Filed by Cell Therapeutics, Inc. Pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933 And deemed filed pursuant Rule 14a-12 Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Subject Company: Cell Therapeutics, Inc. Commission File No.: 001-12465 |
CTI-Novuspharma Merger
June 17, 2003
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
|
Strategic Rationale
| |||||
![]() |
Greater revenue growth potential | ||||
![]() |
TRISENOX® gaining hematology market share | MARKETED | |||
![]() |
XYOTAX in pivotal trials for lung cancer | LAUNCH 2005 | |||
![]() |
Pixantrone in pivotal trials for NHL | LAUNCH 2006 | |||
![]() |
Targeting profitability in 2005 | ||||
![]() |
Strong combined balance sheet | ||||
![]() |
$230 million proforma end Q1, 2003 | ||||
![]() |
Significant cost savings | ||||
![]() |
$18-$20 million annual operating synergies | ||||
![]() |
Strengthened oncology drug development expertise | ||||
![]() |
Global access to patients, physicians and capital markets | ||||
Overview of CTI
| ||||
![]() |
TRISENOX®: approved in US and EU for APL | |||
![]() |
100%CAGR expected through 2004 | |||
![]() |
Potential to capture significant share of hematologic malignancy market (MDS, MM) | |||
![]() |
$150 million US sales potential | |||
![]() |
XYOTAX: safer, potentially more effective paclitaxel in pivotal trials for non-small cell lung and ovarian cancers | |||
![]() |
CT-2106 (PG-CPT): safer, potentially more effective camptothecin in phase I | |||
![]() |
Balance sheet: ~$111 million cash as of 3/31/03 | |||
![]() |
Research coverage | |||
![]() |
CIBC World Markets, Lehman Bros., Piper Jaffray, Wells Fargo, Punk Ziegel, Delafield Hambrecht | |||
Overview of
| ||||
![]() |
Pixantrone potential best in class safer, more effective anthracycline in pivotal trials for NHL | |||
![]() |
Strong balance sheet: ~$120 million cash as of 3/31/03 | |||
![]() |
Former oncology drug development arm of Boehringer Mannheim, part of Hoffman La Roche | |||
![]() |
Expertise in pre-development, pharmacology, CMC, Phase I-II | |||
![]() |
Research coverage: Lehman Bros., SG Cowen, Banca IMI, Caboto | |||
Timing
| ||||
![]() |
Unanimous approval of both Boards | |||
![]() |
Subject to Novuspharma and CTI shareholder approval | |||
![]() |
Subject to approval of CTIs application to list its shares on the Nuovo Mercato | |||
![]() |
Merger expected to close Q4 | |||
![]() |
Integration plan & team established | |||
![]() |
$18-20 million full year of cost savings expected in 2004 | |||
![]() |
Year end combined cash position forecasted at $160M | |||
Specifics of Agreement
| ||||
![]() |
CTI to issue 16 million shares of CTIC to Novuspharma shareholders | |||
![]() |
Fixed exchange ratio 2.45 | |||
![]() |
Transaction value ~$235 million | |||
![]() |
Dual listing on NASDAQ and Nuovo Mercato | |||
![]() |
Novuspharma to have two seats on board with a third independent director to be nominated prior to closing | |||
![]() |
Silvano Spinelli, CEO of Novuspharma to join CTIs management team in following roles | |||
![]() |
EVP, Development at CTI | |||
![]() |
Managing Director, CTIs European subsidiary in Bresso | |||
Company Profiles
| ||||||||
CTI |
Novuspharma |
|||||||
![]() | ||||||||
![]() |
Therapeutic focus |
|
Cancer |
|
Cancer |
![]() | ||
|
|
| ||||||
Key Products |
||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Marketed |
TRISENOX® |
-- | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Phase III |
XYOTAX |
Pixantrone | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Phase I/II |
CT-2106 (polyglutamate camptothecin) |
MT-201, BBR3576 | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Core competencies |
Sales & Marketing, Phase II/III, Target discovery & validation |
