UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2012
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-12291
THE AES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 54 1163725 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
4300 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia | 22203 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(703) 522-1315
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company ¨ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of Registrants Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, on November 2, 2012 was 743,961,090.
THE AES CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
1 | ||||||
ITEM 1. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | 1 | ||||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets | 1 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations | 2 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | 3 | |||||
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 4 | |||||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 5 | |||||
ITEM 2. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 43 | ||||
ITEM 3. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 90 | ||||
ITEM 4. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 93 | ||||
94 | ||||||
ITEM 1. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 94 | ||||
ITEM 1A. |
RISK FACTORS | 102 | ||||
ITEM 2. |
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | 102 | ||||
ITEM 3. |
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | 102 | ||||
ITEM 4. |
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | 102 | ||||
ITEM 5. |
OTHER INFORMATION | 102 | ||||
ITEM 6. |
EXHIBITS | 102 | ||||
103 |
THE AES CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
September 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(Revised) | ||||||||
(in millions, except share and per share data) |
||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,943 | $ | 1,704 | ||||
Restricted cash |
735 | 478 | ||||||
Short-term investments |
873 | 1,356 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $307 and $273, respectively |
2,671 | 2,534 | ||||||
Inventory |
796 | 785 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
431 | 454 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
226 | 157 | ||||||
Other current assets |
1,009 | 1,570 | ||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations and held for sale assets |
- | 191 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
8,684 | 9,229 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NONCURRENT ASSETS |
||||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
||||||||
Land |
1,036 | 1,090 | ||||||
Electric generation, distribution assets and other |
31,429 | 31,073 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(9,562 | ) | (8,944 | ) | ||||
Construction in progress |
2,581 | 1,788 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
25,484 | 25,007 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Assets: |
||||||||
Investments in and advances to affiliates |
1,334 | 1,422 | ||||||
Debt service reserves and other deposits |
561 | 876 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,967 | 3,820 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $250 and $164, respectively |
462 | 547 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
671 | 715 | ||||||
Other |
2,168 | 2,345 | ||||||
Noncurrent assets of discontinued operations and held for sale assets |
25 | 1,385 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other assets |
7,188 | 11,110 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 41,356 | $ | 45,346 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 2,327 | $ | 2,014 | ||||
Accrued interest |
426 | 327 | ||||||
Accrued and other liabilities |
2,438 | 3,390 | ||||||
Non-recourse debt, including $294 and $259, respectively, related to variable interest entities |
2,324 | 2,123 | ||||||
Recourse debt |
11 | 305 | ||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations and held for sale businesses |
- | 279 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
7,526 | 8,438 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Non-recourse debt, including $1,173 and $1,156, respectively, related to variable interest entities |
13,049 | 13,412 | ||||||
Recourse debt |
6,176 | 6,180 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,417 | 1,321 | ||||||
Pension and other post-retirement liabilities |
1,555 | 1,729 | ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
3,719 | 3,111 | ||||||
Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued and held for sale businesses |
- | 1,348 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
25,916 | 27,101 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Contingencies and Commitments (see Note 8) |
||||||||
Cumulative preferred stock of subsidiaries |
78 | 78 | ||||||
EQUITY |
||||||||
THE AES CORPORATION STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 1,200,000,000 shares authorized; 810,312,922 issued and 743,875,691 outstanding at September 30, 2012 and 807,573,277 issued and 765,186,316 outstanding at December 31, 2011 |
8 | 8 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
8,540 | 8,507 | ||||||
Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit) |
(439 | ) | 678 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(2,905 | ) | (2,758 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost (66,437,231 shares at September 30, 2012 and 42,386,961 shares at December 31, 2011, respectively) |
(780 | ) | (489 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total AES Corporation stockholders equity |
4,424 | 5,946 | ||||||
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS |
3,412 | 3,783 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity |
7,836 | 9,729 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 41,356 | $ | 45,346 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1
THE AES CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Regulated |
$ | 2,546 | $ | 2,373 | $ | 7,375 | $ | 7,136 | ||||||||
Non-Regulated |
2,041 | 1,934 | 6,144 | 5,762 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
4,587 | 4,307 | 13,519 | 12,898 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cost of Sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Regulated |
(2,114 | ) | (1,707 | ) | (6,267 | ) | (5,332 | ) | ||||||||
Non-Regulated |
(1,469 | ) | (1,590 | ) | (4,478 | ) | (4,571 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total cost of sales |
(3,583 | ) | (3,297 | ) | (10,745 | ) | (9,903 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross margin |
1,004 | 1,010 | 2,774 | 2,995 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(64 | ) | (90 | ) | (225 | ) | (282 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(401 | ) | (418 | ) | (1,202 | ) | (1,137 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
89 | 102 | 263 | 293 | ||||||||||||
Other expense |
(15 | ) | (76 | ) | (59 | ) | (126 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
7 | 57 | 40 | 107 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investments |
30 | - | 214 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
(1,850 | ) | (17 | ) | (1,850 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||
Asset impairment expense |
(43 | ) | (130 | ) | (72 | ) | (163 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign currency transaction losses |
(8 | ) | (90 | ) | (110 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Other non-operating expense |
- | (82 | ) | (50 | ) | (82 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE TAXES AND EQUITY IN EARNINGS OF AFFILIATES |
(1,251 | ) | 266 | (277 | ) | 1,575 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(176 | ) | (68 | ) | (519 | ) | (457 | ) | ||||||||
Net equity in earnings of affiliates |
24 | 5 | 48 | 11 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
(1,403 | ) | 203 | (748 | ) | 1,129 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations of discontinued businesses, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(2), $(16), $3, and $(22), respectively |
3 | (28 | ) | - | (44 | ) | ||||||||||
Net gain (loss) from disposal and impairments of discontinued businesses, net of income tax (benefit) expense of $(1), $0, $60, and $0, respectively |
(2 | ) | - | 68 | - | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
(1,402 | ) | 175 | (680 | ) | 1,085 | ||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests: |
||||||||||||||||
Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(166 | ) | (271 | ) | (407 | ) | (769 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Income from discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
- | (35 | ) | - | (49 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(166 | ) | (306 | ) | (407 | ) | (818 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION |
$ | (1,568 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | $ | (1,087 | ) | $ | 267 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
AMOUNTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax |
$ | (1,569 | ) | $ | (68 | ) | $ | (1,155 | ) | $ | 360 | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
1 | (63 | ) | 68 | (93 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (1,568 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | $ | (1,087 | ) | $ | 267 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax |
$ | (2.10 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | 0.46 | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax |
- | (0.08 | ) | 0.09 | (0.12 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | (2.10 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (1.43 | ) | $ | 0.34 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax |
$ | (2.10 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | (1.52 | ) | $ | 0.46 | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to The AES Corporation common stockholders, net of tax |
- | (0.08 | ) | 0.09 | (0.12 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION COMMON STOCKHOLDERS |
$ | (2.10 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | (1.43 | ) | $ | 0.34 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE: |
$ | 0.04 | $ | - | $ | 0.04 | $ | - | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
THE AES CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (1,402 | ) | $ | 175 | $ | (680 | ) | $ | 1,085 | ||||||
Available-for-sale securities activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0, $0, $0, and $0, respectively |
- | - | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0, $0, $0, and $1, respectively |
- | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total change in fair value of available-for-sale securities |
- | (1 | ) | - | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(2), $42, $(1), and $28, respectively |
14 | (579 | ) | (227 | ) | (309 | ) | |||||||||
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $0, $0, $0, and $0, respectively |
(39 | ) | (11 | ) | (42 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total foreign currency translation adjustments |
(25 | ) | (590 | ) | (269 | ) | (328 | ) | ||||||||
Derivative activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Change in derivative fair value, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $7, $67, $27, and $93, respectively |
(55 | ) | (236 | ) | (167 | ) | (305 | ) | ||||||||
Reclassification to earnings, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(5), $(12), $(38), and $(15), respectively |
27 | 53 | 153 | 112 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total change in fair value of derivatives |
(28 | ) | (183 | ) | (14 | ) | (193 | ) | ||||||||
Pension activity: |
||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss, net of income tax (expense) benefit of $(4), $(2), $(10), and $(6), respectively |
6 | 5 | 19 | 12 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total pension adjustments |
6 | 5 | 19 | 12 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) |
(47 | ) | (769 | ) | (264 | ) | (512 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
(1,449 | ) | (594 | ) | (944 | ) | 573 | |||||||||
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(159 | ) | 14 | (290 | ) | (650 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE AES CORPORATION |
$ | (1,608 | ) | $ | (580 | ) | $ | (1,234 | ) | $ | (77 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
THE AES CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (680 | ) | $ | 1,085 | |||
Adjustments to net income (loss): |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,038 | 947 | ||||||
(Gain) loss from sale of investments and impairment expense |
1,802 | 321 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
101 | (67 | ) | |||||
Contingencies |
51 | 36 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on the extinguishment of debt |
- | 52 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal and impairment write-down discontinued operations |
(130 | ) | 1 | |||||
