e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-10272
ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
90-0042860 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
identification no.) |
9200 E Panorama Circle, Suite 400
Englewood, Colorado 80112
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(303) 708-5959
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At October 30, 2006 there were approximately 30,338,000 of the Registrants Class A-1 and Class B
Common Units outstanding, held by
non-affiliates.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
13,105,946 |
|
|
$ |
11,226,114 |
|
Real estate held-for-sale |
|
|
135,939 |
|
|
|
133,150 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
934,658 |
|
|
|
836,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,307,227 |
|
|
|
10,522,571 |
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities |
|
|
212,884 |
|
|
|
132,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments |
|
|
12,520,111 |
|
|
|
10,655,299 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
52,080 |
|
|
|
13,638 |
|
Restricted cash in tax-deferred exchange escrow |
|
|
54,579 |
|
|
|
495,274 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
480,561 |
|
|
|
302,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,107,331 |
|
|
$ |
11,467,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND UNITHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facilities |
|
$ |
25,714 |
|
|
$ |
394,578 |
|
Term loan
international |
|
|
272,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term unsecured debt |
|
|
3,388,156 |
|
|
|
2,545,119 |
|
Mortgages payable |
|
|
2,794,204 |
|
|
|
2,310,277 |
|
Mortgages
payable held-for-sale |
|
|
83,375 |
|
|
|
83,375 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
75,124 |
|
|
|
53,366 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
416,637 |
|
|
|
311,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
7,056,002 |
|
|
|
5,698,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other common unitholders interest, at redemption
value (A-1 Common Units: 30,784,610 in 2006 and
33,910,022 in 2005) |
|
|
1,675,914 |
|
|
|
1,420,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual Preferred Units |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
Common unitholders equity (218,758,589 units in
2006 and 212,413,939 units in 2005) |
|
|
4,332,448 |
|
|
|
4,300,019 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(7,033 |
) |
|
|
(1,720 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unitholders equity |
|
|
4,375,415 |
|
|
|
4,348,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and unitholders equity |
|
$ |
13,107,331 |
|
|
$ |
11,467,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
299,366 |
|
|
$ |
222,744 |
|
|
$ |
828,065 |
|
|
$ |
604,105 |
|
Other income |
|
|
27,299 |
|
|
|
25,840 |
|
|
|
57,100 |
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,665 |
|
|
|
248,584 |
|
|
|
885,165 |
|
|
|
641,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
75,665 |
|
|
|
51,707 |
|
|
|
191,611 |
|
|
|
145,805 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
25,748 |
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
|
|
76,806 |
|
|
|
56,208 |
|
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
68,708 |
|
|
|
53,916 |
|
|
|
203,073 |
|
|
|
146,605 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
72,751 |
|
|
|
46,680 |
|
|
|
186,833 |
|
|
|
123,946 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
18,497 |
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
49,794 |
|
|
|
41,644 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
5,538 |
|
|
|
14,046 |
|
|
|
37,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,355 |
|
|
|
191,478 |
|
|
|
722,163 |
|
|
|
551,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
63,310 |
|
|
|
57,106 |
|
|
|
163,002 |
|
|
|
90,665 |
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
31,484 |
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
Other non-operating income |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
28,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings before discontinued operations |
|
|
67,116 |
|
|
|
59,017 |
|
|
|
196,623 |
|
|
|
138,270 |
|
Net earnings from discontinued apartment communities |
|
|
82,995 |
|
|
|
129,046 |
|
|
|
290,134 |
|
|
|
185,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
150,111 |
|
|
|
188,063 |
|
|
|
486,757 |
|
|
|
324,239 |
|
Preferred unit distributions |
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
(3,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
attributable to Common Units Basic |
|
$ |
149,154 |
|
|
$ |
187,105 |
|
|
$ |
483,885 |
|
|
$ |
320,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
248,695 |
|
|
|
232,794 |
|
|
|
247,950 |
|
|
|
226,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
249,643 |
|
|
|
233,996 |
|
|
|
248,810 |
|
|
|
227,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
Common Unit Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
Common Unit Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
0.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid per Common Unit |
|
$ |
0.435 |
|
|
$ |
0.4325 |
|
|
$ |
1.305 |
|
|
$ |
1.2975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Unitholders Equity,
Other Common Unitholders Interest and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Total Unitholders |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
Balances at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,300,019 |
|
|
$ |
(1,720 |
) |
|
$ |
4,348,299 |
|
|
$ |
1,420,491 |
|
|
$ |
5,768,790 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
422,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422,541 |
|
|
|
64,216 |
|
|
|
486,757 |
|
Change in fair value of hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,525 |
) |
|
|
(8,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,525 |
) |
Change in fair value of
marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
Foreign currency exchange
translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
attributable to Common Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Unit distribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
Common Unit distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(281,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(281,755 |
) |
|
|
(42,289 |
) |
|
|
(324,044 |
) |
A-1 Common
Units converted into A-2 Common Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,758 |
|
|
|
(107,758 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Exercise of Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,441 |
|
Accrual of equity-classified
awards under Compensation Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,670 |
|
Issuance of A-1 Common Units
under Dividend Reinvestment Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,472 |
|
Issuance of A-1 Common Units in
exchange for real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,412 |
|
|
|
81,412 |
|
Adjustment to redemption value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(259,842 |
) |
|
|
259,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,332,448 |
|
|
$ |
(7,033 |
) |
|
$ |
4,375,415 |
|
|
$ |
1,675,914 |
|
|
$ |
6,051,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
486,757 |
|
|
$ |
324,239 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flow provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
222,360 |
|
|
|
181,087 |
|
Gains on dispositions of depreciated real estate |
|
|
(314,246 |
) |
|
|
(196,549 |
) |
Gains on sale of marketable equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,948 |
) |
Change in
swap value DeWAG hedges |
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for possible loss on investments |
|
|
4,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
3,610 |
|
|
|
(18,750 |
) |
Interest accrued on Mezzanine loans |
|
|
(7,814 |
) |
|
|
(3,308 |
) |
Change in other assets |
|
|
14,757 |
|
|
|
(29,022 |
) |
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
22,854 |
|
|
|
22,721 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
(6,733 |
) |
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities |
|
|
427,280 |
|
|
|
251,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate investments |
|
|
(1,826,663 |
) |
|
|
(1,599,629 |
) |
Purchase of DeWAG net of cash acquired of $20,364 |
|
|
(252,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in investments in unconsolidated entities, net |
|
|
(67,523 |
) |
|
|
23,488 |
|
Proceeds from dispositions |
|
|
1,190,054 |
|
|
|
812,206 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
440,695 |
|
|
|
55,515 |
|
Change in notes receivable, net |
|
|
(83,592 |
) |
|
|
(41,826 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
7,679 |
|
|
|
(1,735 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow used in investing activities |
|
|
(591,778 |
) |
|
|
(751,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Long-Term Unsecured Debt, net |
|
|
859,385 |
|
|
|
495,724 |
|
Payments on Long-Term Unsecured Debt |
|
|
(31,250 |
) |
|
|
(231,250 |
) |
Proceeds from (payments on) unsecured credit facilities, net |
|
|
(368,864 |
) |
|
|
187,007 |
|
Principal repayment of mortgages payable, including prepayment penalties |
|
|
(220,410 |
) |
|
|
(263,457 |
) |
Regularly scheduled principal payments on mortgages payable |
|
|
(11,723 |
) |
|
|
(9,392 |
) |
Proceeds from term loan to fund DeWAG investment |
|
|
272,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
655 |
|
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Units, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
491,440 |
|
Proceeds from Common Units issued under DRIP and employee stock options |
|
|
46,913 |
|
|
|
33,275 |
|
Repurchase of Common Units and Preferred Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,495 |
) |
Repurchase of Series E and F Perpetual Preferred Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,522 |
) |
Cash distributions paid on Common Units |
|
|
(324,044 |
) |
|
|
(312,568 |
) |
Cash distributions paid on Preferred Units |
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
(2,873 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(16,987 |
) |
|
|
(2,368 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by financing activities |
|
|
202,940 |
|
|
|
310,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
38,442 |
|
|
|
(189,937 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
13,638 |
|
|
|
203,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
52,080 |
|
|
$ |
13,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1 Common Units issued in exchange for real estate |
|
$ |
81,412 |
|
|
$ |
400,749 |
|
N-1 and N-2 Convertible Redeemable Units issued in exchange for real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
A-1 Common Units converted to A-2 Common Units |
|
|
107,758 |
|
|
|
5,547 |
|
Assumption of mortgages payable upon purchase of apartment communities |
|
|
728,484 |
|
|
|
654,727 |
|
These Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows combine cash flows from discontinued
operations with cash flows from continuing operations.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2006 and 2005
(Unaudited)
(1) Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
Archstone-Smith is structured as an UPREIT under which all property ownership and business
operations are conducted through the Archstone-Smith Operating Trust, which we refer to herein as
the Operating Trust. Archstone-Smith is our sole trustee and owns approximately 87.7% of the
Operating Trusts outstanding Common Units; the remaining 12.3% of the Common Units are owned by
minority interest holders. As used herein, we, our and the company refers to the Operating
Trust and Archstone-Smith, collectively, except where the context otherwise requires.
Archstone-Smith is an equity REIT organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. We focus on
creating value for our unitholders by acquiring, developing, redeveloping and operating apartments
in our core markets which are characterized by protected locations with limited land for new
housing construction, expensive single-family home prices, and a strong, diversified economic base
with significant employment growth potential.
Interim Financial Reporting
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Operating Trust are
unaudited and certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements have been omitted. While management believes that the disclosures presented are
adequate for interim reporting, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes included in the Operating Trusts Annual Report on Form
10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2005 (2005 Form 10-K). See the glossary in our 2005 Form
10-K for all defined terms not defined herein.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Operating Trusts financial statements for the
interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported in the financial statements and the related notes. Actual results could
differ from managements estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the
effects of revisions are reflected in the period they are determined to be necessary.
Marketable Securities and Other Investments
All publicly traded equity securities are classified as available-for-sale and carried at
fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of unitholders
equity. Private investments, for which we do not have the ability to exercise significant
influence, are accounted for at cost. Declines in the value of public and private investments that
management determines are other than temporary are recorded as a provision for loss on investments.
Real Estate and Depreciation
We allocate the cost of newly acquired properties between net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets. The primary intangible asset associated with an apartment community acquisition
is the value of the existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired property, we
first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to
the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the property is vacant. We estimate
the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a
hypothetical lease-up. We depreciate the building and fixtures based on the expected useful life
7
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
of the asset and amortize the intangible value of the lease agreements over the average
remaining life of the existing leases. This amortization expense is included in depreciation on
real estate investments in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
We recognized goodwill in connection with the DeWAG acquisition. Goodwill represents the
excess of the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets. Intangible assets consist of non-compete agreements and lease
related intangibles. We will perform an impairment test annually, or more frequently, if events or
changes in circumstances indicate impairment of our goodwill or intangible assets, which are
included in other assets.
