled 8,472,500 and 7,230,000, respectively.
Recent accounting
pronouncements - In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair
Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
and expands disclosure about fair values. This statement is effective
for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Management
believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on
the consolidated financial results of the Company.
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF
BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES
(continued)
|
Recent accounting
pronouncements (continued)
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 158, "Employer's Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)" (FAS 158). FAS 158 requires that
employers recognize the funded status of their defined benefit pension and other
postretirement plans on the balance sheet and recognize as a component of other
comprehensive income, net of tax, the plan-related gains or losses and prior
service costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as
components of net periodic benefit cost. We will prospectively adopt FAS 158 on
April 30, 2007. Management believes that the adoption of SFAS No. 158 will not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial results of the
Company.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115" (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits companies to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value and establishes presentation and
disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and
liabilities. The provisions of FAS 159 become effective as of the beginning of
our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the impact that FAS 159 will
have on our financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 160, Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51 which applies to
all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except
not-for-profit organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an
outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that
deconsolidate a subsidiary. The statement is effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2008.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,”
(SFAS “161”) as amended and interpreted, which requires enhanced disclosures
about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the
transparency of financial reporting. Disclosing the fair values of
derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format provides a
more complete picture of the location in an entity’s financial statements of
both the derivative positions existing at period end and the effect of using
derivatives during the reporting period. Entities are required to provide
enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods
beginning after November 15, 2008. Early adoption
is permitted.
At
December 31, 2007, the Company did not have any derivative instruments or
hedging activities. Management is aware of the requirements
of SFAS 161 and will disclose when appropriate.
Reclassification –
The financial statements from 2006 reflect certain reclassifications, which will
have no effect on net income, to conform to classifications in the current
year.
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
2.
FIXED
ASSETS
Fixed
assets consist of the following as of December 31, 2007:
Machinery
and equipment
|
$ |
55,463 |
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
113,635 |
Computers, equipment
and software |
|
42,484 |
Leasehold
improvements |
|
12,569 |
Lab
equipment |
|
115,946 |
|
|
340,097 |
Less: accumulated
depreciation |
|
317,657 |
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net of
accumulated depreciation |
$ |
22,440 |
Depreciation
expense for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $7,023 and $10,343,
respectively.
3. INTANGIBLE AND OTHER ASSETS
Patents
and trademarks are capitalized at its historical cost and are amortized over
their useful lives. As of December 31, 2007, patents and trademarks total
$74,894, and amortization expense for 2007 and 2006 were $10,963 and
$10,219, respectivley.
License
and distributor rights (“agreement”) was acquired by the Company in January 1999
and provides exclusive use distribution of polymers and polymer based products.
The Company has a non-expiring term on the license and distribution rights.
Accordingly, the Company annually assesses this license and distribution rights
for impairment and has determined that no impairment write-down is considered
necessary as of December 31, 2007.
Future
amortization expense for patents and trademarks as of December 31, 2007 are as
follows:
2008 |
$ |
11,256 |
2009
|
|
11,256 |
2010
|
|
3,223 |
2011
|
|
3,223 |
2012
|
|
3,223 |
Prepaid
royalties fees are amounts prepaid by the Company related to the license and
distributor rights. The future royalties payments required by the Company total
$2,000,000. The royalties fees are to be paid at the equal to the greater of (a)
$6,000 per month; or (b) 1.5% of net revenues realized by the sale of the
associated polymer products subject to a cap of $2,000,000. The Company will
make payments of $6,000 per month, and by a payment on any royalties in excess
of $72,000 in each year payable on an annual basis calculated within 60 days of
each anniversary date of the agreement. The future royalties payments are to be
amortized over eight years, which is the life of the agreement. As of
December 31, 2007, the Company has paid a total of $1,880,000 of
which $1,220,000 has been expensed and $420,000 has been recorded as prepaid
royalties the Company will expense the prepayment in the future in accordance to
the terms of the agreement. The remaining future royalties payments related to
the agreement approximates $120,000.
|
Unearned
revenue totaling $450,000 as of December 31, 2007 relates to two marketing
and distribution rights agreements entered into during 2004 for which
monies were received and not considered earned. (See Note 7 for further
discussion.)
