e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-10272
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
90-0042860
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.) |
9200 E. Panorama Circle, Suite 400
Englewood, Colorado 80112
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(303) 708-5959
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At May 1, 2007, there were approximately 27,309,000 of the Registrants Class A-1 and Class B Common Units outstanding, held by non-affiliates.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
12,101,054 |
|
|
$ |
12,214,034 |
|
Real estate held-for-sale |
|
|
975,821 |
|
|
|
973,606 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(975,517 |
) |
|
|
(957,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,101,358 |
|
|
|
12,230,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities |
|
|
252,014 |
|
|
|
235,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments |
|
|
12,353,372 |
|
|
|
12,465,817 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
49,270 |
|
|
|
48,655 |
|
Restricted cash in tax-deferred exchange and bond escrow |
|
|
669,395 |
|
|
|
319,312 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
389,464 |
|
|
|
425,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,461,501 |
|
|
$ |
13,259,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND UNITHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facilities |
|
$ |
275,900 |
|
|
$ |
84,723 |
|
Unsecured loans International |
|
|
171,730 |
|
|
|
235,771 |
|
Long-Term Unsecured Debt |
|
|
3,321,702 |
|
|
|
3,355,699 |
|
Mortgages payable |
|
|
2,557,553 |
|
|
|
2,639,280 |
|
Mortgages payable held-for-sale |
|
|
136,738 |
|
|
|
136,954 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
77,603 |
|
|
|
71,967 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
47,446 |
|
|
|
67,135 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
342,403 |
|
|
|
365,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
6,931,075 |
|
|
|
6,956,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other common unitholders interest, at redemption value
(A-1 Common Units: 27,471,404 in 2007 and 29,514,128 in
2006) |
|
|
1,491,148 |
|
|
|
1,718,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual Preferred Units |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Common unitholders equity (222,754,422 units in 2007
and 220,147,167 units in 2006) |
|
|
4,984,986 |
|
|
|
4,530,801 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
4,292 |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unitholders equity |
|
|
5,039,278 |
|
|
|
4,584,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and unitholders equity |
|
$ |
13,461,501 |
|
|
$ |
13,259,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
268,132 |
|
|
$ |
207,734 |
|
Other income |
|
|
15,754 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,886 |
|
|
|
223,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
63,430 |
|
|
|
45,330 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
26,240 |
|
|
|
18,897 |
|
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
67,492 |
|
|
|
53,359 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
67,293 |
|
|
|
45,527 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
18,998 |
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,408 |
|
|
|
188,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
39,478 |
|
|
|
35,098 |
|
Income from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
18,878 |
|
Other non-operating income |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations |
|
|
42,199 |
|
|
|
54,152 |
|
Earnings from discontinued operations |
|
|
282,728 |
|
|
|
89,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
324,927 |
|
|
|
143,892 |
|
Preferred Unit distributions |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Basic |
|
|
323,969 |
|
|
|
142,934 |
|
Interest on Convertible Debt |
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Diluted |
|
$ |
331,264 |
|
|
$ |
142,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
249,982 |
|
|
|
246,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
259,875 |
|
|
|
247,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Common Unit Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings $ |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Common Unit Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.22 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid per Common Unit |
|
$ |
0.4525 |
|
|
$ |
0.4350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Unitholders
Equity, Other Common Unitholders Interest and Comprehensive Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
Balances at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,530,801 |
|
|
$ |
3,520 |
|
|
$ |
4,584,321 |
|
|
$ |
1,718,017 |
|
|
$ |
6,302,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,699 |
|
|
|
37,228 |
|
|
|
324,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
845 |
|
Reclassification
adjustment for realized net gains
on marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange
translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
attributable to Common Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Unit distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,455 |
) |
|
|
(13,087 |
) |
|
|
(113,542 |
) |
A-1 Common Units converted into
A-2 Common Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,351 |
|
|
|
(49,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Common Units under
Dividend Reinvestment Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of A-1 Common Units in
exchange for real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-classified awards under
Compensation Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to redemption value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,227 |
|
|
|
(202,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,984,986 |
|
|
$ |
4,292 |
|
|
$ |
5,039,278 |
|
|
$ |
1,491,148 |
|
|
$ |
6,530,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
324,927 |
|
|
$ |
143,892 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flow provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
78,871 |
|
|
|
72,762 |
|
Gains on dispositions of depreciated real estate |
|
|
(278,722 |
) |
|
|
(82,191 |
) |
Gains on sale of marketable equity securities |
|
|
(1,867 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in swap value DeWAG derivatives |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provision for possible loss on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
Interest accrued on Mezzanine loans |
|
|
(1,336 |
) |
|
|
(2,086 |
) |
Change in other assets |
|
|
(18,630 |
) |
|
|
1,092 |
|
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(32,755 |
) |
|
|
(16,966 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
4,741 |
|
|
|
6,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities |
|
|
77,021 |
|
|
|
126,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate investments |
|
|
(365,264 |
) |
|
|
(435,550 |
) |
Change in investments in unconsolidated entities, net |
|
|
(18,736 |
) |
|
|
(15,491 |
) |
Proceeds from dispositions |
|
|
689,405 |
|
|
|
280,133 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
(350,083 |
) |
|
|
315,532 |
|
Change in notes receivable, net |
|
|
44,102 |
|
|
|
(54,105 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
6,710 |
|
|
|
(34,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by investing activities |
|
|
6,134 |
|
|
|
55,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Long-Term Unsecured Debt, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,946 |
|
Payments on Long-Term Unsecured Debt |
|
|
(34,750 |
) |
|
|
(18,750 |
) |
Proceeds from (payments on) unsecured credit facilities, net |
|
|
191,177 |
|
|
|
(309,869 |
) |
Principal repayment of mortgages payable, including prepayment penalties |
|
|
(71,373 |
) |
|
|
(49,923 |
) |
Regularly scheduled principal payments on mortgages payable |
|
|
(2,047 |
) |
|
|
(4,406 |
) |
Proceeds from Unsecured loans International |
|
|
88,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments on Unsecured loans International |
|
|
(152,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Common Units issued under DRIP and employee stock options |
|
|
16,059 |
|
|
|
22,630 |
|
Cash distributions paid on Common Units |
|
|
(113,542 |
) |
|
|
(107,952 |
) |
Cash distributions paid on Preferred Units |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(958 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(3,065 |
) |
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow used by financing activities |
|
|
(82,540 |
) |
|
|
(171,653 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
10,109 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
48,655 |
|
|
|
13,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
49,270 |
|
|
$ |
23,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1 Common Units issued in exchange for real estate |
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
|
$ |
25,191 |
|
A-1 Common Units converted to A-2 Common Units |
|
|
49,351 |
|
|
|
23,552 |
|
Assumption of mortgages payable upon purchase of apartment communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,449 |
|
These Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows combine cash flows from discontinued operations with
cash flows from continuing operations.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2007 and 2006
(Unaudited)
(1) Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
Archstone-Smith is structured as an UPREIT under which all property ownership and business
operations are conducted through the Archstone-Smith Operating Trust, which we refer to herein as
the Operating Trust. Archstone-Smith is our sole trustee and owns approximately 89.0% of the
Operating Trusts outstanding Common Units; the remaining 11.0% of the Common Units are owned by
minority interest holders. As used herein, we, our and the company refers to the Operating
Trust and Archstone-Smith, collectively, except where the context otherwise requires.
Archstone-Smith is an equity REIT organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. We focus on
creating value for our unitholders by acquiring, developing, redeveloping and operating apartments
in markets characterized by protected locations with limited land for new housing construction,
expensive single-family home prices, and a strong, diversified economic base with significant
employment growth potential.
Interim Financial Reporting
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Operating Trust are
unaudited and certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements have been omitted. While management believes that the disclosures presented are
adequate for interim reporting, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes included in the Operating Trusts Annual Report on Form
10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2006 (2006 Form 10-K). See the glossary in our 2006 Form
10-K for definitions of all initially-capitalized terms not defined herein.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Operating Trusts financial statements for the
interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported in the financial statements and the related notes. Actual results could
differ from managements estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the
effects of revisions are reflected in the period they are determined to be necessary.