Insurance Recoveries
We recognize insurance recovery proceeds as other income if the recovery is related to items
that were originally expensed, such as legal settlements, legal expenses and repairs that did not
meet capitalization guidelines. For recoveries of property damages that were eligible for
capitalization, we reduce the basis of the property or if the property has subsequently been sold,
we recognize the proceeds as an additional gain on sale. We recognize insurance recoveries at such
time that we believe the recovery is probable and we have sufficient information to make a
reasonable estimate of proceeds, except in cases where we have to pursue recovery via litigation.
In this circumstance, we recognize the recovery when we have a signed, legally binding agreement
with the insurance carrier.
Legal Fees
We generally recognize legal expenses as incurred; however, if such fees are related to the
accrual for an estimated legal settlement, we accrue for the related incurred and anticipated legal
fees at the same time we accrue the estimated cost of settlement.
Foreign Currency Translation
Assets and liabilities of the companys foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at
the exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at
average rates in effect during the period. The resulting translation adjustment is reflected as
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of unitholders equity on the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The functional currency utilized for these subsidiaries is
the local foreign currency.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We utilize derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk, foreign currency
exchange risk, exposure to changes in the fair value of certain investments in equity securities
and exposure to volatile energy prices. During 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 149, Amendment of
Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Under SFAS No. 149, the resulting
assets and liabilities associated with derivative financial instruments are carried on our
financial statements at estimated fair value at the end of each reporting period. The changes in
fair value of a fair value hedge and the fair value of the items hedged are generally recorded in
earnings for each reporting period. The change in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges and
foreign currency hedges are carried on our financial statements as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). If effective, our hedges have little or no impact on our current
earnings. The most significant derivative transactions
entered into during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were the execution of forward treasury
locks, which fixed the treasury rate component on $300 million of unsecured debt that we expect to
refinance in 2007, and another $300 million we expect to refinance in 2008. On October 23, 2006,
we settled these treasury locks. The resulting $2.0 million gain will be amortized into interest
expense over the term of the debt, when issued. In connection with the DeWAG transaction, we
assumed interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
227 million. These swaps, which had an aggregate fair value of approximately $4.0 million at
September 30, 2006, were put in place by DeWAG to fix the interest cost associated with certain
variable rate mortgages. These
8
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
derivatives were not designated as hedges for US GAAP purposes. Changes in fair value are
recorded as adjustments to interest expense.
Income Taxes
We have made an election to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and we believe we qualify as a REIT and have made all required distributions of our
taxable income.
Income taxes for our taxable REIT subsidiaries are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized
in earnings in the period that includes the enactment date.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income, which is defined as net earnings and all other non-owner changes in
equity, is displayed in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Unitholders Equity,
Other Common Unitholders Interest and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Other comprehensive income
(loss) reflects unrealized holding gains and losses on the available-for-sale investments, changes
in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges and gains and losses on long-term foreign currency
transactions.
Our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Gains on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Hedges |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
(1,612 |
) |
|
$ |
(292 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,720 |
) |
Change in fair value of hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,525 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange
translation and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
|
|
1,797 |
|
Mark to market for marketable
equity securities |
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,599 |
|
|
$ |
(10,137 |
) |
|
$ |
1,505 |
|
|
$ |
(7,033 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit Data
Following is a reconciliation of basic EPS to diluted EPS for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
149,154 |
|
|
$ |
187,105 |
|
|
$ |
483,885 |
|
|
$ |
320,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Basic |
|
|
248,695 |
|
|
|
232,794 |
|
|
|
247,950 |
|
|
|
226,778 |
|
Assumed exercise of options |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Diluted |
|
|
249,643 |
|
|
|
233,996 |
|
|
|
248,810 |
|
|
|
227,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF No. 04-5, Determining Whether a
General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights (EITF No. 04-5). This Issue provides a
framework for evaluating whether a general partner or group of general partners or managing members
controls a limited partnership or limited liability
company and therefore whether they should consolidate the entity. The presumption that the general
partner or group of general partners or managing members controls a limited liability partnership
or limited liability company may be overcome if the limited partners or members have (1) the
substantive ability to dissolve the partnership without cause, or (2) substantive participating
rights. EITF No. 04-5 became effective on June 30, 2005 for new or modified limited partnerships or
limited liability companies and January 1, 2006 for all existing arrangements. Adoption of EITF
No. 04-5 did not have a material impact on our financial position, net earnings or cash flows.
In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FIN 46R-6, Determining the
Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This FSP addresses certain
implementation issues related to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities. Specifically, FSP FIN 46R-6 addresses how a reporting enterprise
should determine the variability to be considered in applying FIN 46R. The variability that is
considered in applying FIN 46R affects the determination of: (a) whether an entity is a variable
interest entity (VIE); (b) which interests are variable interests in the entity; and (c) which
party, if any, is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. Our assessment of variability affects any
calculation of expected losses and expected residual returns, if such a calculation is necessary.
The company is required to apply the guidance in this FSP prospectively to all entities (including
newly created entities) with which it first becomes involved and to all entities previously
required to be analyzed under FIN 46R when a reconsideration event has occurred, beginning July
1, 2006. The company will evaluate the impact of this FSP at the time any such reconsideration
event occurs, and for any new entities with which the company becomes involved in future periods.
In July 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 defines a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2006. The adoption of FIN 48 is not expected to have a material effect on our financial
position, net earnings or cash flows.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 (SAB 108) Topic 1N,
Financial Statements Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. This Bulletin provides guidance on the
consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements
for the purpose of a materiality assessment. The guidance in this Bulletin must be applied to
financial reports covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The adoption of
SAB 108 is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position, net earnings or cash
flows.
Please refer to Note 9 for details regarding the implementation of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment.
10
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(2) Real Estate
Investments in Real Estate
Investments in real estate, at cost, were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
|
|
Operating Trust Apartment Communities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating communities |
|
$ |
11,163,224 |
|
|
$ |
9,966,915 |
|
|
Communities under construction |
|
|
683,330 |
|
|
|
575,631 |
|
Development communities In Planning(1) |
|
|
72,948 |
|
|
|
24,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Trust apartment communities |
|
|
11,919,502 |
|
|
|
10,566,911 |
|
Ameriton(1) |
|
|
503,887 |
|
|
|
692,269 |
|
International and other real estate assets(2) |
|
|
818,496 |
|
|
|
100,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate |
|
$ |
13,241,885 |
|
|
$ |
11,359,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) In Planning is defined as those parcels of land owned or Under Control, which are in the
development planning process, upon which construction is expected subsequent to the completion of
the entitlement and building permit processes. Under Control is the term we use to identify land
parcels which we do not own, yet have an exclusive right to purchase through contingent contract or
letter of intent during a contractually agreed upon time period, subject to approval of
contingencies during the due diligence and entitlement processes. Our investment as of September
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 for development communities In Planning Under Control was $8.2
million and $145,000, respectively, and is reflected in the Other assets caption of our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2) Includes land that is not In Planning and other real estate assets.
The change in investments in real estate, at cost, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
11,359,264 |
|
Acquisition-related expenditures (including DeWAG) |
|
|
2,313,142 |
|
Redevelopment expenditures |
|
|
38,937 |
|
Recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
32,677 |
|
Development expenditures, including initial acquisition costs |
|
|
270,514 |
|
Acquisition of land for development |
|
|
193,451 |
|
Dispositions |
|
|
(981,345 |
) |
Provision for possible loss on investment |
|
|
(4,328 |
) |
Change in estimated hurricane retirements |
|
|
4,496 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net apartment community activity |
|
|
1,874,419 |
|
Change in other real estate assets |
|
|
8,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
13,241,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2006, we had unfunded contractual commitments of $588.0 million related to
communities under construction and under redevelopment. The purchase prices of certain recent
acquisitions in Northern California, New York, and Germany were allocated to land, buildings and
other assets based on preliminary estimates and is subject to change as we obtain more complete
information regarding land, building and lease intangibles values.
11
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(3) DeWAG Acquisition
On July 27, 2006, we acquired 94% of the shares and 94% of an outstanding shareholder loan of
DeWAG Deutsche WohnAnlage GmbH (DeWAG) for approximately $271 million, based on the exchange rate
on the transaction date. We have the option to acquire the remaining 6%, owned by the Managing
Directors of DeWAG, under certain circumstances. The results of DeWAGs operations have been
included in the consolidated financial statements since July 1, 2006. The purchase was funded by
an international term loan, which is expected to be repaid on or before April 27, 2007. In
addition, we assumed approximately $509 million in DeWAG liabilities. DeWAG specializes in the
acquisition, ownership, operation and re-sale of quality residential properties in the major
metropolitan areas of Southern and Western Germany, as well as West Berlin. As of July 1, 2006,
the portfolio consisted of approximately 6,400 residential units. We acquired DeWAG because we were
interested in expanding our operations into the German markets which we believe have attractive
fundamentals for apartment operations.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition. The goodwill associated with the transaction
is primarily attributable to the people and processes which comprise the investing and the
operating platform. Due to the recent closing of the transaction, we are still in the process of
seeking information to finalize the valuations for our real estate, intangible assets, and certain
liabilities. Therefore, the purchase price allocation is subject to change (dollar amounts in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
646,285 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
67,722 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
30,958 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
34,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
779,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgages payable |
|
$ |
407,933 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
10,759 |
|
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
69,327 |
|
Intangible liabilities |
|
|
20,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
508,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
270,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
Following are preliminary values as of September 30, 2006 related to the intangible assets and
liabilities we identified in connection with the DeWAG transaction and the corresponding
amortization we expect to record (dollar amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
Non-compete agreements |
|
$ |
18,776 |
|
|
$ |
(1,174 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
In-place leases |
|
|
12,182 |
|
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
$ |
30,958 |
|
|
$ |
(1,935 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below-market leases |
|
$ |
20,514 |
|
|
$ |
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible liabilities |
|
$ |
20,514 |
|
|
$ |
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net amortization for the year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
$ |
1,305 |
|
2007 |
|
$ |
2,611 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
2,611 |
|
2009 |
|
$ |
2,611 |
|
2010 |
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
Our proforma results, assuming the transaction occurred at the beginning of the year, would not
have been materially different from the previously reported results.