|
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
5. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED
LIABILITIES
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following as of December 31,
2007:
Accounts payable
|
$ |
256,695 |
Credit
card payable
|
|
106,338 |
Accrued officers
salary payables |
|
105,453 |
Accrued
payroll taxes
|
|
9,848 |
Other accrued expenses
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
479,554 |
6.
|
STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANTS
|
Stock options employees and
directors – During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the
Company granted stock options to employees and directors
totaling 2,075,000 and 7,292,525 shares of its common
stock with a weighted average strike price of $0.24 and $0.13 per share,
respectively. Certain stock options were exercisable upon grant and have a life
ranging from 3 months to 5 years. The stock options have been valued at $221,867
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based upon the following
assumptions: term of 5 years, risk free interest rates ranging from
3.5% to 4.5%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility rates ranging from 178 % to
184%. The vesting periods range from 1 year to 3
years. The Company has recorded an expense of $78,441 for
the year ended December 31, 2007 based upon the vested portion of the stock
options totaling 691,667 up through December 31, 2007.
Stock options non-employees
and directors – During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the
Company granted stock options for services totaling 637,500 and
670,000 shares of its common stock with a weighted average strike
price of $0.25 and $0.30 per share, respectively. Certain stock options were
exercisable upon grant and have a life ranging from 3 months to 5 years. The
stock options have been valued at $292,065 using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model based upon the following assumptions: term of 5
years, risk free interest rates ranging from 3.5% to 4.5%, a dividend
yield of 0% and volatility rates ranging from 120% to
139%.
The
following is a summary of option activity during the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
2,825,000 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
Options granted and assumed
|
7,292,525 |
|
|
0.13 |
Options expired
|
5,817,525 |
|
|
-- |
Options canceled
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
Options exercised
|
100,000 |
|
|
0.05 |
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
4,200,000 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
Options granted and assumed
|
2,075,000 |
|
|
0.24 |
Options expired
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
Options canceled
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
Options exercised
|
760,000 |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
5,515,000 |
|
$ |
.17 |
As of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, 4,031,500 and 2,671,667 stock options, respectively,
are exercisable.
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
6.
|
STOCK OPTIONS AND
WARRANTS (continued)
|
Stock warrants
-
The
following is a summary of warrants activity during the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
7,162,000 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
Warrants granted and assumed
|
670,000 |
|
|
0.30 |
Warrants expired
|
4,802,000 |
|
|
0.20 |
Warrants canceled
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
Warrants exercised
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
3,030,000 |
|
$ |
0.11 |
Warrants granted and assumed
|
1,911,500 |
|
|
0.25 |
Warrants expired
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
Warrants canceled
|
-- |
|
|
-- |
Warrants exercised
|
710,000 |
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
4,231,500 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
All
warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are
exercisable.
7. INCOME
TAXES
At
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had a federal operating loss
carryforward of approximately $6,220,500 and $4,470,500, respectively, which
begins to expire in 2018.
Components
of net deferred tax assets, including a valuation allowance, are as follows at
December 31:
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
Net
operating loss carryforward
|
$ |
2,177,187 |
|
$ |
1,564,674 |
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
168,877 |
|
|
296,687 |
Total
deferred tax assets
|
|
2,346,064 |
|
|
1,861,361 |
Less:
Valuation Allowance
|
|
(2,346,064) |
|
|
(1,861,361) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Deferred Tax Assets
|
$ |
-- |
|
$ |
-- |
The
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 was
$2,346,064 and $1,861,361, respectively. In assessing the recovery of
the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers
the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. As a result, management determined it was more likely
than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of December 31, 2007
and 2006, and recorded a full valuation allowance.
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
7. INCOME TAXES
(continued)
Reconciliation
between the statutory rate and the effective tax rate for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
statutory tax rate
|
(35.0)%
|
|
(35.0)%
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
35.0%
|
|
35.0%
|
|
|
|
|
Effective
tax rate
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
8.
