Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

OR

Commission File Number 001-33274

TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

24601 Center Ridge Road, Suite 200, Westlake, OH  44145-5639

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(440) 808-9100

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes o  No x

Number of Common Shares outstanding at August 8, 2008: 14,504,185 common shares.

Table of Contents

TRAVELCENTERS OF AMERICA LLC

FORM 10-Q

June 30, 2008

INDEX

As used herein the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “TA” include TravelCenters of America LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise expressly stated or the context otherwise requires.

Table of Contents

Part I.  Financial Information

Item 1.  Financial Statements

TravelCenters of America LLC

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

1.                                      Basis of Presentation, Business Description and Organization

TravelCenters of America LLC, which we refer to as the Company, we, us and our, operates and franchises travel centers under the “TravelCenters of America,” “TA” and “Petro” brands primarily along the U.S. interstate highway system. Our customers include trucking fleets and their drivers, independent truck drivers and motorists.  Our travel centers are typically 20 to 25 acre sites and provide our customers with diesel fuel and gasoline as well as nonfuel products and services such as truck repair and maintenance services, full service restaurants, quick service restaurants, travel and convenience stores and various other driver services. We also collect rents and franchise royalties from our franchisees.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited. The unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, applicable for interim financial statements. Therefore, the disclosures do not include all the information necessary for complete financial statements in accordance with GAAP.  These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.  In the opinion of our management, all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.  Our operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

At June 30, 2008, our business included 236 travel centers in 41 states and in Canada, 167 of which were operated under the “Travel Centers of America” or “TA” brand names and 69 that were operated under the “Petro” brand name. We operated 189 of these travel centers, which we refer to as Company operated sites, and our franchisees operated 47 of these travel centers including 10 travel centers which our franchisees sublease from us and 37 travel centers which our franchisees own or lease from other lessors.

We were formed as a Delaware limited liability company on October 10, 2006. Our initial capitalization of one dollar was provided by Hospitality Properties Trust, or Hospitality Trust, on our formation date. Until January 31, 2007, we were a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of Hospitality Trust that conducted no business activities.  On January 31, 2007, Hospitality Trust acquired Travel Centers of America, Inc., our predecessor, through a merger of a subsidiary of ours with and into TravelCenters of America, Inc., restructured the business of our predecessor and distributed our then outstanding shares to Hospitality Trust shareholders in a spin off transaction.  The principal effects of the restructuring were that (i) our predecessor became our 100% owned subsidiary, (ii) subsidiaries of Hospitality Trust that we do not own became owners of the real estate at substantially all of the travel centers and certain other assets previously owned by our predecessor, (iii) we entered a lease for that real estate and those other assets with Hospitality Trust, which we refer to as the TA Lease, and (iv) all of the outstanding indebtedness of our predecessor was repaid in full.  We refer to these January 31, 2007 events as the HPT Transaction (see Note 3). We retained the balance of the assets previously owned by our predecessor and continued their operations.  We sometimes refer to Hospitality Trust and the subsidiaries of Hospitality Trust from which we lease properties collectively as Hospitality Trust.

On May 30, 2007, we acquired Petro Stopping Centers, L.P., or Petro, from Petro Stopping Centers Holdings, L.P., or Petro Holdings, which transaction we refer to as the Petro Acquisition (see Note 3).  Also on May 30, 2007, Hospitality Trust acquired Petro Holdings, which owned the real estate of 40 Petro travel centers.  Simultaneously with Hospitality Trust’s acquisition of this real estate, we leased these 40 travel centers from Hospitality Trust. We refer to this lease as the Petro Lease.

2.                                      Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, or FAS 157. FAS 157 provides a common fair value hierarchy for companies to follow in determining fair value measurements in the preparation of financial statements and expands disclosure requirements relating to how such fair value measurements were developed. FAS 157 clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions that the marketplace would use when pricing an asset or liability, rather than company specific data.  FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.  However, on February 12, 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position 157-2 which delayed the effective date of FAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair

5

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. For items within its scope, this Staff Position defers the effective date of FAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.  The Company adopted FAS 157 effective January 1, 2008 for its financial assets and liabilities and this adoption did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.  The Company does not believe that the adoption , effective January 1, 2009, of FAS 157 for its non-financial assets and liabilities will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations”, or FAS 141(R).  FAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer shall recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest in the acquiree and goodwill acquired in a business combination.  FAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.  We are currently evaluating the effect that adopting FAS 141(R) will have on our consolidated financial statements.