Real Estate and Depreciation
We allocate the cost of newly acquired properties between net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets. When allocating cost to an acquired property, we first allocate costs to the
estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to the estimated value of the
land, building and fixtures assuming the property is vacant. We estimate the intangible value of
the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a hypothetical lease-up. We
depreciate the building and fixtures based on the expected useful life of the asset and amortize
the intangible value of the lease agreements over the average remaining life of the existing
leases. This amortization expense is included in depreciation on real estate investments in our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
7
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Intangibles
Intangible assets consist of lease-related intangibles and certain intangibles associated with
the DeWAG acquisition. The market value of above and below market leases are based on our estimate
of current market rents as compared to the rent that we are receiving and is recorded in either
other assets or other liabilities. These assets are charged and liabilities are credited to rental
income over the estimated term of the lease. We also recognize the value of our in-place lease
agreements and amortize these assets into depreciation on real estate investments over the
estimated term of the lease.
We will perform an impairment test annually, or more frequently, if events or changes in
circumstances indicate impairment of our intangible assets, which are included in other assets.
Revenue and Gain Recognition
We generally lease our apartment units under operating leases with terms of one year or less.
Communities subject to the Oakwood Master Leases entered into in 2005 have a seven-year term.
Rental income related to leases is recognized in the period earned over the lease term in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No.13, Accounting for Leases.
Rent concessions are recognized as an offset to revenues collected over the term of the underlying
lease. We use the full accrual method of profit recognition in accordance with SFAS No. 66 to
record gains on sales of real estate. Accordingly, we evaluate the related GAAP requirements in
determining the profit to be recognized at the date of each sale transaction (i.e., the profit is
determinable and the earnings process is complete). We recognize deferred gains when a property is
sold to a third party.
Rental Expenses
Rental expenses shown on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
include costs associated with on-site and property management personnel, utilities, repairs and
maintenance, property insurance, marketing, landscaping and other on-site and related
administrative costs. Utility reimbursements from residents, which are recorded as offsets to
utility expenses, aggregated $6.8 million and $5.8 million including amounts reclassified to
discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Insurance Recoveries
We recognize insurance recovery proceeds as other income if the recovery is related to items
that were originally expensed, such as legal settlements, legal expenses and repairs that did not
meet capitalization guidelines. For recoveries of property damages that were eligible for
capitalization, we reduce the basis of the property or if the property has subsequently been sold,
we recognize the proceeds as an additional gain on sale. We recognize insurance recoveries at such
time that we believe the recovery is probable and we have sufficient information to make a
reasonable estimate of proceeds, except in cases where we have to pursue recovery via litigation.
In this circumstance, we recognize the recovery when we have a signed, legally binding agreement
with the insurance carrier.
Legal Fees
We generally recognize legal expenses as incurred; however, if such fees are related to the
accrual for an estimated legal settlement, we accrue for the related incurred and anticipated legal
fees at the same time we accrue the estimated cost of settlement.
8
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of the companys foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at
the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at
average rates in effect during the period. The resulting translation adjustment is reflected as
accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of unitholders equity on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The functional currency utilized for these subsidiaries is
the local foreign currency.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk, foreign currency
exchange risk, exposure to changes in the fair value of certain investments in equity securities
and exposure to volatile energy prices. The resulting assets and liabilities associated with
derivative financial instruments are carried on our financial statements at estimated fair value at
the end of each reporting period. The changes in fair value of a fair value hedge and the fair
value of the items hedged are generally recorded in earnings for each reporting period. The change
in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges and foreign currency hedges are carried on our
financial statements as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. If effective, our
hedges have little or no impact on our current earnings.
Income Taxes
We have made an election to be taxed as a partnership under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, and we believe we qualify as a partnership and have made all required distributions of
our taxable income.
Income taxes for our taxable REIT subsidiaries are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized
in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income, which is defined as net earnings and all other non-owner changes in
equity, is displayed in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Unitholders Equity,
Other Common Unitholders Interest and Comprehensive Income. Other comprehensive income reflects
unrealized holding gains and losses on the available-for-sale investments, changes in the fair
value of effective cash flow hedges and gains and losses on long-term foreign currency
transactions.
Our accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Gains on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Hedges |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Income |
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,822 |
|
|
$ |
(554 |
) |
|
$ |
2,252 |
|
|
$ |
3,520 |
|
Change in fair value of hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
789 |
|
Change in fair value of long-term debt hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized net
gains |
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,794 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
291 |
|
|
$ |
3,973 |
|
|
$ |
4,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Per Unit Data
Following is a reconciliation of basic net earnings per Common Unit to diluted net earnings
per Common Unit for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Reconciliation of numerator between basic and diluted
net earnings per Common Unit(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Basic |
|
$ |
323,969 |
|
|
$ |
142,934 |
|
Interest on Convertible Debt |
|
|
7,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Diluted |
|
$ |
331,264 |
|
|
$ |
142,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of denominator between basic and diluted
net earnings per Common Unit(1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Units
outstanding Basic |
|
|
249,982 |
|
|
|
246,961 |
|
Assumed conversion of Convertible Debt into Common Units |
|
|
9,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental options |
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Units
outstanding Diluted |
|
|
259,875 |
|
|
|
247,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the impact of potentially dilutive equity securities during periods in which
they are anti-dilutive. |
To calculate earnings per Common Unit, we allocate the interest on the Convertible Debt on a
pro-rata basis between continuing and discontinued operations.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 defines a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The
adoption of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 did not have a material effect on our financial position,
net earnings or cash flows.
We recognize these tax positions and evaluate them using a two-step process. First, we
determine whether a tax position is more likely than not (greater than 50 percent probability) to
be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes,
based on the technical merits of the position. Then, we measure to determine the amount of benefit
to recognize and record the amount of the benefit that is more likely than not to be realized upon
ultimate settlement.
We or one of our subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and
various states and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are not subject to U.S. federal,
state and local, or non-U.S. income tax
examinations by tax authorities for years before 2001. As of March 31, 2007, no taxing authority
has proposed any significant adjustments to our tax positions. We have no significant current tax
examinations in process.
10
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized Tax Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,021 |
|
Current Period Interest |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007. |
|
$ |
2,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
We are required to recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in
tax expense. As of the date of adoption, the Company has accrued interest of approximately $228,000
and we have not recorded any penalties.
(2) Real Estate
Investments in Real Estate
Investments in real estate, at cost, were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Investment |
|
Operating Trust Apartment Communities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating communities |
|
$ |
10,899,899 |
|
|
$ |
11,208,052 |
|
Communities under construction |
|
|
466,532 |
|
|
|
406,881 |
|
Development communities In Planning(1). |
|
|
94,970 |
|
|
|
75,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Trust apartment communities |
|
|
11,461,401 |
|
|
|
11,690,471 |
|
Ameriton(1) |
|
|
626,191 |
|
|
|
585,524 |
|
International |
|
|
929,037 |
|
|
|
851,593 |
|
Other real estate assets(2) |
|
|
60,246 |
|
|
|
60,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate |
|
$ |
13,076,875 |
|
|
$ |
13,187,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes development communities In Planning Owned but excludes In Planning Under
Control. Our investment as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 for development
communities In Planning Under Control was $10.9 million and $7.6 million, respectively,
and is reflected in the Other assets caption of our Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes land that is not In Planning and other non-multifamily real estate assets. |
The change in investments in real estate, at cost, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
13,187,640 |
|
Acquisition-related expenditures |
|
|
165,125 |
|
Redevelopment expenditures |
|
|
8,873 |
|
Recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
7,731 |
|
Development expenditures, including initial acquisition costs |
|
|
130,665 |
|
Acquisition of land for development |
|
|
41,283 |
|
Dispositions |
|
|
(466,379 |
) |
Other |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net apartment community activity |
|
|
(112,202 |
) |
Change in other real estate assets |
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
13,076,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
11
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
At March 31, 2007, we had unfunded contractual commitments of $507.6 million related to
communities under construction and under redevelopment. The purchase prices of certain recent
acquisitions in New York and Germany were allocated to land, buildings and other assets based on
preliminary estimates and is subject to change as we obtain more complete information regarding
land, building and lease intangibles values.