Other |
10 | 65 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
(191 | ) | (185 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in inventory |
(10 | ) | (118 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets |
90 | 67 | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(379 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities |
303 | 200 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in income tax payables, net |
(151 | ) | (151 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
275 | 227 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
2,129 | 2,313 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(1,581 | ) | (1,832 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions net of cash acquired |
(18 | ) | (158 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of businesses, net of cash sold |
432 | 47 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of assets |
4 | 89 | ||||||
Sale of short-term investments |
5,116 | 4,191 | ||||||
Purchase of short-term investments |
(4,764 | ) | (3,632 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
11 | (164 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in debt service reserves and other assets |
24 | (379 | ) | |||||
Affiliate advances and equity investments |
1 | (91 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from performance bond |
- | 199 | ||||||
Proceeds from government grants for asset construction |
120 | 7 | ||||||
Other investing |
(21 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(676 | ) | (1,734 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
(Repayments) borrowings under the revolving credit facilities, net |
(322 | ) | 126 | |||||
Issuance of recourse debt |
- | 2,050 | ||||||
Issuance of non-recourse debt |
822 | 1,516 | ||||||
Repayments of recourse debt |
(8 | ) | (474 | ) | ||||
Repayments of non-recourse debt |
(759 | ) | (1,489 | ) | ||||
Payments for financing fees |
(24 | ) | (153 | ) | ||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(741 | ) | (990 | ) | ||||
Contributions from noncontrolling interests |
12 | 6 | ||||||
Financed capital expenditures |
(30 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(301 | ) | (225 | ) | ||||
Other financing |
8 | (7 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(1,343 | ) | 347 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
9 | (79 | ) | |||||
Decrease in cash of discontinued and held for sale businesses |
120 | 1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total increase in cash and cash equivalents |
239 | 848 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
1,704 | 2,522 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ | 1,943 | $ | 3,370 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES: |
||||||||
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 1,024 | $ | 982 | ||||
Cash payments for income taxes, net of refunds |
$ | 580 | $ | 647 |
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
THE AES CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION
The prior period condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Form 10-Q) have been reclassified to reflect the businesses held for sale and discontinued operations as discussed in Note 17 Discontinued Operations and Held for Sale Businesses and the December 31, 2011 condensed consolidated balance sheet has been revised to reflect the adjustments to the final purchase price allocation related to the DPL acquisition as discussed in Note 18 Acquisitions and Dispositions.
On June 26, 2012, The AES Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K (June 2012 Form 8-K) to recast previously filed financial statements included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (2011 Form 10-K) to reclassify certain businesses held for sale as discussed in Note 17 Discontinued Operations and Held for Sale Businesses, to present a separate consolidated statement of comprehensive income in accordance with the new accounting guidance on comprehensive income and to reflect changes in the Companys reportable segments in accordance with the accounting guidance on segment reporting as discussed in Note 12 Segments. The revisions to the 2011 Form 10-K were limited to the Companys Business Overview, Selected Financial Data, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes, and the Financial Statement Schedules contained in Items 1, 6, 7, 8 and 15, respectively.
Consolidation
In this Quarterly Report the terms AES, the Company, us or we refer to the consolidated entity including its subsidiaries and affiliates. The terms The AES Corporation, the Parent or the Parent Company refer only to the publicly-held holding company, The AES Corporation, excluding its subsidiaries and affiliates. Furthermore, variable interest entities (VIEs) in which the Company has a variable interest have been consolidated where the Company is the primary beneficiary. Investments in which the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
On June 29, 2012, the State Public Service Commission of New York approved the sale of Somerset and Cayuga, two coal-fired power plants in New York, to the bondholders for approximately $240 million. The plants were owned by AES Eastern Energy L.P. (AES Eastern Energy), which had filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on December 30, 2011 and, effective that date, had been deconsolidated from the Companys consolidated financial statements due to the loss of control. The gain on deconsolidation of AES Eastern Energy continues to be deferred pending the resolution of bankruptcy protection proceedings. See Note 1. General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Principles of Consolidation to the Consolidated Financial Statement in our June 2012 Form 8-K for further information.
Interim Financial Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and footnotes have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), as contained in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification, for interim financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for annual fiscal reporting periods. In the opinion of management, the interim financial information includes all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, comprehensive income and cash flows. The results of operations for the three and nine months
5
ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the 2011 audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, which are included in the June 2012 Form 8-K.
New Accounting Policies Adopted
ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820), Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, which among other requirements, prohibits the use of the block discount factor for all fair value level hierarchies; permits an entity to measure the fair value of its financial instruments on a net basis when the related market risks are managed on a net basis; states the highest and best use concept is no longer relevant in the measurement of financial assets and liabilities; clarifies that a reporting entity should disclose quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in Level 3 measurements and that the application of premiums and discounts is related to the unit of account for the asset or liability being measured at fair value; and requires expanded disclosures to describe the valuation process used for Level 3 measurements and the sensitivity of Level 3 measurements to changes in unobservable inputs. In addition, entities are required to disclose the hierarchy level for items which are not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position, but for which fair value is required to be disclosed. AES adopted ASU No. 2011-04 on January 1, 2012. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, which requires comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement or in two consecutive statements reporting net income and other comprehensive income. The amendment does not change what items are reported in other comprehensive income or the U.S. GAAP requirement to report the reclassification of items from other comprehensive income to net income. The Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05 on January 1, 2012 and chose to report comprehensive income in two consecutive statements by adding a new consolidated statement of comprehensive income. As ASU No. 2011-05 impacts financial statement presentation only, the adoption did not have an impact on the Companys historical financial position or results of operations and is not expected to have an impact in future periods.
Revenue Recognition Following the Companys acquisition of DPL Inc. (DPL) and its competitive retail supply business in November 2011, we have modified our definition of regulated and non-regulated revenue as follows: revenue is classified as regulated on the condensed consolidated statements of operations where the price is determined or set by a regulator, including alternative forms of price regulation such as a price range, price cap or earnings tests. Typically, revenue of utility businesses meets the above criteria and would be classified as regulated revenue. Revenue that is not subject to rate regulation or is not determined by a regulator is classified as non-regulated revenue. Typically, revenue of generation businesses would be classified as non-regulated revenue.
Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective
The following accounting standard has been issued, but is not yet effective for, and has not been adopted by AES.
ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment
On July 27, 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02 under which an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and
6
circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount. An entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 or January 1, 2013 for the Company. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2012-02 on January 1, 2013 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
2. INVENTORY
The following table summarizes the Companys inventory balances as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
September 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Coal, fuel oil and other raw materials |
$ | 413 | $ | 444 | ||||
Spare parts and supplies |
383 | 341 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 796 | $ | 785 | ||||
|
|
|
|
3. FAIR VALUE
The fair value of current financial assets and liabilities, debt service reserves and other deposits approximate their reported carrying amounts. The estimated fair values of the Companys assets and liabilities have been determined using available market information. By virtue of these amounts being estimates and based on hypothetical transactions to sell assets or transfer liabilities, the use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Valuation Techniques
The fair value measurement accounting guidance describes three main approaches to measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities: (1) market approach, (2) income approach and (3) cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present value amount. The measurement is based on current market expectations of the return on those future amounts. The cost approach is based on the amount that would currently be required to replace an asset. The Company measures its investments and derivatives at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, in connection with annual or event-driven impairment evaluations, certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These include long-lived tangible assets (i.e., property, plant and equipment), goodwill and intangible assets (e.g., sales concessions, land use rights and emissions allowances, etc.). In general, the Company determines the fair value of investments and derivatives using the market approach and the income approach, respectively. In the nonrecurring measurements of nonfinancial assets and liabilities, all three approaches are considered; however, fair value estimated under the income approach is often selected. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
7
Investments
The Companys investments measured at fair value generally consist of marketable debt and equity securities. Equity securities are measured at fair value using quoted market prices. Debt securities primarily consist of unsecured debentures, certificates of deposit and government debt securities held by our Brazilian subsidiaries. Returns and pricing on these instruments are generally indexed to the CDI (Brazilian equivalent to London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, a benchmark interest rate widely used by banks in the interbank lending market) or Selic (overnight borrowing rate) rates in Brazil. Fair value is determined from comparisons to market data obtained for similar assets and are considered Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. For more detail regarding the fair value of investments see Note 4 Investments in Marketable Securities.