(4) Discontinued Operations
The results of operations for properties sold during the period or designated as held-for-sale
at the end of the period are required to be classified as discontinued operations. The property
specific components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include rental
revenues, rental expenses, real estate taxes, depreciation expense, minority interest, income taxes
and interest expense (actual interest expense for encumbered properties and a pro-rata allocation
of interest expense for any unencumbered property up to our weighted average leverage ratio), as
well as the net gain or loss on the disposition of properties.
Consistent with our capital recycling program, we had 4 operating apartment communities,
representing 2,136 units (unaudited), classified as held-for-sale under the provisions of SFAS No.
144, at September 30, 2006. Accordingly, we have classified the operating earnings from these 4
properties within discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 2005. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006
and 2005, we sold 28 and 16 Archstone-Smith and Ameriton operating communities, respectively. The
operating results of these communities and the related gain/loss on sale are also included in
discontinued operations for 2006 and 2005.
The following is a summary of net earnings from discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
7,169 |
|
|
$ |
41,766 |
|
|
$ |
53,841 |
|
|
$ |
133,957 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
(3,351 |
) |
|
|
(14,064 |
) |
|
|
(20,618 |
) |
|
|
(44,578 |
) |
Real estate taxes |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(5,584 |
) |
|
|
(6,443 |
) |
|
|
(17,216 |
) |
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
(7,321 |
) |
|
|
(9,439 |
) |
|
|
(28,137 |
) |
Interest expense(1) |
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
|
|
(10,143 |
) |
|
|
(13,044 |
) |
|
|
(34,239 |
) |
Estimated income taxes (Ameriton properties) |
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
|
|
(9,990 |
) |
|
|
(11,855 |
) |
|
|
(13,206 |
) |
Provision for possible loss on real estate investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt extinguishment costs related to dispositions |
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(7,589 |
) |
|
|
(5,264 |
) |
Gains from the disposition of Ameriton real estate investments, net |
|
|
4,631 |
|
|
|
39,940 |
|
|
|
55,286 |
|
|
|
61,597 |
|
Internal Disposition Costs Ameriton transactions(2) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(3,543 |
) |
|
|
(1,047 |
) |
Gains from
the disposition of Operating Trust real estate investments, net |
|
|
79,984 |
|
|
|
94,755 |
|
|
|
258,960 |
|
|
|
134,952 |
|
Internal Disposition Costs Operating Trust transactions(2) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued apartment communities |
|
$ |
82,995 |
|
|
$ |
129,046 |
|
|
$ |
290,134 |
|
|
$ |
185,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The portion of interest expense included in discontinued operations that is allocated
to properties based on the companys leverage ratio was $0.3 million and $7.4 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $6.7 million and $24.9 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the direct and incremental compensation and related costs associated with
the employees dedicated to our significant disposition activity. |
13
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The disposition proceeds associated with the sales of individual rental units by our
foreign subsidiaries are included in continuing operations as such sales do not meet the
requirements under SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets to be
reflected as discontinued operations.
(5) Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities
Real Estate Joint Ventures
We have investments in entities that we account for using the equity method. At September 30,
2006, the
investment balance consisted of $179.4 million in twelve Operating Trust joint ventures and $33.5
million in five Ameriton joint ventures. At December 31, 2005, the investment balance consisted of
$102.6 million in thirteen Operating Trust joint ventures and $30.1 million in six Ameriton joint
ventures. The Operating Trust and Ameritons combined weighted average percentage of ownership in
joint ventures based on total assets at September 30, 2006 was 38.8%.
Combined summary balance sheet data for our investments in unconsolidated entities presented
on a stand-alone basis follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
1,372,103 |
|
|
$ |
1,142,921 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
249,006 |
|
|
|
244,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,621,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,387,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and owners equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-company debt payable to Operating Trust |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
2,324 |
|
Mortgages payable(1) |
|
|
999,438 |
|
|
|
894,300 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
202,907 |
|
|
|
120,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,202,618 |
|
|
|
1,017,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners equity |
|
|
418,491 |
|
|
|
369,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners equity |
|
$ |
1,621,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,387,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Operating Trust guarantees $289.2 million of the outstanding debt balance as of
September 30, 2006. |
Selected combined summary results of operations for our unconsolidated investees presented on
a stand-alone basis follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating Trust Joint Ventures
Revenues |
|
$ |
35,662 |
|
|
$ |
30,723 |
|
|
$ |
99,634 |
|
|
$ |
96,875 |
|
Net Earnings(1) |
|
|
8,225 |
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
40,261 |
|
|
|
36,279 |
|
Ameriton Joint Ventures
Revenues |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
3,056 |
|
Net Earnings(2) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
18,185 |
|
|
|
11,339 |
|
Total Revenues |
|
$ |
35,715 |
|
|
$ |
31,516 |
|
|
$ |
99,910 |
|
|
$ |
99,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
8,089 |
|
|
$ |
8,952 |
|
|
$ |
58,446 |
|
|
$ |
47,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes gains associated with the disposition of Operating Trust Joint Venture
assets of $9.3 million and $9.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, and $37.1 million and $31.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Ameritons share of pre-tax gains associated with the disposition of real
estate joint venture assets. There were no gains for the three months ended September 30,
2006 and the gains were $0.3 |
14
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
million during the three months ended September 30, 2005, and $19.7 million and $13.2
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
In June 2006, we closed a joint venture transaction with the State of Wisconsin Investment
Board (SWIB). SWIB committed $100 million of capital for 80% of the equity and we committed $25
million of capital for the remaining 20%. We invested $11 million during the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 and our remaining commitment as of September 30, 2006 is $14.0 million.
(6) Mortgage and Other Notes Receivable
The change in mortgage and other notes receivable, which are included in other assets, during
the nine months ended September 30, 2006 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
74,396 |
|
Funding of additional notes |
|
|
85,077 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
7,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
167,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
We have a commitment to fund an additional $30.4 million under existing agreements. Our
rights to the underlying collateral on these notes in the event of default are generally
subordinate to the primary mortgage lender. We recognized interest income associated with notes
receivable of $5.5 million and $2.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, and $13.4 million and $4.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on these notes as of September 30, 2006 was
approximately 12.4%, including 14.3% relating to mezzanine notes receivable.
(7) Borrowings
Unsecured Credit Facilities
Our $600 million unsecured credit facility,
which is led by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. bears
interest at the greater of the prime rate or the federal funds rate plus 0.50% or, at our option,
LIBOR plus 0.40%. The spread over LIBOR can vary from LIBOR plus 0.325% to LIBOR plus 1.00%, based
upon the rating of our long-term unsecured senior notes. The facility contains an accordion
feature that allows us to increase the size of the commitment to $1.0 billion at any time during
the life of the facility, subject to lenders providing additional commitments, and enables us to
borrow up to $150 million in foreign currencies. The credit facility is scheduled to mature in
June 2010, but may be extended for one year at our option.
The following table summarizes our revolving credit facility borrowings under our line of
credit (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
As of and for the |
|
|
Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Total unsecured revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Borrowings outstanding at end of period |
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
Outstanding letters of credit under this facility |
|
|
44,945 |
|
|
|
37,813 |
|
Weighted average daily borrowings |
|
|
36,541 |
|
|
|
183,434 |
|
Maximum borrowings outstanding during the period |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
580,000 |
|
Weighted average daily nominal interest rate |
|
|
5.47 |
% |
|
|
3.95 |
% |
Weighted average daily effective interest rate |
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
We also have a short-term unsecured borrowing agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., which
provides for maximum borrowings of $100 million. The borrowings under the agreement bear interest
at an overnight rate
15
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
agreed to at the time of borrowing and ranged from 4.6% to 5.7% during 2006. There were $4.7
million of borrowings outstanding under the agreement at September 30, 2006, and $34.6 million of
borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2005.
Term Loan International
We entered into a $272.8 million secured, short-term borrowing agreement with LaSalle Bank
National Association to fund the acquisition of DeWAG. The borrowing under this agreement bears
interest at EURIBOR plus 0.40%. The effective interest rate at September 30, 2006 was 3.50%. The
loan is scheduled to mature in January 2007 and may be extended for three months, at our option.
We expect this loan to be paid off on or before April 27, 2007.
Long-Term Unsecured Debt
A summary of our Long-Term Unsecured Debt outstanding at September 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005 follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Coupon |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Remaining |
|
Type
of Debt |
|
Rate (1) |
|
|
Rate (1) (2) |
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
Long-term unsecured
senior notes |
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
|
5.60 |
% |
|
$ |
3,311,565 |
|
|
$ |
2,468,047 |
|
|
|
11.46 |
|
Unsecured tax-exempt bonds |
|
|
4.01 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
76,591 |
|
|
|
77,072 |
|
|
|
16.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/Weighted average |
|
|
5.40 |
% |
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
$ |
3,388,156 |
|
|
$ |
2,545,119 |
|
|
|
11.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a fixed rate for the long-term unsecured notes and a variable rate for the
unsecured tax-exempt bonds. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the effect of fair value hedges, loan cost amortization and other ongoing fees and
expenses, where applicable. |
On March 16, 2006, the Operating Trust issued $300 million in long-term unsecured ten-year
senior notes with a coupon rate of 5.75% and an effective interest rate of 5.89%.
On July 14, 2006
the Operating Trust issued $575 million of exchangeable senior unsecured notes that are due in
2036 with a coupon rate of 4.0%. The notes are exchangeable into common shares at an initial
exchange ratio of 15.7206 per $1,000 principal of notes (or an initial exchange price of $63.6108
per common share). No separate value is ascribed to the conversion feature. The company received
approximately $563 million in net proceeds from this offering. The notes are senior unsecured
obligations of the Operating Trust. The company used the net proceeds from the offering to repay
outstanding balances under its revolving credit facility and certain secured debt, and intends to
use the remainder to repay additional secured debt, make incremental investments and for general
corporate purposes. Prior to July 18, 2011, the holders, at their option, may exchange the notes
for common shares upon the occurrence of specified events. Upon tender of notes for exchange, we
may pay cash, Archstone-Smith common shares or a combination of cash and common shares, at our
option. The holders may require us to repurchase the notes for cash on July 18, 2011 and on July
15 of 2016, 2021, 2026 and 2031 and at any time prior to maturity upon the occurrence of a
fundamental change in Archstone-Smith. On or after July 18, 2011, we may elect to redeem all or
part of the notes for cash. We may redeem the notes at any time prior to maturity to the extent
necessary to preserve our status as a real estate investment trust. If these notes are dilutive to
our earnings per share, we will add the interest to the numerator and include the shares in the
denominator of the weighted average shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share.
16
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Mortgages payable
Our mortgages payable generally feature either monthly interest and principal payments or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. Early repayment of mortgages
is generally subject to prepayment penalties.
