UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | |||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|||
Check the appropriate box: |
|||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
||
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
||
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
||
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
||
o |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
675 West Kendall Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
May 12, 2009
To Our Stockholders:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to be held at 10:30 a.m., local time, on Wednesday, June 10, 2009, at the offices of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109.
The Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement on the following pages describe the matters to be presented at the meeting.
It is important that your shares be represented at this meeting to assure the presence of a quorum. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we hope that you will have your stock represented by voting your shares over the Internet or by telephone as provided in the instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card, or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy in the enclosed envelope, as soon as possible. Your stock will be voted in accordance with the instructions you have given in your proxy.
Thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
Craig
A. Wheeler
President and Chief Executive Officer
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
675 West Kendall Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142
NOTICE OF 2009 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On June 10, 2009
To Our Stockholders:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or the Annual Meeting, will be held on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 at 10:30 a.m., local time, at the offices of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109. At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will consider and vote on the following matters:
The stockholders will also act on any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Stockholders of record at the close of business on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. A complete list of such stockholders will be open to the examination of any stockholder at our principal executive offices at 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, during ordinary business hours, for a period of ten days prior to the Annual Meeting as well as on the day of the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting may be adjourned from time to time without notice other than by announcement at the Annual Meeting.
We hope that all stockholders will be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. However, to ensure that a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, please vote your shares over the Internet or by telephone as provided in the instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card, or complete, date, sign and promptly return the enclosed proxy card whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting. A postage-prepaid envelope, addressed to Broadridge Financial Solutions, serving as proxy tabulator, has been enclosed for your convenience. If you attend the Annual Meeting in person, your proxy will, upon your written request, be returned to you and you may vote your shares in person.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Bruce
A. Leicher
Secretary
Cambridge,
Massachusetts
May 12, 2009
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE AS PROVIDED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD, OR COMPLETE, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND PROMPTLY MAIL IT IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE TO ASSURE REPRESENTATION OF YOUR SHARES AT THE ANNUAL MEETING. NO POSTAGE NEED BE AFFIXED IF THE PROXY CARD IS MAILED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES.
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
675 WEST KENDALL STREET
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02142
For the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held on Wednesday, June 10, 2009
This proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card are being furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., also referred to in this proxy statement as the "Company", "Momenta", "we" or "us", for use at the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or the Annual Meeting, to be held on Wednesday, June 10, 2009 at 10:30 a.m., local time, at the offices of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109, and at any adjournment thereof. You may obtain directions to the location of the Annual Meeting by contacting Bruce A. Leicher, Secretary, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, telephone: (617) 491-9700.
All proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained in those proxies. If no choice is specified, the proxies will be voted in favor of the matters set forth in the accompanying Notice of Meeting. Any proxy may be revoked by a stockholder at any time before it is exercised by delivery of written revocation to our Secretary or by appearing at the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
Our 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 is being mailed to stockholders with the mailing of these proxy materials on or about May 12, 2009.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on June 10, 2009:
This proxy statement and the 2008 Annual Report to Stockholders are available for viewing, printing and downloading at http://ir.momentapharma.com/annuals.cfm.
A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, except for exhibits, will be furnished without charge to any stockholder upon written request to Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, Attention: Richard P. Shea, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, facsimile: (617) 621-0431.
Voting Securities and Votes Required
Stockholders of record at the close of business on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. On that date, 39,889,050 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. Each share of common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote with respect to all matters submitted to stockholders at the Annual Meeting. We have no other securities entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
The presence in person or representation by proxy of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to establish a quorum for the transaction of business. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will be adjourned until a quorum is obtained.
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote on the election. To be approved, the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, requires the affirmative vote of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of stock present or represented and voting on such matters. The votes will be counted, tabulated and certified by a representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions, who will serve as the inspector of elections at the Annual Meeting.
Abstentions are included in the shares present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present, and are counted as a vote against for purposes of determining whether a proposal is approved. Broker non-votes (when shares are represented at the Annual Meeting by a proxy
specifically conferring only limited authority to vote on certain matters and no authority to vote on other matters) are included in the determination of the number of shares represented at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present but are not counted for purposes of determining whether a proposal has been approved and thus have no effect on the outcome.
Voting Your Shares
If you are the record holder of your shares, you may vote in one of four ways. You may vote by submitting your proxy over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail or you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
You may vote over the Internet. If you have Internet access, you may vote your shares from any location in the world by following the "Vote by Internet" instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card.
You may vote by telephone. You may vote your shares by following the "Vote by Phone" instructions set forth on the enclosed proxy card.
You may vote by mail. You may vote by completing, dating and signing the proxy card that accompanies this proxy statement and promptly mailing it in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope. You do not need to put a stamp on the enclosed envelope if you mail it in the United States. The shares you own will be voted according to the instructions on the proxy card you mail. If you return the proxy card, but do not give any instructions on a particular matter described in this proxy statement, the shares you own will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors. Our board of directors recommends that you vote FOR each nominee for director and FOR Proposal 2.
You may vote in person. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote by delivering your completed proxy card in person or you may vote by completing a ballot. Ballots will be available at the meeting.
Changing Your Vote; Revocation of Proxy
Voting over the Internet or by telephone or execution of a proxy will not in any way affect a stockholder's right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. A proxy may be revoked before it is used to cast a vote. To revoke a proxy, a stockholder must:
Any written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy should be sent to us at the following address: Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, MA 02142, Attention: Bruce A. Leicher, Secretary. The shares represented by all properly executed proxies received in time for the Annual Meeting will be voted as specified in those proxies. If the shares you own are held in your name and you do not specify in the proxy card how your shares are to be voted, they will be voted in favor of the election of the directors named in this proxy statement, in favor of the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm and, in the discretion of the persons appointed as proxies, on any other items that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. If the shares you own are held in "street name," the bank or brokerage firm, as the record holder of your shares, is required to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. To vote your shares held in "street name," you will need to follow the directions provided to you by your bank or brokerage firm.
2
PROPOSAL ONE
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Board Recommendation
The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" the election of each of Mr. Clarke, Mr. Sulat and Mr. Wheeler as Class II directors.
We have three classes of directors, currently consisting of three Class I directors, four Class II directors and three Class III directors. At each annual meeting, directors are elected for a full term of three years to succeed those whose terms are expiring. The terms of the three classes are staggered in a manner so that only one class is elected by stockholders annually. John K. Clarke, Robert S. Langer, James Sulat and Craig A. Wheeler are currently serving as Class II directors. Dr. Langer is not standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The Class II directors elected this year will serve as members of our board of directors until the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders, or until their respective successors are elected and qualified.
The persons named in the enclosed proxy card will vote to elect Messrs. Clarke, Sulat and Wheeler as Class II directors unless you withhold authority to vote for the election of any or all nominees by marking the proxy card (whether executed by you or through the Internet or telephonic voting). Stockholders may vote by proxy to elect no more than three persons to our board of directors at the Annual Meeting. Messrs. Clarke, Sulat and Wheeler currently serve on our board of directors. The nominees have indicated their willingness to continue to serve if elected. However, if any director nominee should be unable to serve, the shares of common stock represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by our board of directors. Our board of directors has no reason to believe that the nominees will be unable to serve if elected.
On December 3, 2008, Peter Barrett, a Class III director and a member of nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees, submitted his resignation effective as of the December 4, 2008. Our board of directors has provided that our full board of directors shall be composed of eleven members. We are actively recruiting potential candidates to fill the vacancies left by Mr. Barrett and Dr. Langer. These vacancies may be filled by a vote of a majority of the directors then in office. The directors elected to fill these vacancies shall hold office until the next election of the class for which such director shall have been chosen.
No director or executive officer is related by blood, marriage or adoption to any other director or executive officer. No arrangements or understandings exist between any director or person nominated for election as a director and any other person pursuant to which such person is to be selected as a director or nominee for election as a director.
3
Our Board of Directors
Set forth below for each of our directors, including the Class II director nominees, is information as of April 15, 2009 with respect to each director's (a) name and age, (b) positions and offices with us, (c) principal occupation and business experience during at least the past five years, (d) directorships, if any, of other publicly-held companies and (e) the year such person became a member of our board of directors.
Name
|
Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class I directors (terms expiring 2011) |
||||||||
Alan L. Crane |
45 |
2001 |
Alan L. Crane has been a director since June 2001 and served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from May 2002 through August 2006 and September 2006, respectively. Mr. Crane also held the position of Chairman of the Board from May 2002 through June 2005 when, in connection with the determination of our board of directors to separate the positions of chairman of the board and chief executive officer, Mr. Crane resigned as Chairman. Mr. Crane has served as a Venture Partner of Polaris Ventures, a venture capital firm, since 2002 and a General Partner since April 2009. Mr. Crane served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Cerulean Pharma Inc. (formerly Tempo Pharmaceuticals), a biopharmaceutical company, from December 2006 through April 2009. From February 1997 to May 2002, Mr. Crane held various management positions at Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company, where he most recently served as Senior Vice President, Global Corporate Development. Mr. Crane serves on the boards of several privately-held biopharmaceutical companies. Mr. Crane received his B.A. in Biology, summa cum laude, from Harvard College and both his M.A. in Biology and M.B.A. in General Management from Harvard University. |
4
Name
|
Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Barton Hutt(2)(3) |
74 | 2001 | Peter Barton Hutt, LL.B., L.L.M. has been a director since June 2001. Mr. Hutt is a senior counsel at the law firm of Covington & Burling and has been an attorney with that firm since 1975. He served as Chief Counsel for the Food and Drug Administration from 1971 through 1975. Mr. Hutt is a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences and teaches a course on Food and Drug Law each Winter Term at Harvard Law School. He co-authored the casebook used to teach Food and Drug Law and has published numerous papers on the subject. Mr. Hutt is a member of the board of directors of Ista Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Xoma Ltd., Celera Genomics and several privately-held life sciences companies. Mr. Hutt received his B.A., magna cum laude, from Yale University, his L.L.B. from Harvard University and his L.L.M. from New York University. |
|||||
Marsha H. Fanucci(1) |
56 |
2005 |
Marsha H. Fanucci has been a director since March 2005. Ms. Fanucci served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from July 2004 through January 2009, where she was responsible for corporate strategy, treasury, financial planning and reporting and operations. While at Millennium since 2000, she also served as Vice President, Finance and Corporate Strategy and Vice President, Corporate Development and Strategy. Previously, she was Vice President of Corporate Development and Strategy at Genzyme Corporation, a biotechnology company, from 1998 to 2000. From 1987 to 1998, Ms. Fanucci was employed at Arthur D. Little, Inc. where she most recently served as Vice President and Director. She received her B.S. in Pharmacy from West Virginia University and her M.B.A. from Northeastern University. |
5
Name
|
Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class II directors, nominees to be elected at the 2009 Annual Meeting (if elected, terms to expire in 2012) |
||||||||
John K. Clarke(1)(2) |
55 |
2002 |
John K. Clarke has been a director since April 2002. Mr. Clarke founded Cardinal Partners, a venture capital firm, in 1997 and has served as the Managing General Partner since 1997. He has founded and served as interim Chief Executive Officer of a number of portfolio companies, including Alkermes, Inc., Arris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the DNX Corporation. Mr. Clarke is chairman of the board of directors of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and serves as a member of the board of directors of a number of privately-held health care companies. He received his B.A. in Biology and Economics from Harvard College and his M.B.A. from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. |
|||||
James Sulat(1)(3) |
58 |
2008 |
James Sulat has been a director since June 2008 and has served as Chairman of the Board since December 2008. Mr. Sulat served as the Chief Financial Officer of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp, a biotechnology company, from February 2008 through September 2008 and previously served as Memory Pharmaceuticals' President and Chief Executive Officer from May 2005 through February 2008. Mr. Sulat also served as a member of the board of directors of Memory Pharmaceuticals from May 2005 through January 2009. Mr. Sulat served as Chief Financial Officer of R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, a diversified printing company, from February 2004 through May 2004 following the acquisition of Moore Wallace Incorporated by R.R. Donnelley. From May 2003 to February 2004, Mr. Sulat served as the Senior Executive Vice President of Moore Wallace Incorporated, a diversified printing company. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Sulat served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chiron Corporation, a biotechnology company. Mr. Sulat serves as a director of Maxygen, Inc. and Intercell AG. Mr. Sulat received a B.S. in Administrative Sciences from Yale University, and an M.B.A. and an M.S. in Health Services Administration from Stanford University. |
6
Name
|
Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig A. Wheeler |
48 | 2006 | Craig A. Wheeler has served as President and as a Class II director since August 22, 2006 and was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer effective as of September 12, 2006. Prior to joining Momenta, Mr. Wheeler served as President of Chiron Biopharmaceuticals, a division of Chiron Corporation, from August 2001 until June 2006. Prior to joining Chiron, Mr. Wheeler was a senior member of The Boston Consulting Group's health care practice from August 1988 until August 2001. Mr. Wheeler was appointed to the board of directors of Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in September 2005 and has served as Chairman of the Board since May 2007. Mr. Wheeler received B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering from Cornell University and an M.B.A. degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. |
|||||
Class III directors (terms expiring in 2010) |
||||||||
Ram Sasisekharan(4) |
44 |
2001 |
Ram Sasisekharan, Ph.D. is a co-founder of our company and has been a director since May 2001. Dr. Sasisekharan has been a Professor of Biological Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology since 1996 and is Director of the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology and Edward Hood Taplin Professor of Biological Engineering & Health Sciences & Technology and also a member of the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research. Dr. Sasisekharan's research on complex polysaccharides has led to over 125 publications and over 50 patents, including the core technologies of Momenta. He has won both the Burroughs Wellcome and Beckman Foundation Young Investigator Awards and was the recipient of the 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001 CaPCure Awards from the CaPCure Foundation. Dr. Sasisekharan serves on the steering committee of the Consortium for Functional Glycomics. Dr. Sasisekharan received his Ph.D. in Medical Sciences from Harvard Medical School. |
7
Name
|
Age | Director Since | Principal Occupation, Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years and Other Directorships |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bennett M. Shapiro(2)(3)(4) |
69 | 2003 | Bennett M. Shapiro, M.D. has been a director since May 2003. Since 2006, he has served as a Partner at PureTech Ventures and since 2003 he has served as a private consultant providing advice to executives. From September 1990 to July 2003, Dr. Shapiro served as an Executive Vice President of Merck & Co., Inc., a research-based pharmaceutical company. Dr. Shapiro is the former head of Worldwide Licensing and External Research at Merck; prior to that he served as the head of Basic and Preclinical Research at Merck and as Chairman of the Biochemistry department at the University of Washington. Dr. Shapiro serves on the board of Celera Genomics as well as a number of privately-held biopharmaceutical companies. Dr. Shapiro received his B.S. in Chemistry from Dickinson College and his M.D. from Jefferson Medical College. |
|||||
Elizabeth Stoner(2)(4) |
58 |
2007 |
Elizabeth Stoner, M.D. has been a director since October 2007. Dr. Stoner is a managing director at MPM Capital, a venture capital firm, where she has been since October 2007. Prior to joining MPM Capital, Dr. Stoner had a 22-year career at Merck Research Laboratories. At the time of her retirement from Merck, Dr. Stoner was Senior Vice President of Global Clinical Development Operations with responsibility for the company's clinical development activities in more than 40 countries. Prior to her position at Merck, she was an Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at Cornell University Medical College. Dr. Stoner serves on the board of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company. Dr. Stoner received her B.S. in Chemistry from Ottawa University, KS, her M.S. in Chemistry from the State University of New York at Stony Brook, and her M.D. from Albert Einstein College of Medicine. |
For information relating to compensation of our directors, including shares of our common stock owned by and options granted to each of our directors, see the disclosure set forth under the headings "Executive CompensationCompensation of Directors" and "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters."