Derivatives
The fair value of interest rate swap, cap and floor agreements, foreign currency forwards, swaps and options, and energy derivatives is the estimated net amount that the Company would receive or pay to sell or transfer the agreements as of the balance sheet date.
When deemed appropriate, the Company manages its risk from interest and foreign currency exchange rate and commodity price fluctuations through the use of over-the-counter or exchange traded financial and physical derivative instruments. The derivatives are primarily interest rate swaps to hedge non-recourse debt to establish a fixed rate on variable rate debt, foreign exchange instruments to hedge against currency fluctuations, commodity derivatives to hedge against commodity price fluctuations and embedded derivatives associated with commodity contracts. The Companys subsidiaries are counterparties to various over-the-counter or exchange traded derivatives, which include interest rate swaps and options, foreign currency options and forwards and commodity swaps. In addition, the Companys subsidiaries are counterparties to certain Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) and fuel supply agreements that are derivatives or include embedded derivatives.
For derivatives for which there is a standard industry valuation model, the Company uses a third-party treasury and risk management software product that uses a standard model and observable inputs to estimate the fair value. For these derivatives, the Company performs analytical procedures and makes comparisons to other third-party information in order to assess the reasonableness of the fair value. For derivatives for which there is not a standard industry valuation model (such as PPAs and fuel supply agreements that are derivatives or include embedded derivatives), the Company has created internal valuation models to estimate the fair value, using observable data to the extent available. At each quarter-end, the models for the commodity and foreign currency-based derivatives are generally prepared and reviewed by employees who globally manage the respective commodity and foreign currency risks, and analytically reviewed independent of those employees. For all derivatives, with the exception of those classified as Level 1, the income approach is used, which consists of forecasting future cash flows based on contractual notional amounts and applicable and available market data as of the valuation date. Among the most common market data inputs used in the income approach include volatilities, spot and forward benchmark interest rates (such as LIBOR and Euro Inter Bank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)), foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. Forward rates with the same tenor as the derivative instrument being valued are generally obtained from published sources, with these forward rates being assessed quarterly at a portfolio-level for reasonableness versus comparable published information provided from another source. In situations where significant inputs are not observable, the Company uses relevant techniques to best estimate the inputs, such as regression analysis, Monte Carlo simulation or prices for similarly traded instruments available in the market.
For each derivative, with the exception of those classified as Level 1, the income approach is used to estimate the cash flows over the remaining term of the contract. Those cash flows are then discounted using the relevant spot benchmark interest rate (such as LIBOR or EURIBOR) plus a spread that reflects the credit or nonperformance risk. This risk is estimated by the Company using credit spreads and risk premiums that are observable in the market, whenever possible, or estimated borrowing costs based on bank quotes, industry
8
publications and/or information on financing closed on similar projects. To the extent that management can estimate the fair value of these assets or liabilities without the use of significant unobservable inputs, the fair value of these derivatives are classified as Level 2.
The Companys methodology to fair value its derivatives is to start with any observable inputs; however, in certain instances the published forward rates or prices may not extend through the remaining term of the contract and management must make assumptions to extrapolate the curve, which necessitates the use of unobservable inputs, such as proxy commodity prices or historical settlements to forecast forward prices. In addition, in certain instances, there may not be third party data readily available, requiring the use of unobservable inputs. Similarly, in certain instances, the spread that reflects the credit or nonperformance risk is unobservable. The fair value hierarchy of an asset or a liability is based on the level of significance of the input assumptions. An input assumption is considered significant if it affects the fair value by at least 10%. Assets and liabilities are transferred to Level 3 when the use of unobservable inputs becomes significant. Similarly, when the use of unobservable inputs becomes insignificant for Level 3 assets and liabilities, they are transferred to Level 2. Transfers between Level 3 and Level 2 are determined as of the end of the reporting period.
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used for the Level 3 derivative assets (liabilities) at September 30, 2012:
Type of Derivative |
Fair Value | Unobservable Input |
Amount or Range (Weighted Average) |
|||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||
Interest rate |
$ | (297) | Subsidiaries credit spreads | 3% - 3.75% (3.43%) | ||||||
Foreign currency: |
||||||||||
Embedded derivative Argentine Peso |
61 | Argentine Peso to U.S. Dollar currency exchange rate after 2 years |
8.2 | |||||||
Other |
(1) | |||||||||
Commodity & other: |
||||||||||
Embedded derivative Aluminum |
(50) | Market price of power for customer in Cameroon (per KWh) |
$0.06 - $0.14 ($0.12) | |||||||
Embedded derivative Philippine inflation |
11 | U.S. Producer Price Index after 5 years (where base year of 2005 = 100) |
141.3 - 174.54 (152.74) | |||||||
Other |
1 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | (275) | ||||||||
|
|
Changes in the above significant unobservable inputs that lead to a significant and unusual impact to current period earnings are disclosed to the Financial Audit Committee. For interest rate derivatives, increases (decreases) in the estimates of our own credit spreads would decrease (increase) the value of the derivatives in a liability position. For foreign currency derivatives, increases (decreases) in the estimate of the above exchange rate would increase (decrease) the value of the derivative. For commodity and other derivatives in the above table, increases (decreases) in the estimated inflation would increase (decrease) the value of those embedded derivatives, while increases (decreases) in the estimated market price for power would increase (decrease) the value of that embedded derivative.
The only Level 1 derivative instruments as of September 30, 2012 are exchange-traded commodity futures for which the pricing is observable in active markets, and as such, these are not expected to transfer to other levels. There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2.
9
Debt
Recourse and non-recourse debt are carried at amortized cost. The fair value of recourse debt is estimated based on quoted market prices. The fair value of non-recourse debt is estimated differently based upon the type of loan. In general, the carrying amount of variable rate debt is a close approximation of its fair value. For fixed rate loans, the fair value is estimated using quoted market prices or discounted cash flow analyses. In the discounted cash flow analysis, the discount rate is based on the credit rating of the individual debt instruments, if available, or the credit rating of the subsidiary. If the subsidiarys credit rating is not available, a synthetic credit rating is determined using certain key metrics, including cash flow ratios and interest coverage, as well as other industry specific factors. For subsidiaries located outside the U.S., in the event that the country rating is lower than the credit rating previously determined, the country rating is used for purposes of the discounted cash flow analysis. The fair value of recourse and non-recourse debt excludes accrued interest at the valuation date. The fair value was determined using available market information as of September 30, 2012. The Company is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts subsequent to September 30, 2012.
Nonfinancial Assets and Liabilities
For nonrecurring measurements derived using the income approach, fair value is determined using valuation models based on the principles of discounted cash flows (DCF). The income approach is most often used in the impairment evaluation of long-lived tangible assets, goodwill and intangible assets. The Company uses its internally developed DCF valuation models as the primary means to determine nonrecurring fair value measurements though other valuation approaches prescribed under the fair value measurement accounting guidance are also considered. Depending on the complexity of a valuation, an independent valuation firm may be engaged to assist management in the valuation process. A few examples of input assumptions to such valuations include macroeconomic factors such as growth rates, industry demand, inflation, exchange rates and power and commodity prices. Whenever possible, the Company attempts to obtain market observable data to develop input assumptions. Where the use of market observable data is limited or not available for certain input assumptions, the Company develops its own estimates using a variety of techniques such as regression analysis and extrapolations.
For nonrecurring measurements derived using the market approach, recent market transactions involving the sale of identical or similar assets are considered. The use of this approach is limited because it is often difficult to identify sale transactions of identical or similar assets. This approach is used in impairment evaluations of certain intangible assets. Otherwise, it is used to corroborate the fair value determined under the income approach.
For nonrecurring measurements derived using the cost approach, fair value is typically determined using the replacement cost approach. Under this approach, the depreciated replacement cost of assets is determined by first determining the current replacement cost of assets and then applying the remaining useful life percentages to such costs. Further adjustments for economic and functional obsolescence are made to the depreciated replacement cost. This approach involves a considerable amount of judgment, which is why its use is limited to the measurement of a few long-lived tangible assets. Like the market approach, this approach is also used to corroborate the fair value determined under the income approach.
Fair Value Considerations
In determining fair value, the Company considers the source of observable market data inputs, liquidity of the instrument, the credit risk of the counterparty and the risk of the Companys or its counterpartys nonperformance. The conditions and criteria used to assess these factors are:
Sources of market assumptions
The Company derives most of its market assumptions from market efficient data sources (e.g., Bloomberg and Reuters). To determine fair value, where market data is not readily available, management uses comparable market sources and empirical evidence to develop its own estimates of market assumptions.
