UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or 40-F.

Form 20-F   x      Form 40-F    o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1)   o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7)   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Yes   o      No   x

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82:

NEWS RELEASE

Havant, UK – July 15, 2008 - Xyratex Ltd (Nasdaq: XRTX) today released the following financial information for the second quarter of its 2008 fiscal year, ending May 31, 2008:

·                                          Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

·                                          Unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This section contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include those listed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.

Overview

We are a leading provider of modular enterprise-class data storage subsystems and storage process technology. We design, develop and manufacture enabling technology that provides our customers with data storage products to support high-performance storage and data communication networks. We operate in two business segments: Networked Storage Solutions and Storage Infrastructure.

Our Networked Storage Solutions products are primarily storage subsystems, which we provide to OEMs and our Storage Infrastructure products consist of disk drive manufacturing process equipment, which we sell directly to manufacturers of disk drives and disk drive components. We form long-term strategic relationships with our customers and we support them through our operations in the United States, Asia and Europe. In our 2007 fiscal year, sales to our top three customers, NetApp, Seagate Technology and Western Digital, accounted for 56%, 12% and 12% of our revenues, respectively. In the six months ended May 31, 2008, sales to NetApp accounted for 62% of our revenues. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in the period. We had 47 customers which individually contributed more than $0.5 million to revenues in our 2007 fiscal year and at May 31, 2008 we had over 150 active customers. We enter into joint development projects with our key customers and suppliers in order to research and introduce new technologies and products.

Revenues

We derive revenues primarily from the sale of our Networked Storage Solutions products and our Storage Infrastructure products.

Our Networked Storage Solutions products consist primarily of storage subsystems that address three market segments through our OEM customers: Network Attached Storage or NAS, Storage Area Networks or SAN, and Capacity Optimized storage. We have continued to see strong growth in each of these market segments over the past two fiscal years, particularly through NetApp, our main customer addressing these marketplaces. Our customers typically operate across multiple market segments. Capacity Optimized storage is primarily driven by magnetic tape technology being replaced by storage systems containing low cost disk drive technology in the backup and recovery processes within enterprises. The deployment of low cost disk drives is also taking place within the SAN and NAS market segments as IT departments begin to classify their data as part of an information life cycle or corporate data management strategy. Our customers in each market segment currently use the Fibre Channel protocol to access the storage subsystem which can incorporate either high performance Fibre Channel or lower cost ATA/SATA disk drives.

Our Storage Infrastructure revenues are primarily derived from the sale of disk drive manufacturing process equipment directly to manufacturers of disk drives and disk drive components. We supply three main product lines in this segment: production test systems, servo track writers and media process technology (comprising media cleaning and media handling automation technology). Revenues from these products are subject to significant fluctuations, particularly from quarter to quarter, as they are dependent on the capital investment decisions and installation schedules of our customers.

We typically enter into arrangements with our largest customers and provide them with products based on purchase orders executed under these arrangements. These arrangements often include estimates as to future product demand but do not typically specify minimum volume purchase requirements. Due to the complexity of our products, we provide almost all of our products on a build-to-order basis. The prices of our products are generally agreed to in advance and are based on a pre-negotiated pricing model. The pricing model may specify certain product components and component costs as well as anticipated profit margins.

As described above, the unit prices we obtain from our major customers will typically vary with volumes. As products become more mature, prices will generally decline, partly reflecting reduced component costs. We also regularly introduce new products which are likely to incorporate additional features or new technology and these products will generally command a higher unit price.

Average unit prices will also vary with the mix of customers and products. Our unit prices for Networked Storage Solutions products have reduced in the last two fiscal years as volumes with our major customers have increased and prices are adjusted in line with the agreed price/volume matrix. Because this is related to volume growth, this has not resulted in a reduction in our revenues in those fiscal years and has also enabled reductions in component costs. With this exception, we have not seen an overall trend in our unit prices.

We believe that both of our business segments present the opportunity for growth over the next several years. We are seeing growth in demand from many of our customers, which we believe relates to factors including increases in the amount of digitally stored information, increased information technology spending, growth in the specific markets that our customers address, the trend towards outsourcing and increased market share of our customers. Growth in our Storage Infrastructure revenues can also be specifically affected by the growth in shipped volume and increases in the individual storage capacity of disk drives.