(3) DeWAG Acquisition
On July 27, 2006, we acquired 94% of the shares and 94% of an outstanding shareholder loan of
DeWAG Deutsche WohnAnlage GmbH (DeWAG) for approximately $271 million, based on the exchange rate
on the transaction date. We have the option to acquire the remaining 6%, owned by the Managing
Directors of DeWAG, under certain circumstances. The results of DeWAGs operations have been
included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements since July 1, 2006. The purchase was
funded by an international term loan, which is expected to be repaid or refinanced during the
second quarter of 2007. In addition, we assumed approximately $509 million in DeWAG liabilities.
DeWAG specializes in the acquisition, ownership, operation and re-sale of quality residential
properties in the major metropolitan areas of Southern and Western Germany, as well as West Berlin.
As of July 1, 2006, the portfolio consisted of approximately 6,400 residential units. We acquired
DeWAG because we are interested in expanding our operations into German markets which we believe
have attractive fundamentals for apartment operations.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition. We recognized goodwill in connection with the
DeWAG acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price and related costs over the
value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets. The goodwill associated with
the transaction is primarily attributable to the people and processes which comprise the investing
and the operating platform. We will perform an impairment test annually, or more frequently if
events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment of our goodwill. Due to the recent closing
of the transaction, we are still in the process of seeking information to finalize the valuations
for our real estate, intangible assets, and certain liabilities. Therefore, the purchase price
allocation is subject to change (dollar amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
646,285 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
67,722 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
30,958 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
34,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
779,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages payable |
|
$ |
407,933 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
10,759 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
69,327 |
|
Intangible liabilities |
|
|
20,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
508,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
270,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
Following are preliminary values as of March 31, 2007 related to the intangible assets and
liabilities we identified in connection with the DeWAG transaction and the corresponding
amortization we expect to record (dollar amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Useful |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Accumulated |
|
Life (in |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amortization |
|
years) |
|
Non-compete agreements. |
|
$ |
19,869 |
|
|
$ |
(3,725 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
In-place leases |
|
|
12,893 |
|
|
|
(2,417 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
32,762 |
|
|
$ |
(6,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below-market leases |
|
$ |
21,711 |
|
|
$ |
(4,071 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible liabilities |
|
$ |
21,711 |
|
|
$ |
(4,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net amortization for the year ended |
2007 |
|
$ |
2,763 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
2,763 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
2,763 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,382 |
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
35,450 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustment |
|
|
(481 |
) |
Change in foreign currency translation |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
35,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Discontinued Operations
The results of operations for properties sold during the period or designated as held-for-sale
at the end of the period are required to be classified as discontinued operations. The property
specific components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental
revenues, rental expenses, real estate taxes, depreciation expense, minority interest, income
taxes, a pro-rata allocation of interest expense and the net gain or loss on the disposition of
properties.
Consistent with our capital recycling program, we had 16 operating apartment communities,
representing 6,724 units (unaudited), classified as held-for-sale under the provisions of SFAS No.
144, at March 31, 2007. Accordingly, we have reclassified the operating earnings from these
properties to discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, we sold 11 REIT and one Ameriton operating community. The
operating results of these communities and the related gain on sale are also included in
discontinued operations for 2007 and 2006.
The following is a summary of net earnings from discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
31,254 |
|
|
$ |
77,504 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
(7,997 |
) |
|
|
(22,014 |
) |
Real estate taxes |
|
|
(3,616 |
) |
|
|
(10,260 |
) |
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(6,654 |
) |
|
|
(16,215 |
) |
Interest expense(1) |
|
|
(7,027 |
) |
|
|
(16,224 |
) |
Income taxes from taxable REIT subsidiaries |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
Provision for possible loss on real estate investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs related to dispositions |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
Gains from the disposition of REIT real estate investments, net |
|
|
275,197 |
|
|
|
67,467 |
|
Internal disposition costs REIT transactions(2) |
|
|
(709 |
) |
|
|
(649 |
) |
Gains from the disposition of taxable subsidiary real estate investments, net |
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
14,724 |
|
Internal disposition costs taxable subsidiary transactions(2) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued apartment communities |
|
$ |
282,728 |
|
|
$ |
89,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest expense included in discontinued operations is allocated to properties based
on each assets cost in relation to the companys leverage ratio and the average effective
interest rate for each respective period. |
13
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents the direct and incremental compensation and related costs associated with
the employees dedicated to our significant disposition activity. |
The real estate and mortgage payable balances associated with operating communities classified
as held-for-sale are reflected as Real estate held-for-sale and Mortgages payable
held-for-sale in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The disposition proceeds associated with the sales of individual rental units by our foreign
subsidiaries are included in continuing operations as such sales do not meet the requirements under
SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, to be reflected as
discontinued operations.
(5) Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities
Real Estate Joint Ventures
We have investments in entities that we account for using the equity method. At March 31,
2007, the investment balance consisted of $210.7 million in thirteen Operating Trust joint ventures
and $41.3 million in five Ameriton joint ventures. At December 31, 2006, the investment balance
consisted of $199.7 million in 13 Operating Trust joint ventures and $35.6 million in five Ameriton
joint ventures. The Operating Trust and Ameritons combined weighted average percentage of
ownership in joint ventures based on total assets at March 31, 2007 was 37.4%.
Combined summary balance sheet data for our investments in unconsolidated entities presented
on a stand-alone basis follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
1,589,914 |
|
|
$ |
1,530,659 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
165,946 |
|
|
|
213,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,755,860 |
|
|
$ |
1,744,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and owners equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-company debt payable to Operating Trust |
|
$ |
512 |
|
|
$ |
1,519 |
|
Mortgages payable(1) |
|
|
1,080,560 |
|
|
|
1,063,451 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
65,932 |
|
|
|
126,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,147,004 |
|
|
|
1,191,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners equity |
|
|
608,856 |
|
|
|
553,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners equity |
|
$ |
1,755,860 |
|
|
$ |
1,744,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Operating Trust guarantees $288.8 million of the outstanding debt balance as of
March 31, 2007 and is committed to guarantee another $43.1 million upon funding of
additional debt. |
Selected combined summary results of operations for our unconsolidated investees presented on
a stand-alone basis follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating Trust Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
37,483 |
|
|
$ |
31,008 |
|
Net Earnings(1) |
|
|
(2,589 |
) |
|
|
2,179 |
|
Ameriton Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
Net Earnings(2) |
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
18,362 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
37,611 |
|
|
$ |
31,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
1,261 |
|
|
$ |
20,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There were no gains associated with the disposition of Operating Trust Joint Venture
assets for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Ameritons share of pre-tax gains associated with the disposition of real
estate joint venture assets. The gains for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
were $3.9 million and $19.6 million, respectively. |
(6) Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
The change in mortgage and other notes receivable, which are included in other assets, during
the three months ended March 31, 2007 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
123,261 |
|
Funding of additional notes |
|
|
464 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
1,336 |
|
Prepayments |
|
|
(44,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
80,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
We have a commitment to fund an additional $20.9 million under existing agreements. Our
rights to the underlying collateral on these notes in the event of default are generally
subordinate to the primary mortgage lender. We evaluate the collectibility of our mezzanine and
other notes receivable on a quarterly basis. We recognized interest income associated with notes
receivable of $2.7 million and $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The weighted average contracted interest rate on these notes as of March 31, 2007
was approximately 11.9%.
(7) Borrowings
Unsecured Credit Facilities
Our $600 million unsecured credit facility, which is led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., bears
interest at the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or, at our option,
LIBOR plus 0.40%. The spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.325% to LIBOR plus 1.00%, based
upon the rating of our long-term unsecured senior notes. The facility contains an accordion
feature that allows us to increase the size of the commitment to $1.0 billion at any time during
the life of the facility, subject to lenders providing additional commitments, and enables us to
borrow up to $150 million in foreign currencies. The credit facility is scheduled to mature in
June 2010, but may be extended for one year at our option.
