Edgar Filing: Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-Accelerated Filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 29, 2012

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 001-35184

FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


BERMUDA		98-0522138
(Jurisdiction)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6501 William Cannon Drive West Austin, Texas		78735
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(512) 895-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of July 13, 2012 there were 248,129,391 shares of the registrant’s common shares outstanding.

Table of Contents


		Page
Part I	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements:

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011		3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (unaudited) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011		4

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 29, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011		5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Six Months Ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011		6

	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		29

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		45

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		46

Part II	Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		47

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		47

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		47

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		47

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		47

Item 5.	Other Information		47

Item 6.	Exhibits		47

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Financial Statements

Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(in millions, except per share amounts)	June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011			June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011

Net sales	$	1,029		$	1,223		$	1,979		$	2,417
Cost of sales		589			706			1,137			1,416

Gross margin		440			517			842			1,001
Selling, general and administrative		116			137			218			268
Research and development		188			207			369			409
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets		4			63			7			126
Reorganization of business and other		20			79			(32	)		170

Operating earnings		112			31			280			28
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net		—			(42	)		(28	)		(42	)
Other expense, net		(135	)		(151	)		(270	)		(299	)

Loss before income taxes		(23	)		(162	)		(18	)		(313	)
Income tax expense		11			6			25			3

Net loss	$	(34	)	$	(168	)	$	(43	)	$	(316	)


Net loss per share:
Basic	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.79	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(1.54	)
Diluted	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.79	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(1.54	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		248			213			247			205
Diluted		250			215			250			206

See accompanying notes.

Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(in millions)	June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011			June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011

Net loss	$	(34	)	$	(168	)	$	(43	)	$	(316	)

Other comprehensive (loss) earnings, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		3			(1	)		(1	)		(2	)
Unrealized (losses) gains on derivative instruments:
Unrealized (losses) gains arising during the period		(4	)		(1	)		1			(1	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for items included in net loss		—			—			1			—
Post-retirement adjustments:
Net (loss) gain arising during the period		(1	)		—			1			—

Other comprehensive (loss) earnings		(2	)		(2	)		2			(3	)

Comprehensive loss	$	(36	)	$	(170	)	$	(41	)	$	(319	)

See accompanying notes.

Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


(in millions, except per share amounts)	June 29, 2012 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2011

ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	881		$	772
Accounts receivable, net		444			459
Inventory, net		820			803
Other current assets		192			198

Total current assets		2,337			2,232

Property, plant and equipment, net		736			772
Intangible assets, net		82			84
Other assets, net		344			327

Total assets	$	3,499		$	3,415


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	6		$	2
Accounts payable		369			347
Accrued liabilities and other		588			451

Total current liabilities		963			800
Long-term debt		6,578			6,589
Other liabilities		456			506

Total liabilities		7,997			7,895

Shareholders’ deficit:
Preferred shares, par value $0.01 per share; 100 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011		—			—
Common shares, par value $0.01 per share; 900 shares authorized, 248 and 246 issued and outstanding at June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		2			2
Additional paid-in capital		8,176			8,153
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings		27			25
Accumulated deficit		(12,703	)		(12,660	)

Total shareholders’ deficit		(4,498	)		(4,480	)

Total liabilities and shareholders’ deficit	$	3,499		$	3,415

See accompanying notes.

Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended
(in millions)	June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(43	)	$	(316	)
Depreciation and amortization		138			388
Reorganization of business and other		(32	)		170
Share-based compensation		19			13
Deferred incomes taxes		4			(3	)
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net		28			42
Proceeds from business interruption insurance recoveries		61			—
Deferred intellectual property revenue		109			—
Other non-cash items		(12	)		(15	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		28			(17	)
Inventory, net		(2	)		(7	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(19	)		(199	)
Other operating assets and liabilities		(27	)		(30	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		252			26


Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(55	)		(58	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale		1			55
Sales and purchases of short-term and other investments, net		1			1
Payments for purchased licenses and other assets		(43	)		(29	)

Net cash used for investing activities		(96	)		(31	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Retirements of and payments for long-term debt and capital lease obligations		(528	)		(937	)
Debt issuance proceeds, net of debt issuance costs		481			724
Cash restricted for bond redemptions		—			(879	)
Proceeds from IPO of common stock and over-allotment exercise, net of offering costs		—			838
Proceeds from stock option exercises		6			—

Net cash used for financing activities		(41	)		(254	)


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(6	)		21

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		109			(238	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		772			1,043

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	881		$	805

See accompanying notes.

Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Dollars in millions, except as noted)

(1) Overview and Basis of Presentation

Overview: With a heritage of innovation and product leadership spanning over 50 years, Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. (“Freescale Ltd.”), based in Austin, Texas, is a global leader in embedded processing solutions. An embedded processing solution is the combination of embedded processors, complementary semiconductor devices and software. Our embedded processor products include microcontrollers, single-and multi-core microprocessors, applications processors and digital signal processors. They provide the core functionality of electronic systems, adding essential control and intelligence, enhancing performance and optimizing power usage while lowering system costs. We also offer complementary semiconductor products, including radio frequency, power management, analog, mixed-signal devices and sensors. A key element of our strategy is to combine our embedded processors, complementary semiconductor devices and software to offer highly integrated platform-level solutions that are increasingly sought by our customers to simplify their development efforts and shorten their time to market. Effective the first quarter of 2012, we realigned our business into two strategic product design groups: Automotive, Industrial and Multi-Market Solutions and Networking and Multimedia Solutions. We believe that this market-based structure positions us to provide more highly integrated solutions to our target markets and creates a more effective and collaborative configuration of company resources, improved efficiency and greater customer support. We sell our products directly to original equipment manufacturers, distributors, original design manufacturers and contract manufacturers through our global direct sales force. On April 25, 2012, Freescale’s shareholders approved the change of the Company’s name from “Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.” to “Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.” The Company’s name was changed because the words “Holdings I” are not meaningful to the business or marketing purposes of the Company and the elimination of these words from the name of the Company will decrease confusion among investors and the public. Freescale Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. (“Freescale Inc.”), are collectively referred to as the “Company,” “Freescale,” “we,” “us” or “our,” as the context requires.

Basis of Presentation: The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for Freescale Ltd. as of June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and for the three and six months ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011 are unaudited, with the December 31, 2011 amounts included herein derived from the audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and reclassifications) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of June 29, 2012 and for all periods presented. Certain amounts reported in previous periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 29, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In addition to the items described below, our significant accounting policies and critical estimates are disclosed in our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Refer to “Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Estimates” within “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for more information.

Revenue Recognition: We recognize revenue from product sales when title transfers, the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured, which is generally at the time of shipment. Sales with destination point terms, which are primarily related to European customers where these terms are customary and certain customers to whom Freescale ships product directly from Asia, are recognized upon delivery.

ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service was sold on a standalone basis. The ESP is determined by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to our pricing practices, gross margin objectives, internal costs and industry specific information. Changes in any number of these factors may have had a substantial impact on the selling price as assigned to each element. These inputs and assumptions represent management’s best estimates at the time of the transaction. Applicable receivables are discounted in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

(2) Other Financial Data

Statements of Operations Supplemental Information

Intellectual Property Revenue

We entered into multiple intellectual property revenue arrangements during the second quarter of 2012 that contained multiple deliverables. The arrangements include multi-year patent license agreements, ranging from six to eight years, one of which contains renegotiation rights from the second quarter of 2012 through the third quarter of 2013 and renewal options upon the expiration of such license agreement and patent sales and services. Certain of these arrangements may limit our ability to sell or license some of our intellectual property to other parties through the third quarter of 2013 and may reduce our intellectual property revenues that are not associated with these agreements. The total consideration to be received under these agreements is $287 million, of which $144 million was received in the quarter. The remaining cash will be received over the next seven years, with $115 million anticipated to be received within the next twelve months.

The total consideration was allocated to the separate units of accounting based on their relative selling price. Revenue or Other Income is recognized for the accounting units when the basic revenue recognition criteria are met, which is consistent with our policy for revenue recognition related to products and services.

We recognized $58 million in revenue for these agreements in the second quarter of 2012. Revenue for the patent license agreements will be recognized over the course of the renegotiation rights period, which is from the second quarter of 2012 through the third quarter of 2013, if applicable, and up front if renegotiation rights do not exist. Revenue for the patent sales and services will be recognized upon delivery of such items, and as such, there will be variability in the revenue recognized prospectively. Revenue for the remaining items will be recognized ratably over the course of the respective agreements. We also recognized $11 million of intellectual property revenue during the second quarter of 2012 related to patent license agreements previously entered into. At June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, included in accrued liabilities and other was $124 million and $10 million, respectively, of deferred revenue related to our intellectual property and other agreements.

Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Long-Term Debt, Net

In the first half of 2012, we recorded a charge of $28 million in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations associated with the close of the Q1 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction, which included both the extinguishment and modification of existing debt and the issuance of the 2012 Term Loan. This charge consisted of a portion of the call premiums, the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and other expenses not eligible for capitalization under ASC Subtopic 470-50, “Modifications and Extinguishments” (“ASC Subtopic 470-50”).

In the first half of 2011, we recorded a charge of $42 million in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations associated with the extinguishment of debt and the amendment to the Credit Facility, both of which were accomplished in connection with the completion of the 2011 initial public offering (“IPO”). This charge consisted of expenses associated with the IPO Debt Redemption and the amendment to the Credit Facility, which were not eligible for capitalization under ASC Subtopic 470-50, including call premiums of $32 million and the write-off of remaining unamortized debt issuance costs of $7 million related to the extinguished debt. (Refer to Note 4, “Debt,” for definitions and discussion of capitalized terms referenced in this section.)

Other Expense, Net

The following table displays the amounts comprising other expense, net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011			June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011
Interest expense	$	(128	)	$	(153	)	$	(263	)	$	(304	)
Interest income		3			3			5			5

Interest expense, net		(125	)		(150	)		(258	)		(299	)
Other, net		(10	)		(1	)		(12	)		—

Other expense, net	$	(135	)	$	(151	)	$	(270	)	$	(299	)

Cash paid for interest was $127 million and $265 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, and $203 million and $297 million for the second quarter and first half of 2011, respectively.

During the second quarter and first half of 2012, we recorded losses in other, net of $8 million and $11 million, respectively, primarily attributable to (i) the realized results and changes in the fair value associated with our interest rate swap agreements as well as (ii) the ineffectiveness of our gold swap contracts, as recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC Topic 815”). Additionally, we recorded losses of $2 million and $1 million in the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, related to foreign currency fluctuations.

During both the second quarter and first half of 2011, we recorded losses in other, net of $4 million attributable to the realized results and changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and gold swap contracts recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 815, as well as one of our investments accounted for under the equity method. These losses were partially offset by gains in other, net of $3 million and $4 million, during the second quarter and first half of 2011, respectively, related primarily to foreign currency fluctuations. (Refer to Note 3, “Fair Value Measurement” and Note 5, “Risk Management” for further discussion.)

Net Loss Per Share

We calculate net loss per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” using the treasury stock method. Basic net loss per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and unissued shares for vested restricted share units during the period. Diluted net loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common shares were exercised or converted into common shares or resulted in the issuance of common shares that then shared in the net loss of the Company. For both the second quarter and first half of 2012, approximately 13 million and for both the second quarter and first half of 2011, approximately 10 million of the Company’s stock options, restricted share units and a warrant were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because the inclusion of these awards would have been anti-dilutive. The anti-dilutive stock options were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average estimated fair value of the common shares or the number of shares assumed to be repurchased using the proceeds of unrecognized compensation expense, potential windfall tax benefits and exercise prices was greater than the weighted average number of shares underlying outstanding stock options. The anti-dilutive restricted share units were excluded because the number of shares assumed to be repurchased using the proceeds of unrecognized compensation expense and potential windfall tax benefits was greater than the weighted average number of outstanding unvested restricted share units. The warrant was excluded because the exercise price was greater than the average fair value of the common shares during the second quarter and first half of 2012 as well as the second quarter and first half of 2011. These awards could be dilutive in the future if the average estimated fair value of the common shares increases and is greater than the exercise price of these awards and the assumed repurchases of shares under the treasury stock method.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net loss per common share computations for the periods presented:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(in millions, except per share amount)	June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011			June 29, 2012			July 1, 2011
Basic net loss per share:
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(34	)	$	(168	)	$	(43	)	$	(316	)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding ⁽¹⁾		248			213			247			205

Basic net loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.79	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(1.54	)

Diluted net loss per share:
Numerator:
Net loss	$	(34	)	$	(168	)	$	(43	)	$	(316	)
Denominator:
Number of shares used in basic computation ⁽¹⁾		248			213			247			205
Add: Incremental shares for dilutive effect of warrants ⁽²⁾		—			—			—			—
Add: Incremental shares for dilutive effect of stock options⁽³⁾		2			2			3			1
Add: Incremental shares for dilutive effect of unvested restricted share units⁽⁴⁾		—			—			—			—

Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding		250			215			250			206

Diluted net loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.79	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(1.54	)

(1)	Weighted average common shares outstanding includes outstanding common shares of the Company, in addition to vested, but unissued, restricted share units.

(2)	A warrant to purchase an aggregate of 9.5 million common shares at $36.12 per share was outstanding during all periods presented, but was not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the warrant’s exercise price was greater than the average estimated fair value of the common shares.

(3)

Stock options to purchase an aggregate of 3.8 million common shares that were outstanding during both the second quarter and first half of 2012 and stock options to purchase an aggregate of 0.6 million common shares that were outstanding during both the second quarter and first half of 2011 are anti-dilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average estimated fair value of the common shares or the number of shares assumed to be repurchased using the proceeds of unrecognized compensation expense, potential windfall tax benefits and exercise prices was greater than the weighted average number of shares underlying outstanding stock options.

(4)

Unvested restricted share units of less than 1 million for all periods presented are anti-dilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the number of shares assumed to be repurchased using the proceeds of unrecognized compensation expense and potential windfall tax benefits was greater than the weighted average number of outstanding unvested restricted share units.

Balance Sheets Supplemental Information

Inventory, Net

Inventory, net consisted of the following:


	June 29, 2012		December 31, 2011
Work in process and raw materials	$	605	$	591
Finished goods		215		212

	$	820	$	803

As of June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our reserves for inventory deemed obsolete or in excess of forecasted demand, which are included in the amounts above, were $60 million and $73 million, respectively. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by our management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Depreciation and amortization expense was $44 million and $90 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, including capital lease amortization expense of $1 million and $2 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was $97 million and $211 million for the second quarter and first half of 2011, respectively, including capital lease amortization expense of $1 million and $3 million, respectively. Accumulated depreciation and amortization was $2,672 million and $2,686 million at June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings


	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Unrealized Gain on Postretirement Obligation		Foreign Currency Translation			Total
Balance at January 1, 2012	$	(5	)	$	5	$	25		$	25
Current period net change		1			1		(1	)		1
Reclassification to net loss		1			—		—			1

Balance at June 29, 2012	$	(3	)	$	6	$	24		$	27

(3) Fair Value Measurement

Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures,” establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are market inputs participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect our assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability. The guidance establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable; and,

Level 3 – inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions).

Assets and Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

We measure cash and cash equivalents and derivative contracts at fair value on a recurring basis. The tables below set forth, by level, the fair value of these financial assets and liabilities as of June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The table does not include assets and liabilities which are measured at historical cost or on any basis other than fair value. In the first half of 2012 and 2011, there were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. We had no Level 3 instruments at June 29, 2012 or December 31, 2011.