The acquisition of Maxtor by Seagate Technology in May 2006 represented a significant consolidation among disk drive suppliers and caused significant changes in market share. We believe these market share changes resulted in an exceptional level of purchases of our equipment in our 2006 fiscal year as our customers invested in new capacity to capture increased market share. In addition Seagate is reutilizing certain Maxtor-owned equipment, which was previously planned to be replaced by Xyratex equipment. This surplus capacity and reutilization of Maxtor owned equipment resulted in a significant decline in our revenues during 2007 fiscal year compared to our 2006 fiscal year and whilst the opportunity for growth in the longer term remains, revenues from our Storage Infrastructure products have continued to be impacted by these factors during the first half of our 2008 fiscal year.

Foreign Exchange Rate Fluctuations

The functional currency for all our operations is U.S. dollars and the majority of our revenues and cost of revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars. A significant proportion (approximately $71.0 million in our 2007 fiscal year) of our non-U.S. dollar operating expenses relates to payroll and other expenses of our U.K. operations. To a lesser extent we are also exposed to movements in the Malaysian Ringgit relative to the U.S. dollar. We manage our exchange rate exposures through the use of forward foreign currency exchange contracts and option agreements. By using these derivative instruments, increases or decreases in our U.K. pound operating expenses resulting from changes in the U.S. dollar to U.K. pound exchange rate are partially offset by realized gains and losses on the derivative instruments.

Over our last three fiscal years there has been significant volatility in the exchange rate between the U.K. pound and the U.S. dollar. Overall in this period the U.S. dollar reduced in value by approximately 9% relative to the U.K. pound. The effect of this volatility and movement is reduced because we have hedged the majority of our exposure to this exchange rate movement for approximately one year ahead. Excluding the effect of future movements in the exchange rate, we anticipate this movement will increase our operating expenses by approximately $5.0 million in our 2008 fiscal year, in comparison to our 2007 fiscal year.

Costs of Revenues and Gross Profit

Our costs of revenues consist primarily of the costs of the materials and components used in the assembly and manufacture of our products, including disk drives, electronic cards, enclosures and power supplies. Other items included in costs of revenues include salaries, bonuses and other labor costs for employees engaged in the component procurement, assembly and testing of our products, warranty expenses, shipping costs, depreciation of manufacturing equipment and certain overhead costs. Our gross margins change primarily as a result of fluctuations in our product mix. Our gross margins also change as a result of changes to product pricing, manufacturing volumes and costs of components. The gross margins for our Networked Storage Solutions products tend to be lower than the margins of our Storage Infrastructure products and therefore our gross profit as a percentage of revenues will continue to vary with the proportions of revenues in each segment.

Research and Development

Our research and development expenses include expenses related to product development, engineering, materials costs and salaries, bonuses and other labor costs for our employees engaged in research and development. Research and development expenses include the costs incurred in designing products for our OEM customers, which often occurs prior to their commitment to purchase these products. We expense research and development costs as they are incurred.

Due to the level of competition in the markets in which we operate and the rapid changes in technology, our future revenues are heavily dependent on the improvements we make to our products and the introduction of new products.  During our 2007 fiscal year our research and development expenses related to over approximately 45 separate projects covering improving existing products, meeting customer specific requirements and entering new markets, such as development of the Storage Bridge Bay (SBB) compliant OneStor platform and the application of our media process automation technology to solar cell manufacturing.

As of November 2007, 26% of our employees were engaged in our research and development activities. Over recent fiscal years research and development expenses have risen approximately at the level of increase in revenue. Over the longer term we expect this trend to continue. In our 2007 fiscal year, although revenues declined, we continued to increase our research and development expenditure. This reflects our continuing commitment to developing products based on advanced technologies and designs to support growth in Networked Storage Solutions revenues and the longer term opportunities for growth of our Storage Infrastructure revenues.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general, and administrative expenses include expenses related to salaries, bonuses and other labor costs for senior management and sales, marketing, and administrative employees, market research and consulting fees, commissions to sales representatives, information technology costs, other marketing and sales activities and exchange gains and losses arising on the retranslation of U.K. pound denominated assets and liabilities. Our selling, general and administrative expenses have increased over recent fiscal years as we have grown our business. To the extent our business continues to grow we would expect these expenses to continue to increase approximately in line with our revenues.