10
Market liquidity
The Company evaluates market liquidity based on whether the financial or physical instrument, or the underlying asset, is traded in an active or inactive market. An active market exists if the prices are fully transparent to market participants, can be measured by market bid and ask quotes, the market has a relatively large proportion of trading volume as compared to the Companys current trading volume and the market has a significant number of market participants that will allow the market to rapidly absorb the quantity of assets traded without significantly affecting the market price. Another factor the Company considers when determining whether a market is active or inactive is the presence of government or regulatory controls over pricing that could make it difficult to establish a market based price when entering into a transaction.
Nonperformance risk
Nonperformance risk refers to the risk that an obligation will not be fulfilled and affects the value at which a liability is transferred or an asset is sold. Nonperformance risk includes, but may not be limited to, the Company or its counterpartys credit and settlement risk. Nonperformance risk adjustments are dependent on credit spreads, letters of credit, collateral, other arrangements available and the nature of master netting arrangements. The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various interest rate swaps and options; foreign currency options and forwards; and derivatives and embedded derivatives, which subject the Company to nonperformance risk. The financial and physical instruments held at the subsidiary level are generally non-recourse to the Parent Company.
Nonperformance risk on the investments held by the Company is incorporated in the fair value derived from quoted market data to mark the investments to fair value.
The Company adjusts for nonperformance or credit risk on its derivative instruments by deducting a credit valuation adjustment (CVA). The CVA is based on the margin or debt spread of the Companys subsidiary or its counterparty and the tenor of the respective derivative instrument. The counterparty for a derivative asset position is considered to be the bank or government sponsored banking entity or counterparty to the PPA or commodity contract. The CVA for asset positions is based on the counterpartys credit ratings and debt spreads or, in the absence of readily obtainable credit information, the respective countrys debt spreads are used as a proxy. The CVA for liability positions is based on the Parent Companys or the subsidiarys current debt spread, the margin on indicative financing arrangements, or in the absence of readily obtainable credit information, the respective countrys debt spreads are used as a proxy. All derivative instruments are analyzed individually and are subject to unique risk exposures.
11
Recurring Measurements
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
$ | 857 | $ | 1 | $ | 856 | $ | - | ||||||||
Trading securities |
12 | 12 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
126 | - | 42 | 84 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 995 | $ | 13 | $ | 898 | $ | 84 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
$ | 844 | $ | - | $ | 485 | $ | 359 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 844 | $ | - | $ | 485 | $ | 359 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale securities |
$ | 1,340 | $ | 1 | $ | 1,339 | $ | - | ||||||||
Trading securities |
12 | 12 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
120 | 2 | 52 | 66 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,472 | $ | 15 | $ | 1,391 | $ | 66 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
$ | 690 | $ | - | $ | 476 | $ | 214 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 690 | $ | - | $ | 476 | $ | 214 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present a reconciliation of net derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 (presented net by type of derivative where any foreign currency impacts are presented as part of gains (losses) in earnings or other comprehensive income as appropriate):
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate |
Cross Currency |
Foreign Currency |
Commodity and Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at July 1 |
$ | (281 | ) | $ | - | $ | 47 | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (286 | ) | |||||||
Total gains (losses) (realized and unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings(1) |
(1 | ) | - | 14 | 16 | 29 | ||||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
(29 | ) | - | - | - | (29 | ) | |||||||||||||
Included in regulatory (assets) liabilities |
- | - | - | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Settlements |
12 | - | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | 7 | |||||||||||||
Transfers of (assets) liabilities out of Level 3(2) |
2 | - | - | - | 2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at September 30 |
$ | (297 | ) | $ | - | $ | 60 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (275 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains/(losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | - | $ | 13 | $ | 18 | $ | 30 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate |
Cross Currency |
Foreign Currency |
Commodity and Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at July 1 |
$ | (60 | ) | $ | 15 | $ | 38 | $ | 17 | $ | 10 | |||||||||
Total gains (losses) (realized and unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings(1) |
- | (3 | ) | 4 | (44 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
(36 | ) | (37 | ) | - | - | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||
Included in regulatory (assets) liabilities |
- | - | - | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Settlements |
4 | 4 | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers of assets (liabilities) into Level 3(2) |
(101 | ) | - | - | - | (101 | ) | |||||||||||||
Transfers of (assets) liabilities out of Level 3(2) |
2 | - | - | - | 2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at September 30 |
$ | (191 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 41 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (209 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total gains (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains/(losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period |
$ | - | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (52 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate |
Cross Currency |
Foreign Currency |
Commodity and Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | (128 | ) | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 51 | $ | (53 | ) | $ | (148 | ) | ||||||
Total gains (losses) (realized and unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings(1) |
(1 | ) | - | 12 | 10 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
(30 | ) | 8 | - | - | (22 | ) | |||||||||||||
Included in regulatory (assets) liabilities |
- | - | - | 9 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Settlements |
19 | 11 | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | 23 | |||||||||||||
Transfers of assets (liabilities) into Level 3(2) |
(159 | ) | - | - | - | (159 | ) | |||||||||||||
Transfers of (assets) liabilities out of Level 3(2) |
2 | (1 | ) | - | - | 1 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at September 30 |
$ | (297 | ) | $ | - | $ | 60 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (275 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total gains/(losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains/(losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | - | $ | 10 | $ | 13 | $ | 22 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate |
Cross Currency |
Foreign Currency |
Commodity and Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | 10 | $ | 22 | $ | 18 | $ | 49 | |||||||||
Total gains (losses) (realized and unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Included in earnings(1) |
- | (5 | ) | 21 | (50 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income |
(3 | ) | (34 | ) | - | - | (37 | ) | ||||||||||||
Included in regulatory (assets) liabilities |
- | - | - | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Settlements |
- | 8 | (2 | ) | (9 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers of assets (liabilities) into Level 3(2) |
(189 | ) | - | - | - | (189 | ) | |||||||||||||
Transfers of (assets) liabilities out of Level 3(2) |
2 | - | - | - | 2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance at September 30 |
$ | (191 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 41 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (209 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total gains/(losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains/(losses) relating to assets and liabilities held at the end of the period |
$ | - | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 18 | $ | (56 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
(1) | The gains (losses) included in earnings for these Level 3 derivatives are classified as follows: interest rate and cross currency derivatives as interest expense; foreign currency derivatives as foreign currency transaction gains (losses); and commodity and other derivatives as either non-regulated revenue, non-regulated cost of sales, or other expense. See Note 5 Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for further information regarding the classification of gains and losses included in earnings in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. |
(2) | Transfers in and out of Level 3 are determined as of the end of the reporting period and are from and to Level 2. The assets (liabilities) transferred into and out of Level 3 are primarily the result of an increase or decrease in the significance of unobservable inputs used to calculate the CVAs of these derivative instruments. |
The following table presents a reconciliation of available-for-sale securities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | - | $ | 40 | $ | - | $ | 42 | ||||||||
Settlements |
- | - | - | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at September 30 |
$ | - | $ | 40 | $ | - | $ | 40 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonrecurring Measurements
For purposes of impairment evaluation, the Company measured the fair value of long-lived assets and equity method investments under the fair value measurement accounting guidance. Impairment expense is measured by comparing the fair value of asset groups at the evaluation date to their carrying amount at the end of the month prior to the evaluation date. The following table summarizes major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period and their level within the fair value hierarchy:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value | Gross Loss |
||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets held and used:(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Kelanitissa |
$ | 22 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 10 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||
Wind projects |
16 | - | - | - | 16 | |||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets held for sale:(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Wind turbines |
45 | - | - | 25 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
St. Patrick |
33 | - | 22 | - | 11 | |||||||||||||||
Equity method investments(2) |
205 | - | 155 | - | 50 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
||||||||||||||||||||
DP&L(3) |
2,449 | - | - | 599 | 1,850 |
14
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value | Gross Loss |
||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets held and used:(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Wind turbines and deposits |
$ | 161 | $ | - | $ | 45 | $ | - | $ | 116 | ||||||||||
Kelanitissa |
66 | - | - | 29 | 37 | |||||||||||||||
Bohemia |
14 | - | 5 | - | 9 | |||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations and held for sale businesses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Carbon Reduction Projects |
49 | - | - | 11 | 33 | (4) | ||||||||||||||
Equity method investments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Yangcheng |
100 | - | - | 26 | 74 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Chigen |
17 | - | - | - | 17 |
(1) | See Note 14 Asset Impairment Expense for further information. |
(2) | See Note 16 Other Non-Operating Expense for further information. |
(3) | See Note 15 Goodwill Impairment for further information. |
(4) | The carrying amounts and fair value of the asset groups also include other assets and liabilities; however, impairment expense recognized was limited to the carrying amounts of long-lived assets. |
The following table summarizes the significant unobservable inputs used in the Level 3 measurement of long-lived assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
Fair Value | Valuation Technique |
Unobservable Input |
Range (Weighted Average) |
|||||||||
(in millions) | ($ in millions) | |||||||||||
Long-lived assets held and used: |
||||||||||||
Kelanitissa |
$ | 10 | Discounted | |||||||||
cash flow | Annual revenue growth |
-9% to 4% (-1%) | ||||||||||
Annual pretax operating margin |
-4% to 16% (-1%) | |||||||||||
Weighted average cost of capital |
11.9% | |||||||||||
Long-lived assets held for sale: |
||||||||||||
Wind turbines |
25 | Market | ||||||||||
Approach | Indicative offer prices |
$ | 12 to 38 (25) | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 35 | ||||||||||
|
|
15
Financial Instruments not Measured at Fair Value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
The following table sets forth the carrying amount and fair value of the Companys financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, but for which fair value is disclosed. In addition, the fair value level hierarchy of such assets and liabilities is presented as of September 30, 2012:
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables(1) |
$ | 387 | $ | 304 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 304 | ||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt |
15,373 | 16,000 | - | 12,156 | 3,844 | |||||||||||||||
Recourse debt |
6,187 | 6,899 | - | 6,899 | - | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables(1) |
$ | 432 | $ | 414 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse debt |
15,535 | 15,862 | ||||||||||||||||||
Recourse debt |
6,485 | 6,640 |
(1) | Trade receivables are included in Current Assets Accounts Receivable and Noncurrent assets Other in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. These receivables principally relate to amounts due from the independent system operator in Argentina. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the significant decline in fair value of these receivables was a result of the increased credit risk in Argentina. |
16
4. INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The following table sets forth the Companys investments in marketable debt and equity securities as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by security class and by level within the fair value hierarchy. The security classes are determined based on the nature and risk of a security and are consistent with how the Company manages, monitors and measures its marketable securities.