			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs
As of June 29, 2012:	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)
Assets
Money market mutual funds ⁽¹⁾	$	219	$	219	$	—
Time deposits ⁽¹⁾		248		248		—
Foreign currency derivative contracts ⁽²⁾		1		—		1

Total Assets	$	468	$	467	$	1

Liabilities
Foreign currency derivative contracts ⁽²⁾	$	3	$	—	$	3
Interest rate swap agreements ⁽³⁾		13		—		13
Commodity derivative contracts ⁽⁴⁾		1		—		1

Total Liabilities	$	17	$	—	$	17


			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs
As of December 31, 2011:	Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)
Assets
Money market mutual funds ⁽¹⁾	$	357	$	357	$	—
Time deposits ⁽¹⁾		246		246		—
Foreign currency derivative contracts ⁽²⁾		2		—		2

Total Assets	$	605	$	603	$	2

Liabilities
Foreign currency derivative contracts ⁽²⁾	$	3	$	—	$	3
Interest rate swap agreements ⁽³⁾		6		—		6
Commodity derivative contracts ⁽⁴⁾		4		—		4

Total Liabilities	$	13	$	—	$	13

The following footnotes indicate where the noted items are recorded in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

(1)	Money market funds and time deposits are reported as cash and cash equivalents.

(2)	Foreign currency derivative contracts are reported as other current assets or accrued liabilities and other.

(3)	Interest rate swap arrangements are reported as accrued liabilities and other or other liabilities at June 29, 2012 and as accrued liabilities and other at December 31, 2011.

(4)	Commodity derivative contracts are reported as accrued liabilities and other.

Valuation Methodologies

In determining the fair value of our interest rate swap derivatives, we use the present value of expected cash flows based on market observable interest rate yield curves commensurate with the term of each instrument. For foreign currency and commodity derivatives, our approach is to use forward contract valuation models employing market observable inputs, such as spot and forward rates for currencies and commodities. Since we only use observable inputs in our valuation of our derivative assets and liabilities, they are considered Level 2.

Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments

In addition to the assets and liabilities described above, our financial instruments also include accounts receivable, other investments, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt. Except for the fair value of our long-term debt, which was $6,653 million and $6,632 million at June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (as determined based upon quoted market prices), respectively, the fair values of these financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying or contract values at those dates.

Assets and Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Non-recurring Basis

We measure certain financial and non-financial assets and liabilities, including cost and equity method investments, at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These assets are adjusted to fair value when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. As of June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the carrying value of these assets was $1 million and $2 million, respectively.

(4) Debt

The carrying value of our long-term debt at June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following:


	June 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
Extended maturity term loan due 2016	$	2,215		$	2,215
2012 Term Loan due 2019		494			—
Replacement revolver due 2016		—			—
Senior secured 10.125% notes due 2018		663			663
Senior secured 9.25% notes due 2018		1,380			1,380
Senior unsecured floating rate notes due 2014		57			57
Senior unsecured 8.875% notes due 2014		298			298
Senior unsecured 10.75% notes due 2020		473			473
Senior unsecured 8.05% notes due 2020		739			739
Senior subordinated 10.125% notes due 2016		264			764

		6,583			6,589
Less: current maturities		(5	)		—

Total long-term debt	$	6,578		$	6,589

First Quarter 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction

2012 Term Loan was issued with an original issue discount and was recorded at its fair value of $495 million on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The net proceeds of this issuance, along with approximately $59 million of cash on hand, were used on March 29, 2012 to redeem $500 million of the senior subordinated 10.125% notes due 2016 (“Senior Subordinated Notes”), and pay related call premiums of $25 million, accrued interest of $15 million and amendment, consent and other fees totaling $14 million in the aggregate. (Refer to Note 2 “Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Long Term Debt, Net”, for further information on the debt transactions discussed in this note.)

The proceeds from the issuance of the 2012 Term Loan were used to extinguish a portion of the Senior Subordinated Notes, thus relieving Freescale Inc. and the Guarantors of their obligations associated with that portion of the liability (Refer to Note 10, “Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements” for the definition of Guarantors). This portion of the Q1 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction constitutes an extinguishment of debt under ASC Subtopic 470-50, and was accounted for accordingly. Certain lenders who participated in the partial repayment of the Senior Subordinated Notes were also lenders under the 2012 Term Loan. Effectively, this portion of the Senior Subordinated Notes was exchanged by these lenders for the new term loan. This part of the transaction was accounted for as a modification of debt which was not substantial under ASC Subtopic 470-50.

IPO and Over-Allotment Debt Redemptions

In the second quarter of 2011, Freescale Ltd. contributed the net proceeds from the IPO to Freescale Inc. to prepay and redeem $887 million of outstanding debt in a transaction referred to as the “IPO Debt Redemption.” On June 1, 2011, we prepaid the $532 million remaining outstanding balance under the original revolving credit facility and issued 30-day notices of redemption announcing our intent to redeem a portion of the senior unsecured 10.75% notes due 2020 (“10.75% Unsecured Notes”) and a portion of the senior unsecured 9.125%/9.875% PIK-election notes due 2014 (“PIK-Election Notes”). Upon the expiration of this 30-day period on July 1, 2011, we completed the IPO Debt Redemption by redeeming $262 million of the 10.75% Unsecured Notes and $93 million of the PIK-Election Notes, as well as paying related call premiums of $32 million and accrued interest of $13 million, with the initial IPO proceeds along with cash on hand. Because cash proceeds were used for the prepayment and redemption of debt in the IPO Debt Redemption, which relieved Freescale Inc. and the Guarantors of their obligations associated with the aforementioned portion of the liabilities outstanding under the Credit Facility, the 10.75% Unsecured Notes and the PIK-Election Notes, the transaction was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt in accordance with ASC Subtopic 470-50.

On June 9, 2011, the underwriters of our IPO partially exercised their over-allotment option to purchase an additional 5,567,000 common shares at $18.00 per share. The over-allotment transaction closed on June 14, 2011, at which time we issued a 30-day notice of redemption announcing our intent to redeem a portion of the senior secured 10.125% notes due 2018 (“10.125% Secured Notes”). Subsequently, upon the expiration of this 30-day period on July 14, 2011, we used the $96 million of net proceeds received in the over-allotment transaction, along with cash on hand, to redeem $87 million of the 10.125% Secured Notes and pay related call premiums of $9 million and accrued interest of $3 million, in a transaction referred to as the “Over-Allotment Debt Redemption.” Because cash proceeds were used for the redemption of debt in the Over-Allotment Debt Redemption, which relieved Freescale Inc. and the Guarantors of their obligations associated with the aforementioned portion of the liability outstanding under the 10.125% Secured Notes, the transaction was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt in accordance with ASC Subtopic 470-50 in the third quarter of 2011. As of July 1, 2011, the net proceeds received upon the closing of the over-allotment transaction, along with cash on hand, in the aggregate of $99 million, were classified as restricted cash on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Second Quarter 2011 Debt Issuance

On June 10, 2011, Freescale Inc. issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of 8.05% senior unsecured notes due February 1, 2020 (“8.05% Unsecured Notes”) with the intention to use the proceeds, along with existing cash, to redeem the remaining outstanding balance of the PIK-Election Notes and a portion of the senior unsecured 8.875% notes due 2014 (“8.875% Unsecured Notes”), and to pay related call premiums and accrued interest, in a transaction referred to as the “Q2 2011 Debt Issuance.” Also on June 10, 2011, we issued 30-day notices of redemption announcing our intent to redeem the aforementioned senior notes. The Q2 2011 Debt Issuance was completed in compliance with the credit agreement as well as the indentures governing our senior secured, senior unsecured, and senior subordinated notes. The 8.05% Unsecured Notes were recorded at fair value which was equal to the gross cash proceeds received from the issuance. Upon the expiration of the 30-day period on July 11, 2011, we used the net proceeds from the issuance of the 8.05% Unsecured Notes, along with existing cash, to redeem $162 million of PIK-Election Notes and $588 million of the 8.875% Unsecured Notes, and to pay related call premiums of $33 million and accrued interest of $5 million, in a transaction referred to as the “Q3 2011 Debt Refinancing Transaction.” Because cash proceeds from the Q2 2011 Debt Issuance were used for the redemption of debt, which relieved Freescale Inc. and the Guarantors of their obligations associated with the abovementioned portion of the liabilities outstanding under the 8.875% Unsecured Notes and the PIK-Election Notes, the transaction was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt in accordance with ASC Subtopic 470-50 in the third quarter of 2011. Furthermore, the $750 million aggregate principal amount of 8.05% Unsecured Notes was separately accounted for as an issuance of debt in the second quarter of 2011. As of July 1, 2011, the net proceeds of the Q2 2011 Debt Issuance, along with existing cash, in the aggregate of $788 million were classified as restricted cash on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

First Quarter 2011 Amendment to the Credit Facility

On March 4, 2011, and in connection with the IPO, Freescale Inc. entered into an amendment to the Credit Facility to, among other things, allow for the replacement of its existing revolving credit facility thereunder with a new revolving credit facility (the “Replacement Revolver”). We received commitments of $425 million for the Replacement Revolver, which became available, and the amendments became effective, on June 1, 2011, at which time Freescale Inc. had satisfied certain conditions. The Replacement Revolver’s available capacity is reduced by outstanding letters of credit.

Credit Facility

At June 29, 2012, Freescale Inc.’s Credit Facility included (i) the $2,215 million extended maturity term loan (“Extended Term Loan”), (ii) the aforementioned 2012 Term Loan and (iii) the Replacement Revolver, including letters of credit and swing line loan sub-facilities, with a committed capacity of $425 million. The interest rate on the 2012 Term Loan and the Extended Term Loan at June 29, 2012 was 6.00% and 4.49%, respectively. (The spread over LIBOR with respect to the 2012 Term Loan and the Extended Term Loan was 4.75% and 4.25%, respectively. As noted below, the 2012 Term Loan has a LIBOR floor of 1.25%.) At June 29, 2012, the Replacement Revolver’s available capacity was $408 million, as reduced by $17 million of outstanding letters of credit.

2012 Term Loan

At June 29, 2012, $499 million was outstanding under the 2012 Term Loan, which will mature on February 28, 2019. The 2012 Term Loan bears interest, at Freescale Inc.’s option, at a rate equal to a margin over either (i) a base rate equal to the higher of either (a) the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. or (b) the federal funds rate, plus one-half of 1%; or (ii) a LIBOR rate based on the cost of funds for deposit in the currency of borrowing for the relevant interest period, adjusted for certain additional costs. The Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement as of February 28, 2012 (“Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) provides that the spread over LIBOR with respect to the 2012 Term Loan is 4.75%, with a LIBOR floor of 1.25%. Under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, Freescale Inc. is required to repay a portion of the 2012 Term Loan in quarterly installments in aggregate annual amounts equal to 1% of the initial $500 million outstanding balance. There is an early maturity acceleration clause associated with the 2012 Term Loan such that principal amounts under the loan will become due and payable on December 15, 2017, if, at December 1, 2017, (i) Freescale, Inc.’s total leverage ratio is greater than 4:1 at the September 30, 2017 test period and (ii) the aggregate principal amount of the 10.125% Secured Notes or the senior secured 9.25% notes due 2018 (“9.25% Secured Notes”) exceeds $500 million, individually or collectively. Additionally, the 2012 Term Loan contains a provision whereby Freescale Inc. can call the loan at 101% of the principal amount within twelve months from the date of issuance. At June 29, 2012, the 2012 Term Loan was recorded on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at a $5 million discount, which is subject to accretion to par value over the term of the loan using the effective interest method.

The obligations under the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by the same parties and in the same manner as under the credit agreement that was in effect prior to the Q1 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction. In addition, the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains the same prepayment provisions as the previous credit agreement except as indicated above. (Refer to the guarantees discussion under “Credit Facility” in Note 4 to our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.)

Senior Notes

Freescale Inc. had an aggregate principal amount of $3,874 million in senior secured, senior unsecured and senior subordinated notes (collectively, the “Senior Notes”) outstanding at June 29, 2012, consisting of (i) $663 million of 10.125% Secured Notes, (ii) $1,380 million of 9.25% Secured Notes, (iii) $57 million of senior unsecured floating rate notes due 2014 (“Floating Rate Notes”), (iv) $298 million of 8.875% Unsecured Notes, (v) $473 million of 10.75% Unsecured Notes, (vi) $739 million of 8.05% Unsecured Notes and (vii) $264 million of Senior Subordinated Notes. The Floating Rate Notes bear interest at a rate, reset quarterly, equal to three-month LIBOR (0.47% in effect on June 29, 2012) plus 3.875% per annum.

Hedging Transactions

Freescale Inc. has entered into interest rate swap agreements and has previously used interest rate cap agreements with various counterparties as a hedge of the variable cash flows of our variable interest rate debt. (Refer to Note 3, “Fair Value Measurement” and Note 5, “Risk Management,” for further details of these interest rate swap and cap agreements.)

Covenant Compliance

Freescale Inc.’s Credit Facility and indentures governing the senior notes contain restrictive covenants that limit the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred shares, pay dividends and make other restricted payments, impose limitations on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions, create or incur certain liens, make certain investments, transfer or sell assets, engage in transactions with affiliates and merge or consolidate with other companies or transfer all or substantially all of our assets. Under the Credit Facility, Freescale Inc. must comply with conditions precedent that must be satisfied prior to any borrowing.

As of June 29, 2012, Freescale Inc. was in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facility and the indentures and met the total leverage ratio and the fixed charge coverage ratio, but did not meet the senior secured first lien leverage ratio of 3.50:1 or the consolidated secured debt ratio of 3.25:1. As of June 29, 2012, Freescale Inc.’s senior secured first lien leverage ratio was 3.82:1 and the consolidated secured debt ratio was 4.69:1. Accordingly, we are currently restricted from incurring liens on assets securing indebtedness, except as otherwise permitted by the indentures, and, among other things, from making restricted payments, except as otherwise permitted by our Credit Facility. The fact that we do not meet these ratios does not result in any default under the Credit Facility or the indentures.

Debt Service

We are required to make debt service principal payments under the terms of our debt agreements. As of June 29, 2012, the remaining debt payments for 2012 are $3 million. Future obligated debt payments are $5 million in 2013, $360 million in 2014, $5 million in 2015, $2,484 million in 2016, $5 million in 2017 and $3,725 million thereafter.

(5) Risk Management

Foreign Currency Risk

At June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had net outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts not designated as accounting hedges with notional amounts totaling approximately $218 million and $198 million, respectively, which are accounted for at fair value. These forward contracts have original maturities of less than three months. The fair value of the forward contracts was a net unrealized loss of $1 million at both June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Forward contract (losses) gains of $(8) million and $1 million for the second quarter of 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $(5) million and $5 million for the first half of 2012 and 2011, respectively, were recorded in other expense, net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to our realized and unrealized results associated with these foreign exchange contracts. Management believes that these financial instruments will not subject us to undue risk of foreign exchange movements because gains and losses on these contracts should offset losses and gains on the assets and liabilities being hedged. The following table shows, in millions of U.S. dollars, the notional amounts of the most significant net foreign exchange hedge positions for outstanding foreign exchange contracts not designated as accounting hedges:


Buy (Sell)	June 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
Euro	$	140		$	119
Japanese Yen	$	34		$	(13	)
Israeli Shekel	$	6		$	6
Swedish Kroner	$	6		$	5
Indian Rupee	$	(5	)	$	(2	)
Taiwan Dollar	$	(12	)	$	(12	)

Cash Flow Hedges

At June 29, 2012, we had Malaysian Ringgit and Israeli Shekel forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional amount of $74 million and $19 million, respectively, and both with fair values of a net unrealized loss of $1 million. At December 31, 2011, we had Malaysian Ringgit and Israeli Shekel forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional amount of $71 million and $30 million, respectively, and fair values of a net unrealized gain (loss) of $1 million and $(1) million, respectively. These forward contracts have original maturities of less than 15 months. Gains of $1 million for both the second quarter and first half of 2012 and less than $1 million for both the second quarter and first half of 2011, were recorded in cost of sales in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to our realized results associated with the Malaysian Ringgit cash flow hedges. Losses of less than $1 million for both the second quarter and first half of 2012 were recorded in research and development expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to our realized results associated with the Israeli Shekel cash flow hedges. Management believes that these financial instruments will not subject us to undue risk of foreign exchange movements because gains and losses on these contracts should offset losses and gains on the forecasted expenses being hedged.