3.                                      HPT Transaction and Petro Acquisition

On January 31, 2007, the HPT Transaction was consummated and we entered the TA Lease.  On May 30, 2007, we consummated the Petro Acquisition and entered the Petro Lease.  Significant differences exist between our statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and that of our predecessor.

The following unaudited pro forma information presents our results of operations for the 2007 periods as if both the HPT Transaction and the Petro Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2007:

These pro forma results of operations are presented for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that actually would have resulted had the HPT Transaction and the Petro Acquisition occurred at the beginning of the period presented, or that may result in the future.  The pro forma results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 include $66,554 of merger related expenses, $16,662 of debt extinguishment expenses and $4,268 of share based compensation expense, each incurred by our predecessor or Petro as a result of the HPT Transaction or our Petro Acquisition, and $8,369 of expenses related to employee retention and separation payments.  The pro forma results for the three months ended June 30, 2007 include $21,582 of merger related expenses and $522 of debt extinguishment expenses incurred by Petro as a result of our Petro Acquisition, and $6,449 of expenses related to employee retention and separation payments.  We do not include motor fuel taxes in our fuel revenues and fuel cost of sales; however prior to the Petro Acquisition, Petro included motor fuel taxes in their fuel revenues and fuel cost of sales.  For purposes of the pro forma presentation provided above, these amounts, for periods prior to May 30, 2007, have not been removed from Petro’s reported revenues prior to the Petro Acquisition.  For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the total revenues presented above include $52,161 of motor fuel taxes that were also included in fuel cost of sales.  For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the total revenues presented above include $130,240 of motor fuel taxes that were also included in fuel cost of sales.

6

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

4.                                      Earnings Per Share

As of the date of the HPT Transaction and continuing through June 30, 2008 we did not have any share options or warrants outstanding.  Shares granted under our equity incentive plan are included in our basic and fully diluted weighted average share counts except to the extent of unvested shares, which would have had an anti-dilutive effect on loss per share for the periods ended June 30, 2008.  The assumed exercise of our predecessor’s stock options and warrants, all of which were cancelled in connection with the HPT Transaction, would have had an anti-dilutive effect on loss per share for the one month period ended January 31, 2007.

5.                                      Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

6.                                      Restricted Investments and Current Maturities of Long Term Debt

The 9% Notes.  Simultaneously with the Petro Acquisition, we and Hospitality Trust made arrangements to call Petro’s 9% Senior Secured Notes due 2012, which we refer to as the 9% Notes, by depositing with the trustee for the 9% Notes U.S. Treasury obligations sufficient to effect a covenant defeasance, to pay all of the interest due on the 9% Notes until the redemption date and to pay the full amount of the 9% Notes, including the redemption premium, on the redemption date of February 15, 2008. On December 31, 2007, $250,000 in principal amount of the 9% Notes was outstanding.  The 9% Notes were our obligations and remained so until the redemption date, and are included on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, at their estimated fair value, which includes the redemption premium.  On February 15, 2008, we paid the 9% Notes, the redemption premium and accrued interest using funds from the restricted investments that had been held by the trustee for that purpose.

Revolving Credit Facility.  We have a $100,000 revolving credit agreement, or credit facility, under which a maximum of $100,000 may be drawn, repaid and redrawn until maturity in November 2012. The maximum amount is subject to limits based on qualified collateral. The credit facility may be used for general business purposes and provides for the issuance of letters of credit. Generally, no principal payments are due until maturity. Credit facility borrowings bear interest at LIBOR plus a spread (currently 100 basis points, subject to adjustment based upon facility availability, utilization and other requirements), and are secured principally by our accounts receivable and inventory.  On July 8, 2008, we entered an amendment to the credit facility to add certain previously excluded receivables and inventory as qualified collateral, subject to completion of lender due diligence.