The following table summarizes our revolving credit facility borrowings under our line of
credit (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
December 31, 2006 |
Total unsecured revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Borrowings outstanding at end of period |
|
|
228,552 |
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
Outstanding letters of credit under this facility |
|
|
9,211 |
|
|
|
14,880 |
|
Weighted average daily borrowings |
|
|
160,160 |
|
|
|
100,474 |
|
Maximum borrowings outstanding during the period |
|
|
242,417 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
Weighted average daily nominal interest rate |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Weighted average daily effective interest rate |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
15
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
We also have a short-term unsecured borrowing agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
which provides for maximum borrowings of $100 million. The borrowings under the agreement bear
interest at an overnight rate agreed to at the time of borrowing and ranged from 5.6% to 5.8%
during 2007. There were $47.3 million of borrowings outstanding under the agreement at March 31,
2007, and $4.7 million of borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2006.
Unsecured Loans International
We entered into a $272.8 million short-term loan agreement with LaSalle Bank National
Association to fund the acquisition of DeWAG. We also entered into a separate $129.6 million
short-term revolving loan agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association to fund acquisitions by
DeWAG. The borrowings under these loans bear interest at EURIBOR plus 0.40%. The effective interest
rate at March 31, 2007 was 4.3%. The unpaid balance on our Unsecured loans International at
March 31, 2007 was $171.7 million. We expect the balances of these loans to be paid off or
refinanced during the second quarter of 2007.
Long-Term Unsecured Debt
A summary of our Long-Term Unsecured Debt outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Coupon |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Remaining |
|
Type of Debt |
|
Rate(1) |
|
|
Rate(1) (2) |
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
Long-term unsecured senior notes |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
$ |
3,261,759 |
|
|
$ |
3,279,404 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Unsecured tax-exempt bonds |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
59,943 |
|
|
|
76,295 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted average |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
$ |
3,321,702 |
|
|
$ |
3,355,699 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a fixed rate for the long-term unsecured notes and a variable rate for the
unsecured tax-exempt bonds. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the effect of fair value hedges, loan cost amortization and other ongoing
fees and expenses, where applicable. |
Mortgages Payable
Our mortgages payable generally feature either monthly interest and principal payments or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. Early repayment of mortgages
is generally subject to prepayment penalties.
A summary of mortgages payable follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance at(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Interest |
|
|
|
March 31, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Rate(2) |
|
Secured floating rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt debt |
|
$ |
866,720 |
|
|
$ |
935,536 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Conventional mortgages |
|
|
157,377 |
|
|
|
167,020 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Floating |
|
|
1,024,097 |
|
|
|
1,102,556 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Secured fixed rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt debt |
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
Conventional mortgages |
|
|
1,648,448 |
|
|
|
1,651,650 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
Other secured debt |
|
|
18,661 |
|
|
|
18,942 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed |
|
|
1,670,194 |
|
|
|
1,673,678 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgages payable |
|
$ |
2,694,291 |
|
|
$ |
2,776,234 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the unamortized fair market value adjustment associated with assumption of
fixed rate mortgages in connection with real estate acquisitions. The unamortized balance
aggregated $40.8 million and $43.9 million at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
respectively, and is being amortized as a credit to interest expense over the life of the
underlying debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the effect of fair value hedges, credit enhancement fees, the amortization
of fair market value purchase adjustment, and other related costs, where applicable. |
The change in mortgages payable during the three months ended March 31, 2007 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
2,776,234 |
|
Regularly scheduled principal amortization |
|
|
(2,047 |
) |
Prepayments, final maturities and other |
|
|
(79,896 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
2,694,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
The book value of total assets pledged as collateral for mortgage loans and other obligations
at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was $5.6 billion. Our debt instruments generally contain
covenants common to the type of facility or borrowing, including financial covenants establishing
minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios. We were in compliance with all
financial covenants pertaining to our debt instruments at March 31, 2007.
The total interest paid on all outstanding debt was $106.4 million and $82.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. We capitalize interest incurred during the construction
period as part of the cost of apartment communities under development. Capitalized interest was
$12.9 million and $12.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
(8) Distributions to Unitholders
The following table summarizes the quarterly cash distributions paid per unit on Common and
Preferred Units during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and the annualized distribution we
expect to pay for 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly |
|
Annualized |
|
|
Cash |
|
Cash |
|
|
Distribution |
|
Distribution |
|
|
Per Unit |
|
Per Unit |
Common Units |
|
$ |
0.4525 |
|
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
Series I Perpetual Preferred Units(1) |
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
7,660 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Series I Preferred Units have a par value of $100,000 per unit. |
(9) Benefit Plans and Implementation of SFAS 123R
Our long-term incentive plan was approved in 1997 and was modified in connection with the
Smith Merger. There have been six types of awards under the plan: (i) options with a DEU feature
(only awarded prior to 2000); (ii) options without the DEU feature (generally awarded after 1999);
(iii) RSU awards with a DEU feature (awarded prior to 2006); (iv) RSU awards with a cash dividend
payment feature (awarded after 2005); (v) employee share purchase program with matching options
without the DEU feature, granted only in 1997 and 1998; and (vi) performance units, which are
convertible into Common Shares upon vesting, issued to certain named executives under a Special
Long-Term Incentive Program.
No more than 20.0 million share or option awards in the aggregate may be granted under the
plan, and no individual may be awarded more than 1.0 million share or option awards in any one-year
period. As of March 31, 2007, Archstone-Smith had approximately 9.7 million shares available for
future issuance. Non-qualified options
17
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
constitute an important component of compensation for officers below the level of senior vice
president and for selected employees.
A summary of share option activity for the options and RSUs is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
RSU Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Units |
|
Grant Price |
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,831,355 |
|
|
$ |
30.14 |
|
|
|
946,615 |
|
|
$ |
31.82 |
|
Granted |
|
|
388,017 |
|
|
$ |
58.62 |
|
|
|
175,176 |
|
|
$ |
58.62 |
|
Exercised/Settled |
|
|
(165,369 |
) |
|
$ |
33.70 |
|
|
|
(99,532 |
) |
|
$ |
28.86 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(22,306 |
) |
|
$ |
42.63 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Expired |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Balance, March 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,031,697 |
|
|
$ |
35.16 |
|
|
|
1,022,259 |
|
|
$ |
36.72 |
|
Certain of the options and RSUs, included in the table above, have a DEU feature. The
aggregate number of vested DEUs outstanding as of March 31, 2007 was approximately 267,000. During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, we recorded $97,000 as a charge to operating expense related
to unvested DEUs and $415,000 of Common Share dividends related to vested DEUs.
Options
During the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the share options granted to associates
had a calculated fair value of $8.44 and $5.52 per option, respectively. The historical exercise
patterns of the associate groups receiving option awards are similar, and therefore we used only
one set of assumptions in calculating fair value for each period. For the three months ended March
31, 2007, the calculated fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model,
using a weighted average risk-free rate interest rate of 4.44%, a weighted average dividend yield
of 3.39%, a volatility factor of 18.62% and a weighted average expected life of four years. For
the three months ended March 31, 2006, the calculated fair value was determined using the
Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, using a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 4.66%, a
weighted average dividend yield of 4.57%, a volatility factor of 18.30% and a weighted average
expected life of four years. The options vest over a three-year period and have a contractual term
of 10 years. We used an estimated forfeiture rate of 10% in recording option compensation expense
for the three months ended March 31, 2007, based primarily on historical experience. The
unamortized compensation cost is $2.2 million, which includes all options previously granted but
not yet vested. This amount will be recorded as compensation cost ratably through December 31,
2009.
The total intrinsic value of the share options exercised during the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $4.5 million and $21.9 million, respectively. The intrinsic value is
defined as the difference between the realized fair value of the share or the quoted fair value at
the end of the period, less the exercise price of the option. We have 1.2 million fully vested
options outstanding at March 31, 2007 with a weighted average exercise price of $25.64. The
weighted-average contractual life of the fully vested options is 6.75 years, and they have an
intrinsic value of $35.7 million. In addition, we have 627,342 options outstanding that we expect
to vest with a weighted average exercise price of $51.15. The weighted-average contractual life of
the unvested options is 9.5 years, and they have an intrinsic value of $2.0 million.