Commodity Price Risk

We operate facilities that consume commodities, and we have established forecasted transaction risk management programs to mitigate fluctuations in fair value and the volatility of future cash flows caused by changes in commodity prices. These programs reduce, but do not always entirely eliminate, the impact of commodity price movements.

At June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had gold swap contracts to hedge our exposure to increases in the price of gold bullion. Our gold swap contracts were designated as cash flow hedges under ASC Topic 815. At June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, these contracts had net outstanding notional amounts totaling 22,500 ounces and 27,500 ounces, respectively, which were accounted for at fair value. All of these outstanding gold swap contracts had original maturities of 15 months or less. The fair value of these gold swap contracts was a net unrealized loss of $1 million and $4 million at June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. During the second quarter and first half of 2012, losses of $1 million and $2 million, respectively, were recorded in cost of sales related to our realized results attributable to these gold swap contracts. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2012 and 2011, losses of less than $1 million and $1 million, respectively, and during the first half of both 2012 and 2011, losses of $1 million were recorded in other expense, net in the accompanying condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to ineffectiveness on these gold swap contracts. Management believes that these financial instruments will not subject us to undue risk of fluctuations in the price of gold bullion because gains and losses on these swap contracts should offset losses and gains on the forecasted gold wire expense being hedged.

We have provided $3 million in collateral to three of our counterparties in connection with our foreign exchange and gold hedging programs as of June 29, 2012. This amount is classified as a component of other current assets on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. We do not offset the fair value of our derivative instruments against any rights to reclaim cash collateral.

Interest Rate Risk

We use interest rate swap agreements to assist in managing the floating rate portion of our debt portfolio. At June 29, 2012, we had effectively fixed our interest rate on $200 million of our variable interest rate debt through December 1, 2012 with interest rate swaps. We are required to pay the counterparties a stream of fixed interest payments at an average rate of 3.76%. In addition, during the first half of 2012, we entered into additional interest rate swap agreements in order to effectively fix our interest rate beginning on December 1, 2012. We are required to pay the counterparties a stream of fixed interest payments at an average rate of: (i) 0.99% on a notional amount of $100 million from December 1, 2012 through December 1, 2015, (ii) 1.46% on a notional amount of $200 million from December 1, 2012 through December 1, 2016 and (iii) 1.26% on a notional amount of $500 million from December 1, 2013 through December 1, 2016. In connection with our interest rate swap agreements, we receive variable interest payments based on 3-month LIBOR (0.47% in effect on June 29, 2012) from the counterparties. In the second quarter and first half of 2012, in accordance with ASC Topic 815, we recognized losses of $8 million and $10 million, respectively, and in both the second quarter and first half of 2011, we recognized losses of less than $1 million in other expense, net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations associated with the realized results and change in fair value of our interest rate swaps.

In addition to interest rate swap agreements, we historically have used interest rate cap agreements to manage our floating rate debt. At July 1, 2011, we had effectively capped our interest rate on $400 million of our variable interest rate debt through December 1, 2012 with interest rate caps. In both the second quarter and first half of 2011, in accordance with ASC Topic 815, we recognized losses of less than $1 million in other expense, net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations associated with the change in fair value of these interest rate caps. During the fourth quarter of 2011, we terminated these interest rate cap agreements.

Counterparty Risk

Outstanding financial derivative instruments expose us to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to the agreements. We also enter into master netting arrangements with counterparties when possible to mitigate credit risk in derivative transactions. A master netting arrangement may allow counterparties to net settle amounts owed to each other as a result of multiple, separate derivative transactions. The credit exposure related to these financial instruments is represented by the contracts with a positive fair value at the reporting date. On a periodic basis, we review the credit ratings of our counterparties and adjust our exposure as deemed appropriate. As of June 29, 2012, we believe that our exposure to counterparty risk is immaterial.

Refer to Note 3, “Fair Value Measurement,” for further information on our foreign currency and commodity derivatives and our interest rate swap and cap agreements.

(6) Share and Equity-based Compensation

2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan

In connection with the completion of the IPO, we adopted a new share-based compensation plan referred to as the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”), which authorizes awards for up to approximately 22 million of our common shares. As a publicly-traded company, we have transitioned from one time grants of share-based compensation awards to annual grants under the 2011 Plan. Accordingly, during the second quarter of 2012, we granted approximately 2.6 million stock options and 2.8 million Restricted Share Units (RSUs) to certain employees and executives of the Company as part of the annual grant. The strike price for the stock options was equal to the closing price on the date of grant, or $15.41. Total compensation cost associated with these awards of $48 million, net of estimated forfeitures, will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of four years to additional paid-in capital.

Non-qualified Options

As of June 29, 2012 we have granted approximately 3.5 million non-qualified stock options in Freescale Ltd. (“2011 Options”), with exercise prices ranging from $8.74 to $17.30 per share, to certain qualified participants pursuant to the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Options vest at a rate of 25% of the total grant on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant, and are subject to the terms and conditions of the 2011 Plan. As of June 29, 2012, we had approximately $19 million in unamortized expense, net of expected forfeitures, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of four years to additional paid-in capital.

The fair value of the 2011 Options was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing method. The assumptions used in the model are outlined in the following table:


	Six Months Ended
	June 29,
	2012
Weighted average grant date fair value per share	$	7.69
Weighted average assumptions used:
Expected volatility		60	%
Expected lives (in years)		4.75
Risk free interest rate		0.98	%
Expected dividend yield		0	%

In accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation”, the computation of the expected volatility assumptions used in the Black-Scholes calculations for grants was based on historical volatilities and implied volatilities of peer companies. The Company utilized the volatilities of peer companies due to its lack of extensive history as a public company and the fact that its current equity was not publicly traded prior to May 26, 2011. The peer companies operate in the semiconductor industry and are of similar size. When establishing its expected life assumptions, we use the “simplified” method prescribed in ASC Topic 718 for companies that do not have adequate historical data. The risk-free interest rate is measured as the prevailing yield for a U.S. Treasury security with a maturity similar to the expected life assumption.

A summary of changes in the 2011 Options outstanding during the six months ended June 29, 2012 is presented below:


						Wtd. Avg.
				Wtd. Avg.		Remaining		Aggregate
	Stock Options			exercise price		Contractual		Intrinsic Value
	(in thousands)			per share		Term (Years)		(in millions)
Balance at January 1, 2012		890		$	12.50		7	$	—
Granted		2,615		$	15.36
Terminated, cancelled or expired		(109	)	$	13.95
Exercised		—		$	—

Balance at June 29, 2012		3,396		$	14.65		7	$	—

Exercisable options at June 29, 2012		—		$	—		—	$	—

Restricted Share Units and Performance-based Restricted Share Units

RSUs have been granted to certain qualified participants under the 2011 Plan. These grants are rights to receive our common shares on a one-for-one basis and generally vest at a rate of 25% of the total grant on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant and are not entitled to dividends or voting rights, if any, until the underlying common shares are delivered. The fair value of the RSU awards is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the employee service period.

During the first half of 2012, we granted RSUs and performance-based restricted share units (PRSUs) to certain employees and executives of the Company under the 2011 Plan. The RSUs, to the extent earned, vest at a rate of either (i) 25% of the total grant on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant or (ii) one-third of the total grant on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant, depending on the award, and PRSUs, to the extent earned, vest at a rate of one-third of the total grant on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant; both are subject to the terms and conditions of the 2011 Plan. The number of PRSUs that could be earned pursuant to such award range from none to twice the number of target PRSUs established at the grant date based on certain performance factors set each year for adjusted net earnings per share and revenue targets which are, or will be, approved by the Compensation and Leadership Committee of the Board of Directors.

As of June 29, 2012 we had approximately $48 million in unamortized expense, net of forfeitures, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis to additional paid-in capital over a period of three years for PRSUs and three or four years, depending on the award, for RSUs. Under the terms of the RSU and PRSU award agreements, common shares underlying RSU and PRSU awards are issued to the participant upon vesting of the award.

A summary of changes in the RSUs and PRSUs outstanding under the 2011 Plan during the six months ended June 29, 2012 is presented below:


	RSUs and PRSUs
	(in thousands)
Non-vested RSU and PRSU balance at January 1, 2012		1,373
Granted		3,394
Vested		—
Issued		(7	)
Terminated, cancelled or expired		(185	)

Non-vested RSU and PRSU balance at June 29, 2012		4,575

On July 2, 2012, we granted approximately 1.2 million stock options, with an exercise price of $10.06 per share, and 387 thousand total RSUs and PRSUs to our new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) under the 2011 Plan. Under the terms of each award, the underlying options or shares will vest over a period of two to four years. The aggregate fair value of these awards of approximately $11 million will be amortized on a straight-line basis to additional paid-in-capital over periods ranging from two to four years according to each award’s vesting schedule.

2006 Management Incentive Plan and 2007 Employee Incentive Plan

Upon completion of the IPO, the shares reserved for issuance under the 2006 Management Incentive Plan (“2006 MIP”) and 2007 Employee Incentive Plan (“2007 EIP”), both as described below, that were not issued or subject to outstanding grants became available under the 2011 Plan, and no further awards will be made under the 2006 MIP or 2007 EIP. In the event that any outstanding award under the 2011 Plan, the 2006 MIP or the 2007 EIP is forfeited for any reason, terminates, expires or lapses, any shares subject to such award will be available for issuance under the 2011 Plan. (Refer to our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on the 2006 MIP and 2007 EIP.)

Non-qualified Options

During the six months ended June 29, 2012, approximately 871 thousand and 113 thousand stock options were exercised under the 2006 MIP and 2007 EIP, respectively. The weighted average strike prices for the stock options exercised in the six months ended June 29, 2012 for the 2006 MIP and 2007 EIP were $6.42 and $6.40, respectively. As of June 29, 2012, we had approximately $20 million in unamortized expense related to options issued under the 2006 MIP and 2007 EIP, net of expected forfeitures, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of four years to additional paid-in capital.

Restricted Share Units and Deferred Share Units

Under the terms of the 2006 MIP, RSUs were granted to certain members of management, key employees and directors. The grants are rights to receive our common shares on a one-for-one basis and vest 25% on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date and are not entitled to dividends or voting rights, if any, until the common shares are delivered. The fair value of the RSU awards is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the employee service period.

During 2009, we also granted performance-based deferred stock units (DSUs) to certain executives of Freescale Inc. under the 2006 MIP. The number of DSUs that could be earned pursuant to such awards range from zero to twice the number of target DSUs established at the grant date based upon the achievement of EBITDA and revenue growth levels measured against a group of peer companies over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2009. As of February 1, 2012, these performance-based DSUs were cancelled because the minimum performance conditions were not achieved.

A summary of changes in RSUs and DSUs outstanding under the 2006 MIP during the six months ended June 29, 2012 is presented below:


	RSUs and DSUs (in thousands)
Non-vested RSU and DSU balance at January 1, 2012		1,894
Granted		—
Vested		(60	)
Issued		(22	)
Terminated, cancelled or expired		(1,722	)

Non-vested RSU balance at June 29, 2012		90

Under the terms of the RSU award agreements, common shares are not issued to the participant upon vesting of the RSU. Shares are issued upon the earlier of: (i) the participant’s termination of employment, (ii) the participant’s death, (iii) the participant’s disability, (iv) a change of control, or (v) the fifth or seventh anniversary of the date of grant. Vested RSUs are considered outstanding until shares have been issued or the awards have been cancelled. As of June 29, 2012, we had approximately $1 million in unamortized expense related to RSUs issued under the 2006 MIP, net of expected forfeitures, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis to additional paid-in capital over a period of two to four years.

Employee Share Purchase Plan

We initiated an Employee Share Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) upon the completion of the IPO, for which we have approximately six million common shares reserved for future issuance. Under the ESPP, eligible participants are allowed to purchase common shares of Freescale through payroll deductions of up to 15% of their compensation on an after-tax basis. The price an employee pays per share is 85% of the fair market value of the common shares on the close of the last trading day of the purchase period. The ESPP has two six-month purchase periods, the first of which begins on January 1 and the second of which begins on July 1.

The offering period for the first ESPP began on January 1, 2012 and ended on June 29, 2012. On July 6, 2012, approximately 1.4 million common shares of Freescale were issued to participating employees under the ESPP.

(7) Income Taxes

Income taxes for the interim periods presented have been included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements on the basis of an estimated annual effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate is impacted by the mix of earnings and losses by taxing jurisdictions. Although the Company is a Bermuda entity with a statutory income tax rate of zero, the earnings of many of the Company’s subsidiaries are subject to taxation in the U.S. and other foreign jurisdictions. We record minimal tax expense on our U.S. earnings due to valuation allowances recorded on substantially all the Company’s U.S. net deferred tax assets, as we have incurred cumulative losses in the United States.

For the second quarter of 2012, we recorded an income tax provision of $11 million. This includes $2 million net tax expense related to discrete events primarily attributable to withholding tax on intellectual property royalties offset by tax benefits from the reversal of unrecognized tax benefits related to a foreign audit settlement. For the first half of 2012, we recorded an income tax provision of $25 million. This included a net income tax expense of $6 million primarily attributable to discrete events associated with withholding tax on intellectual property royalties.

For the second quarter of 2011, we recorded an income tax provision of $6 million. This includes a $3 million tax benefit related to discrete events primarily attributable to the release of domestic valuation allowances on capital losses carryforwards which the Company believes will likely be realized and the tax benefit from the reversal of unrecognized tax benefits related to foreign audit settlements. For the first half of 2011, we recorded an income provision of $3 million, including an $11 million tax benefit related to discrete events primarily attributable to the release of foreign and domestic valuation allowances related to certain deferred tax assets which the Company believes will likely be realized and the tax benefit from the reversal of unrecognized tax benefits due to foreign audit settlements.

The Company estimates that it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by approximately $17 million in the next twelve months primarily due to the lapsing of statutes. The projected decrease is anticipated to result in a tax benefit of approximately $7 million. The remaining decrease will not impact our effective tax rate, as the tax benefits will be offset by valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets. Certain of our income tax returns for the 2004 through 2010 tax years are currently under examination by various taxing authorities around the world. Although the resolution of open audits is highly uncertain, management considers it unlikely that the results of these examinations will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

(8) Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Product purchase commitments associated with our strategic manufacturing relationships with our wafer foundries and for assembly and test services include take or pay provisions based on volume commitments for work in progress and forecasted demand based on 18-month rolling forecasts, which are adjusted monthly. The commitment under these relationships is $87 million as of June 29, 2012.

