Edgar Filing: COMPETITIVE COMPANIES INC

f10k2009_resourceacq.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	COMPETITIVE COMPANIES, INC.
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		333-76630		65-1146821
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(Commission File Number)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

19206 Huebner Rd., Suite 202

San Antonio, TX 78258

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(210) 233-8980

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yeso No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on April 15, 2010, based on a closing price of $0.0745 was approximately $5,996,250.

The number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding on April 15, 2010, was 106,187,001 shares.

COMPETITIVE COMPANIES, INC.

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009

Index to Report on Form 10-K

PART I		Page

Item 1.	Business	2
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	8
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	11
Item 2.	Properties	11
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	11
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	11

PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	12
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	14
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	18
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	19
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	19
Item 9A (T)	Control and Procedures	19
Item 9B.	Other Information	20

PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	21
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	24
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	25
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	26
Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	27

PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	28

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This document contains “forward-looking statements.” All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, but not limited to, any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objections of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Forward-looking statements may include the words “may,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” or other similar words. These forward-looking statements present our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates on which they are made. Except for our ongoing securities laws, we do not intend, and undertake no obligation, to update any forward-looking statement. Additionally, the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 most likely do not apply to our forward-looking statements as a result of being a penny stock issuer. You should, however, consult further disclosures we make in future filings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Although we believe the expectations reflected in any of our forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in any of our forward-looking statements. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The factors impacting these risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

·	Our current deficiency in working capital;

·	Increased competitive pressures from existing competitors and new entrants;

·	Our ability to market our services to new subscribers;

·	Inability to locate additional revenue sources and integrate new revenue sources into our organization;

·	Adverse state or federal legislation or regulation that increases the costs of compliance, or adverse findings by a regulator with respect to existing operations;

·	Changes in U.S. GAAP or in the legal, regulatory and legislative environments in the markets in which we operate;

·	Consumer acceptance of price plans and bundled offering of our services;

·	Loss of customers or sales weakness;

·	Technological innovations;

·	Inability to efficiently manage our operations;

·	Inability to achieve future sales levels or other operating results;

·	Inability of management to effectively implement our strategies and business plan

·	Key management or other unanticipated personnel changes;

·	The unavailability of funds for capital expenditures; and

·	The other risks and uncertainties detailed in this report.

For a detailed description of these and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement, please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this document.

Throughout this Annual Report references to “CCI,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” and similar terms refer to Competitive Companies, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Any annual, quarterly, special reports and other information filed with the SEC can be inspected and copied at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405. Information regarding the public reference facilities may be obtained from the SEC by telephoning 1-800-SEC-0330. The Company’s filings are also available through the SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval System which is publicly available through the SEC’s website (www.sec.gov). Copies of such materials may also be obtained by mail from the public reference section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549-0405 at prescribed rates.

-1-

PART I

Item 1. Business.

General Business Development

Competitive Companies, Inc. (“CCI”) was originally incorporated in the state of Nevada in March 1998. CCI currently acts as a holding company for its operating subsidiaries, Competitive Communications, Inc. (“Competitive Communications”), an approved and regulated local and long distance telephone company, CCI Residential Services Inc. (“CCI Residential”), a non-regulated telephone company providing local and long distance telephone service, high-speed Internet and cable television service, DiscoverNet, Inc. (“DiscoverNet”), a Company providing web hosting, dial-up, wireless and DSL internet services to businesses and residents within various markets throughout Wisconsin, the United States and Puerto Rico, DiscoverNet of Wisconsin, LLC, (“DiscoverNet, LLC”), a dormant entity available for future projects, Innovation Capital Management, Inc., (“ICM, Inc.”), an investment company that focuses on raising capital and developing joint ventures and acquisitions, and Innovation Capital Management, LLC (“ICM, LLC”), a Company that maintains management office operations. CCI, and their aforementioned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) provide telephone, cable television, long distance/inter-exchange, wireless, dial up and high-speed internet connections and e-mail services.

On April 2, 2009, the Company entered into an acquisition agreement and plan of merger whereby the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding interest of four private companies under common control by the CEO of Competitive Companies, Inc. Pursuant to the share exchange agreement, Competitive Companies, Inc. (CCI) acquired 100% of the combined equity of DiscoverNet, Inc. (DNI), ICM, Inc. (ICMI), ICM, LLC (ICML), and DiscoverNet, LLC (DNL) in exchange for stock on a 10 to 1 basis, resulting in the issuance of 31,102,740 shares. The fair market value of the shares was $1,555,137 based on the closing stock price on April 2, 2009, the date of grant.

On May 5, 2009, DiscoverNet, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Competitive Companies, Inc. which was acquired on April 2, 2009 as described in Note 3 below, filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

On January 12, 2010 the Company acquired Voice Vision, Inc. (“VVI”), a voice over internet protocol (“VOIP”) company organized under the laws of the State of California, through a share exchange agreement consisting of the acquisition of one hundred percent (100%) of the outstanding capital stock, or ownership interest of VVI, in exchange for a total of 10,000,000 shares of common stock of Competitive Companies, Inc. valued at $300,000 based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock.

Current Business Operations

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we provided telecommunications products and services that included local telephone services, domestic and international long distance services, enhanced voice, data and Internet services, and Cable TV service primarily to residents of apartment complexes, retail businesses and residential users, as well as, Dial-up, Wireless and DSL Internet services to businesses and residents within various markets throughout Wisconsin, the United States and Puerto Rico. We operate in both a regulated and non-regulated environment. It is our intention in the future to provide bundled services to our customers and expand our revenue sources in the telecommunications industry. During 2009 we discontinued our services provided exclusively to apartment complexes.

Principal Products and Services

During the year ended December 31, 2009, CCI provided telecommunications services to residents of apartment complexes, retail businesses and residential users, in primary and secondary metropolitan areas of California and Alabama. CCI provided telephone service to approximately 300 customers at seven apartment complexes, provided television service to approximately 350 customers at four properties, and provided DSL services to approximately 150 customers at five properties. CCI also provided dial-up services to approximately 800 customers, DSL services to approximately 150 customers, wireless services to approximately 50 customers and web hosting services to approximately 25 customers through the DiscoverNet subsidiary.

-2-

During the year ended December 31, 2009, CCI operated as a regulated Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (“CLEC”) and as an Interexchange Carrier (“IXC”), owning and operating Class 4 tandem switches and providing telephone service to residences, businesses, and Shared Tenant Services (“STS”) providers using a Hub Concept.

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, CCI’s regulated subsidiary, Competitive Communications, receives significantly discounted prices from the existing or traditional local phone companies and long distance carriers, thereby reducing their costs. As a regulated telecommunications provider, the company is required to negotiate agreements for resale services from the local exchange carriers, to file telephone rate tariffs with state public utilities commissions, and is subject to the state public utilities commission rules regarding telecommunications carriers. The company is currently approved as an operating telephone company in California and Alabama, and operates as an approved public utility by each state’s Public Service Commissions. Competitive Communications has completed wholesale interconnect agreements with SBC, now known as “AT&T,” Verizon, BellSouth, and QWEST. These agreements allow us to purchase wholesale local and long distance telephone service and nationwide Internet service at discounted prices and resell those services at retail rates to businesses and residential users.

The subsidiary, CCI Residential, operates under shared tenant services provisions within each state and is a non-regulated company. As such, it is not required to file tariffs with state public utilities commissions and does not have to comply with commission rules regarding local exchange carriers, thus legally avoiding the more onerous rate filing requirements of the regulated subsidiaries and other regulated carriers. CCI Residential can sign individual agreements with property owners allowing for commission payments to the property owner consisting of a portion of the revenue the subsidiary receives from apartment complex residents on the owner’s property. As a shared tenant service provider, CCI Residential is required by each state’s public utilities commission to provide regulated carriers with equal access to the apartment complexes it services.

The Company intends to negotiate definitive agreements to create new strategic alliances and acquisitions that would provide new services and products. Specifically, the Company hopes to provide wireless high speed internet, nationwide dial-up, broadband DSL, broadband satellite, web design services, discount cellular services, VoIP services and other similar services in the telecommunications industry.

Competitive Communications, Inc.

This subsidiary offered the following services in most of their markets during the year ended December 31, 2009: local and long distance telephone services, toll-free or (800) service, and dedicated Internet and DSL services to business and non-apartment complex residential customers.

To offer these services, Competitive Communications must secure certification from a state regulator and typically must file rates or price lists for the services that it will offer. The certification process varies from state to state; however, the fundamental requirements are largely the same. State regulators require new entrants to demonstrate that they have secured adequate financial resources to establish and maintain good customer service. New entrants must show that they possess the knowledge and ability required to establish and operate a telecommunications network. CCI currently has all necessary agreements in place in California and Alabama, but does not expect to renew these agreements and has ceased to provide services in these markets.

Services were sold as bundled or unbundled, depending on the customer’s preference. Competitive Communications also sold services to CCI Residential, which then sold those services to apartment residents under shared tenant services provisions. Nearly all of Competitive Communications’ sales were attributed to CCI Residential, and only a small portion was from direct sales of telephone and Internet services to retail residential and business customers.

CCI Residential Services

CCI Residential provided the following products and services: local and long distance services, high-speed Internet, cable television, and toll-free or (800) service in California and Alabama.

-3-

To offer these services to apartment complex customers, CCI Residential had to sign a contract with the apartment owner. These multi-year contracts typically ranged from five (5) to twenty (20) years. They provided for the apartment owner to share in a percentage of the revenue received from servicing the complex. The percentage received varied from 0% to 11%, based on the total revenue received, the types of services provided, the term of the contract and other negotiated factors. If the complex was under construction, CCI Residential had to plan for, have approved, and install underground cabling. If the complex was already built, it had to survey the cabling needs and negotiate the use of the cable with the owner. It also had to secure state approval to conduct business in the state and establish service from Competitive Communications, if available, or if Competitive Communications is not yet certified, from the traditional local telephone companies. CCI Residential marketed to the MDU (multiple-dwelling units) market as it was able to provide bundled services in a cost effective manner.

Services sold by CCI Residential could be bundled or unbundled depending on the customer’s preference. Competitive Communications sold unbundled telephone, cable television, and Internet services to CCI Residential at, Competitive Communications’ cost. CCI Residential then sold these services to apartment complex customers at competitive market prices. By having all outside service agreements under Competitive Communications, it was possible to negotiate better terms and discounts based on the combined volume of the customer bases of Competitive Communications and CCI Residential.

When tenants moved into an apartment complex serviced by CCI Residential, the leasing agent informed them that the complex had a private telephone service provider and a private cable television provider (in those locations where CCI provided the cable television service). Tenants had to contact CCI Residential in order to activate their telephone and cable television service. Those tenants who preferred to receive service from the local telephone company could do so; however, their telephone line had to be cross-connected from CCI Residential to the local telephone company. This took the telephone company from a few days to two weeks to accomplish and the installation charges were assessed to the tenant. In most cases, telephone service to the tenants that selected CCI Residential for their service was activated while they were still on the line placing their orders. On average, more than 30% of tenants decided to use CCI Residential telephone service when offered at the complex. Those who did not use the CCI Residential could select a local carrier, use their cell phones only, or choose not to have any telephone service. Over 70% of tenants used CCI Residential to provide cable television service at those complexes where CCI Residential offered the service. Those who did not use CCI Residential either used satellite television dishes for service or did not have television service at all. Approximately 20% of tenants used DSL Internet service provided by CCI Residential.

Of the total revenue generated by CCI Residential, approximately 40% was from telephone-related service, approximately 40% was from cable television service, and approximately 20% was from internet service to tenants of apartment complexes serviced by the Company.

As CCI Residential purchased its services from Competitive Communications, CCI Residential did not need or have the same connection services agreements required of Competitive Communications.

DiscoverNet, Inc.

DiscoverNet provides web hosting, dial-up, wireless and DSL internet services to businesses and residents within various markets throughout Wisconsin, the United States and Puerto Rico. The Company operates primarily in rural markets.

Long Distance Services

The company offers a full range of domestic and international long distance services. These services include “1+” outbound calling and inbound toll free service.

Competitive Communications, Inc. has negotiated an agreement with QWEST Communications for volume discounts for long distance resale. Prior to signing with QWEST, the Company had long distance service providers that were more expensive than QWEST and provided inferior service. Periodically, the Company reviews proposals from other long distance providers to ensure that it is receiving the best possible rates. Should better rates with comparable service be found, a request revision of the QWEST agreement would be initiated or the more cost effective provider would be selected and transition made to the new provider.