Preclinical (in vivo, PK/PD), CMC (analytical), Phase I-II | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Head count |
288 |
85 | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Facilities |
170,000 sq ft (Seattle) |
75,000 sq ft (Milan) | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Balance sheet 3/31/03 |
$111 million |
$120 million* | ||||||
![]() | ||||||||
*Converted to US dollars; exchange rate 1.18 | ||||||||
Merged Company
| ||||||
![]() |
||||||
![]() |
Therapeutic focus |
|
Cancer |
![]() | ||
|
| |||||
Key Products |
||||||
|
| |||||
Marketed |
TRISENOX® | |||||
|
| |||||
Phase III |
XYOTAX, Pixantrone | |||||
|
| |||||
Phase I/II |
CT-2106, MT-201, BBR3576 | |||||
|
| |||||
Core competencies |
Fully integrated capabilities from target discovery through commercialization | |||||
|
| |||||
Head count |
~320 | |||||
|
| |||||
Facilities |
250,000 sq ft (Seattle-Milan) | |||||
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
Balance sheet (3/31/03) |
~$230 million* | |||||
![]() | ||||||
*Converted to US dollars; exchange rate 1.18 | ||||||
Operating Synergies
| ||||
Center of excellence Milan | ||||
![]() |
Medicinal chemistry, lead optimization | |||
![]() |
Preclinical models, toxicology-ADME, analytical development, pharmacology | |||
![]() |
Clinical trials material production | |||
![]() |
PK/PD testing in Phase I | |||
![]() |
EU pharmacovigilance, QA/QC | |||
![]() |
European clinical development | |||
Operating Synergies
| |||||
Corporate Headquarters Seattle | |||||
![]() |
Target discovery/validation | ||||
![]() |
Clinical Development | ||||
![]() |
Phase I-III | ||||
![]() |
Drug Regulatory Affairs | ||||
![]() |
Drug Safety & Surveillance | ||||
![]() |
Sales & Marketing | ||||
Portfolio Synergies
| ||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
Key Products |
|
Hematology |
|
Solid Tumors |
![]() | ||
|
|
| ||||||
TRISENOX® |
Leukemia, CML MDS, |
|||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Pixantrone |
Aggressive NHL |
Breast cancer | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
XYOTAX |
|
NSC Lung cancer | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
CT-2106 |
|
Colorectal cancer |
||||||
|
|
| ||||||
Pixantrone
| ||||
![]() |
Long lasting complete/partial responses in heavily treated NHL patients as single agent | |||
![]() |
Synergistic with combination therapy (Rituxan®) | |||
![]() |
Cardiac toxicity profile superior to existing agents | |||
![]() |
Convenience of eliminating central line | |||
![]() |
Reduces need for expensive anti-emetics | |||
![]() |
Initial market entry into area of high unmet need | |||
Pixantrone
| |||||
![]() |
Extensive experience in >170 patients | ||||
![]() |
7 phase I, II trials | ||||
![]() |
Highly active in combination regimens for relapsed/refractory NHL replacing doxorubicin | ||||
![]() |
CHOP n=17 | ||||
![]() |
13 patients evaluable; 6CRs/1PR | ||||
![]() |
ESHAP n=21 | ||||
![]() |
19 pts evaluable; 7CRs/4PRs | ||||
![]() |
Highly active in relapsed/refractory indolent NHL | ||||
![]() |
FND-R n=9 | ||||
![]() |
6 patients evaluable; 5CRs/1PR | ||||
Pixantrone
| ||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Patient |
|
NHL |
![]() |
Status |
![]() |
Prior Rx |
![]() |
Resistant |
![]() |
Respnse |
|
Duration |
![]() | ||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||||||
M-80 |
DLC |
1st Rel |
Dx380 |
Yes |
uPR(650) |
NA | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-79 |
DLC |
2nd Rel |
Dx400 |
Yes |
CR(1530) |
17 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-65 |
DLC |
2nd Rel |
Dx400 |
Yes |
CR(1530) |
4 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-65 |
DLC |
3rd Rel |
Dx250 |
No |
uPR(1190) |
NA | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-72 |
DLC |