The credit facility requires maintenance of collateral, limits the incurrence of debt and liens, restricts the making of certain investments and the payment of dividends and other distributions, requires a minimum fixed charge ratio under certain circumstances and has other customary covenants, events of default and other provisions. The credit facility provides for acceleration of principal and interest payments upon an event of default. Events of default include, but are not limited to, failure to pay interest or other amounts due, a change in control of us, as defined in the credit facility, and our default of the lease agreements with Hospitality Trust or our management and shared services agreement with Reit Management & Research LLC, or Reit Management.

7

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

At December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2008, there were no amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility, but at June 30, 2008, we had issued $69,442 of letters of credit under this facility, which we caused to be issued to secure certain purchases, insurance, fuel tax and other trade obligations.

7.                                      Shareholders’ Equity and Equity Incentive Plans

On January 31, 2007, as part of the HPT Transaction, Hospitality Trust distributed 8,808,575 of our common shares to its shareholders in a spin off transaction.  In July and August 2007 we issued an additional 5,335,090 of our common shares in a public offering.

Equity Incentive Plans.  An aggregate of 2,000,000 of our common shares are reserved for issuance under the terms of our 2007 Equity Compensation Plan, or the Plan.  During the six months ended June 30, 2008, 25,000 shares were awarded under the Plan.  These shares were valued at $56, based upon the closing price of our shares on the American Stock Exchange on the date of the grant.  As of June 30, 2008, 1,636,960 shares remained available for issuance under our Plan.  We recognized $349 and $550 of noncash share based compensation expense for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, and recognized no such expense during the five months ended June 30, 2007.

Our predecessor had a share option plan that we did not assume. All 939,375 share options that were outstanding under our predecessor’s share option plan as of December 31, 2006 were cancelled as part of the HPT Transaction on January 31, 2007. Our predecessor recognized share based compensation expense of $4,268 in January 2007 when its outstanding options vested and were cancelled as a result of the HPT Transaction.

8.                                      Related Party Transactions

One of our Managing Directors, Barry Portnoy, is a managing trustee of Hospitality Trust and the Chairman and majority owner of Reit Management.  Our other Managing Director and President and our Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer are also senior vice presidents of Reit Management.  In addition to providing services to us, Reit Management also provides services to Hospitality Trust.  For these reasons, we consider Hospitality Trust and Reit Management to be related parties.  For a more complete description of the relationships among us, Hospitality Trust and Reit Management, please review the contracts among these parties which are publicly available as exhibits to our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, and are accessible at the SEC website, www.sec.gov, and also see our descriptions of these relationships in our Proxy Statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the description of the risks which may arise from these relationships in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, both of which documents are also accessible on the SEC website.

We were formerly a 100% subsidiary of Hospitality Trust and Hospitality Trust is our principal landlord.  During 2007 we completed both the HPT Transaction and the Petro Acquisition together with Hospitality Trust.  Under these leases we are required to pay the following rent amounts: (i) minimum amounts of rent to Hospitality Trust specified in the leases, (ii) additional rent to Hospitality Trust in connection with certain sales to Hospitality Trust of qualifying improvements at sites leased from Hospitality Trust, and (iii) the underlying ground lease payments at those sites subleased to us by Hospitality Trust, which ground lease payments we pay directly to the party from whom Hospitality Trust leases the site.  In certain cases Hospitality Trust has exercised purchase options or otherwise acquired the leased properties that had previously been subleased to us and we now pay the related ground lease rents to Hospitality Trust.  On May 12, 2008, we and Hospitality Trust amended the TA Lease.  Under the TA Lease, we can sell to Hospitality Trust certain capital improvements we make to properties owned by Hospitality Trust with no increase in our rent payable to Hospitality Trust.  These sales were limited to $125,000 but no more than $25,000 in any one year.  This lease amendment permits us to sell to Hospitality Trust qualified improvements which we have made or may make to the travel centers leased from Hospitality Trust under the TA Lease on an expedited basis.  In the event that we elect to sell these capital improvements before the time contractually permitted by the original lease terms, Hospitality Trust’s purchase commitment amount is discounted to reflect the accelerated receipt of funds by us according to a present value formula established in the amended lease.  During the six month period ended June 30, 2008, we sold leasehold improvements to Hospitality Trust for total cash proceeds of $67,729, all of which occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2008.  Taking into account the discount for the early receipt of certain of these proceeds, at June 30, 2008 the remaining amount of the leasehold improvements saleable to Hospitality Trust with no increase in our rent was $28,203.  The following table summarizes the various amounts related to our leases with Hospitality Trust that are reflected in our operating results:

8

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

The other current liabilities balance in our consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, included $18,281 and $17,987, respectively, for rent due to Hospitality Trust.

On August 11, 2008 we entered a rent deferral agreement with Hospitality Trust.  See Note 11 for a description of this agreement.

We are party to a management and shared services agreement with Reit Management. Reit Management oversees and assists us with various aspects of our business, which may include, but are not limited to, compliance with various laws and rules applicable to our status as a publicly owned company, maintenance of our travel centers, site selection for properties on which new travel centers may be developed, identification of, and purchase negotiation for travel centers and travel center companies, accounting and financial reporting, capital markets and financing activities, investor relations and general oversight of all our daily business activities, including legal matters, human resources, insurance programs, management information systems and the like. For these services, we pay Reit Management a fee equal to 0.6% of our fuel gross margin and 0.6% of our total non-fuel revenues. The fee is payable monthly based upon the prior month’s margin or revenues, as applicable. In connection with the payments made to Reit Management under the management and shared services agreement, for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, we recognized expense of $2,196 and $1,775, respectively, and for the six and five months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 we recognized expense of $4,153 and $2,709, respectively.

We have a minority joint venture interest in Petro Travel Plaza LLC, which owns one travel center that we operate under a management agreement and a parcel of land upon which Petro Travel Plaza LLC is developing a new travel center that we expect to operate.  This investment is accounted for under the equity method.  Included in our results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 was management and accounting fee income of $95 and $190, respectively, earned from our management of this joint venture.  At June 30, 2008 we had a net payable to Petro Travel Plaza LLC of $2,246.

9.                                      Commitments and Contingencies

Guarantees

In the normal course of our business we periodically enter into agreements that contain guarantees or indemnification provisions. While the maximum amount to which we may be exposed under such agreements cannot be estimated, we do not believe that any potential guaranty or indemnification will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

We offer a warranty of our workmanship in our truck repair shops, but we believe the annual warranty expense and corresponding liability are not material to us.

9

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

Environmental Matters

Our operations and properties are extensively regulated by environmental laws that (i) regulate our operations that may have adverse environmental effects, such as potentially hazardous discharges to air, soil and water, (ii) regulate our management of petroleum products and other potentially hazardous substances, and (iii) impose liability for the costs of cleaning up sites affected by, and for damages resulting from, disposal or other releases of hazardous substances. We use underground and above ground storage tanks to store petroleum products and waste at our travel centers; and we must comply with requirements of environmental laws regarding tank construction, integrity testing, leak detection and monitoring, overfill and spill control, contaminant release reporting, financial assurance and corrective action in the event of a release from a storage tank into the environment.  We regularly conduct investigatory and/or remedial actions with respect to releases of hazardous substances at a number of our sites. We regularly receive notices of alleged violations of environmental laws at travel centers.

Under certain environmental agreements entered into as part of our predecessor’s acquisitions of travel centers, prior owners of certain of our sites are required to indemnify us for certain environmental conditions. Certain of our remediation expenditures may be recovered from state government administered tank funds. In addition, we have insurance of up to $35,000 for environmental liabilities at certain of our travel centers that were known at the time the policies were issued, and up to $60,000 for unknown environmental liabilities, subject, in each case, to certain limitations and deductibles.