The agreement with QWEST allows CCI to offer long distance telephone service in all fifty (50) states.

-4-

Internet Services

CCI had been installing and offering high-speed internet service to selected apartment complex customers since May of 2002. It offered high-speed internet access services via digital subscriber line (DSL). After accepting bids from other carriers, based on price and service quality, QWEST was selected as the carrier to provide internet service telephone lines at selected apartment complexes.

As a result of the acquisition with DiscoverNet, Inc., we have been able to integrate and expand our current internet services by providing “wireless” broadband internet services as well web design services and network design services. This expansion has allowed us to reach a much broader market than we previously serviced.

Voice-over-Internet Protocol

VoIP uses the traditional technology of sending data packets over the internet to now transmit voices, through the compression of sound into data packets which are transmitted over data networks. Instead of establishing a specific connection between two devices and sending a message in “one piece,” VoIP separates the message into smaller fragments called packets. These packets are transmitted separately over a decentralized network and upon reaching its final destination, are reassembled into the original message.

Discount Cellular Services

We have been able to expand our services to include cellular services as a result of the acquisition with DiscoverNet, Inc. In addition, we anticipate being able to offer AT&T, Verizon and T-mobile cellular services.

Principal Suppliers

During the year ended December 31, 2009, CCI had various suppliers for its telephone, cable television, long distance/inter-exchange, and dial up and high-speed internet connections and e-mail services. More specifically, it had contracts with QWEST to supply its long distance and DSL services, AT&T for local telephone services, and Direct TV for cable services.

Competition and Market Overview

The telecommunications industry is highly competitive, rapidly evolving, and subject to technology changes. Additionally, there are numerous telecommunications service companies that conduct extensive advertising campaigns to capture market share. CCI believes that the principal competitive factors affecting its business will be pricing levels and clear pricing policies, customer service, and the variety of services offered. Its ability to compete effectively will depend upon its continued ability to maintain high-quality, market-driven services at prices generally equal to or below those charged by competitors. To maintain a competitive posture, CCI believes that it must be in a position to reduce its prices in order to meet reductions in rates, if any, by others. Any such reductions could reduce revenues. Many of CCI’s current and potential competitors have financial, personnel, and other resources, including brand name recognition as well as other competitive advantages.

CCI competes principally with traditional local phone companies serving an area, such as AT&T, BellSouth, and Verizon. While these types of providers have name recognition, CCI markets its ability to offer lower pricing and bundled packages of services with one bill and one point of contact.

CCI has not achieved and does not expect to achieve a significant market share for any of its resale services. Recent regulatory initiatives allow newer local phone companies such as our subsidiary, Competitive Communications, to connect with traditional local phone company facilities. Although this provides increased business opportunities for CCI, such connection opportunities have been, and likely will continue to be, accompanied by increased pricing flexibility for and relaxation of regulatory oversight of the traditional local telephone companies.

-5-

Traditional local telephone companies have long-standing relationships with regulatory authorities at the federal and state levels. While recent FCC administrative decisions and initiatives provide for increased business opportunities to telecommunication providers such as CCI, they also provide the traditional local telephone companies with increased pricing flexibility for their private line, special access and switched access services. However, wireless internet and VoIP services are currently non-regulated and cost much less than the standard hardwire services offered by the local phone companies. Therefore, CCI hopes to be able to move the majority of its business from the regulated arena and compete competitively with the traditional companies.

Voice-over-Internet Protocol

VoIP services first emerged in the mid 1990s but were not typically used for transmitting voice signals due to the potential for data packets to be delayed or lost, preventing a real-time transmission and possibly resulting in poor sound quality. Due to these glitches, VoIP did not receive a positive response early on and most consumers were not attracted to the idea of VoIP. However, as bandwidth increased and improvements in the packet technology occurred, the quality and reliability of VoIP were enhanced.

With new improvements, VoIP now allows a much higher volume of telecommunications traffic to flow at much higher speeds than do traditional circuits, while at a significantly lower cost. VoIP networks are less capital intensive to construct and much less expensive to maintain. VoIP networks are based on internet protocol and therefore can interface with web-based services, such as virtual portals, interactive voice response, and unified messaging packages. A VoIP network utilizes intellectual property to transmit a call from its origination point to CCI’s servers. The ability to minimize the use of established telecommunication lines reduces the cost of transmitting telephone calls for CCI and ultimately the customer.

Today, VoIP is increasingly used by residential and business users and offered through a wide array of service providers. Vonage and Skype are the most advertised and well-known of these VoIP providers. Some other providers are long distance phone companies, cable companies, and internet service providers. These types of providers differ in the type of networks used and the characteristics and features offered for VoIP communications services. However, we believe future competition could come from a variety of enterprises both in the internet and telecommunications industry and the existing competitors are likely to continue to expand their service offerings.

Customers

During the year ended December 31, 2009, two apartment complexes that we service accounted for approximately 22% of our annual sales. The complex of Colonial Village in Trussville, Alabama accounted for 15%, or $38,000 in revenue and the complex of Durham Greens in Fremont, California accounted for 7%, or $18,000 in revenue.

Intellectual Property

CCI’s Hartline system enters, schedules, provisions, and tracks a customer’s order from the point of sale to the installation and testing of service. It also interfaces with trouble management, inventory, billing, collection and customer service systems.

Personnel

As of December 31, 2009, we had ten full-time employees. Currently, there are no organized labor agreements or union agreements between us and our employees.

Assuming we are able to pursue additional revenue through acquisitions and/or strategic alliances with those companies we have executed LOIs, we anticipate an increase of personnel and may need to hire additional employees. In the interim, we intend to use the services of independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services when appropriate. We believe the use of third-party service providers may enhance our ability to control general and administrative expenses and operate efficiently.

-6-

Governmental Approval and Regulation

CCI generally is subject to all of the governmental regulations that regulate businesses generally such as compliance with regulatory requirements of federal, state, and local agencies and authorities, including regulations concerning workplace safety, labor relations, and disadvantaged businesses. In addition, the Company’s operations are affected by federal and state laws relating to marketing practices in the telecommunications industry.

More specifically, CCI’s telecommunication services business offered during the year ended December 31, 2009, were subject to state and local regulation. Traditionally, telephone services have been subject to extensive state regulation, while internet services have been subject to much less regulation. VoIP has elements that resemble traditional telephone companies as well as those that resemble the internet. Therefore, VoIP did not fit into either existing framework of regulation and until recently operated in an environment that was largely free of regulation.

However, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), U.S. Congress, and various state regulatory bodies have begun to assert regulatory authority over VoIP providers and on a continuous basis are evaluating how VoIP will be regulated in the future. Some of the existing regulations for VoIP are applicable to the entire industry, while other rulings are limited to specific companies and/or categories of service. At this point in time, the application of rules to CCI and its competitors is speculative.

Federal Regulation

The FCC has authority to regulate and implement provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. One of the provisions enacted by the FCC was the Universal Service Order, which requires telecommunications carriers providing interstate telecommunications services to periodically contribute to universal service support programs administered by the FCC. The periodic contribution requirements to the Universal Service Funds are currently assessed based on a percentage of each contributor’s interstate end user telecommunications revenues reported to the FCC. The contribution rate factors are determined quarterly and carriers are billed for their contribution requirements each month based on projected interstate and international end-user telecommunications revenues, subject to periodic reconciliation. We pass these contributions through as a part of our services.

The FCC is considering several proposals that would fundamentally alter the basis upon which the Universal Service Fund contributions are determined and the means by which contributions can be recovered from customers. This may impact our service fees and the ability to recoup these contributions from our customers.

State Regulation

State regulatory agencies have jurisdiction when facilities and services are used to provide intrastate services. A portion of CCI’s current traffic may be classified as intrastate and therefore subject to state regulation. CCI expects to offer more intrastate services as its business and product lines expand and state regulations are modified to allow increased local services competition. For other than shared tenant services, in order to provide intrastate services, CCI generally must obtain a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the state regulatory agency and comply with state requirements for telecommunications utilities, including state rate requirements.

State agencies require that CCI file periodic reports, pay various fees and assessments, and comply with rules governing quality of service, consumer protection, and similar issues. Although the specific requirements vary from state to state, they tend to be more detailed than the FCC’s regulation because of the strong public interest in the quality of basic local exchange service. CCI will comply with all applicable state regulations, and as a general matter does not expect that these requirements of industry-wide applicability will harm the business. However, new regulatory burdens in a particular state may affect the profitability of services in that state.

Local Regulation

CCI’s networks are subject to numerous local regulations such as building codes and licensing. Such regulations vary on a city-by-city and county-by-county basis. If CCI decides in the future to install its own fiber optic transmission facilities, it will need to obtain rights-of-way to publicly owned land. Since CCI is an approved public utility, such rights-of-way may be available to the Company on economically reasonable or advantageous terms.

-7-

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Risks Relating with Our Business and Marketplace

We have incurred losses since inception and expect to incur losses for the foreseeable future. In addition, our poor financial condition raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our net operating losses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $1,005,927 and $420,556, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, we only had $10,133 in cash available to finance our operations and a working capital deficit of $709,413. Capital requirements have been and will continue to be significant, and our cash requirements have exceeded cash flow from operations since inception. We are in need of additional capital to continue our operations and have been dependent on the proceeds of private placements of securities and recent loans to from an officer to satisfy working capital requirements. We will continue to be dependent upon the proceeds of future offerings or public offerings to fund development of products, short-term working capital requirements, marketing activities and to continue implementing the current business strategy. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise the necessary capital to continue operations.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise funds to finance ongoing operations; however we may not be able to raise sufficient funds to do so. Our independent auditors have indicated that there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months. Because of these factors, an investor cannot determine if and when we will become profitable and therefore runs the risk of losing their investment.

If we are unable to obtain additional funding, our business operations will be harmed and if we do obtain additional financing our then existing stockholders may suffer substantial dilution.

We will require additional funds to expand our operations and believe the current cash on hand and the other sources of liquidity will not be sufficient enough to fund our operations through fiscal 2010. We anticipate that we will require approximately $400,000 to $500,000 to fund our continued operations for fiscal 2010 as well as be able to close on the intended acquisitions, depending on revenue from operations.

Additional capital will be required to effectively support the operations and to otherwise implement our overall business strategy. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. The inability to obtain additional capital will restrict our ability to grow and may reduce our ability to continue to conduct business operations. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we will likely be required to curtail our marketing and development plans and possibly cease our operations. Any additional equity financing may involve substantial dilution to our then existing stockholders.

We may acquire assets or other businesses in the future.

We may consider acquisitions of assets or other business as recently noted with executed LOIs. Any acquisition involves a number of risks that could fail to meet our expectations and adversely affect our profitability. For example:

·	The acquired assets or business may not achieve expected results;

·	We may incur substantial, unanticipated costs, delays or other operational or financial problems when integrating the acquired assets;

·	We may not be able to retain key personnel of an acquired business;

·	Our management’s attention may be diverted; or

·	Our management may not be able to manage the acquired assets or combined entity effectively or to make acquisitions and grow our business internally at the same time.

If these problems arise we may not realize the expected benefits of an acquisition.

-8-

Without realization of additional capital, it would be unlikely for us to continue as a going concern.

As a result of our deficiency in working capital at December 31, 2009, and other factors, our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their audit report regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments as a result of this uncertainty. The going concern qualification may adversely impact our ability to raise the capital necessary for the continuation of operations.

Our limited resources may prevent us from retaining key employees or inhibit our ability to hire and train a sufficient number of qualified management, professional, technical and regulatory personnel.

Our success may also depend on our ability to attract and retain other qualified management and personnel familiar in telecommunications industry. Currently, we have a limited number of personnel that are required to perform various roles and duties as a result of our limited financial resources. We intend to use the services of independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, when appropriate to help conserve our capital. However, if and when we determine to acquire additional personnel, we will compete for such persons with other companies and other organizations, some of which have substantially greater capital resources than we do. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful in recruiting or retaining personnel of the requisite caliber or in adequate numbers to enable us to conduct our business.

Competition from companies with already established marketing links and brand recognition to our potential customers may adversely affect our ability to introduce and market our products.

The telecommunications industry is highly competitive. Many of our current and potential competitors have financial, personnel and other resources, including brand name recognition, substantially greater than ours, as well as other competitive advantages over us. Certain competitors may be able to secure product from vendors on more favorable terms, devote greater resources to marketing and promotional campaigns, and adopt more aggressive pricing than we will. There can be no assurance we will be able to compete successfully against these competitors, which ultimately may have a materially adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and potential products in the future.