A summary of mortgages payable follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance at (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Interest |
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Rate (2) |
|
Secured floating rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt debt |
|
$ |
1,010,466 |
|
|
$ |
839,318 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Conventional mortgages |
|
|
184,703 |
|
|
|
54,455 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Floating |
|
|
1,195,169 |
|
|
|
893,773 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Secured fixed rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt debt |
|
|
3,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Conventional mortgages |
|
|
1,660,350 |
|
|
|
1,480,170 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Other secured debt |
|
|
18,974 |
|
|
|
19,709 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed |
|
|
1,682,410 |
|
|
|
1,499,879 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgages payable |
|
$ |
2,877,579 |
|
|
$ |
2,393,652 |
|
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the unamortized fair market value adjustment associated with assumption of fixed
rate mortgages in connection with real estate acquisitions. The unamortized balance
aggregated $47.0 million and $63.5 million at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
respectively, and is being amortized into interest expense over the life of the underlying
debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the effect of fair value hedges, credit enhancement fees, the amortization of fair
market value purchase adjustment, and other related costs, where applicable. |
The change in mortgages payable during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
2,393,652 |
|
Mortgage assumptions related to property acquisitions |
|
|
728,484 |
|
Regularly scheduled principal amortization |
|
|
(11,723 |
) |
Prepayments, final maturities and other |
|
|
(232,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
2,877,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
The book value of total assets pledged as collateral for mortgage loans and other obligations
at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is $5.6 billion and $4.6 billion, respectively. Our
debt instruments generally contain covenants common to the type of facility or borrowing, including
financial covenants establishing minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios.
We were in compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our debt instruments at September
30, 2006.
The total interest paid on all outstanding debt was $96.5 million and $83.2 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively and $244.8 million and $203.3 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We capitalize interest
incurred during the construction period as part of the cost of apartment communities under
development. Capitalized interest was $13.3 million and $9.9 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively and $39.6 million and $27.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
17
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(8) Distributions to Unitholders
The following table summarizes the quarterly cash distributions paid per unit on Common and
Preferred Units during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and the annualized distribution we
expect to pay for 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly |
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
|
Per Unit |
|
|
Per Unit |
|
Common Units and A-1 Units |
|
$ |
0.435 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
Series I Perpetual Preferred Units(1) |
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
7,660 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Series I Preferred Units have a par value of $100,000 per unit. |
(9) Benefit Plans and Implementation of SFAS 123R
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. This Statement is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Statement requires companies to recognize, in the
income statement, the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity based compensation
issued to employees. We used the modified prospective method in adopting the Statement, which
became effective January 1, 2006.
Since we early-adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 for all awards
granted after January 1, 2003, adoption of SFAS No. 123R did not have a material impact on our
financial position, net earnings
or cash flows. Upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, we recorded a benefit resulting from application of
an anticipated forfeiture rate on existing awards of approximately $100,000 which had no effect on
our reported earnings per share. With respect to options granted prior to January 1, 2003, no
stock-based employee compensation expense was reflected in the financial statements for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006. Recording this expense would have lowered net earnings by
approximately $100,000. We have made an election to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended; therefore, there was no tax impact that was recorded as a result of the
adoption of this standard.
Our long-term incentive plan was approved in 1997 and was modified in connection with the
Smith Merger. There have been six types of awards under the plan: (i) options with a DEU feature
(only awarded prior to 2000); (ii) options without the DEU feature (generally awarded after 1999);
(iii) Restricted Share Unit awards with a DEU
feature (awarded prior to 2006); (iv) Restricted Share Unit awards with a cash dividend payment
feature (awarded after 2005); (v) employee share purchase program with matching options without the
DEU feature, granted only in
1997 and 1998; and (vi) performance units issued to certain named executives under our Special
Long-Term Incentive Plan.
No more than 20.0 million share or option awards in the aggregate may be granted under the
plan, and no individual may be awarded more than 1.0 million share or option awards in any one-year
period. As of September 30, 2006, Archstone-Smith had approximately 9.8 million shares available
for future grants. Non-qualified options constitute an important component of compensation for
officers below the level of senior vice president and for selected employees.
18
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
A summary of share option activity for the options and restricted share units is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards |
|
RSU Awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Units |
|
Price |
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,702,026 |
|
|
$ |
24.94 |
|
|
|
948,735 |
|
|
$ |
27.77 |
|
Granted |
|
|
424,523 |
|
|
|
45.58 |
|
|
|
226,666 |
|
|
|
45.58 |
|
Exercised/Settled |
|
|
942,485 |
|
|
|
23.28 |
|
|
|
35,905 |
|
|
|
24.56 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
21,895 |
|
|
|
34.29 |
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
31.84 |
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,162,169 |
|
|
$ |
29.56 |
|
|
|
1,134,784 |
|
|
$ |
31.42 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
47.70 |
|
|
|
18,193 |
|
|
|
47.70 |
|
Exercised/Settled |
|
|
89,307 |
|
|
|
24.35 |
|
|
|
23,129 |
|
|
|
25.16 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
18,633 |
|
|
|
34.49 |
|
|
|
12,048 |
|
|
|
35.00 |
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2,055,277 |
|
|
$ |
29.80 |
|
|
|
1,117,800 |
|
|
$ |
31.76 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
53.36 |
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
54.52 |
|
Exercised/Settled |
|
|
69,231 |
|
|
|
27.82 |
|
|
|
10,673 |
|
|
|
19.16 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
43.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,982,854 |
|
|
$ |
29.87 |
|
|
|
1,108,442 |
|
|
$ |
31.80 |
|
Certain of the options and restricted share units, included in the table above, have a DEU
feature. The aggregate number of vested DEUs outstanding as of September 30, 2006 was 323,000.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recorded $370,000 as a charge to operating
expense related to unvested DEUs and $1,210,000 of common share dividends related to vested DEUs.
Options
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the share options granted to
associates had a calculated fair value of $5.52 and $4.19 per option, respectively. The historical
exercise patterns of the associate groups receiving option awards are similar, and therefore we
used only one set of assumptions in calculating fair value for each period. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006, the calculated fair value was determined using the
Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, using a weighted average risk-free rate interest rate of
4.66%, a weighted average dividend yield of 4.57%, a volatility factor of 18.3% and a weighted
average expected life of four years. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the
calculated fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, using a
weighted average risk-free interest rate of 3.77%, a weighted average dividend yield of 5.63%, a
volatility factor of 21.97% and a weighted average expected life of five years. The options vest
over a three-year period and have a contractual term of 10 years. We used an estimated forfeiture
rate of 30% in recording option compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006, based primarily on historical experience. The unamortized compensation cost is $1.4
million, which includes all options previously granted but not yet vested. This amount will be recorded as
compensation cost ratably through December 31, 2008.
The total intrinsic value of the share options exercised during the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $26.0 million and $19.7 million, respectively. The intrinsic
value is defined as the difference between the realized fair value of the share or the quoted fair
value at the end of the period, less the exercise price of the option. We have 1.1 million fully
vested options outstanding at September 30, 2006 with a weighted average exercise price of $23.47.
The weighted-average contractual life of the fully vested options is 5.3 years, and they have an
intrinsic value of $34.9 million. In addition, we have 589,000 options outstanding that we expect
19
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
to vest with a weighted average exercise price of $38.58. The weighted-average contractual
life of the unvested options is 9.3 years, and they have an intrinsic value of $9.3 million.
Restricted Share Units
Also during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we issued RSUs to senior officers and
trustees of the company with an average grant date fair value of $45.77 per share. The units vest
over a three-year period and the related unamortized compensation cost is $11.9 million, which
includes all units previously granted but not yet vested. This amount will be recorded as
compensation cost ratably through December 31, 2008.
We have 630,000 fully vested RSUs outstanding at September 30, 2006 with a weighted average
grant date fair value of $26.65. The weighted-average contractual life for the fully vested shares
is 5.6 years and the intrinsic value is $34.4 million. In addition, we have 478,000 RSUs
outstanding that we expect to vest with a weighted average grant date fair value of $38.59. The
weighted-average contractual life for the unvested shares is 9.2 years and the intrinsic value is
$26.0 million. The total intrinsic value of the RSUs settled during the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005 were $3.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
Special Long Term Incentive Plan
Effective January 1, 2006, a special long-term incentive program related to the achievement of
total shareholder return performance targets was established for certain of our executive officers.
We would issue approximately 300,000 performance units if all performance targets are ultimately
met as of December 31, 2008. The calculated grant date fair value of approximately $4.8 million is
being charged to compensation expense ratably over the three-year term of the plan. The calculated
fair value was determined by an independent third party using a Monte Carlo simulation approach
which yielded an estimated payout percentage of 41%. The related unamortized compensation cost at
September 30, 2006 is $3.6 million.
Summary
The compensation cost associated with all awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
was approximately $8.9 million, of which approximately $6.7 million was charged to operating
expenses, and approximately $2.2 million related to dedicated investment personnel and was
capitalized with respect to development and other qualifying investment activities. The
compensation cost associated with all awards for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
approximately $6.5 million, of which approximately $5.0 million was charged to operating expenses,
and approximately $1.5 million related to dedicated investment personnel and was capitalized with
respect to development and other qualifying investment activities.
(10) Segment Data
We have determined that each of our garden communities and each of our high-rise properties
have similar economic characteristics and also meet the other GAAP criteria, which permit the
garden communities and high-rise properties to be aggregated into two reportable segments.
Additionally, we have defined the activity from Ameriton as an individual operating segment as its
primary focus is the opportunistic acquisition, development and eventual disposition of real estate
with a short-term investment horizon. NOI is defined as rental revenues less rental expenses and
real estate taxes. We rely on NOI for purposes of making decisions about resource allocations
and assessing segment performance. We also believe Same-Store NOI is a valuable means of comparing
year-to-year property performance.