At June 30, 2008, we had an accrued liability for environmental matters of $10,841, as well as a receivable for expected recoveries of certain of these estimated future expenditures and cash in an escrow account to fund certain of these estimated future expenditures, resulting in an estimated net amount of $4,057 to be funded by us in the future.  While it is not possible to quantify with certainty our environmental exposure, in our opinion, based upon the information now known to us, our potential liability for clean up and remediation in excess of the accrual we have recorded will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

While the costs of our environmental compliance in the past have not had, and we do not believe such costs will have, a material adverse impact on us, it is impossible to predict the ultimate effect that changing circumstances and changing environmental laws may have on us in the future. We cannot be certain that additional contamination presently unknown to us does not exist at our sites, or that material liability will not be imposed on us in the future. If additional environmental matters arise or are discovered, or if additional environmental requirements are imposed by government agencies, increased environmental compliance or remediation expenditures may be required, and such costs could have a material adverse effect on us.

Pending Litigation

In February 2006 a subsidiary of our predecessor and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, a competitor of ours, were sued by Flying J, Inc., another one of our competitors, and its affiliates in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah.  In essence the lawsuit claims that we, Pilot and others participated in an unlawful concerted antitrust action to refuse to accept a payment card issued by a Flying J affiliate.  Flying J and its affiliates sought damages in amounts to be determined at trial and other relief.  In April 2008 we settled this litigation for $5,000 and by agreeing to begin accepting the payment card issued by Flying J’s affiliate.  As a result of this settlement, we were dismissed from the litigation on May 5, 2008.  The expense related to this settlement was recognized in the first quarter of 2008 in our selling, general and administrative expenses.

In May 2007 we terminated a contract with Simons Petroleum, Inc., or Simons, a fuel marketer, that had been entered by our predecessor.  This contract permitted Simons to market fuel to trucking companies and distribute that fuel through our TA branded locations in exchange for paying low pumping fees to us.  The termination was made at our option as provided in the contract and required an 18 month wind down period during which Simons may continue to market and distribute fuel through our locations.  A dispute arose between us and Simons regarding the proper conduct of the parties during the wind down period.  After settlement negotiations were conducted, we and Simons participated in a mediation, which failed to produce a settlement.  In February 2008, we and Simons participated in a binding arbitration, under the auspices of the American Arbitration Association, or AAA.  During the arbitration, Simons claimed damages in excess of $10,000 and sought a ruling allowing Simons greater flexibility to continue to sell and deliver fuel through our locations, while we claimed damages in excess of $6,000 and sought to clarify the limits of Simons’s rights during the wind down period.

10

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

On March 14, 2008, we received the AAA ruling, which ordered us to pay Simons $900 and to accept new customers, if any, presented to us by Simons until November 7, 2008.  We recognized the expense of $900 related to the AAA ruling in the fourth quarter of 2007 and paid this amount in April 2008.

On February 1, 2008, we commenced litigation against E2 Investment Partners LLC and related entities and individuals in the Delaware Court of Chancery.  On December 31, 2007, these defendants forwarded a letter to us proposing directors and other matters for consideration at our 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.  We sought a court order declaring that the defendants did not comply with our limited liability company agreement and that therefore the defendants’ notice was invalid and their proposed nominees and other matters were not properly presented for consideration at our 2008 annual meeting.  On April 4, 2008, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order declaring that the defendants’ notice breached our limited liability company agreement and was therefore invalid and of no force or effect.  On May 8, 2008, we commenced further litigation against the same defendants in the Delaware Court of Chancery to collect our costs and expenses arising from the defendants’ breach of our LLC agreement.  On July 2, 2008, the defendants filed an answer to our complaint and generally denied liability.  This lawsuit is proceeding.  We do not know what amounts, if any, will ultimately be collected by us.

On February 1, 2008, Alan R. Kahn filed a purported derivative action in the Delaware Court of Chancery on behalf of TA against members of our board of directors, Hospitality Trust and Reit Management. This action alleges that our directors breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the Petro Acquisition and seeks an award of unspecified damages and reformation of our Petro Lease. This action also appears to allege that Reit Management and Hospitality Trust aided and abetted our directors.  Under our limited liability company agreement and agreements with Reit Management and Hospitality Trust, we are liable to indemnify our directors, Hospitality Trust and Reit Management for liabilities, costs and expenses incurred by them in connection with this litigation.  On May 6, 2008, we moved to dismiss this complaint.  On June 20, 2008 the plaintiff filed an amended complaint making additional allegations regarding the members of our board of directors and withdrawing his request for reformation of the Petro Lease.  On July 2, 2008, we moved to dismiss the amended complaint.  We believe plaintiff’s allegations are without merit.