Restricted Share Units
Also during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we issued RSUs to senior officers
and trustees of the company with an average grant date fair value of $58.62 and $45.58,
respectively per share. The units vest over a three-year period and the related unamortized
compensation cost is $17.5 million, which includes all units
previously granted but not yet vested. This amount will be recorded as compensation cost ratably
through December 31, 2009.
18
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
We have 595,732 fully vested RSUs outstanding at March 31, 2007 with a weighted average
grant date fair value of $36.72. The weighted-average contractual life for the fully vested shares
is 6.74 years and the intrinsic value is $32.3 million. In addition, we have 426,527 RSUs
outstanding that we expect to vest with a weighted average grant date fair value of $48.68. The
weighted-average contractual life for the unvested shares is 9.1 years and the intrinsic value is
$23.1 million. The total intrinsic value of the RSUs settled during the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006 were $6.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively.
Special Long-Term Incentive Program
Effective January 1, 2006, a special long-term incentive program related to the achievement of
total shareholder return performance targets was established for certain of our executive officers.
We would issue approximately 300,000 performance units if all performance targets are ultimately
met as of December 31, 2008. The calculated grant date fair value of approximately $4.8 million is
being charged to compensation expense ratably over the three-year term of the plan. The calculated
fair value was determined by an independent third party using a Monte Carlo simulation approach
which yielded an estimated payout percentage of 41%. The related unamortized compensation cost at
March 31, 2007 is $2.8 million.
Summary
The compensation cost associated with all awards for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was
approximately $3.0 million, of which approximately $2.1 million was charged to operating expenses,
and approximately $.9 million related to dedicated investment personnel and was capitalized with
respect to development and other qualifying investment activities. The compensation cost
associated with all awards for the three months ended March 31, 2006 was approximately $3.0
million, of which approximately $2.3 million was charged to operating expenses, and approximately
$0.7 million related to dedicated investment personnel and was capitalized with respect to
development and other qualifying investment activities.
(10) Segment Data
We have determined that our garden communities and our High-Rise properties have similar
economic characteristics and meet the other GAAP criteria, which permit the garden communities and
High-Rise properties to be aggregated into two reportable segments. Additionally, we have defined
the activity from Ameriton as an individual operating segment as its primary focus is the
opportunistic acquisition, development and eventual disposition of real estate with a short-term
investment horizon. NOI is defined as rental revenues less rental expenses and real estate taxes.
We rely on NOI for purposes of making decisions about resource allocations and assessing segment
performance. We also believe NOI is a valuable means of comparing year-to-year operating
performance.
Following are reconciliations, which exclude the amounts classified as discontinued
operations, of each reportable segments (i) revenues to consolidated revenues; (ii) NOI to
consolidated earnings from operations; and (iii) assets to consolidated assets, for the periods
indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Reportable apartment communities segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
116,538 |
|
|
$ |
108,760 |
|
High-Rise properties |
|
|
84,436 |
|
|
|
79,598 |
|
Non Same-Store and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
15,110 |
|
|
|
2,812 |
|
High-Rise communities |
|
|
29,257 |
|
|
|
11,368 |
|
Ameriton communities(1) |
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
International and other non-reportable operating
segment revenues |
|
|
20,598 |
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated rental revenues |
|
$ |
268,132 |
|
|
$ |
207,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Reportable apartment communities segment NOI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
82,350 |
|
|
$ |
76,656 |
|
High-Rise communities |
|
|
58,155 |
|
|
|
55,089 |
|
Non Same-Store and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
7,672 |
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
High-Rise communities |
|
|
17,929 |
|
|
|
6,931 |
|
Ameriton communities(1) |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
International and other non-reportable operating
segment |
|
|
11,242 |
|
|
|
3,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment NOI |
|
$ |
178,462 |
|
|
$ |
143,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
15,754 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(67,492 |
) |
|
|
(53,359 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(67,293 |
) |
|
|
(45,527 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(18,998 |
) |
|
|
(15,385 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
(10,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated earnings from operations |
|
$ |
39,478 |
|
|
$ |
35,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
While rental revenue and NOI are the primary measures we use to evaluate the
performance of our assets, management also utilizes gains from the disposition of real
estate when evaluating the performance of Ameriton as its primary focus is the
opportunistic acquisition, development and eventual disposition of real estate with a short
term investment horizon. Pre-tax net gains from the disposition of Ameriton operating
communities were $3.4 million and $13.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. These gains are classified within discontinued operations.
Additionally, Ameriton had gains from the sale of unconsolidated joint venture assets that
are classified within income from unconsolidated entities and gains from land sales that
are classified within other income. Ameriton assets are excluded from our Same-Store
population as they are acquired or developed to achieve short-term opportunistic gains, and
therefore, the average holding period is typically much shorter than the holding period of
assets operated by the Operating Trust. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Reportable operating communities segment assets, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
3,598,470 |
|
|
$ |
3,610,111 |
|
High-Rise properties |
|
|
3,055,678 |
|
|
|
3,070,712 |
|
Non Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
1,330,053 |
|
|
|
1,527,922 |
|
High-Rise properties |
|
|
1,692,038 |
|
|
|
1,699,610 |
|
Ameriton |
|
|
446,426 |
|
|
|
412,030 |
|
FHA/ADA settlement accrual |
|
|
22,701 |
|
|
|
29,185 |
|
International |
|
|
915,661 |
|
|
|
843,003 |
|
Other non-reportable operating segment assets |
|
|
154,709 |
|
|
|
153,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
11,215,736 |
|
|
|
11,346,140 |
|
Real estate held-for-sale, net |
|
|
885,622 |
|
|
|
884,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
12,101,358 |
|
|
|
12,230,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities |
|
|
252,014 |
|
|
|
235,323 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
49,270 |
|
|
|
48,655 |
|
Restricted cash in tax-deferred exchange escrow |
|
|
669,395 |
|
|
|
319,312 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
389,464 |
|
|
|
425,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
$ |
13,461,501 |
|
|
$ |
13,259,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Total capital expenditures for garden communities included in continuing operations were
$12.4 million and $7.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Total capital expenditures for High-Rise properties included in continuing operations were $7.0
million and $10.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Total
capital expenditures for Ameriton properties included in continuing operations were $0.5 million
and $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
(11) Litigation and Contingencies
During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement in the United
States District Court for the District of Maryland with three national disability organizations and
agreed to make capital improvements in a number of our communities in order to make them fully
compliant with the FHA and ADA. The litigation, settled by this agreement, alleged lack of full
compliance with certain design and construction requirements under the two federal statutes at 71
of the companys wholly-owned and joint venture communities, of which we still own or have an
interest in 42. As part of the settlement, the three disability organizations all recognized that
the Operating Trust had no intention to build any of its communities in a manner inconsistent with
the FHA or ADA.
The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the communities named in the
settlement was estimated at $47.2 million and was accrued as an addition to real estate during the
fourth quarter of 2005. The settlement agreement approved by the court allows us to remediate each
of the designated communities over a three year period, and also provides that we are not
restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation period. We agreed to pay
damages totaling $1.4 million, which included legal fees and costs incurred by the plaintiffs. We
had $22.7 million of the original accrual remaining on March 31, 2007.
We are subject to various claims filed in 2002 and 2003 in connection with moisture
infiltration and resulting mold issues at certain high-rise properties we once owned in Southeast
Florida. These claims generally allege that water infiltration and resulting mold contamination
resulted in the claimants having personal injuries and/or property damage. Although certain of
these claims continue to be in various stages of litigation, with respect to the majority of these
claims, we have either settled the claims and/or we have been dismissed from the lawsuits that had
been filed. With respect to the lawsuits that have not been resolved, we continue to defend these
claims in the normal course of litigation.
We are a party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or
results of operations.