Equity Compensation Expense

We record equity compensation expense using the fair value method required by Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) 123R—“Share Based Payment”. Equity compensation expense calculated under FAS 123R for the six month periods ended May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007 was $4.2 million and $3.8 million respectively.

Equity – Share Capital

On January 14, 2008 we commenced a share buy-back program. We have announced that we will purchase our common shares up to a value of $30 million and it is anticipated that the repurchase will take place over a period of up to one year. During the six months ended May 31, 2008 we purchased 202,000 shares at a total value of $3.1 million.

Provision for Income Taxes

We are subject to taxation primarily in the United Kingdom, the United States and Malaysia. Our Malaysian operations benefit from a beneficial tax status which provided us with a zero tax rate on substantially all of our income arising in Malaysia. In 2006 we were granted a tax exempt status for substantially all of our operations in Malaysia until 2012, provided that we meet certain requirements. In the United Kingdom and the United States we benefit from research and development tax credits. As of November 30, 2007 we recorded a deferred tax asset of $15.4 million related to loss carryforwards and other timing differences in the United Kingdom. The majority of this asset is denominated in U.K. pounds and income tax expense will therefore include exchange adjustments to this asset. As a result of loss carryforwards we have not been required to make any significant U.K. tax payments in recent fiscal years. Of the remaining deferred tax balance of $7.3 million, $5.3 million relates to equity compensation expense as described in the next paragraph and $2.9 million relates to net operating loss carryforwards recorded in connection with our acquisition of nStor.

Following the introduction of FAS 123R in our 2006 fiscal year, we have recorded equity compensation expense using the fair value method. This has resulted in the recording of a tax benefit of $3.5 million which is included in the deferred tax asset at November 30, 2007. We also recorded a deferred tax asset of $1.8 million related to equity compensation expense calculated under the intrinsic method prior to our 2006 fiscal year. The realization of these elements of our deferred tax asset is dependent on future share price movements over the next four fiscal years. We anticipate recording any variation to the value of this asset as an adjustment to Additional Paid in Capital.

Tax payments in our 2007 fiscal year amounted to $0.5 million and, due to the beneficial Malaysian tax status and U.K. tax losses, these tax payments related primarily to our U.S. operations. We do not anticipate a significant change in the level of our tax payments in our 2008 fiscal year. Over the last three fiscal years our tax benefit or expense has primarily consisted of U.S. current taxes and movements in the U.K. deferred tax asset.

As described in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, with effect from December 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FAS No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance with FAS 109 and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, the Company recorded no additional unrecognized tax benefits. As of December 1, 2007, the Company had $7.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits. If this asset were recognized approximately $3.4 million would reduce our income tax expense and the remainder would result in a balance sheet reclassification only.

Results from Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected operating data as a percentage of revenues.

Three Months Ended May 31, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended May 31, 2007

The following is a tabular presentation of our results of operations for the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007. Following the table is a discussion and analysis of our business and results of operations for such periods.

Revenues

The 25.1% increase in our revenues in the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007 was attributable to increased sales of our Networked Storage Solutions products being partially offset by a decrease in sales of our Storage Infrastructure products.

Of the $63.4 million, or 37.5%, increase in revenues from sales of our Networked Storage Solutions products management estimates that $42.2 million was contributed by a 34% increase in revenues from sales of our storage subsystem products incorporating Fibre Channel disk drives.

The remaining increase related primarily to growth of approximately 41% in sales from products incorporating low-cost disk drives. Both of these increases reflected continued growth in our sales to NetApp together with increased volumes from other customers, the introduction of new products and the contribution of new customers.. We believe this reflects the increasing requirements for storage of digital information, particularly networked storage. In addition we estimate that $20 million of this increase resulted from customers pulling forward shipments from our third quarter to minimize any impacts from the introduction of our new Enterprise Resource Planning software

The $10.0 million, or 22.8%, decrease in revenues from sales of Storage Infrastructure products primarily related to a decrease in demand due to the investment by Seagate Technology in an exceptional level of production capacity in 2006 in connection with its acquisition of Maxtor as described in the overview. As also described in the overview, our revenues from our Storage Infrastructure products are subject to significant fluctuations, particularly between quarters, resulting from our major customers’ capital expenditure decisions and installation schedules.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

The increase in cost of revenues and gross profit in the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007 was primarily due to higher Networked Storage Solutions revenues. As a percentage of revenues our gross profit was 15.3% for the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to 17.0% for the three months ended May 31, 2007. This change was primarily attributable to the increased proportion of revenues from the sales of lower margin Networked Storage Solutions products.