Beginning in mid December 2006, a series of class action lawsuits was filed against numerous companies in the petroleum industry, including our predecessor and subsidiaries, in United States District courts in over 20 states. Major petroleum companies and significant retailers in the industry have been named as defendants in one or more of these lawsuits.  The plaintiffs in the lawsuits generally allege that they are retail purchasers who purchased motor fuel at temperatures greater than 60 degrees Fahrenheit at the time of sale.   One theory alleges that the plaintiffs purchased smaller quantities of motor fuel than the amount for which we and other defendants charged them because the defendants measured the amount of motor fuel delivered by volume of gallons which, at higher temperatures, contain less energy.  These “temperature cases” seek, among other relief, an order requiring the defendants to install temperature correcting equipment on their retail motor fuel dispensing devices, damages, and attorneys’ fees.   A second theory alleges that fuel taxes are calculated in temperature adjusted 60 degree gallons and are collected by the federal and various state governments from suppliers and wholesalers, who are reimbursed in the amount of the tax by us and other retailers before the fuel is sold to consumers.  These “tax cases” allege that when the fuel is subsequently sold to consumers at temperatures above 60 degrees, the retailers sell a greater volume of fuel than the amount on which they paid tax, and therefore reap an excess profit because the customers pay more tax than the retailer paid. These “tax” cases seek, among other relief, recovery of excess taxes paid and punitive damages.  We believe that there are substantial factual and legal defenses to the theories alleged in these cases.  The cases have been consolidated into one court pursuant to multi-district litigation procedures; and, because discovery has only recently commenced, we cannot estimate our ultimate exposure to loss or liability, if any, related to these lawsuits.

In November 2006 Great American Insurance Company of New York and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, or Novartis, filed a complaint against our predecessor and an unrelated party Prime, Inc., or Prime, in connection with the alleged theft of a tractor trailer operated by Prime which contained Novartis pharmaceutical products.  The alleged theft occurred at our Bloomsbury, New Jersey travel center.  Novartis seeks damages up to or exceeding $30,000 together with interest and costs, attorneys’ fees and disbursements.  On January 5, 2007, our predecessor answered Novartis’ complaint and asserted a cross claim for contribution and indemnification against Prime.  We believe that there are substantial defenses to these claims and that any liability arising from this matter may be covered by one or more of our existing insurance policies or by Prime.

11

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

On July 10, 2008, Riverside County, California filed litigation against us in the Superior Court of California, Riverside County, seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief for alleged past violations of various state laws and regulations relating to our predecessor’s management of underground storage tanks.  A second California county, Tehama County, commenced litigation against our predecessor in March 2005 in the Superior Court of California, Tehama County, seeking civil penalties and injunctive relief arising out of a fuel spill which occurred in December 2003.  We have been involved in negotiations with these two California counties and two other California counties, San Bernardino County and Shasta County, concerning alleged past violations of various state laws and regulations relating to the management of underground storage tanks in an effort to resolve pending and threatened claims.  Although we believe that the judgments or settlements which may result from these litigations and negotiations are unlikely to be material, California’s environmental laws provide for the possible assessment of large civil penalties for various violations, including some violations which do not result in environmental harm or continuing environmental risks.  In addition, only a portion of the claims being asserted by these California counties are likely to be covered under our environmental insurance policies with our insurers.  Accordingly, these litigations and negotiations may result in our obligation to pay material amounts.