21
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Trustee and Unitholders
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Archstone-Smith
Operating Trust and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007, and the related condensed consolidated
statements of earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the condensed
consolidated statement of unitholders equity, other common unitholders interest and comprehensive
income for the three months ended March 31, 2007, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. These condensed consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of Archstone-Smith Operating Trusts management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, unitholders equity,
other common unitholders interest and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year
then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 1, 2007, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set
forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006 is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has
been derived.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
May 9, 2007
22
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with Archstone-Smith Operating Trusts
2006 Form 10-K as well as the financial statements and notes included in Item 1 of this report.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, beliefs, assumptions,
estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate. Words such as
expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and variations of
such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
Information concerning expected investment balances, expected funding sources, planned investments,
forecasted dates and revenue and expense growth assumptions are examples of forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our
control. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed,
forecasted or implied in such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update
publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Our operating results depend primarily on income from apartment communities, which is
substantially influenced by supply and demand for apartment units, operating expense levels,
property level operations and the pace and price at which we can develop, acquire or dispose of
apartment communities. Capital and credit market conditions, which affect our cost of capital,
also influence operating results. See Archstone-Smith Operating Trusts 2006 Form 10-K, Item 1.
Business, for a more complete discussion of risk factors that could impact our future financial
performance.
The Company
We are engaged primarily in the acquisition, development, redevelopment, operation and
long-term ownership of apartment communities in the United States. Archstone-Smith is structured as
an UPREIT, with all property ownership and business operations conducted through the Operating
Trust. Archstone-Smith is the sole trustee and owned approximately 89.0% of our Common Units at
March 31, 2007. Archstone-Smith Common Shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: ASN).
Results of Operations
Executive Summary
The major factors that influenced our operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
as compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
NOI increased due primarily to an increase of 6.8% in NOI for our Same-Store
communities as well as the DeWAG transaction. |
|
|
|
|
Other income was lower due primarily to lower insurance recoveries offset by an
increase in interest income resulting from higher restricted cash balances attributable
to our 1031 exchange disposition transactions. |
|
|
|
|
Higher depreciation and interest expense was due to the increase in the size of the
real estate portfolio and the related financing activities, respectively. Rising
interest rates also influenced the increase in interest expense. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased principally as a result of our
international expansion. |
|
|
|
|
Other expenses were lower in 2007 due principally to $8.4 million of Ameriton income
tax expense recorded in 2006 related primarily to disposition gains. |
|
|
|
|
Earnings from unconsolidated entities was higher in 2006 primarily due to higher
gains on the sale of Ameriton joint venture assets. |
|
|
|
|
The increase in gains on disposition of real estate was driven principally by
significantly higher volume of REIT dispositions in 2007. |
23
Reconciliation of Quantitative Summary to Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
The following schedules are provided to reconcile our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Earnings to the information presented in the Quantitative Summary provided in the next section
(dollar amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
268,132 |
|
|
$ |
31,254 |
|
|
$ |
299,386 |
|
|
$ |
207,734 |
|
|
$ |
77,504 |
|
|
$ |
285,238 |
|
Other income |
|
|
15,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,754 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
Property operating
expenses (rental
expenses and real
estate taxes) |
|
|
89,670 |
|
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
101,283 |
|
|
|
64,227 |
|
|
|
32,274 |
|
|
|
96,501 |
|
Depreciation on
real estate
investments |
|
|
67,492 |
|
|
|
6,654 |
|
|
|
74,146 |
|
|
|
53,359 |
|
|
|
16,215 |
|
|
|
69,574 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
67,293 |
|
|
|
7,027 |
|
|
|
74,320 |
|
|
|
45,527 |
|
|
|
16,224 |
|
|
|
61,751 |
|
General and
administrative
expenses |
|
|
18,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,998 |
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
13,839 |
|
Income from
unconsolidated
entities |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
18,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,878 |
|
Other non-operating
income |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
Gains, net of
disposition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
277,872 |
|
|
|
277,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,434 |
|
|
|
80,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
42,199 |
|
|
$ |
282,728 |
|
|
$ |
324,927 |
|
|
$ |
54,152 |
|
|
$ |
89,740 |
|
|
$ |
143,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Summary
This summary is provided for reference purposes and is intended to support and be read in
conjunction with the narrative discussion of our results of operations. This quantitative summary
includes all operating activities, including those classified as discontinued operations
for GAAP reporting purposes. This information is presented to correspond with the manner in which
we analyze the business. We generally reinvest disposition proceeds into new operating communities
and developments and therefore believe it is most useful to analyze continuing and discontinued
operations on a combined basis. The impact of communities classified as discontinued operations
24
for GAAP reporting purposes is discussed separately in a later section under the caption
Discontinued Operations Analysis (dollar amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Rental revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store(1) |
|
$ |
226,827 |
|
|
$ |
213,201 |
|
|
$ |
13,626 |
|
Non Same-Store and other |
|
|
48,581 |
|
|
|
59,559 |
|
|
|
(10,978 |
) |
Ameriton |
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
|
7,712 |
|
|
|
(4,332 |
) |
Non-multifamily |
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
(1,394 |
) |
International |
|
|
18,990 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
17,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rental revenues |
|
|
299,386 |
|
|
|
285,238 |
|
|
|
14,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses
(rental expenses and real
estate taxes): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store(1) |
|
|
68,922 |
|
|
|
65,392 |
|
|
|
3,530 |
|
Non Same-Store and other |
|
|
21,378 |
|
|
|
25,851 |
|
|
|
(4,473 |
) |
Ameriton |
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
3,927 |
|
|
|
(2,299 |
) |
Non-multifamily |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
International |
|
|
9,139 |
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
8,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating
expenses |
|
|
101,283 |
|
|
|
96,501 |
|
|
|
4,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
(rental revenues less
property operating expenses). |
|
|
198,103 |
|
|
|
188,737 |
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
Margin (NOI/rental revenues): |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Average occupancy during
period:(2) |
|
|
93.2 |
% |
|
|
95.2 |
% |
|
|
(2.0 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
15,754 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
Depreciation of real estate
investments |
|
|
74,146 |
|
|
|
69,574 |
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
87,207 |
|
|
|
74,522 |
|
|
|
12,685 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
12,887 |
|
|
|
12,771 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
|
|
74,320 |
|
|
|
61,751 |
|
|
|
12,569 |
|
General and administrative
expenses |
|
|
18,998 |
|
|
|
15,385 |
|
|
|
3,613 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
2,059 |
|
|
|
13,839 |
|
|
|
(11,780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing and
discontinued operations....... |
|
|
44,334 |
|
|
|
44,404 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from
unconsolidated entities |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
18,878 |
|
|
|
(18,183 |
) |
Other non-operating income |
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on disposition of real
estate investments, net of
disposition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable subsidiaries |
|
|
3,384 |
|
|
|
13,616 |
|
|
|
(10,232 |
) |
REIT |
|
|
274,488 |
|
|
|
66,818 |
|
|
|
207,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
324,927 |
|
|
|
143,892 |
|
|
|
181,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects revenues and operating expenses for Same-Store communities that were owned on
March 31, 2007 and fully operating during both of the comparison periods. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include occupancy associated with properties owned by Ameriton, located in
Germany or operated under the Oakwood Master Leases. |
25
Property-level operating results
We utilize NOI as the primary measure to evaluate our operating performance and for purposes
of making decisions about resource allocations and assessing segment performance. We also believe
NOI is a valuable means of comparing period-to-period operating performance. In analyzing the
performance of our operating portfolio, we evaluate Same-Store communities separately from Non
Same-Store communities and other properties.
Same-Store Analysis
The following table reflects revenue, expense and NOI growth for Same-Store communities that
were owned on March 31, 2007 and fully operating during each of the respective comparison periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store |
|
Same-Store |
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
Expense |
|
Same-Store |
|
|
Growth |
|
Growth |
|
NOI Growth |
|
|
Q1 2007 vs. |
|
Q1 2007 vs. |
|
Q1 2007 vs. |
|
|
Q1 2006 |
|
Q1 2006 |
|
Q1 2006 |
Garden |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
High-Rise |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-store revenues were up 6.4% for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period in 2006 due primarily to an increase in average rental revenue per unit which was
partially offset by a decrease in occupancy in Washington, D.C. and New York. Same-store expenses
were up 5.4% for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006, primarily
due to higher real estate taxes and personnel costs. These changes in revenues and expenses
resulted in an increase in same-store NOI of 6.8% driven principally by strong growth in Seattle,
Southern California, the New York metropolitan area and the San Francisco Bay Area, which represent
57% of the companys portfolio.