We may not be able to provide our products and services if we do not connect or continue to connect with the traditional carriers, our primary competitors.

As a competitive carrier, we must coordinate with traditional carriers so that we can provide local service to customers on a timely and competitive basis. The Telecommunications Act created incentives for regional Bell operating companies to cooperate with competitive carriers and permit access to their facilities by denying such companies the ability to provide in-region long distance services until they have satisfied statutory conditions designed to open their local markets to competition. The regional Bell operating companies in our markets are not yet permitted by the FCC to offer long distance services. These companies may not be accommodating once they are permitted to offer long distance service. Currently AT&T is permitted to offer both local and long distance service in some our mutual service areas, but we have not yet noticed any impact on our markets.

Many competitive carriers, including us, have experienced difficulties in working with traditional carriers with respect to initiating, connecting, and implementing the systems used by these competitive carriers to order and receive network elements and wholesale services and locating equipment in the offices of the traditional carriers.

If we cannot obtain the cooperation of a regional Bell operating company in a region, whether or not we have been authorized to offer long distance service, our ability to offer local services in such region on a timely and cost-effective basis will be harmed.

Risks Relating To Our Common Stock

If we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as us, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. More specifically, FINRA has enacted Rule 6530, which determines eligibility of issuers quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board by requiring an issuer to be current in its filings with the Commission. Pursuant to Rule 6530(e), if we file our reports late with the Commission three times in a two-year period or our securities are removed from the OTC Bulletin Board for failure to timely file twice in a two-year period then we will be ineligible for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board for one year. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

-9-

Our internal controls may be inadequate, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. As defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officer and effected by the board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of CCI; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of CCI are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of CCI, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of CCI’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

We have a limited number of personnel that are required to perform various roles and duties. Furthermore, we have one individual, our Chief Executive Officer, who is responsible for monitoring and ensuring compliance with our internal control procedures. As a result, our internal controls may be inadequate or ineffective, which could cause our financial reporting to be unreliable and lead to misinformation being disseminated to the public. Investors relying upon this misinformation may make an uninformed investment decision.

Because our common stock is deemed a low-priced “Penny” Stock, an investment in our common stock should be considered high risk and subject to marketability restrictions.

Since our common stock is a penny stock, as defined in Rule 3a51-1 under the Securities Exchange Act, it will be more difficult for investors to liquidate their investment of our common stock. Until the trading price of the common stock rises above $5.00 per share, if ever, trading in the common stock is subject to the penny stock rules of the Securities Exchange Act specified in rules 15g-1 through 15g-10. Those rules require broker-dealers, before effecting transactions in any penny stock, to:

·	Deliver to the customer, and obtain a written receipt for, a disclosure document;

·	Disclose certain price information about the stock;

·	Disclose the amount of compensation received by the broker-dealer or any associated person of the broker-dealer;

·	Send monthly statements to customers with market and price information about the penny stock; and

·	In some circumstances, approve the purchaser’s account under certain standards and deliver written statements to the customer with information specified in the rules.

Consequently, the penny stock rules may restrict the ability or willingness of broker-dealers to sell the common stock and may affect the ability of holders to sell their common stock in the secondary market and the price at which such holders can sell any such securities. These additional procedures could also limit our ability to raise additional capital in the future.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that, in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

-10-

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our corporate headquarters are in San Antonio, Texas, where we lease approximately 1,750 square feet of office space for approximately $2,800 per month. The lease expired on November 30, 2009, and has been extended on a month to month basis.

One of our subsidiary’s operations is located in Eau Claire, WI, where we lease approximately 1,650 square feet of office and warehouse space for approximately $3,174 per month. The lease expired on October 31, 2009, and has been extended on a month to month basis.

One of our subsidiary’s operations is located in Riverside, CA, where we lease approximately 2,134 square feet of office and warehouse space for approximately $2,460 per month. The lease is for five years and expires in December 2011. Pursuant to the lease we have minimal annual rental increase for the duration of the five years, culminating at $2,945 for the last year of the lease. The Company is in default on the lease payments, has vacated the property and is in negotiations to settle the outstanding balance of unpaid lease payments and remaining lease obligations.

We do not intend to renovate, improve, or develop properties. However, if and when definitive agreements are executed with potential acquisitions, we may expand our office space and/or locations.

We are not subject to competitive conditions for property and currently have no property to insure. We have no policy with respect to investments in real estate or interests in real estate and no policy with respect to investments in real estate mortgages. Further, we have no policy with respect to investments in securities of or interests in persons primarily engaged in real estate activities.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

On May 5, 2009, DiscoverNet, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, (the “Debtor”) filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (the “Bankruptcy Court”). Under Chapter 11, certain claims against the Debtor in existence prior to the filing of the petitions for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws are stayed while the Debtor continues business operations as Debtor-in-possession. These claims are reflected in the December 31, 2009, balance sheet as “liabilities subject to compromise.” Additional claims (liabilities subject to compromise) may arise subsequent to the filing date resulting from rejection of Executor contracts, including leases, and from the determination by the court (or agreed to by parties in interest) of allowed claims for contingencies and other disputed amounts. Claims secured against the Debtor’s assets (“secured claims”) also are stayed, although the holders of such claims have the right to move the court for relief from the stay. Secured claims are secured primarily by liens on the Debtor’s property, plant, and equipment.

The Debtor has received approval from the Bankruptcy Court to pay or otherwise honor certain of its prepetition obligations, including employee wages and product warranties. The Debtor has determined that there is insufficient collateral to cover the interest portion of scheduled payments on its prepetition debt obligations. Contractual interest on those obligations amounts to $6,549, which is $1,096 in excess of reported interest expense; therefore, the debtor has discontinued accruing interest on these obligations. Refer to Note 7 of the notes to the financial statements for a discussion of the credit arrangements entered into subsequent to the Chapter 11 filings. A plan of reorganization has not yet been developed and accepted by the Bankruptcy Court.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).

-11-

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

CCI’s Common Stock was approved for trading on the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board market (OTC:BB) under the symbol CCOP on March 8, 2006. Our common stock has traded infrequently on the OTC:BB, which severely limits our ability to locate accurate high and low bid prices for each quarter within the last two fiscal years. Therefore, the following table lists the quotations for the high and low bid prices as reported by a Quarterly Trade and Quote Summary Report of the OTC Bulletin Board. The quotations from the OTC Bulletin Board reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

	December 31, 2009				December 31, 2008
	High		Low		High		Low
1st Quarter	$	0.110	$	0.030	$	0.050	$	0.020
2nd Quarter	$	0.061	$	0.035	$	0.050	$	0.015
3rd Quarter	$	0.160	$	0.035	$	0.055	$	0.015
4th Quarter	$	0.090	$	0.030	$	0.200	$	0.007

Holders of Common Stock

As of April 15, 2009, we had approximately 550 stockholders of the 106,187,001 shares outstanding.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid dividends on our Common Stock. We intend to follow a policy of retaining earnings, if any, to finance the growth of the business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of future dividends on the Common Stock will be at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our profitability and financial condition, capital requirements, statutory and contractual restrictions, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant.

Any cash dividends in the future to common stockholders will be payable when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors, based upon the Board’s assessment of.

	· our financial condition;
	· earnings;
	· need for funds;
	· capital requirements;
	· prior claims of preferred stock to the extent issued and outstanding; and
	· other factors, including any applicable laws.

Therefore, there can be no assurance that any dividends on the common stock will ever be paid.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Consultant and Employee Stock Compensation Plan

We currently maintain a stock incentive plan in which common stock may be granted to employees, directors and consultants. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we cancelled 3,435,000 options which were previously outstanding as of December 31, 2004 and adopted our 2005 Stock Option Plan, whereby we then reissued 3,435,000 options plus an additional 3,237,000 options. All of the options, totaling 6,672,000, vest immediately with an exercise price of $0.10 per share and are exercisable through December 15, 2015. The stock option plan was adopted by our board of directors and has not been approved by our stockholders. The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2009, regarding outstanding options granted under the plan and options reserved for future grant under the plan.

-12-

Plan Category	Number of shares to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)	Number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding shares reflected in column (a)) (c)

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders	-0-	-0-	-0-

Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders	6,672,000	$0.10	3,328,000

Total	6,672,000	$0.10	3,328,000

Under CCI’s Employee Stock Incentive Plan, adopted on December 2, 2005, an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance. This plan is intended to encourage directors, officers, employees and consultants to acquire ownership of CCI’s common stock. The opportunity is intended to foster in participants a strong incentive to put forth maximum effort for the Company’s continued success and growth, to aid in retaining individuals who put forth such effort, and to assist in attracting the best available individuals to CCI in the future. As of December 31, 2009, 3,328,000 shares remain available for issuance under this stock option plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Company sold a total of 1,317,904 shares of its common stock for proceeds of approximately $51,175 to a total of eight (8) accredited investors. Of these sales, 873,571 shares were issued during the first quarter of 2010.

We believe the issuance of the shares is exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirement of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) and/or Regulation D, Rule 506. The shares were issued directly by us and did not involve a public offering or general solicitation. The recipients of the shares were afforded an opportunity for effective access to our files and records of that contained the relevant information needed to make their investment decision, including our financial statements and 34 Act reports. We reasonably believed that the recipients had such knowledge and experience in the Company’s financial and business matters that they were capable of evaluating the merits and risks of his investment.

Subsequent Issuances

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company sold 3,867,617 shares of its common stock for proceeds of approximately $98,950 to a total number of seventeen (17) accredited investors.

On April 2, 2010, the Company cancelled 100,000 shares of its common stock formerly held by a related party.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2009.

-13-

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

CCI is a Nevada corporation that acts as a holding company for its operating subsidiaries, Competitive Communications, Inc. (“Competitive Communications”), which is an approved and regulated local and long distance telephone company, and CCI Residential Services Inc. (“CCI Residential”), which is a non-regulated telephone company providing local and long distance telephone service, high-speed Internet and cable television service to large apartment complexes, DiscoverNet, Inc. (“DiscoverNet”), a Company providing web hosting, dial-up, wireless and DSL internet services to businesses and residents within various markets throughout Wisconsin, the United States and Puerto Rico, DiscoverNet of Wisconsin, LLC, (“DiscoverNet, LLC”), a dormant entity available for future projects, Innovation Capital Management, Inc., (“ICM, Inc.”), an investment company that focuses on raising capital and developing joint ventures and acquisitions, and Innovation Capital Management, LLC (“ICM, LLC”), a Company that maintains management office operations.

The telecommunications products and services provided by the company and its subsidiaries include local telephone services, domestic and international long distance services, and enhanced voice, data and internet services, and cable TV service, as well as, web hosting, dial-up, wireless and DSL internet services primarily to residents of apartment complexes, retail businesses and residential users. It is our intention in the future to provide bundled services to our customers as well as expand to customers beyond apartment complexes by providing additional services and options in addition to our current products.

Overview of Current Operations

Due to increased competition and our customers’ expanded use of cellular telephones as their primary home telephone, we discontinued servicing apartment complexes in California and Alabama during 2009. As a result, we closed our office in California and moved our headquarters to San Antonio, Texas. The transition has enabled us to shift our focus to more contemporary revenue sources, such as, web hosting, dial-up, wireless and DSL internet services.

On January 12, 2010 we acquired Voice Vision, Inc. (“VVI”) in an effort to expand our voice over internet protocol (“VoIP”) services. The acquisition is expected to enable us to expand our services to our existing customers and compete in a rapidly changing technological market place. VVI has developed a video VoIP product that we expect to be able to bring to market in the near term.

For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we incurred net losses of $1,071,545 and $428,606, respectively. Our accumulated deficit at the end of December 31, 2009 was $4,271,122. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern over the next twelve months.

Result of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

The following income and operating expenses tables summarize selected items from the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.

-14-

INCOME:

	The Year Ended December 31,						Increase/ (Decrease)
	2009			2008			%
Revenues	$	254,549		$	665,144			(62	%)

Cost of Sales		391,921			389,590			1	%

Gross Profit	$	(137,372	)	$	275,554			(150	%)

Gross Profit Percentage of Revenue		(54%	)		41	%		(95	%)

Revenues

Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $254,549 compared to revenues of $665,144 for the year ended December 31, 2008. This resulted in a decrease in revenues of $410,595, or 62%.

During 2007, regulations governed by the Federal Communications Commission were changed that allowed direct competitors to our telephone and cable services to compete with our customers in the apartment complexes that we serviced. As a result, we were unable to remain competitive with larger competitors and our customer base steadily diminished as customers’ switched providers, ultimately, resulting in the closure of our office in California. Our acquisitions in April of 2009 enabled us to extend our operations to other regions, including Texas and Wisconsin.