The gross margin for our Networked Storage Solutions products decreased to 14.0% in the three months ended May 31, 2008 from 14.4% in the three months ended May 31, 2007, as a result of a number of changes in product and customer mix, none of which were individually significant.

The gross margin for Storage Infrastructure products was 24.9% in the three months ended May 31, 2008, compared to 28.0% in the three months ended May 31, 2007. This was primarily a result of fixed costs relative to lower volumes.

In measuring the performance of our business segments from period to period we focus on gross profit by product group, which excludes a non-cash equity compensation charge of $0.3 million for the three months ended May 31, 2008 and $0.3 million for the three months ended May 31, 2007. See Note 13 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of our segments and how we measure segment performance.

Research and Development

The $2.4 million increase in research and development expense in the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007 primarily relate to increased investment in a number of our product lines to support specific customer opportunities and requirements, particularly production test racks and our OneStor storage subsystem platform.

Selling, General and Administrative

The $1.1 million increase in our selling, general and administrative expense in the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007 relates primarily to increased expenditure to support the growth in Networked Storage Solutions revenues.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

The $0.5 million decrease in amortization of intangible assets in the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007 primarily resulted from intangible assets acquired as a result of the acquisition of ZT Automation in our 2004 fiscal year becoming fully amortized.

Interest Income, Net

We recorded net interest income of $0.4 million in the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to $0.8 million in the three months ended May 31, 2007. This primarily resulted from a decrease in interest rates and was also affected by a decrease in average cash balances.

Provision for Income Taxes

During the three months ended May 31, 2008 we recorded a $0.4 million provision for income taxes compared with an income tax benefit of $0.5 million in the three months ended May 31, 2007. This was primarily as a result of the inclusion in the comparative quarter of the effect of a reduction in effective tax rate.

Net Income

Net income was essentially unchanged for the three months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended May 31, 2007. This primarily reflected the offsetting effects of an increase in Networked Storage Solutions revenues and a decrease in Storage Infrastructure revenues.

Six Months Ended May 31, 2008 Compared to Six Months Ended May 31, 2007

The following is a tabular presentation of our results of operations for the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007. Following the table is a discussion and analysis of our business and results of operations for such periods.

Revenues

The 7.6% increase in our revenues in the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007 was attributable to increased sales of our Networked Storage Solutions products being partially offset by a decrease in sales of our Storage Infrastructure products.

Of the $87.6 million, or 26.3%, increase in revenues from sales of our Networked Storage Solutions products, management estimates that $52.8 million was contributed by a 23% increase in revenues from sales of our storage subsystem products incorporating Fibre Channel disk drives. The remaining increase related primarily to growth of approximately 33% in sales from products incorporating low-cost disk drives. Both of these increases reflected continued growth in our sales to NetApp together with increased volumes from other customers, the introduction of new products and the contribution of new customers. We believe this reflects the increasing requirements for storage of digital information, particularly networked storage. In addition we estimate that $20 million of this increase resulted from customers pulling forward shipments from our third quarter to minimize any impacts from the introduction of our new Enterprise Resource Planning software.

The $53.5 million, or 45.9%, decrease in revenues from sales of Storage Infrastructure products primarily related to a decrease in demand due to the investment by Seagate Technology in an exceptional level of production capacity in 2006 in connection with its acquisition of Maxtor as described in the overview. As also described in the overview, our revenues from our Storage Infrastructure products are subject to significant fluctuations, particularly between quarters, resulting from our major customers’ capital expenditure decisions and installation schedules.

Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit

The increase in cost of revenues and decrease in gross profit in the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007 was primarily due to higher Networked Storage Solutions revenues. As a percentage of revenues gross profit was 15.2% in the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to 18.1% for the six months ended May 31, 2007. This change was primarily attributable to the increased proportion of revenues from the sales of lower margin Networked Storage Solutions products.