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unsecured debentures |
$ | - | $ | 440 | $ | - | $ | 440 | $ | - | $ | 665 | $ | - | $ | 665 | ||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
- | 338 | - | 338 | - | 576 | - | 576 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Government debt securities |
- | 26 | - | 26 | - | 31 | - | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
- | 804 | - | 804 | - | 1,272 | - | 1,272 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds |
- | 52 | - | 52 | - | 67 | - | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
1 | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
1 | 52 | - | 53 | 1 | 67 | - | 68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total available-for-sale |
1 | 856 | - | 857 | 1 | 1,339 | - | $ | 1,340 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
TRADING: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds |
12 | - | - | 12 | 12 | - | - | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total trading |
12 | - | - | 12 | 12 | - | - | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
$ | 13 | $ | 856 | $ | - | $ | 869 | $ | 13 | $ | 1,339 | $ | - | $ | 1,352 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Held-to-maturity securities |
4 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total marketable securities |
$ | 873 | $ | 1,356 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | Cost/amortized cost approximated fair value at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, with the exception of certain common stock investments with a cost basis and fair value of $1 million at September 30, 2012, and a cost basis and fair value of $4 million and $1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2011. |
As of September 30, 2012, all available-for-sale debt securities had stated maturities within one year.
The following table summarizes the pre-tax gains and losses related to available-for-sale and trading securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. Gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined using the specific identification method. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no realized losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities and no other-than-temporary impairment of marketable securities recognized in earnings or other comprehensive income.
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Losses included in earnings that relate to trading securities held at the reporting date |
$ | - | $ | (2 | ) | $ | - | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities included in other comprehensive income |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
1,513 | 1,134 | 5,160 | 4,218 | ||||||||||||
Gross realized gains on sales |
- | 1 | 1 | 5 |
17
5. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Risk Management Objectives
The Company is exposed to market risks associated with its enterprise-wide business activities, namely the purchase and sale of fuel and electricity as well as foreign currency risk and interest rate risk. In order to manage the market risks associated with these business activities, we enter into contracts that incorporate derivatives and financial instruments, including forwards, futures, options, swaps or combinations thereof, as appropriate. The Company generally applies hedge accounting to contracts as long as they are eligible under the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging. While derivative transactions are not entered into for trading purposes, some contracts are not eligible for hedge accounting.
Interest Rate Risk
AES and its subsidiaries utilize variable rate debt financing for construction projects and operations, resulting in an exposure to interest rate risk. Interest rate swap, cap and floor agreements are entered into to manage interest rate risk by effectively fixing or limiting the interest rate exposure on the underlying financing. These interest rate contracts range in maturity through 2030, and are typically designated as cash flow hedges. The following table sets forth, by underlying type of interest rate index, the Companys current and maximum outstanding notional under its interest rate derivative instruments, the weighted average remaining term and the percentage of variable-rate debt hedged that is based on the related index as of September 30, 2012 regardless of whether the derivative instruments are in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships:
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Maximum(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Derivatives |
Derivative Notional |
Derivative Notional Translated to USD |
Derivative Notional |
Derivative Notional Translated to USD |
Weighted Average Remaining Term(1) |
% of Debt Currently Hedged by Index(2) |
||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in years) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Libor (U.S. Dollar) |
3,614 | $ | 3,614 | 4,561 | $ | 4,561 | 10 | 70 | % | |||||||||||||||
Euribor (Euro) |
627 | 806 | 627 | 806 | 10 | 66 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Libor (British Pound) |
58 | 94 | 70 | 113 | 16 | 88 | % |
(1) | The Companys interest rate derivative instruments primarily include accreting and amortizing notionals. The maximum derivative notional represents the largest notional at any point between September 30, 2012 and the maturity of the derivative instrument, which includes forward starting derivative instruments. The weighted average remaining term represents the remaining tenor of our interest rate derivatives weighted by the corresponding maximum notional. |
(2) | Excludes variable-rate debt tied to other indices where the Company has no interest rate derivatives. |
Cross currency swaps are utilized in certain instances to manage the risk related to fluctuations in both interest rates and certain foreign currencies. These cross currency contracts range in maturity through 2028. The following table sets forth, by type of foreign currency denomination, the Companys outstanding notional amount under its cross currency derivative instruments as of September 30, 2012, which are all in qualifying cash flow hedge relationships. These swaps are amortizing and therefore the notional amount represents the maximum outstanding notional amount as of September 30, 2012:
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Cross Currency Swaps |
Notional | Notional Translated to USD |
Weighted Average Remaining Term(1) |
% of Debt Currently Hedged by Index(2) |
||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in years) | |||||||||||||||
Chilean Unidad de Fomento (CLF) |
6 | $ | 266 | 13 | 85 | % |
(1) | Represents the remaining tenor of our cross currency swaps weighted by the corresponding notional. |
18
(2) | Represents the proportion of foreign currency denominated debt hedged by the same foreign currency denominated notional of the cross currency swap. |
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to foreign currency risk as a result of our investments in foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. AES operates businesses in many foreign countries and such operations may be impacted by significant fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Foreign currency options and forwards are utilized, where deemed appropriate, to manage the risk related to fluctuations in certain foreign currencies. These foreign currency contracts range in maturity through 2015. The following tables set forth, by type of foreign currency denomination, the Companys outstanding notional amounts over the remaining terms of its foreign currency derivative instruments as of September 30, 2012 regardless of whether the derivative instruments are in qualifying hedging relationships:
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Options |
Notional | Notional Translated
to USD(1) |
Probability Adjusted Notional(2) |
Weighted Average Remaining Term(3) |
||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in years) | |||||||||||||||
Euro (EUR) |
68 | $ | 87 | $ | 38 | <1 | ||||||||||
Brazilian Real (BRL) |
94 | 46 | 26 | <1 | ||||||||||||
Philippine Peso (PHP) |
1,174 | 28 | 6 | <1 | ||||||||||||
British Pound (GBP) |
18 | 28 | 6 | <1 |
(1) | Represents contractual notionals at inception of trade. |
(2) | Represents the gross notional amounts times the probability of exercising the option, which is based on the relationship of changes in the option value with respect to changes in the price of the underlying currency. |
(3) | Represents the remaining tenor of our foreign currency options weighted by the corresponding notional. |
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Forwards |
Notional | Notional Translated to USD |
Weighted Average Remaining Term(1) |
|||||||||
(in millions) | (in years) | |||||||||||
Chilean Peso (CLP) |
86,476 | $ | 176 | <1 | ||||||||
Euro (EUR) |
115 | 161 | 1 | |||||||||
Colombian Peso (COP) |
172,643 | 94 | <1 | |||||||||
British Pound (GBP) |
11 | 17 | <1 | |||||||||
Argentine Peso (ARS) |
76 | 14 | 1 |
(1) | Represents the remaining tenor of our foreign currency forwards weighted by the corresponding notional. |
In addition, certain of our subsidiaries have entered into contracts which contain embedded derivatives that require separate valuation and accounting due to the fact that the item that is being purchased or sold is denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the subsidiary or the currency of the item. These contracts range in maturity through 2026. The following table sets forth, by type of foreign currency denomination, the Companys outstanding notional over the remaining terms of its foreign currency embedded derivative instruments as of September 30, 2012:
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Embedded Foreign Currency Derivatives |
Notional | Notional Translated to USD |
Weighted Average Remaining Term(1) |
|||||||||
(in millions) | (in years) | |||||||||||
Philippine Peso (PHP)(2) |
62,040 | $ | 1,486 | 11 | ||||||||
Argentine Peso (ARS) |
857 | 183 | 12 | |||||||||
Kazakhstani Tenge (KZT) |
1,266 | 8 | 4 | |||||||||
Euro (EUR) |
2 | 3 | 8 |
19
(1) | Represents the remaining tenor of our foreign currency embedded derivatives weighted by the corresponding notional. |
(2) | Notional also relates to an embedded derivative related to inflation. |
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the price of electricity, fuel and environmental credits. Although our businesses primarily enter into long-term contracts or retail sales concessions (which provide our distribution businesses with a franchise to serve a specific geographic region), a portion of our current and expected future revenues are derived from businesses without significant long-term purchase or sales contracts. These businesses subject our results of operations to the volatility of prices for electricity and fuel in competitive markets. We have used a hedging strategy, where appropriate, to hedge our financial performance against the effects of fluctuations in energy commodity prices.