Due to this change in the regulatory environment of our traditional business operations, we have begun to pursue and investigate alternative revenue sources.

Cost of sales

Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $391,921, an increase of $2,331, or 1%, from $389,590 for the year ended December 31, 2008. We were unable to reduce cost of sales as our revenues declined during the year ended December 31, 2009 due to the nature of our fixed circuit costs. We expect cost of sales to decline significantly in 2010 with the closure of our California office.

Gross profit

Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased from 41% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to (54%) for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our gross profit has decreased as a result of not being able to better manage our cost of sales in relation to our overall decrease in revenues.

OPERATING EXPENSES:

	The Year Ended December 31,						Increase/ (Decrease)
	2009			2008			%
General and administrative expenses		533,031		$	326,065			64	%

Salaries and wages		227,376			200,048			14	%

Consulting fees		12,590			122,208			(90	%)

Depreciation		36,916			33,296			11	%

Bad Debt		58,642			14,493			305	%

Net operating loss	$	(1,005,927	)	$	(420,556	)		(139	%)

-15-

General and Administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses were $533,031 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $326,065 for the year ended December 31, 2008. This resulted in an increase of $206,966 or 64%. The increase was due primarily to the additional general and administrative expenses incurred by the subsidiaries that were acquired on April 2, 2009.

Salaries and Wages

Salary and wage expenses were $227,376 for the year ended December 31, 2009, versus $200,048 of salary and wage expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, which resulted in an increase of $27,328, or 14%. Our salaries and wages increased due to the additional employees that were acquired in April of 2009, which were necessary to operate the expanded regional operations in Wisconsin and Texas. We expect that we may need to increase our personnel in the future and ultimately experience higher salaries and wages as we expand our operations and finalize potential acquisitions and alternative revenue sources.

Consulting Fees

Consulting fees were $12,590 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $122,208 consulting fees for the year ended December 31, 2008, which resulted in a decrease of $109,618, or 90%. The significant decrease in consulting fees was a result of stock-based compensation being paid for professional services in the pursuit of finding financing and merger & acquisition candidates as well as a significant increase in professional fees during 2008, which we did not similarly experience in 2009.

Depreciation

Depreciation expenses were $36,916 for the year ended December 31, 2009, versus $33,296 for the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting in an increase of $3,620 or 11%. During the 2009 year we acquired depreciable fixed assets with the acquisitions on April 2, 2009. We anticipate our depreciation expenses to remain stable as we steadily replace aging fixed assets.

Bad Debt

Bad debt expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $58,642 as compared to $14,493 for the same period of 2008, which resulted in an increase of $44,149. Our bad debt expenses increased significantly due to write offs of uncollectible accounts receivable, as well as, significant increases in management’s estimate of allowances for doubtful accounts.

Net Operating (Loss)

The net operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $1,005,927, versus a net operating loss of $420,556 for the year ended December 31, 2008. This resulted in a decrease of 139% when compared to the same period of 2008. Although we had a significant decrease in our consulting fees during the 2009 year, we were unable to decrease our overall operating loss with all our other expenses. Our $410,595 reduction in revenues was not supported with equivalent reductions in operating costs. We expect significant improvements in our cost reduction efforts in 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital at December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008.

	December 31,			December 31,			Increase / (Decrease)
	2009			2008			$		%

Current Assets	$	26,594		$	108,851		$	82,257		(76	%)

Current Liabilities	$	736,007		$	263,577		$	472,430		179	%

Working (Deficit)	$	(709,413	)	$	(154,726	)	$	554,687		(358	%)

-16-

While we have raised capital to meet our working capital and financing needs in the past, additional financing is required in order to meet our current and projected cash flow deficits from operations and development of alternative revenue sources. As of December 31, 2009, we had a working capital deficit of $709,413. Current liabilities increased significantly due to the acquisition of $448,254 of current liabilities held by our newly acquired subsidiaries. Our poor financial condition raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and we have incurred losses since inception and may incur future losses.

From time to time we have received loans from our Chief Executive Officer, William H. Gray. These unsecured, interest free loans are due on demand. The balance due was $1,474 as of December 31, 2009.

On December 2, 2009 we received $30,000 in exchange for an unsecured promissory note that carries an 8% interest rate, maturing on March 2, 2010

On July 17, 2009 we received $50,000 in exchange for an unsecured convertible promissory note that carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on July 16, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.06 per share, whichever is greater.

On June 26, 2009 we received $10,000 in exchange for an unsecured convertible promissory note that carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on December 15, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.001 per share, whichever is greater.

On June 15, 2009 we received $10,000 in exchange for an unsecured convertible promissory note that carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on December 26, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.001 per share, whichever is greater.

On June 15, 2009 we received $5,000 in exchange for an unsecured convertible promissory note that carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on December 15, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.001 per share, whichever is greater.

However, should we not be able to continue to secure additional financing when needed, we may be required to slow down or suspend our growth or reduce the scope of our current operations, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the expansion of our wireless internet services in rural markets; VoIP services; additional marketing of the (800) services; the cost and availability of third-party financing for development; addition of new revenue sources; and administrative and legal expenses.

We anticipate that we will incur operating losses in the next twelve months. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development. Such risks for us include, but are not limited to, an evolving and unpredictable business model; recognition of additional revenue sources; and the management of growth. To address these risks, we must, among other things, expand our customer base, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, respond to competitive developments, and attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so can have a material adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

-17-

Going Concern

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred continuous losses from operations, have an accumulated deficit of $4,271,122 and a working capital deficit of $709,413 at December 31, 2009, and have reported negative cash flows from operations over the last four years. In addition, we do not currently have the cash resources to meet our operating commitments for the next twelve months. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, and complications frequently encountered by entrance into established markets and the competitive nature in which we operate.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations to meet our cash needs and/or to raise funds to finance ongoing operations and repay debt. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to raise additional debt or equity capital and/or that our cash generated by our operations will be adequate to meet our needs. These factors, among others, indicate that we may be unable to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results or operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”). The ASC has become the single source of non-governmental accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB in the preparation of financial statements. The ASC does not supersede the rules or regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), therefore, the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC continue to be additional sources of GAAP for the Company. The Company adopted the ASC as of July 1, 2009. The ASC does not change GAAP and did not have an effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855-10 entitled “Subsequent Events”. Companies are now required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated by management. Public entities (as defined) must conduct the evaluation as of the date the financial statements are issued, and provide disclosure that such date was used for this evaluation. ASC 855-10 provides that financial statements are considered “issued” when they are widely distributed for general use and reliance in a form and format that complies with GAAP. ASC 855-10 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and must be applied prospectively. The adoption of ASC 855-10 upon inception did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements as of that date or for the period then ended. In connection with preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009, management evaluated subsequent events through the date that such financial statements were issued (filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission).

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable.

-18-

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

COMPETITIVE COMPANIES, INC

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

	PAGES
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	F-2

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS	F-3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS	F-4

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	F-5

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS	F-6

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-7 – F-18

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Competitive Companies, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Competitive Companies, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Competitive Companies, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the periods then in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has insufficient working capital, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC

www.mkacpas.com

Houston, Texas

April 15, 2010

F-2

Competitive Companies, Inc.
(Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Balance Sheets


	December 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008
Assets

Current assets:
Cash	$	10,133		$	23,340
Account receivable, net of allowance of $18,000 and $77,472		13,611			82,514
Prepaid expenses		2,850			2,997
Total current assets		26,594			108,851

Property and equipment, net		29,745			56,425

Other assets:
Deposits		1,366			1,366


Total assets	$	57,705		$	166,642


Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Liabilities Not Subject to Compromise
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	441,078		$	162,812
Accrued expenses		57,984			32,025
Customer deposits		39,913			44,670
Deferred revenues		38,552			-
Current maturities of notes payable		68,480			11,700
Current maturities of long term debt, net of discounts of $-0-
and $2,630 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively		90,000			12,370
Total current liabilities		736,007			263,577

Liabilities Subject to Compromise (a)		390,075			-
Notes payable, less current maturities		-			8,476

Total liabilities		1,126,082			272,053

Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value 10,000,000 shares authorized:
Class A convertible, no shares issued and
outstanding with no liquidation value		-			-
Class B convertible, 1,495,436 shares issued and
outstanding with no liquidation value		1,495			1,495
Class C convertible, 1,000,000 shares issued and
outstanding with no liquidation value		1,000			1,000
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares
authorized, 98,745,813 and 64,187,630 shares issued
and outstanding at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively		98,746			64,188
Additional paid-in capital		2,710,583			2,913,469
Subscription payable, 8,194,506 and 2,180,280 shares
at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively		390,921			114,014
Accumulated (deficit)		(4,271,122	)		(3,199,577	)
Total stockholders' (deficit)		(1,068,377	)		(105,411	)


Total liabilities and stockholders' (deficit)	$	57,705		$	166,642

(a) Liabilities subject to compromise consist of the following:
Secured debt, 2.25% above "Money Rates",
secured by a $250,000 life insurance policy	$	142,009
Subordinated debentures, 8.5%		15,686
Subordinated debentures, 5%		10,000
Trade payables and other miscellaneous claims		222,380
	$	390,075

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

Competitive Companies, Inc.
(Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Statements of Operations


	For the years ended
	December 31,
	2009			2008

Revenue	$	254,549		$	665,144
Cost of sales		391,921			389,590

Gross profit (loss)		(137,372	)		275,554

Expenses:
General and administrative		533,031			326,065
Salaries and wages		227,376			200,048
Consulting fees		12,590			122,208
Depreciation		36,916			33,296
Bad debts		58,642			14,493
Total operating expenses		868,555			696,110

Net operating loss		(1,005,927	)		(420,556	)

Other income (expenses):
Other income		23,985			-
Other expense		(1,950	)		-
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		(44,497	)		-
Interest expense		(31,156	)		(8,050	)
Total other income (expenses)		(53,618	)		(8,050	)

Net loss before reorganization items		(1,059,545	)		(428,606	)
Professional fees		(12,000	)		-


Net loss	$	(1,071,545	)	$	(428,606	)

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding - basic and fully diluted		85,233,678			59,409,944

Net loss per share - basic and fully diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

Competitive Companies, Inc.
(Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity


					Class A				Class B				Class C													Total
	Common Stock				Preferred Stock				Preferred Stock				Preferred Stock				Additional			Subscriptions			Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Paid-in			Payable			(Deficit)			Equity

Balance, December 31, 2007		56,707,050	$	56,707		-	$	-		1,495,436	$	1,495		1,000,000	$	1,000	$	2,661,782		$	14,000		$	(2,770,971	)	$	(35,987	)

Shares issued for cash		1,250,000		1,250		-		-		-		-		-		-		67,250			100,014			-			168,514

Shares issued for services		6,230,580		6,231		-		-		-		-		-		-		180,687			-			-			186,918

Beneficial conversion of convertible debt		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		3,750			-			-			3,750

Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2008		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			-			(428,606	)		(428,606	)

Balance, December 31, 2008		64,187,630	$	64,188		-	$	-		1,495,436	$	1,495		1,000,000	$	1,000	$	2,913,469		$	114,014		$	(3,199,577	)	$	(105,411	)

Shares issued for cash		8,153,093		8,153		-		-		-		-		-		-		387,085			(89,139	)		-			306,099

Shares issued for services		2,623,282		2,623		-		-		-		-		-		-		126,041			-			-			128,664

Shares issued for acquisitions		23,781,808		23,782		-		-		-		-		-		-		1,165,309			366,046			-			1,555,137

Beneficial conversion of convertible debt		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		8,919			-			-			8,919

Consideration paid in excess of
fair value of acquisitions		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(1,890,240	)		-			-			(1,890,240	)

Net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2009		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-			-			(1,071,545	)		(1,071,545	)

Balance, December 31, 2009		98,745,813	$	98,746		-	$	-		1,495,436	$	1,495		1,000,000	$	1,000	$	2,710,583		$	390,921		$	(4,271,122	)	$	(1,068,377	)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

Competitive Companies, Inc.
(Debtor-in-Possession)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	For the years ended
	December 31,
	2009			2008

Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss) before reorganization items	$	(1,059,545	)	$	(428,606	)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to
net cash (used in) operating activities:
Provision for bad debts (recoveries)		58,642			14,493
Depreciation		36,916			33,296
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		44,497			-
Share-based compensation		128,664			186,918
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature		11,549			1,120
Decrease (increase) in assets:
Accounts receivable		36,700			(7,583	)
Prepaid expenses		2,952			(436	)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable		271,618			45,449
Accrued expenses		18,866			19,243
Customer deposits		(4,757	)		810
Deferred revenues		38,552			-
Net cash (used in) operating activities
before reorganization items		(415,346	)		(135,296	)
Professional fees paid for services rendered in
connection with the Chapter 11 proceeding		(12,000	)		-
Net cash (used in) operating activities		(427,346	)		(135,296	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of equipment		(9,987	)		(1,640	)
Cash acquired in merger		25,273			-
Net cash provided by investing activities		15,286			(1,640	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from long term debt		112,751			15,000
Principal payments on long term debt		(9,197	)		(27,147	)
Proceeds from sale of common stock		306,099			168,514
Principal payments on prepetition debt		(10,800	)		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		398,853			156,367

Net (decrease) in cash		(13,207	)		19,431
Cash - beginning		23,340			3,909
Cash - ending	$	10,133		$	23,340

Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid	$	12,279		$	2,733
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Shares issued for services	$	128,664		$	186,918


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Competitive Companies, Inc. ("CCI") was originally incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in March 1998, and shortly thereafter acquired all of the assets and assumed all of the liabilities of Competitive Communications, Inc. ("COMM"), which was incorporated under the laws of the state of California in February 1996. In January 2000, CCI Residential Services, Inc. ("CCIR") was formed. This entity, which is also a wholly owned subsidiary of CCI was formed to expand on residential services provided by COMM, while COMM focused on developing revenue streams from other services.