3rd Rel |
Dx400 |
No |
PR(1530) |
6.5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-66 |
tFoll |
5th Rel |
Dx240/ |
No |
PR(1360) |
17+ | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-65 |
Mant |
2nd Rel |
Dx300 |
Yes |
CR(1060) |
12.5 | ||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() | ||||||||||
M-65 |
DLC |
2nd Rel |
Dx300 |
No |
uPR(1020) |
NA | ||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||||
Pixantrone
| ||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Patient |
|
NHL |
![]() |
Status |
![]() |
Prior Rx |
![]() |
Resistant |
![]() |
Response |
|
Duration |
![]() | ||
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| ||||||||||
F-72 |
DLC |
4th Rel |
Dx300 |
Yes |
PR(1020) |
5 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-41 |
Mcy |
3rd Rel |
Dx300 |
No |
CR(1241) |
7 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-60 |
DLC |
3rd Rel |
Dx400 |
Yes |
PR(1020) |
NA | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-78 |
Mant |
2nd Rel |
None |
Yes |
uPR(1020) |
NA | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
F-55 |
DLC |
1st Rel |
Dx300 |
No |
CR(1326) |
12 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
M-66 |
DLC |
2nd Rel |
Dx |
Yes |
uPR(425) |
1 | ||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||||
Pixantrone
| ||||
![]() |
High response rates in relapsed/resistant aggressive NHL | |||
![]() |
ORR= >30% (7CRs/5PRs + 5uPRs) | |||
![]() |
Durable responses: TTP >8 months for responders | |||
![]() |
Well tolerated | |||
![]() |
Grade 4 neutropenia 13/33 (40%) | |||
![]() |
Grade 4 anemia/thrombocytopenia 0-1/33 (<3%) | |||
![]() |
28/33 (85%) had maximum prior anthracycline exposure | |||
![]() |
14/33 (42%) received >1,000-1500mg/m2 Pixantrone | |||
![]() |
Encouraging low incidence of cardiac events despite prior anthracycline exposure | |||
Pixantrone
| ||||
![]() |
New strategy for registration in U.S. | |||
![]() |
Pivotal trial in 3rd line aggressive NHL | |||
![]() |
Compelling phase II clinical data | |||
![]() |
High unmet needqualifies for fast track | |||
![]() |
No approved agentsnon-randomized single open label trial ~120 pts |
|||
![]() |
Enrollment completion late 2004 | |||
![]() |
NDA target Q4 2005 | |||
![]() |
Potential launch 2006 | |||
![]() |
Phase III in relapsed indolent NHL ± rituximab to provide market penetration support |
|||
Pixantrone
| |||||
![]() |
Anthracyclines | ||||
![]() |
Standard of care | ||||
![]() |
Front line and relapsed aggressive NHL (CHOP) | ||||
![]() |
Front line for acute myeloid leukemias | ||||
![]() |
Front line breast cancer, relapsed HR prostate cancer | ||||
![]() |
$500+ million in annual sales | ||||
![]() |
Market leaders | ||||
![]() |
Doxorubicin (US) | ||||
![]() |
Epirubicin (EU) | ||||
![]() |
Major limitationlife time cardiac toxicity threshold |
||||
Pixantrone
| ||||
![]() |
If approved in 3rd line aggressive NHL | |||
![]() |
100% would use it in 2nd & 3rd line | |||
![]() |
50% would replace doxorubicin in 1st line for aggressive especially high cardiac risk patients | |||
![]() |
>50% would use it in 2nd and 3rd line indolent | |||
![]() |
Zevalin and Bexxar® would be used after Pixantrone due to difficulty with nuclear medicine scheduling issues | |||
![]() |
With supportive data in clinical trials could move into breast and prostate cancers | |||
![]() |
Base case forecast $150 million peak U.S. sales | |||
TRISENOX®
| ||||
![]() |
Product approved U.S. and EU | |||
![]() |
100% CAGR forecasted through 2003 | |||
![]() |
$150+ million peak U.S. sales potential | |||
![]() |
Compelling efficacy in hematologic cancers (APL, MM, MDS) | |||
![]() |
Gaining US market share | |||
![]() |
EU penetration limited to initial label (APL) | |||
![]() |
