e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                     to                     .
Commission File Number 1-10272
ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Maryland   90-0042860
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. employer
incorporation or organization)   identification no.)
9200 E Panorama Circle, Suite 400
Englewood, Colorado 80112
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(303) 708-5959
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing for the past 90 days.
Yes þ      No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated filer þ     Accelerated filer o     Non-accelerated filer o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o      No þ
   At October 30, 2006 there were approximately 30,338,000 of the Registrant’s Class A-1 and Class B Common Units outstanding, held by non-affiliates.
 
 

 


 

Table of Contents
             
        Page  
Item   Description   Number  
 
           
 
  PART 1 – Financial Information        
 
           
  Financial Statements        
 
  Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005     3  
 
           
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings – Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)     4  
 
           
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statement of Unitholders’ Equity, Other Common Unitholders’ Interest and Comprehensive Income (Loss) –Nine months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited)     5  
 
           
 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – Nine months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)     6  
 
           
 
  Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)     7  
 
           
 
  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Review Report     24  
 
           
  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations     25  
 
           
  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk     35  
 
           
  Controls and Procedures     36  
 
           
 
  PART II – Other Information        
 
           
  Legal Proceedings     37  
 
           
  Risk Factors     37  
 
           
  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds     37  
 
           
  Defaults Upon Senior Securities     37  
 
           
  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders     37  
 
           
  Other Information     37  
 
           
  Exhibits     37  
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions
 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Awareness Letter
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302
 Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906
 Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906

2


Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except unit data)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
    (Unaudited)          
ASSETS
               
 
               
Real estate
  $ 13,105,946     $ 11,226,114  
Real estate — held-for-sale
    135,939       133,150  
Less accumulated depreciation
    934,658       836,693  
 
           
 
    12,307,227       10,522,571  
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities
    212,884       132,728  
 
           
Net investments
    12,520,111       10,655,299  
Cash and cash equivalents
    52,080       13,638  
Restricted cash in tax-deferred exchange escrow
    54,579       495,274  
Other assets
    480,561       302,967  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 13,107,331     $ 11,467,178  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND UNITHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
 
Liabilities:
               
Unsecured credit facilities
  $ 25,714     $ 394,578  
Term loan — international
    272,792        
Long-term unsecured debt
    3,388,156       2,545,119  
Mortgages payable
    2,794,204       2,310,277  
Mortgages payable — held-for-sale
    83,375       83,375  
Accounts payable
    75,124       53,366  
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
    416,637       311,673  
 
           
Total liabilities
    7,056,002       5,698,388  
 
           
Other common unitholders’ interest, at redemption value (A-1 Common Units: 30,784,610 in 2006 and 33,910,022 in 2005)
    1,675,914       1,420,491  
 
           
 
               
Unitholders’ equity:
               
Perpetual Preferred Units
    50,000       50,000  
Common unitholders equity (218,758,589 units in 2006 and 212,413,939 units in 2005)
    4,332,448       4,300,019  
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (7,033 )     (1,720 )
 
           
Total unitholders’ equity
    4,375,415       4,348,299  
 
           
Total liabilities and unitholders’ equity
  $ 13,107,331     $ 11,467,178  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Revenues:
                               
Rental revenues
  $ 299,366     $ 222,744     $ 828,065     $ 604,105  
Other income
    27,299       25,840       57,100       37,815  
 
                       
 
    326,665       248,584       885,165       641,920  
 
                       
 
                               
Expenses:
                               
Rental expenses
    75,665       51,707       191,611       145,805  
Real estate taxes
    25,748       20,037       76,806       56,208  
Depreciation on real estate investments
    68,708       53,916       203,073       146,605  
Interest expense
    72,751       46,680       186,833       123,946  
General and administrative expenses
    18,497       13,600       49,794       41,644  
Other expenses
    1,986       5,538       14,046       37,047  
 
                       
 
    263,355       191,478       722,163       551,255  
 
                       
Earnings from operations
    63,310       57,106       163,002       90,665  
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities
    2,088       1,839       31,484       18,750  
Other non-operating income
    1,718       72       2,137       28,855  
 
                       
Net earnings before discontinued operations
    67,116       59,017       196,623       138,270  
Net earnings from discontinued apartment communities
    82,995       129,046       290,134       185,969  
 
                       
Net earnings
    150,111       188,063       486,757       324,239  
Preferred unit distributions
    (957 )     (958 )     (2,872 )     (3,614 )
 
                       
Net earnings attributable to Common Units — Basic
  $ 149,154     $ 187,105     $ 483,885     $ 320,625  
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average Common Units outstanding:
                               
Basic
    248,695       232,794       247,950       226,778  
 
                       
Diluted
    249,643       233,996       248,810       227,803  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings per Common Unit — Basic:
                               
Earnings before discontinued operations
  $ 0.27     $ 0.25     $ 0.78     $ 0.59  
Discontinued operations, net
    0.33       0.55       1.17       0.82  
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 0.60     $ 0.80     $ 1.95     $ 1.41  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings per Common Unit — Diluted:
                               
Earnings before discontinued operations
  $ 0.27     $ 0.25     $ 0.78     $ 0.59  
Discontinued operations, net
    0.33       0.55       1.16       0.82  
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 0.60     $ 0.80     $ 1.94     $ 1.41  
 
                       
 
                               
Distributions paid per Common Unit
  $ 0.435     $ 0.4325     $ 1.305     $ 1.2975  
 
                       
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Unitholders’ Equity,
Other Common Unitholders’ Interest and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands)
(Unaudited
)
                                                 
    Perpetual                                    
    Preferred                                    
    Units at             Accumulated                      
    Aggregate     Common     Other             Other Common        
    Liquidation     Unitholders’     Comprehensive     Total Unitholders’     Unitholders’        
    Preference     Equity     Income (Loss)     Equity     Interest     Total  
Balances at December 31, 2005
  $ 50,000     $ 4,300,019     $ (1,720 )   $ 4,348,299     $ 1,420,491     $ 5,768,790  
Comprehensive income:
                                               
 
                                               
Net earnings
          422,541             422,541       64,216       486,757  
Change in fair value of hedges
                (8,525 )     (8,525 )           (8,525 )
Change in fair value of marketable securities
                1,415       1,415             1,415  
Foreign currency exchange translation
                1,797       1,797             1,797  
 
                                             
Comprehensive income attributable to Common Units
                                            481,444  
 
                                             
Preferred Unit distribution
          (2,872 )           (2,872 )           (2,872 )
Common Unit distributions
          (281,755 )           (281,755 )     (42,289 )     (324,044 )
A-1 Common Units converted into A-2 Common Units
          107,758             107,758       (107,758 )      
Exercise of Options
          29,441             29,441             29,441  
Accrual of equity-classified awards under Compensation Plans
          5,670             5,670             5,670  
Issuance of A-1 Common Units under Dividend Reinvestment Plans
          17,472             17,472             17,472  
Issuance of A-1 Common Units in exchange for real estate
                            81,412       81,412  
Adjustment to redemption value
          (259,842 )           (259,842 )     259,842        
Other, net
          (5,984 )           (5,984 )           (5,984 )
 
                                   
Balances at September 30, 2006
  $ 50,000     $ 4,332,448     $ (7,033 )   $ 4,375,415     $ 1,675,914     $ 6,051,329  
 
                                   
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited
)
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2006     2005  
Operating activities:
               
Net earnings
  $ 486,757     $ 324,239  
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flow provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    222,360       181,087  
Gains on dispositions of depreciated real estate
    (314,246 )     (196,549 )
Gains on sale of marketable equity securities
          (27,948 )
Change in swap value — DeWAG hedges
    1,407        
Provision for possible loss on investments
    4,328        
Undistributed equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities
    3,610       (18,750 )
Interest accrued on Mezzanine loans
    (7,814 )     (3,308 )
Change in other assets
    14,757       (29,022 )
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
    22,854       22,721  
Other, net
    (6,733 )     (602 )
 
           
Net cash flow provided by operating activities
    427,280       251,868  
 
           
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Real estate investments
    (1,826,663 )     (1,599,629 )
Purchase of DeWAG net of cash acquired of $20,364
    (252,428 )      
Change in investments in unconsolidated entities, net
    (67,523 )     23,488  
Proceeds from dispositions
    1,190,054       812,206  
Change in restricted cash
    440,695       55,515  
Change in notes receivable, net
    (83,592 )     (41,826 )
Other, net
    7,679       (1,735 )
 
           
Net cash flow used in investing activities
    (591,778 )     (751,981 )
 
           
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Proceeds from Long-Term Unsecured Debt, net
    859,385       495,724  
Payments on Long-Term Unsecured Debt
    (31,250 )     (231,250 )
Proceeds from (payments on) unsecured credit facilities, net
    (368,864 )     187,007  
Principal repayment of mortgages payable, including prepayment penalties
    (220,410 )     (263,457 )
Regularly scheduled principal payments on mortgages payable
    (11,723 )     (9,392 )
Proceeds from term loan to fund DeWAG investment
    272,792        
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable
          655  
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Units, net
          491,440  
Proceeds from Common Units issued under DRIP and employee stock options
    46,913       33,275  
Repurchase of Common Units and Preferred Units
          (56,495 )
Repurchase of Series E and F Perpetual Preferred Units
          (19,522 )
Cash distributions paid on Common Units
    (324,044 )     (312,568 )
Cash distributions paid on Preferred Units
    (2,872 )     (2,873 )
Other, net
    (16,987 )     (2,368 )
 
           
Net cash flow provided by financing activities
    202,940       310,176  
 
           
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    38,442       (189,937 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    13,638       203,255  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 52,080     $ 13,318  
 
           
 
               
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities:
               