8
General
We believe that good corporate governance is important to ensure that Momenta is managed for the long-term benefit of our stockholders. We continuously review our corporate governance policies and practices and to compare them to those suggested by various authorities in corporate governance and the practices of other public companies.
This section describes key corporate governance practices that we have adopted. Complete copies of our corporate governance guidelines, committee charters and code of conduct described below are available on the "Corporate Governance" section of our website at www.momentapharma.com. Alternatively, you may request a copy of any of these documents by writing to Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, attention: Bruce A. Leicher, Secretary, facsimile: (617) 621-0431.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our board of directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines to assist our board of directors in the exercise of its duties and responsibilities and to serve the best interests of Momenta and its stockholders. These guidelines, which provide a framework for the conduct of the board of directors' business, provide that:
Board Determination of Independence
Under applicable NASDAQ rules, a director will only qualify as an "independent director" if, in the opinion of our board of directors, that person does not have a relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. Our board of directors has determined that none of John K. Clarke, Marsha H. Fanucci, Peter Barton Hutt, Robert Langer, Bennett M. Shapiro, Elizabeth Stoner or James Sulat, from whom directors are currently selected to comprise our audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is "independent" as that term is defined under Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Our board of directors also determined that neither of Peter Barrett or Stephen T. Reeders, who served on our nominating and corporate governance committee and audit committee, respectively, for part of 2008, had a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is "independent" as that term is defined under Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.
9
Board Meetings and Attendance
Our board of directors met eight times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, either in person or by teleconference. During 2008, each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of board meetings and the total number of meetings held by all committees on which he or she then served.
Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
Our corporate governance guidelines provide that directors are responsible for attending the annual meeting of stockholders. All of our then-current directors attended the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders.
Board Committees
Our board of directors has established four standing committeesaudit, compensation, nominating and corporate governance and scienceeach of which operates under a charter that has been approved by our board of directors. Current copies of the audit, compensation, nominating and corporate governance and science committee charters are posted on the Corporate Governance section of our website located at www.momentapharma.com.
Our board of directors has determined that all of the members of each of the board of directors' standing committees (except the science committee) are independent as defined under the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. including, in the case of all members of the audit committee, the independence requirements contemplated by Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
Audit Committee
The audit committee currently consists of Marsha H. Fanucci, John K. Clarke and James Sulat. Ms. Fanucci chairs the audit committee. The audit committee held nine meetings in 2008. Our audit committee's responsibilities include:
10
Our board of directors has determined that each of Marsha H. Fanucci, John K. Clarke and James Sulat is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by applicable Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
Compensation Committee
The compensation committee currently consists of John K. Clarke, Peter Barton Hutt, Bennett M. Shapiro and Elizabeth Stoner. Mr. Clarke chairs the compensation committee. The compensation committee held eight meetings in 2008. Our compensation committee's responsibilities include:
The processes and procedures followed by our compensation committee in considering and determining executive and director compensation are described below under the heading "Executive and Director Compensation Processes."
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee currently consists of Peter Barton Hutt, Bennett M. Shapiro and James Sulat. Mr. Hutt chairs the nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee held seven meetings in 2008. Our nominating and corporate governance committee's responsibilities include:
The processes and procedures followed by our nominating and corporate governance committee in identifying and evaluating director candidates are described below under the heading "Director Nomination Process."
11
Science Committee
Our science committee currently consists of Bennett M. Shapiro, Robert S. Langer, Jr., Ram Sasisekharan and Elizabeth Stoner. Dr. Shapiro chairs the science committee. The science committee held five meetings in 2008. Our science committee's responsibilities include:
Executive and Director Compensation Processes
We have implemented an annual performance review program for our executives focused around annual corporate goals that are proposed by management, reviewed by the compensation committee and approved by the board of directors. These corporate goals target the achievement of specified operational and financial goals; specific research, clinical, regulatory, commercial and/or compliance milestones; and business development and financing initiatives. Individual performance is evaluated in part by reviewing the extent to which such performance facilitates the achievement of our annual corporate and business goals. Annual salary changes, individual components of annual incentive cash bonus awards and equity awards for each of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers, or our Named Executives, are tied to a combination of achievement of corporate goals and individual performance.
During the first calendar quarter of each year, we evaluate individual performance as well as corporate performance against the corporate goals for the recently completed year. Each executive's evaluation begins with 360-performance reviews. These 360-performance reviews are evaluations of each executive that are submitted to our CEO by our employees who interact with the executive. Each executive also completes a written self-assessment which is submitted to the CEO. The CEO then assimilates the feedback from the 360-performance reviews and the self-assessment into formal written evaluations, including the CEO's own evaluation of the executive. Each executive is then rated based on his or her performance during the year. The CEO then works directly with our Vice President, Human Resources to provide comprehensive recommendations for salary changes, individual components of annual incentive cash bonus awards and equity awards for each of our executives. These recommendations are presented to, reviewed by, modified or accepted and, once final, approved by our compensation committee. In the case of the CEO, the compensation committee conducts his individual performance evaluation, utilizing input from the board of directors and from selected executive officers in connection with an annual 360-performance review, which determines his compensation changes and awards. For all executives, annual base salary changes, annual incentive cash bonus awards and annual stock option grants and restricted stock awards, to the extent granted, are implemented during the first calendar quarter of the year.
The compensation committee has delegated to Craig A. Wheeler, our CEO, the authority to make stock option grants under our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, to newly-hired employees below the senior director level based on a number of options within a range as set forth in a matrix previously approved by the board of directors. Grants to newly-hired employees, whether made either by the CEO or by the compensation committee, are made on regularly scheduled monthly dates that occur outside of regularly scheduled quarterly financial blackout periods.
12
The compensation committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants and other outside advisors to assist in the evaluation of executive officer compensation. To assist the compensation committee in discharging its responsibilities, in March 2007 the compensation committee retained an independent compensation consultant, Radford Surveys & Consulting, which we refer to as Radford, to evaluate certain aspects of our compensation practices and to assist in developing and implementing our incentive compensation program, and in June 2008 the compensation committee engaged Radford to assess our non-employee director compensation practices and provide recommendations for changes to the program. In September 2008 the compensation committee retained DolmatConnell & Partners, an independent compensation consultant that we refer to as DolmatConnell, to evaluate certain aspects of our compensation practices and assist the compensation committee with setting executive compensation.
Director Nomination Process
The process followed by our nominating and corporate governance committee to identify and evaluate director candidates includes requests to board members and others for recommendations, meetings from time to time to evaluate biographical information and background material relating to potential candidates and interviews of selected candidates by members of the nominating and corporate governance committee and other members of the board of directors, as applicable. In addition, during 2008, the nominating and corporate governance committee used the services of an executive search firm to help identify and evaluate potential director candidates.
In considering whether to recommend any particular candidate for inclusion in the board's slate of recommended director nominees, the nominating and corporate governance committee applies the criteria attached to its charter. These criteria include the candidate's integrity, business acumen, knowledge of our business and industry, experience, diligence, conflicts of interest and the ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. The nominating committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and no particular criterion is a prerequisite for each prospective nominee. We believe that the backgrounds and qualifications of our directors, considered as a group, should provide a composite mix of experience, knowledge and abilities that will allow the board of directors to fulfill its responsibilities.
Stockholders may recommend individuals to the nominating and corporate governance committee for consideration as potential director candidates by submitting their names, together with appropriate biographical information and background materials and a statement as to whether the stockholder or group of stockholders making the recommendation has beneficially owned more than 5% of our common stock for at least a year as of the date such recommendation is made, to the nominating and corporate governance committee, c/o Bruce A. Leicher, Esq., Secretary, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142. Assuming that appropriate biographical and background material has been provided on a timely basis, the nominating and corporate governance committee will evaluate stockholder-recommended candidates by following substantially the same process, and applying substantially the same criteria, as it follows for candidates submitted by others.
Stockholders also have the right under our bylaws to directly nominate director candidates, without any action or recommendation on the part of the nominating and corporate governance committee or the board of directors, by following the procedures set forth in our amended and restated bylaws that are described below under the heading "Stockholder Proposals."
In June 2008, James Sulat was appointed by our board of directors as a new director. Mr. Sulat was originally proposed to the nominating and corporate governance committee by a search firm engaged to assist us in recruiting new members to the board of directors.
13
Communicating with the Independent Directors
Our board of directors will give appropriate attention to written communications that are submitted by stockholders, and will respond if and as appropriate. The chairman of the board of directors (if an independent director), or the lead director (if one is appointed), or otherwise the chairperson of the nominating and corporate governance committee, subject to advice and assistance from the general counsel and, if requested, outside legal counsel, is primarily responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and for providing copies of summaries of such communications to the other directors as he or she considers appropriate.
Under procedures approved by a majority of the independent directors, communications are forwarded to all directors if they relate to important substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that the chairman of the board considers to be important for the directors to know. In general, communications relating to corporate governance and corporate strategy are more likely to be forwarded than communications relating to ordinary business affairs, personal grievances and matters as to which we tend to receive repetitive or duplicative communications.
Stockholders who wish to send communications on any topic to the board of directors should address such communications to board of directors c/o Bruce A. Leicher, Secretary, Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. We have posted a current copy of the code on our website, which is located at www.momentapharma.com. In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or NASDAQ Global Market listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the code.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and the holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership of our common stock and other equity securities on a Form 3 and reports of changes in such ownership on a Form 4 or Form 5. Officers, directors and 10% stockholders are required by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of copies of Section 16(a) reports furnished to us and representations made to us, we believe that during 2008 our officers, directors and holders of more than 10% of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.