LETTER OF INTENT AND
DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT
In March
2004, the Company entered into a letter of intent (“LOI”) with Dermal Defense,
Inc. for the exclusive marketing and distribution rights to its patented
Antimicrobial Hand Sanitizer product for North America. Terms of the LOI require
Dermal Defense, Inc. to pay a fee of $1 million comprising of a non-refundable
deposit of $250,000 with the balance of $750,000 payable as to $75,000 per
calendar quarter or 5% of product sales (whichever is greater) until the entire
$750,000 is received. The $1 million fee will be recognized as revenue ratably
over a five year period. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has received
$1,000,000 and has reflected $200,000 as unearned revenue and $800,000 as
revenue on cumulative basis of which $200,000 has been recorded as revenue for
both years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. In addition and further to the
payment fee of $1 million, Dermal Defense, Inc. agrees to pay a royalty fee of
5% on product sales of the Antimicrobial Hand Sanitizer.
In June
2004, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Cross Global, Inc.
(“Cross Global”) whereby, the Company would provide exclusive marketing and
distribution rights to its proprietary "Sunless Tanning Spray Formulation" for
Canada, the United States, Mexico, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain,
Sweden, United Kingdom and Israel. In addition CGI is granted the right to use
the name "Solerra(TM)" within the territory. Terms of the agreement require
Cross Global to pay a fee of $1 million comprising of a non-refundable deposit
of $200,000 with the balance of $800,000 payable as $200,000 due August 30,
2004, November 30, 2004, February 28, 2005 and May 30, 2005. The $1 million fee
will be recognized as revenue ratably over a five year period. As of December
31, 2007, the Company has received $1,000,000 and has reflected $250,000 as
unearned revenue and $750,000 as revenue on a cumulative basis of which $200,000
has been recorded as revenue for both years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006. In addition and further to the payment fee of $1 million, Cross
Global agrees to pay a royalty fee of 5% on product sales of the Sunless Tanning
Spray Formulation.
On April
11, 2007, we entered into a Licensing Agreement (“Agreement”) with DRJ Group,
Inc. (“DRJ”), a California corporation. Under the terms of this Agreement, we
granted DRJ the exclusive right to distribute, market, sell, and promote a
topical analgesic that incorporates our proprietary and patented Invisicare
polymer in North America. DRJ manufactures STOPAIN®, a cream product topically
applied which is designed to provide relief to people suffering from muscle
stiffness, arthritis or muscle strains. Under the terms of the Agreement, the
Company will generate revenues from product sales of Invisicare to DRJ and be
entitled to receive royalties from all product sales generated by
DRJ. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has received $22,179 in
royalties from DRJ.
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
9. CONVERTIBLE NOTES
PAYABLE
During
2007, the Company issued an aggregate of $260,500 consisting of promissory
convertible notes to seven individuals. The notes are due by August 30, 2007,
one note due June 30, 2007, accruing interest at 10% per annum. At the
investor’s option until the repayment date. The note can be converted to shares
of the Company’s common stock at a fixed price of $0.20 per share
along with additional warrants to purchase one share per every two shares issued at the
exercise price of $0.25 per share if exercised in year one and $0.30 per share
if exercised in year two and available only upon conversion of the note
payable. As of December 31, 2007, $260,500 plus accrued
interest of $5,650 were converted into 2,073,000 shares.
In
accordance with EITF 00-27, the Company has determined value associated with the
conversion feature and detachable warrants issued in connection with these
convertible notes payable. The Company has determined the debentures to have a
beneficial conversion feature totaling $216,098 which has been fully expensed as
of December 31, 2007. The beneficial conversion feature has been
recorded as a debt discount which will be amortized over the life of the
loan. The beneficial conversion feature is valued under the intrinsic
value method and warrants were valued under the Black-Scholes option pricing
model using the following assumptions: stock price range from $0.23 to $0.31,
life of 3 years, a dividend yield of 0%, volatility raging from 78%
to 127%, and a debt discount rate of 4.50%. The investor shall
have one year from December 11, 2007 to exercise 1,250,000
warrants. The warrant strike price shall be $0.25 per
share. The Company has determined the warrants to have a value of
$78,915 which has been fully expensed as of December 31, 2007.
During 2007, the Company issued a
$150,000 promissory convertible note from one individual. The note is due by
December 11, 2008, accruing interest at 10% per annum. At the investor’s option
until the repayment date. The note can be converted to shares of the Company’s
common stock at a fixed price of $0.075 per share along with additional warrants
to purchase one share per every two shares issued at the exercise price of
$0.15 per share if exercised in year one and available only upon conversion of
the note payable. As of December 31, 2007, the $150,000 convertible
note payable remains outstanding.