A-1 Common Units issued in exchange for real estate
  $ 81,412     $ 400,749  
N-1 and N-2 Convertible Redeemable Units issued in exchange for real estate
          250  
A-1 Common Units converted to A-2 Common Units
    107,758       5,547  
Assumption of mortgages payable upon purchase of apartment communities
    728,484       654,727  
These Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows combine cash flows from discontinued operations with cash flows from continuing operations.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
(1) Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
     Business
     Archstone-Smith is structured as an UPREIT under which all property ownership and business operations are conducted through the Archstone-Smith Operating Trust, which we refer to herein as the “Operating Trust”. Archstone-Smith is our sole trustee and owns approximately 87.7% of the Operating Trust’s outstanding Common Units; the remaining 12.3% of the Common Units are owned by minority interest holders. As used herein, “we,” “our” and the “company” refers to the Operating Trust and Archstone-Smith, collectively, except where the context otherwise requires. Archstone-Smith is an equity REIT organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. We focus on creating value for our unitholders by acquiring, developing, redeveloping and operating apartments in our core markets which are characterized by protected locations with limited land for new housing construction, expensive single-family home prices, and a strong, diversified economic base with significant employment growth potential.
     Interim Financial Reporting
     The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Operating Trust are unaudited and certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been omitted. While management believes that the disclosures presented are adequate for interim reporting, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Operating Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005 (“2005 Form 10-K”). See the glossary in our 2005 Form 10-K for all defined terms not defined herein.
     In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Operating Trust’s financial statements for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
     Use of Estimates
     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements and the related notes. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period they are determined to be necessary.
     Marketable Securities and Other Investments
     All publicly traded equity securities are classified as “available-for-sale” and carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of unitholders’ equity. Private investments, for which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence, are accounted for at cost. Declines in the value of public and private investments that management determines are other than temporary are recorded as a provision for loss on investments.
     Real Estate and Depreciation
     We allocate the cost of newly acquired properties between net tangible and identifiable intangible assets. The primary intangible asset associated with an apartment community acquisition is the value of the existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired property, we first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the property is vacant. We estimate the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a hypothetical lease-up. We depreciate the building and fixtures based on the expected useful life

7


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
of the asset and amortize the intangible value of the lease agreements over the average remaining life of the existing leases. This amortization expense is included in depreciation on real estate investments in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
     Goodwill and Other Intangibles
     We recognized goodwill in connection with the DeWAG acquisition. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets. Intangible assets consist of non-compete agreements and lease related intangibles. We will perform an impairment test annually, or more frequently, if events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment of our goodwill or intangible assets, which are included in other assets.
     Insurance Recoveries
     We recognize insurance recovery proceeds as other income if the recovery is related to items that were originally expensed, such as legal settlements, legal expenses and repairs that did not meet capitalization guidelines. For recoveries of property damages that were eligible for capitalization, we reduce the basis of the property or if the property has subsequently been sold, we recognize the proceeds as an additional gain on sale. We recognize insurance recoveries at such time that we believe the recovery is probable and we have sufficient information to make a reasonable estimate of proceeds, except in cases where we have to pursue recovery via litigation. In this circumstance, we recognize the recovery when we have a signed, legally binding agreement with the insurance carrier.
     Legal Fees
     We generally recognize legal expenses as incurred; however, if such fees are related to the accrual for an estimated legal settlement, we accrue for the related incurred and anticipated legal fees at the same time we accrue the estimated cost of settlement.
     Foreign Currency Translation
     Assets and liabilities of the company’s foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates in effect during the period. The resulting translation adjustment is reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of unitholders’ equity on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The functional currency utilized for these subsidiaries is the local foreign currency.
     Derivative Financial Instruments
     We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, exposure to changes in the fair value of certain investments in equity securities and exposure to volatile energy prices. During 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” Under SFAS No. 149, the resulting assets and liabilities associated with derivative financial instruments are carried on our financial statements at estimated fair value at the end of each reporting period. The changes in fair value of a fair value hedge and the fair value of the items hedged are generally recorded in earnings for each reporting period. The change in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges and foreign currency hedges are carried on our financial statements as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If effective, our hedges have little or no impact on our current earnings. The most significant derivative transactions entered into during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were the execution of forward treasury locks, which fixed the treasury rate component on $300 million of unsecured debt that we expect to refinance in 2007, and another $300 million we expect to refinance in 2008. On October 23, 2006, we settled these treasury locks. The resulting $2.0 million gain will be amortized into interest expense over the term of the debt, when issued. In connection with the DeWAG transaction, we assumed interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of 227 million. These swaps, which had an aggregate fair value of approximately $4.0 million at September 30, 2006, were put in place by DeWAG to fix the interest cost associated with certain variable rate mortgages. These

8


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
derivatives were not designated as hedges for US GAAP purposes. Changes in fair value are recorded as adjustments to interest expense.
     Income Taxes
     We have made an election to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and we believe we qualify as a REIT and have made all required distributions of our taxable income.
     Income taxes for our taxable REIT subsidiaries are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
     Comprehensive Income
     Comprehensive income, which is defined as net earnings and all other non-owner changes in equity, is displayed in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Unitholders’ Equity, Other Common Unitholders’ Interest and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) reflects unrealized holding gains and losses on the available-for-sale investments, changes in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges and gains and losses on long-term foreign currency transactions.
     Our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Net Unrealized                     Accumulated  
    Gains on             Foreign     Other  
    Marketable     Cash Flow     Currency     Comprehensive  
    Securities     Hedges     Translation     Income (Loss)  
Balance at December 31, 2005
  $ 184     $ (1,612 )   $ (292 )   $ (1,720 )
Change in fair value of hedges
          (8,525 )           (8,525 )
Foreign currency exchange translation and other
                1,797       1,797  
Mark to market for marketable equity securities
    1,415                   1,415  
 
                       
Balance at September 30, 2006
  $ 1,599     $ (10,137 )   $ 1,505     $ (7,033 )
 
                       
     Per Unit Data
     Following is a reconciliation of basic EPS to diluted EPS for the periods indicated (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Net earnings attributable to Common Units — Basic and Diluted
  $ 149,154     $ 187,105     $ 483,885     $ 320,625  
 
                       
Weighted average number of Common Units
                               
Outstanding — Basic
    248,695       232,794       247,950       226,778  
Assumed exercise of options
    948       1,202       860       1,025  
 
                       
Weighted average number of Common Units
                               
Outstanding — Diluted
    249,643       233,996       248,810       227,803  
 
                       

9


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
     New Accounting Pronouncements
     In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” (EITF No. 04-5). This Issue provides a framework for evaluating whether a general partner or group of general partners or managing members controls a limited partnership or limited liability company and therefore whether they should consolidate the entity. The presumption that the general partner or group of general partners or managing members controls a limited liability partnership or limited liability company may be overcome if the limited partners or members have (1) the substantive ability to dissolve the partnership without cause, or (2) substantive participating rights. EITF No. 04-5 became effective on June 30, 2005 for new or modified limited partnerships or limited liability companies and January 1, 2006 for all existing arrangements. Adoption of EITF No. 04-5 did not have a material impact on our financial position, net earnings or cash flows.
     In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FIN 46R-6, “Determining the Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R).” This FSP addresses certain implementation issues related to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” Specifically, FSP FIN 46R-6 addresses how a reporting enterprise should determine the variability to be considered in applying FIN 46R. The variability that is considered in applying FIN 46R affects the determination of: (a) whether an entity is a variable interest entity (VIE); (b) which interests are “variable interests” in the entity; and (c) which party, if any, is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Our assessment of variability affects any calculation of expected losses and expected residual returns, if such a calculation is necessary. The company is required to apply the guidance in this FSP prospectively to all entities (including newly created entities) with which it first becomes involved and to all entities previously required to be analyzed under FIN 46R when a “reconsideration event” has occurred, beginning July 1, 2006. The company will evaluate the impact of this FSP at the time any such “reconsideration event” occurs, and for any new entities with which the company becomes involved in future periods.
     In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.” FIN 48 defines a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position, net earnings or cash flows.
     In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108) Topic 1N, “Financial Statements – Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” This Bulletin provides guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. The guidance in this Bulletin must be applied to financial reports covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of SAB 108 is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position, net earnings or cash flows.
     Please refer to Note 9 for details regarding the implementation of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.”

10


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(2) Real Estate
     Investments in Real Estate
     Investments in real estate, at cost, were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
    Investment     Investment  
     
Operating Trust Apartment Communities:
               
Operating communities
  $ 11,163,224     $ 9,966,915  
 
Communities under construction
    683,330       575,631  
Development communities In Planning(1)
    72,948       24,365  
 
           
Total Operating Trust apartment communities
    11,919,502       10,566,911  
Ameriton(1)
    503,887       692,269  
International and other real estate assets(2)
    818,496       100,084  
         
Total real estate
  $ 13,241,885     $ 11,359,264  
         
 
(1)  In Planning is defined as those parcels of land owned or Under Control, which are in the development planning process, upon which construction is expected subsequent to the completion of the entitlement and building permit processes. Under Control is the term we use to identify land parcels which we do not own, yet have an exclusive right to purchase through contingent contract or letter of intent during a contractually agreed upon time period, subject to approval of contingencies during the due diligence and entitlement processes. Our investment as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 for development communities In Planning – Under Control was $8.2 million and $145,000, respectively, and is reflected in the “Other assets” caption of our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)   Includes land that is not In Planning and other real estate assets.
The change in investments in real estate, at cost, consisted of the following (in thousands):
         
Balance at December 31, 2005
  $ 11,359,264  
Acquisition-related expenditures (including DeWAG)
    2,313,142  
Redevelopment expenditures
    38,937  
Recurring capital expenditures
    32,677  
Development expenditures, including initial acquisition costs
    270,514  
Acquisition of land for development
    193,451  
Dispositions
    (981,345 )
Provision for possible loss on investment
    (4,328 )
Change in estimated hurricane retirements
    4,496  
Other
    6,875  
 
     
Net apartment community activity
    1,874,419  
Change in other real estate assets
    8,202  
 
     
Balance at September 30, 2006
  $ 13,241,885  
 
     
     At September 30, 2006, we had unfunded contractual commitments of $588.0 million related to communities under construction and under redevelopment. The purchase prices of certain recent acquisitions in Northern California, New York, and Germany were allocated to land, buildings and other assets based on preliminary estimates and is subject to change as we obtain more complete information regarding land, building and lease intangibles values.

11


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(3) DeWAG Acquisition
     On July 27, 2006, we acquired 94% of the shares and 94% of an outstanding shareholder loan of DeWAG Deutsche WohnAnlage GmbH (“DeWAG”) for approximately $271 million, based on the exchange rate on the transaction date. We have the option to acquire the remaining 6%, owned by the Managing Directors of DeWAG, under certain circumstances. The results of DeWAG’s operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since July 1, 2006. The purchase was funded by an international term loan, which is expected to be repaid on or before April 27, 2007. In addition, we assumed approximately $509 million in DeWAG liabilities. DeWAG specializes in the acquisition, ownership, operation and re-sale of quality residential properties in the major metropolitan areas of Southern and Western Germany, as well as West Berlin. As of July 1, 2006, the portfolio consisted of approximately 6,400 residential units. We acquired DeWAG because we were interested in expanding our operations into the German markets which we believe have attractive fundamentals for apartment operations.
     The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition. The goodwill associated with the transaction is primarily attributable to the people and processes which comprise the investing and the operating platform. Due to the recent closing of the transaction, we are still in the process of seeking information to finalize the valuations for our real estate, intangible assets, and certain liabilities. Therefore, the purchase price allocation is subject to change (dollar amounts in thousands).
         
