Page 1
background image
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Report on Form 6-K dated April 03, 2014
Commission File Number 1-14846
AngloGold Ashanti Limited
(Name of registrant)
76 Jeppe Street
Newtown, 2001
(P.O. Box 62117, Marshalltown, 2107)
South Africa
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F X          Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
Yes
No X
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
Yes
No X
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes              No X
Enclosure:    ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
                      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
background image

ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2013

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
background image
1
GUIDE TO REPORTING
AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AngloGold Ashanti) publishes a suite of reports to record its
overall performance annually. The Annual Financial Statements 2013 addresses our
statutory reporting requirements.
The full suite of 2013 reports for AngloGold Ashanti Limited comprises:
·
Annual Integrated Report 2013, the primary report;
·
Annual Financial Statements 2013;
·
Annual Sustainability Report 2013; and
·
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Report 2013.
Other reports available for the financial year are the operational and project profiles and country fact
sheets. The full suite of 2013 reports have been furnished to the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 6-K. These reports are all available on our annual report portal
at www.aga-reports.com.
FOR NOTING:
The following key parameters should be noted in respect of our reports:
·
Production is expressed on an attributable basis unless otherwise indicated;
·
Unless otherwise stated, $ or dollar refers to US dollars throughout this suite of reports;
·
Group and company are used interchangeably, except for in the group and company annual
financial statements;
·
Statement of financial position and balance sheet are used interchangeably; and
·
The company implemented an Enterprise Resource Planning System (ERP), i.e. SAP at all its
operations, except for the Continental Africa region. ERP and SAP are used interchangeably.

background image
2
VISION, MISSION AND VALUES
To create value for our shareholders, our employees and our business and social partners through
safely and responsibly exploring, mining and marketing our products. Our primary focus is gold, but
we will pursue value creating opportunities in other minerals where we can leverage our existing
assets, skills and experience to enhance the delivery of value.
background image
3








Safety is our first value.
We place people first and correspondingly put the highest priority on safe and healthy
practices and systems of work. We are responsible for seeking out new and innovative
ways to ensure that our workplaces are free of occupational injury and illness. We live each
day for each other and use our collective commitment, talents, resources and systems to
deliver on our most important commitment…to care.
We treat each other with dignity and respect.
We believe that individuals who are treated with respect and who are entrusted to take
responsibility respond by giving their best. We seek to preserve people’s dignity, their sense of
self-worth in all our interactions, respecting them for who they are and valuing the unique
contribution that they can make to our business success. We are honest with ourselves and
others, and we deal ethically with all of our business and social partners.
We value diversity
.
We aim to be a global leader with the right people for the right jobs. We promote inclusion and
team work, deriving benefit from the rich diversity of the cultures, ideas, experiences and skills
that each employee brings to the business.
We are accountable for our actions and undertake to
deliver on our
commitments
.
We are focused on delivering results and we do what we say we will do. We accept
responsibility and hold ourselves accountable for our work, our behaviour, our ethics and our
actions. We aim to deliver high performance outcomes and undertake to deliver on our
commitments to our colleagues, business and social partners, and our investors.
The communities and societies in which we operate will
be better off for AngloGold Ashanti having been there.
We uphold and promote fundamental human rights where we do business. We contribute to
building productive, respectful and mutually beneficial partnerships in the communities in which
we operate. We aim to leave host communities with a sustainable future.
We respect the environment.
We are committed to continually improving our processes in order to prevent pollution,
minimise waste, increase our carbon efficiency and make efficient use of natural resources. We
will develop innovative solutions to mitigate environmental and climate risks.
background image
4
CONTENTS
GOVERNANCE
Audit and Corporate Governance Committee - Chairman’s letter
5
Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee - Chairman’s letter
12
Corporate governance
14
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Director's approval
41
Secretary's certificate
41
Affirmation of financial statements
41
Directors’ report
42
Remuneration and Human Resources Committee – Chairman’s letter
57
Remuneration report
59
Independent auditor's report
76
Group financial statements
78
Company financial statements
193
Principal subsidiaries and operating entities
226
OTHER
Glossary of terms and abbreviations
227
Shareholders’ information
231
Administrative information
236
Forward–looking statements
Certain statements contained in this document, other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, those
concerning the economic outlook for the gold mining industry, expectations regarding gold prices, production, cash costs, all-in
sustaining costs, cost savings and other operating results, return on equity, productivity improvements, growth prospects and
outlook of AngloGold Ashanti’s operations, individually or in the aggregate, including the achievement of project milestones,
commencement and completion of commercial operations of certain of AngloGold Ashanti’s exploration and production projects
and the completion of acquisitions and dispositions, AngloGold Ashanti’s liquidity and capital resources and capital
expenditures and the outcome and consequence of any potential or pending litigation or regulatory proceedings or
environmental, health and safety issues are forward-looking statements regarding AngloGold Ashanti’s operations, economic
performance and financial condition. These forward-looking statements or forecasts involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause AngloGold Ashanti’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ
materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements.
Although AngloGold Ashanti believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements and forecasts are
reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Accordingly, results could differ
materially from those set out in the forward-looking statements as a result of, among other factors, changes in economic, social
and political and market conditions, the success of business and operating initiatives, changes in the regulatory environment
and other government actions, including environmental approvals and requirements, fluctuations in gold prices and exchange
rates, the outcome of pending or future litigation proceedings, and business and operational risk management.

For a discussion of such risk factors, refer to the prospectus supplement to AngloGold Ashanti’s prospectus, dated
17 July 2012, that was filed with the United States SEC on 26 July 2013 and to our annual reports on Form 20F and any
prospectus supplement filed with the United States SEC subsequent to the date of this report. These factors are not necessarily
all of the important factors that could cause AngloGold Ashanti’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors could also have material adverse effects on future results.
Consequently, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. AngloGold Ashanti
undertakes no obligation to update publicly or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of these Annual Financial Statements or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except
to the extent required by applicable law. All subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to AngloGold
Ashanti or any person acting on its behalf are qualified by the cautionary statements herein. This communication may contain
certain “Non-GAAP” financial measures. AngloGold Ashanti utilises certain Non-GAAP performance measures and ratios in
managing its business. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, the
reported operating results or cash flow from operations or any other measures of performance prepared in accordance with
IFRS. In addition, the presentation of these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures other companies may
use. AngloGold Ashanti posts information that is important to investors on the main page of its website at
www.anglogoldashanti.com and under the “Investors & media” tab on the main page. This information is updated regularly.
Investors should visit this website to obtain important information about AngloGold Ashanti.
background image
5
AUDIT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE –
CHAIRMAN’S LETTER
The Audit and Corporate Governance Committee (the Audit Committee), an independent statutory
committee, appointed by the shareholders at the May 2013 Annual General Meeting, takes pleasure
in presenting its report for the financial year ended 31 December 2013. The Audit Committee has
decision-making authority with regards to its statutory duties and is accountable in these regards to
both the board and the shareholders. On all other board delegated responsibilities the Audit
Committee makes recommendations for board approval.
It is the Audit Committee’s principal regulatory duty to oversee the integrity of the group’s internal
control environment and to ensure that financial statements are appropriate and comply with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and fairly present the financial position of the
group and company and the results of their operations. The Audit Committee provides regular reports
to the board, which assumes ultimate responsibility for the functions performed by the Audit
Committee, relating to the safeguarding of assets, accounting systems and practices and internal
control processes.
This report is presented in accordance with the company’s Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI), the
requirements of the Companies Act, No. 71 of 2008, as amended, (the Companies Act), the
recommendations contained in the third King Report on Governance for South Africa (King III), as well
as its formally approved charter that is in line with the JSE Listings Requirements.
Management has established and maintains internal controls and procedures, which are reviewed by
the board on a regular basis. These are designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of
business failures and to provide reasonable assurance against such failures.
COMPOSITION
The appointed Audit Committee comprises four independent Non-Executive Directors. Collectively,
the members possess the skills and knowledge to oversee and assess the strategies and processes
developed and implemented by management to manage the business in the continually evolving
mining environment in which AngloGold Ashanti operates, to align operations with corporate
governance best practice and to comply with legislation, regulations and requirements in the
jurisdictions in which AngloGold Ashanti operates.
The statutory duties and general activities of the Audit Committee are set out in its board-approved
terms of reference which is reviewed and updated annually. The Audit Committee’s mandate includes:
·
monitoring the integrity of the group’s integrated reporting and annual financial statements and all
factors and risks that may impact on reporting;
·
annually nominating the external auditors for appointment by the shareholders;
·
determining the external auditors’ remuneration;
·
pre-approving all non-audit services in line with a formal policy on non-audit services;
·
assessing the internal and external auditors’ independence;
background image
6
·
monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the group’s internal and external audit function;
·
annually reviewing the expertise, appropriateness and experience of the finance function and Chief
Financial Officer;
·
ensuring a combined assurance model is applied to provide a co-ordinated approach to all
assurance activities;
·
reviewing developments in governance and best practice;
·
ensuring that there is an ethics policy in place which is aligned to the strategy of the company; and
·
evaluating the effectiveness of the committee.
The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Group General Counsel
and Company Secretary, Senior Vice President: Group Internal Audit, the external auditors, regional
heads of finance, as well as other assurance providers attend relevant committee meetings in an ex
officio capacity and provide responses to questions raised by committee members during meetings.
The Audit Committee meets separately with management, internal audit and external audit at every
scheduled quarterly meeting.
During 2013, the Audit Committee formally met ten times and attendance at these meetings is set out
in the table below:
14 February
4 March
(1)
19 March
(1)
23 April
(1)
8 May
25 June
(1)
1 August
11 September
(1)
31 October
4 December
(1)
Prof LW Nkuhlu                                Y                       Y                       Y                   Y               Y                        Y                     Y                          Y                         Y                         Y 
(2)(3)
FB Arisman
(3)(4)
8
R Gasant
(3)
8
NP January-Bardill
8
MJ Kirkwood
§
§
In attendance
§ Attended as an invitee
8 Apologies
(1)
Special meeting
(2)
Chairman of the Audit Committee
(3)
Members of the Risk and Information Integrity Committee
(4)
Retired from the Board of Directors on 13 May 2013
The Audit Committee assessed its effectiveness through the completion of a self-assessment
process, results were discussed, actions taken and processes put in place to address areas identified
for improvement.
OVERSIGHT OF RISK MANAGEMENT
Notwithstanding the fact that the board has a fully constituted Risk and Information Integrity
Committee (Risk Committee) to assist with the discharge of its duties regarding the integrated risk
management process, the Audit Committee has a vested interest in risk management as a result of its
responsibilities in terms of integrated reporting and combined assurance. To achieve greater
integration between the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee, the majority of the Audit
Committee members, including the Chairman, are also members of the Risk Committee.
INTERNAL AUDIT
Group Internal Audit is a key independent assurance and consulting business partner within
AngloGold Ashanti under the leadership of the Senior Vice President: Group Internal Audit who has
direct access to the chairmen of both the Audit Committee and the board. The Audit Committee has
background image
7
assessed the performance of the Senior Vice President: Group Internal Audit in terms of the annually
reviewed and approved internal audit charter and is satisfied that the internal audit function is
independent and appropriately resourced, and that the Senior Vice President: Group Internal Audit
has fulfilled the obligations of the position by performing the following functions:
·
evaluating ethical leadership and corporate citizenship within AngloGold Ashanti;
·
assessing the governance of risk within AngloGold Ashanti;
·
reviewing the governance of Information Technology;
·
assessing compliance with laws, rules, codes and standards;
·
evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and internal controls in
general;
·
reporting findings to management and the Audit Committee and monitoring the remediation of all
significant deficiencies reported; and
·
implementing a Combined Assurance Framework for the Group.
Group Internal Audit is subject to an independent quality assessment review as required by the
Institute of Internal Auditors’ Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Audit every 5 years,
the last of which was concluded during 2012. The independent assessment conducted by PwC
yielded a favourable result, which included a benchmark conducted against international peers.
The Audit Committee is of the opinion, having considered the written assurance statement provided
by Group Internal Audit, that the group’s system of internal financial controls is effective and provides
reasonable assurance that the financial records may be relied upon for the preparation of the annual
financial statements.
2013 IN OVERVIEW
During the financial year ended 31 December 2013, the Audit Committee carried out its duties as
required by section 94(2) of the Companies Act, King III, and the committee’s terms of reference in
accordance with its annual plan adopted to manage the discharge of its responsibilities.
Set out below are some highlights from 2013:
Focus area
Actions
Financial statements
Accounting policies
and reporting
standards
Received updates on new accounting standards impacting AngloGold
Ashanti - thereby enabling committee members to probe deeper into the
implications of certain complex financial reporting standards on AngloGold
Ashanti’s financial statements.
Reviewed accounting policies for appropriateness.
The Audit Committee also monitored the project changing the accounting
standard utilised in preparing the annual Form 20F in the United States from
US GAAP to IFRS.
background image
8
Focus area
Actions
Integrated reporting
Reviewed the integrated report including the group’s annual financial
statements and resource and reserve report. The Audit Committee reviewed
the disclosure of sustainability issues in the integrated report and is satisfied
that these do not conflict with the financial results.
Quarterly and annual
IFRS reports
Reviewed and recommended the quarterly and annual IFRS financial
statements to the board for approval and subsequent submission to the
JSE, SEC and other stock exchanges as applicable, after:
·
ensuring that complex accounting areas comply with IFRS;
·
carefully evaluating significant accounting judgements, including but not
limited to environmental rehabilitation provisions, taxation provisions and
the valuation of the portfolio of assets (assessment for impairments) and
estimates;
·
discussing the accounting treatment of significant and unusual
transactions with management and the external auditors;
·
reviewing, assessing and approving adjusted and unadjusted audit
differences reported by the external auditors; and
·
considering the documented assessment of the company’s going
concern status prepared by management which included the key
assumptions for reasonability.
Internal controls
Risk-based internal
audit
Considered the internal control heat-map for AngloGold Ashanti as
presented by Group Internal Audit.
Reviewed and approved the risk-aligned internal audit plan tabled on a
quarterly basis and the detailed combined assurance plan.
Monitored the implementation of significant audit recommendations through
a formal tracking process administered by Group Internal Audit.
External auditors
Recommended the appointment of Ernst and Young Inc. as the external
auditors for 2013, approved the external audit plan and fees for 2013, and
assessed the independence of the external auditors as required in terms of
section 94(8) of the Companies Act, which included consideration of
compliance with criteria relating to independence or conflicts of interest as
prescribed by the Independent Regulatory Board of Auditors.
Approved the appointment of the external auditors to provide independent
limited assurance on certain sustainability indicators as included in the
Sustainability Report.
Pre-approved all non-audit services provided by the external auditors of the
group in terms of the policy on non-audit services.
background image
9
Focus area
Actions
Combined assurance               Monitored the implementation of the AngloGold Ashanti combined
assurance plan. The scope of the technical bottom-up combined assurance
plan were reduced during 2013, but the Audit Committee is comfortable with
other assurance provided by management on technical aspects.
Implementation of
Systems, Applications
and Products in Data
Processing (SAP)
Monitored the impact of the implementation of SAP on the internal control
environment.
The Audit Committee considered all the reports provided by the internal and
external auditors on internal control deficiencies identified related to SAP
and based on its evaluation concluded that none of these deficiencies in
isolation or in aggregate, are material to the integrity and reliability of the
annual financial statements. The Audit Committee, together with the
Risk Committee, will continue to review progress on the remediation of
control deficiencies not yet fully remediated and will also receive feedback
on the benefits realised through this implementation.
Group wide
restructuring
Monitored the impact of the group wide restructuring on the internal control
environment of AngloGold Ashanti.
Internal control
assessment
Considered the results presented by internal and external assurance
providers through the evolving combined assurance framework in order to
conclude on the internal control, risk management and internal financial
control environments within AngloGold Ashanti.
Corporate governance
King III
Monitored the progress and ensured implementation of the requirements of
King III. A register detailing compliance with the principles of King III in 2013
can be found on our website www.anglogoldashanti.com.
Risk
governance
Fulfilled an oversight role regarding financial reporting risks, internal
financial controls, fraud risk and information technology risks as these relate
to financial reporting.
Compliance
Monitored the development and refinement of a global compliance
management framework. The framework allows for a systematic approach
for regions to identify and monitor compliance to major laws, regulations,
standards and codes.
Subsidiary audit
committees
Monitored the proceedings of relevant statutory subsidiary audit committees
during each of its meetings.
background image
10
FINANCE FUNCTION AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
The Audit Committee received feedback on an internal assessment conducted on the skills, expertise
and resourcing of the finance function and was satisfied with the overall adequacy and
appropriateness of the function. The Audit Committee further reviewed the expertise and experience
of the previous and current Chief Financial Officers, Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan and Richard Duffy
and was satisfied with the appropriateness thereof.
WHISTLE-BLOWING
The Audit Committee received quarterly updates on AngloGold Ashanti’s whistle-blowing process.
Reports received and investigated did not reveal any malpractice relating to the accounting practices,
internal financial controls, internal audit function and the content of the company’s financial
statements.
LOOKING FORWARD
AngloGold Ashanti has seen the successful and timely implementation of a single SAP instance in all
its operations, excluding the Continental Africa Region during 2013. The implementation of SAP had
a definitive impact on the internal control and internal financial control environment of the group.
Control deficiencies were identified, none of which, in isolation or in aggregate, are material to the
integrity and reliability of the annual financial statements. The Audit Committee, together with the
Risk Committee, will continue to review progress on the remediation of control deficiencies reported
and will also receive feedback on the benefits realised through this implementation.
The Audit Committee will continue to closely monitor the impact of the staff reductions on the internal
control environment during 2014.
STATEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL
Based on the results of the formal documented review of the company’s system of internal controls
and risk management, including the design, implementation and effectiveness of the internal financial
controls conducted by Group Internal Audit and other identified assurance providers in terms of the
evolving combined assurance model and considering information and explanations given by
management and discussions with both the internal and external auditors on the results of their
audits, assessed by the Audit Committee, nothing has come to the attention of the board that caused
it to believe that the company’s system of internal controls and risk management is not effective and
that the internal financial controls do not form a sound basis for the preparation of reliable financial
statements.
The opinion of the board is supported by the Audit Committee.
background image
11
ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Audit Committee has evaluated the consolidated and separate annual financial statements for the
year ended 31 December 2013 and concluded that they comply, in all material aspects, with the
requirements of the Companies Act, International Financial Reporting Standards, and JSE Listing
Requirements. The Audit Committee therefore recommended the approval of the annual financial
statements to the board.
CONCLUSION
The Audit Committee is satisfied that it has considered and discharged its responsibilities in
accordance with its mandate and terms of reference during the year under review.
Prof Wiseman Nkuhlu
Chairman: Audit and Corporate Governance Committee
18 March 2014




background image
12
SOCIAL, ETHICS AND TRANSFORMATION COMMITTEE -
CHAIRMAN’S LETTER
The Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee (SE&T) is constituted as a statutory committee of
AngloGold Ashanti in compliance with Sections 72(4) and Regulation 43 of the Companies Act. It was
established on 30 April 2012 and comprised five members as at 31 December 2013, the majority of
whom are independent Non-Executive Directors.
The SE&T has terms of reference that set out its roles and responsibilities which comply with the
Companies Act and the guidelines of King III and are approved by the board of directors. The terms of
reference are available on the company’s website.
The SE&T has an executive sponsor nominated by the Chief Executive Officer in the person of the
executive vice president responsible for the group’s sustainability function. The executive sponsor
assists in the general running of the committee.
PURPOSE AND MANDATE OF THE COMMITTEE
The purpose of the SE&T is to assist the board in discharging its responsibilities relating to (i) the
functions of a Social and Ethics Committee as contemplated by the Companies Act; (ii) Safety, Health
and the Environment; (iii) Transformation and Localisation; (iv) Ethical Conduct of the Company and
its officers; and (v) recommending to the board support for the promotion of democracy in the
jurisdictions in which the company operates.
Key areas of the committee’s responsibilities which are monitoring in nature, include the following:
·
Sustainable development;
·
Social and economic development;
·
Corporate citizenship;
·
Human rights;
·
Safety, health and environment;
·
Transformation, empowerment and localisation;
·
Labour relations and employment;
·
Compliance with the Code of Ethics and Business Principles;
·
Stakeholder relations; and
·
Regulatory, statutory and legislative compliance.
ACTIVITIES IN 2013
In 2013, the committee became fully operational, and pursuant to its duties and responsibilities as
outlined above, the SE&T monitored the following activities of the company:
·
The company’s programmes on safety, health and the environment through regular reports from
the Safety, Health and Environment committee;
·
The group’s progress in complying with transformation targets set by the Mining Charter and the
Department of Mineral Resources in South Africa;
·
Transformation activities at the group’s other operations, especially in relation to developing local
talent and skills;
background image
13
x
Activities relating to stakeholder management;
x
Community improvement programmes and spend in that regard, as well as ensuring that such
spend is guided by criteria that seek to promote achievement of the company’s business
objectives;
x
Systems and programmes in place to enable the group to comply with relevant laws and
regulations; and
x
Labour relations environment and advised on developing strategies to improve the landscape of
labour relations.
In addition, the committee performed the following activities:
x
Reviewed and approved, jointly with the SHE committee, the Sustainability Report 2012;
x
In order to strengthen the company’s compliance with anti-corruption and anti-bribery legislation, a
revised risk-based compliance framework was presented to the committee and implemented; and
x
The Committee’s mandate was revised to include that of the Party Political Donations Committee.
The committee’s mandate was revised in November 2013 to include oversight on activities to support
democracy in the company’s operational jurisdictions.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
The committee carried out a performance self-evaluation for 2013, the results of which showed that
the committee had made significant progress in fulfilling its mandate. A few areas which were
highlighted for improvement will be focused on during 2014.
MEETING ATTENDANCE BY MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE DURING 2013
Name of director
15 February
19 March
9 May
2 August
1 November
NP January-Bardill
(1)
M Cutifani
(2)
8
WA Nairn
(3)
Prof LW Nkuhlu
MJ Kirkwood
SM Pityana
8
RJ Ruston
In attendance
8 Apologies
(1)
Chairman of the Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee
(2)
Resigned with effect from 1 April 2013
(3)
Retired on 13 May 2013
The Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee is satisfied that, in 2013, it fulfilled its mandate in
accordance with its terms of reference.


Ms Nozipho Patricia January-Bardill
Chairman: Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee
18 March 2014
background image
14
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
In exercising its governance oversight, the board of AngloGold Ashanti is cognisant that sound
governance practices are key to earning and sustaining the trust and confidence of the company’s
stakeholders, which are critical to the achievement of the company’s business objectives as well as
creating and sustaining shareholder value. Thus, best practices in corporate governance continued to
be the guiding principle of how the company operates.
AngloGold Ashanti subscribes to the principles of the King Code on Corporate Governance (King III)
given the company’s primary listing on the JSE and as reported at the end of 2012, the company had
applied all the principles of King III. However, on 17 February 2014, the board elected
Mr
SM
Pityana, a non-independent Non-Executive Director to replace Mr TT Mboweni, an
independent Non-Executive Director, who stood down as the Chairman of the board. The board
appointed Prof LW Nkuhlu as lead independent director in line with the recommendation of King III
that such an appointment be considered where the board chairman is not independent. The board
and management recognise that application of King III requires continuous updating and monitoring of
governance structures, procedures and processes. Therefore, during 2013, the company continued to
refine its governance processes and procedures as required by King III, through maintaining a
compliance register. The register is available on the company’s website, www.anglogoldashanti.com,
and is regularly updated. The company’s application of the principles contained in chapter 2, which
link up to other chapters of the King III, is set out below. In addition some of the activities undertaken
during 2013 to further strengthen our governance processes are included in the highlights of the
activities of the board and committees from page 24.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE – KING III COMPLIANCE
Analysis of the application as at March 2014 by AngloGold Ashanti of Chapter 2 of the King Code of
Governance for South Africa, 2009 (King III).
Area
Requirement
Status
Comments
2. Boards and directors
Role and
function of the
board
2.1
The board should act as
the focal point for and
custodian of corporate
governance
Applied
The board has a documented charter in place that
deals with the roles, responsibilities and
accountabilities of the board. Meetings are conducted
on a regular basis, at least quarterly, following a
formal agenda. The board is supported by nine
committees that have been delegated responsibility to
deal with specific matters in more detail and provide
feedback to the full board. These committees include
the Audit and Corporate Governance (Audit
Committee); Social, Ethics and Transformation;
Remuneration and Human Resources; Risk and
Information Integrity (R&II) and the Executive
Committee. To ensure that the board executes all its
responsibilities, a full annual plan has been
developed that is assessed at the end of each
meeting to ensure full coverage of standard agenda
items.
background image
15
Area
Requirement
Status
Comments
2.2
The board should
appreciate that strategy,
risk, performance and
sustainability are
inseparable
Applied
The board is cognisant that its business strategies
are not achievable without effectively managing its
risk environment in a sustainable manner. It is for
this reason that the board has established the risk
management and sustainability frameworks.
2.3
The board should
provide effective
leadership based on an
ethical foundation
Applied
The board has approved a strategy for AngloGold
Ashanti designed to ensure that the vision and
mission of the company is achieved over the long
term to ensure a sustainable business. The execution
of the strategy takes place within the confines of a set
of clearly articulated values and business principles.
These values and principles are further refined and
explained in more detail in the company’s Code of
Ethics and Business Principles (Our Code). Our Code
was fully endorsed by the Board of Directors and the
Executive Committee.
2.4
The board should
ensure that the
company is and is seen
to be a responsible
corporate citizen
Applied
The vision and mission of the group is clearly
articulated and supported by six values that aim to
ensure that the company is a responsible corporate
citizen. AngloGold Ashanti is committed to ensuring it
contributes to improving the lives of the communities
in which it operates and formally reports on. The
company provides essential information on its global
community improvement initiatives in the Annual
Sustainability Report that is available on the
company’s website.
2.5
The board should
ensure that the
company’s ethics are
managed effectively
Applied
To provide direction and clarity on “grey” areas,
various policies have been developed for, among
other matters, conflicts of interest, gifts and
hospitality, anti-bribery and anti-corruption. These
policies were reviewed and approved by the
Executive Committee and are communicated to all
employees. Our Code and other training, in various
forms, including e-learning, has been and is being
rolled out corporation wide. Training completion
statistics are published to the Executive Committee
and the relevant board committee. AngloGold
Ashanti has implemented a combined assurance
process to provide the board with the necessary
assurance that there is alignment between the
strategy of the group risk management and the
implementation and execution of controls to manage
the identified risks effectively. Ethical and
compliance risk is being factored into the risk and
combined assurance processes.
2.6
The board should
ensure that the
company has an
effective and
independent audit
committee
Applied
The Audit Committee consists only of independent
Non-Executive Directors who meet quarterly and
hold special meetings when required. It is
considered one of the most effective committees as
evidenced by the annual performance evaluations.
Three of the four Audit Committee members are
financially literate. The Chairman, Prof Nkuhlu, who
is the board designated financial expert, is well
respected within the financial community, both
locally and internationally, and serves on various
accounting standard setting panels.
background image
16
Area
Requirement
Status
Comments
2.7
The board should be
responsible for the
governance of risk
Applied
The board is assisted by the R&II in discharging its
responsibilities with respect to risk management. On
a quarterly basis, the board, through the R&II,
discusses the top risks (both imminent and longer
term), facing the company as well as control
strategies to manage them. The company has a
comprehensive risk register which is continuously
updated. Refer to Principle 4 on the website register
for a detailed explanation on the governance of risk.
2.8
The board should be
responsible for
information technology
(IT) governance
Applied
The R&II also assists the board in discharging its
responsibilities relating to the effective and efficient
management of IT resources and the integrity of
information. In order to achieve the strategic
objectives of AngloGold Ashanti, governance of IT is
discussed and reviewed at each R&II meeting with
formal feedback provided by its chairman to the
board. An IT charter has been established and the
board has approved the Control Objectives for IT
(COBIT) Governance Framework to be applied by
AngloGold Ashanti.
2.9
The board should
ensure that the
company complies with
applicable laws and
considers adherence to
non-binding rules,
codes and standards
Applied
AngloGold Ashanti’s Compliance Statement states
that AngloGold Ashanti will comply not only to the
letter, but with the spirit of all legislation in all the
countries in which we operate. To give effect to this
statement, the Vice President: Group Compliance is
working with management, and group legal counsel
under the direction of the Audit Committee, on a
global regulatory framework to facilitate the
monitoring of compliance to applicable laws and
adherence to non-binding rules, codes and
standards. This framework is being completed and
AngloGold Ashanti will continue to monitor
compliance in 2014 and beyond through, among
other things, country-specific heat maps evidencing
regulatory compliance and certifications of
compliance from operations.
2.10
The board should
ensure that there is an
effective risk-based
internal audit
Applied
AngloGold Ashanti has an independent and
objective Group Internal Audit department (GIA), the
stature of which meets the standards set by the
Institute of Internal Auditors for the Professional
Practice of Internal Auditing and Code of Ethics. GIA
activities are set out in the Internal Audit Charter
and are reviewed and approved by the Audit
Committee on an annual basis. The charter deals
with the reporting lines of the Head of GIA, access
to unrestricted information and resources of the
company, as well as roles and responsibilities of the
GIA. The Audit Committee exercises oversight
responsibilities over the GIA and the head of GIA
has unrestricted access to the chairman of the
committee and other committee members when
necessary. The Audit Committee ensures that GIA
has the required resources at all times to execute its
mandate.