In
accordance with EITF 00-27, the Company has determined value associated with the
conversion feature and detachable warrants issued in connection with these
convertible notes payable. The Company has determined the debentures to have a
beneficial conversion feature totaling $95,557. The beneficial
conversion feature has been recorded as a debt discount which will be amortized
over the life of the loan. The beneficial conversion feature is
valued under the intrinsic value method and warrants were valued under the
Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions: stock price
of $0.14, life of 3 years, a dividend yield of 0%, volatility of
106%, and a debt discount rate of 4.50%. The investor shall
have one year from December 11, 2007 to exercise 1,000,000
warrants. The warrant strike price shall be $0.15 per
share. The Company has determined the warrants to have a value of
$53,829 which has been reflected as a financing cost and will be amortized over
the life of the loan. As of December 31, 2007, financing costs
total $53,484, net of accumulated amortization of $344.
10. RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
As of
December 31, 2007, the Company had an unsecured loan payable due to
the CEO with an interest rate of 10% per annum, due on demand totaling
$68,360.
As of
December 31, 2007, the Company had an unsecured loan payable due to a
shareholder, bearing no interest, due on demand totaling $10,500.
As of
December 31, 2007, the Company had a receivable due to them from a shareholder
totaling $1,196.
SKINVISIBLE,
INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(AUDITED)
11. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
Lease obligations –
The Company has operating leases for its offices. The lease for its
offices expires on December 29, 2009. Future minimum lease payments
under the operating leases for the facilities as of December 31, 2007 are as
follows:
2008 |
$ |
97,028 |
2009 |
|
98,622 |
Rental expense, resulting from operating lease
agreements for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, was $102,539 and
$93,388, respectively.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of
common stock for a conversion of a loanat $0.075 per share totaling
$150,000.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 248,000 shares of
common stock for payment on accounts payable at $0.10 per share totaling
$24,000.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 799,990 shares of
common stock for a conversion of a loan at $0.10 per share totaling
$79,999.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of
common stock for a conversion of a loan at $0.05 per share totaling
$60,000.
No events
occurred requiring disclosure under Item 304(b) of Regulation S-B.
The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that
such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the
definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures.
The
Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered in this
report. Based on the foregoing, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
There has
been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
controls over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
The
Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and
with the participation of the Company’s management, including our principal
executive and principal financial officers, conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the
framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO Framework”).
Based on this evaluation under the COSO Framework management concluded that its
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31,
2007.
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered
public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the
Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only
management’s report in this annual report.
Limitations on the
Effectiveness of Internal Controls
Our
management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our
internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and
material error. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide
reasonable assurance of achieving our objectives and our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the
internal control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part
upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be
no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under
all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
None.
PART III
The
following information sets forth the names of our current directors and
executive officers, their ages and their present positions.
Name
|
Age
|
Position(s)
and Office(s) Held
|
Terry
Howlett
|
60
|
Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, &
Director
|
Brian
Piwek
|
62
|
Director
|
Greg
McCartney
|
56
|
Director
|
Set forth
below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each
of our current executive officers and directors.
Mr. Terry H. Howlett, has been
our Chief Executive Officer & Director since March 5, 1998. Mr. Howlett has
a diversified background in market initialization and development, sales and
venture capital financing for emerging growth companies. He has held senior
management, marketing and sales positions with various companies, including the
Canadian Federation of
Independent
Business, Family Life Insurance, and Avacare of Canada and founded Presley
Laboratories, Inc., which marketed cosmetic and skin, care products on a direct
sales basis. For the ten years prior to becoming President of the Company, Mr.
Howlett was the President and CEO of Voice-it Solutions, Inc., a publicly traded
company on the Vancouver Stock exchange that made voice response software for
order entry systems.
Mr. Brian Piwek joined our
board of directors in January, 2008. Mr. Piwek's experience and expertise is in
the international retail industry. He was president of Overwaitea Foods
supermarket from 1991 until 1997. In 1997 Brian accepted the position as Co-CEO
with A&P Canada (The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company Inc.) and in
2000 was appointed Chairman, President and CEO of A&P Canada. In late 2002
he moved to the U.S. as President and Chief Executive Officer of A&P US (New
York Stock Exchange symbol "GAP") where he began the turnaround of North
America's oldest retail food chain. Brian retired from A&P in July 2005.