Real estate
  $ 646,285  
Other assets
    67,722  
Intangible assets
    30,958  
Goodwill
    34,490  
 
     
Total assets
  $ 779,455  
 
     
 
       
Mortgages payable
  $ 407,933  
Other liabilities
    10,759  
Deferred tax liability
    69,327  
Intangible liabilities
    20,514  
 
     
Total liabilities
    508,533  
 
     
Net assets acquired
  $ 270,922  
 
     
Following are preliminary values as of September 30, 2006 related to the intangible assets and liabilities we identified in connection with the DeWAG transaction and the corresponding amortization we expect to record (dollar amounts in thousands).
                         
                    Weighted  
    Gross             Average  
    Carrying     Accumulated     Useful Life  
    Amount     Amortization     (in years)  
 
Non-compete agreements
  $ 18,776     $ (1,174 )     4  
In-place leases
    12,182       (761 )     4  
             
Total intangible assets
  $ 30,958     $ (1,935 )        
             
 
                       
Below-market leases
  $ 20,514     $ (1,282 )     4  
               
Total intangible liabilities
  $ 20,514     $ (1,282 )        
             

12


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
         
Estimated net amortization for the year ended        
 
2006
  $ 1,305  
2007
  $ 2,611  
2008
  $ 2,611  
2009
  $ 2,611  
2010
  $ 1,306  
Our proforma results, assuming the transaction occurred at the beginning of the year, would not have been materially different from the previously reported results.
(4) Discontinued Operations
     The results of operations for properties sold during the period or designated as held-for-sale at the end of the period are required to be classified as discontinued operations. The property specific components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental revenues, rental expenses, real estate taxes, depreciation expense, minority interest, income taxes and interest expense (actual interest expense for encumbered properties and a pro-rata allocation of interest expense for any unencumbered property up to our weighted average leverage ratio), as well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties.
     Consistent with our capital recycling program, we had 4 operating apartment communities, representing 2,136 units (unaudited), classified as held-for-sale under the provisions of SFAS No. 144, at September 30, 2006. Accordingly, we have classified the operating earnings from these 4 properties within discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, we sold 28 and 16 Archstone-Smith and Ameriton operating communities, respectively. The operating results of these communities and the related gain/loss on sale are also included in discontinued operations for 2006 and 2005.
The following is a summary of net earnings from discontinued operations (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Rental revenues
  $ 7,169     $ 41,766     $ 53,841     $ 133,957  
Rental expenses
    (3,351 )     (14,064 )     (20,618 )     (44,578 )
Real estate taxes
    (436 )     (5,584 )     (6,443 )     (17,216 )
Depreciation on real estate investments
    (951 )     (7,321 )     (9,439 )     (28,137 )
Interest expense(1)
    (1,289 )     (10,143 )     (13,044 )     (34,239 )
Estimated income taxes (Ameriton properties)
    (1,256 )     (9,990 )     (11,855 )     (13,206 )
Provision for possible loss on real estate investment
                (4,328 )      
Debt extinguishment costs related to dispositions
    (825 )     (8 )     (7,589 )     (5,264 )
Gains from the disposition of Ameriton real estate investments, net
    4,631       39,940       55,286       61,597  
Internal Disposition Costs — Ameriton transactions(2)
    (414 )     (93 )     (3,543 )     (1,047 )
Gains from the disposition of Operating Trust real estate investments, net
    79,984       94,755       258,960       134,952  
Internal Disposition Costs — Operating Trust transactions(2)
    (267 )     (212 )     (1,094 )     (850 )
 
                       
Earnings from discontinued apartment communities
  $ 82,995     $ 129,046     $ 290,134     $ 185,969  
 
                       
 
(1)   The portion of interest expense included in discontinued operations that is allocated to properties based on the company’s leverage ratio was $0.3 million and $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $6.7 million and $24.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
(2)   Represents the direct and incremental compensation and related costs associated with the employees dedicated to our significant disposition activity.

13


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
     The disposition proceeds associated with the sales of individual rental units by our foreign subsidiaries are included in continuing operations as such sales do not meet the requirements under SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets to be reflected as discontinued operations.
(5) Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities
     Real Estate Joint Ventures
     We have investments in entities that we account for using the equity method. At September 30, 2006, the investment balance consisted of $179.4 million in twelve Operating Trust joint ventures and $33.5 million in five Ameriton joint ventures. At December 31, 2005, the investment balance consisted of $102.6 million in thirteen Operating Trust joint ventures and $30.1 million in six Ameriton joint ventures. The Operating Trust and Ameriton’s combined weighted average percentage of ownership in joint ventures based on total assets at September 30, 2006 was 38.8%.
     Combined summary balance sheet data for our investments in unconsolidated entities presented on a stand-alone basis follows (in thousands):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Assets:
               
Real estate
  $ 1,372,103     $ 1,142,921  
Other assets
    249,006       244,557  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 1,621,109     $ 1,387,478  
 
           
Liabilities and owners’ equity:
               
Inter-company debt payable to Operating Trust
  $ 273     $ 2,324  
Mortgages payable(1)
    999,438       894,300  
Other liabilities
    202,907       120,898  
 
           
Total liabilities
    1,202,618       1,017,522  
 
           
Owners’ equity
    418,491       369,956  
 
           
Total liabilities and owners’ equity
  $ 1,621,109     $ 1,387,478  
 
           
 
(1)   The Operating Trust guarantees $289.2 million of the outstanding debt balance as of September 30, 2006.
     Selected combined summary results of operations for our unconsolidated investees presented on a stand-alone basis follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Operating Trust Joint Ventures Revenues
  $ 35,662     $ 30,723     $ 99,634     $ 96,875  
Net Earnings(1)
    8,225       9,547       40,261       36,279  
Ameriton Joint Ventures Revenues
  $ 53     $ 793     $ 276     $ 3,056  
Net Earnings(2)
    (136 )     (595 )     18,185       11,339  
Total Revenues
  $ 35,715     $ 31,516     $ 99,910     $ 99,931  
 
                       
Net Earnings
  $ 8,089     $ 8,952     $ 58,446     $ 47,618  
 
                       
 
(1)   Includes gains associated with the disposition of Operating Trust Joint Venture assets of $9.3 million and $9.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $37.1 million and $31.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
(2)   Includes Ameriton’s share of pre-tax gains associated with the disposition of real estate joint venture assets. There were no gains for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and the gains were $0.3

14


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
million during the three months ended September 30, 2005, and $19.7 million and $13.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
In June 2006, we closed a joint venture transaction with the State of Wisconsin Investment Board (“SWIB”). SWIB committed $100 million of capital for 80% of the equity and we committed $25 million of capital for the remaining 20%. We invested $11 million during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 and our remaining commitment as of September 30, 2006 is $14.0 million.
(6) Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
     The change in mortgage and other notes receivable, which are included in other assets, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 consisted of the following (in thousands):
         
Balance at December 31, 2005
  $ 74,396  
Funding of additional notes
    85,077  
Accrued interest
    7,814  
 
     
Balance at September 30, 2006
  $ 167,287  
 
     
     We have a commitment to fund an additional $30.4 million under existing agreements. Our rights to the underlying collateral on these notes in the event of default are generally subordinate to the primary mortgage lender. We recognized interest income associated with notes receivable of $5.5 million and $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $13.4 million and $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on these notes as of September 30, 2006 was approximately 12.4%, including 14.3% relating to mezzanine notes receivable.
(7) Borrowings
     Unsecured Credit Facilities
     Our $600 million unsecured credit facility, which is led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. bears interest at the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or, at our option, LIBOR plus 0.40%. The spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.325% to LIBOR plus 1.00%, based upon the rating of our long-term unsecured senior notes. The facility contains an accordion feature that allows us to increase the size of the commitment to $1.0 billion at any time during the life of the facility, subject to lenders providing additional commitments, and enables us to borrow up to $150 million in foreign currencies. The credit facility is scheduled to mature in June 2010, but may be extended for one year at our option.
     The following table summarizes our revolving credit facility borrowings under our line of credit (in thousands, except for percentages):
                 
    As of and for the    
    Nine Months   As of and for the
    Ended   Year Ended
    September 30,   December 31,
    2006   2005
Total unsecured revolving credit facility
  $ 600,000     $ 600,000  
Borrowings outstanding at end of period
    21,000       360,000  
Outstanding letters of credit under this facility
    44,945       37,813  
Weighted average daily borrowings
    36,541       183,434  
Maximum borrowings outstanding during the period
    360,000       580,000  
Weighted average daily nominal interest rate
    5.47 %     3.95 %
Weighted average daily effective interest rate
    5.68 %     4.25 %
     We also have a short-term unsecured borrowing agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., which provides for maximum borrowings of $100 million. The borrowings under the agreement bear interest at an overnight rate

15


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
agreed to at the time of borrowing and ranged from 4.6% to 5.7% during 2006. There were $4.7 million of borrowings outstanding under the agreement at September 30, 2006, and $34.6 million of borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2005.
     Term Loan – International
     We entered into a $272.8 million secured, short-term borrowing agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association to fund the acquisition of DeWAG. The borrowing under this agreement bears interest at EURIBOR plus 0.40%. The effective interest rate at September 30, 2006 was 3.50%. The loan is scheduled to mature in January 2007 and may be extended for three months, at our option. We expect this loan to be paid off on or before April 27, 2007.
     Long-Term Unsecured Debt
     A summary of our Long-Term Unsecured Debt outstanding at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
                                         
            Effective                     Average  
    Coupon     Interest     Balance at     Balance at     Remaining  
Type of Debt
  Rate (1)     Rate (1) (2)     September 30, 2006     December 31, 2005     Life (Years)  
Long-term unsecured senior notes
    5.44 %     5.60 %   $ 3,311,565     $ 2,468,047       11.46  
Unsecured tax-exempt bonds
    4.01 %     4.25 %     76,591       77,072       16.85  
 
                             
Total/Weighted average
    5.40 %     5.57 %   $ 3,388,156     $ 2,545,119       11.58  
 
                             
 
(1)   Represents a fixed rate for the long-term unsecured notes and a variable rate for the unsecured tax-exempt bonds.
 