We are involved from time to time in various other legal and administrative proceedings and threatened legal and administrative proceedings incidental to the ordinary course of our business. However, except for the litigation described above, we believe that we are not now involved in any litigation which, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

10.                               Income Taxes

The provisions (benefits) for income taxes included in our current and historical financial statements were as follows:

Because of our short history and operating losses we do not currently recognize the benefit of any of our deferred tax assets, including tax loss carry forwards, that may be used to offset future taxable income.  We will, however, continue to assess our ability to generate sufficient taxable income during future periods in which our deferred tax assets may be realized. If we later believe it is more likely than not we will recover some or all of our deferred tax assets, we will record an appropriate amount of these assets as an income tax benefit in our consolidated statement of operations at that time.  As of December 31, 2007, our federal net operating loss carryforward was approximately $37,200. Our net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2028.

12

Table of Contents

TravelCenters of America LLC

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)

Our effective tax rates for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2008 were a provision of 1.0% and 0.6%, respectively, which differed from the statutory rate primarily due to recognition of a valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets and to state income taxes net of the federal tax effect.  Our effective tax rate for the three and five month periods ended June 30, 2007 and our predecessor’s effective tax rate for the one month ended January 31, 2007 were benefits of 38.4%, 38.1% and 64.7%, respectively.  Our tax rate for the three and five month periods ended June 30, 2007, differed from the statutory rate primarily due to state income taxes, net of the federal tax effect.  Our predecessor’s tax rate for the one month ended January 31, 2007 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to deductibility for tax purposes of expenses related to stock options that were not expensed for financial reporting purposes, partially offset by certain merger related expenses recognized in the financial statements which were not deductible for income tax purposes.

11.                               Subsequent Event

On August 11, 2008, we entered a rent deferral agreement with Hospitality Trust.  Significant terms of this agreement include:

13

Table of Contents

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We were formed in October 2006 as a Delaware limited liability company. We were formed as a wholly owned subsidiary of Hospitality Trust to succeed to the operating business of our predecessor, which Hospitality Trust acquired on January 31, 2007. Until January 31, 2007, we operated as a shell company subsidiary of Hospitality Trust. Because of the HPT Transaction and the Petro Acquisition described in Note 1 to our financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we believe our 2007 historical financial information may not be an appropriate basis for comparison with our current or future financial position, results of operations or cash flows. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Our fuel costs are subject to potentially material changes as a result of the market prices of diesel fuel and gasoline, as well as the availability of these products. These factors are subject to the worldwide petroleum products supply chain, which historically has incurred shocks as a result of, among other things, severe weather, terrorism, political crises, wars and other military actions and variations in demand, which are often the result of changes in the macroeconomic environment. Over the past few years there has been a significant increase in the cost of diesel fuel and gasoline; first, as crude oil demand increased during the previous economic recovery in the United States and events such as Hurricane Katrina affected the supply system; then as economic growth in certain developing economies, such as China and India, increased demand for petroleum products; and, more recently, as the world value of the U.S. dollar has declined and as speculation in the price of these commodities has increased. We expect that, although most of these significant increases in our costs for these products can largely be passed on to our customers over time, these increased prices can result in negative effects on our sales and profitability and material increases in our working capital requirements. We expect that petroleum products markets will continue to be volatile during the next 12 months.

Sumnmary of Travel Center Site Counts

The changes in the number of our sites (company operated, franchisee leased and operated or franchisee owned and operated) are significant factors that influenced the changes in our results of operations. The following table summarizes the changes in the composition of our business from December 31, 2006 through June 30, 2008:

14

Table of Contents

Relevance of Fuel Revenues

Due to volatile pricing of fuel products and our pricing arrangements with fuel customers, we believe that fuel revenue is not a reliable metric for analyzing our results of operations or our predecessor’s results from period to period. As a result solely of changes in fuel prices, our fuel revenue may increase or decrease significantly versus our or our predecessor’s historical results of operations, in both absolute amounts and on a percentage basis, without a comparable change in fuel sales volumes or in gross margin per gallon. We consider fuel volumes and gross margin to be better measures of comparative performance than fuel revenues.

Results of Operations

Three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007

The following table summarizes our results for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.  Due to the Petro Acquisition on May 30, 2007, the results for the 2007 period may not be an appropriate basis for comparison to our current year results.  The results shown for the 2007 period include the results from Petro beginning on May 30, 2007 and do not include pro forma adjustments.