Brian is an MBA graduate and has served on many voluntary boards.
Mr. Greg McCartney has been a
member of our board of directors since January 10, 2005. Mr. McCartney is
Managing Director of Taylor, Butterfield & Worth Asset Management
Corporation a management consulting services firm assisting clients in
becoming fully reporting public companies. Previously Mr. McCartney
was the Chairman of the Board for Genesis Bioventures (formely BioLabs) and also
formerly served as their CEO. Genesis Bioventures is currently trading on the
OTCBB. Mr. McCartney has over 20 years experience serving as officer and
director of both private and public companies in various manufacturing and
technology industries. Prior to founding BioLabs in 1997, Mr. McCartney was the
founder and director of Aspenwood Holdings Corporation, a business consulting
firm specializing in financing, public relations and venture capital in the
technology and manufacturing industries. From 1986 to 1995 he was the President
of an emerging high technology company and also served as officer and director
of other companies. Previously, he was involved with international real estate
and land development.
Term
of Office
Our
directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual
meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our
bylaws.
Our
executive officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until
removed by the board.
Significant
Employees
We have
one significant employee that makes a significant contribution to our business
other than our officers and directors.
Dr. James A. Roszell, Ph.D, is
a doctoral chemist with over 35 years' experience in product formulation,
experimental design, analysis, and method validation. Since joining
Skinvisible in 1998, he has been responsible for research and
development of our patented technology, related polymer delivery vehicles,
product formulations and compositions. Dr. Roszell is a joint
contributor
to Skinvisible's Patent Number 6.756.059 and responsible for our eight
pending patents. Prior to joining Skinvisible, he worked as chemist
for Supertech Products, Inc. in Florida where his responsibilities included
ensuring compliance with OSHA, EPA and other standards and regulations,
maintenance of quality control, research and development for new products. Dr.
Roszell's background includes work in chemical, pharmaceutical,
environmental and clinical laboratory arenas. His chemical and scientific
expertise makes a significant contribution to our business.
Family
Relationships
There are
no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or
persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive
officers.
Involvement
in Certain Legal Proceedings
To the
best of our knowledge, during the past five years, none of the
following occurred with respect to a present
director, person nominated to become director, executive officer,
or control person: (1) any bankruptcy petition
filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or
executive officer either at the time of the
bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a
criminal proceeding or being subject to a
pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations
and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree,
not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any
court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or
temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her
involvement in any type of business, securities or banking
activities; and (4) being found
by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil
action), the SEC or the
Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have
violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has
not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
Audit
Committee
We do not
have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire
board of directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written
charter governs the actions of the board of directors when performing the
functions of that would generally be performed by an audit committee. The board
of directors approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and
interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to
financial reporting. In addition, the board of directors reviews the scope and
results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management
and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the
adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and
accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the
performance of the independent auditor.
We do not
have an audit committee financial expert because of the size of our company and
our board of directors at this time. We believe that we do not
require an audit committee financial expert at this time because we retain
outside consultants who possess these attributes as
needed.
For the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, the board of directors:
1.
|
Reviewed
and discussed the audited financial statements with management,
and
|
2.
|
Reviewed
and discussed the written disclosures and the letter from our independent
auditors on the matters relating to the auditor's
independence.
|
Based
upon the board of directors’ review and discussion of the matters above, the
board of directors authorized inclusion of the audited financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2007 to be included in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and
persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of the
Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities
of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent
beneficial shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the best of our
knowledge based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments
thereof) received by us during or with respect to the year ended December 31,
2007, the following persons have failed to file, on a timely basis, the
identified reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007:
Name
and principal position
|
Number
of
late
reports
|
Transactions
not
timely
reported
|
Known
failures to
file
a required form
|
Terry
Howlett
CEO,
CFO & Director
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
Jost
Steinbruchel
former
Director
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Greg
McCartney
Director
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Code
of Ethics Disclosure
We
adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Executives, which include our principal
executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics was
filed as an exhibit to the annual report on Form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 and filed with the SEC on April 14, 2005.