background image
17
Area
Requirement
Status
Comments
2.11
The board should
appreciate that
stakeholders’
perceptions affect the
company’s reputation
Applied
The board is cognisant that AngloGold Ashanti’s
vision to become the leading mining company
cannot be realised without the contribution of all
stakeholders, including shareholders, employees,
communities and governments. The board, CEO
and other members of the Executive Committee
continuously engage with stakeholders to explain
the company’s activities.
2.12
The board should
ensure the integrity of
the company’s
integrated report
Applied
The Annual Integrated Report is reviewed by the
Audit Committee and recommended for approval by
the board.
2.13
The board should report
on the effectiveness of
the company’s system
of internal controls
Applied
The board (through the Audit Committee) assesses
annually the adequacy of the company’s internal
control system. A rigorous assessment of controls
covering key governance areas including ethics, risk
management, information technology, legal and
regulatory compliance is conducted, led by GIA
through combined assurance. Management
provides an assessment of the effectiveness of
internal controls including internal controls over
financial reporting for review by the Audit Committee
and a recommendation is made to the board for
consideration and inclusion in the Annual Financial
Statements.
2.14
The board and its
directors should act in
the best interests of the
company
Applied
The board is aware of its fiduciary duties requiring it
to act collectively, and individually, in the best
interests of the company. The board comprises an
appropriate mix of skills, enabling it to interrogate all
aspects of the company’s operations and provide
the required leadership.
2.15
The board should
consider business
rescue proceedings or
other turnaround
mechanisms as soon as
the company is
financially distressed as
defined in the
Companies Act
Not
applicable
The solvency and liquidity of the company are
frequently monitored as well as bank balances, the
debt maturity profile and other appropriate financial
and cost metrics. The Audit Committee is presented
with a half yearly going-concern analysis.
2.16
The board should elect
a chairman of the board
who is an independent
Non-Executive Director.
The CEO of the
company should not
also fulfil the role of
chairman of the board.
Explained
The roles of the CEO and chairman are separate.
During February 2014 the board elected a non-
executive chairman who is not independent in terms
of the guidance provided to assess independence.
The board has however, in accordance with the
recommendations of King III, appointed a Lead
Independent Director to support the newly elected
chairman and to provide the required independence.
The chairman’s role and responsibilities are clearly
set out in a role description which was approved by
the board.
2.17
The board should
appoint the CEO and
establish a framework
for the delegation of
authority
Applied
Appointment of the CEO is one of the duties that the
board has reserved for its sole authority. The board
has in place a Delegation of Authority Policy
detailing the authority levels of the CEO and senior
management are regularly reviewed to ensure it
background image
18
Area
Requirement
Status
Comments
remains appropriate to the needs of the company
and effectively fulfils its purpose of facilitating
decision-making. Without abdicating accountability,
the CEO has formally further delegated some of his
authority to the executive and senior management
team.
Composition
of the board
2.18
The board should
comprise a balance of
power, with a majority
of Non-Executive
Directors. The majority
of Non-Executive
Directors should be
independent
Applied
As at the end of February 2014, the 9-member
unitary board comprised six independent Non-
Executive Directors, one Non-Executive Director
who is not independent, and two executive directors.
Board
appointments
process
2.19
Directors should be
appointed through a
formal process
Applied
The board is authorised by the company’s
Memorandum of Incorporation to appoint new
directors based on the recommendations of the
Nominations Committee. The Nominations
Committee assists in identifying and assessing
suitable candidates for appointment to the board.
Newly appointed directors are required to retire at
the next annual general meeting following their
appointment and stand for election by shareholders.
Eligibility for appointment as a director is guided by
the Director’s Fit and Proper Standards Policy,
requirements of the Companies Act, recommenda-
tions of King III and best practice. One third of the
directors retire annually and if eligible and
recommended by the board, make themselves
available for re-election by shareholders at the
Annual General Meeting.
Director
appointment
2.20
The induction of and
ongoing training and
development of
directors should be
conducted through
formal processes
Applied Newly appointed directors undergo a
comprehensive induction training guided by the
Director’s Induction Policy. Training includes one-
on-one briefings on the company and its operations
by the Chairman, Executive Committee members
(including the CEO and CFO), the Company
Secretary and the chairman of the Audit Committee.
Newly appointed directors are also provided with
written background information about the company
and the duties of directors. Directors receive ad hoc
training on their duties and other relevant matters.
Company
Secretary
2.21
The board should be
assisted by a
competent, suitably
qualified and
experienced Company
Secretary
Applied
The board has appointed a suitably qualified
Company Secretary, and formally assesses the
competence, qualifications and experience of the
Company Secretary annually as required by the JSE
Listings Requirements. The independence of the
Company Secretary in relation to the company and
members of the board is also assessed. The
outcome of these assessments is included in this
report on page 23
.
Performance
assessment
2.22
The evaluation of the
board, its committees
and the individual
directors should be
performed every year
Applied
A performance self-evaluation by the board and its
committees is performed annually and the
evaluation is facilitated either internally or externally
by an independent evaluator; the latter within a
three-yearly cycle. The following evaluations are
background image
19
Area
Requirement
Status
Comments
conducted: performance of the board and
committees; performance of individual Non-
Executive Directors; independence of the Non-
Executive Directors classified as “independent”; and
performance of the Chairman.
Board
committees
2.23
The board should
delegate certain
functions to well-
structured committees
but without abdicating
its own responsibilities
Applied
The board has established the committees noted on
page 20. The board charter and the terms of
reference of all committees clearly state that the
board does not abdicate its responsibilities through
this delegation. The board appoints the members of
all committees except the members of the Audit
Committee who are appointed by the shareholders
at the Annual General Meeting. The terms of
reference of the committees are approved by the
board annually or as necessary after they have
been reviewed by the committees.
Group boards
2.24
A governance
framework should be
agreed between the
group and its subsidiary
boards
Applied
The activities of the main subsidiary boards are
reported to the board. The captive insurance
company in the group, AGRe Insurance Company
Limited, which is regulated by the Financial Services
Board (FSB), has its own audit committee.
Remuneration
of directors
and senior
executives
2.25     Companies should
remunerate directors
and executives fairly
and responsibly
Applied
The board recognises the need to remunerate
directors and executives fairly and equitably and in
this regard, on an annual basis, the board, through
the Remuneration and Human Resources
Committee, contracts the services of an
independent consultant, to advise it on remuneration
trends, both locally and globally. The board
considers this advice in setting executive
remuneration and in making recommendations to
shareholders on Non-Executive Directors’ fees.
2.26     Companies should
disclose the
remuneration of each
individual director and
each prescribed officer
Applied
The remuneration of executive and Non-Executive
Directors, as well as the remuneration of prescribed
officers is disclosed in note 35 to the group annual
financial statements.
2.27     Shareholders should
approve the company’s
remuneration policy
Applied
The company seeks annually, in accordance with
market practice, a non-binding vote on its
remuneration policy from shareholders at the Annual
General Meeting.
The company has also implemented the last major outstanding requirement of the Companies Act,
being the adoption of a new Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI) which was approved by
shareholders on 27 March 2013. A copy of the MOI is available on the company’s website.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
The company is governed by a unitary board of directors, supported by board committees and the
Executive Committee. The governance of the company is guided by internal policies and external
laws, rules, regulations and best practice guidelines as detailed in the corporate governance structure
below, details of which are available on the company’s website at www.anglogoldashanti.com/
sustainability, under corporate governance and policies.
background image
20





































* Committee Chairman
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BOARD COMMITTEES
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
SM Pityana (Chairman)
R Gasant
NP January-Bardill
MJ Kirkwood
TT Mboweni
LW Nkuhlu (Lead Independent Director)
RJ Ruston
EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
S Venkatakrishnan
Chief Executive Officer
RN Duffy
Chief Financial Officer
AUDIT AND
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
COMMITTEE
LW Nkuhlu *
MJ Kirkwood
NP January-Bardill
R Gasant
SOCIAL, ETHICS
AND
TRANSFORMATION
COMMITTEE
NP January-Bardill *
MJ Kirkwood
LW Nkuhlu
SM Pityana
RJ Ruston
SAFETY, HEALTH
& ENVIRONMENT
COMMITTEE
SM Pityana *
NP January-Bardill
LW Nkuhlu
RJ Ruston
INVESTMENT
COMMITTEE
R Gasant *
MJ Kirkwood
TT Mboweni
SM Pityana
RJ Ruston
S Venkatakrishnan
REMUNERATION
AND HUMAN
RESOURCES
COMMITTEE
MJ Kirkwood *
TT Mboweni
LW Nkuhlu
SM Pityana
RJ Ruston
NOMINATIONS
COMMITTEE
SM Pityana *
NP January-Bardill
MJ Kirkwood
R Gasant
TT Mboweni
LW Nkuhlu
RJ Ruston
RISK AND
INFORMATION
INTEGRITY
COMMITTEE
RJ Ruston *
R Gasant
LW Nkuhlu
SM Pityana
S Venkatakrishnan
EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE
S Venkatakrishnan *
I Boninelli
CE Carter
RN Duffy
GJ Ehm
RW Largent
D Noko
MP O’Hare
ME Sanz
YZ Simelane
ASSURANCE
Internal Audit
Combined Assurance
External Audit
Independent Assurance
– Sustainability Report
Reserves and
Resources
SOX Compliance
RISK
MANAGEMENT
GLOBAL IT
STEERING
COMMITTEE
JSE Listing Requirements
New York Stock Exchange rules
Companies Act No. 71 of 2008, as amended
Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2002
King Report on Corporate Governance (King III)
Employment Equity Act of South Africa
Anti-Corruption Legislation – UK, SA and USA
Safety and Environmental Laws of Operational Jurisdictions
Labour Laws of Operational Jurisdictions
MAJOR EXTERNAL LEGISLATION
Memorandum of Incorporation
Board Charter
Director’s Induction Policy
Terms of Reference of board committees
Code of Business Principles and Ethics
Delegation of Authority
Insider Trading
Human Rights
Whistle-blowing
Safety
Compliance Policy Statement
Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption
Gifts, Hospitality and Sponsorship
Conflicts of Interest
Code of Ethics for senior financial officers
Risk Management Policy Statement
HIV AIDS Policy
Procurement Policy
Social Media Policy
MAJOR GROUP POLICES/CHARTERS
background image
21
Role and composition of the board
The strategic leadership of AngloGold Ashanti is the responsibility of a unitary board, comprising nine
directors: six of whom are independent Non-Executive Directors, one Non-Executive Director who is
not independent, and two executive directors as at 31 December 2013.
Following the retirement of three members of the board in 2013, the board reviewed its skills set and
has determined additional skills required to augment its technical capabilities in 2014.
The duties, responsibilities and powers of the board, delegation of authority and the matters reserved
for the board are all set out in the Board’s Charter, which is available on the company’s website.
The composition of the board is such that diversity of views are contributed to discussions and there is
a balance of power, so no individual director or group of directors dominate board processes or
decision-making.
Role of the Chairman
In 2013 the board was led by an Independent Chairman, Mr TT Mboweni. On 17 February 2014,
Mr Mboweni stepped down as Independent Chairman and Mr SM Pityana was unanimously
appointed Non-Executive Chairman by the board. The board appointed Prof LW Nkuhlu as Lead
Independent Director to provide the required independence recommended by King III. The roles and
responsibilities of the Chairman of the board are documented and approved by the board and are
separate from those of the Chief Executive Officer. The Chairman leads the board and is responsible
for ensuring its effectiveness in discharging its duties. The Chairman is re-appointed annually in
accordance with King III and the results of the annual performance evaluation guide this process.
Lead Independent Director
In line with the recommendations of King III, the board appointed the Chairman of the Audit and
Corporate Governance Committee as Lead Independent Director (LID). The principal role of the LID is
to act when the board chairman is not present or is unable to perform his duties for other reasons,
including a conflict of interests. The LID also serves as liaison between the Non-Executive Directors
and the board chairman.
Appointment and rotation of directors
Several factors including the requirements of relevant legislation, best practice recommendations,
qualifications and skills of a prospective board member and the requirements of the Director’s Fit and
Proper Standards of the company, as well as regional demographics are considered in appointing
board members. New directors are appointed pursuant to the recommendations of the Nominations
Committee, which conducts a rigorous assessment of the credentials of each candidate. Newly
appointed directors are required to retire at the next annual general meeting following their
appointment and to stand for election by shareholders. Mr RN Duffy, having been appointed with
effect from 1 June 2013 will stand for election at the Annual General Meeting to be held on
14 May 2014.
background image
22
In terms of the company’s MOI, one third of the directors are required to retire at each Annual General
Meeting. The board has determined that the directors to stand for re-election at the Annual General
Meeting to be held on 14 May 2014 are Messrs TT Mboweni, SM Pityana and R Gasant. Mr Mboweni
has decided not to make himself available for re-election.
The summary of the background and qualifications of each director are set out under Board and
Executive Management from page 32 of this report.
Induction and on-going education
Newly appointed directors undergo an induction programme and are provided with relevant
information about the company, governance structures and processes to facilitate their understanding
of the company and to undertake their responsibilities and duties effectively. Briefing sessions are
also arranged with members of the Executive Committee.
Compensation of directors
Non-Executive Directors receive fees for their services as directors including fees for their
membership of committees and an allowance for travelling internationally to attend meetings. These
fees and allowances are fixed by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting. Further details of
executive and Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration and fees are included in group note 35 to the
financial statements. At the Annual General Meeting to be held on 14 May 2014, shareholders will be
requested to approve amended directors’ fees, including a travel allowance.
Independence of directors
Determination of independence of directors is guided by King III, the Companies Act, the
requirements of the JSE and the New York Stock Exchange independence test, the company’s
internal policy on independence, as well as best practice. The independence of all Non-Executive
Directors categorised as independent is assessed annually against the set criteria. The board
evaluated the independence of the directors described as such for the 2013 financial year taking into
consideration information available to the board at the time. All the assessed directors were found to
be independent in terms of character and judgement.
King III provides that assessment of the independence and performance of directors who have been
serving on the board for more than nine consecutive years should be more rigorous than for those
who have been appointed more recently. As at 31 December 2013, none of the company’s
independent directors had served for that length of time. From a commercial perspective, Mr Pityana
is not considered independent following a commercial transaction during 2013 concluded between
AngloGold Ashanti and Izingwe Property Managers (Pty) Limited, a related party of Mr Pityana.
Performance evaluations
Evaluation of the performance of the board, committees, individual directors, independence of
independent directors, performance and independence of the board chairman and Non-Executive
Directors’ self-evaluation, are conducted annually facilitated either internally (self-evaluation) or
externally by an independent party.
background image
23
During 2013, the board implemented a number of remedial measures to address certain issues
identified in the previous year’s evaluations. Improvements resulting from implementation of these
action plans included the following:
·
Quality of the contents of board and committee meeting documents were enhanced, leading to
more productive meetings;
·
More timely submission of meeting papers resulting in better preparation for meetings and more
productive discussions and decision-making;
·
Introduction of electronic systems of delivering board and committee meeting papers assisted in
the timely distribution of meeting documents; and
·
Improvement of communication flow between management and the Non-Executive Directors
between quarterly meetings.
Questionnaires for the 2013 evaluations were completed in December. The results were discussed in
February 2014 and action plans were developed to address the following areas:
·
Composition of the board and committees to enhance their efficiency and effectiveness;
·
Strategy setting and risk management – increase involvement of Non-Executive Directors in
strategy development and in determining the group’s risk appetite; and
·
Greater levels of engagement between management and Non-Executive Directors.
Company Secretary
The Company Secretary, Ria Sanz Perez, is responsible for developing, implementing and
maintaining effective processes and procedures to support the board and its committees in the
effective discharge of their duties and responsibilities. She advises the board and individual directors
on their fiduciary duties and on corporate governance requirements and best practices.
In line with the JSE Listings Requirements, the board evaluated the qualifications, competence and
experience of the Company Secretary in December 2013 and was satisfied that Ria is qualified to
serve as Company Secretary. The board also confirmed her independence and her arms-length
relations with the board noting that she is not a director of the company and has no personal
connections with any of the directors. Ria’s qualifications and experience can be viewed in the section
under Board and Executive Management and on the website.
Role of the Chief Executive Officer
The company’s Chief Executive Officer, supported by nine executive officers, is responsible for the
execution of the company’s strategy and the day-to-day running of the business.
Executive committee
The day-to-day management of the group’s affairs is vested in the Executive Committee, chaired by
the Chief Executive Officer and comprising 10 members. The committee’s work is supported by
country and regional management teams as well as group corporate functions.
On 21 May 2013, a major restructuring of the Executive Committee was undertaken to position the
team to address the strategy and current imperatives of the company.
background image
24
Chief Financial Officer
Richard Duffy was appointed as Chief Financial Officer on 1 June 2013 to replace
Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan. As required by the JSE Listings Requirements, the Audit and Corporate
Governance Committee, at its meeting held on 13 February 2014, considered and expressed its
satisfaction at the level of expertise and experience of Messrs Duffy and Venkatakrishnan as current
and previous Chief Financial Officers of AngloGold Ashanti during 2013.
The committee concluded that, they, together with other members of the financial management team,
had effectively and efficiently managed the group’s financial affairs during the period under review as
detailed in the Chief Financial Officer’s report included in the Annual Integrated Report 2013.
Prescribed Officers
In terms of Section 66(10), and regulation 38 of the Companies Act, AngloGold Ashanti has
determined that all members of the Executive Committee are prescribed officers.
The resumés of the prescribed officers are disclosed under Board and Executive Management from
page 32 of this report. The remuneration of Prescribed Officers (which includes the three highest paid
employees, other than Executive Directors), is reported on an individual basis in group note 35.
BOARD COMMITTEES AND THEIR FUNCTIONS
Key activities of the board and committees during 2013
The activities of the board and committees during 2013 were aimed at building a sustainable business
by ensuring its financial viability. Its operations are conducted with due regard to the expectations
and or needs of its stakeholders; safety and health of its employees and communities; development of
systems to ensure proper access to and dissemination of credible information; and the goal of
achieving best practice in corporate governance.
Enhancement activities of committees during 2013 include:
·
Each committee had an executive sponsor nominated by the Chief Executive Officer to assist in
the general running of the committee. Among other duties executive sponsors ensure that meeting
papers are in line with the standard approved format for board and committee submissions and
that the contents of the papers are relevant to the strategic mandate of the committees. They also
determine management attendees to committee meetings to facilitate fruitful discussions and
deliberations. The responsibilities of the executive sponsors are included in the terms of reference
of committees;
·
The terms of reference of all committees were revised to align them with the contents of the
company’s new MOI, the Companies Act, the guidelines of King III and best practices in corporate
governance; and
·
The format and content of committee papers were reviewed to improve alignment with the
strategic mandates of the committees.




background image
25
Below is a summary of the major activities of the board and its committees during 2013:
Board of Directors
The board is charged with the overall governance of AngloGold Ashanti
and discharges these responsibilities in accordance with good governance
principles and the expectations of the company’s stakeholders.
Highlights of the board’s activities during 2013:
·
Following the resignation of the former Chief Executive Officer with
effect from 1 April 2013, ensured stability of executive management by
putting in place interim leadership with the appointment of
Messrs AM O’Neill and S Venkatakrishnan as joint group Chief
Executive Officers.
·
Appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer in May 2013.
·
Appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer in June 2013.
·
Reviewed board committee structures and mandates to improve their
effectiveness and efficiency.
·
Established a Technical Advisory Group, which will become operational
in 2014, to advise the board and management on technical operational
matters.
·
Reviewed the skills set of the board resulting in a decision to recruit an
additional director with the requisite technical skills in 2014.
·
Monitored implementation of strategy by the Executive Committee and
assessed progress against set objectives.
·
Evaluated and approved strategy and ensured business plans were
aligned with needs of the business and stakeholders’ expectations.
·
Discussed and approved management’s budget proposals.
·
Evaluated performance of the board, individual Non-Executive
Directors and committees.
·
Adopted a new constitutional document (Memorandum of
Incorporation) and recommended it to shareholders for approval as
required by the Companies Act.
·
Kept abreast with material legal and regulatory developments in
operational jurisdictions.
·
Reviewed and approved a revised group’s Delegation of Authority
Policy to improve and facilitate decision-making.
·
Post year-end, appointed new board Chairman after the former
Chairman stood down.
Audit and Corporate
Governance Committee
(Audcom)
The overall role of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee is to
ensure the integrity of financial reporting and the establishment and
maintenance of appropriate governance structures and processes.
Highlights of key activities of the committee during 2013:
·
Reviewed and assessed the integrity of published financial statements
to ensure their preparation was in accordance with relevant accounting
standards and other requirements.
·
Considered and confirmed the independence of the external audit firm
and recommended its re-appointment by shareholders.
·
Considered and approved the audit fees.
background image
26
·
Considered and approved the internal and external audit plans and
monitored performance against these plans.
·
Ensured that the internal audit department had the required resources
to deliver on its mandate.
·
Considered internal audit reports and monitored implementation of
remedial actions to address any adverse findings.
·
Reviewed and pre-approved non-audit services and related fees in
accordance with policy on the approval of non-audit services.
·
Evaluated and confirmed the competence and professionalism of the
Chief Financial Officer in accordance with the JSE Listing
Requirements.
·
Evaluated the accounting issues that impacted the group and
company’s financial statements.
·
Reviewed major legal cases and disputes that impacted or could
impact the company financially.
·
Reviewed and recommended the Annual Integrated Report 2012 and
Annual Financial Statements 2012 to the board for approval.
·
Held closed sessions with external and internal auditors, Group
General Counsel and financial management to discuss any issues they
may be facing in executing their responsibilities and advised
accordingly.
More details of the activities of this committee are available in the Audit
and Corporate Governance Committee Chairman’s letter on page 5 of this
report.
Remuneration and
Human Resources
Committee (Rem&HR)
The role of the Remuneration and Human Resources Committee is to
assist the board in discharging its responsibilities relating to executive
compensation and Non-Executive Directors’ fees and the development of
the company’s human resources.
Highlights of key activities of the committee during 2013:
·
Considered and recommended implementation of a retention scheme
for executive management following the resignation of the then Chief
Executive Officer.
·
Assisted the board in determining the remuneration of the new Chief
Executive Officer appointed in May 2013.
·
Reviewed and approved corporate goals and objectives relevant to the
compensation of the executive management.
·
Approved both short- and long-term executive compensation after
evaluating executives’ performance against set targets and
consideration of local and international executive remuneration trends.
·
Pro-actively explained the company’s remuneration policy to major
shareholders. At the Annual General Meeting, 82% of shareholders
voted to endorse the policy.
·
Reviewed market trends on Non-Executive Directors and made
recommendations to the board regarding the board fee proposal to be
presented to shareholders for approval.
background image
27
·
Appointed an external remuneration advisor to assist the committee in
better understanding trends in executive and non-executive
remuneration, both locally and internationally, enabling the committee
to make informed decisions on the subject.
·
Devised adjusted metrics for the 2014 Bonus Share and Long-Term
Incentive Plan to reflect the company’s revised priorities and to improve
alignment with shareholder interests.
Risk and Information
Integrity Committee
(R&II)
The role of the Risk and Information Integrity Committee is to assist the
board in discharging its responsibilities relating to the (i) governance of
risk; (ii) effective and efficient management of IT resources; and (iii) the
integrity of information.
Highlights of key activities of the committee during 2013:
·
Guided management in determining the company’s top risks, both
short- and long-term, and reviewed implementation of remedial
measures.
·
Adopted a new risk management policy which categorises risks in
terms of imminent and longer-term risks. One key risk facing the
company was discussed in detail at each quarterly meeting. Remedial
measures to address such risks were also deliberated.
·
Provided oversight of the roll-out of the Enterprise Resource Planning
(ERP) programme to operations in South Africa, Australia and
Americas regions. Implementation of the ERP has improved the
company’s information management systems which are now largely
automated.
·
Reviewed the 2013/2014 insurance policies to ensure adequate
insurance cover for the company’s assets and employees at
competitive rates.
Safety, Health and
Environment
Committee (SHE)
The primary mandate of the Safety, Health and Environment Committee is
to assist the board in ensuring that AngloGold Ashanti’s operations are
conducted with the utmost care to prevent negative impact on the safety
and health of its employees, the communities in its operational areas, as
well as to safeguard the environment.
Highlights of key activities of the committee during 2013:
·
Given that “safety is our first value” the focus was on providing direction
and support to management in implementing programmes to improve
work place safety. Positive results were achieved and improvements in
key safety indicators are detailed in the Annual Sustainability Report
2013.
·
Reviewed and provided direction and support to management on the
implementation of programmes to improve the health and well-being of
employees and their families.
·
Considered mining activities that had the potential to negatively impact
the environment.
·
Reviewed the Sustainability Report 2012 with the Social, Ethics and
Transformation Committee.
background image
28
Social, Ethics and
Transformation
Committee (SE&T)
The role of this Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee, which is
monitoring in nature, is to assist the board in discharging its statutory
responsibilities relating to (i) the functions of a Social and Ethics
Committee as contemplated by the Companies Act; (ii) Safety, Health and
the Environment; and (iii) ethical conduct of the company and its officers.
All of these are aimed at strengthening the company’s position as a good
corporate citizen.
Highlights of key activities of the committee during 2013. The
Committee monitored the activities of the company in the following
areas:
·
Programmes on safety, health and the environment through regular
reports from the SHE Committee.
·
The group’s progress in complying with transformation targets set by
the Mining Charter and the Department of Mineral Resources (DMR) in
South Africa.
·
Transformation activities at the group’s other operations, especially in
relation to developing local talent and skills.
·
The group’s activities relating to stakeholder management.
·
The group’s community improvement programmes and spend in that
regard, as well as ensuring that such spend is guided by criteria that
seek to promote achievement of the company’s business objectives.
·
The systems and programmes in place to enable the group to comply
with relevant laws and regulations.
·
The group’s labour relations environment and advised on developing
strategies to improve the landscape of labour relations.
·
Reviewed and approved, jointly with the SHE committee, the
Sustainability Report 2012.
·
In order to strengthen the company’s compliance with anti-corruption
and anti-bribery legislation, a revised risk based compliance framework
was presented to the committee and implemented.
·
The committee’s mandate was revised to include that of the Party
Political Donations Committee.
Investment Committee
(Invcom)
The main mandate of this Investment Committee is to assess capital
projects to ensure that investments, divestments and financing proposals
are aligned with AngloGold Ashanti’s business objectives.
Highlights of key activities of the committee during 2013:
·
Reviewed progress reports on the execution of capital projects to
assess progress against board approved plans and project
specifications.
·
Received information on the company’s financial position at the start of
each meeting to assist the committee in its investment decisions.
·
Deliberated on the group’s asset portfolio with a view to guiding
management on its rationalising in accordance with future growth
plans.
background image
29
Nominations
Committee (Nomcom)
The main mandate of the Nominations Committee is to assist the board, in
consultation with the Chairman of the board and Chief Executive Officer, in
identifying suitable candidates for appointment to the board and other
duties relating to the board’s governance structures and processes.
Highlights of key activities of the committee during 2013:
·
Reviewed, on behalf of the board, the results of the 2013 performance
evaluation of the board, the independence of independent directors, the
qualifications and competence of the company secretary and the
independence and performance of the Chairman of the board.
·
Monitored implementation of an action plan to address concerns and
suggestions arising from the evaluations.
·
Discussed results of the evaluation of the independence and
performance of the Chairman of the board and co-ordinated his re-
appointment for 2013.
·
Co-ordinated processes and procedures culminating in the
appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer following the resignation
of the former Chief Executive Officer in March 2013.
·
Interviewed several candidates for appointment to the board in 2014.
·
Post year-end, following the retirement of the independent Non-
Executive Chairman, oversaw appointment of the new Non-Executive
Chairman and Lead Independent Director .
During 2013, of the two ad hoc committees, the Financial Analysis Committee did not meet and the
Party Political Donation’s Committee was dissolved and its mandate transferred and included with that
of the Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee.
background image
30
Board and committee meeting attendance
The composition of the board and committees at the date of this report and attendance at meetings
during 2013 are disclosed in the table below:
Name of director
Board
Audcom
Rem&HR
R&II
SHE
SE&T  Invcom   Nomcom
TT Mboweni
12/12
-
5/5
-
-
-
4/4
5/5
SM Pityana
11/12
-
4/5
4/4
4/5
4/5
4/4
5/5
FB Arisman
(1)
3/4
4/5
2/3
1/2
2/3
-
1/2
2/3
M Cutifani
(2)
3/3
-
-
1/1
1/2
1/2
1/1
-
RN Duffy
(3)
7/7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
R Gasant
(4)
12/12
9/10
-
4/4
-
-
1/1
5/5
NP January-Bardill
11/12
9/10
-
-
5/5
5/5
-
5/5
MJ Kirkwood
(5)
11/12
7/7
5/5
-
-
5/5
4/4
5/5
WA Nairn
(7)
3/4
-
3/3
2/2
3/3
3/3
2/2
2/3
Prof LW Nkuhlu
(8)
12/12
10/10
5/5
4/4           5/5
5/5           1/1           4/5
AM O’Neill
(6)
4/5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
F Ohene-Kena
(9)
3/4
-
-
-
1/3
-
-
1/3
RJ Ruston
(10)
11/12
-
2/2
4/4
5/5
5/5
4/4
5/5
S Venkatakrishnan
12/12
-
-
4/4
-
-
4/4
-
(1)
Mr Arisman retired from the board on 13 May.
(2)
Mr Cutifani resigned as CEO and executive director on 31 March 2013.
(3)
Mr Duffy was appointed as CFO and executive director on 1 June 2013.
(4)
Mr Gasant was appointed a member and chairman of the Invcom with effect from 1 September 2013.
(5)
Mr Kirkwood was appointed to the Audcom with effect from 1 April 2013.
(6)
Mr O’Neill was appointed as executive director with effect from 20 February 2013 and resigned on 19 July 2013.
(7)
Mr Nairn retired from the board on 13 May 2013.
(8)
Prof Nkuhlu resigned from the Invcom with effect from 1 April 2013.
(9)
Mr Ohene-Kena retired from the board on 13 May 2013.
(10)
Mr Ruston was appointed a member of the Rem&HR with effect from 1 July 2013.
POST YEAR END EVENTS
Changes to board of directors