14
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our current executive officers as of April 15, 2009:
Name
|
Age | Position | Held Position Since | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig A. Wheeler* | 48 | President and Chief Executive Officer |
August 2006 September 2006 |
||||
Richard P. Shea(1) |
57 |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
July 2007 (Vice President and Chief Financial Officer October 2003July 2007) |
||||
Ganesh Venkataraman, Ph.D.(2) |
42 |
Chief Scientific Officer, Senior Vice President, Research |
September 2007 April 2005 (Vice President, Technology August 2002April 2005) |
||||
Steven B. Brugger(3) |
50 |
Chief Operating Officer |
September 2007 (Senior Vice President, Strategic Business Operations April 2005September 2007 Vice President, Strategic Product Development August 2002April 2005) |
||||
John E. Bishop, Ph.D.(4) |
47 |
Senior Vice President, Pharmaceutical Sciences |
December 2006 (Vice President, Pharmaceutical Sciences and Manufacturing November 2004December 2006) |
||||
Bruce A. Leicher(5) |
53 |
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
July 2008 September 2008 |
||||
James M. Roach, M.D.(6) |
49 |
Senior Vice President, Development, Chief Medical Officer |
February 2008 |
15
role of complex sugars in biology. From March 1995 to July 2000, Dr. Venkataraman was a research faculty member at the Harvard M.I.T. division of Health and Sciences and Technology, where he investigated the biochemistry and biophysics of carbohydrates and research in the area of analytical techniques for complex carbohydrates. Dr. Venkataraman received his M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
16
research and/or medical affairs positions at Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., LeukoSite, Inc., a biotechnology company, Medical and Technical Research Associates, Inc., a contract research organization, and Astra USA, a pharmaceutical company, where he began his career in the industry in September 1995. Dr. Roach is board certified in Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Disease, and Critical Care Medicine and is an Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and an Associate Physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Dr. Roach received his B.A. in biology and philosophy from the College of the Holy Cross and his M.D. from Georgetown University School of Medicine. He completed his residency in Internal Medicine and fellowship in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C.
17
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Philosophy
Our compensation committee has determined that the executive compensation program should be designed to:
The objective of our executive compensation program is to align the interests of management with the interests of stockholders through a system that correlates compensation to enterprise objectives and, to a lesser extent, individual performance. Our program is geared for short and long-term performance, with the goal of increasing stockholder value over the long term. We also emphasize employee retention in our program.
Our executive compensation philosophy is based on the following principles:
Background for 2008 Compensation
In 2007, our compensation committee determined that the executive compensation program should be redesigned to align the interests of management with the interests of stockholders through a system that correlates compensation to enterprise objectives and, to a lesser extent, individual performance. Our program is geared for short and long-term performance, with the goal of increasing stockholder value over the long term. In redesigning and formalizing our compensation program, in February 2007, Radford and our compensation committee focused predominantly on two areas of compensation: our
18
annual incentive cash bonus program and our equity award program. With respect to our bonus program, Radford gathered competitive data from the Radford Biotechnology Executive Survey, focusing on companies with 150 to 499 employees. Specifically, Radford evaluated the prevalence of formalized bonus plans, the cost of such programs as a percentage of payroll, the incidence of minimum/maximum levels of performance and associated payout, the number of issuers that employed metric weighting between company and individual performance and the timing and performance period for short-term incentive awards. Whereas our historical cash bonus program was primarily linked to individual performance, the survey data showed that most short-term incentive programs weighted corporate performance as approximately 60% of the bonus opportunity, 98% of these programs used a percentage of salary as the basis for determining target bonuses and almost all companies paid bonuses annually with awards paid for the prior twelve months of performance. With that data as a backdrop, our annual cash incentive program was designed to reward our CEO solely on corporate performance based on metrics defined by management and approved by our board of directors and, with respect to executives below the CEO level, 75% in relation to corporate performance and 25% based on individual contribution toward those corporate goals.
With respect to our equity award program, Radford reviewed information from the 2006 Radford Biotechnology Stock by Level Equity Report and evaluated 21 peer companies to better understand aggregate equity use and executive long-term incentive awards. The specific "peer companies" evaluated included:
Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Atherogenics, Inc. | Maxygen, Inc. | |||
Adolor Corporation | CombinatoRx, Incorporated | Metabasis Therapeutics | |||
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals | Cytokinetics Incorporated | Pharmion Corporation | |||
Altus Pharmaceuticals | Exelixis, Inc. | Progenics Pharmaceuticals | |||
Ariad Pharmaceuticals | Indenix Pharmaceuticals | Rigel Pharmaceuticals | |||
Array Biopharma Inc. | Incyte Corporation | Seattle Genetics, Inc. | |||
Aspreva Pharmaceuticals Corp. | Inspire Pharmaceuticals | XenoPort, Inc. |
A regression analysis was used to determine appropriate long-term incentive values by grade, drawing upon the average salary level for each grade, and competitive data were collected for Black-Scholes equity value and number of options. Based on the data reviewed, Radford and our compensation committee determined that our forward-looking long-term incentive program must balance multiple considerations, including building a management team for the future, retaining key employees and anticipating future business outlook, while adhering to a target burn rate, program guidelines based on market competitive practices of broad life sciences companies and the appropriate mix of equity vehicles. We grant stock options to executives and other employees upon commencement of employment. The size of the initial stock option grant has been determined by reference to a pre-set range approved by our board of directors generally intended to reflect the level of the employee's position. We also make annual performance grants, and those grants have also been made pursuant to a pre-set range approved by our board of directors and have been intended to reflect the level of the employee's position with us.
Radford also reviewed the salary structure for our Named Executives and other employees. For our Named Executives, Radford based its review on a blend of market data and proxy data from a positional perspective. For non-executive positions, Radford differentiated between scientific and non-scientific positions based upon departmental assignments. In order to determine the appropriate target level for company-wide salary increases for 2008, we obtained survey data from the following sources: WorldatWork Budget Survey 07/08; Mercer 2007/2008 U.S. Compensation Planning; ERI Salary Increase Survey 2008; Compdata Survey (Merit Only); Hewitt Associates; and Radford Life Sciences. These surveys were utilized to assure that our proposed merit salary increases were market competitive. The projected merit salary increases for 2008 contained in five of the six surveys were
19
between 3.8% and 4.0% of current base salaries of all exempt employees. The average projected merit salary increase for executives was slightly above 4.0%. Using this data, we set a target level of merit salary increase at 4.0%.
Background for 2009 Compensation
In early 2008, we engaged Radford to re-examine our historical peer group companies and determine the appropriateness of retaining those companies as our peer group. In reviewing and selecting potential peer group companies, Radford first identified all publicly traded, U.S.-headquartered companies in the biotechnology/pharmaceutical marketplace. Radford next refined the pool to reflect companies with 65 employees to 600 employees and a market capitalization between $200 million to $1.4 billion. Radford next qualitatively evaluated and refined the pool to identify each company's product focus, stage of development and its peer companies, where publicly disclosed. Radford then selected companies that were similar to Momenta, taking into considering the financial profile, product focus and product stage of development for each company.
Based on the above methodology and analysis, Radford recommended that 13 of 21 historical peer group companies should remain on the peer group list. In addition, Radford identified additional similar peer group companies for consideration. In June 2008, the compensation committee reviewed and approved the new peer group companies, which are:
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Incyte Corporation | ||
Adolor Corporation | Inspire Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||
Affymax Inc. | Maxygen Inc. | ||
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Progenics Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||
Array BioPharma Inc. | Rigel Pharmaceuticals Inc. | ||
Dendreon Corporation | Seattle Genetics Inc. | ||
Dyax Corp. | Synta Pharmaceuticals Corporation | ||
Exelixis Inc. | Theravance Inc. | ||
GTx Inc. | Xenoport Inc. | ||
Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
In addition, in order to determine the appropriate target level for company-wide salary increases for 2009, in September 2008 we obtained survey data from the following survey sources: The Survey Group; WorldatWork; Mercer; Hewitt Associates; Conference Board and Radford. These surveys were utilized to assure that our proposed merit salary increases were competitive in the market. The projected merit salary increases for 2009 contained in the surveys were between 3.6% and 4.2% of current base salaries. The average projected merit salary increase for executives was 3.85%, while the projected merit salary increase for exempt employees was 3.83%. Using this data, we set a target level of merit salary increase for 2009 at 4.0%.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In September 2007, our board of directors, upon recommendation of the compensation committee, approved a stock ownership and retention program for our executive officers and directors. The purpose of the program is to ensure that each of our executive officers and directors has a long-term equity stake in Momenta, to more closely align the interests of the executive officers and directors with those of our stockholders and to further promote our commitment to sound corporate governance.
Under the program's guidelines, (i) our President and CEO is expected to hold shares of our common stock having an aggregate value equal to or greater than three times his or her annual base salary, (ii) other executive officers are expected to hold shares of our common stock having an aggregate value equal to or greater than one time their annual base salary and (iii) non-employee
20
directors are expected to hold shares of our common stock having an aggregate value equal to or greater than three times their then current annual base retainer for general board membership, excluding subcommittee retainers, per meeting or other similar fees.
Our executive officers and directors are expected to comply with these guidelines by the later of March 31, 2013 and the fifth anniversary that each such person becomes subject to the guidelines. Until the applicable minimum share requirement is achieved, each executive officer and director is required to retain all shares of restricted stock upon the lapse of vesting restrictions, net of shares surrendered or sold to pay applicable withholding taxes. Once an executive officer or director has met these guidelines, he or she must continue to satisfy the guidelines so long as he or she remains subject to the guidelines. Each executive officer and director's satisfaction of the minimum share requirement will be measured on an annual basis. Shares that count toward satisfaction of the guidelines include:
The minimum share requirement may be waived, at the discretion of the compensation committee, if compliance would create severe hardship, would prevent an executive officer or director from complying with a court order, as in the case of a divorce settlement, or when he or she attains the age of 62.
Determining Executive CompensationRoles and Process
Utilizing the philosophy and background outlined above, our compensation committee determines the parameters of the executive compensation program, including appropriate target levels and performance measures, and administers our executive compensation program. This section discusses in greater detail the roles and process underlying the application of our executive compensation philosophy.
Role of CEO in Compensation Decisions
The CEO's role in the compensation process begins with the establishment of our corporate and business performance objectives against which the payment of annual incentive bonus awards will be measured. Our CEO, together with our executive team, discusses and formulates annual corporate and business goals. These goals are presented to our compensation committee, which refines the goals and recommends them for approval by our board of directors. The CEO's role in the compensation process continues with his review of our Named Executives. Our CEO elicits 360-performance reviews with respect to each of our Named Executives. These 360-performance reviews are evaluations of each Named Executive that are submitted to our CEO by our employees who interact with these Named Executives. Each executive also completes a written self-assessment which is submitted to the CEO. The CEO then assimilates the feedback from the 360-performance reviews and the self-assessment into formal written evaluations of each Named Executive, including the CEO's own evaluation of the Named Executive. The CEO's evaluation also includes documenting each Named Executive's performance during the year, detailing accomplishments, areas of strength and areas for development. The CEO bases this evaluation on his knowledge of each Named Executive's performance and feedback provided by the 360-performance reviews. Each Named Executive is then rated based on their performance during the year. The CEO then works directly with our Vice President, Human Resources to provide comprehensive recommendations for salary changes, individual components of annual incentive cash bonus awards and equity awards for each of our Named Executives. These
21
recommendations are presented to, reviewed by, modified or accepted and, once final, approved by our compensation committee. The CEO then sits down with each Named Executive and reviews his or her respective performance evaluations and compensation changes, if any.
At the request of the compensation committee, our CEO attends all or portions of periodic meetings of the compensation committee, but does not attend portions of any meeting in which the compensation committee discusses his compensation or performance. In addition, our compensation committee reviews the information with respect to executive compensation trends among biotechnology companies, including the overall blend of salary, bonus and equity compensation within such group, presented by our Vice President, Human Resources and her recommendations pertaining to our executive compensation program. As discussed below, the compensation committee also reviews data and recommendations from compensation consultants.
Role of the Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee recognizes the importance of maintaining sound principles for the development and administration of our compensation program, which is intended to strengthen the link between executive pay and performance. The compensation committee, in accordance with its written charter, oversees all aspects of our director, officer and other executive compensation policies. Based on the process described under the caption "Role of CEO in Compensation Decisions," above, the CEO, together with our Vice President, Human Resources, makes a recommendation to the compensation committee on each Named Executive's compensation, except his own. Named Executives do not propose or seek approval for their own compensation. The compensation committee then determines the compensation of each of these Named Executives. The chairman of the board and the chairman of compensation committee evaluate the CEO's performance, utilizing input from the board of directors and from selected executive officers in connection with an annual 360-performance review, and make recommendations to the compensation committee, which then determines the CEO's compensation.