Environmental Contingencies

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA, or Superfund), and equivalent state law, Motorola, Inc. (“Motorola”) has been designated as a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) by the United States Environmental Protection Agency with respect to certain waste sites with which the Company’s operations may have had direct or indirect involvement. Such designations are made regardless of the extent of Motorola’s involvement. Pursuant to the master separation and distribution agreement entered into in connection with our spin-off from Motorola in 2004, Freescale Inc. has indemnified Motorola for these liabilities going forward. These claims are in various stages of administrative or judicial proceedings. They include demands for recovery of past governmental costs and for future investigations or remedial actions. The remedial efforts include environmental cleanup costs and communication programs. In many cases, the dollar amounts of the claims have not been specified and have been asserted against a number of other entities for the same cost recovery or other relief as was asserted against Freescale Inc. We accrue costs associated with environmental matters when they become probable and reasonably estimable by recording the future estimated cash flows associated with such costs on a discounted basis, as the amount and timing of cash payments become fixed or readily determinable, for the estimated remediation periods, ranging from seven years to over 50 years.

Due to the uncertain nature, the actual costs that will be incurred could differ significantly from the amounts accrued. As of both June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the undiscounted future cash flows are estimated at $90 million. The expected payments for the remainder of 2012 through 2016 are $6 million, $5 million, $4 million, $3 million and $3 million, respectively, with remaining expected payments of $69 million thereafter. Accruals at both June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were $42 million; the majority of which are included in other liabilities on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts represent only our estimated share of costs incurred in environmental cleanup sites without considering recovery of costs from any other party or insurer, since in most cases PRPs other than us may exist and be held responsible. For more information, refer to “Environmental Matters” in Part I, “Item 3: Legal Proceedings” and Note 8, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to our audited consolidated financial statements in our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Litigation

We are a defendant in various lawsuits, including intellectual property suits noted in this section, and are subject to various claims which arise in the normal course of business. The Company records an associated liability when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable.

From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including tort, contractual and customer disputes, claims before the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and other employee grievances, and intellectual property litigation and infringement claims. Intellectual property litigation and infringement claims could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from selling our products. Under agreements with Motorola, Freescale Inc. must indemnify Motorola for certain liabilities related to our business incurred prior to our separation from Motorola.

On April 17, 2007, Tessera also filed a parallel lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against ATI, Freescale Inc., Motorola and Qualcomm claiming an unspecified amount of monetary damage as compensation for the alleged infringement of the same Tessera patents. The lawsuit was stayed during the pendency of the ITC matter, but is now active, and has been transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. We continue to assess the merits of the United States District Court litigation and have recorded no associated liability as of June 29, 2012.

The resolution of intellectual property litigation, including those matters described above, may require us to pay damages for past infringement or to obtain a license under the other party’s intellectual property rights that could require one-time license fees or ongoing royalties, require us to make material changes to our products and/or manufacturing processes, require us to cross-license certain of our patents and other intellectual property and/or prohibit us from manufacturing or selling one or more products in certain jurisdictions, which could adversely impact our operating results in future periods. If any of those events were to occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Other Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, we regularly execute contracts that contain customary indemnification provisions. Additionally, we execute other contracts considered outside the ordinary course of business which contain indemnification provisions. Examples of these types of agreements include business divestitures, business acquisitions, settlement agreements and third-party performance guarantees. In each of these circumstances, payment by us is conditioned on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract, which procedures typically allow us to challenge the other party’s claims. Further, our obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of duration, (i.e. typically not in excess of 24 months) and/or amount (i.e. not in excess of the contract value). In some instances we may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made by us.

Historically, we have not made significant payments for indemnification provisions contained in these agreements. During the first six months of 2012, we recorded a benefit of $4 million to reorganization of business and other for the expiration of indemnification obligations under a contract previously executed outside the ordinary course of business. At June 29, 2012, we have no remaining accruals related to known estimated indemnification obligations. We believe that if we were to incur additional losses with respect to any unknown matters at June 29, 2012, such losses would not have a material negative impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. (Refer to Note 9 “Reorganization of Business and Other”, for further information on the contract reversal discussed in this note.)

(9) Reorganization of Business and Other

Six Months Ended June 29, 2012

Chief Executive Leadership Transition

During the second quarter of 2012, $21 million was recorded in reorganization of business and other related to the change in the executive leadership of the Company. The majority of this amount was a charge related to indemnification and other provisions included in Gregg Lowe’s (our current president and CEO) employment agreement along with other costs associated with his hiring. We also recognized costs related to the successful transition of duties of our former Chairman of the Board and CEO.

Sendai, Japan Fabrication Facility and Design Center

On March 11, 2011, a 9.0-magnitude earthquake off the coast of Japan caused extensive infrastructure, equipment and inventory damage to our 150 millimeter fabrication facility and design center in Sendai, Japan. The design center was vacant and being marketed for sale at the time of the earthquake. The fabrication facility was previously scheduled to close in the fourth quarter of 2011. The extensive earthquake damage to the facility and the interruption of basic services, coupled with numerous major aftershocks and the resulting environment, prohibited us from returning the facility to an operational level required for wafer production in a reasonable time frame. As a result, the Sendai, Japan fabrication facility ceased operations at the time of the earthquake, and we were unable to bring the facility back up to operational condition due to the extensive damage to our facilities and equipment. During the first half of 2012, we recorded a $55 million benefit for business interruption insurance recoveries which was partially offset by $4 million of expenses primarily related to on-going closure costs. These amounts do not include (i) the $95 million benefit recorded in the second half of 2011 for property and inventory damage and related business interruption insurance recoveries or (ii) any additional potential future recoveries associated with our insurance coverage, as such recoveries cannot be estimated at this time. In the first half of 2012, the remaining $3 million of contract termination exit costs previously accrued in connection with the site closure were paid.

Reorganization of Business Program

We have executed a series of restructuring initiatives under the Reorganization of Business Program that streamlined our cost structure and re-directed some research and development investments into expected growth markets. The only remaining actions relating to the Reorganization of Business Program are the disposal or sale of the land and buildings located in Sendai, Japan and the closure of our Toulouse, France manufacturing facility. The closure of our Toulouse, France manufacturing facility will occur during the third quarter of 2012.

At each reporting date, we evaluate our accruals for exit costs and employee separation costs, which consist primarily of termination benefits (principally severance and relocation payments), to ensure that our accruals are still appropriate. In certain circumstances, accruals are no longer required because of efficiencies in carrying out our plans or because employees previously identified for separation resign unexpectedly and do not receive severance or are redeployed due to circumstances not foreseen when the original plans were initiated. We reverse accruals to earnings when it is determined they are no longer required.

The following table displays a roll-forward from January 1, 2012 to June 29, 2012 of the employee separation and exit cost accruals established related to the Reorganization of Business Program:


(in millions, except headcount)	Accruals at January 1, 2012		Charges		Adjustments & Currency Impact			Amounts Used			Accruals at June 29, 2012
Employee Separation Costs
Supply chain	$	106		—		(1	)		(11	)	$	94
Selling, general and administrative		8		—		(6	)		—			2
Research and development		14		—		(12	)		—			2

Total	$	128		—		(19	)		(11	)	$	98

Related headcount		720		—		—			(50	)		670

Exit and Other Costs	$	6		2		—			(2	)	$	6

The $11 million used reflects cash payments made to employees separated as part of the Reorganization of Business Program in the first half of 2012. We have adjusted our anticipated future severance payments by $19 million to incorporate currency impact in the above presentation. These adjustments reflect the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro partially offset by the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Japanese Yen since the charges were originally recorded in 2009. The accrual of $98 million at June 29, 2012 reflects the estimated liability to be paid to the remaining 670 employees through 2014 based on current exchange rates. Additionally, during the first half of 2012 we recorded $2 million in exit costs related to the termination of various supply agreements in connection with the closure of our Toulouse, France manufacturing facility. In addition, during the first half of 2012, we paid $2 million of exit costs related to underutilized office space which was previously vacated in connection with our Reorganization of Business Program and in accordance with ASC Topic 420 “Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations” (“ASC Topic 420”).

Other Contingencies

During the first six months of 2012, we recorded a benefit of $4 million related to the expiration of indemnification obligations under a contract previously executed outside the ordinary course of business.

Six Months Ended July 1, 2011

IPO-Related Costs

In the second quarter of 2011 and in connection with the IPO, we recorded $71 million of cash costs primarily attributable to the termination of various management agreements with affiliates and advisors of the Sponsors. (Refer to Note 10, “Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financing Statements” elsewhere in this report as well as Note 11, “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions,” to our consolidated financial statements in our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.)

Sendai, Japan Fabrication Facility and Design Center

The following table displays a roll-forward from January 1, 2011 to July 1, 2011 of the employee termination benefits and exit cost accruals established related to the closing of our fabrication facility in Sendai, Japan:


(in millions, except headcount)	Accruals at January 1, 2011		Charges		Adjustments			Amounts Used			Accruals at July 1, 2011
Employee Separation Costs
Supply chain	$	—		12		(3	)		(5	)	$	4
Selling, general and administrative		—		—		—			—			—
Research and development		—		—		—			—			—

Total	$	—		12		(3	)		(5	)	$	4

Related headcount		—		480		(100	)		—			380

Exit and Other Costs	$	—		7		—			(2	)	$	5

We recorded $12 million in employee termination benefits associated with the closure of the Sendai, Japan fabrication facility in the first half of 2011. The $5 million used reflects cash payments made to employees separated as part of this action in the first half of 2011. We reversed $3 million of employee termination benefits as a result of 100 employees previously identified as eligible for such benefits who were either temporarily redeployed due to circumstances not foreseen when the original plan was approved or have forfeited these benefits in connection with establishing other employment outside the Company. In addition, we also recorded $7 million of exit costs related to the termination of various supply contracts. In the first half of 2011, $2 million of these exit costs were paid.

Asset Impairment Charges and Other Costs

As a result of the significant structural and equipment damage to the Sendai, Japan fabrication facility and the Sendai, Japan design center, we recorded $49 million in non-cash asset impairment charges in the first half of 2011. We also had raw materials and work-in-process inventory that were destroyed or damaged either during the earthquake or afterwards due to power outages, continuing aftershocks and other earthquake-related events. As a result, we recorded a non-cash inventory charge of $15 million directly attributable to the impact of the earthquake in the first half of 2011. In addition to these non-cash asset impairment and inventory charges, we incurred $18 million of on-going closure costs due to inactivity subsequent to the March 11, 2011 earthquake.

Reorganization of Business Program

The following table displays a roll-forward from January 1, 2011 to July 1, 2011 of the employee separation and exit cost accruals established related to the Reorganization of Business Program:


(in millions, except headcount)	Accruals at January 1, 2011		Charges		Adjustments			Amounts Used			Accruals at July 1, 2011
Employee Separation Costs
Supply chain	$	157		—		—			(12	)	$	145
Selling, general and administrative		12		—		—			(3	)		9
Research and development		16		—		—			(1	)		15

Total	$	185		—		—			(16	)	$	169

Related headcount		1,420		—		—			(90	)		1,330

Exit and Other Costs	$	15		2		(2	)		(5	)	$	10

The $16 million used reflects cash payments made to employees separated as part of the Reorganization of Business Program in the first half of 2011. While previously recorded severance accruals for employees at our Sendai, Japan facility are reflected in the table above, refer to the prior section, “Sendai, Japan Fabrication Facility and Design Center,” for other charges associated with this facility in the first half of 2011 as a result of the earthquake in Japan. In addition, in connection with our Reorganization of Business Program, and in accordance with ASC Topic 420, we recorded $2 million of exit costs associated with the sale and leaseback of our facility in Tempe, Arizona that were not eligible for deferral, which were offset by a $2 million benefit related to the reversal of exit costs associated primarily with underutilized office space which was previously vacated.

(10) Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements

Pursuant to the terms of our acquisition by a consortium of private equity funds (“Sponsors”) in a transaction referred to as the “Merger” in December 2006, Freescale Inc. continues as a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Freescale Ltd. The reporting entity subsequent to the Merger is Freescale Ltd.

In connection with the Merger and subsequent debt refinancing transactions, we had $3,874 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes outstanding as of June 29, 2012, as disclosed in Note 4, “Debt”. The senior secured notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a secured, senior basis; the senior unsecured notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on an unsecured, senior basis; and, the senior subordinated notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on an unsecured, senior subordinated basis, in each case, subject to certain exceptions, by Freescale Ltd., its wholly owned subsidiaries created in connection with the Merger, and SigmaTel, LLC (together, the “Guarantors”). Each Guarantor fully and unconditionally guarantees, jointly and severally with the other Guarantors, as a primary obligor and not merely as a surety, the due and punctual payment and performance of the obligations. As of June 29, 2012, other than SigmaTel, LLC, none of Freescale Inc.’s domestic or foreign subsidiaries (“Non-Guarantors”) guarantee the Senior Notes or Credit Facility. In the future, other subsidiaries may be required to guarantee all or a portion of the Senior Notes, if and to the extent they guarantee the Credit Facility. (The relationship between the Company and the parent companies is defined and discussed in Note 1, “Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation,” to our consolidated financial statements in our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.)

The following tables present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Freescale Ltd., the Guarantors, Freescale Inc., the Non-Guarantors and eliminations as of June 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and for the three and six months ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011, to arrive at the information on a consolidated basis:


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For the Three Months Ended June 29, 2012
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	—		$	1,345		$	1,401		$	(1,717	)	$	1,029
Cost of sales		—			—			1,021			1,285			(1,717	)		589

Gross margin		—			—			324			116			—			440
Selling, general and administrative		1			—			164			48			(97	)		116
Research and development		—			—			120			68			—			188
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets		—			—			4			—			—			4
Reorganization of business and other		—			—			18			2			—			20

Operating (loss) earnings		(1	)		—			18			(2	)		97			112
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net		—			—			—			—			—			—
Other (expense) income, net		(33	)		(32	)		(41	)		101			(130	)		(135	)

(Loss) earnings before income taxes		(34	)		(32	)		(23	)		99			(33	)		(23	)
Income tax expense		—			—			9			2			—			11

Net (loss) earnings	$	(34	)	$	(32	)	$	(32	)	$	97		$	(33	)	$	(34	)


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Loss For the Three Months Ended June 29, 2012
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net loss (earnings)	$	(34	)	$	(32	)	$	(32	)	$	97		$	(33	)	$	(34	)

Other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—			—			—			3			—			3
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period		—			—			(4	)		—			—			(4	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for items included in net loss		—			—			—			—			—			—
Post-retirement adjustments:
Net gain (loss) arising during the period		—			—			—			(1	)		—			(1	)

Other comprehensive (loss) earnings		—			—			(4	)		2			—			(2	)

Comprehensive (loss) earnings	$	(34	)	$	(32	)	$	(36	)	$	99		$	(33	)	$	(36	)


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended June 29, 2012
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors		Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	—	$	2,653		$	2,735		$	(3,409	)	$	1,979
Cost of sales		—			—		2,013			2,533			(3,409	)		1,137

Gross margin		—			—		640			202			—			842
Selling, general and administrative		3			—		290			94			(169	)		218
Research and development		—			—		234			135			—			369
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets		—			—		7			—			—			7
Reorganization of business and other		—			—		(18	)		(14	)		—			(32	)

Operating (loss) earnings		(3	)		—		127			(13	)		169			280
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net		—			—		(28	)		—			—			(28	)
Other income (expense), net		88			89		(19	)		175			(603	)		(270	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		85			89		80			162			(434	)		(18	)
Income tax (benefit) expense		—			—		(9	)		34			—			25

Net earnings (loss)	$	85		$	89	$	89		$	128		$	(434	)	$	(43	)



Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Loss For the Six Months Ended June 29, 2012
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.		Guarantors		Freescale Inc.		Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net earnings (loss)	$	85	$	89	$	89	$	128		$	(434	)	$	(43	)

Other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—		—		—		(1	)		—			(1	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period		—		—		1		—			—			1
Less: reclassification adjustment for items included in net loss		—		—		1		—			—			1
Post-retirement adjustments:
Net gain (loss) arising during the period		—		—		—		1			—			1

Other comprehensive earnings		—		—		2		—			—			2

Comprehensive earnings (loss)	$	85	$	89	$	91	$	128		$	(434	)	$	(41	)


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For the Three Months Ended July 1, 2011
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	—		$	1,652		$	1,687		$	(2,116	)	$	1,223
Cost of sales		—			—			1,241			1,581			(2,116	)		706

Gross margin		—			—			411			106			—			517
Selling, general and administrative		2			—			147			85			(97	)		137
Research and development		—			—			129			78			—			207
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets		—			—			63			—			—			63
Reorganization of business and other		1			—			58			20			—			79

Operating (loss) earnings		(3	)		—			14			(77	)		97			31
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net		—			—			(42	)		—			—			(42	)
Other (expense) income, net		(78	)		(78	)		(61	)		99			(33	)		(151	)

(Loss) earnings before income taxes		(81	)		(78	)		(89	)		22			64			(162	)
Income tax (benefit) expense		—			—			(8	)		14			—			6

Net (loss) earnings	$	(81	)	$	(78	)	$	(81	)	$	8		$	64		$	(168	)



Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Loss For the Three Months Ended July 1, 2011
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
Net (loss) earnings	$	(81	)	$	(78	)	$	(81	)	$	8		$	64	$	(168	)

Other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—			—			—			(1	)		—		(1	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period		—			—			(1	)		—			—		(1	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for items included in net loss		—			—			—			—			—		—
Post-retirement adjustments:
Net gain (loss) arising during the period		—			—			—			—			—		—

Other comprehensive loss		—			—			(1	)		(1	)		—		(2	)

Comprehensive (loss) earnings	$	(81	)	$	(78	)	$	(82	)	$	7		$	64	$	(170	)


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For the Six Months Ended July 1, 2011
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	—		$	3,248		$	3,343		$	(4,174	)	$	2,417
Cost of sales		—			—			2,419			3,171			(4,174	)		1,416

Gross margin		—			—			829			172			—			1,001
Selling, general and administrative		3			—			303			138			(176	)		268
Research and development		—			—			259			150			—			409
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets		—			—			126			—			—			126
Reorganization of business and other		1			—			75			94			—			170

Operating (loss) earnings		(4	)		—			66			(210	)		176			28
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net		—			—			(42	)		—			—			(42	)
Other (expense) income, net		(225	)		(225	)		(253	)		176			228			(299	)

Loss before income taxes		(229	)		(225	)		(229	)		(34	)		404			(313	)
Income tax (benefit) expense		—			—			(1	)		4			—			3

Net loss	$	(229	)	$	(225	)	$	(228	)	$	(38	)	$	404		$	(316	)



Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Comprehensive Loss For the Six Months Ended July 1, 2011
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations		Consolidated
Net loss	$	(229	)	$	(225	)	$	(228	)	$	(38	)	$	404	$	(316	)

Other comprehensive earnings (loss), net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustments		—			—			—			(2	)		—		(2	)
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period		—			—			(1	)		—			—		(1	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for items included in net loss		—			—			—			—			—		—
Post-retirement adjustments:
Net gain (loss) arising during the period		—			—			—			—			—		—

Other comprehensive loss		—			—			(1	)		(2	)		—		(3	)

Comprehensive loss	$	(229	)	$	(225	)	$	(229	)	$	(40	)	$	404	$	(319	)


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet June 29, 2012
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors		Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7		$	—		$	298		$	576	$	—		$	881
Inter-company receivable		215			—			481			462		(1,158	)		—
Accounts receivable, net		—			—			133			311		—			444
Inventory, net		—			—			270			550		—			820
Other current assets		—			—			119			73		—			192

Total current assets		222			—			1,301			1,972		(1,158	)		2,337
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			—			352			384		—			736
Investment in affiliates		(4,676	)		(4,674	)		1,592			—		7,758			—
Intangible assets, net		—			—			81			1		—			82
Inter-company note receivable		—			111			2			156		(269	)		—
Other assets, net		—			—			196			148		—			344

Total Assets	$	(4,454	)	$	(4,563	)	$	3,524		$	2,661	$	6,331		$	3,499


Liabilities and Shareholders’ (Deficit) Equity

Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	—		$	—		$	6		$	—	$	—		$	6
Inter-company payable		—			—			741			417		(1,158	)		—
Accounts payable		—			—			196			173		—			369
Accrued liabilities and other		—			—			400			188		—			588

Total current liabilities		—			—			1,343			778		(1,158	)		963
Long-term debt		—			—			6,578			—		—			6,578
Inter-company note payable		43			113			—			113		(269	)		—
Other liabilities		1			—			277			178		—			456

Total liabilities		44			113			8,198			1,069		(1,427	)		7,997

Total shareholders’ (deficit) equity		(4,498	)		(4,676	)		(4,674	)		1,592		7,758			(4,498	)

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ (Deficit) Equity	$	(4,454	)	$	(4,563	)	$	3,524		$	2,661	$	6,331		$	3,499


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet December 31, 2011
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors		Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2		$	—		$	56		$	714	$	—		$	772
Inter-company receivable		200			—			430			505		(1,135	)		—
Accounts receivable, net		—			—			127			332		—			459
Inventory, net		—			—			290			513		—			803
Other current assets		—			—			124			74		—			198

Total current assets		202			—			1,027			2,138		(1,135	)		2,232
Property, plant and equipment, net		—			—			378			394		—			772
Investment in affiliates		(4,645	)		(4,643	)		1,607			—		7,681			—
Intangible assets, net		—			—			83			1		—			84
Inter-company note receivable		—			110			12			148		(270	)		—
Other assets, net		—			—			171			156		—			327

Total Assets	$	(4,443	)	$	(4,533	)	$	3,278		$	2,837	$	6,276		$	3,415


Liabilities and Shareholders’ (Deficit) Equity

Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	—		$	—		$	1		$	1	$	—		$	2
Inter-company payable		—			—			569			566		(1,135	)		—
Accounts payable		—			—			187			160		—			347
Accrued liabilities and other		—			—			284			167		—			451

Total current liabilities		—			—			1,041			894		(1,135	)		800
Long-term debt		—			—			6,589			—		—			6,589
Inter-company note payable		37			111			—			122		(270	)		—
Other liabilities		—			1			291			214		—			506

Total liabilities		37			112			7,921			1,230		(1,405	)		7,895

Total shareholders’ (deficit) equity		(4,480	)		(4,645	)		(4,643	)		1,607		7,681			(4,480	)

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ (Deficit) Equity	$	(4,443	)	$	(4,533	)	$	3,278		$	2,837	$	6,276		$	3,415


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows For the Six Months Ended June 29, 2012
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated

Cash flow (used for) provided by operating activities	$	(7	)	$	(1	)	$	318		$	70		$	(128	)	$	252

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases for property, plant and equipment		—			—			(21	)		(34	)		—			(55	)
Sales and purchases of short-term and other investments, net		—			—			1			—			—			1
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale		—			—			—			1			—			1
Payments for purchased licenses and other assets		—			—			(20	)		(23	)		—			(43	)
Inter-company loan receivable, dividends and capital contributions		—			(1	)		10			(8	)		(1	)		—

Cash flow used for investing activities		—			(1	)		(30	)		(64	)		(1	)		(96	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Retirements of and payments for long-term debt and capital lease obligations		—			—			(527	)		(1	)		—			(528	)
Debt issuance proceeds, net of debt issuance costs		—			—			481			—			—			481
Proceeds from stock option exercises		6			—			—			—			—			6
Inter-company loan payable, dividends and capital contributions		6			2			—			(137	)		129			—

Cash flow provided by (used for) financing activities		12			2			(46	)		(138	)		129			(41	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			—			(6	)		—			(6	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5			—			242			(138	)		—			109
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		2			—			56			714			—			772

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	7		$	—		$	298		$	576		$	—		$	881


Supplemental Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows For the Six Months Ended July 1, 2011
(in millions)	Freescale Ltd.			Guarantors			Freescale Inc.			Non-Guarantors			Eliminations			Consolidated
Cash flow (used for) provided by operating activities	$	(1	)	$	1		$	30		$	(3	)	$	(1	)	$	26

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases for property, plant and equipment		—			—			(35	)		(23	)		—			(58	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale		—			—			55			—			—			55
Sales and purchases of short-term and other investments, net		—			—			1			—			—			1
Payments for purchased licenses and other assets		—			—			(17	)		(12	)		—			(29	)
Contribution of net proceeds from IPO of common shares and over-allotment exercise		(838	)		(838	)		—			—			1,676			—
Inter-company loan receivable, dividends and capital contributions		—			2			81			(3	)		(80	)		—

Cash flow (used for) provided by investing activities		(838	)		(836	)		85			(38	)		1,596			(31	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Retirements of and payments for long-term debt and capital lease obligations		—			—			(936	)		(1	)		—			(937	)
Debt issuance proceeds, net of debt issuance costs		—			—			724			—			—			724
Cash restricted for bond redemptions		—			—			(879	)		—			—			(879	)
Proceeds from IPO of common shares and over-allotment exercise, net of offering costs		838			—			—			—			—			838
Receipt of contribution of net proceeds from IPO of common shares and over-allotment exercise		—			838			838			—			(1,676	)
Inter-company loan payable, dividends and capital contributions		1			(3	)		—			(79	)		81			—

Cash flow provided by (used for) financing activities		839			835			(253	)		(80	)		(1,595	)		(254	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		—			—			—			21			—			21

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		—			—			(138	)		(100	)		—			(238	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		—			—			302			741			—			1,043

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	—		$	—		$	164		$	641		$	—		$	805

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following is a discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition as of and for the three and six months ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011. The following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the notes in “Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described in the “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward looking statements. Freescale Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. (“Freescale Inc.”), are collectively referred to as the “Company,” “Freescale,” “we,” “us” or “our,” as the context requires.

Our Business. We are a global leader in embedded processing solutions. An embedded processing solution is the combination of embedded processors, complementary semiconductor devices and software. Our embedded processor products include microcontrollers (MCUs), single-and multi-core microprocessors, applications processors and digital signal processors (DSPs). They provide the core functionality of electronic systems, adding essential control and intelligence, enhancing performance and optimizing power usage while lowering system costs. We also offer complementary semiconductor products, including radio frequency (RF), power management, analog, mixed-signal devices and sensors. A key element of our strategy is to combine our embedded processors, complementary semiconductor devices and software to offer highly integrated platform-level solutions that are increasingly sought by our customers to simplify their development efforts and shorten their time to market. We have a heritage of innovation and product leadership spanning over 50 years and have an extensive intellectual property portfolio which allow us to serve our customers through our direct sales force and distribution partners. Our close customer relationships have been built upon years of collaborative product development.

Effective the first quarter of 2012, we have realigned our business into two strategic product design groups: Automotive, Industrial and Multi-Market Solutions (AISG) and Networking and Multimedia Solutions (NMSG). We believe that this market-based structure positions us to provide more highly integrated solutions to our target markets and creates a more effective and collaborative configuration of company resources, improved efficiency and greater customer support. We sell our products directly to original equipment manufacturers, distributors, original design manufacturers and contract manufacturers through our global direct sales force.

The trend of increasing connectivity and the need for enhanced intelligence in existing and new markets are the primary drivers of the growth of embedded processing solutions in electronic devices. The majority of our net sales are derived from our two primary product groupings. Our AISG product line represents the largest component of our total net sales. MCUs, analog devices, sensors and associated application development systems represented approximately 55% of our total net sales in both the second quarter and first half of 2012. Demand for our MCU products is driven by the automotive, consumer and industrial markets. The automotive end market accounted for 74% of AISG’s net sales in both the second quarter and first half of 2012. Our NMSG product line, which includes communications processors, DSPs, networked multimedia devices, application processors and RF devices, represented 33% of our total net sales in the both second quarter and first half of 2012. Our primary end markets for our network and multimedia products are communications infrastructure for enterprise and service provider markets, processors for industrial applications, and application processors for the mobile consumer and driver information system markets. Demand for these products is driven by the automotive, consumer, industrial, wireless infrastructure and computer peripherals markets.

Conditions Impacting Our Business. Our business is significantly impacted by demand for electronic content in automobiles, networking and wireless infrastructure equipment, industrial automation and consumer electronic devices. We operate in an industry that is cyclical and subject to constant and rapid technological change, product obsolescence, price erosion, evolving standards, short product life-cycles, customer inventory levels and fluctuations in product supply and demand. The pace of the global economic recovery in the markets we serve is continuing to negatively impact our overall sales and profitability on a year over year basis. Our revenues declined 18% and our gross margin (excluding the impact of depreciation expense associated with purchase price accounting adjustments) decreased 260 basis points in the first half of 2012 as compared to the first half of 2011. The decline in revenue was experienced in all the geographic regions in which we operate with the exception of Japan.

During the second quarter of 2012, our operating results improved as compared to the first quarter of 2012. Our revenues increased 8% and our gross margin increased 50 basis points in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to the first quarter of 2012. The increase in revenue was experienced in all of our product groups, with the exception of cellular. Distribution sales in the second quarter of 2012 were flat compared to the first quarter of 2012. We expect weaker macroeconomic conditions to limit growth in our products serving the automotive, industrial, and networking markets in the third quarter of 2012. In addition, our cellular revenues will decline due to continued reduction in customer demand for our legacy products and intellectual property revenues will decline. Intellectual property agreements entered into during the second quarter of 2012 may limit our ability to sell or license some of our intellectual property to other parties through the third quarter of 2013 and may reduce our

intellectual property revenues that are not associated with these agreements. As a result, we expect our revenues, gross margins and operating earnings to decline and our net losses to increase in the third quarter of 2012. Refer to Note 2, “Other Financial Data—Intellectual Property Revenue” for additional information regarding our intellectual property revenue.

Our business results during the remainder of 2012 will depend on the extent and pace of a general global economic recovery, our ability to meet unscheduled or temporary increases in demand and our ability to meet product development launch cycles in our target markets, among other factors. For more information on trends and other factors affecting our business, refer to Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Debt Restructuring Activities. During the first half of 2012, Freescale Inc. completed the Q1 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction which amended the Credit Facility to allow for the issuance of a new senior secured term loan facility, the 2012 Term Loan, in the aggregate principle amount of $500 million, the proceeds of which, along with cash on hand, were used to redeem a portion of the Senior Subordinated Notes, and to pay related call premiums, fees and accrued interest. The effect of this transaction extends the maturity of $500 million of debt from 2016 to 2019 and is expected to result in annualized interest savings of $20 million, which we began to realize during the second quarter of 2012, through the lower interest rate on the 2012 Term Loan compared to that on the Senior Subordinated Notes. (Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing Activities” below for the definition and additional discussion of capitalized terms and transactions referenced in this section.)

Reorganization of Business Program and Sendai, Japan Closure. We have executed a series of restructuring actions that are referred to as the “Reorganization of Business Program” which streamlined our cost structure and redirected some research and development investments into expected growth markets. We announced in the second quarter of 2009 our plans to exit our remaining 150 millimeter manufacturing facilities in Toulouse, France and Sendai, Japan, as the industry has experienced a migration from 150 millimeter technologies and products to more advanced technologies and products. The Sendai, Japan facility ceased operations in the first quarter of 2011 due to extensive damage following the March 11, 2011 earthquake off the coast of Japan, and we have finalized the closure of the site with the exception of the disposal of the land and building located at the site. As of June 29, 2012, the only remaining action to be completed is the closure of our 150 millimeter facility in Toulouse, France as described below.