Subsequent to year end, the following changes were made to the board:
·
Tito Mboweni stood down as Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the board on
17 February 2014.
·
Sipho Pityana was unanimously appointed Non-Executive Chairman of the board with effect from
17 February 2014.
·
Prof LW Nkuhlu was appointed as Lead Independent Director in terms of the recommendations of
King III with effect from 17 February 2014.
Restructuring of Board Committees
Action plans put in place to address issues emanating from the 2013 annual performance evaluation
of the board and committees included plans to improve the effectiveness of board and committee
meetings and related governance processes. In this regard, the Nominations Committee reviewed
the existing structures of committees on 11 March 2014 and made recommendations for their
background image
31
restructuring and these were accepted by the board. Implementation of the recommendations
resulted in the number of standing committees being reduced from seven (7) to five (5) through
consolidations of four committees into two, as detailed below. The restructuring also rationalised the
number of committee membership of each board member. The overall effect of the restructuring is
expected to improve the effectiveness of committees by, among others, (i) removing existing
duplication in the mandates of certain committees; (ii) reduce meeting days; and (ii) allow for more
effective preparation for meetings by board and management.
In terms of remuneration of board members, the new structure will allow for equity in terms of fees
payable to each board member and also ensure that market relativity in terms of pay would remain
aligned to agreed benchmarks. The new structure will be implemented from 1 May 2014.
NAME OF 2013 COMMITTEE
NEW 2014 COMMITTEE
Audit and Corporate Governance
Audit and Risk
Risk and Information Integrity
Consolidated with Audit and Risk
Safety, Health and Environment
Social, Ethics and Sustainability
Social, Ethics and Transformation
Consolidated with Social, Ethics and Sustainability
Investment
Investment – unchanged
Remuneration and Human Resources
Remuneration and Human Resources – unchanged
Nominations
Nominations – unchanged
The number of members per committee was also reviewed and reduced to improve committee
efficiency and fee costs.
Pursuant to the mandates of the JSE Listing Requirements and King III, it was also determined that a
Lead Independent Director, whose primary responsibility shall be to provide leadership and advice to
the Board, without detracting from the authority of the Chairman, when the Chairman has a conflict of
interest, should be appointed. King III further allows that the role of a Lead Independent Director may
be combined with that of a Deputy Chairman, which role the Company’s Memorandum of
Incorporation also permits. Consequently, AngloGold Ashanti has introduced the role of Deputy
Chairman / Lead Independent Director.
background image
32
BOARD AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
Board
Executive directors
Mr S Venkatakrishnan (Venkat) (48)
BCom; ACA (ICAI)
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Venkat was appointed CEO on 8 May 2013, after holding the position of joint acting CEO since April
of that year. He was previously Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at Ashanti Goldfields until its merger
with AngloGold in May 2004, creating what is now AngloGold Ashanti. Venkat became CFO of the
combined entity shortly after the merger and joined the board on 1 August 2005. He is the Chairman
of the Executive Committee and also a member of the Risk and Information Integrity and Investment
Committees. In his role as CFO, he oversaw funding for all of AngloGold Ashanti’s operating activities,
giving him a detailed knowledge of all of our mines and operating jurisdictions. He is a member of the
audit committee of the World Gold Council and is a member of the Financial Reporting Investigation
Panel, an advisory panel of the JSE. He was the executive responsible for eliminating a 12Moz
hedge book, generating significant value for the company, and was the key executive behind
rebuilding the balance sheet through a series of successful debt financings that introduced long-term
tenor and more favourable funding terms to the company’s credit profile. During Venkat’s first year as
CEO of AngloGold Ashanti, two new mines were commissioned on time and ahead of budget, the
company achieved its best ever safety performance and a significant restructuring was undertaken of
operating and overhead costs in order to focus the business on delivery of sustainable free cash flow
and returns. Venkat has also previously been a Director of Corporate Reorganisation Services at
Deloitte & Touche in London.
Mr RN Duffy (50)
BCom; MBA
Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Richard Duffy was appointed to the board of AngloGold Ashanti on 1 June 2013. He has 27 years of
global mining industry experience, initially with Anglo American plc, from 1987 and then AngloGold
Ashanti, from its inception in 1998. At AngloGold Ashanti, he has worked across a number of key
areas. In November 2000, he was appointed head of business planning and in 2004 assumed
responsibility for all new business opportunities globally. In April 2005, this role was expanded to
include greenfields exploration. He was appointed to the Executive Committee in August 2005. He
was appointed Executive Officer: Business Planning in 2004 during which time he also deputised for
the role of CFO. From 2004 to 2008, Richard was Executive Vice President: Business Development,
accountable for mergers and acquisition activities as well as greenfields exploration. He was
appointed Executive Vice President: Africa in June 2008 and Executive Vice President: Continental
Africa in February 2010. He is an invitee to the meetings of the Audit and Corporate Governance and
Investment Committees.
background image
33
Non-Executive Directors
Mr SM Pityana (54)
BA (Hons) (Essex); MSc (London); Dtech (Honoris)(Vaal University of Technology)
Chairman and Non-Executive Director
Sipho Mila Pityana is a director having joined the board of AngloGold Ashanti in February 2007. He is
the Chairman of the Safety, Health and Environment and the Nominations Committees, and a
member of the following committees: Remuneration and Human Resources; Social, Ethics and
Transformation; Risk and Information Integrity; Investment; and Financial Analysis Committees. He
was previously the Chairman of the Board’s Remuneration and Human Resources Committee.
Mr Pityana has extensive business experience having served in both an executive and non-executive
capacity on several JSE listed boards of companies as well as running his own company which he
chairs, Izingwe Capital. He is Chairman of the JSE listed Onelogix and of Munich Reinsurance of
Africa. He also served on the boards of Bytes Technology Group, AFROX, SPESCOM and the Old
Mutual Leadership Group. He previously worked as the Executive Director of Nedcor Investment Bank
and Managing Director of Nedbank. He is also a director of a number of manufacturing companies
including Scaw Metals and Aberdare Cables.
In addition to his private sector track record, Mr Pityana has extensive public sector experience and
international exposure. He was the first Director General of Department of Labour in a democratic
South Africa. As the Foreign Affairs Director General he represented South Africa in various
international fora including the United Nations, African Union, Commonwealth and the International
Labour Organisation. He was one of the founding members of the governing body of the Commission
for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) and Convenor of the South African government
delegation to the National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC).
Prof LW Nkuhlu (69)
BCom; CA (SA); MBA (New York University)
Lead Independent Director
Wiseman Nkuhlu was first appointed to the board on 4 August 2006 and resigned on 30 April 2009.
He was re-appointed to the board on 1 June 2009 and appointed as Lead Independent Director on
17 February 2014. He is the Chairman of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee and also
serves as a member of the Risk and Information Integrity; Safety, Health and Environment;
Nominations; Remuneration and Human Resources; Social, Ethics and Transformation; and Financial
Analysis Committees. Prof Nkuhlu, a respected South African academic, educationist, professional
and business leader, served as Economic Adviser to the former President of South Africa,
Mr Thabo Mbeki, and as Chief Executive of the Secretariat of the New Partnership for Africa's
Development (NEPAD) from 2000 to 2005. From 1989 to 2000, he served as a director on a number
of major South African companies or subsidiaries, including Standard Bank, South African Breweries,
Old Mutual, Tongaat Hulett, BMW and JCI. Prof Nkuhlu was President of the South African Institute of
Chartered Accountants from 1998 to 2000 and Principal and Vice Chancellor of the University of
Transkei from 1987 to 1991. He is currently a member of the Board of the Ethics Institute of South
background image
34
Africa, Datatec Limited, the Nepad Business Foundation and the Chartered Director Governing body
of the Institute of Directors in South Africa. He was elected President of the Geneva-based
International Organisation of Employees (IOE) in May 2008 and served for two years. Lastly, he is a
trustee of the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation which provides oversight of the
accounting standard setting operations of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
Mr R Gasant (54)
CA (SA)
Independent Non-Executive Director
Rhidwaan Gasant was appointed to the board of AngloGold Ashanti on 12 August 2010 and is
Chairman of the Investment Committee and a member of the Audit and Corporate Governance; Risk
and Information Integrity; Nominations; and Financial Analysis Committees. He is the former Chief
Executive Officer of Energy Africa Limited and sits on the boards of international companies in the
MTN Group. He is currently Chief Executive Officer of Rapid African Energy Holdings, a start-up oil
and gas exploration company, focused on Africa.
Mrs NP January-Bardill (63)
BA English; Philosophy and Certificate in Education (UBLS, Lesotho); MA Applied Linguistics
(Essex UK); Diploma Human Resources Development (Damelin, SA)
Independent Non-Executive Director
Nozipho January-Bardill was appointed to the board of AngloGold Ashanti on 1 October 2011. She is
the Chairman of the Social, Ethics and Transformation Committee and is a member of the Audit and
Corporate Governance; Safety, Health and Environment; and Nominations Committees. She was an
Executive Director, Corporate Affairs and spokesperson of the MTN Group where she also served on
the boards of a number of operations in the MTN footprint. She is a former South African Ambassador
to Switzerland, Lichtenstein and the Holy See, and former Deputy Director General, Human Capital
Management and Head of the Foreign Service Institute in the then Department of Foreign Affairs (now
DIRCO). She is currently the founder and Executive Director of Bardill & Associates, a consulting
company focusing on strategic communications, high-level government relations and stakeholder
management. She serves on the boards of Credit Suisse Securities, Johannesburg, the Health and
Welfare SETA which she chairs, and the State Information and Technology Agency. She is also a
member of the United Nations Expert Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination;
Xenophobia and Related Intolerances for the period 2012-2016; and was recently appointed Interim
Chief of Staff of UN Women in New York.
Mr MJ Kirkwood (66)
AB, Stanford University, Economics & Industrial Engineering
Independent Non-Executive Director
Michael Kirkwood joined the board of AngloGold Ashanti on 1 June 2012 and is the Chairman of the
Remuneration and Human Resources Committee and is a member of the Audit and Corporate
Governance; Investment; Social, Ethics and Transformation; and Nominations Committees. He is a
highly experienced and respected former international banker, having worked at Citigroup during his
30 year career with the bank. He is currently Chairman of Circle Holdings PLC, sits on the boards of
background image
35
UK Financial Investments Ltd and Eros International plc, and is Senior Advisor (former Chairman) of
Ondra Partners LLP.
Mr TT Mboweni (54)
BA; MA (Development Economics)
Independent Non-Executive Director
Tito Mboweni was appointed to the board and as Chairman of AngloGold Ashanti on 1 June 2010. He
is a member of the Nominations; Investment; Remuneration and Human Resources; and the Financial
Analysis Committees. He has a long and outstanding record of public service. As Minister of Labour
from 1994 to 1998, Mr Mboweni was the architect of South Africa’s post-apartheid labour legislation
which today continues to provide the basis for the mutually respectful labour relationships central to
AngloGold Ashanti’s operational approach in South Africa. He was the eighth Governor of the South
African Reserve Bank from 1999 to 2009, and Chancellor of the University of the North from 2002 to
2005. He is also the non-executive Chairman of Nampak Limited, SacOil Holdings Limited, Accelerate
Property Fund Limited, a member of the board of Discovery Limited and an international adviser to
Goldman Sachs. Mr Mboweni is a founder member of Mboweni Brothers Investment Holdings. He is
Chairman of the fund raising committee of the Nelson Mandela Children’s Hospital and a member of
the Council of Advisors of the Thabo Mbeki Foundation. In December 2012, he was elected as a
member of the National Executive Committee of the African National Congress.
Mr RJ Ruston (63)
MBA; Business BE (Mining)
Independent Non-Executive Director
Rodney Ruston was appointed to the board of AngloGold Ashanti on 1 January 2012 and is Chairman
of the Risk and Information Integrity Committee. He is a member of the Investment; Safety, Health
and Environment; Nominations; Social, Ethics and Transformation; and the Remuneration and Human
Resources Committees. Rodney, a mining engineer, has over 35 years of experience in the resources
industry. He is currently the Chief Executive Officer of County Coal Limited, an Australian listed
company which he joined in July 2012. He was appointed as a Non-Executive Director of Cockatoo
Coal Limited which was listed on the Australian Stock Exchange on 6 January 2014. He was
previously Chief Executive Officer and President of North American Energy Partners Inc., a large
Canadian mining and construction contracting company listed on the NYSE and the TSX.
Executive management
Ms I Boninelli (57)
MA (Psychology); Post Graduate Diploma in Labour Relations
Executive Vice President: People and Organisational Development
Italia Boninelli joined AngloGold Ashanti on 15 October 2010 as Senior Vice President: Human
Resources, Strategy and Change Management and was appointed to the Executive Committee on
1 December 2011 where she is responsible for the company’s people strategy, transformation and
change management initiatives. She is now Executive Vice President: People & Organisational
Development, with accountability for the company’s System for People, Human Resources, corporate
services and organisational redesign. Italia has more than 25 years’ experience in human resources,
background image
36
marketing communications, customer relationship management and business transformation, in a
variety of industries including mining, manufacturing, healthcare and banking. She is a registered
industrial psychologist with the Health Professions Council of South Africa, holds a master’s degree in
psychology and a postgraduate diploma in labour relations.
Dr CE Carter (51)
BA (Hons); DPhil; EDP
Executive Vice President: Strategy and Business Development
Charles Carter has worked in the mining industry in South Africa and the Americas since 1991, in a
range of corporate roles with Anglo American plc, RFC Corporate Finance and AngloGold Ashanti. He
is currently accountable for group strategy, corporate finance and business development, investor
relations and corporate communications. Prior to this he was responsible for the company’s business
in Colombia and has also previously had executive accountability for business planning, risk
management Project ONE implementation and corporate HR. He retains accountability for AngloGold
Ashanti’s investor relations and financial public relations activies. Charles is a director of Rand
Refinery Limited and a past Chairman of the Denver Gold Group.
Mr GJ Ehm (57)
BSc Hons; MAusIMM; MAICD
Executive Vice President: Planning and Technical
Graham Ehm has, since 1977, gained diverse experience in mine operations and project
management, covering the nickel, phosphate, copper, uranium and gold sectors. He was appointed
General Manager Sunrise Dam Gold Mine in 2000, Regional Head: Australia in 2006 and Executive
Vice President: Australasia in December 2007. He assumed the role of Executive Vice President:
Tanzania on 1 June 2009 and during August 2010, resumed the position of Executive Vice President:
Australasia. In May 2013, he was appointed Executive Vice President: Planning and Technical, which
includes oversight over safety, business planning, asset optimisation, capital investment optimisation
and monitoring (including projects, studies, and exploration), Project ONE, risk management and
other technical disciplines and related centres of excellence.
Mr MP O'Hare (54)
BSc Engineering (Mining)
Chief Operating Officer: South Africa
Mike O’Hare joined Anglo American plc in 1977, and has held a number of positions at various gold
mining operations within the group. His roles have included: General Manager of Kopanang Mine
(1998), Great Noligwa Mine (2003), Head of Mining and Mineral Resource Management for
Underground African Mines (2006), Vice President: Technical Support for African Mines (2008),
Senior Vice President: Operations and Business Planning for South Africa Region (2010), and in
2011, was appointed as Executive Vice President: South Africa Region. Mike has the leadership role
as Chief Operating Officer in the South African operations with responsibility for the underground and
surface operations and leading three operating regions (West Wits, Vaal River and Surface
Operations). He also leads the company’s technology project in South Africa.
background image
37
Mr RW Largent (53)
BSc (Min. Eng.); MBA
Chief Operating Officer: International
Ron Largent has over 30 years of experience in the mining industry in both domestic and international
operations as well as project management. He has served on the Board of Directors of the Colorado
Mining Association, the Nevada Mining Association and the California Mining Association. He joined
the company in 1994 as Manager of Gold Operations for Cripple Creek & Victor (CC&V). He was
named Vice President (VP) and General Manager of the Jerritt Canyon Joint Venture in 2000 and VP
and General Manager of CC&V in 2002. In January of 2004 he was named VP for the North America
Region followed by his appointment to the position of Executive Vice President: Americas in
December of 2007. In June 2013, Ron was appointed Chief Operating Officer for the non-South
African operations.
Mr D Noko (56)
MBA; Senior Executive Programme; Post Graduate Diploma in Company Direction; Higher National
Diploma (Engineering)
Executive Vice President: Sustainability
David Noko joined the group in June 2012 and assumed responsibility for social and sustainable
development. David’s role includes Executive Vice President: Sustainability, which comprises the
disciplines of Health, the Environment, Social and Community Affairs, Corporate Social Investment,
Human Rights and Global Security and public affairs. In this role, he sets the company sustainability
direction and strategy, positioning sustainability within the company as core to the business, as well
as positioning the company externally as a leader within the global sustainability landscape.
As a member of the executive leadership team, David supports the CEO and two Chief Operating
Officers in enabling the implementation of the company sustainability strategy, as well as on matters
relating to AngloGold Ashanti’s involvement in country-based industry institutions and global
institutions relating to sustainable development.
Prior to joining AngloGold Ashanti, David served as the Managing Director of CelaCorp (Pty) Ltd and
as the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd. He was
previously Vice President of the Chamber of Mines South Africa, and is a member of the Institute of
Directors. He has held a host of other directorships, including the position of Deputy Chairman of the
Board at Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd. David has strong experience in business leadership
and in the sustainable development function in other mining organisations and has developed his
skills across a broad platform of technical, environmental and sustainability issues.
background image
38
Ms ME Sanz Perez (48)
BCom LLB; H Dip Tax; Admitted Attorney
Executive Vice President: Group General Counsel and Company Secretary
Maria (Ria) Sanz Perez joined AngloGold Ashanti in June 2011 having worked in a number of
industries and major corporate organisations. She has held legal roles at Investec Bank, Basil Read,
Afrox and Sappi. She was also Group Head of Sustainability at Sappi. She was appointed Company
Secretary in September 2012. Ria’s role is Executive Vice President: Group General Counsel and
Company Secretary, with accountability for legal affairs, compliance, company secretarial, corporate
cost reduction, and integrated reporting. She is also accountable for the legal and commercial aspects
of global procurement.
Ms YZ Simelane (48)
BA LLB; MAP; EMPM
Executive Vice President: Stakeholder Relations and Marketing
Yedwa Simelane joined AngloGold in November 2000 as Managing Secretary to the board and
Executive Committee. Prior to joining AngloGold she was in financial services and has experience in
the retirement funding industry. She was appointed an executive officer in May 2004 and Vice
President: Government Relations in July 2008. In November 2009, she was appointed Senior Vice
President: Corporate Affairs responsible for Government Relations, Corporate Communications,
Marketing and the Sustainability Report. Yedwa is now Executive Vice President: Stakeholder
Relations and Marketing, with accountability for stakeholder and government relations, marketing and
sustainability reporting. She will also support the Chairman and CEOs offices in relation to
government relations and the company’s involvement in multilateral organisations and the World Gold
Council.
VALUES AND ETHICS
King III enjoins the board to provide ethical leadership to the company. The Code of Business
Principles and Ethics (Our Code) is the defining document on AngloGold Ashanti’s values and ethics.
The board and management recognise the enduring importance of ethical behaviour by all
employees, directors and related parties at all times as the company strives to generate competitive
shareholder returns and create value for the benefit of all stakeholders.
Our Code provides a framework and sets requirements for the implementation of key corporate
policies and guidelines. Among other areas it addresses fraud, bribery and corruption, conflict of
interests, gifts, hospitality and sponsorships, use of company assets, privacy and confidentiality,
disclosures and insider trading.
Roll-out of Our Code, which began soon after its launch in November 2010, continued during 2013.
Our Code has been translated into four languages and is available on the corporate website
www.anglogoldashanti.com and the intranet.
background image
39
In 2013, the online training platform was re-launched on the oneERP learning management platform,
providing access to four courses. An additional course is to be rolled out in 2014. Training is
available in four languages and has enabled accelerated training in Our Code and on anti-bribery and
anti-corruption.
At the end of December 2012, a DVD for training on Our Code was released and distributed in eight
languages to all regions for roll out during 2013 to employees who do not have access to computers.
AngloGold Ashanti holds all employees, directors and officers accountable for complying with Our
Code and policies, in addition to applicable laws, regulations, standards and contractual obligations in
the countries in which AngloGold Ashanti does business. Failure to live up to Our Code may result in
disciplinary action being taken, up to and including dismissal.
Employees, directors and officers who are aware of a situation in which they believe Our Code is
being transgressed are urged to communicate their concerns to their line managers, the legal
department, human resources or group compliance. No employee, director or officer will be
disciplined or otherwise victimised for raising a concern in good faith.
The company has promoted its whistle-blowing communication channels that include hotlines, text
messaging, email, and web facilities, which are administered by a third party. Use of these facilities is
promoted by means of posters at all locations. Employees, directors, officers and external parties
may use the hotlines, anonymously if they wish, to report concerns. All concerns are carefully
investigated and, wherever possible, feedback is provided to the person raising the concern upon
request.
LEGAL, ETHICAL AND REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
The group’s geographical spread makes its legal and regulatory environment diverse and complex.
Given the critical importance of compliance in building a sustainable business, Group Compliance
plays an essential role in co-ordinating compliance with laws and regulations, standards and
contractual obligations and in assisting and advising the board and management on designing and
implementing appropriate compliance policies and procedures.
During 2013, Group Compliance activities aimed at enhancing the company’s governance. Key
among these activities were:
·
the hiring of a permanent full-time head of compliance (Vice-President: Group Compliance) based
in Johannesburg;
·
the continued global roll-out of awareness training on Our Code by means of both online training
and “in person” DVD training for those without computer access;
·
continued development of a compliance programme aligned with “best practice” principles
identified by, among others, bodies responsible for the prosecution of violations of key extra-
territorial legislation like the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and adaptable on an operational level
to enhance the effectiveness of the compliance framework;
·
development of a global supplier code of conduct and a revised risk-based third party due-
diligence process;
background image
40
·
development of a methodology for continuous improvement in auditing and a review of compliance
policies and the addressing new risk, including the development of compliance metrics for use in
internal audits;
·
the continued roll-out of online anti-bribery and anti-corruption training;
·
revised and issued new policies and procedures, including the development of an investigation
reporting standard for the company;
·
assessment of the automated group gifts, hospitality and sponsorship registers;
·
automation of the group’s conflicts of interests registers; and
·
additional efforts to provide automated access to track and monitor compliance with laws and
regulations, including self-certification process and legal register by country.
South African Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998
In compliance with Section 21 of the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, the company is obliged to file
with the Department of Labour, the employment equity statistics for its South African workforce. A
report was filed with the Department of Labour on 13 January 2014, covering the period
1 August 2012 to 31 July 2013. A copy of the report is available on the AngloGold Ashanti website,
www.anglogoldashanti.com/sustainability, in the section entitled “Other public reports”.
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
AngloGold Ashanti’s vision to become the leading mining company cannot be realised without the
contribution of all stakeholders. The company has therefore adopted an inclusive approach to
stakeholder engagement. Its key stakeholders include shareholders, employees, communities and
governments. Numerous stakeholder engagement activities took place during 2013 and are detailed
under Our Stakeholders in the Annual Sustainability Report 2013.
background image
41
DIRECTORS’ APPROVAL
In accordance with Section 30(3)(c) of the Companies Act, No. 71 of 2008, as amended, the annual
financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2013 were approved by the board of directors
on 18 March 2014 and are signed on its behalf by:
DIRECTORS
SM Pityana, Chairman
S Venkatakrishnan, Chief Executive Officer
RN Duffy, Chief Financial Officer
LW Nkuhlu (Prof), Chairman, Audit and Corporate Governance Committee
SECRETARY’S CERTIFICATE
In terms of Section 88(2)(e) of the Companies Act, No. 71 of 2008, as amended, I certify that the
company has lodged with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission all such returns and
notices as are required of a public company in terms of the Act, and that all such returns and notices
are true, correct and up-to-date.
ME Sanz Perez
Company Secretary
Johannesburg
18 March 2014
AFFIRMATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In accordance with Section 30(2) and 30(3) of the Companies Act, No. 71 of 2008, as amended, the
annual financial statements for AngloGold Ashanti Limited, registration number 1944/017354/06, for
the year ended 31 December 2013, have been audited by Ernst & Young Inc., the company’s
independent external auditors, whose unqualified audit report can be found under Independent
Auditor’s Report, on page 76.
The financial statements have been prepared by the corporate reporting staff of AngloGold Ashanti
Limited, headed by Mr John Edwin Staples, the group’s Chief Accounting Officer. This process was
supervised by Mr Richard Duffy, the group’s Chief Financial Officer and Mr Srinivasan
Venkatakrishnan, the group’s Chief Executive Officer.