The PPAs and fuel supply agreements entered into by the Company are evaluated to determine if they meet the definition of a derivative or contain embedded derivatives, either of which requires separate valuation and accounting. To be a derivative under the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging, an agreement would need to have a notional and an underlying, require little or no initial net investment and could be net settled. Generally, these agreements do not meet the definition of a derivative, often due to the inability to be net settled. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate the markets for the commodities to be delivered under these agreements to determine if facts and circumstances have changed such that the agreements could then be net settled and meet the definition of a derivative.
Nonetheless, certain of the PPAs and fuel supply agreements entered into by certain of the Companys subsidiaries are derivatives or contain embedded derivatives requiring separate valuation and accounting. These contracts range in maturity through 2024. The following table sets forth, by type of commodity, the Companys outstanding notionals for the remaining term of its commodity derivatives and embedded derivative instruments as of September 30, 2012:
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||
Commodity Derivatives |
Notional | Weighted Average Remaining Term(1) |
||||||
(in millions) | (in years) | |||||||
Natural gas (MMBTU) |
29 | 11 | ||||||
Aluminum (MWh) |
14 | (2) | 7 | |||||
Petcoke (Metric tons) |
12 | 12 | ||||||
Power (MWh) |
4 | 2 | ||||||
Heating Oil (Gallons) |
2 | 1 | ||||||
Coal (Metric tons) |
1 | 1 |
(1) | Represents the remaining tenor of our commodity and embedded derivatives weighted by the corresponding volume. |
(2) | The embedded derivative relates to fluctuations in the price of aluminum versus fluctuations in the price of electricity, where the notional is based on the amount of power we sell under the PPA. |
20
Accounting and Reporting
Fair Value Hierarchy
The following table sets forth the Companys derivative instruments as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by type of derivative and by level within the fair value hierarchy. Derivative assets and liabilities are recognized at their fair value. Derivative assets and liabilities are combined with other balances and included in the following captions in our condensed consolidated balance sheets: current derivative assets in other current assets, noncurrent derivative assets in other noncurrent assets, current derivative liabilities in accrued and other liabilities and noncurrent derivative liabilities in other noncurrent liabilities.
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
$ | - | $ | 6 | $ | 5 | $ | 11 | $ | - | $ | 24 | $ | 4 | $ | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
- | 14 | 5 | 19 | 2 | 16 | 3 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
- | 20 | 10 | 30 | 2 | 40 | 7 | 49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
- | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
- | 8 | - | 8 | - | - | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
- | 7 | 63 | 70 | - | 3 | 58 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
- | 5 | 11 | 16 | - | 9 | - | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total noncurrent assets |
- | 22 | 74 | 96 | - | 12 | 59 | 71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | - | $ | 42 | $ | 84 | $ | 126 | $ | 2 | $ | 52 | $ | 66 | $ | 120 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
$ | - | $ | 79 | $ | 37 | $ | 116 | $ | - | $ | 97 | $ | 22 | $ | 119 | ||||||||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
- | 4 | - | 4 | - | - | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
- | 8 | 1 | 9 | - | 5 | 1 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
- | 18 | 7 | 25 | - | 17 | 6 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
- | 109 | 45 | 154 | - | 119 | 34 | 153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Noncurrent liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
- | 263 | 260 | 523 | - | 334 | 106 | 440 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
- | 2 | - | 2 | - | - | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
- | 106 | 7 | 113 | - | 10 | 10 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
- | 5 | 47 | 52 | - | 13 | 50 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
- | 376 | 314 | 690 | - | 357 | 180 | 537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | - | $ | 485 | $ | 359 | $ | 844 | $ | - | $ | 476 | $ | 214 | $ | 690 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Hedge Designation
The following table sets forth the fair value and balance sheet classification of derivative instruments as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
September 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Designated as Hedging Instruments |
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
Total | Designated as Hedging Instruments |
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
$ | 4 | $ | 7 | $ | 11 | $ | 10 | $ | 18 | $ | 28 | ||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
1 | 18 | 19 | 2 | 19 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total current assets |
5 | 25 | 30 | 12 | 37 | 49 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Noncurrent assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
- | 2 | 2 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
8 | - | 8 | 1 | - | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
7 | 63 | 70 | 3 | 58 | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
1 | 15 | 16 | - | 9 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total noncurrent assets |
16 | 80 | 96 | 4 | 67 | 71 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 21 | $ | 105 | $ | 126 | $ | 16 | $ | 104 | $ | 120 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
$ | 106 | $ | 10 | $ | 116 | $ | 110 | $ | 9 | $ | 119 | ||||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
4 | - | 4 | 5 | - | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
7 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
7 | 18 | 25 | - | 23 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
124 | 30 | 154 | 116 | 37 | 153 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Noncurrent liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
500 | 23 | 523 | 425 | 15 | 440 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
2 | - | 2 | 14 | - | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
- | 113 | 113 | - | 20 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
3 | 49 | 52 | 3 | 60 | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
505 | 185 | 690 | 442 | 95 | 537 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | 629 | $ | 215 | $ | 844 | $ | 558 | $ | 132 | $ | 690 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has elected not to offset derivative positions in the financial statements. Accordingly, we do not offset such derivative positions against the fair value of amounts (or amounts that approximate fair value) recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) under master netting arrangements. At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we held $1 million and $3 million, respectively, of cash collateral that we received from counterparties to our derivative positions. Beyond the cash collateral held by us, our derivative assets are exposed to the credit risk of the respective counterparty and, due to this credit risk, the fair value of our derivative assets (as shown in the above two tables) have been reduced by a CVA. Also, at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there was $13 million and $16 million, respectively, of cash collateral posted with (held by) counterparties to our derivative positions.
22
The table below sets forth the pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) expected to be recognized as an increase (decrease) to income from continuing operations before income taxes (in millions) over the next twelve months as of September 30, 2012 for the following types of derivative instruments:
Interest rate derivatives |
$(106 | ) | ||
Cross currency derivatives |
$ | 6 | ||
Foreign currency derivatives |
$ | (5 | ) | |
Commodity and other derivatives |
$ | (9 | ) |
The balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for interest rate hedges and cross currency swaps (except for the amount reclassified to foreign currency transaction gains and losses to offset the remeasurement of the foreign currency-denominated debt being hedged by the cross currency swaps), as depreciation is recognized for interest rate hedges during construction, as foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure, and as electricity sales and fuel purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electricity and fuel transactions. These balances are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows as operating and/or investing activities based on the nature of the underlying transaction.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, pre-tax gains (losses) of $(11) million, and $0 million, respectively, net of noncontrolling interests were reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of a cash flow hedge because it was probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur by the end of the originally specified time period (as documented at the inception of the hedging relationship) or within an additional two-month time period thereafter.