Our facilities, equipment and inventory in Sendai, Japan experienced significant damage resulting from the earthquake, aftershocks and other difficulties associated with the resulting environment. In the first half of 2012, we recorded a benefit of $55 million attributable to earthquake-related business interruption insurance recoveries which were partially offset by $4 million of expenses primarily related to the on-going costs associated with the closure of our Sendai, Japan facilities. We have completed the majority of the payments associated with these closure activities as of June 29, 2012. We continue to work with our insurers to finalize our claims and expect additional insurance proceeds, but we cannot estimate the total amount or timing of recoveries at this time. As we finalize the closure and disposition of the Sendai, Japan facilities, we may incur additional charges associated with preparing our sites for sale.

With regard to our Toulouse, France facility, the closure will occur during the third quarter of 2012. We estimate the remaining severance and other costs of this facility closure to be approximately $130 million, including $100 million in cash severance costs and $30 million in cash costs for other site decommissioning and exit expenses. We anticipate substantially all remaining payments will be made through 2014; however, the timing of these payments depends on many factors, including the actual closing date and local employment laws, and actual amounts paid may vary based on currency fluctuation.

The Company has previously estimated that it expected to receive approximately $120 million in annualized savings once the closure process has been completed and production moved to our remaining 200 millimeter facilities. As of the end of the first half of 2012, we have realized approximately $50 million of annualized cost savings related to the closure of the Sendai, Japan facility. We expect to begin realizing a portion of the $70 million in estimated annualized cost savings associated with the closure of the Toulouse facility beginning in the first quarter of 2013. Actual cost savings realized, and the timing thereof, will depend on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and could differ materially from our estimates.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011


	Three Months Ended
(in millions)	June 29, 2012			% of Net Sales			July 1, 2011			% of Net Sales
Orders (unaudited)	$	1,009			98.1	%	$	1,221			99.8	%

Net sales	$	1,029			100.0	%	$	1,223			100.0	%
Cost of sales		589			57.2	%		706			57.7	%

Gross margin		440			42.8	%		517			42.3	%
Selling, general and administrative		116			11.3	%		137			11.2	%
Research and development		188			18.3	%		207			16.9	%
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets		4			0.4	%		63			5.2	%
Reorganization of business and other		20			1.9	%		79			6.5	%

Operating earnings		112			10.9	%		31			2.5	%
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net		—			*			(42	)		*
Other expense, net		(135	)		*			(151	)		*

Loss before income taxes		(23	)		*			(162	)		*
Income tax expense		11			1.1	%		6			0.5	%

Net loss	$	(34	)		*		$	(168	)		*

*	Not meaningful.

Three Months Ended June 29, 2012 Compared to Three Months Ended July 1, 2011

Net Sales

Our net sales in the second quarter of 2012 decreased by $194 million, or 16%, compared to the prior year quarter, and orders decreased 17% over the same period, reflecting weaker demand in our core automotive, networking and consumer markets and declines in industrial products purchased through our distribution channel, as compared to the prior year. Distribution sales were approximately 23% of net sales and represented a decrease of 20% compared to the prior year quarter. Distribution inventory, in dollars, was 9.6 weeks at June 29, 2012, compared to 10.7 weeks at March 30, 2012 and 10.2 weeks at July 1, 2011. Net sales by product design group for the three months ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
(in millions)	June 29, 2012		July 1, 2011
Automotive, Industrial and Multi-Market	$	568	$	634
Networking and Multimedia		335		423
Cellular Products		50		122
Other		76		44

Total net sales	$	1,029	$	1,223

AISG

AISG’s net sales decreased by $66 million, or 10%, in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year quarter. AISG’s net sales decreased by 5% in the automotive marketplace in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 primarily as a result of continued lower demand in the European automotive market. Our net sales associated with products purchased through our distribution channel, primarily by the industrial market, declined in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the second quarter of 2011 due to weaker demand and elevated inventory levels that began in the second half of 2011 continuing to negatively impact our sales.

NMSG

NMSG’s net sales decreased by $88 million, or 21%, in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year quarter. We experienced decreases in revenues across the product portfolio of networking, RF and multimedia. This contraction was driven primarily by an overall decline in our core networking business due to lower capital investment in wireless infrastructure markets.

Cellular Products

Cellular product net sales decreased by $72 million, or 59%, in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year quarter due to lower demand for our baseband processors and power management integrated circuits from our legacy customers. We expect revenues from this business to continue to decline over the coming quarters consistent with our decision to discontinue investing in new products and platforms.

Other

Other net sales increased by $32 million, or 73% in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year quarter, attributable to increased patent license and sales revenue earned during the quarter. As a percentage of net sales, intellectual property revenue was 7% and 3% for the second quarter of 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Gross Margin

In the second quarter of 2012, our gross margin decreased by $77 million, or 15%, compared to the prior year quarter. This decline was the result of lower net product sales, decreases in average selling price resulting from our annual negotiations with our customers put into effect in the first quarter of 2012 along with changes in product sales mix. As a percentage of net sales, gross margin in the second quarter was 42.8%, reflecting an increase of 0.5 percentage points compared to the second quarter of 2011. This improvement in gross margin as a percentage in net sales was the result of a $52 million decrease in depreciation expense from the second quarter of 2011 to the second quarter of 2012, the realization of savings from the closure of our Sendai, Japan manufacturing facility and higher intellectual property revenue in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to the prior year quarter. Gross margin also benefited from procurement and productivity cost savings, improved yields and lower incentive compensation. Our gross margin included PPA impact of $42 million in the second quarter of 2011. (The term “PPA” refers to the effect of acquisition accounting. Certain PPA impacts were recorded in our cost of sales and affect our gross margin and earnings from operations, and other PPA impacts are recorded in our operating expenses and only affect our earnings from operations. The majority of the prior year quarter PPA depreciation impact was driven by tools and equipment which had PPA depreciable lives that ended during 2011.)

Selling, General and Administrative

Our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $21 million, or 15%, in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year quarter. This decrease was primarily the result of lower incentive compensation, the elimination of management fees in connection with the second quarter of 2011 IPO, decreased spending on select sales and marketing programs and discretionary cost reductions. As a percentage of our net sales, our selling, general and administrative expenses were 11.3% in the second quarter of 2012, reflecting a slight decrease over the prior year quarter.

Research and Development

Our research and development expense decreased by $19 million, or 9%, in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year quarter. This decrease was primarily the result of lower incentive compensation and the elimination of our cellular handset spend along with a favorable impact of the dollar appreciating against the currencies in which we incur much of our research and development expenditures. These cost reductions were partially offset by increased expenses related to focused investment in our core businesses. As a percentage of our net sales, our research and development expenses were 18.3% in the second quarter of 2012, reflecting an increase of 1.4 percentage points compared to the second quarter of 2011.

Amortization Expense for Acquired Intangible Assets

Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets related to developed technology and tradenames/trademarks decreased by $59 million, or 94%, in the second quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year quarter. This decrease was associated with a significant portion of our developed technology and purchased licenses initially established in connection with the Merger being fully amortized during 2011. (Refer to Note 10, “Supplemental Guarantor Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements”, for the definition and discussion of the term Merger.)

Reorganization of Business and Other

In the second quarter of 2012, we recorded a charge of $21 million in connection with the change in the executive leadership of the Company. Additionally, we recorded $2 million in exit costs related to the termination of various supply agreements in connection

with the closure of our Toulouse, France manufacturing facility along with $1 million of on-going closure costs due to inactivity at our Sendai, Japan fabrication facility. These charges were partially offset by a benefit of $4 million related to the expiration of indemnification obligations under a contract previously executed outside the ordinary course of business.

In the second quarter of 2011 and in connection with the completion of our IPO, we recorded $71 million of cash costs attributable primarily to the termination of various management agreements with affiliates and advisors of the Sponsors. In addition, in relation to the closing of the Sendai, Japan fabrication facility in the first quarter of 2011 as a result of extensive damage from the March 11, 2011 earthquake off the coast of Japan, we incurred $8 million of on-going closure costs due to inactivity subsequent to the earthquake.

Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Long-Term Debt, Net

In the second quarter of 2011, we recorded a charge of $42 million associated with the extinguishment of debt and the amendment to the Credit Facility, both of which were accomplished in connection with the completion of the IPO. This charge consisted of expenses associated with the IPO Debt Redemption and the amendment to the Credit Facility; including call premiums, the write-off of remaining unamortized debt issuance costs and other costs not eligible for capitalization. (Capitalized terms referenced in this section are defined and discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing Activities.”)

Other Expense, Net

Net interest expense in the second quarter of 2012 included interest expense of $128 million, partially offset by interest income of $3 million. Net interest expense in the second quarter of 2011 included interest expense of $153 million, partially offset by interest income of $3 million. The decrease in interest expense is primarily due to the utilization of IPO and related over-allotment proceeds along with cash on hand to extinguish $974 million of our long term debt in the second and third quarters of 2011, along with refinancing transactions in the third quarter of 2011 and first quarter of 2012 in which we effectively decreased our interest rate on outstanding debt. During the second quarter of 2012, we recorded losses in other, net of $10 million attributable to (i) the realized results and changes in the fair value associated with our interest rate swap agreements and (ii) foreign currency fluctuations. During the second quarter of 2011, we recorded losses in other, net of $4 million attributable to the realized results and changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and gold swap contracts as well as to one of our investments accounted for under the equity method. These losses were partially offset by gains in other, net of $3 million related primarily to foreign currency fluctuations.

Income Tax Expense

For the second quarter of 2012, we recorded an income tax provision of $11 million. This includes a $2 million tax expense related to discrete events primarily attributable to withholding tax on intellectual property royalties offset by tax benefits from the reversal of unrecognized tax benefits related to a foreign audit settlement. For the second quarter of 2011, we recorded an income tax provision of $6 million. This includes a $3 million tax benefit related to discrete events primarily attributable to the release of domestic valuation allowances on capital losses carryforwards which the Company believes will likely be realized and the tax benefit from the reversal of unrecognized tax benefits related to foreign audit settlements. Although the Company is a Bermuda entity with a statutory income tax rate of zero, the earnings of many of the Company’s subsidiaries are subject to taxation in the U.S. and other foreign jurisdictions. We record minimal tax expense on our U.S. earnings due to valuation allowances recorded on substantially all the Company’s U.S. net deferred tax assets, as we have incurred cumulative losses in the United States. Our effective tax rate is impacted by the mix of earnings and losses by taxing jurisdictions.

Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011


	Six Months Ended
(in millions)	June 29, 2012			% of Net Sales			July 1, 2011			% of Net Sales
Orders (unaudited)	$	2,008			101.5	%	$	2,413			99.8	%

Net sales	$	1,979			100.0	%	$	2,417			100.0	%
Cost of sales		1,137			57.5	%		1,416			58.6	%

Gross margin		842			42.5	%		1,001			41.4	%
Selling, general and administrative		218			11.0	%		268			11.1	%
Research and development		369			18.6	%		409			16.9	%
Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets		7			0.4	%		126			5.2	%
Reorganization of business and other		(32	)		*			170			7.0	%

Operating earnings		280			14.1	%		28			1.2	%
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net		(28	)		*			(42	)		*
Other expense, net		(270	)		*			(299	)		*

Loss before income taxes		(18	)		*			(313	)		*
Income tax expense		25			1.3	%		3			0.1	%

Net loss	$	(43	)		*		$	(316	)		*

*	Not meaningful.

Six Months Ended June 29, 2012 Compared to Six Months Ended July 1, 2011

Net Sales

Our net sales in the first half of 2012 decreased by $438 million, or 18%, compared to the prior year period, and orders decreased 17% over the same period, reflecting weaker demand in our core automotive, networking and consumer markets and declines in industrial products purchased through our distribution channel. Distribution sales were approximately 23% of our total net sales and represented a decrease of 19% compared to the prior year period. Net sales by product design group for the six months ended June 29, 2012 and July 1, 2011 were as follows:


	Six Months Ended
(in millions)	June 29, 2012		July 1, 2011
Automotive, Industrial and Multi-Market	$	1,095	$	1,254
Networking and Multimedia		652		820
Cellular Products		116		260
Other		116		83

Total net sales	$	1,979	$	2,417

AISG

AISG’s net sales decreased by $159 million, or 13%, in the first half of 2012 compared to the prior year period. AISG’s net sales decreased by 10% in the automotive marketplace in the first half of 2012 compared to the first half of 2011 as a result primarily of lower demand in the European automotive market. Our net sales associated with products purchased through our distribution channel, primarily by the industrial market, declined in the first half of 2012 compared to the first half of 2011 due to weaker demand and elevated inventory levels that began in the second half of 2011 continuing to negatively impact our sales.

NMSG

NMSG’s net sales decreased by $168 million, or 20%, in the first half of 2012 compared to the prior year period. We experienced decreases in revenues across the product portfolio of networking, RF and multimedia. This contraction

was driven primarily by an overall decline in our core networking business due to lower capital investment in wireless infrastructure markets and lower multimedia revenues due to decreased demand in the e-reader market.

Cellular Products

Cellular Products net sales decreased by $144 million, or 55%, in the first half of 2012 compared to the prior year period due to lower demand for our baseband processors and power management integrated circuits from our legacy customers. We expect revenues from this business to continue to decline over the coming quarters consistent with our decision to discontinue investing in new products and platforms.

Other

Other net sales increased by $33 million, or 40%, in the first half of 2012 compared to the prior year period, due primarily to an increase in revenue from patent license and sales agreements partially offset by a slight decrease in contract manufacturing sales. As a percentage of net sales, intellectual property revenue was 5% and 3% for the first half of 2012 and 2011, respectively. We anticipate our intellectual property revenue to return to historical levels over the second half of 2012.

Gross Margin

In the first half of 2012, our gross margin decreased by $159 million, or 16%, compared to the prior year period. This decline was the result of lower net product sales, decreases in average selling price resulting from our annual negotiations with our customers put into effect in the first quarter of 2012 along with changes in product sales mix. As a percentage of net sales, gross margin in the first half of 2012 was 42.5%, reflecting an increase of 1.1 percentage points compared to the first half of 2011. This improvement in gross margin as a percentage in net sales was the result of a $116 million decrease in depreciation expense from the first half of 2011 to the first half of 2012, the realization of savings from the closure of our Sendai, Japan manufacturing facility, higher intellectual property revenue in the first half of 2012 compared to the first half of 2011 and an increase in utilization of our manufacturing assets, inclusive of the benefit received from the consolidation of our manufacturing facilities, which contributed to continued improvement in operating leverage of our fixed manufacturing costs. Gross margin also benefited from procurement and productivity cost savings, improved yields and lower incentive compensation. Our gross margin included PPA impact and depreciation acceleration related to the closure of our 150 millimeter manufacturing facilities of $90 million in the first half of 2011. (The term “PPA” refers to the effect of acquisition accounting. Certain PPA impacts were recorded in our cost of sales and affect our gross margin and earnings from operations, and other PPA impacts are recorded in our operating expenses and only affect our earnings from operations. The majority of the prior year quarter PPA depreciation impact was driven by tools and equipment which had PPA depreciable lives that ended during 2011.)