(2)   Includes the effect of fair value hedges, loan cost amortization and other ongoing fees and expenses, where applicable.
     On March 16, 2006, the Operating Trust issued $300 million in long-term unsecured ten-year senior notes with a coupon rate of 5.75% and an effective interest rate of 5.89%.
     On July 14, 2006 the Operating Trust issued $575 million of exchangeable senior unsecured notes that are due in 2036 with a coupon rate of 4.0%. The notes are exchangeable into common shares at an initial exchange ratio of 15.7206 per $1,000 principal of notes (or an initial exchange price of $63.6108 per common share). No separate value is ascribed to the conversion feature. The company received approximately $563 million in net proceeds from this offering. The notes are senior unsecured obligations of the Operating Trust. The company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay outstanding balances under its revolving credit facility and certain secured debt, and intends to use the remainder to repay additional secured debt, make incremental investments and for general corporate purposes. Prior to July 18, 2011, the holders, at their option, may exchange the notes for common shares upon the occurrence of specified events. Upon tender of notes for exchange, we may pay cash, Archstone-Smith common shares or a combination of cash and common shares, at our option. The holders may require us to repurchase the notes for cash on July 18, 2011 and on July 15 of 2016, 2021, 2026 and 2031 and at any time prior to maturity upon the occurrence of a fundamental change in Archstone-Smith. On or after July 18, 2011, we may elect to redeem all or part of the notes for cash. We may redeem the notes at any time prior to maturity to the extent necessary to preserve our status as a real estate investment trust. If these notes are dilutive to our earnings per share, we will add the interest to the numerator and include the shares in the denominator of the weighted average shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share.

16


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Mortgages payable
     Our mortgages payable generally feature either monthly interest and principal payments or monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. Early repayment of mortgages is generally subject to prepayment penalties.
     A summary of mortgages payable follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
                         
    Outstanding Balance at (1)        
                    Effective Interest  
    September 30, 2006     December 31, 2005     Rate (2)  
Secured floating rate debt:
                       
Tax-exempt debt
  $ 1,010,466     $ 839,318       4.7 %
Conventional mortgages
    184,703       54,455       5.5 %
 
                 
Total Floating
    1,195,169       893,773       4.8 %
Secured fixed rate debt:
                       
Tax-exempt debt
    3,086             6.3 %
Conventional mortgages
    1,660,350       1,480,170       6.0 %
Other secured debt
    18,974       19,709       4.1 %
 
                 
Total Fixed
    1,682,410       1,499,879       6.0 %
 
                 
Total mortgages payable
  $ 2,877,579     $ 2,393,652       5.52 %
 
                 
 
(1)   Includes the unamortized fair market value adjustment associated with assumption of fixed rate mortgages in connection with real estate acquisitions. The unamortized balance aggregated $47.0 million and $63.5 million at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 respectively, and is being amortized into interest expense over the life of the underlying debt.
 
(2)   Includes the effect of fair value hedges, credit enhancement fees, the amortization of fair market value purchase adjustment, and other related costs, where applicable.
The change in mortgages payable during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 consisted of the following (in thousands):
         
Balance at December 31, 2005
  $ 2,393,652  
Mortgage assumptions related to property acquisitions
    728,484  
Regularly scheduled principal amortization
    (11,723 )
Prepayments, final maturities and other
    (232,834 )
 
     
Balance at September 30, 2006
  $ 2,877,579  
 
     
     Other
     The book value of total assets pledged as collateral for mortgage loans and other obligations at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is $5.6 billion and $4.6 billion, respectively. Our debt instruments generally contain covenants common to the type of facility or borrowing, including financial covenants establishing minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios. We were in compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our debt instruments at September 30, 2006.
     The total interest paid on all outstanding debt was $96.5 million and $83.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively and $244.8 million and $203.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We capitalize interest incurred during the construction period as part of the cost of apartment communities under development. Capitalized interest was $13.3 million and $9.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively and $39.6 million and $27.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

17


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(8) Distributions to Unitholders
     The following table summarizes the quarterly cash distributions paid per unit on Common and Preferred Units during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and the annualized distribution we expect to pay for 2006:
                 
    Quarterly     Annualized  
    Cash     Cash  
    Distribution     Distribution  
    Per Unit     Per Unit  
Common Units and A-1 Units
  $ 0.435     $ 1.74  
Series I Perpetual Preferred Units(1)
    1,915       7,660  
 
(1)   Series I Preferred Units have a par value of $100,000 per unit.
(9) Benefit Plans and Implementation of SFAS 123R
     In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” This Statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and supersedes APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” The Statement requires companies to recognize, in the income statement, the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity based compensation issued to employees. We used the modified prospective method in adopting the Statement, which became effective January 1, 2006.
     Since we early-adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted after January 1, 2003, adoption of SFAS No. 123R did not have a material impact on our financial position, net earnings or cash flows. Upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, we recorded a benefit resulting from application of an anticipated forfeiture rate on existing awards of approximately $100,000 which had no effect on our reported earnings per share. With respect to options granted prior to January 1, 2003, no stock-based employee compensation expense was reflected in the financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Recording this expense would have lowered net earnings by approximately $100,000. We have made an election to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended; therefore, there was no tax impact that was recorded as a result of the adoption of this standard.
     Our long-term incentive plan was approved in 1997 and was modified in connection with the Smith Merger. There have been six types of awards under the plan: (i) options with a DEU feature (only awarded prior to 2000); (ii) options without the DEU feature (generally awarded after 1999); (iii) Restricted Share Unit awards with a DEU feature (awarded prior to 2006); (iv) Restricted Share Unit awards with a cash dividend payment feature (awarded after 2005); (v) employee share purchase program with matching options without the DEU feature, granted only in 1997 and 1998; and (vi) performance units issued to certain named executives under our Special Long-Term Incentive Plan.
     No more than 20.0 million share or option awards in the aggregate may be granted under the plan, and no individual may be awarded more than 1.0 million share or option awards in any one-year period. As of September 30, 2006, Archstone-Smith had approximately 9.8 million shares available for future grants. Non-qualified options constitute an important component of compensation for officers below the level of senior vice president and for selected employees.

18


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
     A summary of share option activity for the options and restricted share units is presented below:
                                 
    Option Awards   RSU Awards
            Weighted           Weighted
            Average           Average Grant
    Options   Exercise Price   Units   Price
Balance, December 31, 2005
    2,702,026     $ 24.94       948,735     $ 27.77  
Granted
    424,523       45.58       226,666       45.58  
Exercised/Settled
    942,485       23.28       35,905       24.56  
Forfeited
    21,895       34.29       4,712       31.84  
Expired
                       
Balance, March 31, 2006
    2,162,169     $ 29.56       1,134,784     $ 31.42  
Granted
    1,048       47.70       18,193       47.70  
Exercised/Settled
    89,307       24.35       23,129       25.16  
Forfeited
    18,633       34.49       12,048       35.00  
Expired
                       
Balance, June 30, 2006
    2,055,277     $ 29.80       1,117,800     $ 31.76  
Granted
    1,406       53.36       1,315       54.52  
Exercised/Settled
    69,231       27.82       10,673       19.16  
Forfeited
    4,598       43.85              
Expired
                       
Balance, September 30, 2006
    1,982,854     $ 29.87       1,108,442     $ 31.80  
     Certain of the options and restricted share units, included in the table above, have a DEU feature. The aggregate number of vested DEUs outstanding as of September 30, 2006 was 323,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recorded $370,000 as a charge to operating expense related to unvested DEUs and $1,210,000 of common share dividends related to vested DEUs.
     Options
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the share options granted to associates had a calculated fair value of $5.52 and $4.19 per option, respectively. The historical exercise patterns of the associate groups receiving option awards are similar, and therefore we used only one set of assumptions in calculating fair value for each period. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the calculated fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, using a weighted average risk-free rate interest rate of 4.66%, a weighted average dividend yield of 4.57%, a volatility factor of 18.3% and a weighted average expected life of four years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the calculated fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, using a weighted average risk-free interest rate of 3.77%, a weighted average dividend yield of 5.63%, a volatility factor of 21.97% and a weighted average expected life of five years. The options vest over a three-year period and have a contractual term of 10 years. We used an estimated forfeiture rate of 30% in recording option compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, based primarily on historical experience. The unamortized compensation cost is $1.4 million, which includes all options previously granted but not yet vested. This amount will be recorded as compensation cost ratably through December 31, 2008.
     The total intrinsic value of the share options exercised during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $26.0 million and $19.7 million, respectively. The intrinsic value is defined as the difference between the realized fair value of the share or the quoted fair value at the end of the period, less the exercise price of the option. We have 1.1 million fully vested options outstanding at September 30, 2006 with a weighted average exercise price of $23.47. The weighted-average contractual life of the fully vested options is 5.3 years, and they have an intrinsic value of $34.9 million. In addition, we have 589,000 options outstanding that we expect