Role of External Advisors
To assist the compensation committee in discharging its responsibilities, our compensation committee utilized in 2008 an independent compensation consultant, Radford, to evaluate certain aspects of our compensation practices and to assist in making recommendations for our board of directors and executive compensation programs. Radford provided research regarding best practices and performed analyses of competitive compensation levels within our peer group. As part of this process, members of the compensation committee reviewed materials provided and had the opportunity to meet independently with Radford periodically throughout the year to discuss our executive compensation and to receive input and advice. Any written reports and studies provided by Radford to management are provided to the compensation committee. Radford did not provide any other services to us other than those described in this Executive Compensation section.
In addition, during 2008, the compensation committee, with the assistance of management of the company, conducted a process to evaluate the possibility of engaging new compensation consultants. The process included setting criteria, identifying services needed and determining expected standard deliverables. Criteria used in considering potential compensation consultants and selecting a final candidate included:
22
The compensation committee reviewed three finalists and after discussion agreed to engage DolmatConnell as a new compensation consultant. DolmatConnell provided analysis and advice regarding the Company's executive compensation program, long-term incentive plan and company-wide merit increase for 2009. In conducting its review, DolmatConnell considered good corporate governance practices as well as the company's ability to continue to recruit, retain and incent the executive team. DolmatConnell considered a balanced approach to executive pay, providing pay opportunities within marketplace norms and offering appropriate rewards for the achievement of corporate goals, reflecting the level of long-term performance of both Momenta and our executive team. Given our competitive cash compensation levels for most executives, DolmatConnell did not recommend any significant compensation adjustments for our executives. As part of this process, members of the compensation committee reviewed materials provided and had the opportunity to meet independently with DolmatConnell at anytime throughout the process to discuss our executive compensation and to receive input and advice. Any written reports and studies provided by DolmatConnell to management are provided to the compensation committee. DolmatConnell did not provide any other services to us other than those described in this Executive Compensation section.
We have not retained any other compensation consultant to review our policies and procedures relating to executive compensation. We expect that from time to time our compensation committee will engage one or more consultants to provide advice and resources.
We do not use "internal pay equity" as a constraint on compensation paid to our CEO or other Named Executives. Such systems typically put a ceiling on part or all of an executive's compensation based on a specified multiple of compensation awarded to another executive or a class of employees of Momenta. Our management and our compensation committee do not believe that such arbitrary limitations are an appropriate way to make compensation decisions for our executives. Instead, we rely on the judgment of the compensation committee, after considering recommendations from management and external advisors, available market data and evaluations of executive performance, in the context of a program that is weighted heavily in favor of performance-based compensation for our Named Executives.
Elements of Compensation
Our compensation program is designed to reward each Named Executive based upon a combination of corporate and individual performance. Corporate performance is evaluated by reviewing the extent to which pre-set goals are met, which generally include the achievement of: specified operational and financial goals; specific research, clinical, regulatory, commercial or compliance milestones; and business development and financing initiatives. We evaluate individual performance in part by reviewing the extent to which individual performance facilitated the achievement of the corporate and business goals discussed above.
The compensation package offered to each Named Executive is comprised of a combination of:
23
We maintain broad-based benefits that are provided to eligible employees, including health, dental, life and disability insurance and a 401(k) plan. Our Named Executives are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, in each case on the same basis as other employees.
Base Salary. Base salaries are established for our Named Executives at levels that are intended to reflect the scope of each Named Executive's industry experience, knowledge and qualifications, salary levels in effect for comparable positions within peer companies within our industry and internal comparability considerations. We believe that base salaries are a fundamental element of our executive compensation program. Base salaries are reviewed at least annually by our compensation committee and are adjusted from time to time to ensure that our executive compensation structure remains aligned with our compensation objectives and are based upon various subjective criteria and the compensation paid by peer-group companies. Subjective performance criteria include an executive's ability to lead through motivating and inspiring others, to demonstrate the skills necessary to perform effectively in his or her area of responsibility, to recognize and pursue new business opportunities and to initiate programs to enhance our growth and success.
2008 Base Salary
In 2008, the salaries of the Named Executives were reviewed at the February 22, 2008 meeting of the compensation committee. Using the 4% merit increase target approved by the compensation committee as well performance review input for each of the Named Executives, with the exception of the CEO, the compensation committee approved salary increases to be effective January 1, 2008. The compensation committee then discussed the CEO's performance. The compensation committee noted that the CEO had performed extremely well during the year and wanted to reward him accordingly. At the February 22, 2008 meeting, the compensation committee approved salary increases to be effective January 1, 2008 for our CEO and the other Named Executives as follows:
Name
|
2007 Base Salary ($) |
2008 Base Salary ($) |
Percentage Increase(1) (%) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig A. Wheeler |
500,000 | 515,000 | 3.0 | |||||||
Richard P. Shea |
270,000 | 280,800 | 4.0 | |||||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
290,928 | 302,565 | 4.0 | |||||||
Steven B. Brugger |
345,000 | 353,280 | 2.4 | |||||||
John E. Bishop |
270,400 | 283,379 | 4.8 |
2009 Base Salary
In 2009, the salaries of the Named Executives were reviewed at the January 27, 2009 meeting of the compensation committee. A 4% merit increase target had been previously approved by the compensation committee in connection with the review of survey data of industry trends. The compensation committee used the target as well performance review input for each of the Named Executives, with the exception of the CEO, to approve salary increases to be effective January 1, 2009. The compensation committee discussed and took into consideration the current global economic conditions and recognized that proposed merit increases for 2010 could be significantly less than historical increases. The compensation committee then discussed the CEO's performance. The compensation committee noted that the CEO had performed extremely well during the year and wanted to reward him accordingly. The compensation committee recognized that the CEO's
24
compensation was at the 75th percentile of peer group companies but determined that a 3% increase was appropriate because of his performance during 2008. The compensation committee also discussed the recommendation for the Named Executives and their individual performance during 2008. The compensation committee approved a salary increase for the CEO and the other Named Executives to be effective as of January 1, 2009 as set forth below:
Name
|
2008 Base Salary ($) |
2009 Base Salary ($) |
Percentage Increase (%) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig A. Wheeler |
515,000 | 530,450 | 3.0 | |||||||
Richard P. Shea |
280,800 | 292,032 | 4.0 | |||||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
302,565 | 314,668 | 4.0 | |||||||
Steven B. Brugger |
353,280 | 369,178 | 4.5 | |||||||
John E. Bishop |
283,379 | 295,281 | 4.2 |
Annual Incentive Cash Bonus. We use annual incentive cash bonuses to motivate our Named Executives to achieve and exceed specified goals in a time frame that is one year in duration. Annual incentive cash bonuses are determined on the basis of our achievement of corporate performance targets and individual contribution toward those corporate goals. Our corporate goals are typically focused upon the achievement of specific research, clinical, regulatory, commercial, financial, compliance or operational milestones. These goals are also considered to be conducive to the creation of stockholder value and designed to contribute to our current and future financial success.
Under our annual incentive cash bonus program, corporate goals are proposed by management and approved by the compensation committee and our entire board of directors. Each corporate goal is assigned a percentage value (e.g., 10%, 15%, 20%, etc.) and within each corporate goal there are achievement milestones that are expressed in the following target percentages: 70%, 100% and 130%. If a corporate goal does not meet at least the 70% target percentage no achievement percentage is assigned. Each computed actual level of achievement is rounded up to the nearest whole number. In addition, our compensation committee has the discretion to take into consideration mitigating and/or extraordinary circumstances when determining the level of achievement of goals and related milestones. The CEO's annual incentive bonus award is completely dependent upon the achievement of corporate goals, and senior vice presidents' and vice presidents' target bonuses are 75% dependent upon the achievement of corporate goals and 25% dependent upon the subjective analysis of their individual performance in relation to the corporate goals. If, for example, we were to achieve 100% of our corporate goals, but only to the extent of the 70% target percentage within each goal, the annual bonus pool for that year would be 70% of the aggregate bonus potential for all participants.
The target bonus potential for the CEO is 60% of base salary, with a maximum bonus opportunity equal to 150% of his base salary. The target bonus potential for the other Named Executives is 30% of base salary for vice presidents, 35% for senior vice presidents and 45% for the chief operating officer. Bonuses, if any, are determined and paid on an annual basis after completion of the fiscal year in which bonuses are earned.
The corporate goals for 2008 were: timing of addressing the immunogenicity questions raised by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, related to M-Enoxaparin and ongoing review and approval of the M-Enoxaparin Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA, (15% and 10%, respectively); advancing our M356, glycoprotein and research programs (15%, 10% and 5%, respectively); commencement of Phase 2b clinical studies for M118 (10%); advancement of our corporate strategy plan (25%); and achievement of financial discipline goals (10%). In assessing the achievement of these goals, the compensation committee considered the recommendations of our CEO, who, with input from the executive officers, assessed our performance against corporate goals for 2008 and made his recommendations to the committee. The compensation committee then reviewed and discussed these recommendations, taking into account mitigating and/or extraordinary circumstances. In
25
early December 2008, the committee made an initial determination of the achievement of the goals at 56% and, in its discretion, awarded an additional 19% to the achievement level of corporate goals related to significant achievements during the year which were not set forth in the original 2008 corporate goals. These achievements included the considerable effort applied in responding to the FDA's questions regarding M-Enoxaparin immunogenicity, the Company's assistance with the contamination issues that occurred in the global heparin market and the receipt of for first-to-file status for the M356 ANDA. The compensation committee subsequently adjusted its initial assessment of the achievement of the corporate goals in light of completion of our financing on December 16, 2008, which had it occurred prior to the initial assessment would have substantially achieved our "advancement of corporate strategy plan" corporate goal. As a result, on December 22, 2008 the compensation committee concluded that a total achievement level of 81% of the 2008 Corporate Goals had been achieved by the company, including the additional achievements and completion of the financing, as follows:
Corporate Goal
|
Percentage Value (%) |
Actual Level of Achievement (%) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Timing of Addressing FDA Immunogenicity Questions |
15 | 70 | |||||
Ongoing Review and Approval of M-Enoxaparin ANDA |
10 | 70 | |||||
Advancement of our M356 Program |
15 | 100 | |||||
Advancement of our Glycoprotein Program |
10 | 100 | |||||
Advancement of our Research Programs |
5 | 70 | |||||
Commencement of Phase 2b Clinical Studies for M118 |
10 | | |||||
Advancement of Corporate Strategy Plan |
25 | | |||||
Financial Discipline Goals |
10 | 100 | |||||
Additional Achievements and Completion of Financing |
25 | 100 |
The compensation committee then reviewed each Named Executive's performance recommendation as submitted by the CEO and our Vice President, Human Resources. The individual objectives for our Names Executives included meeting specified targets in the following areas: successfully managing the business to the budget; business development achievements; external alliance management and funding; pipeline development; and strategic planning. Based on the 81% corporate goal achievements (weighted 100% for Mr. Wheeler and 75% for all other Named Executives), as well as individual goals (except in the case of Mr. Wheeler), in February 2009, we paid bonuses to our Named Executives for their performances in 2008 representing the following percentages of base salary as of December 31, 2008:
Name
|
Target Bonus Potential as a Percentage of Base Salary (%) |
2008 Bonus Payment ($) |
Percentage of 2008 Base Salary (%) |
Percentage of Target Bonus (%) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig A. Wheeler |
60 | 250,290 | 49 | 81 | |||||||||
Richard P. Shea |
35 | 78,133 | 28 | 80 | |||||||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
35 | 84,189 | 28 | 80 | |||||||||
Steven B. Brugger |
45 | 130,857 | 37 | 82 | |||||||||
John E. Bishop |
35 | 79,780 | 28 | 80 |
In January 2009, our compensation committee met to establish corporate goals for 2009, which are approval of the M-Enoxaparin ANDA (30%); advancing our M356 and glycoprotein programs (20% and 15%, respectively); completion of certain clinical and non-clinical studies for M118 (10%); advancement of our corporate strategic plan (15%); and achievement of financial discipline goals (10%).
26
Equity Awards. Compensation for employees, including executive officers, also includes equity awards designed to align the long-term interests of our employees and our stockholders and to assist in the retention of executives. We believe that equity compensation is a critical component of competitive compensation in the industry in which we operate.
We award initial stock option grants to executives when they join Momenta or are promoted to executive officer. The size of an initial stock option grant is generally targeted to be within a pre-set range and is approved by the compensation committee. Initial stock option grants typically vest as to 25% of the shares subject to such option one year from the date of grant and 6.25% of the shares subject to such option vest on a quarterly basis thereafter. Annual performance grants are also made pursuant to a pre-set range approved by the board of directors and set forth on a matrix that is generally intended to reflect the level of the employee's position with us as well as an individual's performance relative to his or her goals and other employees at the same performance and position level. These stock option grants are typically made annually in conjunction with the review of individual performance. This review takes place at the beginning of each fiscal year for performance in the previous year, and is reviewed and awarded annually typically at the regularly scheduled meeting of the compensation committee following completion of company-wide performance reviews. Performance options generally vest quarterly over a four-year period commencing three months from the date of grant.