Selling, General and Administrative

Our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $50 million, or 19%, in the first half of 2012 compared to the prior year period. This decrease was primarily the result of lower incentive compensation, the elimination of management fees in connection with the second quarter of 2011 IPO, decreased spending on select sales and marketing programs and discretionary cost reductions. As a percentage of our net sales, our selling, general and administrative expenses were 11.0% in the first half of 2012, reflecting a slight decrease over the prior year period.

Research and Development

Our research and development expense for the first half of 2012 decreased $40 million, or 10%, compared to the first half of 2011. This decrease was primarily the result of lower incentive compensation and the elimination of our cellular handset spend along with a favorable impact of the dollar appreciating against the currencies in which we incur much of our research and development expenditures. These cost reductions were partially offset by increased expenses related to focused investment in our core businesses. As a percentage of our net sales, our research and development expenses were 18.6% in the first half of 2012, reflecting an increase of 1.7 percentage points compared to the first half of 2011.

Amortization Expense for Acquired Intangible Assets

Amortization expense for acquired intangible assets related to developed technology and tradenames/trademarks decreased by $119 million, or 94%, in the first half of 2012 compared to the prior year period. This decrease was associated with a significant portion of our developed technology and purchased licenses initially established in connection with the Merger being fully amortized during 2011.

Reorganization of Business and Other

In the first half of 2012, we recorded a benefit of $55 million for earthquake-related business interruption insurance recoveries related to our Sendai, Japan fabrication facility which suffered extensive damage from the March 2011 earthquake. This benefit was partially offset by $4 million of cash costs consisting primarily of on-going closure costs related to this site. Additionally, we recorded $2 million in exit costs related to the termination of various supply agreements in connection with the closure of our

Toulouse, France manufacturing facility. We also recorded a charge of $21 million in connection with the change in the executive leadership of the Company, which was partially offset by a benefit of $4 million related to the expiration of indemnification obligations under a contract previously executed outside the ordinary course of business.

In the first half of 2011, in connection with the closing of the Sendai, Japan fabrication facility due to extensive damage from the March 11, 2011 earthquake off the coast of Japan, we incurred $98 million in charges associated with non-cash asset impairment and inventory charges, cash costs for employee termination benefits, contract termination and other on-going closure costs. We also recorded $71 million of cash costs attributable primarily to the termination of various management agreements with affiliates and advisors of the Sponsors in connection with the completion of our IPO.

Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Long-Term Debt, Net

During the first half of 2012, we recorded a charge of $28 million associated with the close of the Q1 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction which included both the extinguishment and modification of existing debt and the issuance of the 2012 Term Loan. This charge consisted of call premiums, the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and other costs not eligible for capitalization. (Capitalized terms referenced in this section are defined and discussed in “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financing Activities.”)

In the first half of 2011, we recorded a charge of $42 million associated with the extinguishment of debt and the amendment to the Credit Facility, both of which were accomplished in connection with the completion of the IPO. This charge consisted of expenses associated with the IPO Debt Redemption and the amendment to the Credit Facility including call premiums, the write-off of remaining unamortized debt issuance costs and other costs not eligible for capitalization.

Other Expense, Net

Net interest expense in the first half of 2012 included interest expense of $263 million, partially offset by interest income of $5 million. Net interest expense in the first half of 2011 included interest expense of $304 million, partially offset by interest income of $5 million. The decrease in interest expense is primarily due to the utilization of IPO and related over-allotment proceeds along with cash on hand to extinguish $974 million of our long term debt in the second and third quarters of 2011, along with refinancing transactions in the third quarter of 2011 and first quarter of 2012 in which we effectively decreased our interest rate on outstanding debt. During the first half of 2012, we recorded losses in other, net of $12 million primarily attributable to (i) the realized results and changes in the fair value associated with our interest rate swap agreements and (ii) the ineffectiveness of our gold swap contracts, as recorded in accordance with ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC Topic 815”).

During the first half of 2011, we recorded a $4 million gain in other, net related primarily to foreign currency fluctuations. This gain was offset by a $4 million loss recorded in other, net attributable to changes in the fair value of our interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and gold swap contracts as well as to one of our investments accounted for under the equity method.

Income Tax Expense

For the first half of 2012, our income tax provision was $25 million, including $6 million in tax expense related to discrete events primarily attributable to withholding tax on intellectual property royalties partially offset by tax benefits from the reversal of unrecognized tax benefits related to a foreign audit settlement. For the first half of 2011, our income tax provision was $3 million, including an $11 million tax benefit related to discrete events primarily attributable to the release of foreign and domestic valuation allowances related to certain deferred tax assets which the Company believes will likely be realized and the tax benefit from the reversal of unrecognized tax benefits due to foreign audit settlements. The increase in non-discrete tax expense during the first half of 2012 as compared to the first half of 2011 is due primarily to higher profitability in our foreign jurisdictions. Although the Company is a Bermuda entity with a statutory income tax rate of zero, the earnings of many of the Company’s subsidiaries are subject to taxation in the U.S. and other foreign jurisdictions. We record minimal tax expense on our U.S. earnings due to valuation allowances recorded on substantially all the Company’s U.S. net deferred tax assets, as we have incurred cumulative losses in the United States. Our effective tax rate is impacted by the mix of earnings and losses by taxing jurisdictions.

Reorganization of Business and Other

Six Months Ended June 29, 2012

Chief Executive Leadership Transition

Sendai, Japan Fabrication Facility and Design Center

Reorganization of Business Program

The following table displays a roll-forward from January 1, 2012 to June 29, 2012 of the employee separation and exit cost accruals established related to the Reorganization of Business Program:


(in millions, except headcount)	Accruals at January 1, 2012		Charges		Adjustments & Currency Impact			Amounts Used			Accruals at June 29, 2012
Employee Separation Costs
Supply chain	$	106	$	—	$	(1	)	$	(11	)	$	94
Selling, general and administrative		8		—		(6	)		—			2
Research and development		14		—		(12	)		—			2

Total	$	128	$	—	$	(19	)	$	(11	)	$	98

Related headcount		720		—		—			(50	)		670

Exit and Other Costs	$	6	$	2	$	—		$	(2	)	$	6

Other Contingencies

Six Months Ended July 1, 2011

IPO-Related Costs

Sendai, Japan Fabrication Facility and Design Center


(in millions, except headcount)	Accruals at January 1, 2011		Charges		Adjustments			Amounts Used			Accruals at July 1, 2011
Employee Separation Costs
Supply chain	$	—	$	12	$	(3	)	$	(5	)	$	4
Selling, general and administrative		—		—		—			—			—
Research and development		—		—		—			—			—

Total	$	—	$	12	$	(3	)	$	(5	)	$	4

Related headcount		—		480		(100	)		—			380

Exit and Other Costs	$	—	$	7	$	—		$	(2	)	$	5

Asset Impairment Charges and Other Costs

Reorganization of Business Program

The following table displays a roll-forward from January 1, 2011 to July 1, 2011 of the employee separation and exit cost accruals established related to the Reorganization of Business Program:


(in millions, except headcount)	Accruals at January 1, 2011		Charges		Adjustments			Amounts Used			Accruals at July 1, 2011
Employee Separation Costs
Supply chain	$	157	$	—	$	—		$	(12	)	$	145
Selling, general and administrative		12		—		—			(3	)		9
Research and development		16		—		—			(1	)		15

Total	$	185	$	—	$	—		$	(16	)	$	169

Related headcount		1,420		—		—			(90	)		1,330

Exit and Other Costs	$	15	$	2	$	(2	)	$	(5	)	$	10

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Of the $881 million of cash and cash equivalents at June 29, 2012, $301 million is attributable to our U.S. subsidiaries and $580 million is attributable to our foreign subsidiaries. The repatriation of the funds of these foreign subsidiaries could be subject to delay and potential tax consequences, principally with respect to withholding taxes paid in foreign jurisdictions.

Operating Activities

We generated cash flow from operations of $252 million and $26 million in the first half of 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in cash generated from operations is attributable to (i) proceeds from the sale and license of intellectual property, some of which has not yet been recognized, (ii) proceeds from the Sendai, Japan earthquake-related insurance recoveries and (iii) lower payments for incentive compensation. These items are partially offset by (i) costs associated the closure of our Sendai, Japan and Toulouse, France fabrication facilities, including inventory builds to support end-of-life products produced at these facilities and (ii) costs associated with the completion of our IPO in the second quarter of 2011. Our days purchases outstanding (excluding the impact of purchase accounting on cost of sales in 2011) increased to 56 days at June 29, 2012 from 55 days at both December 31, 2011 and July 1, 2011, reflecting the timing of payments on our payables. Our days sales outstanding decreased to 39 days at June 29, 2012 compared to 41 days at December 31, 2011 and increased from 35 days at July 1, 2011. Our days of inventory on hand (excluding the impact of purchase accounting on inventory and cost of sales in 2011) decreased to 125 days at June 29, 2012 from 126 days at December 31, 2011 and increased from 100 days at July 1, 2011. The increase in days of inventory on hand from July 1, 2011 is due to inventory builds to support end-of-life products and the transfer of production from our Toulouse, France facility to our other fabrication facilities and outside foundry partners along with AISG inventory builds related to anticipated inventory requirements for the second half of 2012.

Investing Activities

Our net cash utilized for investing activities was $96 million and $31 million in the first half of 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our investing activities are driven primarily by (i) capital expenditures, which were $55 million and $58 million for the first half of 2012 and 2011, respectively, and represented 3% and 2% of net sales, respectively, and (ii) payments for purchased licenses and other assets, which were $43 million and $29 million for the first half of 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in the cash utilized for investing activities from the first half of 2011 was predominately the result of the benefit in the prior year from the receipt of cash for the sale of our Tempe, Arizona facility (of which we are now leasing a portion).

Financing Activities

Our net cash utilized for financing activities was $41 million and $254 million in the first half of 2012 and 2011, respectively. Cash flows related to financing activities in the first half of 2012 included the repayment of $500 million of the Senior Subordinated Notes in connection with the Q1 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction, along with call premiums of $25 million, $2 million in scheduled capital lease payments and $1 million in scheduled principal payments. These payments were partially offset by the receipt

of $481 million of proceeds from the issuance of the 2012 Term Loan, net of related amendment, consent and other fees totaling $14 million. Additionally, cash provided by financing activities included $6 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options.

Cash flows related to financing activities in the first half of 2011 included the receipt of approximately $838 million in net cash proceeds upon completion of the IPO and the over-allotment exercise and $724 million in net cash proceeds in connection with the issuance of the 8.05% Unsecured Notes and other debt refinancing activities associated with the IPO Debt Redemption and the amendment to the Credit Facility. These cash inflows were offset by (i) the utilization of $937 million related primarily to payments for principal and call premiums in connection with the IPO Debt Redemption and (ii) the classification of $879 million of our cash balance as restricted cash set aside for the redemption of indebtedness that was completed in the third quarter of 2011 as part of the Over-Allotment Debt Redemption and the Q3 2011 Refinancing Transaction.

First Quarter 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction

On February 28, 2012, Freescale Inc. received the requisite consents from its lenders to amend the senior secured credit facility (“Credit Facility”) which, among other things, allowed for the issuance of a new term loan and eliminated the remaining incremental borrowing capacity previously available under the Credit Facility. As a result, on February 28, 2012, Freescale Inc. closed the transaction referred to as the “Q1 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction” and announced the amendment of the Credit Facility and the issuance of $500 million aggregate principal amount of a senior secured term loan due February 28, 2019 (“2012 Term Loan”). The 2012 Term Loan was issued with an original issue discount and was recorded at its fair value of $495 million on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The net proceeds of this issuance, along with approximately $59 million of cash on hand, were used on March 29, 2012 to redeem $500 million of the senior subordinated 10.125% notes due 2016 (“Senior Subordinated Notes”), and pay related call premiums of $25 million, accrued interest of $15 million and amendment, consent and other fees totaling $14 million in the aggregate. (Refer to Note 2 “Loss on Extinguishment or Modification of Long Term Debt, Net”, for further information on the debt transactions discussed in this note.)

The proceeds from the issuance of the 2012 Term Loan were used to extinguish a portion of the Senior Subordinated Notes, thus relieving Freescale Inc. and the Guarantors of their obligations associated with that portion of the liability. This portion of the Q1 2012 Debt Refinancing Transaction constitutes an extinguishment of debt under ASC Subtopic 470-50, “Modifications and Extinguishments” (“ASC Subtopic 470-50”), and was accounted for accordingly. Certain lenders who participated in the partial repayment of the Senior Subordinated Notes were also lenders under the 2012 Term Loan. Effectively, this portion of the Senior Subordinated Notes was exchanged by these lenders for the new term loan. This part of the transaction was accounted for as a modification of debt which was not substantial under ASC Subtopic 470-50.

IPO and Over-Allotment Debt Redemptions

Second Quarter 2011 Debt Issuance

First Quarter 2011 Amendment to the Credit Facility

Credit Facility

2012 Term Loan

Senior Notes

Hedging Transactions

Covenant Compliance

Debt Service

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated in accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and the indentures governing Freescale Inc.’s senior notes. Adjusted EBITDA is net (loss) earnings adjusted for certain non-cash and other items that are included in net (loss) earnings. Freescale Inc. is not subject to any maintenance covenants under its existing debt agreements and is therefore not required to maintain any minimum specified level of Adjusted EBITDA or maintain any ratio based on Adjusted EBITDA or otherwise. However, our ability to engage in specified activities is tied to ratios under Freescale Inc.’s debt agreements based on Adjusted EBITDA, in each case subject to certain exceptions. Our subsidiaries are unable to incur any indebtedness under the indentures and specified indebtedness under the Credit Facility, pay dividends, make certain investments, prepay junior debt and make other restricted payments, in each case not otherwise permitted by our debt agreements, unless, after giving effect to the proposed activity, the fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined in the applicable indenture) would be at least 2:1 and the senior secured first lien leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility) would be no greater than 3.5:1. Also, our subsidiaries may not incur certain indebtedness in connection with acquisitions unless, prior to and after giving effect to the proposed transaction, the total leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Facility) is no greater than 6.5:1, except as otherwise permitted by the Credit Facility. In addition, except as otherwise permitted by the applicable debt agreement, we may not designate any subsidiary as unrestricted or engage in certain mergers unless, after giving effect to the proposed transaction, the fixed charge coverage ratio would be at least 2:1 or equal to or greater than it was prior to the proposed transaction and the senior secured first lien leverage ratio would be no greater than 3.5:1. We are also unable to have liens on assets securing indebtedness without also securing the notes unless the consolidated secured debt ratio (as defined in the applicable indenture) would be no greater than 3.25:1 after giving effect to the proposed lien, except as otherwise permitted by the indentures. Accordingly, we believe it is useful to provide the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA to investors for purposes of determining our ability to engage in these activities. As of June 29, 2012, Freescale Inc. was in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facility and the indentures and met the total leverage ratio and the fixed charge coverage ratio, but did not meet the senior secured first lien leverage ratio of 3.50:1 or the consolidated secured debt ratio of 3.25:1. As of June 29, 2012, Freescale Inc.’s senior secured first lien leverage ratio was 3.82:1 and the consolidated secured debt ratio was 4.69:1. Accordingly, we

are currently restricted from incurring liens on assets securing indebtedness, except as otherwise permitted by the indentures, and, among other things, from making restricted payments, except as otherwise permitted by our Credit Facility. The fact that we do not meet these ratios does not result in any default under the Credit Facility or the indentures.