Potential for MDS filing in 2004 allows for re-evaluation of EU commercial potential and strategy |
|||
TRISENOX®
| ||||
Myelodysplasia (120 patients) | ||||
![]() |
Decreases or eliminates RBC and platelet transfusion independence | |||
![]() |
80% of responding patients became transfusion independent lasting up to 2 yrs | |||
![]() |
32% objective responses including high risk patients | |||
![]() |
Well tolerated, no dose reductions required | |||
![]() |
Projected sNDA and sMAA filing in both EU and US in 2004 | |||
Multiple myeloma (86 patients) | ||||
![]() |
High response rates in combination with vitamin C | |||
![]() |
40% objective responses | |||
![]() |
100% improvement in kidney function | |||
![]() |
Well tolerated, manageable side effects | |||
Reported at conferences in May, 2003 | ||||
TRISENOX®
| ||
![]() |
||
|
||
XYOTAX
| ||||
![]() |
Novel, patented polyglutamate polymer technology links paclitaxel to a digestible polymer |
|||
![]() |
Polymer bound paclitaxel accumulates preferentially in tumor blood vessels |
|||
![]() |
Allows the chemotherapy to enter cancer cells through a different mechanism than standard paclitaxel |
|||
![]() |
Selectively releases chemotherapy in tumor | |||
![]() |
A new chemical entity; not a reformulation | |||
![]() |
Patent protection through 2017 | |||
XYOTAX
| |||||
|
|
|
|||
Premedications | |
|
|
||
Special Infusion kits | |
|
|
||
Infusion time | |
|
|
||
Hair Loss | |
|
|
||
Lung Toxicity | |
|
|
||
Neuropathy | |
|
|
||
Tolerability | |
|
|
||
Efficacy | Superior | | | ||
XYOTAX
| ||||
![]() |
Designated fast track by FDA | |||
![]() |
PS2 NSC lung cancer is incurable and current treatments offer modest benefit | |||
![]() |
XYOTAX has the potential to demonstrate improvement over available therapy in these patients based on anti-tumor activity reported in phase I and phase II clinical trials | |||
![]() |
FDA approved Phase III program in NSC lung cancer to demonstrate superior survival | |||
![]() |
Front line therapy in PS2 | |||
![]() |
Second line treatment | |||
![]() |
Gynecologic Oncology Group to run phase III in ovarian cancer |
|||
![]() |
Front line therapy | |||
Phase II XYOTAX
| ||||
![]() |
PS2 accounts for 25% of 170,000 patients with NSC lung cancer (most are elderly) |
|||
![]() |
Current treatments are poorly tolerated (median 2 doses) | |||
![]() |
Disease progresses rapidly | |||
![]() |
Median 6 weeks | |||
![]() |
Median survival poor (2.4 3.9 months)* | |||
![]() |
High unmet needpotential accelerated regulatory review | |||
![]() |
Phase II XYOTAX clinical data supports phase III investigation | |||
![]() |
Principle investigators on Phase III program are key opinion leaders of major cooperative groups (CALGB, ECOG, SWOG) | |||
*Single agent v. combination therapy respectively | ||||
Phase II XYOTAX
| ||||||||||||
Efficacy (PS2) |
Response Rate |
Median # of Doses |
Progression (months) |
Survival (months) |
||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
XYOTAX |
|
~10% |
![]() |
4 |
![]() |
2.6 |
|
³5.4 |
![]() |
||
![]() |
||||||||||||
Toxicities (Grade 3 / 4) | ||||||||||||
Highest (Grade 4) | 10% | |||||||||||
Neutropenia | 4% | |||||||||||
Neuropathy/Fatigue | 7% | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
Paclitaxel |
![]() |
~10% |
![]() |
2 |
![]() |
1.5 |
![]() |
2.4 |
||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
Toxicities (Grade 3 / 4)*** | ||||||||||||
Highest (Grade 4) | 53% | |||||||||||
Neutropenia | 63% | |||||||||||
Neuropathy/Fatigue | >10% | |||||||||||
*ASCO 2003 poster ** ASCO 2002 presentation, R.C. Lilenbaum *** Paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen, NEJM Vol 346, No. 2, June 10, 2002 |
||||||||||||
STELLAR 2-3-4 trials
| |||||||||
![]() |
STELLAR 2 |
![]() |