We have also made restricted stock awards to our CEO and executives as a compliment to granting stock options in order to balance the volatility of the price of stock options and to assist with compliance with our stock ownership guidelines. In addition, we have made restricted stock awards from time to time to certain key employees. When such restricted stock has been awarded, the circumstances were carefully evaluated and we focused on factors such as the individual's contribution to Momenta, his or her importance to Momenta and, in some cases, the achievement of key milestones.
For 2008 performance, our compensation committee approved annual stock option grants to all of our employees, including the Named Executives, and also approved the award of restricted stock to executives, including the Named Executives. We do not use a quantitative formula to relate option grants or restricted stock awards to the degree to which an individual achieved his or her goals for a particular year. Goal achievement and non-goal specific activities are factored into making the assessment of an executive's overall contribution. The compensation committee intends that the annual aggregate value of awards (using the Black Scholes or equivalent valuation methodology) to executives will be set near competitive levels for companies represented in the compensation data it reviews.
The compensation committee reviewed equity awards for 2008 performance of the Named Executives in February 2009. At that meeting, the compensation committee approved the following equity awards our CEO and the other Named Executives as follows:
Name
|
Number of Shares of Common Stock Underlying Stock Options(1) (#) |
Shares of Restricted Common Stock(2) (#) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig A. Wheeler |
100,000 | 75,000 | |||||
Richard P. Shea |
17,100 | 8,550 | |||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
18,050 | 9,025 | |||||
Steven B. Brugger |
34,650 | 17,325 | |||||
John E. Bishop |
19,950 | 9,975 |
27
of grant and an additional 6.25% of the shares vest and become free from forfeiture at the end of each successive three-month period thereafter.
Timing and Pricing of Option Grants. The compensation committee's procedure for timing of equity grants is intended to ensure that grant timing is not being manipulated to result in a price that is favorable to employees. Commencing in 2007, the annual equity grant date for all eligible employees, including the Named Executives, is the date of the regularly scheduled meeting of the compensation committee following completion of Company-wide performance reviews. The grant date timing is driven by the fact that it coincides with our calendar-year-based performance management cycle, allowing us to deliver the equity awards close in time to performance appraisals, which increases the impact of the awards by strengthening the link between pay and performance.
Aside from the annual equity grant, it is our policy that options will normally be granted:
The compensation committee sets the exercise price of all stock options to equal the closing price of our common stock on NASDAQ Global Market on the day before the date of grant in the case of annual non-employee director grants, and the date of grant for all other grants.
Other Elements of Compensation and Perquisites. In order to attract, retain and pay market levels of compensation, we provide our executive officers and other employees the following benefits and perquisites:
Medical Insurance. We provide to each Named Executive, their spouses, domestic partners and children, health, dental and vision insurance coverage that we generally make available to other employees. We pay a portion of the premiums for this insurance for all employees.
Life and Disability Insurance. We provide each Named Executive disability and/or life insurance that we may from time to time make available to other executive employees of the same level of employment. Our CEO also receives reimbursement for an additional $3.0 million dollar life and disability policy, capped at a maximum of $5,000 of reimbursement premium per year.
Defined Contribution Plan. We offer a Section 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan, or the 401(k) Plan, a tax-qualified retirement plan, to eligible employees. The 401(k) Plan permits eligible employees to defer up to 60% of their annual eligible compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, which we refer to as the Code. The employees' elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable in the 401(k) Plan. In any plan year, we will contribute to each participant a matching contribution equal to 50% of the first 6% of the participant's compensation that he or she has contributed to the plan. Our contribution is subject to vesting at the rate of 25% at the end of each year over the first four years of employment. All of our Named Executives participated in the 401(k) Plan during 2008 and received matching contributions.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. We also offer an Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the ESPP, which qualifies under Section 423 of the Code. The ESPP is available to all of our employees, including the Named Executives, who work more than 20 hours in a week and five months during the course of a year. Under the ESPP, eligible participants purchase shares of our common stock at a discount of 15% from the fair market value of the lower of the beginning date or end date of the applicable purchase period. The purchase dates occur on the last business day of January and July of each year. To pay for the shares, each participant may authorize periodic payroll deductions ranging from 1% to 15% of his or her cash compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. All payroll deductions
28
collected from the participant during a plan period are automatically applied to the purchase of common stock on that period's purchase date provided the participant remains an eligible employee and has not withdrawn from the ESPP prior to that date.
Other. We make available certain other perquisites or fringe benefits to all eligible employees, including the Named Executives, such as tuition reimbursement, parking fees, professional society dues, gym subsidies, cell phones and food and recreational fees incidental to official company functions, including board meetings. The CEO is also entitled to financial and tax advice and reimbursement of expenses in connection with using his personal airplane for business purposes (up to the equivalent amount of a first class commercial fare per usage).
Severance and Change-of-Control Benefits. Pursuant to employment agreements we entered into with Messrs. Shea, Venkataraman, Brugger and Bishop in April 2008, these Named Executives are entitled to specified benefits in the event of the termination of their employment under specified circumstances, including termination without cause and for good reason following a change of control of Momenta.
We believe that severance protections, particularly in the context of a change-of-control transaction, can play a valuable role in attracting and retaining executive officers, are an important part of an executive's compensation and are consistent with competitive practices. Accordingly, we provide such protections for our Named Executives and certain other executive officers. We believe that the occurrence, or potential occurrence, of a change-of-control will create uncertainty regarding the continued employment of our Named Executives. This uncertainty results from the fact that many change-of-control transactions result in significant organizational changes, particularly at the senior executive level. Our practice, in the case of our employment agreements, has been to structure these change-of-control benefits as "double trigger" benefits. In other words, the change of control does not itself trigger benefits; rather, benefits are paid only if the employment of the Named Executive is terminated during the twelve month period after the change of control. We believe a "double trigger" benefit maximizes stockholder value because it prevents an unintended windfall to executives in the event of a friendly change of control, while still providing them appropriate incentives to cooperate in negotiating any change of control in which they believe they may lose their jobs. Because we believe that a termination by the executive for good reason is conceptually the same as a termination by us without cause, and that in the context of a change-of-control potential acquirers would otherwise have an incentive to constructively terminate the executive's employment to avoid paying severance, we provide severance benefits in these circumstances. We have provided more detailed information about these benefits, along with estimates of their value under various circumstances, under the captions "Employment, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements" and "Potential Termination and Change of Control Payments" below.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
It is generally our policy to qualify compensation paid to executive officers for deductibility under section 162(m) of the Code. Section 162(m) generally prohibits us from deducting the compensation of certain executive officers that exceeds $1,000,000 unless that compensation is based on the satisfaction of objective performance goals. However, we reserve the discretion to pay compensation to our executive officers that may not be deductible.
We account for equity compensation paid to our employees under the rules of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, referred to as SFAS 123(R), that requires us to measure and recognize compensation expense in our financial statements for all share-based payments based upon an estimate of their fair value over the service period of the award. We record cash compensation as an expense at the time the obligation is accrued.
29
Non-Employee Director Compensation
Non-employee director compensation is set by our board of directors at the recommendation of the compensation committee. In 2007, the compensation committee recommended, and our board of directors approved, a compensation and benefit program for non-employee directors. Our board of directors determined that each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer and an annual fee for each committee on which the non-employee director serves. Our chairman also receives a fee for serving in such position. Our board of directors also approved reimbursement to directors for reasonable and necessary expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of our board of directors and other Momenta business.
In June 2008, we retained Radford to assess our non-employee director compensation practices and provide recommendations for changes to the program, if any. The updated peer group companies were used in the analysis, as well as other market data. Radford's review demonstrated that the annual cash compensation for non-employee directors trailed the 50th percentile for our peer group companies while the equity compensation value exceeded the 75th percentile. In order to better align non-employee director compensation to our peer group, the following changes will be made effective as of the date of the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders based on Radford's analysis and recommendations:
These changes are acceptable to our board of directors because they will decrease the overall annual non-employee director compensation. The changes will bring annual cash compensation closer to the 50th percentile and equity compensation value at or below the 75th percentile.
Upon appointment, each new non-employee director is granted an option to purchase shares of common stock. Upon re-election at our annual meetings of stockholders, each non-employee director is also granted an option to purchase shares of our common stock.
For a further description of the compensation paid to non-employee directors for 2008 and to be paid in 2009, see "Compensation of Directors" below.
30
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006. We refer to these executive officers as our "Named Executives" elsewhere in this proxy statement.
Name and Principal Position(1)
|
Year | Salary ($) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards(2) ($) |
Option Awards(2) ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
All Other Compensation ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Craig A. Wheeler |
2008 | 515,000 | | 755,342 | 1,151,380 | 250,290 | 18,482 | (3) | 2,690,494 | |||||||||||||||||
President, Chief Executive Officer |
2007 | 500,000 | | 1,965,286 | 1,027,696 | 273,000 | 483,897 | (8) | 4,249,879 | |||||||||||||||||
and Director |
2006 | 180,556 | (13) | 108,000 | (14) | 145,176 | 368,844 | | 54,587 | (15) | 857,163 | |||||||||||||||
Richard P. Shea |
2008 |
280,800 |
|
56,263 |
193,804 |
78,133 |
10,844 |
(4) |
619,844 |
|||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief |
2007 | 254,063 | | 14,749 | 340,470 | 85,995 | 10,536 | (9) | 705,813 | |||||||||||||||||
Financial Officer |
2006 | 230,000 | 75,900 | | 342,276 | | 7,580 | (16) | 655,756 | |||||||||||||||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
2008 |
302,565 |
|
733,380 |
232,493 |
84,189 |
11,218 |
(5) |
1,363,845 |
|||||||||||||||||
Chief Scientific Officer, Senior Vice |
2007 | 290,928 | | 1,492,608 | 390,147 | 92,660 | 10,949 | (10) | 2,277,292 | |||||||||||||||||
President, Research |
2006 | 278,400 | 107,184 | 1,774,836 | 369,054 | | 7,580 | (17) | 2,537,054 | |||||||||||||||||
Steven B. Brugger |
2008 |
353,280 |
|
733,380 |
167,348 |
130,857 |
10,870 |
(6) |
1,395,735 |
|||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer |
2007 | 303,133 | | 1,492,608 | 88,500 | 146,575 | 10,601 | (11) | 2,041,417 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2006 | 279,912 | 112,664 | 1,774,836 | 72,652 | | 7,580 | (18) | 2,247,644 | |||||||||||||||||
John E. Bishop |
2008 |
283,379 |
|
109,133 |
526,687 |
79,780 |
11,044 |
(7) |
1,010,023 |
|||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, |
2007 | 270,400 | | 64,798 | 481,457 | 90,429 | 10,674 | (12) | 917,758 | |||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical Sciences |
2006 | 232,648 | 92,748 | 2,783 | 283,879 | | 7,577 | (19) | 619,635 |
31
32
2008 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table sets forth information regarding awards made to our Named Executives during the year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
Stock Awards: Number of Shares of |
Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying |
Exercise Price of Option |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option |
||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Type of Award(1) |
Grant Date | Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Stock (#) |
Options (#) |
Awards(5) ($/Sh) |
Awards(6) ($) |
||||||||||||||||||
Craig A. Wheeler |
RS | 2/22/2008 | (3) | | | | 75,000 | | | 555,750 | |||||||||||||||||
|
SO | 2/22/2008 | (4) | | | | | 100,000 | 7.41 | 539,020 | |||||||||||||||||
|