background image
42
DIRECTORS’ REPORT
For the year ended 31 December 2013
NATURE OF BUSINESS
AngloGold Ashanti conducts mining operations in Africa, North and South America and Australia, and
undertakes exploration activities in some of these jurisdictions and in other parts of the world. In
addition, the company is involved in the manufacturing, marketing and selling of gold products, as well
as the development of markets for gold. At certain of its operations, AngloGold Ashanti produces
uranium, silver and sulphuric acid as by-products in the course of producing gold.
A review of the unaudited performance of the various operations is available in the operational profiles
on AngloGold Ashanti’s annual report website www.aga-reports.com.
Shareholders holding 10% or more of AngloGold Ashanti’s issued share capital
As at 31 December 2013, there were no shareholders holding 10% or more of the company’s issued
share capital. This does not take cognisance of the shares held by the Bank of New York Mellon as
depositary for the AngloGold Ashanti ADR programme.
SHARE CAPITAL
Authorised
The authorised share capital of AngloGold Ashanti as at 31 December 2013 was made up as follows:
SA rands
• 600,000,000 ordinary shares of 25 South African cents each
150,000,000
• 4,280,000 E ordinary shares of 25 South African cents each
1,070,000
• 2,000,000 A redeemable preference shares of 50 South African cents each
1,000,000
• 5,000,000 B redeemable preference shares of 1 South African cent each
50,000
The following are the movements in the issued and unissued share capital from 1 January 2013 to
28 February 2014:
Issued
Ordinary shares
Number of
shares
Value
SA rands
Number
of shares
Value
SA rands
2013
2012
At 1 January
383,320,962
95,830,241
382,242,343         95,560,586
Issued during year:
Conversion of E ordinary shares
– Bokamoso ESOP
145,018
36,254
84,446               21,112
– Izingwe
91,683
22,921
48,532                12,133
Exercise of options by participants in the
AngloGold Ashanti Share Incentive Scheme
930,743                    232,686
945,641             236,410
Conversion of Mandatory Convertible Bond
issued in 2010 and matured on
15 September 2013
18,140,000                 4,535,000
                     -
At 31 December
(1)
402,628,406              100,657,102
383,320,962        95,830,241
background image
43
Ordinary shares
Number of
shares
Value
SA rands
Number
of shares
Value
SA rands
2013
2012
At 31 December
(1)
402,628,406
100,657,102
383,320,962         95,830,241
Issued subsequent to year-end
–   Exercise of options by participants in the
AngloGold Ashanti Share Incentive
Scheme
216,299                    54,075
–   Bokamoso ESOP on conversion of
E ordinary shares
2,618                         654
At 28 February 2014
402,847,323
100,711,831
(1
)
Share capital of $16m (2012: $16m) is translated at historical rates of exchange at the reporting dates. Refer to group note 26.
E ordinary shares
On 11 December 2006, shareholders in general meeting authorised the creation of a maximum of
4,280,000 E ordinary shares to be issued pursuant to an Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP)
and a black economic empowerment transaction with Izingwe Holdings (Pty) Limited (Izingwe)
(collectively, the BEE transaction).
Number of
shares
Value
SA rands
Number of
shares
Value
SA rands
2013
2012
At 1 January
1,617,752
404,438
2,582,962           645,741
Cancelled in exchange for ordinary shares in terms
of the cancellation formula:
– Bokamoso ESOP
(555,746)
(138,937)
(615,210)       (153,803)
– Izingwe
(350,000)
(87,500)
(350,000)          (87,500)
At 31 December
712,006
178,001
1,617,752           404,438
Cancelled and exchanged for ordinary shares issued
in terms of the cancellation formula:
– Bokamoso ESOP
(9,120)
(2,280)
At 28 February 2014
702,886
175,721
Share capital is translated at historical rates of exchange at the reporting dates. Refer to group
note 26.
In terms of the original authority granted by shareholders in 2006, E ordinary shares, on vesting, are
cancelled in exchange for ordinary shares in accordance with the cancellation formula.
However, in November 2011, in addition to reinstating the cancelled E ordinary shares, shareholders
approved an amendment to the cancellation formula through the resetting of the strike price.
Participants to the ESOP and Izingwe are now guaranteed a minimum conversion price of R40 per
E ordinary share with a maximum of R90 per E ordinary share for the ESOP and R70 per E ordinary
share for Izingwe from a base price of R320 and R330 per share, respectively.
E ordinary shareholders are entitled to vote at all shareholder meetings, but do not hold veto rights.
Dividends payable on E ordinary shares are equivalent to 50% of dividends payable to ordinary
shareholders.
background image
44
E ordinary shares, on vesting, are exchanged for ordinary shares and cancelled and may not be re-
issued. Therefore, they do not form part of the unissued share capital of the company.
Redeemable preference shares
The A and B redeemable preference shares, all of which are held by the wholly owned subsidiary,
Eastvaal Gold Holdings Limited, may not be transferred and are redeemable from the realisation of
the assets relating to the Moab lease area after the cessation of mining operations in the area. The
shares carry the right to receive dividends equivalent to the profits (net of royalty, ongoing capital
expenditure and taxation) from operations in the area. No further A and B redeemable preference
shares will be issued.
Further details of the authorised and issued shares, as well as the share premium, are given in group
note 26.
Unissued
Number of ordinary shares
2013
2012
At 1 January
216,679,038
217,757,657
Issued during the year
(19,307,444)
(1,078,619)
At 31 December
197,371,594
216,679,038
Issues subsequent to year-end
(218,917)
At 28 February 2014
197,152,677
Ordinary shares under the control of the directors
Pursuant to the authority granted by shareholders at the Annual General Meeting held on
13 May 2013, 5% of the shares in issue, from time to time, are placed under the control of the
directors to allot and issue, for such purposes and on such terms as the directors, in their discretion,
may determine. At 31 December 2013, the total number of shares placed under the control of the
directors was 20,131,420. No shares were issued during 2013 by the directors in terms of this
authority, which will expire at the close of the next Annual General Meeting, unless renewed.
Shareholders will therefore be asked at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 14 May 2014, to
renew this authority by placing 5% of the number of shares in issue, from time to time, under the
control of the directors to allot and issue, for such purposes and on such terms as the directors, at
their discretion, may determine.
In terms of the Listings Requirements of the JSE, shareholders may, subject to certain conditions,
authorise the directors to issue the ordinary shares held under their control for cash other than by
means of a rights offer to shareholders. To enable the directors of the company to take advantage of
favourable business opportunities which may arise for the issue of such ordinary shares for cash,
without restriction, for the benefit of the company, shareholders will be asked to consider an ordinary
resolution to this effect at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 14 May 2014.
background image
45
Shareholders will also be asked to approve as a general authority, the acquisition by the company, or
a subsidiary of the company, of its own shares from its issued ordinary share capital for certain
specific housekeeping reasons.
Depositary interests
American Depositary Shares
At 31 December 2013, the company had in issue, through The Bank of New York Mellon as
Depositary and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) 185,581,840 (2012: 153,711,993),
American Depositary Shares (ADSs). Each ADS is equal to one ordinary share. At 28 February 2014,
there were 187,791,768 ADSs in issue and listed on the NYSE.
CHESS Depositary Interests
At 31 December 2013, the company had in issue, through the Clearing House Electronic Sub-register
System (CHESS), and listed on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), 89,789,845
(2012:
89,780,845) CHESS Depositary Interests (CDI). The number of CDIs in issue at
28 February 2014 was 89,789,845. Every five CDIs is equivalent to one AngloGold Ashanti ordinary
share and carry the right to one vote.
Ghanaian Depositary Shares
At 31 December 2013, the company had in issue, through NTHC Limited as Depositary and listed on
the Ghana Stock Exchange (GSE), 16,556,655 Ghanaian Depositary Shares (GhDSs)
(2012: 16,551,255). The register as at 28 February 2014 remained unchanged. Every 100 GhDSs has
one underlying AngloGold Ashanti ordinary share and carries the right to one vote.
CREST Depositary Interests
To facilitate trading on the London Stock Exchange (LSE) and settlement in CREST, AngloGold
Ashanti has established a Depositary Interest (DI) facility which is administered by Computershare
Investor Services Plc. The DI facility became effective on 17 September 2012, via a change of trading
platform. Shareholders wishing to trade their AngloGold Ashanti shares on the LSE will be able to do
so by converting their ordinary shares into dematerialised DIs on a one-for-one basis. At
31 December 2013, a total of 138,397 DIs (2012: 19,364) had been issued in exchange for ordinary
shares and were listed on the LSE. At 28 February 2014, there were 229,812 DIs in issue.

background image
46
ANGLOGOLD SHARE INCENTIVE SCHEME
AngloGold Ashanti operates a share incentive scheme through which Executive Directors, members
of the Executive Committee and other management groups of the company and its subsidiaries are
given the opportunity to acquire shares in the company. The objective is to incentivise such
employees to identify themselves more closely with the fortunes of the group, support its continued
growth, and to promote the retention of such employees.
Non-Executive Directors are not eligible to participate in the share incentive scheme.
Employees participate in the share incentive scheme to the extent that they are granted options or
rights to acquire shares and accept them. All options or rights which have not been exercised within
ten years from the date of grant, automatically expire.
The incentives offered by AngloGold Ashanti are reviewed periodically to ensure that they remain
globally competitive, so as to attract, reward and retain managers of the highest calibre. As a result,
several types of incentives, each with their own issue and vesting criteria, have been granted to
employees. These are collectively known as the “AngloGold Share Incentive Scheme” or “Share
Incentive Scheme”.
Although the Remuneration and Human Resources Committee has the discretion to incentivise
employees through the issue of shares, only options or awards have so far been granted.
The type and vesting criteria of the options or awards granted are:
Performance-related options
The granting of performance-related options was approved by shareholders at the Annual General
Meeting held on 30 April 2002 and amended at the Annual General Meeting held on 29 April 2005
when it was agreed that no further performance-related options would be granted. Performance-
related options granted will terminate on 1 November 2014, being the date on which the last options
granted hereunder may be exercised or they will expire.
Bonus Share Plan (BSP)
The granting of awards in terms of the BSP was approved by shareholders at the Annual General
Meeting held on 29 April 2005 and amended at the General Meeting held on 6 May 2008 when
shareholders approved an increase in the maximum level of the bonus payable to eligible participants,
as well as shortening of the vesting period. Executive directors, executives and other management
groups are eligible for participation. Each award made in respect of the BSP entitles the holder to
acquire one ordinary share at “nil” cost. In respect of all awards granted to and including 2007, these
awards vest in full, three years from the date of grant, provided that the participant remains in the
employ of the company at the date of vesting unless an event, such as death, retirement or
redundancy occurs, which may result in an earlier vesting date. In respect of awards granted in 2008
and thereafter, the vesting period has been shortened to two years, with 40% of awards granted
vesting in year one and 60% in year two from the date of grant or, in the event that participants
background image
47
awards remain unexercised after 3 years from the original grant date, an additional 20% will be
granted.
Certain changes were approved at the Extraordinary General Meeting of shareholders held on
11 March 2013. The 20% uplift for the retention of shares for three years fell away but was added to
the initial 100% resulting in an allocation of 120% share matching for all categories of management.
The Executive Committee members received an increased allocation from 120% to 150%. The
vesting period has been shortened to two years with 50% vesting 12 months after the date of issue
and the remaining 50% vesting 24 months after the date of issue.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
The granting of awards in terms of the LTIP was approved by shareholders at the Annual General
Meeting held on 29 April 2005. Executive directors and selected senior management are eligible for
participation. Each award made in respect of the LTIP entitles the holder to acquire one ordinary
share at “nil” cost. Awards granted vest three years from the date of grant, to the extent that the set
company performance targets, under which the awards were made, are met, and provided that the
participant remains in the employ of the company at the date of vesting, unless an event, such as
death, retirement or redundancy occurs, which may result in an earlier vesting date.
In 2013, the Remuneration and Human Resources Committee approved a new retention bonus
scheme comprising both cash (40% of total base pay) and shares (60% of base pay) which was
implemented on 1 March 2013 for the Executive Committee members. This was implemented over
the short term to support a strategy of retaining the top management for a minimum period of
18 months to ensure delivery on key business imperatives, while the new Chief Executive Officer was
inducted. The share award will be a performance-based share (LTIP) granted in March 2013. Subject
to the performance conditions, these shares will vest at the end of August 2014. In line with the LTIP
vesting, the cash portion will be paid at the end of August 2014, based on the achievement of the
performance conditions.
Following a change in Schedule 14 of the JSE Listings Requirements (Share Incentive Schemes) on
15 October 2008 the maximum number of shares attributable to the scheme was changed from
2.75% of issued share capital from time to time to a fixed figure of 17,000,000. The maximum
aggregate number of shares which may be acquired by any one participant in the scheme is 5% of
the shares attributable to the scheme, being 850,000 ordinary shares in aggregate.
Also, as a result of the change to the JSE Listings Requirements, as aforementioned, the recycling of
options/awards that have vested and which have been delivered, and for which AngloGold Ashanti
shares have been issued, is no longer allowed.

background image
48
The table below reflects the total number of options/awards that are unissued in terms of the share
incentive scheme, as a result of this rule change:
Details
Options/Awards
Total number of options/awards attributable to the scheme at 31 December 2013
17,000,000
Less:
·
Total number of options/awards granted and outstanding at 31 December 2013
(5,688,383)
·
Total number of options/awards exercised:
·
During the period 15 October to 31 December 2008
(101,013)
·
During the period 1 January to 31 December 2009
(1,131,916)
·
During the period 1 January to 31 December 2010
(823,411)
·
During the period 1 January to 31 December 2011
(889,593)
·
During the period 1 January to 31 December 2012
(945,641)
·
During the period 1 January to 31 December 2013
(930,743)
Total options/awards available but unissued at 31 December 2013
6,489,300
Co-Investment Plan (CIP)
To assist executives in meeting their Minimum Shareholding Requirements (MSR’s) with effect from
February 2013, they were given the opportunity, on a voluntary basis, to participate in the Co-
Investment Plan (CIP), and this has been adopted based on the following conditions: executives will
be allowed to take up to 50% of their after tax cash bonus to participate in a further matching scheme
by purchasing shares in AngloGold Ashanti, and the company will match their initial investment into
the scheme at 150%, with vesting over a two-year period in equal tranches.
Changes in options and awards
In accordance with the JSE Listings Requirements and the rules of the AngloGold Share Incentive
Scheme, the changes in options and awards granted and the ordinary shares issued as a result of the
exercise of options and awards during the period 1 January 2013 to 28 February 2014 are disclosed
below:
Performance-
related
Bonus Share
Plan
(1)
Long-Term
Incentive Plan
(1)
Total Share
Incentive Scheme
At 1 January 2013
92,967
2,156,456
2,330,906
4,580,329
Movement during year
– Granted
-
1,300,968
2,019,360
3,320,328
– Exercised
(370)
(645,735)
(284,638)
(930,743)
– Lapsed – terminations
(35,715)
(212,802)
(1,033,014)
(1,281,531)
At 31 December 2013
56,882
2,598,887
3,032,614                       5,688,383
Average exercise/issue price
per share outstanding
Subsequent to year-end
– Granted
-
1,924,042
2,167,474
4,091,516
– Exercised
-
(171,324)
(44,975)
(216,299)
– Lapsed – terminations
(14,093)
(8,742)
(285,651)
(308,486)
At 28 February 2014
42,789
4,342,863
4,869,462
9,255,114
(1)
BSP and LTIP awards are granted at no cost to participants.
background image
49
Total shares issued on the exercise of options and awards from the inception of the scheme:
Total number of shares issued
At 1 January 2013
8,759,065
– Exercised 2013
930,743
At 31 December 2013
9,689,808
Subsequent to year-end
– Exercised January and February 2014
216,299
At 28 February 2014
9,906,107
DIVIDEND POLICY
Dividends are proposed by, and approved by the board of directors of AngloGold Ashanti, based on
the company’s financial performance. AngloGold Ashanti expects to continue to pay dividends,
although there can be no assurance that dividends will be paid in the future or as to the particular
amounts that will be paid from year to year. The payment of future dividends will depend upon the
board’s ongoing assessment of AngloGold Ashanti’s earnings, after providing for long-term growth,
cash/debt resources, compliance with the solvency and liquidity requirements of the Companies Act,
the amount of reserves available for a dividend based on the going-concern assessment, and
restrictions (if any) placed by the conditions of debt facilities, protection of the investment grade credit
rating and other factors.
Dividends declared since 1 January 2013:
Final dividend Number 116
Interim dividend Number 117
Ordinary shares
Declaration date
18 February 2013
10 May 2013
Amount paid per ordinary share
– South African currency (cents)
50
50
– United Kingdom currency (pence)
3.624
3.458
– Ghanaian currency (cedis)
10.58
10.28
Amount per CDI
(1)
– Australian currency
(cents)
5.315                                                 5.375
Amount per GhDS
(2)
– Ghanaian currency
(cedis)
0.1058                                               0.1028
Amount per ADS
(3)
– United States currency (cents)
5.34
5.02
E ordinary share
South African currency (cents) per share
25
25
(1)
Each CDI (CHESS Depositary Interest) is equal to one-fifth of one ordinary share.
(2)
Each GhDS (Ghanaian Depositary Share) is equal to one-hundredth of one ordinary share.
(3)
Each ADS (American Depositary Share) is equal to one ordinary share.
Dematerialised shareholders on the South African share register will receive payment of their
dividends electronically, as provided for by STRATE. Certificated shareholders, who have elected to
receive their dividends electronically, will be paid via the company’s electronic funds transmission
service. Certificated shareholders who have not yet elected to receive dividend payments
electronically, are encouraged to mandate this method of payment for all future dividends.
background image
50
Withholding tax
On 1 April 2012, the South African government imposed a 15% withholding tax on dividends and
other distributions payable to shareholders.
BORROWINGS
The company’s borrowing powers are unlimited pursuant to the company’s Memorandum of
Incorporation. As at 31 December 2013, the group’s gross borrowings totalled $3,891m
(2012: $3,583m).
Significant events during the year under review
Resignation of Mr Mark Cutifani as Chief Executive Officer: On 8 January 2013, the board of
AngloGold Ashanti announced the resignation of Chief Executive Officer, Mr Mark Cutifani with effect
from 1 April 2013. The board further announced the appointment of the then Chief Financial Officer,
Mr Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan and Executive Vice President Business and Technical Development,
Mr Anthony O’Neill as joint Chief Executive Officers, with Mr Venkatakrishnan responsible for all
Finance and Corporate functions and Mr O’Neill responsible for all Operations, Projects (including the
company’s Enterprise Resource Planning programme and procurement) and Technical functions.

Appointment of a director: On 21 February 2013, AngloGold Ashanti announced the appointment of
Mr Anthony O’Neill as an Executive Director to its Board of Directors with effect from
20 February 2013.
Approval of amendments to the incentive plans: On 11 March 2013, AngloGold Ashanti
announced that shareholders of the company approved all ordinary resolutions relating to
amendments to the rules of the Bonus Share Plan and the Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Approval of new Memorandum of Incorporation: On 27 March 2013, AngloGold Ashanti
announced that at the general meeting held on 27 March 2013, the shareholders approved the new
Memorandum of Incorporation.
Proposed sale of the Navachab mine: On 30 April 2013, AngloGold Ashanti announced its plan to
sell the Navachab mine in Namibia.
Appointment of new Chief Executive Officer: On 8 May 2013, AngloGold Ashanti announced the
appointment of Mr Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to replace the former
CEO, Mr Mark Cutifani, who left the company at the end of March 2013.
Appointment of new Chief Financial Officer: On 21 May 2013, AngloGold Ashanti announced the
appointment of Mr Richard Duffy as the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) with effect from 1 June 2013 to
replace Mr Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan, the former CFO. On the same day, the company announced
changes to its executive leadership team.
Credit rating downgrade: On 12 July 2013, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded the issuer rating
of AngloGold Ashanti to Baa3 from Baa2. Moody’s also downgraded the senior unsecured debt
obligations of AngloGold Ashanti’s guaranteed subsidiary, AngloGold Ashanti Holdings plc, to Baa3
from Baa2.
background image
51
Resignation of Mr Anthony O’Neill: On 15 July 2013, AngloGold Ashanti notified shareholders of
the resignation of Mr Anthony O’Neill as an Executive Director from the Board of Directors with effect
from 19 July 2013.
Credit rating downgrade: On 17 July 2013, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) cut its long-term corporate
credit rating on AngloGold Ashanti to BB+ from BBB- and its long- and short-term South Africa
national-scale ratings on AngloGold Ashanti to zaA/zaA-2 from zaAA-zaA-1. It also lowered its issue
rating on AngloGold’s senior unsecured notes to BB+ from BBB-.
Corporate bond: On 30 July 2013, AngloGold Ashanti raised a corporate bond of $1,250m at 8.5%
interest per annum to refinance the 3.5% Guaranteed Convertible Bond due May 2014.
Conversion of bonds: On 17 September 2013, AngloGold Ashanti announced the conversion of the
6.0% Mandatory Convertible Subordinated Bonds issued on 15 September 2010 by AngloGold
Ashanti Holdings Finance plc, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company, into ordinary shares of the
company.
Kibali pours its first gold: On 25 September 2013, the Kibali Gold Mine in the Democratic Republic
of the Congo, in which AngloGold Ashanti owns a 45% stake, poured its first gold ahead of schedule
and within budget.
Tropicana pours its first gold: On 26 September 2013, the Tropicana Gold Mine in Western
Australia, owned 70% by AngloGold Ashanti, began production ahead of schedule and within budget.
Redemption of 3.5% Guaranteed Convertible Bonds: On 11 November 2013, AngloGold Holdings
Finance plc announced the completion of the previously announced optional redemption of its
outstanding 3.5% Guaranteed Convertible Bonds due 2014.
Significant events subsequent to year-end
AMCU Strike Notice: On 20 January 2014, AngloGold Ashanti confirmed that the Association of
Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) had served notice that it intended to call a strike by its
members at the company’s South Africa operations, starting Thursday, 23 January 2014.
Threatened strike by AMCU declared unprotected: On 30 January 2014, AngloGold Ashanti
announced that South Africa’s Labour Court had ruled that a strike threatened by AMCU at the
company’s South Africa mines would be unprotected, and that employees should continue to proceed
to work. Also, on 30 January 2014, the court granted an interim interdict and ruled that AMCU must
return to court on 14 March 2014 to explain why the interim interdict should not be made permanent.
On 14 March 2014, a postponement was requested and a new court date was set for 5 June 2014.
The interim interdict will remain in force until 5 June 2014.
AngloGold Ashanti enters into agreement to sell Navachab mine: On 10 February 2014,
AngloGold Ashanti announced that it had signed a binding agreement, subject to certain conditions, to
sell its entire interest in AngloGold Ashanti Namibia (Proprietary) Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary
which owns the Navachab Gold Mine, to a wholly-owned subsidiary of QKR Corporation Limited. The
agreement provided for an upfront consideration based on an enterprise value of US$110 million
background image
52
which will be adjusted to take into account the mine’s net debt and working capital position on the
closing date of the transaction and is subject to a number of conditions precedent.
Changes to the Board of Directors: On 17 February 2014, AngloGold Ashanti announced that as a
result of his increasing portfolio of professional commitments, Mr TT Mboweni had decided not to
stand for re-election as an independent Non-Executive Director at the Annual General Meeting to be
held on 14 May 2014. Mr Mboweni also stood down as Chairman on the same date. Mr SM Pityana
was elected unanimously by the board to take over from Mr Mboweni. Prof LW Nkuhlu was also
appointed Lead Independent Director.
Material change
There has been no material change in the financial results or trading position of the AngloGold
Ashanti group since the publication of the report for the fourth quarter and year ended
31 December 2013 on 19 February 2014 and the date of this report. These results were audited by
Ernst & Young Inc. who issued an unqualified audit report on 18 March 2014.
Material resolutions
Details of special resolutions and other resolutions of a significant nature passed by the company
during the year under review, requiring disclosure in terms of the JSE Listings Requirements, are as
follows:
Detail of resolution
Effective date
Passed at the Annual General Meeting held on 13 May 2013:
AngloGold Ashanti
Limited
Approval for the company or any of its subsidiaries to acquire
ordinary shares issued by the company
13 May 2013
AngloGold Ashanti
Limited
Approved increase in Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration for
their service as directors
13 May 2013
AngloGold Ashanti
Limited
Approved increase in Non-Executive Directors’ fees for board and
statutory committee meetings
13 May 2013
AngloGold Ashanti
Limited
Approval for the company to grant financial assistance in terms of
Sections 44 & 45 of the Companies Act
13 May 2013
Annual general meetings
At the 69
th
Annual General Meeting held on Monday, 13 May 2013, shareholders passed resolutions
relating to the:
·
re-appointment of Ernst & Young Inc. as auditors of the company;
·
election of MJ Kirkwood as a director;
·
election of AM O’Neill as a director;
·
re-election of S Venkatakrishnan as a director;
·
appointment of Prof LW Nkuhlu as a member of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee
of the company;
·
appointment of MJ Kirkwood as a member of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee of
the company;
·
appointment of R Gasant as a member of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee of the
company;
·
appointment of NP January-Bardill as a member of the Audit and Corporate Governance
Committee of the company;
background image
53
·
renewal of the general authority placing 5% of the number of ordinary shares of the company in
issue from time to time under the control of the directors;
·
granting of a general authority to directors to issue for cash those ordinary shares which the
directors are authorised to allot and issue, subject to certain limitations of the Listings
Requirements of the JSE;
·
advisory endorsement of the AngloGold Ashanti remuneration policy;
·
approved, as a special resolution, increase in Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration for their
service as directors;
·
approved as a special resolution, increase in Non-Executive Directors’ fees for board and statutory
committee meetings;
·
approved, as a special resolution, acquisition by the company and its subsidiaries of ordinary
shares issued by the company; and
·
approval, as a special resolution, the granting of financial assistance by the company in terms of
Sections 44 and 45 of the Companies Act.
Notice of the 70
th
Annual General Meeting to be held in the Auditorium, 76 Jeppe Street, Newtown,
Johannesburg at 11:00 (South African time) on 14 May 2014, will be printed as a separate document
and distributed to shareholders in accordance with the Companies Act.
Directorate and secretary
The following changes to the board of directors took place during the period from 1 January 2013 to
31 December 2013 and subsequent to year-end:
Executive directors
·
Mark Cutifani, Chief Executive Officer, resigned as Executive Director effective 1 April 2013.
·
Anthony O’Neill was appointed as an Executive Director of the company with effect from
20 February 2013.
·
Anthony O’Neill resigned as Executive Director with effect from 19 July 2013.
·
Richard Duffy was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Executive Director with effect from
1 June 2013. Richard will retire at the Annual General Meeting to be held on 14 May 2014 and will
offer himself for re-election.
Non-Executive Directors
·
The following directors retired at the Annual General Meeting held on 13 May 2013: Bill Nairn,
Ferdinand Ohene-Kena and Frank Arisman.
In terms of the company’s Memorandum of Incorporation, the following directors will retire at the
Annual General Meeting to be held on 14 May 2014: Rhidwaan Gasant, Sipho Pityana and
Tito Mboweni, and are eligible for re-election. Tito Mboweni has decided not to make himself
available for re-election.
The names and biographies of the directors of the company are listed on page 33 of this document.
background image
54
Company Secretary
There was no change to the office of Company Secretary during 2013. The name, business and
postal address of the Company Secretary are set out under Administrative Information on page 236.
Directors’ and Prescribed Officers’ interests in AngloGold Ashanti shares
The interests of directors, prescribed officers and their associates in the ordinary shares of the
company at 31 December 2013, which did not individually exceed 1% of the company’s issued
ordinary share capital, were:
31 December 2013
Beneficial holding
31 December 2012
Beneficial holding
Direct
Indirect
Direct
Indirect
Non-Executive Directors
FB Arisman
-
-
-
4,984
MJ
Kirkwood
3,000                             -                            -                            -
LW Nkuhlu
-
3,000
-
800
RJ Ruston
(1)
-                     1,000
-
-
Total
3,000
4,000
                    5,784
Executive Directors
RN
Duffy
1,180                             -                            -                            -
M Cutifani
-
-
61,692
-
AM O’Neill
-
-
-
7,000
S Venkatakrishnan
78,437
-
52,508
-
Total
79,617
-
114,200                     7,000
Company Secretary
ME Sanz Perez
1,135
-
-
-
Total
1,135
-
-                            -
Prescribed Officers
I
Boninelli
-
1,284                             -                             -
CE Carter
36,500
-
25,078
-
GJ Ehm
(2)
1,213
-                                                       -
MP
O’Hare
1,379                             -                            -                             -
RW
Largent
1,910                             -                           -                              -
DC
Noko
615                            -                            -                             -
Total
41,617
1,284
25,078                            -
Grand total
125,369
5,284
139,278                    12,784
SM Pityana, Non-Executive Director of AngloGold Ashanti, has an indirect beneficial holding in the
company given that he is a trustee and beneficiary of a trust which holds a 44% interest in Izingwe
Holdings, the company’s BEE partner. As at 31 December 2013, Izingwe Holdings held 350,000
E ordinary shares in the issued capital of the company (2012: 700,000 E ordinary shares). This
holding is unchanged at the date of this report.
(1)
Held on the Australian stock exchange as 5,000 CHESS Depository Receipts (5 CDIs are equivalent to 1 ordinary share)
(2)
Held on the Australian stock exchange as 6,067 CHESS Depository Receipts (5 CDIs are equivalent to 1 ordinary share)
background image
55
Changes in directors’ and prescribed officers’ interests in AngloGold Ashanti shares after
31 December 2013:
Date of
transaction
Type of transaction
Number
of shares
Direct/indirect
beneficial
holding
Executive Directors
RN Duffy
4 March 2014
On market purchase of shares
5,025      Indirect
S Venkatakrishnan          28 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
2,572      Direct
Company Secretary
ME Sanz Perez
28 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
5,520      Direct
4 March 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
851      Direct
Prescribed Officers
GJ Ehm
21 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
6,000      Direct
MP O’Hare
28 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
695     Direct
5 March 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
461     Direct
I Boninelli
28 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
963     Indirect
CE Carter
28 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
1,287     Direct
DC Noko
28 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
461    Direct
RW Largent
24 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
6,600    Direct
YZ Simelane
28 February 2014
On-market purchase of ordinary shares pursuant
to the AngloGold Ashanti Co-Investment Plan
1,440    Direct
Details of service contracts of directors and prescribed officers
In accordance with Section 30(4)(e) of the Companies Act, the salient features of the service
contracts of directors and prescribed officers have been disclosed in the Remuneration Report.
Annual Financial Statements
The financial statements set out fully the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the
group and the company for the financial year ended 31 December 2013.
The directors of AngloGold Ashanti are responsible for the maintenance of adequate accounting
records and the preparation of the annual financial statements and related information in a manner
that fairly presents the state of affairs of the company, in conformity with the Companies Act and in
terms of the JSE Listings Requirements.
The directors are also responsible for the maintenance of effective systems of internal control which
are based on established organisational structures and procedures. These systems are designed to
provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the annual financial statements, and to prevent
and detect material misstatement and loss.
In preparing the annual financial statements, the group has complied with International Financial
Reporting Standards (IFRS) and used appropriate accounting policies supported by pragmatic
judgements and estimates.
background image
56
AngloGold Ashanti, through its Executive Committee, reviews its short-, medium- and long-term
funding, treasury and liquidity requirements and positions monthly. The board of directors also
reviews these on a quarterly basis at its meetings.
Cash and cash equivalents, net of bank overdraft, at 31 December 2013 amounted to $628m
(2012: $892m), and together with cash budgeted to be generated from operations in 2014 and the net
incremental borrowing facilities available, are in management’s view, adequate to fund operating,
mine development, capital expenditure and financing obligations as they fall due for at least the next
12 months.
Based on the results of a formal documented review of the company’s system of internal controls and
risk management, covering both the adequacy in design and effectiveness in implementation,
performed by the internal audit function during the year 2013, the board of directors has considered:
·
information and explanations provided by line management;
·
discussions held with the external auditors on the results of the year-end audit; and
·
the assessment by the Audit and Corporate Governance and the Risk and Information Integrity
Committees.
Nothing has come to the attention of the board that caused it to believe that the company’s system of
internal controls and risk management are not effective and that the internal financial controls do not
form a sound basis for the preparation of reliable financial statements.
Taking these factors into account, the directors of AngloGold Ashanti have formed the judgement that,
at the time of approving the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2013, it is
appropriate to prepare these financial statements on a going concern basis.
The directors are of the opinion that these financial statements fairly present the financial position of
the company and group at 31 December 2013 and the results of their operations and cash flow
information for the year then ended in accordance with IFRS.
The external auditor, Ernst & Young Inc., is responsible for independently auditing and reporting on
the financial statements in conformity with International Standards on Auditing and the Companies Act
of South Africa. Their unqualified report on these financial statements appears in the Independent
Auditor’s Report.
The company will file a set of financial statements in accordance with IFRS in its annual report on
Form 20-F as must be filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission by no later than
30 April 2014. Copies of the annual report on Form 20-F will be made available once the filing has
been made, on request, from the Bank of New York Mellon, or from the company’s corporate office
detailed in the section Administrative Information.
Investments
Particulars of the group’s principal subsidiaries and operating entities are presented in this report on
page 226.