The gross margin for our Networked Storage Solutions products increased to 14.3% in the six months ended May 31, 2008 from 14.0% in the six months ended May 31, 2007, as a result of a number of changes in product and customer mix, none of which were individually significant.

The gross margin for Storage Infrastructure products was 22.1% in the six months ended May 31, 2008, compared to 30.2% in the six months ended May 31, 2007. This was primarily a result of fixed costs relative to lower volumes.

In measuring the performance of our business segments from period to period we focus on gross profit by product group, which excludes a non-cash equity compensation charge of $0.7 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008 and $0.6 million for the six months ended May 31, 2007. See Note 13 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of our segments and how we measure segment performance.

Research and Development

The $2.9 million increase in research and development expense in the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007 primarily related to increased investment in a number of our Storage Infrastructure product lines, particularly production test racks.

Selling, General and Administrative

The $1.3 million increase in our selling, general and administrative expense in the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007 relates primarily to increased expenditure to support the growth in Networked Storage Solutions revenues.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

The $0.8 million decrease in amortization of intangible assets in the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007 primarily resulted from intangible assets acquired as a result of the acquisition of ZT Automation in our 2004 fiscal year becoming fully amortized.

Other Income

We recorded income of $0.9 million in the six months ended May 31, 2007 relating to the final payment in respect of the disposal of a product line to Napatech in 2006.

Interest Income, Net

We recorded net interest income of $1.3 million in the six months ended May 31, 2008 which was not significantly different to the $1.4 million recorded in the six months ended May 31, 2007.

Provision for Income Taxes

During the six months ended May 31, 2008 we recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.7 million compared with $0.8 million in the six months ended May 31, 2007. This was primarily as a result of the decrease in income before income taxes, offset by the inclusion of a $0.9 million prior period adjustment in the comparative period.

Net Income

The decrease in net income for the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to the six months ended May 31, 2007 resulted primarily from a decrease in revenues from our Storage Infrastructure products partially offset by the effect of an increase in Networked Storage Solutions revenues.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows

Net cash used in operating activities was $2.4 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $24.3 million for the six months ended May 31, 2007.

Cash used in operating activities of $2.4 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008 resulted primarily from the increases in inventory and accounts receivable of $48.7 million and $22.9 million respectively. The increase in inventory primarily related to a build up of inventory to mitigate the risks associated with the migration to our new “ERP” system.

The increase in accounts receivable related primarily from the timing of revenues in our second fiscal quarter being weighted towards the end of the quarter. In addition a decrease in deferred revenues of $5.2 million, relating to a decrease in orders on hand for automation equipment, contributed to the cash used in operating activities. These negative effects on cashflow were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $60.8 million. The increase in accounts payable primarily related to the timing of revenues and increase in inventories in our second quarter being weighted towards the end of the quarter.

Cash provided by operating activities of $24.3 million for the six months ended May 31, 2007 resulted primarily from the positive contribution of net income of $12.1 million after excluding net non-cash charges totaling $13.6 million together with decreases in inventory of $12.1 million and accounts receivable of $3.6 million. The decreases in both inventory and accounts receivable primarily related to the lower revenues in our second fiscal quarter. These positive effects on cashflow were partially offset by an increase in other current assets of $2.7 million, and decreases in accounts payable, employee compensation and benefits and deferred revenue of $4.2 million, $5.6 million and $4.1 million, respectively. The decrease in accounts payable resulted from the lower revenues in our second fiscal quarter. The increase in other currents assets related to a reduction in value of forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The decrease in employee compensation and benefits payable related to the payment of 2006 fiscal year bonuses. The decrease in deferred revenue relates to a reduction in orders on hand in our Storage Infrastructure segment. Deferred revenue represents advance payments from customers for Storage Infrastructure products and varies with the level of orders on hand for these products.

Net cash used in investing activities was $11.6 million for the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to $14.3 million for the six months ended May 31, 2007.

Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended May 31, 2008 related to capital expenditure. Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended May 31, 2007 included $4.9 million related to the purchase of intellectual property from IBM and Ario Data Networks Inc., $1.7 million deferred consideration related to our acquisition of ZT Automation in 2004 and $7.8 million related to capital expenditure.