23
Effective Portion of Cash Flow Hedges
The following tables set forth the gains (losses) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) and earnings related to the effective portion of derivative instruments in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, as defined in the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Gains (Losses) Recognized in AOCL |
Classification
in Statements of Operations |
Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCL into Earnings(1) |
||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
Type of Derivative |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
$ | (62) | $ | (295) | Interest expense |
$ | (40) | $ | (35) | |||||||||
Non-regulated cost of sales |
(1) | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
Net equity in earnings of affiliates |
(2) | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
Asset impairment expense |
(5) | - | ||||||||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
4 | (37) | Interest expense |
(3) | (3) | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) |
15 | (26) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
- | 29 | Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) |
4 | 3 | |||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
(4) | - | Non-regulated revenue |
- | (2) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | (62) | $ | (303 | ) | $ | (32 | ) | $ | (65 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) Recognized in AOCL |
Classification
in Statements of Operations |
Gains (Losses) Reclassified from AOCL into Earnings(1) |
||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
Type of Derivative |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
$ | (204) | $ | (391) | Interest expense |
$ | (102 | ) | $ | (91 | ) | |||||||
Non-regulated cost of sales |
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net equity in earnings of affiliates |
(4 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Asset impairment expense |
(5 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investments |
(96 | ) | - | |||||||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
9 | (34) | Interest expense |
(9 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) |
27 | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
12 | 27 | Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) |
4 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
(11) | - | Non-regulated revenue |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | (194) | $ | (398) | $ | (191 | ) | $ | (127 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes amounts that were reclassified from AOCL related to derivative instruments that previously, but no longer, qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. |
24
Ineffective Portion of Cash Flow Hedges
The following table sets forth the pre-tax gains (losses) recognized in earnings related to the ineffective portion of derivative instruments in qualifying cash flow hedging relationships, as defined in the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Type of Derivative |
Classification in Statements of Operations |
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings |
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings |
|||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
Interest expense |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | ||||||
Net equity in earnings of affiliates |
- | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
Cross currency derivatives |
Interest expense |
(1 | ) | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | (3 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not Designated for Hedge Accounting
The following table sets forth the gains (losses) recognized in earnings related to derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments under the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Type of Derivative |
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings |
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings |
||||||||||||||||
Classification in Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate derivatives |
Interest expense |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency derivatives |
Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) |
(11 | ) | 27 | (87 | ) | 54 | |||||||||||
Commodity and other derivatives |
Non-regulated revenue |
14 | (54 | ) | 15 | (63 | ) | |||||||||||
Regulated revenue |
(3 | ) | - | (2 | ) | - | ||||||||||||
Non-regulated cost of sales |
1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Regulated cost of sales |
(3 | ) | - | (20 | ) | - | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | (4 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (95 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
In addition, DPL and IPL, our utilities in North America, have derivative instruments for which the gains and losses are accounted for in accordance with accounting standards for regulated operations, as regulatory assets or liabilities. Gains and losses due to changes in the fair value of these derivatives are probable of recovery through future rates and are initially recognized as an adjustment to the regulatory asset or liability and recognized through earnings when the related costs are recovered through rates. Therefore, these gains and losses are excluded from the above table.
25
The following table sets forth the change in regulatory assets and liabilities resulting from the change in the fair value of these derivatives for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in regulatory assets |
$ | 4 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | |||||
Increase (decrease) in regulatory liabilities |
$ | - | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 3 |
Credit Risk-Related Contingent Features
Gener, our generation business in Chile, has cross currency swap agreements with counterparties to swap Chilean inflation indexed bonds issued in December 2007 into U.S. Dollars. The derivative agreements contain credit contingent provisions which would permit the counterparties with which Gener is in a net liability position to require collateral credit support when the fair value of the derivatives exceeds the unsecured thresholds established in the agreements. These thresholds vary based on Geners credit rating. If Geners credit rating were to fall below the minimum threshold established in the swap agreements, the counterparties can demand immediate collateralization of the entire mark-to-market loss of the swaps (excluding credit valuation adjustments), which was $2 million at September 30, 2012. The mark-to-market value of the swaps was $18 million at December 31, 2011. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, Gener had not posted collateral to support these swaps.
DPL has certain over-the-counter commodity derivative contracts under master netting agreements that contain provisions that require its debt to maintain an investment-grade credit rating from credit rating agencies. If its debt were to fall below investment grade, the business would be in violation of these provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative contracts could request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization of the mark-to-market loss (excluding credit valuation adjustments), which was $22 million as of September 30, 2012. As of September 30, 2012, DPL had posted $13 million of cash collateral directly with third parties and in a broker margin account and held $1 million of cash collateral that it received from counterparties to its derivative instruments that were in an asset position. As of December 31, 2011, DPL had posted $16 million of cash collateral directly with third parties and in a broker margin account and held $3 million of cash collateral that it received from counterparties to its derivative instruments that were in an asset position.
6. LONG-TERM FINANCING RECEIVABLES
Long-term financing receivables represent receivables from certain Latin American governmental bodies that have contractual maturities of greater than one year. Management continually assesses the collectability of these receivables and believes they are recoverable. The decrease in the long-term financing receivables from December 31, 2011 is primarily related to the impact of foreign currency translation. The receivables are included in Noncurrent assets other on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The following table sets forth the breakdown of financing receivables by country as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
September 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Argentina |
$ | 208 | $ | 232 | ||||
Dominican Republic |
39 | 49 | ||||||
Brazil |
9 | 14 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total long-term financing receivables |
$ | 256 | $ | 295 | ||||
|
|
|
|
26
7. DEBT
Non-Recourse Debt
The following table summarizes the Companys subsidiary non-recourse debt in default or accelerated as of September 30, 2012 and is classified as current non-recourse debt unless otherwise indicated:
Primary Nature of Default |
September 30, 2012 | |||||||||
Subsidiary |
Default Amount | Net Assets (Liabilities) |
||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||
Maritza |
Covenant | $ | 850 | $ | 534 | |||||
Sonel |
Covenant | 285 | 359 | |||||||
Kavarna |
Covenant | 204 | 72 | |||||||
Saurashtra |
Covenant | 28 | 16 | |||||||
Kelanitissa |
Covenant | 10 | 56 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,377 | ||||||||
|
|
Except as noted in the table above, the defaults are not payment defaults, but are instead technical defaults triggered by failure to comply with other covenants and/or other conditions such as (but not limited to) failure to meet information covenants, complete construction or other milestones in an allocated time, meet certain minimum or maximum financial ratios, or other requirements contained in the non-recourse debt documents of the Company.
In addition, in the event that there is a default, bankruptcy or maturity acceleration at a subsidiary that meets the applicable definition of materiality under the corporate debt agreements of The AES Corporation, there could be a cross-default to the Companys recourse debt. At September 30, 2012 none of the defaults listed above results in a cross-default under the recourse debt of the Company.
8. CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS
Guarantees, Letters of Credit and Commitments
In connection with certain project financing, acquisition, power purchase and other agreements, AES has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments, most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events. In the normal course of business, AES has entered into various agreements, mainly guarantees and letters of credit, to provide financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of AES businesses. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness otherwise achieved by a business on a stand-alone basis, thereby facilitating the availability of sufficient credit to accomplish their intended business purposes. Most of the contingent obligations relate to future performance commitments which the Company or its businesses expect to fulfill within the normal course of business. The expiration dates of these guarantees vary from less than one year to more than 14 years.
27
The following table summarizes the Parent Companys contingent contractual obligations as of September 30, 2012. Amounts presented in the table below represent the Parent Companys current undiscounted exposure to guarantees and the range of maximum undiscounted potential exposure. The maximum exposure is not reduced by the amounts, if any, that could be recovered under the recourse or collateralization provisions in the guarantees. The amounts include obligations made by the Parent Company for the direct benefit of the lenders associated with the non-recourse debt of its businesses of $24 million.
Contingent Contractual Obligations |
Amount | Number of Agreements |
Maximum Exposure Range for Each Agreement | |||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||
Guarantees |
$ | 550 | 19 | <$1 - $222 | ||||||
Letters of credit under the senior secured credit facility |
5 | 9 | <$1 - $2 | |||||||
Cash collateralized letters of credit |
234 | 8 | <$1 - $209 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 789 | 36 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2012, the Company had $9 million of commitments to invest in subsidiaries under construction and to purchase related equipment that were not included in the letters of credit discussed above. The Company expects to fund these net investment commitments in 2012. The exact payment schedules will be dictated by the construction milestones.