AIBP | 3/7/2007 | 309,000 | 772,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Richard P. Shea |
RS |
2/22/2008 |
(3) |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
80,028 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
SO | 2/22/2008 | (4) | | | | | 34,750 | 7.41 | 187,309 | |||||||||||||||||
|
AIBP | 3/7/2007 | 98,280 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
RS |
2/22/2008 |
(3) |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
37,050 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
SO | 2/22/2008 | (4) | | | | | 34,750 | 7.41 | 187,309 | |||||||||||||||||
|
AIBP | 3/7/2007 | 105,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steven B. Brugger |
RS |
2/22/2008 |
(3) |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
37,050 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
SO | 2/22/2008 | (4) | | | | | 40,001 | 7.41 | 215,613 | |||||||||||||||||
|
AIBP | 3/7/2007 | 158,976 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
John E. Bishop |
RS |
2/22/2008 |
(3) |
|
|
|
10,800 |
|
|
80,028 |
|||||||||||||||||
|
SO | 2/22/2008 | (4) | | | | | 39,963 | 7.41 | 215,409 | |||||||||||||||||
|
AIBP | 3/7/2007 | 99,183 |
33
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2008 YEAR-END
The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding stock options and awards of restricted stock held by our Named Executives as of December 31, 2008:
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares That Have Not Vested(1) ($) |
|||||||||||||
Craig A. Wheeler |
210,936 | (2) | 164,064 | 16.18 | 8/21/2016 | 100,000 | (3) | 1,160,000 | |||||||||||
|
18,750 | (4) | 81,250 | 7.41 | 2/22/2018 | 175,000 | (5) | 2,030,000 | |||||||||||
|
| | | | 75,000 | (6) | 870,000 | ||||||||||||
Richard P. Shea |
108,800 |
(7) |
|
0.61 |
10/27/2013 |
10,313 |
(8) |
119,631 |
|||||||||||
|
12,800 | (9) | | 4.91 | 3/24/2014 | 10,800 | (6) | 125,280 | |||||||||||
|
10,546 | (10) | 704 | 6.88 | 1/31/2015 | | | ||||||||||||
|
12,890 | (11) | 5,860 | 23.62 | 3/6/2016 | | | ||||||||||||
|
3,062 | (12) | 3,938 | 12.81 | 2/21/2017 | | | ||||||||||||
|
4,687 | (13) | 10,313 | 10.41 | 8/14/2017 | | | ||||||||||||
|
6,515 | (4) | 28,235 | 7.41 | 2/22/2018 | | | ||||||||||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
32,000 |
(14) |
|
0.23 |
5/28/2013 |
200,000 |
(15) |
2,320,000 |
|||||||||||
|
7,200 | (16) | | (16) | 0.99 | (16) | 4/6/2014 | 5,000 | (6) | 58,000 | |||||||||
|
31,200 | (16) | | (16) | 4.91 | (16) | 4/6/2014 | | | ||||||||||
|
23,445 | (17) | 1,555 | 6.88 | 1/31/2015 | | | ||||||||||||
|
6,562 | (18) | 8,438 | 12.81 | 2/21/2017 | | | ||||||||||||
|
6,515 | (4) | 28,235 | 7.41 | 2/22/2018 | | | ||||||||||||
Steven B. Brugger |
27,200 |
(19) |
|
0.23 |
9/17/2012 |
200,000 |
(15) |
2,320,000 |
|||||||||||
|
28,530 | (20) | | 0.23 | 5/28/2013 | 5,000 | (6) | 58,000 | |||||||||||
|
23,445 | (21) | 1,555 | 6.88 | 1/31/2015 | | | ||||||||||||
|
9,843 | (22) | 12,657 | 12.81 | 2/21/2017 | | | ||||||||||||
|
6,666 | (23) | 18,334 | 5.16 | 11/13/2017 | | | ||||||||||||
|
7,500 | (4) | 32,501 | 7.41 | 2/22/2018 | | | ||||||||||||
John E. Bishop |
8,750 |
(24) |
|
8.10 |
11/1/2014 |
7,501 |
(25) |
87,012 |
|||||||||||
|
34,375 | (26) | 15,625 | 23.62 | 3/6/2016 | 11,250 | (27) | 130,500 | |||||||||||
|
15,000 | (28) | 15,000 | 16.94 | 12/13/2016 | 10,800 | (6) | 125,280 | |||||||||||
|
16,406 | (29) | 21,094 | 12.81 | 2/21/2017 | | | ||||||||||||
|
7,493 | (4) | 32,470 | 7.41 | 2/22/2018 | | |
34
35
36
2008 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The following table sets forth information regarding options exercised by our Named Executives and shares of restricted stock that vested and became free from forfeiture during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008:
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized on Exercise ($) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($) |
|||||||||
Craig A. Wheeler |
| | | | |||||||||
Richard P. Shea |
| | 4,687 | 65,752 | (2) | ||||||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
| | | | |||||||||
Steven B. Brugger |
| | | | |||||||||
John E. Bishop |
37,875 | 328,088 | (1) | 7,499 | 84,198 | (2) |
Employment, Severance and Change of Control Arrangements
Craig A. Wheeler Employment Agreement
On August 22, 2006, we entered into an employment agreement with Craig A. Wheeler, pursuant to which Mr. Wheeler serves as our President, CEO and as a director. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Wheeler initially received an annual base salary of $500,000, subject to annual increases by the board of directors. Mr. Wheeler's annual base salary for 2008 was $515,000 and was increased to $530,450 for 2009. Mr. Wheeler is eligible to receive bonuses of up to 150% of his base salary for the applicable fiscal year, with an annual bonus target of 60% of the then-applicable base salary. The compensation committee approved a $250,290 bonus paid to Mr. Wheeler in 2009 based on Company achievements in 2008. Mr. Wheeler is also entitled to specified benefits, including: participation in our sponsored benefit programs; reimbursement for life insurance premium expenses and related tax gross-up payments; and reimbursement of tax and financial advisor fees incurred by Mr. Wheeler during the period of his employment.
Equity Awards
Mr. Wheeler's employment agreement provides for the grant or issuance, as applicable, of the following stock-based awards:
1. On August 22, 2006, we granted Mr. Wheeler options to purchase an aggregate of 375,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $16.18 per share, which is referred to as the Initial Option Grant. The Initial Option Grant is subject to vesting as to 25% of the shares subject to such option on August 22, 2007 and as to 6.25% of the shares subject to such option at the end of each three-month period thereafter.
2. On August 22, 2006, we issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock to Mr. Wheeler, which is referred to as the Time-Based Grant. The shares of common stock subject to the Time-Based Grant vest and become free from forfeiture on the fourth anniversary of the date of issuance.
3. On January 17, 2007, we issued to Mr. Wheeler 175,000 shares of restricted common stock, which is referred to as the Performance Grant. Subject to the acceleration provisions set forth in
37
Mr. Wheeler's employment agreement, the shares of common stock subject to the Performance Grant shall vest and become free from forfeiture upon fulfillment of any of the following conditions:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if at any time during the four year-period ending on January 17, 2011 our board of directors elects to abandon the M-Enoxaparin program and no longer pursue the commercialization of M-Enoxaparin either for strategic reasons or as a result of adverse events in the regulatory process, the shares of common stock subject to the Performance Grant shall vest and become free from the forfeiture on the date that our board of directors certifies that any one of the three events set forth in item (ii) above shall have occurred; or
4. In addition to the Initial Option Grant, the Time-Based Grant and the Performance Grant, on February 22, 2008, we granted Mr. Wheeler (i) 75,000 shares of restricted common stock subject to vesting over four years, which is referred to as the First Target Grant and (ii) an option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock subject to vesting over four years, with an exercise price of $7.41 per share, which is referred to as the Second Target Grant.
Beginning in 2009, the grant of stock-based awards is at the discretion of the board of directors in accordance with the overall equity practices of the company.
Termination of Employment
In the event that Mr. Wheeler's employment is terminated by us without cause, by reason of his death or disability or by him for good reason, other than in connection with a change in control (as those terms are defined in his employment agreement),
38
In the event Mr. Wheeler's employment is terminated by us without cause within 24 months following a change of control (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or is terminated by Mr. Wheeler for good reason within 24 months following a change of control, the unvested portions of the Initial Option Grant, the Time-Based Grant, the Performance Grant, the First Target Grant, the Second Target Grant and all future stock-based awards shall fully and immediately vest.
Under his employment agreement, Mr. Wheeler or Momenta may terminate his employment at any time, and Mr. Wheeler will be entitled to the following severance benefits. In the event Mr. Wheeler's employment is terminated without cause by us, as the result of death or disability or Mr. Wheeler terminates his employment for good reason, other than in connection with a change in control, Mr. Wheeler will receive a lump sum payment equal to
Additionally, Mr. Wheeler and his dependents will receive comparable benefits for a maximum of 12 months following such termination subject to his reemployment with comparable benefits.
If Mr. Wheeler terminates his employment for good reason within 24 months following a change of control of Momenta, or if we terminate Mr. Wheeler's employment without cause within 24 months following a change of control, Mr. Wheeler will receive a lump-sum cash payment equal to
Additionally, Mr. Wheeler is entitled to a tax gross-up payment following such termination and Mr. Wheeler and his dependents will receive comparable benefits for a maximum of 36 months following such termination subject to his reemployment with comparable benefits.
Other Provisions
Our employment agreement with Mr. Wheeler also contains non-disclosure, non-competition and assignment of intellectual property terms. These terms provide for the protection of our confidential information, the transfer of ownership rights to intellectual property developed by Mr. Wheeler and a 12-month non-compete provision.
39
Executive Employment Agreements with Richard P. Shea, Ganesh Venkataraman, Steven B. Brugger and John E. Bishop
On April 28, 2008, we entered into executive employment agreements, or the Executive Employment Agreements, with the following Named Executives: Richard P. Shea, Ganesh Venkataraman, Steven B. Brugger and John E. Bishop.
Salary, Bonus and Benefits
Pursuant to the Executive Employment Agreements, Messrs. Shea, Brugger, Bishop and Venkataraman will receive annual base salaries of $280,800, $353,280, $283,379 and $302,565, respectively, subject to adjustment thereafter, as determined by our board of directors or a committee or designee thereof. If our board of directors approves an annual bonus for calendar year 2008 or any calendar year thereafter Messrs. Shea, Brugger, Bishop and Venkataraman will be eligible for a discretionary bonus award. The annual target for each executive's bonus will be 35%, 45%, 35% and 35% of the annualized base salary for Messrs. Shea, Brugger, Bishop and Venkataraman, respectively. We will determine, in our sole discretion, whether (and in what amount) a bonus award is payable to each executive. In determining whether a bonus award in any given year shall be granted, we will review whether we have achieved our annually approved corporate goals as well as whether the executive has achieved his personal objectives as established by us. In order to be eligible for any bonus hereunder, the executive must be an active employee of Momenta on the date such bonus is distributed.
Each executive shall be entitled to participate in all benefit plans and programs that we establish and make available to our employees to the extent that the executive is eligible under (and subject to the provisions of) the plan documents governing those programs.
Payments Upon Resignation by the Executive Without Good Reason or Termination by Us for Cause
If the executive voluntarily resigns his employment other than for good reason (as defined in each Executive Employment Agreement), or if we terminates the executive for cause (as defined in each Executive Employment Agreement), we shall pay the executive all accrued and unpaid base salary through the executive's date of termination and any vacation that is accrued but unused as of such date. The executive shall not be eligible for any severance or separation payments or any continuation of benefits (other than those provided for COBRA), or any other compensation pursuant to the Executive Employment Agreement or otherwise. The executive also shall have such rights, if any, with respect to outstanding stock options and restricted stock grants as may be provided under each applicable agreement.
Payments Upon Termination by Reason of Death or Disability, Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason
If the executive's employment with us is terminated by reason of the executive's death or disability (as defined in each Executive Employment Agreement), by us without cause, or by the executive's voluntary resignation for good reason, other than in connection with a change in control (as defined in each Executive Employment Agreement), then the executive shall be paid all accrued and unpaid base salary and any accrued but unused vacation through the date of termination. In addition, the executive shall be eligible to receive the following separation benefits:
40
Payments Upon Termination in Connection with a Change of Control
If the executive's employment with the Company is terminated without cause or if the executive terminates his employment with good reason within one year following a change in control (as defined in each Executive Employment Agreement), the executive shall be entitled to all accrued and unpaid base salary and any accrued but unused vacation through the date of termination. In addition, the executive shall be eligible to receive the following separation benefits:
Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation, Confidential Information and Developments
In connection with the execution of the Executive Employment Agreements, Messrs. Shea, Brugger and Bishop restated and reaffirmed all of their respective obligations pursuant to their respective Employee Non-disclosure, Non-competition and Assignment of Inventions Agreements providing for the protection of our confidential information, the transfer of ownership rights to intellectual property developed by each such executive and a 12-month non-compete provision. Mr. Venkataraman's Executive Employment Agreement contains provisions for the protection of our confidential information, the transfer of ownership rights to intellectual property developed by him and a 12-month non-compete provision.
41
Potential Termination and Change of Control Payments
Potential Termination and Change of Control Payments for Craig A. Wheeler
The following table describes the potential payments, benefits and acceleration of vesting applicable to stock options and restricted stock awards under our employment agreement with Craig A. Wheeler. The amounts shown below assume that the termination of Mr. Wheeler is effective as of December 31, 2008. Actual amounts payable to Mr. Wheeler upon his termination can only be determined definitively at the time of his actual departure.