STELLAR 4 | ||||||
![]() |
Second line therapy |
![]() |
Front line PS2 XYOTAX v. | ||||||
![]() |
XYOTAX v. docetaxel | gemcitabine or vinorelbine | |||||||
![]() |
840 patients |
![]() |
370 patients | ||||||
![]() |
Target enrollment- end Q2-2004 |
![]() |
Target enrollment- end Q1-2004 |
||||||
![]() |
STELLAR 3 | ||||||||
![]() |
Front line PS2 XYOTAX/platinum v. paclitaxel/platinum |
ENDPOINTS on all trials Superior Survival |
|||||||
![]() |
370 patients | ||||||||
![]() |
Target enrollment- end Q4-2003 |
||||||||
XYOTAX for Ovarian Cancer
| ||||
XYOTAX (175mg/m2) (n=91, Salvage^) | ||||
|
|
|||
|
||||
CR/PR | |
|
||
SD | |
|
||
XYOTAX* + cisplatin (75mg/m2) (n=12) | *175,210,225,250 mg/m2 ^ patients with 2 prior regimens Results reported at 2002 EORTC Meeting |
|||
Platinum Sensitive/ Resistant |
||||
|
||||
PR | |
|||
SD | |
|||
Phase II XYOTAX
| ||||||
XYOTAX*** |
Taxol®* |
Doxil®** |
Topotecan** |
|||
|
||||||
Efficacy | 28% |
15% |
28% |
28% |
||
Response rate | |
|
|
|
||
Side Effects | |
|
|
|
||
Neutropenia | 2% |
65% |
12% |
77% |
||
Neuropathy | 10% |
21% |
N/A |
N/A |
||
Skin toxicity | 0% |
0% |
23% |
0% |
||
Hair loss | 0% |
87% |
16% |
49% |
||
Dose reduction | 1% |
N/A |
57% |
78% |
||
* Taxol® package insert, 2nd line data ovarian cancer, 3hr infusion ** J Clin Oncology 2001, Randomized trial Doxil® v. Topotecan in 2nd line ovarian cancer *** Third-line treatment |
XYOTAX Phase III Ovarian Cancer
| ||||
![]() |
Front Line Ovarian Cancer | |||
![]() |
XYOTAX/platinum v. paclitaxel/platinum | |||
![]() |
Conducted by 200+ GOG centers in US | |||
![]() |
1200 patients (12 months enrollment) | |||
![]() |
Start late 2004 | |||
![]() |
Endpoint: non inferior PFS, Superior side effect profile | |||
Why Novuspharma?
| ||||
![]() |
Economically superior | |||
![]() |
$120M in cash | |||
![]() |
$18M-$20M in cost savings | |||
![]() |
Contributes additional phase III $150M+ product | |||
![]() |
Critical mass in global oncology drug development | |||
![]() |
Increases commercial capabilities in EU for expanded TRISENOX® label and sales potential | |||
![]() |
FDAs XYOTAX fast track designation significant validating value driver | |||
![]() |
Retention of WW (excluding Asia) rights critical among the potential multi-national pharma companies | |||
![]() |
Allows the Company to re-evaluate prior interest in focusing solely on ex-US partner for XYOTAX and turn attention to more global strategic relationship | |||
Portfolio Synergies
| |||||
![]() |
TRISENOX® | ||||
![]() |
EU sales driven by product label indications | ||||
![]() |
Potential MDS label expansion makes ex-US commercial prospect attractive | ||||
![]() |
Expanded label has attracted interest among several pharma companies for co-promotional relationship | ||||
![]() |
Investment in EU commercial presence would maximize WW revenue potential | ||||
![]() |
XYOTAX | ||||
![]() |
Stronger EU presence to allow more efficient pivotal trial management | ||||
![]() |
35-40% of phase III enrollment in the EU | ||||
![]() |
Transaction allows CTI to retain WW rights and explore growing interest for potential global partnership | ||||
Portfolio Synergies
| ||||
![]() |
Pixantrone | |||
![]() |
Strong US hematology presence will facilitate clinical and regulatory development | |||
![]() |
Same customer base as TRISENOX® provides sales and marketing efficiencies | |||
![]() |
CT-2106 | |||
![]() |
Enhances access to clinical sites in EU to expedite phase II trials | |||
![]() |
Provides cost synergies for required preclinical, manufacturing activites | |||
![]() |
Preclinical targets | |||
![]() |
HIF-1a and LPAAT promising novel targets | |||
![]() |
Remaining product programs with greatest commercial potential will be reviewed and prioritized | |||