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The
Company currently has an employment agreement with its sole executive officer,
Terry Howlett. The term of the agreement is three (3)
years. Unless extended or renewed, the agreement will terminate on
January 1, 2009. Under the agreement, Mr. Howlett earns a cash
stipend of $13,333.33 per month ($160,000 per year). In addition, the
agreement provides for Mr. Howlett to be awarded stock options at the discretion
of the board of directors. Our two independent directors currently
receive a stipend of $1,000 per month, in addition to discretionary awards of
stock options.
Currently,
the objective of the cash compensation paid by the company is to provide fair
reimbursement for the time spent by our executive officer and independent
directors to the extent feasible within the financial constraints faced by our
developing business. The stock options granted to our executive
officer and to our independent directors are intended to provide these
individuals with incentives to pursue the growth and development of the
company’s operations and business opportunities. Although the options awarded to
our executive and directors are typically exercisable immediately, they also
remain valid and exercisable for terms of several years. We believe
this provides the proper balance of short-term and long-term incentives to
increase the value of the company. Although an immediate increase in
share price following the issuance of the options would obviously result in a
profit if those options were exercised, the longer exercisable period of the
options also provides an incentive to increase value over the long term and
gives our executive officer and directors the opportunity to realize gains based
on the sustained growth of our operations and revenues.
In
addition, our sole executive officer holds substantial ownership in the company
and is generally motivated by a strong entrepreneurial interest in expanding our
operations and revenue base to the best of his ability.
Summary
Compensation Table
The table
below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our former
or current executive officers for the fiscal years ended 2007 and
2006.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
Name
and
principal
position
|
Year
|
Salary ($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Terry
Howlett
CEO
& CFO
|
2007
2006
|
160,000
160,000
|
-
-
|
-
-
|
182,252
36,000
|
-
-
|
-
-
|
-
-
|
342,252
196,000
|
Narrative
Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table
We have a
3 year employment agreement dated January 1, 2006 with Mr.
Howlett. Mr. Howlett earned an annual base salary of $160,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and $160,000 for the year ended December 31,
2006. Due to financial constraints, however, we were only able to
actually pay Mr. Howlett $58,769.22 in cash during the fiscal
year. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, we granted Mr.
Howlett options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at the exercise
price of $0.24 per share with an expiration date of July 29,
2012. These options are fully vested and immediately
exercisable. The aggregate value of these options, which totaled
$182,252, was computed in accordance with FAS 123R and is reported in the
summary compensation table above in the column titled “Option
Awards.”
At no
time during the last fiscal year was any outstanding option repriced or
otherwise modified. There was no tandem feature, reload feature, or
tax-reimbursement feature associated with any of the stock options we granted to
our executive officers or otherwise.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The table
below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity
incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of December 31,
2007.
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END
|
OPTION
AWARDS
|
STOCK
AWARDS
|
Name
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or
Payout
Value
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
Terry
Howlett
|
1,000,000
200,000
1,200,000
500,000
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
0.24
0.18
0.05
0.05
|
7/29/2012
1/3/2011
04/01/2008
09/29/2008
|
-
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
-
|
Compensation
of Directors
The table
below summarizes all compensation of our directors as of December 31,
2007.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
|
Name
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid
in
Cash
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Terry
Howlett
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Jost
Steinbruchel, former director
|
12,000
|
-
|
45,563
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
57,563
|
Greg
McCartney
|
12,000
|
-
|
45,563
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
57,563
|
Brian
Piwek
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
Narrative
Disclosure to the Director Compensation Table
The all
fees earned or paid in cash and stock options awards granted to Terry Howlett
were earned in connection with his service as an executive
officer. Mr. Howlett received no compensation for his service
as a member of our board of directors.
We pay
our independent directors a monthly fee of $1,000. Mr. McCartney and
Mr. Steinbruchel each received a total of $12,000 in consideration for services
rendered as members of our board of directors. In addition, Mr.
McCartney and Mr. Steinbruchel each received options to purchase 250,000 shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $0.24 per share. These
options are fully vested and immediately exercisable. The aggregate
value of these options, which totaled $45,563 for each independent director, was
computed in accordance with FAS 123R and is reported in the director
compensation table above in the column titled “Option Awards.”