COMM and CCIR provided telephone, cable television, long distance/inter - exchange, and dial up and high-speed Internet connections and e-mail services, mainly to customers who lived in multi-tenant residential buildings. The Company's operations were located in Riverside, California and substantially all of its customers were California residents. COMM and CCIR ceased services to their California residents in 2009.

On May 5, 2005 the Company merged with CA Networks, Inc. ("CAN"), which was a development stage enterprise that was in the process of developing a business model in the same industry as Competitive. CAN was formed under the laws of the state of Wyoming on January 14, 2004. The combined companies maintained the name of CCI. The merged company (collectively "we", "us", "ours") continued to be a provider of local telephone, long distance service and high speed internet service through Wireless Internet networks in all states it operates in, and also offered cellular service nationwide until 2006 when the assets of CAN were sold and operations were halted in Kentucky and Wyoming.

CCI, with their wholly-owned subsidiaries; COMM, CCIR, DNI, ICMI, ICML, and DNL (collectively referred to as the "Company") provide dial up and high-speed broadband internet services, mainly to customers in rural markets throughout Wisconsin, San Antonio, TX and Puerto Rico. The Company's operations are located in San Antonio, Texas and substantially all of its customers are Wisconsin and Texas residents.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements. The reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period may be affected by the estimates and assumptions we are required to make. Actual results could differ significantly from our estimates.

F-7

Cash and cash equivalents

CCI maintains a cash balances in interest and non-interest-bearing accounts, which do not currently exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Basis of Accounting

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CCI, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, COMM, CCIR, DNI, ICMI, ICML, and DNL. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated. CCI, COMM, CCIR, DNI, ICMI, ICML, and DNL will be collectively referred herein to as the “Company”.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue is recognized when (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery of our services has occurred; (3) our price to our customer is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured. As such, we recognize revenues in the month in which we provide services. Services provided but not billed by the end of the year are reflected as unbilled receivables in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We evaluate the allowance for doubtful accounts on a regular basis through periodic reviews of the collectability of the receivables in light of historical experience, adverse situations that may affect our customers' ability to repay, and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. Accounts receivable are determined to be past due based on how recently payments have been received and those considered uncollectible are charged against the allowance account in the period they are deemed uncollectible. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $18,000 and $77,472 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Fixed assets

Fixed assets are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net recoverable amount. The cost of property, plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method based on the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the lease term based on the following life expectancy:

Furniture and fixtures	5 years
Telecommunication equipment and computers	5 – 10 years
Leasehold Improvements	7 years

Repairs and maintenance expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. Major improvements and replacements, which have extend the useful life of an asset, are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining estimated useful life of the asset. When assets are retired or sold, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are eliminated and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

Impairment of long-lived assets

Long-lived assets held and used by Competitive are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable or is impaired. Recoverability is assessed using undiscounted cash flows based upon historical results and current projections of earnings before interest and taxes. Impairment is measured using discounted cash flows of future operating results based upon a rate that corresponds to the cost of capital. Impairments are recognized in operating results to the extent that carrying value exceeds discounted cash flows of future operations. The Company did not incur any impairment losses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

F-8

Basic and diluted loss per share

The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss adjusted on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities. For 2009 and 2008, potential dilutive securities had an anti-dilutive effect and were not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per common share.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets are recorded at fair value and not amortized, but are reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008 we had no goodwill or other intangible assets. The Company did not incur any impairment losses for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Income taxes

CCI recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. CCI provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets to be more likely than not.

Stock-based compensation

The Company adopted FASB guidance on stock based compensation upon inception at August 13, 2009. Under FASB ASC 718-10-30-2, all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Stock issued for services totalled $128,664 and $186,918 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Advertising

We expense advertising costs as they are incurred. These expenses approximated $2,160 and $-0- for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

F-9

Note 2 – Going Concern

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplate the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have incurred continuous losses from operations, have an accumulated deficit of $4,271,122 and a working capital deficit of $709,413 at December 31, 2009, and have reported negative cash flows from operations over the last six years. In addition, we do not currently have the cash resources to meet our operating commitments for the next twelve months, and we expect to have ongoing requirements for capital investment to implement our business plan. Finally, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered by entrance into established markets and the competitive environment in which we operate.

Since inception, our operations have primarily been funded through private equity financing, and we expect to continue to seek additional funding through private or public equity and debt financing.

Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 – Petition for Relief under Chapter 11

On May 5, 2009, DiscoverNet, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, (the "Debtor") filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy laws in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Under Chapter 11, certain claims against the Debtor in existence prior to the filing of the petitions for relief under the federal bankruptcy laws are stayed while the Debtor continues business operations as Debtor-in-possession. These claims are reflected in the December 31, 2009, balance sheet as "liabilities subject to compromise." Additional claims (liabilities subject to compromise) may arise subsequent to the filing date resulting from rejection of executory contracts, including leases, and from the determination by the court (or agreed to by parties in interest) of allowed claims for contingencies and other disputed amounts. Claims secured against the Debtor's assets ("secured claims") also are stayed, although the holders of such claims have the right to move the court for relief from the stay. Secured claims are secured primarily by liens on the Debtor's property, plant, and equipment.

The Debtor has received approval from the Bankruptcy Court to pay or otherwise honor certain of its prepetition obligations, including employee wages and product warranties. The Debtor has determined that there is insufficient collateral to cover the interest portion of scheduled payments on its prepetition debt obligations. Contractual interest on those obligations amounts to $6,549, which is $1,096 in excess of reported interest expense; therefore, the debtor has discontinued accruing interest on these obligations. Refer to Note 7 for a discussion of the credit arrangements entered into subsequent to the Chapter 11 filings. A plan of reorganization has not yet been developed and accepted by the bankruptcy court.

As such, the Company has presented the financial statements and disclosures as a Debtor-in-Possession in accordance with FASB ASC 852-10-15, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code”.

F-10

Note 4 – Business Combination

The merger provides CCI with valuable assets, sound management and a solid investor base that is an integral part of our business.

The Company has recognized the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:

	April 2, 2009
Consideration:
Equity instruments (31,102,740 shares issued of CCI1)	$	1,555,137
Fair value of total consideration exchanged	$	1,555,137

Recognized amounts of identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash	$	25,273
Accounts receivable and intercompany loans		40,328
Equipment		44,746
Other current assets		2,804
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(249,964	)
Long term debt		(198,290	)
Consideration paid in excess of fair value		1,890,240
Total identifiable net assets	$	1,555,137

1	The fair value of the 31,102,740 common shares issued as consideration paid for 100% of DNI, ICMI, ICML & DNL was determined on the basis of the closing market price of CCI’s common shares on the issuance date of April 2, 2009.
2	The consideration paid in excess of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been allocated towards additional paid in capital due to the related party nature of the companies acquired (under common management by the Company’s CEO, Bill Gray).

The unaudited supplemental pro forma results of operations of the combined entity had the acquisition date been January 1, 2009 or January 1, 2008 are as follows:

F-11

	Combined Pro Forma:
	For the year ended December 31, 2009			For the year ended December 31, 2008

Expenses:
Revenue	$	367,343		$	1,116,919
Cost of sales		488,160			847,734
Gross profit		(120,817	)		269,185

Operating expenses		1,156,332			1,436,916

Net operating (loss)		(1,277,149	)		(1,167,731	)

Other income (expense)		(58,517	)		(160,111	)

Net (loss)	$	(1,335,666	)	$	(1,327,842	)

Weighted average number of common shares
Outstanding – basic and fully diluted		92,418,220			81,262,927

Net (loss) per share – basic and fully diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)

Management believes the communications network, management team and other assets acquired will enable the Company to enhance their business model and enable the Company to take advantage of opportunities in the fast changing telecommunications industry.

Note 5 – Related Party

On January 30, 2009, during the annual meeting of shareholders, a new CEO was elected. Mr. William Gray was elected to replace Jerald L. Woods. During the meeting a new board of directors was elected by a majority of the shareholders. The following board members were elected:

William Gray	Ray Powers
Jerald Woods	David Hewitt
Larry Griffin	Michael Benbow*
Tonni Lyn Smith-Atkins**	(* Resigned June 15, 2009)
(** Resigned March 17, 2009)

On August 1, 2009, the board of directors appointed former CEO, Henri Hornby to serve on the Board of Directors. Mr. Hornby subsequently resigned on October 27, 2009.

On April 2, 2009 we consummated an acquisition of four companies under common control by our CEO, William H. Gray. The following companies became wholly owned subsidiaries of Competitive Companies, Inc. and are consolidated in these financial statements:

DiscoverNet, Inc.	ICM, Inc.
ICM, LLC	DiscoverNet, LLC

On January 7, 2009, the Company capitalized website development costs in the amount of $9,987. The website development services were provided by DiscoverNet, Inc., a company under common control by the CEO, Bill Gray. The Company believes this to have taken place in an arm’s length transaction prior to the acquisition, and the amount capitalized represents the equivalent purchase price from a third party vendor.

From time to time the Company has received loans from the Officer, Bill Gray. The total of the unsecured loans, interest free, demand notes was $1,474 at December 31, 2009.

During 2008 the Company received loans from the former Officer and current board member, Jerald L. Woods. The total of these unsecured demand loans, carrying an 18% interest rate, were $4,500 at December 31, 2008 and were repaid in full during 2009, along with accrued interest of $5,996.

During 2009 Jerald L. Woods was also repaid $6,754 for unreimbursed expenses that he previously paid on behalf of the Company. An unpaid accounts payable balance of $4,325 remains outstanding as of December 31, 2009.