Following are reconciliations, which exclude the amounts classified as discontinued
operations, of each reportable segments (i) revenues to consolidated revenues; (ii) NOI to
consolidated earnings from operations; and (iii) assets to consolidated assets, for the periods
indicated (in thousands):
20
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Reportable apartment communities segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
119,798 |
|
|
$ |
111,457 |
|
|
$ |
338,297 |
|
|
$ |
317,532 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
76,863 |
|
|
|
71,729 |
|
|
|
220,857 |
|
|
|
207,707 |
|
Non Same-Store and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
45,810 |
|
|
|
19,599 |
|
|
|
137,067 |
|
|
|
36,718 |
|
High-rise communities |
|
|
36,398 |
|
|
|
15,527 |
|
|
|
96,594 |
|
|
|
33,418 |
|
Ameriton communities(1) |
|
|
2,958 |
|
|
|
1,564 |
|
|
|
7,199 |
|
|
|
4,435 |
|
International and other non-reportable operating
segment revenues |
|
|
17,539 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
28,051 |
|
|
|
4,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated rental revenues |
|
$ |
299,366 |
|
|
$ |
222,744 |
|
|
$ |
828,065 |
|
|
$ |
604,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Reportable apartment communities segment NOI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
80,814 |
|
|
$ |
76,826 |
|
|
$ |
232,862 |
|
|
$ |
216,317 |
|
High-rise communities |
|
|
51,675 |
|
|
|
48,260 |
|
|
|
150,524 |
|
|
|
137,102 |
|
Non Same-Store and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
29,622 |
|
|
|
13,468 |
|
|
|
91,073 |
|
|
|
23,583 |
|
High-rise communities |
|
|
22,913 |
|
|
|
9,788 |
|
|
|
63,672 |
|
|
|
19,993 |
|
Ameriton communities(1) |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
1,742 |
|
International and other non-reportable operating
segment NOI |
|
|
11,442 |
|
|
|
2,112 |
|
|
|
18,071 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment NOI |
|
|
197,953 |
|
|
|
151,000 |
|
|
|
559,648 |
|
|
|
402,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
27,299 |
|
|
|
25,840 |
|
|
|
57,100 |
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(68,708 |
) |
|
|
(53,916 |
) |
|
|
(203,073 |
) |
|
|
(146,605 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(72,751 |
) |
|
|
(46,680 |
) |
|
|
(186,833 |
) |
|
|
(123,946 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(18,497 |
) |
|
|
(13,600 |
) |
|
|
(49,794 |
) |
|
|
(41,644 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(1,986 |
) |
|
|
(5,538 |
) |
|
|
(14,046 |
) |
|
|
(37,047 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated earnings from operations |
|
$ |
63,310 |
|
|
$ |
57,106 |
|
|
$ |
163,002 |
|
|
$ |
90,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
While rental revenue and NOI are the primary measures we use to evaluate the
performance of our assets, management also utilizes gains from the disposition of real
estate when evaluating the performance of Ameriton as its primary focus is the
opportunistic acquisition, development and eventual disposition of real estate with a short
term investment horizon. Pre-tax gains from the disposition of Ameriton operating assets
were $4.2 million and $39.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
and $51.7 million and $60.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. These gains are classified within discontinued operations. Additionally,
Ameriton had gains from the sale of unconsolidated joint venture assets that are classified
within income from unconsolidated entities and gains from land sales that are classified
within other income. Ameriton assets are excluded from our Same-Store population as they
are acquired or developed to achieve short-term opportunistic gains, and therefore, the
average holding period is typically much shorter than the holding period of assets operated
by the Operating Trust. |
21
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Reportable operating communities segment assets, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
3,034,848 |
|
|
$ |
3,067,033 |
|
High-rise communities |
|
|
2,542,689 |
|
|
|
2,572,512 |
|
Non Same-Store, Under Development and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
2,866,398 |
|
|
|
2,570,585 |
|
High-rise communities |
|
|
2,408,715 |
|
|
|
1,419,177 |
|
Ameriton communities |
|
|
407,967 |
|
|
|
599,404 |
|
ADA settlement accrual |
|
|
35,439 |
|
|
|
47,198 |
|
International and other non-reportable operating
segment assets |
|
|
883,784 |
|
|
|
121,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
12,179,840 |
|
|
|
10,397,721 |
|
Real estate held-for-sale |
|
|
127,387 |
|
|
|
124,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
12,307,227 |
|
|
|
10,522,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated entities |
|
|
212,884 |
|
|
|
132,728 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
52,080 |
|
|
|
13,638 |
|
Restricted cash in tax-deferred exchange escrow |
|
|
54,579 |
|
|
|
495,274 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
480,561 |
|
|
|
302,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
$ |
13,107,331 |
|
|
$ |
11,467,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures for garden communities included in continuing operations were $17.9
million and $9.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $43.8 million
and $23.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total
capital expenditures for high-rise properties included in continuing operations were $15.9 million
and $18.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $44.2 million and
$42.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total capital
expenditures for Ameriton properties included in continuing operations were $0.7 million and $0.3
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $2.3 million and $0.4 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
(11) Litigation and Contingencies
During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement in the United
States District Court for the District of Maryland with three national disability organizations and
agreed to make capital improvements in a number of our communities in order to make them fully
compliant with the Fair Housing Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. The litigation, settled by
this agreement, alleged lack of full compliance with certain design and construction requirements
under the two federal statutes at 71 communities. As part of the settlement, the three disability
organizations all recognized that Archstone-Smith had no intention to build any of its communities
in a manner inconsistent with the FHA or ADA.
The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the remaining communities named
in the settlement is estimated at $47.2 million and was accrued as an addition to real estate, of
which $35.4 remains accrued at September 30, 2006. The settlement agreement approved by the court
allows us to remediate each of the designated communities over a three year period, and also
provides that we are not restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation
period. We paid a settlement totaling $1.4 million, which included legal fees and costs incurred
by the plaintiffs.
22
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
During 2004 and 2005, we incurred losses associated with multiple hurricanes in Florida.
As a result of this damage, we recorded charges for actual or estimated losses associated with both
wholly owned and unconsolidated apartment communities and benefits for collected or estimated
insurance recoveries. These estimates represent managements best estimate of the probable and
reasonably estimable costs and related recoveries and are based on the most current information
available from our insurance adjustors.
We are subject to various claims filed in 2002 and 2003 in connection with moisture
infiltration and resulting mold issues at certain high-rise properties we once owned in Southeast
Florida. These claims generally allege that water infiltration and resulting mold contamination
resulted in the claimants having personal injuries and/or property damage. Although certain of
these claims continue to be in various stages of litigation, with respect to the majority of these
claims, we have either settled the claims and/or we have been dismissed from the lawsuits that had
been filed. With respect to the lawsuits that have not been resolved, we continue to defend these
claims in the normal course of litigation.
We are a party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or
results of operations.
23
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Trustee and Unitholders
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Archstone-Smith
Operating Trust and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006, and the related condensed consolidated
statements of earnings for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the
condensed consolidated statement of unitholders equity, other common unitholders interest and
comprehensive income (loss) for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006, and the condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.
These condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Archstone-Smith
Operating Trusts management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to
the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, unitholders equity,
other common unitholders interest and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 9, 2006, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in
all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been
derived.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
November 9, 2006
24
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with Archstone-Smith Operating Trusts
2005 Form 10-K as well as the financial statements and notes included in Item 1 of this report.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, beliefs, assumptions,
estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate. Words such as
expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and variations of
such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
Information concerning expected investment balances, expected funding sources, planned investments,
forecasted dates and revenue and expense growth assumptions are examples of forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our
control. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed,
forecasted or implied in such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update
publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Our operating results depend primarily on income from apartment communities, which is
substantially influenced by supply and demand for apartment units, operating expense levels,
property level operations and the pace and price at which we can develop, acquire or dispose of
apartment communities. Capital and credit market conditions, which affect our cost of capital,
also influence operating results. See Archstone-Smith Operating Trusts 2005 Form 10-K, Item 1.
Business, for a more complete discussion of risk factors that could impact our future financial
performance.
The Company
We are engaged primarily in the operation, development, redevelopment, acquisition, management
and long-term ownership of apartment communities throughout the United States. Archstone-Smith is
structured as an UPREIT, with all property ownership and business operations conducted through the
Operating Trust and our subsidiaries and affiliates. Archstone-Smith is the sole trustee and owns
approximately 87.7% of our Common Units as of September 30, 2006.
Results of Operations
Executive Summary
The major factors that influenced our operating results for the quarter ended September 30,
2006 as compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
NOI increased significantly due primarily to net acquisition activity, including the
Oakwood and DeWAG transactions and an increase of 5.9% in NOI for our Same-Store
communities. |
|
|
|
|
Other income was higher due primarily to higher interest income attributable to our
mezzanine loan financing activities and increased cash balances that resulted primarily
from our convertible debt issuance and 1031 exchange disposition transactions, as well
as an $11.0 million gain on the sale of Ameriton land, which were partially offset by
$21.3 million in insurance recoveries in 2005. |
|
|
|
|
The higher depreciation and interest expense was due to the increase in the size of
the real estate portfolio and the related financing activities, respectively. Rising
interest rates also influenced the increase in interest expense. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased principally as a result of our
international expansion. |
|
|
|
|
Other expenses were lower in 2006 due principally to a $4.6 million litigation
charge recorded in 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was higher due to the
receipt of contingent proceeds related to the prior sale of our Rent.com investment in
2005. |
|
|
|
|
The decrease in net earnings from discontinued operations was driven principally by
lower gains as a result of fewer asset sales from the disposition of real estate in
2006. |
25
The major factors that influenced our operating results for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
NOI increased significantly due primarily to net acquisition activity, including the
Oakwood and DeWAG transactions, and an increase of 8.5% in NOI for our Same-Store
communities. |
|
|
|
|