Environmental
The Company periodically reviews its obligations as they relate to compliance with environmental laws, including site restoration and remediation. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had recorded liabilities of $24 million for projected environmental remediation costs. Due to the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment and remediation activities, future costs of compliance or remediation could be higher or lower than the amount currently accrued. Based on currently available information and analysis, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that costs associated with such liabilities, or as yet unknown liabilities, may exceed current reserves in amounts that could be material but cannot be estimated as of September 30, 2012.
Litigation
The Company is involved in certain claims, suits and legal proceedings in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for litigation and claims when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company has evaluated claims in accordance with the accounting guidance for contingencies that it deems both probable and reasonably estimable and accordingly, has recorded aggregate reserves for all claims of approximately $334 million and $363 million as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These reserves are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within accrued and other liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities. A significant portion of the reserves relate to employment, non-income tax and customer disputes in international jurisdictions, principally Brazil. Certain of the Companys subsidiaries, principally in Brazil, are defendants in a number of labor and employment lawsuits. The complaints generally seek unspecified monetary damages, injunctive relief, or other relief. The subsidiaries have denied any liability and intend to vigorously defend themselves in all of these proceedings. There can be no assurance that these reserves will be adequate to cover all existing and future claims or that we will have the liquidity to pay such claims as they arise.
The Company believes, based upon information it currently possesses and taking into account established reserves for liabilities and its insurance coverage, that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings and actions is unlikely to have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements. However, where no reserve has been recognized, it is reasonably possible that some matters could be decided unfavorably to the Company and could require the Company to pay damages or make expenditures in amounts that could be
28
material but could not be estimated as of September 30, 2012. The material contingencies where a loss is reasonably possible primarily include: claims under financing agreements; disputes with offtakers, suppliers and EPC contractors; alleged violation of monopoly laws and regulations; income tax and non-income tax assessments by tax authorities; and environmental and regulatory matters. In aggregate, the Company estimates that the range of potential losses, where estimable, related to these reasonably possible material contingences to be between $230 million and $1.5 billion. The amounts considered reasonably possible do not include amounts reserved, as discussed above. These material contingencies do not include income tax related contingencies which are considered part of our uncertain tax positions.
9. REGULATORY LIABILITIES
In July 2012, the Brazilian energy regulator (the Regulator) approved the periodic review and reset of a component of Eletropaulos regulated tariff which determines the margin to be earned by Eletropaulo. The review and reset of this tariff component is retroactive to July 2011 and will be applied to customers invoices from July 2012 to June 2015. From July 2011 through June 2012, Eletropaulo invoiced customers under the then existing tariff rate, as required by the Regulator. As the new tariff rate is lower than the pre-existing tariff rate, Eletropaulo is required to reduce customer tariffs for this difference over the next three years. Accordingly, from July 2011 through June 2012, Eletropaulo recognized a regulatory liability for such estimated future refunds, which was subsequently adjusted as of June 30, 2012 upon the finalization of the new tariff with the Regulator. As of September 30, 2012, Eletropaulo had recorded a regulatory liability of $536 million.
10. PENSION PLANS
Total pension cost for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 included the following components:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | Foreign | U.S. | Foreign | U.S. | Foreign | U.S. | Foreign | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 4 | $ | 4 | $ | 1 | $ | 5 | $ | 11 | $ | 14 | $ | 5 | $ | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
11 | 124 | 8 | 144 | 35 | 391 | 24 | 434 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(13 | ) | (107 | ) | (8 | ) | (130 | ) | (41 | ) | (340 | ) | (24 | ) | (391 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
1 | - | 1 | - | 4 | - | 3 | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
6 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 18 | 30 | 10 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on curtailment |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total pension cost |
$ | 9 | $ | 30 | $ | 5 | $ | 25 | $ | 27 | $ | 95 | $ | 18 | $ | 80 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employer contributions for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 for the Companys U.S. and foreign subsidiaries were $39 million and $122 million, respectively. The expected remaining scheduled employer contributions for 2012 are $10 million for U.S. subsidiaries and $47 million for foreign subsidiaries.
29
11. EQUITY
Changes in Equity
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending equity attributable to stockholders of The AES Corporation, noncontrolling interests and total equity as of September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
The AES Corporation Stockholders Equity |
Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Equity |
The AES Corporation Stockholders Equity |
Noncontrolling Interests |
Total Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | (in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 5,946 | $ | 3,783 | $ | 9,729 | $ | 6,473 | $ | 3,940 | $ | 10,413 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(1,087 | ) | 407 | (680 | ) | 267 | 818 | 1,085 | ||||||||||||||||
Total change in fair value of available-for-sale securities, net of income tax |
- | - | - | (3 | ) | - | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total foreign currency translation adjustment, net of income tax |
(158 | ) | (111 | ) | (269 | ) | (178 | ) | (150 | ) | (328 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total pension adjustments, net of income tax |
5 | 14 | 19 | 4 | 8 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total change in fair value of derivatives, net of income tax |
6 | (20 | ) | (14 | ) | (167 | ) | (26 | ) | (193 | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital contributions from noncontrolling interests |
- | 12 | 12 | - | 9 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
- | (625 | ) | (625 | ) | - | (990 | ) | (990 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Disposition of businesses |
- | (37 | ) | (37 | ) | - | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Acquisition of treasury stock |
(301 | ) | - | (301 | ) | (225 | ) | - | (225 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Issuance and exercise of stock-based compensation benefit plans, net of income tax |
40 | - | 40 | 43 | - | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interests |
3 | (11 | ) | (8 | ) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on common stock ($0.04 per share) |
(30 | ) | - | (30 | ) | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||
Sale of subsidiary shares to noncontrolling interest |
- | - | - | 19 | 16 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance at September 30 |
$ | 4,424 | $ | 3,412 | $ | 7,836 | $ | 6,233 | $ | 3,624 | $ | 9,857 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:
September 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net |
$ | 2,125 | $ | 1,967 | ||||
Unrealized derivative losses, net |
528 | 534 | ||||||
Unfunded pension obligation, net |
252 | 257 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
$ | 2,905 | $ | 2,758 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Dividend
On August 1, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.04 per outstanding share. As of September 30, 2012, the Company has recognized a liability of $30 million related to such dividends, which will be payable on November 15, 2012, to common shareholders of record as of October 30, 2012, with an ex-dividend date of October 26, 2012.
30
Stock Repurchase Program
On April 19, 2012, the Companys Board of Directors approved an increase to the stock repurchase program (the Program), which was announced on July 7, 2010, bringing the total amount authorized for purchases of AES common stock from $500 million to $680 million. Under the program, the Company may repurchase stock through a variety of methods, including open market repurchases and/or privately negotiated transactions. There can be no assurances as to the amount, timing or prices of repurchases, which may vary based on market conditions and other factors. The Program does not have an expiration date and it can be modified or terminated by the Companys Board at any time. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, shares of common stock repurchased under this plan totaled 6,046,021 at a total cost of $71 million plus a nominal amount of commissions (average of $11.71 per share including commissions). During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, shares of common stock repurchased under this plan totaled 24,790,384 at a total cost of $301 million plus a nominal amount of commissions (average of $12.16 per share including commissions), bringing the cumulative total purchases under the program to 58,715,189 shares at a total cost of $680 million, which includes a nominal amount of commissions (average of $11.58 per share including commissions). As of September 30, 2012, the Company has reached the authorized limit for stock repurchases under the existing program.
The shares of stock repurchased have been classified as treasury stock and accounted for using the cost method. A total of 66,437,231 and 42,386,961 shares were held as treasury stock at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company has not retired any shares held in treasury during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.
12. SEGMENTS
During the first quarter of 2012, the Company completed its operational management and reporting restructuring. The management reporting structure is organized along two lines of business Generation and Utilities, each led by a Chief Operating Officer. The segment reporting structure primarily uses the Companys management reporting structure as its foundation to reflect how the Company manages the business internally with further aggregation by geographic regions to provide better socio-political-economic understanding of our business. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company applied the segment reporting accounting guidance, which provides certain quantitative thresholds and aggregation criteria. The Company concluded that Tietê, our 2,663 MW hydro generation business in Brazil, met the quantitative thresholds to require separate presentation. As such, an additional reportable segment which consists solely of the results of Tietê is now reported as Generation Tietê. Tietê was formerly reported within the Latin America Generation segment. The previously disclosed Latin America Generation segment is now reported as Generation Latin America Other and, with the exception of Tietê, includes the results of all remaining businesses as previously reported. All prior period results have been retrospectively revised to reflect the new segment reporting structure. The Company has increased from six to the following seven reportable segments:
| Generation Latin America Other; |
| Generation Tietê; |
| Generation North America; |
|