F-12

Note 6 – Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following:

	December 31,
	2009			2008

Telecommunication equipment and computers	$	29,666		$	274,419
Furniture and fixtures		47,383			-
Software		19,647			-
		96,696			274,419

Less accumulated depreciation		(66,951	)		(217,994	)
	$	29,745		$	56,425

Depreciation expense totaled $36,916 and $33,296 for 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company disposed of $284,406 and $21,670 of fixed assets that were no longer in service during 2009 and 2008, respectively. A loss of $44,497 and $-0- resulted from the disposal as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Note 7 – Notes Payable

Notes payable consists of the following at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008

Related party, unsecured promissory note, interest free, due on demand.	$	1,474	$	-

Unsecured promissory note carries an 8% interest rate, maturing on March 2, 2010.		30,000		-

Unsecured promissory note carries an 8% interest rate, matured on June 15, 2009. Currently in default.		10,000		-

Unsecured promissory note carries an 8% interest rate, matured on June 15, 2009. Currently in default.		10,000		-

Secured line of credit, including accrued interest, carries a variable interest rate at 2.25% above “Money Rates”. The line matured on March 17, 2009, and the debt is currently under the protection of the bankruptcy petition. The Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan has not yet been submitted for approval from the bankruptcy court therefore, the Company has not yet entered into credit arrangements with the lender. The note carries an additional 5% default rate, and is secured by a $250,000 life insurance policy on the CEO.		142,009		-

Unsecured promissory note, including accrued interest, carries an 8.5% interest rate, maturing on October 1, 2010. The debt is currently under the protection of the bankruptcy petition. The Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan has not yet been submitted for approval from the bankruptcy court therefore, the Company has not yet entered into credit arrangements with the lender.		15,686		-

F-13

Unsecured, interest free promissory note carries a 5% late fee penalty in the event the Company is more than 10 days late with monthly payments of $1,000 beginning on September 1, 2008, matured on June 6, 2009. Currently in default and under the protection of the bankruptcy petition. The Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan has not yet been submitted for approval from the bankruptcy court therefore, the Company has not yet entered into credit arrangements with the lender.		10,000		-

Related party, unsecured promissory note carries an 18% interest rate, due on demand. Interest expense of $863 and $5,133 accrued during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.		-		4,500

Unsecured note payable in default to a stockholder, with interest at 8%, and monthly principal and interest payments of $683, maturing on February 23, 2011. Currently in default.		17,006		15,676
Total notes payable		236,175		20,176
Less: liabilities subject to compromise		167,695		-
Less: current portion		68,480		11,700
Notes payable, less current portion	$	-	$	8,476

Note 8 – Convertible Debt

Notes payable consists of the following at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008

Unsecured convertible promissory note carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on July 16, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.06 per share, whichever is greater. Currently in default.	$	50,000	$	-

Unsecured convertible promissory note carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on December 26, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.001 per share, whichever is greater. Currently in default.		10,000		-

Unsecured convertible promissory note carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on December 15, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.001 per share, whichever is greater. Currently in default.		10,000		-

F-14

Unsecured convertible promissory note carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on December 15, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.001 per share, whichever is greater. Currently in default.		5,000		-

Unsecured convertible promissory note carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on May 11, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.001 per share, whichever is greater. Currently in default.		10,000		10,000

Unsecured convertible promissory note carries an 8.75% interest rate, matured on April 30, 2009. The principal is convertible into shares of common stock at the discretion of the note holder at a price equal to eighty percent (80%) of the volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the twenty two (22) trading days prior to the conversion date, or $0.001 per share, whichever is greater. Currently in default.		5,000		5,000
Total convertible debt		90,000		15,000
Less: discount on beneficial conversion feature		-		2,630
Convertible debt	$	90,000	$	12,370

In addition, the Company recognized and measured the embedded beneficial conversion feature present in the convertible debt by allocating a portion of the proceeds equal to the intrinsic value of the feature to additional paid-in-capital. The intrinsic value of the feature was calculated on the commitment date using the effective conversion price of the convertible debt. This intrinsic value is limited to the portion of the proceeds allocated to the convertible debt.

The aforementioned accounting treatment resulted in a total debt discount equal to $12,669. The discount was amortized over a six month period, from the date of issuance until the stated redemption date of the debt.

According to the terms of the Convertible Promissory Notes, the number of shares that would be received upon conversion was 3,531,401 shares at December 31, 2009.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded financial expenses in the amount of $11,549 attributed to the amortization of the aforementioned debt discount.

As of December 31, 2009, no shares were issued pursuant to debt conversion.

The Company recorded interest expense in the amount of $31,156 and $8,050 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

F-15

Note 9 – Stockholders’ Equity

On January 30, 2009, the shareholders of the Company voted to increase the authorized common shares of the Company from 70,000,000 authorized shares of common stock to 500,000,000 authorized shares of common stock. Additionally, the shareholders voted to increase the authorized preferred shares of the Company from 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock to 100,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock. As a result of this vote, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to reflect this change.

Convertible Class A Preferred Stock

In consummation of the merger in Note 1, the Company repurchased 4,000,000 Class “A” preferred stock for $40,000 during 2005. Therefore, there was no outstanding Class “A” preferred stock at December 31, 2009 or 2008, respectively.

Convertible Class B Preferred Stock

We currently have 1,495,436 shares of Class B convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding which can be converted into shares of our common stock.

Convertible Class C Preferred Stock

We currently have 1,000,000 shares of Class C convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding which can be converted into shares of our common stock. All of the shares are held by one stockholder.

Common stock

On December 18, 2009 the Company sold 320,000 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $8,000. The shares were issued on March 12, 2010.

On November 18, 2009 the Company sold 200,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On November 16, 2009 the Company sold 33,330 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $1,000.

On November 14, 2009 the Company sold 150,000 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $3,750. The shares were issued on March 12, 2010.

On November 12, 2009 the Company sold 100,000 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $2,500. The shares were issued on January 15, 2010.

On October 30, 2009 the Company sold 142,857 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000. The shares were issued on March 12, 2010.

On October 29, 2009 the Company sold 142,857 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000. The shares were issued on March 12, 2010.

On October 29, 2009 the Company sold 400,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $10,000.

On October 29, 2009 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the share exchange agreement dated April 2, 2009.

On October 27, 2009 the Company issued 250,000 free trading (S-8) shares of common stock for accounting services rendered. The fair market value of the shares was $10,000 based on the closing stock price on the grant date.

F-16

On October 16, 2009 the Company sold 17,857 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $625. The shares were issued on March 12, 2010.

On October 15, 2009 the Company sold 25,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $1,000.

On October 13, 2009 the Company sold 75,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $9,300.

On September 18, 2009 the Company sold 510,564 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $25,528.

On September 18, 2009 the Company sold 100,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On August 24, 2009 the Company sold 100,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On August 24, 2009, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to an investor that had purchased the Company’s common stock on January 19, 2009 in exchange for proceeds of $2,500.

On August 24, 2009 the Company issued 643,115 shares of common stock pursuant to the share exchange agreement dated April 2, 2009.

On August 21, 2009 the Company sold 1,048,439 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $52,422.

On August 21, 2009 the Company sold 20,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $1,000.

On August 17, 2009 the Company sold 100,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000

On August 14, 2009 the Company sold 40,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $2,000.

On August 14, 2009 the Company sold 60,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $3,000.

On August 13, 2009 the Company sold 100,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On August 10, 2009 the Company sold 160,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $8,000.

On August 4, 2009 the Company sold 100,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On July 29, 2009 the Company sold 150,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $6,000.

On July 29, 2009 the Company sold 400,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $20,000.

F-17

On July 15, 2009 the Company issued a total of 910,000 free trading (S-8) shares of common stock for accounting services rendered. The fair market value of the shares was $45,500 based on the closing stock price on the grant date.

On July 15, 2009 the Company issued a total of 1,463,282 free trading (S-8) shares of common stock for legal services rendered. The fair market value of the shares was $73,164 based on the closing stock price on the grant date.

On July 15, 2009 the Company issued 285,710 shares of common stock pursuant to the share exchange agreement dated April 2, 2009.

On May 1, 2009 the Company issued 21,852,983 of the 31,102,740 shares granted as part of the share exchange agreement on April 2, 2009.

On April 12, 2009 the Company sold 124,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $6,200.

On April 10, 2009 the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to an individual investor that had purchased the Company’s common stock on March 28, 2007, which was previously recorded as a stock subscription payable in the total amount of $10,000.

On April 2, 2009 the Company authorized the issuance of 31,102,740 shares of common stock in exchange for a total of 3,110,274 shares (10:1) of four private companies, representing 100% of their outstanding equity as part of a share exchange agreement. The four acquired entities are consolidated in the financial statements herein. The total fair value of the common stock was $1,555,137.

On March 31, 2009 the Company issued a total of 2,080,280 shares of common stock to seven individual investors that had purchased the Company’s common stock during the year ending December 31, 2008, which was previously recorded as stock subscriptions payable in the total amount of $104,014.

On March 25, 2009 the Company sold 100,000 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000. The shares were issued on April 10, 2009.

On March 18, 2009 the Company sold 23,480 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $1,174. The shares were issued on April 10, 2009.

On March 3, 2009 the Company sold 100,000 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000. The shares were issued on April 10, 2009.

On March 3, 2009 the Company sold 70,000 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $3,500. The shares were issued on April 10, 2009.

On February 27, 2009 the Company sold 400,000 shares of common stock as a subscription payable to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $20,000. The shares were issued on April 10, 2009.

On February 5, 2009 the Company sold 400,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $20,000.

On January 19, 2009 the Company sold 160,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $8,000. On August 24, 2009 the Company issued 50,000 shares, and the remaining 110,000 shares were issued on November 16, 2009.

F-18

On January 14, 2009 the Company sold 540,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $27,000.

On January 5, 2009 the Company sold 60,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $3,000.

On January 5, 2009 the Company sold 120,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $6,000.

On January 1, 2009 the Company sold 22,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $1,100.

On various dates between December 10, 2008 and December 19, 2008, CCI received a total of $99,014 in exchange for 1,980,280 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from five different individual investors. As of December 31, 2008 the shares had not yet been issued and were recorded as subscriptions payable.

On December 8, 2008, CCI received $5,000 in exchange for 100,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from an individual investor.

On December 6, 2008, CCI received $10,000 in exchange for 200,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from an individual investor.

On December 5, 2008, CCI received $5,000 in exchange for 100,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from an individual investor.

On December 3, 2008, CCI received $5,000 in exchange for 200,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from an individual investor. As of December 31, 2008 the shares had not yet been issued. Accordingly, the $5,000 received has been presented as Subscriptions Payable at December 31, 2008.

On November 18, 2008 the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock to an investor that had purchased the Company’s common stock on April 16, 2007, which was previously recorded as a stock subscription payable in the amount of $4,000.

On October 1, 2008, the Company issued 1,000,000 unrestricted, S-8 shares under the 2008 Non-Qualified Consultants Stock Compensation Plan to a consultant for consulting services rendered in the pursuit of obtaining a potential merger candidate over the three month period ending December 31, 2008. The fair market value of the shares was $30,000.

On September 10, 2008, CCI received $20,000 in exchange for 400,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from an individual investor.

On September 2, 2008, CCI received $5,000 in exchange for 100,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from an individual investor.

On August 14, 2008, CCI filed a form S-8 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission which authorizes the Company to issue a total of 7,730,580 unrestricted shares of the Company’s common stock, of which, 5,500,000 are to be issued to consultants and 2,230,580 are to be issued as payment for professional services rendered.

On July 30, 2008, the Company issued 1,230,580 of these S-8 shares for legal services rendered. The fair market value of the shares was $36,918.

On July 30, 2008, the Company issued 1,000,000 of these S-8 shares to a consulting firm for accounting services rendered. The fair market value of the shares was $30,000.

F-19

On July 30, 2008, the Company granted 3,000,000 of these S-8 shares to a consultant for consulting services rendered in the pursuant of obtaining a potential merger candidate. The fair market value of the shares was $90,000.

On May 14, 2008, CCI received $6,500 in exchange for 130,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from an individual investor.

On April 16, 2008, CCI received $5,000 in exchange for 50,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from the Company’s CEO.

On April 1, 2008, CCI received $3,000 in exchange for 30,000 shares of its $.001 par value common stock from an individual investor.

Note 10 – Common Stock Options

During the year ended December 31, 2005, Company cancelled 3,435,000 options outstanding at December 31, 2004 and adopted 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan authorizes the issuance of stock options and other awards to acquire up to a maximum 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (less the number of shares issuable upon exercise of options granted by the Company under all other stock incentive plans on the date of any grant under the Plan). The Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options (within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended), options that are not incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights and various other stock-based grants.

On December 15, 2005, the Company granted employees and directors options to purchase 6,672,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $0.10 with a ten-year life. Because the Company stock was not trading at the grant date, and the Company issued all shares at $.10 in 2005, which was equal to the exercise price. No further options were granted during 2009 and 2008.

Shares Underlying

Shares Underlying Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Weighted

Average

Weighted

Underlying

Remaining

Average

Underlying

Average

Range of

Options

Contractual

Exercise

Options

Exercise

Exercise Prices

Outstanding

Life

Price

Exercisable

Price

0.10

6,672,000

0.10

6,672,000

0.10

The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2005 Stock Option Plan:

			Weighted
			Average
	Number		Exercise
	Of Shares		Price

Balance, December 31, 2007		6,672,000	$	0.10
Options cancelled		-		-
Options granted		-		-
Options exercised		-		-
Balance, December 31, 2008		6,672,000	$	0.10
Options cancelled		-		-
Options granted		-		-
Options exercised		-		-
Balance, December 31, 2009		6,672,000	$	0.10

Exercisable, December 31, 2009		6,672,000	$	0.10

F-20

Note 11 – Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC 740-10, which requires use of the liability method. FASB ASC 740-10-25 provides that deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes, referred to as temporary differences.