background image
57
REMUNERATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE –
CHAIRMAN’S LETTER
Dear Shareholders
As the incoming Remuneration and Human Resources Committee Chairman, I am pleased to provide
you with AngloGold Ashanti’s Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 December 2013.
The Committee faced a challenging and eventful year with the transition of CEOs from Mark Cutifani
on 31 March 2013 to the dual CEO leadership of Srinivasan Venkatakrishnan (Venkat) and
Tony O’Neill commencing on 1 April 2013. After a comprehensive external search and review of
internal candidates, the board announced the appointment of Venkat as the new CEO, effective
8 May 2013.
Through the CEO transition it is important to note that on resigning from AngloGold Ashanti
Mark Cutifani did not receive any financial benefit over and above his contractual benefits provided on
resignation. Any shares that had at the time not yet vested, lapsed and he was not afforded any
bonus payments. Tony O’ Neill, however, took early retirement and thus was contractually entitled to a
pro-rata allocation of shares and a pro-rata bonus payment.
The transition of CEO made it important that we stabilised and retained our executive management
team. Consequently retention measures were initiated to ensure that the team would remain in place
to support the new CEO. To increase on-going alignment of the executive management team with
shareholder interests, we also introduced the Minimum Shareholding Requirement.
In developing the remuneration package for the incoming CEO, the Remuneration and Human
Resources Committee considered the correct market positioning to reflect that this is Venkat’s first
CEO role. This resulted in applying a market related salary which is nonetheless lower than that of his
predecessor.
Once the new CEO was in role, a review of Executive Committee remuneration was completed taking
into consideration each member’s adjusted responsibilities. The Executive Committee was
restructured from 13 to 10 members including the appointment of two Chief Operating Officers, one
for the South African Region and the second for the International Operations. This review showed that
notwithstanding changes to the Executive Committee and adjustments to corporate strategy, the
broad remuneration structure remained appropriate.
It is worth noting that Venkat has elected not to take a salary adjustment for 2014. He provides the
following rationale:
·
From an SA mining perspective he feels that the stakeholder circle of trust is broken and needs
fixing, making this voluntary sacrifice a good start to show commitment and rebuild trust;
background image
58
·
Based on the challenging year in 2013, AngloGold Ashanti’s restructuring resulted in significant job
losses. As a consequence, Venkat felt that accepting an increase would be inappropriate; and
·
His actions were taken in consideration of the call from the South African Minister of Finance and
the South African Minister of Mineral Resources for CEOs to show pay restraint and narrow the
wage gap.
Venkat has further elected not to take the cash element of his bonus for 2013 which means that he
also forfeits the right to participate in AngloGold Ashanti’s Co-Investment Plan. He will, however,
receive the matching BSP shares. The total value of amounts forfeited inclusive of annual increase,
pension contributions, BSP cash bonus and Co-Investment Plan are summarised in the table below:
Pay element
Value
R
Salary increase
852,000
Pension contributions
210,870
BSP cash bonus
5,618,400
Co-Investment Plan
2,528,280
Special bonus
4,200,000
Total
13,409,550
In addition, he has applied R750,000 per annum of his own pay for a minimum 3 year period to start
up a bursary scheme for 5 HDSA students to pursue financial and accounting qualifications, as his
way of giving back to South Africa. The bursary initiative is run with the University of Witwatersrand
and the first five students were enrolled in January 2014.
The achievement of both short and long term performance this year is reflective of the metrics which
are well aligned to the business delivery. It was a year of strong headwinds with a significant drop in
the gold price, on-going labour market unrest in the South African operations and declining grades in
some operations with the resulting negative impact on company performance. This is reflected clearly
in the improved (compared to 2012), but still low, variable pay awards to all our executives.
The Remuneration and Human Resources Committee will be recommending some adjustments to the
performance conditions for 2014 to reflect revised group priorities going forward. These new priorities
are described in the CEOs Report in the Annual Integrated Report 2013 and in consultation with some
major shareholders, the Committee has developed appropriate metrics for the BSP and LTIP plans
that support the amended priorities and, we believe, will be more congruent with shareholder
interests.
In this Remuneration Report we trust that we have provided clear and detailed explanations of our
executive management team’s remuneration and that you find this to be a comprehensive overview.
Mr Michael Kirkwood
Chairman, Remuneration and Human Resources Committee
18 March 2014
background image
59
REMUNERATION REPORT
This report covers the period from 1 January to 31 December 2013.
THE REMUNERATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
Remit and purpose of the Committee
The Remuneration and Human Resources Committee (the Committee) activities are governed by the
Terms of Reference (as reviewed and approved by the Committee on 29 October 2013). The primary
purpose of the Committee is to operate in an independent role as an overseer of remuneration and
human resource matters with accountability to the board. In performing this function, the Committee
discharges its oversight responsibilities relating to all compensation, including annual base salary,
annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation, retention schemes, employment
contracts, severance pay, on-going perquisites or special benefit items and equity compensation of
the company’s executives and management. This includes the design and application of material
compensation programmes, and share ownership guidelines. The Committee also has oversight of
talent management, succession planning strategies and any other human resources issues
considered strategic in nature. This is accomplished by:
·
Reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the
executive management team, including the Executive Directors;
·
Evaluating the performance of the executive management team against these goals and objectives
annually and setting each executive’s compensation based on such evaluation;
·
Ensuring that the mix of fixed and variable pay meets the company’s operational and strategic
objectives;
·
Considering the views of the company’s investors and aligning executive compensation to be
congruent with investor interests, including benchmarking externally to position AngloGold
Ashanti’s compensation appropriately;
·
Overseeing and reviewing all aspects of any share option scheme operated by, or to be
established by, the company;
·
Regularly reviewing incentive schemes to ensure continued contribution to shareholder value and
ensuring that these are administered in terms of the rules; and
·
Regularly reviewing human resources strategy aimed at ensuring the supply and retention of
sufficient skilled resources to achieve the company’s objectives.
Committee constitution and attendance
Remuneration and Human
Resource Committee Members
Mr MJ Kirkwood (Chairman)
Mr TT Mboweni
Prof LW Nkuhlu
Mr SM Pityana
Mr RJ Ruston
Number of meetings from
January to December 2013
Five
Other individuals who regularly
attended meetings
Mr S Venkatakrishnan (CEO)
Ms I Boninelli (EVP: People and Organisational Development)
Mr M Hopkins (Independent Advisor to the Remuneration and Human
Resources Committee)
Ms C van Dyk (VP: Remuneration and Benefits and Secretary to the
Remuneration and Human Resources Committee)
background image
60
No individual is in attendance when his or her own remuneration is under discussion.
Please refer to the Corporate Governance Report, page 30 for details of directors’ attendance.
REMUNERATION CONSULTANTS
The Remuneration and Human Resources Committee obtains advice from independent remuneration
consultants where necessary. The consultants are employed directly by the Committee to ensure
independence. Currently the Committee has appointed PwC to provide specialist, independent
remuneration advice and the following summarises some, but not all, of the advisory areas in the year
under review:
·
Remuneration terms for the new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO);
·
Information on current trends, including the pay gap and global market updates;
·
Review and commentary on management proposals;
·
Advice on Non-Executive Director pay; and
·
General advice and guidance on ad hoc issues.
Mercer Consulting (South Africa) Pty Limited performs an independent bespoke executive survey and
their advice is primarily around:
·
Benchmarking of pay of executives and senior management around comparable roles;
·
Advice on comparable sectors, roles and sizes of peer companies;
·
Information on current market trends; and
·
Benchmarking of pay of Non-Executive Directors in comparable sized roles in the identified peer
companies.
REMUNERATION PHILOSOPHY AND POLICY
Our core leadership philosophy of “People are the business …. Our business is people” remains
unchanged which means that we have over the past year strived through difficult times to retain and
remunerate our employees utilising fair, robust and appropriate remuneration and reward for their
contributions.
Our remuneration policy
Our remuneration policy is designed around our philosophy, and is designed to support the
achievement of our operational and strategic goals. The policy is reviewed annually to ensure that it
remains appropriate and effective in terms of delivering our goals. In setting our remuneration policy
we continue to aim to:
·
Remunerate such that the behaviours and performance of our employees and executives are
aligned to the organisation, shareholder and employee strategic goals;
·
Ensure that the performance metrics are demanding, measureable, sustainable and cover all
aspects of the business, including both the key financial and non-financial drivers;
·
Structure remuneration to ensure that our values are maintained and the correct governance
frameworks are applied across our remuneration decisions and practices;
·
Apply the appropriate remuneration benchmarks; and
·
Provide competitive rewards to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled executives and staff.
background image
61
When determining remuneration, the Committee considers all elements of short- and long-term fixed
and variable pay and is consistent with the strategic direction of the organisation and the performance
of the organisation and the individuals.
Before any pay allocations are made, benchmarking and modelling are done to ensure that
appropriately competitive levels of pay are paid for top performers; median or mid quartile pay is paid
for average performance, and limited to no variable pay is applied for poor/below median
performance.
Our approach to determining remuneration
When devising pay, the Committee considers total remuneration (being fixed base salary plus short-
term and long-term incentives) that may be earned for different levels of performance.
When determining remuneration of either an existing or new executive, the Committee considers the
appropriate package through the following steps:
Step 1
Role-sizing and
benchmarking
Sizing the role and benchmarking this against a group of carefully
selected global competitors of similar size and geographic spread.
When doing this AngloGold Ashanti’s size and complexity, along
with the individual’s role are taken into consideration.
Step 2
Peer survey by
Mercer Consulting
(South Africa) Pty
Limited
Annually, the Committee instructs Mercer Consulting (South Africa)
Pty Limited to conduct a bespoke survey with an identified group of
peers (currently 11) which are similar to AngloGold Ashanti in size,
complexity and geographic spread. The survey is then used by the
Committee to determine the appropriate pay level (Mercer
Consulting (South Africa) Pty Limited compiles the information, but
does not make the recommendation on the executives’ pay level).
Step 3
Committee
consideration of each
individual
The Committee then looks at each individual’s role, skills,
experience, location and personal performance (for existing
employees), identified retention risks (where applicable) and then
benchmarks them from a base pay, benefits, and variable pay
perspective.
Application of
prescribed
maximums
The Committee ensures that the correct mix of pay and alignment
to peers are considered when determining the pay level. They also
ensure that the prescribed maximums per stratum or level are
applied when considering the variable pay elements of short-term
incentives (STI) and long-term incentives (LTI).
To ensure that we maintain the best possible approach, the Committee constantly remains appraised
of market and regulatory changes as well as shareholder sentiments. In 2013, new legislation on
executive pay was proposed and in some instances implemented in many countries. Some of the
issues that we reviewed are described as follows:


background image
62
Legislative updates
In Australia, South Africa, UK and the USA some of the legislative changes include disclosure of
remuneration claw-back principles; the link between performance and pay; disclosure of a comparison
of CEO pay to the median of pay in the company and the “implement or explain” approach to
complying with requirements of the codes.
Shareholders
Institutional shareholders’ views and activism have grown in importance and a number have started
providing remuneration guidelines for the companies in which they invest.
Remuneration
AngloGold Ashanti has designed its remuneration program to emphasise performance-based
incentives that reward its executives for the achievement of specific annual, medium- and long-term
business objectives. These objectives are derived from AngloGold Ashanti’s business strategy.
Each executive is on a full term contract which details how the remuneration program is specifically
applied to them. Details of executive contracts can be seen on page 167
.
Linking reward to strategy
Our reward program is driven by our company strategy, which is explained in more detail in the
Annual Integrated Report 2013. The current performance measures which have been selected for the
short-term and long-term incentives reflect our strategic and operational priorities. The diagram below
illustrates how our reward program is aligned to these priorities.
Base Salary: Aligned to global
market comparators ensuring
employees are rewarded fairly and
competitively in the markets that
they operate.
Benefits: Retirement and medical
benefits aligned to local markets in
which employees operate to ensure
that they are legislatively compliant
and then globally aligned to peers.
Other Benefits: In line with the
markets in which we operate.
Short Term Incentive: Short- to
medium-term (3 year) recognition
structure which is delivered in two
parts: an annual cash incentive,
and deferred bonus shares under
the Bonus Share Plan (BSP).
Co-Investment Plan: Retention
scheme to assist executives to
achieve their Minimum
Shareholding Requirements.
Long Term Incentive:
Performance based scheme
delivered in cliff-vesting shares
over a 3 year period.
Total reward 
aligned to the 
strategic 
objectives
VAR
IAB
LE 

PAY
FIXED 
PAY
2013 Strategic
Objectives:
People are the
Business
Grow the
Business to
support
shareholder value
Manage asset
base as an
investment
portfolio
Create a new
business model to
improve margins
and deliver on
15% ROE
Build a stable
business
Fixed Pay:
·     Ensuring that employees are valued
and rewarded for their contributions
·     Retention of employees through
competitive fixed pay models both
internally and externally
Short Term Incentive
Measures:
· Safety
· Production
· Resources to reserves
conversion
· Total cash costs
· Adjusted headline earnings
per share
Co-Investment Plan:
· 
   Creating shareholding for
the executives through the
Minimum Shareholder
Requirements
·     Aligning shareholder and
executive interests
Long Term Incentive Measures:
· Resources to reserves
conversion
· Project delivery
· Total shareholder return
· Free cash flow
background image
63
In the second half of 2013, AngloGold Ashanti’s Strategy was revised to reflect the new challenges
posed by the material drop in gold price and to respond to investor concerns. To take account of this,
the remuneration measures will be adjusted for 2014 to align with the revised company strategy. This
is more fully described on page 73.
Summary of reward elements
The following table sets out the components of remuneration which are used to build total reward.
These components take into consideration the global market; regional and local practices; and
legislative requirements:
Reward element
Description
Base salary
The base salary forms an essential part of the remuneration mix for
executives as it is the core measure, for comparison with, and to remain
competitive relative to, peer companies. The base salary is used as the basis
to determine other elements of compensation and benefits. The base salary
provides the executive with remuneration that is not “at risk”.
The following factors with regards to the executive base pay are important to
note:
·
Annual adjustments for our executives are effective 1 January each year;
·
The executive base salary is targeted at the 50
th
percentile of the specific
role as measured on the Mercer Consulting (South Africa) Pty Limited job
sizing methodology, but can vary depending on individual performance
level and retention concerns; and
·
The CEO does not make a recommendation in terms of his own salary or
any other component of his overall remuneration (although he makes
recommendations on the rest of the executive team).
For the year ended 31 December 2013, the adjustments below were made to annual base salaries in
accordance with the company’s remuneration policy and in terms of the market and peer alignment.
When it came to determining the CEOs pay at the time of his appointment on 8 May 2013, he was
positioned in relation to his experience levels as a new CEO, resulting in a lower base salary than his
predecessor.
background image
CEO comparison graph
The graph below depicts the difference in pay between the current CEO and his predecessor:
Note: Guaranteed package includes base pay, company contribution to medical aid and company contribution to retirement
funding.
Variable pay is calculated for BSP cash bonus at an individual performance rating of 4 and a company performance of 46.1%, whilst 
LTIP is calculated at an average company performance of 49.43% for the past 3 years.  
Reward element
Retirement funds
Medical insurance
Other benefits
Bonus Share Plan

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
R'000
 
 
 
 
 
 
0
5,000
0,000
5,000
0,000
5,000
0,000
5,000
0,000
5,000
0,000
Guaranteed package
 
Description
Each executive is eligible to participate in a retirement scheme applicable to
the res
pective country or region in which he or she operates. The
contribut
ions to the retirement vehicles for the executives vary based on the
fund tha
t they participate in.
 
AngloGold Ashanti provides medical aid assistance through a percentage
contribut
ion, reimbursement, company provided clinics or health care
providers
.
Other benefits are provided to the executive management team such as life
assuran
ce, disability
and accidental death insurance, assistance in terms of
completi
ng their tax
returns and cash in lieu of untaken leave (above the
legislate
d minimum
leave). These are all paid within policy and legislative
requirem
ents.
The short-term incentive, known as the Bonus Share Plan (BSP), is part of
the vari
able element of the total reward package. The BSP is designed to
reward t
he executive, prescribed officers, and qualifying employees for their
overall
annual performance in the company, through meeting set company
objective
s in a given year.
 
17,250

15,018

M Cutifani: Previous CEO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Variable pay
30,332
 
S Venkatakrishnan: Currrent CEO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25,009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total package
47,582
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
40,027
64
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
background image
65
Executive Directors’ and Prescribed Officers’ remuneration
The table below summarises the Executive Directors’ and Prescribed Officers’ remuneration for 2013
and 2012:
Appointed
with effect
from
Resigned/
retired with
effect from
Salary
(1)
Performance
related
payments
(2)
Pension
scheme
benefits
Other
benefits
and
encashed
leave
(3)
Sub
total
Pre-tax
gain on
share
options
Total
Total
Figures in thousands
2013
SA Rands
US Dollars
(4)
Executive Directors
M Cutifani
31-Mar-13
3,639
-
664
1,915
6,218
19,293
25,511
2,651
RN Duffy
Full year
6,589
2,659
1,341
152
10,741
-
10,741
1,116
AM O' Neill
(7)
2-Aug-13
10,256
-
145
5,171
15,572
18,421
33,993
3,532
S Venkatakrishnan
Full year
13,135
-
2,704
2,117
17,956
-
17,956
1,866
33,619
2,659
4,854
9,355
50,487
37,714
88,201
9,165
Prescribed Officers
I Boninelli
Full year
5,200
3,691
553
58
9,502
-
9,502
987
CE Carter
Full year
6,457
2,234
686
487
9,864
3,048
12,912
1,342
GJ Ehm
Full year
7,349
4,433
232
85
12,099
-
12,099
1,257
RW Largent
Full year
10,037
4,358
1,662
2,647
18,704
2,952
21,656
2,251
M MacFarlane
(5) (8)
30-Jun-13
2,292
-
284
3,367
5,943
-
5,943
618
DC Noko
Full year
4,792
1,802
509
10
7,113
-
7,113
739
MP O' Hare
(6)
Full year
6,697
2,719
1,363
117
10,896
517
11,413
1,186
ME Sanz Perez
Full year
4,864
3,573
517
53
9,007
-
9,007
936
YZ Simelane
Full year
3,865
909
787
214
5,775
-
5,775
600
51,553
23,719
6,593
7,038
88,903
6,517
95,420
9,916
Total Executive Directors' and Prescribed
Officers' remuneration ZAR
85,172
26,378
11,447
16,393
139,390
44,231
183,621
19,081
Total Executive Directors' and Prescribed
Officers' remuneration USD
8,851
2,741
1,189
1,703
14,484
4,597
19,081
Appointed
with effect
from
Resigned/
retired with
effect from
Salary
(1)
Performance
related
payments
(2)
Pension
scheme
benefits
Other
benefits
and
encashed
leave
(3)
Sub
total
Pre-tax
gain on
share
options
Total
Total
Figures in thousands
2012
SA Rands
US Dollars
(4)
Executive Directors
M Cutifani
(9)
Full year
14,041
2,939
2,879
466
20,325
22,946
43,271
5,279
S Venkatakrishnan
(9)(10)
Full year
8,708
2,577
1,711
4,277
17,273
18,713
35,986
4,391
22,749
5,516
4,590
4,743
37,598
41,659
79,257
9,670
Prescribed Officers
I Boninelli
Full year
4,841
965
505
27
6,338
-
6,338
773
CE Carter
(9)(10)
Full year
5,601
1,281
584
2,388
9,854
8,674
18,528
2,261
RN Duffy
(10)
Full year
6,191
869
1,211
2,669
10,940
-
10,940
1,335
GJ Ehm
(10)
Full year
5,641
977
510
1,435
8,563
-
8,563
1,045
RW Largent
(10)
Full year
6,779
1,447
1,565
2,920
12,711
14,022
26,733
3,262
RL Lazare
(10) (11)
31-Mar-12
1,419
2,626
245
3,067
7,357
10,184
17,541
2,140
M MacFarlane
(5)
1-Jun-12
3,108
346
219
2
3,675
-
3,675
448
DC Noko
(12)
15-Jun-12
2,446
455
306
2,256
5,463
-
5,463
667
MP O’Hare
Full year
5,634
1,035
1,101
391
8,161
-
8,161
996
AM O’Neill
(10)
Full year
11,911
2,686
318
2,101
17,016
-
17,016
2,076
ME Sanz Perez
(13)
Full year
3,945
830
411
789
5,975
-
5,975
729
YZ Simelane
Full year
3,496
594
684
111
4,885
-
4,885
596
61,012
14,111
7,659
18,156
100,938
32,880
133,818
16,328
Total executive Directors' and Prescribed
Officers' remuneration ZAR
83,761
19,627
12,249
22,899
138,536
74,539
213,075
25,998
Total Executive Directors' and Prescribed
Officers' remuneration USD
10,220
2,395
1,494
2,794
16,903
9,095
25,998
(1)
Salaries are disclosed only for the period from or to which office is held. The 2013 salaries for RN Duffy and AM O’Neill are inclusive of
salaries as Prescribed Officers and Executive Directors. The salary for S Venkatakrishnan is inclusive of CFO, acting CEO and CEO roles.
(2)
The performance related payments are calculated on the year's financial results.
(3)
Includes health care, separation payments, cash in lieu of dividends and personal travel. Surplus leave days accrued are automatically
encashed unless work requirements allow for carry over.
(4)
Values have been converted using the average annual exchange rate for 2013 of R9.6231:$1 (2012: R8.1961:$1).
(5)
M MacFarlane commuted between Canada and South Africa and the company carried the cost of flights and hotel accommodation in South
Africa; these are excluded for reporting purposes.
(6)
MP O' Hare had a once off pension payment in recognition of previous service paid into the AngloGold Ashanti Pension Fund to the value of
R7.4m. This has not been included for reporting purposes.
(7)
Other benefits of AM O' Neill include early retirement payments of a pro-rata retention bonus payment and pay in lieu of leave on separation.
(8)
Other benefits of M MacFarlane include separation payments of a severance package and pay in lieu of leave.
(9)
These executives and prescribed officer applied all of the after tax proceeds from the sale of their options to acquire ordinary shares in
AngloGold Ashanti as follows: Messrs Cutifani 51,692; Venkatakrishnan 42,157; and Carter 19,541.
(10)
Received retention bonus.
(11)
Cash paid in lieu of LTIP for 2012.
(12)
Received a sign-on bonus.
(13)
Received the remainder of sign-on bonus in July 2012 (paid over 24 months).
background image
66
Short-term incentives and deferral into restricted shares
Participants:
Participation in the BSP is extended to the Executive Directors, Prescribed Officers and other
qualifying employees.
Elements:
The BSP consists of two elements:
·
An annual performance-based cash incentive bonus, which is linked to individual and company
performance during the financial year and is payable at the end of the relevant financial year; and
·
An award of forfeitable bonus shares, which are linked to performance during the financial year, in
the same manner as the annual cash incentive, and are awarded at the end of the relevant
financial year. These shares are further subject to a two year holding period before they vest, and
remain restricted during this period. 50% of the bonus shares will vest one year after the grant, and
the remaining 50% of the bonus shares will vest two years after the grant. The shares will be
forfeited should a participant leave during the holding period (except in limited “good leaver”
circumstances). Participants do not receive dividends in terms of the BSP, but are eligible to
receive a cash payment upon vesting which is equal to the value of allocated dividends. However,
no cash in lieu of dividends is paid for any shares that lapsed or were forfeited during the year.
Bonus share matching percentage:
The BSP was updated in 2013 and the matching bonus share award is 150% of the cash bonus for
the executive team and 120% of the cash bonus for qualifying employees below the executive level.
Maximum value of annual cash incentive and bonus shares:
The table below shows the maximum cash bonus and bonus shares for the executive team:
Short term incentives
Cash bonus as
a % of salary
on achieving
Target metrics
Cash bonus as a
% of salary on
achieving
Stretch metrics
Total award as
a % of salary
(cash + equity)
on achieving
Target metrics
Total maximum
award as a % of
salary (cash +
equity) on
achieving Stretch
metrics
Chief Executive Officer
40%
80%
100%
200%
Chief Financial Officer
35%
70%
87.5%
175%
Executive Management
30%
60%
75%
150%
Company and individual limit:
An aggregate limit between the BSP and the LTIP applies – refer to details in the Directors’ Report
from page 46.
background image
67
Operation and performance measures:
Awards in terms of the BSP are determined on the basis of both company and individual performance
measures. The individual performance measures are the agreed priorities and focus areas for the
year and the company metrics are derived from the business strategy and focus. The company and
individual weightings for the executive team are as follows:
Short-term incentives
Company performance weighting
as a % of bonus
Individual performance weighting as
a % of bonus
Chief Executive Officer
70%
30%
Chief Financial Officer
60%
40%
Executive Management
60%
40%
Individual Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) for 2013 were set in alignment with company strategy
for each executive, under the following categories:
(1)     People are the business: To deliver on our targets, we need to put in place the people, the
management, the processes and strategy to deliver. These are inclusive of individual metrics
that are cascaded through the business on the applicable Regional and Business Unit
measurements on transformation, localisation and Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) targets
(where applicable);
(2)    Grow the business to support shareholder value: To deliver exceptional returns we need to target
cash flow and financial performance growth;
(3)    Manage the asset base as an investment portfolio: To deliver sustainable returns and maximum
shareholder value, we need to be able to sustain and grow the business;
(4)    Create new business model to improve margins and deliver on 15% Return on Equity (ROE)
targets: We must establish a business model that ensures we have a sustainable and growing
business; and
(5)    Building a sustainable business: We will not maintain our license to operate unless we have a
sustainable business model in place, and we see a potential competitive advantage in this
undertaking.
Assessment of performance:
Once the performance year is completed each executive’s individual performance is reviewed by the
CEO and the Committee. Their performance score along with the overall company performance
scores are consolidated by the finance team and audited prior to bonuses being allocated.
Actual 2013 performance:
The company performance criteria used in 2013 are indicated below with the weightings for each of
the criterion. A safety multiplier is applied once the bonus score has been calculated; this can either
reduce or increase the final bonus score by up to 25% although the bonus remains capped at the
overall maximum cap per level.






background image
BSP company performance measure 2013
Resource to Reserve conversion
Production
Total c
ash costs (including stay-in-business capital, Ore Reserve
develo
pment and corporate costs)
Adjuste
d headline earnings per share (AHEPS)
Sub Total
Safety

The fin
al performance scores for 2013 were calculated as follows:
Performance measure
Resource to Reserve conversion
Producti
on
Total ca
sh costs (including Stay-in-
busines
s-capital, Ore Reserve
develop
ment and corporate costs)
AHEPS
Sub Tot
al
Safety multiplier
Total co
mpany performance points
The impact of foreign exchange rate and oil price were removed from the calculation.
Actual BSP Achieved
BSP achievement declined materially in 2012, however, a partial recovery can be noted in the 2013
results as per the graph below. This recovery is primarily due to the improved safety performance, a
sharp turnaround in production and reduction in costs that were achieved, notably in the second half
of the year.

