The
following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2008, the beneficial ownership of
our common stock by each executive officer and director, by each person known by
us to beneficially own more than 5% of the our common stock and by the executive
officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all
shares are owned directly and the percentage shown is based on 75,487,238 shares
of common stock issued and outstanding on March 31, 2007. Except as otherwise
indicated, the address of each person named in this table is c/o Skinvisible,
Inc., 6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120.
Title
of class
|
Name
and address
of
beneficial owner (1)
|
Amount
of
beneficial
ownership
|
Percent
of
class*
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
Officers & Directors:
|
Common
|
Terry
Howlett
|
9,823,248
shares
|
13.01%
(2)
|
Common
|
Brian
Piwek
|
600,990
shares
|
0.80%
(3)
|
Common
|
Greg
McCartney
|
905,000
shares
|
1.20%
(4)
|
Total
of All Directors and Executive Officers:
|
11,329,238
shares
|
15.01%
|
More
Than 5% Beneficial Owners:
|
None
|
(1) |
As
used in this table, "beneficial ownership" means the sole or shared power
to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared
investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose
of, or to direct the disposition of, a security). In addition, for
purposes of this table, a person is deemed, as of any date, to have
"beneficial ownership" of any security that such person has the right to
acquire within 60 days after such date.
|
(2) |
Includes
options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 1,000,000 shares at
a price of $0.24, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase
200,000 shares at a price of $0.18, options that may be exercised
immediately to purchase 400,000 shares at $0.10, and warrants that may be
immediately exercised to purchase 500,000 shares at a price of
$0.15.
|
(3) |
Includes
options that may be immediately exercised to purchase 200,000 shares at a
price of $0.10 and warrants that may be immediately exercised to purchase
125,000 at $0.12
|
(4) |
Includes
options that may be exercised immediately to purchase 100,000 shares at a
price of $0.10, options that may be exercised immediately to purchase
100,000 shares at a price of $0.18, options that may be exercised
immediately to purchase 250,000 shares at $0.24, and options that may be
exercised immediately to purchase 200,000 shares at
$0.10.
|
None of
our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a
director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares
carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding
shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents,
children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any
material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction since the beginning of
our last fiscal year on January 1, 2007 or in any presently proposed transaction
which, in either case, has or will materially affect us.
Our
policy regarding related transactions requires that any director or officer who
has an interest in any transaction disclose the presence and the nature of the
interest to the board of directors prior to any approval of the transaction by
the board of directors. The transaction may then be approved by a majority of
the disinterested directors, provided that an interested director may be counted
in determining the presence of a quorum at the meeting of the board of directors
to approve the transaction.
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
10.1
|
Amendment
to Distribution Agreement (1)
|
10.2
|
Employment Agreement
with Terry Howlett(2)
|
14.1
|
Code
of Ethics(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Certain
portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment and those portions have been filed separately with
the Securities and Exchange Commission
|
(2) |
Incorporated
by reference to annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 2,
2007. |
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference to annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 14,
2005.
|
Audit
Fees
The
aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services rendered in
connection with a review of the financial statements included in our quarterly
reports on Form 10-QSB and the audit of our annual consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
were approximately $31,990 and $26,980 respectively.
Audit-Related
Fees
Our
auditors did not bill any additional fees for assurance and related services
that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our
financial statements.
Tax
Fees
The
aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services for tax
compliance, tax advice, and tax planning were $0 and $0 for the fiscal years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
All
Other Fees
The
aggregate fees billed by our auditors for all other non-audit services, such as
attending meetings and other miscellaneous financial consulting, for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $0 and $0 respectively.
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
Skinvisible,
Inc.
By: |
/s/Terry Howlett |
|
Terry
Howlett |
|
Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
April 11,
2008 |
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated:
By: |
/s/Terry Howlett |
|
By: |
/s/Brian Piwek |
|
Terry
Howlett |
|
|
Brian
Piwek |
|
Director |
|
|
Director |
|
April 11,
2008 |
|
|
April 11,
2008 |
By:
|
/s/Greg
McCartney |
|
Greg
McCartney |
|
Director
|
|
April
11, 2008
|