For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred net operating losses and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At December 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $4,987,000 of federal and state net operating losses. The net operating loss carry forwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2025.

The components of the Company’s deferred tax asset are as follows:

	As of December 31,			As of December 31,
	2009			2008
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	1,745,500		$	1,594,250
Total deferred tax assets		1,745,500			1,594,250

Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance		1,745,500			1,594,250
Less: Valuation allowance		(1,745,500	)		(1,594,250	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-0-		$	-0-

Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company’s history of its loss, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:

	2009			2008

Federal and state statutory rate		35	%		35	%
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets		(35	%)		(35	%)
		-0-			-0-

F-21

Note 12 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 on January 1, 2008. Under FASB ASC 820-10-5, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures. Under GAAP, certain assets and liabilities must be measured at fair value, and FASB ASC 820-10-50 details the disclosures that are required for items measured at fair value.

The Company has various financial instruments that must be measured under the new fair value standard including: cash and debt. The Company currently does not have non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, with the exception of intangible assets. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. The fair value of the Company’s cash is based on quoted prices and therefore classified as Level 1.

Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table provides a summary of the fair values of assets and liabilities:

	Carrying Value				Fair Value Measurements at
	December 31,				December 31, 2009
	2009		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Cash	$	10,133	$	10,133	$	-	$	-

Liabilities:
Notes payable	$	68,480	$	-	$	-	$	68,480
Long term debt		90,000						90,000
Total	$	168,613	$	10,133	$	-	$	158,480

The Company believes that the market rate of interest as at December 31, 2009 was not materially different to the rate of interest at which the debts were issued. Accordingly, the Company believes that the fair value of the debt approximated their carrying value at December 31, 2009.

Note 13 – Subsequent Events

On January 11, 2010 the Company sold 300,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $4,500.

F-22

On January 13, 2010 the Company sold 333,333 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On January 13, 2010 the Company sold 350,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,250.

On January 15, 2010 the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to an individual investor that had purchased the Company’s common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009, which was previously recorded as stock subscriptions payable in the amount of $2,500.

On January 19, 2010 the Company sold 500,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $10,000.

On January 21, 2010 the Company sold 333,333 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On January 26, 2010 the Company sold 71,429 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $2,500.

On January 28, 2010 the Company sold 142,857 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On January 29, 2010 the Company sold 183,333 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,500.

On February 11, 2010 the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the share exchange agreement dated April 2, 2009. The shares were valued at $150,000 and were included in subscriptions payable at December 31, 2009.

On February 12, 2010 the Company sold 71,429 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $2,500.

On February 19, 2010 the Company sold 142,857 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On February 25, 2010 the Company sold 71,429 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $2,500.

On February 26, 2010 the Company sold 142,857 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On March 4, 2010 the Company received $50,000 in exchange for an 8% Secured Convertible Note maturing on December 5, 2010. The note is convertible into 58% of the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period ending one trading day prior to the conversion request, and is secured by 5,172,414 shares of the Company’s unissued common stock, which has been reserved in the event of default. The note converts to a 22% interest rate in the event of default.

On March 5, 2010 the Company sold 120,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $4,200.

F-23

On March 8, 2010 the Company sold 142,857 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On March 10, 2010 the Company sold 142,857 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On March 11, 2010 the Company sold 200,000 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $7,000. The shares remain unissued as of April 15, 2010.

On March 12, 2010 the Company issued a total of 773,571 shares of common stock to five individual investors that had purchased the Company’s common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009, which was previously recorded as stock subscriptions payable in the total amount of $22,375.

On March 19, 2010 the Company sold 333,332 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $10,000.

On April 2, 2010 the Company sold 142,857 shares of common stock to an investor in exchange for proceeds of $5,000.

On April 2, 2010, the Company cancelled 100,000 shares of its common stock formerly held by a related party.

In accordance with ASC 855-10, all subsequent events have been reported through the filing date of April 15, 2010.

F-24

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

On April 21, 2009, Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA P.C. (“Scharfman”) resigned as the principal independent accountants for the Company.

On August 11, 2009, the PCAOB revoked the registration of Scharfman because of deficiencies in the conduct of certain of its audits and its procedures, none of which pertain to the Registrant.

Scharfman had been the Company’s principal independent accountants and had reported on the financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Except as described below, the audit report of Scharfman on the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, did not contain an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and was not qualified or modified as to audit scope or accounting principles. Scharfman’s 2008 audit report relating to the audit of the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, included an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern in light of their lack of revenues and history of losses.

In connection with the audits of the Registrant’s consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, and through April 21, 2009, there were: (1) no disagreements between the Company and Scharfman on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Scharfman, would have caused Scharfman to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for such year, and (2) no reportable events within the meaning set forth in Item 304 of Regulation S-K.

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer during the year ended December 31, 2009, William Gray, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, Mr. Gray concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective, which are discussed below in more detail, in timely alerting him to material information relating to us required to be included in our periodic SEC filings and in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

-19-

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control, as is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These internal controls are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the reported financial information is presented fairly, that disclosures are adequate and that the judgments inherent in the preparation of financial statements are reasonable. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of internal controls, including the possibility of human error and overriding of controls. Consequently, an effective internal control system can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance with respect to reporting financial information.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and the receipts and expenditures of company assets are made and in accordance with our management and directors authorization; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework and criteria established in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2009 for the following reasons.

·	The Company does not have an independent board of directors or audit committee or adequate segregation of duties;

·	All of our financial reporting is carried out by our financial consultant;

·	We do not have an independent body to oversee our internal controls over financial reporting and lack segregation of duties due to the limited nature and resources of the Company.

We intend to rectify these weaknesses by implementing an independent board of directors and hiring of additional accounting personnel once we have additional resources to do so.

The material weaknesses identified did not result in the restatement of any previously reported financial statements or any other related financial disclosures, nor does management believe that it had any effect on the accuracy of our financial statements for the current reporting period.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Item 9B. Other Information.

On October 27, 2009, Henry Hornby submitted his resignation of his position on the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Hornby’s resignation was not a result of any disagreement with management, or the Board of Directors. Currently, Mr. Hornby’s position on the Board of Directors remains vacant.

-20-

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The members of the Board of Directors of the Company will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors have been elected. The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. Officers are elected by the Board of Directors and their terms of office are, except to the extent governed by employment contract, at the discretion of the Board. Information as to the directors and executive officers of the Company is as follows:

NAME	AGE	POSITION
William H. Gray (2)	59	Chief Executive Officer, Current Director
Jerald Woods (1)	61	Former Chief Executive Officer, Current Director
David Hewitt	64	Director
Larry Griffin	57	Director
Ray Powers (3)	63	Current President and Director

(1)	On February 10, 2009, Mr. Woods resigned from his position as Chief Executive Officer.

(2)	Mr. Gray was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer upon Mr. Woods resignation.

(3)	Dr. Ray Powers was appointed President on February 10, 2009.

Duties, Responsibilities and Experience

William Gray became a Director upon the resignation of Mr. Henri Hornby in November 2008. Mr. Gray became the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on February 10, 2009 upon the resignation of Mr. Woods. Additionally, Mr. Gray is the founder of Innovation Capital Management, Inc. (ICM), a Delaware Corporation that was incorporated in May 2008. ICM is involved in managing investment securities design and development. ICM is also the owner of ICM LLC and DiscoverNet, Inc. DiscoverNet, Inc. is a full service Internet Service Provider currently deploying wireless broadband Internet throughout western Wisconsin and was incorporated in July of 1996. Mr. Gray has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of DiscoverNet since May of 1997 and has been chiefly responsible for the funding of DiscoverNet since inception. Most recently, the Company has developed a proprietary propagation software capable of designing tier one wireless networks via the web. ICM intends to offer this unique software to other Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISP) as part of its planned investment and acquisition program. Mr. Gray is highly skilled and experienced in designing investment securities, developing financial forecast, structuring mergers and acquisitions, writing business plans and drafting private placement memorandum. Mr. Gray has managed investment securities exceeding $100 million.

David Hewitt has been a Director since December 2001 and became a director as a result of the merger with Huntington Telecommunications Partners. Prior to joining the Company through the merger with Huntington Telecommunications, Inc., he was the Co-Founder and President of Huntington Partners, Inc., which was a development and investment company providing capital and management for real estate and business venture investments as well as an affiliate to the general partner of Huntington Telecommunicaitons. Currently, Mr. Hewitt is the Managing Member of Southwind Realty Group, LLC, which focuses on the acquisition and redevelopment of infill residential properties in Southern California. From 1999 to 2005, Mr. Hewitt was a founder, Chairman, and a Director of Silverwood Investments, LLC, a real estate investment company focused on apartment property development throughout California. From 1989 to 1992, he was Co-Founder and Managing Director of Trilateral Company, a real estate firm. He has an MBA with Distinction from Amos Tuck School of Business Administration at Dartmouth College and a BA from University of Rochester.

-21-

Larry Griffin has been the IT Director for Diamondback Management, Inc. since 2005 and prior to that worked as an independent contractor from 1998 to 2005. Additionally, he was the Director of Network Development O.S. for WorldCom from 1988 to 1997. At WorldCom, Mr. Griffin was responsible for WorldCom’s redesign and development of its integrated billing systems during the Company’s accelerated telecom acquisitions in the mid 1990’s. Mr. Griffin was the chief architect with the sub-system of the DEX (Digital Switch) switches to allow account codes to be validated against a common database from any switch in the DEX network. He led the design and development of a switch update and CDR collection systems for the DEX network. Mr. Griffin hopes to advise CCI on its integrated billing systems for future subscriber acquisitions.

Jerald Woods served as the Chief Executive Officer from November 2007 to February 2009. Prior to becoming the CEO, Mr. Woods was the Vice President and Director of CA Networks, Inc. and subsequent to the merger of CCI and CA Networks, Inc. he had remained in those positions. Prior to the merger, Mr. Woods served as a telecommunications consultant for Competitive Companies. Additionally, Mr. Woods has been a director of CCI since 1998. From 1994 to 2000 he was an Officer and Director of APMSAFE.COM (American Privacy Management, Inc.), a private company engaged in the computer encryption business. From 1988 to 1994, he was Chairman and Director for American Digital Communications, Inc. From 1984 to 1989, he hosted and produced “Breakthroughs in Technology,” an investment program specializing in high technology companies. He currently is President of JLW Communications Services. Mr. Woods has served as a director for several private companies as well as owning his own investment banking and advertising companies.

Dr. Ray Powers was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors on November 25, 2008 and later President on February 10, 2009. Mr. Powers’ business leadership experience spans over 30 years in a Fortune 200 corporate environment of AT&T/US West/Quest followed by accomplishments in a variety of enterprise scenarios. Dr. Powers began his career at AT&T in 1965 and continued to work in various capacities for AT&T and its successors until 1996. Currently, Dr. Powers is the chief consultant for Strategic Alliance Enterprises, Inc., which provides new technology communications products and services and serves in a consulting role in project management, development of business plans and process improvement initiatives. Prior to his consulting work, from 2004 to 2006, Dr. Powers served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Corban Networks, Inc., which is a communications industry service provider specializing in wireless communications. From 1998 to 2004, Dr. Powers served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Compass Corporate Holdings, Inc., which through its subsidiaries provided technology services, technology management and project management consulting. Dr. Powers has served on several companies’ Board of Directors and currently sits on the Board of Strategic Alliance Enterprises, Inc., Worldwide Communications Associates, Inc., and the Executive Initiative Institute. Dr. Powers holds a Bachelor of Science from Arizona State University, a MBA in Technology Management and a Doctorate in Educational Leadership from the University of Phoenix. Dr. Powers is also an adjunct professor for both undergraduate and graduate level courses at the University of Phoenix.

Election of Directors and Officers.

Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers are appointed to serve until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

No Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation has been the subject of any Order, Judgment, or Decree of any Court of competent jurisdiction, or any regulatory agency permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring suspending or otherwise limiting him from acting as an investment advisor, underwriter, broker or dealer in the securities industry, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of an investment company, bank, savings and loan association, or insurance company or from engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with any such activity or in connection with the purchase or sale of any securities.

No Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation has been convicted in any criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations) or is the subject of a criminal proceeding which is currently pending.

No current Executive Officer or Director of the Corporation is the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

-22-

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), requires executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of an issuer’s common stock, which has been registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten-percent beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based upon a review of the copies of such forms furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and directors, we believe that as of December 31, 2009, they were not all current in their filings.