Other income was higher in 2006 due primarily to (i) higher gains on the sale of land
(ii) higher interest income attributable to our mezzanine loan financing activities as well
as higher cash balances resulting primarily from our convertible debt offering in July and
1031 exchange disposition transactions, partially offset by (iii) higher moisture
infiltration-related insurance recoveries in 2005. |
|
|
|
|
The higher depreciation and interest expense was due to the increase in size of the real
estate portfolio and the related financing activities, respectively. Rising interest rates
also influenced the increase in interest expense. |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses increased principally as a result of our
international expansion. |
|
|
|
|
Other expenses were lower due primarily to higher debt extinguishment costs and the
settlement of the FHA/ADA lawsuit in 2005, partially offset by aggregate impairments of
$4.3 million on a non-core asset in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
Income from unconsolidated entities was higher for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 due to more income from community dispositions and related venture liquidations. |
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income was lower in 2006 due to higher gains on the sale of our Rent.com
investment and marketable securities in 2005. |
|
|
|
|
The increase in net earnings from discontinued operations was driven principally by
greater gains as a result of more asset sales from the disposition of real estate partially
offset by reduced net operating income in 2006 as a result of dispositions. |
Reconciliation of Quantitative Summary to Consolidated Statements of Earnings
The following schedules are provided to reconcile our consolidated statements of earnings to
the information presented in the Quantitative Summary provided in the next section (dollar
amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
299,366 |
|
|
$ |
7,169 |
|
|
$ |
306,535 |
|
|
$ |
222,744 |
|
|
$ |
41,766 |
|
|
$ |
264,510 |
|
Other income |
|
|
27,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,299 |
|
|
|
25,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,840 |
|
Property operating
expenses (rental
expenses and real
estate taxes) |
|
|
(101,413 |
) |
|
|
(3,787 |
) |
|
|
(105,200 |
) |
|
|
(71,744 |
) |
|
|
(19,648 |
) |
|
|
(91,392 |
) |
Depreciation on
real estate
investments |
|
|
(68,708 |
) |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
(69,659 |
) |
|
|
(53,916 |
) |
|
|
(7,321 |
) |
|
|
(61,237 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(72,751 |
) |
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
|
|
(74,040 |
) |
|
|
(46,680 |
) |
|
|
(10,143 |
) |
|
|
(56,823 |
) |
General and
administrative
expenses |
|
|
(18,497 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,497 |
) |
|
|
(13,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,600 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
(1,986 |
) |
|
|
(2,081 |
) |
|
|
(4,067 |
) |
|
|
(5,538 |
) |
|
|
(9,998 |
) |
|
|
(15,536 |
) |
Income from
unconsolidated
entities |
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
Other non-operating
income |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
Gains, net of
disposition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,934 |
|
|
|
83,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,390 |
|
|
|
134,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
67,116 |
|
|
$ |
82,995 |
|
|
$ |
150,111 |
|
|
$ |
59,017 |
|
|
$ |
129,046 |
|
|
$ |
188,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Total |
|
Rental revenue |
|
$ |
828,065 |
|
|
$ |
53,841 |
|
|
$ |
881,906 |
|
|
$ |
604,105 |
|
|
$ |
133,957 |
|
|
$ |
738,062 |
|
Other income |
|
|
57,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,100 |
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
Property operating
expenses (rental
expenses and real
estate taxes) |
|
|
(268,417 |
) |
|
|
(27,061 |
) |
|
|
(295,478 |
) |
|
|
(202,013 |
) |
|
|
(61,794 |
) |
|
|
(263,807 |
) |
Depreciation on
real estate
investments |
|
|
(203,073 |
) |
|
|
(9,439 |
) |
|
|
(212,512 |
) |
|
|
(146,605 |
) |
|
|
(28,137 |
) |
|
|
(174,742 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(186,833 |
) |
|
|
(13,044 |
) |
|
|
(199,877 |
) |
|
|
(123,946 |
) |
|
|
(34,239 |
) |
|
|
(158,185 |
) |
General and
administrative
expenses |
|
|
(49,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,794 |
) |
|
|
(41,644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,644 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
(14,046 |
) |
|
|
(23,772 |
) |
|
|
(37,818 |
) |
|
|
(37,047 |
) |
|
|
(18,470 |
) |
|
|
(55,517 |
) |
Income from
unconsolidated
entities |
|
|
31,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,484 |
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
Other non-operating
income |
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
28,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,855 |
|
Gains, net of
disposition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,609 |
|
|
|
309,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,652 |
|
|
|
194,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
196,623 |
|
|
$ |
290,134 |
|
|
$ |
486,757 |
|
|
$ |
138,270 |
|
|
$ |
185,969 |
|
|
$ |
324,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative Summary
This summary is provided for reference purposes and is intended to support and be read in
conjunction with the narrative discussion of our results of operations. This quantitative summary
includes all operating activities, including those classified as discontinued operations
for GAAP reporting purposes. This information is presented to correspond with the manner in which
we analyze the business. We generally reinvest disposition proceeds into new operating communities
and developments and therefore believe it is most useful to analyze continuing and discontinued
operations on a combined basis. The impact of communities classified as discontinued operations
for GAAP reporting purposes is discussed separately in a later section under the caption
Discontinued Operations Analysis (dollar amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Variance |
|
Rental revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store(1) |
|
$ |
198,609 |
|
|
$ |
185,017 |
|
|
$ |
13,592 |
|
|
$ |
564,825 |
|
|
$ |
530,612 |
|
|
$ |
34,213 |
|
Non Same-Store and other |
|
|
87,094 |
|
|
|
69,572 |
|
|
|
17,522 |
|
|
|
272,071 |
|
|
|
177,808 |
|
|
|
94,263 |
|
Ameriton |
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
7,053 |
|
|
|
(3,760 |
) |
|
|
16,959 |
|
|
|
25,346 |
|
|
|
(8,387 |
) |
Non-multifamily |
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
9,378 |
|
|
|
4,296 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
International |
|
|
14,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,691 |
|
|
|
18,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rental revenues |
|
|
306,535 |
|
|
|
264,510 |
|
|
|
42,025 |
|
|
|
881,906 |
|
|
|
738,062 |
|
|
|
143,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses
(rental expenses and real
estate taxes): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store(1) |
|
|
65,047 |
|
|
|
58,907 |
|
|
|
(6,140 |
) |
|
|
178,323 |
|
|
|
174,242 |
|
|
|
(4,081 |
) |
Non Same-Store and other |
|
|
32,415 |
|
|
|
27,762 |
|
|
|
(4,653 |
) |
|
|
98,503 |
|
|
|
75,771 |
|
|
|
(22,732 |
) |
Ameriton |
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
8,672 |
|
|
|
12,853 |
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
Non-multifamily |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
2,845 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
(1,904 |
) |
International |
|
|
4,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,854 |
) |
|
|
7,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating
expenses |
|
|
105,200 |
|
|
|
91,392 |
|
|
|
(13,808 |
) |
|
|
295,478 |
|
|
|
263,807 |
|
|
|
(31,671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
(rental revenues less property
operating expenses) |
|
|
201,335 |
|
|
|
173,118 |
|
|
|
28,217 |
|
|
|
586,428 |
|
|
|
474,255 |
|
|
|
112,173 |
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
Variance |
|
Margin(NOI/rental revenues): |
|
|
65.7 |
% |
|
|
65.4 |
% |
|
|
.3 |
% |
|
|
66.5 |
% |
|
|
64.3 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Average occupancy during
period:(2) |
|
|
95.0 |
% |
|
|
95.2 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
|
|
94.9 |
% |
|
|
94.6 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
27,299 |
|
|
|
25,840 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
57,100 |
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
|
|
19,285 |
|
Depreciation of real estate
investments |
|
|
69,659 |
|
|
|
61,237 |
|
|
|
(8,422 |
) |
|
|
212,512 |
|
|
|
174,742 |
|
|
|
(37,770 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
87,370 |
|
|
|
66,685 |
|
|
|
(20,685 |
) |
|
|
239,515 |
|
|
|
185,529 |
|
|
|
(53,986 |
) |
Capitalized interest |
|
|
13,330 |
|
|
|
9,862 |
|
|
|
3,468 |
|
|
|
39,638 |
|
|
|
27,344 |
|
|
|
12,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
|
|
74,040 |
|
|
|
56,823 |
|
|
|
(17,217 |
) |
|
|
199,877 |
|
|
|
158,185 |
|
|
|
(41,692 |
) |
General and administrative
expenses |
|
|
18,497 |
|
|
|
13,600 |
|
|
|
(4,897 |
) |
|
|
49,794 |
|
|
|
41,644 |
|
|
|
(8,150 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
15,536 |
|
|
|
11,469 |
|
|
|
37,818 |
|
|
|
55,517 |
|
|
|
17,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from continuing and
discontinued operations |
|
|
62,371 |
|
|
|
51,762 |
|
|
|
10,609 |
|
|
|
143,527 |
|
|
|
81,982 |
|
|
|
61,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from
unconsolidated entities |
|
|
2,088 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
31,484 |
|
|
|
18,750 |
|
|
|
12,734 |
|
Other non-operating income |
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
28,855 |
|
|
|
(26,718 |
) |
Gains on disposition of real
estate investments, net of
disposition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable subsidiaries |
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
39,847 |
|
|
|
(35,630 |
) |
|
|
51,743 |
|
|
|
60,550 |
|
|
|
(8,807 |
) |
REIT |
|
|
79,717 |
|
|
|
94,543 |
|
|
|
(14,826 |
) |
|
|
257,866 |
|
|
|
134,102 |
|
|
|
123,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
150,111 |
|
|
$ |
188,063 |
|
|
$ |
(37,952 |
) |
|
$ |
486,757 |
|
|
$ |
324,239 |
|
|
$ |
162,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects revenues and operating expenses for Same-Store communities that were owned on
September 30, 2006 and fully operating during both of the comparison periods. |
|
(2) |
|
Does not include occupancy associated with properties owned by Ameriton, located in
Germany or operated under the Oakwood Master Leases. |
Property-level operating results
We utilize NOI as the primary measure to evaluate the performance of our operating communities
and for purposes of making decisions about resource allocations and assessing segment performance.
We also believe NOI is a valuable means of comparing period-to-period property performance. In
analyzing the performance of our operating portfolio, we evaluate Same-Store communities separately
from Non Same-Store communities and other properties.
Same-Store Analysis
The following table reflects revenue, expense and NOI growth for Same-Store communities that
were owned on September 30, 2006 and fully operating during each of the respective comparison
periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store Expense |
|
|
|
|
Same-Store Revenue Growth |
|
Growth/(Decline) |
|
Same-Store NOI Growth |
|
|
Q3 2006 vs. |
|
YTD 2006 vs. |
|
Q3 2006 vs. |
|
YTD 2006 vs. |
|
Q3 2006 vs. |
|
YTD 2006 vs. |
|
|
Q3 2005 |
|
YTD 2005 |
|
Q3 2005 |
|
YTD 2005 |
|
Q3 2005 |
|
YTD 2005 |
Garden |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
High-Rise |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
(.2 |
)% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
Total |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
Both quarter to date and year to date Same-Store revenues increased in each of our core
markets for both the garden and the high-rise portfolios, resulting primarily from higher rental
income per unit. In addition to strong rent increases, third quarter revenue growth was partially
the result of efforts to better manage lease expirations in markets that have very seasonal leasing
trends such as Washington, D.C., Northern California and Boston. We are
28
seeing significant upward
pressure on new move-in rental rates as a result of a number of factors, including: (i) steady
employment growth; (ii) lack of new apartment supply due to limited land to build competing assets;
(iii) less confidence in the prospect of value increases of single-family homes and condominiums;
and (iv) rising interest rates, all of which have translated into significant increases in our
revenue growth. In addition, we continue to believe that our strong operating performance is not
only the result of improving operating fundamentals, but also the continued enhancements we are
making to many components of our operating platform, such as LRO, MRI, online lease, resident
portal and internet marketing. We believe that all of these improvements have resulted in
meaningful efficiencies for us. The 10.4% increase in third quarter Same-Store expenses was driven
by higher make-ready and personnel costs as well as higher insurance and ground lease expenses.