0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BSP
83
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010
3.25%
 
 
 
 
Target
2.2moz
4,349koz
$4,599m
251 UScps
 
 
 
 
BSP 201
80.82
 
 
Achieved
(1.2moz)
4,105koz
$4,713m
209 UScps
 
 
 
 
11
2%
 
 
 
% of Target
metrics
achieved
 
improvement
 
 
 
 
BSP 2012
6.44%
+ / - 25% multiplier on the base
 
 
 
achievable on
Stretch metrics
-
94.4%

 102.5%
   59.5%

23.2%
 
 
 
 
 
 
calculation
Max points
 
 
20
30
30
20
100
1.25
125
 
 
 
 
BSP 2013
46.10%
68
Weighting
20%
30%
30%
20%
100%
 
 
Points
awarded
-
17.6
19.5
-
37.1
1.24
46.1
 
 
 
background image
69
Long-term incentives
Reward element
Description
Long-term incentive
The executives, prescribed officers, and qualifying managerial employees
participate in the Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP). The objective of the
LTIP is to align the interests of the company, shareholders and executive
management over the medium to long term.
Participants:
All Executives Directors and Prescribed Officers participate in the LTIP.
Company and individual limit:
The company and individual limits for the BSP, LTIP and any other share scheme that AngloGold
Ashanti has in place are described in the Director’s Report on page 46.
Operation and performance measures:
Participants are granted the right to receive shares with a three year vesting period from date of grant.
The LTIP is subject to approved company performance conditions.
Under the LTIP, no dividends are received by the executives or any eligible employee participating in
the scheme. However, at the time of vesting, cash payments equal to the value of the accumulated
dividends are allocated. No cash in lieu of dividends is paid across for any shares that lapsed or were
forfeited during the year.
Value of awards:
The value of the awards that are typically granted under the LTIP as a percentage of base salary is
shown in the table below (for these purposes base salary includes any offshore payments).
In 2013, the allocation of 140% of base pay for LTIP awards was approved for all executives with an
additional 60% granted for the 2013 Retention Scheme. The maximum award for any executive is
currently capped at 200% of base salary in any financial year.
The table below reflects the LTIP allocations by role:
Role
LTIP allocation as a % of base salary
Chief Executive Officer
160 - 200
Chief Financial Officer
140 - 200
Executive Management
100 - 200
Senior Management
80
Other Management (discretionary)
60
The LTIP awards granted in respect of the 2013 financial year, issued in 2013 to executive
management, are disclosed in this report on page 48.

background image
The table below indicates the percentage of the 2011 LTIP awards that vested on 21 February 2014:
Performance
measu
re
Adjusted headline
earnings per share
(AHEP
S)
Total shareholder
return (
TSR)
Safety
Generation of
resour
ces
Generation of
reserves
Total L
Actual L
The grap
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

TIP award percentage
Long-Term I
ph below sho
2006
45%
40%
 
Performance criteria
AHEPS growth of at least 2% net of US
inflation per
year for three years on a sliding
scale
Ranking against 4 competitor companies
A 20% year on year improvement in Fatal
Injuries Freq
uency Rate (FIFR) and All Injuries
Frequency
Rate (AIFR) for the 3 year period
Between 21 – 27Moz (3x7-9Moz)
measured/in
dicated resources
9 – 15Moz (3x3-5Moz) published reserves 11.
achieved ov
er a three year period
 
Incentive Pl
ows LTIP ve
2007
56%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
an Vesting
sting over th
7
2
82%
56%
Senior Management
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(as % of ma
he past 6 yea
2008
82%
 
Executive Management
 
Achievement
 
Criteria not met
 
Achieved 5
 
 
 
Safety improvement
of
36.9% against
tar
get
29.
ac
hievement
 
achievement
aximum ach
ars:
2009
70%
70%
 
 
 
 
 
th
place
 
 
 
7Moz
 
6Moz
 
ievable)
2010
41%
41%
 
 
Allocation 2011
- % awarded
 
 
 
20
10
7.
37.2%
2011
37%
37%
70
 
 
 
-
-
.0%
.0%
2%
 
background image
71
Options and awards granted
The table below reflects the number of options and awards granted to executive directors and
prescribed officers for 2013 and 2012:
Balance at
1 January 2013
Granted
during
2013
Exercised
during
2013
Pre-tax gains on
share options
exercised ($000)
Lapsed
during
2013
Balance as at
31 December
2013
(1)
Executive Directors
M Cutifani
(3)
271,891
5,429
88,594
2,005
188,726
-
RN Duffy
109,648
65,193
-
-
8,298
166,543
AM O’Neill
(4)
150,113
124,961
129,284
1,914
145,790
-
S Venkatakrishnan
136,395
99,043
-
-
15,045
220,393
668,047                294,626                    217,878
3,919                  357,859
386,936
Prescribed Officers
(2)
I Boninelli
30,158
52,314
-
-
-
82,472
CE Carter
66,331
66,929
13,609
317
7,262
112,389
GJ Ehm
68,471
59,443
-
-
5,452
122,462
RW Largent
56,206
76,865
12,537
306
7,461
113,073
MP O’Hare
74,619
66,699
2,306
54
5,396
133,616
M MacFarlane
-
42,765
-
-
42,765
-
D Noko
-
45,334
-
-
-
45,334
ME Sanz Perez
21,793
46,087
-
-
-
67,880
YZ Simelane
42,969
36,218
-
-
5,152
74,035
360,547
492,654
28,452
677
73,488
751,261
Other management
3,551,735
2,533,048
684,413
12,227
850,184
4,550,186
Total share incentive scheme
4,580,329
3,320,328
930,743
16,823
1,281,531
5,688,383
Balance at
1 January 2012
Granted
during
2012
Exercised
during
2012
Pre-tax gains on
share options
exercised ($000)
Lapsed
during
2012
Balance as at
31 December
2012
(1)
Executive Directors
M Cutifani
258,210
112,183
86,293
2,800
12,209
271,891
S Venkatakrishnan
160,966
52,176
70,375
2,283
6,372
136,395
419,176                 164,359                 156,668
5,083
18,581
408,286
Prescribed Officers
(2)
I Boninelli
8,568
21,590
-
-
-
30,158
CE Carter
76,627
25,507
32,621
1,058
3,182
66,331
RN Duffy
85,394
27,790
-
-
3,536
109,648
GJ Ehm
48,845
22,286
-
-
2,660
68,471
RW Largent
88,331
26,083
52,069
1,711
6,139
56,206
RL Lazare
(7)
41,573
1,901
34,279
1,243
9,195
-
MP O’Hare
54,281
22,809
-
-
2,471
74,619
M MacFarlane
(5)
-
-
-
-
-
-
AM O’Neill
108,544
45,512
-
-
3,943
150,113
D Noko
(6)
-
-
-
-
-
-
ME Sanz Perez
8,406
13,387
-
-
-
21,793
YZ Simelane
32,008
13,350
-
-
2,389
42,969
552,577                 220,215                  118,969
4,012
33,515
620,308
Other management
3,006,829
1,592,126
670,004
23,155
377,216
3,551,735
Total share incentive scheme
3,978,582               1,976,700
945,641
32,250                  429,312
4,580,329
(1)
The latest expiry date of all options/awards granted and outstanding at 31 December 2013 is 13 March 2023 (2012: 21 February 2022;
2011: 21 February 2021).
(2)
Pursuant to the Companies Act, which came into effect on 1 May 2011, companies are required to identify and disclose the remuneration for
the Prescribed Officers of the company.
(3)
No longer an Executive Director with effect from 31 March 2013.
(4)
No longer an Executive Director with effect 15 July 2013 and went on early retirement from 2 August 2013.
(5)
M MacFarlane was appointed to the Executive Committee with effect from 1 June 2012 and therefore had no holdings/grants in 2012.
(6)
D Noko was appointed to the Executive Committee with effect from 15 June 2012 and therefore had no holdings/grants in 2012.
(7)
No longer a prescribed officer with effect from 31 March 2012.

Subsequent to year end and up to 28 February 2014, no options/awards have been exercised by Executive Directors and
Prescribed Officers, except for: CE Carter who exercised 4,481 awards for a pre-tax gain of $89k; and RW Largent who
exercised 4,790 awards for a pre-tax gain of $101k.

A total of 1,668,617 (2012: 1,264,872; 2011: 1,143,194) options/awards out of the 5,688,383 (2012: 4,580,329;
2011: 3,978,582) options/awards granted and outstanding at 31 December are fully vested.

Awards granted since 2005 have been granted at no cost to participants.

Non-Executive Directors are not eligible to participate in the share incentive scheme.
background image
Co-Investment Plan
Reward element
Co-Investment Plan
Treatment of BSP, LTIP and CIP shares upon departure
Where a
course of the year the following is applied:
Scheme
BSP
LTIP
CIP
Pay mix of Executive Directors
Remuneration mix: CEO, CFO & Executive Committee members: CEO, CFO & Executive Committee members
The graphs below indicates the pay mix for the Executive Directors and Prescribed Officers, taking all
of the reward elements into consideration:

























Notes:
·
LTIP target shares are calculated on an estimated performance achievement of 49.43% (last 3 years’ average)
·
BSP target is calculated at 50% of the maximum
·
BSP shares are a 150% matching of the cash bonus
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
 
 
 
a participant of the BSP, LTIP or CIP leaves the employment of AngloGold Ashanti through the
 
Resignation
Unvested shares
lapse
Unvested shares
lapse
Unvested matching
portion l
apses
 
 
 
 
 
CEO Target
100%
25%
40%
60%
99%
Base salary
Description
Executives are, on a voluntary basis, provided the opportunity to participate in the Co-
Investme
nt Executive Share Plan (CIP). This allows for the executive to take up to
50% of t
heir after-tax cash bonus to participate in a further matching scheme by
purchasi
ng shares in AngloGold AAshanti, and the company will match their initial
investme
nt into the scheme at 150%, with vesting over a two-year period in two equal
tranches,
on condition that the initial investment is retained for a minimum of two years.
This allo
ws the executives to hold shares in AngloGold Ashanti aligning both their and
the share
holders’ interests. This further supports the strategy of the Minimum
Sharehol
ding Requirements for our executives.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CEO M
100
25
80
120
200
The percentages in the graph are a percentage of base salary
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dismissal
Lapse all shares (both
vested une
xercised and
unvested)
Lapse all shares, (both
vested une
xercised and
unvested)
Forfeit matching portion of
shares
 
 
 
 
 
Max
CFO Target
0%
%
0%
0%
0%
 
Benefits
BSP Cash Bonus
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
100%
21%
35%
53%
99%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Normal & early retirement, retrenchment
and death
Pro-rata unvested shares based on the length
of employ
ment from date of offer

Pro-rata unvested share based on the length
of employ
ment from date of offer by applying
the last tw
o years’ average performance results
(death has
no performance criteria applied)
   Matching shares based on the length of
employment from date of purchase
 
 
CFO Max
100%
21%
70%
105%
200%
 
BSP Shares
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Excom Target
100%
11%
30%
45%
99%
 
 
LTIP Shares
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Excom Max
100%
11%
60%
90%
200%
 
72
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
%
%
%
%
%
background image
73
Minimum Shareholding Requirements for executives
With effect from March 2013, a Minimum Shareholding Requirement (MSR) was applied to the
executives. The Committee is of the opinion that share ownership by executives demonstrates their
commitment to the success of the company, and serves to reinforce the alignment between executive
and shareholder interests. Further, MSRs are in line with international best practice.
Executive Directors
·
Within three years of appointment (or for existing executives, from the introduction of the rule),
Executive Directors (CEO and CFO) are required to accumulate an MSR of AngloGold Ashanti
shares to the value of 100% of net annual base salary; and
·
At the end of six years, Executive Directors are to accumulate an MSR of AngloGold Ashanti
shares to the value of 200% of net annual base salary, which they will be required to hold on an
on-going basis.
Executive Committee members
·
Within three years of appointment (or for existing executives, from the introduction of the rule), the
Executive Committee members are required to accumulate an MSR of AngloGold Ashanti shares
to the value of 75% of net annual base salary; and
·
At the end of six years, the Executive Committee members are to accumulate an MSR of
AngloGold Ashanti shares to the value of 150% of net annual base salary, which they will be
required to hold on an on-going basis.
REVISED ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI STRATEGY
The sharp decline in gold price in 2013 required a refocus of the strategic objectives of the company.
This, aligned with shareholder requirements, led AngloGold Ashanti to reposition their variable pay
elements in line with the 5 broad strategic targets below:
(1)
Maintain the strong foundation – Safety: Improve safety performance and reduce fatalities;
People: Develop and retain the people who are the business; and Sustainability: ensure that the
we retain our social licences to operate
(2)
Improving financial flexibility – Being prudent and proactive in balance sheet management by
- improving earnings, returns and free cash flow; ensuring liquidity and headroom; and by
mitigating refinancing risks
(3)
Optimise our cost base – Reduce direct operating costs, overheads and indirect spend and
optimise annual total capital spend
(4)
Improve portfolio quality – Bring on line Tropicana, Kibali and brownfields projects under
construction and remove unprofitable ounces by better planning and divesture of marginal assets
(5)
Maintain long term optionality, albeit at a reasonable cost – Ramp up the reef boring
technology at the South African mines and focused greenfield exploration programmes at
selected international assets
background image
74
Short-term incentives 2014
For 2014, the BSP metrics have been amended to better align with the new strategic goals of
AngloGold Ashanti.
Long-term incentives 2014
For 2014, the LTIP metrics have been amended to better align with the new strategic goals of
AngloGold Ashanti, as well as to take into account shareholder feedback.
The BSP and LTIP metrics are aligned to the delivery of the strategy as per the strategic diagram
below:

REMUNERATION OF NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS
Remuneration for the Non-Executive Directors is set taking into consideration both the guidance of
King III and the legislative requirements of the Companies Act. Using competitive market benchmark
information provided by Mercer Consulting (South Africa) Pty Limited the remuneration rates were
reviewed. Over the past three years the Non-Executive Director remuneration has been adjusted to
equalise the international and South African directors. The proposed alignment adjustment of board
fees approved for June 2013 was fully implemented in October 2013. The final proposed adjustment
will be put to shareholders for approval at the Annual General Meeting. The actual remuneration for
the Non-Executive Directors can be viewed in the table that follows:
background image
75
Non-Executive Directors' fees and allowances
Figures in thousands
(1)
Director
fees
Committee
fees
Travel
allowance
Total
Total
Total
US Dollars
2013
2012
2011
SM Pityana (chairman)
88                         98
-
186
175
137
TT Mboweni
292                         52
-
344
357
302
TJ Motlatsi (retired 17 February 2011)
(2)
-                                                                                                                        -
36
FB Arisman
60                          51
9
120
251
258
R Gasant
72                          59
-
131
118
102
NP January-Bardill
70                          70
-
140
146
17
MJ Kirkwood
107                         112                                  47                        266                              94
-
WA Nairn
39                          32
-                           71
178
146
LW Nkuhlu
72                        112
-                         184                           178
135
F Ohene-Kena
25                          13                                 16                            54
118
111
RJ Ruston
83                        121                                 47                          251                           189
-
Total
(2)
908
720
119
1,747
1,804
1,244
(1)
Directors’ compensation is disclosed in US dollars, the amounts reflected are the values calculated using the exchange rate of R9.6231:$1
(2012: R8.1961: $1; 2011 R7.2569:$1).
(2)
Fees are disclosed only for the period from or to which, office is held.
(3)
At the Annual General Meeting of shareholders held on 13 May 2013, shareholders approved an increase in directors’ fees with effect from
1 June 2013. Directors fees for committees may vary depending on the number of committees on which the Non-Executive Director is a
member and whether he/she is the Chairman or a member of the committee.

Non-Executive Directors do not hold service contracts with the company. Executive Directors do not receive payment of
directors’ fees or committee fees.


background image
76
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the shareholders of AngloGold Ashanti Limited
We have audited the consolidated and separate financial statements of AngloGold Ashanti Limited set
out on pages 78 to 226, which comprise the statements of financial position as at 31 December 2013,
and the statements of comprehensive income, statements of changes in equity and statements of
cash flows for the year then ended, and the notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting
policies and other explanatory information.
DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The company’s directors are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these
consolidated and separate financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards and the requirements of the Companies Act of South Africa, and for such internal control
as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated and separate
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITY
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated and separate financial statements
based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the International Standards on
Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated and separate financial
statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or
error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s
preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
the accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management,
as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
for our audit opinion.
OPINION
In our opinion, the consolidated and separate financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated and separate financial position of AngloGold Ashanti Limited as at
31 December 2013, and its consolidated and separate financial performance and consolidated and
separate cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards, and the requirements of the Companies Act of South Africa.

background image
77
OTHER REPORTS REQUIRED BY THE COMPANIES ACT
As part of our audit of the consolidated and separate financial statements for the year ended
31 December 2013, we have read the Directors’ Report, the Chairman’s letter of the Audit and
Corporate Governance Committee and the Company Secretary’s Certificate for the purpose of
identifying whether there are material inconsistencies between these reports and the audited
consolidated and separate financial statements. These reports are the responsibility of the respective
preparers. Based on our reading of these reports, we have not identified material inconsistencies
between these reports and the audited consolidated and separate financial statements. However, we
have not audited these reports and accordingly do not express an opinion on these reports.
Ernst & Young Inc.
Director – Lance Ian Neame Tomlinson
Registered Auditor
Chartered Accountant (SA)
102 Rivonia Road
Sandton, Johannesburg
18 March 2014



background image
78
GROUP – INCOME STATEMENT
For the year ended 31 December
Figures in million
Notes
2013
2012
Restated
2011
Restated
US Dollars
Revenue
3
5,708
6,632
6,925
Gold income
2,3
5,497
6,353
6,570
Cost of sales
4
(4,146)
(3,964)                    (3,892)
Gain (loss) on non-hedge derivatives and other commodity contracts
37
94
(35)
(1)
Gross profit
2
1,445
2,354
2,677
Corporate administration, marketing and other expenses
5
(201)
(291)                      (278)
Exploration and evaluation costs
(255)
(395)                       (279)
Other operating expenses
6
(19)
(47)
(31)
Special items
7
(3,410)
(402)
163
Operating (loss) profit
(2,440)
1,219
2,252
Dividends received
3
5
7
-
Interest received
3
39
43
52
Exchange gain
14
8
2
Finance costs and unwinding of obligations
8
(296)
(231)                       (196)
Fair value adjustment on $1.25bn bonds
(58)
-
-
Fair value adjustment on option component of convertible bonds
9
83
84
Fair value adjustment on mandatory convertible bonds
356
162
104
Share of associates and joint ventures' (loss) profit
9
(162)
(30)
72
(Loss) profit before taxation
(2,533)
1,261
2,370
Taxation 12
333
(346)                         (737)
(Loss) profit for the year
(2,200)
915
1,633
Allocated as follows
Equity shareholders
(2,230)
897
1,587
Non-controlling interests
30
18
46
(2,200)
915
1,633
Basic (loss) earnings per ordinary share (cents)
13
(568)
232
411
Diluted (loss) earnings per ordinary share (cents)
13
(631)
177
355




background image
79
GROUP – STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the year ended 31 December
Figures in million
2013
2012
2011
Restated
Restated
US Dollars
(Loss) profit for the year
(2,200)
915
1,633
Items that will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations
(433)
(92)
(365)
Share of associates and joint ventures' other comprehensive loss
-
-
(1)
Net loss on available-for-sale financial assets
(23)
(27)
(81)
Release on impairment of available-for-sale financial assets (note 7)
30
16
21
Release on disposal of available-for-sale financial assets
(1)
-
1
Cash flow hedges
1
-
-
Deferred taxation thereon
2
6
(8)
9
(5)
(67)
Items that will not be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss:
Actuarial gain (loss) recognised
69
(14)
(36)
Deferred taxation rate change thereon
-
(9)
-
Deferred taxation thereon
(20)
3
13
49
(20)
(23)
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax
(375)
(117)
(456)
Total comprehensive (loss) income for the year, net of tax
(2,575)
798
1,177
Allocated as follows
Equity shareholders
(2,605)
780
1,131
Non-controlling interests
30
18
46
(2,575)
798
1,177


background image
80
GROUP – STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As at 31 December
Figures in million
Notes
2013
2012
2011
Restated
Restated
US Dollars
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Tangible assets
15
4,815
7,776
6,545
Intangible assets
16
267
315
210
Investments in associates and joint ventures
18
1,327
1,047
691
Other investments
19
131
167
186
Inventories 20
586
610
410
Trade and other receivables
22
29
79
76
Deferred taxation
30
177
97
79
Cash restricted for use
23
31
29
23
Other non-current assets
21
41
7
9
7,404
10,127
8,229
Current assets
Other investments
19
1
-
-
Inventories 20
1,053
1,213
998
Trade and other receivables
22
369
472
354
Cash restricted for use
23
46
35
35
Cash and cash equivalents
24
648
892
1,112
2,117
2,612
2,499
Non-current assets held for sale
25
153
-
21
2,270
2,612
2,520
Total assets
9,674
12,739
10,749
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
Share capital and premium
26
7,006
6,742
6,689
Accumulated losses and other reserves
(3,927)
(1,269)
(1,706)
Shareholders' equity
3,079
5,473
4,983
Non-controlling interests
28
21
137
Total equity
3,107
5,494
5,120
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings 27
3,633
2,724
2,456
Environmental rehabilitation and other provisions
28
963
1,238
782
Provision for pension and post-retirement benefits
29
152
221
195
Trade, other payables and deferred income
31
4
10
14
Derivatives 37
-
10
93
Deferred taxation
30
579
1,084
1,148
5,331
5,287
4,688
Current liabilities
Borrowings 27
258
859
32
Trade, other payables and deferred income
31
820
979
751
Bank overdraft
24
20
-
-
Taxation 32
81
120
158
1,179
1,958
941
Non-current liabilities held for sale
25
57
-
-
1,236
1,958
941
Total liabilities
6,567
7,245
5,629
Total equity and liabilities
9,674
12,739
10,749


background image
81
GROUP – STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the year ended 31 December
Figures in million
Notes
2013
2012
2011
Restated
Restated
US Dollars
Cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from customers
5,709
6,523
6,796
Payments to suppliers and employees
(4,317)
(4,173)
(3,715)
Cash generated from operations
33
1,392
2,350
3,081
Dividends received from joint ventures
18
72
111
Taxation refund
32
23
54
98
Taxation paid
32
(187)
(507)                         (477)
Net cash inflow from operating activities
1,246
1,969
2,813
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditure
- project capital
(594)
(779)                           (459)
- stay-in-business capital
(907)
(1,146)
(1,092)
Interest capitalised and paid
(5)
(12)
-
Expenditure on intangible assets
(68)
(79)                            (16)
Proceeds from disposal of tangible assets
10
5
19
Other investments acquired
(91)
(97)                          (147)
Proceeds from disposal of other investments
81
86
91
Investments in associates and joint ventures
(472)
(349)                            (115)
Proceeds from disposal of associates and joint ventures
6
20
-
Loans advanced to associates and joint ventures
(41)
(65)                             (25)
Loans repaid by associates and joint ventures
33
1
-
Dividends received
5
7
-
Proceeds from disposal of subsidiary
34
2
6
9
Cash in subsidiary acquired
34
-
5
-
Cash in subsidiary disposed
34
-
(31)                             (11)
Reclassification of cash balances to held for sale assets
(2)
-
-
Acquisition of subsidiary and loan
34
-
(335)
-
Increase in cash restricted for use
(20)
(3)                            (19)
Interest received
23
36
39
Loans advanced
-
(45)
-
Repayment of loans advanced
-
-
4
Net cash outflow from investing activities
(2,040)
(2,775)
(1,722)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of share capital
-
2
10
Share issue expenses
-
-
(1)
Proceeds from borrowings
2,344
1,432
109
Repayment of borrowings
(1,486)
(217)                           (268)
Finance costs paid
(200)
(145)                           (144)
Acquisition of non-controlling interest
-
(215)
-
Revolving credit facility and bond transaction costs
(36)
(30)
-
Dividends paid
(62)
(236)                          (169)
Net cash inflow (outflow) from financing activities
560
591
(463)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(234)
(215)                             628
Translation
(30)
(5)                         (102)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
892
1,112
586
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
24
628
892
1,112