19


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
to vest with a weighted average exercise price of $38.58. The weighted-average contractual life of the unvested options is 9.3 years, and they have an intrinsic value of $9.3 million.
     Restricted Share Units
     Also during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we issued RSUs to senior officers and trustees of the company with an average grant date fair value of $45.77 per share. The units vest over a three-year period and the related unamortized compensation cost is $11.9 million, which includes all units previously granted but not yet vested. This amount will be recorded as compensation cost ratably through December 31, 2008.
     We have 630,000 fully vested RSUs outstanding at September 30, 2006 with a weighted average grant date fair value of $26.65. The weighted-average contractual life for the fully vested shares is 5.6 years and the intrinsic value is $34.4 million. In addition, we have 478,000 RSUs outstanding that we expect to vest with a weighted average grant date fair value of $38.59. The weighted-average contractual life for the unvested shares is 9.2 years and the intrinsic value is $26.0 million. The total intrinsic value of the RSUs settled during the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $3.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
     Special Long Term Incentive Plan
     Effective January 1, 2006, a special long-term incentive program related to the achievement of total shareholder return performance targets was established for certain of our executive officers. We would issue approximately 300,000 performance units if all performance targets are ultimately met as of December 31, 2008. The calculated grant date fair value of approximately $4.8 million is being charged to compensation expense ratably over the three-year term of the plan. The calculated fair value was determined by an independent third party using a Monte Carlo simulation approach which yielded an estimated payout percentage of 41%. The related unamortized compensation cost at September 30, 2006 is $3.6 million.
     Summary
     The compensation cost associated with all awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was approximately $8.9 million, of which approximately $6.7 million was charged to operating expenses, and approximately $2.2 million related to dedicated investment personnel and was capitalized with respect to development and other qualifying investment activities. The compensation cost associated with all awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was approximately $6.5 million, of which approximately $5.0 million was charged to operating expenses, and approximately $1.5 million related to dedicated investment personnel and was capitalized with respect to development and other qualifying investment activities.
(10) Segment Data
     We have determined that each of our garden communities and each of our high-rise properties have similar economic characteristics and also meet the other GAAP criteria, which permit the garden communities and high-rise properties to be aggregated into two reportable segments. Additionally, we have defined the activity from Ameriton as an individual operating segment as its primary focus is the opportunistic acquisition, development and eventual disposition of real estate with a short-term investment horizon. NOI is defined as rental revenues less rental expenses and real estate taxes. We rely on NOI for purposes of making decisions about resource allocations and assessing segment performance. We also believe Same-Store NOI is a valuable means of comparing year-to-year property performance.
     Following are reconciliations, which exclude the amounts classified as discontinued operations, of each reportable segment’s (i) revenues to consolidated revenues; (ii) NOI to consolidated earnings from operations; and (iii) assets to consolidated assets, for the periods indicated (in thousands):

20


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Reportable apartment communities segment revenues:
                               
Same-Store:
                               
Garden communities
  $ 119,798     $ 111,457     $ 338,297     $ 317,532  
High-rise properties
    76,863       71,729       220,857       207,707  
Non Same-Store and other:
                               
Garden communities
    45,810       19,599       137,067       36,718  
High-rise communities
    36,398       15,527       96,594       33,418  
Ameriton communities(1)
    2,958       1,564       7,199       4,435  
International and other non-reportable operating segment revenues
    17,539       2,868       28,051       4,295  
 
                       
Total segment and consolidated rental revenues
  $ 299,366     $ 222,744     $ 828,065     $ 604,105  
 
                       
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Reportable apartment communities segment NOI:
                               
Same-Store:
                               
Garden communities
  $ 80,814     $ 76,826     $ 232,862     $ 216,317  
High-rise communities
    51,675       48,260       150,524       137,102  
Non Same-Store and other:
                               
Garden communities
    29,622       13,468       91,073       23,583  
High-rise communities
    22,913       9,788       63,672       19,993  
Ameriton communities(1)
    1,487       546       3,446       1,742  
International and other non-reportable operating segment NOI
    11,442       2,112       18,071       3,355  
 
                       
Total segment NOI
    197,953       151,000       559,648       402,092  
 
                       
Reconciling items:
                               
Other income
    27,299       25,840       57,100       37,815  
Depreciation on real estate investments
    (68,708 )     (53,916 )     (203,073 )     (146,605 )
Interest expense
    (72,751 )     (46,680 )     (186,833 )     (123,946 )
General and administrative expenses
    (18,497 )     (13,600 )     (49,794 )     (41,644 )
Other expenses
    (1,986 )     (5,538 )     (14,046 )     (37,047 )
 
                       
Consolidated earnings from operations
  $ 63,310     $ 57,106     $ 163,002     $ 90,665  
 
                       
 
(1)   While rental revenue and NOI are the primary measures we use to evaluate the performance of our assets, management also utilizes gains from the disposition of real estate when evaluating the performance of Ameriton as its primary focus is the opportunistic acquisition, development and eventual disposition of real estate with a short term investment horizon. Pre-tax gains from the disposition of Ameriton operating assets were $4.2 million and $39.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $51.7 million and $60.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These gains are classified within discontinued operations. Additionally, Ameriton had gains from the sale of unconsolidated joint venture assets that are classified within income from unconsolidated entities and gains from land sales that are classified within other income. Ameriton assets are excluded from our Same-Store population as they are acquired or developed to achieve short-term opportunistic gains, and therefore, the average holding period is typically much shorter than the holding period of assets operated by the Operating Trust.

21


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Reportable operating communities segment assets, net:
               
Same-Store:
               
Garden communities
  $ 3,034,848     $ 3,067,033  
High-rise communities
    2,542,689       2,572,512  
Non Same-Store, Under Development and other:
               
Garden communities
    2,866,398       2,570,585  
High-rise communities
    2,408,715       1,419,177  
Ameriton communities
    407,967       599,404  
ADA settlement accrual
    35,439       47,198  
International and other non-reportable operating segment assets
    883,784       121,812  
 
           
Total segment assets
    12,179,840       10,397,721  
Real estate held-for-sale
    127,387       124,850  
 
           
Total segment assets
    12,307,227       10,522,571  
 
           
Reconciling items:
               
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities
    212,884       132,728  
Cash and cash equivalents
    52,080       13,638  
Restricted cash in tax-deferred exchange escrow
    54,579       495,274  
Other assets
    480,561       302,967  
 
           
Consolidated total assets
  $ 13,107,331     $ 11,467,178  
 
           
     Total capital expenditures for garden communities included in continuing operations were $17.9 million and $9.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $43.8 million and $23.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total capital expenditures for high-rise properties included in continuing operations were $15.9 million and $18.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $44.2 million and $42.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total capital expenditures for Ameriton properties included in continuing operations were $0.7 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $2.3 million and $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(11) Litigation and Contingencies
     During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland with three national disability organizations and agreed to make capital improvements in a number of our communities in order to make them fully compliant with the Fair Housing Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. The litigation, settled by this agreement, alleged lack of full compliance with certain design and construction requirements under the two federal statutes at 71 communities. As part of the settlement, the three disability organizations all recognized that Archstone-Smith had no intention to build any of its communities in a manner inconsistent with the FHA or ADA.
     The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the remaining communities named in the settlement is estimated at $47.2 million and was accrued as an addition to real estate, of which $35.4 remains accrued at September 30, 2006. The settlement agreement approved by the court allows us to remediate each of the designated communities over a three year period, and also provides that we are not restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation period. We paid a settlement totaling $1.4 million, which included legal fees and costs incurred by the plaintiffs.

22


Table of Contents

Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
     During 2004 and 2005, we incurred losses associated with multiple hurricanes in Florida. As a result of this damage, we recorded charges for actual or estimated losses associated with both wholly owned and unconsolidated apartment communities and benefits for collected or estimated insurance recoveries. These estimates represent management’s best estimate of the probable and reasonably estimable costs and related recoveries and are based on the most current information available from our insurance adjustors.
     We are subject to various claims filed in 2002 and 2003 in connection with moisture infiltration and resulting mold issues at certain high-rise properties we once owned in Southeast Florida. These claims generally allege that water infiltration and resulting mold contamination resulted in the claimants having personal injuries and/or property damage. Although certain of these claims continue to be in various stages of litigation, with respect to the majority of these claims, we have either settled the claims and/or we have been dismissed from the lawsuits that had been filed. With respect to the lawsuits that have not been resolved, we continue to defend these claims in the normal course of litigation.
     We are a party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.

23


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Trustee and Unitholders
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust:
     We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006, and the related condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the condensed consolidated statement of unitholders’ equity, other common unitholders’ interest and comprehensive income (loss) for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. These condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust’s management.
     We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
     Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
     We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, unitholders’ equity, other common unitholders’ interest and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 9, 2006, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
November 9, 2006

24


Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
     The following information should be read in conjunction with Archstone-Smith Operating Trust’s 2005 Form 10-K as well as the financial statements and notes included in Item 1 of this report.
     Forward-Looking Statements
     Certain statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Information concerning expected investment balances, expected funding sources, planned investments, forecasted dates and revenue and expense growth assumptions are examples of forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed, forecasted or implied in such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
     Our operating results depend primarily on income from apartment communities, which is substantially influenced by supply and demand for apartment units, operating expense levels, property level operations and the pace and price at which we can develop, acquire or dispose of apartment communities. Capital and credit market conditions, which affect our cost of capital, also influence operating results. See Archstone-Smith Operating Trust’s 2005 Form 10-K, “Item 1. Business,” for a more complete discussion of risk factors that could impact our future financial performance.
     The Company
     We are engaged primarily in the operation, development, redevelopment, acquisition, management and long-term ownership of apartment communities throughout the United States. Archstone-Smith is structured as an UPREIT, with all property ownership and business operations conducted through the Operating Trust and our subsidiaries and affiliates. Archstone-Smith is the sole trustee and owns approximately 87.7% of our Common Units as of September 30, 2006.
     Results of Operations
Executive Summary
     The major factors that influenced our operating results for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005 were as follows:
    NOI increased significantly due primarily to net acquisition activity, including the Oakwood and DeWAG transactions and an increase of 5.9% in NOI for our Same-Store communities.
 
    Other income was higher due primarily to higher interest income attributable to our mezzanine loan financing activities and increased cash balances that resulted primarily from our convertible debt issuance and 1031 exchange disposition transactions, as well as an $11.0 million gain on the sale of Ameriton land, which were partially offset by $21.3 million in insurance recoveries in 2005.
 
    The higher depreciation and interest expense was due to the increase in the size of the real estate portfolio and the related financing activities, respectively. Rising interest rates also influenced the increase in interest expense.
 
    General and administrative expenses increased principally as a result of our international expansion.
 
    Other expenses were lower in 2006 due principally to a $4.6 million litigation charge recorded in 2005.
 
    Non-operating income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was higher due to the receipt of contingent proceeds related to the prior sale of our Rent.com investment in 2005.
 
    The decrease in net earnings from discontinued operations was driven principally by lower gains as a result of fewer asset sales from the disposition of real estate in 2006.

25


Table of Contents

     The major factors that influenced our operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were as follows:
    NOI increased significantly due primarily to net acquisition activity, including the Oakwood and DeWAG transactions, and an increase of 8.5% in NOI for our Same-Store communities.
 
    Other income was higher in 2006 due primarily to (i) higher gains on the sale of land (ii) higher interest income attributable to our mezzanine loan financing activities as well as higher cash balances resulting primarily from our convertible debt offering in July and 1031 exchange disposition transactions, partially offset by (iii) higher moisture infiltration-related insurance recoveries in 2005.
 
    The higher depreciation and interest expense was due to the increase in size of the real estate portfolio and the related financing activities, respectively. Rising interest rates also influenced the increase in interest expense.
 