The increase in make-ready costs, including repair and maintenance, relates directly to the planned
increase in turnover during the third quarter when customer demand is higher and our pricing power
is stronger in connection with a lease expiration program implemented in 2006. A ground lease we
have in the City of Arlington reflected a one-time favorable adjustment of $793,000 in the third
quarter of 2005, which had the effect of increasing our Same-Store expense growth in this quarter
by 150 basis points. Our year to date Same-Store expense increase was only 2.3% due principally to
lower utility expense as a result of higher resident reimbursements, primarily in Washington, D.C.
where we recently completed the rollout of our utility reimbursement program, and experienced a
milder winter compared to 2005. These revenue and expense fluctuations resulted in overall NOI
growth in our Same-Store portfolio of 5.9% and 8.5% for the quarter and year to date period ended
September 30, 2006, respectively. This growth was driven principally by strong NOI growth in the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, Southern California and the New York City metropolitan area
which represent more than 72% of the Operating Trusts portfolio with quarter to date Same-Store NOI
increases of 4.6%, 7.7% and 11.1% and year to date Same-Store NOI increases of 7.7%, 10.2% and
13.3%, respectively.
Non Same-Store and Other Analysis
The $12.9 million increase in NOI in the Non Same-Store portfolio for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 is primarily attributable to: (i) $22.0
million related to acquisitions; (ii) $3.3 million related to recently stabilized development
communities and communities in lease-up; (iii) $5.1 million related to the Oakwood Master Leases;
offset by (iv) $17.8 million related to community dispositions.
The $71.5 million increase in NOI in the Non Same-Store portfolio for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005 is primarily attributable to: (i) $71.8
million related to acquisitions; (ii) $10.4 million related to recently stabilized development
communities and communities in lease-up; (iii) $31.8 million related to the Oakwood Master Leases;
offset by (iv) $44.3 million related to community dispositions.
The Oakwood Master Leases also contributed to our overall margin improvement in the year to
date comparison, since the only operating expenses we incur relate to property taxes and insurance.
Ameriton
The decrease in NOI from Ameriton apartment communities for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006 as compared to the comparable period in the prior year is primarily attributable
to dispositions.
International
The increase in NOI of $9.8 million and $11.5 million for the three and nine months period
ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same periods in the prior year is primarily
attributable to the DeWAG acquisition that occurred in July 2006. DeWAG specializes in the
acquisition, ownership, operation and re-sale of quality residential properties in the major
metropolitan areas of Southern and Western Germany as well as West Berlin. As of July 1, 2006, the
portfolio consisted of approximately 6,400 residential units.
Other Income
Other income was higher for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the same
period in 2005 due primarily to: (i) higher interest income attributable to our mezzanine loan
financing activities (ii) higher interest due to interest earned on our higher cash balances that
resulted primarily from our convertible debt
offering and 1031 exchange disposition transactions and (iii) an $11.0 million gain on the sale of
Ameriton land which is offset by $21.3 million in insurance recoveries in 2005.
29
Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was higher due to (i) higher gains
on sale of Ameriton land (ii) higher interest income attributable to our mezzanine loan financing
activities as well as higher cash balances resulting primarily from our convertible debt offering
in July and 1031 exchange disposition transactions, partially offset by (iii) higher moisture
infiltration-related recoveries in 2005.
Depreciation Expense
The depreciation increase for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 is primarily
related to the increase in the size of the real estate portfolio.
Interest Expense
The increase in gross interest expense during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2006 is due to higher average debt levels associated with the increased size of the real estate
portfolio combined with higher average interest rates on our debt. The Oakwood and international
transactions were the most significant drivers of the portfolio increase. Capitalized interest
also increased significantly as a result of the increase in the size and number of communities
under construction and, to a lesser extent, higher average interest rates.
Other Expenses
Other expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was lower due principally to a $4.6
million charge in 2005 related to the settlement of the FHA/ADA lawsuit.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the settlement noted above and significant debt
extinguishment costs in 2005 more than offset aggregate impairments of $4.3 million on a non-core
asset in 2006, resulting in an overall decrease in other expense.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were higher for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006 due primarily to higher personnel-related costs driven principally by our recent
international expansion.
Equity in Earnings from Unconsolidated Entities
Earnings from unconsolidated entities was higher in 2006 primarily due to more income from
community dispositions and related venture liquidations.
Other Non-Operating Income
Non-operating income was lower for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 due to
higher gains on the sale of our Rent.com investment and marketable securities in 2005.
Gains on Real Estate Dispositions
See Discontinued Operations Analysis below for discussion of gains.
Discontinued Operations Analysis
Included in the overall results discussed above are the following amounts associated with
properties which have been sold or were classified as held-for-sale as of September 30, 2006
(dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
7,169 |
|
|
$ |
41,766 |
|
|
$ |
53,841 |
|
|
$ |
133,957 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
(3,351 |
) |
|
|
(14,064 |
) |
|
|
(20,618 |
) |
|
|
(44,578 |
) |
Real estate taxes |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(5,584 |
) |
|
|
(6,443 |
) |
|
|
(17,216 |
) |
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
(7,321 |
) |
|
|
(9,439 |
) |
|
|
(28,137 |
) |
Interest expense(1) |
|
|
(1,289 |
) |
|
|
(10,143 |
) |
|
|
(13,044 |
) |
|
|
(34,239 |
) |
Income taxes from taxable REIT subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
|
|
(9,990 |
) |
|
|
(11,855 |
) |
|
|
(13,206 |
) |
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Provision for possible loss on real estate investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Debt extinguishment costs related to dispositions |
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(7,589 |
) |
|
|
(5,264 |
) |
Gains on disposition of real estate investments, net
of disposition costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable subsidiaries |
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
39,847 |
|
|
|
51,743 |
|
|
|
60,550 |
|
REIT |
|
|
79,717 |
|
|
|
94,543 |
|
|
|
257,866 |
|
|
|
134,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
$ |
82,995 |
|
|
$ |
129,046 |
|
|
$ |
290,134 |
|
|
$ |
185,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of communities sold during the period |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Number of sold communities included in discontinued
operations NOI |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Number of communities classified as held-for-sale
and included in discontinued operations NOI
as of September 30, 2006 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The portion of interest expense included in discontinued operations that is allocated to
properties based on the companys leverage ratio was $0.3 million and $7.4 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, and $6.7 million and $24.9 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
As a result of the execution of our strategy of managing our invested capital through the
selective sale of apartment communities in non-core locations and redeploying the proceeds to fund
investments with higher anticipated growth prospects in our core markets, we had significant
disposition activity in both 2006 and 2005, although there was higher transaction volume year to
date in 2006. The resulting gains, net of disposition costs, including those from Ameriton, were
the biggest drivers of overall earnings from discontinued operations. NOI related to communities
sold or classified as held-for-sale was higher in 2005 as compared to 2006 due primarily to the
sold communities that produced more NOI in 2005 than 2006. Changes in direct operating expenses
and allocated interest expense are generally proportional to the communities included in
discontinued operations for each period. Depreciation is proportionately higher in 2005 as a
result of communities that have been added to discontinued operations. We cease depreciating an
asset prospectively from the period it is added to discontinued operations. Gains and debt
extinguishment costs are deal-specific and therefore will not necessarily correlate with the volume
of activity in discontinued operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are committed to maintaining a strong balance sheet and preserving our financial
flexibility, which we believe enhances our ability to capitalize on attractive investment
opportunities as they become available. As a result of the significant cash flow generated by our
operations, current cash positions, the available capacity under our unsecured credit facilities,
gains from the disposition of real estate and our demonstrated ability to access the capital
markets, we believe our liquidity and financial condition are sufficient to meet all of our
reasonably anticipated cash flow needs during 2006. Please refer to the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for detailed information of our sources and uses of cash for the periods
ending September 30, 2006 and 2005.
Scheduled Debt Maturities and Interest Payment Requirements
We have structured our long-term debt maturities in a manner designed to avoid unmanageable
repayment obligations in any year, which would negatively impact our financial flexibility. As of
September 30, 2006, we had scheduled long term debt maturities of $40.8 million, $498.0 million and
$545.2 million during 2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively and a $272.8 million international term
loan that we expect to pay off on or before April 27, 2007. On October 30, 2006, we had $78.1
million borrowed on our unsecured credit facilities, $10.3 million outstanding under letters of
credit and available borrowing capacity on our unsecured credit facilities of $611.6 million.
Our unsecured credit facilities, long-term unsecured debt, mortgages payable and international
term loan had effective weighted average interest rates of 5.6%, 5.6%, 5.5% and 3.5%, respectively,
as of September 30, 2006. All of these rates give effect to debt issuance costs, fair value
hedges, the amortization of fair market value purchase adjustments and other fees and expenses, as
applicable.
Our debt instruments generally contain covenants common to the type of facility or borrowing,
including financial covenants establishing minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum
leverage ratios. We were in
31
compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our debt
instruments as of and for the period ended September 30, 2006.
Unitholder Distribution Requirements
Based on anticipated distribution levels for 2006 and the number of Common Units outstanding
as of September 30, 2006, we anticipate that we will pay distributions of $436.6 million in the
aggregate during the year ended December 31, 2006. This amount represents distributions on our
Common and Preferred Units.
Planned Investments
Following is a summary of planned investments as of September 30, 2006, including amounts for
the Operating Trust and Ameriton, but excluding unconsolidated joint ventures (dollar amounts in
thousands). The amounts labeled Discretionary represent future investments that we plan to make,
although there is not a contractual commitment to do so. The amounts labeled Committed represent
the approximate amount that we are contractually committed to fund for communities under
construction in accordance with construction contracts with general contractors. In Planning is
defined as those parcels of land owned or Under Control, which are in the development planning
process, upon which construction is expected subsequent to the completion of the entitlement and
building permit processes. Under Control is the term we use to identify land parcels which we do
not own, yet have an exclusive right to purchase through contingent contract or letter of intent
during a contractually agreed upon time period, subject to approval of contingencies during the due
diligence and entitlement processes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned Investments |
|
|
|
Discretionary |
|
|
Committed |
|
Communities under redevelopment |
|
$ |
2,698 |
|
|
$ |
3,476 |
|
Communities under construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
549,130 |
|
Communities In Planning and owned |
|
|
1,226,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
Communities In Planning and Under Control |
|
|
332,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
Community acquisitions under contract |
|
|
285,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
FHA/ADA settlement capital accrual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,847,335 |
|
|
$ |
588,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the planned investments noted above, we expect to make additional investments
in (i) unconsolidated joint ventures; (ii) recently acquired communities; and (iii) capital
expenditures to improve and maintain our established operating communities.
We anticipate completion of most of the communities that are currently under construction and
the planned operating community improvements by the end of 2008. No assurances can be given that
communities we do not currently own will be acquired or that planned developments will actually
occur. In addition, actual costs incurred could be greater or less than our current estimates.
Funding Sources
We anticipate financing our planned investment and operating needs primarily with cash flow
from operating activities, disposition proceeds from our capital recycling program, existing cash
balances, borrowings under our unsecured credit facilities and proceeds from long-term financing.