background image
82
GROUP – STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Figures in million
Equity holders of the parent
Share
capital and
premium
Other
capital
reserves
(1)
Accumulated
losses
(2)
Cash flow
hedge
reserve
(3)
Available-
for-sale
reserve
(4)
Actuarial
(losses)
gains
Foreign
currency
translation
reserve
Total
Non-
controlling
interests
Total
equity
US Dollars
Balance at 31 December 2010 as
previously reported
6,627
194
(2,750)
(2)
86
(62)
(104)
3,989
124
4,113
Restated for IFRIC 20 (note 39)
(83)
(83)
(83)
Restated for IAS 19 (note 39)
(2)
2
-
-
Balance at 31 December 2010 - restated
6,627
194
(2,835)
(2)
86
(60)
(104)
3,906
124
4,030
Profit for the year
1,587
1,587
46
1,633
Other comprehensive loss
(1)
(67)
(23)
(365)
(456)
(456)
Total comprehensive (loss) income
-
(1)
1,587
-
(67)
(23)
(365)
1,131
46
1,177
Shares issued
63
63
63
Share issue expenses
(1)
(1)
(1)
Share-based payment for share awards
net of exercised
9
9
9
Dividends paid (note 14)
(131)
(131)
(131)
Dividends of subsidiaries
-
(27)
(27)
Translation
(31)
28
(1)
10
6
(6)
-
Balance at 31 December 2011 - restated
6,689
171
(1,351)
(2)
18
(73)
(469)
4,983
137
5,120
Profit for the year
897
897
18
915
Other comprehensive loss
(5)
(20)
(92)
(117)
(117)
Total comprehensive income (loss)
-
-
897
-
(5)
(20)
(92)
780
18
798
Shares issued
53
53
53
Share-based payment for share awards
net of exercised
15
15
15
Acquisition of non-controlling interest
(5)
(144)
(144)
(71)
(215)
Disposal of subsidiary
(6)
-
(45)
(45)
Dividends paid (note 14)
(215)
(215)
(215)
Dividends of subsidiaries
-
(17)
(17)
Translation
(9)
7
3
1
(1)
-
Balance at 31 December 2012 - restated
6,742
177
(806)
(2)
13
(90)
(561)
5,473
21
5,494
Loss for the year
(2,230)
(2,230)
30
(2,200)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
1
8
49
(433)
(375)
(375)
Total comprehensive (loss) income
-
-
(2,230)
1
8
49
(433)
(2,605)
30
(2,575)
Shares issued
(7)
264
264
264
Share-based payment for share awards
net of exercised
(8)
(13)
(13)
(13)
Dividends paid (note 14)
(40)
(40)
(40)
Dividends of subsidiaries
-
(23)
(23)
Translation
(28)
15
(3)
16
-
-
Balance at 31 December 2013
7,006
136
(3,061)
(1)
18
(25)
(994)
3,079
28
3,107
(1)
Other capital reserves comprise a surplus on disposal of company shares held by companies prior to the formation of AngloGold Ashanti
Limited of $14m (2012: $17m; 2011: $18m), surplus on equity transaction of joint venture of $36m (2012: $36m; 2011: $37m), share of
associates and joint ventures' other comprehensive loss of $2m (2012: $1m; 2011: $1m), equity items for share-based payments of $85m
(2012: $123m; 2011: $115m) and other reserves.
(2)
Included in accumulated losses are retained earnings totalling $83m (2012: $181m; 2011: $189m) arising at the joint venture operations
which may not be remitted without third party consent and gains/losses on the convertible bonds of $709m (2012: $344m; 2011: $99m),
which is included in certain subsidiaries.
(3)
Cash flow hedge reserve represents the effective portion of fair value gains or losses in respect of cash flow hedges that expired in prior
periods. The cash flow hedge reserve shall remain in equity and will unwind over the life of the Serra Grande mine.
(4)
Available-for-sale reserve represents fair value gains or losses on available-for-sale financial assets.
(5)
On 28 June 2012, AngloGold Ashanti Limited acquired the remaining 50% shareholding in the Serra Grande mine from Kinross Gold
Corporation for $220m less $5m for dividends declared and paid to minorities.
(6)
In early December 2012, AngloGold Ashanti Limited disposed of a 5% interest in Rand Refinery Limited, resulting in Rand Refinery Limited
being reported as an associate.
(7)
Includes share awards exercised and delivery of 18,140,000 shares to settle the outstanding 6% Mandatory Convertible Subordinated
Bonds.
(8)
Includes reassessment of estimated vesting profile related to the accelerated share options.
background image
83
GROUP- NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December
1     ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Statement of compliance
The consolidated and company financial statements are prepared in compliance with
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Interpretations of those standards, as
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in the English language, the
Financial Reporting Guides (FRG) as issued by the South African Institute of Chartered
Accountants and the Companies Act.
During the current financial year, the following standards, interpretations and amendments were
adopted:
Regulatory
publication
Title
Effective for annual
periods beginning on or after
IFRS 7
Amendment – Disclosures – Offsetting Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities
1 January 2013
IFRS 10
Consolidated Financial Statements
1 January 2013
IFRS 11
Joint Arrangements
1 January 2013
IFRS 12
Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities
1 January 2013
IFRS 13
Fair Value Measurement
1 January 2013
IFRSs
Annual Improvements 2009 – 2011
1 January 2013
IAS 1
Amendment – Presentation of Items of Other
Comprehensive Income
1 July 2012
IAS 19
Employee Benefits (revised)
1 January 2013
IAS 27
Separate Financial Statements (Revised 2011)
1 January 2013
IAS 28
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures
(Revised 2011)
1 January 2013
IAS 36
Amendment - Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-
Financial Assets
1 January 2014
IFRIC 20
Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine
1 January 2013
Circular 2/2013
Headline Earnings
Annual periods ending 31 July 2013
The adoption of these standards, interpretations and amendments did not have any effect on the
financial position or results of the group, except for IFRIC 20 and IAS 19. The adoption of IAS 1,
IFRS 12 and IFRS 13 had an effect on disclosures by the group.
IAS 1 amendments were adopted which requires an entity to group other comprehensive income
items by those that will be subsequently reclassified and those that will not be subsequently
reclassified to profit and loss. The amendment affected presentation and had no impact on the
group’s financial position or performance.
background image
84
IFRIC 20 clarifies when an entity should recognise waste removal costs that are incurred in
surface mining activity during the production phase of the mine (“production stripping costs”) as
an asset. The interpretation impacts the way in which the group accounts for production stripping
costs (refer change in accounting policies Note 39).
IAS 19 includes a number of amendments to the accounting for defined benefit plans, including
actuarial gains and losses that are now recognised in other comprehensive income (OCI) and
permanently excluded from profit and loss; expected returns on plan assets that are no longer
recognised in profit or loss, instead, there is a requirement to recognise interest on the net
defined benefit liability (asset) in profit or loss, calculated using the discount rate used to
measure the defined benefit obligation; and unvested past service costs are now recognised in
profit or loss at the earlier of when the amendment occurs or when the related restructuring or
termination costs are recognised. Other amendments include new disclosures. In the case of the
group, the transition to IAS 19 had no impact on the net defined benefit plan obligations due to
the difference in accounting for interest on plan assets (refer change in accounting policies
Note 39).
IFRS 10 replaces the guidance on control and consolidation in IAS 27 “Consolidated and
Separate Financial Statements”, and SIC-12 “Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities”. In
accordance with IFRS 10, the group re-assessed the control conclusion for its investees at
1 January 2013 and concluded that the adoption of IFRS 10 did not result in any change in the
consolidation status of its subsidiaries.
Under IFRS 11, joint arrangements are classified as either joint operations or joint ventures
depending upon the contractual rights and obligations each investor has rather than the legal
structure of the joint arrangement. The group has assessed the nature of its joint arrangements
and identified the joint ventures and the joint operations at 1 January 2013 and concluded that
the adoption of IFRS 11 did not result in any change in the method of accounting for its joint
arrangements. Under IFRS 11, the group is required to account for its joint ventures using the
equity method. Joint operations are accounted for by recognition of the joint operator’s interest in
the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in accordance with the IFRSs applicable to the
particular assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
The IAS 36 amendments remove the unintended consequences of IFRS 13 on the disclosures
required under IAS 36. In addition, these amendments require disclosure of the recoverable
amounts for the assets or CGUs for which impairment loss has been recognised or reversed
during the period. These amendments are effective retrospectively for annual periods beginning
on or after 1 January 2014 with earlier application permitted, provided IFRS 13 is also applied.
The group has early adopted these amendments to IAS 36 as it has adopted IFRS 13 and these
amendments impact the adoption consequences.
background image
85
The following accounting standards, amendments to standards and new interpretations (as at
11 March 2014, the last practicable date), which are not yet mandatory, have not been adopted
in the current year:
Standard
or Interpretation
Title
Effective for annual
periods beginning on or after
IFRS 9
Financial Instruments: Classification and
Measurement
1 January 2015
IAS 32
Amendment – Offsetting Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities
1 January 2014
IFRS 9 and IFRS 7
Mandatory Effective Date of IFRS 9 and Transition
Disclosures
1 January 2015
IFRS 10, 12 and IAS 27
Investment Entities
1 January 2014
IAS 39
Amendment – Novation of Derivatives and
Continuation of Hedge Accounting
1 January 2014
IFRIC 21
Levies
1 January 2014
IFRS 14
Regulatory Deferral Accounts
1 January 2016
The group is in the process of assessing the significance of these new standards, amendments
to standards and new interpretations.
1.1
BASIS OF PREPARATION
The financial statements are prepared according to the historical cost convention, except for the
revaluation of certain financial instruments to fair value. The group’s accounting policies as set
out below are consistent in all material respects with those applied in the previous year, except
for the adoption of the new and revised standards and interpretations mentioned above.
The group financial statements are presented in US dollars.
The group financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the company, its
subsidiaries and its interests in joint ventures and associates. The financial statements of all
material subsidiaries, the Environmental Rehabilitation Trust Fund, joint ventures and associates,
are prepared using the same accounting policies as the holding company.
Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the group has control. The
group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its
involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the
entity. Control would generally exist where the group owns more than 50% of the voting rights,
unless the group and other investors collectively control the entity where they must act together
to direct the relevant activities. In such cases, as no investor individually controls the entity the
investment is accounted for as an equity method investment or a joint operation. Subsidiaries are
fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the group. They are de-
consolidated from the date on which control ceases. The group re-assesses whether or not it
controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of
the three elements of control. Consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the group obtains
control over the subsidiary and ceases when the group loses control of the subsidiary. Assets,
liabilities, income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the year are
background image
86
included in the statement of comprehensive income from the date the group gains control until
the date the group ceases to control the subsidiary.
The acquisition of non-controlling interests is reflected as an equity transaction. The entire
difference between the cost of the additional interest and the non-controlling interests’ share at
the date of acquisition is reflected as a transaction between owners.
Disclosures for non-controlling interests are assessed by reference to consolidated non-
controlling interest.
Intra-group transactions, balances and unrealised gains and losses on transactions between
group companies, including any resulting tax effect are eliminated. Unrealised losses are also
eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred.
Subsidiaries are accounted for at cost and are adjusted for impairments where appropriate in the
company financial statements.
1.2
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING JUDGEMENTS AND ESTIMATES
Use of estimates
The preparation of the financial statements requires the group’s management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The determination of estimates requires
the exercise of judgement based on various assumptions and other factors such as historical
experience, current and expected economic conditions, and in some cases actuarial techniques.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate
to Ore Reserve that are the basis of future cash flow estimates and unit-of-production
depreciation, depletion and amortisation calculations; environmental, reclamation and closure
obligations; estimates of recoverable gold and other materials in heap leach pads; asset
impairments/ reversals (including impairments of goodwill); and write-downs of inventory to net
realisable value. Other estimates include post-employment, post-retirement and other employee
benefit liabilities and deferred taxation.
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and
other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under
the circumstances.
As a global company, the group is exposed to numerous legal risks. The outcome of currently
pending and future proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Thus, an adverse decision in
a lawsuit could result in additional costs that are not covered, either wholly or partly, under
insurance policies and that could significantly influence the business and results of operations.
background image
87
The judgements that management has applied in the application of accounting policies, and the
estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year, are discussed below.
Carrying value of goodwill and tangible assets
The majority of mining assets are amortised using the units-of-production method where the
mine operating plan calls for production from a well-defined proved and probable Ore Reserve.
For mobile and other equipment, the straight-line method is applied over the estimated useful life
of the asset which does not exceed the estimated mine life based on proved and probable Ore
Reserve as the useful lives of these assets are considered to be limited to the life of the relevant
mine.
The calculation of the units-of-production rate of amortisation could be impacted to the extent
that actual production in the future is different from current forecast production based on proved
and probable Ore Reserve. This would generally arise when there are significant changes in any
of the factors or assumptions used in estimating Ore Reserve.
These factors could include:
·
changes in proved and probable Ore Reserve;
·
the grade of Ore Reserve may vary significantly from time to time;
·
differences between actual commodity prices and commodity price assumptions;
·
unforeseen operational issues at mine sites; and
·
changes in capital, operating, mining, processing and reclamation costs, discount rates and
foreign exchange rates.
Changes in proved and probable Ore Reserve could similarly impact the useful lives of assets
amortised on the straight-line method, where those lives are limited to the life of the mine.
The group has a number of surface mining operations that are in the production phase for which
production stripping costs are incurred. The benefits that accrue to the group as a result of
incurring production stripping costs include (a) ore that can be used to produce inventory and
(b) improved access to further quantities of material that will be mined in future periods.
The production stripping costs relating to improved access to further quantities in future periods
are capitalised as a stripping activity asset, if and only if, all of the following are met:
·
It is probable that the future economic benefit (improved access to the ore body) associated
with the stripping activity will flow to the group;
·
The group can identify the component of the ore body for which access has been improved;
and
·
The costs relating to the stripping activity associated with that component or components can
be measured reliably.
background image
88
Components of the various ore bodies at the operations of the group are determined based on
the geological areas identified for each of the ore bodies and are reflected in the Ore Reserve
reporting of the group. In determining whether any production stripping costs should be
capitalised as a stripping activity asset, the group uses three operational guidance measures;
two of which relate to production measures, while the third relates to an average stripping ratio
measure.
Once determined that any portion of the production stripping costs should be capitalised, the
group uses the average stripping ratio of the component or components to which the production
stripping costs relate to determine the amount of the production stripping costs that should be
capitalised. Stripping activity assets are amortised on the units-of-production method based on
the Ore Reserve of the component or components of the ore body to which these assets relate.
This accounting treatment is consistent with that for stripping costs incurred during the
development phase of a mine, before production commences, except that stripping costs
incurred during the development phase of a mine, before production commences, are amortised
on the units-of-production method based on the Ore Reserve of the life of the mine as a whole.
Deferred stripping costs are included in ‘Mine development costs’, within tangible assets. These
costs form part of the total investment in the relevant cash-generating unit, which is reviewed for
impairment if events or a change in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Amortisation of stripping activity assets is included in operating costs.
An individual operating mine is not a typical going-concern business because of the finite life of
its reserves. The allocation of goodwill to an individual mine will result in an eventual goodwill
impairment due to the wasting nature of the mine reporting unit. In accordance with the
provisions of IAS 36 “Impairment of Assets”, the group performs its annual impairment review of
assigned goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year.
The group reviews and tests the carrying value of tangible assets when events or changes in
circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Assets are grouped at
the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of cash flows of other
assets. If there are indications that impairment may have occurred, estimates are prepared of
expected future cash flows for each group of assets. Expected future cash flows used to
determine the value in use of goodwill and tangible assets are inherently uncertain and could
materially change over time and impact the recoverable amounts. The cash flows and value in
use are significantly affected by a number of factors including published reserves, resources,
exploration potential and production estimates, together with economic factors such as spot and
future gold prices, discount rates, foreign currency exchange rates, estimates of costs to produce
reserves and future capital expenditure. Refer note 15 for estimates and assumptions used to
calculate recoverable amounts. In addition the group considers the reversal of previously
recognised impairments at each reporting date. At the reporting date the group assesses
whether any of the indicators which gave rise to previously recognised impairments have
changed such that the impairment loss no longer exists or may have decreased. The impairment
background image
89
loss is then assessed on the original factors for reversal and if indicated, such reversal is
recognised.
The recoverable amount is estimated based on the positive indicators. If an impairment loss has
decreased, the carrying amount is recorded at the recoverable amount as limited in terms of
IAS 36.
The carrying amount of goodwill in the consolidated financial statements at 31 December 2013
was $154m (2012: $195m; 2011: $179m). The carrying amount of tangible assets at
31 December 2013 was $4,815m (2012: $7,776m; 2011: $6,545m). The impairment and
derecognition of goodwill and tangible assets recognised in the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended 31 December 2013 were $15m (2012: $nil; 2011: $nil) and $2,978m
(2012: $356m; 2011: $15m) respectively. No reversals of impairment were recognised during
2013, (2012: nil; 2011:$135m).
Production start date
The group assesses the stage of each mine construction project to determine when a mine
moves into the production stage. The criteria used to assess the start date are determined by the
unique nature of each mine construction project and include factors such as the complexity of a
plant and its location. The group considers various relevant criteria to assess when the mine is
substantially complete and ready for its intended use and moves into the production stage. Some
of the criteria would include but are not limited to the following:
·
the level of capital expenditure compared to the construction cost estimates;
·
completion of a reasonable period of testing of the mine plant and equipment;
·
ability to produce gold in saleable form (within specifications and the de minimis rule); and
·
ability to sustain ongoing production of gold.
When a mine construction project moves into the production stage, the capitalisation of certain
mine construction costs ceases and costs are either regarded as inventory or expensed, except
for capitalisable costs related to mining asset additions or improvements, underground mine
development, deferred stripping activities, or Ore Reserve development.
Income taxes
The group is subject to income taxes in numerous jurisdictions. Significant judgement is required
in determining the worldwide provision for income taxes due to the complexity of legislation.
There are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is
uncertain during the ordinary course of business. The group recognises liabilities for anticipated
tax audit issues based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due. Where the final tax
outcome of these matters is different from the amounts that were initially recorded, such
differences will impact the income tax and deferred tax provisions in the period in which such
determination is made.
background image
90
The group recognises the net future tax benefit related to deferred income tax assets to the
extent that it is probable that the deductible temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable
future. Assessing the recoverability of deferred income tax assets requires the group to make
significant estimates related to expectations of future taxable income. Estimates of future taxable
income are based on forecast cash flows from operations and the application of existing tax laws
in each jurisdiction. To the extent that future cash flows and taxable income differ significantly
from estimates, the ability of the group to realise the net deferred tax assets recorded at the
reporting date could be impacted.
Additionally, future changes in tax laws in the jurisdictions in which the group operates could limit
the ability of the group to obtain tax deductions in future periods.
Carrying values of the group at 31 December 2013:
·
deferred tax asset: $177m (2012: $97m; 2011: $79m);
·
deferred tax liability: $579m (2012: $1,084m; 2011: $1,148m);
·
taxation liability: $81m (2012: $120m; 2011: $158m); and
·
taxation asset: $51m (2012: $54m; 2011: $39m).
Unrecognised value of deferred tax assets: $414m (2012: $89m; 2011: $51m).
Provision for environmental rehabilitation obligations
The group’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations
governing the protection of the environment. The group recognises management’s best estimate
for decommissioning and restoration obligations in the period in which they are incurred. Actual
costs incurred in future periods could differ materially from the estimates. Additionally, future
changes to environmental laws and regulations, life of mine estimates, inflation rates, foreign
currency exchange rates and discount rates could affect the carrying amount of this provision.
The carrying amount of the rehabilitation obligations for the group at 31 December 2013 was
$728m (2012: $841m; 2011: $747m).
Stockpiles, metals in process and ore on leach pad
Costs that are incurred in or benefit the production process are accumulated as stockpiles,
metals in process and ore on leach pads. Net realisable value tests are performed at least
annually and represent the estimated future sales price of the product, based on prevailing and
long-term metals prices, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to
sale.
Stockpiles and underground metals in process are measured by estimating the number of tonnes
added and removed from the stockpile and from underground, the number of contained gold
ounces based on assay data, and the estimated recovery percentage based on the expected
processing method. Stockpile and underground ore tonnages are verified by periodic surveys.
background image
91
Estimates of the recoverable gold on the leach pads are calculated from the quantities of ore
placed on the pads based on measured tonnes added to the leach pads, the grade of ore placed
on the leach pads based on assay data and a recovery percentage based on metallurgical
testing and ore type.
Although the quantities of recoverable metal are reconciled by comparing the grades of ore to the
quantities of gold actually recovered (metallurgical balancing), the nature of the process
inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor recoverability levels. As a result, the metallurgical
balancing process is constantly monitored and engineering estimates are refined based on actual
results over time.
Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and
estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realisable value are accounted for on a
prospective basis.
The carrying amount of inventories (excluding finished goods and mine operating supplies) for
the group at 31 December 2013 was $1,125m (2012: $1,309m; 2011: $994m).
Recoverable tax, rebates, levies and duties
In a number of countries, particularly in Continental Africa, AngloGold Ashanti Limited is due
refunds of indirect tax which remain outstanding for periods longer than those provided for in the
respective statutes.
In addition, AngloGold Ashanti Limited has unresolved tax disputes in a number of countries,
particularly in Continental Africa and in Brazil. If the outstanding input taxes are not received and
the tax disputes are not resolved in a manner favourable to AngloGold Ashanti Limited, it could
have an adverse effect upon the carrying value of these assets.
The carrying value of recoverable tax, rebates, levies and duties for the group at
31 December 2013 was $229m (2012: $243m; 2011: $188m).
Pension plans and post-retirement medical obligations
The determination of AngloGold Ashanti Limited’s obligation and expense for pension and
provident funds, as well as post-retirement health care liabilities, depends on the selection of
certain assumptions used by actuaries to calculate amounts. These assumptions include, among
others, the discount rate, the expected long-term rate of return of plan assets, health care
inflation costs, rates of increase in compensation costs and the number of employees who reach
retirement age before the mine reaches the end of its life. While AngloGold Ashanti Limited
believes that these assumptions are appropriate, significant changes in the assumptions may
materially affect pension and other post-retirement obligations as well as future expenses, which
may result in an impact on earnings in the periods that the changes in these assumptions occur.
The carrying value of the defined benefit plans (including the net asset position disclosed under
non-current assets) at 31 December 2013 was $111m (2012: $221m; 2011: $192m).
background image
92
Ore Reserve estimates
An Ore Reserve estimate is an estimate of the amount of product that can be economically and
legally extracted from the group’s properties. In order to calculate the Ore Reserve, estimates
and assumptions are required about a range of geological, technical and economic factors,
including quantities, grades, production techniques, recovery rates, production costs, transport
costs, commodity demand, commodity prices and exchange rates.
Estimating the quantity and/or grade of the Ore Reserve requires the size, shape and depth of
ore bodies to be determined by analysing geological data such as the logging and assaying of
drill samples. This process may require complex and difficult geological judgements and
calculations to interpret the data.
The group is required to determine and report its Ore Reserve in accordance with the SAMREC
code.
Because the economic assumptions used to estimate changes in the Ore Reserve from period to
period, and because additional geological data is generated during the course of operations,
estimates of the Ore Reserve may change from period to period. Changes in the reported Ore
Reserve may affect the group’s financial results and financial position in a number of ways,
including the following:
·
asset carrying values may be affected due to changes in estimated future cash flows;
·
depreciation, depletion and amortisation charged in the income statement may change where
such charges are determined by the units-of-production method, or where the useful
economic lives of assets change;
·
overburden removal costs, including production stripping activities, recorded on the statement
of financial position or charged in the income statement may change due to changes in
stripping ratios or the units-of-production method of depreciation;
·
decommissioning site restoration and environmental provisions may change where changes
in the estimated Ore Reserve affect expectations about the timing or cost of these activities;
and
·
the carrying value of deferred tax assets may change due to changes in estimates of the likely
recovery of the tax benefits.
Development expenditure
Development activities commence after project sanctioning by the appropriate level of
management. Judgement is applied by management in determining when a project has reached
a stage at which economically recoverable reserves exist such that development may be
sanctioned. In exercising this judgement, management is required to make certain estimates and
assumptions similar to those described above for capitalised exploration and evaluation
expenditure. Any such estimates and assumptions may change as new information becomes
available. If, after having started the development activity, a judgement is made that a
development asset is impaired, the appropriate amount will be written off to the income
statement.
background image
93
Share-based payments
The group issues equity-settled share-based payments to certain employees and third parties
outside the group. Equity-settled share-based payments are measured at fair value (excluding
the effect of non-market based vesting conditions) at the date of grant. The fair value determined
at the grant date of the equity-settled share-based payments is expensed as services are
rendered over the vesting period, based on the group’s estimate of the shares that will eventually
vest and adjusted for the effect of non-market-based vesting conditions.
Fair value is measured using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The expected life used in
the model has been adjusted, based on management’s best estimate, for the effects of non-
transferability, exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
The income statement charge for the year was $30m (2012: $66m; 2011: $61m).
Contingencies
By their nature, contingencies will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail
to occur. The assessment of such contingencies inherently involves the exercise of significant
judgement and estimates of the outcome of future events. Such contingencies include, but are
not limited to environmental obligations, litigation, regulatory proceedings, tax matters and losses
resulting from other events and developments.
Firstly, when a loss is considered probable and reasonably estimable, a liability is recorded in the
amount of the best estimate for the ultimate loss. The likelihood of a loss with respect to a
contingency can be difficult to predict and determining a meaningful estimate of the loss or a
range of loss may not always be practicable based on the information available at the time and
the potential effect of future events and decisions by third parties that will determine the ultimate
resolution of the contingency. It is not uncommon for such matters to be resolved over many
years, during which time relevant developments and new information is continuously evaluated to
determine both the likelihood of any potential loss and whether it is possible to reasonably
estimate a range of possible losses. When a loss is probable but a reasonable estimate cannot
be made, disclosure is provided.
In determining the threshold for disclosure on a qualitative and quantitative basis, management
considers the potential for a disruptive effect on the normal functioning of the group and/or
whether the contingency could impact investment decisions. Such qualitative matters considered
are reputational risks, regulatory compliance issues and reasonable investor considerations. For
quantitative purposes an amount of $20m, has been considered.
Litigation and other judicial proceedings as a rule raise difficult and complex legal issues and are
subject to uncertainties and complexities including, but not limited to, the facts and
circumstances of each particular case, issues regarding the jurisdiction in which each suit is
brought and differences in applicable law. Upon resolution of any pending legal matter, the group
may be forced to incur charges in excess of the presently established provisions and related
insurance coverage. It is possible that the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of
the group could be materially affected by the unfavourable outcome of litigation.
background image
94
1.3
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Equity-accounted investments
Joint ventures
A joint venture is an entity in which the group holds a long-term interest and which the group and
one or more other ventures jointly control under a contractual arrangement, that provides for
strategic, financial and operating policy decisions relating to the activities requiring unanimous
consent of the parties sharing control. The group’s interests in joint arrangements classified as
joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method.
Profits and losses realised in connection with transactions between the group and joint ventures
are eliminated in proportion to share ownership. Such profits and losses are deducted from the
group’s equity and related statement of financial position amount and released in the group
accounts when the assets are effectively realised outside the group. Dividends received from
joint ventures are included in operating activities in the cash flow statement.
Joint ventures are accounted for at cost and are adjusted for impairments where appropriate in
the company financial statements.
Associates
The equity method of accounting is used for an investment over which the group exercises
significant influence and normally owns between 20% and 50% of the voting equity. Associates
are equity-accounted from the effective date of acquisition to the effective date of disposal. If
necessary, impairment losses on the equity value are reported under share of profit and loss
from investments accounted for using the equity method.
Profits and losses realised in connection with transactions between the group and associated
companies are eliminated in proportion to share ownership. Such profits and losses are deducted
from the group’s equity and related statement of financial position amount and released in the
group accounts when the assets are effectively realised outside the group. Dividends received
from associates are included in investing activities in the cash flow statement.
As the group only has significant influence, it is unable to obtain reliable information at reporting
period on a timely basis. The results of associates are equity-accounted from their most recent
audited annual financial statements or unaudited interim financial statements, all within three
months of the year end of the group. Adjustments are made to the associates’ financial results
for material transactions and events in the intervening period.
Associates are accounted for at cost and are adjusted for impairments where appropriate in the
company financial statements.
background image
95
Joint ventures and associates
Any losses of equity-accounted investments are brought to account in the consolidated financial
statements until the investment in such investments is written down to zero. Thereafter, losses
are accounted for only insofar as the group is committed to providing financial support to such
investees.
The carrying value of equity-accounted investments represents the cost of each investment,
including goodwill, balance outstanding on loans advanced if the loan forms part of the net
investment in the investee, any impairment losses recognised, the share of post-acquisition
retained earnings and losses, and any other movements in reserves. The carrying value of
equity-accounted investments is reviewed when indicators arise and if any impairment in value
has occurred; it is recognised in the period in which the impairment arose.
Business combinations
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The cost of an
acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred measured at
acquisition date fair value and the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree.
Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred and included in administrative expenses.
Goodwill is initially measured at cost, being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration
transferred and the amount recognised for non-controlling interest over the net identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed. If the fair value of the net assets acquired is in excess of the
aggregate consideration transferred, the gain is recognised in profit or loss.
Unincorporated joint ventures – joint operations
A joint operation is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the
arrangement have rights to the use of assets and obligations for the liabilities of the arrangement.
The group accounts for activities under joint operations by recognising in relation to the joint
operation, the assets it controls and the liabilities it incurs, the expenses it incurs and the revenue
from the sale or use of its share of the joint operations output.
Foreign currency translation
Functional currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the group’s entities are measured using the
currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the ‘functional
currency’).
Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the approximate
exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses
resulting from the settlement of foreign currency transactions and from the translation at the
reporting period exchange rate of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are recognised in the income statement, except for hedging derivative balances that
are within the scope of IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”.
Translation differences on these balances are reported as part of their fair value gain or loss.
background image
96
Translation differences on non-monetary items, such as equities classified as available-for-sale
financial assets, are included in other comprehensive income within equity.
Group companies
The results and financial position of all group entities (none of which has the currency of a
hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the presentation
currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:
·
share capital and premium are translated at historical rates of exchange at the reporting date;
·
retained earnings are converted at historical average exchange rates;
·
assets and liabilities for each statement of financial position presented are translated at the
closing rate at the date of that statement of financial position;
·
income and expenses for each income statement presented are translated at monthly
average exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the
cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and
expenses are translated at the rates prevailing at the date of the transaction);
·
all resulting exchange differences are recognised in other comprehensive income and
presented as a separate component of equity (foreign currency translation); and
·
other reserves, other than those translated above, are converted at the closing rate at each
reporting date. These resulting exchange differences are recognised in retained earnings.
Exchange differences arising from the translation of the net investment in foreign operations, and
of borrowings and other currency instruments designated as hedges of such investments, are
taken to other comprehensive income on consolidation. For the company, the exchange
differences on such monetary items are reported in the company income statement.
When a foreign operation is sold, such exchange differences are recognised in the income
statement as part of the gain or loss on sale.
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising from the acquisition of a foreign operation are treated
as assets and liabilities of the foreign operation and translated at the closing rate.
Segment reporting
An operating segment is a business activity whose results are regularly reviewed by the chief
operating decision maker in order to make decisions about resources to be allocated to it and to
assess its performance and for which discrete financial information is available. The chief
operating decision maker has been determined to be the Executive Committee.
Tangible assets
Tangible assets are recorded at cost less accumulated amortisation and impairments/reversals.
Cost includes pre-production expenditure incurred during the development of a mine and the
present value of related future decommissioning costs.
Interest on borrowings relating to the financing of major capital projects under construction is
capitalised during the construction phase as part of the cost of the project. Such borrowing costs
are capitalised over the period during which the asset is being acquired or constructed and
background image
97
borrowings have been incurred. Capitalisation ceases when construction is interrupted for an
extended period or when the asset is substantially complete. Other borrowing costs are
expensed as incurred.
If there is an indication that the recoverable amount of any of the tangible assets is less than the
carrying value, the recoverable amount is estimated and an allowance is made for the
impairment in value.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount only when it is probable that future
economic benefits associated with the asset will flow to the group, and the cost of the addition
can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income
statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.
To the extent a legal or constructive obligation to a third party exists, the acquisition cost includes
estimated costs of dismantling and removing the asset and restoring the site. A change in
estimated expenditures for dismantling, removal and restoration is added to and/or deducted
from the carrying value of the related asset. To the extent that the change would result in a
negative carrying amount, this effect is recognised as income. The change in depreciation
charge is recognised prospectively.
For assets amortised on the units-of-production method, amortisation is calculated to allocate the
cost of each asset to its residual value over its estimated useful life.
For those assets not amortised on the units-of-production method, amortisation is calculated over
their estimated useful life as follows:
·
buildings up to life of mine;
·
plant and machinery up to life of mine;
·
equipment and motor vehicles up to five years;
·
computer equipment up to three years; and
·
leased assets over the shorter of the period of the lease and the useful life.
Major renovations are depreciated over the remaining useful life of the related asset or to the
date of the next major renovation, whichever is sooner.
Assets are amortised to residual values. Residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and
adjusted if appropriate, at the beginning of each financial year.
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing net sale proceeds with the carrying
amount. These are included in the income statement.
Mine development costs
Capitalised mine development costs include expenditure incurred to develop new ore bodies, to
define further mineralisation in existing ore bodies and, to expand the capacity of a mine. Mine
development costs include acquired proved and probable Ore Reserve at cost at the acquisition
date. These costs are amortised from the date on which commercial production begins.
background image
98
Depreciation, depletion and amortisation of mine development costs are computed by the units-
of-production method based on estimated proved and probable Ore Reserve. The proved and
probable Ore Reserve reflects estimated quantities of reserves which can be recovered
economically in the future from known mineral deposits.
Capitalised mine development costs also include stripping activity assets relating to production
stripping activities incurred in the production phase of open-pit operations of the group. Once
determined that any portion of the production stripping costs should be capitalised, the group
uses the average stripping ratio and the average mine costs per tonne of the component to which
the production stripping costs relate to determine the amount of the production stripping costs
that should be capitalised. Stripping activity assets are amortised on a units-of-production
method based on the Ore Reserve of the component of the ore body to which these assets
relate.
The average stripping ratio is calculated as the number of tonnes of waste material expected to
be removed during the life of the component per tonne of ore mined from the component or
components. The average mine cost per tonne of the component is calculated as the total
expected costs to be incurred to mine the relevant component of the ore body, divided by the
number of tonnes expected to be mined from the component. The average mine stripping ratio
and the average mine cost per tonne of the component to which the stripping activity asset
relates are recalculated annually in the light of additional knowledge and changes in estimates.
Mine infrastructure
Mine plant facilities, including decommissioning assets, are amortised using the lesser of their
useful life or units-of-production method based on estimated proved and probable Ore Reserve.
Other tangible assets comprising vehicles and computer equipment are depreciated by the
straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.
Land and assets under construction
Land and assets under construction are not depreciated and are measured at historical cost less
impairments.
Mineral rights and dumps
Mineral rights are amortised using the units-of-production method based on the estimated proved
and probable Ore Reserve. Dumps are amortised over the period of treatment.
Exploration and evaluation assets
All exploration costs are expensed until it is concluded that a future economic benefit will more
likely than not be realised. In evaluating if expenditures meet this criterion to be capitalised,
several different sources of information are used depending on the level of exploration. While the
criterion for concluding that expenditure should be capitalised is always probable, the information
used to make that determination depends on the level of exploration.
·
Costs on greenfields sites, being those where the group does not have any mineral deposits
which are already being mined or developed, are expensed as incurred until the group is able
background image
99
to demonstrate that future economic benefits are probable, which generally will be the
establishment of proved and probable Ore Reserve at this location.
·
Costs on brownfields sites, being those adjacent to mineral deposits which are already being
mined or developed, are expensed as incurred until the group is able to demonstrate that
future economic benefits are probable, which generally will be the establishment of increased
proved and probable Ore Reserve after which the expenditure is capitalised as a mine
development cost.
·
Costs relating to extensions of mineral deposits, which are already being mined or developed,
including expenditure on the definition of mineralisation of such mineral deposits, are
capitalised as a mine development cost.
Costs relating to property acquisitions are capitalised within development costs.
Intangible assets
Acquisition and goodwill arising thereon
Where an investment in a subsidiary, joint venture or an associate is made, any excess of the
consideration transferred over the fair value of the attributable Mineral Resource including value
beyond proved and probable, exploration properties and net assets is recognised as goodwill.
Goodwill in respect of subsidiaries is disclosed as goodwill. Goodwill relating to equity-accounted
joint ventures and associates is included within the carrying value of the investment which is
tested for impairment when indicators exist.
Goodwill relating to subsidiaries is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less
accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the
carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. Goodwill is allocated to cash-generating
units for the purpose of impairment testing.
Royalty rate concession
The royalty rate concession with the government of Ghana was capitalised at fair value at
agreement date. Fair value represents a present value of future royalty rate concessions over 15
years. The royalty rate concession has been assessed to have a finite life and is amortised on a
straight-line method over a period of 15 years, the period over which the concession runs. The
related amortisation expense is charged through the income statement. This intangible asset is
tested for impairment when there is an indicator of impairment.
Software
Software purchased, including direct costs associated with customisation and installation of the
software, is capitalised.
Internally-developed software is capitalised when it meets the criteria for capitalisation. Other
software development expenditure is charged to the income statement when incurred. Software
is amortised on a straight-line basis over its useful life which is determined to be the lesser of the
licence period of the software; the manufacturer’s announced upgrade that management intends
to implement; or 3 years. Useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the beginning
of each financial year.
background image
100
Impairment of assets
Intangible assets that have an indefinite useful life and separately recognised goodwill are not
subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment and whenever events or changes
in circumstance indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Assets that are
subject to amortisation are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.
An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds
its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs
to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the
lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units).
Impairment calculation assumptions include life of mine plans based on prospective reserves and
resources, management’s estimate of the future gold price, based on current market price trends,
foreign exchange rates, and a pre-tax discount rate adjusted for country and project risk. It is
therefore reasonably possible that changes could occur which may affect the recoverability of
tangible and intangible assets.
Leased assets
Assets subject to finance leases are capitalised at the lower of their fair value or the present
value of minimum lease payments measured at inception of the lease with the related lease
obligation recognised at the same amount. Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the
shorter of their estimated useful lives and the lease term. Finance lease payments are allocated
using the rate implicit in the lease, which is included in finance costs, and the capital repayment,
which reduces the liability to the lessor.
Operating lease rentals are charged against operating profits in a systematic manner related to
the period the assets concerned will be used.
Non-current assets held for sale
Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will
be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This
condition is regarded as having been met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset (or
disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be
committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale
within one year from the date of classification.
Non-current assets (and disposal groups) classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of
their previous carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Exploration and research expenditure
Pre-licence costs are recognised in profit or loss as incurred. Exploration and research
expenditure is expensed in the year in which it is incurred. These expenses include: geological
and geographical costs, labour, Mineral Resource and exploratory drilling costs.
background image
101
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realisable value after appropriate allowances
for redundant and slow moving items. Cost is determined on the following bases:
·
metals in process are valued at the average total production cost at the relevant stage of
production;
·
gold doré/bullion is valued on an average total production cost method;
·
ore stockpiles are valued at the average moving cost of mining and stockpiling the ore.
Stockpiles are classified as a non-current asset where the stockpile exceeds current
processing capacity;
·
by-products, which include uranium oxide and sulphuric acid, are valued using an average
total production cost method. By-products are classified as a non-current asset where the by-
products on hand exceed current processing capacity;
·
mine operating supplies are valued at average cost; and
·
heap leach pad materials are measured on an average total production cost basis. The cost
of materials on the leach pad from which metals are expected to be recovered in a period
longer than 12 months is classified as a non-current asset.
A portion of the related depreciation, depletion and amortisation charge is included in the cost of
inventory.
Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the group has a present obligation, whether legal or
constructive, because of a past event for which it is probable that an outflow of resources
embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can
be made of the amount of the obligation. Where some or all of the expenditure required to settle
a provision is expected to be reimbursed by another party, the reimbursement is recognised only
when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The amount to be reimbursed is recognised as a
separate asset. Where the group has a joint and several liability with one or more other parties,
no provision is recognised to the extent that those other parties are expected to settle part or all
of the obligation.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure
required to settle the obligation at the reporting date. The discount rate used to determine the
present value reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks
specific to the liability.
Litigation and administrative proceedings are evaluated on a case-by-case basis considering the
information available, including that of legal counsel, to assess potential outcomes. Where it is
considered probable that an obligation will result in an outflow of resources, a provision is
recorded for the present value of the expected cash outflows if these are reasonably measurable.
These provisions cover the estimated payments to plaintiffs, court fees and the cost of potential
settlements.
background image
102
AngloGold Ashanti Limited does not recognise a contingent liability on its statement of financial
position except in a business combination where the contingent liability represents a possible
obligation. A contingent liability is disclosed when the possibility of an outflow of resources
embodying economic benefits is not remote.
Employee benefits
Pension obligations
Group companies operate various pension schemes. The schemes are funded through
payments to insurance companies or trustee-administered funds, determined by periodic
actuarial calculations. The group has both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. A
defined benefit plan is a pension plan that defines an amount of pension benefit that an
employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors such as age,
years of service and compensation.
A defined contribution plan is a pension scheme under which the group pays fixed contributions
into a separate entity. The group has no legal or constructive obligation to pay further
contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating
to employee service in current and prior periods. The contributions are recognised as employee
benefit expenses when they are due. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the
extent that a cash refund or a reduction in future contribution payments is available.
The asset/liability recognised in the statement of financial position in respect of defined benefit
pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the reporting date less the
fair value of plan assets, together with adjustments for past service costs. The defined benefit
obligation is calculated annually by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method.
The value of any defined benefit asset recognised is restricted to the sum of any past service
cost and the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the
plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial
assumptions are immediately recorded in other comprehensive income.
Other post-employment benefit obligations
Some group companies provide post-retirement health care benefits to their retirees. The
entitlement to these benefits is usually conditional on the employee remaining in service up to
retirement age and completion of a minimum service period. The expected costs of these
benefits are accrued over the period of employment using an accounting methodology on the
same basis as that used for defined benefit pension plans. Actuarial gains and losses arising
from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are recorded in other
comprehensive income immediately. These obligations are valued annually by independent
qualified actuaries.
background image
103
Termination benefits
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated before the normal retirement
date, or when an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. An
entity shall recognise a liability and expense for termination benefits at the earlier of the following
dates: (a) when the entity can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits; and (b) when the
entity recognises costs for a restructuring that is within the scope of IAS 37 and involves the
payment of termination benefits. The group recognises termination benefits when it is
demonstrably committed to either terminating the employment of current employees according to
a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal; or providing termination benefits as a
result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy based on the number of employees
expected to accept the offer. Benefits falling due more than 12 months after reporting date are
discounted to present value.
Profit-sharing and bonus plans
The group recognises a liability and an expense for bonuses and profit-sharing, based on a
formula that takes into consideration the profit attributable to the group’s shareholders after
certain adjustments. The group recognises a provision where contractually obliged or where
there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation.
Share-based payments
The group’s management awards certain employee bonuses in the form of equity-settled share-
based payments on a discretionary basis.
The fair value of the equity instruments granted is calculated at measurement date, for
transactions with employees this is at grant date. For transactions with employees, fair value is
based on market prices of the equity instruments granted, if available, taking into account the
terms and conditions upon which those equity instruments were granted. If market prices of the
equity instruments granted are not available, the fair value of the equity instruments granted is
estimated using an appropriate valuation model. Vesting conditions, other than market
conditions, are not taken into account when estimating the fair value of shares or share options
at measurement date.
Over the vesting period, the fair value at measurement date is recognised as an employee
benefit expense with a corresponding increase in other capital reserves based on the group’s
estimate of the number of instruments that will eventually vest. The income statement charge or
credit for a period represents the movement in cumulative expense recognised as at the
beginning and end of that period. Vesting assumptions for non-market conditions are reviewed at
each reporting date to ensure they reflect current expectations.
When options are exercised or share awards vest, the proceeds received, net of any directly
attributable transaction costs, are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium.
Where the terms of an equity settled award are modified, as a minimum, an expense is
recognised as if the terms had not been modified. In addition, an expense is recognised for any
modification which increases the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement, or is
otherwise beneficial to the employee, as measured at the date of the modification.
background image
104
In the company financial statements, share-based payment arrangements with employees of
other group entities are recognised by charging that entity its share of the expense and a
corresponding increase in other capital reserves. When options are exercised or share awards
vest, the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to
share capital (nominal value) and share premium.
Environmental expenditure
The group has long-term remediation obligations comprising decommissioning and restoration
liabilities relating to its past operations which are based on the group’s environmental
management plans, in compliance with current environmental and regulatory requirements.
Provisions for non-recurring remediation costs are made when there is a present obligation, it is
probable that expenditure on remediation work will be required and the cost can be estimated
within a reasonable range of possible outcomes. The costs are based on currently available
facts, technology expected to be available at the time of the clean-up, laws and regulations
presently or virtually certain to be enacted and prior experience in remediation of contaminated
sites.
Contributions for the South African operations are made to Environmental Rehabilitation Trust
Funds, created in accordance with local statutory requirements where applicable, to fund the
estimated cost of rehabilitation during and at the end of the life of a mine. The amounts
contributed to the trust funds are accounted for as non-current assets in the company. Interest
earned on monies paid to rehabilitation trust funds is accrued on a time proportion basis and is
recorded as interest income. For group purposes, the trusts are consolidated.
Decommissioning costs
The provision for decommissioning represents the cost that will arise from rectifying damage
caused before production commences. Accordingly, a provision and a decommissioning asset is
recognised and included within mine infrastructure.
Decommissioning costs are provided at the present value of the expenditures expected to settle
the obligation, using estimated cash flows based on current prices. The unwinding of the
decommissioning obligation is included in the income statement. Estimated future costs of
decommissioning obligations are reviewed regularly and adjusted as appropriate for new
circumstances or changes in law or technology. Changes in estimates are capitalised or reversed
against the relevant asset. Estimates are discounted at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money.
Gains or losses from the expected disposal of assets are not taken into account when
determining the provision.
Restoration costs
The provision for restoration represents the cost of restoring site damage after the start of
production. Changes in the provision are recorded in the income statement as a cost of
production.
background image
105
Restoration costs are estimated at the present value of the expenditures expected to settle the
obligation, using estimated cash flows based on current prices and adjusted for risks specific to
the liability. The estimates are discounted at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognised at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable to the extent
that it is probable that economic benefits will flow to the group and revenue and costs can be
reliably measured. The following criteria must also be present:
·
the sale of mining products is recognised when the significant risks and rewards of ownership
of the products are transferred to the buyer;
·
dividends and royalties are recognised when the right to receive payment is established;
·
interest is recognised on a time proportion basis, taking account of the principal outstanding
and the effective rate over the period to maturity, when it is determined that such income will
accrue to the group; and
·
where a by-product is not regarded as significant, revenue is credited against cost of sales,
when the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the products are transferred to the
buyer.
Taxation
Deferred taxation is provided on all qualifying temporary differences at the reporting date
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting
purposes.
Deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that the deductible
temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and future taxable profit will be
available against which the temporary difference can be utilised.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at future anticipated tax rates, which have been
enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Current and deferred tax is recognised as income or expense and included in profit or loss for the
period, except to the extent that the tax arises from a transaction or event which is recognised, in
the same or a different period in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, or a business
combination that is an acquisition.
Current tax is measured on taxable income at the applicable statutory rate enacted or
substantively enacted at the reporting date.
background image
106
Special items
Items of income and expense that are material and require separate disclosure, in accordance
with IAS 1.97, are classified as special items on the face of the income statement. Special items
that relate to the underlying performance of the business are classified as operating special items
and include impairment charges and reversals. Special items that do not relate to underlying
business performance are classified as non-operating special items and are presented below
operating profit (loss) on the income statement.
Dividend distribution
Dividend distribution to the group’s shareholders is recognised as a liability in the group’s
financial statements in the period in which the dividends are declared by the board of directors of
AngloGold Ashanti Limited.
Financial instruments
Financial instruments are initially measured at fair value when the group becomes a party to their
contractual arrangements. Transaction costs are included in the initial measurement of financial
instruments, except financial instruments classified as at fair value through profit or loss. The
subsequent measurement of financial instruments is dealt with below.
A financial asset is derecognised when the right to receive cash flows from the asset has expired
or the group has transferred its rights to receive cash and either (a) has transferred substantially
all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) has neither transferred nor retained substantially all
the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.
A financial liability is derecognised when the obligation under the liability is discharged, cancelled
or expires.
On derecognition of a financial asset, the difference between the proceeds received or receivable
and the carrying amount of the asset is included in profit or loss.
On derecognition of a financial liability, the difference between the carrying amount of the liability
extinguished or transferred to another party and the amount paid is included in profit or loss.
Regular way purchases and sales of all financial assets and liabilities are accounted for at
settlement date.
Derivatives and hedge accounting
The group enters into derivatives to ensure a degree of price certainty and to guarantee a
minimum revenue on a portion of future planned gold production. In addition, the group enters
into derivatives to manage interest rate and currency risk.
The method of recognising fair value gains and losses depends on whether derivatives are
classified as held for trading or are designated as hedging instruments, and if the latter, the
nature of the risks being hedged. The group designates derivatives as either hedges of the
variability in highly probable future cash flows attributable to a recognised asset or liability, or a
forecast transaction (cash flow hedges); or hedges of the fair value of recognised asset or liability
or a firm commitment (fair value hedges).
background image
107
For cash flow hedges, the effective portions of fair value gains or losses are recognised in other
comprehensive income until the hedging instrument expires or is sold, or when a hedge no
longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting or when the hedge transactions affect earnings.
Any cumulative gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity until the forecast
transaction is recognised in the income statement. If a hedge of a forecast transaction
subsequently results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or liability, the associated
cumulative gains and losses that were recognised directly in other comprehensive income are
reclassified into earnings in the same periods during which the asset acquired or the liability
assumed affects earnings for the period.
When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or loss that was
reported in other comprehensive income is immediately transferred to the income statement. The
ineffective portion of fair value gains and losses is reported in earnings in the period to which
they relate. For fair value hedges, the gain or loss from changes in fair value of the hedged item
is reported in earnings, together with the offsetting gains and losses from changes in fair value of
the hedging instrument.
All other derivatives are classified as held for trading and are subsequently measured at their
estimated fair value, with the changes in estimated fair value in the statement of financial position
as either a derivative asset or derivative liability, including translation differences, at each
reporting date being reported in earnings in the period to which it relates. Fair value gains and
losses on these derivatives are included in gross profit in the income statement.
Commodity-based (normal purchase or normal sale) derivative contracts that meet the
requirements of IAS 39 are recognised in earnings when they are settled by physical delivery.
The estimated fair values of derivatives are determined at discrete points in time based on the
relevant market information. These estimates are calculated with reference to the market rates
using industry standard valuation techniques.
Other investments
Listed equity investments and unlisted equity investments, other than investments in
subsidiaries, joint ventures, and associates, are classified as available-for-sale financial assets
and subsequently measured at fair value. Listed investments’ fair values are calculated by
reference to the quoted selling price at the close of business on the reporting date. Fair values
for unlisted equity investments are estimated using methods reflecting the economic
circumstances of the investee. Equity investments for which fair value cannot be measured
reliably are recognised at cost less impairment. Changes in fair value are recognised in other
comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. These amounts are removed from
equity and reported in income when the asset is derecognised or when there is objective
evidence that the asset is impaired based on a significant or prolonged decrease in the fair value
of the equity instrument below its cost.
background image
108
Investments which management has the intention and ability to hold to maturity are classified as
held-to-maturity financial assets and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest rate method. If there is evidence that held-to-maturity financial assets are
impaired, the carrying amount of the assets is reduced and the loss recognised in the income
statement.
Other non-current assets
·
Loans and receivables are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective
interest rate method. If there is evidence that loans and receivables are impaired, the carrying
amount of the assets is reduced and the loss recognised in the income statement.
·
Post-retirement assets are measured according to the employee benefits policy.
Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised
cost using the effective interest method, less accumulated impairment. Impairment of trade and
other receivables is established when there is objective evidence as a result of a loss event that
the group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the
receivables. Objective evidence includes failure by the counterparty to perform in terms of
contractual arrangements and agreed terms. The amount of the impairment is the difference
between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows,
discounted at the original effective interest rate. Impairments relate to specific accounts whereby
the carrying amount is directly reduced. The impairment is recognised in the income statement.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash on hand, demand deposits and short-term,
highly liquid investments which are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and subject to
insignificant risk of changes in value. They are measured at amortised cost which is deemed to
be fair value as they have a short-term maturity.
Cash restricted for use
Cash which is subject to legal or contractual restrictions on use is classified separately as cash
restricted for use.
Financial liabilities
Financial liabilities, other than derivatives and liabilities classified as at fair value through profit or
loss, are subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective interest rate method.
Financial liabilities permitted to be designated on initial recognition as being at fair value through
profit or loss are recognised at fair value, with transaction costs being recognised in profit or loss,
and are subsequently measured at fair value. Gains and losses on financial liabilities that are
designated as at fair value through profit or loss are recognised in profit or loss as they arise. Fair
value of a financial liability that is quoted in an active market is the current offer price times the
number of units of the instrument held or issued.
background image
109
Financial guarantee contracts are accounted for as financial instruments and measured initially at
estimated fair value. They are subsequently measured at the higher of the amount determined in
accordance with IAS 37 “Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”, and the
amount initially recognised less (when appropriate) cumulative amortisation recognised in
accordance with IAS 18 “Revenue”.
Convertible bonds
Convertible bonds, except equity components, are accounted for as liabilities. Option
components are treated as derivative liabilities and carried at fair value, with changes in fair
value recorded in the income statement as a separate instrument and reported separately except
where the host contract is carried at fair value. The bond component is carried at amortised cost
using the effective interest rate. Where the fair value option is elected, the bonds are carried at
fair value with changes in fair value recorded in the income statement.
Treasury shares
The group’s own equity instruments, which are reacquired or held by subsidiary companies
(treasury shares), are deducted from equity. No gain or loss is recognised in profit or loss on the
purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the group’s own equity instruments.
Fair value measurements
The group measures financial instruments at fair value at each balance sheet date where
relevant. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair
value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would
use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic
best interest.
For the purpose of the fair value disclosures, the group has determined classes of assets and
liabilities on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability and the level
of the fair value hierarchy. The group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the
circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the
use of the relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
Accounting for BEE transactions
Where equity instruments are issued to a BEE party at less than fair value, these are accounted
for as share-based payments.
Any difference between the fair value of the equity instrument issued and the consideration
received is accounted for as an expense in the income statement.
A restriction on the BEE party to transfer the equity instrument subsequent to its vesting is not
treated as a vesting condition, but is factored into the fair value determination of the instrument.
background image
110
GROUP – NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December
    SEGMENTAL INFORMATION
AngloGold Ashanti Limited's operating segments are being reported based on the financial
information provided to the Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Committee, collectively
identified as the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM). Individual members of the Executive
Committee are responsible for geographic regions of the business.