    General and administrative expenses increased principally as a result of our international expansion.
 
    Other expenses were lower due primarily to higher debt extinguishment costs and the settlement of the FHA/ADA lawsuit in 2005, partially offset by aggregate impairments of $4.3 million on a non-core asset in 2006.
 
    Income from unconsolidated entities was higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 due to more income from community dispositions and related venture liquidations.
 
    Non-operating income was lower in 2006 due to higher gains on the sale of our Rent.com investment and marketable securities in 2005.
 
    The increase in net earnings from discontinued operations was driven principally by greater gains as a result of more asset sales from the disposition of real estate partially offset by reduced net operating income in 2006 as a result of dispositions.
Reconciliation of Quantitative Summary to Consolidated Statements of Earnings
     The following schedules are provided to reconcile our consolidated statements of earnings to the information presented in the “Quantitative Summary” provided in the next section (dollar amounts in thousands).
                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30, 2006     Three Months Ended September 30, 2005  
    Continuing     Discontinued             Continuing     Discontinued        
    Operations     Operations     Total     Operations     Operations     Total  
Rental revenue
  $ 299,366     $ 7,169     $ 306,535     $ 222,744     $ 41,766     $ 264,510  
Other income
    27,299             27,299       25,840             25,840  
Property operating expenses (rental expenses and real estate taxes)
    (101,413 )     (3,787 )     (105,200 )     (71,744 )     (19,648 )     (91,392 )
Depreciation on real estate investments
    (68,708 )     (951 )     (69,659 )     (53,916 )     (7,321 )     (61,237 )
Interest expense
    (72,751 )     (1,289 )     (74,040 )     (46,680 )     (10,143 )     (56,823 )
General and administrative expenses
    (18,497 )           (18,497 )     (13,600 )           (13,600 )
Other expense
    (1,986 )     (2,081 )     (4,067 )     (5,538 )     (9,998 )     (15,536 )
Income from unconsolidated entities
    2,088             2,088       1,839             1,839  
Other non-operating income
    1,718             1,718       72             72  
Gains, net of disposition costs
          83,934       83,934             134,390       134,390  
 
                                   
Net earnings
  $ 67,116     $ 82,995     $ 150,111     $ 59,017     $ 129,046     $ 188,063  
 
                                   

26


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006     Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005  
    Continuing     Discontinued             Continuing     Discontinued        
    Operations     Operations     Total     Operations     Operations     Total  
Rental revenue
  $ 828,065     $ 53,841     $ 881,906     $ 604,105     $ 133,957     $ 738,062  
Other income
    57,100             57,100       37,815             37,815  
Property operating expenses (rental expenses and real estate taxes)
    (268,417 )     (27,061 )     (295,478 )     (202,013 )     (61,794 )     (263,807 )
Depreciation on real estate investments
    (203,073 )     (9,439 )     (212,512 )     (146,605 )     (28,137 )     (174,742 )
Interest expense
    (186,833 )     (13,044 )     (199,877 )     (123,946 )     (34,239 )     (158,185 )
General and administrative expenses
    (49,794 )           (49,794 )     (41,644 )           (41,644 )
Other expense
    (14,046 )     (23,772 )     (37,818 )     (37,047 )     (18,470 )     (55,517 )
Income from unconsolidated entities
    31,484             31,484       18,750             18,750  
Other non-operating income
    2,137             2,137       28,855             28,855  
Gains, net of disposition costs
          309,609       309,609             194,652       194,652  
 
                                   
Net earnings
  $ 196,623     $ 290,134     $ 486,757     $ 138,270     $ 185,969     $ 324,239  
 
                                   
Quantitative Summary
     This summary is provided for reference purposes and is intended to support and be read in conjunction with the narrative discussion of our results of operations. This quantitative summary includes all operating activities, including those classified as discontinued operations for GAAP reporting purposes. This information is presented to correspond with the manner in which we analyze the business. We generally reinvest disposition proceeds into new operating communities and developments and therefore believe it is most useful to analyze continuing and discontinued operations on a combined basis. The impact of communities classified as “discontinued operations” for GAAP reporting purposes is discussed separately in a later section under the caption “Discontinued Operations Analysis” (dollar amounts in thousands).
                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2006     2005     Variance     2006     2005     Variance  
Rental revenues:
                                               
Same-Store(1)
  $ 198,609     $ 185,017     $ 13,592     $ 564,825     $ 530,612     $ 34,213  
Non Same-Store and other
    87,094       69,572       17,522       272,071       177,808       94,263  
Ameriton
    3,293       7,053       (3,760 )     16,959       25,346       (8,387 )
Non-multifamily
    2,848       2,868       (20 )     9,378       4,296       5,082  
International
    14,691             14,691       18,673             18,673  
 
                                   
Total rental revenues
    306,535       264,510       42,025       881,906       738,062       143,844  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Property operating expenses (rental expenses and real estate taxes):
                                               
Same-Store(1)
    65,047       58,907       (6,140 )     178,323       174,242       (4,081 )
Non Same-Store and other
    32,415       27,762       (4,653 )     98,503       75,771       (22,732 )
Ameriton
    1,641       3,966       2,325       8,672       12,853       4,181  
Non-multifamily
    1,243       757       (486 )     2,845       941       (1,904 )
International
    4,854             (4,854 )     7,135             (7,135 )
 
                                   
Total property operating expenses
    105,200       91,392       (13,808 )     295,478       263,807       (31,671 )
 
                                   
Net operating income (rental revenues less property operating expenses)
    201,335       173,118       28,217       586,428       474,255       112,173  

27


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Three Months Ended September 30,     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
    2006     2005     Variance     2006     2005     Variance  
Margin(NOI/rental revenues):
    65.7 %     65.4 %     .3 %     66.5 %     64.3 %     2.2 %
Average occupancy during period:(2)
    95.0 %     95.2 %     (0.2 %)     94.9 %     94.6 %     0.3 %
 
                                               
Other income
    27,299       25,840       1,459       57,100       37,815       19,285  
Depreciation of real estate investments
    69,659       61,237       (8,422 )     212,512       174,742       (37,770 )
Interest expense
    87,370       66,685       (20,685 )     239,515       185,529       (53,986 )
Capitalized interest
    13,330       9,862       3,468       39,638       27,344       12,294  
 
                                   
Net interest expense
    74,040       56,823       (17,217 )     199,877       158,185       (41,692 )
General and administrative expenses
    18,497       13,600       (4,897 )     49,794       41,644       (8,150 )
Other expense
    4,067       15,536       11,469       37,818       55,517       17,699  
 
                                   
Earnings from continuing and discontinued operations
    62,371       51,762       10,609       143,527       81,982       61,545  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities
    2,088       1,839       249       31,484       18,750       12,734  
Other non-operating income
    1,718       72       1,646       2,137       28,855       (26,718 )
Gains on disposition of real estate investments, net of disposition costs
                                               
Taxable subsidiaries
    4,217       39,847       (35,630 )     51,743       60,550       (8,807 )
REIT
    79,717       94,543       (14,826 )     257,866       134,102       123,764  
 
                                   
 
                                               
Net earnings
  $ 150,111     $ 188,063     $ (37,952 )   $ 486,757     $ 324,239     $ 162,518  
 
                                   
 
(1)   Reflects revenues and operating expenses for Same-Store communities that were owned on September 30, 2006 and fully operating during both of the comparison periods.
 
(2)   Does not include occupancy associated with properties owned by Ameriton, located in Germany or operated under the Oakwood Master Leases.
Property-level operating results
     We utilize NOI as the primary measure to evaluate the performance of our operating communities and for purposes of making decisions about resource allocations and assessing segment performance. We also believe NOI is a valuable means of comparing period-to-period property performance. In analyzing the performance of our operating portfolio, we evaluate Same-Store communities separately from Non Same-Store communities and other properties.
     Same-Store Analysis
     The following table reflects revenue, expense and NOI growth for Same-Store communities that were owned on September 30, 2006 and fully operating during each of the respective comparison periods.
                                                 
                    Same-Store Expense    
    Same-Store Revenue Growth   Growth/(Decline)   Same-Store NOI Growth
    Q3 2006 vs.   YTD 2006 vs.   Q3 2006 vs.   YTD 2006 vs.   Q3 2006 vs.   YTD 2006 vs.
    Q3 2005   YTD 2005   Q3 2005   YTD 2005   Q3 2005   YTD 2005
Garden
    7.5 %     6.5 %     12.6 %     4.1 %     5.2 %     7.7 %
High-Rise
    7.2 %     6.3 %     7.3 %     (.2 )%     7.1 %     9.7 %
Total
    7.3 %     6.4 %     10.4 %     2.3 %     5.9 %     8.5 %
     Both quarter to date and year to date Same-Store revenues increased in each of our core markets for both the garden and the high-rise portfolios, resulting primarily from higher rental income per unit. In addition to strong rent increases, third quarter revenue growth was partially the result of efforts to better manage lease expirations in markets that have very seasonal leasing trends such as Washington, D.C., Northern California and Boston. We are