Benefit
|
Voluntary Termination or Termination for Cause ($) |
Termination Without Cause, Termination by Reason of Death or Disability, Resignation for Good Reason ($) |
Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason Within 24 Months of a Change of Control ($) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accrued Obligations |
|||||||||||
Vacation |
49,519 | 49,519 | 49,519 | ||||||||
Severance Benefits |
|||||||||||
Lump-sum cash payment |
| 824,000 | (2) | 1,648,000 | (3) | ||||||
Lump-sum payment with respect to business combination |
| | 824,000 | (4) | |||||||
Insurance/Healthcare benefits |
| 17,376 | (5) | 52,128 | (6) | ||||||
Market Value of Stock Vesting on Termination(1) |
| 3,675,369 | (7) | 4,400,438 | (8) | ||||||
Gross-Up Payments |
| | 3,262,654 | (9) | |||||||
Total |
49,519 | 4,566,264 | 10,236,739 |
42
Mr. Wheeler's reemployment with comparable healthcare benefits. In the event the aggregate purchase price is less than $1.1 billion, Mr. Wheeler would be entitled to 24 months continuation of coverage under medical and dental plans for Mr. Wheeler and his dependents subject to Mr. Wheeler's reemployment with comparable healthcare benefits, with a value equal to $34,752. This value is based upon the type of insurance coverage we carried for Mr. Wheeler as of December 31, 2008 and is valued at the premiums in effect on December 31, 2008.
43
Potential Termination and Change of Control Payments for Messrs. Shea, Venkataraman, Brugger and Bishop
The following table describes the potential payments, benefits and acceleration of vesting applicable to stock options and restricted stock awards under our Executive Employment Agreements with each of Messrs. Shea, Venkataraman, Brugger and Bishop. The amounts shown below assume that the termination of each executive is effective as of December 31, 2008 and that each of the Executive Employment Agreements was effective as of December 31, 2008. Actual amounts payable to each Named Executive listed below upon his termination can only be determined definitively at the time of each Named Executive's actual departure.
Name
|
Benefit | Voluntary Termination or Termination for Cause ($) |
Termination for Death, Disability, Without Cause or for Good Reason Other than in Connection with Change of Control ($) |
Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason Within 12 Months of a Change of Control ($) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Richard P. Shea | Accrued Obligations |
|||||||||||
Vacation |
11,610 | 11,610 | 11,610 | |||||||||
Severance Benefits |
||||||||||||
Salary |
280,800 | (2) | ||||||||||
Lump-sum cash payment |
| 98,280 | (3) | 379,080 | (4) | |||||||
Insurance/Healthcare |
| 13,773 | 13,773 | (5) | ||||||||
Market Value of Stock |
| 142,498 | (6) | 378,811 | (7) | |||||||
Total | 11,610 | 546,961 | 783,274 | |||||||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
Accrued Obligations |
|||||||||||
Vacation |
23,274 | 23,274 | 23,274 | |||||||||
Severance Benefits |
||||||||||||
Salary |
302,565 | (2) | ||||||||||
Lump-sum cash payment |
| 105,898 | (3) | 408,463 | (4) | |||||||
Insurance/Healthcare |
| 1,427 | 1,427 | (5) | ||||||||
Market Value of Stock |
| 69,112 | (6) | 2,503,644 | (7) | |||||||
Total | 23,274 | 502,276 | 2,936,808 | |||||||||
Steven B. Brugger |
Accrued Obligations |
|||||||||||
Vacation |
24,458 | 24,458 | 24,458 | |||||||||
Severance Benefits |
||||||||||||
Salary |
353,280 | (2) | ||||||||||
Lump-sum cash payment |
| 158,976 | (3) | 512,256 | (4) | |||||||
Insurance/Healthcare |
| 17,376 | 17,376 | (5) | ||||||||
Market Value of Stock |
| 117,538 | (6) | 2,639,590 | (7) | |||||||
Total | 24,458 | 671,628 | 3,193,680 | |||||||||
John E. Bishop |
Accrued Obligations |
|||||||||||
Vacation |
6,676 | 6,676 | 6,676 | |||||||||
Severance Benefits |
||||||||||||
Salary |
283,379 | (2) | ||||||||||
Lump-sum cash payment |
| 99,183 | (3) | 382,562 | (4) | |||||||
Insurance/Healthcare |
| 17,376 | 17,376 | (5) | ||||||||
Market Value of Stock |
| 183,657 | (6) | 478,841 | (7) | |||||||
Total | 6,676 | 590,271 | 885,455 |
44
Executive's termination date. For more information relating to compensation earned by our Named Executives, see the section of this proxy statement entitled "Executive CompensationSummary Compensation Table."
Compensation of Directors
2008 Director Compensation
Grant of Stock Options Upon Appointment. Each newly elected non-employee director automatically received an option to purchase up to 30,000 shares of our common stock upon appointment to the board of directors. These options vest quarterly over the three years following the grant date, subject to such director's continued service on the board of directors.
Grant of Additional Stock Options. Non-employee directors who served on our board of directors during 2007 and who continued to serve on the board of directors during 2008 were granted an option to purchase up to 19,200 shares of our common stock at the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. These options vest quarterly over the year following the grant date, subject to the non-employee director's continued service on the board of directors. Currently, each such non-employee director stock option will terminate on the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or two years after the recipient ceases to serve as a director.
45
Payment of Retainer Fee; Reimbursement of Travel and Other Expenses. In addition to an option grant, each non-employee director received an annual retainer of $25,000 for his or her service on our board of directors during 2008. Additional amounts were paid as follows:
Position
|
Additional Fees | |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Non-Employee Chairman of the Board |
$25,000 | |||
Audit Committee Chair |
$10,000 | |||
Audit Committee Members (other than the Chair) |
$ 7,500 | |||
Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairs and Members (no additional fees shall be paid to members serving on both the Compensation and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees) |
$ 5,000 | |||
Science Committee Chair |
$10,000 | |||
Science Committee Members (other than the Chair) |
$ 7,500 | |||
Additional Payments to Science Committee Chair and Members |
$ 3,000 for each all day session attended (up to a maximum of $15,000 per year) that is in addition to the standard quarterly meetings of the Science Committee |
All retainer amounts were paid quarterly during 2008. Non-employee directors also received reimbursement for reasonable travel and other expenses in connection with attending meetings of our board of directors during 2008.
The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2008:
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) ($) |
Stock Awards(2) ($) |
Option Awards(3)(4)(5) ($) |
All Other Compensation ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Barrett |
55,000 | | 155,871 | (6) | | 210,871 | ||||||||||
John K. Clarke |
32,500 | | 168,281 | | 200,781 | |||||||||||
Alan L. Crane |
25,000 | | 280,968 | | 305,968 | |||||||||||
Marsh H. Fanucci |
35,000 | | 184,371 | | 219,371 | |||||||||||
Peter Barton Hutt |
30,000 | | 168,281 | | 198,281 | |||||||||||
Robert S. Langer, Jr |
32,500 | 87,764 | 168,281 | | 288,545 | |||||||||||
Stephen T. Reeders |
13,929 | | 38,003 | (7) | | 51,932 | ||||||||||
Ram Sasisekharan |
32,500 | 131,645 | 168,281 | | 332,426 | |||||||||||
Bennett M. Shapiro |
40,000 | | 168,281 | | 208,281 | |||||||||||
Elizabeth Stoner |
37,500 | | 149,543 | | 187,043 | |||||||||||
James R. Sulat |
21,326 | | 32,342 | | 53,668 |
46
Mr. Sulat represents fees earned as a Class II director from June 5, 2008 to December 31, 2008 and fees earned as chairman of the board from December 5, 2008 to December 31, 2008.
During 2008, compensation expense was recognized in the 2008 financial statements for the following awards of restricted stock to our non-employee directors:
Name
|
Grant Date | Number of Shares Subject to Award(#) |
Number of Shares Vested in 2008(#) |
2008 Expense Recognized Under SFAS 123(R)($) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert S. Langer, Jr. |
September 13, 2007 | 16,000 | | 87,764 | ||||||||
Ram Sasisekharan |
September 13, 2007 | 24,000 | | 131,645 |
47
In addition, during 2008, compensation expense was recognized in respect of the following grants of stock options to our non-employee directors:
Name
|
Grant Date | Number of Shares Subject to Options(#) |
Number of Shares Vested in 2008(#) |
2008 Expense Recognized Under SFAS 123(R)($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Barrett |
6/13/2007 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 68,530 | |||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 87,341 | |||||||||
John K. Clarke |
6/13/2007 |
19,200 |
9,600 |
68,530 |
|||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 99,751 | |||||||||
Alan L. Crane |
12/30/2005 |
28,600 |
5,091 |
112,687 |
|||||||||
|
6/13/2007 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 68,530 | |||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 99,751 | |||||||||
Marsha H. Fanucci |
3/15/2005 |
38,400 |
12,800 |
16,090 |
|||||||||
|
6/13/2007 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 68,530 | |||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 99,751 | |||||||||
Peter Barton Hutt |
6/13/2007 |
19,200 |
9,600 |
68,530 |
|||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 99,751 | |||||||||
Robert S. Langer, Jr. |
6/13/2007 |
19,200 |
9,600 |
68,530 |
|||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 99,751 | |||||||||
Stephen T. Reeders |
6/13/2007 |
19,200 |
4,800 |
38,003 |
|||||||||
Ram Sasisekharan |
6/13/2007 |
19,200 |
9,600 |
68,530 |
|||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 99,751 | |||||||||
Bennett M. Shapiro |
6/13/2007 |
19,200 |
9,600 |
68,530 |
|||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 99,751 | |||||||||
Elizabeth Stoner |
12/14/2007 |
30,000 |
10,000 |
49,792 |
|||||||||
|
6/5/2008 | 19,200 | 9,600 | 99,751 | |||||||||
James R. Sulat |
9/12/2008 |
30,000 |
2,500 |
32,342 |
48
Name
|
Aggregate Number of Shares Subject to Outstanding Stock Options(#) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Option Grants Made During 2008($) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peter Barrett |
86,400 | 174,205 | |||||
John K. Clarke |
96,000 | 174,205 | |||||
Alan L. Crane |
73,600 | 174,205 | |||||
Marsh H. Fanucci |
96,000 | 174,205 | |||||
Peter Barton Hutt |
171,500 | 174,205 | |||||
Robert S. Langer, Jr. |
96,000 | 174,205 | |||||
Stephen T. Reeders |
72,000 | | |||||
Ram Sasisekharan |
96,000 | 174,205 | |||||
Bennett M. Shapiro |
110,450 | 174,205 | |||||
Elizabeth Stoner |
49,200 | 174,205 | |||||
James Sulat |
30,000 | 321,951 |
2009 Director Compensation
Grant of Stock Options Upon Appointment. Each newly elected non-employee director will automatically receive an option to purchase up to 30,000 shares of our common stock upon appointment to the board of directors. These options will vest quarterly over the three years following the grant date, subject to such director's continued service on the board of directors.
Grant of Additional Stock Options. Non-employee directors who served on our board of directors during 2008 and who continue to serve on the board of directors during 2009 will be granted an option to purchase up to 15,000 shares of our common stock at the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders. These options vest quarterly over the year following the grant date, subject to the non-employee director's continued service on the board of directors. Currently, each such non-employee director stock option will terminate on the earlier of ten years from the date of grant or two years after the recipient ceases to serve as a director.
49
Payment of Retainer Fee; Reimbursement of Travel and Other Expenses. In addition to an option grant, effective as of the annual meeting of our stockholders, each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer of $30,000 for his or her service on our board of directors during. Additional amounts will be paid as follows:
Audit Committee Chairperson |
$17,000 | |||
Audit Committee Members (other than the Chairperson) |
$ 8,000 | |||
Compensation Committee Chairperson |
$12,000 | |||
Compensation Committee Members |
$ 6,000 | |||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chairperson |
$12,000 | |||
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Members |
$ 6,000 | |||
Science Committee Chairperson |
$10,000 | |||
Science Committee Members |
$ 7,500 | |||
Science Committee, Chairperson and Members |
$ 3,000 for each all day session attended (up to a maximum of $15,000 per year) that is in addition to the standard quarterly meetings of the Scientific Committee |
All retainer amounts will be paid quarterly during 2009. Non-employee directors will also receive reimbursement for reasonable travel and other expenses in connection with attending meetings of our board of directors during 2009.
Compensation Committee Report
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with the Company's management. Based on this review and discussion, the compensation committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
By the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:
John
K. Clarke (Chairperson)
Peter Barton Hutt
Bennett M. Shapiro
Elizabeth Stoner
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The compensation committee currently consists of John K. Clarke, who serves as chairman, Peter Barton Hutt, Bennett M. Shapiro and Elizabeth Stoner.
None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee. None of the current members of our compensation committee has ever been an employee of Momenta.