Group analysis by origin is as follows:
Figures in million
Net operating assets
Total assets
(2)(3)
US Dollars
2013
2012
2011
2013
2012
2011
South Africa
(1)
1,941
2,619
1,834
2,325
3,082
2,148
Continental Africa
(4)
1,339
3,184
3,083
3,391
4,846
4,234
Australasia
(1)
776
684                  340
1,108
1,045
736
Americas
(1)
1,627
2,315
2,068
2,203
2,878
2,501
Other, including non-gold producing subsidiaries
(5)
39
60                       60
647
888
1,130
5,722
8,862
7,385
9,674
12,739
10,749
Non-current assets considered material, by country are:
South Africa
2,101
2,790
1,930
DRC
1,241
Ghana
1,410
1,500
Tanzania
1,058
970
Australia
878
Brazil
714
1,047
990
Figures in million
Amortisation
Capital expenditure
US Dollars
2013
2012
2011
2013
2012
2011
South Africa
253
302 338
451
583
532
Continental Africa
(2)
254
285 276
839
925
569
Australasia
98
36 42
285
369
102
Americas
(2)
201
213 169
410
409
466
Other, including non-gold producing subsidiaries
8
9 11
8
36
17
814
845 836
1,993
2,322
1,686
Equity-accounted investments included above
(15)
(10) (9)
(411)
(303)                  (89)
799
835 827
1,582
2,019
1,597
background image
111
GROUP – NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December
        Segmental Information (continued)
Gold production (attributable)
(000oz)
2013
2012
2011
South Africa
1,302
1,212
1,624
Continental Africa
1,460
1,521
1,570
Australasia
342
258
246
Americas
1,001
953
891
4,105
3,944
4,331
Figures in million
Gold income
US Dollars
2013
2012
2011
Geographical analysis of gold income by origin is as follows:
South Africa
1,810
2,013
2,560
Continental Africa
(2)
2,111
2,609
2,530
Australasia
441
426
385
Americas
1,425
1,656
1,487
5,787
6,704
6,962
Equity-accounted investments included above
(290)
(351)                (392)
(note 3)
5,497
6,353
6,570
Foreign countries included in the above and considered material are:
Brazil
758
851
767
Ghana
642
772
802
Tanzania
640
906
754
Geographical analysis of gold income by destination is as follows:
South Africa
2,944
3,600
2,620
North America
1,064
1,197
1,022
Australia
435
426
378
Asia
399
387
478
Europe
355
404
630
United Kingdom
590
690
1,834
5,787
6,704
6,962
Equity-accounted investments included above
(290)
(351)                (392)
(note 3)
5,497
6,353
6,570
Figures in million
Gross profit (loss)
(6)
US Dollars
2013
2012
2011
South Africa
510
651
1,083
Continental Africa
(2)
475
959
987
Australasia
(9)
78
(13)
Americas
(2)
516
736
748
Corporate and other
-
41
27
1,492
2,465
2,832
Equity-accounted investments included above
(47)
(111)                (155)
1,445
2,354
2,677
(1)
Total assets includes allocated goodwill of $10m (2012: $13m; 2011: nil) for South Africa, $136m (2012: $159m; 2011: $156m) for
Australasia and $8m (2012: $23m; 2011: $23m) for Americas (note 16).
(2)
Includes equity-accounted investments.
(3)
During the year, pre-tax impairments, derecognition of goodwill, tangible assets and intangible assets of $3,029m were accounted for
in South Africa ($311m), Continental Africa ($1,776m) and the Americas ($942m).
(4)
As at 31 December 2013, total assets included assets held for sale in respect of Navachab mine of $153m (note 25).
(5)
As at 31 December 2011, total assets included assets held for sale in respect of the AGA-Polymetal Strategic Alliance of $20m and
properties held for sale by Rand Refinery of $1m (note 25).
(6)
The group's segment profit measure is gross profit, which excludes the results of associates and joint ventures. For reconciliation of
gross profit to profit before taxation, refer to the group income statement.
Comparative years have been restated for the adoption of IFRIC 20 and IAS 19. Refer note 39 for details.
background image
112
GROUP – NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December
Figures in million
2013
2012
2011
US Dollars
3 Revenue
Revenue consists of the following principal categories:
Gold income (note 2)
5,497
6,353
6,570
By-products (note 4)
149
206
224
- silver income
80
95                    99
- uranium income
54
90                    99
- sulphuric acid income
13
19                    22
- other
2
2                      4
Dividends received
5
7
-
Royalties received (note 7)
18
23
79
Interest received (note 33)
39
43
52
- loans and receivables
(1)
23
13
14
- available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investments
8
5
7
- cash and cash equivalents
8
25
31
5,708
6,632
6,925
(1)
Interest received from loans and receivables comprises:
- related parties
1
1
-
- unwinding of long-term receivables
5
4
12
- other loans
17
8
2
23
13
14
4
Cost of sales
Cash operating costs
(1)
3,247
3,129                      2,871
Insurance reimbursement
-
(30)
-
By-products revenue (note 3)
(149)
(206)                    (224)
3,098
2,893                     2,647
Royalties
129
164
193
Other cash costs
43
35
30
Share scheme and related costs
27
43                       46
Total cash costs
3,297
3,135
2,916
Retrenchment costs
69
10
15
Rehabilitation and other non-cash costs
18
67
229
Production costs
3,384
3,212
3,160
Amortisation of tangible assets (notes 15 and 33)
775
830
825
Amortisation of intangible assets (notes 16 and 33)
24
5
2
Total production costs
4,183
4,047
3,987
Inventory change
(37)
(83)
(95)
4,146
3,964
3,892
(1)
Cash operating costs comprise:
- salaries and wages
1,231
1,186
1,104
- stores and other consumables
747
746
684
- fuel, power and water
641
670
598
- contractors
632
560
499
- other
(4)
(33)                 (14)
3,247
3,129               2,871
Comparative years have been restated for the adoption of IFRIC 20.
Refer note 39 for details.
The comparatives have also been amended to separately disclose share
scheme and related costs from cash operating costs for improved
disclosure.
5
Corporate administration, marketing and other expenses
Corporate administration expenses
183                     236                232
Marketing expenses
6
10                     9
Share scheme and related costs
12                       45                  37
201
 291
278
background image
113
GROUP – NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December
Figures in million
2013
2012
2011
US Dollars
6
Other operating expenses
Pension and medical defined benefit provisions
14
37                         10
Claims filed by former employees in respect of loss of employment, work-
related accident injuries and diseases, governmental fiscal claims and care
and maintenance of old tailings operations
5
10                        21
19
47                        31
Comparative years have been restated for the adoption of IAS 19. Refer
note 39 for details.
7
Special items
Impairment (reversal) and derecognition of goodwill, tangible and intangible
assets (notes 13, 15 and 16)
3,029
346                      (120)
Impairment of other investments (note 13)
30
16
21
Impairment (reversal) of other receivables
-
1
(1)
Write-down of stockpiles and heap leach to net realisable value and other
stockpile adjustments (note 20)
216
-
-
Net inventory write-off at Geita due to fire
(1)
1
-
-
Write-off of a loan (Sokimo)
7
-
-
Net (profit) loss on disposal and derecognition of land, mineral rights,
tangible assets and exploration properties (note 13)
(2)
15
8
Profit on disposal of subsidiary ISS International Limited (note 13)
-
-
(2)
Profit on partial disposal of Rand Refinery Limited (note 13)
-
(14)
-
BEE transaction modification costs for Izingwe (Pty) Limited (Izingwe)
(note 11)
-
-
7
Insurance claim recovery on capital items (note 13)
-
-
(3)
Costs on early settlement of convertible bonds and transaction costs on the
$1.25bn bonds and standby facility
(2)
61
-
-
Contract termination and settlement costs
(3)
19
21
-
Indirect tax expenses and legal claims
(4)
43
40
6
Retrenchment and related costs
24
-
-
Royalties received (note 3)
(5)
(18)
(23)
(79)
3,410
402
(163)
(1)
Comprises inventory write-off of $14m and insurance proceeds received on the inventory claim of $13m.
(2)
Includes costs on early settlement of convertible bonds of $41m and transaction costs on the $1.25bn bond and standby facility of
$20m.
(3)
Contract termination and settlement costs include the following:
- the Mining & Building Contractors Limited (MBC) termination costs of $1m (2012: $17m; 2011:nil) at Obuasi;
- contract settlement costs of nil (2012: $4m; and 2011: nil) at Siguiri;
- Mongbwalu termination costs of $15m (2012: nil; 2011: nil); and
- other movements of $3m (2012: nil; 2011: nil).
(4)
Indirect tax expenses and legal claims include the following:
- net impairment for non-recovery of VAT and fuel duties in Argentina, Colombia, Guinea and Tanzania of $43m (2012: $29m;
2011: $1m); and
- the Westchester/Africore Limited legal claim in Ghana of nil (2012: $11m; 2011: $5m).
(5)
Includes the Boddington royalty of $13m (2012: $18m; 2011: $38m) and other royalties of $5m (2012: $5m; 2011: $6m). In 2011,
royalties received included the sale of Ayanfuri royalty to Franco Nevada Corporation for a pre-taxation amount of $35m.
background image
114
GROUP – NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December
Figures in million
2013
2012
2011
US Dollars
8
Finance costs and unwinding of obligations
Finance costs
Finance costs on rated bonds and corporate notes
148
74
56
Finance costs on convertible bonds
18
27
25
Finance costs on bank loans and overdrafts
43
18
10
Finance costs on mandatory convertible bonds
26
37
38
Amortisation of fees
10
15
7
Finance lease charges
5
6
5
Other finance costs
2
2
3
252
179
144
Amounts capitalised (note 15)
(5)
(12)
(3)
Total finance costs
247
167
141
Unwinding of obligations, accretion of convertible bonds and other
discounts
Unwinding of decommissioning obligation (note 28)
13
11
12
Unwinding of restoration obligation (note 28)
14
17
15
Unwinding of other provisions (note 28)
2
1
-
Accretion of convertible bonds discount
20
30
28
Discounting of long-term trade and other receivables
-
5
-
Total unwinding of obligations, accretion of convertible bonds and other
discounts
49
64
55
Total finance costs, unwinding of obligations, accretion of convertible bonds
and other discounts (note 33)
296
231
196
9
Share of associates and joint ventures' (loss) profit
Revenue
334
383
409
Operating costs, special items and other expenses
(315)
(326)                  (289)
Net interest received (paid)
4
2
(1)
Profit before taxation
23
59
119
Taxation
(21)
(30)
(51)
Profit after taxation
2
29
68
Impairment of investments in associates (notes 13 and 18)
(14)
(20)
(5)
Impairment of investments in joint ventures (notes 13 and 18)
(181)
(39)
(11)
Loss on disposal of loan to joint venture (notes 13 and 18)
-
(2)                            -
Reversal of impairment in associate (notes 13 and 18)
-
2
-
Reversal of impairment in joint venture (notes 13, 18 and 25)
(1)
31
-
20
(note 33)
(162)
(30)
72
(1)
During 2013, a loan of $31m was recovered which was impaired in 2012.
Comparative years have been restated for the adoption of IFRIC 20. Refer note 39 for details.
background image
115
GROUP – NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December
Figures in million
2013
2012
2011
US Dollars
10        Employee benefits
Employee benefits including Executive Directors' and Prescribed Officers'
salaries and other benefits
1,321
1,298
1,232
Health care and medical scheme costs
- current medical expenses
72
77
78
- defined benefit post-retirement medical expenses
13
36
14
Pension and provident plan costs
- defined contribution
64
69
64
- defined benefit pension plans
11
9
6
Retrenchment costs
82
10
15
Share-based payment expense (note 11)
30
66
54
Included in cost of sales, other operating expenses, special items and
corporate administration, marketing and other expenses
1,593
1,565
1,463
Actuarial defined benefit plan expense analysis