We have filed registration statements to facilitate issuance of debt and equity securities on an
as-needed basis subject to our ability to effect offerings on satisfactory terms based on
prevailing conditions. We had $611.6 million in available capacity on our unsecured credit
facilities at October 30, 2006. In addition, we expect to
complete the disposition of $0.8 to $1.0 billion of Operating
Trust operating communities during the remainder of 2006.
Other Contingencies
During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement in the United
States District Court for the District of Maryland with three national disability organizations and
agreed to make capital
improvements in a number of our communities in order to make them fully compliant with the Fair
Housing Act and Americans with Disabilities Act. The litigation, settled by this agreement, alleged
lack of full compliance with certain design and construction requirements under the two federal
statutes at 71 communities. As part of the settlement, the three disability organizations all
recognized that the Operating Trust had no intention to build any of its communities in a manner
inconsistent with the FHA or ADA.
32
The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the remaining communities named
in the settlement is estimated at $47.2 million and was accrued as an addition to real estate, of
which $35.4 remains accrued at September 30, 2006. The settlement agreement approved by the court
allows us to remediate each of the designated communities over a three year period, and also
provides that we are not restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation
period. We paid a settlement totaling $1.4 million, which included legal fees and costs incurred
by the plaintiffs.
During 2004 and 2005, we incurred losses associated with multiple hurricanes in Florida. As a
result of this damage, we recorded charges for actual or estimated losses associated with both
wholly owned and unconsolidated apartment communities and benefits for collected or estimated
insurance recoveries. These estimates represent managements best estimate of the probable and
reasonably estimable costs and related recoveries and are based on the most current information
available from our insurance adjustors.
We are subject to various claims filed in 2002 and 2003 in connection with moisture
infiltration and resulting mold issues at certain high-rise properties we once owned in Southeast
Florida. These claims generally allege that water infiltration and resulting mold contamination
resulted in the claimants having personal injuries and/or property damage. Although certain of
these claims continue to be in various stages of litigation, with respect to the majority of these
claims, we have either settled the claims and/or we have been dismissed from the lawsuits that had
been filed. With respect to the lawsuits that have not been resolved, we continue to defend these
claims in the normal course of litigation.
We are a party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or
results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
We define critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that require our
management to exercise their most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. Our management has
discussed the development and selection of all of these critical accounting policies with our audit
committee, and the audit committee has reviewed the disclosure relating to these policies. Our
critical accounting policies relate principally to the following key areas:
Internal Cost Capitalization
We have an investment organization that is responsible for development and redevelopment of
apartment communities. Consistent with GAAP, all direct and certain indirect costs, including
interest and real estate taxes, incurred during development and redevelopment activities are
capitalized. Interest is capitalized on real estate assets that require a period of time to get
them ready for their intended use. The amount of interest capitalized is based upon the average
amount of accumulated development expenditures during the reporting period. Included in capitalized
costs are managements estimates of the direct and incremental personnel costs and indirect project
costs associated with our development and redevelopment activities. Indirect project costs consist
primarily of personnel costs associated with construction administration and development
accounting, legal fees, and various office costs that clearly relate to projects under development.
Because the estimation of capitalizable internal costs requires managements judgment, we believe
internal cost capitalization is a critical accounting estimate.
Valuation of Real Estate
Long-lived assets to be held and used are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted. We also evaluate
assets for potential impairment when we deem them to be held-for-sale. Valuation of real estate is
considered a critical accounting estimate because the evaluation of impairment and the
determination of fair values involve a number of management assumptions relating to future economic
events that could materially affect the determination of the ultimate value, and therefore, the
carrying amounts of our real estate. Furthermore, decisions regarding when a property should be
classified as held-for-sale under SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, requires significant management judgment. There are many phases to the
disposition process ranging from the
33
initial market research to being under contract with
non-refundable earnest money. Deciding when management is committed to selling an asset is
therefore highly subjective.
When determining if there is an indication of impairment, we estimate the assets NOI over the
anticipated holding period on an undiscounted cash flow basis and compare this amount to its
carrying value. Estimating the expected NOI and holding period requires significant management
judgment. If it is determined that there is an indication of impairment for assets to be held and
used, or if an asset is deemed to be held-for-sale, we then determine the fair value of the asset.
The apartment industry uses capitalization rates as the primary measure of fair value.
Specifically, annual NOI for a community is divided by an estimated capitalization rate to
determine the fair value of the community. Determining the appropriate capitalization rate requires
significant judgment and is typically based on many factors including the prevailing rate for the
market or submarket, as well as the quality and location of the properties. Further, capitalization
rates can fluctuate up or down due to a variety of factors in the overall economy or within local
markets. If the actual capitalization rate for a community is significantly different from our
estimated rate, the impairment evaluation for an individual asset could be materially affected.
Capital Expenditures and Depreciable Lives
We incur costs relating to redevelopment initiatives, revenue enhancing and expense reducing
capital expenditures, and recurring capital expenditures that are capitalized as part of our real
estate. These amounts are capitalized and depreciated over estimated useful lives determined by
management. We allocate the cost of newly acquired properties between net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets. The primary intangible asset associated with an apartment community acquisition
is the value of the existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired property, we
first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to
the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the property is vacant. We estimate
the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a
hypothetical lease-up. We depreciate the building and fixtures based on the expected useful life of
the asset and amortize the intangible value of the lease agreements over the average remaining life
of the existing leases.
Determining whether expenditures meet the criteria for capitalization, the assignment of
depreciable lives and determining the appropriate amounts to allocate between tangible and
intangible assets for property acquisitions requires our management to exercise significant
judgment and is therefore considered a critical accounting estimate.
Pursuit Costs
We incur costs relating to the potential acquisition of real estate which we refer to as
pursuit costs. To the extent that these costs are identifiable with a specific property and would
be capitalized if the property were already acquired, the costs are accumulated by project and
capitalized in the Other Assets section of the balance sheet. If these conditions are not met, the
costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized costs include but are not limited to earnest money,
option fees, environmental reports, traffic reports, surveys, photos, blueprints, direct and
incremental personnel costs (for development-related acquisitions) and legal costs. Upon
acquisition, the costs are included in the basis of the acquired property. When it becomes probable
that a prospective acquisition will not be acquired, which is a highly subjective judgment, the
accumulated costs for the property are charged to other expense on the statement of earnings in the
period such a determination is made.
Consolidation vs. Equity Method of Accounting for Ventures
From time to time, we make co-investments in real estate ventures with third parties and are
required to determine whether to consolidate or use the equity method of accounting for the
venture. FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (as revised)
and Emerging Issues Task Force EITF No. 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the
General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited
Partners Have Certain Rights are the two primary sources of accounting guidance in this area.
Appropriate application of these relatively complex rules requires substantial management judgment,
which we believe makes the choice of the appropriate accounting method for these ventures a
critical accounting estimate.
34
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our real estate investments in entities that do not qualify as variable interest entities,
variable interest entities where we are not the primary beneficiary and entities we do not control
through majority economic interest are not consolidated and are reported as investments in
unconsolidated entities. Our investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities at September
30, 2006, aggregated $212.9 million. Please refer to Note 5 to our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities, contained in this
report for additional information.
As part of the Smith Merger and the Oakwood transaction, we are required to indemnify certain
unitholders for any personal income tax expense resulting from the sale of properties identified in
tax protection agreements.
Contractual Commitments
The following is a summary of significant changes in contractual commitments for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
Please refer to Scheduled Debt Maturities and Interest Payment Requirements and
Planned Investments above for further discussion of significant contractual commitments. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest Rate Hedging Activities
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and will occasionally utilize interest
rate swaps and interest rate caps as hedges with the objective of lowering our overall borrowing
costs. These derivatives are generally designated as either cash flow or fair value hedges. We do
not use these derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes. Further, as a matter of
policy, we only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit
ratings and other factors. When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure
that the derivatives are designed to hedge, we have not sustained, nor do we expect to sustain, a
material loss from the use of these hedging instruments.
We formally assess, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether each
designated derivative is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the
hedged item. We measure hedge effectiveness by comparing the changes in the fair value or cash
flows of the derivative instrument with the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged
item. We assess effectiveness of purchased interest rate caps based on overall changes in the fair
value of the caps. If a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge
accounting prospectively.
Foreign Currency Hedging Activities
We are exposed to foreign-exchange related variability and earnings volatility on our foreign
investments. We have entered into two foreign currency forward contracts and have designated them
as cash flow hedges. The notional amounts of the contracts are 8.5 million and 7.5
million, with fair market values at September 30, 2006 of ($.4) million and ($.05) million,
respectively.
Energy Contract Hedging Activities
We are exposed to price risk associated with the volatility of fuel oil and electricity rates.
We have entered into contracts with several of our suppliers to fix our payments on set quantities
of fuel oil and electricity. If the contract meets the criteria of a derivative, we designate
these contracts as cash flow hedges of the overall changes in floating-rate payments made on our
energy purchases. At September 30, 2006, we had energy-related derivatives with aggregate notional
amounts of $5.8 million and an estimated fair value of ($1.0) million. These contracts mature on
or before December 31, 2007.
There has been no material change in the qualitative or quantitative disclosures regarding our
market risk. For detailed information about the qualitative and quantitative disclosures of our
market risk, see Item 7A in our 2005 Form 10-K.
35
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934). Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were, to the best of their knowledge,
effective as of September 30, 2006.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we acquired DeWAG. Management has implemented
monitoring controls over DeWAG and believes DeWAGs control structure is not reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Other than this change, there has been no other change
to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 that
has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over
financial reporting.
36
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of
business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims and litigation, individually or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results
of operations. See Note 11 to the financial statements included in this report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Not Applicable (See the factors discussed in Part 1, Item 1A Risk Factors in our 2005 Form
10-K).
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
No other information is required to be disclosed for the period ended September 30, 2006 that
has not been disclosed in a report on Form 8-K. There has been no change to the procedures by
which security holders may recommend nominees to the companys Board of Trustees.
Item 6. Exhibits
See Exhibits.
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARCHSTONE-SMITH TRUST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ R. SCOT SELLERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Scot Sellers |
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ CHARLES E. MUELLER, JR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles E. Mueller, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ MARK A. SCHUMACHER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Schumacher |
|
|
Senior Vice-President and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
Date: November 9, 2006
38
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Archstone-Smith Trust (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to Archstone-Smith Trusts Current Report of Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2,
2006) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Restated Bylaws of Archstone-Smith Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Archstone-Smith Trusts Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Archstone-Smith Trusts Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on June 2, 2006) |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Bylaws of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Archstone-Smith Trusts Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2006) |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions |
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Awareness Letter |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
39