Capital expenditure increased in comparison to the prior period to support actual and planned growth in Networked Storage Solutions revenues. Our capital expenditures relate primarily to purchases of equipment such as tooling, production lines and test equipment. We do not anticipate any significant changes in the nature or level of our capital expenditures and we would expect these to generally change in line with our revenues. We currently have no material commitments for capital expenditures.

Net cash used in our financing activities was $2.1 million in the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to $5.6 million in the six months ended May 31, 2007.

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended May 31, 2008 comprised the repurchase of shares under our share buy-back program as described in the overview of the value $3.1 million partially offset by $1.0 million proceeds from the exercise of employee share options.

Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended May 31, 2007 comprised repayments of the $7.0 million remaining under our HSBC term loan partially offset by $1.4 million proceeds from the exercise of employee share options.

Liquidity

As of May 31, 2008, our principal sources of liquidity consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $54.6 million and our multi-currency credit facilities with HSBC. The HSBC credit facilities include a revolving line of credit which expires in December 2008, and a short-term overdraft facility. The revolving line of credit is for an aggregate principal amount of up to $30.0 million and bears interest at a rate of between 0.6% and 1.25% above LIBOR, depending on the level of debt relative to operating income. The overdraft facility is for an aggregate principal amount of $15.0 million and bears interest at a rate equal to 0.75% above LIBOR. As of May 31, 2008 we had no debt outstanding under our revolving line of credit or our overdraft facility. The HSBC credit facilities provide for a security interest on substantially all of our assets.

In addition to the share buy-back described above in the overview, our future financing requirements will depend on many factors, but are particularly affected by the rate at which our revenues and associated working capital requirements grow, changes in the payment terms with our major customers and suppliers of disk drives, and quarterly fluctuations in our revenues. Additionally, our cash flow could be significantly affected by any acquisitions we might choose to make or alliances we have entered or might enter into. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents together with our credit facilities with HSBC will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements at least through the next 12 months. We cannot assure you that additional equity or debt financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Accounting Policies

Critical Accounting Policies

Our critical accounting policies are set out in our Annual Report on form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2008. By “critical accounting policies” we mean policies that are both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and financial results and require critical management judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Although we believe that our judgments and estimates are appropriate, actual future results may differ from our estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On December 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standard No. 157 (“FAS 157”), “Fair Value Measurements”. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The adoption of FAS 157 did not give rise to any adjustments to the consolidated financial statements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-2 permits a one-year deferral in applying the measurement provisions of FAS 157 to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP 157-2 is not expected to give rise to any adjustments to the consolidated financial statements.

On December 1, 2007, the Company adopted FAS No. 159 (“FAS 159”), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—including an amendment of FAS No. 115”. FAS 159 allows measurement at fair value of eligible financial assets and liabilities that are not otherwise measured at fair value. If the fair value option for an eligible item is elected, unrealized gains and losses for that item shall be reported in current earnings at each subsequent reporting date. FAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to draw comparison between the different measurement attributes the company elects for similar types of assets and liabilities. The adoption of FAS 159 did not give rise to any adjustments to the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations”. FAS 141R retains the fundamental requirements of the original pronouncement requiring that the purchase method be used for all business combinations. FAS 141R defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination, establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control and requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest at their fair values as of the acquisition date. In addition, FAS 141R requires expensing of acquisition-related and restructure-related costs, remeasurement of earn out provisions at fair value, measurement of equity securities issued for purchase at the date of close of the transaction and non-expensing of in-process research and development related intangibles. FAS 141R is effective for our business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after December 1, 2009.

In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”. FAS 161 requires additional disclosures about the objectives of using derivative instruments, the method by which the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FAS 133 and its related interpretations, and the effect of derivative instruments and related hedged items on financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. FAS 161 also requires disclosure of the fair value of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format. This statement is effective for our 2009 fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the effect, if any, that the adoption of FAS 161 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

XYRATEX LTD

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

XYRATEX LTD

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

XYRATEX LTD

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(US dollars and amounts, in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

XYRATEX LTD

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

XYRATEX LTD

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(US dollars and amounts in thousands, except per share data, unless otherwise stated)

1.    The Company and its Operations

Xyratex Ltd together with its subsidiaries (“the Company”) is a leading provider of modular enterprise-class data storage subsystems and storage process technology with principal operations in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), the United States of America (“U.S.”) and Malaysia. We operate in two business segments: Networked Storage Solutions (NSS) and Storage Infrastructure (SI). Our NSS products are hard disk drive based data storage subsystems. Our SI products include disk drive production test systems, process automation for disk drive and solar panel manufacturing, servo track writers and disk cleaning systems.