28


Table of Contents

seeing significant upward pressure on new move-in rental rates as a result of a number of factors, including: (i) steady employment growth; (ii) lack of new apartment supply due to limited land to build competing assets; (iii) less confidence in the prospect of value increases of single-family homes and condominiums; and (iv) rising interest rates, all of which have translated into significant increases in our revenue growth. In addition, we continue to believe that our strong operating performance is not only the result of improving operating fundamentals, but also the continued enhancements we are making to many components of our operating platform, such as LRO, MRI, online lease, resident portal and internet marketing. We believe that all of these improvements have resulted in meaningful efficiencies for us. The 10.4% increase in third quarter Same-Store expenses was driven by higher make-ready and personnel costs as well as higher insurance and ground lease expenses. The increase in make-ready costs, including repair and maintenance, relates directly to the planned increase in turnover during the third quarter when customer demand is higher and our pricing power is stronger in connection with a lease expiration program implemented in 2006. A ground lease we have in the City of Arlington reflected a one-time favorable adjustment of $793,000 in the third quarter of 2005, which had the effect of increasing our Same-Store expense growth in this quarter by 150 basis points. Our year to date Same-Store expense increase was only 2.3% due principally to lower utility expense as a result of higher resident reimbursements, primarily in Washington, D.C. where we recently completed the rollout of our utility reimbursement program, and experienced a milder winter compared to 2005. These revenue and expense fluctuations resulted in overall NOI growth in our Same-Store portfolio of 5.9% and 8.5% for the quarter and year to date period ended September 30, 2006, respectively. This growth was driven principally by strong NOI growth in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, Southern California and the New York City metropolitan area – which represent more than 72% of the Operating Trust’s portfolio – with quarter to date Same-Store NOI increases of 4.6%, 7.7% and 11.1% and year to date Same-Store NOI increases of 7.7%, 10.2% and 13.3%, respectively.
     Non Same-Store and Other Analysis
     The $12.9 million increase in NOI in the Non Same-Store portfolio for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 is primarily attributable to: (i) $22.0 million related to acquisitions; (ii) $3.3 million related to recently stabilized development communities and communities in lease-up; (iii) $5.1 million related to the Oakwood Master Leases; offset by (iv) $17.8 million related to community dispositions.
     The $71.5 million increase in NOI in the Non Same-Store portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 is primarily attributable to: (i) $71.8 million related to acquisitions; (ii) $10.4 million related to recently stabilized development communities and communities in lease-up; (iii) $31.8 million related to the Oakwood Master Leases; offset by (iv) $44.3 million related to community dispositions.
     The Oakwood Master Leases also contributed to our overall margin improvement in the year to date comparison, since the only operating expenses we incur relate to property taxes and insurance.
     Ameriton
     The decrease in NOI from Ameriton apartment communities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the comparable period in the prior year is primarily attributable to dispositions.
     International
     The increase in NOI of $9.8 million and $11.5 million for the three and nine months period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same periods in the prior year is primarily attributable to the DeWAG acquisition that occurred in July 2006. DeWAG specializes in the acquisition, ownership, operation and re-sale of quality residential properties in the major metropolitan areas of Southern and Western Germany as well as West Berlin. As of July 1, 2006, the portfolio consisted of approximately 6,400 residential units.
Other Income
     Other income was higher for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 due primarily to: (i) higher interest income attributable to our mezzanine loan financing activities (ii) higher interest due to interest earned on our higher cash balances that resulted primarily from our convertible debt offering and 1031 exchange disposition transactions and (iii) an $11.0 million gain on the sale of Ameriton land which is offset by $21.3 million in insurance recoveries in 2005.

29


Table of Contents

     Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was higher due to (i) higher gains on sale of Ameriton land (ii) higher interest income attributable to our mezzanine loan financing activities as well as higher cash balances resulting primarily from our convertible debt offering in July and 1031 exchange disposition transactions, partially offset by (iii) higher moisture infiltration-related recoveries in 2005.
Depreciation Expense
     The depreciation increase for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 is primarily related to the increase in the size of the real estate portfolio.
Interest Expense
     The increase in gross interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 is due to higher average debt levels associated with the increased size of the real estate portfolio combined with higher average interest rates on our debt. The Oakwood and international transactions were the most significant drivers of the portfolio increase. Capitalized interest also increased significantly as a result of the increase in the size and number of communities under construction and, to a lesser extent, higher average interest rates.
Other Expenses
     Other expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was lower due principally to a $4.6 million charge in 2005 related to the settlement of the FHA/ADA lawsuit.
     For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the settlement noted above and significant debt extinguishment costs in 2005 more than offset aggregate impairments of $4.3 million on a non-core asset in 2006, resulting in an overall decrease in other expense.
General and Administrative Expenses
     General and administrative expenses were higher for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 due primarily to higher personnel-related costs driven principally by our recent international expansion.
Equity in Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities
     Earnings from unconsolidated entities was higher in 2006 primarily due to more income from community dispositions and related venture liquidations.
Other Non-Operating Income
     Non-operating income was lower for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 due to higher gains on the sale of our Rent.com investment and marketable securities in 2005.
Gains on Real Estate Dispositions
     See “Discontinued Operations Analysis” below for discussion of gains.
Discontinued Operations Analysis
     Included in the overall results discussed above are the following amounts associated with properties which have been sold or were classified as held-for-sale as of September 30, 2006 (dollars in thousands).
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Rental revenues
  $ 7,169     $ 41,766     $ 53,841     $ 133,957  
Rental expenses
    (3,351 )     (14,064 )     (20,618 )     (44,578 )
Real estate taxes
    (436 )     (5,584 )     (6,443 )     (17,216 )
Depreciation on real estate investments
    (951 )     (7,321 )     (9,439 )     (28,137 )
Interest expense(1)
    (1,289 )     (10,143 )     (13,044 )     (34,239 )
Income taxes from taxable REIT subsidiaries
    (1,256 )     (9,990 )     (11,855 )     (13,206 )

30


Table of Contents

                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2006     2005     2006     2005  
Provision for possible loss on real estate investment
                (4,328 )      
Debt extinguishment costs related to dispositions
    (825 )     (8 )     (7,589 )     (5,264 )
Gains on disposition of real estate investments, net of disposition costs:
                               
Taxable subsidiaries
    4,217       39,847       51,743       60,550  
REIT
    79,717       94,543       257,866       134,102  
 
                       
Total discontinued operations
  $ 82,995     $ 129,046     $ 290,134     $ 185,969  
 
                       
 
                               
Number of communities sold during the period
    5       7       28       16  
Number of sold communities included in discontinued operations NOI
    5       50       27       56  
Number of communities classified as held-for-sale and included in discontinued operations NOI as of September 30, 2006
    4       2       4       2  
 
(1)   The portion of interest expense included in discontinued operations that is allocated to properties based on the company’s leverage ratio was $0.3 million and $7.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $6.7 million and $24.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
     As a result of the execution of our strategy of managing our invested capital through the selective sale of apartment communities in non-core locations and redeploying the proceeds to fund investments with higher anticipated growth prospects in our core markets, we had significant disposition activity in both 2006 and 2005, although there was higher transaction volume year to date in 2006. The resulting gains, net of disposition costs, including those from Ameriton, were the biggest drivers of overall earnings from discontinued operations. NOI related to communities sold or classified as held-for-sale was higher in 2005 as compared to 2006 due primarily to the sold communities that produced more NOI in 2005 than 2006. Changes in direct operating expenses and allocated interest expense are generally proportional to the communities included in discontinued operations for each period. Depreciation is proportionately higher in 2005 as a result of communities that have been added to discontinued operations. We cease depreciating an asset prospectively from the period it is added to discontinued operations. Gains and debt extinguishment costs are deal-specific and therefore will not necessarily correlate with the volume of activity in discontinued operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     We are committed to maintaining a strong balance sheet and preserving our financial flexibility, which we believe enhances our ability to capitalize on attractive investment opportunities as they become available. As a result of the significant cash flow generated by our operations, current cash positions, the available capacity under our unsecured credit facilities, gains from the disposition of real estate and our demonstrated ability to access the capital markets, we believe our liquidity and financial condition are sufficient to meet all of our reasonably anticipated cash flow needs during 2006. Please refer to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for detailed information of our sources and uses of cash for the periods ending September 30, 2006 and 2005.
     Scheduled Debt Maturities and Interest Payment Requirements
     We have structured our long-term debt maturities in a manner designed to avoid unmanageable repayment obligations in any year, which would negatively impact our financial flexibility. As of September 30, 2006, we had scheduled long term debt maturities of $40.8 million, $498.0 million and $545.2 million during 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively and a $272.8 million international term loan that we expect to pay off on or before April 27, 2007. On October 30, 2006, we had $78.1 million borrowed on our unsecured credit facilities, $10.3 million outstanding under letters of credit and available borrowing capacity on our unsecured credit facilities of $611.6 million.
     Our unsecured credit facilities, long-term unsecured debt, mortgages payable and international term loan had effective weighted average interest rates of 5.6%, 5.6%, 5.5% and 3.5%, respectively, as of September 30, 2006. All of these rates give effect to debt issuance costs, fair value hedges, the amortization of fair market value purchase adjustments and other fees and expenses, as applicable.
     Our debt instruments generally contain covenants common to the type of facility or borrowing, including financial covenants establishing minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios. We were in

31


Table of Contents

compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our debt instruments as of and for the period ended September 30, 2006.
     Unitholder Distribution Requirements
     Based on anticipated distribution levels for 2006 and the number of Common Units outstanding as of September 30, 2006, we anticipate that we will pay distributions of $436.6 million in the aggregate during the year ended December 31, 2006. This amount represents distributions on our Common and Preferred Units.
     Planned Investments
     Following is a summary of planned investments as of September 30, 2006, including amounts for the Operating Trust and Ameriton, but excluding unconsolidated joint ventures (dollar amounts in thousands). The amounts labeled “Discretionary” represent future investments that we plan to make, although there is not a contractual commitment to do so. The amounts labeled “Committed” represent the approximate amount that we are contractually committed to fund for communities under construction in accordance with construction contracts with general contractors. In Planning is defined as those parcels of land owned or Under Control, which are in the development planning process, upon which construction is expected subsequent to the completion of the entitlement and building permit processes. Under Control is the term we use to identify land parcels which we do not own, yet have an exclusive right to purchase through contingent contract or letter of intent during a contractually agreed upon time period, subject to approval of contingencies during the due diligence and entitlement processes.
                 
    Planned Investments  
    Discretionary     Committed  
Communities under redevelopment
  $ 2,698     $ 3,476  
Communities under construction
          549,130  
Communities In Planning and owned
    1,226,448        
Communities In Planning and Under Control
    332,289        
Community acquisitions under contract
    285,900        
FHA/ADA settlement capital accrual
          35,439  
 
           
Total
  $ 1,847,335     $ 588,045  
 
           
     In addition to the planned investments noted above, we expect to make additional investments in (i) unconsolidated joint ventures; (ii) recently acquired communities; and (iii) capital expenditures to improve and maintain our established operating communities.
     We anticipate completion of most of the communities that are currently under construction and the planned operating community improvements by the end of 2008. No assurances can be given that communities we do not currently own will be acquired or that planned developments will actually occur. In addition, actual costs incurred could be greater or less than our current estimates.
     Funding Sources
     We anticipate financing our planned investment and operating needs primarily with cash flow from operating activities, disposition proceeds from our capital recycling program, existing cash balances, borrowings under our unsecured credit facilities and proceeds from long-term financing. We have filed registration statements to facilitate issuance of debt and equity securities on an as-needed basis subject to our ability to effect offerings on satisfactory terms based on prevailing conditions. We had $611.6 million in available capacity on our unsecured credit facilities at October 30, 2006. In addition, we expect to complete the disposition of $0.8 to $1.0 billion of Operating Trust operating communities during the remainder of 2006.
     Other Contingencies
     During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland with three national disability organizations and agreed to make capital improvements in a number of our communities in order to make them fully compliant with the Fair Housing Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. The litigation, settled by this agreement, alleged lack of full compliance with certain design and construction requirements under the two federal statutes at 71 communities. As part of the settlement, the three disability organizations all recognized that the Operating Trust had no intention to build any of its communities in a manner inconsistent with the FHA or ADA.