Non Same-Store and Other Analysis
The $6.5 million decrease in NOI in the Non Same-Store portfolio for the quarter ended March
31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 is primarily attributable to a $23.8 million
decrease related to community dispositions, offset by an $11.9 million increase related to
acquisitions and a $4.5 million increase related to recently stabilized development communities and
communities in lease-up.
Ameriton
The decrease in NOI from Ameriton apartment communities for the three months ended March 31,
2007 as compared to the comparable period in the prior year is primarily attributable to
dispositions.
International
The increase in NOI of $8.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period in the prior year is primarily attributable to the DeWAG acquisition that occurred in
July 2006. As of March 31, 2007, the overall International portfolio consisted of approximately
9,100 residential units.
Other Income
Other income was lower for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in
2006 due primarily to a $5.0 million reduction in insurance recoveries offset by higher interest
income earned on higher cash balances that resulted primarily from our 1031 exchange disposition
transactions.
Depreciation Expense
The depreciation increase for the three months ended March 31, 2007 is primarily related to
the increase in the size of the real estate portfolio as compared to March 31, 2006.
26
Interest Expense
The increase in gross interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2007 is due to
higher average debt levels associated with the increased size of the real estate portfolio as
compared to March 31, 2006.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were higher for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 due
primarily to higher personnel-related costs associated with our recent international expansion.
Other Expense
Other expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was lower due principally to $8.4 million
of income tax expense related primarily to prior year disposition gains and a $2.2 million
impairment charge related to an asset that we sold in 2006.
Equity in Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities
Earnings from unconsolidated entities were lower in 2007 primarily due to lower gains on the
sale of Ameriton joint venture assets.
Other Non-Operating Income
Non-operating income was higher for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 due to higher gains on
the sale of marketable securities.
Gains on Real Estate Dispositions
See Discontinued Operations Analysis below for discussion of gains.
Discontinued Operations Analysis
Included in the overall results discussed above are the following amounts associated with
properties which have been sold or were classified as held-for-sale as of March 31, 2007 (dollars
in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
31,254 |
|
|
$ |
77,504 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
(7,997 |
) |
|
|
(22,014 |
) |
Real estate taxes |
|
|
(3,616 |
) |
|
|
(10,260 |
) |
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(6,654 |
) |
|
|
(16,215 |
) |
Interest expense(1) |
|
|
(7,027 |
) |
|
|
(16,224 |
) |
Income taxes from taxable REIT subsidiaries |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(422 |
) |
Provision for possible loss on real estate investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs related to dispositions |
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
(863 |
) |
Gains on disposition of real estate investments, net
of disposition costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable subsidiaries |
|
|
3,384 |
|
|
|
13,616 |
|
REIT |
|
|
274,488 |
|
|
|
66,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
$ |
282,728 |
|
|
$ |
89,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of communities sold during the period |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Number of sold communities included in discontinued
operations NOI |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Number of communities classified as held-for-sale
and included in discontinued operations NOI
as of March 31, 2007 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest expense included in discontinued operations is allocated to properties based
on each assets cost in relation to the companys leverage ratio and the average effective
interest rate for each respective period. |
27
As a result of the execution of our strategy of managing our invested capital through the
selective sale of apartment communities and redeploying the proceeds to fund investments with
higher anticipated growth prospects, we had significant disposition activity in both 2007 and 2006.
The resulting gains, net of disposition costs, including those from Ameriton, were the biggest
drivers of overall earnings from discontinued operations. NOI related to communities sold or
classified as held-for-sale was higher in 2006 as compared to 2007 due primarily to the longer
holding period for communities we have sold. Direct operating expenses, depreciation and allocated
interest expense are generally proportional to the net operating income of communities included in
discontinued operations for each period. The number of REIT dispositions in 2007 and the relative
size of the corresponding gain was significantly higher in 2007. The portion of earnings from
discontinued operations allocated to minority interest in 2007 was higher than 2006 due primarily
to higher gains.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are committed to maintaining a strong balance sheet and preserving our financial
flexibility, which we believe enhances our ability to capitalize on attractive investment
opportunities as they become available. As a result of the significant cash flow generated by our
operations, current cash positions, the available capacity under our unsecured credit facilities,
gains from the disposition of real estate and our demonstrated ability to access the capital
markets, we believe our liquidity and financial condition are sufficient to meet all of our
reasonably anticipated cash flow needs during the next 12 months. Please refer to the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for detailed information of our sources and uses of cash for
the periods ending March 31, 2007 and 2006.
Scheduled Debt Maturities and Interest Payment Requirements
We have structured our long-term debt maturities in a manner designed to avoid unmanageable
repayment obligations in any year, which would negatively impact our financial flexibility. As of
March 31, 2007, we had scheduled long-term debt maturities of $479.6 million, $544.6 million and
$477.4 million during 2007, 2008 and
2009, respectively and $171.7 million in International loans that we expect to be paid off or
refinanced during the second quarter of 2007.
On May 1, 2007, we had $484.9 million borrowed on our unsecured credit facilities, $19.3
million outstanding under letters of credit and available borrowing capacity on our unsecured
credit facilities of $195.8 million.
Our unsecured credit facilities, long-term unsecured debt, mortgages payable and international
loan had effective weighted average interest rates of 5.6%, 5.5%, 5.5% and 4.3%, respectively, as
of March 31, 2007. All of these rates give effect to debt issuance costs, fair value hedges, the
amortization of fair market value purchase adjustments and other fees and expenses, as applicable.
Our debt instruments generally contain covenants common to the type of facility or borrowing,
including financial covenants establishing minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum
leverage ratios. We were in compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our debt
instruments as of and for the period ended March 31, 2007.
Unitholder Distribution Requirements
Based on anticipated distribution levels for 2007 and the number of Common Units outstanding
as of March 31, 2007, we anticipate that we will pay distributions and dividends of $456.7 million
in the aggregate during the year ending December 31, 2007. This amount represents distributions on
our Common and Preferred Units.
28
Planned Investments
Following is a summary of planned investments as of March 31, 2007, including Ameriton, but
excluding joint ventures. The amounts labeled Discretionary represent future investments that we
plan to make, although there is not a contractual commitment to do so. The amounts labeled
Committed represent the approximate amount that we are contractually committed to fund for
communities under construction in accordance with construction contracts with general contractors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned Investments |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Discretionary |
|
|
Committed |
|
Communities under redevelopment |
|
$ |
603 |
|
|
$ |
3,597 |
|
Communities under construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
503,969 |
|
Communities In Planning and owned |
|
|
1,376,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
Communities In Planning and Under Control |
|
|
660,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
Community acquisitions under contract |
|
|
309,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/ADA settlement capital accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,346,088 |
|
|
$ |
530,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the planned investments noted above, we expect to make additional investments
relating to planned expenditures on recently acquired communities as well as recurring expenditures
to improve and maintain our established operating communities.
We anticipate completion of most of the communities that are currently under construction and
the planned operating community improvements by the end of 2010. No assurances can be given that
communities we do not currently own will be acquired or that planned developments will actually
occur. In addition, actual costs incurred could be greater or less than our current estimates.
Funding Sources
We anticipate financing our planned investment and operating needs primarily with cash flow
from operating activities, disposition proceeds, existing cash balances, borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities and proceeds from long-term financing. We have filed registration
statements to facilitate issuance of debt and equity securities on an as-needed basis subject to
our ability to effect offerings on satisfactory terms based on prevailing
conditions. At May 1, 2007, we had $195.8 million in available capacity on our unsecured credit
facilities. In addition, we expect the proceeds from REIT dispositions to approximate our
investment in new
Operating Trust operating community acquisitions in 2007. We therefore do not believe that
discontinued operations will have a significant adverse impact on our liquidity in the foreseeable
future.
Litigation and Contingencies
During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement in the United
States District Court for the District of Maryland with three national disability organizations and
agreed to make capital improvements in a number of our communities in order to make them fully
compliant with the FHA and ADA. The litigation, settled by this agreement, alleged lack of full
compliance with certain design and construction requirements under the two federal statutes at 71
of the companys wholly-owned and joint venture communities, of which we still own or have an
interest in 42. As part of the settlement, the three disability organizations all recognized that
the Operating Trust had no intention to build any of its communities in a manner inconsistent with
the FHA or ADA.