The following directors, including Peter Barton Hutt, a member of our compensation committee, officers and holders of more than five percent of our voting securities and their affiliates have been
50
granted registration rights with respect to shares of our common stock under the terms of investors' right agreements between us and these holders:
Name of Holder
|
Number of Registrable Shares as of April 1, 2009 (#) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alan L. Crane and affiliates |
578,602 | ||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
465,440 | ||||
Peter Barton Hutt |
37,498 | ||||
Robert S. Langer, Jr. and affiliates |
970,022 | ||||
Ram Sasisekharan |
406,344 | ||||
Novartis Pharma AG |
4,708,679 | ||||
Total |
7,166,585 | ||||
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 1, 2009 by:
The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person or entity is determined in accordance with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and includes voting or investment power with respect to shares of our common stock. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Shares of our common stock issuable under stock options exercisable on or before May 31, 2009 are deemed beneficially owned for computing the percentage ownership of the person holding the options, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock, except to the extent authority is shared by spouses under community property laws. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of all directors and executive officers is c/o Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142. The inclusion of any shares deemed beneficially owned in this table does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares.
51
There were, as of April 1, 2009, approximately 64 holders of record and 3,866 beneficial holders of our common stock.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Total Number of Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percentage of Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Holders of more than 5% of our Common Stock |
|||||||
Novartis AG |
4,708,679 |
(2) |
11.8 |
% |
|||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
3,338,081 |
(3) |
8.4 |
% |
|||
Visium Asset Management, LP |
3,349,122 |
(4) |
8.4 |
% |
|||
Federated Investors, Inc. |
2,824,546 |
(5) |
7.1 |
% |
|||
Samana Capital, L.P. |
2,109,760 |
(6) |
5.3 |
% |
|||
Directors (which includes all nominees) and Named Executives |
|||||||
Craig A. Wheeler |
720,310 |
(7) |
1.8 |
% |
|||
Alan L. Crane |
647,402 | (8) | 1.6 | % | |||
Robert S. Langer, Jr. |
1,061,222 | (9) | 2.7 | % | |||
John K. Clarke |
168,323 | (10) | * | ||||
Ram Sasisekharan |
497,544 | (11) | 1.2 | % | |||
Peter Barton Hutt |
234,563 | (12) | * | ||||
Bennett M. Shapiro |
112,650 | (13) | * | ||||
Elizabeth Stoner |
26,900 | (14) | * | ||||
Marsha H. Fanucci |
91,200 | (15) | * | ||||
James Sulat |
4,999 | (16) | * | ||||
Steven B. Brugger |
398,237 | (17) | 1.0 | % | |||
Richard P. Shea |
203,807 | (18) | * | ||||
John E. Bishop |
144,891 | (19) | * | ||||
Ganesh Venkataraman |
581,264 | (20) | 1.5 | % | |||
All Directors and Executives as a group (16 persons) |
4,987,259 | (21) | 12.0 | % |
52
holder of 4,708,679 shares of common stock. Novartis Pharma is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Novartis, and, as a result, Novartis is the beneficial owner of the 4,708,679 shares of common stock held of record by Novartis Pharma. Novartis Pharma and Novartis have shared power to vote and shared power to dispose of such shares.
53
us and Dr. Langer, and 91,200 shares of common stock underlying options exercisable on or before May 31, 2009.
54
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2008:
Plan Category
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options (a) (#) |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options (b) ($) |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) (#) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)(2) |
3,953,383 | 11.26 | 3,174,579 | |||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
| | | |||||||
Total |
3,953,383 | 11.26 | 3,174,579 |
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Compensation Paid to Directors and Executive Officers
Please see discussion under the heading "Executive Compensation."
Registration Rights
For information relating to certain registration rights granted by us to certain of our directors, officers and stockholders, please see the discussion under the heading "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation."
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
In 2007, our board of directors adopted written policies and procedures for the review of any transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we are a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and one of our executive officers, directors, director nominees or 5% stockholders (or their immediate family members), each of whom we refer to as a "related person," has a direct or indirect material interest.
If a related person proposes to enter into such a transaction, arrangement or relationship, which we refer to as a "related person transaction," the related person must report the proposed related person transaction to our General Counsel. The policy calls for the proposed related person transaction to be reviewed and, if deemed appropriate, approved by our audit committee. Whenever practicable, the reporting, review and approval will occur prior to entry into the transaction. If advance review and approval is not practicable, the audit committee will review, and, in its discretion, may ratify the related person transaction. The policy also permits the chairman of the audit committee to review and, if deemed appropriate, approve proposed related person transactions that arise between committee meetings, subject to ratification by the audit committee at its next meeting. Any related person transactions that are ongoing in nature will be reviewed annually.
55
A related person transaction reviewed under the policy will be considered approved or ratified if it is authorized by the audit committee after full disclosure of the related person's interest in the transaction. As appropriate for the circumstances, the audit committee will review and consider:
Our audit committee may approve or ratify the transaction only if the audit committee determines that, under all of the circumstances, the transaction is in our best interests. Our audit committee may impose any conditions on the related person transaction that it deems appropriate.
In addition to the transactions that are excluded by the instructions to the Securities and Exchange Commission's related person transaction disclosure rule, our board of directors has determined that the following transactions do not create a material direct or indirect interest on behalf of related persons and, therefore, are not related person transactions for purposes of this policy:
The policy provides that transactions involving compensation of executive officers shall be reviewed and approved by our compensation committee in the manner specified in its charter.
We will disclose the terms of related person transactions in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission to the extent required. Since January 1, 2008, we have not been a party to, and we have no plans to be a party to, any transaction or series of similar transactions in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000 and in which any current director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than in connection with the transactions described above.
56
PROPOSAL TWO
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board Recommendation
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009.
The audit committee of our board of directors has selected the firm of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. Although stockholder approval of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP is not required by law, our board of directors believes that it is advisable to give stockholders an opportunity to ratify this selection. If this proposal is not approved at the Annual Meeting, our audit committee directors will reconsider its appointment of Ernst & Young LLP. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.
Auditors' Fees
The following table summarizes the fees of Ernst & Young LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, billed to us for each of the last two fiscal years.
Fee Category
|
2008 | 2007 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees(1) |
$ | 479,500 | $ | 380,000 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2) |
| | ||||||
Tax Fees(3) |
28,850 | 27,100 | ||||||
All Other Fees |
| | ||||||
Total Fees |
$ |
508,350 |
$ |
407,100 |
||||
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the approval of all audit and non-audit services that are to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. This policy generally provides that we will not engage our independent registered public accounting firm to render audit or non-audit services unless the service is specifically approved in advance by our audit committee or the engagement is entered into pursuant to one of the pre-approval procedures described below.
57
From time to time, our audit committee may pre-approve specified types of services that are expected to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm during the next 12 months. Any such pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or type of services to be provided and is also generally subject to a maximum dollar amount.
Report of the Audit Committee
The audit committee has reviewed our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and has discussed these consolidated financial statements with our management and our independent registered public accounting firm. Management is responsible for the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and for maintaining an adequate system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for that purpose. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for conducting an independent audit of our annual consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and issuing a report on the results of their audit. The audit committee is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of these processes.
The audit committee has also received from, and discussed with, our independent registered public accounting firm various communications that they are required to provide to the audit committee, including the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.
Our independent registered public accounting firm also provided the audit committee with the written disclosures and letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant's communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and our audit committee has discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm their independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the audit committee recommended to our board of directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
By the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:
Marsha H. Fanucci (Chairperson) John K. Clarke James Sulat |
58
In order to be included in proxy material for the 2009 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, stockholders' proposals must be received by us at our principal executive offices, 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, no later than January 12, 2010. We suggest that proponents submit their proposals by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to our Secretary, Bruce A. Leicher, Esq.
Stockholders who intend to present a proposal at such meeting without inclusion of such proposal in our proxy materials pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are required to provide advanced notice of such proposal to us at the aforementioned address not later than March 28, 2010.
In addition, our by-laws require that we be given advance notice of stockholder nominations for election to the board of directors and of other matters which stockholders wish to present for action at an annual meeting of stockholders, other than matters included in our proxy statement. The required notice must be in writing and received by our Secretary at our principal offices not later than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting and not before 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting. However, if the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders is advanced by more than 20 days, or delayed by more than 60 days, from the first anniversary of the Annual Meeting, notice must be received not earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (1) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting and (2) the 10th day following the date on which notice of the date of such annual meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting was made, whichever occurs first. Our by-laws also specify requirements relating to the content of the notice that stockholders must provide, including a stockholder nomination for election to the board of directors, to be properly presented at the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders.
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS
Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of "householding" proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of our proxy statement and annual report to stockholders may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of either document to you upon written request to Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 675 West Kendall Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, Attention: Richard P. Shea, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, facsimile: (617) 621-0431. If you want to receive separate copies of the proxy statement or annual report to stockholders in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy per household, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee record holder, or you may contact us at the above address and phone number.
Our board of directors is not aware of any matter to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than the matters referred to above and does not intend to bring any other matters before the Annual Meeting. However, if other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is intended that holders of the proxies will vote thereon in their discretion.
The accompanying proxy is solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors, whose notice of meeting is attached to this proxy statement, and the entire cost of such solicitation will be borne by us.
59
In addition to the use of the mails, proxies may be solicited by personal interview, telephone and telegram by directors, officers and other employees of Momenta who will not be specially compensated for these services. We will also request that brokers, nominees, custodians and other fiduciaries forward soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of shares held of record by such brokers, nominees, custodians and other fiduciaries. We will reimburse such persons for their reasonable expenses in connection therewith.
Certain information contained in this proxy statement relating to the occupations and security holdings of our directors and officers is based upon information received from the individual directors and officers.
WE WILL FURNISH, WITHOUT CHARGE, A COPY OF OUR REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008, INCLUDING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BUT NOT INCLUDING EXHIBITS, TO EACH OF OUR STOCKHOLDERS OF RECORD ON APRIL 21, 2009, AND TO EACH BENEFICIAL STOCKHOLDER ON THAT DATE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST MADE TO BRUCE A. LEICHER, SECRETARY, MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 675 WEST KENDALL STREET, CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02142. A REASONABLE FEE WILL BE CHARGED FOR COPIES OF REQUESTED EXHIBITS.
PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE AS PROVIDED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD, OR COMPLETE, DATE, SIGN AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE IN THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE. A PROMPT RETURN OF YOUR PROXY CARD WILL BE APPRECIATED AS IT WILL SAVE THE EXPENSE OF FURTHER MAILINGS.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Craig A.
Wheeler
President and Chief Executive Officer
Cambridge, Massachusetts
May 12, 2009
60
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 675 WEST KENDALL STREET CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142 |
|
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Momenta pharmaceuticals, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: |
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Vote on Directors |
For |
Withhold |
For All |
|
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark For All Except and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. |
|
||||||||||
|
1. To elect the following three (3) nominees as Class II |
All |
All |
Except |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Directors of the Company. |
o |
o |
o |
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Nominees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
01) John K. Clarke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
02) James Sulat |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
03) Craig A. Wheeler |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Vote on Proposals |
For |
Against |
Abstain |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
2. To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. |
o |
o |
o |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
The shares represented by this proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned Stockholder(s). If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR items 1, and 2. If any other matters properly come before the meeting, or if cumulative voting is required, the person named in this proxy will vote in their discretion. |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
o o |
Please sign your name exactly as it appears hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please add your title as such. When signing as joint tenants, all parties in the joint tenancy must sign. If a signer is a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by duly authorized officer. |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] |
Date |
|
Signature (Joint Owners) |
Date |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
June 10, 2009
Please date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.
Dear Stockholder:
Please take note of the important information enclosed with this proxy card. There are matters related to the operation of the Company that require your prompt attention. Your vote counts, and you are strongly encouraged to exercise your right to vote your shares.
Please mark the boxes on the proxy card to indicate how your shares will be voted. Then sign and date the card, detach it and return your proxy in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration of these matters.
Sincerely,
Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided.
PROXY
MOMENTA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
675 WEST KENDALL STREET
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02142
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE 10, 2009
The undersigned, revoking all prior proxies, hereby appoints Craig A. Wheeler and Richard P. Shea, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side, all shares of common stock of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., held of record by the undersigned on April 21, 2009 at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 10, 2009 at 10:30 a.m., local time, at the offices of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 60 State Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02109 and any adjournments thereof. The undersigned hereby directs Messrs. Wheeler and Shea to vote in accordance with their best judgment on any matters which may properly come before the Annual Meeting, all as indicated in the Notice of Annual Meeting, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and to act on the matters set forth in such Notice as specified by the undersigned.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN WITH RESPECT TO A PARTICULAR PROPOSAL, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1 AND 2, IN THE DISCRETION OF MESSRS. WHEELER AND SHEA, ON ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT MY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING. ATTENDANCE OF THE UNDERSIGNED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OR AT ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF WILL NOT BE DEEMED TO REVOKE THIS PROXY UNLESS THE UNDERSIGNED REVOKES THIS PROXY IN WRITING. UNLESS VOTING YOUR SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE, PLEASE FILL IN, DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)