32


Table of Contents

     The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the remaining communities named in the settlement is estimated at $47.2 million and was accrued as an addition to real estate, of which $35.4 remains accrued at September 30, 2006. The settlement agreement approved by the court allows us to remediate each of the designated communities over a three year period, and also provides that we are not restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation period. We paid a settlement totaling $1.4 million, which included legal fees and costs incurred by the plaintiffs.
     During 2004 and 2005, we incurred losses associated with multiple hurricanes in Florida. As a result of this damage, we recorded charges for actual or estimated losses associated with both wholly owned and unconsolidated apartment communities and benefits for collected or estimated insurance recoveries. These estimates represent management’s best estimate of the probable and reasonably estimable costs and related recoveries and are based on the most current information available from our insurance adjustors.
     We are subject to various claims filed in 2002 and 2003 in connection with moisture infiltration and resulting mold issues at certain high-rise properties we once owned in Southeast Florida. These claims generally allege that water infiltration and resulting mold contamination resulted in the claimants having personal injuries and/or property damage. Although certain of these claims continue to be in various stages of litigation, with respect to the majority of these claims, we have either settled the claims and/or we have been dismissed from the lawsuits that had been filed. With respect to the lawsuits that have not been resolved, we continue to defend these claims in the normal course of litigation.
     We are a party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
     We define critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that require our management to exercise their most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. Our management has discussed the development and selection of all of these critical accounting policies with our audit committee, and the audit committee has reviewed the disclosure relating to these policies. Our critical accounting policies relate principally to the following key areas:
     Internal Cost Capitalization
     We have an investment organization that is responsible for development and redevelopment of apartment communities. Consistent with GAAP, all direct and certain indirect costs, including interest and real estate taxes, incurred during development and redevelopment activities are capitalized. Interest is capitalized on real estate assets that require a period of time to get them ready for their intended use. The amount of interest capitalized is based upon the average amount of accumulated development expenditures during the reporting period. Included in capitalized costs are management’s estimates of the direct and incremental personnel costs and indirect project costs associated with our development and redevelopment activities. Indirect project costs consist primarily of personnel costs associated with construction administration and development accounting, legal fees, and various office costs that clearly relate to projects under development. Because the estimation of capitalizable internal costs requires management’s judgment, we believe internal cost capitalization is a “critical accounting estimate.”
Valuation of Real Estate
     Long-lived assets to be held and used are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted. We also evaluate assets for potential impairment when we deem them to be held-for-sale. Valuation of real estate is considered a “critical accounting estimate” because the evaluation of impairment and the determination of fair values involve a number of management assumptions relating to future economic events that could materially affect the determination of the ultimate value, and therefore, the carrying amounts of our real estate. Furthermore, decisions regarding when a property should be classified as held-for-sale under SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” requires significant management judgment. There are many phases to the disposition process ranging from the

33


Table of Contents

initial market research to being under contract with non-refundable earnest money. Deciding when management is committed to selling an asset is therefore highly subjective.
     When determining if there is an indication of impairment, we estimate the asset’s NOI over the anticipated holding period on an undiscounted cash flow basis and compare this amount to its carrying value. Estimating the expected NOI and holding period requires significant management judgment. If it is determined that there is an indication of impairment for assets to be held and used, or if an asset is deemed to be held-for-sale, we then determine the fair value of the asset.
     The apartment industry uses capitalization rates as the primary measure of fair value. Specifically, annual NOI for a community is divided by an estimated capitalization rate to determine the fair value of the community. Determining the appropriate capitalization rate requires significant judgment and is typically based on many factors including the prevailing rate for the market or submarket, as well as the quality and location of the properties. Further, capitalization rates can fluctuate up or down due to a variety of factors in the overall economy or within local markets. If the actual capitalization rate for a community is significantly different from our estimated rate, the impairment evaluation for an individual asset could be materially affected.
     Capital Expenditures and Depreciable Lives
     We incur costs relating to redevelopment initiatives, revenue enhancing and expense reducing capital expenditures, and recurring capital expenditures that are capitalized as part of our real estate. These amounts are capitalized and depreciated over estimated useful lives determined by management. We allocate the cost of newly acquired properties between net tangible and identifiable intangible assets. The primary intangible asset associated with an apartment community acquisition is the value of the existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired property, we first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the property is vacant. We estimate the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a hypothetical lease-up. We depreciate the building and fixtures based on the expected useful life of the asset and amortize the intangible value of the lease agreements over the average remaining life of the existing leases.
     Determining whether expenditures meet the criteria for capitalization, the assignment of depreciable lives and determining the appropriate amounts to allocate between tangible and intangible assets for property acquisitions requires our management to exercise significant judgment and is therefore considered a “critical accounting estimate.”
     Pursuit Costs
     We incur costs relating to the potential acquisition of real estate which we refer to as pursuit costs. To the extent that these costs are identifiable with a specific property and would be capitalized if the property were already acquired, the costs are accumulated by project and capitalized in the Other Assets section of the balance sheet. If these conditions are not met, the costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized costs include but are not limited to earnest money, option fees, environmental reports, traffic reports, surveys, photos, blueprints, direct and incremental personnel costs (for development-related acquisitions) and legal costs. Upon acquisition, the costs are included in the basis of the acquired property. When it becomes probable that a prospective acquisition will not be acquired, which is a highly subjective judgment, the accumulated costs for the property are charged to other expense on the statement of earnings in the period such a determination is made.
     Consolidation vs. Equity Method of Accounting for Ventures
     From time to time, we make co-investments in real estate ventures with third parties and are required to determine whether to consolidate or use the equity method of accounting for the venture. FASB Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (as revised) and Emerging Issues Task Force EITF No. 04-5, “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” are the two primary sources of accounting guidance in this area. Appropriate application of these relatively complex rules requires substantial management judgment, which we believe makes the choice of the appropriate accounting method for these ventures a “critical accounting estimate.”

34


Table of Contents

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
     Our real estate investments in entities that do not qualify as variable interest entities, variable interest entities where we are not the primary beneficiary and entities we do not control through majority economic interest are not consolidated and are reported as investments in unconsolidated entities. Our investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities at September 30, 2006, aggregated $212.9 million. Please refer to Note 5 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities,” contained in this report for additional information.
     As part of the Smith Merger and the Oakwood transaction, we are required to indemnify certain unitholders for any personal income tax expense resulting from the sale of properties identified in tax protection agreements.
Contractual Commitments
     The following is a summary of significant changes in contractual commitments for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
    Please refer to “Scheduled Debt Maturities and Interest Payment Requirements” and “Planned Investments” above for further discussion of significant contractual commitments.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Hedging Activities
     We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and will occasionally utilize interest rate swaps and interest rate caps as hedges with the objective of lowering our overall borrowing costs. These derivatives are generally designated as either cash flow or fair value hedges. We do not use these derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes. Further, as a matter of policy, we only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors. When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the derivatives are designed to hedge, we have not sustained, nor do we expect to sustain, a material loss from the use of these hedging instruments.
     We formally assess, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether each designated derivative is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. We measure hedge effectiveness by comparing the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the derivative instrument with the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. We assess effectiveness of purchased interest rate caps based on overall changes in the fair value of the caps. If a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively.
Foreign Currency Hedging Activities
     We are exposed to foreign-exchange related variability and earnings volatility on our foreign investments. We have entered into two foreign currency forward contracts and have designated them as cash flow hedges. The notional amounts of the contracts are 8.5 million and 7.5 million, with fair market values at September 30, 2006 of ($.4) million and ($.05) million, respectively.
Energy Contract Hedging Activities
     We are exposed to price risk associated with the volatility of fuel oil and electricity rates. We have entered into contracts with several of our suppliers to fix our payments on set quantities of fuel oil and electricity. If the contract meets the criteria of a derivative, we designate these contracts as cash flow hedges of the overall changes in floating-rate payments made on our energy purchases. At September 30, 2006, we had energy-related derivatives with aggregate notional amounts of $5.8 million and an estimated fair value of ($1.0) million. These contracts mature on or before December 31, 2007.
     There has been no material change in the qualitative or quantitative disclosures regarding our market risk. For detailed information about the qualitative and quantitative disclosures of our market risk, see Item 7A in our 2005 Form 10-K.

35


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were, to the best of their knowledge, effective as of September 30, 2006.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
     During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we acquired DeWAG. Management has implemented monitoring controls over DeWAG and believes DeWAG’s control structure is not reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Other than this change, there has been no other change to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

36


Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     We are party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims and litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations. See Note 11 to the financial statements included in this report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     Not Applicable (See the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A Risk Factors in our 2005 Form 10-K).
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
     None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     None
Item 5. Other Information
     No other information is required to be disclosed for the period ended September 30, 2006 that has not been disclosed in a report on Form 8-K. There has been no change to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the company’s Board of Trustees.
Item 6. Exhibits
     See Exhibits.

37


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
           
    ARCHSTONE-SMITH TRUST  
 
         
 
  BY:   /s/ R. SCOT SELLERS  
 
         
 
            R. Scot Sellers  
 
      Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
         
 
  BY:   /s/ CHARLES E. MUELLER, JR.  
 
         
 
            Charles E. Mueller, Jr.  
 
            Chief Financial Officer  
 
      (Principal Financial Officer)  
 
         
 
  BY:   /s/ MARK A. SCHUMACHER  
 
         
 
      Mark A. Schumacher  
 
Senior Vice-President and Chief Accounting Officer  
 
      (Principal Accounting Officer)  
Date: November 9, 2006

38


Table of Contents

     Item 6. Exhibits
     
3.1
  Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Archstone-Smith Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Archstone-Smith Trust’s Current Report of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006)
     
3.3
  Restated Bylaws of Archstone-Smith Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Archstone-Smith Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006)
     
10.1
  Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Archstone-Smith Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006)
     
10.2
  Bylaws of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Archstone-Smith Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006)
     
12.1
  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
     
12.2
  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions
     
15.1
  Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Awareness Letter
     
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
32.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     
32.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

39