The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the communities named in the
settlement was estimated at $47.2 million and was accrued as an addition to real estate during the
fourth quarter of 2005. The settlement agreement approved by the court allows us to remediate each
of the designated communities over a three year period, and also provides that we are not
restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation period. We agreed to pay
damages totaling $1.4 million, which included legal fees and costs incurred by the plaintiffs. We
had $22.7 million of the original accrual remaining on March 31, 2007.
We are subject to various claims filed in 2002 and 2003 in connection with moisture
infiltration and resulting mold issues at certain high-rise properties we once owned in Southeast
Florida. These claims generally allege that water infiltration and resulting mold contamination
resulted in the claimants having personal injuries and/or property damage. Although certain of
these claims continue to be in various stages of litigation, with respect to the
29
majority of these
claims, we have either settled the claims and/or we have been dismissed from the lawsuits that had
been filed. With respect to the lawsuits that have not been resolved, we continue to defend these
claims in the normal course of litigation.
We are a party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or
results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
We define critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that require our
management to exercise their most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. Our management has
discussed the development and selection of all of these critical accounting policies with our audit
committee, and the audit committee has reviewed the disclosure relating to these policies. Our
critical accounting policies relate principally to the following key areas:
Internal Cost Capitalization
We have an investment organization that is responsible for development and redevelopment of
apartment communities. Consistent with GAAP, all direct and certain indirect costs, including
interest and real estate taxes, incurred during development and redevelopment activities are
capitalized. Interest is capitalized on real estate assets that require a period of time to get
them ready for their intended use. The amount of interest capitalized is based upon the average
amount of accumulated development expenditures during the reporting period. Included in capitalized
costs are managements estimates of the direct and incremental personnel costs and indirect project
costs associated with our development and redevelopment activities. Indirect project costs consist
primarily of personnel costs associated with construction administration and development
accounting, legal fees, and various office costs that clearly relate to projects under development.
Because the estimation of capitalizable internal costs requires managements judgment, we believe
internal cost capitalization is a critical accounting estimate.
If future accounting rules limit our ability to capitalize internal costs or if our
development activity decreased significantly without a proportionate decrease in internal costs,
there could be an increase in our operating expenses.
Valuation of Real Estate
Long-lived assets to be held and used are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted. We also evaluate
assets for potential impairment when we deem them to be held-for-sale. Valuation of real estate is
considered a critical accounting estimate because the evaluation of impairment and the
determination of fair values involve a number of management assumptions relating to future economic
events that could materially affect the determination of the ultimate value, and therefore, the
carrying amounts of our real estate. Furthermore, decisions regarding when a property should be
classified as held-for-sale under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, requires significant management judgment. There are many phases to the
disposition process ranging from the initial market research to being under contract with
non-refundable earnest money to closing. Deciding when management is committed to selling an asset
is therefore highly subjective.
When determining if there is an indication of impairment for assets intended to be held and
used, we estimate the assets NOI over the anticipated holding period on an undiscounted cash flow
basis and compare this amount to its carrying value. Estimating the expected NOI and holding period
requires significant management judgment. If it is determined that there is an indication of
impairment for assets to be held and used, or if an asset is deemed to be held-for-sale, we then
determine the fair value of the asset.
The apartment industry uses capitalization rates as the primary measure of fair value.
Specifically, annual NOI for a community is divided by an estimated capitalization rate to
determine the fair value of the community. Determining the appropriate capitalization rate requires
significant judgment and is typically based on many factors including the prevailing rate for the
market or submarket, as well as the quality and location of the properties. Further, capitalization
rates can fluctuate up or down due to a variety of factors in the overall economy or within local
markets. If the actual capitalization rate for a community is significantly different from our
estimated rate, the impairment evaluation for an individual asset could be materially affected.
30
Capital Expenditures and Depreciable Lives
We incur costs relating to redevelopment initiatives, revenue enhancing and expense reducing
capital expenditures, and recurring capital expenditures that are capitalized as part of our real
estate. These amounts are capitalized and depreciated over estimated useful lives determined by
management. We allocate the cost of newly acquired properties between net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets. The primary intangible asset associated with an apartment community acquisition
is the value of the existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired property, we
first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to
the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the property is vacant. We estimate
the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a
hypothetical lease-up. We depreciate the building and fixtures based on the expected useful life of
the asset and amortize the intangible value of the lease agreements over the average remaining life
of the existing leases.
Determining whether expenditures meet the criteria for capitalization, the assignment of
depreciable lives and determining the appropriate amounts to allocate between tangible and
intangible assets for property acquisitions requires our management to exercise significant
judgment and is therefore considered a critical accounting estimate.
Pursuit Costs
We incur costs relating to the potential acquisition of existing operating communities or land
for development of new operating communities, which we refer to as pursuit costs. To the extent
that these costs are identifiable with a specific property and would be capitalized if the property
were already acquired, the costs are accumulated by project and capitalized in the Other Asset
section of the balance sheet. If these conditions are not met, the costs are expensed as incurred.
Capitalized costs include but are not limited to earnest money, option fees, environmental reports,
traffic reports, surveys, photos, blueprints, direct and incremental personnel costs and legal
costs. Upon acquisition, the costs are included in the basis of the acquired property. When it
becomes probable that a prospective acquisition will not be acquired, the accumulated costs for the
property are charged to other expense on the statement of earnings in the period such a
determination is made.
Because of the inherent judgment involved in evaluating whether a prospective property will
ultimately be acquired, we believe capitalizable pursuit costs are a critical accounting
estimate.
Consolidation vs. Equity Method of Accounting for Ventures
From time to time, we make co-investments in real estate ventures with third parties and are
required to determine whether to consolidate or use the equity method of accounting for the
venture. FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (as revised)
and Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF No. 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the
General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited
Partners Have Certain Rights, are the two primary sources of accounting guidance in this area.
Appropriate application of these relatively complex rules requires substantial management judgment,
which we believe, makes the choice of the appropriate accounting method for these ventures a
critical accounting estimate.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our real estate investments in entities that do not qualify as variable interest entities,
variable interest entities where we are not the primary beneficiary and entities we do not control
through majority economic interest are not consolidated and are reported as investments in
unconsolidated entities. Our investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities at March 31,
2007 aggregated $252.0 million. Please refer to Note 5, Investments in and Advances to
Unconsolidated Entities for additional information.
Contractual Commitments
Please refer to Scheduled Debt Maturities and Interest Payment Requirements and Planned
Investments above for further discussion of significant contractual commitments.
31
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There has been no material change in the qualitative or quantitative disclosures regarding our
market risk. For detailed information about the qualitative and quantitative disclosures of our
market risk, see Item 7A in our 2006 Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934). Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, to the best of their
knowledge, as of March 31, 2007.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal control over financial reporting.
32
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of
business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims and litigation, individually or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results
of operations. See Note 11 to the financial statements included in this report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
See the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2006 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended March 31, 2007, we issued 18,081 Common Units in reliance upon
the exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
No other information is required to be disclosed for the period ended March 31, 2007 that has
not been disclosed in a report on Form 8-K. There has been no change to the procedures by which
security holders may recommend nominees to our Board of Trustees.
Item 6. Exhibits
See Exhibits.
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ R. SCOT SELLERS
R. Scot Sellers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ CHARLES E. MUELLER, JR.
Charles E. Mueller, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ MARK A. SCHUMACHER
Mark A. Schumacher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
Date: May 9, 2007
34
Item 6. Exhibits
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Archstone-Smith Trust (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Archstone-Smith Trusts Current Report of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2,
2006) |
|
3.3 |
|
Restated Bylaws of Archstone-Smith Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Archstone-Smith Trusts Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006) |
|
10.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Archstone-Smith Trusts Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on June 2, 2006) |
|
10.2 |
|
Bylaws of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Archstone-Smith Trusts Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006) |
|
12.1 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
12.2 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions |
|
15.1 |
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Awareness Letter |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
35