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-U.S. GAAP measure. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent, and should not be considered an alternative to, net (loss) earnings, operating (loss) earnings, or cash flow from operations as those terms are defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, (U.S. GAAP) and does not necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient to fund cash needs. Although Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are frequently used as measures of operations and the ability to meet debt service requirements by other companies, our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies. The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA in the indentures and the Credit Facility allows us to add back certain charges that are deducted in calculating net (loss) earnings. However, some of these expenses may recur, vary greatly and are difficult to predict. Further, our debt instruments require that Adjusted EBITDA be calculated for the most recent four fiscal quarters. We do not present Adjusted EBITDA on a quarterly basis. In addition, the measure can be disproportionately affected by quarterly fluctuations in our operating results, and it may not be comparable to the measure for any subsequent four-quarter period or any complete fiscal year.

The following is a reconciliation of net loss, which is a U.S. GAAP measure of our operating results, to Adjusted EBITDA, as calculated pursuant to Freescale Inc.’s debt agreements for the most recent four fiscal quarter period as required by such agreements.


(in millions)	Twelve Months Ended June 29, 2012
Net loss	$	(137	)
Interest expense, net		522
Income tax expense		50
Depreciation and amortization		457
Non-cash share-based compensation expense ^(a)		33
Fair value adjustment on interest rate and commodity derivatives ^(b)		7
Loss on extinguishment or modification of long-term debt, net ^(c)		83
Reorganization of business and other ^(d)		(120	)
Cost savings ^(e)		92
Other terms ^(f)		28

Adjusted EBITDA	$	1,015

(a)	Reflects non-cash, share-based compensation expense under the provisions of ASC Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation.”

(b)	Reflects the change in fair value of our interest rate and commodity derivatives which are not designated as cash flow hedges under the provisions of ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”

(c)	Reflects losses on extinguishments and modifications of our long-term debt, net.

(d)	Reflects items related to our reorganization of business programs and other charges.

(e)	Reflects costs savings that we expect to achieve from initiatives commenced prior to December 31, 2009 under our reorganization of business programs that are in process or have already been completed.

(f)	Reflects adjustments required by our debt instruments, including business optimization expenses, relocation expenses and other items.

Future Financing Activities

Our primary future cash needs on a recurring basis will be for working capital, capital expenditures and debt service obligations. In addition, we expect to spend approximately $50 million over the remainder of 2012, approximately $75 million in 2013 and approximately $10 million thereafter in connection with the Reorganization of Business Program and the closure of the Sendai, Japan and Toulouse, France fabrication facilities; however, the timing of these payments depends on many factors, including the actual closing dates and local employment laws, and actual amounts paid may vary based on currency fluctuation. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents balance as of June 29, 2012 of $881 million and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs, capital expenditures, restructuring plan and other business requirements for at least the next 12 months. In addition, our ability to borrow under the Replacement Revolver was $408 million as of June 29, 2012, as reduced by $17 million of outstanding letters of credit.

If our cash flows from operations are less than we expect or we require funds to consummate acquisitions of other businesses, assets, products or technologies, we may need to incur additional debt, sell or monetize certain existing assets or utilize our cash and cash equivalents. In the event additional funding is required, there can be no assurance that future funding will be available on terms favorable to us or at all. Furthermore, our debt agreements contain restrictive covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, incur additional debt and sell assets. We are highly leveraged, and this could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry, expose us to interest rate risk to the extent of our variable rate debt and prevent us from meeting our obligations under one or more of our debt agreements. Increases in interest rates could also adversely affect our financial condition. In the absence of sufficient operating results and resources to service our debt, or as the result of the inability to complete appropriate refinancings and amendments of our debt, we could face substantial liquidity problems and may be required to seek the disposal of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. If we cannot make scheduled payments on our indebtedness, we will be in default under one or more of our debt agreements and, as a result, we would need to take other action to satisfy our obligations or be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.

As market conditions warrant, or as repurchase obligations under the agreements governing our Credit Facility and Senior Notes may require, we and our major equity holders may from time to time repurchase or redeem debt securities issued by Freescale Inc. through redemptions under the terms of the indentures, in privately negotiated or open-market transactions, by tender offer or otherwise, or issue new debt in order to refinance or prepay amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility or the existing Senior Notes or for other permitted purposes.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We use customary off-balance sheet arrangements, such as operating leases and letters of credit, to finance our business. None of these arrangements has or is likely to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. If actual results differ significantly from management’s estimates and projections, there could be a material negative impact on our financial statements. In addition to the items described below, our significant accounting policies and critical estimates are disclosed in our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Revenue Recognition: We recognize revenue from product sales when title transfers, the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the customer, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured, which is generally at the time of shipment. Sales with destination point terms, which are primarily related to European customers where these terms are customary and certain customers to whom Freescale ships product directly from Asia, are recognized upon delivery.

Accruals are established, with the related reduction to net sales at the time the related net sales are recognized, for allowances for discounts and product returns based on actual historical experience. Revenue is reported net of sales taxes. Revenue for services is recognized ratably over the contract term or as services are being performed. Revenue related to licensing agreements is recognized at the time we have fulfilled our obligations and the fee is fixed. Net sales from contracts with multiple elements are recognized as each element is earned based on the relative fair value of each element when there are no undelivered elements that are essential to the functionality of the delivered elements and when the amount is not contingent upon delivery of the undelivered elements. More specifically, the deliverables under each arrangement are analyzed to determine whether they are separate units of accounting, and if so, the total arrangement consideration is allocated based on each element’s relative selling price using vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”), third-party evidence (“TPE”), or estimated selling prices (“ESP”), as the basis of selling price. When we are unable to establish selling price using VSOE or TPE, we use ESP in our allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of ESP is to determine the price at which we would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a standalone basis. The ESP is determined by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to our pricing practices, gross margin objectives, internal costs and industry specific information. Changes in any number of these factors may have had a substantial impact on the selling price as assigned to each element. These inputs and assumptions represent management’s best estimates at the time of the transaction. Applicable receivables are discounted in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

Recent Developments

On April 25, 2012, Freescale’s shareholders approved the change of the Company’s name from “Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.” to “Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd.” The Company’s name was changed because the words “Holdings I” are not meaningful to the business or marketing purposes of the Company and the elimination of these words from the name of the Company will decrease confusion among investors and the public.

Item 3:

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Foreign Currency Risk

A significant variation of the value of the U.S. dollar against currencies other than the U.S. dollar could result in a favorable impact on our net earnings (loss) in the case of an appreciation of the U.S. dollar, or a negative impact on our net earnings (loss) if the U.S. dollar depreciates relative to these currencies. Currency exchange rate fluctuations affect our results of operations because our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, in which we receive the majority of our net sales, while we incur a significant portion of our costs in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Certain significant costs incurred by us, such as manufacturing labor costs, research and development, and selling, general and administrative expenses are incurred in the currencies of the countries in which our operations are located.

In order to reduce the exposure of our financial results to fluctuations in exchange rates, our principal strategy has been to naturally hedge the foreign currency-denominated liabilities on our balance sheet against corresponding foreign currency-denominated assets such that any changes in liabilities due to fluctuations in exchange rates are inversely and entirely offset by changes in their corresponding foreign currency assets. In order to further reduce our exposure to U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations, we have entered into foreign currency hedge agreements related to the currency and the amount of expenses we expect to incur in countries in which our operations are located. No assurance can be given that our hedging transactions will prevent us from incurring higher foreign currency-denominated manufacturing costs when translated into our U.S. dollar-based accounts in the event of a weakening of the U.S. dollar on the non-hedged portion of our costs and expenses. (Refer to Note 5, “Risk Management,” to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion.)

At June 29, 2012, we had net outstanding foreign exchange contracts not designated as accounting hedges with notional amounts totaling $218 million. These forward contracts have original maturities of less than three months. The fair value of these forward contracts was a net unrealized loss of $1 million at June 29, 2012. Forward contract (losses) gains of $(5) million and $5 million for the first half of 2012 and 2011, respectively, were recorded in other expense, net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to our realized and unrealized results associated with these foreign exchange contracts. Management believes that these financial instruments should not subject us to undue risk of foreign exchange movements because gains and losses on these contracts should offset losses and gains on the assets and liabilities being hedged. The following table shows, in millions of U.S. dollars, the notional amounts of the most significant net foreign exchange hedge positions for outstanding foreign exchange contracts not designated as accounting hedges:


Buy (Sell)	June 29, 2012
Euro	$	140
Japanese Yen	$	34
Israeli Shekel	$	6
Swedish Kroner	$	6
Indian Rupee	$	(5	)
Taiwan Dollar	$	(12	)

Foreign exchange financial instruments that are subject to the effects of currency fluctuations, which may affect reported earnings, include financial instruments which are not denominated in the functional currency of the legal entity holding the instrument. Derivative financial instruments consist primarily of forward contracts. Other financial instruments, which are not denominated in the functional currency of the legal entity holding the instrument, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, notes and accounts payable and receivable. The fair value of the foreign exchange financial instruments would hypothetically decrease by $47 million as of June 29, 2012, if the U.S. dollar were to appreciate against all other currencies by 10% of current levels. This hypothetical amount is suggestive of the effect on future cash flows under the following conditions: (i) all current payables and receivables that are hedged were not realized, (ii) all hedged commitments and anticipated transactions were not realized or canceled, and (iii) hedges of these amounts were not canceled or offset. We do not expect that any of these conditions will be realized. We expect that gains and losses on the derivative financial instruments should offset losses and gains on the assets and liabilities being hedged. If the hedged instruments were included in the sensitivity analysis, the hypothetical change in fair value would be immaterial. The foreign exchange financial instruments are held for purposes other than trading.

At June 29, 2012, we had Malaysian Ringgit and Israeli Shekel forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges with an aggregate notional amount of $74 million and $19 million, respectively, and both with fair values of a net unrealized loss of $1 million. These forward contracts have original maturities of less than 15 months. A gain of $1 million for both the second quarter and

first half of 2012 was recorded in cost of sales in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to our realized results associated with the Malaysian Ringgit cash flow hedges. Losses of less than $1 million and $1 million for the second quarter and first half of 2012, respectively, were recorded in research and development expense in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to our realized results associated with the Israeli Shekel cash flow hedges.

Commodity Price Risk

In addition to our foreign exchange financial instruments at June 29, 2012, we had outstanding gold swap contracts designated as cash flow hedges with notional amounts totaling 22,500 ounces. The fair value of these gold swap contracts was a net unrealized loss of $1 million June 29, 2012. During the second quarter and first half of 2012, losses of $1 million and $2 million, respectively, were recorded in cost of sales related to our realized results attributable to these gold swap contracts. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2012 and 2011, losses of less than $1 million and $1 million, respectively, and during the first half of both 2012 and 2011, losses of $1 million were recorded in other expense, net in the accompanying condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations related to ineffectiveness on these gold swap contracts. A 10% increase in the price of gold would increase our cost of sales by $11 million annually, absent our outstanding gold swap contracts. All of these contracts have original maturities of 15 months or less.

Interest Rate Risk

At June 29, 2012, we had total long-term debt of $6,587 million, including $2,771 million of variable interest rate debt based on either 1-month or 3-month LIBOR. As of June 29, 2012, we have effectively fixed our interest rate on $200 million of our variable rate debt through December 1, 2012, $100 million of our variable rate debt from December 1, 2012 through December 1, 2015, $200 million of our variable rate debt from December 1, 2012 through December 1, 2016 and an additional $500 million of our variable rate debt from December 1, 2013 through December 1, 2016 with the use of interest rate swap agreements. Our remaining variable interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk, because our interest payments will fluctuate as the underlying interest rates change from market changes. A 100 basis point change in LIBOR rates would result in an increase in our interest expense of $23 million per year.

The fair value of the aggregate principal amount of our long-term debt approximates $6,653 million at June 29, 2012, which has been determined based upon quoted market prices. Since considerable judgment is required in interpreting market information, the fair value of the long-term debt is not necessarily indicative of the amount which could be realized in a current market exchange. The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements (excluding accrued interest) was a net obligation of $13 million at June 29, 2012. The fair value of these agreements was estimated based on the yield curve at June 29, 2012. A 100 basis point change in interest rates would impact the fair value of our long-term debt by $123 million and impact the net obligation under our interest rate swap agreements by $28 million.

As of June 29, 2012, we have provided $3 million in collateral to three of our counterparties in connection with our foreign exchange and gold hedging programs.

Reference is made to Note 2, “Other Financial Data”, Note 3, “Fair Value Measurement” and Note 5, “Risk Management” elsewhere in this report as well as the “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” discussion within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than the change to the fair value of our long-term debt, we experienced no significant changes in market risk during the three and six months ended June 29, 2012. However, we cannot provide assurance that future changes in foreign currency rates, commodity prices or interest rates will not have a significant effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 4:

Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded as of the Evaluation Date that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information relating to the Company, including our consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three and six months ended June 29, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - Other Information

Item 1:

Legal Proceedings.

On April 17, 2007, Tessera Technologies, Inc. filed a complaint against Freescale Inc., ATI Technologies, Inc., Motorola, Inc., Qualcomm, Inc., Spansion, Inc., Spansion LLC, and STMicroelectronics N.V. in the International Trade Commission (ITC) requesting the ITC to enter an injunction barring the importation of any product containing a device that infringes two identified patents related to ball grid array packaging technology. On May 20, 2009, the ITC issued a final order finding that all the respondents infringed Tessera’s asserted patents, and granted Tessera’s request for a Limited Exclusion Order prohibiting the importation of respondents’ infringing products. On September 17, 2010, the asserted patents expired, thus nullifying the Limited Exclusion Order. On April 17, 2007, Tessera also filed a parallel lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against ATI, Freescale Inc., Motorola and Qualcomm claiming an unspecified amount of monetary damage as compensation for the alleged infringement of the same Tessera patents. The lawsuit was stayed during the pendency of the ITC matter, but is now active, and has been transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. We continue to assess the merits of the United States District Court litigation and have recorded no associated liability as of June 29, 2012.

Refer to Part I, Item 3: “Legal Proceedings” of our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

Item 1A:

Risk Factors.

Refer to Part I, Item 1A: “Risk Factors” of our December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

Item 2:

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a)	Not applicable.

(b)	Not applicable.

(c)	Not applicable.

Item 3:

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4:

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5:

Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6:

Exhibits.


Exhibit No.		Exhibit Title

3.1*		Certificate of Incorporation on Change of Name of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd., as issued by the Bermuda Registrar of Companies on April 26, 2012.

10.1+		Transition and Release Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2012, between the Company, Freescale Holdings GP, Ltd. and Richard M. Beyer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 6, 2012).

10.2+		Employment Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2012, between the Company and Gregg Lowe (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 6, 2012).

10.3+*		Freescale Semiconductor Holdings 2011 Omnibus Plan Performance Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2012, between Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. and Gregg Lowe.

10.4+*		Freescale Semiconductor Holdings 2011 Omnibus Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2012, between Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. and Gregg Lowe.

10.5+*		Freescale Semiconductor Holdings 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan Make Whole Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2012, between Freescale Semiconductor, Ltd. and Gregg Lowe.

10.6+*		Freescale Semiconductor Holdings 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan Form Restricted Share Unit Award Agreement - Director.

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

32.1*		Section 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer).

32.2*		Section 1350 Certification (Chief Financial Officer).

101.ins#		Instance Document.

101.sch#		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.cal#		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.def#		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.lab#		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.pre#		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

+	= indicates a management contract or compensatory plan arrangement

*	= filed herewith

#	= furnished, not filed, herewith.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, LTD.

Dated: July 20, 2012	By:	/s/ ALAN CAMPBELL
		Alan Campbell
		Chief Financial Officer