Code of Ethics

A code of ethics relates to written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

·	Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;

·	Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that are filed with, or submitted to, the Commission and in other public communications made by an issuer;

·	Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;

·	The prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the code; and

·	Accountability for adherence to the code.

On December 18, 2005, we adopted a written code of ethics that governs all of our officers, and more specifically our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer directors, employees and contractors. The code of ethics relates to written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote the above mentioned objectives. Anyone can obtain a copy of the Code of Ethics by contacting the Company. The Company will post any amendments to the Code of Ethics, as well as any waivers that are required to be disclosed by the rules of either the Securities and Exchange Commission or FINRA.

Corporate Governance

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has analyzed the independence of each director and has concluded that currently Messrs. Hewitt and Griffin are considered independent directors in accordance with the director independence standards of the NYSE Amex Equities, and has determined that they have not had a material relationship with CCI that would impair their independence from management.

Nominating Committee

We do not have a Nominating Committee or Nominating Committee Charter. Our Board of Directors performs some of the functions associated with a Nominating Committee. We elected not to have a Nominating Committee during the year ended December 31, 2009, in that we had limited operations and resources.

Director Nomination Procedures

Generally, nominees for Directors are identified and suggested by the members of the Board or management using their business networks. The Board has not retained any executive search firms or other third parties to identify or evaluate director candidates in the past and does not intend to in the near future. In selecting a nominee for director, the Board or management considers the following criteria:

whether the nominee has the personal attributes for successful service on the Board, such as demonstrated character and integrity; experience at a strategy/policy setting level; managerial experience dealing with complex problems; an ability to work effectively with others; and sufficient time to devote to the affairs of the Company;

2.	whether the nominee has been the chief executive officer or senior executive of a public company or a leader of a similar organization, including industry groups, universities or governmental organizations;

-23-

3.	whether the nominee, by virtue of particular experience, technical expertise or specialized skills or contacts relevant to the Company’s current or future business, will add specific value as a Board member; and

4.	whether there are any other factors related to the ability and willingness of a new nominee to serve, or an existing Board member to continue his service.

The Board or management has not established any specific minimum qualifications that a candidate for director must meet in order to be recommended for Board membership. Rather, the Board or management will evaluate the mix of skills and experience that the candidate offers, consider how a given candidate meets the Board’s current expectations with respect to each such criterion and make a determination regarding whether a candidate should be recommended to the stockholders for election as a Director. During 2009, the Company received no recommendation for Directors from its stockholders.

Audit Committee

Currently, we do not have an Audit Committee. At this time, the board of directors will perform the necessary functions of an Audit Committee, such as: recommending an independent registered public accounting firm to audit the annual financial statements; reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm; review of the financial statements and other required regulatory financial reporting; and reviewing management’s policies and procedures in connection with its internal control over financial reporting.

Additionally, we do not have a financial expert. We believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. However, at such time the Company has the financial resources a financial expert will be hired.

Compensation Committee

We currently do not have a compensation committee of the board of directors. Until a formal committee is established our board of directors will review all forms of compensation provided to our executive officers, directors, consultants and employees, including stock compensation. The Board makes all compensation decisions for the Executives and approves recommendation regarding equity awards to all elected officers of CCI. Decisions regarding the non-equity compensation of other executive officers are made by the Board.

Shareholder Communications

Any shareholder communications to the Board should be forwarded to the attention of the Company’s Secretary at our offices at 19206 Huebner Rd., Suite 202, San Antonio, TX, 78258. Our Secretary will review any communication received from a stockholder, and all material communications from stockholders will be forwarded to the Chairman of the Board, the Board of Directors, or other individual directors as appropriate.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

The following table sets forth the compensation of our executive officers for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively:

Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary	Stock Awards (4)	All Other Compensation	Total

William Gray, CEO and/or Principal Executive Officer, Director (1)	2009 2008	$79,099 $-0-	$-0- $-0-	$-0- $-0-	$79,099 $-0-

Jerald Woods, Former Chief Executive Officer, Director (2)	2009 2008	$-0- $-0-	$-0- $-0-	$11,006 $-0-	$11,006 $-0-

Ray Powers, President, Director (3)	2009 2008	$-0- S-0-	$-0- $-0-	$19,500 $-0-	$19,500 $-0-

-24-

(1)	On February 10, 2009, Mr. Woods resigned from his position as Chief Executive Officer.

(2)	Mr. Gray was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer upon Mr. Woods resignation.

(3)	Dr. Ray Powers was appointed President on February 10, 2009.

(4)	On October 29, 2009, Mr. Ray Powers received 1,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the acquisition on April 2, 2009. The shares were not issued as compensation expense.

(5)

Mr. Gray was granted 6,734,858 shares of common stock pursuant to the acquisition on April 2, 2009. On February 11, 2010 there were 3,000,000 shares issued, of which Mr. Gray subsequently exchanged 500,000 shares in a private transaction. The remaining 3,734,858 shares have not yet been issued. The shares were not issued as compensation expense.

Employment Agreement

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not have any employment agreements or understandings in place with our executive officers.

Termination of Employment

There are no compensatory plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from the Company, with respect to any person associated with the Company which would in any way result in payments to any such person because of his resignation, retirement, or other termination of such person’s employment with the Company or its subsidiaries, or any change in control of the Company, or a change in the person’s responsibilities following a change in control of the Company.

Compensation Committee

We currently do not have a compensation committee on the board of directors. Until a formal committee is established our entire board of directors will review all forms of compensation provided to our executive officers, directors, consultants, and employees, including stock compensation.

Equity Awards

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we did not grant any equity awards to our officers and/or directors.

Director Compensation and Other Arrangements

As a result of having limited resources during most of 2009, we did not provide compensation to our board of directors.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table presents information, to the best of our knowledge, about the beneficial ownership of our common stock on December 31, 2009, held by those persons known to beneficially own more than 5% of our capital stock and by our directors and executive officers. The percentage of beneficial ownership for the following table is based on 98,745,813 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2009.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes those shares of common stock over which the stockholder has sole or shared voting or investment power. It also includes (unless footnoted) shares of common stock that the stockholder has a right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2009, through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right. The percentage ownership of the outstanding common stock, however, is based on the assumption, expressly required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, that only the person or entity whose ownership is being reported has converted options or warrants into shares of our common stock.

-25-

Name of Officer or Director (1)	Number of Common Shares	Percent Beneficially Owned (2)
Henri R. Hornby, Former Chief Executive Officer and Former Director (6)	10,266,666	10%
Jerald Woods, Former Chief Executive Officer, Current Director (3)	7,198,886	7%
William Gray, Current Chief Executive Officer and Director (4)	6,234,858	6%
Ray Powers (5)	1,000,000	1%
David Hewitt	1,000,000	1%
Larry Griffin	0	0%
Michael Benbow	0	0%
All Officers and Directors as a Group	25,700,410	24%

** Denotes less than 1%.

(1)

As used in this table, “beneficial ownership” means the sole or shared power to vote, or to direct the voting of, a security, or the sole or shared investment power with respect to a security (i.e., the power to dispose of, or to direct the disposition of, a security). The address of each person is in the care of the Company.

(2)	Figures are rounded to the nearest percent.

(3)	On February 10, 2009, Mr. Woods resigned from his position as Chief Executive Officer.

(4)

On February 10, 2009, Mr. Gray was appointed the Company’s Chief Executive Officer upon Mr. Woods’ resignation. Innovation Capital Management, Inc. purchased 100,000 shares pursuant to a private placement. Mr. William Gray has the authority to exercise dispositive and voting power over the shares of common stock for Innovation Capital Management, Inc. Mr. Gray cancelled the shares and returned them to treasury on April 2, 2010. Mr. Gray was also granted 6,734,858 shares of common stock pursuant to the acquisition on April 2, 2009, of these, 3,000,000 shares were issued on February 11, 2010, of which Mr. Gray subsequently exchanged 500,000 shares in a private transaction. The remaining 3,734,858 shares have not yet been issued.

(5)	Dr. Ray Powers was appointed as the Company’s President on February 10, 2009. On October 29, 2009, Mr. Ray Powers received 1,000,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the acquisition on April 2, 2009.

(6)	Mr. Hornby resigned as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on November 12, 2007, and as Director on October 27, 2009.

(7)	Mr. Gray was granted 6,734,858 shares of common stock pursuant to the acquisition on April 2, 2009. On February 11, 2010 there were 3,000,000 shares issued, of which Mr. Gray subsequently exchanged 500,000 shares in a private transaction. The remaining 3,734,858 shares have not yet been issued.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

From time to time we have received loans from our Chief Executive Officer, William H. Gray. These unsecured, interest free loans are due on demand. The balance due was $1,474 as of December 31, 2009.

CCI’s former Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Woods, loaned the Company $4,500 and $25,000 during the 2008 and 2007 years, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has repaid all outstanding notes payable, and related accrued interest, at a rate of 18% per annum in full. The Company recorded interest expense to Mr. Woods in the amount of $-0- and $5,133 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Mr. Woods is also owed a total of $4,325 for unreimbursed expenses as included in accounts payable at December 31, 2009.

-26-

DiscoverNet, Inc.	ICM, Inc.
ICM, LLC	DiscoverNet, LLC

As a result of the shares exchanged in this transaction, Mr. Gray was granted 6,734,858 shares of common stock, of these, 3,000,000 shares were issued on February 11, 2010, of which Mr. Gray subsequently exchanged 500,000 shares in a private transaction. The remaining 3,734,858 shares have not yet been issued. In addition, on October 29, 2009 the Company’s President and Director, Mr. Ray Powers, was issued a total of 1,000,000 shares as a result of these acquisitions.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

(1) Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by M&K CPAs, PLLC for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were $37,500 and $-0-, respectively.

The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA P.C., for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were $15,000 and $27,500, respectively.

(2) Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed by M&K CPAs, PLLC for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the registrant’s financial statements for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were $-0- and $-0-, respectively.

The aggregate fees billed by Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA P.C., for assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the registrant’s financial statements for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were $-0- and $-0-, respectively.

(3) Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed by M&K CPAs, PLLC for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were $-0- and $-0-, respectively.

The aggregate fees billed by Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA P.C. for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 were $-0- and $-0-, respectively.

(4) All Other Fees

There were no other fees to be billed by M&K CPAs, PLLC for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 other than the fees described above.

There were no other fees to be billed by Lawrence Scharfman & Co., CPA P.C. for the fiscal years 2009 and 2008 other than the fees described above.

(5) Audit Committee Policies and Procedures

We do not have an audit committee.

(6) If greater than 50%, disclose the percentage of hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

Not applicable.

-27-

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report of Form 10-K:

1.	The financial statements listed in the “Index to Financial Statements” at page F-1 are filed as part of this report.

2.	Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

3.	Exhibits included or incorporated herein: See index to Exhibits.

(b) Exhibits

			Incorporated by reference
Exhibit	Exhibit Description	Filed herewith	Form	Period ending	Exhibit	Filing date
2.1	Plan and agreement of reorganization between Huntington Telecommunications Partners, LP and Competitive Companies Holdings, Inc. and Competitive Companies, Inc.		SB-2		2	01/11/02

2.2	Plan and agreement of reorganization between Huntington Telecommunications Partners, LP and Competitive Companies Holdings, Inc. and Competitive Companies, Inc.		SB-2/A		2.2	08/02/02

2.3	Plan and agreement of reorganization between Huntington Telecommunications Partners, LP and Competitive Companies Holdings, Inc. and Competitive Companies, Inc.		SB-2/A		2.2	04/24/03

2.4	Plan and agreement of reorganization between Competitive Companies, Inc. and CCI Acquisition Corp		8-K		10.1	05/09/05

3(i)	Articles of Competitive Companies, as amended		SB-2		3(I)	01/11/02

3(ii)	Bylaws of Competitive Companies		SB-2		3(II)	01/11/02

4	Rights and Preferences of Preferred Stock		SB-2		4	01/11/02

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	X

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	X

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	X

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	X

-28-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused the report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	COMPETITIVE COMPANIES, INC.

Date: April 15, 2010	By:	/s/ William Gray
		William Gray
		Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ William Gray	Chief Executive Officer, Principal	April 15, 2010
William Gray	Accounting Officer and Director


/s/ Ray Powers	Current President, Director	April 15, 2010
Ray Powers


/s/ Jerald Woods	Director	April 15, 2010
Jerald Woods


/s/ Larry Griffin	Director	April 15, 2010
Larry Griffin


/s/ David Hewitt	Director	April 15, 2010
David Hewitt

-29-