2.    Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

These condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited but include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which the Company’s management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of such dates and the operating results and cash flows for those periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. In addition, the results of operations for the interim periods may not necessarily be indicative of the operating results that may be incurred for the entire year.

The November 30, 2007 balance sheet was derived from audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 20, 2008.

3.              Equity compensation plans

The following table summarizes equity compensation expense related to share-based awards under FAS 123R for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2008 and  2007.

The Company’s share-based awards include restricted stock units (“RSUs”), share options, an Employee Stock Purchase Plan and restricted shares. From March 2006 the Company’s share awards have principally consisted of RSUs. Based on an agreement with the Company’s managing underwriter for the Initial Public Offering in 2004, there are 2,609 shares authorized for future grants under the plans. Option exercises are satisfied through the issue of new shares or where previously agreed with the trustee, through the transfer of shares from an employee benefit trust.

Restricted Stock Units

RSUs generally require that shares be awarded over four years from the date of grant, subject to continued service. The vesting of these units is also generally subject to the achievement of certain performance conditions in the year of grant. Equity compensation expense relating to RSUs totaling $3,502 has been recorded in the six months ended May 31, 2008.  Restricted stock units granted, exercised, canceled and expired are summarized as follows:

Share Option Activity

The Company has five plans under which employees have been granted options to purchase Xyratex Ltd shares. Options granted, exercised, canceled and expired under all of the Company’s share option plans, excluding the Sharesave Plan, are summarized as follows:

Exercise prices of option activity and options outstanding denominated in U.K. pounds have been converted to the U.S. dollar equivalent in the above table using the U.K. pound/U.S. dollar exchange rate as of each transaction date or period end date as appropriate.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Restricted Shares

14 shares were granted under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan in the six months ended May 31, 2008.

4.    Equity – Share Capital

Share Buy-Back

On January 14, 2008 the Company commenced a share buy-back program. The Company has announced that it will purchase its own shares up to a value of $30 million and it is anticipated that the repurchase will take place over a period of up to one year. During the six months ended May 31, 2008 the Company has purchased 202 shares at a total value of $3,103.

5.    Net earnings per share

Basic net earnings per share for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of Xyratex Ltd common shares. Diluted net earnings per share gives effect to all potentially dilutive common share equivalents outstanding during the period.

6.    Other income

On March 6, 2006, the Company concluded the disposal of a product line through a license agreement of intellectual property of certain network analysis technology and the transfer of the related customer base to Napatech, a programmable network adapter company based in Denmark. The Company is continuing to manufacture the related product lines for Napatech under a separate Supply Agreement. Under the license agreement a total of $4,093 became payable, of which $890 has been recorded in the statement of operations as other income in the six months ended May 31, 2007.

7.    Derivative financial instruments

The Company manages its exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk between the U.K. pound to the U.S. dollar and the Malaysian ringgit to the U.S. dollar through entering into forward exchange contracts and options. The Company designated all of its forward foreign currency contracts as qualifying for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of these instruments are deferred and recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) until the hedged transactions affect earnings, at which time the deferred gains and losses on the forward foreign currency contracts are recognized in the income statement.

The Company reclassified a gain of $992 and $1,932, net of tax of $425 and $828, from AOCI to earnings during the six months ended May 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively due to the realization of the underlying transactions. The Company recorded the decrease in fair market value of derivatives related to its cash flow hedges of $567, net of tax of $243, to AOCI for the six months ended May 31, 2008 compared to an increase of $640, net of tax of $275 for the six months ended May 31, 2007. Any remaining unrealized amounts are expected to be reclassified to earnings during the next eighteen months. The fair value of these foreign currency contracts represents the amount the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts, considering first, quoted market prices of comparable agreements, or in the absence of quoted market prices, such factors as interest rates, currency exchange rates and remaining maturity.

The following table shows derivatives existing as of May 31, 2008 and November 30, 2007:

Derivatives between U.K. pound and U.S. dollar

Derivatives between Malaysian ringgit and U.S. dollar